Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Volcanic explosivity index

The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) is a standardized, semi-quantitative ranging from 0 to 8 that classifies the relative explosivity of volcanic eruptions based on the volume of ejected material, plume height, and other observable characteristics. Developed in 1982 by volcanologists Christopher G. Newhall of the U.S. Geological Survey and Stephen Self of the , the VEI provides a simple metric for comparing eruptions across time, from historical events to prehistoric supereruptions, despite variations in data availability. The index operates on a roughly logarithmic basis, where each unit increase typically represents about a tenfold rise in the volume of (pyroclastic debris) and other , though it also incorporates eruption column height and qualitative descriptors like "gentle" for low VEI values and "mega-colossal" for the highest. VEI 0 denotes non-explosive activity with less than 10,000 cubic meters of material, while VEI 5 eruptions—such as the 1980 blast—involve around 1 cubic kilometer of and plume heights exceeding 25 kilometers; VEI 6 events, like the 1991 eruption, scale up to about 10 cubic kilometers; and rare VEI 8 supereruptions, such as the 631,000-year-old Yellowstone event, release over 1,000 cubic kilometers, with plumes surpassing 20 kilometers. This framework aids hazard assessment by linking explosivity to potential impacts, including ash fallout, flows, and global climate effects from large eruptions. Although widely used for its simplicity and applicability to incomplete records, the VEI has recognized limitations: it does not fully account for eruption duration (e.g., prolonged VEI 4 events like from 1943–1952 totaled 1.3 cubic kilometers over years), variations in plume behavior due to wind or composition, or the distinction between single blasts and multi-phase events in ancient deposits. Recent analyses, including the preliminary VEI 5 assignment for the 2022 eruption, highlight ongoing refinements to address these inconsistencies.

Definition and History

Definition

The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) is a semiquantitative designed to measure the relative explosivity of volcanic eruptions, ranging from 0 (nonexplosive) to 8 (ultra-plinian), with the potential for higher values in exceptionally large events. It primarily classifies eruptions based on the total volume of —encompassing , flows, and surges—while incorporating secondary parameters such as plume height for lower VEI levels where volume estimates may be imprecise. This ensures that each increment (from VEI 2 upward) represents approximately an order-of-magnitude increase in volume, facilitating straightforward comparisons of eruption magnitudes despite variations in across historical and geological records. Key parameters include ejecta volume thresholds that define each level: for example, VEI 0 applies to eruptions with less than 10,000 m³ of ejecta, VEI 5 to those exceeding 1 km³ (10⁹ m³), and VEI 8 to volumes greater than 1,000 km³ (10¹² m³). Qualitative descriptors provide intuitive labels, such as "gentle" for VEI 0–1 eruptions (effusive or weakly explosive) and "mega-colossal" for VEI 8 events (cataclysmic plinian eruptions with global impacts). Plume height serves as a proxy for lower levels (VEI 0–3), where heights below 100 m indicate nonexplosive activity and those exceeding 25 km suggest VEI 5 or higher, though this metric is adjusted for factors like atmospheric conditions. The VEI's purpose is to offer a standardized, accessible for volcanologists, assessors, and the public to compare eruption sizes across different volcanoes and time periods, bridging gaps in incomplete datasets while emphasizing potential over other eruption attributes like duration or composition. It is calculated using the basic formula: \text{VEI} = \log_{10} (\text{[ejecta](/page/Ejecta) volume in m}^3) - 4 which is rounded to the nearest ; in ambiguous cases, especially for VEI ≤ 4, plume or qualitative observations may refine the assignment. This approach prioritizes bulk volume as the dominant indicator of explosivity, ensuring the index remains practical for both modern monitoring and paleovolcanic reconstructions.

Development

The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) was developed in 1982 by volcanologists Christopher G. Newhall of the U.S. Geological Survey and Stephen Self of the University of Hawaii, as detailed in their seminal paper published in the Journal of Geophysical Research. This scale emerged from the recognition that volcanology lacked a standardized, quantitative measure for comparing the magnitude of explosive eruptions, relying instead on subjective qualitative descriptors such as "large," "major," or "catastrophic," which varied widely among researchers and hindered global assessments. Inspired by the Richter magnitude scale for earthquakes, which provided a simple logarithmic metric for seismic events, Newhall and Self aimed to create an analogous tool that emphasized eruption volume and intensity while remaining accessible for rapid application to both modern and historical data. To validate the VEI, Newhall and Self retrospectively assigned values to well-documented historical eruptions, demonstrating its utility in standardizing past records. For instance, the in was rated VEI 7, reflecting its immense ejecta volume of approximately 150 cubic kilometers and global climatic impacts, while the in received a VEI 6 rating, consistent with its 20 cubic kilometers of erupted material and widespread flows. Over the subsequent decades, the VEI underwent minor refinements to enhance its compatibility with large-scale eruption databases, particularly in the 1990s as the Smithsonian Institution's (GVP) expanded its cataloging efforts. These adjustments, such as clarifying thresholds for ultra-large eruptions exceeding 1,000 cubic kilometers (assigned VEI 8), facilitated consistent application across thousands of global events without altering the core logarithmic structure. The GVP's adoption of the VEI as a standard metric has since supported systematic analysis of volcanic frequency and patterns, underscoring the scale's enduring role in the field.

Classification Scale

Assessment Criteria

The primary criterion for assigning a Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) rating is the total volume of and deposits (explosive ), typically measured in cubic kilometers (km³) of dense-rock equivalent. This volume is estimated through methods such as field mapping of deposits, analysis of for dispersal patterns, and calculations based on deposit thickness and extent. The scale is logarithmic, with each integer increase in VEI corresponding to approximately an increase in volume, providing a standardized measure of eruption magnitude. Secondary criteria, such as eruption plume height, are used to corroborate or estimate VEI when volume data are incomplete, particularly for prehistoric eruptions where direct measurements are unavailable. Plume height is assessed via eyewitness observations, thermal , or modeling of atmospheric dispersion, with thresholds like greater than 25 km indicating VEI 5 or higher. Eruption duration may also factor in qualitatively to refine the assessment. Data for VEI assessment are drawn from geological surveys conducted by organizations like the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Smithsonian Institution's (GVP), which catalogs over 7,742 eruptions as of 2025. For historical eruptions, eyewitness accounts provide details on plume dynamics and distribution, while isotopic dating methods, such as ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar, enable volume estimation for ancient events by establishing eruption timelines and correlating deposits. Challenges in VEI assessment include significant uncertainty in volume estimates for submarine eruptions, where dispersal and fragmentation complicate deposit mapping and quantification. Similarly, ice-covered eruptions pose difficulties, as glacial cover can obscure or alter deposits, hindering accurate thickness measurements and volume calculations. Moreover, the process requires post-eruption analysis, limiting its utility for real-time hazard evaluation during ongoing events. The procedural steps for determining VEI involve: (1) estimating the total volume using field, , or modeling data; (2) applying the to map the volume to a preliminary VEI value; (3) against secondary indicators like plume and eruption duration; and (4) assigning the final integer VEI based on the composite evaluation.

VEI Levels

The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) classifies eruptions on a from 0 to 8, where each level represents an approximate order-of-magnitude increase in the volume of (ejecta) and corresponding eruption column height, serving as indicators of explosivity. This ordinal balances qualitative observations with quantitative metrics to categorize eruption magnitude, emphasizing the potential for widespread dispersal of volcanic products. Lower VEI levels characterize frequent, localized events, while higher levels denote infrequent, cataclysmic occurrences with hemispheric or global consequences. The was developed to standardize reporting and enable comparisons, drawing on historical records and geological evidence. The vast majority of volcanic eruptions—over 90% of those documented in the epoch (the last ~11,700 years)—have a VEI of 3 or lower, reflecting the dominance of smaller-scale activity at most volcanoes. These events typically involve modest plume heights and limited ejecta volumes, resulting in regional rather than global impacts. In contrast, VEI 4 and higher eruptions are progressively rarer, with VEI 7 events occurring roughly once every 1,000 years on average and VEI 8 eruptions approximately once every 50,000 years; consequently, only about a dozen VEI 7 eruptions are confirmed in the , and none reach VEI 8. Higher-level eruptions often feature ultra-Plinian styles, producing towering plumes that inject aerosols into the , potentially causing years-long climatic cooling.
VEIQualitative TermTephra VolumePlume Height (km)Typical Eruption Style
0Non-explosive< 10^{-5} km³< 0.1Hawaiian (effusive lava flows)
1Gentle10^{-5}–10^{-4} km³0.1–1Strombolian (mild explosions)
2Explosive10^{-4}–10^{-3} km³1–5Strombolian to Vulcanian
3Severe10^{-3}–0.01 km³3–15Vulcanian to Surtseyan
4Cataclysmic0.01–0.1 km³10–25Plinian
5Paroxysmal0.1–1 km³>25Plinian
6Colossal1–10 km³>25Ultra-Plinian
7Super-colossal10–100 km³>25Ultra-Plinian
8Mega-colossal>100 km³>25Ultra-Plinian (global effects)

Applications and Uses

In Volcanology and Hazard Assessment

In volcanology, the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) serves as a standardized metric for cataloging eruptions in comprehensive global databases, enabling systematic tracking of volcanic activity over time. The Smithsonian Institution's , for example, assigns VEI values to documented events, including the June 2024 explosive eruption of volcano in the , classified as VEI 3 based on its ejecta volume and plume height. This cataloging supports retrospective analyses that refine eruption models by correlating VEI with precursory signals like and gas emissions, improving predictions of future event magnitudes. Such analyses have been instrumental in identifying long-term patterns at restless systems worldwide. For hazard assessment, VEI provides a quantitative basis for prioritizing response measures, including evacuation planning and international coordination. Eruptions reaching VEI 4 or higher typically escalate alert levels through frameworks endorsed by the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior (IAVCEI), prompting enhanced monitoring and cross-border notifications to mitigate widespread risks. In aviation safety, VEI informs ash plume dispersion modeling, where values of 3 or greater signal potential for atmospheric injections that disrupt air traffic; for instance, simulations of VEI 4 events like the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption have guided no-fly zone implementations to prevent engine damage from abrasive particles. VEI also links volcanic activity to broader environmental and climatic consequences, particularly through its role in estimating sulfate aerosol burdens that drive global cooling. Eruptions of VEI 6 or higher, such as the 1991 event, have been associated with "volcanic winters," where stratospheric aerosols reduce incoming solar radiation, leading to hemispheric temperature drops of 0.5–1°C for 1–3 years. These impacts are incorporated into (IPCC) models to evaluate from volcanic sulfates, accounting for interactions with anthropogenic warming and potential amplification under changing atmospheric conditions. Contemporary tools leverage VEI for advanced spatial and predictive applications in volcanic monitoring. (GIS) platforms integrate VEI data to map hazard zones, as seen in the IAVCEI Maps Database, which visualizes eruption scenarios for 612 volcanoes (as of ) to support and community preparedness. Additionally, AI-driven systems incorporate historical VEI records to analyze real-time geophysical data, enhancing forecasts at high-threat sites like ; recent applications have detected tenfold more micro-earthquakes there since 2008, aiding early identification of precursors to potential large-scale (VEI 7–8) events.

Comparison with Other Scales

The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) shares similarities with the eruption magnitude scale, which quantifies explosive events based on the logarithm of bulk mass. Defined as M = \log_{10} ( mass in kg) - 7, this scale, proposed by Pyle (2000), emphasizes the total mass of airborne while excluding non-explosive components such as lava flows or domes. In contrast, VEI provides a broader assessment by incorporating total volume, including flows and surges, alongside plume height and qualitative observations of dispersal, making it more versatile for classifying overall eruption scale across diverse styles. Another key comparison is with volcanic intensity, which focuses on the dynamic power of an eruption rather than its cumulative size. Wilson et al. (1980) defined intensity as I = \log_{10} (mass eruption rate in kg/s) + 3, capturing the rate at which material is expelled and thus the energetic output over time. This metric complements VEI by highlighting short-term eruption vigor—such as peak plume rise driven by rapid gas release—while VEI prioritizes the total volume and longevity of the event, allowing scientists to distinguish between high-intensity but low-volume bursts and sustained, large-scale explosions. VEI also differs from predictive volcanic hazard indices, which rely on precursory monitoring rather than post-eruption analysis. For instance, Newhall and Hoblitt (2002) developed an event-tree framework using seismic, gas, and deformation data to probabilistically forecast eruption outcomes, enabling real-time hazard assessment before climax. VEI, however, serves as a retrospective tool for cataloging and comparing historical events, without incorporating monitoring precursors. As an internationally recognized standard, VEI is endorsed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for consistent global reporting of eruption sizes. Nonetheless, applications to submarine eruptions reveal scaling differences, as VEI criteria—calibrated for subaerial conditions—often underestimate explosivity due to water-magma interactions that fragment material more finely and suppress plume heights.

Limitations and Improvements

Shortcomings

The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) has been critiqued for its failure to differentiate between types of erupted material, treating dense lava flows equivalently to highly vesicular in volume assessments. This oversight can underestimate the explosive potential of eruptions dominated by gas-rich, low-density materials, as the index relies on bulk volume without adjusting for variations or vesicularity, which influence plume height and dispersal dynamics. A significant limitation is the VEI's exclusion of volatile emissions, such as (SO₂), which play a crucial role in atmospheric and climatic effects independent of volume. For instance, the 1991 eruption, classified as VEI 6 with a moderate volume of approximately 10 km³, injected about 15–20 million tons of SO₂ into the , forming aerosols that caused of up to 0.5°C for several years—effects not captured by the VEI's focus on physical . Similarly, low-sulfur eruptions like in 1980 (VEI 5) produced minimal climatic forcing despite substantial volume, highlighting how the index misrepresents hazard potential by ignoring gas content and formation. Volume estimates underpinning VEI assignments are highly subjective, particularly for ancient or poorly documented eruptions, with uncertainties often exceeding 50% due to incomplete proximal-distal and reliance on extrapolation methods like isopach . This subjectivity is exacerbated for effusive-dominant events, where the index inadequately distinguishes large-volume lava flows from explosive production, leading to inconsistent classifications. Pre-1900 records, in particular, suffer from observational biases, assigning default VEI values (e.g., VEI 2–3) to under-documented explosions without quantitative validation. The logarithmic structure of the VEI—from VEI 2 upward, where each unit increase represents a tenfold escalation—introduces by compressing distinctions among smaller eruptions while amplifying the perceived significance of rare mega-eruptions (VEI 7–8). This makes subtle variations in low-VEI events (e.g., VEI 0–1) difficult to resolve, as they lack logarithmic scaling and often lump diverse outcomes into broad categories, skewing probabilistic hazard models toward overemphasizing infrequent large events. Developed in the pre-satellite era, the VEI struggles with modern eruptions involving complex atmospheric injections, as seen in the 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai event (VEI 5), where submarine interactions produced unprecedented stratospheric (∼150 million tons) alongside limited SO₂, complicating plume dynamics and climatic assessments beyond the index's ejecta-focused criteria. Such cases underscore the VEI's inadequacy for integrating satellite-derived data on injection height, dispersal, and non-pyroclastic volatiles, often resulting in delayed or incomplete classifications due to data gaps.

Proposed Refinements

To address the limitations of the VEI in distinguishing eruption intensity from magnitude, volcanologists have proposed hybrid approaches that incorporate eruption rates alongside ejecta volume. For instance, during IAVCEI workshops in the , such as the 2013 Volcano Observatory Best Practices session, experts advocated for a "VEI-plus" framework that integrates plume height and data to better capture dynamic explosivity, allowing for more nuanced forecasting during ongoing events. Efforts to develop multi-parameter indices aim to refine VEI assessments by accounting for factors like magma vesicularity and volatile gas content, which influence eruption dynamics beyond bulk volume. Studies have shown positive correlations between mean deposit and VEI levels, suggesting that incorporating measurements could adjust for vesiculated and improve accuracy for diverse compositions. Similarly, the dense rock equivalent (DRE) adjustment standardizes volumes by correcting for vesicularity (typically 40-80% in pyroclasts), converting bulk to non-porous equivalents and enabling consistent comparisons across eruptions. Advancements in digital tools offer real-time proxies for VEI estimation, leveraging observations and to overcome post-eruption delays. NASA's MODIS and successor VIIRS instruments, operational since the early and enhanced in the , detect thermal anomalies and ash plumes to infer eruption scales, with algorithms estimating mass eruption rates from for rapid VEI approximations. models, such as convolutional neural networks applied to seismic and plume , classify eruption states and predict VEI probabilities in near real-time, as demonstrated in analyses of global datasets where attributes like patterns forecast explosivity with over 80% accuracy. Global standardization initiatives, particularly through the Smithsonian's (GVP), have focused on refining VEI for submarine eruptions, where water-magma interactions obscure traditional metrics. The GVP classifies the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai eruption as VEI 5, though some studies as of 2025 propose higher values (VEI 5.7–6.3) based on acoustic energy, volume, and plume dynamics to better account for underwater settings and improve worldwide monitoring.

Notable Eruptions

Examples by VEI Level

The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) categorizes eruptions from non-explosive (VEI 0) to colossal (VEI 8), with historical examples illustrating the progression in scale, ejecta volume, and impacts. Low VEI eruptions (0-2) are the most common and typically involve effusive lava flows or mild explosions with limited ash production, posing localized hazards rather than widespread disruption. A prime example of a VEI 0 eruption is the prolonged activity at volcano in from 1983 to 2018, centered on the vent along the East . This effusive event produced approximately 4.4 km³ of basaltic lava over 35 years, forming extensive flow fields that added about 200 hectares of new land to the island while destroying over 700 structures, but generated minimal ash and no significant explosive phases. Stromboli volcano in exemplifies ongoing VEI 1 activity, characterized by frequent Strombolian explosions ejecting small volumes of and gas (typically <10,000 m³ per event) from its summit craters. These mild bursts, occurring every few minutes to hours for centuries, create rhythmic fire fountains up to 200 m high but rarely produce ash plumes exceeding 3 km, allowing continuous monitoring and on the island. Mid-range VEI eruptions (3-5) involve greater explosivity, generating substantial columns and flows that can affect regional , , and . The 1980 eruption of in Washington, USA, reached VEI 5, expelling about 1.1 km³ of including and , initiated by a massive lateral blast that devastated 600 km² of forest. This event, lasting nine hours on May 18, formed a 2 km-wide and caused 57 fatalities, highlighting the destructive potential of directed blasts in composite volcanoes. In contrast, the 2010 eruption of in was a VEI 4 event, producing 0.25 km³ of over two months from March to June, with ash plumes reaching 10 km altitude due to subglacial interaction. The fine particles led to the closure of European airspace for six days, canceling over 100,000 flights and stranding 10 million travelers, demonstrating aviation vulnerabilities from moderate Icelandic eruptions. High VEI eruptions (6-8) are exceptionally rare and catastrophic, ejecting immense volumes that can alter global climate through stratospheric aerosols. The 1815 eruption of Tambora in achieved VEI 7 status, releasing approximately 160 km³ of material (bulk volume) over three months from April to July, collapsing the volcano's summit into a 6 km-wide . This led to the "" in 1816, with cooling of 0.4-0.7°C due to aerosols, causing widespread failures and . The ~74,000-year-old Toba supereruption in , , represents a VEI 8 event, the largest known in the period, with an estimated 2,800 km³ of and covering 20,000 km². It formed a 100 km-long lake and injected massive into the atmosphere, potentially causing a 6-10 year with up to 3-5°C; while once hypothesized to trigger a human population bottleneck reducing numbers to 3,000-10,000 individuals, recent genetic evidence suggests early modern humans endured with minimal long-term demographic impact. Across the (last ~12,000 years), approximately 90% of documented eruptions register VEI 0-3, reflecting the dominance of small-scale events at the ~1,500 active volcanoes, while VEI 7+ eruptions constitute less than 0.1% of the record, with only about a dozen confirmed instances amid over 7,000 total eruptions. This skewed distribution underscores the logarithmic rarity of high-VEI events, informing probabilistic models.

Recent Eruptions

In the , the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) has been applied to numerous eruptions, highlighting a spectrum from low-intensity effusive events to highly explosive ones. For instance, the in was classified as VEI 0, characterized by effusive lava flows without significant ash production, covering approximately 33 square kilometers of the volcano's upper flanks over two weeks. In contrast, the submarine eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai in January 2022 reached VEI 5, ejecting approximately 6 cubic kilometers of material, generating tsunamis up to 15 meters high across the Pacific, and producing an atmospheric shockwave that circled the globe multiple times. More recently, the June 2024 eruption of Kanlaon Volcano in the was assigned VEI 3, producing ash plumes up to 4 kilometers high and causing ashfall that affected over 57,000 people, leading to evacuations and agricultural disruptions in Negros Island. Advancements in global monitoring networks, including satellite remote sensing and seismic arrays, have improved detection of moderate eruptions, revealing an apparent increase in documented VEI 2-4 events compared to earlier decades, though this likely reflects enhanced surveillance rather than a true rise in frequency. No eruptions reaching VEI 6 or higher have occurred since 's VEI 6 event in 1991, underscoring the relative rarity of such cataclysmic activity in modern records. As of 2025, preliminary assessments for the ongoing Reykjanes Peninsula activity in Iceland, including multiple fissure eruptions in 2024, suggest a VEI 1 classification for the most intense phases, involving minor ash emissions alongside extensive lava flows that threatened nearby infrastructure. Emerging discussions in volcanology propose refinements to the VEI to account for climate-influenced factors, such as glacial melt reducing overburden pressure on magma chambers, potentially leading to more explosive outcomes at ice-covered volcanoes like those in Patagonia. These debates draw from studies showing that deglaciation since the last Ice Age correlated with heightened eruptive explosivity. The VEI has played a key role in post-2020 global volcanic alerts, aiding rapid hazard communication; between 2020 and 2025, approximately 15 VEI 3 or higher events were recorded worldwide, emphasizing the scale of ongoing risks in populated regions.

References

  1. [1]
    USGS: Volcano Hazards Program Glossary - VEI
    Jan 23, 2017 · Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) is a numeric scale that measures the relative explosivity of historic eruptions. Volume of products, eruption ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    The Volcanic Explosivity Index: A tool for comparing the sizes of ...
    Dec 26, 2022 · A common scale for expressing the size of an explosive volcanic eruption is the VEI—Volcanic Explosivity Index. Eruption size can't be ...
  4. [4]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Criteria for estimation of the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI)
    Dec 26, 2022 · A common scale for expressing the size of an explosive volcanic eruption is the VEI—Volcanic Explosivity Index. Eruption size can't be ...
  6. [6]
    Smithsonian Institution - Global Volcanism Program: Worldwide ...
    The Global Volcanism Program documents, disseminates, and archives eruption information to better understand worldwide volcanic activity.Holocene Volcano Search · Smithsonian / USGS Weekly... · Current EruptionsMissing: refinements 1990s
  7. [7]
    Dynamics of deep-submarine volcanic eruptions | Scientific Reports
    Feb 28, 2022 · There are numerous technical and logistical challenges associated with accessing deep-submarine volcanic ... submarine explosive eruptions ...
  8. [8]
    Melting Ice and Volcanic Hazards in the Twenty‐First Century
    Dec 10, 2012 · This chapter contains sections titled: Summary Introduction What are hazards for ice- and snow-covered volcanoes, and where are they found?<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Anticipating future Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) 7 eruptions and ...
    Feb 28, 2018 · An imperfect but handy measure of explosive magnitude is the VEI (Newhall and Self, 1982), a broadly logarithmic scale similar to Richter ...
  10. [10]
    How big will the next eruption be? | Journal of Applied Volcanology
    Mar 25, 2022 · Although there are significant regional variations, ~ 1500 marks a major change in the VEI completeness (Mead & Magill 2014). This retrospective ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Global Effects of Mount Pinatubo - NASA Earth Observatory
    Jun 14, 2001 · Pinatubo injected about 15 million tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, where it reacted with water to form a hazy layer of aerosol ...Missing: VEI limitation
  12. [12]
    Three empirical methods for the calculation of distal volume of ...
    Three empirical methods for the calculation of distal tephra-fall volumes are presented and tested. The three methods allow calculation of approximate ...
  13. [13]
    Volcano observatory best practices (VOBP) workshops
    Mar 13, 2019 · We summarize major findings and best-practice recommendations from three Volcano Observatory Best Practices (VOBP) workshops, which were held in 2011, 2013 and ...
  14. [14]
    The porosity of pyroclasts as an indicator of volcanic explosivity
    We find that the mean porosity values of the deposits correlate positively with the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) of Newhall and Self (1982), regardless ...
  15. [15]
    The Transition from MODIS to VIIRS for Global Volcano Thermal ...
    The analysis on 9 active volcanoes reveals that VIIRS data analyzed with the MIROVA algorithm allows detecting ~60% more alerts than MODIS.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  16. [16]
    Universal machine learning approach to volcanic eruption ... - Frontiers
    Jun 25, 2024 · This innovative method classifies the state of volcanic hazard in near real-time and estimates a probability of the occurrence of an eruption.
  17. [17]
    Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai - Global Volcanism Program
    The Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai volcano includes small islands and shallow submarine ... (Submarine) VEI: 3. Episode 1 | Eruption (Submarine), about 1 km SW of Hunga ...
  18. [18]
    Ongoing Activity at Hunga Submarine Volcano, Tonga: The Case for ...
    Aug 21, 2024 · Eruption dates are from Global Volcanism Program (2024). The islands of Hunga Tonga and Hunga Ha'apai are the above sea-level portion of a ...
  19. [19]
    The Pu'u'ō'ō Eruption Lasted 35 Years - USGS.gov
    The Pu'u'ō'ō eruption began in 1983, and ranks as the longest and most voluminous known outpouring of lava from Kīlauea Volcano's East Rift Zone in more ...
  20. [20]
    Kīlauea's Pu'u 'Ō'ō Eruption (1983–2018): A synthesis of magmatic ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · The VEI 0 eruption that began along the southeast rift zone in 1983 ... Both Mauna Loa and Kilauea basement rocks are the likely sources of the ...
  21. [21]
    Stromboli - Global Volcanism Program
    The intensity of the explosions varied from low-to-high (less than 80 m to more than 150 m high) in both the N and CS crater areas. Aug 2023 ...
  22. [22]
    Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI)
    The United States Geological Survey (USGS) provides a freely downloadable Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) that describes the size of an explosive volcanic ...
  23. [23]
    MSH Comparisons With Other Eruptions [USGS]
    May 18, 1980 · The VEI scale ranges from 0 to 8. A VEI of 0 denotes a nonexplosive eruption, regardless of volume of erupted products. Eruptions designated a ...
  24. [24]
    1980 Cataclysmic Eruption | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
    The total avalanche volume is about 2.5 km3 (3.3 billion cubic yards), equivalent to 1 million Olympic swimming pools. ... Bulge on the north side of Mount St.Missing: ejecta | Show results with:ejecta
  25. [25]
    Eyjafjallajökull - Global Volcanism Program - Smithsonian Institution
    The second eruption occurred within the initially ice-covered caldera of Eyjafjallajökull. ... Information about large Quaternary eruptions (VEI >= 4) is ...
  26. [26]
    Impact of 2010 Eyjafjallajökull Eruption - Volcano Hazards Program
    Feb 10, 2016 · The 2010 eruption closed over 300 airports, cancelled 100,000 flights, affected 7 million passengers, and caused $1.7 billion in lost revenue.
  27. [27]
    Volcanological study of the great Tambora eruption of 1815 | Geology
    Jun 1, 2017 · The 1815 eruption of Tambora is one of the largest explosive volcanic events of the past 10 000 yr. By a conservative estimate, 175 km3 of ...
  28. [28]
    Tambora - Global Volcanism Program
    VEI (Explosivity Index). 1812 - 1815 Jul 15 (?) Confirmed Eruption (Explosive / Effusive) VEI: 7. Episode 1 | Eruption (Explosive / Effusive). 1812 - 1815 Jul ...
  29. [29]
    Understanding the overestimated impact of the Toba volcanic super ...
    Sep 10, 2020 · The Toba super-eruption, estimated at Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) 8, which occurred roughly 74 ka ago in northern Sumatra, Indonesia ...
  30. [30]
    The Toba mega-eruption, global cooling, and human evolution - News
    Jun 8, 2009 · Toba supervolcano about 70,000–75,000 years ... eruption reducing human population enough to create a genetic bottleneck in our evolution.
  31. [31]
    Recurrence rates of large explosive volcanic eruptions - AGU Journals
    Jun 8, 2010 · For these eruptions, a provisional tephra volume of 0.1, 1, and 10 km3 is given for VEI 4, 5, and 6 eruptions, respectively.
  32. [32]
    Global time-size distribution of volcanic eruptions on Earth - Nature
    May 1, 2018 · Volcanic eruptions differ enormously in their size and impacts, ranging from quiet lava flow effusions along the volcano flanks to colossal events.
  33. [33]
    Mauna Loa - Global Volcanism Program
    There is data available for 110 confirmed eruptive periods. 2022 Nov 27 - 2022 Dec 10 Confirmed Eruption (Explosive / Effusive) VEI: 0. Episode 1 | Eruption ( ...
  34. [34]
    It's Official: Tonga's Volcano Was The Largest Explosive Eruption of ...
    Apr 21, 2022 · Having ejected material around 10 cubic kilometers (more than 2 cubic miles) in volume, generating an atmospheric shock wave that circled the ...Missing: km3 | Show results with:km3
  35. [35]
    Kanlaon - Global Volcanism Program
    2024 Jun 3 - 2024 Jun 3 Confirmed Eruption (Explosive / Effusive) VEI: 3 ... Information about large Quaternary eruptions (VEI >= 4) is cataloged in the ...
  36. [36]
    DSWD DROMIC Report #42 on Kanlaon Volcano Eruption as of 17 ...
    Aug 17, 2024 · In case of ash fall events that may affect communities downwind of Kanlaon's crater, people should cover their nose and mouth with a damp ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Thermal Remote Sensing for Global Volcano Monitoring - Frontiers
    In this paper, we present the architecture of the system and we provide a state of the art on satellite thermal data usage for operational volcano monitoring ...
  38. [38]
    What was erupting in the year...? - Global Volcanism Program
    Columns showing the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) values reflect the maximum VEI for the overall eruption and are assigned to the year in which the eruption ...Missing: refinements | Show results with:refinements
  39. [39]
    Reykjanes - Global Volcanism Program
    2023 Dec 18 - 2024 Dec 8 Confirmed Eruption (Explosive / Effusive) VEI: 1. Episode 1 | Eruption (Explosive / Effusive), Sundhnúkagígar, Svartsengi fissure ...
  40. [40]
    Melting glaciers are awakening Earth's most dangerous volcanoes
    Jul 8, 2025 · Melting glaciers may be silently setting the stage for more explosive and frequent volcanic eruptions in the future, according to research ...