Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Voluntary redundancy

Voluntary redundancy is a process in which employees voluntarily agree to terminate their employment with their organization, typically in exchange for a severance package that may include enhanced financial compensation beyond statutory requirements, as part of an employer's strategy to reduce headcount during restructuring or downsizing. This approach allows workers to opt in rather than being selected for compulsory redundancy, helping employers avoid potential disputes while providing participants with a negotiated exit that can include lump-sum payments, continued benefits, or pension enhancements. In the , where the term is most commonly applied, voluntary redundancy schemes must adhere to employment law under the , treating the arrangement as a form of dismissal for purposes rather than a mutual . Employers are required to conduct meaningful consultations with affected staff, outlining the business reasons for the redundancies and the selection criteria, with collective consultation mandatory if 20 or more employees are at risk. Volunteering does not guarantee selection, as employers retain discretion to choose participants based on operational needs, skills retention, or fairness, potentially leading to a mix of voluntary and compulsory redundancies if insufficient volunteers come forward. Eligible employees under such schemes are entitled to statutory redundancy pay after two years of continuous service—calculated as one week's pay per year of service (capped at £719 per week from 6 2025) for those aged 22-40, 1.5 weeks for those over 41, and half a week's pay for under 22—often topped up by employer enhancements to make the offer more attractive. Participants may also qualify for , though tax implications apply, with payments up to £30,000 generally tax-free. While voluntary offers a less adversarial alternative to forced layoffs, it carries risks for employees, such as gaps or inadequate future job prospects, and employers must ensure the process is non-discriminatory to avoid claims.

Definition and Context

Core Definition

Voluntary redundancy is an employment practice in which an employer invites employees to volunteer for termination of their as part of a broader workforce reduction initiative, typically in exchange for a package. This approach allows participating employees to opt out voluntarily, distinguishing it from mandatory workforce cuts where the employer unilaterally selects individuals for dismissal. The process is initiated by the employer seeking volunteers to avoid or minimize compulsory redundancies, ensuring that no employee is forced to accept the offer. Key characteristics of voluntary redundancy include the emphasis on employee , with the package often comprising enhanced pay calculated based on length of service, statutory notice periods, and continuation of certain benefits such as coverage or contributions during a transition phase. Unlike compulsory redundancy, where selection criteria are determined solely by the employer—often involving factors like skills, performance, or last-in-first-out policies—voluntary redundancy empowers employees to self-select, potentially leading to a more amicable separation. The financial incentive is designed to make the departure attractive, but acceptance remains non-binding, allowing employees to withdraw their application if circumstances change. The term "voluntary redundancy" originates primarily within employment law and practice, where it is governed by statutes like the , which outlines redundancy entitlements. In other regions, such as the , analogous concepts are referred to as voluntary severance packages or employee buyouts (EBOs), which similarly offer incentives for voluntary exits during downsizing. These variations share the core principle of incentivizing self-selection to facilitate organizational restructuring without coercive measures.

Historical Evolution

Voluntary redundancy emerged in the during the post-World War II era of industrial restructuring in the 1950s and , as employers and trade unions negotiated arrangements to manage workforce reductions without resorting to strikes or compulsory layoffs. In this period, redundancy payments were not statutory but ad hoc, often secured through ; for instance, a 1955 redundancy affecting 4,900 workers initially offered no compensation, but negotiations resulted in payments of 1 to 2 weeks' pay per year of service, reflecting a growing emphasis on voluntary exits to maintain industrial peace. Trade unions played a pivotal role, shifting from outright resistance to redundancies toward advocating for protective payments, which helped mitigate labor disputes amid economic modernization efforts. The practice gained formal recognition with the Redundancy Payments Act 1965, which established statutory lump-sum payments based on age and service length—such as 1½ weeks' pay per year for workers over 41—creating incentives for older employees to opt for voluntary separation and reversing traditional "last in, first out" policies. These provisions were later consolidated and expanded in the , which defined redundancy dismissals and preserved entitlements to payments for voluntary exits treated as dismissals. Additionally, law was shaped by directives on collective redundancies, starting with Directive 75/129/EEC (recast as 98/59/EC in 1998), implemented domestically through the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) 1992, requiring consultation for proposed redundancies of 20 or more employees; this framework influenced voluntary schemes until the 's exit from the EU via in 2020, after which retained EU-derived laws continued to apply without further obligations. The concept of voluntary redundancy spread globally, adapted to local labor contexts. In , it was integrated into statutory frameworks via the , which mandates redundancy pay and consultation for genuine job losses, allowing employees to volunteer for separation while entitling them to payments scaled by service length, building on precedents from the 1984 Termination, Change and Redundancy Case. In the United States, a similar approach appeared in the federal sector as Voluntary Separation Incentive Programs (VSIPs), authorized by the Federal Workforce Restructuring Act of 1994 to offer up to $25,000 lump-sum payments for voluntary resignations or retirements during downsizing, often paired with Voluntary Early Retirement Authority to facilitate workforce reshaping without forced reductions.

Motivations and Drivers

Employer Incentives

Organizations initiate voluntary redundancy programs primarily to achieve strategic workforce reductions in a controlled and less disruptive manner, enabling them to adapt to economic pressures, technological changes, or organizational shifts without resorting to compulsory layoffs. By inviting employees to self-select for departure, often with enhanced severance packages, employers can streamline operations while mitigating associated risks. This approach is particularly appealing during periods of , as it aligns with broader business objectives like cost management and skill optimization. A key is the potential for significant cost savings over the long term. Voluntary redundancy reduces ongoing expenses by eliminating positions without the higher immediate outlays of litigation or disputes that often accompany forced redundancies. For instance, in the U.S. context, programs like the Voluntary Separation Payment (VSIP) have demonstrated net savings of up to $4.54 billion over five years for the Department of Defense by avoiding and accrual costs, outperforming involuntary reductions when factoring in employee transition expenses. Additionally, the process is typically faster, bypassing complex selection criteria and appeals, which further lowers administrative burdens and preserves among remaining staff by avoiding perceptions of unfair targeting. Voluntary redundancy also facilitates workforce reshaping, allowing employers to target surplus roles and realign skills without the rigidity of compulsory selections. This is especially valuable during mergers, acquisitions, or operational pivots, where organizations need to eliminate redundancies in functions while maintaining overall productivity. By encouraging applications from non-core areas, employers can achieve a more agile structure; for example, VSIP implementations have enabled targeted downsizing of positions, reducing average experience but creating promotion pathways for junior talent and minimizing internal disruptions like employee "bumping." Such flexibility supports strategic goals without the turbulence of broad layoffs. Finally, these programs aid in retaining key by prioritizing voluntary exits from non-essential staff, thereby protecting critical employees who choose to remain. Employers can applications from high-value individuals, ensuring that essential skills are preserved amid reductions. This selective approach not only sustains operational but also boosts employer reputation, as voluntary options signal a humane that reduces anxiety and turnover among survivors. In federal examples, VSIP has helped retain mid-career professionals by focusing separations on retirement-eligible seniors, avoiding the morale erosion and dips from involuntary actions.

Employee Considerations

Employees considering voluntary redundancy often evaluate the financial incentives offered, as these packages typically provide a lump-sum that exceeds statutory minimum requirements. Such enhanced severance can offer a financial for or facilitating a transition, making the option appealing for those seeking stability amid change. For instance, employers frequently structure voluntary schemes with additional benefits beyond the basic statutory pay, which is calculated based on , of , and weekly pay, to encourage uptake. Career stage plays a significant role in decision-making, with older workers approaching more likely to view voluntary as a timely opportunity for an early exit. These individuals may prioritize the financial security of a to bridge the gap to eligibility or full , especially if continued employment feels less essential. In contrast, younger employees tend to weigh the potential impact on their re-employment prospects more heavily, assessing whether the payout justifies the risk of entering a competitive job with a on their record. The broader job market context further influences , with rates typically rising during economic downturns when alternative opportunities are limited and feels precarious. In such periods, employees may opt for voluntary redundancy to secure a payout preemptively, avoiding the of potential compulsory layoffs. Conversely, in booming markets with abundant job openings, tends to decline as workers perceive stronger leverage to negotiate or seek better opportunities elsewhere.

Implementation Process

Selection and Eligibility Criteria

In voluntary redundancy schemes, employers typically identify eligibility by targeting employees in specific roles or departments deemed surplus due to organizational , technological changes, or economic factors, while excluding positions critical to operations. For instance, roles in administrative support or lines may be prioritized if they are no longer required, but essential functions such as or specialized technical positions are often ineligible to ensure continuity. This role-based approach helps align the scheme with the employer's need to reduce headcount without disrupting core activities. Eligibility often includes a minimum length of service requirement, commonly set at two years of continuous , as this qualifies employees for statutory redundancy payments and allows access to enhanced voluntary packages. Employees with shorter tenure may be excluded to prioritize those who have contributed longer and are entitled to benefits calculated based on age, service length (capped at 20 years), and weekly pay (capped at £719 as of April 2025). Such criteria ensure the scheme is cost-effective for employers while providing meaningful support to longer-serving staff. The application process requires employees to express interest voluntarily, usually in writing and in line with the employer's established or . Once applications are received, employers review them against needs; volunteering does not guarantee acceptance, particularly if the applicant holds a protected or irreplaceable role. In cases of oversubscription—where more employees apply than positions available—employers must apply fair and transparent selection methods, such as scoring based on skills, , or records, or managerial discretion to retain key talent.

Offer Structure and Negotiation

Voluntary redundancy offers in the UK typically comprise a statutory minimum payment supplemented by employer-specific enhancements to incentivize participation. The statutory redundancy pay is calculated based on an employee's age, length of service, and weekly earnings, with eligibility requiring at least two years of continuous employment. For each full year of service (capped at 20 years), the payment is 0.5 week's pay for those under 22, one week's pay for ages 22 to 40, and 1.5 weeks' pay for those aged 41 and over, using the average weekly pay over the 12 weeks prior to the notice period and subject to a statutory cap on weekly pay (£719 as of April 2025, updated annually). Enhancements beyond this minimum may include additional lump sums, such as one or two extra weeks' pay per year of service, outplacement support, continuation of health benefits, or contributions to pension schemes, often outlined in company policies or collective agreements to make the package more attractive. Negotiation of these offers allows employees to seek improved terms, particularly through individual discussions or settlement agreements, where counter-offers can address elements like increased severance, extended notice periods, or non-financial perks. In cases involving recognized trade unions, plays a key role, standardizing offers across groups and ensuring enhancements are equitably distributed during consultation periods mandated by law for larger redundancies ( or more employees). Employers are not obligated to accept all volunteer applications or every negotiated term, balancing business needs such as retaining critical skills, but refusals must avoid based on protected characteristics. The timeline for voluntary redundancy offers generally includes a defined application , often lasting 4 to 6 weeks, during which eligible employees can express interest and negotiate terms before the employer reviews and selects volunteers. Following acceptance, exit planning commences, incorporating statutory notice periods (at least one week per year of service, up to 12 weeks) and any agreed handover arrangements to facilitate a smooth departure. In the , employers implementing voluntary redundancy must adhere to statutory consultation requirements to ensure employees are informed and involved in the process. For individual redundancies, consultation should be meaningful and timely, allowing employees to discuss alternatives and the selection process. However, if 20 or more employees are proposed for redundancy at a single establishment within a 90-day period, collective consultation is mandatory under the and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; this requires employers to consult with appropriate employee representatives or recognized at least 30 days before the first dismissal if 20 to 99 redundancies are planned, or 45 days if 100 or more are proposed. Voluntary redundancy offers must comply with fairness principles to avoid discrimination claims under the , which prohibits direct or indirect based on protected characteristics such as , , , or . Employers cannot selectively target groups for voluntary redundancy offers in a way that disadvantages protected categories, such as limiting offers to older employees eligible for early retirement, as this may constitute unlawful . Additionally, redundancy payments carry specific tax implications: statutory redundancy pay up to £30,000 is exempt from and contributions, though any excess or non-statutory elements may be taxable, and employers must provide a breakdown to facilitate accurate reporting to . Employers are required to provide written terms for voluntary redundancy offers, typically through a formal agreement or settlement document, outlining the payment details, , and any conditions to protect both parties. Failure to follow proper procedures, such as inadequate consultation or unfair selection, can expose employers to claims at an , where employees with at least two years' service may seek remedies including compensation or reinstatement. To mitigate risks, offers should include a right of and be processed transparently.

Variations by Jurisdiction

In the United States, voluntary redundancy is commonly referred to as voluntary buyouts or early incentives, which allow employers to offer packages or enhanced benefits to encourage employees to leave without triggering mandatory regulations for involuntary terminations. These programs are generally less regulated at the level compared to compulsory s, as they do not require advance notice unless they result in a mass layoff or plant closing affecting or more employees at a single site, in which case the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act mandates at least 60 days' written notice to affected employees and officials. Within the and , voluntary redundancy practices are harmonized under Council Directive 98/59/EC, which primarily governs collective redundancies—defined as dismissals for economic, technical, or organizational reasons not tied to individual workers—requiring employers to consult workers' representatives on measures to avoid or mitigate such redundancies, including potential voluntary departures. While the directive does not explicitly mandate voluntary options, member states like emphasize them through negotiated "social plans" (Sozialpläne) between employers and works councils, which often include voluntary severance programs to achieve staff reductions amicably and avoid court challenges to mass dismissals. In , voluntary redundancy is integrated into the Fair Work Act 2009's framework for protections, where employers must consult affected employees before implementing changes that may lead to , and a genuine redundancy—meaning no suitable alternative role exists—shields the employer from claims if proper consultation occurs. Employees can volunteer for redundancy during this process, receiving statutory redundancy pay based on length of service, but the arrangement must align with the Act's requirements to prevent disputes. In , voluntary redundancy is less formalized than in many Western jurisdictions and is typically implemented through Voluntary Retirement Schemes (VRS) under the , which permits employers to offer early retirement packages as an alternative to compulsory layoffs, especially since direct retrenchment of workers is restricted without government approval in certain industries. These schemes are set to align with broader labor codes, including the , which is pending full implementation as of 2025, require employees to have at least 10 years of service or be over 40 years old to qualify, with benefits often including lump-sum payments exempt from tax up to ₹5,00,000 under Section 10(10C) of (as of 2025), though implementation varies by company policy and lacks uniform statutory mandates.

Impacts and Outcomes

Organizational Effects

Voluntary redundancy programs enable organizations to streamline operations by voluntarily reducing headcount, minimizing disruptions associated with compulsory layoffs and allowing for targeted adjustments. This approach often leads to significant gains, including reductions in labor and associated overheads ranging from 12% to 20% in specific sectors like , as demonstrated in case studies where such schemes achieved substantial financial savings without extensive legal conflicts. By avoiding protracted disputes and preserving operational continuity, these programs support smoother transitions during periods of driven by employer incentives for control. Regarding morale and productivity, voluntary redundancy can enhance remaining employees' perceptions of fairness, thereby helping to maintain or boost compared to forced reductions, which often result in widespread and demotivation. However, this benefit is contingent on transparent implementation; otherwise, the departure of voluntary participants may lead to knowledge loss, particularly if experienced or high-performing staff exit, potentially eroding institutional expertise and hindering short-term . Studies indicate that such risks contribute to "survivor syndrome," where remaining workers experience heightened stress and reduced output unless mitigated through clear communication and support measures. Strategically, voluntary redundancy facilitates organizational pivots, such as shifts toward , by enabling the realignment of resources and elimination of redundant roles, which supports long-term adaptability. Post-implementation metrics, including lowered overheads and faster decision-making, underscore these outcomes, with successful programs achieving sustained efficiency improvements through reduced . This method proves particularly effective in dynamic environments, allowing firms to reallocate toward without the morale-draining effects of involuntary separations.

Individual and Societal Consequences

Voluntary redundancy can provide individuals with a financial through packages, which often include lump-sum payments calculated based on years of service, offering temporary security during job transitions. However, financial outcomes vary significantly; while some employees leverage these funds for retraining or pivots, others encounter prolonged spells, particularly in regions with limited job opportunities or during economic downturns. For instance, older workers over 50, who frequently opt for voluntary schemes, are three times less likely to secure new employment within compared to younger counterparts, exacerbating risks of depleted savings and reliance on benefits. Psychologically, participants in voluntary redundancy tend to fare better than those facing involuntary dismissal, reporting lower levels of and higher engagement in job-search activities, which can facilitate smoother re-entry into the . Studies indicate that approximately 79% of redundant workers find new within a year, though this rate drops for voluntary participants in skill-mismatched sectors, where unemployment gaps may persist beyond 12 months. Many use the interim period for reskilling, such as acquiring competencies, though access to tailored programs remains uneven, often depending on employer support during consultations. On a societal level, voluntary redundancy mitigates the shocks of mass layoffs by encouraging self-selected exits, thereby dampening spikes in overall unemployment rates and preserving social cohesion in affected communities. In the UK during the 1980s Thatcher era, such schemes reduced compulsory redundancies in union-heavy industries like coal and steel, with voluntary take-ups comprising up to 37% of total job losses, fostering labor market flexibility without immediate widespread economic disruption. However, this approach can intensify inequality, as it often disproportionately attracts older workers nearing retirement, who may exit prematurely due to age discrimination in re-hiring, thus straining pension systems and accelerating workforce aging by limiting knowledge transfer.

Case Studies and Examples

Private Sector Applications

In the automotive sector, (JLR) implemented a voluntary redundancy scheme in July 2025 to address a 15.1% sales drop in the three months to June, influenced by U.S. tariffs and economic pressures. The program targeted up to 500 UK-based management roles, representing about 1.5% of its British workforce, with costs of £42 million reported in the company's Q2 fiscal 2025/26 results. This approach aimed to streamline operations without exceeding the specified cuts, supporting JLR's focus on efficiency amid challenges like delayed launches. In the manufacturing sector, implemented a voluntary buyout program in 2008 amid the global financial crisis to address declining sales and excess capacity. The program targeted all 54,000 U.S. hourly workers, offering packages such as $50,000 lump-sum payments for non-skilled employees and $70,000 for skilled trades, along with continued and retirement benefits, to reduce costs without immediate plant closures. This approach built on earlier s from 2006-2007, where Ford had aimed to eliminate 25,000 to 30,000 positions through voluntary means. These cases demonstrated positive outcomes, with high participation rates enabling workforce reductions while minimizing morale damage and legal risks. For instance, Ford's prior buyout rounds saw over 38,000 employees accept offers by late 2006—nearly half of the eligible U.S. hourly workforce—allowing the company to avoid widespread compulsory layoffs and stabilize operations during the recession, contributing to its survival without government . Similarly, JLR's scheme facilitated operational adjustments by targeting specific roles, aiding adaptation to market challenges while preserving core capabilities.

Public Sector Implementations

Voluntary redundancy schemes in the public sector are frequently employed to manage workforce reductions amid budget constraints, restructuring, or efficiency drives, often prioritizing voluntary participation to minimize disruption and legal risks. In the United Kingdom, these schemes are governed by frameworks like the Civil Service Compensation Scheme, which caps payouts at £95,000 and emphasizes value for money through assessments of long-term savings. For instance, the UK Civil Service has implemented voluntary exit programs to achieve an 11% reduction in running costs by 2028-29, with over 8,500 civil servants projected to depart by March 2027 at a total cost of £536 million, enabling recruitment of new skills while avoiding compulsory redundancies. In , public bodies utilized early retirement and voluntary redundancy to reduce headcount by approximately 20,000 since 2009, with half of these exits occurring through such schemes, costing £561 million for 14,000 staff over 2010/11 and 2011/12 alone. The average package was £38,740, though some exceeded £100,000, with payback periods varying based on service redesign benefits; for example, required schemes to align with service improvements, demonstrating value for money through reduced payroll and targeted restructuring. Creative Scotland, Education Scotland, and Skills Development Scotland experienced over 20% workforce reductions via these exits, aiding adaptation to cuts. Argyll & Bute Council integrated voluntary redundancies into a five-year workforce planning strategy, achieving sustainable staff reductions without immediate service impacts. Similarly, in , 10,658 early departures, including voluntary redundancies, occurred across 58 public bodies from April 2010 to December 2013, representing 4% of the and costing £254 million upfront, with an average of £23,805 per package and a typical of 10 months. The NHS sector saw 7,683 exits at £144.3 million, primarily voluntary, while the achieved a 15.3% reduction through 977 voluntary exits costing £48.8 million; initiatives like the £17 million "Invest to Save" fund supported NHS schemes, yielding £33 million in recurrent savings by reallocating resources to frontline services. , for example, managed 1,071 departures at £26.9 million, focusing on efficiency in local administration. In , the has relied on voluntary redundancies since the to downsize amid fiscal pressures, reducing staff by 23,700 (16%) from 1995 to 1998 across 59 agencies, with 19,637 retrenchments costing $711 million. The Taxation Office (ATO) implemented phased voluntary separation programs from 1994-95, achieving 1,718 exits and a net reduction of 1,311 staff while maintaining performance levels, though it noted challenges like loss of high performers and morale dips. The Department of Primary Industries and Energy (DPIE) targeted specific roles, resulting in 717 retrenchments and improved outcomes, such as the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service reducing 862 positions by 2001 to enhance export quality. The Department of Transport and Regional Development used voluntary offers alongside redeployment, securing 259 exits and a net cut of 672 staff, supported by the APS Market Adjustment Program, which saved $15.4 million overall but saw declining effectiveness. These implementations highlight a : voluntary schemes facilitate transitions in , with costs offset by long-term savings, though success depends on strategic targeting, equality monitoring, and post-exit evaluations to preserve service delivery.

References

  1. [1]
    Volunteering for redundancy - Your rights during redundancy - Acas
    Oct 3, 2025 · Your employer does not have to offer voluntary redundancy to everyone. But if you feel they stopped you volunteering because of your sex, age, ...
  2. [2]
    Voluntary Redundancy: Guide for Employers - DavidsonMorris
    Feb 17, 2025 · What is voluntary redundancy? Voluntary redundancy occurs when employees choose to leave their job in exchange for a financial package. It is ...
  3. [3]
    Redundancy: overview - Practical Law - Thomson Reuters
    This practice note outlines the statutory definition of "redundancy" under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), including business and workplace closures ...
  4. [4]
    What Is Voluntary Redundancy? A Legal Guide For UK Employers ...
    Aug 23, 2025 · UK law requires employers to consult with potentially affected staff before making any redundancy decisions. For collective redundancies (20+ ...
  5. [5]
    Choosing voluntary redundancy - Citizens Advice
    Your employer will select the people to be made redundant from everyone who volunteered. It's up to your employer if they select you for redundancy. Just ...
  6. [6]
    Voluntary redundancy: What are my rights? | reed.co.uk
    Voluntary redundancy is still classed as a dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996, not a resignation. This is a crucial point, as it means you don't ...
  7. [7]
    Voluntary redundancy: How it works in practice - Personio
    Voluntary redundancy must follow the same process as normal redundancies. The processes are quite clearly laid out by gov.uk in their information about making ...
  8. [8]
    Voluntary Redundancy: What Is It, Process & More [2025]
    Rating 5.0 (594) Nov 2, 2025 · Voluntary redundancy is when your employer invites employees to step forward and leave their job as part of a redundancy programme. Instead of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Employee Buyout (EBO): Voluntary Severance Overview
    Feb 5, 2025 · An employee buyout (EBO) refers to when an employer offers select employees a voluntary severance package. The package usually includes benefits and pay for a ...
  10. [10]
    Voluntary Layoffs: What You Need to Know (Plus Policy Template)
    May 7, 2025 · This type of workforce reduction—often called a voluntary separation, voluntary redundancy, or employee buyout—helps organizations cut costs ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Britain's redundancy payments for displaced workers
    In 1965, British policymakers created the Redundancy Pay- ments Act, calling for advance notification of workers who are to be laid off (made "redundant") ...
  12. [12]
    Employment Rights Act 1996, Section 139 - Legislation.gov.uk
    Section 139 defines redundancy as dismissal due to employer ceasing business or diminished work requirements, including if contract is not renewed.
  13. [13]
    Redundancy - Fair Work Ombudsman
    Aug 28, 2025 · Redundancy is when a business no longer needs an employee's job to be done by anyone. Learn more about when redundancy happens and what ...Redundancy pay · Notice & redundancy calculator · Consultation and cooperation...
  14. [14]
    The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) - Australian Law Reform Commission
    Apr 8, 2013 · 4.65 The origins of the provision lie in the 1984 Termination, Change and Redundancy Case of the former Australian Conciliation and Arbitration ...
  15. [15]
    Voluntary Separation Incentive Payments - OPM
    The Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment Authority, also known as buyout authority, allows agencies that are downsizing or restructuring to offer employees ...Missing: redundancy | Show results with:redundancy
  16. [16]
    Guide to offering voluntary redundancy - Harper James Solicitors
    May 30, 2025 · Voluntary redundancy (sometimes known as non-compulsory redundancy) might be worth considering if your business needs to reduce headcount.Why Might You Choose To... · What Is The Process To... · Do I Have To Accept An...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  17. [17]
    Redundancy | Factsheets - CIPD
    This factsheet suggests alternatives to redundancy and provides guidance on managing redundancy when it's unavoidable.
  18. [18]
    Making staff redundant: Non-compulsory redundancy - GOV.UK
    Rules employers must follow when making staff redundant - consultations, notice periods, compulsory and non-compulsory redundancy and redundancy pay.
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    CIPD | Labour Market Outlook
    ### Summary of Redundancy Trends and Employee Acceptance from Labour Market Outlook – Autumn 2025
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Learning from the downturn - Institute for Employment Studies (IES)
    Younger workers felt the impact of this recession particularly badly. In the first year of the recession the redundancy rate for 16 to 24 year olds increased ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Step 5: Select employees - Managing a redundancy process - Acas
    Sep 24, 2025 · Examples of selection criteria could include: standard of work or performance; skills, qualifications or expertise; attendance record, which ...
  23. [23]
    Calculate your statutory redundancy pay - GOV.UK
    Calculate how much statutory redundancy you can get based on age, weekly pay and number of years in the job.
  24. [24]
    Enhanced redundancy packages explained - Clarkslegal LLP
    Aug 6, 2025 · Enhanced redundancy pay is offered in addition to statutory minimum, often as an increase to the minimum, and may include benefits beyond just ...
  25. [25]
    Discussing and negotiating an offer - Settlement agreements - Acas
    Oct 16, 2025 · a settlement agreement is voluntary – the worker does not have to agree to it · the worker can negotiate and make a counter offer · discussions ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  26. [26]
    When you must consult - Collective consultation for redundancy - Acas
    May 21, 2024 · When counting how many employees could be made redundant, you must include: voluntary redundancies – for example if you propose to make 22 ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Collective Redundancy Consultation - Trades Union Congress
    Jan 31, 2012 · • Allowing time to negotiate voluntary redundancy packages and for volunteers to apply. • Allowing time to negotiate redundancy payment ...
  28. [28]
    Redundancy: your rights: Consultation - GOV.UK
    If your employer is making 20 or more employees redundant at the same time, the consultation should take place between your employer and a representative (rep).
  29. [29]
    Making staff redundant: Redundancy consultations - GOV.UK
    You must follow 'collective consultation' rules if you're making 20 or more employees redundant within any 90-day period at a single establishment.
  30. [30]
    your rights: Being selected for redundancy - GOV.UK
    Your employer cannot just offer voluntary redundancy to age groups eligible for an early retirement package - this could be unlawful age discrimination.
  31. [31]
    Redundancy: your rights: Tax and National Insurance - GOV.UK
    If you're made redundant, you may get a 'termination payment'. This could include: statutory redundancy pay; holiday pay; unpaid wages; company benefits, ...
  32. [32]
    Reductions in Force: Legal Do's and Don'ts | Insights - Skadden
    Dec 13, 2022 · Voluntary RIFs include offering current employees severance pay or “buyout” programs, early retirement packages, job sharing agreements and/or ...
  33. [33]
    Early Retirement Programs - Corporate Counsel - FindLaw
    A voluntary program does not require the employer to issue a minimum 60 days' advance written notice to the employees under the federal WARN Act, as described ...
  34. [34]
    Directive - 98/59 - EN - EUR-Lex
    ### Summary of Directive 98/59/EC on Collective Redundancies
  35. [35]
    FAQ on voluntary redundancy programmes - CMS Law
    May 15, 2020 · A voluntary redundancy programme (VP) aims to carry out socially acceptable staff reductions via amicable arrangements with employees.
  36. [36]
    Termination Of Employment In Germany: Severance Pay, Notice ...
    Jan 31, 2025 · Although there's no mandatory redundancy pay, social plans (sozialplan) are often negotiated during mass layoffs, potentially offering severance ...
  37. [37]
    Redundancy | Fair Work Commission
    Feb 10, 2022 · An employer can only make a role redundant if it is a real redundancy. The law protects employees from dismissal that is not a legal ('genuine') ...
  38. [38]
    What you need to know about voluntary redundancy | Ai Group
    Jun 9, 2025 · An employer may receive requests for a voluntary redundancy from employees they wish to keep for example, those with the most marketable skills, ...Missing: determine | Show results with:determine
  39. [39]
    What is a Voluntary Retirement and How VRS Comes into Play?
    Jun 17, 2025 · A voluntary retirement scheme is completely optional, and it is up to the employee to choose whether they want to retire or not.Missing: codes | Show results with:codes
  40. [40]
    Voluntary Retirement Scheme: VRS Full Form and Meaning
    Rating 4.2 (924) Voluntary retirement allows individuals to retire at an earlier age like in their 40's or 50's. This can benefit both employees who want to pursue other ...What Is Vrs? · When Should An Individual... · Conclusion
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Experience-with-labor-redundancy-schemes-in-the-transport-sector ...
    a voluntary redundancy scheme. A ... and other cost categories between 12% and. 20% so that a cost reduction of 300 million guilders would be achieved.
  42. [42]
    The Voluntary Redundancy Option: Carrot or Stick? - ResearchGate
    Aug 5, 2025 · From an organizational perspective voluntary redundancy does appear to smooth the downsizing process but at the same time tends to mask ...Missing: gains | Show results with:gains
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Employee Morale During Downsizing
    The most frequently cited benefits of downsizing to the organisation include: lower overheads and cost reductions, less bureaucracy, faster decision making, ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Redundancy Support for Over 50s - Centre for Ageing Better
    Mar 25, 2025 · People over 50 are more likely to become long-term unemployed after falling out of work, and workers made redundant over 50 are three times less ...
  45. [45]
    Experiential differences between voluntary and involuntary job ...
    Dec 24, 2010 · Results at Study 1 showed that voluntarily redundant participants experienced lower levels of depression and engaged in more job-search activity ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  46. [46]
    Returning to work: regional determinants of re-employment after ...
    Dec 7, 2017 · All in all, according to our data set, about 79% of the redundant workers found new employment the year after losing their job. This is broadly ...
  47. [47]
    Where to from here? Evaluating employability during career transition
    Aug 6, 2025 · This study explores attitudes towards employability among a small group of individuals who were in career transition as a result of taking ...
  48. [48]
    “Selling Their Jobs?” Thatcherism, Voluntary Redundancy and ...
    Jan 5, 2022 · This article seeks to reposition voluntary redundancy as a key element of the raft of measures that changed the face of the British society.
  49. [49]
    Redundancy Support for Over 50s | Centre for Ageing Better
    People aged 50 and over, are twice as likely to struggle to find a new job if they're made redundant and they often face age discrimination in recruitment. If ...
  50. [50]
    Microsoft to slash 18000 jobs in deepest cuts in tech giant's history
    Jul 17, 2014 · Most of the job losses expected to come from firm's Nokia unit, which Microsoft acquired in April for $7.2bn.Missing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
  51. [51]
    Microsoft announces steps to simplify organization and align ...
    Jul 17, 2014 · Of the total, about 12,500 professional and factory positions will be eliminated through synergies and strategic alignment of the Nokia Devices ...Missing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
  52. [52]
    Microsoft cutting 18000 jobs, 14% of company, in largest layoffs in its ...
    Jul 17, 2014 · Microsoft will cut 18000 jobs over the next year, including 12500 related to its acquisition of Nokia's Devices and Services business, theMissing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
  53. [53]
    Ford offering buyouts to all hourly workers - NBC News
    Jan 24, 2008 · Ford is offering eight different packages for employees, including a $50,000 lump-sum payment for non-skilled workers and a $70,000 lump-sum ...Missing: voluntary crisis
  54. [54]
    Details of Ford's buyout packages - Cleveland.com
    Feb 15, 2008 · Ford Motor Co. will offer 10 retirement packages or buyout offers to all its US workers on Tuesday. Here are the details.Missing: financial crisis 35000
  55. [55]
    Revamping and Buyouts to Cost Ford $17 Billion
    Nov 30, 2006 · Ford said it needed to eliminate between 25,000 and 30,000 jobs by 2008 as it closed 16 plants to more closely align its production capacity ...Missing: program | Show results with:program
  56. [56]
    38,000 Workers Accept Ford's Buyout Plans - CBS News
    38,000 so far this year — have accepted buyouts or early retirement offers as ...Missing: financial crisis
  57. [57]
    NAO guidance: Government exits and redundancies
    Sep 25, 2025 · Over 8,500 civil servants are expected to leave under current exit schemes up to the end of March 2027, at a cost of £536 million. More exits ...
  58. [58]
    Payouts for departing civil servants capped at £95000 under ...
    Apr 1, 2025 · Payouts for departing civil servants capped at £95,000 under voluntary exit scheme ... civil service salary is just over £30,000 per year.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Managing early departures from the Scottish public sector
    Early retirements and voluntary redundancies, for example, can be a useful way of avoiding the delays and costs of compulsory redundancies and quickly reducing ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Managing early departures across Welsh public bodies - Audit Wales
    Feb 10, 2015 · For voluntary exits and voluntary redundancies, local authorities have discretion to set their own early departure arrangements and, in practice ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Staff Reductions in the Australian Public Service
    Jun 29, 1999 · voluntary redundancy ie. severance benefits (the number of weeks of salary paid for continuous service). It does not include those amounts ...