Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Yes, and...

"Yes, and..." is a foundational principle in improvisational theatre, directing performers to accept ("yes") the reality or suggestion presented by a scene partner and then build upon it ("and") to advance the collaborative narrative.^[1] This technique, often regarded as the cornerstone of improv comedy, promotes spontaneity, trust, and creativity by discouraging denial or negation of ideas.^[2] The phrase emerged in the mid-20th century within the Chicago improv scene, particularly through the work of influential figures such as Elaine May and Del Close during their time with the Compass Players in the 1950s.^[3] Close, a pioneering director and teacher, further popularized the concept at institutions like The Second City and iO Theater, integrating it into long-form improvisation formats such as the Harold.^[4] Beyond its theatrical roots, "yes, and..." has been adapted across diverse fields, including business training to enhance teamwork and innovation, educational settings to foster inclusive learning environments, and therapeutic practices to build emotional resilience and interpersonal connection.^[5]^[6]^[7]

History

Origins in Early Improvisation

The origins of "Yes, and..." trace back to the mid-20th century, when Viola Spolin pioneered theater games in Chicago during the 1940s and 1950s as a drama supervisor with the Works Progress Administration's Recreation Project at Hull House.^[8] Working primarily with children from diverse immigrant backgrounds, Spolin drew on Neva Boyd's educational play theories to create intuitive exercises that bypassed traditional scripted acting, instead emphasizing spontaneous group interaction to overcome inhibitions and build trust.^[9] Her approach formalized acceptance-based improvisation, where participants built upon each other's contributions rather than rejecting them, laying the groundwork for collaborative scene work.^[10] Spolin's Improvisation for the Theater (1963) marked the first comprehensive codification of these games, compiling over 200 exercises designed to cultivate intuitive responses and ensemble cohesion in performers./01%3A_First_Course-_Ready_Set_Go/1.01%3A_History-_A_Brief_History_of_Improv) Key examples include "Mirror," in which two players face each other and one leads subtle movements that the other precisely copies, fostering attunement and non-verbal acceptance of the partner's initiative.^[11] Similarly, "Give and Take" involves partners alternating the initiation of actions or dialogue, requiring fluid responsiveness to maintain scene momentum without interruption or negation.^[12] These games, played in Chicago's educational and community theater programs, implicitly embodied principles of acceptance without denial, training participants to affirm and extend ideas in real time.^[13] Paul Sills, Spolin's son and a University of Chicago theater student, adapted her methods for adult ensembles, co-founding the Compass Players in 1955 with David Shepherd to explore audience-suggested improvisations in a Hyde Park cabaret setting.^[14] By 1959, Sills directed the opening of The Second City, where performers used Spolin's games to generate unscripted scenes, demanding affirmative builds to sustain narrative flow and humor.^[15] This transition from workshop exercises to public performance solidified the role of acceptance in spontaneous theater.^[16] Emerging in the post-World War II period, this improvisational movement reflected a broader American theater reaction against the rigid, star-centric scripted drama of Broadway, favoring instead collaborative, democratic creativity that engaged audiences directly and democratized artistic expression.^[14]

Evolution Through Key Practitioners

Del Close played a pivotal role in refining and institutionalizing the "yes, and..." principle during the 1960s and 1970s through his work at Second City's Toronto and Chicago locations, where he directed productions and trained performers in collaborative improvisation techniques that emphasized building on offers rather than denying them.^[4] The exact phrase "yes, and..." is often credited to Elaine May and Del Close during their time with the Compass Players in the 1950s, encapsulating the principle of acceptance and building.^[1] In 1983, Close co-founded the ImprovOlympic (now iO Theater) in Chicago with Charna Halpern, where the Harold was taught and further refined as a long-form improv structure consisting of interconnected scenes that explicitly requires "yes, and..." to weave disparate ideas into a cohesive narrative, fostering ensemble trust and organic storytelling.^[17] This format, developed in the mid-1960s with The Committee and first performed in 1967, later refined at iO over decades, became a cornerstone of modern improv training, mandating acceptance of initial premises to generate complexity and humor.^[18] Parallel to Close's efforts in North America, Keith Johnstone advanced similar concepts of acceptance in the United Kingdom during the 1950s and 1960s, founding The Theatre Machine, an improvisation group that toured Europe and North America, promoting spontaneous scene-building based on agreeing to and expanding upon performers' suggestions to avoid blocking creativity.^[19] Johnstone's approach, which highlighted status interactions and narrative flow through unreserved acceptance of ideas, culminated in his influential 1979 book Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre, where he codified "yes, and..."-like techniques as essential for overcoming improvisers' tendencies to negate offers, thereby enabling freer artistic expression. The ideas of Close and Johnstone cross-pollinated in North American improv training starting in the late 1970s, as Johnstone's emphasis on acceptance influenced iO Chicago's curriculum alongside Close's Harold structure, with training programs integrating status exercises and offer-building drills to reinforce "yes, and..." as a foundational ethic for ensemble work.^[20] This synthesis helped standardize the principle across improv schools, blending Johnstone's narrative spontaneity with Close's long-form interconnections.^[21] A key milestone in this evolution came in 1994 with the publication of Truth in Comedy: The Manual of Improvisation, co-authored by Close, Halpern, and Kim Howard Johnson, which formalized "yes, and..." as improv's cardinal rule, detailing its application in the Harold and crediting it with transforming improvisation from short sketches to profound, audience-engaging performances.

Core Principles

The Basic Rule

The "Yes, and..." principle serves as the foundational rule in improvisational theater, mandating that performers accept any premise or action introduced by a scene partner—the "yes"—and then extend it with additional elements—the "and"—to collaboratively advance the narrative. This approach ensures that scenes evolve organically without interruption, prioritizing agreement over denial to maintain momentum and coherence. The rule emerged as a response to the constraints of scripted theater, promoting spontaneity and freeing performers from predetermined outcomes.^[1] In practice, the mechanics begin with identifying an "offer," defined as any declarative statement, gesture, or implied reality that shapes the scene, such as establishing a location, relationship, or object. The responding improviser must affirm the offer explicitly or implicitly, avoiding negation that could dismantle the established world, and then contribute novel information to enrich the scenario, such as heightening stakes, introducing complications, or developing characters. This step-by-step process—recognition, acceptance, and augmentation—relies on active listening and quick thinking to sustain the ensemble's shared reality.^[1] A classic example illustrates the rule's application: if one performer declares, "We're astronauts on a spaceship hurtling toward Mars," an effective response might be, "Yes, and the oxygen levels are dropping—quick, check the gauges!" This accepts the spatial and role-based offer while adding urgency to propel the scene. Conversely, a blocking reply like "No, we're actually pirates on a submarine" rejects the premise, creating conflict and halting progress, which undermines the collaborative spirit.^[1] By prohibiting denial, the "Yes, and..." rule averts dead-ends driven by argumentative opposition, instead cultivating trust among performers and enabling creative risk-taking within a supportive framework. It draws from early improvisation pedagogies that sought to transcend rigid scripting, emphasizing intuitive connection over intellectual control.^[1]

Supporting Techniques

Supporting techniques in improvisation complement the foundational "yes, and..." principle by providing structured ways to deepen scene development while preserving acceptance and collaboration. These methods—endowment, heightening, and tilting—serve as extensions that encourage improvisers to build richer narratives without negating prior offers, fostering organic growth in ensemble performances. Endowment refers to the practice of assigning specific traits, roles, histories, or environmental details to fellow performers or props, thereby collaboratively enriching characters and settings. For instance, in response to a partner's initiation, an improviser might affirm it with, "Yes, and you're the fearless captain who's sailed these stormy seas for decades," instantly endowing the partner with expertise and backstory. This technique aligns with "yes, and..." by accepting the existing reality and adding constructive layers that invite further response, promoting character depth in real-time. As outlined in foundational improv texts, endowment games train performers to listen actively and contribute without overriding others. Heightening involves progressively intensifying the core "game" or unusual pattern within a scene to amplify emotional stakes, humor, or drama, always rooted in affirmative advancement. Starting from an initial offer like "It's starting to rain outside," an improviser might heighten through successive additions: "Yes, and now it's pouring so hard the streets are flooding," escalating to "Yes, and the floodwaters are rising to apocalyptic levels, forcing us to build an ark." This escalation maintains narrative momentum by building directly on accepted elements rather than introducing denials, ensuring the scene evolves dynamically. Heightening is emphasized as a key mechanism for sustaining engagement in long-form structures, where it transforms ordinary initiations into compelling arcs. Tilting, a concept introduced by Keith Johnstone, entails introducing a pivotal emotional shift, relational twist, or patterned behavior that "tilts" the established platform into heightened action, unifying the scene around a shared game. For example, after building a mundane conversation between colleagues, one improviser might tilt by responding affirmatively yet dramatically: "Yes, and suddenly I realize you're not just my boss—you're my long-lost sibling from a forgotten family feud." This creates instability and pattern for collaborative exploration, always predicated on accepting prior offers to avoid blocking. In practice, tilting enhances "yes, and..." by injecting specificity and unity, particularly in extended formats where it helps link beats without forcing unrelated changes.^[22] Unlike the core "yes, and..." rule, which focuses on basic acceptance and addition, these techniques function as specialized tools to refine and propel scenes forward, often integrated in long-form improvisation like the Harold—a structure pioneered by Del Close that interweaves multiple scenes through organic connections enabled by such methods. In the Harold, endowment might flesh out recurring characters across beats, heightening could amplify thematic games in group scenes, and tilting might pivot relationships to reveal deeper connections, all while upholding affirmative collaboration. This interplay ensures improvisers remain responsive and inventive, turning individual offers into cohesive ensemble storytelling.

Applications

In Performing Arts

In short-form improvisation, the "Yes, and..." principle facilitates the rapid evolution of quick scenes derived from audience-suggested prompts, as exemplified in performances at venues like The Second City. Performers accept the initial idea—such as an unusual occupation or scenario—and immediately add details to propel the sketch forward, creating concise, humorous vignettes that typically last 3-5 minutes. This technique ensures collaborative momentum, transforming potentially disjointed suggestions into cohesive, engaging content without blocking or negation.^[23] In long-form improvisation, "Yes, and..." integrates deeply into structures like the Harold or monoscene, where it sustains extended narrative arcs spanning 20-30 minutes by encouraging continuous acceptance and expansion of offers. The Harold, pioneered by Del Close, begins with an opening based on a single audience suggestion, followed by interconnected beats (first, second, and third) that reincorporate earlier elements; here, the principle promotes ensemble listening and agreement to weave disparate scenes into a unified, thematic story. Similarly, the monoscene format confines action to one location and set of characters, allowing improvisers to heighten relationships and conflicts through layered additions, resulting in a focused yet expansive single-scene performance.^[24] The "Yes, and..." approach from improv training also enhances scripted performing arts, particularly by equipping actors for unscripted elements in productions like Saturday Night Live. Cast members often train at improv hubs such as the Upright Citizens Brigade Theatre, where the technique builds skills in real-time adaptation and mutual support, enabling seamless pivots during live sketches or ad-libbed interactions. For instance, performers like Sasheer Zamata credit this training for fostering the spontaneity needed in SNL's dynamic, high-pressure environment.^[25] Prominent illustrations of "Yes, and..." appear in scenes from Whose Line Is It Anyway?, where the cast exemplifies real-time collaboration devoid of denial across various games. In "Scenes from a Hat," players draw audience-submitted prompts—like improbable inventions—and affirm each other's initial responses to construct escalating, absurd dialogues; likewise, "Helping Hands" requires one performer to use another's hands as puppets, demanding instant acceptance to maintain comedic flow. These segments highlight how the principle drives unpredictable yet synchronized improvisation, forming the backbone of the show's format.^[26]

In Professional and Educational Settings

In professional settings, the "Yes, and..." principle has been adapted for team-building workshops to foster innovation and collaboration. Companies such as Pixar have incorporated it into their Braintrust meetings, where team members accept and build upon creative ideas without immediate criticism, as encouraged by co-founder Ed Catmull to enhance storytelling and problem-solving.^[27] Similarly, Google employs improvisation-based workshops featuring "Yes, and..." exercises to strengthen ethical decision-making and team dynamics.^[28] These sessions often include collaborative storytelling activities, where participants sequentially add to a shared narrative, promoting idea generation and reducing hierarchical barriers in business environments.^[29] In educational contexts, "Yes, and..." supports student-led discussions across disciplines like literature and science by encouraging learners to affirm and expand on peers' contributions rather than dismissing them. For instance, in literature classes, it facilitates interpretive dialogues on texts, while in science, it aids in iteratively building hypotheses during group inquiries.^[30] This approach, derived from improvisational techniques, enhances engagement in case-based or whole-class discussions by requiring students to preface responses with "Yes, and..." to affirm prior ideas.^[31] Therapeutic applications of "Yes, and..." appear in applied improv therapy programs targeting social anxiety, where it cultivates empathy through mutual acceptance of contributions and minimizes confrontational interactions. Participants practice exercises that emphasize agreeing with and extending others' statements, fostering supportive group dynamics.^[32] Research on improv training has shown its efficacy in reducing social anxiety symptoms by promoting non-judgmental listening and response patterns.^[33] As of 2025, the principle has also been adapted in dementia care, where geriatricians use improv techniques to train caregivers in validating patients' realities and building emotional connections, reducing dismissals and enhancing comfort.^[34] Key programs illustrate these adaptations, including Second City's corporate training initiatives, which began in the 1980s under names like the Second City Comedy Marketing Group to apply improv principles to professional skills development.^[35] Additionally, Keith Johnstone's Theatresports format has been implemented in school settings to support conflict resolution, using competitive yet collaborative improv games to build positive social interactions among youth.^[36]

Analysis and Impact

The practice of "Yes, and..." in improvisation enhances cognitive flexibility and creativity by encouraging participants to accept and build upon ideas without negation, which reduces inhibitory mental barriers and promotes divergent thinking. Studies have shown that improvisation training, incorporating principles like "Yes, and...," leads to significant improvements in generating novel ideas and breaking from conventional thought patterns, as measured by tasks assessing fluency and originality in responses. This effect is attributed to the technique's role in lowering cognitive load associated with rejection or critique, allowing for freer associative processes that foster innovative problem-solving. For instance, experimental interventions demonstrate that even brief exposure to improv exercises increases scores on divergent thinking tests, linking the approach to broader creative capacities beyond performance contexts. On the social front, "Yes, and..." cultivates trust and rapport within groups by emphasizing affirmation and collaboration, creating a supportive environment that mitigates interpersonal conflicts. Research indicates that improv-based interventions, guided by this principle, reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in clinical populations, with participants reporting lower scores on standardized scales after short-term group sessions focused on acceptance and co-creation. These dynamics emerge from the technique's structure, which prioritizes mutual support over individual dominance, fostering psychological safety and stronger relational bonds as evidenced in qualitative analyses of group interactions. Such outcomes highlight how "Yes, and..." shifts group energy toward collective progress, enhancing overall cohesion without requiring extended training. Interpersonally, "Yes, and..." bolsters active listening and empathy by training individuals to fully attend to others' contributions before responding, thereby redirecting focus from self-centered narratives to shared storytelling. Empirical evidence from improv workshops shows measurable gains in empathy metrics, such as perspective-taking, among participants who practice affirmative responses, with pre- and post-intervention surveys revealing heightened emotional attunement. This skill transfer occurs because the technique encourages non-judgmental engagement, promoting deeper understanding and responsiveness in everyday interactions. Overall, these benefits are supported by a growing body of empirical research, including randomized pilots and controlled trials from the 2010s onward, which consistently link "Yes, and..."-driven improv to enhanced cognitive and social outcomes like improved problem-solving and reduced emotional distress.

Criticisms and Limitations

The "Yes, and..." principle risks over-acceptance, which can lead to unrealistic scenarios in improvisational scenes or enable toxic behaviors by ignoring personal or group boundaries, particularly in power-imbalanced settings where one participant dominates without pushback. For instance, responding to a verbal attack with unqualified agreement, such as "Yes, you're right and I'm wrong and I'm a bad person," fails to blend constructively and may erode individual agency rather than promote healthy collaboration.^[37] This pitfall arises because unconditional acceptance can be misconstrued as passivity or resignation, potentially stifling necessary resistance or change in dynamic interactions.^[37] The principle's Western emphasis on direct positivity and explicit agreement may conflict with communication norms in collectivist cultures, where indirect styles prioritize harmony through subtlety rather than overt affirmation, as outlined in cross-cultural analyses of high-context versus low-context interactions.^[38] Such biases highlight how "Yes, and..." assumes a low-context environment conducive to bold acceptance, potentially alienating participants from backgrounds favoring nuanced, face-saving responses over enthusiastic buildup. In practical applications, blind application of "Yes, and..." in high-stakes environments like negotiations can undermine effective pushback, especially amid power imbalances that favor one party, rendering affirmative strategies insufficient for equitable outcomes. This limitation underscores the principle's constraints outside supportive, low-risk contexts, where unbridled acceptance might exacerbate disparities rather than resolve conflicts. Critiques have prompted adaptations, such as "Yes, but...," which introduces complications or qualifiers to handle nuanced scenarios while avoiding outright denial, as explored in modern improvisational literature. These modifications aim to balance collaboration with realism, though they require careful facilitation to prevent devolving into blocking. While such limitations contrast with the principle's established psychological benefits in fostering rapport, they emphasize the need for contextual tailoring.

References

[1]
Improv, explained | University of Chicago News
The origins of the exact phrase “yes, and” are a little hazy, but Sweet says he wouldn't be surprised if they came from Del Close, Elaine May and Mike Nichols.
[2]
What is Yes, and/Accepting Influence | IGI Global Scientific Publishing
the guiding principle of improv in which a person accepts (the “yes”) and then adds onto the suggestion of another player (the “and”). Published in Chapter:.
[3]
What is Longform Improv? - Big Blue Door
May 9, 2012 · The basic agree-and-add principle called by improvisers 'Yes and… ... This principle is usually credited to Elaine May and Del Close while in a ...
[4]
Yes And - IRC Improv Wiki
Sep 9, 2025 · Yes And is a concept thought by many to be the defining principle of improvisational theory. It suggests that improvisers are obligated to accept the offers of ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[5]
“Yes and...”: Introducing Improvisational Theatre Techniques to the ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Improvisation technique is based on five guidelines: (a) Have fun and relax: there is not a right/wrong idea (Moshavi 2001) ; (b) Yes, and … : ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
Using Improv to Inspire Inclusion - Lerner - University of Delaware
Sep 27, 2023 · Based on the popular “Yes, And” principle of improvisation, this exercise builds on Nicholas Epley's work on the power of gratitude to help ...
[7]
How The 'Yes, And?' Mindset Helps Build Resilience - Forbes
Mar 28, 2025 · “Yes, And?” works because it mirrors how resilience actually develops: through acceptance, adaptation and continuous forward motion.
[8]
Free to Experience: Viola Spolin and the Invention of Improvisation
Its very early roots are actually in a Chicago settlement house, where a young woman learned about group play from a sociologist. That young woman, Viola Spolin ...
[9]
[PDF] A Study on the Origins of Viola Spolin's Theatrical Education - ERIC
Spolin introduced the games into workshops for adult professional actors from the mid-1950s to the mid-1960s when she conducted workshops at The Compass and The ...Missing: 1940s | Show results with:1940s
[10]
Viola Spolin and the Origins of Modern Improvisational Theater
Sep 27, 2023 · In the 1940s and 1950s, Viola Spolin started working with children in Chicago's Hull House, a settlement house known for its progressive social ...
[11]
Demonstrating Viola Spolin's Theater Games | Chicago Stories
In Mirror, two players stand facing one another. One player initiates movement while the other attempts to copy their exact movements. Spolin has a few ...Missing: Take | Show results with:Take
[12]
Give and Take Archives - Improvisational Library and Training
Oct 18, 2018 · Viola Spolin is the internationally recognized originator of Theater Games – the basis of improvisational theater. Along with her son, Paul ...
[13]
Biography - Viola Spolin
Now widely viewed as the first modern improvisational theater, Compass' innovations were in large part based on the teaching of Spolin.Missing: 1940s | Show results with:1940s
[14]
Improvisational Theater - Encyclopedia of Chicago
That was achieved in Chicago in 1955, when David Shepherd and Paul Sills started an ensemble called the Compass Players. Set up in a Hyde Park bar, just blocks ...
[15]
Paul Sills - The Second City
His mark on The Second City's history is indelible. Born in 1927, Paul Sills was the son of Viola Spolin. He used the improv games his mother invented to create ...
[16]
A Brief History of Improvisation: Spolin and Sills Laid Down The Rules
Viola Spolin is the internationally recognized originator of Theater Games – the basis of improvisational theater. Along with her son, Paul Sills, Viola Spolin ...Missing: 1940s | Show results with:1940s<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Del Close - The Second City
Close soon hooked up with The Committee, an improv group in San Francisco. ... Ready to say “yes, and…” to Costa Rica? The Second. We said farewell and ...Missing: origin - | Show results with:origin -
[18]
About Us | iO Improv
The founders of iO Theater- Charna Halpern, Del Close ... Halpern then met Second City director Del Close and approached him about teaching at ImprovOlympic.
[19]
Del Close and the Influence of Long Form Improvisation On ... - jstor
... Second. City and iO (formerly known as ImprovOlympic), Close introduced Harold to his students, practiced, developed, and refined it over the course of three.
[20]
[PDF] TS_Guide_ENG.pdf - International Theatresports Institute
Mar 31, 2019 · He founded the improvisation group The Theatre Machine in the 1960's, which toured Europe and North America and was invited by the Canadian ...
[21]
The Trouble with Yes, and... - Spolin Games Online
Among them Del Close, Johnstone, Dudley Riggs, and Second City. One concept that came into popular use after Spolin codified the first methodology is “Yes and…Missing: iO | Show results with:iO
[22]
Impro for Storytellers - Keith Johnstone - Google Books
Jan 21, 2014 · Impro for Storytellers aims to take jealous and self-obsessed beginners and teach them to play games with good nature and to fail gracefully.
[23]
Yes, And ... 5 More Lessons In Improv-ing Collaboration And ...
Feb 26, 2015 · Second City's “Yes, And” exercise “Word at a Time” trains people to create a tall tale by taking turns building sentences one word at a time.Missing: short- | Show results with:short-
[24]
The Harold: A Cornerstone of Long-Form Improv – New York Improv ...
... Why The Harold Works. The Harold is a testament to: Ensemble Listening: The continuous attention and responsiveness among players. Agreement: The “yes, and ...
[25]
How the Upright Citizens Brigade Improvised a Comedy Empire
Aug 29, 2016 · And, for their offspring, there are onesies imprinted with the words “Yes, and.” When Sasheer Zamata, a current “Saturday Night Live” cast ...<|separator|>
[26]
Pixar's Famous Braintrust Meetings Exemplify The Power of ...
Oct 29, 2024 · A famous example comes from Pixar, where co-founder Ed Catmull encouraged a “Yes, and” culture to stimulate creative storytelling. Pixar's “ ...
[27]
Improvisation for companies - Expat Improv
May 31, 2025 · Google uses improvisation-based workshops to strengthen ethical ... Core improv skills such as agreement ("Yes, and...") and emotional ...
[28]
Say 'Yes, And' to Innovation: Improv Techniques Revolutionizing ...
According to a Fast Company article, Pixar's Braintrust sessions embrace the "Yes, And" philosophy, enabling team members to offer and build on ideas without ...
[29]
“Yes, and” as Teaching-Learning Methodology
Apr 8, 2017 · Here we present 'Yes, and,' a concept derived from improvisational theatre, as a teaching-learning methodology that supports engaged experiential learning.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[30]
4 Ways to Ensure All Students Engage in Case Discussions
Mar 13, 2025 · “Yes, and . . .” rule: Encourage students to build on each other's ideas by saying “Yes, and . . .” before their comment, rather than ...
[31]
Improv as a Powerful Clinical Tool
Sep 6, 2019 · In improv, the rule of “Yes, and…” acts as a social frame guiding all participants to unconditional accept another's offer without judgement or ...
[32]
The use of improvisational theater training to reduce social anxiety ...
Week two focuses on accepting and building on each other's ideas with the “golden rule” “Yes, and” (Berk & Trieber, 2009), using exercises such as “One Word ...<|separator|>
[33]
Training Creativity: The Scientists Say Improvise - The Second City
Jun 14, 2018 · When The Second City first started offering corporate workshops in the 1980's under the names of The Second City Comedy Marketing Group and ...
[34]
Use of theatresports to promote positive education among youth ...
May 19, 2023 · This study examined the outcomes of theatresports as a means to implement positive education in youth work settings.
[35]
[PDF] “Yes, and”: Acceptance, Resistance, and Change in Improv, Aikido ...
The article explores applying a yes, and approach to the processing of negative emotions. It also discusses possible applications of improv training in couples ...
[36]
[PDF] Communication Styles - Think Cultural Health
The table below outlines different aspects of communication styles and how they tend to vary across cultures. Being aware of how communication styles tend ...
[37]
The Pros and Cons of Getting to Yes - Shortcomings and Limitations ...
This paper examines the alleged shortcomings and limitations of principled bargaining in negotiation and mediation and analyses whether the criticism raised ...