Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Science

Science is the systematic pursuit of knowledge about the natural world through empirical observation, hypothesis formulation, experimentation, and iterative refinement based on . This approach emphasizes testable predictions, replicability, and as core principles to distinguish reliable explanations from unsubstantiated claims. Unlike dogmatic or anecdotal assertions, scientific claims must withstand scrutiny via controlled tests that can potentially disprove them, ensuring progress through correction rather than accumulation of unverified assertions. The typically involves observing phenomena, posing questions, developing hypotheses, designing experiments to test predictions, analyzing , and drawing conclusions that inform or further . This iterative process, rooted in from repeatable evidence, has yielded transformative achievements, including the elucidation of planetary motion, the enabling antibiotics like penicillin, and underpinning modern electronics. Historical milestones, such as the 17th-century shift from geocentric models to via telescopic observations and mathematical modeling, exemplify how empirical challenges overturn prior assumptions. Despite these successes, science grapples with controversies like the , where systematic failures to reproduce results in fields such as and —often exceeding 50% non-replication rates—reveal vulnerabilities to , p-hacking, and underpowered studies. These issues, amplified by institutional pressures favoring novel over robust findings, highlight the necessity of preregistration, , and meta-analytic scrutiny to uphold empirical rigor, even as they underscore science's self-correcting nature when biases in academic incentives are confronted.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition and Distinctions

constitutes the disciplined pursuit of understanding the natural world through empirical observation, experimentation, and the development of falsifiable hypotheses that yield testable predictions. This process emphasizes , where independent investigators can verify results under controlled conditions, and relies on inductive and to generalize from specific to broader principles. Explanations in science are constrained to mechanisms observable and measurable within the physical , excluding or metaphysical claims that cannot be empirically assessed. A defining feature of science is its commitment to , as articulated by philosopher in the mid-20th century: for a theory to qualify as scientific, it must entail observable consequences that could potentially refute it, rather than merely accommodating all outcomes through unfalsifiable adjustments. This criterion distinguishes science from , which often presents claims resembling scientific inquiry—such as or certain practices—but evades rigorous disconfirmation by shifting explanations post hoc or prioritizing confirmatory evidence over potential refutations. Scientific progress advances via iterative cycles of hypothesis testing, where surviving scrutiny strengthens theories, whereas pseudoscientific assertions typically resist empirical challenge and lack predictive power. Science further differentiates from philosophy and religion by its methodological naturalism and evidential standards: while philosophy explores conceptual foundations and ethics through logical argumentation, and religion posits truths via revelation or faith, science demands material evidence and quantitative validation, rendering it agnostic toward untestable propositions like ultimate origins or moral absolutes. This demarcation ensures science's self-correcting nature, as evidenced by historical paradigm shifts like the replacement of geocentric models with through telescopic observations contradicting prior doctrines. Yet, science's scope remains provisional; theories represent the best current approximations, subject to revision with new data, underscoring its distinction from dogmatic systems that claim .

Etymology and Historical Terminology

The English word science derives from the Latin scientia, signifying "knowledge" or "a knowing," which stems from the verb scire, meaning "to know" or "to discern." This root traces back to Proto-Indo-European origins, though its precise etymology remains uncertain, with scientia originally encompassing any assured or systematic understanding, including moral, theological, and practical domains rather than exclusively empirical inquiry. The term entered Old French as science around the 12th century, denoting learning or a corpus of human knowledge, before being adopted into Middle English by the mid-14th century to describe the "state of knowing" or accumulated expertise acquired through study. Historically, scientia served as the Latin translation of the Greek epistēmē, a concept central to philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, who used it to denote justified true belief or demonstrative knowledge distinct from mere opinion (doxa) or practical skill (technē). In antiquity and the medieval period, what modern usage terms "science" was broadly classified under philosophia naturalis (natural philosophy), encompassing inquiries into nature's causes via reason and observation, as articulated by thinkers from Aristotle's Physica to Islamic scholars like Avicenna, who integrated Greek epistēmē with empirical methods in works like Kitab al-Shifa. By the Renaissance, terms like physica or "physic" persisted in English for natural studies, reflecting Aristotelian divisions, while "natural history" described descriptive compilations of phenomena, as in Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia (77 CE). The narrowing of "science" to its contemporary sense—systematic, empirical investigation of the physical world—occurred gradually during the Scientific Revolution, with fuller specialization by 1725 in English usage, coinciding with the exclusion of non-empirical fields like theology. Practitioners were initially termed "natural philosophers" or "cultivators of science," but in 1833–1834, Cambridge philosopher William Whewell proposed "scientist" as a neutral descriptor analogous to "artist," replacing gendered or class-laden alternatives amid the professionalization of disciplines like chemistry and biology. This shift reflected broader terminological evolution, where Greek-derived suffixes like -logia (e.g., biologia coined in 1802 by Gottfried Reinhold Treviranus) proliferated to denote specialized empirical studies, distinguishing them from speculative philosophy. Earlier, medieval Latin texts often used scientia experimentalis for knowledge gained through trial, as in Roger Bacon's 13th-century advocacy for verification over authority, prefiguring modern distinctions.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Classical Origins

The earliest recorded precursors to scientific inquiry appeared in the agricultural civilizations of and around 3500–3000 BCE, where empirical observations supported practical needs like flood prediction, land measurement, and celestial tracking for calendars. In , development of writing circa 3200 BCE enabled scribes to document systematic records of economic transactions, astronomical events, and basic computations, marking the transition from ad hoc knowledge to codified data. These efforts prioritized utility over abstract theory, with focused on solving real-world problems such as dividing fields or calculating interest, reflecting causal reasoning grounded in observable patterns rather than speculative metaphysics. Babylonian advancements in and astronomy, building on foundations, flourished from approximately 2000 BCE to 539 BCE, utilizing a numeral system that persists in modern time and angle measurements. Tablets from this period demonstrate proficiency in equations, , and approximations of irrational numbers like square roots, with (circa 1800 BCE) listing Pythagorean triples—pairs of integers satisfying a^2 + b^2 = c^2—indicating empirical of ratios through proportional reasoning rather than axiomatic proof. Astronomical records, including clay tablets detailing planetary positions and lunar eclipses from as early as 1800 BCE, employed predictive algorithms based on accumulated observations, achieving accuracies sufficient for agricultural and astrological forecasting without reliance on uniform models later adopted in . In , scientific practices similarly emphasized empirical application, with documented in papyri like the (circa 1650 BCE) addressing problems in arithmetic, , and volume calculations essential for pyramid construction and inundation surveys. Egyptian geometers used a unit (run-to-rise ratio) for slope determination, solving linear equations implicitly to achieve precise alignments, as seen in the (circa 2580–2560 BCE), whose base approximates a square with sides varying by less than 20 cm over 230 meters. Medical knowledge, preserved in texts such as the (circa 1550 BCE), cataloged over 700 remedies derived from trial-and-error observations of herbal effects, surgical techniques, and anatomical descriptions, prioritizing observable symptoms and outcomes over humoral theories. established a 365-day by circa 3000 BCE, aligning solar years with cycles through star observations like the of Sothis, demonstrating causal links between celestial periodicity and terrestrial agriculture. These Mesopotamian and contributions laid foundational techniques in quantification and , though intertwined with religious —such as Babylonian omen texts interpreting events—their reliance on verifiable data and repeatable methods prefigured later scientific , distinct from purely mythical explanations prevalent in prehistoric oral traditions. Early Chinese records from the (circa 1600–1046 BCE) similarly show inscriptions tracking eclipses and calendars, but Near Eastern systems provided the most extensive preserved evidence of proto-scientific systematization before Hellenistic synthesis.

Classical Antiquity and Hellenistic Advances

In Classical Antiquity, particularly from the 6th century BCE onward in Ionian Greece, thinkers began seeking naturalistic explanations for phenomena, marking a departure from mythological accounts. Thales of Miletus (c. 624–546 BCE), often regarded as the first philosopher, proposed water as the fundamental substance underlying all matter and reportedly predicted a solar eclipse in 585 BCE using geometric reasoning derived from Babylonian observations. His successors, Anaximander and Anaximenes, extended this by positing the apeiron (boundless) and air as primary principles, respectively, emphasizing empirical observation and rational speculation over divine intervention. Pythagoras (c. 570–495 BCE) and his school advanced as a means to uncover cosmic order, discovering the for right triangles and linking numerical ratios to musical harmonies, which influenced later views of the universe as mathematically structured. Democritus (c. 460–370 BCE) introduced , theorizing that the universe consists of indivisible particles (atomos) moving in a void, a mechanistic model anticipating modern , though it lacked experimental verification at the time. Hippocrates of (c. 460–370 BCE) founded the basis of Western medicine by emphasizing clinical observation, prognosis, and natural causes of disease over supernatural ones, compiling case histories and articulating the humoral theory—positing imbalances in blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile as disease origins—which guided diagnostics for centuries. (384–322 BCE) systematized knowledge across disciplines, classifying over 500 animal species based on empirical dissections and observations, developing syllogistic logic as a for , and formulating theories of motion and (material, formal, efficient, final causes) that dominated until the . The , following the Great's conquests (323–31 BCE), saw scientific inquiry flourish in cosmopolitan centers like Alexandria's , supported by royal patronage and the , which amassed vast collections for scholars. (fl. c. 300 BCE) codified in his Elements, presenting 13 books of theorems derived from five axioms and postulates, establishing deductive proof as the standard for mathematical rigor and influencing fields from to astronomy. Archimedes of Syracuse (c. 287–212 BCE) pioneered with his principle of —stating that a submerged body displaces fluid equal to its weight—applied in devices like the screw pump for , and approximated π between 3 10/71 and 3 1/7 using polygonal methods, while devising levers capable of moving the in principle. In astronomy, (c. 310–230 BCE) proposed a heliocentric model with the rotating daily and orbiting , estimating relative sizes but facing rejection due to inconsistencies with geocentric observations; (c. 276–194 BCE) calculated at approximately 252,000 stadia (about 39,000–46,000 km, close to modern 40,075 km) via angle measurements from shadows in and Syene. Ptolemy (c. 100–170 CE), synthesizing Hellenistic traditions, detailed a geocentric system in the using epicycles and deferents to model planetary retrograde motion with trigonometric tables, achieving predictive accuracy for eclipses and conjunctions that endured until Copernicus. Advances in medicine included Herophilus (c. 335–280 BCE) and (c. 304–250 BCE) performing human dissections in , identifying nerves, the brain's role in intelligence, and distinguishing arteries from veins, though vivisections on criminals raised ethical concerns later suppressed under Roman influence.

Medieval Period and Non-Western Contributions

In following the fall of the around 476 , scientific knowledge from antiquity was largely preserved rather than advanced, with monastic institutions serving as key repositories for copying classical texts in Latin. Figures such as (c. 560–636 ) compiled encyclopedic works like Etymologies, synthesizing Greco-Roman learning on and astronomy, while the Venerable (c. 673–735 ) contributed to computus, refining calculations for dating based on empirical observations of lunar cycles. Despite narratives of stagnation, medieval scholars developed practical technologies, including mechanical clocks by the late and eyeglasses around 1286 , alongside early empirical approaches in and through trial-and-error herbalism in monastic gardens. Universities emerging from the , such as (1088 ) and (c. 1150 ), fostered , integrating Aristotelian logic with , though emphasis on authority over experimentation limited novel discoveries. Parallel to these efforts, the during the (c. 8th–13th centuries) drove significant advancements by translating and expanding upon , , and texts in centers like Baghdad's , established under Caliph (r. 813–833 CE). Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi (c. 780–850 CE) systematized in Al-Kitab al-Mukhtasar fi Hisab al-Jabr wal-Muqabala (c. 820 CE), introducing methods for solving linear and quadratic equations that influenced later European mathematics. In optics, (965–1040 CE) pioneered the through experimentation in Kitab al-Manazir (c. 1011–1021 CE), disproving emission theories of vision and describing refraction and the , laying groundwork for in and physics. Medical compendia like Ibn Sina's (c. 1025 CE) integrated , , and clinical trials, remaining a standard text in until the 17th century. These works, often building causally on preserved empirical data rather than pure speculation, were later translated into Latin via and in the 12th century, facilitating Europe's recovery of classical knowledge. In , mathematical and astronomical traditions persisted from earlier texts, with scholars like Bhaskara II (1114–1185 CE) advancing calculus precursors in Lilavati (c. 1150 CE), including solutions to indeterminate equations and early concepts of through geometric proofs. Indian astronomers refined heliocentric elements and , as in the Siddhanta Shiromani, calculating planetary positions with sine tables accurate to within arcminutes, influencing and Islamic computations. During China's (960–1279 CE), technological innovations emphasized practical engineering over theoretical abstraction, with formulas refined for military use by the 10th century, enabling bombs, rockets, and cannons documented in texts like the (1044 CE). The magnetic evolved into a reliable navigational tool by the , using needles in water bowls for maritime expansion, while movable-type printing (c. 1040 CE by ) accelerated knowledge dissemination. These developments, driven by state-sponsored in civil and naval projects, contrasted with Europe's feudal fragmentation.

Scientific Revolution and Early Modern Era

The , occurring primarily between the mid-16th and late 17th centuries, represented a profound transformation in , shifting emphasis from qualitative Aristotelian explanations and reliance on ancient authorities to , mathematical modeling, and direct empirical observation of natural phenomena. This era's advancements were driven by innovations in instrumentation, such as the , and a growing commitment to experimentation, laying the groundwork for and astronomy. Key developments challenged the Ptolemaic geocentric system, which posited as the unmoving surrounded by , in favor of evidence-based alternatives. Nicolaus initiated this shift with the 1543 publication of , proposing a heliocentric model in which occupied the center, with and other planets orbiting it in circular paths, thereby simplifying compared to the epicycle-laden geocentric framework. Although Copernicus retained some circular orbits and deferred full endorsement to avoid controversy, his work provided a conceptual that subsequent observers built upon through precise measurements. Tycho Brahe's meticulous naked-eye observations from 1576 to 1601, including comet trajectories that pierced supposedly solid , supplied the data needed to refine these ideas, though Brahe himself favored a geo-heliocentric hybrid. Johannes Kepler, using Brahe's data after 1601, formulated three empirical laws of planetary motion: first, orbits are ellipses with at one focus (); second, a line from a to sweeps equal areas in equal times, implying varying speeds (); and third, the square of a 's orbital period is proportional to the cube of its semi-major axis (1619). These laws discarded , aligning with and enabling predictions of planetary positions with unprecedented accuracy. Galileo Galilei advanced this empirical turn by improving the in , observing Jupiter's (thus demonstrating orbiting bodies beyond ), the (consistent only with ), and , which refuted the Aristotelian doctrine of perfect, unchanging heavens. His 1632 Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems publicly defended Copernicanism, leading to a 1633 Inquisition trial where he was convicted of for asserting as fact rather than hypothesis, resulting in until his death in 1642. Galileo's kinematic studies, including falling bodies and , emphasized mathematics as the language of nature, prefiguring unified physical laws. In biology and medicine, William Harvey demonstrated in 1628, through vivisections and quantitative measurements of blood volume, that blood circulates continuously as a closed loop pumped by the heart, overturning Galen's ancient model of ebb-and-flow tides and establishing circulation as a mechanical process verifiable by experiment. Harvey's work quantified cardiac output, estimating the heart pumps about two ounces per beat, multiplying to over 500 ounces daily—far exceeding bodily blood volume—thus proving unidirectional flow. Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687) synthesized these threads into a comprehensive mechanical framework, articulating three laws of motion— inertia, F=ma, and action-reaction—and the law of universal gravitation, positing that every mass attracts every other with force proportional to product of masses and inverse-square of distance. By deriving Kepler's laws from these principles, Newton demonstrated celestial and terrestrial mechanics as governed by the same quantifiable rules, applicable from falling apples to orbiting planets, without invoking occult qualities. This causal unification, rooted in mathematical deduction from observed effects, marked a pinnacle of the era's method. Methodologically, Francis Bacon's (1620) advocated from systematic observations and experiments to generalize laws, critiquing deductive syllogisms and "idols" of the mind—biases like unexamined traditions—that distort inquiry. Bacon's tables of presence, absence, and degrees aimed to eliminate variables incrementally, promoting collaborative, cumulative knowledge over isolated speculation. In chemistry, Robert Boyle's corpuscular theory viewed matter as composed of minute, shape- and size-varying particles in motion, whose interactions explain properties like gas pressure; his 1662 experiments established (PV constant at fixed ), distinguishing chemical experimentation from alchemical mysticism. Institutionalization accelerated progress: the Royal Society of London, founded November 28, 1660, and chartered in 1662 by , fostered empirical verification through weekly meetings, publications like Philosophical Transactions (from 1665), and rejection of untested claims, embodying Baconian ideals of organized inquiry. Similar academies emerged in (1666), promoting standardized methods amid Europe's intellectual networks. These developments, while facing resistance from entrenched , propelled science toward predictive power and , influencing the Early Modern Era's broader .

19th-Century Industrialization of Science

The 19th century witnessed the transformation of science from an avocation of elite amateurs into a structured profession integrated with industrial and academic institutions. This shift, often termed the professionalization of science, involved the creation of dedicated research facilities, formalized training programs, and career paths dependent on institutional support rather than private patronage. Key drivers included the demands of the for technological advancements and the emulation of rigorous organizational models from emerging nation-states. By mid-century, scientific output surged, with specialized journals proliferating to disseminate findings rapidly. Pioneering laboratories exemplified this industrialization. established a model and in chemistry at the in 1824, training over 1,000 students in standardized experimental methods that emphasized and . This approach influenced global chemical and contributed to applications, such as synthetic dyes and fertilizers, fostering a feedback loop between academic and manufacturing. In , the Royal Institution, founded in 1799 but expanded under and , hosted systematic investigations into , while the at opened in 1874 to advance . Institutional frameworks solidified scientific practice. The term "" was introduced by philosopher in 1833 to denote full-time investigators, reflecting the era's recognition of science as a distinct vocation. Universities adopted the German Humboldtian ideal of research-oriented education, with the degree standardizing advanced training; in the United States, established in 1876, exemplified this by prioritizing graduate research over undergraduate instruction. Scientific societies expanded, such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science founded in 1848, which coordinated efforts and lobbied for funding. Government and industry investment grew, with Britain's recording over 10,000 patents annually by the 1880s, many rooted in scientific principles. This era's industrialization accelerated discoveries but introduced tensions, including competition for resources and the alignment of research agendas with economic priorities. Empirical methodologies refined through repeated experimentation yielded breakthroughs in and , underpinning the Second Industrial Revolution from the 1870s. However, reliance on institutional funding raised questions about independence, as private enterprises like the established in-house labs by 1875 to pursue proprietary innovations. Overall, these developments scaled scientific production, making it a cornerstone of modern technological progress.

20th-Century Theoretical and Experimental Revolutions

The 20th century marked transformative shifts in scientific understanding, primarily through revolutions in physics that redefined space, time, matter, and energy, with subsequent experimental validations enabling technological applications like nuclear power and semiconductors. Theoretical advancements began with Max Planck's 1900 quantum hypothesis, which posited that electromagnetic radiation is emitted and absorbed in discrete packets of energy called quanta to resolve discrepancies in blackbody radiation spectra. Albert Einstein's 1905 special theory of relativity challenged classical notions by establishing that the laws of physics are the same for all non-accelerating observers and that the speed of light is constant, leading to consequences such as time dilation and mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²). Einstein extended this in 1915 with general relativity, describing gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy, later confirmed by observations like the 1919 solar eclipse deflection of starlight. Quantum mechanics emerged as a comprehensive framework in the 1920s, building on Planck's and Einstein's 1905 explanation of the , where light behaves as particles (s) to eject electrons from metals. Bohr's 1913 atomic model incorporated quantized electron orbits to explain hydrogen's spectral lines, bridging classical and quantum ideas by postulating stationary states and emission during transitions. Werner Heisenberg's 1927 formalized the inherent limits on simultaneously measuring a particle's and , underscoring the probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena rather than deterministic trajectories. These developments culminated in (Heisenberg, 1925) and wave mechanics (Schrödinger, 1926), unifying into a theory predicting atomic and subatomic behaviors with unprecedented accuracy, though interpretations like emphasized observer-dependent outcomes. Experimental breakthroughs validated these theories and spurred further revolutions. Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann's 1938 discovery of nuclear fission, where uranium nuclei split upon neutron bombardment to release energy and lighter elements like barium, built on quantum insights into nuclear stability and enabled chain reactions harnessed in the 1940s Manhattan Project. In biology, James Watson and Francis Crick's 1953 double-helix model of DNA elucidated genetic information storage via base pairing, integrating chemical structure with heredity and paving the way for molecular biology. Geosciences underwent a with , accepted in the late 1960s after evidence from , magnetic striping, and distributions showed continents drift on lithospheric plates driven by . In cosmology, Edwin Hubble's 1929 observation of galactic redshifts supported an expanding universe, bolstering Georges Lemaître's 1927 primeval atom hypothesis (later ), with decisive 1965 detection of radiation by Penzias and Wilson providing relic heat from the early universe. These revolutions, grounded in empirical verification, expanded science's explanatory power while revealing fundamental limits, such as quantum indeterminacy and relativistic invariance.

Post-1945 Expansion and Contemporary Frontiers

The end of marked a pivotal shift in the scale and organization of scientific endeavor, driven by recognition of science's wartime contributions such as the and advancements. In 1945, Vannevar Bush's report Science, the Endless Frontier argued for sustained federal investment in to maintain national security and economic prosperity, influencing the establishment of the (NSF) in 1950 with an initial budget of $3.5 million, which grew to support thousands of grants annually by the 1960s. Federal R&D funding in the United States, negligible before the war, expanded to encompass over 50% of by the late , fostering national laboratories like and Argonne, and international collaborations such as founded in 1954 for exploration. This era saw "" emerge, characterized by large-scale, capital-intensive projects requiring interdisciplinary teams and substantial resources. The launch of Sputnik by the in prompted a surge in U.S. funding, leading to NASA's creation in 1958 and the Apollo program's achievement of the in 1969, which involved over 400,000 personnel and advanced rocketry, , and . In biology, the 1953 elucidation of DNA's double helix structure by , Crick, , and Wilkins laid foundations for , culminating in the Human Genome Project's completion in 2003, which sequenced the human genome at a cost of $2.7 billion using international consortia. Computing advanced from the 1947 invention of the at to integrated circuits and the ARPANET precursor of the in 1969, enabling data-driven research across disciplines. Particle physics progressed through accelerators like the Stanford Linear Accelerator (operational 1966) and (1967), confirming the Standard Model's quarks and gluons by the 1970s, with the discovery at CERN's in 2012 validating mass-generation mechanisms. Biomedical fields expanded with penicillin's post-war and recombinant DNA techniques in the 1970s, leading to industries valued at trillions by the 2020s. Contemporary frontiers encompass quantum technologies, where Google's 2019 demonstration of highlighted computational potentials beyond classical limits, though scalability remains challenged by decoherence. Gene editing via CRISPR-Cas9, developed in 2012, achieved FDA approval for sickle cell treatment in 2023, enabling precise genomic modifications but raising ethical concerns over germline edits. In cosmology, the Space Telescope's 2021 deployment revealed early universe galaxies, probing and comprising 95% of the cosmos, while fusion experiments like the National Ignition Facility's 2022 net gain advance sustainable prospects. , powered by frameworks since the 2010s, drives applications in predictions via (2020) and autonomous systems, yet faces scrutiny over demands and alignment with human values. Climate research, amid debates over modeling reliability and policy influences, utilizes satellite data for tracking phenomena like ice melt, with partisan divides evident in surveys showing 90% Democratic versus 30% acceptance of anthropogenic warming in the U.S. These pursuits, supported by global R&D expenditures exceeding $2 trillion annually by 2020, underscore science's institutionalization but highlight tensions between empirical rigor and institutional biases in funding allocation.

Scientific Method and Epistemology

Principles of Empirical Inquiry

Empirical inquiry constitutes the foundational approach in science for deriving knowledge from direct , , and verifiable rather than untested assumptions or . This insists that claims about natural phenomena must be grounded in data accessible through the senses or precise , enabling replication and scrutiny. As articulated in guidelines from the , it involves posing hypotheses that are empirically testable and designing studies capable of ruling out alternative explanations through controlled evidence collection. Central to empirical inquiry is the principle of systematic observation, which requires recording phenomena according to explicit protocols that specify what data to gather, from where, and in what manner to minimize variability and ensure comparability. This approach counters subjective interpretation by emphasizing quantifiable metrics—such as lengths measured to 0.1 mm precision or temperatures logged via calibrated thermometers—over anecdotal reports. serves as a cornerstone, mandating that observations yield consistent results when repeated by different investigators under identical conditions, as demonstrated in foundational experiments like Galileo's telescopic observations of Jupiter's moons, which multiple astronomers verified shortly thereafter. Another key principle is objectivity through methodological controls, which seeks to isolate causal factors by varying one element while holding others constant, thereby attributing effects to specific rather than influences. For instance, in testing , dropping objects of varying masses in a eliminates air resistance as a , yielding a uniform 9.8 m/s² value across trials. Empirical thus privileges causal by demanding of mechanisms observable in the natural world, rejecting explanations reliant solely on theoretical constructs without supporting . This rigor has enabled self-correction in science, as erroneous claims—like the 19th-century of —succumb to contradictory empirical findings, such as Lavoisier's 1770s quantitative gas measurements revealing oxygen's role. Empirical principles also incorporate skepticism toward unverified generalizations, favoring inductive reasoning that builds from specific instances to tentative laws only after extensive data accumulation. Quantitative and qualitative data collection methods, such as randomized sampling in surveys yielding statistically significant p-values below 0.05, further ensure robustness against sampling errors. While institutional biases in data interpretation can arise—particularly in fields influenced by prevailing ideologies—adherence to these principles, including peer review and data transparency, provides mechanisms for detection and rectification, as seen in the retraction of over 10,000 papers annually due to evidential shortcomings reported by databases like Retraction Watch since 2010.

Hypothetico-Deductive Framework and Falsification

The hypothetico-deductive framework describes scientific inquiry as a process beginning with the formulation of a testable derived from a broader , followed by the logical of specific, predictions that the hypothesis entails under given conditions. These predictions are then subjected to empirical testing through controlled experiments or systematic observations; if the outcomes match the predictions, the hypothesis gains tentative corroboration, whereas discrepancies lead to its rejection or modification. This approach contrasts with strict , which relies on accumulating confirmatory instances to generalize theories, by emphasizing from general principles to particular testable claims. Central to this framework is the principle of falsification, articulated by philosopher Karl Popper in his 1934 work Logik der Forschung (published in English as The Logic of Scientific Discovery in 1959), which posits that a hypothesis or theory qualifies as scientific only if it is empirically falsifiable—meaning it prohibits certain outcomes and risks refutation by potential evidence. Popper argued that confirmation through repeated positive instances cannot conclusively verify universal theories, as an infinite number of confirmations remain logically possible without proving the theory true, but a single contradictory observation suffices to falsify it, thereby demarcating science from non-scientific pursuits like metaphysics or pseudoscience. For instance, Einstein's general theory of relativity advanced falsifiable predictions about light deflection during the 1919 solar eclipse, which, if unmet, would have refuted it; the observed confirmation thus provided strong but provisional support rather than irrefutable proof. Falsification underscores an asymmetric logic in hypothesis testing: while failed predictions decisively undermine a (barring adjustments to auxiliary assumptions), successful predictions merely fail to disprove it, aligning with causal realism by prioritizing mechanisms that could refute rather than affirm causal claims. Popper's criterion, however, has faced critiques for oversimplifying scientific practice; the Duhem-Quine thesis holds that no experiment isolates a single , as tests invariably involve background assumptions, allowing researchers to preserve favored theories by tweaking auxiliaries rather than abandoning the core idea. Empirical studies of scientific , such as Thomas Kuhn's analysis in (1962), reveal that paradigms persist amid anomalies until cumulative evidence prompts shifts, not strict single falsifications, suggesting falsification functions more as an ideal regulative principle than a literal historical descriptor. Despite these limitations, the framework promotes rigorous empirical scrutiny, reducing reliance on untested authority and fostering progress through bold, refutable conjectures.

Experimentation, Observation, and Verification

Experimentation in science involves the deliberate manipulation of one or more variables under rigorously controlled conditions to determine their causal effects on dependent variables, thereby isolating specific mechanisms from influences. Controlled experiments typically incorporate in assigning subjects or units to to minimize selection biases and ensure comparability. For instance, in clinical trials, double-blinding prevents experimenter and participant expectations from skewing outcomes, as demonstrated in randomized controlled trials evaluating pharmaceutical efficacy. Observation complements experimentation by systematically collecting data on phenomena without direct intervention, often through precise instrumentation such as telescopes for astronomical events or sensors in environmental monitoring. This method relies on predefined protocols to record measurements objectively, reducing subjective interpretation; for example, satellite observations of Earth's climate have provided longitudinal datasets on temperature anomalies since the 1970s. In fields like astronomy or ecology, where manipulation is infeasible, repeated observations across diverse conditions serve to build empirical patterns amenable to statistical analysis. Verification entails subjecting experimental or observational results to independent replication, statistical scrutiny, and cross-validation to confirm reliability and rule out artifacts. Key techniques include calculating p-values to assess the probability of results occurring by chance—conventionally set below 0.05 for —and employing confidence intervals to quantify estimate precision. However, reveals systemic challenges: in , a 2015 large-scale replication attempt succeeded in only about 36% of cases, highlighting issues like underpowered studies and selective reporting. Similarly, biomedical research shows replication failure rates exceeding 50% in some domains, underscoring the need for preregistration of protocols and sharing to mitigate p-hacking and . These verification shortcomings, often exacerbated by incentives favoring novel over replicable findings, necessitate causal realism in interpreting single-study claims, prioritizing mechanisms grounded in first-principles over correlative associations alone.

Limitations, Errors, and Sources of Bias

The , while robust for empirical inquiry, is inherently limited in scope, applicable primarily to phenomena that are observable, testable, and falsifiable, thereby excluding questions of metaphysics, , or the foundational presuppositions of science itself, such as the uniformity of or the reliability of . These constraints arise because the method relies on repeatable experiments and observations, which cannot definitively prove universal generalizations or address non-empirical domains like aesthetic or normative judgments. Furthermore, the —highlighted by philosophers like —persists, as finite observations cannot logically guarantee future outcomes, rendering scientific laws probabilistic rather than certain. Errors in scientific practice often stem from statistical and methodological pitfalls, including Type I errors (false positives) and Type II errors (false negatives) in hypothesis testing, exacerbated by practices like p-hacking or selective reporting. The exemplifies these issues, with empirical attempts to reproduce findings in fields like yielding success rates around 40%, and surveys indicating that nearly three-quarters of biomedical researchers acknowledge a problem as of 2024. Such failures arise not only from measurement inaccuracies but also from underpowered studies and inadequate controls, leading to inflated effect sizes that erode cumulative knowledge when non-replicable results accumulate in the literature. Sources of bias further undermine reliability, with prompting researchers to favor evidence aligning with preconceptions while discounting disconfirming data, a tendency documented in experimental settings where participants selectively sample supportive . compounds this by disproportionately favoring positive or statistically significant results, as evidenced by meta-analyses showing suppressed null findings in preclinical research, which distorts meta-analytic conclusions and wastes resources on futile pursuits. Additional vectors include in sampling, where non-representative populations skew generalizability, and funding influences, where sponsor interests—such as in pharmaceutical trials—correlate with favorable outcomes, though empirical reviews confirm modest rather than overwhelming effects from such pressures. Institutional factors, including "" incentives, amplify these biases by prioritizing novel over rigorous findings, particularly in environments where ideological in may subtly favor hypotheses aligning with prevailing worldviews, though direct causal evidence for systemic distortion remains contested and requires scrutiny beyond self-reported surveys. Despite self-corrective mechanisms like , these limitations necessitate preregistration, replication mandates, and transparent reporting to mitigate distortions.

Branches of Science

Natural Sciences

Natural sciences constitute the core disciplines investigating the physical and through empirical , experimentation, and to uncover invariant laws and causal mechanisms. These fields prioritize testable hypotheses, reproducible results, and predictive models derived from , distinguishing them from formal sciences like , which abstractly manipulate logical structures without reference to physical , and from social sciences, which grapple with human actions influenced by subjective factors and less controllable variables. The primary branches include physical sciences—physics, which delineates fundamental particles, forces, and dynamics as in the encompassing quarks, leptons, and gauge bosons; , detailing atomic and molecular interactions via and , exemplified by the periodic table organizing 118 elements by ; and astronomy, mapping cosmic structures from solar systems to galaxy clusters using and . Earth sciences integrate , probing tectonic plate movements at rates of 2-10 cm per year, , analyzing currents driving global heat distribution, and , modeling weather patterns through equations. Life sciences, centered on , dissect organismal processes from cellular —where ATP powers reactions with a change of -30.5 kJ/mol—to evolutionary adaptations, as evidenced by records spanning 3.5 billion years and genetic sequences revealing 99% human-chimpanzee DNA similarity. Interdisciplinary extensions like biochemistry link to enzymatic catalysis rates exceeding 10^6 s^-1, while quantifies via Lotka-Volterra equations predicting predator-prey oscillations. These pursuits have engineered breakthroughs, including semiconductor physics enabling transistors with billions on microchips since the integrated circuit invention, and , achieving targeted DNA cuts with 90% efficiency in lab settings by 2012. Contemporary frontiers probe unification of gravity with , biological origins via hypotheses tested in Miller-Urey simulations yielding under primordial conditions, and through detections numbering over 5,000 by NASA's Kepler and TESS missions as of 2023. Despite institutional biases potentially skewing interpretations in areas like environmental modeling, natural sciences advance via rigorous skepticism and data confrontation, fostering technologies from mRNA vaccines deployed in 2020 with efficacy rates above 90% against specific pathogens to fusion energy pursuits achieving net gain in 2022 inertial confinement experiments.

Formal Sciences

Formal sciences comprise disciplines that analyze abstract structures and formal systems using deductive methods and logical inference, independent of empirical observation or the physical world. These fields establish truths through axiomatic foundations and proofs, yielding apodictic certainty rather than probabilistic conclusions typical of empirical inquiry. Key examples include , which explores quantities, structures, and patterns; , which examines principles of valid reasoning; , focusing on computation, algorithms, and automata; and , which formalizes methods for data inference and probability. Systems theory and decision theory also fall within this domain, modeling abstract relationships and choices under uncertainty. In contrast to natural sciences, which test hypotheses against observable phenomena through experimentation, formal sciences operate a priori: their validity stems from within the system, not external validation. For instance, a mathematical holds regardless of real-world applicability, as long as it follows from accepted axioms like those in or Peano arithmetic. This distinction traces to philosophical roots, with enabling rigorous argumentation since —Aristotle's syllogistic logic in the 4th century BCE systematized deduction—but modern formalization accelerated in the with George Boole's 1847 work on and Gottlob Frege's 1879 , which introduced predicate logic. These developments addressed foundational crises, such as paradoxes in identified by in 1901, prompting axiomatic reforms by and others in the early . The role of formal sciences extends as foundational tools for other branches: underpins physical models in physics, as in differential equations describing motion since Isaac Newton's 1687 Principia; enables testing in , with methods like the formalized by in 1900; and informs algorithms in across disciplines. In 2023, , a formal subfield, proved limits on efficient solvability for problems like the traveling salesman, impacting optimization in . While debates persist on classifying formal disciplines as "sciences"—given their non-empirical nature—they integrate via hybrid applications, such as probabilistic models bridging and empirical data. Formal sciences thus provide frameworks resistant to observational biases, prioritizing logical rigor over contingent evidence.

Social and Behavioral Sciences

The social and behavioral sciences investigate human actions, societal patterns, and institutional mechanisms through systematic observation and analysis. These fields encompass , which examines individual mental processes and behaviors; , which analyzes group interactions and social structures; , which models resource distribution and decision-making under scarcity; , which studies power dynamics and systems; and , which documents cultural practices and human adaptation. Methodologies in these disciplines blend quantitative techniques, such as randomized experiments, , and large-scale surveys, with qualitative approaches like ethnographic fieldwork and case studies. Economists frequently employ mathematical modeling, as in equilibrium, to predict market outcomes based on incentives and constraints. Challenges persist due to the complexity of human systems, including variables, ethical limits on manipulation, and low statistical in studies. The exemplifies these issues: a project replicated only 39% of 100 psychological experiments, while saw 61% success across 18 studies. Sociology has been slower to address such concerns compared to and . Ideological imbalances among researchers compound these problems, with surveys showing 76% of social scientists in top universities identifying as left-wing and 16% as far-left, far exceeding conservative representation. This homogeneity, at ratios exceeding 10:1 in some subfields, can skew selection toward preferred narratives and hinder scrutiny of dissenting evidence. Many theories in interpretive branches like resist strict falsification, allowing flexible reinterpretations of data that evade decisive refutation, thus blurring boundaries with non-empirical speculation. Despite limitations, advancements in tools, such as instrumental variables and natural experiments, have strengthened claims in and . Such partisan divides, as in public perceptions of issues, highlight the domains these sciences address, where empirical data often reveal deep cleavages.

Applied and Engineering Sciences

Applied sciences involve the practical application of knowledge derived from natural and formal sciences to achieve tangible outcomes, such as developing technologies, improving processes, or solving societal challenges. This contrasts with , which seeks to expand fundamental understanding without immediate utility, by emphasizing empirical validation in real-world contexts to produce usable products or methods. Engineering sciences represent a specialized extension of applied sciences, focusing on the systematic , , , and optimization of structures, machines, and systems under constraints like cost, safety, and reliability. While applied sciences may prioritize adapting scientific principles to specific problems, engineering integrates these with iterative prototyping, mathematical modeling, and to ensure scalable functionality, distinguishing it through its emphasis on creation and deployment rather than mere application. Major fields within engineering sciences include:
  • Civil engineering: Designs infrastructure such as bridges, roads, and water systems, addressing load-bearing capacities and environmental durability.
  • Mechanical engineering: Develops machinery and thermal systems, applying and to engines and .
  • Electrical engineering: Focuses on power generation, , and , underpinning devices from circuits to renewable grids.
  • Chemical engineering: Scales chemical processes for manufacturing fuels, pharmaceuticals, and materials, optimizing reaction efficiency and safety.
  • Biomedical engineering: Merges with engineering to create medical devices like prosthetics and tools, enhancing diagnostics and treatments.
These fields often overlap, as in for propulsion or for hardware-software integration. Applied and engineering sciences drive technological progress by converting scientific discoveries into deployable innovations, such as semiconductors from or antibiotics from , thereby fueling economic growth—U.S. engineering output contributed approximately 10% to GDP in recent decades through sectors like and . Post-1945 milestones include the 1947 invention of the at , enabling modern computing and communications; the development of jet engines for by the 1950s; and integrated circuits in the , which scaled for personal devices. These advancements required rigorous testing against practical failure modes, revealing limitations in pure theory, such as material fatigue in structures or efficiency losses in conversion, often necessitating hybrid approaches beyond initial scientific models.

Research Practices and Institutions

Methodologies and Tools

Scientific methodologies in research typically adhere to an iterative empirical process involving observation of phenomena, formulation of testable hypotheses, data collection through experimentation or systematic measurement, statistical analysis, and drawing conclusions that may lead to new hypotheses. This framework, often termed the , emphasizes and to distinguish robust findings from conjecture. Experimental methodologies dominate fields amenable to control, such as physics and , where independent variables are manipulated while holding others constant to infer causality, as in randomized controlled trials that allocate subjects to treatment or control groups via to minimize . Observational methodologies, conversely, rely on natural variation without intervention, prevalent in astronomy or , where techniques like cohort studies track groups over time to identify associations, though they cannot conclusively prove causation due to factors. Quantitative methodologies predominate in hypothesis-driven research, employing numerical data analyzed via inferential statistics to generalize from samples to populations, including t-tests for comparing means and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple groups. models relationships between variables, such as fitting a straight line to predict outcomes like y = β0 + β1x + ε, where β coefficients quantify effect sizes. Qualitative methodologies complement these by exploring contexts through interviews, , or , generating hypotheses from patterns in non-numerical data, though they require with quantitative evidence to enhance validity. Computational methodologies, including simulations and algorithms, model complex systems; for instance, methods use random sampling to approximate probabilities in scenarios intractable analytically, as in for estimating event rates. Research tools span physical instruments, software, and analytical frameworks tailored to disciplinary needs. Laboratory instruments like spectrophotometers measure light absorption to quantify molecular concentrations with precision up to parts per million, enabling biochemical assays since their development in the early 20th century. Advanced imaging tools, such as scanning electron microscopes, provide high-resolution surface topography by scanning electron beams, achieving magnifications over 100,000x for nanomaterial characterization. In fieldwork, sensors and data loggers, including GPS-enabled devices and environmental probes, automate collection of variables like temperature or seismic activity at high temporal resolution. Software tools facilitate data handling and modeling; Python libraries like and perform matrix operations and optimization, while excels in statistical computing for tasks like generalized linear models. Bayesian statistical tools, implemented in packages such as , incorporate prior knowledge to update posteriors via sampling, offering advantages over frequentist methods in handling uncertainty with small datasets. Survey instruments, including validated questionnaires with Likert scales, standardize self-reported data in social sciences, ensuring reliability through pilot testing and for internal consistency, typically targeting values above 0.7. These tools, when calibrated and validated, underpin verifiable results, though improper use—such as ignoring multiple testing corrections in hypothesis evaluations—can inflate false positives.

Peer Review, Replication, and Publication

serves as a mechanism in scientific , wherein independent experts in the relevant field assess submitted manuscripts for methodological soundness, originality, validity of conclusions, and overall contribution to knowledge prior to acceptance in journals. The process typically involves editors selecting 2-3 reviewers, who provide confidential recommendations, though it does not formally "approve" truth but rather filters for plausibility and rigor. Common variants include single-anonymized review, where reviewers know authors' identities but not , which remains predominant due to ; double-anonymized, concealing both parties to mitigate ; and open review, revealing identities to promote accountability but risking reprisal. Despite its centrality, exhibits systemic limitations, including failure to consistently detect , errors, or —such as in high-profile retractions—and susceptibility to biases favoring established researchers or trendy topics over substantive merit. Reviewers identify issues in data, methods, and results more effectively than textual , yet the process remains overburdened, with delays averaging months and rejection rates exceeding 70% in top journals, exacerbating the "" incentive structure that prioritizes quantity over verification. Empirical evaluations indicate enhances manuscript quality modestly but does not eliminate flawed publications, as evidenced by post-publication retractions and critiques highlighting its role in perpetuating echo chambers rather than ensuring causal validity. Replication constitutes an independent re-execution of experiments or studies to confirm original findings, distinguishing robust effects from artifacts of chance, error, or bias, and forms a of empirical validation by testing generalizability across contexts. However, replication rates remain alarmingly low: , only 39% of 100 prominent studies replicated in a large-scale effort, while saw 61% success across 18 studies and analogous failures undermine clinical reliability. This "," spanning disciplines since the 2010s, stems from underpowered original studies, selective reporting, and institutional disincentives—replications garner fewer citations and career rewards than novel claims—yielding inflated effect sizes in initial reports. Recent reforms, including preregistration and mandates, have elevated replication success to nearly 90% in compliant studies, underscoring that methodological safeguards can mitigate but not erase incentive-driven distortions. Publication practices amplify these issues through biases like , where non-significant results face rejection, skewing the literature toward positive findings, and p-hacking, involving post-hoc data dredging or analysis flexibility to achieve statistical significance (p < 0.05). Econometric analyses of submissions reveal bunching at p = 0.05 thresholds, indicating manipulation, with p-hacked results cited disproportionately despite lower replicability, eroding meta-analytic reliability and public trust. Journals' emphasis on impact factors incentivizes sensationalism over incremental replication, though emerging open-access models and preprints bypass traditional gates, enabling faster scrutiny but risking unvetted dissemination. Collectively, these elements highlight that while peer review and publication facilitate dissemination, true advancement demands rigorous replication, often sidelined by career pressures favoring apparent novelty.

Funding Mechanisms and Organizational Structures

Scientific research funding derives from multiple sources, with government grants forming the primary mechanism for , while industry investments dominate applied and development activities. In the , the federal government accounted for 41% of basic research funding in recent assessments, channeled through agencies such as the (NSF) and (NIH), which disbursed billions annually via competitive grants and contracts. Globally, total R&D expenditures reached approximately $2.5 trillion in 2022, with the business sector performing the majority—around 70-80%—driven by profit motives, whereas governments funded about 10-20% of performed R&D in countries like the and . Philanthropic foundations, such as the Gates Foundation, supplement these by targeting specific fields like , though their allocations can prioritize donor agendas over broad scientific inquiry. The US federal R&D budget for fiscal year 2024 included proposals for $181.4 billion in requested investments across agencies, supporting both intramural and extramural research through mechanisms like research grants (R series), cooperative agreements (U series), and small business innovation research (SBIR) contracts. These funds often flow to external performers via peer-reviewed proposals, but allocation decisions reflect policy priorities, such as national security or health crises, potentially skewing toward applied outcomes over fundamental discovery. Industry funding, comprising the bulk of global R&D at nearly $940 billion in the US alone for 2023, incentivizes proprietary research with commercial potential, as seen in pharmaceutical and technology sectors. Organizational structures in scientific research encompass universities, laboratories, and private institutes, each with distinct models influencing productivity and focus. Universities, often structured hierarchically with principal investigators (PIs) leading labs under departmental oversight, emphasize and tenure systems but face administrative burdens from cycles. National laboratories, such as those under the US Department of Energy, operate as federally funded centers (FFRDCs) with mission-driven mandates, employing organizations that integrate disciplinary teams for large-scale projects like . Private entities, including corporate R&D divisions and non-profits like the , adopt flatter or project-based structures to accelerate innovation, though profit imperatives can limit data sharing compared to public institutions. International collaborations, such as CERN's model involving member states, pool resources through intergovernmental agreements, fostering specialized facilities beyond single-nation capacities. These structures and funding paths interact dynamically; for instance, researchers rely heavily on federal grants (75% of some institutions' totals), creating dependencies that may align inquiries with priorities rather than unfettered curiosity. Critics note that funder influence—whether governmental alignment or corporate interests—shapes trajectories, underscoring the need for diversified support to mitigate directional biases.

Global Collaboration and Competition

International scientific collaboration in fields like and leverages shared infrastructure and diverse expertise to address challenges beyond national capacities. The European Organization for Nuclear Research (), founded in 1954 by 12 European countries and now comprising 23 member states, exemplifies this through projects such as the (LHC), operational since 2008, which confirmed the particle on July 4, 2012, via data from over 10,000 scientists worldwide. Similarly, the (ISS), assembled in orbit starting in 1998 and continuously inhabited since November 2, 2000, unites agencies from the United States (), Russia (), Europe (ESA), Japan (), and Canada (), enabling experiments in microgravity that have yielded over 3,000 investigations advancing and . These efforts distribute costs—CERN's annual budget exceeds 1.2 billion Swiss francs—and foster knowledge exchange, though they require navigating differing regulatory frameworks and agreements. Despite collaborative successes, geopolitical competition propels scientific advancement by incentivizing rapid innovation and resource allocation. The U.S.-Soviet from 1957, triggered by Sputnik 1's launch on October 4, culminated in the on July 20, 1969, spurring technologies like integrated circuits and weather satellites that benefited civilian applications. In contemporary terms, U.S.- rivalry manifests in space ambitions, with NASA's targeting landings by 2026 contrasting China's plans for a by 2030, alongside competitions in and . This dynamic is underscored by global R&D expenditures: in 2023, the invested $823 billion, narrowly surpassing 's $780 billion, while the top eight economies accounted for 82% of the world's $2.5 trillion total, highlighting concentrated efforts amid export controls, such as U.S. restrictions on advanced semiconductors to implemented in October 2022. Tensions between collaboration and competition introduce challenges, including data-sharing restrictions and funding dependencies exacerbated by conflicts like the 2022 Russia-Ukraine war, which strained ISS operations despite continued joint missions. Benefits of cooperation—enhanced research capacity, reduced duplication, and breakthroughs from interdisciplinary input—are empirically linked to higher citation impacts for internationally co-authored papers, yet barriers such as language differences, cultural variances, and national security concerns persist, often requiring bilateral agreements to mitigate. In fields like climate modeling, initiatives such as the (IPCC), involving thousands of scientists from 195 countries since 1988, demonstrate collaboration's role in synthesizing evidence, though competitive national priorities can skew participation or interpretations. Overall, while competition accelerates targeted progress, sustained global collaboration remains essential for existential challenges like pandemics, where frameworks like facilitated vaccine distribution but faced inequities in access.

Philosophy of Science

Ontology and Epistemological Foundations

The ontology of science posits an objective reality independent of human perception, comprising entities and processes with inherent causal structures that scientific inquiry aims to uncover. This view aligns with , which asserts that mature and successful scientific theories provide approximately true descriptions of both observable and unobservable aspects of the world, such as subatomic particles or gravitational fields. The no-miracles argument supports this position: the predictive and explanatory successes of theories like or would be extraordinarily improbable if they did not correspond to actual features of reality, rather than mere calculational devices. In contrast, treats theories primarily as tools for organizing observations and generating predictions, denying commitment to the literal existence of theoretical entities, a stance historically associated with but critiqued for undermining the depth of scientific explanation. Epistemologically, science rests on empiricism, where knowledge claims derive from sensory experience, systematic observation, and controlled experimentation, rather than pure deduction or intuition. This foundation traces to figures like , who in 1620 advocated inductive methods to build generalizations from particulars, emphasizing repeatable evidence over speculative metaphysics. Yet, science integrates rationalist elements, particularly in formal sciences like , where a priori reasoning establishes theorems independent of empirical input, as seen in Euclidean geometry's axioms yielding deductive proofs. The interplay resolves in a hypothetico-deductive framework: hypotheses are rationally formulated and logically derived to testable predictions, then empirically assessed, with confirmation strengthening but never proving theories due to the highlighted by in 1748, which notes that past regularities do not logically guarantee future ones. Central to scientific epistemology is falsifiability, as articulated by in his 1934 work Logique der Forschung, where theories gain credibility not through verification but by surviving rigorous attempts at refutation through experiment. This criterion demarcates scientific claims from non-scientific ones, prioritizing causal mechanisms testable against reality over unfalsifiable assertions. Bayesian approaches further refine this by quantifying evidence through probability updates based on data likelihoods relative to priors, enabling cumulative progress despite —where multiple theories fit observations equally well—resolved pragmatically by and . Critiques from constructivist quarters, prevalent in some academic circles, portray as socially negotiated rather than discovered, but such views falter against the objective convergence of results across diverse investigators, as evidenced by replicated findings in physics from independent labs worldwide.

Key Paradigms and Shifts

defined scientific paradigms as the shared constellation of theories, methods, exemplars, and values that a accepts, guiding "normal science" where practitioners extend and refine the by solving puzzles it defines as legitimate. Accumulating anomalies—empirical results incompatible with the paradigm—can precipitate a crisis, potentially culminating in a , wherein a rival framework gains acceptance through revolutionary change rather than incremental accumulation. Kuhn posited that such shifts involve incommensurability, where old and new paradigms resist direct rational comparison due to differing conceptual frameworks, resembling perceptual changes more than objective progress toward truth. This model, outlined in Kuhn's (1962), has faced criticism for and overemphasis on extrarational factors like community sociology, potentially undermining the role of and logical argumentation in theory choice. rejected Kuhn's revolutionary discontinuities, arguing instead for progress via falsification: theories advance by surviving rigorous tests that could refute them, with paradigm-like commitments tested incrementally rather than overthrown wholesale. Empirical suggests shifts often correlate with superior and explanatory scope, as new paradigms resolve anomalies while accommodating prior successes, though Kuhn's framework highlights how entrenched assumptions can delay acceptance despite evidential warrant. A foundational occurred during the with the transition from Ptolemaic —reliant on epicycles and equants to fit observations to an Earth-centered cosmos—to , initiated by Copernicus's (1543), which posited circular orbits around the Sun for simplicity and aesthetic appeal, though initially lacking dynamical explanation. Galileo's 1610 telescopic discoveries of Jupiter's satellites and Venus's phases provided empirical support, undermining geocentric uniqueness, while (1609, 1619) introduced elliptical orbits derived from Tycho Brahe's precise data (1576–1601). Newton's (1687) effected closure by deriving Kepler's laws from a universal of gravitation, unifying terrestrial and under empirical laws verifiable by experiments and trajectories. In , Darwin's (1859) instigated a shift from typological and creationist views—positing fixed species designed by divine agency—to descent with modification via , mechanistically explaining adaptive diversity through variation, heredity, overproduction, and differential survival, supported by geological (Lyell, 1830–1833) and Malthusian population pressures (1798). This paradigm integrated fossil records showing transitional forms (e.g., , discovered 1861) and biogeographical patterns, though Mendel's genetic mechanisms (1865, rediscovered 1900) later refined against blending inheritance assumptions. Twentieth-century physics witnessed dual shifts: Einstein's (1905) resolved the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) by abolishing , predicting E=mc² verified in particle accelerators from 1932 onward; (1915) extended this gravitationally, forecasting light deflection confirmed during the 1919 . Concurrently, supplanted classical determinism, with Planck's quantum hypothesis (1900) explaining , Bohr's atomic model (1913) fitting spectral lines, and wave-particle duality formalized in Schrödinger's equation (1926) and Heisenberg's matrix mechanics (1925), accommodating anomalies like the (Einstein, 1905, verified Millikan 1916). These paradigms persist due to unprecedented predictive accuracy, such as ' g-factor predictions matching experiment to 12 decimal places by 1986. Other shifts include Lavoisier's oxygen paradigm in (1777 treatise), displacing phlogiston by quantifying weights and identifying via precise measurements, and Pasteur's germ theory (1860s swan-neck flask experiments), establishing microbes as causal agents of and disease, validated by (1884) and reduced postoperative infections via antisepsis (Lister, 1867). Despite Kuhnian crises, acceptance hinged on replicable experiments and quantitative , underscoring causal mechanisms over narrative persuasion.

Demarcation from Pseudoscience

The demarcation problem in philosophy of science concerns the challenge of establishing criteria to reliably distinguish scientific theories and practices from , non-science, or metaphysics. This issue gained prominence in the amid efforts to clarify the rational foundations of following the logical positivist movement, which sought verifiable empirical content as a boundary but faced limitations in application. , by contrast, mimics scientific form—employing terminology, experiments, or claims of evidence—while systematically evading rigorous empirical scrutiny, often through unfalsifiable assertions or selective confirmation. Karl Popper proposed falsifiability as a primary criterion in the 1930s, arguing that scientific theories must make bold predictions capable of being empirically tested and potentially refuted; theories that are immune to disconfirmation, such as those accommodating any outcome via modifications, belong to . For instance, Albert Einstein's general qualified as scientific because it risked falsification through observable predictions like the 1919 solar eclipse deflection of starlight, whereas Freud's and failed this test by interpreting diverse behaviors or events as confirmatory regardless of specifics. Popper's approach emphasized that science advances through conjecture and refutation, prioritizing error-elimination over inductive confirmation, which pseudosciences often prioritize to sustain core dogmas. This criterion, while influential, drew critiques for overlooking auxiliary hypotheses that complicate outright falsification, as noted by in his framework of progressive versus degenerative research programs, where the latter resemble by protecting falsified predictions through endless adjustments. Subsequent philosophers like and challenged strict demarcation, with Kuhn viewing scientific boundaries as paradigm-dependent and Feyerabend rejecting methodological rules altogether, suggesting "anything goes" in scientific practice. Nonetheless, practical indicators persist: scientific claims demand by independent researchers, quantitative precision testable against controls, and integration with broader empirical knowledge, whereas pseudosciences like —positing "" effects from extreme dilutions—resist replication under standardized conditions and ignore null results from rigorous trials. Another marker is evidential indifference; pseudosciences often dismiss contradictory data as artifacts or conspiracies, lacking the self-correcting mechanisms of peer-reviewed science, such as statistical hypothesis testing with predefined significance thresholds (e.g., p < 0.05). In contemporary assessments, demarcation functions less as a than a , informed by processes like communal and error-correction norms, yet core to scientific integrity is causal accountability: theories must yield novel, risky predictions explaining phenomena via mechanisms grounded in observable regularities, not vague correlations or unfalsifiable essences. For example, demarcates from by generating testable phylogenies and genetic forecasts, such as predicting transitional fossils or molecular clocks, while retreats to claims unamenable to disproof. This emphasis on empirical vulnerability underscores science's provisional yet robust status, contrasting pseudoscience's amid accumulating anomalies.

Critiques of Scientism and Reductionism

Critiques of contend that it constitutes an ideological overextension of scientific methods beyond empirical domains, asserting science as the exclusive source of knowledge while dismissing philosophical, ethical, and interpretive inquiries. Philosopher Austin L. Hughes described as a that seeks to supplant with science, arguing that scientific claims about reality's ultimate nature require philosophical justification, rendering scientism self-undermining. Similarly, evolutionary biologist critiques highlight how scientism's blind faith in "settled science" has historically justified authoritarian policies, such as programs in the early , by conflating empirical findings with moral imperatives. emphasized the role of —unarticulated skills and intuitions essential to scientific practice—that eludes formal scientific codification, as elaborated in his 1958 work Personal Knowledge, undermining scientism's claim to completeness. Further objections note scientism's inability to address normative questions, such as ethical values or aesthetic judgments, which resist empirical verification; for instance, the assertion that "only scientific knowledge counts" is itself a non-scientific philosophical stance, leading to performative contradiction. and illustrated science's provisional nature through and shifts, respectively, challenging scientism's portrayal of science as cumulatively authoritative across all domains. In sciences, critiqued the "pretence of " in 1974, arguing that complex human systems defy predictive modeling akin to physics due to dispersed, subjective , as seen in failed central experiments like Soviet . Reductionism, the methodological commitment to explaining phenomena by decomposing them into fundamental components, encounters limitations in accounting for emergent properties arising from system interactions that surpass part-wise predictions. In molecular biology, complex gene regulatory networks exhibit nonlinear dynamics where outcomes cannot be deduced from isolated molecular behaviors, as evidenced by unpredictable cellular responses in genetic perturbation studies. Physical systems involving many-body interactions, such as or , resist computational reduction due to exponential complexity, rendering "" reductionism practically infeasible despite theoretical appeals. Philosophers like argued in 1974's "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?" that subjective defies reductive explanation in physical terms, as involve irreducible first-person perspectives not capturable by third-person scientific descriptions. posits that higher-level properties, such as liquidity in water molecules or behaviors, arise from part interactions without being predictable or explainable solely by part properties, supported by observations in where small initial variations yield macro-scale divergences. These critiques do not reject analytical but advocate methodological , integrating holistic approaches to capture causal realities overlooked by pure , as in ecological systems where species interactions produce stability irreducible to individual .

Science in Society

Education, Literacy, and Public Engagement

Science education typically emphasizes foundational concepts in , , , and sciences, often integrating the as a core framework for . In the United States, national assessments like the (NAEP) track student performance; in 2024, the average eighth-grade science score stood at 4 points lower than in 2019, reflecting stagnation or decline since 2009. Internationally, the (PISA) 2022 results placed the U.S. average science literacy score higher than 56 education systems but lower than 9 others, indicating middling global standing. Similarly, the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2019 showed U.S. fourth-graders scoring 539 in science, above the international centerpoint of 500, though subsequent data reveal declines, particularly among lower-performing students. Scientific literacy among adults remains limited, with surveys highlighting gaps in understanding core principles. A 2019 Pew Research Center study found that 39% of Americans answered 9 to 11 out of 11 basic science questions correctly, qualifying as high knowledge, while many struggled with concepts like and probability. The 2020 Wellcome Global Monitor reported that only 23% of Americans claimed to know "a lot" about science, underscoring broader deficiencies. A 2021 survey indicated that 85% of Americans desire more science knowledge, yet 44% feel they are falling behind, pointing to self-perceived inadequacies. Public engagement efforts include science museums, outreach programs, and media initiatives aimed at bridging these gaps. Institutions like museums host exhibits and events to foster hands-on interaction, with studies showing such activities can enhance understanding and interest, though attendance varies and impact on deep literacy is debated. Scientists increasingly use and public dialogues to communicate findings, as emphasized in calls for broader involvement to counter and build trust. However, partisan divides complicate engagement; for instance, surveys reveal stark differences in beliefs about topics like , with Democrats far more likely than Republicans to affirm its occurrence and attribute responsibility to industry, reflecting how ideological filters influence science reception. Challenges persist due to persistent misconceptions, inadequate curricula, and external biases. Students often enter education with alternative conceptions—such as viewing forces as rather than interactions—that resist correction without targeted strategies like conceptual change teaching. Declines in performance correlate with disruptions like the but also stem from systemic issues, including curricula prioritizing rote memorization over critical inquiry. Ideological influences in and , often favoring certain narratives over empirical scrutiny, exacerbate low , making publics vulnerable to and politicized claims. Effective requires addressing these by emphasizing evidence-based reasoning and about source biases to cultivate informed .

Ethical and Moral Dimensions

Scientific inquiry, as a for understanding natural phenomena through empirical observation and testable hypotheses, is inherently value-neutral in its core . However, the conduct of and its applications frequently intersect with moral considerations, particularly regarding harm to participants, societal risks, and the allocation of benefits. Ethical frameworks have evolved primarily in response to historical abuses, emphasizing principles such as , minimization of harm, and equitable distribution of research outcomes. These dimensions underscore the tension between pursuing knowledge and preventing , with regulations often lagging behind technological advances. In human subjects research, foundational ethical standards emerged from post-World War II reckonings with atrocities. The of 1947, arising from the at the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, established ten principles, including the absolute requirement for voluntary, and the necessity for experiments to yield results unprocurable by other means while avoiding unnecessary suffering. This code directly addressed Nazi medical experiments on prisoners, which involved non-consensual procedures causing severe harm or death for data on , high-altitude effects, and infectious diseases. Building on this, the World Medical Association's in 1964 extended ethical guidelines to , mandating that protocols prioritize participant welfare over scientific interests and require independent ethical review. Persistent violations highlighted the need for domestic reforms. The U.S. Public Health Service's (1932–1972) withheld penicillin treatment from 399 African American men with after 1947, deceiving them into believing they received care while observing disease progression, resulting in at least 28 deaths and infections in spouses and children. Public exposure in 1972 prompted the 1979 , which codified three core principles—respect for persons (encompassing autonomy and consent), beneficence (maximizing benefits while minimizing harms), and (fair subject selection and benefit distribution)—forming the basis for U.S. federal regulations like 45 CFR 46. Animal experimentation raises distinct moral questions about and , with practices dating to ancient vivisections but intensifying in the amid physiological advances. Regulations, such as the U.K.'s Cruelty to Animals Act of and the U.S. , impose oversight, while the 3Rs framework (replacement, reduction, refinement) proposed by Russell and Burch in 1959 seeks to minimize animal use without forgoing necessary data. Critics argue that alternatives like models or computational simulations remain underdeveloped, yet empirical evidence shows animal models have been indispensable for vaccines (e.g., ) and drug safety testing, though over-reliance persists due to incomplete human-animal physiological analogies. Dual-use research exemplifies moral trade-offs where benign intentions enable misuse. Defined as studies with knowledge, products, or technologies reasonably anticipated for both beneficial and harmful applications, examples include 2011 experiments enhancing H5N1 avian flu transmissibility among mammals, debated for risk versus preparedness gains. U.S. policy since 2012 requires oversight for 15 agents and seven experimental categories posing threats. Similarly, J. Robert Oppenheimer's leadership of the (1942–1945) yielded the atomic bomb, deployed on and in 1945, killing over 200,000 civilians; Oppenheimer later expressed remorse, quoting the —"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds"—and opposed the hydrogen bomb, illustrating scientists' post-hoc ethical burdens amid wartime imperatives. Contemporary amplifies these dilemmas, as seen in He Jiankui's 2018 editing of human embryos using CRISPR-Cas9 to disable the gene for resistance, resulting in twin girls' births. Condemned for bypassing germline editing bans, lacking safety data, and risking off-target mutations, He was sentenced to three years in prison by Chinese authorities in 2019, prompting global calls for moratoriums despite potential therapeutic merits. Such cases reveal causal realities: unchecked innovation can confer heritable changes with unknown long-term effects, challenging the moral neutrality of pure research while underscoring the need for rigorous, precedent-based ethical deliberation over ideological impositions.

Economic and Policy Influences

Scientific research funding derives primarily from public and private sectors, with governments compensating for market failures in , where private returns are diffuse and long-term. In 2022, the U.S. federal government accounted for 40% of funding, compared to 37% from businesses, while the dominated applied research at 75% of total R&D performance. Globally, government R&D shares vary, with the U.S. at 10%, at 8%, and higher in like the UK's 20%. Public investments demonstrate high economic returns, driving productivity and growth. NIH grants yield $2.30–$2.46 per dollar in economic activity, while broader federal non-defense R&D contributes 140–210% returns to business-sector , accounting for one-fifth of such gains. NSF-supported research similarly returns 150–300% on investment, fostering jobs and innovation spillovers. Policy-induced cuts, such as a 20% reduction in federal R&D, could subtract over $700 billion from U.S. GDP over 10 years relative to sustained levels. Policies like grant allocations, tax credits, and fiscal instruments direct priorities and amplify corporate innovation. R&D spending enhances firm-level technological progress via subsidies and , though it risks short-term economic activity over transformative outcomes. policies, including patents, incentivize private funding—over 40% of university patents with private assignees link to industry sponsors—but skew efforts toward patentable domains like drugs and devices, sidelining unpatentable basic inquiries. Industry funding introduces selection biases, as sponsors prioritize proprietary-aligned topics, potentially distorting scientific agendas away from public goods. Heightened for limited further pressures researchers toward incremental, low-risk projects, undermining novelty despite formal emphasis on high-impact work. Internationally, policies fuel ; China's R&D surge outpaces stagnation, with government support rising for and , reshaping global innovation flows. U.S. policies, historically emphasizing federal , sustain leadership but face erosion from declining shares amid rising private applied focus.

Cultural and Political Interactions

Governments exert significant influence over through allocations, which constituted approximately 40% of expenditures in the United States in 2022. In the U.S., Democratic administrations have historically increased federal more than ones, reflecting priorities in areas like environmental and . This dynamic can steer toward politically favored topics, such as initiatives under Democratic leadership, while conservative skepticism toward intervention often correlates with resistance to expansive regulatory . Extreme historical cases illustrate the risks of ideological override. In the from to , Trofim Lysenko's rejection of Mendelian in favor of environmentally acquired traits—aligned with Marxist —led to disastrous agricultural policies, contributing to famines that killed millions. suppressed dissenting geneticists, including the execution or imprisonment of figures like , demonstrating how political doctrine can eclipse and cause widespread harm. In contemporary democracies, political interference manifests in subtler forms, such as selective suppression of agency findings. Across U.S. administrations from to , over 300 documented instances occurred where political appointees altered or delayed on topics like and , often to align with policy agendas. Organizations tracking these events, like the , highlight patterns but reflect institutional perspectives that may emphasize regulatory science over market-oriented critiques. Cultural interactions often arise from tensions between and traditional beliefs. The by has sparked enduring conflicts, particularly in the U.S., where creationist views rooted in religious literalism challenge public school curricula; the 1925 exemplified early legal battles, with ongoing debates leading to "" proposals as alternatives. These disputes underscore a broader clash, as science relies on testable mechanisms while explanations invoke unobservable causation, fostering mutual incompatibility in educational and societal spheres. Modern politicization exacerbates divides, notably in climate science, where correlates strongly with : a 2022 poll found 78% of Democrats viewing as a major threat versus 23% of Republicans, with similar gaps in attributing responsibility to human activity or . This partisan asymmetry stems partly from academia's left-leaning composition, where surveys indicate overwhelming orientations among researchers, potentially prioritizing hypotheses aligned with environmental activism over contrarian analyses of data uncertainties or economic trade-offs. Such biases, documented in fields beyond the natural sciences, can manifest in and decisions, undermining claims of institutional neutrality and fueling public from conservative viewpoints that perceive science as co-opted for policy advocacy.

Controversies and Challenges

Replication Crisis and Reproducibility Issues

The replication crisis denotes the systematic inability to reproduce a significant portion of published scientific findings, particularly in psychology, biomedical research, and social sciences, challenging the reliability of empirical claims central to scientific knowledge. Large-scale replication efforts since the early 2010s have revealed reproducibility rates often below 50%, with original studies typically reporting strong statistical significance while replications yield weaker or null effects. This issue stems from methodological flaws and systemic pressures rather than isolated errors, as evidenced by coordinated projects involving independent researchers adhering closely to original protocols. In , the Collaboration's 2015 project replicated 100 experiments from three high-impact journals published in 2008, achieving significant results in only 36% of cases compared to 97% in the originals; replicated effect sizes averaged half the original magnitude. Similar failures occurred in other domains: researchers in 2012 confirmed just 11% (6 out of 53) of landmark preclinical cancer studies, often due to discrepancies in data handling and statistical reporting despite direct methodological emulation. reported comparable irreproducibility in 2011 for 18-25% of targeted studies across and . showed higher rates at 61% in a 2018 multi-lab effort, yet still highlighted variability tied to original effect strength rather than replication rigor. These patterns indicate domain-specific severity, with "soft" sciences like exhibiting lower due to higher variability in human subjects and smaller sample sizes. Primary causes include , where journals preferentially accept positive results, inflating the apparent prevalence of true effects; low statistical power from underpowered studies (often below 50% to detect true effects); and questionable research practices such as p-hacking—selective analysis until p-values fall below 0.05—and (hypothesizing after results are known). Incentives exacerbate these: academic "publish or perish" cultures reward novel, significant findings over rigorous replication, with tenure and funding tied to high-impact publications that rarely prioritize null outcomes. Systemic biases in and institutional evaluation further discourage transparency, as sharing was historically rare, enabling post-hoc adjustments undetected by reviewers. Responses have emphasized procedural reforms, including pre-registration of hypotheses, methods, and analysis plans on platforms like the Open Science Framework to curb flexibility in data interpretation and distinguish confirmatory from exploratory work. Mandates for , code, and materials in journals, alongside incentives like badges for reproducible practices, have increased adoption; for instance, the Reproducibility Project's follow-ups showed pre-registered replications yielding more consistent estimates. Multi-lab collaborations and larger sample sizes via consortia have boosted power, though challenges persist: adoption remains uneven, especially in resource-constrained fields, and pre-registration does not fully eliminate bias if not rigorously enforced. Despite progress, the crisis underscores that reproducibility demands cultural shifts beyond tools, prioritizing verification over novelty to restore empirical foundations.

Fraud, Misconduct, and Incentives

Scientific misconduct encompasses fabrication, falsification, , and other practices that undermine research integrity, with surveys indicating varying prevalence rates. A of 21 surveys estimated that approximately 1.97% of scientists admit to falsifying or fabricating data, while broader questionable research practices (QRPs) such as selective reporting or failing to disclose conflicts are more common, affecting up to one in three researchers in some studies. Self-reported misconduct rates among NSF fellows stood at 3.7%, with 11.9% aware of colleagues engaging in it, though underreporting due to career risks likely understates true figures. Retractions provide a proxy for detected , with 67.4% of cases from 1996 to 2015 attributed to , suspected , , or , rather than honest . Biomedical retractions have quadrupled over the past two decades, reaching over 5,500 in , with driving nearly 67% of them; this surge reflects improved detection but also escalating , including organized "paper mills" producing fabricated s for sale. Global networks, often resilient and profit-driven, have industrialized , infiltrating journals and exploiting open-access models, with hotspots in countries like , the , and showing elevated retraction rates tied to . Institutional incentives exacerbate these issues through the "" paradigm, where career progression, tenure, and hinge predominantly on quantity and impact factors rather than methodological rigor or replicability. This pressure favors novel, positive results over null findings or incremental work, incentivizing QRPs like p-hacking or , as grants and promotions reward high-output productivity metrics over truth-seeking verification. Modeling studies demonstrate that such systems can sustain fraudulent equilibria, where thrives because honest replication yields fewer publications, eroding collective trustworthiness unless incentives shift toward . In fields like , where federal ties to preliminary promising , the rush for breakthroughs amplifies risks, as seen in retracted high-profile claims from manipulated images or datasets. Efforts to mitigate include enhanced statistical training, preregistration of studies, and incentives for replication, but systemic reforms lag, as academic hierarchies prioritize prestige over accountability. While outright remains a minority, the cumulative effect of incentivized corner-cutting distorts scientific knowledge, particularly in policy-influencing areas like and climate science, where undetected biases compound errors. Retraction databases and AI detection tools have improved vigilance, yet the incentive structure's causal role in fostering misconduct underscores the need for reevaluating reward systems rooted in verifiable outputs over mere publication counts.

Ideological Biases and Politicization

Scientific communities exhibit a pronounced left-leaning ideological skew, with surveys indicating that 55% of Association for the Advancement of Science members identified as Democrats in , compared to only 6% as Republicans. This disparity extends to political donations, where scientists contributing to federal candidates overwhelmingly favor Democrats over Republicans, reflecting broader polarization within academia. Such homogeneity raises concerns about and selective testing, particularly in fields intersecting with policy, as empirical research shows that ideological alignment influences research evaluations and outcomes. Politicization manifests in policy-relevant sciences like , where public acceptance correlates strongly with political affiliation; for instance, Democrats are far more likely than to affirm anthropogenic global warming and attribute responsibility to industries. Nonetheless, the scientific consensus among climate scientists holds that human activities are the primary driver of recent global warming, with over 97% of actively publishing experts agreeing based on multiple peer-reviewed assessments. This partisan divide has intensified, with trust in declining sharply from 87% in 2019 to around 35% by 2023, amid controversies over policies and origins research. In social sciences, ideological biases affect study design and interpretation, as evidenced by the backlash against James Damore's 2017 Google memo, which cited peer-reviewed evidence on sex differences in vocational interests—supported by meta-analyses showing greater male variability and interest disparities—yet prompted his dismissal and widespread condemnation despite endorsements from psychologists affirming the underlying science. Academic institutions' systemic left-wing orientation, documented in faculty surveys across disciplines, contributes to underrepresentation of conservative viewpoints, potentially skewing funding priorities and suppressing dissenting research, such as early dismissals of the COVID-19 lab-leak hypothesis as conspiratorial despite later acknowledgments of its plausibility by agencies like the U.S. Department of Energy. Mainstream media and academic outlets, often aligned with progressive narratives, amplify this by framing ideological nonconformity as misinformation, eroding public trust across political spectra; Pew data reveals Democrats viewing scientists as honest at 80% versus 52% for Republicans in 2024. While self-selection into science may partly explain the skew—attraction to empirical rigor over ideology—causal evidence from donation patterns and policy advocacy indicates that this imbalance incentivizes conformity, hindering objective inquiry in contested domains like gender differences and environmental modeling.

Anti-Science Movements and Public Skepticism

Anti-science movements encompass organized efforts to reject or undermine established scientific findings, often rooted in ideological, religious, or economic motivations. Historical examples include 19th-century opposition to in and the , where critics argued against mandatory on grounds of personal and safety concerns despite of efficacy. In the , promoted pseudoscientific agricultural theories under , leading to famines and the suppression of research, illustrating how political ideology can eclipse evidence-based . Modern instances feature anti-vaccination campaigns, amplified during the , with groups questioning safety and efficacy amid reports of rare adverse events and policy mandates. These movements frequently cite isolated fraud cases, such as Andrew Wakefield's retracted 1998 study linking to , to fuel broader distrust, though subsequent large-scale studies affirm safety. Public skepticism toward science manifests in declining confidence in institutions, particularly along partisan lines. A 2024 Pew Research Center survey found 76% of Americans express confidence in scientists acting in the public's interest, yet trust has eroded since the early 2000s, with Republicans showing steeper declines—only 66% held a great deal or fair amount of confidence in 2023 compared to 87% of Democrats. This divergence, evident since the 1990s, correlates with politicized issues like , where 2021 surveys revealed 90% of Democrats affirming global warming's occurrence versus 60% of Republicans, with even larger gaps on attributing responsibility to industry. Factors include perceived ideological biases in and , where left-leaning consensus on topics like differences or marginalizes dissenting , fostering perceptions of science as partisan advocacy rather than neutral inquiry. The exacerbates skepticism by highlighting systemic flaws in scientific practice. Failures to reproduce landmark findings in and —estimated at 50% non-replicability in some fields—undermine claims of robustness, as seen in the Collaboration's 2015 replication of only 36% of 100 psychological studies. Public awareness remains low, but exposure erodes trust, particularly when non-replicable results influence policy, such as in or guidelines. Incentives favoring novel, positive results over mundane replications, coupled with biases, contribute causally to this crisis, prompting calls for preregistration and to restore credibility. Legitimate skepticism, distinct from irrational denial, arises from such evidence of overhyping tentative findings, as in early mask efficacy debates where initial uncertainty gave way to evolving consensus amid conflicting trials. Broader drivers of distrust include amplified by and , where industry funding influences outcomes, as alleged in pharmaceutical trials. Conservative often stems from opposition to overreach via science-backed regulations, viewing them as pretext for control rather than evidence-driven policy. Conversely, mainstream portrayals sometimes conflate critique of specific consensuses—like overreliance on observational data in —with wholesale anti-science, ignoring challenges. Efforts to counter movements, such as over 420 anti-vaccine and bills in U.S. statehouses by 2025, risk deepening divides by prioritizing enforcement over transparent engagement. Restoring trust demands addressing root causes like perverse incentives and politicization, rather than dismissing skeptics as uninformed.

Achievements, Impacts, and Future Directions

Major Discoveries and Technological Outcomes

Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687, formulated the three laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation, providing the mechanical foundation for engineering advancements that powered the Industrial Revolution, including steam engines and railway systems that transformed global transportation and manufacturing by the mid-19th century. These principles enabled precise calculations for projectile motion and orbital mechanics, directly contributing to the development of rocketry and space exploration technologies, such as Robert Goddard's liquid-fueled rockets in 1926 and subsequent NASA missions. In , James Clerk Maxwell's , unified in 1865, described the behavior of electric and magnetic fields, laying the groundwork for wireless communication technologies including radio transmission pioneered by in 1895 and modern infrastructure. discoveries, beginning with Max Planck's quantization of energy in 1900 and Albert Einstein's explanation of the in 1905, enabled the invention of semiconductors and transistors in 1947 by researchers, which revolutionized computing and led to the integrated circuits powering personal computers and smartphones by the 1970s and beyond. Biological breakthroughs include Charles Darwin's by , outlined in in 1859, which informed practices and modern , culminating in the agricultural that increased crop yields through hybrid varieties developed in the 20th century. The elucidation of DNA's double-helix structure by and in 1953 facilitated technology in the 1970s, enabling biotechnology industries producing insulin and vaccines, with further advancements like CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, discovered in 2012, yielding FDA-approved therapies for in 2023. Medical discoveries such as Louis Pasteur's germ theory in the 1860s demonstrated microorganisms as disease causes, leading to sterilization techniques and the antibiotic era initiated by Alexander Fleming's penicillin discovery in 1928, which has saved millions of lives by reducing infection mortality rates from over 50% pre-1940s to under 1% for treatable bacterial infections today. Edward Jenner's in 1796 exemplified principles, contributing to the eradication of the disease in 1980 and informing platforms used in responses starting 2020, which achieved over 95% efficacy in trials. Nuclear physics progressed with the discovery of by and in 1938, enabling production, as demonstrated by the first controlled in 1942 under , which powered nuclear reactors supplying about 10% of global by 2023 while also yielding applications in like isotope-based cancer treatments. These outcomes underscore science's causal role in technological progress, where empirical validations of natural laws have iteratively driven innovations enhancing human productivity, health, and exploration.

Societal Benefits and Unintended Consequences

Scientific advancements have substantially increased global , which rose from about 32 years for newborns in 1900 to 71 years by 2021, driven largely by medical innovations such as and antibiotics, , and . These gains stem from empirical reductions in and infectious diseases, with modern enabling survival rates past age 65 for most in developed nations. Economically, scientific fuels and ; U.S. R&D investments in 2018 directly and indirectly supported 1.6 million , $126 billion in labor , and $197 billion in added economic output. Econometric models project that halving nondefense R&D spending would diminish long-term U.S. GDP by 7.6%, underscoring causal links between and aggregate output via spillovers to adoption. perceptions align with these metrics, as 73% of American adults in a 2019 survey attributed a net positive societal effect to science. Despite these advantages, scientific progress has produced unintended negative outcomes through misapplication or overlooked externalities. The Industrial Revolution's reliance on scientific principles in steam power and chemistry accelerated environmental harm, including coal-induced that caused urban and water contamination from factory effluents, depleting resources and altering ecosystems on a global scale. Such industrialization contributed to ongoing issues like , with 2017 estimates valuing annual damages from industrial emissions at €277–433 billion in health and ecological costs across . Fundamental physics research on , pursued in the 1930s for atomic insights, enabled atomic weapons development, culminating in the 1945 Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings that killed over 200,000 people and introduced risks persisting into the . Pioneers like , who conceptualized chain reactions in 1933, later opposed weaponization, highlighting how curiosity-driven inquiry can yield destructive applications absent deliberate safeguards. These cases illustrate causal chains where scientific , once disseminated, escapes original intent, amplifying risks in policy and military domains.

Quantitative Measures of Progress

Scientific progress can be quantified through metrics such as the volume of peer-reviewed publications, (R&D) expenditures, citation rates, and enhancements in computational capabilities that enable complex simulations and . These indicators primarily capture inputs to and outputs from the scientific enterprise, though they do not directly measure the accumulation of verified knowledge, which is harder to quantify due to factors like paradigm shifts and error correction. For instance, the in publications suggests heightened productivity, but it may also reflect incentives for quantity over quality in academic evaluation systems. The number of scientific publications has grown exponentially, with an average annual rate of approximately 4-5.6% since the mid-20th century, corresponding to a of 13-17 years. Between and , global publication totals increased by 59%, driven largely by expansions in and the , the two largest producers. In the life sciences, doubling times have been as short as 10 years in recent decades, with journals publishing more papers per issue—from an average of 74 in 1999 to 99.6 by 2018. Citation volumes have similarly expanded at about 7% annually since the , indicating broader dissemination and building upon prior work. However, this surge raises concerns about dilution of impact, as not all outputs contribute equally to foundational advances. Global R&D spending, a key input metric, reached nearly $2.5 trillion in 2022 (adjusted for ), having tripled in real terms since 1990. Projections for 2024 estimate $2.53 trillion, reflecting an 8.3% increase from prior forecasts amid post-pandemic recovery. As a of GDP, R&D varies by country—around 2.8% in the U.S. and higher in (5%)—but has remained relatively stable in advanced economies while growing in emerging ones like , which overtook the U.S. in total spending by 2017. These investments correlate with output metrics but face scrutiny for inefficiencies, such as in crowded fields. Advancements in computational power, governed by until recently, have exponentially boosted scientific capabilities by doubling transistor density roughly every two years from 1965 onward, reducing costs and enabling genome sequencing, climate modeling, and particle simulations that were infeasible decades prior. This has facilitated data-intensive discoveries, such as the Project's completion in 2003, which required processing petabytes of data. Although has slowed since the 2010s due to physical limits, its legacy underscores how hardware scaling has amplified progress across disciplines, though software and algorithmic innovations now drive further gains. Nobel Prizes in science categories (Physics, Chemistry, or ) have been awarded annually at a steady rate of 2-3 per field since 1901 (with wartime interruptions), totaling over 200 laureates this century, but their fixed volume limits their utility as a growth metric compared to expanding publication and funding trends.
MetricHistorical TrendKey Data PointSource
Publications4-5.6% annual growthDoubling every 13-17 years; +59% (2012-2022)
R&D SpendingTripled since 1990$2.5T global (2022)
Citations~7% annual growthSince 19th century
Transistors (Moore's Law)Doubled every ~2 yearsFrom 1965-2010s

Emerging Frontiers and Predictions

Artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into scientific workflows, enabling accelerated hypothesis generation, data analysis, and experimental design across disciplines. In , models like have resolved millions of structures, facilitating and applications, with extensions now targeting small molecules and dynamics. AI-driven multi-omics at the single-cell level combines , transcriptomics, and to map cellular heterogeneity, promising insights into disease mechanisms and , though challenges in and validation persist. Predictions suggest AI could autonomously perform significant portions of research by the late , potentially earning recognition for discoveries, but human oversight remains essential to mitigate errors from training data biases. Quantum computing advances focus on error correction and scalable qubits, with Google's 2025 Quantum Echoes algorithm demonstrating verifiable quantum advantage in simulating complex systems intractable for classical computers. Industry roadmaps from IBM and others project utility-scale systems by 2030, enabling breakthroughs in cryptography, optimization, and molecular modeling, though current noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices limit practical utility. Bain & Company estimates a potential $250 billion economic impact by mid-century if fault-tolerant systems emerge, but gradual adoption is more likely than rapid disruption due to engineering hurdles. Nuclear fusion research has achieved sustained confinement exceeding 1,000 seconds in China's EAST as of January 2025, advancing toward net energy gain. The U.S. Department of Energy's October 2025 roadmap outlines paths to pilot plants by the mid-2030s, emphasizing optimization and inertial confinement, with private investments totaling $9.7 billion fueling modular designs. The IAEA's World Fusion Outlook 2025 highlights global momentum, but commercialization timelines remain uncertain, historically delayed by instabilities and material durability issues. Broader predictions include AI experts forecasting —where AI surpasses —potentially by the 2040s, based on accelerating model capabilities, though such estimates vary widely and depend on compute scaling laws holding. In biotechnology, engineered living therapeutics and enhancements could yield therapies for chronic diseases by 2030, per assessments, contingent on regulatory and ethical resolutions. Overall, progress metrics like publication rates and funding indicate in interdisciplinary fields, but replication of foundational claims and biases toward high-profile areas may temper expectations for transformative impacts.

References

  1. [1]
    What is the Scientific Method: How does it work and why is it ... - AJE
    Oct 27, 2024 · The scientific method is a systematic process involving steps like defining questions, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, ...Steps in the scientific method · Where did the scientific...
  2. [2]
    The scientific method (article) - Khan Academy
    1. Make an observation. · 2. Ask a question. · 3. Propose a hypothesis. · 4. Make predictions. · 5. Test the predictions. · 6. Iterate.
  3. [3]
    Science relies on evidence
    In science, ideas that are not supported by evidence are ultimately rejected. And ideas that are protected from testing or are only allowed to be tested by one ...
  4. [4]
    Steps of the Scientific Method - Science Buddies
    1. Ask a Question · 2. Do Background Research · 3. Construct a Hypothesis · 4. Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment · 5. Analyze Your Data and Draw a ...
  5. [5]
    Empirical evidence: A definition | Live Science
    Feb 8, 2022 · Empirical evidence is information that is acquired by observation or experimentation and is used to prove or disprove a hypothesis.
  6. [6]
    The reproducibility “crisis”: Reaction to replication ... - PubMed Central
    Aug 9, 2017 · The reproducibility crisis involves concerns that many studies fail to replicate results, with low levels of reproducibility in biomedical ...
  7. [7]
    The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and ...
    Jul 25, 2023 · The 'replication crisis' has introduced a number of considerable challenges, including compromising the public's trust in science and ...
  8. [8]
    'An Existential Crisis' for Science - Institute for Policy Research
    Feb 28, 2024 · The replication crisis is when scientists can't get the same results as previous studies, threatening the reliability of scientific results.
  9. [9]
    A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition (1999)
    Science is a particular way of knowing about the world. In science, explanations are limited to those based on observations and experiments that can be ...
  10. [10]
    https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/nature-science
  11. [11]
    Karl Popper: Falsification Theory - Simply Psychology
    Jul 31, 2023 · The Falsification Principle, proposed by Karl Popper, is a way of demarcating science from non-science. It suggests that for a theory to be ...
  12. [12]
    Karl Popper: The Line Between Science and Pseudoscience
    The distinction between the two is at the core of what comprises human knowledge: How do we actually know something to be true? Sir Karl Popper (1902-1994), the ...
  13. [13]
    What is the difference between science and pseudoscience? - Space
    Aug 2, 2023 · Pseudoscience is a practice that, from the outside, looks like science, but upon closer inspection, is revealed to be nothing but. And what ...
  14. [14]
    “Trust Me, I'm a Scientist”: How Philosophy of Science Can ... - NIH
    Aug 17, 2022 · We believe that philosophers should help people to understand why science, even though it is far from perfect, deserves our trust and its special standing in ...
  15. [15]
    Science - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from mid-14c. Old French and Latin scientia, science means knowledge acquired by study, information, and assurance of certainty or expertise.
  16. [16]
    What is the first recorded use of the word "scientia"?
    Aug 13, 2020 · Scientia is the Latin translation of Greek épistémè, it goes back to Plato and Aristotle. And it did not mean "science" in the modern sense.
  17. [17]
    Science - World History Encyclopedia
    May 28, 2014 · The term science comes from the Latin word scientia, meaning "knowledge". It can be defined as a systematic attempt to discover, by means of ...
  18. [18]
    A Brief History of Science in English Words - Scientific Gems
    Feb 20, 2015 · Here is a brief history of science in ten English words: Alembic (14 th century). The word “alembic” comes to us from the Greek word ἄμβιξ (ambix) via the ...
  19. [19]
    How The Word 'Scientist' Came To Be - NPR
    May 21, 2010 · In 1834, Cambridge University historian and philosopher of science William Whewell coined the term "scientist" to replace such terms as "cultivators of science ...
  20. [20]
    The Origin of Words: Interesting Examples from Science and History
    Jul 12, 2021 · Ancient Greek gifted us with the 'ologies', from -logia, meaning 'the study of' – for example, biology (study of life), cosmology (study of the ...
  21. [21]
    Who came up with the word “science”? | Ask Dr. Universe
    Nov 14, 2017 · He said the English word “science” comes from the Latin, scientia, which means knowledge. In medieval times, the pursuit of knowledge included ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Ancient Science of Mesopotamia, Egypt and China
    The first signs of science began to emerge in ancient Mesopotamia,. Egypt and China as these agricultural political economies began to.
  23. [23]
    Science in the Ancient World | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Mesopotamia (4000 b.c.e. to 539b.c.e.). From its beginnings in Sumer before the mid-third millennium b.c.e., Mesopotamian science was characterized by ...
  24. [24]
    Babylonian mathematics | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Babylonian mathematics, practiced between 2100 and 200 BCE in the region of Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq), is a fascinating study of an ancient ...
  25. [25]
    The Earliest Astronomers: A Brief Overview of Babylonian Astronomy
    Sep 18, 2023 · These nightly astronomical observations appear in the Astronomical Diaries, a series of 1500–2000 tablets beginning around 700 BCE containing ...
  26. [26]
    Mathematics - Ancient Egypt, Numbers, Geometry | Britannica
    Oct 1, 2025 · The geometric problems in the papyri seek measurements of figures, like rectangles and triangles of given base and height, by means of suitable ...
  27. [27]
    Ancient Egyptian science | Department of History and Philosophy of ...
    Ancient Egypt is one of the earliest civilizations to have left written, pictorial, and archaeological records of its culture, including medicine, mathematics, ...
  28. [28]
    SCIENCE IN ANCIENT EGYPT: INVENTIONS, MEASUREMENTS ...
    Mathematics in Ancient Egypt. The Egyptians used a base-10 system of numbers. Sometimes they used different symbols for 1s, 10s, 100s, 1,000s, 10,000s ...Missing: specifics | Show results with:specifics
  29. [29]
    Science through time: Stone Age to Scientific Revolution
    May 23, 2025 · Much early scientific knowledge – including data still used today – developed within systems of divination such as astrology and haruspicy ...
  30. [30]
    Early Greek Science: Thales to Plato - Galileo and Einstein
    The crucial contribution of Thales to scientific thought was the discovery of nature. By this, we mean the idea that the natural phenomena we see around us are ...
  31. [31]
    History of science - Greek Science, Philosophers, Astronomy
    Sep 29, 2025 · Hellenic science was built upon the foundations laid by Thales and Pythagoras. It reached its zenith in the works of Aristotle and Archimedes.
  32. [32]
    Scientific Advancements in the Classical Period | Western Civilization
    Key advancements included Greek math, astronomy, and the Hippocratic school of medicine, which revolutionized medicine.
  33. [33]
    Classical Greek culture (article) - Khan Academy
    The Greeks made important contributions to philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine. Literature and theatre was an important aspect of Greek culture ...
  34. [34]
    The Lasting Legacy of Ancient Greek Leaders and Philosophers
    Oct 19, 2023 · Here are some notable Greek figures—from philosophers to mathematicians and scientists—and how they have shaped the world we know today ...
  35. [35]
    9.4 Science and Technology in the Hellenistic Period - Fiveable
    The Hellenistic period saw a boom in scientific and technological progress. Scholars made huge strides in math, astronomy, geography, medicine, and engineering.
  36. [36]
    Greek Science after Aristotle - Galileo and Einstein
    Two of his major contributions to physics are his understanding of the principle of buoyancy, and his analysis of the lever. He also invented many ingenious ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    The First Great Age of Science in Hellenistic period
    The sciences which received the major attention in the Hellenistic Age were astronomy, mathematics, geography, medicine, and physics. Chemistry as a pure ...
  38. [38]
    Ptolemy (85 - 165) - Biography - MacTutor History of Mathematics
    One of the most influential Greek astronomers and geographers of his time, Ptolemy propounded the geocentric theory in a form that prevailed for 1400 years.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Scientific Advancements in the Hellenistic Period - McGill University
    In the late fourth century, new disciplines including astronomy, medicine and mathematics emerged. ... science are highly evident in the field of medicine.
  40. [40]
    “Medieval Science,” Oxymoron? Think Again – Part 1 of 3
    The early medieval period also saw the emergence of two important natural philosophers: Isidore of Seville (560-636) and the Venerable Bede (d. 735). Their ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Science in the Middle Ages – Rediscovering its Latent Genius
    Feb 13, 2021 · Medieval science included fields like botany, math, and theology, with monasteries as research centers. Discoveries included the clock, ...
  42. [42]
    Middle-Ages Science - Medieval Period - Explorable.com
    Medieval science saw advancements in philosophy, the scientific method, and the growth of empiricism, with the development of the first universities.
  43. [43]
    The Scientific advancements in Islamic golden age
    Feb 14, 2023 · The historical achievements of Golden age Muslim mathematicians are the developments of algebra and algorithms by Muhammad Ibn Musa al ...
  44. [44]
    Islam's Golden Age Sparks a Spectrum of Optical Knowledge
    largely for its advancements in mathematics.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  45. [45]
    Why the Arabic World Turned Away from Science - The New Atlantis
    Perhaps the most oft-repeated claim about the Golden Age is that Muslims invented algebra. ... The Golden Age also saw advances in medicine. One of the ...
  46. [46]
    Science in the Monastery. How medieval monks preserved, copied…
    Sep 20, 2025 · As contact with the Islamic world grew, monasteries also became hubs of translation. Arabic manuscripts containing advanced mathematics, optics, ...
  47. [47]
    Mathematics and Astronomy in Ancient India | IIT Dharwad
    Aryabhatiya, the influential 5th century treatise on Mathematics and Astronomy, included Aryabhata's innovations like Trigonometry as well as knowledge passed ...Missing: medieval | Show results with:medieval
  48. [48]
    An Overview of Mathematics and Astronomy in India - Indica Today
    Jul 25, 2024 · The whole tradition of ancient Indian mathematics is basically a combination of the jyotisha (astronomical) tradition and Vedic tradition of India.Missing: medieval | Show results with:medieval
  49. [49]
    Gunpowder - Song Dynasty China | Asia for Educators
    Song military engineers found gunpowder to be helpful in siege warfare, leading to the development of early types of rockets, cannons, bombs, and mines.
  50. [50]
    8 Key Inventions and Innovations of the Song Dynasty | History Hit
    8 Key Inventions and Innovations of the Song Dynasty · 1. Movable-type printing · 2. Paper money · 3. Gunpowder · 4. The compass · 5. The astronomical clock tower · 6 ...
  51. [51]
    China in 1000 CE - Song Dynasty China | Asia for Educators
    Francis Bacon on the Significance of Three Chinese Inventions: Printing, Gunpowder, and the Compass. Chinese inventions of printing, gunpowder, and the ...
  52. [52]
    The Scientific Revolution (1550-1700): Study Guide - SparkNotes
    It describes the 150-year period of profound advancement in scientific achievement in which Newton, Galileo, Kepler, and other European thinkers set the ...
  53. [53]
    Galileo and the Telescope | Modeling the Cosmos | Digital Collections
    The story of Galileo's telescopic observations illustrates how a tool for seeing and collecting evidence can dramatically change our understanding of the cosmos ...
  54. [54]
    Whose Revolution? Copernicus, Brahe & Kepler | Articles and Essays
    Copernicus anticipated his ideas would be controversial. Because of this, he waited more than 30 years to publish his book in 1543. De revolutionibus orbium ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Orbits and Kepler's Laws - NASA Science
    May 2, 2024 · Kepler's Laws. In 1609 Kepler published “Astronomia Nova,” which explained what are now called Kepler's first two laws of planetary motion.Kepler's Laws of Planetary... · Who Was Johannes Kepler?
  56. [56]
    Galileo goes on trial for heresy | April 12, 1633 - History.com
    Galileo was ordered to turn himself in to the Holy Office to begin trial for holding the belief that the Earth revolves around the sun, which was deemed ...
  57. [57]
    The Trial of Galileo: An Account - Famous Trials
    Galileo's discovery of the telescope in 1609 enabled him to confirm his beliefs in the Copernican system and emboldened him to make public arguments in its ...
  58. [58]
    Lessons from the life of William Harvey - PMC - NIH
    Aug 31, 2023 · William Harvey (1578–1658) discovered that blood flows in a circle and described this new finding in a short book in 1628.
  59. [59]
    Newton, Principia, 1687 - Hanover College History Department
    Isaac Newton is probably most famous for having discovered the universal laws of gravity. (That is, he showed that gravity explains the behavior of stars ...
  60. [60]
    Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
    Dec 20, 2007 · ... laws of motion and law of gravity have been found by this method. And it is enough that gravity should really exist and should act according ...
  61. [61]
    Novum Organum | Online Library of Liberty
    Part of a larger but incomplete magnum opus in which Bacon demonstrates the use of the scientific method to discover knowledge about the natural world.
  62. [62]
    Robert Boyle | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    He discovered Boyle's law, which shows that the volume and pressure of a gas are proportionally related. He used empirical evidence to refute both the four- ...Life · Natural Philosophy · Philosophy of Science · References and Further Reading
  63. [63]
    History of the Royal Society
    In the mid-17th century, informal gatherings of London- and Oxford-based intellectuals coalesced to form a chartered organisation.
  64. [64]
    The rise of the professional - Nature
    Feb 16, 2005 · British science, it is generally acknowledged, finally became a professional activity during the lengthy reign of Queen Victoria.
  65. [65]
    The Professional and the Scientist in Nineteenth-Century America | Isis
    Professionals were men of science who engaged in commercial relations with private enterprises and took fees for their services.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] New Biological Methods in the 19th Century The rise of laboratory ...
    Two of the most important early labs were that of the Royal Institution, London, around 1800, and Liebig's lab at Giessen in the 1820s. Liebig's laboratory ...
  67. [67]
    Laboratories and the rise of the physics profession in the nineteenth ...
    Jun 1, 1983 · There were no established research laboratories before the nineteenth century. Galileo had a small shop, Hooke was a curator of instruments, Boyle worked at ...Missing: 1800s | Show results with:1800s
  68. [68]
    The History of the English Science Lab - The Historic England Blog
    Sep 1, 2022 · The 19th-century emergence of medical specialization. Specialization continued throughout the 1870s and 1880s. These decades saw the development ...17th-Century Laboratories · The 18th-Century 'scientific... · The 19th-Century Emergence...
  69. [69]
    Scientists and Scientific Organizations in Mid-Century America - NCBI
    The middle of the century witnessed the rise of the Smithsonian Institution and the creation of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).The Smithson Bequest · Bache and Henry · Growth and Spread of...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Science and the Industrial Revolution
    This paper examines the contributions of different types of knowledge to British industrialization, by assessing the backgrounds, education and inventive ...
  71. [71]
    History of the Beginnings of the Laboratory in the Early Modern World
    Aug 8, 2011 · In 1875, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company set up its own research laboratory, followed by East Man Kodak in 1886 and General Electric in 1900.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870-1914
    The second Industrial Revolution is usually dated between 1870 and 1914, although a number of its char- acteristic events can be dated to the 1850s.<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    The birth of quantum theory | December 14, 1900 - History.com
    Planck's theory held that radiant energy is made up of particle-like components, known as “quanta.” The theory helped to resolve previously unexplained natural ...
  74. [74]
    Einstein publishes his groundbreaking theory of relativity - History.com
    Jun 25, 2024 · On June 30, 1905, Albert Einstein publishes “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper (On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies),” a paper that sets out his theory of ...
  75. [75]
    Atomic flashback: A century of the Bohr model - CERN
    Jul 12, 2013 · In July of 1913, Danish physicist Niels Bohr published the first of a series of three papers introducing this model of the atom, which became ...
  76. [76]
    February 1927: Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
    In February 1927, the young Werner Heisenberg developed a key piece of quantum theory, the uncertainty principle, with profound implications.
  77. [77]
    Manhattan Project: The Discovery of Fission, 1938-1939 - OSTI.gov
    It was December 1938 when the radiochemists Otto Hahn (above, with Lise Meitner) and Fritz Strassmann, while bombarding elements with neutrons in their Berlin ...
  78. [78]
    A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid - Nature
    The determination in 1953 of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), with its two entwined helices and paired organic bases, was a tour de force in ...
  79. [79]
    Plate Tectonics—The Unifying Theory of Geology
    Feb 11, 2020 · Two scientific advances in the mid-20th Century resulted in information critical to acceptance of continental drift and plate tectonic theory.
  80. [80]
    Bell Labs Scientists Proved the Big Bang Theory - IEEE Spectrum
    Sep 26, 2025 · While Bell Labs researchers were using the Horn Antenna in Holmdel, N.J., they discovered a buzzing noise that proved the big bang theory.
  81. [81]
    The National Science Foundation: A Brief History - About NSF
    The classic, readable survey of the evolution of the relationship between science and government from the time of the Constitution to the eve of World War II.<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Federal Funding of Scientific Research – A Timeline
    Federal funding began with WWII, increased after Sputnik, and was further boosted by the 2005 report and the America COMPETES Act.
  83. [83]
    The Evolution and Impact of Federal Government Support for R&D in ...
    It is outlined here to provide some perspective on the historical processes that have shaped the current system of support for US R&D.
  84. [84]
    https://oxfordre.com/physics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190871994.001.0001/acrefore-9780190871994-e-25
  85. [85]
    It's All About the R&D: Implications of Post-World War II Spending
    Jun 20, 2025 · There have been four major R&D developments of interest since the end of WWII. The first trend was a period of US government research dominance ...
  86. [86]
    Chronology of twentieth-century science
    1900, Quantum theory proposed / Planck. 1901, Discovery of human blood groups / Landsteiner. 1905, Wave-particle duality of light / Einstein.Missing: key experimental
  87. [87]
    6 World War II Innovations That Changed Everyday Life - History.com
    Apr 26, 2021 · 6 World War II Innovations That Changed Everyday Life. Radar, computers, penicillin and more all came out of development during the Second World War.
  88. [88]
    An Evolving Twentieth-Century Profession: Technology after World ...
    Jul 1, 2021 · Major developments were taking place in technology. Nuclear weapons, space surveillance systems, and missile technologies leapt ahead.
  89. [89]
    The Scientific and Technological Advances of World War II
    One such example was the Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer (ENIAC), one of the first general purpose computers. Capable of performing thousands of ...
  90. [90]
    9 recent scientific breakthroughs and discoveries | The Week
    Oct 2, 2025 · 9 recent scientific breakthroughs and discoveries · 1. Night-vision contact lenses; ‍ Take a science quiz · 2. Curing sickle cell anemia · 3.
  91. [91]
    Science's new frontier
    Mar 5, 2021 · The year 2020 saw a reusable rocket launch two astronauts into space, multiple COVID-19 vaccines developed in record time, and a robot that ...Missing: contemporary 2020s
  92. [92]
    Wyss researchers predict biggest scientific advances of 2020s
    Jan 13, 2020 · “The biggest knowledge gap, and frontier of opportunity, is taming the biological software that underlies embryogenesis and regeneration.Missing: contemporary | Show results with:contemporary
  93. [93]
    The History and Future of Funding for Scientific Research | The Brink
    Apr 6, 2015 · The federal government pays almost $140 billion a year for research and development, down from a 2010 peak of about $160 billion, in constant dollars.
  94. [94]
    What Is Empirical Research? Definition, Types & Samples for 2025
    Empirical research is defined as any study whose conclusions are exclusively derived from concrete, verifiable evidence.
  95. [95]
    Chapter: 3 Guiding Principles for Scientific Inquiry
    They include seeking conceptual (theoretical) understanding, posing empirically testable and refutable hypotheses, designing studies that test and can rule out ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY
    It involves recording observations according to a plan, which prescribes what information to collect, where it should be sought, and how it should be recorded.
  97. [97]
    Scientific Observation - Collecting Empirical Evidence
    Observation consists of receiving knowledge of the outside world through our senses, or recording information using scientific tools and instruments.
  98. [98]
    Scientific Method - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Nov 13, 2015 · Scientific method should be distinguished from the aims and products of science, such as knowledge, predictions, or control.
  99. [99]
    Why control an experiment? From empiricism, via consciousness ...
    Empirical research is based on observation and experimentation. Yet, experimental controls are essential for overcoming our sensory limits and generating ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Ch3-Fundamentals-of-the-Scientific-Approach.pdf
    By testing ideas through empirical observation and revising theories based on observations, science self-corrects as it reveals the secrets of nature.
  101. [101]
    Science Produces Explanations That Can Be Tested Using ... - NCBI
    Science requires that scientific explanations of phenomena be based on events or mechanisms that can be observed in the natural world.
  102. [102]
    Understanding the Empirical Method in Research Methodology
    Oct 5, 2023 · The fundamental principle behind the empirical method is that knowledge comes from what can be observed and measured. Unlike purely theoretical ...
  103. [103]
    What is empirical analysis and how does it work? - TechTarget
    Oct 4, 2022 · Empirical analysis is an evidence-based approach to the study and interpretation of information. Empirical evidence is information that can be gathered from ...How To Conduct Empirical... · Quantitative And Qualitative... · Empirical Research Cycle<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    Empirical Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Academics
    Jan 18, 2024 · Empirical research relies on gathering and studying real, observable data. Learn how to conduct empirical research, its advantages and ...
  105. [105]
    Hypothetico-Deductive Model - Sage Research Methods
    Definition. A general model of science (Popper, 1934, 1959; Hempel, 1970) in which science is stated as involving the formulation of ...
  106. [106]
    Hypothetico-Deductive Method - Sociology Definition - ThoughtCo
    Mar 6, 2017 · The hypothetico-deductive method is an approach to research that begins with a theory about how things work and derives testable hypotheses ...Missing: proponents | Show results with:proponents
  107. [107]
    Hypothetico-Deductive Method - Testing Theories - Explorable.com
    The hypothetico- deductive method is based on trying to falsify (disprove) the researchers hypothesis.Missing: proponents | Show results with:proponents
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Confirmation versus Falsificationism - PhilArchive
    May 27, 2014 · Confirmation and falsification are different strategies for testing theories and character- izing the outcomes of those tests. Roughly.
  109. [109]
    What is wrong with Popper's theory of falsification? [duplicate]
    Jun 12, 2015 · An annoying meta-problem with Popper's claim is that it doesn't apply to all scientific theories, it only applies to theories with unbounded domains.What are the most important criticisms of Popper's account of ...Popper's falsification principle and statistical signficance levelsMore results from philosophy.stackexchange.com
  110. [110]
    Confirmationist and falsificationist paradigms of science
    Sep 5, 2014 · In falsificationist reasoning, it is the researcher's actual hypothesis A that is put to the test. How do these two forms of reasoning differ?
  111. [111]
    Falsifiability in medicine: what clinicians can learn from Karl Popper
    May 22, 2021 · For clinicians, Popper's notion might be used to evaluate new ideas and decide how much weight to give them.
  112. [112]
    5.1.1. What is experimental design?
    In an experiment, we deliberately change one or more process variables (or factors) in order to observe the effect the changes have on one or more response ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  113. [113]
    What is Scientifically Based Research? - LINCS
    Unlike case studies and correlational methods, experiments use techniques such as random assignment of subjects to treatment and control conditions and the ...
  114. [114]
    In brief: What types of studies are there? - InformedHealth.org - NCBI
    Mar 25, 2020 · The main types of studies are randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case-control studies and qualitative studies.
  115. [115]
    Principles of Scientific Inquiry - Transportation Research Board
    It involves recording observations according to a plan, which prescribes what information to collect, where it should be sought, and how it should be recorded.
  116. [116]
    What Is the Scientific Method? | NESDIS - NOAA
    Some steps to the scientific method are: wonder, define, review, design, experiment, analyze, and conclude. One Way to Do Science.<|separator|>
  117. [117]
    Experimental Techniques and the Treatment of Data - NCBI
    One goal of methods is to facilitate the independent verification of scientific observations. Thus, many experimental techniques—such as statistical tests ...
  118. [118]
    What is the Replication Crisis? - News-Medical
    Apr 13, 2022 · The replication crisis, also known as the reproducibility crisis and the replicability crisis, is a crisis that impacts the methodology of scientific research.
  119. [119]
    The Replication Crisis in Empirical Science: Implications for Human ...
    This term was coined to describe recent significant failures to replicate empirical findings in both medicine and psychology. In many cases, over 50% of ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  120. [120]
    [PDF] A PHILOSOPHICAL CRITIQUE OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD
    The presuppositions or foundational bases of science tend to limit science. They are what science itself cannot explained (using its method). This brings us to ...
  121. [121]
    Limitations of the Scientific Method - Science | HowStuffWorks
    These limitations are based on the fact that a hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable and that experiments and observations be repeatable.
  122. [122]
    Study Bias - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    In academic research, bias refers to a type of systematic error that can distort measurements and/or affect investigations and their results.
  123. [123]
    What the replication crisis means for intervention science - PMC
    The “replication crisis” not only highlights the limitations of traditional statistical approaches and the circumscribed requirements for scientific ...
  124. [124]
    'Publish or perish' culture blamed for reproducibility crisis - Nature
    Jan 20, 2025 · Nearly three-quarters of biomedical researchers think there is a reproducibility crisis in science, according to a survey published in November.
  125. [125]
    Meta-assessment of bias in science - PNAS
    Mar 20, 2017 · Small-study effects, in particular, had by far the largest magnitude, suggesting that these are the most important source of bias in meta- ...
  126. [126]
    Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current ...
    Oct 1, 2023 · Confirmation bias is the tendency to believe or pay attention to evidence that confirms our expectations or beliefs, while ignoring or rejecting ...
  127. [127]
    Humans actively sample evidence to support prior beliefs - PMC
    Confirmation bias is defined as the tendency of agents to seek out or overweight evidence that aligns with their beliefs while avoiding or underweighting ...
  128. [128]
    Publication bias: What are the challenges and can they be overcome?
    In preclinical and experimental research, this bias may seriously distort the literature, drain scarce resources by undertaking research in futile quests, and ...
  129. [129]
    The Empirical Evidence of Bias in Trials Measuring Treatment ...
    Theory suggests that bias in the conduct of studies would influence treatment effects. Our review found some evidence of this effect in relation to some aspects ...
  130. [130]
    Biases in ecological research: attitudes of scientists and ways of ...
    Jan 8, 2021 · All phases of scientific study are prone to biases. One of the widely known biases is publication bias, which has a recognized influence on the ...
  131. [131]
    [PDF] Bias in Science: Natural and Social - PhilSci-Archive
    In science, an investigator's values can readily serve as sources of bias. Since one's values generally give rise to corresponding motivations, they can ...
  132. [132]
    Reporting errors and biases in published empirical findings
    Publication bias occurs at the study level when authors do not submit studies with statistically non-significant results for publication, or when reviewers and ...<|separator|>
  133. [133]
    What Is Natural Science? 5 Definitions | University of the People |
    Jun 19, 2024 · The Five Main Branches of Natural Science · 1. Biology · 2. Chemistry · 3. Earth Sciences · 4. Physics · 5. Space Sciences.
  134. [134]
    Key Differences Between Natural and Social Science Research
    May 2, 2024 · Natural science examines the physical world through controlled experimentation, while social science investigates human behavior using more ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  135. [135]
    Natural Science | Definition, Branches & Examples - Lesson
    Learn about the three branches of natural science: physical, Earth, and life science. See definitions and examples of each science.What is Natural Science? · What are the Branches of...
  136. [136]
    What are the Main Branches of Natural Science
    Natural science can be defined as a rational approach to the study of the universe and the physical world. Astronomy, biology, chemistry, earth science, ...<|separator|>
  137. [137]
    What Is Natural Science? - Advanced ChemTech
    Apr 15, 2022 · What are the five branches of natural science? · Astronomy · Biology · Chemistry · Physics · Earth sciences.
  138. [138]
    75 Breakthroughs by America's National Laboratories
    National Labs invented Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS), the backbone of the device that allowed the Curiosity Rover to analyze material from Mars.
  139. [139]
    NASA's 10 Greatest Achievements - Science | HowStuffWorks
    Feb 27, 2024 · This list presents some of those great moments in science, beginning with the launch of the first US spacecraft: Explorer 1, a little satellite that made a ...
  140. [140]
    Sage Reference - Formal Sciences
    Formal sciences are disciplines based on formal systems. These include logic, mathematics, and the theoretical fields of information ...
  141. [141]
    Formal Science - Sanjeev Katariya
    The field is divided into three major branches: automata theory and languages, computability theory, and computational complexity theory, which are linked by ...
  142. [142]
    Kinds of Science - HippoCampus.org
    The natural sciences are empirical, and sometimes the terms are used interchangeably. Formal science is based on theoretical symbols, rules, and logic.
  143. [143]
    Does Logic Have a History at All? | Foundations of Science
    Nov 14, 2023 · In his Ancient Formal Logic of 1951, Bocheński interprets the Aristotle passage as saying that there is “no history of logic at all” (Bocheński ...
  144. [144]
    Formal v/s Empirical Sciences | Educators Perspective - LinkedIn
    May 3, 2017 · Formal Sciences: Based on formal systems (a system with abstract thoughts based on the model of Mathematics) which provides framework for empirical sciences.
  145. [145]
    Exploring the Five Main Branches of Social Science - Investopedia
    Aug 8, 2025 · Major Disciplines in Social Science · Anthropology · Economics · Political Science · Psychology · Sociology.What Is Social Science? · Branches · Education · Careers
  146. [146]
    Social science disciplines - UKRI
    May 31, 2023 · Social science disciplines · Demography · Area and development studies · Economics · Economic and social history · Education · Environmental planning.
  147. [147]
    [PDF] Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices
    These methods include laboratory experiments, field surveys, case research, ethnographic research, action research, and so forth.
  148. [148]
    Types of Research Methodology - Social/Behavioral Sciences ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · The research methodologies are quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Quantitative research tests hypotheses, while qualitative research ...
  149. [149]
    A New Replication Crisis: Research that is Less Likely to be True is ...
    May 21, 2021 · Papers that cannot be replicated are cited 153 times more because their findings are interesting, according to a new UC San Diego study.
  150. [150]
    Crisis? What Crisis? Sociology's Slow Progress Toward Scientific ...
    Oct 27, 2023 · Sociology has lagged behind economics, political science, and psychology in its recognition of a replication crisis, adoption of scientific ...
  151. [151]
    Survey: 76% of academics in the social sciences in the world's ...
    Apr 25, 2022 · Survey: 76% of academics in the social sciences in the world's leading universities self-identify as left-wing with 16% identifying as 'far left ...
  152. [152]
    Political Biases in Academia | Psychology Today
    May 29, 2020 · One study found that, in social sciences and humanities, self-described "radicals," "activists," and "Marxists" outnumber conventional conservatives by about ...
  153. [153]
    How can we discuss the fact that social sciences are not falsiable ...
    Aug 6, 2021 · If they are not falsifiable, they are not scientific in the popperian sense. That applies to Marxism, Freudianism, multiverse conjectures ...What are the main drawbacks of Popper's method of science? - QuoraWhat are some critiques within the philosophy of science of Popper's ...More results from www.quora.com
  154. [154]
    Is Social Science Research Politically Biased? - ProMarket
    Nov 15, 2023 · Everyone—including academic researchers—has political beliefs, but it remains unclear whether these beliefs actually influence research findings ...
  155. [155]
    Social and behavioural sciences - ECDC - European Union
    Social and behavioural sciences focus on the cognitive, social, and environmental factors shaping health-related behaviours.
  156. [156]
    Applied Science - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Applied science refers to the practical application of scientific knowledge to produce products or solutions that serve public interest, focusing on utility ...
  157. [157]
    Basic vs Applied Science: Understanding the Differences
    Jun 7, 2023 · Applied science aims to solve practical problems, meet societal needs, and drive technological advancements for the betterment of individuals ...Basic Science · Applied Science · Objectives
  158. [158]
    Difference between Applied Science and Engineering?
    Jun 28, 2010 · Engineering is a part of applied science. Applied science seeks to apply pure science or discover where it can be applied.How Does Applied Science Compare to Engineering for Career ...Bachelor of Applied Sciences? Bachelor of Engineering?More results from www.physicsforums.com
  159. [159]
    [PDF] Is it Time to separate Applied Science and Engineering?
    Coarsely put, engineers design but applied scientists do not. The participatory nature of engineering distinguishes it at the most fundamental level from ...<|separator|>
  160. [160]
    Types of Engineering: What Are They? Everything Explained | NU
    Oct 18, 2022 · We'll look at the five main branches of engineering: civil, mechanical, electrical, chemical, and industrial engineering, then provide some ...
  161. [161]
    A Comprehensive List of 52 Engineering Majors To Consider - Indeed
    Jul 26, 2025 · 1. Aerospace engineering · 2. Agricultural engineering · 3. Audio engineering · 4. Biomedical engineering · 5. Chemical engineering · 6. Civil ...
  162. [162]
    A Complete Guide to the Fields of Engineering | Oxford Scholastica
    Mar 14, 2025 · The six fields of engineering are civil, mechanical, chemical, electrical, aerospace/aeronautical, and computer engineering.
  163. [163]
    Engineering and technology development - Understanding Science
    Science builds knowledge of how the natural world works, engineers use that knowledge to develop useful technologies, and these technologies may, in turn, ...
  164. [164]
    The Relationship Between Science and Technology - Belfer Center
    Science contributes to technology in at least six ways: (1) new knowledge which serves as a direct source of ideas for new technological possibilities.
  165. [165]
    The Advance of Science & Technology Since 1945 - Study.com
    Oct 19, 2024 · This lesson will provide examples from the different areas of advancement, such as communication, transportation, and computers.
  166. [166]
    The Role of Applied Physics in Modern Engineering Challenges
    Feb 27, 2025 · Applied physics bridges pure physics and engineering to apply fundamental principles to hands-on technologies and real-world problems.
  167. [167]
    Scientific Research & Study Design - Research Process - LibGuides
    Oct 16, 2025 · The research follows the scientific method, an iterative process of observation and inquiry. The Scientific Method. Make an observation ...
  168. [168]
    Steps of the Scientific Method - Science Buddies
    1. Ask a Question · 2. Do Background Research · 3. Construct a Hypothesis · 4. Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment · 5. Analyze Your Data and Draw a ...Background Research Plan · Science Fair Project Question · Laboratory Notebook
  169. [169]
    Research Methods--Quantitative, Qualitative, and More: Overview
    Sep 26, 2025 · This guide provides an overview of research methods, how to choose and use them, and supports and resources at UC Berkeley.
  170. [170]
    6. The Methodology - Organizing Your Social Sciences Research ...
    Oct 16, 2025 · The methodology section of a research paper answers two main questions: How was the data collected or generated? And, how was it analyzed?
  171. [171]
    Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis - PMC
    Statistical methods involved in carrying out a study include planning, designing, collecting data, analysing, drawing meaningful interpretation and ...
  172. [172]
    6 Statistical Methods (Plus Definition and Importance) | Indeed.com
    Jun 6, 2025 · 6 statistical methods · 1. Mean · 2. Standard deviation · 3. Hypothesis testing · 4. Regression · 5. Sample size determination · 6. Analysis of ...
  173. [173]
    Research Methods and Methodologies – Howdy or Hello? Technical ...
    Research methods are often categorized as quantitative, qualitative or mixed method. Some projects, such as lab experiments, require the use of the scientific ...
  174. [174]
    Statistical Methods Resources | CTSI | University of Utah Health
    In addition to these basic statistical methods it is important to use simple graphs or contingency tables to check for outliers, distribution of the data or ...
  175. [175]
    Scientific Tools in Research: An Overview - wisio.app
    Feb 1, 2024 · Scientific tools include instruments, methodologies, and techniques for observation, measurement, and analysis. Examples include microscopes, ...
  176. [176]
    Choosing the Instrument - Research Tools & Instruments
    Sep 26, 2025 · Research instruments are tools used to collect data in both qualitative and quantitative studies. Common types include: Surveys & Questionnaires.
  177. [177]
    Statistical Theory and Methods | Biostatistics | School of Public Health
    Bayesian methods are widely used to solve complex inference problems in microsimulations, genomics, causal inference, missing data problems, and more.
  178. [178]
    Research Instruments & Scales - Health Sciences Research
    Aug 27, 2025 · Research instruments are tools that can be used to collect, measure and analyze data. Instruments can come in many different forms: questionnaires, surveys, ...
  179. [179]
    What is Peer Review? - Wiley Author Services
    Peer review is the process where experts from a specific field or discipline evaluate the quality of a peer's research.
  180. [180]
    Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
    It is the method by which grants are allocated, papers published, academics promoted, and Nobel prizes won. Yet it is hard to define.
  181. [181]
    Types of Peer Review - Wiley Author Services
    The three most common types of peer review are single-anonymized, double-anonymized, and open peer review. Peer review is constantly evolving. Over time, new ...
  182. [182]
    Understanding peer review - Author Services - Taylor & Francis
    Common types of peer review. Play an audio reading of this section: Single-anonymous peer review. This type of peer review is also called 'single-blind review'.
  183. [183]
    Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and ...
    Another of the main criticisms against the peer review process is the lack of adequate detection of practices considered research misconduct in scientific ...
  184. [184]
    The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to ...
    The peer-review process was more effective in identifying retraction causes related to data, methods, and results than those related to text plagiarism and ...Abstract · Introduction · Discussion And Conclusions
  185. [185]
    The peer-review crisis: how to fix an overloaded system - Nature
    Aug 6, 2025 · Journals and funders are trying to boost the speed and effectiveness of review processes that are under strain.
  186. [186]
    Full article: An evaluation of the process of peer review
    Nov 22, 2022 · In this short article I will review the peer review system, look at the criticisms of it, review how it works in practice, then go on discuss what makes a good ...3.2. Pre-Publication Peer... · 6. How Peer Review Works In... · 8. Conclusions
  187. [187]
    The limitations to our understanding of peer review
    Apr 30, 2020 · Research on peer review is not particularly well-developed, especially as part of the broader issue of research integrity; often produces ...Roles Of Editors In Peer... · Role Of Reviewers In Peer... · Peer Review And...<|separator|>
  188. [188]
    Replicability - Reproducibility and Replicability in Science - NCBI - NIH
    Replication is one of the key ways scientists build confidence in the scientific merit of results. When the result from one study is found to be consistent by ...
  189. [189]
    The Replication Crisis in Psychology - Noba Project
    In science, replication is the process of repeating research to determine the extent to which findings generalize across time and across situations.
  190. [190]
    A Simple Explanation for the Replication Crisis in Science
    Aug 23, 2016 · The reasons proposed for this crisis are wide ranging, but typical center on the preference for “novel” findings in science and the pressure on investigators.
  191. [191]
    Preregistering, transparency, and large samples boost psychology ...
    Nov 9, 2023 · Preregistering, transparency, and large samples boost psychology studies' replication rate to nearly 90% · So-called “rigor-enhancing practices” ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics<|separator|>
  192. [192]
    Modelling publication bias and p-hacking - PubMed
    Publication bias and p-hacking are two well-known phenomena that strongly affect the scientific literature and cause severe problems in meta-analyses.
  193. [193]
    The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science - PMC - NIH
    Mar 13, 2015 · One type of bias, known as “p-hacking,” occurs when researchers collect or select data or statistical analyses until nonsignificant results become significant.
  194. [194]
    Unpacking P-hacking and Publication Bias
    We use unique data from journal submissions to identify and unpack publication bias and p-hacking. We find initial submissions display significant bunching.
  195. [195]
    Unpacking P-Hacking and Publication Bias | NBER
    Aug 10, 2023 · We use unique data from journal submissions to identify and unpack publication bias and p-hacking. We find that initial submissions display significant ...
  196. [196]
    Seven Recent Developments in US Science Funding
    Jan 9, 2023 · For instance, the federal government is the largest source of funding for basic research (41 percent of the total), followed by the business ...
  197. [197]
    Funding Categories - NIH Grants & Funding
    Feb 3, 2025 · As the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world, NIH supports a variety of programs from grants and contracts to loan repayment ...
  198. [198]
    https://www.statista.com/topics/6737/research-and-development-worldwide/
  199. [199]
    Global R&D and International Comparisons
    Jul 23, 2025 · The government sectors in the United Kingdom and France performed about 20% of R&D, compared with 10% for the United States and 8% for China.
  200. [200]
    Science costs money – research is guided by who funds it and why
    Oct 3, 2025 · Today, government and private funding both remain important for scientific discoveries and translating knowledge into practical applications.<|separator|>
  201. [201]
    Federal Research and Development (R&D) Funding: FY2026
    Sep 3, 2025 · The requested $181.4 billion would support federal investments in the conduct of R&D as well as R&D-related physical assets (such as the ...
  202. [202]
    Funding Mechanisms
    Oct 18, 2024 · Broad classes of mechanisms include Training Awards (K), Research Grants (R), Cooperative Agreements (U), and Contracts (SBIR/STTR).
  203. [203]
    Federal R&D funding | Emerging Technology Policy Careers
    Jul 3, 2025 · Funding for external researchers flows through a mix of competitive grants, contracts, and other mechanisms.
  204. [204]
    Report Shows U.S. Still Leads the World in R&D – for Now
    Jul 25, 2025 · In 2023, the United States spent nearly $940 billion in R&D across all sectors of the economy. When measured in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) ...
  205. [205]
    Research Team Structure | Elsevier Language Services Blog
    Nov 9, 2021 · 1. Principal Investigator (PI): · 2. Project or Research Director: · 3. Project Coordinator or Research Associate: · 4. Research Assistant: · 5.
  206. [206]
    [PDF] Key Considerations in Organizing and Structuring University Research
    Key considerations include creating research positions, management positions, units, office, oversight committees, rules for integrity, project lifecycle, ...
  207. [207]
    Impact of institutional organization on research productivity and ...
    Jun 27, 2023 · The organizational structure of a research institution is a determinant factor for internal communication processes between researchers. It can ...
  208. [208]
    Research & Development Organizational Chart - How to Create One
    Jun 18, 2025 · Learn how to create an org chart for a R&D department, including key structures, types of org charts, and tips to create one for yourself.
  209. [209]
    9.2 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND CENTER MANAGEMENT
    In a multi-institution ERC, it is essential to develop and foster strong administrative relationships within and among the cooperating colleges and departments ...
  210. [210]
    2024 Research Funding | Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research
    UIC received 75% of its research funding from federal sponsors, led by $205.4 million from the National Institutes of Health. The National Science Foundation ...
  211. [211]
    [PDF] CERN, a working example of global scientific collaboration - arXiv
    On the political level, CERN is a most successful and effective example of international collaboration which served as a blueprint for other research ...
  212. [212]
    Examples of International Scientific Collaboration
    A well known example of international scientific collaboration, sixteen nations are partnering to build and operate the International Space Station (ISS)
  213. [213]
    CERN and ESA: a decade of innovation
    May 30, 2025 · CERN and ESA: a decade of innovation · 1. Mapping the Universe · 2. Planetary exploration · 3. Earth observation · 4. Dosimetry for human ...Missing: global | Show results with:global<|separator|>
  214. [214]
    The New Space Race | Power & Politics in 21st Century
    The USA, China and Russia are the clear front-runners, but the race is very different this time. More than 80 countries now have a presence in space.
  215. [215]
    https://trendsresearch.org/insight/orbital-rivalry-the-u-s-china-competition-and-the-future-of-the-global-space-economy/
  216. [216]
    In the race to attract the world's smartest minds, China is gaining on ...
    Sep 29, 2025 · In 2023, China spent more than $780 billion on research and development, compared with roughly $823 billion from the US, according to the most ...Missing: modern | Show results with:modern
  217. [217]
    Unraveling Cosmic Mysteries: the collaboration between ISS and ...
    CERN and NASA join forces in exploring the secrets of the universe, a challenging endeavour that results in practical benefits for society.
  218. [218]
    Benefits, Motivations, and Challenges of International Collaborative ...
    Feb 15, 2021 · International research collaborations have increased in volume and importance, responding to higher education expansion and the advancement of ...Abstract · Characterizing international... · Reflections on the benefits...
  219. [219]
    Cooperation through science diplomacy: Benefits and examples
    Using CERN as a blueprint, global cooperation among scientists became one of UNESCO's key missions and paved the way to support other institutions that combine ...
  220. [220]
    Realism, instrumentalism, and scientific symbiosis - PubMed - NIH
    Scientific realism views theories as approximations of universal truths, while instrumentalism sees them as useful for predictions and problem-solving.
  221. [221]
    Realism, Instrumentalism, and Scientific Symbiosis - APA PsycNet
    Scientific realism posits nonobservable entities exist, while instrumentalism aims to produce useful predictions, not necessarily truth.
  222. [222]
    Realism and instrumentalism (Chapter 11)
    Realism views knowledge as descriptive of the universe, while instrumentalism sees it as only for predicting facts, not describing the universe.
  223. [223]
    Rationalism Versus Empiricism -- How Reality Is Understood
    Jul 6, 2020 · Empiricism, on the other hand, is nowadays the main way science develops, i.e, through experience and experiment-based research, as opposed ...
  224. [224]
    Rationalism vs. Empiricism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aug 19, 2004 · The dispute between rationalism and empiricism has been taken to concern the extent to which we are dependent upon experience in our effort to gain knowledge ...Introduction · The Innate Knowledge Thesis · Bibliography
  225. [225]
    [PDF] The Epistemological Foundations of Scientific Knowledge
    Science shares the same foundations, seeks situated knowledge, not absolute truth, and is produced by humans, not found in the world. It is organized knowledge.
  226. [226]
    The epistemological foundations of science reconsidered
    P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? (Contributions to Constructivism), Norton, New York (1984) ...
  227. [227]
    Epistemology: The Foundations of Scientific Knowledge - SpringerLink
    Jan 10, 2023 · The word epistemology means the critical study of the basic aspects, validity and limits of scientific knowledge. The term, coined in 1854 by ...
  228. [228]
    [PDF] Epistemological Foundations In Philosophy Of Science - Jurnal Unisai
    Jun 30, 2024 · Epistemological foundations in philosophy of science include empiricism-positivism, rationalism, constructivism, and criticism.
  229. [229]
    Thomas Kuhn - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aug 13, 2004 · Kuhn claimed that science guided by one paradigm would be 'incommensurable' with science developed under a different paradigm, by which is meant ...
  230. [230]
    [PDF] Paradigm Shifts Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996
    When observations or the results of research do not conform to the paradigm, they are seen as not refuting the paradigm, but as the mistake of the researcher.
  231. [231]
    Thomas Kuhn's Skepticism Went Too Far - John Horgan
    Jul 26, 2023 · Kuhn rejects Karl Popper's claim that science progresses when theories are disproved, or "falsified." Falsification, Kuhn contends, is no more ...
  232. [232]
    Objections to Kuhn's theory of scientific progression
    Jan 22, 2017 · Kuhn theorized that scientific progress is non-linear and occurs through periods in which science operates under the same focus, equipment, terminology, ...
  233. [233]
    Paradigm Shift Definition: 6 Examples of Paradigm Shifts - 2025
    Jan 14, 2022 · 6 Examples of Paradigm Shifts ; 1. CO2 emissions ; 2. Evolution ; 3. Germs ; 4. Orbit of the sun ; 5. Quantum mechanics ...
  234. [234]
    Paradigm Shifts in Science: Insights from the Arts - Lasker Foundation
    Darwinism and Mendelism.
  235. [235]
    Debunking revolutionary paradigm shifts: evidence of cumulative ...
    Nov 28, 2024 · A revolutionary paradigm shift requires replacing an existing major theory or breakthrough, and revolutionary leaps that represent a complete ...Abstract · Introduction · Results and discussion · Conclusion: evolution over...
  236. [236]
    Pseudoscience and the Demarcation Problem
    Karl Popper was the most influential modern philosopher to write on demarcation, proposing his criterion of falsifiability to sharply distinguish science from ...An Ancient Problem with a... · The Renaissance of the... · Pseudoscience as BS
  237. [237]
    Science and Pseudo-Science - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Sep 3, 2008 · Pseudoscience is an antithesis of science in the individuated rather than the unindividuated sense. There is no unified corpus of pseudoscience ...
  238. [238]
    Karl Popper - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Nov 13, 1997 · These factors combined to make Popper take falsifiability as his criterion for demarcating science from non-science: if a theory is ...Backdrop to Popper's Thought · Basic Statements, Falsifiability... · Critical Evaluation
  239. [239]
    [PDF] Karl Popper's demarcation problem - PhilArchive
    Jan 24, 2019 · Popper uses falsifiability as a demarcation criterion to evaluate theories. The Popper criterion does not exclude from the field of science ...
  240. [240]
    Differentiating Science From Pseudoscience : 13.7 - NPR
    May 8, 2017 · Though it's hard to pin down what makes science science, criteria like these can help us spot pseudoscience when it presents itself as science.
  241. [241]
    Science vs. Pseudoscience
    May 17, 2022 · Homeopathy is a great example of pseudoscience. Homeopathy works under the belief that the body can heal itself and uses heavily diluted ...
  242. [242]
    [PDF] Distinguishing Science and Pseudoscience
    May 30, 2001 · Pseudoscience always avoids putting its claims to a meaningful test. Pseudoscientists never carry out careful, methodical experiments ...
  243. [243]
    Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion
    Jan 6, 2018 · Many philosophers have come to believe there is no single criterion by which one can distinguish between a science and a pseudoscience.2.1 Science And Non-Science · 3.1 Science As Process · 4 A Social Process Criterion<|separator|>
  244. [244]
    The Demarcation Problem and Falsifiability - PLATO
    One of the practical consequences of the Scientific Revolution was a suggestion that one should only believe things that are both true and justified.
  245. [245]
    The Folly of Scientism - The New Atlantis
    Evolutionary Biologist Austin L. Hughes argues against the philosophers and scientists who have sought to replace philosophy with science.
  246. [246]
    The Dangerous Rise Of Scientism - Hoover Institution
    The Dangerous Rise Of Scientism: Blind faith in “settled science” has justified some of the worst horrors of human history.
  247. [247]
    The Critique of Scientism: Ryle and Oakeshott on Tacit Knowledge
    Jun 19, 2017 · Oakeshott's critique of scientism, which he referred to as rationalism, and his elaboration of the distinction between practical and technical ...
  248. [248]
    The Problem with Scientism | Blog of the APA
    Jan 25, 2018 · Scientism is an exaggerated trust in natural science methods applied to all areas, threatening other disciplines and undermining science's ...
  249. [249]
    What are strong and contemporary arguments for rejecting scientism?
    Oct 17, 2021 · The strongest criticism of scientism are those which attack the limits of the scientific methods such as those offered by Popper, Quine, Putnam, Kuhn, and ...
  250. [250]
    Reductionism and complexity in molecular biology - PMC - NIH
    Another defect of reductionist thinking is that it analyses complex network interactions in terms of simple causal chains and mechanistic models.
  251. [251]
    Critical Comments on Reductionism in Physical Sciences - Metanexus
    Sep 1, 2011 · We have shown that “strong” reductionism is impossible and cannot function even in principle when many-body interactions occur as they do in the real world.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  252. [252]
    Reductionism as a Scientific Mythos - by Yohan J John, PhD
    Mar 29, 2023 · Reductionism is the idea that in order to understand any phenomenon, we just break it up into the tiniest measurable pieces, and then understand the pieces.
  253. [253]
    Complexity in biology. Exceeding the limits of reductionism and ...
    First, the reductionist approach is not able to analyse and properly account for the emergent properties that characterize complex systems.
  254. [254]
    Reductionism and Emergence II: Two Philosophers' Takes on My Post
    May 23, 2021 · Put simply, those who believe in emergence (rather than reduction) maintain that the big (holistic) stuff is as real as the small (basic) stuff.
  255. [255]
    Correcting misconceptions - Understanding Science
    This section explains and corrects some of the most common misconceptions that students are likely have trouble with.
  256. [256]
    Explore Results for the 2024 NAEP Science Assessment
    In 2024, the average science score at eighth grade was 4 points lower compared to 2019 and not significantly different than in 2009, the start of a new ...Missing: PISA | Show results with:PISA
  257. [257]
    Fast Facts: International comparisons of achievement (1)
    ... in PISA 2022, the U.S. average science literacy score was. higher than the average in 56 education systems;; lower than the average in 9 education systems; and ...
  258. [258]
    "Just As Devastating" As NAEP - US Math Scores Drop on TIMSS
    Dec 16, 2024 · Eighth graders declined 27 points, with much of the decline at both grade levels coming from the lowest performing students. The latest results ...
  259. [259]
    What Americans Know About Science - Pew Research Center
    Mar 28, 2019 · About four-in-ten Americans (39%) get between nine and 11 correct answers, classified as having high science knowledge on the 11-item scale or ...
  260. [260]
    Public Familiarity with Science and Technology Research Processes
    Feb 14, 2024 · Data from the 2020 Wellcome Global Monitor survey found that 23% of Americans surveyed believed they knew “a lot” about science (Figure PPS-8).
  261. [261]
    Survey Explores Scientific Literacy | September 15, 2021
    Sep 15, 2021 · 85% of Americans want to learn more about science, while close to half (44%) report they are falling behind in their understanding; and ...
  262. [262]
    Nights at the museum: integrated arts and microbiology public ...
    This study uses integrated art and science events to explore a blended approach in improving public understanding of current scientific topics and widening ...
  263. [263]
    Public engagement is key for the future of science research - Nature
    Jun 1, 2016 · As we engage in science outreach, we also change how the public views scientists. They will realise our skills and value. We need to further ...<|separator|>
  264. [264]
    Chapter 4: Misconceptions as Barriers to Understanding Science
    The role of misconceptions in the learning process. Descriptions and examples of some common misconceptions in science. Methods to identify misconceptions.
  265. [265]
    [PDF] AIR Research Brief: Synthesizing NAEP and International Large ...
    In NAEP reading at both grades, NAEP mathematics at both grades, and TIMSS mathematics and science at grade 8, the 90th percentile score rose while the 10th ...
  266. [266]
    (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate ...
    Apr 5, 2021 · Science literacy is often held up as crucial for avoiding science-related misinformation and enabling more informed individual and collective decision-making.
  267. [267]
    Full article: Science literacy in the twenty-first century: informed trust ...
    Apr 9, 2024 · ABSTRACT. A primary justification of teaching science to all young people is to develop students to become “critical consumers” of science.
  268. [268]
    The Belmont Report | HHS.gov
    Aug 26, 2024 · The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research ... Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
  269. [269]
    Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-use Dilemma in ...
    Let us now consider the second ethical issue; it concerns dual-use research on presently existing or novel pathogens (where their present and/or future ...
  270. [270]
    The Nuremberg Code | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are ...
  271. [271]
    Beyond Nazi War Crimes Experiments: The Voluntary Consent ... - NIH
    The Nuremberg Code consists of 10 principles that constitute basic legal and ethical rules for research with human subjects. The first principle, the consent ...
  272. [272]
    WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical ...
    Medical research should be designed and conducted in a manner that avoids or minimizes harm to the environment and strives for environmental sustainability.
  273. [273]
    Fiftieth Anniversary of Uncovering the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
    Jan 19, 2022 · Informed consent was never sought; instead, Public Health Service researchers deceived the men into believing they were receiving expert medical ...The PHS Syphilis Study · Why Was the PHS Syphilis . · The Guatemalan Epilogue
  274. [274]
    Ethical considerations regarding animal experimentation - PMC - NIH
    These guidelines are often permissive of animal experimentation regardless of the damage to the animal as long as human benefits are achieved [59].
  275. [275]
    Why Animal Research Is Necessary | Harvard Medical School
    Animal research remains critical and necessary to comply with legal requirements, for ethical and safety reasons, and to address other scientific and practical ...
  276. [276]
    What is dual-use research of concern?
    Dec 13, 2020 · Dual-use research of concern (DURC) describes research that is intended to provide a clear benefit, but which could easily be misapplied to do harm.
  277. [277]
    Dual-Use Research - NIH Office of Intramural Research
    Sep 5, 2025 · Biological research is considered 'dual-use' in nature if the methodologies, materials, or results could be used to cause harm.
  278. [278]
    The Manhattan Project Shows Scientists' Moral and Ethical ...
    Mar 2, 2022 · Oppenheimer would become an advocate for nuclear peace and oppose the construction of the hydrogen bomb, but not without consequence. He was ...
  279. [279]
    Archive: What's So Controversial About the First Gene-Edited Babies ...
    Nov 30, 2018 · A Chinese researcher, He Jiankui, announced the birth of the first babies who had their DNA edited as embryos. He said he used CRISPR to ...
  280. [280]
    The CRISPR babies controversy: Responsibility and regulation in ...
    May 28, 2020 · The genome editing of human embryos by He Jianjui and the announcement to do so by Denis Rebrikov should spur the research community into ...
  281. [281]
    Analysis of Federal Funding for Research and Development in 2022
    Aug 15, 2024 · National Patterns estimates show that in 2022 40% and 37% of basic research is funded by the federal government and businesses, respectively.
  282. [282]
    X
    Research suggests NIH grants return about $2.30–$2.46 per $1 invested, based on recent economic studies. For NSF grants, the evidence leans toward significant ...
  283. [283]
    [PDF] The Returns to Government R&D: Evidence from U.S. ...
    Nov 17, 2024 · Increased nondefense R&D leads to higher productivity, with returns of 140-210%. Government R&D accounts for one-fifth of business-sector TFP ...<|separator|>
  284. [284]
    NSF cuts endanger research that improves economic growth ...
    May 16, 2025 · The Federal Reserve estimates that government-supported research from the NSF and other agencies has had a return on investment of 150% to 300% ...
  285. [285]
    How Reducing Federal R&D Reduces GDP Growth | ITIF
    Sep 15, 2025 · Cutting federal R&D by 20 percent instead of keeping investments constant as a share of GDP would reduce spending by $620 billion over 10 years— ...
  286. [286]
    Government R&D spending, fiscal instruments and corporate ...
    Our findings suggest that government R&D spending can substantially improve corporate technological innovation through fiscal instruments.
  287. [287]
    Science Funding and Short-Term Economic Activity - PMC - NIH
    Apr 4, 2014 · It is productive work. Scientific endeavors employ people. They use capital inputs. Related economic activity occurs immediately. Data ...Missing: influences | Show results with:influences
  288. [288]
    [PDF] Federal vs. Industry Funding of University Research
    When matching assignee names to funder names, we find that over 40% of patents with private sector assignees are assigned to a company funding the research.
  289. [289]
    [PDF] The Money Blind: How to Stop Industry Bias in Biomedical Science ...
    As long as industry chooses the topics for the research it funds, those topics will be biased towards investigations of patented drugs and devices for ...
  290. [290]
    Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research - PMC
    This article focuses on ensuring that physician-industry relationships do not result in ethical transgressions or cause damage to doctor-patient relationships.
  291. [291]
    Science's Worst Enemy: Corporate Funding - Discover Magazine
    Nov 19, 2007 · “The government is clearly increasing its reliance on industry and forming 'joint ventures' to accomplish research that it is unable to afford ...
  292. [292]
    How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice - NIH
    Feb 13, 2024 · Researchers across all groups experienced that competition for funding shapes science, with many unintended negative consequences.Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  293. [293]
    R&D spending growth slows in OECD, surges in China; government ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · Growth in government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD) in the OECD area slowed sharply at 0.6% in 2023, down from 5.5% in 2022, as COVID-19 ...
  294. [294]
    Research and Development: U.S. Trends and International ...
    May 21, 2024 · In 2022, the federal government performed $73.3 billion, for an 8% share of U.S. R&D, compared with $66.8 billion in 2021, for a 10% increase (3 ...
  295. [295]
    Which Political Party Provides More Funding for Science?
    Sep 18, 2025 · Though both Republicans and Democrats have historically supported federal funding of research, one party has spent more.
  296. [296]
    Partisan disparities in the funding of science in the United States
    Sep 18, 2025 · Yet there are reasons to believe that science funding is not immune to political forces. Federal funding agencies are ultimately responsible to ...
  297. [297]
    From Anti-Government to Anti-Science: Why Conservatives Have ...
    Nov 15, 2022 · In this essay, we argue that conservative hostility toward science is rooted in conservative hostility toward government regulation of the marketplace.
  298. [298]
    The Soviet Era's Deadliest Scientist Is Regaining Popularity in Russia
    Dec 19, 2017 · But Lysenko, a Soviet biologist, condemned perhaps millions of people to starvation through bogus agricultural research—and did so without ...
  299. [299]
    Inherit a Problem: How Lysenkoism Ruined Soviet Plant Genetics ...
    Jan 20, 2020 · Stalin supported Lysenko, exiled his opponents, and thus ruined Soviet agriculture and genetics until well after his own death in 1953.
  300. [300]
    Protecting Government Science from Political Interference
    Sep 12, 2024 · Overall, UCS has documented 326 examples of politics undermining government science across the last four presidential administrations. Political ...
  301. [301]
    Overview: The Conflict Between Religion and Evolution
    Feb 4, 2009 · Creation science – A movement that has attempted to uncover scientific evidence to show that the biblical creation story is true. Some in the ...
  302. [302]
    Evolution Controversy: A Phenomenon Prompted by the ...
    The incompatibility between science and the belief in supernatural causation helps us understand why people do not accept evolution.
  303. [303]
    The Politicization of Climate Science: Media Consumption ...
    May 26, 2024 · A March 2022 poll by Pew Research Center shows that only 23% of Republicans report seeing global warming is a major threat, compared to 78% ...
  304. [304]
    Academics Decry Federal Overreach Yet See Bias in Universities
    Apr 18, 2025 · Of the participants, 47% listed “ideological commitments or political orientations” in their field as among the greatest threats to academic ...
  305. [305]
    Reproducibility of Scientific Results
    Dec 3, 2018 · (2015) report five replication projects by independent groups of researchers which produce reproducibility estimates ranging from 22% to 49%.
  306. [306]
    Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
    We conducted a large-scale, collaborative effort to obtain an initial estimate of the reproducibility of psychological science.
  307. [307]
    PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
    Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the ...
  308. [308]
    Most laboratory cancer studies cannot be replicated, study shows
    Apr 4, 2012 · Most laboratory studies of cancer are wrong, says a former head of global cancer research at the biotechnology company Amgen.Missing: rate | Show results with:rate
  309. [309]
    What have we learned? - PMC - NIH
    Dec 7, 2021 · Researchers at two drug companies – Bayer and Amgen – had reported that they had not been able to replicate many published findings in cancer ...
  310. [310]
    Replication Crisis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The replication crisis is a term used to refer to widespread concern about the accumulation of erroneous studies in scientific literature.
  311. [311]
    The Replication Crisis: the Six P's | Alex Holcombe's blog
    Jul 23, 2023 · Professor Dorothy Bishop came up with “the four horsemen of irreproducibility“: publication bias, low statistical power, p-hacking, and HARKing.
  312. [312]
    The Evolution of Behavior Analysis: Toward a Replication Crisis?
    OSC (2015) offered three factors as likely responsible for these replication failures: failure to replicate procedures, low-power designs, and publication bias ...
  313. [313]
    Preregistration - Center for Open Science
    If you know the data intimately and understand how the data are going to distribute, then the preregistration is very diminished in its power to mitigate bias.
  314. [314]
    Reproducibility Project: Psychology - OSF
    We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original ...
  315. [315]
    Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and ... - Journals
    Apr 9, 2025 · Various open science practices have been proposed to improve the reproducibility and replicability of scientific research, but not for all ...
  316. [316]
    The preregistration revolution - PMC - NIH
    Preregistration distinguishes analyses and outcomes that result from predictions from those that result from postdictions.
  317. [317]
    How the Replication Crisis Led to Open Science - Aging Well Lab
    Feb 21, 2022 · Low replication rates aren't restricted to the natural sciences, either. In 2015, the US Federal Reserve Board examined 59 publications from ...
  318. [318]
    How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic ...
    A non-systematic review based on survey and non-survey data led to estimate that the frequency of “serious misconduct”, including plagiarism, is near 1% [11].
  319. [319]
    Landmark research integrity survey finds questionable practices are ...
    Jul 7, 2021 · Landmark research integrity survey finds questionable practices are surprisingly common · Largest-ever survey finds one in 12 Dutch scientists ...
  320. [320]
    NSF Fellows' perceptions about incentives, research misconduct ...
    Apr 7, 2023 · The research misconduct rates (3.7% for self-reported and 11.9% for direct knowledge of colleagues) are of magnitude similar to those estimated ...
  321. [321]
    Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
    67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%).
  322. [322]
    Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years — why?
    May 31, 2024 · Of all the retracted papers, nearly 67% were withdrawn owing to misconduct and around 16% for honest errors. The remaining retractions did not ...
  323. [323]
    There's far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit
    Aug 9, 2023 · The truth, however, is that the number of retractions in 2022 – 5,500 – is almost definitely a vast undercount of how much misconduct and fraud ...
  324. [324]
    Scientific fraud has become an 'industry,' alarming analysis finds
    Aug 4, 2025 · Scientific fraud has become an 'industry,' alarming analysis finds. Sophisticated global networks are infiltrating journals to publish fake ...
  325. [325]
    The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and ...
    Numerous recent scientific and journalistic investigations demonstrate that systematic scientific fraud is a growing threat to the scientific enterprise.<|separator|>
  326. [326]
    Geographical Disparities in Research Misconduct: Analyzing ...
    Jan 14, 2025 · Our findings reveal that China, the US, and India have the highest numbers of retractions due to misconduct, with China particularly ...
  327. [327]
    Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure
    Jan 10, 2018 · There is, however, concern that rewarding scientists chiefly on publication creates a perverse incentive, allowing careless and fraudulent ...Introduction · Model outline · Results · Discussion
  328. [328]
    Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure
    There is, however, concern that rewarding scientists chiefly on publication creates a perverse incentive, allowing careless and fraudulent conduct to thrive, ...
  329. [329]
    Cheat or perish? A theory of scientific customs - ScienceDirect.com
    As a consequence, the introduction of performance incentives not only leads to fraudulent behavior in the short run, but may also deteriorate the scientific ...
  330. [330]
    Research Fraud and the Publish or Perish World of Academia
    Jul 14, 2016 · Research fraud, more politely termed questionable research practices, has been receiving increasing attention in the academic literature and ...
  331. [331]
    Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish - PMC
    As always, there is no rule of thumb to ensnare fraudulent articles. There is an indication that "contaminated" studies are not discernible compared with "clean ...
  332. [332]
    https://ascopost.com/news/october-2025/how-the-proliferation-of-fraudulent-scientific-papers-is-threatening-the-integrity-of-cancer-research/
  333. [333]
    A simple — but not easy — way to stop research misconduct | STAT
    Sep 23, 2024 · We must all be accountable for our behavior, and to be sure, some serial offenders have perpetrated shocking cases of scientific fraud.
  334. [334]
    Section 4: Scientists, Politics and Religion | Pew Research Center
    Jul 9, 2009 · Most scientists identify as Democrats (55%), while 32% identify as independents and just 6% say they are Republicans. When the leanings of ...
  335. [335]
    Trends in American scientists' political donations and implications ...
    Oct 13, 2022 · We find that scientists who donate to federal candidates and parties are far more likely to support Democrats than Republicans.
  336. [336]
    A Model of Political Bias in Social Science Research
    Mar 9, 2020 · Political bias has also emerged in the review of ideologically charged scientific articles, in exaggerating the impact of effects favorable to ...
  337. [337]
    The Politics of Climate Change in the United States
    Oct 4, 2016 · Polarized views about climate issues stretch from the causes and cures for climate change to trust in climate scientists and their research.
  338. [338]
    Americans' Trust in Scientists and Views of Science Decline in 2023
    Nov 14, 2023 · Declining levels of trust in scientists and medical scientists have been particularly pronounced among Republicans and Republican-leaning ...
  339. [339]
    The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond - Quillette
    Aug 7, 2017 · The Google Memo: Four Scientists Respond. Psychological differences make equal outcomes impossible. Equality or diversity. You can't have both.
  340. [340]
    Public Trust in Scientists and Views on Their Role in Policymaking
    Nov 14, 2024 · For instance, 80% of Democrats view research scientists as honest, compared with 52% of Republicans.
  341. [341]
    Scientists' political donations reflect polarization in academia
    Jun 6, 2023 · People who lean left politically reported an increase in trust in scientists during the COVID-19 pandemic, while those who lean right ...
  342. [342]
    History of Anti-Vaccination Movements - HistoryOfVaccines.org
    Critics of vaccination have taken various positions, including opposition to the smallpox vaccine in England and the United States in the mid to late 1800s.Missing: science | Show results with:science
  343. [343]
    Anti-science kills: From Soviet embrace of pseudoscience to ...
    Jan 28, 2021 · The relentless attacks on science and scientists during Stalin's Great Purge and the ascendancy of Lysokenkoism and other pseudoscientific theories provide a ...
  344. [344]
    It Can't Happen Here (Or Can It?): The Deadly Rise of Anti-Science ...
    In chapters with titles like “An Army of Patriots Turns Against the Scientists,” “Health Freedom Propagandists,” and “Red Covid,” Hotez juxtaposes recent ...
  345. [345]
    Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it? - PNAS
    Jul 12, 2022 · From vaccination refusal to climate change denial, antiscience views are threatening humanity. When different individuals are provided with ...
  346. [346]
    Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States - PMC
    We revisit historical trends of trust in science among Americans by political orientation. We find steadily diverging trends by political views since the 1990s.
  347. [347]
    The "replication crisis" in the public eye: Germans' awareness and ...
    Sep 14, 2020 · We find that most Germans are not aware of the "replication crisis." In addition, most interpret replication efforts as indicative of scientific quality ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  348. [348]
    The replicability crisis and public trust in psychological science
    We predicted that knowledge about replication failures would reduce trust, especially in past research, but it might also reduce trust in future research.<|control11|><|separator|>
  349. [349]
    Why do so many Americans distrust science? - AAMC
    May 4, 2022 · The forces and factors behind distrust, which include a public overwhelmed by too much information, growing polarization, disinformation ...
  350. [350]
    Widespread distrust in science: Is the way we communicate to blame?
    Jul 14, 2022 · Researchers increasingly find their work misunderstood and misused, as the iterative nature of scientific discovery clashes with an explosion in public access.
  351. [351]
    https://www.aamc.org/news/why-do-so-many-americans-distrust-science
  352. [352]
    The Strange New Politics of Trust in Science
    Notably, in a 2024 survey, respondents identifying as “extremely conservative” were the most likely to express no trust in research findings produced by tech ...Missing: polls | Show results with:polls
  353. [353]
    Science once drove technology – but now the reverse is true. Here's ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · Traditionally, scientific discoveries led the way, with breakthroughs like Newton's laws enabling the Industrial Revolution, and quantum ...
  354. [354]
    10 Scientific Discoveries That Changed The World
    Jan 18, 2024 · 10 Scientific Discoveries That Changed The World · 1. DNA · 2. Earth in Motion · 3. Electricity · 4. Germ Theory of Disease · 5. Gravity · 6.
  355. [355]
    22 inventions that changed the world | Live Science
    Dec 17, 2024 · 1. GPS; 2. Smartphones; 3. Wheel; 4. Printing press; 5. Penicillin; 6. Compass; 7. Light bulb; 8. Telephone; 9. Internal combustion engine; 10.GPS · Smartphones · Wheel · Internet
  356. [356]
    Scientific breakthroughs: 2025 emerging trends to watch - CAS.org
    Dec 27, 2024 · We've identified eight key trends that could drive major scientific breakthroughs in 2025. Recent developments in these areas span diverse subjects like AI in ...Crispr Therapeutics Pipeline... · Molecular Editing Boosting... · Quantum Computing Getting...
  357. [357]
    What Are The Greatest Scientific Discoveries Of All Time? - Hello Bio
    1. Genome editing · 2. CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) · 3. RNA-sequencing · 5. The molecular structure of DNA · 6. Electricity.
  358. [358]
    7 Incredible Medical Breakthroughs | Worldwide Cancer Research
    7 incredible medical breakthroughs that changed the world · Why is medical research so important? · Vaccination · Epidemiology · Anaesthesia · Insulin · Germ theory.
  359. [359]
    Science and technology on fast forward
    Scientific knowledge allows us to build new technologies, which often allow us to make new observations about the world, which, in turn, allow us to build even ...
  360. [360]
    Life Expectancy - Our World in Data
    Across the world, people are living longer. In 1900, the average life expectancy of a newborn was 32 years. By 2021 this had more than doubled to 71 years.Life expectancy: what does this · Twice as long · Than in other rich countries? · Has<|separator|>
  361. [361]
    Global life expectancy has increased over the last 65 years
    May 19, 2020 · Ever since the 1918 influenza pandemic, modern medicine and health science advancements have increased life expectancy around the globe.
  362. [362]
    From Life Span to Health Span: Declaring “Victory” in the Pursuit of ...
    Now that most people born in the modern era have an excellent chance of survival past the age of 65, and, among these survivors, many will survive to ages 85 ...
  363. [363]
    Impacts of Federal R&D Investment On the US Economy
    In 2018, public R&D investment directly and indirectly supported more than 1.6 million U.S. jobs, $126 billion in labor income, $197 billion in added economic ...
  364. [364]
    Cutting Public R&D Would Slash U.S. GDP, Innovation, and Industry ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · According to the model, halving current nondefense public R&D spending would lead to a 7.6% reduction in U.S. GDP over the long term.
  365. [365]
    Most Americans say science has brought benefits to society and ...
    Aug 27, 2019 · About seven-in-ten US adults (73%) say science has had a positive effect on society, just 3% say it has had a negative effect and 23% say it has yielded an ...
  366. [366]
    What was the Industrial Revolution's Environmental Impact? - Greenly
    Aug 26, 2024 · Beyond emissions, industrialisation also contributed to environmental degradation, the depletion of natural resources, water pollution, and ...
  367. [367]
    The Environmental Impacts of Industrialization | EcoMENA
    Apr 23, 2024 · The environmental impacts of industrialization include pollution, resource depletion, species extinction, and water pollution. These effects can ...
  368. [368]
    Industrial emissions - consilium.europa.eu
    According to 2017 estimates, industrial emissions cause damage totalling between €277 and 433 billion to human health and the environment each year. How do EU ...
  369. [369]
    Discoveries, Unintended Consequences, and the Values of Science
    Apr 20, 2020 · Life is strange: developments that initially seem good sometimes turn out to have disastrous consequences, and disasters sometimes have ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  370. [370]
    Leo Szilard: the physicist who envisaged nuclear weapons but later ...
    Jan 24, 2023 · Leo Szilard is best remembered for being the first scientist to call for atomic bombs to be developed – before later demanding they be stopped.
  371. [371]
    When Science Can Harm | Harvard Medical School
    Mar 2, 2020 · “In addition to a long history in which science has benefited people, there are also theories and aspects of science that are used to harm,” said course ...
  372. [372]
    Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve ...
    Oct 7, 2021 · The results of the unrestricted growth of science calculations show that the overall growth rate amounts to 4.10% with a doubling time of 17.3 years.
  373. [373]
    The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in ... - NIH
    The first data used were the numbers of scientific journals. The data indicated a growth rate of about 5.6% per year and a doubling time of 13 years.
  374. [374]
    Publications Output: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons | NSF
    Dec 11, 2023 · From 2012 to 2022, the global yearly publication total grew by 59%. In terms of growth for these two largest producers, China and the United ...
  375. [375]
    U.S. R&D and Innovation in a Global Context: The 2024 Data Update
    Apr 23, 2024 · Adjusted for inflation and cross-economy price differences, global R&D investment has tripled over the past 30 years, from $672 billion in 1992 ...
  376. [376]
    Why the 2024 Global R&D Funding Forecast tally is $2.53 trillion
    Jul 23, 2024 · For 2024, R&D World's editors forecast that $2.53 trillion will be invested globally in R&D, which represents an 8.3% increase over the 2022 forecast.
  377. [377]
    Moore's Law and Its Practical Implications - CSIS
    Oct 18, 2022 · A corollary of Moore's Law is that the cost of computing has fallen dramatically, enabling adoption of semiconductors across a wide span of ...
  378. [378]
    Moore's Law Explained: Past, Present, and What Comes Next
    Jul 15, 2025 · Moore's Law predicted the doubling of computing power every two years. Explore its history, impact, and what happens now that we're hitting ...Moore's Law Explained: Past... · Impact Of Moore's Law On... · Is Moore's Law Still Valid?
  379. [379]
    Science Nobel Prizes by Nations - areppim
    The United States and Canada grabbed 308 or 44%, Asia and the rest of the world won 52 or 7.5% and 6 or 0.9% of the awards respectively. Small nations such as ...
  380. [380]
    Global number of publications over time - Academia Stack Exchange
    Mar 24, 2019 · The overall trend was about 7 percent per year growth in citations, going back to the nineteenth century.
  381. [381]
    Will AI ever win its own Nobel? Some predict a prize-worthy ... - Nature
    Oct 6, 2025 · For an AI scientist to claim its own discovery, the research would need to be performed “fully or highly autonomously”, according to the Nobel ...
  382. [382]
    https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126980/global-number-of-publications-over-time
  383. [383]
    Quantum Computing Roadmaps & Predictions of Leading Players
    May 16, 2025 · As of May 23, 2025, major players like IBM, Google, Microsoft, Rigetti Computing, D-Wave, IonQ, Quantinuum, Intel, Pasqal and Amazon are shaping the future.
  384. [384]
    Quantum Computing Moves from Theoretical to Inevitable
    Sep 23, 2025 · Quantum computing is advancing, with up to $250 billion impact possible. But full potential isn't guaranteed and may be gradual.Quantum's big market potential... · Cybersecurity: Quantum's...
  385. [385]
    China Takes the Lead in Fusion Energy | Neutron Bytes
    Jul 20, 2025 · In January 2025 the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) said its experimental tokamak nuclear reactor successfully ran for more than 1,000 seconds ...
  386. [386]
    [PDF] Fusion Science & Technology Roadmap - Department of Energy
    Oct 16, 2025 · areas to accelerate progress such as. AI and Inertial Fusion Energy (IFE). ... Helion Energy, 2025. Helion's Fusion Technology, https://www ...
  387. [387]
    The State of the Fusion Energy Industry in 2025 - Peak Nano
    Jul 24, 2025 · In 2025, fusion is commercially driven, with $9.7B funding, global collaboration, and pilot plants expected 2030-2035, with a global race.
  388. [388]
    IAEA Launches New World Fusion Outlook at Opening of Fusion ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · Rafael Mariano Grossi, IAEA Director General, today launched the World Fusion Outlook 2025, highlighting how fusion energy is entering a new ...
  389. [389]
    Scientists reveal date when technology will surpass human ...
    Oct 11, 2025 · The findings revealed that AI experts' predictions for the singularity keep getting closer and closer with every unexpected leap in AI's ...
  390. [390]
    Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2025 - The World Economic Forum
    Jun 24, 2025 · The report spans from structural battery composites and engineered living therapeutics to osmotic power and AI-generated content watermarking.
  391. [391]
    Shaping the future: World Economic Forum and Frontiers reveal Top ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · Shaping the future: World Economic Forum and Frontiers reveal Top 10 Emerging Technologies for 2025 · Autonomous Biochemical Sensing.
  392. [392]
    Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate is Warming
    NASA summary of peer-reviewed studies indicating 97% consensus among climate scientists on human-caused warming.
  393. [393]
    Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature
    Cook et al. (2013) peer-reviewed paper analyzing abstracts of scientific papers, finding 97.1% consensus among those expressing a position.