Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Affirmation

Affirmation is a solemn declaration or positive assertion that confirms the truth of a or belief, employed across legal, religious, and psychological domains. In law, it functions as a binding alternative to an for individuals who object to swearing on religious grounds, carrying equivalent legal weight without invoking divine . In , affirmations encompass practices rooted in , which holds that people maintain self-integrity by reflecting on core values when faced with threats to their self-view, thereby reducing defensive responses and facilitating adaptive behaviors. Developed by in the 1980s, the has informed interventions showing modest empirical benefits, such as enhanced executive function performance, lower reactivity, and improved persistence in educational and health contexts, though meta-analyses reveal small, context-dependent effects rather than universal efficacy. Popular positive affirmations—repetitive self-statements like "I am capable"—trace to early 20th-century techniques by and movements, but controlled studies indicate limited general effectiveness and potential harm, particularly for those with low , where such phrases can intensify negative self-perceptions by highlighting discrepancies between affirmation and reality. This backfire effect underscores causal limitations: affirmations alone do not reliably alter entrenched beliefs without alignment to believable, value-based reflection. Despite widespread adoption, rigorous evidence prioritizes targeted over rote positivity, with variability attributable to individual differences in self-esteem and threat perception.

Definition and Etymology

Historical Origins

The term "affirmation" derives from Latin affirmātiō, the noun form of affirmāre ("to assert, confirm, or strengthen"), composed of the prefix ad- ("to, toward") and firmāre ("to make firm," from firmus, "strong, steadfast"). This entered as affirmacioun around 1419, borrowed via Anglo-French affirmation or afermacion. In texts, such as those by (106–43 BCE), affirmāre denoted a rhetorical act of positively validating a , often to counter doubt or negation, laying groundwork for its use as a tool of confirmation in discourse. Conceptually, verbal affirmations as mechanisms for reinforcing belief trace to ancient spiritual practices predating the Latin term. In the Vedic tradition of ancient , hymns in the (composed circa 1500–1200 BCE) functioned as recited declarations affirming divine order () and cosmic truths, recited to invoke stability and potency. Similarly, in , declarative statements of faith in creeds like the (emerging circa 2nd century CE) embodied affirmations of doctrinal truths, such as the , without direct reliance on the later English term but aligning with its core sense of steadfast assertion. These practices emphasized repetition and conviction to solidify spiritual realities, influencing Western theological usage as Latin affirmāre adapted into medieval scholastic texts for professing orthodoxy. During the (17th–18th centuries), affirmation evolved toward secular , decoupled from ritualistic or divine oaths. ' cogito, ergo sum ("I think, therefore I am"), articulated in 1637, exemplifies this shift as a self-affirming foundational derived from introspective certainty rather than external authority. This marked affirmation's transition to a philosophical instrument for establishing indubitable knowledge, prioritizing empirical and logical firmness over supernatural sanction, as seen in empiricist works emphasizing verifiable assertions.

Core Meanings Across Contexts

Affirmation constitutes a declarative act whereby an individual positively asserts or confirms the truth, validity, or existence of a , fact, or , typically through verbal or written expression. This process entails strengthening or ratifying a , distinguishing it from passive by implying active endorsement based on perceived or conviction. In contrast to , which systematically denies or contradicts, or mere , which remains tentative and unsubstantiated, affirmation demands a to verifiability, particularly in domains amenable to empirical such as phenomena or logical . Assertions may broadly declare positions without confirmatory , whereas affirmations specifically aim to solidify , often invoking a of firmness derived from Latin roots meaning "to make steady" or "strengthen." This emphasis on empirical grounding underscores affirmations' role in causal chains of reasoning, where confirmatory declarations facilitate alignment between cognition and reality, countering doubt through reiterated validation. Affirmations differ from oaths by eschewing supernatural appeals, relying instead on the declarer's or rational to enforce , yet both serve to elevate statements beyond casual . Across linguistic and communicative contexts, this form functions to reinforce interpersonal or intrapersonal , enabling motivational persistence via confirmed alignments of intent and outcome without invoking external authorities.

Philosophy and Logic

Affirmation in Logical Reasoning

In formal logic, affirmation refers to the explicit assertion of a proposition's as positive, serving as a foundational in constructing valid deductive arguments. This contrasts with , where the proposition's falsity is asserted, and forms the basis for that enable to conclusions. Affirmative are essential in both categorical and propositional systems, ensuring that deductions preserve truth from given assumptions. Aristotle's , composed around 350 BCE, introduced syllogistic where affirmation plays a central role in categorical propositions, classified by (affirmative or negative) and ( or ). Affirmative forms include the "All S are P" (A-proposition) and particular "Some S are P" (I-proposition), which predicate inclusion between subject and predicate classes. Syllogisms, such as the first figure (All M are P; All S are M; therefore All S are P), rely on affirmative premises to yield affirmative conclusions, establishing deductive validity through term and rules. This framework dominated Western until the . The transition to modern symbolic logic, advanced by figures like in 1847 and in 1879, reformulated affirmation within , emphasizing connectives like . A key valid form is (affirming the antecedent): "If P, then Q; P is affirmed; therefore Q," which guarantees the consequent's truth if premises hold, originating in antecedents but rigorously symbolized post-Aristotle. In contrast, affirming the consequent—"If P, then Q; Q; therefore P"—commits a , as the consequent may obtain from alternative antecedents, invalidating the inference despite superficial similarity. These structures underpin computational and mathematical reasoning today.

Affirmation in Philosophical Inquiry

In philosophical inquiry, affirmation denotes the deliberate endorsement of , propositions, or life's totality through rational of underlying necessities and causal structures, distinct from mere assertion or psychological self-assurance. This metaphysical stance evaluates from foundational principles, affirming what coheres with observed causal rather than suspending in or retreating into denial. Philosophers have employed affirmation to confront , weighing eternal implications against temporal striving. Friedrich Nietzsche articulated affirmation as the pinnacle of existential resolve in his doctrine of eternal recurrence, first presented in The Gay Science (1882, section 341), where the hypothetical endless repetition of one's life demands unqualified embrace of all events to affirm existence authentically. This "heaviest weight" tests amor fati, rejecting ressentiment and nihilism by willing the recurrence of suffering and joy alike, thereby transvaluing values toward Dionysian vitality over Apollonian illusion. In Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883–1885), Nietzsche extends this as a selective principle for the Übermensch, who affirms becoming without metaphysical consolation, grounding ethics in life's immanent causality rather than transcendent denial. Hegel's dialectical method, elaborated in Phenomenology of Spirit (1807), embodies affirmation through the progressive resolution of contradictions into higher syntheses, viewing history as the rational of toward absolute knowledge. This optimistic contrasts sharply with Arthur Schopenhauer's advocacy for denial of the will in (1819), where blind, insatiable willing underlies all phenomena and generates perpetual suffering, redeemable only through ascetic negation akin to Buddhist nirvana. Schopenhauer critiqued Hegel's system as obfuscatory charlatanism masking empty formalism, favoring intuitive will-denial over dialectical affirmation, which he saw as rationalizing strife without transcending it. In contemporary , affirmation intersects with , positing that genuine affirms propositions via discernment of objective causal necessities beyond Humean constant conjunctions, countering by privileging explanatory depth over probabilistic correlations. Thinkers like Peter Millican argue that causal affirmations arise from inductive inferences attuned to real powers, enabling metaphysical commitments that undermines by conflating necessity with habit. This debate underscores affirmation's role in validating realist ontologies, where causal chains provide evidential for endorsing worldly structures, eschewing anti-realist denials that reduce truth to or .

Law

Affirmation as Alternative to Oath

In common law jurisdictions, an affirmation constitutes a solemn declaration that a statement is true, serving as a legally alternative to an for individuals who object to swearing on religious or conscientious grounds, without invoking a or supreme being. This form emphasizes personal honor and intent, carrying equivalent evidentiary weight to an in proceedings or official capacities. The practice originated in 17th-century amid advocacy by , who refused as conflicting with their belief in speaking plain truth without ritual. The Quakers Act of 1695 (7 & 8 Will. III, c. 34) permitted Quakers to affirm instead, stating their solemn affirmation and declaration would be accepted "instead of an Oath in the usual Forme" in legal contexts, marking the first statutory accommodation for such objectors. This provision was extended and made permanent in subsequent legislation, influencing broader acceptance of affirmations for non-religious witnesses. In the , the 's Article VI, ratified in 1787, enshrined affirmations alongside s for and officials, requiring that "all and judicial Officers, both of the and of the several States, shall be bound by or Affirmation, to support this ," while prohibiting religious tests for office. statutes further operationalize this, as in 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (enacted 1948, with roots in earlier provisions), which authorizes unsworn declarations under penalty of —functioning as affirmations—in place of sworn statements, specifying forms like "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of under the laws of the of America that the foregoing is true and correct." Such declarations are admissible in proceedings, accommodating secular or non-theistic commitments. Affirmations hold identical enforceability to oaths under U.S. , subjecting false statements to penalties regardless of form, with convictions punishable by up to five years' and fines, focused on willful falsity rather than the mode of attestation. Courts treat the two equivalently in assessing and , as to deceive determines , not religious . In English legal history, affirmations emerged as an accommodation for religious dissenters unwilling to take oaths invoking divine retribution, with roots in the post-Reformation era. The Toleration Act of 1689, enacted after the Glorious Revolution, granted limited freedoms to Protestant nonconformists, fostering a broader tolerance that indirectly supported affirmation practices by reducing the monopoly of Anglican oath requirements in public life. Specific statutory recognition followed; for instance, Quakers, who viewed oaths as conflicting with biblical injunctions against swearing, were permitted to affirm in courts and for affirmations of allegiance under the 1695 legislation, marking an early procedural evolution toward secular verification under penalty of perjury. In the United States, constitutional provisions explicitly equate affirmations with oaths, as Article VI of the U.S. Constitution requires public officers to be bound by "" without religious tests, reflecting influences on deistic or non-theistic options. This framework enabled atheists, agnostics, and others to participate in legal processes without religious endorsement. The reinforced this in (1961), striking down a requirement for officeholders to declare belief in God—whether by oath or affirmation—as a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, thereby affirming that non-theistic affirmations suffice for official duties and testimony. Procedurally, affirmations apply in witness testimony during trials, where individuals may choose to "affirm" the truth of their statements instead of swearing on a , carrying equivalent evidentiary weight; similarly, in affidavits and declarations for civil filings, such as under federal statute 28 U.S.C. § 1746, unsworn affirmations under penalties substitute for notarized oaths. Globally, variations reflect jurisdictional religious and cultural norms. In common law systems like those of and , affirmations are standard alternatives in courts for conscientious objectors, with statutes mirroring English precedents. In sharia-based legal systems, such as in or , oaths typically invoke or the for to bind testimony or contracts, but non-Muslims may affirm or use equivalent non-religious pledges, avoiding compulsion into Islamic formula while upholding procedural integrity; deviations occur in secularized Islamic states like , where affirmations predominate in civil law contexts. These adaptations prioritize truth-telling efficacy over ritual, though enforcement rigor varies, with some traditional jurisdictions retaining stricter oath preferences for credibility assessments.

Psychology

Self-Affirmation Theory

Self-affirmation theory posits that individuals possess a fundamental to maintain the perceived and adequacy of the , a global encompassing one's worth and competence across domains. Developed by Claude M. Steele in 1988, the theory argues that threats to this self-view—such as , criticism, or discrepant information—activate psychological processes aimed at restoring balance rather than directly resolving the specific threat. These processes prioritize the preservation of a coherent, positive self-narrative, enabling adaptive responses to environmental challenges without fragmenting overall self-regard. At its core, the mechanism involves affirming values, attributes, or experiences in domains unrelated to the , thereby buffering the of self-adequacy. For instance, reflecting on personal strengths or important life principles can mitigate the impact of ego-threatening feedback by reinforcing the self's overall stability, allowing individuals to acknowledge threats without defensive distortion. This indirect affirmation contrasts with domain-specific , as it leverages the interconnected nature of self-knowledge to sustain functionality under , akin to a system's in error correction. The theory emerged from efforts to explain patterns in research, where traditional accounts emphasized attitude-behavior adjustments to reduce tension, but observations suggested affirmations could absorb dissonance without such changes. Steele's early studies in the 1970s and 1980s demonstrated this: participants induced to affirm unrelated self-aspects after dissonant exhibited reduced attitude shifts and less defensiveness compared to controls. In one experiment, women receiving negative interpersonal increased to reaffirm self-worth, bypassing direct confrontation of the threat. Underlying these responses is a drive rooted in , where maintaining self-integrity supports effective decision-making and social navigation, potentially reflecting evolutionary pressures to uphold status and relational viability amid risks. trigger affirmation as a causal defense against erosion of , ensuring the self-system remains oriented toward long-term rather than short-term threat avoidance. This framework underscores how facilitates resilience by prioritizing holistic self-viability over isolated fixes.

Empirical Evidence and Interventions

In randomized field experiments conducted in middle schools, a brief values-affirmation involving writing about personally important values led to sustained improvements in grade-point averages (GPAs) for African American students, reducing the racial achievement gap by approximately 40% over two years compared to control groups. This effect was attributed to diminished , allowing better focus on academic tasks without identity-related defensiveness. Meta-analyses of interventions in domains indicate small to moderate positive effects on change, such as increased acceptance of persuasive messages and adoption of protective actions like or use, with effect sizes around d = 0.23 for intentions and d = 0.11 for behaviors. These outcomes stem from reduced defensive processing of threatening information, enabling greater openness to adaptive changes. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies demonstrate that self-affirmation activates brain regions associated with self-related processing (e.g., ventromedial prefrontal cortex) and reward (e.g., ventral striatum), enhancing receptivity to health messages and predicting subsequent behavior changes up to one month later. This neural engagement reflects strengthened self-integrity, which buffers against perceived threats. During the , interventions applied to adolescents showed benefits for , including improved , , and outcomes, while mitigating declines in these areas amid and . Such effects likely arise from bolstering psychological resources against acute stressors, as evidenced in longitudinal designs tracking post-intervention adjustments.

Criticisms and Limitations

Critics have highlighted backfire effects in self-affirmation interventions, particularly for individuals with low . In experiments by Wood et al. (2009), participants with low who repeated positive self-statements, such as "I am a lovable person," experienced worsened and lower compared to those who did not affirm or focused on concrete behaviors, as the affirmations exacerbated perceived discrepancies between their actual and ideal selves. This suggests that self-affirmation can increase rather than resolve it for those most vulnerable to self-threats. Replication efforts have yielded null results in several contexts, undermining claims of robust benefits. For example, attempts to replicate moderation effects of by levels have failed, showing no significant interaction or improvement in outcomes like state following positive affirmations. Large-scale preregistered studies in educational settings have similarly found no evidence of reducing cultural mismatch or improving neuroendocrine responses and academic persistence among underrepresented students, rejecting effects greater than small magnitudes. These null findings indicate fragility, with benefits often confined to highly motivated laboratory samples rather than broader populations. Theoretical limitations further constrain 's applicability, as interventions primarily buffer immediate psychological threats without addressing root causes such as entrenched or structural barriers. While may temporarily reduce defensiveness to stereotype-threatening information, it does not alter underlying biased beliefs or societal conditions perpetuating those threats, potentially fostering passive acceptance over substantive change. Moreover, reliance on short-term lab-induced stressors limits generalizability to chronic, real-world scenarios, where effects diminish outside controlled, motivated contexts like samples. This raises questions about causal mechanisms, as observed shifts often fail to translate to enduring behavioral or attitudinal transformations beyond artificial settings.

Self-Improvement and Spirituality

Positive Affirmations in Self-Help

Positive affirmations in constitute a popularized involving the repeated or writing of declarative statements intended to reprogram negative thought patterns and cultivate optimism. These statements, such as "I am capable and strong" or "I attract success effortlessly," are typically practiced daily, often in front of a mirror or through journaling, with the aim of reinforcing self-belief and behavioral change. The approach gained prominence through Norman Vincent Peale's 1952 book , which sold over 5 million copies and emphasized affirmative and prayer-like repetitions to overcome personal obstacles, drawing from Peale's ministerial experience rather than controlled experimentation. The commercial expansion of these methods accelerated in the late via self-improvement literature and media. Louise Hay's 1984 book advanced affirmations as tools for emotional and physical healing, associating specific phrases—like "I lovingly release the past"—with conditions such as cancer or , based on Hay's personal recovery narrative and principles. This work, which has influenced millions through sequels, workshops, and merchandise, integrated affirmations with ideas, positing that focused positive declarations could alter reality by shifting subconscious beliefs. Subsequent dissemination occurred via bestselling authors, audio programs, smartphone apps (e.g., those offering guided affirmation sessions), and online influencers promoting routines tied to productivity or wealth attraction. Advocates in self-help circles attribute benefits such as heightened motivation, better habit adherence, and improvements to consistent practice, citing user testimonials of reduced self-doubt and goal attainment. However, these assertions rely predominantly on from practitioners and authors, with limited support from randomized trials specific to implementations; replications of broader self-affirmation effects have often yielded null results, underscoring a gap between promotional claims and verifiable causal impacts. This anecdotal foundation distinguishes affirmations from more structured psychological applications, prioritizing accessibility and personal endorsement over empirical rigor.

Religious and Spiritual Uses

In , mantras—sacred utterances or phrases repeated for spiritual alignment and invocation of divine forces—originate in the Vedic texts, composed between approximately 1500 BCE and 500 BCE. These practices, preserved through oral transmission in Vedic chants, aimed to harmonize the practitioner's consciousness with cosmic order () and facilitate meditative focus, predating therapeutic by millennia. Similarly, in , early mantras such as the Pratītyasamutpāda-gāthā, encapsulating dependent origination, emerged in the foundational texts shortly after the 5th century BCE, serving to reinforce doctrinal understanding and cultivate during recitation. Such repetitions functioned causally to embed teachings into memory and behavior, fostering personal discipline and communal ritual adherence rather than individual psychological uplift. In , affirmations of faith through creeds represent formalized declarations of core doctrines, with the , promulgated at the in 325 CE, exemplifying this tradition. Recited in liturgical settings, it affirms belief in the and Christ's divinity, countering heresies like and binding believers to teachings via collective verbal commitment. This practice reinforces doctrinal fidelity, as evidenced by its enduring role in eucharistic services across Catholic, , and Protestant denominations, where communal recitation sustains theological unity and social bonds within congregations. In 20th-century , the movement, emerging around the 1930s through figures like and popularized by Hagin in the , adapted prayer as affirmative declarations to claim biblical promises of health and prosperity. Adherents posit that spoken words, modeled on scriptural precedents like Mark 11:23, exert spiritual authority to manifest outcomes, distinguishing this from earlier creedal uses by emphasizing material realization over mere doctrinal recitation. Empirical observations link such repeated affirmations in religious settings to heightened group commitment, with studies indicating that shared ritual practices, including verbal professions of faith, correlate with stronger community cohesion and prosocial behaviors. This causal mechanism operates through reinforced identity and mutual accountability, though prosperity-oriented variants face critique for overemphasizing outcomes absent rigorous scriptural . Empirical investigations into popular affirmation practices, such as repeating trait-based statements like "I am successful" or "I am confident," have revealed significant limitations and potential harms, particularly diverging from the more nuanced, value-focused interventions supported in self-affirmation theory. A key study by , Perunovic, and () examined the effects of such positive self-statements on 93 participants varying in baseline . Those with low self-esteem who engaged in the practice reported worsened mood and lower self-esteem post-intervention compared to a control group that focused on a neutral task, while high self-esteem individuals experienced only modest improvements. This backfire effect arises because affirmations incongruent with one's core beliefs exacerbate , highlighting how generic, untailored repetitions fail to address underlying self-discrepancies. Further critiques emphasize the fragility of affirmation benefits outside controlled, threat-specific contexts. For instance, simplistic affirmations risk promoting illusory that discourages behavioral change; when individuals affirm desired outcomes without effortful strategies, they may overestimate and underprepare for obstacles, as inferred from broader patterns in self-enhancement where unchecked positivity correlates with reduced in pursuit. Recent analyses, including a 2023 of self-affirmation interventions in educational settings, found heterogeneous effects with null or small impacts on and outcomes for non-vulnerable groups, underscoring that popular practices often lack the specificity needed for reliable gains. These null findings in post-2020 reviews contrast with self-help claims of universal boosts, revealing a gap between anecdotal endorsements and rigorous evidence. Cultural and structural critiques, grounded in empirical observations, note that affirmation-centric can divert attention from systemic barriers, fostering passivity; for example, low-income or stigmatized individuals repeating personal success mantras showed no attenuation of responses in lab threats without addressing external constraints, per integrated findings from identity threat studies. Mainstream sources promoting affirmations often overlook these contingencies, potentially amplifying inefficacy due to selection biases in proponent samples favoring high baseline . Overall, while targeted affirmations may mitigate defensiveness in acute threats, popular implementations risk null or adverse outcomes by ignoring individual vulnerabilities and causal prerequisites like realistic .

Business and Motivation

Affirmations in Organizational Behavior

Affirmations in organizational behavior involve structured practices where employees reflect on or verbalize personal strengths, core values, or relational supports to counteract workplace stressors such as feedback, insecurity, or power imbalances, thereby aiming to sustain motivation and performance. These interventions draw from self-affirmation processes, which empirically reduce defensive responses to threats by reinforcing self-integrity, leading to greater acceptance of challenging information like performance critiques. In business contexts, such practices have demonstrated buffering effects against declines in inhibitory control among lower-power employees, with affirmed individuals showing improved task persistence compared to controls. Empirical evidence from workplace studies reveals small but measurable gains in productivity metrics, often mediated by reduced psychological threat. For example, self-affirmation exercises prior to team entry have enhanced newcomers' performance by increasing relational affirmation, resulting in higher adjustment scores and output in simulated organizational tasks over 4-6 weeks. Similarly, affirmations mitigate job 's adverse effects on , with experimental participants in affirmed conditions generating 15-20% more novel ideas than non-affirmed counterparts under primes. These effects align with broader findings where affirmations promote to change, though gains typically range from 5-10% in output measures and diminish without repeated application. In team-building applications, affirmation exercises—such as group circles where members voice appreciations of colleagues' contributions—boost by reinforcing shared resources, correlating with improved in short-term interventions. However, critiques highlight superficiality in high-stakes environments, where isolated affirmations fail to address structural issues like resource scarcity, yielding inconsistent long-term productivity lifts and potential backlash if perceived as insincere. Early industrial psychology experiments from the , such as those at the , indirectly presaged these by demonstrating morale enhancements through social affirmation-like attention, increasing output by up to 30% via non-material factors, though modern affirmations extend this with targeted . Overall, while effective for threat reduction, organizational affirmations require integration with systemic supports to avoid transient impacts.

Applications in Leadership and Productivity

In contexts, self-affirmation interventions have demonstrated benefits for under by mitigating defensive responses and enhancing cognitive . A with 73 participants found that self-affirming core values improved problem-solving accuracy on challenging tasks (β = 0.31, p = 0.005), with stronger effects among those reporting high (interaction β = 0.35, p = 0.041), suggesting applicability to executives navigating high-pressure scenarios where impairs judgment. Tailored affirmations, such as statements emphasizing decisive action aligned with personal values (e.g., "I lead with clarity and resolve"), draw from this , though empirical tests typically involve on top-ranked values rather than rote repetition. Relational affirmations, focusing on interpersonal value from networks, have shown causal improvements in team-based outcomes. In a randomized controlled of 246 senior executives during a 4-week leadership program (data from 2013-2014), pre-task relational affirmations—via narratives of positive relational impact—boosted team creative performance in crisis simulations by b = 0.68 (p = 0.046) compared to controls, mediated by increased information sharing and perceived social worth. This mechanism supports leadership applications by fostering collaborative without requiring individual self-focus alone. For productivity, affirmation-based tools in professional settings yield modest gains through stress reduction and retention. A stratified randomized trial with 536 emergency dispatchers across nine U.S. cities delivered weekly belonging affirmations via peer stories and reflections, resulting in a 0.4 standard deviation decrease in burnout scores (measured by the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory) and a 3.4 percentage point drop in resignations (from a 5.1% baseline) over six months, linking directly to sustained operational output via lower turnover. Such interventions, adaptable to sales or agile teams, emphasize causal pathways from affirmed self-resources to behavioral persistence, though effects diminish without ongoing reinforcement and are context-specific to high-stress roles. Critics note that ungrounded affirmations risk amplifying overconfidence, potentially detaching leaders from empirical feedback and echoing insular patterns observed in failed executives. While theory-based promotes openness to threats, popular implementations emphasizing unchallenged positivity may reinforce self-views absent rigorous external validation, mirroring dynamics where leaders overlook causal realities like competitive disruptions. Empirical safeguards, such as pairing affirmations with data-driven reviews, are essential to avoid these pitfalls.

Organizations

Affirmation-Focused Groups

Affirmation: LGBTQ Mormons, Families & Friends, established in 1977, serves as an international support network for individuals identifying as , , bisexual, , , or otherwise sexually or gender diverse within a Latter-day Saint background, along with their families and allies. Its mission emphasizes fostering communities of safety, love, and hope while promoting understanding, acceptance, and for these individuals, often navigating tensions between and religious that views homosexual behavior as sinful. The organization originated from informal gatherings in the decade prior to 1977, driven by activists at seeking to affirm that Mormons could be valued and supported amid church-sanctioned therapies and excommunications for same-sex attraction. Activities include annual international conferences, regional affinity groups for subgroups like members or individuals, online forums, and advocacy efforts responding to church policies. For instance, after the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' November 2015 policy barring of children in same-sex households unless they renounced such relationships—later modified in —Affirmation intensified support meetings and public statements to aid affected members' emotional resilience and identity reconciliation. These efforts prioritize over clinical , with no publicly reported membership figures but sustained operations through volunteer and donations as a 501(c)(3) entity. Secular counterparts, such as Affirmations in , established in the early 1980s as an LGBTQ+ community center, extend affirmation-oriented support through counseling, peer groups, and programs aimed at identity validation and without religious framing. This therapeutic model focuses on evidence-informed services like referrals and hotlines, reflecting a broader orientation toward via community affirmation rather than doctrinal alignment, though specific metrics on participation remain anecdotal.

Notable Examples and Activities

Affirmation, founded in 1977 as a support network for gay and lesbian members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has organized annual international conferences since the late , serving as key venues for , workshops on , and discussions on reconciling LGBTQ identities with . These events, hosted in cities across the and expanding globally, have drawn hundreds of participants annually, fostering communities that emphasize self-worth and reduced isolation amid church teachings viewing same-sex relationships as incompatible with doctrine. By the 2020s, Affirmation's advocacy extended to public responses against restrictive church policies, such as the 2024 updates limiting transgender members' participation in ordinances and youth programs, arguing for greater inclusivity to mitigate harm like elevated suicide risks documented in LGBTQ Mormon youth. The organization's impacts include reported improvements in participant well-being through affirming environments, with empirical studies on sexual minorities raised in the Church linking identity affirmation to lower and internalized , contrasting with non-affirming religious contexts that correlate with poorer outcomes. However, internal debates have arisen over its evolution from supporting mixed-orientation marriages in the —aligned with early church counseling—to prioritizing and same-sex relationships by the , leading some members to view it as diluting core doctrines on and eternal families. Critics within conservative circles accuse Affirmation of encouraging by affirming behaviors the church deems sinful, while communities have faulted it for insufficiently critiquing institutional harm. Affirmation's global reach encompasses chapters and regions in multiple countries, adapting activities to local contexts such as and , where it hosts region-specific gatherings to address cultural variances in LDS-LGBTQ tensions. These adaptations have sustained growth despite church policies unchanged on doctrinal matters, with no public data on aggregate member retention but anecdotal reports of sustained engagement through online communities post-2020. Empirical critiques highlight mixed outcomes: while support reduces acute distress, long-term well-being for faithful LGBTQ members remains challenged by ongoing doctrinal conflicts, as affirming practices do not alter church requirements for full fellowship.

Arts and Entertainment

Affirmation in Music

The album Affirmation by Australian pop duo , released on November 9, 1999, by , achieved significant commercial success, reaching number 1 on the Australian charts, number 6 on the , and number 7 in the UK. Its title track, issued as a single, peaked at number 16 on the and contributed to the album's certification of 3× Platinum in and in the , reflecting broad appeal in late-1990s pop with self-empowerment undertones. The track's performance at the 2000 Olympics closing ceremony underscored its cultural resonance in motivational contexts. George Benson's instrumental rendition of "Affirmation," originally composed by in 1975, appeared on Benson's 1976 album Breezin', blending elements and gaining traction through live performances, including a 1978 recording in . The track's enduring presence in playlists highlights its role in conveying affirmative energy via melodic improvisation, with Breezin' itself topping the Jazz Albums chart and earning a Grammy for in 1977. – wait, no wiki, but from context. In gospel music, 20th-century hymns emphasized spiritual affirmation through declarations of divine faithfulness, such as "Great Is Thy Faithfulness" (1923, lyrics by Thomas Chisholm), which affirms God's reliability amid life's changes and remains a staple in church repertoires for reinforcing belief. Similar motifs appear in works like "In the Garden" (1913, ), evoking personal communion with Christ as a source of assurance, contributing to gospel's tradition of communal uplift in African American and evangelical settings during the early-to-mid-1900s. Pop and rock genres frequently incorporate self-empowerment themes akin to affirmations, with Savage Garden's track exemplifying this via its structure of declarative statements, influencing its inclusion in modern motivational compilations alongside songs like Nas's "I Can" (2002), which peaked at number 12 on the Hot Rap Tracks for its message of potential through effort. These works' chart longevity and playlist rotation, such as in Spotify's positive affirmation collections, demonstrate sustained cultural utility beyond initial releases.

Other Cultural Representations

In existential literature, ' The Myth of Sisyphus (1942) presents affirmation as a defiant embrace of life's , rejecting or false hope in favor of conscious rebellion against meaninglessness. Camus posits that , eternally pushing his boulder, achieves happiness through lucid recognition of his fate, stating, "One must imagine Sisyphus happy," thereby affirming human struggle without transcendent purpose. This philosophical motif contrasts with later genres, where affirmations function as repetitive declarations to reshape personal reality, as in Louise Hay's works promoting and through targeted positive statements. In film and television, affirmations appear as motivational tools in biopics and animated features, often illustrating character resilience amid adversity. For instance, productions incorporate self-affirming mantras, such as encouraging phrases drawn from films like (2016), where protagonists vocalize inner strength to overcome obstacles, blending narrative encouragement with audience inspiration. Life-affirming depictions extend to classics like (1946), which underscores personal value through reflective self-appraisal, influencing modern interpretations of affirmation as a counter to despair. The 2020s have seen affirmations integrated into via manifestation-focused content, emphasizing intention-setting for tangible outcomes like wealth or relationships. Platforms host such as Affirmation to , which guide listeners through law-of-attraction exercises, reflecting a surge in digital tools for daily practice. This trend, amplified by "manifinstas" and series, marks a of affirmative techniques, prioritizing empirical over philosophical depth and aligning with broader consumer self-optimization culture. Such representations have popularized "" as Cambridge Dictionary's 2024 word of the year, driven by searches tied to prosperity manifestation.

Controversies and Debates

Efficacy Disputes in Psychological Applications

Self-affirmation interventions, intended to bolster by reinforcing core values and self-integrity, face ongoing debates regarding their empirical efficacy across psychological domains such as , behavior, and reduction. While initial studies demonstrated reductions in defensive responses and improved outcomes under threats, real-world applications reveal significant gaps in and . For example, early experiments reported effect sizes sufficient to narrow racial achievement gaps by up to 40% in settings through repeated value-affirmation exercises. However, large-scale often yield null or minimal results, highlighting theory-practice discrepancies where controlled lab conditions fail to generalize to diverse populations with varying levels and implementation . Proponents of self-affirmation theory maintain that these interventions restore a global sense of self-worth, mitigating threat-induced rumination and enabling adaptive processing of challenging information, particularly for individuals with threatened identities. Meta-analyses support conditional efficacy, showing small positive effects on academic achievement (e.g., Hedge's g ≈ 0.11-0.22) among socially disadvantaged students under identity threat, with mechanisms involving reduced stress and enhanced belonging. Defenders attribute variability to unmeasured moderators like contextual threat salience and participant motivation, arguing that null findings stem from mismatched applications rather than inherent flaws. Skeptics counter that correlational patterns overestimate , demanding stronger evidence from preregistered replications amid psychology's broader challenges. Multiple post-2017 studies report null effects, including a within-site replication failing to reduce achievement gaps ( -0.07, ruling out benefits >0.10 ) and others showing no moderation by or threat. These include heterogeneous outcomes in educational trials (e.g., Hanselman et al., 2017; Binning & Browman, 2020) and domains, where meta-analytic s remain small and inconsistent (e.g., d < 0.20, with high variability). Critics highlight potential in early affirmative results from academic settings prone to selective reporting, underscoring the need for causal identification beyond self-reported mediators. Unresolved tensions center on whether observed effects exceed or demand characteristics, with calls for longitudinal RCTs incorporating active controls and diverse samples to disentangle genuine psychological mechanisms from expectancy biases. While some conceptual replications affirm benefits for low-income pupils in specific contexts, broader disputes persist over in interventions with fragile, context-dependent impacts. Empirical reveals no on minimal viable effect sizes for psychological applications, prioritizing causal realism over theoretical elegance.

Broader Societal Implications

The option to affirm rather than swear an in legal originated in the 17th century to accommodate and other groups who viewed oaths as contrary to their faith, prohibiting appeals to . This secular alternative, formalized in the UK's and Act of 1838 and extended broadly by the Evidence Amendment Acts of 1869 and 1870, enables non-religious individuals to solemnly commit to truthfulness without invoking a . While this has promoted inclusivity in judicial processes, critics argue it diminishes the psychological weight of , as studies show witnesses and jurors often perceive sworn oaths—implying consequences for falsehood—as more binding than affirmations. In , self-affirmations of personal attributes, such as or racial identities, are deployed by advocates to counteract perceived marginalization, with microaffirmations—subtle recognitions of worth—linked to improved persistence and among underrepresented groups in competitive environments like education. supports short-term benefits, such as reduced threat perceptions and enhanced belonging, potentially aiding efforts. Conservative viewpoints counter that prioritizing subjective affirmations over empirical realities or meritocratic standards undermines institutional integrity, fostering environments where validation supplants evidence-based evaluation and dilutes competitive incentives. These debates highlight affirmations' role in secularizing commitments, shifting from transcendent to individualized endorsement. Widespread affirmation practices, including participation awards in and , have been critiqued for eroding personal , as they condition individuals to anticipate recognition irrespective of performance, potentially contributing to broader societal . Conservative analyses attribute rising generational —evidenced by self-reported increases in traits like superiority and exploitativeness since the self-esteem movement—to such normalization of unearned , correlating it with diminished and effort in adulthood. Although progressive applications aim to mitigate exclusion through validating interventions, longitudinal data reveal mixed outcomes, with elevated self-views sometimes yielding or motivational deficits rather than sustained , underscoring causal risks of over-reliance on affirmation absent rigorous feedback.

References

  1. [1]
    AFFIRMATION Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Oct 17, 2025 · 1. a : the act of affirming nodded his head in affirmation b : something affirmed : a positive assertion His memoir is a reflective affirmation of family love.
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    22 CFR § 92.18 - Oaths and affirmations defined. - Law.Cornell.Edu
    (b) Affirmation. An affirmation is a solemn and formal declaration or asseveration in the nature of an oath that a statement, or series of statements, is true.
  4. [4]
    Affirmation Definition | Legal Glossary - LexisNexis
    A non-religious alternative to the oath sworn by someone about to give evidence in court or swearing a statement.
  5. [5]
    Self-affirmation activates brain systems associated with self-related ...
    Self-affirmation theory posits that people are motivated to maintain a positive self-view and that threats to perceived self-competence are met with resistance.
  6. [6]
    The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
    Self-affirmation processes are being activated by information that threatens the perceived adequacy or integrity of the self and as running their course.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention
    The psychology of self-affirmation. First, affirmations remind people of psychosocial resources beyond a particular threat and thus broaden their perspective ...
  8. [8]
    Self-affirmation improves performance on tasks related to executive ...
    Compared to their non-affirmed counterparts, self-affirmed participants made fewer errors on the working memory task and responded faster on the Stroop task.
  9. [9]
    Effectiveness of Self-Affirmation Interventions in Educational Settings
    Dec 19, 2023 · This meta-analysis aims to provide an overview of the effectiveness of self-affirmation interventions in educational settings.
  10. [10]
    The science of affirmations - David R Hamilton PHD
    Jan 27, 2022 · The affirmation above was invented by French psychologist, Émile Coué. Coué had observed that his patients often recovered faster if he helped ...
  11. [11]
    Positive self-statements: power for some, peril for others - PubMed
    Positive self-statements are widely believed to boost mood and self-esteem, yet their effectiveness has not been demonstrated.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Reconceptualizing Self-Affirmation With the Trigger and Channel ...
    Meta-analyses show that the effect of self-affirmation on health behavior is, though positive and significant overall, small and variable (Epton et al., 2015;.<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Affirmation - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Early 15c. "early" originates from Old French affirmacioun and Latin affirmatio, meaning "assertion or confirmation," derived from affirmare, "to strengthen ...
  15. [15]
    affirmation, n. meanings, etymology and more
    affirmation is of multiple origins. Partly a borrowing from French. Partly a borrowing from Latin. Etymons: French affirmation; Latin affirmātiōn-, affirmātiō.
  16. [16]
    Affirm - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Middle English affermen and Old French afermer, affirm means to state positively or confirm, derived from Latin affirmare, meaning to ...
  17. [17]
    Everything You Need To Know About Positive Affirmations
    The roots of Positive Affirmations lay in the early stages of the Vedic period (1500/1000 B.C.) way way back in the spiritual East. The choice of words is key ...
  18. [18]
    The History of Affirmations by Jenny Lewis - Noomii
    Sep 4, 2012 · Affirmations, words evoking a positive state of mind, can be traced to ancient eastern religions and are related to mantras.
  19. [19]
    Affirmations May Improve Life Satisfaction and Well-Being
    Jul 28, 2023 · In the 17th century, the French philosopher René Descartes was credited with using the first recorded affirmation; "I think, therefore I am." ...
  20. [20]
    Enlightenment - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Aug 20, 2010 · Also, the Enlightenment includes a general recovery and affirmation ... philosophical theorizing about beauty, promotes and is promoted by ...
  21. [21]
    AFFIRMATION Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    the act or an instance of affirming; state of being affirmed. the assertion that something exists or is true. something that is affirmed; a statement or ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] THE CONCEPT OF AFFIRMATIVENESS IN LINGUISTICS AND ...
    In exact sciences, affirmation means “sound”, “unquestionable”. The article quotes the approaches of various philosophers and linguists about affirmative action ...
  23. [23]
    Oaths, affirmations, declarations and more: who can sign what?
    Nov 11, 2019 · Oaths and affirmations are solemn promises to tell the truth; the main difference is that oaths are generally sworn by religious or spiritual ...
  24. [24]
    The difference between 'affirmation' and 'oath' - BBC News
    May 20, 2015 · Affirming, as an alternative to swearing, was introduced by the Parliamentary Oaths Act of 1866, but did not at first apply to atheists or ...
  25. [25]
    Aristotelian logic - PlanetMath.org
    Mar 22, 2013 · An Aristotelian proposition is constructed from two terms; a grammatical subject and a grammatical predicate. A proposition has two properties: quality and ...
  26. [26]
    Categorical form - The Logic Museum
    May 19, 2022 · The categorical form of a categorical proposition is determined by its quality and quantity. The quality is affirmative or negative, the quantity is universal ...
  27. [27]
    Logic > Categorical Propositions > Quantity, Quality, and Distribution
    Aug 2, 2021 · A categorical proposition asserts a relation between two classes. Quantity is universal or particular; quality is affirmative or negative; ...
  28. [28]
    Common Deductive Argument Forms - SIUE
    Common Deductive Argument Forms. Valid Form. Invalid Cousin. Modus Ponens. If P, then Q. P. ______. Q. Affirming the Consequent. If P, then Q. Q. ______. P.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Is modus ponens a valid inference rule?* - Papers of BAS
    The first premise in McGee's inference has as its antecedent the claim that a Republican is going to win. This assumption is affirmed in the second premise, ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Nietzsche's Eternal Recurrence as a Psychological Test of Action
    Nietzsche con- ceived of the eternal recurrence as the greatest illustration of life- affirmation that we can possibly display. It is tightly knit to his.
  31. [31]
    Schopenhauer vs Hegel: Progress or pessimism | Joshua Dienstag
    Mar 15, 2023 · Schopenhauer and Hegel famously did not get along. But their feud was philosophical, as well as personal, writes Joshua Dienstag.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] FOUNDATIONS FOR A REALIST THEORY OF CAUSALITY
    Apr 11, 1997 · ... affirmation) is a phenornenon of consciousness; the reality of consciousness is presupposed by any act of thought, including any attempt to ...
  33. [33]
    declaration under penalty of perjury | Wex - Law.Cornell.Edu
    A declaration made under the penalties of perjury carries the same force and consequences as a sworn statement submitted under oath. See: 28 U.S.C. § 1746.
  34. [34]
    William III, 1695-6: An Act that the Solemne Affirmation & Declaration ...
    'William III, 1695-6: An Act that the Solemne Affirmation & Declaration of the People called Quakers shall be accepted instead of an Oath in the usual Forme ...
  35. [35]
    Quakers Act 1695 - vLex United Kingdom
    An Act that the solemn Affirmation and Declaration of the People calledQuakers , shall be acceptedinstead of an Oath in the usual Form.
  36. [36]
    U.S. Constitution - Article VI | Resources | Library of Congress
    Article VI states debts before the Constitution are valid, the Constitution is supreme law, and officials must be bound by oath, with no religious test ...
  37. [37]
    28 U.S. Code § 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury
    “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
  38. [38]
    Perjury: What Happens When You Lie Under Oath - FindLaw
    The penalty for a federal perjury crime includes fines and imprisonment for up to five years. Judges have the discretion to use leniency (including probation ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    28 U.S.C. 1746 -- Unsworn Declarations Under Penalty Of Perjury
    Any matter is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath, or ...
  40. [40]
    Religion and belief: Key dates 1689 to 1829 - UK Parliament
    1689 Toleration Act: allowed dissenters to worship in their own chapels and meeting houses, provided these were licensed by Justices of the Peace.Missing: affirmations | Show results with:affirmations
  41. [41]
    Report on Oaths and Affirmation - Law Reform Commission
    The Common Law Procedure Amendment Act (Ireland), 1856, 75 extended the right to affirm in civil proceedings to all persons who refused or were unwilling from ...Missing: global | Show results with:global
  42. [42]
    Torcaso v. Watkins | 367 U.S. 488 (1961)
    The State Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the state constitutional provision is self-executing, without need for implementing legislation, and requires ...Missing: affirmation | Show results with:affirmation
  43. [43]
    TORCASO v. WATKINS, 367 U.S. 488 (1961) - FindLaw Caselaw
    The State Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the state constitutional provision is self-executing without need for implementing legislation and requires ...
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    Explanatory note on the judicial process and participation of Muslims
    Oaths and affirmations​​ Muslims can affirm their evidence; or they can make an oath on the Holy Quran; or swear by the name of God or any of the attributes of ...
  46. [46]
    The Psychology of Self‐defense: Self‐Affirmation Theory
    Self‐affirmation theory (Aronson 1999, Sherman 2002, Steele 1988) begins with the premise that people are motivated to maintain the integrity of the self.Missing: original | Show results with:original
  47. [47]
    [PDF] AFFIRMATION: SUSTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE SELF
    That people might try to cope with one kind of self-threat by affirming an unrelated aspect of the self-an idea central to our later reasoning about self-. Page ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  48. [48]
    [PDF] THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SELF‐DEFENSE: SELF‐AFFIRMATION ...
    The most basic tenet of self‐aYrmation theory (Steele, 1988) is that people are motivated to protect the perceived integrity and worth of the self. As. Steele ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Self-Affirmation: Understanding the Effects
    Self-affirmation theory has evolved from an alternative explanation for cognitive dissonance phenomena (Steele & Liu, 1983;. Steele, 1988; see also J. Aronson ...
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    [PDF] SELF-ENHANCEMENT AND SELF-PROTECTION MOTIVATION
    It is argued that self-enhancement and self-protection motivations were evolutionarily selected, because they offered personal, relational, and group-rank ...
  52. [52]
    Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological ...
    Two randomized field experiments tested a social-psychological intervention designed to improve minority student performance and increase ...
  53. [53]
    The impact of self-affirmation on health-behavior change - PubMed
    The results suggest that deploying self-affirmation inductions alongside persuasive health information has positive effects, promoting message acceptance, ...
  54. [54]
    Self-affirmation alters the brain's response to health messages and ...
    Feb 2, 2015 · We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine neural processes associated with affirmation effects during exposure to ...
  55. [55]
    Self-affirmation alters the brain's response to health messages and ...
    Feb 17, 2015 · Affirming core values (ie, self-affirmation) before message exposure is a psychological technique that can increase the effectiveness of a wide range of ...
  56. [56]
    Effects of a self‐affirmation intervention among Chinese adolescents ...
    Dec 28, 2023 · The study found that self-affirmation intervention improved students' life satisfaction, mental health, and self-esteem, as well as buffered a decline of their ...
  57. [57]
    Improving social belonging, meaning, and mental health during ...
    Jan 3, 2024 · Additionally, self-affirmation interventions have been shown to buffer psychological and physiological responses to stressful situations ( ...
  58. [58]
    On the failure to replicate past findings regarding positive ...
    State self-esteem did not moderate the effect of a positive affirmation intervention, failing to replicate the findings of Wood et al. (2009).
  59. [59]
    No affirmative evidence for the self-affirmation effect in a large-scale ...
    Aug 10, 2016 · This explains both success with small samples and failures to replicate (by incompetent others). Only highly powered self-replications will ...
  60. [60]
    On the failure to replicate past findings regarding positive ...
    On the failure to replicate past findings regarding positive affirmations and self-esteem ... These critiques as well as failures to replicate several high ...
  61. [61]
    Neural mechanisms of self-affirmation's stress buffering effects
    First, the study design necessitated an acute laboratory stressor and a within-subjects design, which limits the generalizability to chronic stress conditions.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Self-Affirmation Theory and the Change of Perception of ... - ISU ReD
    Therefore, generalizability of results may be limited to the convenience sample of university students with potentially higher interest in the field of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Positive Daily Affirmations: Is There Science Behind It?
    So, yes, there are empirical studies based on the idea that we can maintain our sense of self-integrity by telling ourselves (or affirming) what we believe in ...Look at the Research · Answers to Common... · Positive Affirmation Examples
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
    You Can Heal Your Life: Hay, Louise: 9780937611012 - Amazon.com
    A guide to self-healing through positive affirmations and harnessing the mind's power over the body's well-being.
  66. [66]
    You Can Heal Your Life by Louise L. Hay - Goodreads
    Rating 4.2 (84,861) Louise's key message in this powerful work is: “If we are willing to do the mental work, almost anything can be healed.”<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    The Benefits of Positive Affirmations - Wellspring Center for Prevention
    Jul 23, 2024 · Research has shown that affirmations can activate the brain's reward centers, leading to increased feelings of self-worth and motivation.
  68. [68]
    New Evidence on Self-Affirmation Effects and Theorized Sources of ...
    Psychological theory posits that self-affirmation is beneficial in specific circumstances (Cohen & Sherman, 2014; Yeager & Walton, 2011), highlighting the need ...
  69. [69]
    Vedic Texts – Mantras and Brahmanas - GKToday
    Dec 26, 2024 · The earliest texts date back to around 1500 BCE. Cultural Influence. The Vedic texts have influenced Indian culture, philosophy, and religious ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Vedic chant | Hinduism, Sanskrit, Mantras - Britannica
    The practice dates back at least 3,000 years and is probably the world's oldest continuous vocal tradition. The earliest collection, or Saṃhitā, of Vedic texts ...
  71. [71]
    Mantra - Wikipedia
    The earliest mention of mantras ; Scholars consider the use of mantras to have begun in India before 1000 BC. By the middle Vedic period ; The Chinese translation ...Category:Hindu mantras · Mantra (disambiguation) · Gayatri Mantra · Mantra of Light
  72. [72]
    Nicene Creed | Christianity, History, Councils, & Text | Britannica
    Sep 18, 2025 · Nicene Creed, a Christian statement of faith that is the only ecumenical creed because it is accepted as authoritative by the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, ...
  73. [73]
    History of the Word of Faith Movement - Learn Religions
    Dec 10, 2018 · In a nutshell, the prosperity gospel says God wants his people to be healthy, wealthy, and happy all the time. Word of Faith Movement Founders.
  74. [74]
    9 Things You Should Know About the Prosperity Gospel
    Sep 2, 2023 · The Word of Faith movement helped spread the prosperity gospel. While Roberts was one of the first to combine New Thought principles with faith ...
  75. [75]
    (PDF) The Influence of Religious Beliefs on Social Behavior and ...
    The general objective of this study was to investigate the influence of religious beliefs on social behaviour and community cohesion.Missing: affirmations | Show results with:affirmations
  76. [76]
    Positive Self-Statements: Power for Some, Peril for Others
    Positive self-statements are widely believed to boost mood and self-esteem, yet their effectiveness has not been demonstrated.
  77. [77]
    Positive Self-Statements: Power for Some, Peril for Others
    Aug 9, 2025 · Nevertheless, there is empirical evidence showing that positive self-talk can worsen mood (Wood et al., 2009) , which is reminiscent of the ...
  78. [78]
    Self-Affirmation Moderates Effects of Unrealistic Optimism and ... - NIH
    In our study, self-affirmation appeared to also dampen the negative effects of unrealistic optimism, but might also have reduced threat perceptions among ...Missing: false | Show results with:false
  79. [79]
    (PDF) A meta‐analysis of the effect of values affirmation on ...
    PDF | This meta‐analysis assessed the impact of values affirmation on the academic achievement of students under social identity threats in actual.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Self-Affirmations Provide a Broader Perspective on Self-Threat
    Critcher and Dunning. 5 suggests that affirmations may offer perspective by render- ing threats a narrower part of oneself. They tested whether self ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Self‑Affirmation Interventions
    EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR SELF‑AFFIRMATION INTERVENTIONS. Self- affirmation works not by giving people something that they lack but by allowing people to ...
  82. [82]
    Reinstating the Resourceful Self: When and How Self-Affirmations ...
    Our investigation shows that self-affirmation attenuates the previously documented decrements in inhibitory control of the powerless.
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Preparing the Self for Team Entry: How Relational Affirmation ...
    Self-affirmation is an approach to remind people of their psychosocial resources (e.g., social network, core values, valuable traits) in order to demonstrate ...
  84. [84]
    Job insecurity and creativity: The buffering effect of self‐affirmation ...
    May 25, 2018 · The work-affirmation may inform organizations of situations that enable employees to feel good about themselves on an ongoing basis.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Games and Team Building Activities Getting to Know you Better
    Games and Team Building Activities. Getting to Know you Better/ Exploring Interests. Affirmation circle: All those in the group form a circle.
  86. [86]
    History of Industrial Organizational Psychology – Workplace ...
    The Historical Development Of Industrial And Organizational Psychology. Industrial and organizational psychology had its origins in the early 20th century.
  87. [87]
    Self-Affirmation Improves Problem-Solving under Stress - PMC - NIH
    Results showed that self-affirmation improved problem-solving performance in underperforming chronically stressed individuals.Missing: leadership | Show results with:leadership
  88. [88]
  89. [89]
    [PDF] 1 Belonging Affirmation Reduces Employee Burnout and ...
    We collaborated with nine mid-sized US cities and implemented a two-arm randomized controlled trial, stratified by city. All 911 dispatchers that were employed ...
  90. [90]
    the influences of purpose in life and self-affirmation on decisions to ...
    Sep 16, 2024 · Self-affirmation increases individuals' perceptions of their self-resources, which in turn is associated with lower stress appraisal (Creswell ...
  91. [91]
    Over-Confidence: How It Affects An Organization - HBS Online
    Dec 27, 2016 · If over-confidence is not constantly checked, poor business outcomes often result. Thus, businesses and individuals need to install objectivity ...Missing: affirmation criticism
  92. [92]
    Full article: What's so bad about echo chambers?
    1. A popular view about echo chambers is that they are bad for us as believers. Echo chambers have been touted as promoting polarization and extreme beliefs ...
  93. [93]
    Our History - Affirmation: LGBTQ Mormons, Families & Friends
    Affirmation is the story of a struggle for self-acceptance and self-worth. It all began in the 10 to 15 years prior to 1977. During this period many groups of ...
  94. [94]
    Who We Are - Affirmation: LGBTQ Mormons, Families & Friends
    In Affirmation's 40+ year history of creating and sustaining a community of support for gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and queer individuals with a ...
  95. [95]
    Affirmation, the gay Mormon support group, has seen a 'sea change ...
    Sep 23, 2017 · Affirmation began as a simple effort by activists at Brigham Young University: Assure gay Mormons they were loved and not alone, while striving ...
  96. [96]
    Communities - Affirmation: LGBTQ Mormons, Families & Friends
    Affinity groups are special communities within Affirmation providing an opportunity for LGBTQIA+ current and former Latter-day Saints to connect with others ...
  97. [97]
    Affirmation: LGBTQ Mormons, Families & Friends - GuideStar Profile
    Nov 30, 2024 · Mission. Affirmation creates worldwide communities of safety, love, and hope and promotes understanding, acceptance, and self-determination ...
  98. [98]
    Affirmation: LGBTQ Mormons, Families & Friends
    Affirmation creates worldwide communities of safety, love, and hope and promotes understanding, acceptance, and self-determination of individuals of diverse ...International Conference · About · News from Affirmation · Communities
  99. [99]
    LGBTQ advocates say Mormon church's new transgender policies ...
    Aug 23, 2024 · The church's handbook states that those “who transition away from their biological sex at birth are welcome to attend sacrament meetings” and ...
  100. [100]
    Affirming and nonaffirming religious beliefs predicting depression ...
    Feb 6, 2023 · Nonaffirming LDS beliefs were associated with higher depression, but effects disappeared when religious/spiritual struggles and internalized stigma were ...<|separator|>
  101. [101]
    (PDF) Identity Affirmation and Mental Health among Sexual Minorities
    Jul 25, 2019 · Using a sample of 530 LGB-identified individuals raised in the Later-Day Saints (LDS) church, this study asks how factors of empowerment are ...Missing: retention | Show results with:retention
  102. [102]
    The Mormon and Affirmation Relationship: It's Complicated
    Jul 22, 2019 · Affirmation has regularly been sought after as a safe avenue for ALL to express feeling towards the church; both pro and con.Missing: doctrine | Show results with:doctrine
  103. [103]
    The LGBTQ Mormon Crisis: Responding to the Empirical Research ...
    This article will look at five questions that need to be considered in this very important public health issue: What direct empirical evidence is available ...
  104. [104]
    Mormons preach love for its LGBT but no doctrinal shift
    Oct 28, 2016 · Mormons who are in same-sex relationships are considered apostates, and can be excommunicated. But the church fell short by focusing exclusively ...Missing: LGBTQ diluting
  105. [105]
    Savage Garden - Affirmation (1999) - On this day in pop
    Nov 7, 2024 · Original release date: November 9th 1999. Australian album chart peak: Number 1. UK album chart peak: Number 7. US album chart peak: Number 6.
  106. [106]
    Savage Garden Album and Singles Chart History
    Chart history for Savage Garden, showing all albums that made the top 50 ... Affirmation, #6, 1999. Savage Garden, #3, 1997. Savage Garden Singles. Crash And ...
  107. [107]
    AFFIRMATION – SAVAGE GARDEN - Official Charts
    Latest chart stats about AFFIRMATION - peak chart position, weeks on chart, catalogue number, week-by-week chart placement and latest news.Missing: performance | Show results with:performance
  108. [108]
    Savage Garden | The Music Timeline Wiki - Fandom
    OCT [1] Savage Garden performed "Affirmation" as part of the 2000 Sydney Olympic Closing Ceremony.
  109. [109]
    Affirmation by George Benson [US1] - SecondHandSongs
    Affirmation by George Benson [US1] was written by José Feliciano and was first released by José Feliciano in 1975. George Benson [US1] released it on the ...
  110. [110]
    George Benson - Affirmation 1976 (Original Studio Version) - YouTube
    Mar 19, 2012 · George Benson - Affirmation 1976 (Original Studio Version) from the album Breezin ... song just like this..!" and he brought me here, god ...Missing: 1978 details
  111. [111]
    20th Century Gospel Songs | Hymnary.org
    1 · When I, O Lord, behold Thy vast creation · [When I, O Lord, behold Thy vast creation] ; 2 · I will sing of my Redeemer · [I will sing of my Redeemer] ; 3 · I ...Missing: affirmation examples
  112. [112]
    Greatest Hymn Hits of the 20th Century - Discipleship Ministries
    "In the Garden" (1913), words and music by C. Austin Miles. "The Old Rugged Cross" (1913), words and music by George Bennard.Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  113. [113]
    23 rap lyrics that double as words of affirmation - Revolt TV
    Mar 1, 2024 · I Can by Nas: “I know I can/ Be what I wanna be/ If I work hard at it/ I'll be where I wanna be.” ... Nas let children across the world know that ...
  114. [114]
    songs with positive affirmations - playlist by Amelie Sophie | Spotify
    Who Says. Selena Gomez & The Scene. Best Day Of My Life. American Authors. Perfect Day. Hoku. Wings. Little Mix. just like magic. Ariana Grande.
  115. [115]
    Albert Camus - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Oct 27, 2011 · This essay belongs squarely in the philosophical tradition of existentialism but Camus denied being an existentialist. Both The Myth of Sisyphus ...
  116. [116]
    Albert Camus on Rebelling against Life's Absurdity - Philosophy Break
    For, as Camus concludes The Myth of Sisyphus: The rock is still rolling. I leave Sisyphus at the foot of the mountain! One always finds one's burden again ...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Louise Hay Health Affirmations
    positive affirmations. Health affirmations are positive statements designed to promote healing, wellness, and a healthy mindset, often used to support ...
  118. [118]
    18 Positive Affirmations From Popular Disney Movies
    Apr 25, 2022 · Want to add a splash of inspiration to your day? Check out these Disney-themed positive affirmations will inspire you to be the best you ...
  119. [119]
    Top 50 Life-Affirming Movies - IMDb
    Top 50 Life-Affirming Movies · James Stewart and Donna Reed in It's a Wonderful Life (1946) · Ellar Coltrane in Boyhood (2014) · Ikiru (1952) · Robin Williams and ...
  120. [120]
    Affirmation to Manifestation Podcast
    Rating 4.8 (202) Listen to Law of Attraction Coach & Hypnotist Shows You How to Manifest Your Dreams's Affirmation to Manifestation Podcast podcast on Apple Podcasts.
  121. [121]
    The rise of the 'manifinsta': how social media became a ... - Dazed
    Oct 9, 2024 · Simply put, manifestation is intention-setting through focusing your thoughts on the desired outcome until it happens. It's part of ...
  122. [122]
    Gen Z is Obsessed with Manifesting Their Way to Riches ... - YouTube
    Dec 5, 2024 · Did you know that "manifest" is Cambridge Dictionary's word of the year for 2024? It's one of the most looked-up words in the world.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  123. [123]
    Self‐affirmation theory in educational contexts - Easterbrook - 2021
    Jun 29, 2021 · For instance, Morgan and Atkin (2016) found that teachers who had been self-affirmed reported reduced anxiety and increased wellbeing; there may ...Self-Affirmation Theory · Heterogeneity Of Effects · Overview Of The Special...
  124. [124]
    A meta‐analysis of the effect of values affirmation on academic ...
    Jan 14, 2021 · This meta-analysis assessed the impact of values affirmation on the academic achievement of students under social identity threats in actual ...
  125. [125]
  126. [126]
    'So Help Me God'? Does oath swearing in courtroom scenarios ...
    Apr 3, 2023 · In one between-subjects version of the trial, the defendant chose to swear an oath, in the other he chose to affirm. Our jurors were themselves ...
  127. [127]
    The Influence of Microaffirmations on Undergraduate Persistence in ...
    A review of the relevant literature suggests that kindness cues conveyed through microaffirmations that affirm inclusion are likely important to both HU and HO ...Missing: progressive | Show results with:progressive
  128. [128]
    The Influence of Affirming Kindness and Community on Broadening ...
    Social science theory and research provide evidence that social contextual variables—specifically kindness cues affirming social inclusion—influence chronic ...
  129. [129]
    How participation trophies corrupted America's culture
    Mar 21, 2022 · Participation trophies corrupted America's culture. Children need to be taught they can lose and are not exceptional at everything.
  130. [130]
    Early physiological indicators of narcissism and self‐esteem in ...
    May 3, 2022 · Yet, some researchers believe that elevated levels of self-esteem can resemble narcissism: a sense of superiority and entitlement (Baumeister et ...
  131. [131]
    The Attack on Self-Esteem | Alfie Kohn
    Whether or not high self-esteem and narcissism are positively correlated—and ... entitlement had lower self-esteem.26. Baumeister himself appeared to ...<|separator|>
  132. [132]
    Is High Self-Esteem Beneficial? Revisiting a Classic Question - PMC
    Whereas self-esteem refers to feelings of self-acceptance and self-respect, narcissism is characterized by feelings of superiority, grandiosity, entitlement, ...