Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Zoo Weekly

Zoo Weekly was a weekly men's published by Bauer Media from September 2006 until its final issue on 12 October 2015. The publication specialized in pictorial spreads of models in revealing attire, alongside satirical articles on current events, sports coverage, and features targeted at a young male readership. Initially boasting strong circulation as one of Australia's top-selling men's titles, Zoo Weekly faced declining sales amid shifting media landscapes and intensified retail pressures, leading to its discontinuation. The magazine gained prominence for its unapologetic, irreverent style but repeatedly courted backlash over content perceived as objectifying women, including photoshopped images superimposing public figures' faces onto models and competitions seeking "Australia's hottest ." Such provocations extended to legal challenges, like lawsuits from celebrities over unauthorized usage, and public campaigns that prompted retailers like Coles to remove it from shelves in 2015. Despite criticisms from advocacy groups and media outlets—often aligned with progressive viewpoints that amplified accusations of —Zoo Weekly maintained a niche appeal through its blend of humor and visual until commercial viability eroded.

Overview

Publication Background

Zoo Weekly was a weekly lads' magazine targeted at young men, featuring content on , , women, , , and . Published initially by EMAP Consumer Media in the , it entered the market as the second weekly title in the men's magazine segment, competing directly with IPC Media's Nuts. The magazine emphasized a mix of , humor, and visual appeal to appeal to readers aged 16 to 30. Launched on 29 2004 with a substantial £10 million campaign, Zoo Weekly aimed to capture the growing demand for affordable, accessible weekly publications in the men's , priced lower than monthly competitors like or Loaded. EMAP positioned it as a fresh, irreverent alternative, with editor Paul Merrill—previously of women's weekly —overseeing a format that included pictorial spreads and stunts to drive circulation. Early sales figures showed it narrowing the gap with Nuts, though it trailed in initial audits. The title's ownership transitioned to following EMAP's divestiture of its consumer media assets in 2008, under which it continued operations and expanded internationally. Zoo Weekly maintained a softcore aesthetic typical of early lads' mags, prioritizing visual content over in-depth , which drew both commercial success in its peak years and criticism for .

Genre and Target Demographic

Zoo Weekly was classified as a lads' magazine, a genre of weekly publications emphasizing irreverent humor, celebrity interviews, sports commentary, and visual content featuring women in minimal clothing, often positioned as softer alternatives to explicit . This format emerged in the early 2000s landscape, following titles like Loaded and , with Zoo positioned as a budget-friendly weekly competitor to IPC's Nuts. The magazine targeted males, specifically men aged 16 to 30, a demographic sought after for its spending power on and products. Publisher Bauer Media marketed Zoo to reach approximately 762,000 individuals in this age group through and channels as of , aligning with the genre's focus on banter, gadgets, and aspirational masculinity. Readership data from the period confirmed heavy skew toward this group, though circulation later declined amid shifting patterns.

History

UK Inception (2004)

Zoo Weekly was announced by EMAP in early January 2004 as a new weekly men's lifestyle magazine positioned to compete in the growing for "lads' mags," with an emphasis on , , , and pictorial features appealing to readers. The publication, internally codenamed "Project Tyson," was marketed as delivering comprehensive content in a compact format, promising "all the tits and tackle" in a single weekly issue to differentiate it from monthly competitors like and Loaded. EMAP committed £10 million to the launch, exceeding the £8 million budget for rival Media's Nuts by £2 million, with funds allocated to , , and a including television spots. The magazine's editorial leadership was finalized in November 2003, with Paul Merrill appointed as editor after being recruited from IPC's women's weekly , where he had overseen its development into a top-selling title. Merrill's team included key hires such as deputy editor Dyane Sutton from and features editor Mark Lehane from Loaded, aiming to blend experienced voices in men's publishing to craft content focused on humor, celebrity interviews, coverage, and . The digital presence preceded print, with ZooWeekly.co.uk going live on January 21, 2004, to build pre-launch buzz through online previews and interactive elements. Print circulation began on January 29, 2004, establishing Zoo Weekly as the UK's second weekly men's following Nuts' debut earlier that month, amid a competitive where weekly formats sought to capture buys at newsstands with cover prices around 75p. Initial issues featured high-profile cover models and tie-ins, such as a launch event with glamour model , reflecting the publication's strategy to leverage visual appeal and event marketing for rapid . EMAP's research, spanning 18 months, informed the proposition of a globally scalable format, though the UK edition adapted content to local tastes in football and British celebrities.

International Launches (2006)

In 2006, following the launch, Zoo Weekly expanded internationally to and , adapting its format of pictorial features on women, sports coverage, and lifestyle content for local markets. These editions aimed to capture the growing demand for affordable weekly men's magazines, positioning Zoo as a competitor to monthly titles like . The Australian edition debuted on February 20, 2006, with an initial promotional issue distributed free to build circulation. Publisher Emap invested £6.4 million (approximately A$13 million at the time) in the launch, targeting over 75,000 weekly sales through aggressive marketing and distribution via newsagents. Early projections anticipated up to 150,000 copies per issue, leveraging local columnists and culturally relevant content such as Australian sports figures to appeal to urban male readers aged 18-30. In , Zoo Weekly launched in October 2006 as the country's first weekly men's lifestyle magazine, published under a between the parent company and local partners including and publishers. An English edition (Zoo Weekly) and Afrikaans counterpart (Zoo Weekliks) hit shelves on October 24, retailing for R14.99, with content tailored to affluent urban men featuring girls, cars, entertainment, and gadgets. The rollout included 150,000 free sample copies bundled with the October issue to drive trial, amid competition from emerging titles like Krew. The South African version ceased publication in 2008 due to insufficient .

Operational Peak (2006–2012)

The Australian edition of Zoo Weekly launched on 27 February 2006 with a free promotional issue, followed by paid weekly releases, marking the beginning of its most commercially viable phase. This entry revitalized the domestic weekly men's magazine segment, which had experienced prior slumps in the monthly category. By May 2008, Zoo Weekly recorded a year-on-year increase in paid circulation amid broader declines across 14 audited weekly titles, as reported by the , positioning it as a growth outlier in a contracting market. Circulation reached its in the years immediately after launch, surpassing later figures such as the approximately ,000 copies sold in by 2013, after which sales began a marked downturn. The magazine's operational strength during 2006–2012 derived from robust retail distribution, consistent advertising support, and appeal to a core demographic of young male readers seeking entertainment-focused content. This era saw Zoo Weekly outperform its counterpart in sales volume, reflecting effective localization and despite emerging cultural pushback. By 2012, however, initial indicators of erosion appeared, including an 11.4% drop in readership for Zoo Weekly compared to the prior year, signaling the onset of competitive pressures from and shifting consumer preferences. The period nonetheless represented the publication's high-water mark in terms of sustained viability before steeper declines precipitated its eventual closure in 2015.

Content and Features

Core Editorial Elements

Zoo Weekly's core editorial elements emphasized visual and textual content designed for a young male readership, prioritizing entertainment, humor, and titillating imagery. The magazine's layout typically devoted substantial space to photographic pictorials of models posed in revealing or semi-nude attire, often spanning multiple pages and serving as the publication's primary draw. These spreads featured models such as and Alice Goodwin, aligning with the softcore style prevalent in lads' magazines during the . Complementing the visuals were articles offering comedic interpretations of news events, sports commentary—frequently focused on and motorsports—and guides to entertainment options including listings, reviews, music updates, previews, and DVD recommendations. Recurring textual features included pub-style jokes, reader-submitted letters addressing personal anecdotes or queries, and a classified advertisements section for small ads related to goods, services, or personals. Additional elements encompassed advice columns, such as the short-lived agony uncle feature penned by actor from 2009 to 2010, which provided humorous or irreverent responses to readers' relationship dilemmas. Random feature stories on topics like unusual signs or hypothetical sports scenarios added variety, maintaining a light, irreverent tone throughout the 68-page weekly format.

Recurring Campaigns and Promotions

Zoo Weekly regularly featured reader competitions and giveaways within its pages to drive engagement and circulation among its target demographic of young men. These promotions typically included prizes such as gadgets, sports memorabilia, and travel experiences, with entries solicited via mail, online forms, or in-magazine coupons. For instance, in February 2004, the edition ran a competition offering a "cannibal holiday" to , including a plane ticket, camera, and the opportunity for the winner to submit a diary feature for publication. In the Australian edition, which launched in 2006 and became the publication's longest-running international variant, issues routinely incorporated "reader offers" encompassing competitions, surveys, and promotional tie-ins with brands like companies and venues. These were designed to foster loyalty, with examples including chances to win event tickets or branded merchandise tied to sports and nightlife themes central to the magazine's content. Promotional pricing campaigns were another recurring tactic, particularly in , where declining sales prompted aggressive discounts. In June 2013, select retailers sold the magazine for AU$1 as a loss-leader strategy to encourage trial purchases and subscriptions, signaling an effort to counter competition from and shifting reader habits. Themed contests, such as searches for "Australia's hottest" in various categories (e.g., or celebrity lookalikes), appeared periodically and often sparked coverage due to their provocative nature, blending reader voting with features. While intended to boost , these drew accusations of insensitivity from critics, though circulation data from Bauer Media indicated they sustained interest during peak years of 2006–2012.

Regional Adaptations

United Kingdom Edition

The edition of Zoo Weekly, published by EMAP Consumer Media, debuted on 29 2004 as a weekly men's targeting males aged 18–25 with content emphasizing pictorial spreads of women in or swimwear, UK-focused sports coverage (particularly ), gaming reviews, and celebrity interviews featuring British entertainers. Its launch followed a £8 million and positioned it as a direct competitor to Media's Nuts, with both aiming for a combined initial circulation exceeding 400,000 copies. Early issues were distributed with promotional tie-ins, including a free first edition dated 24 2004, to build readership amid a growing market for affordable weekly lads' magazines. Unlike later international versions tailored to local markets, the UK edition served as the foundational model, incorporating British cultural references such as football previews and features on domestic television personalities, while maintaining a core format of humor, real-life stories, and "booze guides" aligned with pub-centric social habits. Circulation figures reflected initial success but long-term decline; after peaking in the mid-2000s, sales fell to approximately 44,000 copies per week by June 2013, impacted by competition and shifting retail dynamics. Following the closure of rival Nuts in April 2014, Zoo Weekly briefly held a as the UK's sole weekly men's magazine. Bauer Media Group, which acquired EMAP's consumer media assets in 2008, suspended publication of the UK edition by the end of 2015 after 610 issues, citing plummeting sales and challenging retail conditions rather than external pressures like sexism accusations. The final issues emphasized legacy content, including a farewell edition with lingerie-clad models as symbolic pallbearers, underscoring the title's unapologetic focus on visual appeal despite market contraction. No digital pivot or revival has occurred since, with Bauer shifting resources away from print lads' magazines entirely.

Australian Edition

The Australian edition of Zoo Weekly commenced publication in February 2006 under Bauer Media, adapting the UK format with localized content such as features on Australian models, celebrities, and sports like and . The inaugural issue appeared on 20 February 2006, following a promotional free edition. Circulation peaked at around 71,000 copies per issue in early 2012 but began declining thereafter, falling to 58,000 by mid-2013, 40,000 in late 2013, 29,000 in 2014, and approximately 24,000 in the first half of 2015. Bauer Media withdrew the title from the in May 2015 amid ongoing sales erosion. The edition faced unique Australian controversies, including a 2006 defamation lawsuit by model Lara Bingle over published content, which was settled out of court, and a compelled apology to Greens Senator in 2015 following remarks deemed defamatory. In August 2015, supermarket chain Coles ceased stocking the after staff complaints and an online campaign accusing it of sexism and promoting harmful attitudes toward women. Additional backlash arose from a 2015 Anzac Day-themed cover criticized for insensitivity and a 2012 Advertising Standards Bureau censure for demeaning social media posts. Bauer Media announced the closure of both print and digital operations on 17 September 2015, citing tough retail conditions and sustained sales declines, with the final issue dated 12 October 2015. The decision followed broader industry challenges for print men's magazines, though sources like News.com.au, often aligned with progressive critiques, emphasized the role of public opposition to the publication's content.

South African Edition

The South African edition of Zoo Weekly was launched on 24 October 2006 as South Africa's first weekly men's lifestyle , published in partnership between UK-based EMAP Consumer Media and local publisher , which also handled titles like and . It appeared in both English (Zoo Weekly) and (Zoo Weekliks), marking one of the initial instances in South African where a magazine debuted simultaneously in two languages from its first issue to broaden accessibility in a multilingual market. The debut included distribution of 150,000 free sample copies bundled with the November issue of to build initial readership among the target demographic of males interested in entertainment, sports, and lifestyle content. Content adapted global Zoo Weekly features for local relevance, including celebrity interviews, humor, and pictorial spreads, while incorporating South African-specific elements such as coverage of domestic , music scenes, and to compete with emerging rivals like Krew in the nascent weekly men's segment. Early performance showed promise, with audited average weekly sales reaching 35,340 copies by early 2007, reflecting a total distribution exceeding 141,000 units over the initial period amid promotional efforts. However, the edition faced challenges in sustaining momentum in a market dominated by monthly titles and shifting consumer preferences toward digital alternatives. Media24 discontinued Zoo Weekly/Weekliks in February 2008 after less than 18 months, citing a decision not to commit further despite the initial bilingual and sales. The closure aligned with broader difficulties for print weeklies in , where high production costs and competition from established monthlies limited long-term viability, ending the edition's run without reported unique legal or cultural controversies beyond general lads' mag critiques.

Controversies

Legal Challenges

In May 2006, Australian model Lara Bingle initiated legal action against EMAP Australia, the publisher of Zoo Weekly, alleging over a March issue that featured photographs of her in a compromising pose alongside suggestive captions. The Federal Court ruled in Bingle's favor in December 2006, determining that the publication implied promiscuity and damaged her reputation, leading to an undisclosed settlement that included damages and a public apology from the magazine. A more prominent case arose in 2015 when Senator sued Bauer Media, Zoo Weekly's publisher at the time, for stemming from a July . The piece included a digitally altered image superimposing Hanson-Young's head onto a lingerie model's body, accompanied by text mocking her political stance on asylum seekers with phrases like "I can see France and the boat people." The South Australian Supreme Court found the content , as it portrayed her as hypocritical and objectified her in a manner that lowered her standing, resulting in a settlement where Zoo Weekly issued an apology and retracted the material. These suits highlighted tensions between the magazine's satirical style and laws, which prioritize reputational harm over defenses like fair comment or unless strictly substantiated. No criminal prosecutions or other major litigation, such as disputes, were recorded against Zoo Weekly across its editions.

Accusations of Sexism and Objectification

Zoo Weekly regularly drew accusations of sexism from feminist organizations, which contended that its pictorial features depicting women in minimal attire objectified them by prioritizing physical attributes over personal agency or intellect. Groups such as Collective Shout campaigned against the magazine's distribution in supermarkets, labeling its content as exploitative and demeaning to women. These critics, including advocacy outlets, argued that such depictions reinforced harmful gender stereotypes and contributed to a broader culture of misogyny. A prominent incident occurred in July 2012 when Zoo Weekly published an altered image superimposing the head of Greens Senator onto a lingerie model's body, paired with a headline implying her policies stemmed from personal sexual motivations toward refugees. The senator filed a suit, securing victory on June 6, 2015, after which Bauer Media issued an unreserved apology, retracted the content, and settled with undisclosed damages. Hanson-Young described the portrayal as emblematic of everyday faced by women in public life. Further backlash arose from specific editorial choices, such as a 2014 social media post dividing a woman's image at the for a "boobs or ass" poll, which drew condemnation for reducing to consumable parts and exemplifying dehumanizing . In August 2015, withdrew Zoo Weekly from sale nationwide following a Collective Shout-led effort decrying its "sexist, vile" material, amplifying calls for accountability in merchandising such publications. These accusations aligned with wider scrutiny of "lads' mags" in and the , where parallel titles faced pressure from campaigns targeting explicit covers and content perceived as endorsing predatory attitudes toward women. Zoo Weekly's defenders, including some media commentators, countered that the features involved consenting adult models and catered to voluntary audience preferences, framing the outrage as overreach by ideologically driven activists rather than evidence of inherent harm. However, the cumulative controversies contributed to the magazine's reputational challenges amid declining print media viability.

Political and Cultural Backlash

In Weekly faced significant opposition from feminist advocacy groups, particularly Collective Shout, which campaigned against its distribution in supermarkets on grounds of promoting the of women and contributing to a "rape culture." In May 2015, activist Pintur launched an backed by Collective Shout, garnering over 1,500 signatures to urge Coles and Woolworths to cease stocking the magazine due to its content featuring seminude imagery and articles perceived as endorsing predatory attitudes toward women. Coles announced on August 19, 2015, that it would discontinue sales of Zoo Weekly following staff complaints and the petition, framing the move as a "commercial decision" amid a regular range review, though campaigners attributed it to pressure highlighting the magazine's incompatibility with family-oriented retail environments. Woolworths had already phased out such titles earlier, reflecting broader retail shifts influenced by public complaints rather than outright bans. Critics from these campaigns, including Collective Shout, argued that Zoo Weekly's editorial choices normalized harmful gender stereotypes, while defenders contended that declining print sales stemmed primarily from digital media migration, not ideological victories. Politically, the magazine drew ire from left-leaning figures, exemplified by a 2012 incident where Zoo Weekly photoshopped the head of Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young onto a lingerie model's body in an article critiquing her parliamentary comments on male behavior. Hanson-Young successfully sued for defamation in June 2015, receiving an apology and undisclosed damages from publisher Bauer Media, which the court ruled had falsely implied promiscuity and breached standards of journalistic decency. This case amplified accusations of misogyny, with Hanson-Young stating it exemplified broader cultural tolerance for demeaning women in media, though the magazine's defenders viewed it as satirical commentary on public figures' statements. Culturally, the backlash aligned with international critiques of "lads' mags" as perpetuating outdated norms, with outlets like reporting on Zoo Weekly's content as emblematic of regressive attitudes amid evolving social norms on gender representation. In the UK edition, a 2010 agony uncle column by advising violent retaliation against an ex-partner sparked public outrage and an apology from the publisher, underscoring sensitivities around endorsing aggression in male-oriented media. Such incidents fueled narratives of cultural obsolescence, yet empirical sales data indicated multifaceted pressures, including a 50% circulation drop by 2015, beyond activist influence alone.

Reception and Impact

Commercial Performance

Zoo Weekly, launched in in January 2006 by ACP Magazines, initially targeted high circulation but achieved more modest early sales compared to ambitious projections exceeding 150,000 weekly copies. By 2012, the magazine reached an average weekly print circulation of 61,471 copies, reflecting a period of relative stability in the competitive lads' magazine market. Circulation began declining in subsequent years amid broader shifts in print media consumption. In 2013, average weekly print sales fell to 40,282 copies, a drop of approximately 34% from the prior year, with the rate of decline accelerating. By early 2015, figures had further decreased to 29,035 copies per Audit Bureau of Circulations () data, prompting publisher Bauer Media to withdraw the title from auditing in May 2015 amid ongoing losses. A particularly sharp 36% year-on-year decline occurred in the October–December 2014 quarter, contributing to the magazine's unsustainability. These trends mirrored challenges in the men's weekly sector, where competing titles like Nuts in the UK also faced sales erosion, though Zoo Weekly's Australian edition persisted longer before closure. The cumulative declines, verified through audits, underscored the title's eroding commercial viability, culminating in its final issue on October 12, 2015.

Audience Appeal and Cultural Role

Zoo Weekly appealed to a core audience of young heterosexual men, typically aged 18 to 30, by delivering content centered on coverage, recommendations, grooming tips, and humorous articles laced with banter, alongside pictorial spreads featuring women in minimal attire. This formula provided and validation of everyday male interests, such as matches and culture, without the overlay of moralizing or prevalent in broader media. Readership data from the early indicated a substantial base, with the edition alone reaching hundreds of thousands weekly before declines set in, underscoring its resonance with demographics underserved by more sanitized publications. Culturally, the magazine reinforced a strain of unpretentious masculinity during the lads' mag boom of the 1990s and 2000s, serving as a print counterpart to emerging online forums where men shared similar tastes in humor and visuals. In Australia, launched in 2006, it localized appeal by emphasizing rugby league and local celebrities, embedding itself in supermarket checkouts as affordable weekly entertainment that mirrored the casual, irreverent social dynamics of young male groups. Its role extended to challenging emerging norms around media decorum, prompting defenses from creators who argued it catered to natural appetites rather than imposing external ideologies, even as digital alternatives like aggregator sites began eroding its monopoly on such fare. The publication's cultural footprint waned amid shifting audience behaviors toward interactive online content, yet it highlighted tensions between commercial viability and activist pressures, with its persistence until reflecting sustained demand from a niche resistant to rapid sociocultural pivots. In and the editions, similar dynamics played out, tying into regional sports like and to sustain loyalty among working-class and student readers valuing straightforward, non-elitist media.

Critiques and Defenses

Critiques of Zoo Weekly centered on its portrayal of women, with feminist organizations and activists accusing the magazine of perpetuating sexism and objectification through pictorial features depicting semi-nude models in provocative poses, often accompanied by suggestive captions. Groups like Collective Shout argued that such content normalized male entitlement, coercion, and misogynistic attitudes, linking it to broader societal issues like sexual violence. In August 2015, a Change.org petition signed by over 38,000 people claimed the magazine contributed to "rape culture" by endorsing predatory views of gender roles, prompting supermarket chain Coles to cease stocking it. High-profile incidents amplified these criticisms, including a 2015 defamation lawsuit won by Australian Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young against Zoo Weekly for an article falsely implying she advocated "ditching the bitch" in reference to men, which the court deemed sexist and defamatory; the magazine issued an apology and paid damages. Senator Hanson-Young described the coverage as emblematic of unchecked misogyny in media, stating it was important for women in leadership to confront such instances publicly. Academic analyses, such as those in The Conversation, contended that lads' magazines like Zoo legitimized harmful stereotypes by framing women primarily as sexual objects, potentially desensitizing readers to consent and equality. Defenses of Zoo Weekly emphasized its role as consensual entertainment tailored to a male demographic, with publisher Bauer Media attributing the magazine's 2015 closure primarily to a sharp sales decline—from around 60,000 copies weekly in its peak to 13,000 by mid-2015—driven by the shift to and free online content rather than activist pressure. Founder Paul Merrill argued in 2013 that campaigns against lads' mags were misguided and counterproductive, suggesting they should instead target women's magazines for promoting airbrushed ideals and of both sexes, which he claimed set back by appearing "ludicrous" and overly selective. Supporters, including some media commentators, portrayed the magazine as a lighthearted reaction to perceived overreach in , providing escapist humor, sports, and visual appeal without endorsing real-world harm, and noted that models participated voluntarily for exposure and payment. Commentators like those in SBS opined that celebrating Zoo's demise as a feminist victory overlooked the commercial realities of print media's obsolescence, arguing it represented no substantive advance against since similar content proliferated online unregulated. This perspective aligned with observations that critiques often emanated from ideologically driven groups, while empirical sales data underscored broader market dynamics over cultural boycotts as the causal factor in the magazine's end.

Decline and Cessation

Market Shifts and Sales Decline

The South African edition of Zoo Weekly, published alongside its Afrikaans-language counterpart Zoo Weekliks, debuted on , 2006, targeting a for weekly men's content. Initial circulation proved encouraging, with an average weekly ABC-audited sales figure of 35,340 copies reported in early , equivalent to over 141,000 units distributed on peak sales days. Despite this early performance, the title encountered persistent challenges in a print media environment marked by escalating economic pressures. By February 2008, publisher discontinued both editions after less than 18 months, attributing the decision to a combination of difficult economic conditions that rendered ongoing investment unsustainable. These factors encompassed rising production and distribution costs, constrained advertising revenues, and broader retail sector strains affecting magazine sales in , as evidenced by contemporaneous closures of other titles like TopMotor and MaxPower for similar commercial rationales. Specific post-launch circulation declines for Zoo Weekly in South Africa remain undocumented in available audits, but the swift termination indicates failure to scale beyond initial levels amid a market favoring established monthly men's titles or emerging digital alternatives. The episode reflected early signs of fragmentation in the local print sector, where weekly formats struggled against economic headwinds predating the 2008 global .

Closure Announcements (2015)

Bauer Media announced the closure of Zoo Weekly on September 17, 2015, via a press release confirming the suspension of the Australian weekly edition effective October 12, 2015. The final print issue was scheduled to go on sale that same Monday, marking the end of the magazine's 12-year run since its 2004 launch. This encompassed the shutdown of all associated platforms, including the website and social media accounts. The publisher cited "tough retail conditions in the men's market" as the primary reason for the decision, amid broader challenges facing print media. Circulation data underscored the sales pressures, with Zoo Weekly distributing just 24,122 copies in the final quarter of 2014, reflecting a 36% year-over-year decline that had prompted its removal from auditing earlier in 2015. Bauer Media's statement emphasized economic viability over external criticisms, despite prior events like the August 2015 delisting by following an activist campaign against its content. Media coverage of the announcement varied, with outlets like framing it alongside historical accusations of and , while reports focused on market dynamics. No formal revival or transition to digital-only formats was indicated in the release, signaling a full cessation rather than a .

References

  1. [1]
    Zoo Weekly to publish its last issue in October - ABC News
    Sep 17, 2015 · Controversial men's tabloid magazine Zoo Weekly will publish its final issue in October. Publisher Bauer Media blamed the closure on tough retail conditions.
  2. [2]
    RIP Zoo Weekly — a vile, repugnant and tasteless publication
    Sep 18, 2015 · Since launching in Australia in 2006 Zoo has prided itself on objectifying women, dismissing the most fundamental rules and ethics of ...
  3. [3]
    Zoo magazine to shut after plummeting sales and accusations of ...
    Sep 18, 2015 · The last edition of men's magazine Zoo Weekly will be published next month after flagging sales forced the closure of the title often accused of promoting ...
  4. [4]
    Bauer Media to shut Zoo Weekly - Mumbrella
    Sep 17, 2015 · Bauer Media is closing its struggling Zoo Weekly lads mag and website amid crumbling sales. The publisher said the October 12 issue will be ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Zoo Weekly to close, last edition October 12
    Sep 17, 2015 · Zoo Weekly has become the latest men's magazine to fall off the news stands, with publisher Bauer Media, on Thursday confirming poor sales ...
  6. [6]
    Zoo Weekly's biggest controversies revisted - as the lads mag is ...
    Sep 17, 2015 · Sued by Lara Bingle and Sarah Hanson Young, free 'boob jobs' and the search for Australia's 'hottest asylum seeker': Zoo Weekly's biggest ...
  7. [7]
    Controversial magazine <i>Zoo Weekly</i> axed | The New Daily
    Sep 18, 2015 · Zoo Weekly was often embroiled in controversy, including in 2012, when it photoshopped Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young's head onto a lingerie ...
  8. [8]
    Coles bins 'sexist' Zoo Weekly | SBS News
    Aug 19, 2015 · Coles has binned men's magazine Zoo Weekly from its shelves after a sustained social media campaign against the 'sexist, vile' publication.
  9. [9]
    Breast we forget - 15 of Zoo Weekly's most controversial moments
    Sep 17, 2015 · Designed to provoke and entertain, there were many moments of editorial brilliance. Here, Dr Mumbo celebrates 15 of Zoo's cheekiest moments.
  10. [10]
    Emap prepares Zoo launch - The Guardian
    Jan 16, 2004 · The battle of the men's weeklies will commence in earnest next week when Emap launches its £10m lads' magazine Zoo Weekly, pitching it in a ...
  11. [11]
    Zoo gains on Nuts in sales war | Newspapers & magazines
    Jun 15, 2004 · The battle of weekly lads' mags intensified today with claims that the gap between Nuts and Zoo had narrowed to as few as 25,000 copies.
  12. [12]
    Zoo launch boosts Emap - London - Evening Standard
    Apr 12, 2012 · Zoo, a weekly launched in January 2004 aimed at twenty-something men, was not included in the underlying figures, but would add a further 4 ...
  13. [13]
    Bauer Media to Shutter FHM and Zoo Magazines - WWD
    Nov 17, 2015 · Zoo launched in 2004 as a weekly men's magazine with coverage including girls, sport, music, film and technology, aimed at men between 18 and 35 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    From Zoo to Smith Journal: Are men finally choosing brains over ...
    Jun 20, 2014 · Zoo Weekly stands as the last of the lads' mags on our shores and, in the past 18 months, its print readership has dropped a whopping 34.87 per ...Missing: demographic | Show results with:demographic
  15. [15]
    Zoo Weekly founder: Feminists should target women's weeklies
    Jun 24, 2013 · Zoo Weekly founder: Feminists should target women's weeklies – not lads' mags. This time last year, former Loaded editor Martin Daubney wrote ...Missing: genre demographic
  16. [16]
    Target 762,000 16-30 men in Zoo Magazine & online - Bauer Media
    Dec 19, 2005 · Zoo is an excellent opportunity to target the highly sought after young male audience.Missing: genre | Show results with:genre
  17. [17]
    Big annual readership falls for FHM, Zoo and Nuts - Campaign
    Jun 7, 2011 · Zoo, a Bauer stablemate of FHM, lost 220,000 readers – 35% year on year – to average 411,000 in the 12 months to March. Rival weekly lad's title ...
  18. [18]
    Sport, news, sex... it's a Zoo | Business - The Guardian
    Jan 3, 2004 · The most eagerly anticipated magazine launch for years, Emap's mysterious 'Project Tyson', will be called Zoo. Billed as the first world weekly ...
  19. [19]
    Emap reveals 'Zoo Weekly' line-up - Press Gazette
    Nov 20, 2003 · Emap has finally confirmed Paul Merrill as editor of its new men's weekly magazine – called Zoo Weekly by insiders- and has revealed his launch ...Missing: inception 2004
  20. [20]
    Tits and tackle - twice the fun | Media news - Journalism.co.uk
    Jan 28, 2004 · ZooWeekly.co.uk launched on 21 January, one week ahead of the print ... Zoo Weekly, spending 18 months researching and compiling the proposition ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    IPC goes Nuts with lads mag launch - The Guardian
    Jan 5, 2004 · Paul Keenan, chief executive of Emap consumer media, has described the first 12 issues of Zoo Weekly as a form of "market research". The ...
  22. [22]
    19 Zoo Magazine Launch With Nell Mcandrew Stock Photos, High ...
    Browse 19 zoo magazine launch with nell mcandrew photos and images available, or start a new search to explore more photos and images. show more.
  23. [23]
    Emap lads' weekly Zoo gets transported down under - Campaign
    Feb 10, 2006 · LONDON - Emap is putting £6.4m behind the launch of its weekly lads' magazine Zoo in Australia and hopes to sell more than 75,000 each week ...
  24. [24]
    Zoo Weekly Magazine: My Part In Its Downfall - B&T
    Sep 18, 2015 · The year – if I can think back that far – was 2005 and I was employed by now defunct magazine publisher EMAP Australia and editing now defunct ...
  25. [25]
    Zoo Weekly/ Zoo Weekliks - Media Update
    Oct 9, 2006 · Publishers of FHM and heat, will be launching ZOO Weekly and an Afrikaans version, ZOO Weekliks as the first weekly men's lifestyle magazines in South Africa.
  26. [26]
    Zoo versus Krew - battle of men's weeklies is on
    Publishers of FHM and heat will be launching weekly men's lifestyle magazines ZooWeekly and Afrikaans version Zoo Weekliks on 24 October 2006.
  27. [27]
    ZOO Weekly launches with 150 000 sample copies free with new FHM
    Sep 26, 2006 · From 17 October 2006 a total of 85 000 for both language editions of ZOO Weekly/Weekliks will be printed and distributed nationwide on a weekly ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  28. [28]
    Sales stripped away from adult magazines | news.com.au
    Nov 30, 2009 · Although the bottom fell out of the monthly market a few years ago, the launch of Zoo Weekly in early 2006 has helped revive the category, at ...
  29. [29]
    Weeklies dive in ABC's latest audit - AdNews
    May 16, 2008 · SYDNEY: OK! and Zoo Weekly were the only two weekly magazines of 14 to increase paid circulation figures in the latest Audit Bureau of ...
  30. [30]
    GQ doubles to top readership - AdNews
    May 14, 2010 · Alpha continued its slide, losing 34.3% of readers year-on-year; FHM was down 17.3%; Ralph dropped 4.6% of readers and Zoo Weekly lost 11.4%.<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Zoo zooms in on the topless and the topical - Press Gazette
    Jan 22, 2004 · Emap unleashed the first promotional issue of its £8m men's magazine Zoo Weekly on Wednesday, complete with topless pictures of supermodel Kate Moss.
  32. [32]
    Find Zoo Magazine Back Issues Online | Zoo Weekly | lads-mags.com
    GLAMOUR MODELS · Abi Titmuss · Alex Sim-Wise · Alice Goodwin · Amy Green · Arabella ... BUY ZOO WEEKLY BACK ISSUES ONLINE​. Zoo Magazine, until recently, was the ...Missing: pictorials | Show results with:pictorials
  33. [33]
    Print media analysis of 'Zoo' magazine Free Essay Example
    May 20, 2021 · As well as the weekly features such as news, girls, and cars, many pages of the magazine are filled with random stories such as "The Football of ...
  34. [34]
    Zoo apology after columnist offers 'cut ex's face' advice - Press Gazette
    May 6, 2010 · Zoo magazine issued an unreserved apology yesterday after a heartbroken man was advised by Danny Dyer's agony-uncle column to cut his ex-girlfriend's face.
  35. [35]
    Zoo Weekly - October 19, 2015 AU PDF - Scribd
    Oct 19, 2015 · Sydney NSW 2000. ISSN: 1833-3222. ZOO is published in Australia by Bauer Media Action Sports Pty Limited, part of the Bauer Media Group, ACN 079 ...
  36. [36]
    Making Zoo Weekly the loss leader at just $1
    Jun 10, 2013 · But the message is Zoo Weekly is not worth more than $1. Okay, it's an offer and the publisher will argue it's to get people trialling the title ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Zoo Weekly to close due to 'tough retail conditions' | Irish Independent
    Sep 17, 2015 · Zoo Weekly to close due to 'tough retail conditions'. The last British 'lad mag' is to cease production of it's Australian title.Missing: audience | Show results with:audience<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Men's magazines IV: the weeklies - Magforum
    Emap's Zoo Weekly. Emap followed a similar strategy to IPC, but a week later. Its first issue (dated 24 January) was free. Zoo did not reveal a ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Racy lad mag Zoo Weekly to close; last edition October 12 - Stuff
    Sep 17, 2015 · Zoo Weekly has become the latest men's magazine to leave news stands, with publisher Bauer Media on Thursday confirming that poor sales will ...
  40. [40]
    FHM and Zoo magazines to suspend publication - BBC News
    Nov 17, 2015 · UK men's magazines FHM and Zoo have said they are halting publication. FHM was launched in 1985 under the title For Him Magazine. Zoo was launched in 2004.Missing: United | Show results with:United<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    ZOO Weekly UK Goes Out With Lingerie-Clad Pallbearers - B&T
    Dec 23, 2015 · The British edition of ZOO UK launched in 2004 and closes after 11 years and some 610 issues. The Aussie edition didn't fare as well ...
  42. [42]
    Zoo weekly | Catalogue | National Library of Australia
    Zoo weekly ; Notes: Cover title. Some issues accompanied by DVD. ISSN registration, 00, 20060314 ; Life Dates: Feb. 20, 2006- ; Subject: Popular culture -- ...
  43. [43]
    ZOO WEEKLY (Australia) - Movie Mags
    Mar 15, 2025 · They are presented here for their historical significance and the edification of magazine fans and collectors, everywhere. To Top. Loading...
  44. [44]
    ABCs - men's: Zoo Weekly down by 18.1 per cent - but is not closing ...
    Feb 15, 2013 · Zoo's shrinkage, from 70,992 to 58,165 readers, was even more abrupt than the last round of ABCs, when the title's sales fell by 15.8 per cent.
  45. [45]
    Customers escape weekly mags' Zoo - The Australian
    Nov 8, 2013 · Zoo is now averaging sales of 40,282 print copies a week, down from 61,471 copies at this time last year, with its decline accelerating from ...
  46. [46]
    Zoo Weekly leads the charge in weekly magazine declines - AdNews
    Nov 14, 2014 · It grew a whopping 19.49% year-on-year from its base of 90,949 to its current circulation of 108, 674.Missing: peak | Show results with:peak
  47. [47]
    Bauer's Zoo Weekly resigns from ABC - AdNews
    May 15, 2015 · Controversial men's magazine Zoo Weekly has resigned from the ABC audit, with the title electing to no longer have its circulation figures ...
  48. [48]
    Coles withdraws lads' mag Zoo Weekly from sale after staff ...
    1.03 ...
  49. [49]
    ZOO Weekly courts controversy over Anzac edition front cover
    Apr 24, 2015 · When she refused, ZOO published a Photoshopped image of the Senator's face on the body of a model in lingerie. Have you seen any products or ...
  50. [50]
    Zoo Weekly censured by ad watchdog for 'demeaning' Facebook posts
    Nov 29, 2012 · A posting by Zoo Weekly magazine on its Facebook page that featured a woman's body cut in half before readers were asked which they preferred has been censured ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Zoo Weekly to cease operations in October - Mediaweek
    Sep 18, 2015 · Zoo was launched in Australia in 2006 and on its first birthday was celebrating an audited sales figure of 110,000. However its launch here was ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  52. [52]
    https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/bauer-media-axes-controversial-zoo-weekly-lads-magazine-blaming-tough-retail-conditions/news-story/37367284506de00d866201e7cca511f1
  53. [53]
    Zoo Weekly/Weekliks circulation proves to be successful
    Mar 9, 2007 · Publishing Director Kim Browne says ZOO Weekly/Weekliks' weekly average ABC sales figure of 35 340 translates into 141 336 copies sold on ...
  54. [54]
    Media24 announces the closure of ZOO Weekly/Weekliks - IOL
    Media24 has decided not to invest further in ZOO Weekly/Weekliks, South Africa's only men's lifestyle weekly magazine.Missing: details publisher circulation
  55. [55]
    Judge backs Bingle on Zoo smut - The Sydney Morning Herald
    Dec 8, 2006 · Ms Bingle has taken legal action against the publisher of Zoo Weekly after it printed several photographs of her in March. The photo spread ...
  56. [56]
    Sarah Hanson-Young wins defamation case against ... - ABC News
    Jun 6, 2015 · Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young has won a defamation case against men's magazine Zoo Weekly for photoshopping her head onto a lingerie model's body.Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  57. [57]
    Sarah Hanson-Young says stand over Zoo Weekly sexism was for ...
    Jun 6, 2015 · The Greens senator, Sarah Hanson-Young, has won an apology from “lads' mag” Zoo Weekly over a July 2012 issue depicting her near-naked, arguing women rarely ...
  58. [58]
    Sarah Hanson-Young and Zoo: why satire is no defence against ...
    Jun 10, 2015 · The Greens Senator has won a case against Zoo for photoshopping her head onto a bikini model's body.Missing: challenges lawsuits
  59. [59]
    Zoo Weekly - Collective Shout
    ... mag Zoo Weekly out of Coles supermarkets Bauer Media announced the sexist... ... Zoo Weekly has a long history of exploiting and objectifying women for the ...Missing: accusations | Show results with:accusations
  60. [60]
    Lads' mags, sexual violence and the need for feminist intervention
    Jun 4, 2015 · Magazines like Zoo not only reproduce and legitimise sexist and predatory views of sexual violence and gender roles.Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
  61. [61]
    'Boobs' or 'ass' guy? This magazine chops a woman's body in half ...
    Apr 1, 2014 · Because, really, in what world is this level of objectification okay? ... sexismrape culture. heading. description. username. Show Comments (0).
  62. [62]
    Zoo Weekly's Future Looks Grim As Coles Punts Controversial Title
    Aug 19, 2015 · Supermarket giant Coles has banned men's magazine Zoo Weekly after a sustained social media campaign against the 'sexist, vile' publication.Missing: feminism backlash
  63. [63]
    Comment: Why the demise of Zoo Weekly magazine is no triumph ...
    Sep 20, 2015 · Who will miss Zoo Weekly, which Bauer Media announced on Thursday would close due to “tough retail conditions in the men's market”?
  64. [64]
    Goodbye Zoo Weekly, you won't be missed - Collective Shout
    Oct 13, 2015 · Click here to view the video. From Media Watch: In May a young woman called Laura Pintur began a campaign backed by Collective Shout to persuade ...
  65. [65]
    Petition calls for Zoo Weekly to be banned from Coles and Woolies
    May 11, 2015 · Bauer Media's controversial men's title, Zoo Weekly, has come under fire from a change.org petition which is calling on the CEO's of both Coles ...
  66. [66]
    Online petition calls for ZOO Weekly to be banned from supermarket ...
    Jun 10, 2015 · Now, there's an online petition calling for the magazine to be banned from the shelves of supermarket chains Coles and Woolworths. The petition ...
  67. [67]
    Coles bans <i>Zoo Weekly</i> mag after online campaign
    Aug 20, 2015 · Supermarket giant Coles has announced it will stop stocking provocative 'lad-mag' Zoo Weekly in its stores. An anti-sexism campaign paid off ...
  68. [68]
    FHM and Zoo magazine axed: a victory for feminists? - The Week
    Nov 17, 2015 · The lads' mag industry as whole has suffered huge losses in the past year. Zoo shut down in 2014 and Loaded was axed in March.Missing: United | Show results with:United
  69. [69]
    Outrage at Danny Dyer's 'sick' advice column in Zoo magazine
    May 6, 2010 · Publisher apologises and letter writer complains after celebrity agony uncle Danny Dyer tells him he should 'cut his ex's face'.
  70. [70]
    ABCs: Zoo Weekly withdrawn from audit as women's weeklies take ...
    May 15, 2015 · Zoo Weekly has been withdrawn from the circulation auditing figures by publisher Bauer Media following several quarters of massive declines ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  71. [71]
    https://www.mumbrella.com.au/abcs-zoo-weekly-withdrawn-from-audit-as-womens-weeklies-take-brunt-of-declines-293577
  72. [72]
    Society is obsessed with trigger warnings – yet somehow, our ...
    Feb 8, 2023 · Twenty years ago, when I was starting out in journalism, I worked for a lads' mag called Zoo. Our target audience – men aged 18-30 – seemed to ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
  73. [73]
    the lads mag is dead - i-D Magazine
    run by publishing giant Bauer Media — targeted the male consumer with a mix of smutty content, thinly veiled banter and, yes, ...
  74. [74]
    Men behaving better: how the lads' mags gave way to digital | Media
    Nov 21, 2015 · Closure of Zoo and FHM signals end to an era after new websites replaced magazines aimed at young men.
  75. [75]
    A Gen-Z guide to 'lads' mags' - Indy100
    Jun 19, 2022 · A magazine genre during the 1990s and early 2000s aimed at younger heterosexual men. The content was said to focus on sports, cars, gadgets and grooming.
  76. [76]
    Zoo shuts down: one less vehicle for sexism and promotion of male ...
    Sep 22, 2015 · She highlighted the way the lads' mag promoted coercion, violence, sexism, misogyny and male entitlement. Laura's Change.org petition attracted ...
  77. [77]
    Media24 announces the closure of ZOO Weekly/Weekliks
    Feb 15, 2008 · Due to a variety of difficult economic conditions, Media24 has decided not to invest further in ZOO Weekly/Weekliks, South Africa's only ...
  78. [78]
    Shelf life - The Media Online
    ... closed down for “commercial reasons”), TopMotor and MaxPower (“a business decision”), ZOO Weekly / Zoo Weekliks (“due to a variety of difficult economic ...
  79. [79]
    Zoo Weekly - Wikipedia
    Zoo was a British softcore lad magazine published weekly by Bauer Media Group with periods of an Australian and South African editions.
  80. [80]
    Bauer closes Zoo Weekly magazine - AdNews
    Sep 17, 2015 · The magazine's final edition will go on sale on 12 October with the closure of all of the Zoo Weekly magazine assets – across print, website and ...
  81. [81]
    Zoo magazine says next issue will be its last - NZ Herald
    Sep 17, 2015 · Men's magazine Zoo Weekly and its website will reportedly be shutting down amid collapsing sales. Publisher Bauer Media said the October 12 issue will be the ...Missing: peak | Show results with:peak