Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

1937 Memorial Day massacre

The 1937 Memorial Day Massacre was a deadly clash on May 30, 1937, in South Chicago, where officers fired upon a crowd of roughly 2,000 unarmed steelworkers, family members, and supporters who had gathered for a picnic and spontaneous march toward the plant during an ongoing strike, resulting in ten deaths and over eighty injuries from gunfire, clubs, and tear gas. The event unfolded amid the Steel Workers Organizing Committee's (SWOC) "Little Steel" strike against Corporation, which began in March 1937 after the company rejected union recognition despite U.S. Steel's recent agreement with organized labor, leading to heightened tensions over enforcement and plant access. As the group approached lines intended to protect company property, officers ordered dispersal; unedited newsreel footage captured the crowd turning to retreat when shooting commenced, contradicting initial claims of facing an mob and revealing most were shot in the back or side. Contemporary media often framed the incident as a communist-instigated justifying , but subsequent U.S. investigations by the La Follette Committee documented excessive force, absence of worker firearms in the casualties, and evidence of industrial espionage and favoritism toward management. The massacre intensified national scrutiny of labor violence, bolstered SWOC's organizing drive despite the strike's ultimate failure at , and exemplified the role of state power in suppressing during the era, with all ten fatalities among civilians, no officers killed, though approximately 50 police officers sustained injuries during the clash.

Economic and Legal Context

Great Depression Impacts on Steel Industry

The Great Depression triggered a severe contraction in the U.S. steel industry, with national steel production falling by 75 percent from its 1929 peak to the 1932 trough, as demand for steel-dependent products like automobiles, machinery, and infrastructure collapsed amid broader economic deflation and reduced investment. This decline left vast overcapacity from the 1920s expansion idle, with operating rates dropping to as low as 12 percent in some periods, forcing widespread mill shutdowns and inventory liquidations. Steel ingot output specifically plummeted from over 56 million tons in 1929 to 13.1 million tons in 1932, reflecting not only cyclical demand shocks but also structural inefficiencies in an industry reliant on heavy capital and export markets that contracted globally. Employment in iron and manufacturing halved from 421,000 workers in 1929 to 210,000 by 1932, contributing to localized rates often exceeding 50 percent in towns, far surpassing the national average of 25 percent in 1933. Durable goods sectors, including , saw drop 48.4 percent overall between 1929 and 1933, with layoffs concentrated among semi-skilled and unskilled laborers vulnerable to output fluctuations. Retained workers endured cuts averaging around 30-40 percent nominally—mirroring broader manufacturing trends where income fell 42.5 percent—and drastic hour reductions, often to part-time schedules, intensifying poverty in company-dominated communities. These pressures hit "Little Steel" firms—Republic Steel, Bethlehem Steel, Inland Steel, and Youngstown Sheet & Tube—acutely, as they lacked the scale of to weather the storm through diversification, leading to aggressive cost-cutting via work speed-ups and opposition to amid partial by 1937. Such tactics preserved short-term but deepened worker over unsafe conditions and stagnant pay, fueling demands for as legislation enabled organizing efforts.

Wagner Act and Emergence of CIO Unionism

The National Labor Relations Act, commonly known as the Wagner Act, was enacted on July 5, 1935, establishing federal protections for private sector employees to form unions, engage in , and conduct strikes without employer interference or retaliation. The Act created the (NLRB) to oversee union elections, investigate unfair labor practices such as employer domination of unions or discrimination against organizers, and enforce remedies including back pay and reinstatement. It explicitly outlawed company-dominated unions, which had previously undermined independent organizing efforts, and required employers to bargain in good faith with majority-elected representatives, thereby addressing the perceived imbalance of power in during the . The Wagner Act catalyzed a surge in union membership, expanding from approximately 3 million workers in 1933 to over 15 million by 1946, as it provided legal safeguards that emboldened workers in mass-production industries to challenge entrenched employer resistance. This legal framework shifted the dynamics of by empowering employees to select representatives through secret-ballot elections supervised by the NLRB, reducing the prevalence of coercive tactics like firings or that had historically suppressed union drives. In industries with large, unskilled workforces, such as steel manufacturing, the Act facilitated broader organizing by validating industrial union structures over fragmented craft-based models, though enforcement challenges persisted due to limited NLRB resources and judicial skepticism in early cases. The Act's passage directly facilitated the formation of the Committee for Industrial Organization (CIO) on November 9, 1935, initially as a subcommittee within the American Federation of Labor (AFL), led by United Mine Workers president John L. Lewis and representatives from eight other unions seeking to organize unorganized sectors like steel, automobiles, and rubber. Dissatisfied with the AFL's emphasis on skilled craft unions, which excluded millions of semi-skilled and unskilled factory workers, the CIO adopted an industrial unionism approach—organizing entire plants regardless of trade—to capitalize on the Wagner Act's protections for mass mobilization and collective action. This emergence marked a militant pivot in American labor, with the CIO raising funds through member assessments and deploying organizers to leverage NLRB processes for recognition, though it led to expulsion from the AFL in 1936 and formal independence as the Congress of Industrial Organizations in 1938. In the steel industry, the CIO's Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC), established in June 1936 under director Philip Murray, exemplified this Wagner-enabled strategy by targeting "Little Steel" companies like , which employed over 100,000 workers across integrated mills resistant to prior efforts. SWOC signed contracts with in March 1937, securing recognition for 80% of the industry's workforce without a strike, but Little Steel firms rejected negotiations, prompting the broader Little Steel Strike starting March 1937 and testing the Act's limits amid ongoing employer opposition and sporadic violence. The CIO's rapid growth to over 2 million members by 1937 underscored the Wagner Act's role in enabling , though it exposed tensions between legal guarantees and practical enforcement in capital-intensive sectors where owners viewed unionization as a threat to operational control.

The Little Steel Strike

Breakdown of Negotiations with

Following the successful negotiation of a agreement between the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC) and Steel Corporation on March 2, 1937—which included wage increases, a 40-hour workweek, and recognition of SWOC as the exclusive bargaining agent for its members—SWOC leadership anticipated similar concessions from the "Little Steel" companies, including . However, , under president Tom M. Girdler, rejected union recognition outright, viewing SWOC as an illegitimate external imposition that undermined managerial authority and employee individualism. Republic Steel's management proposed matching the U.S. Steel wage hikes and working conditions improvements but insisted on dealing directly with employees through individual or company unions, refusing to grant SWOC any formal role in negotiations or elections to verify membership support. Girdler publicly argued that such union demands constituted coercion, asserting that Republic's workforce—estimated at around 80,000 employees across its facilities—largely opposed affiliation with the (CIO)-backed SWOC, preferring the company's employee representation plans established earlier in the decade. This stance aligned with Girdler's broader philosophy of an "open shop," where union security clauses were deemed antithetical to free enterprise, as evidenced by his prior resistance to organized labor during the formation of in 1930. SWOC organizers, led by figures like John L. Lewis of the CIO, intensified membership drives in Republic's plants, particularly in Chicago, Youngstown, and Cleveland, claiming majority support by mid-May 1937 but lacking verifiable proof acceptable to Republic without independent elections. Negotiations stalled as Republic conditioned any further talks on SWOC abandoning demands for exclusive bargaining rights, while SWOC viewed wage concessions without recognition as insufficient to protect against arbitrary dismissals or plant closures. By May 20, 1937, with no progress despite mediation attempts by federal labor officials under the Wagner Act, SWOC's Republic Steel lodge authorized a strike, culminating in a nationwide walkout against Little Steel on May 26, 1937, involving approximately 50,000 workers at Republic alone. This impasse highlighted the causal divide between SWOC's push for institutional union power and Republic's commitment to non-union operations, setting the stage for escalating confrontations.

SWOC Militancy and Pre-Massacre Violence

The Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC), affiliated with the (CIO), pursued aggressive unionization in the Little Steel companies, including , after U.S. Steel's capitulation earlier in 1937 left the smaller firms defiant. On May 26, 1937, SWOC authorized strikes at , Inland Steel, and Youngstown Sheet & Tube, mobilizing roughly 67,000 workers nationwide within days to demand recognition, wage hikes, and improved conditions. This rapid escalation reflected SWOC's militant strategy of total shutdowns, contrasting with more conciliatory approaches in prior steel organizing efforts. Central to SWOC's tactics was mass picketing, deploying thousands of strikers to encircle 's plant and bar non-union workers, supplies, and vehicles from entering, effectively halting operations from the strike's outset. In , formed immediately on May 26, with strikers physically obstructing gates and harassing potential scabs to enforce solidarity, a approach rooted in CIO leader John L. Lewis's emphasis on over fragmented craft bargaining. countered by stockpiling $50,000 in and clubs as early as May 20, anticipating forceful resistance to its attempts to resume production with replacement labor. These efforts sparked scattered in the strike's initial days, including scuffles at plant entrances where strikers threw stones and at police-escorted trucks carrying non-strikers or materials, injuring several officers and company personnel before May 30. Such incidents, while not resulting in fatalities, underscored the strikers' willingness to use to maintain impermeable lines, escalating mutual distrust with authorities who viewed mass picketing as tantamount to intimidation under local ordinances. SWOC's refusal to limit picketers to nominal numbers—despite court injunctions in some areas—further intensified confrontations, setting the stage for broader clashes as sought to break the blockade.

Lead-Up to May 30, 1937

Memorial Day Gathering Organization

The Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC), affiliated with the (CIO), organized the Memorial Day gathering on May 30, 1937, as a show of solidarity for striking workers at Republic Steel's South Chicago plant during the ongoing Little Steel Strike. The event was framed as a family picnic and rally to demonstrate worker unity and pressure the company, which had refused to recognize the union or sign a agreement following U.S. Steel's capitulation earlier that year. Local SWOC leaders coordinated the assembly at Sam's Place, the union's strike headquarters near the plant, where participants began with speeches and communal activities before any movement toward the mill was considered. Several hundred attendees, including striking steelworkers, their families, and supporters from diverse ethnic backgrounds such as white, Black, and Latino communities, converged on a nearby prairie field for the picnic. Approximately 200 women were among the crowd, underscoring the event's inclusion of non-combatant family members alongside male unionists. The gathering emphasized demands for union recognition, wage increases, an eight-hour workday, and improved safety conditions, reflecting broader SWOC goals under the Wagner Act to organize the industry despite employer resistance. No advance permits for a march were sought, and the initial setup involved unarmed participants focused on morale-boosting activities rather than confrontation. Planning appears to have been localized and informal, with SWOC relying on word-of-mouth mobilization through strike networks rather than large-scale logistics, as the strike had already drawn over 70,000 workers across multiple states. Union records and contemporary accounts indicate the picnic was intended to sustain enthusiasm amid stalled negotiations, without documented directives from national CIO figures like for escalation. The decision to form a procession toward the plant emerged spontaneously from the assembled group, highlighting the improvisational nature of organizing in the face of restrictions on .

Decision to March on Republic Plant

On May 30, 1937, striking steelworkers affiliated with the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC) and their families gathered at Sam's Place, a near the plant in Chicago's South Side, for a rally and picnic. The event was organized to bolster morale amid the ongoing Little Steel strike, which had begun on May 26, and to protest 's refusal to recognize the , negotiate wages, or address unsafe working conditions, in contrast to U.S. Steel's recent agreement with SWOC in March 1937. Several hundred participants, including men, women, and children from diverse ethnic backgrounds such as white, Black, and Latino workers, attended the peaceful assembly, which featured speeches emphasizing demands for rights under the National Labor Relations Act. The decision to march from the gathering site to the plant approximately one-third of a mile away emerged at the rally's conclusion, framed as a planned to present demands directly to and establish a visible presence after had repeatedly blocked earlier attempts at the facility. accounts portrayed the march as a spontaneous response to the day's speeches and the 's frustrations, with participants responding to a call for to assert their without violence. However, and company representatives contended it was a premeditated and orchestrated effort to provoke confrontation, citing the structured nature of the assembly and prior tensions. No single individual is definitively credited with initiating the call, though local SWOC organizers, including figures like director Joe Germano, played roles in coordinating the broader activities leading to the event. The march's motivation stemmed from Republic Steel's intransigence under president Tom Girdler, who rejected SWOC's overtures and maintained operations with non-union labor protected by armed guards and , fueling strikers' determination to escalate visibility on a national holiday. Approximately 2,000 to 2,500 people ultimately joined the procession across open prairie toward the plant's gates, carrying no weapons according to union reports, though the action reflected growing militancy after failed negotiations and prior skirmishes. This decision, while rooted in legitimate labor grievances, set the stage for the violent blockade that followed.

The Confrontation

Initial Clash and Escalation

On May 30, 1937, approximately 2,000 striking steelworkers and supporters, including women and children, gathered for a picnic near the plant in South Chicago before deciding to march toward the facility to assert picketing rights amid the ongoing Little Steel strike. The group, largely unarmed with only a handful carrying sticks or rocks for potential , approached a line of about 300 officers positioned to block access to the plant, equipped with billy clubs, revolvers, and provided by Republic Steel management. A police captain issued an order for the marchers to disperse, but the crowd continued forward, leading to verbal confrontations. Some strikers responded by throwing rocks, tree branches, and possibly bottles toward line, prompting claims of from officers, though eyewitness accounts and footage indicate the projectiles were limited and did not constitute a coordinated . then advanced, using clubs to beat back the front ranks and deploying to scatter the group, escalating the encounter from tension to physical violence without immediate gunfire. The situation intensified as officers fired into the crowd, particularly targeting those turning to flee, with bullets striking from behind in several fatal cases; this shift to lethal force occurred after the initial dispersal efforts failed and amid retreating demonstrators, resulting in four immediate deaths and further injuries before the shooting ceased. Paramount News footage, later analyzed by the La Follette Civil Liberties Committee, captured the sequence, showing police charging an unarmed majority while highlighting the disparity in armament and the rapid progression to deadly confrontation. Police testimonies emphasized provocation by armed agitators, yet federal investigations questioned the proportionality, noting the crowd's overall peaceful intent under Wagner Act protections.

Police Response and Use of Force

![Defends Chicago police in strike riot tactics][float-right] The Chicago Police Department stationed approximately 200 officers, armed primarily with .38 and .45 caliber revolvers, billy clubs, blackjacks, and some tear gas equipment, to guard the Republic Steel plant against the approaching group of strikers and supporters on May 30, 1937. As the crowd of roughly 1,000 to 2,000 individuals, including families, neared the plant perimeter after transitioning from a picnic gathering, police formed a line across the prairie and issued dispersal orders. When the group did not immediately comply and some strikers hurled rocks, bottles, and other improvised projectiles, officers charged forward, wielding clubs to beat back the crowd and deploying canisters to disperse them. This initial physical assault escalated rapidly as police drew firearms and opened fire, discharging over 200 rounds from revolvers, sawed-off shotguns loaded with buckshot, and rifles into the panicking mass. The shooting continued for several minutes, even as many in the crowd fled or lay prone on the ground, resulting in ten immediate fatalities and at least 67 injuries requiring hospitalization. Autopsies and ballistic evidence revealed that most victims were shot from distances of 50 to 150 feet, with entry wounds predominantly in the back or sides, indicating they were not posing an active threat at the moment of firing. officers later testified that the use of was justified in against an armed and riotous intent on storming the facility, claiming sightings of guns and knives among the strikers. However, forensic examinations of the deceased found no firearms or lethal weapons on the majority, with only minor improvised items like slingshots or clubs recovered from a few, and contemporaneous footage—suppressed initially but later screened by the U.S. Senate's La Follette Civil Liberties Committee—depicted officers firing into the backs of retreating, unarmed demonstrators. The committee's probe concluded that the police response constituted excessive and unjustified lethal force, lacking evidence of imminent peril warranting such tactics.

Casualties and Forensic Details

Breakdown of Fatalities and Injuries

Ten civilians, all participants in the Memorial Day march supporting the steelworkers' strike, were killed by gunfire from Chicago police during the confrontation on May 30, 1937. The victims were identified as Lee Tisdale, Joseph Rothmund, Otis A. Jones, Earl J. Handley, Sam R. Popovich, Kenneth Reed, Leo Francisco, Alfred Causey, Hilding Anderson, and Anthony Taglieri. Four died at the scene, while six succumbed to their wounds in the following days, including Otis A. Jones on June 8. All fatalities resulted from gunshot wounds, with autopsy reports presented during investigations revealing that seven of the ten victims were shot in the back, consistent with them retreating from police lines. In addition to the fatalities, over 90 individuals sustained injuries, including approximately 40 . Other injuries stemmed from beatings with clubs and handles, as well as to deployed during the dispersal. At least 38 people required hospitalization, with some suffering permanent disabilities from their wounds. No officers were reported killed, though claims of injuries to from thrown projectiles were asserted in subsequent defenses.

Evidence of Armaments on Deceased

The Cook County coroner's , convened shortly after the May 30, 1937, incident, examined the bodies of the ten deceased strikers—Hilding Anderson, Alfred Causey, Leon Francisco, Earl Handley, Otis Jones, Kenneth Reed, Joseph Rothmund, Sam Popovich, Anthony Tagliori, and Lee Tisdale—and reported no firearms or other lethal armaments recovered from them. Autopsies conducted by medical examiners, including Dr. Lawrence Jacques, focused on ballistic trajectories, noting that 67.5% of wounds entered from the back, 22.5% from the side, and 10% from the front, but made no reference to weapons in the possession of the victims at the time of death. The jury, after reviewing and witness testimonies, ruled all ten deaths , attributing the clash to an attempt by 1,500–2,000 demonstrators, "many of whom were carrying clubs or missiles," to breach a line near the plant. Testimony during the highlighted improvised weapons in the crowd, including rocks, sticks, and possibly picket sign handles repurposed as clubs, though none were explicitly linked to the deceased individuals. witnesses described being pelted with such objects before resorting to and gunfire, framing their response as defensive against an advancing, armed . A Steel Workers Organizing Committee official, testifying in related proceedings, admitted that picketers had been instructed to use banners as clubs if needed but explicitly denied that guns were carried by union members. The federal Senate Civil Liberties Committee (La Follette Committee), investigating in June–July 1937, reviewed forensic details and witness accounts but found no substantiation for firearms among the victims or marchers generally, portraying the gathering as largely peaceful until escalation. The committee, noted for its pro-labor orientation under Senator Robert La Follette Jr., emphasized police overreach with company-supplied weapons but acknowledged broader strike violence, including prior striker assaults with clubs and projectiles. No peer-reviewed analyses or primary forensic records contradict the absence of guns on the deceased, though the local inquest's acceptance of police claims reflects sympathies toward amid anti-union sentiments in Chicago's business-aligned institutions.

Investigations and Trials

Local Inquests and Police Self-Defense Claims

The Cook County Coroner's into the ten fatalities from the May 30, 1937, confrontation began hearings in late June and concluded with verdicts of for all deaths, effectively exonerating the involved police officers. The , composed of local citizens, reviewed testimonies, medical , and ballistic details over several sessions, determining that police gunfire was a lawful response to an imminent threat posed by the advancing crowd of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 strikers and sympathizers. Police testimonies emphasized as the core justification, with officers recounting how the marchers, initially orderly, suddenly surged toward Republic Steel's gates while hurling bricks, stones, bolts, and clubs—missiles that injured several policemen and prompted the use of before escalating to gunfire. Captains such as C. Prendergast and others described the crowd's intent to forcibly seize the plant, citing pre-incident intelligence from informants about armed unionists planning a , which they argued justified preemptive positioning and rapid response to protect company property and non-striking workers. No officers were indicted, and the findings aligned with initial police reports that portrayed the event as a initiated by agitators rather than a peaceful . Autopsy examinations presented during the inquest documented entry wounds consistent with police accounts in some cases, but subsequent analyses noted that about two-thirds of the gunshot injuries were to the back or sides, raising questions about the directionality of the crowd's movement and the timing of shots fired—details the jury deemed supportive of defensive necessity amid chaotic stone-throwing. The proceedings drew limited public scrutiny at the time, with the verdicts reinforcing local authorities' narrative that officers acted to quell a violent mob influenced by radical elements, though labor advocates contested the impartiality of the jury selection process under Cook County's coroner system.

Federal Senate Probe and Findings

The Subcommittee on Education and Labor, chaired by Senator and formally known as the Subcommittee Investigating Violations of Free Speech and Rights of Labor, initiated hearings into the Memorial Day Massacre on June 30, 1937, as part of its mandate under Senate Resolution 266 to probe interferences with labor organizing. The committee subpoenaed Newsreel footage suppressed by the company, which was screened publicly during sessions on July 2, 1937, revealing police deployment of hatchet-handle clubs and rather than standard equipment against a largely peaceful gathering of approximately 1,500 strikers and supporters. Testimonies included victim Harry Harper, who detailed injuries sustained during the clash while attending the June 30 hearing, and officers such as Captain John C. Prendergast, who defended departmental tactics, alongside Sergeant Lawrence Lyons, whose account sparked contentious exchanges on July 1. The committee's examination debunked initial assertions of striker-initiated violence, protester armament with regulation weapons, drug influence, or communist orchestration, with evidence demonstrating unprovoked aggression and shots fired into retreating crowds, resulting in ten fatalities, including four women, and over 100 injuries. The probe concluded that Chicago police exhibited belligerence and overreach, prioritizing 's interests over public safety and conducting a deficient internal lacking clear directives, thereby violating under the Wagner Act by enabling lethal force to quash mass . While the committee's pro-labor orientation, led by progressive figures, drew criticism for potential bias favoring unions over balanced scrutiny, the empirical newsreel documentation substantiated core determinations of excessive police force absent commensurate threat from unarmed demonstrators. These findings contributed to actions against , yielding limited penalties after protracted litigation, and underscored systemic tensions in strike policing.

Prosecutions of Officers and Strikers

A Cook County , after reviewing testimony and evidence from the May 30, 1937, incident, returned a of on July 21, 1937, determining that the officers acted in against an aggressive crowd armed with improvised weapons such as bricks and pipes. This ruling effectively shielded the approximately 200 officers present from criminal liability, as no indictments were issued by local authorities despite the deaths of ten civilians and injuries to dozens more. accounts emphasized that strikers initiated violence by hurling projectiles and advancing en masse toward the plant gate, prompting the use of firearms only after warnings and initial clubbing failed to disperse the group. In contrast, dozens of strikers and supporters were arrested in the chaos immediately following the shootings, with at least six leaders charged with felony conspiracy to commit an illegal act, specifically plotting to invade the plant. Some arrestees, including critically wounded individuals, faced these accusations amid claims that the march constituted a premeditated rather than a peaceful . However, the charges against the members were ultimately dropped without trials or convictions, influenced by mounting evidence from newsreels and witness statements highlighting overreach, as well as broader public and labor backlash against the . No strikers were successfully prosecuted for or related offenses stemming from the confrontation, reflecting the collapse of the conspiracy narrative under scrutiny.

Media and Contemporary Reactions

Coverage in Chicago and National Press

Chicago newspapers, including the and Chicago Herald and Examiner, framed the May 30, 1937, clash as a provoked by aggressive strikers, emphasizing reports of workers hurling bricks, rivets, and other projectiles at police while attempting to breach the plant perimeter. Initial coverage highlighted police against a mob estimated at 1,000 to 2,000, with early casualty figures cited as four dead and dozens injured, attributing the violence to union radicals and communists infiltrating the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC). These outlets portrayed the event as a necessary restoration of order amid the ongoing Little Steel strike, aligning with local business interests wary of CIO-led unionization efforts. National press coverage exhibited greater variation, with some papers echoing Chicago justifications of police actions as proportionate to the threat posed by advancing crowds, while others amplified labor critiques. The New York Times reported on June 18, 1937, United Mine Workers president John L. Lewis's accusation that the killings constituted a "brutal massacre," charging authorities with suppressing evidence and protecting company interests. Subsequent Times articles detailed the Cook County verdict on July 21, 1937, deeming the ten deaths "justifiable homicide" due to the riot's chaos, yet noted ongoing federal scrutiny under the La Follette Committee, which probed police armament and tactics. This divergence reflected broader editorial biases: Chicago dailies, owned by conservative publishers like of the , prioritized narratives upholding and industrial stability, often downplaying unarmed civilian casualties and family presence in the crowd. National outlets, less tethered to local steel industry ties, gave space to SWOC claims of unprovoked gunfire into retreating demonstrators, though initial wire service reports similarly stressed striker aggression based on police statements. Newsreel suppression, including edited footage omitting crowd dispersal, further shaped public perception toward justifying force, as revealed in later hearings.

Divergent Views from Labor and Business Interests

Labor organizations, including the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC) affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), depicted the May 30, 1937, clash as an unprovoked "massacre" by Chicago police acting in concert with Republic Steel management. Union accounts emphasized that approximately 1,500 strikers and supporters, many with families, were conducting a peaceful Memorial Day march when police, armed with company-provided tear gas and firearms, fired into the crowd without warning, killing ten individuals—nine strikers and one bystander—and injuring over 100 others, predominantly from gunfire. This narrative framed the event as evidence of "Little Steel" companies' defiance of the National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act) by refusing union recognition and employing lethal force to suppress organizing efforts for better wages, hours, and safety amid hazardous working conditions. SWOC leaders leveraged newsreel footage and Senate testimony to portray the victims as defenseless workers exercising constitutional rights, galvanizing broader support for industrial unionism despite the strike's ultimate failure in achieving immediate contracts at Republic and other holdout firms. Republic Steel executives and business advocates, however, maintained that the confrontation stemmed from strikers' illegal mass picketing aimed at intimidating non-strikers and seizing plant operations, which threatened property rights and ongoing production essential to national economic recovery. Company president Tom M. Girdler, in his 1950 autobiography Boot Straps, contended that SWOC's militant tactics— including blockades, harassment, and alleged communist infiltration—escalated tensions, with the Memorial Day group veering toward the plant fence amid reports of hurled bricks, rivets, and clubs that injured dozens of officers prior to gunfire. Republic had preemptively supplied police with over $50,000 in tear gas on May 20, anticipating disruption, and business representatives argued that law enforcement's response constituted lawful self-defense against a riotous assembly, not aggression against peaceful picnickers, as evidenced by hospital records showing mutual casualties from blunt objects and the absence of striker fatalities from police clubs alone. Aligned press outlets like the Chicago Tribune headlined the incident as a "steel strike riot" initiated by union "invaders," underscoring employers' insistence on voluntary recognition over coerced bargaining, which they viewed as undermining managerial prerogative and competitive viability under the industry's wage formulas. These polarized interpretations highlighted fundamental disputes over legality and force : labor decrying extralegal to entrench open-shop policies, while business interests invoked judicial precedents against secondary boycotts and mass action, portraying strategies as economically disruptive and legally untenable in a post-New Deal landscape balancing worker protections with enterprise autonomy. Subsequent rulings found Republic in violation of duties but affirmed no blanket endorsement of mass picketing, reflecting the era's tensions between emerging and traditional property defenses.

Long-Term Consequences

Effects on Steel Unionization Efforts

The Little Steel strike, encompassing the Memorial Day Massacre on May 30, 1937, inflicted immediate setbacks on the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC)'s unionization campaign against and allied firms. Launched on April 12, 1937, the strike mobilized around 75,000 workers but collapsed by late July without securing recognition from key holdouts like Republic, Inland Steel, and Youngstown Sheet & Tube; strikers returned under management's terms, with roughly 8,000 facing dismissal or , severely hampering local momentum. Despite this tactical defeat, the massacre's documented fatalities—ten killed by police gunfire—and subsequent injuries eroded public tolerance for corporate resistance, amplifying calls for federal intervention under the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Senate investigations, including the La Follette Civil Liberties Committee probes starting in 1937, uncovered systematic employer deployment of private armaments and informants, which discredited Little Steel executives and facilitated (NLRB) rulings against unfair labor practices; these exposures shifted bargaining leverage toward unions by validating worker grievances over wages and hours. Longer-term, the episode catalyzed steel unionization amid World War II labor demands and NLRB enforcement. Inland Steel yielded to SWOC contracts as early as November 1937 following NLRB certifications, while and others acceded between 1939 and 1942 under wartime production pressures and accumulated legal precedents; by 1942, SWOC had evolved into the of America with industry-wide coverage, underpinning membership surges to over 500,000 in organized steel plants by mid-decade. This progression reflected not spontaneous growth but causal pressures from evidentiary scandals and economic exigencies, enabling the CIO's broader industrial organizing gains through the 1940s.

Shifts in Law Enforcement Tactics for Strikes

The Memorial Day Massacre exemplified the use of overwhelming police force to disperse mass picket lines during the 1937 Little Steel Strike, with Chicago officers firing into a crowd of approximately 1,500 unarmed demonstrators on , resulting in 10 deaths and over 80 injuries, primarily to enforce Republic Steel's operational continuity. This approach, involving coordinated advances with clubs, , and rifles, reflected pre-existing tactics favoring property protection over protester safety, as police claimed against alleged rock-throwing despite evidence from newsreels showing demonstrators retreating. The subsequent U.S. Senate La Follette Civil Liberties Committee investigation, beginning in June 1937, exposed systemic issues including police-company collusion, arming of private guards, and excessive force, denouncing the Chicago Police Department's actions as unjustified in its July 1937 report. While local trials acquitted officers in 1938, the federal probe's documentation of munitions stockpiles and tactics heightened national scrutiny, prompting some departments to incorporate more defensive formations and documentation protocols in subsequent labor disputes to mitigate political backlash. Longer-term, the massacre fueled legal campaigns portraying mass picketing as inherently coercive, accelerating shifts toward preemptive judicial interventions over reactive violence; by the early 1940s, states like criminalized it as a , and courts routinely issued injunctions limiting picket numbers without requiring proof of violence. This evolution culminated in the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act, which empowered the to seek federal injunctions against "coercive" picketing under Section 8(b)(1)(A), enabling to enforce numerical caps and dispersal orders proactively, reducing reliance on lethal confrontations in favor of statutory compliance and arrests for . Such changes reflected a broader tactical pivot, where police coordinated with prosecutors to preempt mass actions legally, as seen in later strikes like Hormel (1985–1986), where hundreds faced arrests under assembly laws rather than mass shootings.

Economic Realities of Little Steel Formula

The steel industry in 1937 was emerging from the depths of the , with national reaching approximately 80 million tons annually, approaching pre-Depression levels amid rising demand from infrastructure and manufacturing recovery. (Big Steel) preempted a strike by signing a agreement with the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC) on March 2, 1937, which included an average wage increase of 10 cents per hour—equivalent to about 10% for many workers—alongside union recognition, a standard 8-hour workday where feasible, and time-and-a-half overtime pay. This settlement reflected Big Steel's advantages, including ownership of and mines, which lowered costs and enabled higher profit margins, with the company reporting net earnings of over $100 million in 1936. Little Steel firms—Republic Steel, Bethlehem Steel, Youngstown Sheet & Tube, and Inland Steel—faced structurally higher operating costs due to less integrated supply chains, reliance on purchased raw materials, and focus on specialized products like sheets and tubes, which commanded narrower margins in competitive markets. Despite this, these companies publicly committed to matching Big Steel's 10-cent wage hike prior to the May 26 strike to maintain labor peace and operational continuity, acknowledging the sector's profitability resurgence; for example, 's first-half 1937 earnings reached $4.4 million, a sharp rise from $182,000 in 1936 for comparable operations. The core economic contention was not the wage level itself, which Little Steel deemed viable given rising prices and output—industry-wide profits exceeded $200 million in 1937—but the ancillary costs of union recognition, including mandatory rules, grievance procedures, and potential future demands that could erode managerial flexibility and elevate long-term labor expenses beyond the immediate 10-cent adjustment. Post-strike settlements in 1938 and 1939 enforced parity with Big Steel through rulings and renewed negotiations, establishing a "Little Steel formula" of equivalent base pay scales without initial provisions, which preserved short-term cost containment while exposing firms to escalating union-driven adjustments. This approach allowed Little Steel to capitalize on the 1937 economic upswing—steel ingot prices climbed from $35 to $45 per ton—while resisting immediate losses from , though it ultimately facilitated industry-wide that compressed profit differentials between integrated giants and smaller producers by the early 1940s. Critics from business interests argued the formula overlooked firm-specific cost variances, potentially pricing less efficient operators out of markets, whereas labor advocates viewed it as a minimal concession extractable only through confrontation, underscoring the causal link between Depression-era recovery and organized labor's leverage over norms.

Historiographical Perspectives

Evolution of the "Massacre" Interpretation

The term "Memorial Day Massacre" emerged contemporaneously among striking workers, the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC), and aligned progressive outlets to characterize the Chicago shooting of ten civilians—nine strikers and one bystander—on May 30, 1937, as an unprovoked execution of peaceful demonstrators advancing toward the plant. This framing highlighted the fatalities' one-sided nature, with no deaths and including women and children, positioning the event as emblematic of "Little Steel" companies' violent resistance to under the Wagner . Opposing interpretations from Republic Steel management, Chicago authorities, and business-oriented media labeled the incident a "riot," attributing police gunfire to self-defense against a mob of approximately 1,000–2,000 marchers who defied dispersal orders, hurled bricks and stones, and followed a pattern of earlier strike-related sabotage like fence-cutting and plant invasions. These accounts emphasized the march's unauthorized proximity to company property amid ongoing labor unrest, where strikers had previously clashed with non-union workers and security, though forensic evidence later confirmed most victims were shot in the back while fleeing. The U.S. Senate La Follette Civil Liberties Committee's hearings from June to August 1937 decisively tilted toward the "massacre" view by subpoenaing suppressed Paramount News footage, witness affidavits from over 100 survivors, and ballistic analyses revealing police use of .45-caliber pistols and rifles against minimally armed civilians, contradicting claims of imminent threat from stones alone. The committee's reports documented an estimated 84 wounded, many by gunfire, and alleged premeditated police positioning, influencing early labor scholarship and embedding the narrative in CIO annals as a catalyst for federal intervention in industrial disputes. In subsequent decades, from the 1940s through the New Labor History of the 1960s–1980s, the "massacre" designation solidified in academic texts and union commemorations, often prioritizing victim oral histories and Senate evidence over contextual strike violence, such as the 70,000-worker Little Steel walkout's broader disruptions. Documentaries and books, including those drawing on the rediscovered footage in the 1970s–2020s, reinforced this as a symbol of extralegal repression, though the interpretation's dominance reflects labor-aligned sources' archival emphasis, with "riot" framings persisting mainly in local conservative retrospectives.

Critiques of Union Provocation Narratives

Historians have critiqued narratives attributing the violence primarily to striker provocation, arguing that such accounts exaggerate minor acts of resistance while downplaying the disproportionate response and the legal context of mass under the Wagner Act. Ahmed White, in his analysis of the Little Steel Strike, contends that the strikers' march on May 30, 1937, toward Republic Steel's South Chicago plant was a legitimate exercise of rights, with escalating tensions by demanding immediate dispersal after only minutes of chanting, leading to a rapid and lethal barrage of approximately 200 shots fired in 10-15 seconds. These critiques emphasize that while some strikers threw rocks or branches in response to and dispersal orders, no evidence emerged of organized armament or premeditated assault among the roughly 1,500 participants, many of whom included families on a holiday outing that spontaneously turned into a . The Senate Civil Liberties , chaired by Robert La Follette Jr., investigated the incident through hearings in June and July 1937, concluding that police bore full responsibility for initiating and escalating the shooting, rejecting claims of a striker-led as unsubstantiated self-justification by officers armed with company-supplied weapons. findings highlighted suppressed footage depicting officers firing into the backs of fleeing unarmed demonstrators and clubbing fallen individuals, contradicting police testimonies of facing an imminent threat from "communist agitators" or armed mobs. Critics of provocation narratives, including White, further note the selective reliance on biased local accounts, such as the Cook County ruling the ten deaths , which ignored federal evidence and aligned with Republic Steel's interests in portraying the union as the aggressor to undermine organizing efforts. Additional scrutiny focuses on the causal sequence, where prior violence—such as company guards firing on picketers—set a tone of hostility, yet provocation claims isolated the events to absolve state forces of systemic repression against . Post-event analyses, including those from the Oxford Research Encyclopedia, argue that emphasizing striker "aggression" obscures how tactics, including non-regulation clubs and pre-positioned lines, were designed to break the strike rather than respond to genuine peril, as reports showed most victims shot from behind at close range without recovering striker firearms. These critiques maintain that while isolated resistance occurred, it does not causally explain the massacre's scale, which injured over 100 and killed ten, primarily civilians exercising protected amid Republic's refusal to bargain.

References

  1. [1]
    Memorial Day Massacre of 1937 - Chicago History Museum
    May 28, 2024 · Read about the 1937 Memorial Day Massacre, an act of police violence against Republic Steel organizers, and the harm done to Latino workers.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  2. [2]
    [PDF] THE "LITTLE STEEL" STRIKE OF 1937 - Journals
    Rather, the Steel Workers. Organizing Committee (CIO) sought recognition as a bargain- ing agent, and the legitimacy conferred by signed contracts. In Johnstown ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Memorial Day Massacre, Chicago, 1937 Document 8.4 - LAWCHA
    The documentary uses a number of primary sources, including newsreel footage taken by a Paramount News cameraman,. Orlando P. Lippert, during the Memorial Day ...
  4. [4]
    When a Progressive Senator Uncovered the Truth Behind the ...
    Jun 6, 2023 · On May 30, 1937, workers on strike at the massive Republic Steel plant in South Chicago called for a Memorial Day picnic on a nearby prairie ...
  5. [5]
    La Follette Reports - Local 1010
    Robert M. La Follette Jr. was a Wisconsin Senator who chaired the Committee on Education and Labor, Subcommittee Investigating Violations of Free Speech and the ...
  6. [6]
    Great Depression
    The Great Depression reduced the country's total steel production by 75% and steel workers took wage cuts and faced reduced hours.
  7. [7]
    CQ Researcher - The Steel Industry and Recovery
    From a peak of fifty-six and a half million tons of steel ingots and castings in 1929, and a production rate of 87.5 per cent, the industry had fallen to a ...
  8. [8]
    RAW STEEL OUTPUT LOWEST SINCE 1900 - The New York Times
    Production of steel ingots in the United States in 1932 amounted to 13,095,727 tons, compared with 25,192,715 in 1931, according to the American Iron and ...Missing: 1929 | Show results with:1929<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY - GovInfo
    The Industry employed 421,000 jn 1929, 210,000 in 1932, and. 272,000 at the end of July 1933. The hours in the Code should allow of a production without undue ...
  10. [10]
    estimates of the unemployment in the United States - Social Security
    For these groups as a whole the decline in employment between 1929 and 1933 was 48.4 percent in the durable goods industries and only 19.4 percent in the ...Missing: steel | Show results with:steel
  11. [11]
    Great Depression Facts - FDR Presidential Library & Museum
    Wage income for workers who were lucky enough to have kept their jobs fell 42.5% between 1929 and 1933. It was the worst economic disaster in American history.Missing: steel | Show results with:steel
  12. [12]
    Chapter 5: Americans in Depression and War By Irving Bernstein
    But because of the growth of the labor force and increased productivity, there were still 7,700,000 persons unemployed.
  13. [13]
    National Labor Relations Act (1935)
    Also known as the Wagner Act, this bill was signed into law by President Franklin Roosevelt on July 5, 1935. It established the National Labor Relations Board ...
  14. [14]
    FDR and the Wagner Act - FDR Presidential Library & Museum
    The Wagner Act not only restated the Section 7a right of workers to collective bargaining, it established a new independent National Labor Relations Board.
  15. [15]
    Revisiting the Wagner Act & its Causes - by Eric Blanc - Labor Politics
    Jul 28, 2022 · The Act banned company unions and established a robust mechanism for the federal government to enforce workers' rights to unionize.
  16. [16]
    Wagner Act | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act, placed positive federal authority behind labor organizing and collective bargaining.
  17. [17]
    What is the CIO in the AFL-CIO? - National Employment Law Project
    Nov 9, 2018 · On November 9, 1935, John Lewis of the United Mine Workers of America and 10 other unions formed the Committee for Industrial Organizations.
  18. [18]
    CIO, Founded 85 Years Ago, Brought “Liberation” to U.S. Workers | UE
    Nov 14, 2023 · The CIO had initially been formed in 1935 as the “Committee for Industrial Organization” by labor leaders who understood that the labor ...
  19. [19]
    United States steelworkers strike for a contract and union ...
    In June of 1936, the national Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) formed the Steel Workers' Organizing Committee (SWOC) to organize an industry that had ...
  20. [20]
    GIRDLER, TOM MERCER | Encyclopedia of Cleveland History
    Republic's refusal to bargain and allow union elections resulted in the LITTLE STEEL STRIKE in May 1937. ... Girdler resigned from Republic's presidency in 1937 ...
  21. [21]
    Little Steel Strike | Encyclopedia.com
    The Little Steel Strike revealed the limitations of organized labor and federal labor policy. Along with the recession of 1937 to 1938, it temporarily halted ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] THE "LITTLE STEEL" STRIKE OF 1937 - Journals
    At issue in the 1937 strike were neither wages nor hours nor working conditions. Rather, the Steel Workers. Organizing Committee (CIO) sought recognition as a ...
  23. [23]
    LITTLE STEEL STRIKE | Encyclopedia of Cleveland History
    CIO Director Lee Hall addresses a crowd of CIO members on Public Square during the Little Steel Strike, early July 1937. Cleveland Press Collection, CSU ...
  24. [24]
    Memorial Day Massacre - Illinois Labor History Society
    Ten demonstrators were killed by police bullets during the "Little Steel Strike" of 1937. When several smaller steelmakers, including Republic Steel, refused ...
  25. [25]
    1937 Memorial Day Steel Mill Riot - chicagology
    Steel strike rioters, attempting to invade the Republic Steel corporation's plant in South Chicago, precipitated a bloody battle yesterday when they hooted down ...
  26. [26]
    Big Battle Against Little Steel - UFCW 324
    Mar 1, 2010 · Little Steel agreed to match the contract's wage increases, but refused to recognize the union.Missing: negotiations | Show results with:negotiations
  27. [27]
    Memorial Day Massacre | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The Memorial Day Massacre refers to a tragic event that occurred on May 30, 1937, in Chicago, during a labor strike organized by the Steel Workers Organizing ...
  28. [28]
    The Steel Strike of 1937 - Utne Reader
    Jul 19, 2016 · Forceful intervention on behalf of the steel companies who thought themselves above The New Deal resulted in the death of sixteen strikers and ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    (PDF) Carol Quirke - Reframing Chicago's Memorial Day Massacre ...
    The paper reexamines the Chicago Memorial Day Massacre of 1937 ... 1937 ... rocks, pipes and tree branches. A police captain warned strikers to disperse.<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Remembering the Memorial Day Massacre - Chicago History Museum
    May 30, 2021 · On Sunday, May 30, 1937, striking Republic workers and their allies attempted to set up a picket line in the prairie in front of the mill.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  31. [31]
    Memorial Day Massacre death certificates
    Copies of death certificates for ten men killed during the Memorial Day Massacre at Republic Steel: Lee Tisdale, Joseph Rothmund, Otis A. Jones, ...
  32. [32]
    Memorial Day Massacre and American Labor
    Dec 17, 2020 · On the afternoon of May 30, 1937, the Chicago Police killed or mortally wounded ten men who were among a large group of unionists attempting ...
  33. [33]
    Memorial Day Massacre: Chicago Cops Killed 10 During 1937 Steel ...
    May 26, 2023 · We look at the largely forgotten 1937 Memorial Day Massacre, when police in Chicago shot at and gassed a peaceful gathering of striking ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] The Memorial Day Massacre - Libcom.org
    Daniel J. Leab looks at the different accounts of The Memorial Day Massacre, an incident in. 1937 in which Chicago police killed 10 strikers. I know ...
  35. [35]
    None
    ### Summary of Findings from the Coroner's Inquest on Armaments or Weapons on Deceased Victims in the Memorial Day Massacre
  36. [36]
    Reds riot at steel mill: 75 years later - Libcom.org
    Mar 15, 2014 · Mark R. Wolff on the 1937 Memorial Day Massacre, in which police fired upon striking CIO workers.
  37. [37]
    ADMITS STRIKERS PLANNED ATTACK; Chicago Steel Unionist ...
    ADMITS STRIKERS PLANNED ATTACK; Chicago Steel Unionist Says Strategy Called for Pickets to Use Banners as Clubs DENIES GUNSWERE CARRIED Other Republic Mill ...
  38. [38]
    Memorial Day Massacre Confrontation - Encyclopedia of Chicago
    Although a local coroner's jury held the police blameless, the Senate and other investigative groups held that the ten deaths were both caused by the police and ...Missing: 1937 verdicts
  39. [39]
    THE MEMORIAL DAY RIOT - The New York Times
    A few days ago a coroner's jury in Cook County, after an investigation of the deaths of ten men in the Memorial Day riot in South Chicago, brought in a verdict ...
  40. [40]
    La Follette Civil Liberties Committee Hearings - Encyclopedia.com
    Conducted by Senator Robert M. La Follette Jr. of Wisconsin, the hearings exposed the heavy-handed, often brutal tactics many of the nation's leading ...
  41. [41]
    THE MEMORIAL DAY MASSACRE - jstor
    It was on such judgment and information that the police captains decided to halt the parade two blocks from the plant. THE MARCH: The strikers move across the ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Industrial Terrorism and the Unmaking of New Deal Labor Law
    The passage of the Wagner (National Labor Relations) Act of 1935 represented an unprecedented effort to guarantee American workers basic labor rights—the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    May 30, 1937 – The Memorial Day Massacre in Chicago
    May 30, 2024 · Yet a coroner's jury in Chicago would judge the killings “justifiable homicide.” No police would be punished. Dozens of unionists had been ...
  44. [44]
    CALLS KILLING OF 9 'BRUTAL MASSACRE'; Lewis Charges That ...
    CHICAGO, June 17.—Charges that the nine victims of the Memorial Day steel strike riots here gave "their lives, and scores of others have had their bodies ...
  45. [45]
    SAYS KILLING OF 10 WAS 'JUSTIFIABLE'; Coroner's Jury Gives ...
    Justifiable homicide" was the verdict of a coroner's jury today in reporting that the deaths of ten men in the Memorial Day riot in South Chicago were due ...
  46. [46]
    Memorial Day Massacre: Workers Die, Film Buried - PBS
    The first film to fully explore the 1937 tragedy in Chicago, when police shot and killed ten pro-labor marchers--and the shocking film cover-up that followed.Missing: clubs | Show results with:clubs
  47. [47]
    May 30, 1937: Memorial Day Massacre - Zinn Education Project
    The workers were on strike against Republic Steel, and the police attacked them with weapons supplied by the company. The tragic story is told in a new PBS ...
  48. [48]
    Redmond on the 1937 Republic Steel Memorial Day Massacre
    May 21, 2022 · And as that purpose took shape, and some 2500 people marched peacefully to the gates of Republic Steel, they were met by a line of city police ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  49. [49]
    The Memorial Day Massacre and American Labor
    On the afternoon of May 30, 1937, the Chicago Police killed or mortally wounded ten men who were among a large group of unionists attempting to picket a ...
  50. [50]
    Tom M. Girdler and the Labor Policies of Republic Steel Corporation
    Steel Corporation that a contract had been signed with the CIO on March 2,. 1937. It was generally believed that contract signing would only come after a ...
  51. [51]
    The New Deal and Little Steel | International Socialist Review
    The Little Steel Strike pitted steel workers organized by the Steel Workers Organizing Committee (SWOC) and the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) ...
  52. [52]
    America's Last Violent Strike Has Been Wrongly Forgotten - Jacobin
    Apr 14, 2024 · Little Steel ended up in the summer of 1937 in a bitter labor dispute with the SWOC, the Little Steel strike, and four of these companies — ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  53. [53]
    The Memorial Day Massacre and American Labor
    ### Summary of Little Steel Strike Lead-Up, SWOC Strategies, Mass Picketing, and Pre-Memorial Day Violence in Chicago
  54. [54]
    POLICE DENOUNCED IN SENATE REPORT ON RIOT IN CHICAGO
    The subcommittee's report was signed by the two members, Senators La Follette and Thomas of Utah. It summarized the facts that ten strike marchers were fatally ...
  55. [55]
    https://www.progressive.org/latest/when-a-progressive-senator-uncovered-the-truth-mitchell-20230606/
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Workers Disarmed: The Campaign Against Mass Picketing and the ...
    In so doing, the article discerns in the history of mass picketing a fundamental dilemma inherent in liberal labor rights: that liberal labor law can neither ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Wage Chronology: United States Steel Corporation, 1937-67
    This report is one of a series prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics to trace changes in wage scales and related benefits negotiated by individual ...
  58. [58]
    Labor Policy in the American Steel Industry, 1892-1937 - jstor
    This dissertation is intended to unite the concerns of business history and labor history. Even though labor and management could not exist without.Missing: differences Big
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Little Steel's Labor War in Youngstown - JMU Scholarly Commons
    May 6, 2021 · Girdler hold the key to understanding the outbreak of violence in Youngstown, Ohio during the sweltering summer months of 1937. Tom Girdler led ...
  60. [60]
    Business: Strike Earnings | TIME
    First-half profits were up from a measly $182,000 in 1936 to a fat $4,400,000 in 1937. For American Rolling Mill, whose name is not among the 260 steel ...
  61. [61]
    The Unionization of the American Steel Industry
    In its award, the Board granted a wage increase of. 5\ cents an hour under the famous "Little Steel Formula", and what was much more important to the union ...
  62. [62]
    Memorial Day Massacre: Workers Die, Film Buried | PBS
    May 6, 2023 · When police killed ten union activists in Chicago—and the film cover-up that followed.
  63. [63]
    The History of the 1937 Memorial Day Massacre at the Republic ...
    Oct 10, 2022 · On Sunday, May 30, 1937, striking Republic workers and their allies attempted to set up a picket line in the [public] prairie land in front of the mill.Missing: inquest weapons
  64. [64]
    Chicago and the Little Steel strike: Labor History
    The Little Steel strike of 1937 has taken on iconic significance for historians, in large part because of the anti-labor violence of the Memorial Day Massacre.Missing: refusal negotiate facts<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    1937 Memorial Day Steel Mill Riot
    Historical account detailing the events, including injuries to police officers.