Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Organizing

Organizing is the managerial process of structuring resources—such as tasks, people, and materials—into a coordinated framework to achieve specific objectives efficiently and effectively.^[1]^[2] This function establishes roles, responsibilities, and reporting relationships, enabling division of labor and resource allocation while minimizing redundancy and conflict.^[3] In essence, it transforms plans into actionable systems by defining what work needs to be done, who will perform it, and how authority flows to support collaboration.^[4] As a core element of management theory, organizing facilitates specialization, where tasks are grouped into departments or units based on function, product, or geography, promoting expertise and scalability.^[5] It addresses key design choices, including hierarchy levels, span of control (the number of subordinates per manager), and the balance between centralization (top-down decision-making) and decentralization (empowered lower levels), which influence adaptability and innovation.^[6] Effective organizing enhances clarity in relationships, reduces uncertainty, and aligns individual efforts with collective goals, as evidenced by its role in enabling firms to respond to dynamic environments without structural collapse.^[7] Poorly executed organizing, conversely, leads to inefficiencies, such as overlapping duties or bottlenecks, underscoring its causal importance in operational success.^[8] The process typically involves identifying required activities from plans, grouping them logically, delegating authority through chains of command, and establishing coordination mechanisms like policies or teams.^[9] While classical approaches emphasized rigid hierarchies for stability, modern views incorporate flexibility to handle complexity, such as flat structures in agile organizations that prioritize speed over layers.^[10] Organizing's defining impact lies in its ability to scale human coordination beyond informal groups, a prerequisite for large-scale endeavors, though it requires ongoing adjustment to avoid ossification.^[11]

Definition and Fundamentals

Etymology and Linguistic Roots

The term "organize" derives from the Middle English verb organisen, which appeared around the late 15th century, meaning to furnish with organs or to construct systematically.^[12] This English form stems from Old French organiser and directly from Medieval Latin organizare, a verb formed from the noun organum, denoting an instrument or tool.^[13] The Latin organum itself traces back to Ancient Greek organon (ὄργανον), signifying a tool, implement, or instrument for work, originally linked to practical devices like musical organs or mechanical aids.^[12] In linguistic evolution, the root reflects a conceptual shift from literal tools to metaphorical structuring: Greek organon extended to bodily organs as functional parts of a whole, influencing Latin usage in anatomy and music before adapting to abstract organization.^[14] By the early 15th century in English, related forms like "organization" denoted an organic structure or arrangement of interdependent parts, evoking biological coherence rather than mere assembly.^[14] This biological analogy underpinned later senses of "organize" as integrating elements into a functioning unity, emerging prominently by 1817.^[15] The gerund "organizing," as the nominal form denoting the process, inherits these roots without independent etymological divergence, emphasizing action-oriented arrangement in contexts like management or systems design. Proto-Indo-European influences via *werǵ- (to work or perform) appear distally in Greek organon, tying the term to foundational ideas of purposeful labor and instrumental efficacy.^[16]

Core Concepts and Principles

Organizing constitutes the management function that structures tasks, allocates resources, and defines relationships among positions to implement plans and achieve objectives. This process establishes an organizational framework specifying what work is done, by whom, and how it interconnects, drawing from observations of efficient industrial operations where unstructured efforts led to duplication and inefficiency.^[17]^[18] Division of labor forms a core principle, involving the subdivision of work into specialized tasks to leverage individual expertise and reduce time lost to task-switching, as evidenced in early manufacturing where it boosted output per worker by allowing repetitive practice and tool optimization. This specialization necessitates subsequent grouping into departments based on function, product, or process, with empirical studies showing it enhances productivity when aligned with workflow but can foster silos if uncoordinated. Henri Fayol, based on managing over 10,000 employees in a French mining company by 1916, emphasized that such division improves performance only when balanced with unity of direction to align specialized efforts toward common goals.^[18]^[19]^[20] Hierarchy, through the scalar chain principle, delineates authority levels from executive to operative roles, ensuring orders flow downward and accountability upward via clear reporting lines; Fayol documented this in practice as preventing confusion, with each subordinate receiving instructions from one superior to maintain discipline and rapid decision-making. Span of control limits the subordinates per manager—typically 5-7 for complex tasks per empirical observations in bureaucratic settings—to avoid overload, influencing structure height: narrower spans yield taller hierarchies for tight supervision, while wider ones promote flatter designs suited to routine work, as validated in analyses of firm efficiency from the early 20th century onward.^[19]^[21] Coordination integrates divided labor via mechanisms like standardized procedures, mutual adjustment among roles, or hierarchical oversight, addressing causal interdependencies where unaligned specialties cause bottlenecks; Fayol's experience showed planning and control functions as key enablers, with data from managed firms indicating reduced errors and faster goal attainment when coordination matched complexity, such as in assembly lines where timing synchronization doubled throughput. Authority must pair with responsibility, granting decision rights proportional to obligations, to incentivize execution without abdicating oversight.^[20]^[21]^[18]

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Industrial Practices

In ancient Egypt, large-scale projects such as the construction of the pyramids at Giza during the Fourth Dynasty (c. 2580–2560 BCE) demonstrated advanced organizational capabilities, involving the mobilization of thousands of workers through a corvée labor system rather than widespread slavery. Archaeological evidence from workers' villages near Giza reveals a structured workforce of skilled laborers, including masons and overseers, supported by provisions like bread and beer, under hierarchical supervision by officials often drawn from the military.^[22]^[23] This system relied on centralized pharaonic authority to coordinate logistics, such as quarrying, transportation via the Nile, and on-site assembly using ramps and levers, achieving precision in aligning structures to cardinal directions.^[24] Mesopotamian city-states from the Sumerian period (c. 3500–2000 BCE) featured temple and palace administrations that organized economic and social activities through a network of scribes and officials managing irrigation canals, grain storage, and labor allocation. These institutions functioned as proto-bureaucracies, with the temple economy redistributing barley and other staples while enforcing accountability via cuneiform records.^[25] In Uruk and later empires like Akkad, rulers such as Sargon (c. 2334–2279 BCE) expanded control by appointing governors (ensi) to provinces, standardizing weights and measures to facilitate trade and taxation across diverse regions.^[26] The Roman Empire (27 BCE–476 CE in the West) exemplified military and civil organization, with legions structured into cohorts of 480 men each, totaling around 5,000–6,000 per legion, enabling disciplined campaigns through chain-of-command hierarchies from centurions to legates. Administratively, emperors like Augustus established a professional bureaucracy of equestrians and freedmen handling provincial governance, tax collection, and infrastructure like roads, which spanned over 250,000 miles by the 2nd century CE.^[27] This separation of military from civil roles under Diocletian (r. 284–305 CE) further centralized authority, dividing the empire into smaller provinces for efficient oversight.^[28] In imperial China, the Qin dynasty (221–206 BCE) unified the realm under a centralized bureaucracy, standardizing laws, currency, and script while organizing labor for projects like the early Great Wall through conscripted peasant forces divided into work units. Subsequent Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) reforms introduced merit-based selection for officials via recommendation systems, evolving into the examination framework by the Sui (581–618 CE), which staffed a hierarchical civil service managing census, taxation, and hydraulic engineering across vast territories.^[29] This structure emphasized Confucian principles of hierarchical order, with prefectures and commanderies reporting to the capital for coordinated flood control and agricultural productivity.^[30] Pre-industrial Europe from the 9th to 15th centuries operated under feudal hierarchies, where kings granted fiefs to vassals in exchange for military service, organizing land-based economies around manors with serfs performing obligatory labor (corvée) for lords in return for protection and subsistence rights. This decentralized system coordinated defense and agriculture, as seen in the Carolingian Empire's missi dominici inspectors enforcing royal edicts across counties. Craft guilds emerged in urban centers like 12th-century Florence, regulating apprenticeships, quality standards, and market entry for trades such as weaving or blacksmithing, often limiting membership to maintain monopolies and train successors through multi-year terms.^[31]^[32]^[33]

Industrial Revolution and Scientific Management

The Industrial Revolution, originating in Great Britain in the mid-18th century, shifted production from scattered artisanal workshops to centralized factories, compelling the development of systematic organizing methods to coordinate labor, machinery, and raw materials on an unprecedented scale.^[34] Textile innovator Richard Arkwright exemplified this transition with his 1771 Cromford Mill, the world's first successful water-powered cotton spinning factory, which integrated machinery under one roof and imposed disciplined shifts on hundreds of workers, including children, to maintain continuous output.^[35] This factory system introduced hierarchical oversight, task specialization, and time-based synchronization, replacing irregular cottage industry rhythms with mechanized routines that maximized throughput but often at the expense of worker autonomy.^[36] Adam Smith's 1776 analysis in The Wealth of Nations provided a theoretical foundation for these practices, describing how division of labor in a pin factory enabled ten specialized workers to produce 48,000 pins per day—far surpassing the few gross (144 pins) achievable by uncoordinated individuals—through breaking production into 18 distinct operations like drawing wire and heading pins.^[37] Such specialization, rooted in empirical observation of productivity gains from repetition and tool adaptation, informed factory layouts that assigned workers to fixed stations, fostering efficiency via interdependence but risking monotony and skill deskilling.^[38] Scientific Management, formalized by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the early 1900s, elevated these ad hoc arrangements into a rigorous discipline by applying empirical measurement to workflow optimization. Taylor's 1911 The Principles of Scientific Management outlined replacing "rule-of-thumb" habits with time-motion studies to identify the "one best way" for tasks, as demonstrated in his shovel redesign at Bethlehem Steel, which increased daily output from 12.5 to 47-59 tons per worker by matching tool loads to material density.^[39] His four core tenets—scientific task analysis, worker selection and training based on aptitude tests, intimate management-worker collaboration for method adherence, and strict separation of planning (by managers) from execution (by workers)—aimed to eliminate inefficiency and soldiering, though critics noted it prioritized output over human factors.^[40] These principles found practical embodiment in Henry Ford's 1913 moving assembly line for the Model T at Highland Park, Michigan, which sequenced chassis transport past stationary workers, slashing assembly time from over 12 hours to 93 minutes and enabling daily production of 1,000 vehicles by 1914.^[41] Ford's system extended Taylorism through standardized parts, conveyor pacing, and $5 daily wages to attract and retain labor, yielding cost reductions that dropped Model T prices from $850 in 1908 to $260 by 1924, while organizing vertically integrated supply chains.^[42] This era's innovations established organizing as a calculable science, emphasizing measurable causality between process design and output, though they also precipitated labor resistance due to intensified regimentation.^[43]

20th-Century Theoretical Advances

In the early 20th century, Henri Fayol advanced administrative theory through his 1916 book Administration Industrielle et Générale, outlining 14 principles of management—such as division of work, authority, and unity of command—and five managerial functions: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling.^[44] These elements emphasized hierarchical structure and efficiency in large-scale operations, shifting focus from shop-floor tasks to top-level administration, with empirical roots in Fayol's experience managing a French mining company where he implemented scalar chains and equity to reduce turnover.^[45] The 1920s and 1930s saw the emergence of the human relations approach, pioneered by Elton Mayo's Hawthorne Studies at Western Electric's Chicago plant from 1924 to 1932, which involved experiments on lighting, rest breaks, and group dynamics affecting worker output.^[46] Initial findings suggested productivity rose due to social factors like attention from researchers and peer norms rather than physical changes, revealing informal group influences and the "Hawthorne effect" where observation alone boosted performance; subsequent interviews with over 20,000 workers confirmed morale and relational bonds as key drivers, challenging purely mechanistic views.^[47] This empirical shift, though later critiqued for methodological flaws like selection bias, established that employee motivation stems from psychological and social needs, influencing subsequent labor policies.^[48] Chester Barnard's 1938 work The Functions of the Executive conceptualized organizations as cooperative systems sustained by executive leadership in balancing individual incentives with collective goals, identifying three executive functions: establishing communication systems, securing essential services from individuals, and formulating organizational purpose.^[49] Drawing from his AT&T tenure, Barnard argued cooperation depends on acceptability of contributions exceeding inducements, with formal and informal structures maintaining equilibrium amid uncertainty.^[50] Mid-century developments included Herbert Simon's introduction of bounded rationality in his 1947 book Administrative Behavior, positing that decision-makers in organizations operate under cognitive limits, information scarcity, and time constraints, leading to "satisficing" (selecting satisfactory rather than optimal options) instead of perfect rationality.^[51] Simon's analysis of administrative processes, informed by observations of public and private bureaucracies, highlighted how routines, hierarchies, and authority simplify complex choices, with empirical support from case studies showing deviations from economic rationality models.^[52] By the 1960s, contingency theory gained prominence through Tom Burns and G.M. Stalker's 1961 study The Management of Innovation, which examined 20 British firms and distinguished mechanistic structures (rigid hierarchies suited to stable environments) from organic ones (flexible networks for dynamic conditions).^[53] Their field research linked effectiveness to environmental fit, with organic forms fostering innovation via lateral communications in uncertain sectors like electronics, while mechanistic suited predictable ones; this causal framework, tested across industries, underscored that no universal structure exists, influencing later adaptations like Lawrence and Lorsch's differentiation-integration model.^[54]

Theoretical Frameworks

First-Principles Reasoning in Organizing

First-principles reasoning in organizing involves deconstructing complex organizational structures and processes into their most basic, verifiable components—such as core objectives, available resources, individual incentives, and causal mechanisms of coordination—and then reassembling them into functional arrangements grounded in fundamental truths rather than inherited conventions or superficial analogies.^[55]^[56] This approach prioritizes empirical realities, like the physics of production constraints or the economics of resource scarcity, over assumptions derived from past practices, enabling more adaptive and efficient designs.^[56] The process typically begins with rigorous questioning of established norms: for instance, challenging why hierarchical layers exist by examining whether they stem from genuine information asymmetries or merely from tradition, then rebuilding from atomic elements like task interdependence and decision rights.^[57] Key principles include minimizing goal conflicts (or "coupling") between units and reducing coordination overhead, as these represent irreducible costs in any human system.^[57] In practice, this yields structures tailored to specific causal dynamics; SpaceX, for example, achieved rocket reusability and cost reductions by reasoning from material properties and propulsion fundamentals rather than aerospace industry benchmarks, cutting launch expenses from $200 million per Falcon 1 in 2006 to under $30 million for Falcon 9 by 2020.^[56] Applied to broader management, first-principles reasoning counters bureaucratic entropy by focusing on human elements like motivation and accountability: organizations succeed when incentives align with outputs, as evidenced by firms redesigning compensation from tenure-based to performance-linked models, boosting productivity in tech sectors where output metrics are quantifiable.^[58] Empirical outcomes include faster innovation cycles; NVIDIA's CEO Jensen Huang applied this by reevaluating chip design under current silicon constraints, leading to dominance in AI hardware markets with GPUs optimized for parallel computing since the 1999 GeForce release.^[59] Limitations arise in highly uncertain environments, where incomplete fundamentals necessitate iterative testing, but the method's strength lies in its resistance to unexamined scaling assumptions that plague analogical approaches.^[60]

Empirical Models and Evidence

Contingency theory posits that optimal organizational structures vary according to contextual factors including firm size, technology, and environmental uncertainty, rather than adhering to a single ideal form. Empirical investigations, such as the Aston Programme studies led by Derek Pugh in the 1960s across 46 British organizations and later expanded, quantified structural dimensions like formalization, centralization, and specialization, revealing strong correlations with size (e.g., larger firms exhibited greater formalization and hierarchy) and technology type, thus supporting fit-dependent effectiveness over universal designs.^[61] These findings challenged classical bureaucratic universals and influenced subsequent meta-analyses confirming moderate effect sizes (r ≈ 0.20-0.30) for contingency-structure alignments on outcomes like efficiency.^[62] Joan Woodward's 1950s-1960s research on 100 manufacturing firms in England provided early empirical validation by linking production technology (unit/small-batch vs. mass/large-batch vs. process) to authority structures and success metrics; firms with mismatched structures (e.g., organic spans in mass production) showed 20-30% lower profitability and growth rates compared to aligned counterparts.^[63] Similarly, Burns and Stalker's typology distinguished mechanistic (hierarchical, rule-based) structures thriving in stable environments from organic (flexible, decentralized) ones suited to turbulent settings, with case studies of UK firms indicating organic adaptations yielded superior innovation and survival during post-war volatility. Later cross-national replications, including Lawrence and Lorsch's 1967 plastics industry analysis, quantified integration mechanisms' role, finding high-performing firms balanced differentiation (subunit specialization) with integration (cross-unit coordination) amid uncertainty, achieving up to 50% variance explained in profitability.^[64] At the team and subunit level, structural elements like role clarity and coordination protocols demonstrably enhance performance. A 2020 field experiment with 58 teams found that imposing explicit structures (e.g., defined roles and decision protocols) improved coordination mechanisms, boosting task performance by 15-25% via reduced conflicts and faster decision-making, independent of team size or ability composition.^[65] Broader meta-reviews of structure-performance links, synthesizing over 50 studies from 1960-1980, report inconsistent direct effects (average r = 0.10) due to endogeneity and measurement issues, but consistent moderators: decentralized structures correlate with higher adaptability in volatile industries (e.g., tech, r = 0.25), while centralized ones predict efficiency in stable, large-scale operations (e.g., manufacturing, r = 0.18).^[66]^[67] Recent longitudinal evidence tempers enthusiasm for pure contingency fits, highlighting dynamic misalignments' costs; for instance, a 2021 analysis of structural contingency theory's evolution notes that while initial fits predict short-term gains, persistent environmental shifts (e.g., digital disruption post-2010) erode them without adaptive redesign, with misfit firms experiencing 10-15% annual performance declines.^[68] Cultural and learning-oriented models, tested via structural equation modeling on 969 organizations, further indicate that adaptive structures fostering knowledge flows (e.g., matrix hybrids) explain 30-40% of effectiveness variance, outperforming rigid hierarchies in knowledge-intensive sectors.^[69] These patterns underscore causal realism in organizing: structures enable coordination at scale but require empirical calibration to avoid inefficiencies from ideological preferences for flatness, which falter beyond small-group thresholds (e.g., <150 members per anthropological limits on informal control).^[70]

Applications in Management and Business

Structural Design and Hierarchy

Structural design in organizational organizing entails the deliberate configuration of tasks, reporting relationships, and coordination mechanisms to align with strategic goals and operational demands. This process determines how work is divided, authority is distributed, and information flows within the firm. Core elements include departmentalization, which groups activities by function, product, geography, or process; the establishment of a chain of command to delineate authority levels; and the definition of spans of control, which specify the number of subordinates a manager oversees, typically ranging from 4-8 in hierarchical setups for effective oversight.^[71]^[6] Hierarchy manifests as vertical differentiation, creating layers of management from executive leadership to operational staff, enforcing the scalar principle where each level reports to the one above. This structure facilitates clear accountability and efficient decision-making in stable environments by reducing ambiguity in roles and responsibilities. However, excessive layers can impede responsiveness, as communication traverses multiple levels, potentially delaying adaptation to market changes; empirical studies indicate that firms with flatter hierarchies often exhibit faster innovation cycles in dynamic sectors.^[72]^[73] Contingency factors—such as organizational size, technology, and environmental uncertainty—shape optimal design, with no universal "best" structure. Larger firms tend toward taller hierarchies for control, while smaller or tech-driven entities favor wider spans to promote agility. Mechanistic structures, characterized by rigid hierarchies and centralized authority, excel in predictable settings like manufacturing, enhancing efficiency through standardization but risking inertia. Organic structures, with decentralized decision-making and fluid hierarchies, suit volatile industries, fostering adaptability yet potentially complicating coordination. Research corroborates that structural fit with contingencies correlates with performance; for instance, mismatched designs in uncertain environments yield up to 20% lower profitability in longitudinal firm analyses.^[64]^[62] Common hierarchical variants include functional designs, which cluster specialists for expertise-driven efficiency but foster silos and interdepartmental conflicts; divisional structures, segmenting by product or region for market focus, though at the cost of resource duplication; and matrix forms, blending functional and project hierarchies for flexibility in complex projects, albeit introducing dual reporting lines that can dilute accountability. Advantages of hierarchy generally include streamlined command for scaling operations—evident in firms like General Electric's early divisional model—and economies from specialized oversight, while disadvantages encompass bureaucratic delays and suppressed initiative, as taller structures correlate with higher administrative overhead in empirical cross-firm data. Effective design thus balances hierarchy's stabilizing role with mechanisms like cross-functional teams to mitigate rigidity.^[74]^[75]

Resource Allocation and Task Assignment

Resource allocation in organizational management refers to the systematic distribution of finite assets—such as personnel, capital, equipment, and time—to specific activities or projects to maximize efficiency and achieve strategic objectives, grounded in the economic principle of scarcity where resources must be prioritized based on expected returns.^[76] Effective allocation requires evaluating opportunity costs and aligning distributions with organizational goals, often employing quantitative tools like linear programming or optimization algorithms to minimize waste.^[77] In practice, methods such as the Critical Path Method (CPM), which identifies the longest sequence of dependent tasks to determine project duration and resource needs, enable managers to focus inputs on bottleneck activities, as demonstrated in construction and software development projects where CPM reduced completion times by up to 20% in controlled implementations.^[78] Similarly, resource leveling adjusts schedules to resolve overallocations without extending timelines, preventing burnout and maintaining workflow balance, while resource smoothing fine-tunes minor fluctuations to avoid disruptions.^[79] Task assignment complements resource allocation by delegating specific duties to individuals or teams based on skills, expertise, and capacity, ensuring comparative advantages are exploited for causal productivity gains.^[80] Classical principles, as outlined by management theorists, emphasize matching tasks to employee strengths, granting sufficient authority for execution, and establishing clear performance metrics to foster accountability; for instance, Henri Fayol's 1916 principles of division of work and authority underpin modern delegation, where improper assignment leads to duplicated efforts or skill mismatches costing firms an estimated 20-30% in lost productivity annually.^[81] Empirical studies confirm that strategic task assignment, informed by employee modeling and objective functions like workload balancing, enhances organizational performance; a field experiment involving team incentives showed that reassigning tasks to high-performers under performance-based pay increased output by 15% compared to uniform assignments, attributing gains to better skill-task alignment rather than motivation alone.^[82] ^[83] Challenges in both processes arise from information asymmetries and dynamic environments, where over-reliance on heuristic methods like first-come, first-served allocation can exacerbate inequities, as evidenced by operations research models favoring priority-based or proportional systems for equitable outcomes in multi-project settings.^[77] In business contexts, integrating digital tools for real-time tracking—such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems—has empirically reduced misallocation errors by 25-40% in manufacturing firms, by providing data-driven insights into resource utilization and task progress.^[84] However, systemic biases in academic and consulting sources, often favoring complex models over simple hierarchical delegation, may overlook causal evidence that flat structures with clear authority chains yield superior results in stable industries, as smaller teams with direct task ownership report 10-15% higher execution speeds in empirical surveys.^[85] Ultimately, successful implementation hinges on ongoing monitoring and adjustment, with failures typically stemming from inadequate feedback loops rather than initial planning deficiencies.^[86]

Labor and Union Organizing

Labor organizing refers to the coordinated efforts by workers to form or join labor unions, enabling collective bargaining over wages, working conditions, and employment terms. This process applies organizational principles such as building hierarchical structures like organizing committees, allocating resources for campaigns, and assigning tasks to mobilize support among coworkers. In the United States, union membership stood at 9.9 percent of wage and salary workers in 2024, with 14.3 million members, reflecting a slight decline from prior years despite recent high-profile organizing drives in sectors like retail and technology.^[87] Private-sector unionization rates fell to 5.9 percent in the same year, concentrated in industries like utilities (19.6 percent) and telecommunications (13.9 percent).^[88] The typical organizing process begins with informal discussions among workers to identify grievances, followed by forming an organizing committee of 10-20 percent of the workforce to lead efforts.^[89] This committee maps the workplace, assigns roles for one-on-one outreach, and collects signed authorization cards from at least 30 percent (often aiming for 70 percent) of eligible workers to petition for a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election.^[90] Upon majority support in a secret-ballot election, the union is certified, leading to contract negotiations where the committee structures proposals based on member input and prioritizes demands like wage increases.^[91] Empirical data indicate that successful certifications raise member wages by 10-15 percent on average, alongside improved benefits such as health insurance coverage for 96 percent of union workers compared to non-union peers.^[92]^[93] However, even failed drives often yield wage concessions from employers, though these gains are smaller and temporary.^[94] Organizing campaigns leverage structured techniques like house calls and workplace mapping to build solidarity, but face employer resistance including captive audience meetings and legal challenges, which contribute to NLRB election win rates hovering around 60 percent in recent years. Unions enhance worker protections by reducing workplace injuries through negotiated safety standards and increasing federal inspections, with unionized firms showing lower fatal injury rates.^[95] Yet causal evidence reveals trade-offs: unionization correlates with reduced firm employment, payroll, and survival rates, as well as a 10 percent drop in market value post-election victory, reflecting higher labor costs that can deter investment and hiring.^[96]^[97] In right-to-work states, where non-union dues are prohibited, union density is lower, but workers report comparable or higher financial wellbeing metrics like savings rates, suggesting organizing's benefits may not uniformly outweigh costs across contexts.^[98] Critics highlight instances of coercive tactics in organizing, such as peer pressure or threats during card-signing, though empirical studies on violence are limited and often conflated with employer responses.^[99] Broader data show unions reduce income inequality by compressing wage distributions, but at the potential expense of non-union workers who face spillover job losses or wage suppression.^[100] Despite a 2021-2023 surge in strikes and filings, overall membership has not rebounded, indicating structural barriers like globalization and service-sector shifts limit organizing's scalability.^[101] Effective union hierarchies, akin to business management, emphasize clear task delegation and accountability to sustain long-term bargaining power, but misalignments between leadership goals and worker preferences can erode support.^[102]

Grassroots and Activist Movements

Grassroots and activist movements typically employ decentralized, bottom-up organizing structures that prioritize local initiative and volunteer mobilization over hierarchical command, enabling rapid response to grievances but often requiring ad hoc coordination to sustain momentum. Resource mobilization theory, developed in the 1970s, frames these movements as rational enterprises that succeed by aggregating tangible resources—such as participants, funding, and communication networks—rather than solely through spontaneous discontent, emphasizing the causal role of organizational efficiency in converting grievances into collective action.^[103] ^[104] Empirical analyses of social movement organizations highlight how such structures disrupt entrenched practices by reallocating resources toward targeted campaigns, though fragmented leadership can impede scaling beyond initial protests.^[105] In the U.S. Civil Rights Movement, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), founded in April 1960 at Shaw University, exemplified grassroots organizing through non-hierarchical, student-driven tactics that built local capacities for direct action. SNCC coordinated sit-ins across Southern campuses, expanding from the Greensboro Four's February 1, 1960, protest to over 50 cities by summer's end, while establishing field secretaries to train communities in voter registration and economic boycotts.^[106] ^[107] This approach emphasized base-building over charismatic leadership, as advocated by organizer Ella Baker, who prioritized collective decision-making in "group-centered" models to foster indigenous leadership and avoid dependency on external figures.^[108] During the 1961 Freedom Rides, SNCC volunteers filled buses to challenge interstate segregation, enduring arrests and violence that highlighted the movement's reliance on resilient, distributed networks for continuity.^[106] The Tea Party movement, emerging in early 2009 amid opposition to federal bailouts and health care reforms, demonstrated grassroots organizing via loosely affiliated local groups that leveraged social media for mobilization, staging over 750 tax-day protests across U.S. cities by April 15, 2009. These entities operated without a singular national hierarchy, relying on platforms like email lists and town halls to assign tasks such as petition drives and candidate endorsements, which influenced the 2010 midterm elections by helping secure Republican gains in the House.^[109] ^[110] However, the absence of centralized resource allocation led to internal fragmentation, with debates over funding from donors like the Koch network underscoring tensions between purported spontaneity and elite influence, as some local chapters criticized national arms for top-down interference.^[111] Contemporary empirical research on social movements underscores that effective grassroots organizing balances decentralization with selective hierarchy: flat structures excel in ideation and recruitment but falter in resource-intensive phases like litigation or sustained advocacy without formalized roles for task assignment. Studies of movement organizations reveal that those integrating digital tools for data-driven mobilization—tracking volunteer hours and donor contributions—achieve higher persistence rates, as seen in transitions from protest to policy influence.^[112] Pathologies arise when ideological purity overrides pragmatic coordination, causing schisms that dilute causal impact, a pattern observed in both progressive and conservative activist waves where unaddressed free-rider problems erode participation over time.^[113]

Methods and Techniques

Traditional Step-by-Step Processes

The organizing function in classical management theory entails a sequential process to structure tasks, resources, and personnel for goal attainment, following the planning phase. This approach, formalized in early 20th-century industrial contexts, prioritizes division of labor and hierarchical coordination to enhance efficiency amid growing organizational complexity. Henri Fayol, drawing from his experience managing a French mining firm, described organizing as establishing the structure of roles and relationships, integral to his five managerial functions: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling.^[114]^[115] The process commences with reviewing existing plans and objectives to align structure with strategic intent, ensuring no disconnect between ends and means. Managers then determine the precise work activities necessary to fulfill these objectives, decomposing broad goals into discrete, measurable tasks based on required outputs.^[114] For instance, in Fayol's framework, this step incorporates principles like division of work, where specialization increases productivity by allowing focused expertise, as evidenced in his analysis of industrial operations where task fragmentation reduced errors and boosted output by up to 50% in controlled settings.^[116]^[117] Subsequent steps involve classifying and grouping activities into logical units—such as functional departments (e.g., production, finance)—to minimize redundancy and facilitate oversight, guided by Fayol's unity of direction principle, which mandates singular plans per objective to avoid conflicting efforts. Activities are then assigned to individuals or groups, with authority delegated proportionally to responsibility, per Fayol's authority-responsibility linkage, preventing overload or underutilization as seen in pre-Fayol mining inefficiencies where unclear delegations led to delays.^[114]^[116] Finally, a hierarchy of relationships is designed, establishing scalar chains for communication and control, ensuring vertical accountability while allowing lateral coordination, which Fayol quantified through order principles to maintain material and social efficiency in firms employing thousands.^[114]^[116] These steps, while prescriptive, reflect causal mechanisms like specialization's impact on skill depth versus breadth trade-offs, empirically supported in Taylorist time-motion studies contemporaneous with Fayol, though later critiques highlighted rigidity in dynamic environments. Implementation often iterates, with feedback loops to refine groupings, as rigid adherence without adaptation contributed to failures in volatile sectors post-1920s.^[118]^[119]

Contemporary Tools and Digital Innovations

Digital project management platforms have revolutionized organizing by enabling real-time task tracking, resource allocation, and workflow automation, with tools like Asana, introduced in 2008 but widely adopted post-2020 for remote teams, supporting features such as custom workflows and integrations that reduce manual coordination by up to 30% in user-reported cases.^[120] Similarly, Trello and Monday.com utilize Kanban boards and Gantt charts to visualize hierarchies and dependencies, facilitating agile organizing in dynamic environments like software development and marketing campaigns.^[121] These platforms leverage cloud infrastructure, allowing scalable collaboration without physical proximity, a shift accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic's demand for hybrid models.^[122] Communication and collaboration tools, including Slack (launched 2013) and Microsoft Teams (2017), integrate messaging, file sharing, and video conferencing to streamline team organizing, with Teams reporting over 300 million active users by 2023 for coordinating distributed workforces.^[123] Such tools embed bots for automated notifications and task assignments, enhancing causal links between communication and execution, though empirical studies indicate that overuse can fragment attention and reduce deep focus unless structured with clear protocols.^[124] Generative AI innovations, emerging prominently since 2022 with models like ChatGPT, augment organizing through predictive analytics and automation; for instance, AI-driven tools in platforms like Jira forecast project delays with 85% accuracy in controlled tests by analyzing historical data patterns.^[125] McKinsey reports highlight AI's role in agentic workflows, where autonomous agents handle routine allocations, potentially boosting productivity by 40% in functions like operations, but warn of pitfalls including diminished worker motivation and "workslop"—low-value outputs from over-reliance on AI generation.^[126]^[127] Harvard Business Review analyses further substantiate that while AI accelerates tasks like strategy outlining, organizational silos persist without cross-functional integration, underscoring the need for human oversight to align tools with first-principles goals.^[128] In social and activist organizing, digital tools like Eventbrite (for event coordination since 2006, with AI-enhanced matching post-2020) and Discord servers enable grassroots mobilization, tracking participation metrics to optimize resource flows, though data from 2023-2025 shows variable efficacy dependent on user digital literacy rather than tool features alone.^[129] Overall, these innovations prioritize empirical metrics like completion rates over anecdotal efficiency, yet adoption data from 2025 indicates only 1% of firms achieve AI maturity, highlighting implementation barriers rooted in training deficits and resistance to workflow reconfiguration.^[130]

Psychological and Behavioral Aspects

Cognitive Benefits and Mental Health Impacts

Organizing activities, such as task structuring and planning, enhance executive functions including working memory and cognitive flexibility by reducing cognitive overload and unfinished tasks. A 2024 field experiment involving weekly planning interventions found that participants exhibited fewer incomplete tasks, lower levels of rumination, and improved cognitive flexibility compared to controls, indicating that systematic organization mitigates mental distractions and supports adaptive thinking.^[131] Executive functions, which encompass organizing materials and sequences, underpin broader cognitive processes like reasoning and problem-solving, with deficits in these areas linked to impaired performance across development.^[132] Structured organizing also bolsters sustained attention and focus by imposing temporal order on tasks, as evidenced by meta-analytic reviews showing that predictable task structures direct attentional resources more effectively, leading to superior performance in simple cognitive demands.^[133] In cluttered or disorganized environments, cognitive resources are depleted by constant decision-making and visual distractions, whereas organized setups free mental capacity for higher-order processing, such as creativity and decision-making.^[134] Regarding mental health, habitual organizing correlates with reduced stress and anxiety through the establishment of control and predictability, countering the overwhelm induced by disorder. Disorganized spaces and routines exacerbate feelings of chaos, contributing to heightened cortisol levels and emotional distress, while organized ones promote calmer states and better emotional regulation.^[135] Longitudinal observations link poor organizational skills to interpersonal strains and mood disruptions, as chronic disarray hinders daily functioning and fosters frustration.^[136] However, excessive rigidity in organizing can limit spontaneity, potentially stifling creativity and inducing perfectionism-related anxiety in susceptible individuals.^[134] Overall, balanced organizing supports resilience against mental health challenges by fostering a sense of accomplishment and efficacy.

Limitations and Potential Pathologies

Organizing efforts in groups often engender groupthink, a psychological phenomenon wherein members prioritize consensus over critical evaluation, resulting in suboptimal decisions and suppressed dissent. This dynamic, delineated by Irving L. Janis in his 1972 study of policy failures like the Bay of Pigs invasion, manifests through symptoms such as an illusion of invulnerability, unquestioned beliefs in the group's morality, and stereotyping of outsiders.^[137] High group cohesion, structural faults like insulation from external input, and biased leadership intensify these effects, as evidenced in analyses of cohesive teams under stress.^[137] Empirical observations from organizational settings confirm that groupthink correlates with reduced creativity and heightened risk of errors, particularly when leaders discourage deviation.^[138] A core behavioral limitation is the free-rider problem, where participants shirk contributions to collective goals, anticipating benefits from others' efforts without personal cost, which erodes motivation and overall productivity. Mancur Olson's 1965 framework in The Logic of Collective Action demonstrates that this incentive misalignment is acute in large, non-selective groups, necessitating mechanisms like coercion or incentives to mitigate under-provision of public goods.^[139] In social and activist organizing, this pathology manifests as uneven participation, with studies showing individuals rationally withhold effort when outcomes are indivisible, thereby stalling momentum unless small-group dynamics or monitoring enforce reciprocity.^[140] Burnout represents a prevalent emotional pathology among organizers, entailing chronic exhaustion, cynicism, and diminished accomplishment due to sustained high-stakes demands. Surveys of social movement participants reveal burnout rates of 50-60%, linked to vicarious trauma, resource scarcity, and interpersonal conflicts in diverse coalitions like No Borders activism.^[141] ^[142] Longitudinal data from racial justice and environmental activists indicate that power imbalances and unmet expectations exacerbate this, with self-esteem buffers offering limited protection absent structural supports like rotation of roles.^[143] ^[144] Additional pathologies include social loafing, where individual output declines in collective tasks due to diffused responsibility, as quantified in ringelmann effect experiments showing effort halving in groups of four.^[145] The emergence of dark triad traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy—in leaders can further corrupt dynamics, fostering exploitation and toxicity, with organizational studies tying these to secrecy, blame-shifting, and helplessness during crises.^[146] ^[147] These issues underscore causal vulnerabilities in organizing, where unchecked psychological incentives amplify dysfunction over intended coordination.

Criticisms, Challenges, and Debates

Common Organizational Failures

Organizational efforts in labor unions, activist groups, and community initiatives frequently encounter internal and structural pitfalls that undermine their sustainability and effectiveness. Empirical analyses of historical and contemporary cases reveal recurring patterns, such as factionalism driven by ideological differences, which fragments collective action and dilutes focus on shared objectives. For instance, in grassroots movements, conflicts over political vision and financial priorities have historically weakened cohesion, as documented in studies of Costa Rican rural organizations where internal disputes led to operational paralysis. Similarly, union organizing in the American South has faltered partly due to national unions' reluctance to directly address entrenched cultural barriers like racial hierarchies, resulting in limited membership growth and persistent low density rates below 5% in many states as of 2019.^[148]^[149] A primary failure mode is the over-reliance on ideologically homogeneous recruits, which limits outreach and alienates potential allies necessary for scaling efforts. Practitioner accounts from union campaigns highlight that starting with "like-minded people" rather than mapping broader workplace or community power structures often results in isolated actions that fail to achieve leverage, as seen in stalled drives where organizers prioritized affinity over strategic mapping. Complementing this, a lack of active listening supplants relationship-building with premature issue advocacy, eroding trust and participation; surveys of community engagement initiatives report that unaddressed skepticism leads to disengagement rates exceeding 50% in under-resourced projects. Burnout exacerbates these issues, with organizers facing chronic stress from undefined roles and inadequate delegation, contributing to high turnover—up to 40% annually in some activist networks—and stalled momentum.^[150]^[151] Resource mismanagement and fragmentation further compound vulnerabilities. Many groups suffer from ineffective capacity-building, where ad-hoc tactics replace sustained training, leading to duplicated efforts across splintered factions; European community organizing analyses identify this as a core challenge, with movements losing efficacy due to siloed operations rather than unified strategies. External adaptation failures, such as ignoring shifting legal or economic landscapes, amplify risks—labor unions in the 1920s U.S. exemplified this through rigid structures that couldn't counter employer countermeasures, culminating in membership declines from 5 million in 1920 to under 3 million by 1929. Evaluation deficits perpetuate errors, as groups rarely measure impact rigorously, mistaking activity for progress and repeating unproductive cycles. These patterns underscore that success hinges on inclusive coalition-building, clear role delineation, and empirical feedback loops, absent which organizing devolves into self-defeating entropy.^[152]^[153]

Ideological Contests and Causal Realities

In organizing efforts, particularly within labor unions and activist movements, ideological contests often arise between advocates of doctrinal purity—such as class-based collectivism or anti-capitalist frameworks—and proponents of pragmatic, incentive-aligned strategies that prioritize incremental gains over revolutionary rhetoric.^[154] For instance, historical debates in U.S. labor history pitted ideological models like those of the Industrial Workers of the World, emphasizing broad worker solidarity against capitalist structures, against more tactical approaches like Saul Alinsky's community organizing, which focused on power-building through targeted concessions rather than overarching ideology.^[155] These tensions persist today, as seen in discussions over "worker-to-worker" organizing, where some labor advocates critique top-down union structures as insufficiently radical, while others argue that ideological overreach alienates potential participants and hampers practical mobilization.^[156] Causal realities underlying these contests reveal that successful organizing hinges less on ideological fervor and more on overcoming inherent incentive structures, notably the free-rider problem articulated by economist Mancur Olson in his 1965 analysis of collective action.^[139] In large groups pursuing public goods—like higher wages or policy changes—individuals rationally withhold contributions, expecting to benefit from others' efforts without cost, which erodes voluntary participation unless countered by selective incentives (e.g., union-exclusive benefits) or coercive mechanisms (e.g., mandatory dues in closed shops).^[157] Empirical tests of Olson's theory, including laboratory experiments, confirm that free-riding intensifies in diffuse groups, explaining why small, concentrated interests (e.g., craft unions) historically organized more effectively than mass movements.^[158] This dynamic persists in contemporary settings, where ideological appeals to solidarity often fail to surmount rational self-interest absent enforceable exclusivity. Data on union outcomes underscore these causal constraints: despite sustained organizing campaigns, private-sector union density in the U.S. declined to approximately 6% by 2023, reflecting workers' revealed preferences for flexibility amid global competition and alternative bargaining tools like individual negotiation.^[159] While some econometric studies attribute wage premiums to unions—closing certain demographic gaps within firms—others identify causal downsides, such as reduced firm innovation due to misaligned incentives between workers and management.^[96] ^[160] Sources claiming broad pro-worker successes, often from labor-aligned institutions, tend to underemphasize trade-offs like business closures or productivity stagnation in highly unionized sectors, whereas neutral analyses highlight that organizing thrives pragmatically in environments aligning with market incentives rather than ideological mandates.^[161]^[162] In grassroots movements, similar patterns emerge, with evidence favoring adaptive, evidence-based tactics over rigid dogma to mitigate free-riding and sustain momentum.^[163]

References

[1]
Management Guide: Functions, Types & Best Practices 2025
Nov 14, 2024 · Organizing is the process of structuring resources, including people and tasks, to align with the organization's goals. Effective organizing ...
[2]
The Four Functions of Management: How They Impact Business
Organizing involves using resources in a way that allows for an efficient, effective execution of the organization's tactical plans. It also involves tasks such ...
[3]
Organising : Meaning, Importance and Process - GeeksforGeeks
Jul 23, 2025 · "Organizing is the process of defining and grouping the activities of the enterprise and establishing the authority relationships among them.
[4]
What is organizing in management?
Feb 21, 2021 · Organizing is the process of managing different resources to create value for the firm. Typically, managers bring together resources like finance, human ...What is Organizing in... · Developing authority structure<|separator|>
[5]
Importance of Organizing in an Organisation (7 Points)
Points that highlights the importance of organizing in an organization are: 1. Benefits of Specialization 2. Clarity in Working Relationships 3.
[6]
Organizational Structure for Companies With Examples and Benefits
Key elements of an organizational structure include how certain activities are directed to achieve the goals of an organization. They include rules, roles, ...What Is an Organizational... · How It Works · Centralized vs. Decentralized · Types
[7]
The Processes of Organization and Management
or sequences of tasks and activities — that provides an integrated, dynamic picture of organizations and ...
[8]
Organizational System: The Key to Organizational Stability - Orgvue
Nov 16, 2023 · It involves decisions about hierarchy, roles, culture, and how various parts of the organization interact to achieve strategic objectives. In ...
[9]
Basic Elements of Organizing | Four Functions of Management
Basic Elements of Organizing | Four Functions of Management: Planning, Organizing, Leading & Controlling.Designing Jobs · Grouping Jobs · Distributing Authority<|control11|><|separator|>
[10]
[PPT] Classical Organizational Theory - TCNJ
Classical organizational theory espouses two perspectives: Scientific management – focusing on the management of work and workers; Administrative management - ...
[11]
What Is Organizational Theory? History, Applications and More
Jun 17, 2025 · Organizational theory is defined by one researcher as “the study of organizations and their structure, behavior, and dynamics.
[12]
Organized
Something went wrong! Try again.
[13]
Organize Definition & Meaning | YourDictionary
Origin of Organize. Middle English organisen from Old French organiser from Medieval Latin organizāre from Latin organum tool, instrument organ.
[14]
Organization - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Early 15c. "organization" means an organic structure or arrangement of parts, from Medieval Latin organizationem, from Latin organum, meaning "instrument, ...
[15]
Organized - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Organized, from c.1400 meaning "furnished with organs," evolved to "formed into a whole" by 1817 and later referred to unionized workers by 1872.
[16]
Organize etymology in English - Cooljugator
English word organize comes from Ancient Greek ἔργειν, Proto-Indo-European *werḱ-, and later Latin organum (An implement, instrument, tool. Any musical ...
[17]
Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling - Lumen Learning
Organizing is the function of management that involves developing an organizational structure and allocating human resources to ensure the accomplishment of ...
[18]
10.3 The Basic Building Blocks of Organizational Structure
The concept of division of labor (dividing organizational activities into smaller tasks) lies at the heart of the study of organizational structure.
[19]
Henri Fayol's 14 Principles of Management | Indeed.com
Jul 26, 2025 · What are Fayol's 14 principles of management? · 1. Division of work · 2. Authority and responsibility · 3. Unity of command · 4. Unity of direction.
[20]
Henri Fayol's Principles of Management - Mind Tools
Henri Fayol's pioneering 14 Principles of Management set out the idea that managers need to excel in administrative theory over technical skills.
[21]
16 Key Principles of Organisation : Comprehensive Guide 2025
Jan 9, 2025 · They include principles such as the unity of command, a span of control, the scalar principle, the principle of efficiency, the principle of ...
[22]
[PDF] Not slaves. Archaeologist Mark Lehner, digging deeper, discovers a ...
Rooted firmly in the popular imagination is the idea that the pyramids were built by slaves serving a merciless pharaoh. This notion of a vast slave class in ...
[23]
Uncovering the Workers' Village of the Giza Pyramid Builders
Feb 10, 2025 · Explore the Workers' Village at Giza, where pyramid builders crafted monumental structures, inscribed hieroglyphs, and created sacred art ...
[24]
[PDF] The Pyramids and Implementing Project Management Processes
This analogy covers some of the key project management processes: initiation, scope planning, scope definition, activ- ity definition, activity sequencing, ...
[25]
Mesopotamian Government - World History Encyclopedia
Feb 9, 2023 · Government in ancient Mesopotamia was based on the model of the family, where the father was the head of the household, and the concept of the ...
[26]
ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIAN GOVERNMENT - Facts and Details
The early Mesopotamian city-states were ruled a council of elders that was led by a “ lugal” ("big man") who made decisions in times of crisis. Later on, when ...
[27]
Civil And Military Organization Of The Later Roman Empire
Oct 29, 2015 · The civil and military organization established by Constantine was wise and enduring, and it deserves to be better known.
[28]
BUREAUCRACY IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE - Facts and Details
The Romans created a legal and political system that endures to this day, and not only conquered a lot of territory but established an administration system to ...ADMINISTRATION IN THE... · Bureaucracy and... · Roman Bureaucracy and...
[29]
Chinese civil service | History, Facts, Exam, & Bureaucracy - Britannica
The Qin dynasty (221–207 bce) established the first centralized Chinese bureaucratic empire and thus created the need for an administrative system to staff it.
[30]
The Grandeur of the Qing State - Asia for Educators
that is, political power flowed from the top to the bottom through a series of ...
[31]
Feudalism - World History Encyclopedia
Nov 22, 2018 · Feudalism was the system in 10th-13th century European medieval societies where a social hierarchy was established based on local administrative control.
[32]
Feudalism and Knights in Medieval Europe
Oct 1, 2001 · This feudal system (from the medieval Latin feodum or feudum, fee or fief) enabled a cash-poor but land-rich lord to support a military force.
[33]
[PDF] Business in the Middle Ages: What Was the Role of Guilds?
Craft guilds were made up of craftsmen and artisans in the same occupation, such as hatters, carpenters, bakers, blacksmiths, weav- ers and masons.Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
[34]
Industrialization, Labor and Life - National Geographic Education
May 30, 2025 · Most historians place the origin of the Industrial Revolution in Great Britain in the middle decades of the 18th century. In the British Isles ...
[35]
Richard Arkwright | Science and Industry Museum
Jul 29, 2019 · Richard Arkwright kick-started a transformation in the textiles industry and created a vision of the machine-powered, factory-based future of manufacturing.Arkwright's breakthrough · Creating a factory system · Arkwright on trialMissing: organization | Show results with:organization
[36]
Richard Arkwright - Historic UK
Mar 22, 2023 · Richard Arkwright, born in 1732 in Preston, Lancashire, is known as “the father of the modern industrial factory system”.Missing: organization | Show results with:organization
[37]
Wealth of Nations — Bk 1 Chpt 01
The division of labour, however, so far as it can be introduced, occasions, in every art, a proportionable increase of the productive powers of labour.
[38]
Adam Smith and the Pin Factory | Panmure House
Adam Smith's description of the pin factory, with which he begins The Wealth of Nations, introduces the fundamental economic concept of the division of labour.
[39]
[PDF] Frederick Winslow Taylor, The Principles of Scientific Management
Taylor, 1911. Frederick Winslow Taylor. The Principles of. SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT. 1910. Ch. 2: “The Principles of Scientific Management” ... expert Frederick ...
[40]
The principles of scientific management : Taylor, Frederick Winslow ...
Oct 25, 2006 · The principles of scientific management. by: Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1856-1915. Publication date: 1911. Topics: Industrial efficiency.
[41]
Ford's Five-Dollar Day | The Henry Ford - Blog
Jan 3, 2014 · Experiments through 1913 and into 1914 reduced the time required to build a Model T automobile from 12½ hours to a mere 93 minutes. Increased ...
[42]
Assembly Line Revolution | Articles - Ford Motor Company
Sep 3, 2020 · Henry Ford decreased the shifts by one hour and gave employees higher wages. The shift length decrease allowed Ford to create a third shift and ...
[43]
Ford's assembly line starts rolling | December 1, 1913 - History.com
His innovation reduced the time it took to build a car from more than 12 hours to one hour and 33 minutes. Ford's Model T, introduced in 1908, was simple, ...
[44]
[PDF] The Foundations of Henri Fayol's Administrative Theory
(Fayol, 1916). Charles de Freminville (1927) provided a synopsis of Fayol's administrative theory and comparison of Taylor and Fayol's thinking for a Taylor ...
[45]
Henri Fayol's 14 Principles of Management with Examples
Jun 9, 2025 · One classic theory on the principles of management was written by Henri Fayol in his 1916 book, "Administration Industrielle et Générale.
[46]
Elton Mayo's Hawthorne Experiment and It's Contributions to ...
This article gives an insight about Elton Mayo's Hawthorne experiment. Hawthorne studies become the foundation and the basis of human relations management.
[47]
The “Hawthorne Effect” – The Human Relations Movement
Mayo and Roethlisberger helped define a new curriculum focus, one in alliance with Dean Donham's desire to address social and industrial issues through field- ...
[48]
Hawthorne Effect In Psychology: Experimental Studies
Feb 13, 2024 · The Hawthorne effect refers to a tendency in some individuals to alter their behavior in response to their awareness of being observed.
[49]
The Functions of the Executive - Harvard University Press
Jan 1, 1971 · The author presents an analysis of the nature of business organizations and the functions of executives in them.
[50]
The Functions of the Executive, by Chester Barnard. Cambridge, MA
Mar 8, 2018 · Functions is divided into four parts. In Part 1, Barnard introduces readers to the concept of cooperative systems as organizations. In Part 2, ...
[51]
Bounded Rationality - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nov 30, 2018 · Bounded rationality now describes a wide range of descriptive, normative, and prescriptive accounts of effective behavior which depart from the assumptions of ...The Emergence of Procedural... · The Emergence of Ecological...
[52]
Herbert Simon and Organization Theory - MIT Press Direct
Bounded rationality is the cognitive assumption to which Simon refers, by which he has reference to behavior that is intendedly rational but only limitedly ...
[53]
The Contingency Theory of Organizations - Sage Knowledge
Burns and Stalker (1961) extend their analysis to argue that the political system is different between mech- anistic and organic structures, with the looser ...
[54]
(PDF) Revisiting Burns And Stalker: Formal Structure And New ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Burns and Stalker (1961) argued that in dynamic economic sectors, firms with organic structures are more effective than those with more ...
[55]
First Principles Thinking: The Blueprint For Solving Business Problems
Sep 13, 2023 · First principles thinking is a method of problem-solving that involves breaking down complex issues into their most basic and fundamental parts.
[56]
What is First Principles Thinking? - Farnam Street
First principles thinking breaks down complex problems into fundamental truths, separating what is true from assumptions, and identifying irreducible elements.The Basics · ``because I Said So'' Or... · Elon Musk And Spacex
[57]
What are the 'first principles' of organization design? - Naomi Stanford
Oct 30, 2017 · The two most important ones are: 1) Minimizing coupling, or what one can call goal conflicts, and 2) Minimizing coordination costs. These are ...
[58]
64 Management First Principles - Simplicable Guide
Apr 30, 2022 · Management first principles are propositions that have broad explanatory power in solving management problems and making management ...Missing: reasoning | Show results with:reasoning
[59]
Jensen Huang on How to Use First-Principles Thinking to Drive ...
Apr 25, 2024 · “You can learn how something can be done and then go back to first principles and ask yourself, 'Given the conditions today, ...
[60]
Product Management from First Principles | by Philip Pantelides
Aug 4, 2017 · First principles are a key part of a product manager's toolkit when tackling complex problems, where there may be many variables or assumptions in place.Get Philip Pantelides's... · 3. The Scientific Method Aka... · A Practical Product Example<|separator|>
[61]
[PDF] Organization Theory Derek Pugh
Derek Pugh's research provided empirical evidence supporting contingency theory, demonstrating that there is no one best way to organize, but rather.
[62]
[PDF] 2 The Normal Science of Structural Contingency Theory
Burns and Stalker (1961) argued that where an organization faces a stable environment then the mechanistic structure is effective but where the organization ...
[63]
[PDF] Biological models and Empirical Histories of the Growth of ... - Gwern
Organization theories have covered a wide variety of approaches. The classical theorist—Urwick or Fayol, for instance—emphasized control, and a neat ...
[64]
Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research
May 12, 2017 · Organizational theories describe, explain, and predict the complex interaction between organizations and their external environments. Thus, ...
[65]
How Team Structure Can Enhance Performance - PubMed Central
This study directly tested and proposed that team structure helps with teamwork coordination mechanism, which improves team performance.
[66]
Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review
We examine the literature addressing the empirical relationships, if any, between organization structure and performance, and draw distinctions between “hard” ...
[67]
An empirical analysis of organizational structure and financial ...
This paper reports findings on the variables of structure and performance, where financial indicators of performance were used. Generally speaking, structure is ...
[68]
The Rise and Fall of Structural Contingency Theory: A Theory's ...
Sep 16, 2021 · For almost four decades since its 1958 birth, structural contingency theory (SCT) has been a lynchpin of organizational theory. United by ...
[69]
[PDF] A Theory and Some Preliminary Empirical Evidence
The paper then presents a preliminary empirical test of that model using CEO perceptions of culture and effectiveness from a sample of 969 organizations. FOUR ...
[70]
[PDF] AN EMPIRICAL MODEL OF THE LEARNING ORGANISATION
This research tests the efficacy of the learning organisation by building a structural equation model from latent variables inductively developed from the ...<|separator|>
[71]
How to Adapt Your Organizational Structure - HBS Online
Jan 7, 2025 · 1. Component Task Identification · 2. Departmentalization and Chain of Command · 3. Span of Control · 4. Centralization and Decentralization.
[72]
10.1 Organizational Structures and Design - Principles of Management
Mar 20, 2019 · The typical organization has a hierarchical form with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. A flowchart shows an example of a formal ...
[73]
Organizational Structure – Foundations of Commerce
Added layers of management can slow down communication and decision making, causing the organization to become less efficient and productive. That's one reason ...
[74]
10.4 Creating an Organizational Structure – Strategic Management
Using a functional structure creates advantages and disadvantages. An important benefit of adopting a functional structure is that each person tends to learn a ...
[75]
14.2 Organizational Structure – Organizational Behavior
Rigid and bureaucratic, mechanistic structures help companies achieve efficiency, while organic structures, which are decentralized and flexible, aid companies ...
[76]
Resource Allocation - Definition, Example, Methods, Types, Factors
Feb 14, 2024 · Resource allocation is the planned distribution of funds to different investment options or business activities within an organization.<|separator|>
[77]
Resource allocation | Production and Operations Management ...
Resource allocation methods · First-come, first-served · Priority-based allocation · Proportional allocation · Optimization techniques.
[78]
4 Best Resource Allocation Methods In Project Management
Sep 9, 2025 · 4 Key Resource Allocation Methods · 1. The Critical Path Method · 2. The Critical Chain Method · 3. Resource Leveling · 4. Resource Smoothing.
[79]
What Is Resource Allocation In Project Management? - Toggl Track
Mar 8, 2023 · 3 resource allocation strategies in project management · Critical Path Method (CPM) · Critical Chain Method (CCM) · Resource leveling and smoothing.
[80]
How to Delegate Effectively: 9 Tips for Managers - HBS Online
Jan 14, 2020 · Effective delegation involves knowing what to delegate, playing to employee strengths, providing clear objectives, and establishing ...
[81]
The Principles of Successful Delegation – BusinessBalls.com
Delegation is one of the most important management skills. Good delegation saves you time, develops employees, grooms a successor, and motivates.
[82]
Team incentives, task assignment, and performance: A field ...
This paper presents the results of a field experiment designed to study the effects of such team incentives on task assignment and performance.
[83]
[PDF] Employee-Task Assignments for Organization Modeling
In this study, we present a review of task assignment problems in organizations, an area that has become more important as tasks become more complex and ...
[84]
What Is Resource Allocation? An Expert Guide - NetSuite
Sep 19, 2024 · Resource allocation is the process of allotting appropriate employees to particular tasks or projects over a given period of time.Benefits of Effective Resource... · Resource Allocation Challenges
[85]
Managers Must Delegate Effectively to Develop Employees - SHRM
Jun 25, 2024 · Effective delegation involves assigning responsibility and authority for outcomes, not just tasks, to develop employees and show trust. ...
[86]
Resource Allocation in Project Management: Steps & Case Studies
Sep 12, 2025 · Resource allocation in project management is the strategic process of assigning the right resources to the right tasks at the right time. It ...
[87]
Union Membership (Annual) News Release - 2024 A01 Results
Jan 28, 2025 · The union membership rate--the percent of wage and salary workers who were members of unions--was 9.9 percent in 2024, little changed from the prior year.
[88]
Union Members Summary - 2024 A01 Results
Jan 28, 2025 · The union membership rate in the private sector declined by 0.1 percentage point over the year to 5.9 percent. Industries with the highest ...
[89]
How to Unionize Your Workplace: A Step-By-Step Guide
Jun 27, 2022 · Where do I start? · 1) Talk to co-workers · 2) Build a team: the Organizing Committee · 3) Choose a union, collect authorization cards, file them ...
[90]
Step-by-Step Guide to Forming a Union
1. Contact a union organizer or start your own union. 2. Have a majority of your co-workers sign union authorization cards. 3. Ask your employer for voluntary ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods
[91]
What It Takes to Form a Union — and Where to Begin
Oct 7, 2024 · Union representation provides workers with a collective voice when raising such issues at work. ... Step 1: Gather enough people to represent you.
[92]
Treasury Department Releases First-Of-Its-Kind Report on Benefits ...
Aug 28, 2023 · Unions raise the wages of their members by 10 to 15 percent. Unions also improve fringe benefits and workplace procedures such as retirement ...
[93]
Union Facts: The Value of Collective Voice - AFL-CIO
Union members earn better wages and benefits than workers who aren't union members. · Ninety-six percent of union workers have employer-provided health insurance ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[94]
[PDF] Evaluating Unions: Labor Economics and the Law
Even failed union organizing drives frequently result in wage and benefit increases for the target employees (p. 155), although these increases are ...<|separator|>
[95]
Labor unions | County Health Rankings & Roadmaps
Jun 5, 2024 · Unions increase employer-provided health insurance, reduce dangerous working conditions, increase federal safety inspections, and reduce fatal injuries.
[96]
The Surprising Impacts of Unionization: Evidence from Matched ...
Estimates accounting for this selection show that unionization substantially decreases payroll, employment, average worker earnings, and establishment survival.
[97]
[PDF] Long-run Impacts of Unions on Firms: New Evidence from Financial ...
Dec 3, 2012 · Our event-study analysis reveals substantial losses in market value following a union election victory—about a 10% decline in market value, ...
[98]
Understanding Workers' Financial Wellbeing in States with Right-to ...
Sep 8, 2023 · Previous empirical studies on the effects of labor unions and collective bargaining processes have focused on several economic outcomes ranging ...Missing: success | Show results with:success
[99]
Fear and Leadership in Union Organizing Campaigns - Sage Journals
Jan 21, 2016 · ... Violence Language & Linguistics Law Management & Organization Studies ... coercion, intimidation, or harassment; (b) discrimination ...
[100]
[PDF] Labor Unions and the Middle Class - Treasury
The empirical research on unions suggests that middle-class workers reap substantial benefits from unionization. Unions raise the wages of their members by 10 ...
[101]
Workers want unions, but the latest data point to obstacles in their path
Jan 23, 2024 · Summary: The recent surge in labor actions has not translated into higher unionization rates in the latest government data.
[102]
[PDF] Worker-Organization Goal Misalignment and Support for Collective ...
Given the high start-up costs of organizing or joining a labor union, and given ... exposure to conflict‐related violence associated with less intergroup empathy?<|separator|>
[103]
Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory
This essay presents a set of concepts and related propositions drawn from a resource mobilization perspective.
[104]
Social Movement Theory: Resource Mobilization Theory - EBSCO
Resource mobilization theory argues that social movements succeed through the effective mobilization of resources and the development of political ...<|separator|>
[105]
Social Movements, Organizations, and Fields - PubMed Central - NIH
Social movements disrupt institutionalized practices, generate innovations, and reorient institutional logics in diverse fields.
[106]
Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC)
SNCC's emergence as a force in the southern civil rights movement came largely through the involvement of students in the 1961 Freedom Rides, designed to test ...
[107]
SNCC: The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee
Their mandate was to continue mobilizing students to challenge racial segregation and discrimination by organizing sit-ins, demonstrations, boycotts, and other ...
[108]
Building Movement Capacity and Structure: Ella Baker and the Civil ...
Take inspiration from this Civil Rights Movement story about how to build movement capacity and structure. Learn about Ella Baker and SNCC.<|separator|>
[109]
Understanding the Tea Party Movement - UC Merced, SSHA
The Tea Party movement staged tax day protests in over 750 US cities in April 2009, quickly establishing a large and volatile social movement.Missing: grassroots | Show results with:grassroots
[110]
Tea Party Activism: An Overview | Research Starters - EBSCO
The grassroots nature of the movement has resulted in a variety of local organizations, although their influence has fluctuated over time. At its peak, the ...
[111]
Is the Tea Party Really A Grassroots Movement? - NPR
Sep 17, 2010 · It's an organization that has largely been criticized by even some of the more grassroots Tea Party organizations as being run by political ...
[112]
[PDF] Social movements: Organizations and Organizing
We discuss two lines of research that emerged at the crossroads of social movement studies and organization theory, focusing on organizations and.
[113]
The struggle for good leadership in social movement organizations
Empirical studies of leadership in social movements also highlight autonomy as a guiding principle (Benski et al., 2013; Graeber, 2012; Western, 2014).
[114]
The Organizational Process - CliffsNotes
1.Review plans and objectives. · 2.Determine the work activities necessary to accomplish objectives. · 3.Classify and group the necessary work activities into ...
[115]
The five functions of Fayol's management
Apr 8, 2021 · Henri Fayol identified 5 functions of management, which he labelled: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.
[116]
Henri Fayol 14 Principles of Management - BYJU'S
1. Division of Work · 2. Authority and Responsibility · 3. Discipline · 4. Unity of Command · 5. Unity of Direction · 6. Subordination of Individual Interest · 7.
[117]
Henri Fayol's Administrative Management Theory (14 Principles ...
Aug 20, 2025 · Fayol believed managers should interact with personnel in five basic ways to control and plan production.
[118]
https://hrdqstore.com/blogs/hrdq-blog/what-classical-management-theory
[119]
The Four Functions of Management: What Managers Need to Know
There are now four commonly accepted functions of management that encompass these necessary skills: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling.
[120]
Digital Transformation Tools: 8 Types for Modern Workplaces - Nextiva
May 23, 2025 · Asana: Good for creative and marketing teams · Notion: Best for founders and startups · Jira: Good for software engineers · Rocketlane: Best for ...
[121]
40 Best Task Management Software Reviewed For 2025
I reviewed and evaluated the top task management software to shortlist the best tools to improve organization, enhance productivity, and track progress.<|separator|>
[122]
8 Project Management Trends 2025 – Where Are We Headed
Rating 4.8 (236) Jan 30, 2025 · Key digital skills, such as digital collaboration and agile methods, are coming more and more into focus. Yet, what project management ...
[123]
10 virtual collaboration tools to boost productivity and engagement
Oct 18, 2023 · 1. Slack. Slack is a virtual collaboration tool that touts itself as a “digital HQ” to enhance teamwork, communication, and organization. · 2.1. Slack · 6. Microsoft Teams · 9. Monday.Com
[124]
Leading Teams in the Digital Age: Four Perspectives on Technology ...
Digital technologies are changing the nature of teamwork in ways that have important implications for leadership.
[125]
Top 10 Ways AI is Transforming Project Management in 2025
Apr 29, 2025 · AI is a game-changer, transforming project management through predictive analytics, real-time tracking, and workflow automation.Missing: digital 2020-2025
[126]
The agentic organization: A new operating model for AI | McKinsey
Sep 26, 2025 · Discover how agentic organizations use AI-first workflows, empowered teams, and real-time data to drive innovation, productivity, ...
[127]
Gen AI Makes People More Productive—and Less Motivated
May 13, 2025 · Generative AI (gen AI) has revolutionized workplaces, allowing professionals to produce high-quality work in less time.
[128]
Don't Let AI Reinforce Organizational Silos - Harvard Business Review
Sep 18, 2025 · AI was used to optimize departmental metrics rather than to create cross-functional results, such as net promoter score, that would have ...
[129]
Top 12 Digital Tools for Workplace Transformation - Workvivo
Oct 10, 2023 · Project management tools such as Trello · Video conferencing tools like Zoom · Sales automation platforms like Salesforce.Intro · 4. Social Intranet Tools · 6. Digital Workplace Suites
[130]
AI in the workplace: A report for 2025 - McKinsey
Jan 28, 2025 · Almost all companies invest in AI, but just 1% believe they are at maturity. Our new report looks at how AI is being used in the workplace ...
[131]
A field experiment on the effects of weekly planning behaviour on ...
Our results revealed that planning behaviour leads to fewer unfinished tasks and rumination and positively affects cognitive flexibility, but it does not have ...
[132]
Working Memory Underpins Cognitive Development, Learning, and ...
Working memory is the retention of a small amount of information in a readily accessible form. It facilitates planning, comprehension, reasoning, ...
[133]
Sustaining Attention to Simple Tasks: A Meta-Analytic Review of the ...
A fixed temporal structure of stimulus occurrence can improve performance by directing attention to relevant moments in time according to implicit temporal ...
[134]
The Pros and Cons of Being Organized (Yes, There are Cons)
Oct 16, 2020 · Instead, according to this study, occasional “unusual and unexpected experiences” can enhance cognitive flexibility and creativity. In other ...
[135]
Mental Health Benefits of Staying Organized - Workplace Options
Jan 17, 2022 · Living in clutter can cause stress, feeling overwhelmed, depression, anxiety, problems with personal relationships, and more.
[136]
Organization and Time Management - Williamsville Psychiatry
It may surprise you to know that your poor organizational skills can negatively impact your personal relationships. Your partner, friends, and family members ...
[137]
The Psychology of Groups - Noba Project
Janis also singled out four group-level factors that combine to cause groupthink: cohesion, isolation, biased leadership, and decisional stress. Cohesion: ...Learning Objectives · Outside Resources · Discussion Questions · Vocabulary
[138]
Top 10 Cognitive Biases that Affect Strategic Planning - LSA Global
Groupthink occurs when groups make decisions in a way that discourages creativity or individual responsibility in favor of harmony or conformity. Consensus ...
[139]
The Free Rider Problem - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 4, 2025 · The free rider problem occurs when individuals have an incentive not to contribute to a group good, as their benefit is mainly from others' ...History · The Causes of Free Rider... · Solving Free Rider Problems
[140]
The Free-Riding Issue in Contemporary Organizations: Lessons ...
Mar 25, 2024 · In the context of collective action, free riding involves limiting one's own contribution while enjoying the collective benefit generated. Free ...
[141]
Activist Burnout Among Climate Justice Activists in Austria - MDPI
It has been estimated that activist burnout affects 50–60% of activists within social movements [11]. Activist burnout is linked with deleterious consequences ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[142]
Activist burnout in No Borders: The case of a highly diverse movement
Dec 5, 2024 · Indeed, studies on other social movements suggest that activist burnout is a major threat to the sustainability of activist or social movement ...
[143]
Racial Justice Activist Burnout of Women of Color in the United States
Aug 26, 2021 · The pervasive racially hostile climate in society can bring severe mental health ramifications, such as burnout, to racial justice activists ...Missing: organizers | Show results with:organizers
[144]
The desire for power within activist burnout. An illustration of the ...
Feb 1, 2024 · Data collected among German environmental activists suggest that, controlling for self-esteem and resilience, social power motivation does indeed predict ...
[145]
Classroom group work: 10 advantages and disadvantages | InnerDrive
Nov 2, 2020 · 5 disadvantages of group work · 1. Presence of conflict · 2. Unequal participation · 3. Avoiding the task · 4. Time consuming · 5. Individual needs ...
[146]
Active Leadership 8: Protecting your organization from the wrong ...
Jul 1, 2014 · These include the “dark triad” of pathology – Machiavellianism, psychopathy and narcissism. These factors are related to a general inclination ...The Dark Triad · Locus Of Control · Cognitive Moral Development...
[147]
The Dark Side of Organizational Behavior | IntechOpen
The dark side of organizational behavior, which is a reflection of irrational human behaviors and harms businesses with its negative consequences.
[148]
[PDF] Challenging the Intrinsic Virtuosity of a Grassroots Social Movement
Edelman (1999) documents that in Costa Rica, conflicts over political vision and finances weakened the movement, thus “grassroots” does not always equate with ...<|separator|>
[149]
Failure of Labor Unionism in the US South
Nov 22, 2019 · The failure of labor unions to succeed in the American South, largely because national unions proved unable or unwilling to confront white supremacy head on.
[150]
Common organizing mistakes
Nov 25, 2020 · Building your campaign out of like-minded people · Leading with the issues instead of listening · Accomplishing tasks instead of organizing people.
[151]
Top 10 challenges in community engagement - Commonplace
Aug 21, 2024 · 1. A lack of trust. One of the most common challenges when it comes to community engagement is one of the most simple. · 2. Little awareness · 3.
[152]
8 Challenges to Community Organising in Europe
1. Fatigue and Burnout · 2. Confusion about the role of “organisers” · 3. Fragmentation of movements · 4. Lack of organising capacity and ineffective capacity ...
[153]
Labor Unions in the United States – EH.net
The 1920s was an especially dark period for organized labor in the United States where weaknesses visible before World War I became critical failures. Labor's ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[154]
How Ideology Can Help—or Hurt—Movements Trying to Build Power
Sep 28, 2023 · Political educator Harmony Goldberg discusses whether the ideological traditions of the left are helpful for practical organizing.
[155]
The History of the Alinsky Organizing Model and Its Practice within ...
Aug 4, 2023 · Alinsky came to adopt an organizing approach that seemed to counter broader tactics of the Communist Party, the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), or the ...
[156]
The politics of 'Worker-to-Worker' organizing - People's World
May 13, 2025 · Eric Blanc's book, We Are the Union: How Worker-to-Worker Organizing Is Revitalizing Labor and Winning Big, has sparked a debate in wider labor circles.
[157]
https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/olson.html
[158]
An experimental investigation of the free-rider problem - ScienceDirect
An experiment was conducted to test propositions drawn from a theory of rational decision-making propounded by Mancur Olson in The Logic of Collective ...
[159]
Labor Unions and the U.S. Economy | U.S. Department of the Treasury
Aug 28, 2023 · Treasury's report shows that unions have the potential to address some of these negative trends by raising middle-class wages, improving work environments, and ...Missing: organizing | Show results with:organizing
[160]
[PDF] The causal effect of labor unions on innovation
Overall, the evidence presented in this subsection suggests a negative, causal effect of unionization on firm innovation. misaligned incentives hypothesis.Missing: realities organizing
[161]
Explaining the erosion of private-sector unions: How corporate ...
Nov 18, 2020 · An increasing volume of research demonstrates that erosion of worker bargaining power and collective bargaining have led to wage suppression and ...
[162]
Do More Powerful Unions Generate Better Pro-Worker Outcomes?
May 7, 2025 · There is broad consensus in the academic literature that unionization lowers labor turnover.[79] The benefits of reduced labor turnover are ...
[163]
Bridging the Divide Between Idealism and Pragmatism
May 25, 2018 · We believe this debate hinges on a false dichotomy that hinders the immense potential of grassroots activists, professional advocates, and foundations to work ...