Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

A-ration

The A-ration, officially designated as the Field Ration, Type A, is a category of comprising fresh, refrigerated, or frozen foods prepared by cooks in organized dining halls, base kitchens, or field facilities with capabilities. It serves as a group feeding option for sustaining personnel during duties, training exercises, or semi-permanent operations where logistical support allows for perishable items, contrasting with shelf-stable alternatives like B-rations or individual combat meals. Introduced in as an adaptation of the traditional for field conditions, the A-ration emerged from efforts to balance nutritional needs with practical delivery in or forward areas, incorporating chilled meats, , and dairy to address deficiencies seen in earlier preserved rations. By , it was formalized alongside B- and C-rations, enabling hot, varied meals that boosted soldier morale and when units were available. The system saw minimal structural changes through the mid-20th century, drawing from the Armed Forces Recipe Service for standardized 10-day menus emphasizing balanced macronutrients—typically around 1,450 kcal per serving with 14% protein, 32% fat, and 54% carbohydrates, supplemented by items like and . In contemporary use, the A-ration has evolved into the - A (UGR-A), a modular for feeding up to 50 personnel per kit, featuring 7 options, 14 lunch/dinner entrees (such as grilled or ), and 7 short-order menus like hamburgers or Philly cheesesteaks. Each module weighs approximately 86.7 pounds and has a of 3 months in the continental U.S. or 9 months overseas under controlled temperatures, with all components, disposables, and heating included for rapid deployment. This iteration prioritizes palatability and variety to enhance acceptance, reflecting ongoing research into soldier nutrition and operational efficiency since the .

History

Origins and Early Development

The foundational components of the U.S. ration system trace back to legislation passed by the Continental Congress on November 4, 1775, which established a daily allowance including one pound of or twelve ounces of , eighteen ounces of or one pound of , one pint of , and smaller weekly allotments of peas, beans, , and for every hundred rations. This early structure emphasized basic subsistence for troops, primarily relying on preserved or locally sourced meats and grains, but it evolved over the to incorporate more varied items like coffee, sugar, and potatoes during the era, addressing nutritional deficiencies observed in prior conflicts. Following , the U.S. Army undertook significant revisions to its ration system in 1922, shifting emphasis from wartime emergency provisions to more structured feeding for stationary and rear-area units, which laid the groundwork for improved options. These changes incorporated lessons from the war's 17-item ration, which had improved dietary variety but still lacked certain vitamins, prompting a focus on fresh and perishable foods for bases equipped with cooking facilities. By the , the system prioritized locally sourced ingredients to enhance morale and health in non-combat settings, marking a departure from the predominantly preserved foods used in field conditions. The A-ration, formally classified as Type A in the late (defined 1936-1941), represented a premium provision designed specifically for troops in organized rear-area environments with access to facilities, distinguishing it from portable field rations such as the reserve (or iron) ration, which consisted of canned , hard , and for use. This innovation emphasized fresh, refrigerated, or frozen components like meats, , and dairy, prepared in central kitchens to support sustained operations where logistical support allowed, thereby improving overall and efficiency in peacetime garrisons.

World War II Usage

During , A-rations expanded significantly to support U.S. Army troops stationed in rear areas, bases, and established camps where dining facilities or field kitchens could be set up, providing a stark contrast to the canned or individual rations issued in active combat zones. This garrison-style ration was prioritized for units not engaged in direct frontline operations, allowing for central messing that emphasized variety and freshness to sustain soldier health and operational readiness across global theaters. A-rations were integrated into a tiered ration system that included A for garrison use, B for canned field feeding, C for individual combat meals, and D as an emergency supplement, enabling flexible based on operational tempo. Key components featured fresh meats such as , vegetables like potatoes and beans, products, fruits, flour for , and staples including , , , and prunes, with canned or dried substitutes employed when perishables were scarce. Prepared in kitchens or halls by dedicated cooks, these rations targeted a daily caloric intake of approximately 4,000 calories per to meet the demands of activity. Logistically, A-rations demanded robust supply chains, including for perishables via reefer ships and trucks, which posed major challenges in remote or contested areas; for instance, in the North African theater, limited capacity restricted fresh availability, prompting heavy reliance on local of over 1,700 tons of and millions of fruits from Allied suppliers between February and June 1943. Similar issues arose in the European theater, where proximity to ports and lines determined access to fresh items, often sourced from local farms or U.S. shipments to maintain the ration's viability. These efforts not only addressed nutritional needs but also enhanced troop , as the hot, familiar meals of A-rations were widely regarded as a morale booster compared to the monotonous rations.

Post-War Evolution

Following , A-rations underwent significant reforms in the late 1940s and 1950s to incorporate a greater variety of fresh foods, such as vegetables, fruits, and dairy products, driven by advancing nutrition research that emphasized balanced diets to prevent deficiencies observed during the war. These updates were formalized under Army Regulation 30-1, which standardized A-ration components for group feeding in non-garrison settings, ensuring availability of perishable items when logistical support permitted. Influenced by post-war studies on soldier health, the rations aimed for daily caloric intakes of 4,000 to 4,500 with balanced macronutrients to support recovery and performance. During the 1960s, particularly in the , A-rations were primarily utilized in established base camps where field kitchens could prepare hot meals from fresh or minimally processed ingredients, supplementing the for troops in semi-permanent positions. However, the tropical environment posed substantial challenges, as high humidity and temperatures accelerated spoilage of perishable components like meats and produce, often necessitating hybrid approaches that combined A-ration elements with canned substitutes to minimize waste and maintain nutritional integrity. By the , refinements to A-rations focused on enhancing and protein content to better align with intensified demands, incorporating higher-protein options such as lean meats and while adhering to updated nutritional guidelines under AR 40-25. This period saw increased emphasis on through menu diversification, informed by feedback and research to improve acceptance rates. As operations evolved into the , A-rations transitioned toward modular systems, allowing flexible assembly of components for varied operational contexts and paving the way for more adaptable group feeding without relying on ad-hoc WWII-era menus.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Components

A-ration, as a for the U.S. , primarily consists of fresh or frozen perishable foods sourced from commercial suppliers to support organized group feeding in settings with access to and cooking facilities. These components emphasize grocery-store-type items, including meats such as and , vegetables like potatoes and fresh produce, fruits, products including and cheese, grains such as and , and condiments, while explicitly excluding canned, dehydrated, or preserved alternatives to prioritize nutritional and palatability. The daily structure of an A-ration follows a master menu designed to provide three balanced meals per soldier, typically structured around breakfast featuring items like eggs and bacon, lunch or dinner with entrees such as roast meats accompanied by potatoes and salads, and desserts, supplemented by beverages like coffee and additions such as sugar. This formulation, developed under the oversight of the Office of the , aims to deliver approximately 200 distinct items over a 30-day cycle for group servings, ensuring variety through fresh perishables that require logistics for transport and storage from depots to field kitchens. Portion sizes are standardized per , with examples including 4-6 ounces of per to meet caloric needs while accommodating group for units of 100 or more, often scaled from base quantities like 100 pounds of or for 100 rations. Sourcing relies on the Market Center System, which procures items through contracts with civilian specialists and local provisions to maintain freshness, supplemented by frozen options like fruits, vegetables, poultry, eggs, and fish when necessary. Variations in A-ration components account for seasonal availability, regional preferences, and logistical constraints, such as substituting mutton for or incorporating desiccated only when fresh supplies are limited, but always maintaining an emphasis on perishables over preserved foods. in field settings involves central messing to leverage these fresh elements for and benefits.

Preparation Requirements

A-rations consist of fresh, perishable, and semiperishable food items, typically provided as Unitized Group Ration-A (UGR-A), which require dedicated facilities for storage and preparation to maintain quality and safety. These include field kitchens such as the M59 field range, Mobile Kitchen Trailer (MKT), or , as well as dining halls, garrison-type buildings, or modular organized areas like 96-foot TEMPER enclosures under Provider system. Site selection for these facilities emphasizes level ground, good drainage, security, and protection from the elements to support semi-permanent camp operations. units, including Mechanized Transport Cold Standby (MTRCS) systems, Container Systems (RCS) with 9,000 BTU capacity, or 600-cubic-foot walk-in refrigerators, are essential for storing perishables and preventing spoilage. Preparation of A-rations is conducted by trained or food service specialists ( 92G), following standardized processes outlined in field manuals. The workflow begins with thawing frozen UGR-A components for immediate use only, with no refreezing permitted, followed by portioning according to Technical Manual 10-412 guidelines (allowing additional servings as needed), via progressive methods using Armed Forces Recipe Cards, and serving hot to ensure palatability and nutrition. Hygiene standards are strictly enforced per FM 10-23 and TB MED 530, including daily inspections, use of potable (1.75 gallons per per day), and protocols to mitigate risks. Personnel requirements typically involve one per 50-75 , supplemented by kitchen police for support and food service specialists for oversight and headcounting; for larger setups like a 96-foot dining TEMPER, this scales to 26 personnel including supervisors. sources such as are used for equipment like modern burner units, with setup times ranging from 30 minutes for an MKT to 45 minutes for a CK, and full cycles estimated at 2-4 hours depending on complexity. Logistical challenges in A-ration preparation include establishing reliable in forward-operating environments, such as coordinating and fuel resupply amid disruptions, and managing from perishables through methods like soakage pits, trenches, or grease traps in with environmental regulations. Insulated food containers maintain safe temperatures for up to 4 hours during transport and serving, but timely consumption is critical to avoid in semi-permanent camps where perishable inputs demand rapid turnover. These requirements ensure A-rations deliver high-quality, meals while balancing operational demands.

Nutritional Profile

A-rations are designed to provide with approximately 3,600 calories per day to support sustained physical demands in temperate climates. This caloric intake aligns with the needs of physically active soldiers, ensuring adequate for operational performance without excess. The macronutrient composition of A-rations follows guidelines outlined in Army Regulation (AR) 40-25, emphasizing a balanced distribution to optimize and : carbohydrates comprise 50-55% of total calories to provide readily available , protein accounts for 10-35% to support muscle repair and maintenance (approximately 102 grams daily for operational rations, derived from fresh sources like meats and ), and fats contribute ≤30% for long-term and nutrient absorption. These proportions are calculated using the standard caloric equation: total = (4 kcal/g carbohydrates) + (4 kcal/g protein) + (9 kcal/g fat), adjusted based on individual activity levels and mission requirements to prevent fatigue and promote recovery. A-rations excel in micronutrient delivery due to their reliance on fresh produce, which offers superior retention of vitamins compared to preserved rations where processing can degrade heat-sensitive nutrients. For instance, fruits and vegetables in A-rations supply essential (ascorbic acid), helping meet or exceed the Military of 90 mg daily for males and reducing the risk of during extended field use— a concern historically mitigated by access in group feeding scenarios. This fresh-component approach also ensures higher of other vitamins and minerals, such as those from leafy greens and , supporting immune function and overall physiological resilience. Beyond physical sustenance, A-rations enhance morale and operational effectiveness by providing varied, meals that the monotony of shelf-stable alternatives, leading to higher voluntary intake and better cognitive performance. Compliance with AR 40-25 extends to accommodations for special diets, including vegetarian options introduced in the and refined thereafter to include plant-based alternatives as of 2025 plans, allowing customization while maintaining nutritional equivalence through plant-based proteins and fortified elements.

Comparison to Other Rations

Relation to B- and C-Rations

A-rations, B-rations, and C-rations formed a hierarchical system in the military during , with A-rations prioritized for their superior quality and freshness when logistical conditions allowed, followed by B-rations as a preserved alternative, and C-rations as the lowest tier for combat exigencies. This structure reflected the balance between nutritional needs, preparation feasibility, and supply chain constraints, ensuring troops received the best available sustenance based on operational context. B-rations served as a direct preserved counterpart to A-rations, substituting canned or dehydrated components for fresh items to enable group feeding in conditions without . While A-rations featured perishable goods like fresh , potatoes, and prepared in hot meals via kitchens, B-rations mirrored this menu using canned meats, vegetables, bread, coffee, and sugar, maintaining similar nutritional balance but with reduced and variety due to preservation methods. They were issued when fresh supplies failed, typically in semi-static positions where cooking facilities remained accessible, positioning B-rations as an intermediate option between the freshness of A-rations and the portability of C-rations. Logistically, B-rations required less specialized transport than A-rations, as their non-perishable nature eliminated needs, though they still demanded group distribution and preparation time. In contrast, C-rations were designed for individual combat use, consisting of shelf-stable, pre-packaged meals that prioritized portability over quality or variety, marking the lowest rung in the ration hierarchy. Each day's allotment included three meat-and-vegetable units (such as meat and beans or stewed pork), three bread units (biscuits with coffee and sugar), and an accessory pack with items like cigarettes and gum, providing approximately 3,700 calories without cooking requirements. By 1944, varieties expanded to ten meat options to combat monotony, though soldiers often criticized the cold, canned format for its limited appeal compared to the hot, fresher A- and B-rations. C-rations were reserved for frontline troops where field kitchens were infeasible, weighing about 5 pounds 10 ounces per man per day initially and emphasizing ease of carry over bulkier group rations. During WWII, issuance followed strict preference: A-rations when possible for garrison or stable field sites, defaulting to B-rations for preserved group feeding, and C-rations only as a tactical necessity to sustain mobility.

Differences from Individual Combat Rations

A-rations, as field rations consisting of fresh, perishable foods prepared in centralized kitchens, stand in stark contrast to individual combat rations designed for solitary consumption during high-mobility operations. Individual rations such as the provided three pre-packaged meals in lightweight boxes, including canned meats, biscuits, and confections, totaling approximately 2,830 calories per day and weighing about 2.4 pounds for a full day's supply. Similarly, the D-ration was an emergency delivering 600 calories in a compact 4-ounce package, intended for short-term survival without any preparation. Modern equivalents like the (MRE), introduced in the , offer self-contained meals with flameless heating capabilities, each providing 1,200–1,300 calories in a 1.5–2-pound pouch suitable for one person. The primary distinctions lie in preparation, portability, and logistical demands. A-rations require field kitchens and trained cooks to prepare hot, fresh meals from ingredients like meats, , and , emphasizing group serving for organized units and offering a morale boost through variety and familiarity in sustained base environments. In contrast, individual rations are fully self-contained and require no cooking facilities, enabling solo consumption in forward combat zones where mobility is paramount; for instance, the K-ration's design prioritized fitting into soldiers' pockets for paratroopers and patrols. Shelf life further highlights this divide: A-rations, reliant on fresh supplies, have a limited viability of 1–2 days to prevent spoilage, whereas MREs maintain quality for up to three years under proper storage conditions. This bulkier nature of A-ration components—necessitating and for perishables—renders them unsuitable for individual carry, unlike the compact, durable packaging of K- and D-rations.
AspectA-RationIndividual Rations (e.g., K-, D-, MRE)
Serving StyleGroup feeding via kitchensSolo, self-heating or no-cook
PortabilityLow; bulk fresh suppliesHigh; lightweight, pocketable
Shelf Life1–2 days (perishables)1–2 months (K); years (D/MRE)
Primary UseRear echelons, base campsForward , patrols
Caloric ExampleVariable, full daily 600 (D-bar); 2,830/day (K); 1,250/meal (MRE)
These differences ensure no overlap in application: A-rations support prolonged unit cohesion and well-being in semi-static positions, while individual rations prioritize rapid deployment and endurance in dynamic, isolated scenarios.

Transition to Modern Systems

In the 1990s, the U.S. Army initiated reforms to phase out standalone A-rations—fresh, perishables-based group meals requiring field kitchens and refrigeration—in favor of hybrid systems that combined fresh elements with standardized, unitized modules for improved logistics. These changes were heavily influenced by supply chain disruptions during the Gulf War (Operation Desert Shield/Storm, 1990–1991), where disparate deliveries of ration components often failed to synchronize at forward kitchens, prompting the development of integrated packaging to ensure complete meal sets arrived together. A revised feeding policy, approved in November 1990, mandated a "family of rations" approach to deliver three nutritionally balanced meals daily, blending A-rations with B-rations (semi-perishables), T-rations (tray-packed, heat-and-serve entrees), and Meals, Ready-to-Eat (MREs); this framework was successfully implemented during Desert Storm, where A-rations accounted for about 35% of daily meals served (over 460,000 portions). Key milestones in this evolution included the 1996 introduction of (UGR) concepts, which built directly on A-ration foundations by modularizing fresh and frozen components into self-contained kits for 50 personnel, reducing preparation time while maintaining nutritional standards. Concurrently, updates to Army Regulation (AR) 40-657, particularly the 1997 revision on Veterinary/Medical Food Safety, Quality Assurance, and , reinforced protocols for handling fresh A-ration elements in operational environments, emphasizing and perishables to mitigate risks in austere settings. This bridge from World War II-era A-rations—reliant on on-site cooking of fresh foods—to 2000s innovations positioned A-rations as a conceptual precursor to tray-packed fresh meals, such as T-rations introduced in the and expanded in the , which offered pre-portioned, steam-table-compatible entrees for quicker assembly without full kitchen infrastructure. Economically, traditional A-rations proved cost-effective at approximately $2–2.50 per meal in the mid-1990s, roughly half the price of MREs or T-ration equivalents ($4–5 per meal), though their reliance on cold-chain logistics increased overall daily per-soldier expenses to $10–15 when factoring in transport and spoilage. Adapting A-ration principles to modern rapid deployment scenarios posed significant challenges, particularly the absence of established kitchens in small-unit operations (e.g., village stability teams of 16–33 personnel), where fixed 50-meal UGR modules led to excess waste and inefficient resupply; this spurred recommendations for scalable subunits (e.g., 25-meal packs) to align with agile, kitchenless environments without compromising freshness or nutrition.

Modern Implementation

Unitized Group Ration A (UGR-A)

The Unitized Group Ration A (UGR-A) serves as the modern equivalent to historical A-rations, designed to provide high-quality, fresh-like group meals for up to 50 in field environments with organized food service facilities. It incorporates perishable and frozen components alongside semi-perishable items and disposables, emphasizing commercial-grade foods to enhance morale and nutritional variety during operations. As the conceptual successor to post-World War II A-rations, UGR-A requires and a for preparation, distinguishing it from fully shelf-stable alternatives. Each UGR-A comprises three boxes—two semi-perishable and one /perishable—containing complete meals including entrees, starches, , desserts, drink mixes, breads, and utensils such as cups, trays, and napkins. It features 7 rotating menus, 14 lunch/ menus, and 7 short-order options like Philly hoagies or hamburgers, with examples including in , roasted quarters, , and grilled strip loin . Perishable elements, such as entrees, account for a substantial portion of the to deliver fresh-tasting results when properly handled. Preparation involves thawing and cooking in a , with mandatory supplements like and optional enhancements such as fresh fruits or sourced locally. Developed in the late by the U.S. Army Natick , and Engineering Center (NSRDEC) in collaboration with the , UGR-A was introduced in 1999 to streamline group feeding by integrating elements of prior ration systems. Each module weighs approximately 86.7 pounds and occupies 4.03 cubic feet, with a full of 12 modules providing 600 meals. components maintain a of up to 9 months at 0°F (-18°C) for overseas distribution, though quality degrades after thawing, limiting refrigerated use to 24-72 hours depending on temperature exposure. The system meets nutritional standards of about 1,450 calories per meal (14% protein, 32% fat, 54% carbohydrates) when averaged over multiple days. For flexibility, UGR-A integrates with the heat-and-serve UGR-B, allowing units to mix modules based on availability without dedicated cooking equipment.

Current Usage in Operations

The Unitized Group Ration-A (UGR-A), embodying A-ration principles, is primarily deployed in established military bases, forward operating bases (FOBs), and similar settings where organized food service facilities, such as mobile kitchen trailers or containerized , can be set up to prepare and serve meals. This includes operations in challenging environments like and during the 2000s, where UGR-A supported dining facilities amid high temperatures that tested storage integrity for its perishable components. In these contexts, UGR-A integrates with contractor-operated dining facilities under programs like LOGCAP, enabling scalable feeding for hundreds of personnel at FOBs while supplementing or replacing individual rations. Additionally, UGR-A principles extend to humanitarian assistance missions, where operational rations provide structured group feeding when infrastructure is available to support relief efforts alongside logistics. In operations such as those in and , UGR-A was prioritized for issuance when Meals, Ready-to-Eat (MREs) proved insufficient for sustaining troop over extended periods, offering hot, varied meals that enhanced psychological and operational readiness compared to prolonged reliance on individual combat rations. The (DLA) Troop Support oversees of UGR-A modules on a build-to-order basis through commercial contracts, ensuring availability without routine stockpiling, with production scaled to meet demands from joint U.S. forces and compatible allied operations. Annual volumes reach into the millions of modules to support global deployments, reflecting the ration's role in feeding large contingents efficiently. Logistically, UGR-A modules are transported via air, ground, or sea convoys, with frozen components requiring refrigerated (reefer) units such as insulated ISO containers equipped with engine-driven to maintain integrity during transit to operational areas. Transition protocols from MREs to UGR-A typically occur upon establishment of field kitchens at bases or FOBs, allowing units to shift from individual to group feeding for improved nutrition and efficiency during extended deployments. This handover prioritizes rapid setup of heating and capabilities to minimize disruptions in meal service.

Recent Developments and Challenges

In the 2020s, the U.S. Department of Defense () has introduced enhancements to A-ration systems through the Unitized Group Ration-A (UGR-A), focusing on efficiency, adaptability, and for field feeding. efforts have gained prominence, with emphasizing reduced packaging and environmentally preferable sourcing in operational rations. In 2025, AmeriQual Packaging and The Wornick Company secured five-year contracts to produce UGR-A modules, incorporating commercial items with extended semi-perishable of at least nine months at 80°F to minimize waste. Additionally, broader initiatives align with the 2022 White House National Strategy on , , and , aiming to increase plant-based options across rations by 2030 to enhance nutritional outcomes and reduce environmental impact; as of November 2025, UGR-A menus have begun incorporating more plant-based entrees, such as vegetable stir-fries and bean-based proteins, in select modules. Cultural adaptations continue, with and kosher modules integrated into UGR-A variants to accommodate diverse service members, ensuring religious dietary compliance without compromising readiness. Technological integrations, such as -driven menu optimization, are under exploration to refine A-ration formulations. In 2024, the solicited solutions to analyze sensory and data from rations, aiming to improve and nutritional balance for future UGR-A updates. Testing of extended-shelf fresh components, including oxygen-scavenger packaging, has shown promise in preserving perishable items longer, potentially extending usability in austere conditions. Despite these advances, A-ration systems face significant challenges, particularly vulnerabilities exposed by global disruptions. The in 2020-2022 strained military food , leading to delays in perishable deliveries and prompting post-pandemic reforms like diversified sourcing and enhanced contract oversight. A 2024 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report highlighted ongoing issues in the DoD Food Program, including inconsistent nutrition standards and inadequate monitoring of basic daily food allowances for group rations. Climate change exacerbates risks to perishable components in A-rations, with rising temperatures and affecting global food supply chains for fresh produce and . DoD assessments indicate that such impacts could restrict access to high-quality perishables in forward-deployed kitchens, necessitating resilient sourcing strategies. Cost pressures from have further complicated procurement, with GAO noting the need for better budgeting to sustain UGR-A production amid rising commercial ingredient prices. These hurdles underscore the DoD's push for integrated solutions to maintain nutritional readiness by 2030.

References

  1. [1]
    Evolution of Rations: The Pursuit of Universal Acceptance - NCBI - NIH
    The family of rations is currently composed of the Meal, Ready-to-Eat (MRE), which is the standard individual combat ration, and three field feeding options.
  2. [2]
    Operational Rations - Unitized Group Ration, A Option (UGR - A)
    The Unitized Group Ration - A Option (UGR-A) is used to sustain military personnel during worldwide operations that allow organized food service facilities.
  3. [3]
    More than a full stomach: Nutrition and Developments in the Field ...
    The Army's daily ration underwent little change between 1775 and the 1890s, and, in some ways, the Army took a number of steps backwards.
  4. [4]
    The History of Rations — Subsistence & Culinary Arts
    A ration is the allowance of food for the subsistence of one person for one day. This first ration provided the following components: 16 oz. beef; 6.8 oz.peas ...
  5. [5]
    Fresh Foods for the Army, 1775-1950 — Subsistence & Culinary Arts
    In the decades after the Civil War, studies of the food and energy value of Army subsistence resulted in the ration of 1892, providing for fresh beef and fresh ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  6. [6]
    Army Operational Rations – Historical background
    Early rations were all-inclusive, like the garrison ration. Feeding was key to combat. Early rations included meat, bread, and sometimes vegetables. Feeding ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] A BRIEF HISTORY OF U.S. ARMY RATIONS
    In the United States it is defined as half a cup, or four U.S. fluid ounces. Capture of H.B.M. Frigate Macedonian, Capt. J.S. Carden by the U.S. frigate United ...
  8. [8]
    Army Operational Rations — Subsistence & Culinary Arts: History
    From the Revolutionary War to World War Ⅰ, the garrison ration served the unit, the small group, and the individual. Moreover, it was intended to serve them in ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The North Africa Campaign: A Logistics Assessment - DTIC
    May 6, 1991 · The primary research question for the following study is: How effective was the logistical support of the North. Africa Campaign (8 November ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Combat Nutrition: Feeding the Troops – Yesterday, Today, and ...
    Oct 28, 2021 · ... spoilage. While the Army and the Navy worked to mature the ... The A-ration, the classic garrison ration, typically consisted of fresh ...
  11. [11]
    Military Recommended Dietary Allowances, AR 40–25 (1985) - NCBI
    A level of 3600 kilocalories (kcal) is required for operational rations to meet energy demands associated with extended field operations. (See para 2–4 ...Missing: refinements | Show results with:refinements
  12. [12]
    Fresh Foods for the Army, 1775-1950
    With some minor changes after its promulgation, the New Army Ration represented the high-water mark of ration development between the two world wars. It had ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ATTP 4-41 (FM 10-23) Army Field Feeding and Class I Operations
    Oct 14, 2010 · Part two of this manual discusses the Army family of rations and field kitchen equipment. ... RATION ISSUES TO THE KITCHEN FOR PREPARATION. 6-48.
  14. [14]
    The Uses of Recommended Dietary Allowances in Military Nutrition
    During 1957 (Table 1) the average total nutrients provided by the. Master Menu were 4,195 calories, 131 gm protein, 199 gm fat, and 470 gm carbohydrate. The ...Missing: macros carbs<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Army Regulation 40–25 - Air Force
    AR 40-25. OPNAVINST 10110.1/MCO 10110.49. AFI44-141. 3 JANUARY 2017. Medical Services. NUTRITION AND MENU STANDARDS. FOR. HUMAN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION.Missing: ration | Show results with:ration
  16. [16]
    AR 40-25 Nutrition Standards An - Army | PDF | Nutrients - Scribd
    Packet, Long-Range Patrol ration. Nutritional standards for restricted rations are outlined in table 2-2. Raft ration. The GP-I contains 1447 calories.
  17. [17]
    Comparison of Self-Reported Intake Versus Military Dietary ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · Nutrient recommendations for Soldiers are defined by the MDRIs which are outlined in Army Regulation 40-25, Nutrition and Menu Standards for ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    More than a full stomach: nutrition and the field ration
    Troops were issued a reserve ration - also known as an iron ration, or, from the meat-packing company, an Armour ration. It was hard bread, corned beef, coffee ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  19. [19]
    7 Evolution of Rations: The Pursuit of Universal Acceptance
    Six MFMs have been designed utilizing nondevelopmental, commercially available kosher and vegetarian entrees and compatible MRE components. These meals were the ...
  20. [20]
    Food on the Frontlines | National Museum of the Pacific War
    Mar 23, 2024 · Even before the war, military scientists experimented with rations and supplies to feed troops at their various postings. They carefully devised ...Missing: 1922 | Show results with:1922<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Meal, Ready-to-Eat (MRE) - Defense Logistics Agency
    The MRE is a totally self-contained operational ration consisting of a full meal packed in a flexible meal bag. The full bag is lightweight and fits easily into ...
  22. [22]
    The Army Family of Rations - Army Quartermaster Foundation
    This revised feeding policy was approved in November 1990 and successfully exercised during Operation Desert Storm.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] ANALYSIS OF SMALLER UGR-A MEAL MODULES TO SUPPORT ...
    Sep 9, 2013 · The Unitized Group Ration (UGR) configuration concept was specifically developed to resolve. Class I distribution problems during Desert ...Missing: 1996 | Show results with:1996
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Veterinary/Medical Food Inspection and Laboratory Service - DTIC
    Nov 6, 1997 · This regulation applies to the. Active and Reserve Components of the Ar- ... *This regulation supersedes AR 40–657/NAVSUPINST 4355.4E/AFR 161–32 ...Missing: rations | Show results with:rations
  25. [25]
    [PDF] NSIAD-94-180 Industrial Base - Government Accountability Office
    Aug 9, 1994 · rations, the Army is contemplating developing a new ration type for group feeding called the Unitized Group Ration. This new ration might ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Leader's Guide to Operational Rations
    Jun 16, 2016 · The MRE is the primary general-purpose individual ration used by the US Armed Forces. Leaders should consider using the MRE during missions ...Missing: KD document
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Alert to Temperature Abuse of Unitized Group Rations - A (UGR-A)
    Apr 1, 2013 · Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Operational Ration Listing Individual Feeding
    This guide to Operational Rations is a quick reference tool. It is also posted on the JCCoE. Website - Quality Assurance Division section.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] ATP 4-41 Army Field Feeding and Class I Operations ... - BITS
    Dec 31, 2015 · assigned to medical units will be fed according to the Service area of operations (AO) ration policy. However, to simplify procurement, meal ...
  30. [30]
    Operational Rations - Defense Logistics Agency
    Operational Rations are the first line of Subsistence in a combat situation or humanitarian assistance mission. Items include Meals, Ready-to-Eat and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Support Provided to Mobilized Army National Guard ...
    To address this congressional request, this report examines mobilization and logistics issues impacting Army National Guard and the Army Reserve units that ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Army Policy for Field Feeding
    The Army family of rations consists of individual rations, group rations, special feeding rations, a meal supplement, and meal enhancements.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] OPERATIONAL RATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ...
    Aug 1, 2012 · Another ration from World War II was the K-Ration, which was first requested for paratroopers to carry in their pockets. The K-Ration was ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] solicitation/contract/order for commercial items offeror to complete ...
    Mar 15, 2012 · The DLA Troop Support UGR-A Product Quality Audit Program, covering all ... can be imported, volume of import, mode of shipment, import ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Army Field Feeding Systems
    UGR-H&S; limited UGR-A. Supports: 250 UGR-H&S ... It consists of an insulated. 8'x8'x20' ISO intermodal container with an engine driven refrigeration unit.
  36. [36]
    How smaller, nutrient-dense rations support changing warfighter ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · ... MRE menus. The Unitized Group Ration Express, a ration ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    unitized group ration express [Image 2 of 5] - DVIDS
    Sep 16, 2025 · The Unitized Group Ration Express, a ration for small, self-sustained military units that contains everything needed for a hot meal for 18 ...
  38. [38]
    Ameriqual and Wornick Awarded Five-Year UGR-A Contracts
    Aug 9, 2025 · Ameriqual Packaging and The Wornick Co. have each been awarded a five-year fixed-price contract for Unitized Group Ration-A (UGR-A) modules.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] White-House-National-Strategy-on-Hunger-Nutrition-and-Health ...
    Sep 7, 2022 · The strategy aims to end hunger and increase healthy eating by 2030, with pillars focused on food access, nutrition integration, and empowering ...Missing: rations | Show results with:rations
  40. [40]
    Meal, Religious, Kosher/Halal - Defense Logistics Agency
    The Meal, Religious, Ready-To-Eat, Kosher or Halal is utilized to feed those individuals in the Military Service who maintain a strict religious diet.Missing: cultural | Show results with:cultural
  41. [41]
    AI Driven Solutions for Combat Feeding Division - SAM.gov
    Oct 22, 2024 · Using AI to analyze sensory/acceptability data on the current rations could identify ways to improve combat rations to decrease ...Missing: military | Show results with:military
  42. [42]
    Military Explores New Processes, Packaging for Combat Rations
    Jul 3, 2025 · Another project involves injecting oxygen scavengers into food packages to reduce spoilage and extend shelf life.
  43. [43]
    Military Food Supply Chain during the COVID-19 Pandemic - MDPI
    This study is the first to reveal the impact of the pandemic on the military food supply chain in Poland.<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    [PDF] GAO-24-106155, DOD FOOD PROGRAM
    Jun 24, 2024 · OSD and the military services have taken steps to implement a color- coded nutrition labeling program, along with several related initiatives.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Implications of Climate Change for the U.S. Army
    This may result in significant restrictions on military activities (in peace- time) that produce carbon emissions. In concert with these changes, consumer ...
  46. [46]
    DOD Food Program: Additional Actions Needed to Implement ... - GAO
    Jun 24, 2024 · GAO is making 16 recommendations, including for the services to establish nutrition program guidance, DOD to clarify or adjust leadership roles.Missing: 2030 | Show results with:2030
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Strengthening Food Security in the Force: Building on Our Progress
    Dec 11, 2023 · The Military Services are continuing to assess access to healthy food options at installation dining facilities and meal card usage to better ...Missing: rations | Show results with:rations