Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

AP English Language and Composition

AP English Language and Composition is an course offered by the that introduces high school students to college-level and , emphasizing the analysis and production of texts to understand how writers and speakers craft persuasive arguments. The course cultivates skills in reading, writing, and through the study of rhetorical situations, claims supported by evidence, organizational strategies, and stylistic choices in various nonfiction genres, including essays, speeches, , and visual arguments. The curriculum is structured around four big ideas—rhetorical situation, claims and , reasoning and , and —organized into nine units that allow teachers flexibility in selecting texts while ensuring alignment with essential skills. Students engage in evidence-based analytic and argumentative writing, revising their work to refine rhetorical effectiveness, and they analyze how authors make decisions to influence audiences in diverse contexts. No formal prerequisites are required, though the course demands proficiency in college-level reading and writing. The associated , administered annually in May, assesses these competencies through a three-hour-and-fifteen-minute format: a multiple-choice section with questions (60 minutes, 45% of the score) that tests rhetorical analysis across the big ideas, and a free-response section (two hours and fifteen minutes, including a 15-minute reading period, 55% of the score) consisting of three s—a synthesis question requiring integration of at least three sources to build an argument, a rhetorical analysis of a 600–800-word passage, and an argument defending a position with relevant . Scores range from 1 to 5, determined by criterion-referenced standards, with scores of 3 or higher often qualifying students for college credit or at over 3,300 institutions. Participation in the course equips students with transferable skills for college success, such as constructing sophisticated arguments and evaluating persuasive communication, and it is supported by resources like AP Classroom for progress checks and teacher .

Overview

Description

The English Language and Composition course serves as an introductory college-level program in and composition, emphasizing the study of texts to foster skills in rhetorical analysis and evidence-based writing. It aligns with introductory and writing curricula at the collegiate level, preparing students to engage with complex arguments through the examination of essays, speeches, and other persuasive forms. Administered by the , the course equips participants with tools for intellectually responsible and academic success in . Central to the course is the development of advanced practices, including reading texts as writers to identify rhetorical choices, synthesizing to claims, and constructing persuasive arguments that consider and . Students learn to analyze how authors employ reasoning, organization, and stylistic elements to convey meaning, while practicing the revision of their own compositions for clarity and effectiveness. This emphasis on rhetorical awareness enables learners to evaluate sources critically and adapt their writing to diverse contexts, mirroring the demands of college composition. Typically offered to high school juniors, the course has no formal prerequisites, though it assumes strong foundational skills in reading and writing at a preparatory level. Successful performance, particularly scores of 3 or higher on the associated exam, may qualify students for credit or , depending on institutional policies. Beyond academic advantages, the program cultivates abilities essential for civic discourse, such as articulating evidence-supported positions on contemporary issues.

History

The AP English Language and Composition course and exam were introduced by the in 1980, expanding the program's offerings in the humanities with an initial emphasis on rhetorical analysis of nonfiction texts to complement the fiction-focused course. This addition aimed to provide high school students with college-level preparation in argumentative writing and source evaluation, drawing from syllabi of introductory composition courses at institutions. Participation in the exam grew steadily over the decades, reflecting broader access to AP courses in U.S. high schools. By the , annual examinees exceeded 300,000, and the course became the most widely taken AP exam, outpacing even in popularity. In the 2020s, over 500,000 students took the exam each year, underscoring its appeal for developing critical reading and persuasive writing skills applicable to college and careers. Key revisions have shaped the program's evolution to align with evolving educational standards. In 2007, the College Board introduced the synthesis essay prompt in the free-response section, requiring students to integrate multiple sources into a cohesive argument and adding 15 minutes to the exam time for reading preparation. The 2019 redesign shifted free-response scoring from a 9-point holistic scale to a 0-6 analytic rubric per question, emphasizing development, use, and sophistication to better mirror college-level assessment. Further updates in 2024 revised the Course and Exam Description to prioritize skill-based learning across nine units, scaffolding rhetorical analysis, claims and evidence, and stylistic choices while promoting through flexible text selection and resistance to . Beginning with the 2025 exam administration, the test transitioned to a fully digital format via the app, enhancing security and accessibility for the majority of AP exams.

Course Curriculum

Units and Topics

The AP English Language and Composition course is structured around nine units that provide a scaffolded progression for developing rhetorical analysis and argumentative writing skills, allowing students to build complexity over the academic year. Each unit is designed to span approximately 15 class periods, equivalent to about three weeks assuming 45-minute periods five days a week, though teachers have flexibility to adjust pacing based on student needs and local schedules. This structure supports teacher autonomy in sequencing units or integrating skills across them, ensuring the course aligns with diverse classroom contexts while maintaining a logical build from foundational concepts to advanced synthesis. Unit 1 introduces the and claim development supported by evidence, with students analyzing purpose, , and in short texts to craft focused paragraphs. For example, activities might involve examining how authors address specific in essays on topics like or . Unit 2 builds on this by exploring appeals to , the formulation of defensible statements, and establishing a clear line of reasoning to structure arguments. In Unit 3, students delve into reasoning processes, connecting claims to through methods of such as cause-effect or , emphasizing how these techniques strengthen argumentative validity. Unit 4 extends this to crafting effective introductions and conclusions while incorporating additional types and organizational strategies like compare-contrast to enhance overall argument flow. Unit 5 focuses on achieving coherence in arguments through transitions and deliberate style choices, including syntax and word selection, to refine persuasive impact. Unit 6 addresses identifying biases in sources, analyzing via , and evaluating how these elements influence rhetorical effectiveness in works. Unit 7 examines qualifying claims to add nuance, alongside the role of syntax, punctuation, and grammatical conventions in shaping meaning and emphasis. In Unit 8, students revisit the with an emphasis on style for , integrating multiple sources to create cohesive responses tailored to audience needs. Unit 9 culminates in advanced claim qualification, incorporating counterarguments and full argument integration to produce sophisticated, evidence-based compositions. Throughout the units, teachers select topics such as the , , or , drawing from diverse texts including essays, speeches, and articles without a required reading list. These texts are typically at an upper high school reading level to challenge students while remaining accessible for rhetorical analysis. This approach fosters conceptual understanding of through representative examples rather than exhaustive coverage, enabling teachers to adapt materials to engage students with varied perspectives.

Big Ideas and Skills

The AP English Language and Composition course is structured around four big ideas that provide a for understanding and . These big ideas— (RHS), Claims and (CLE), Reasoning and (REO), and (STL)—emphasize how writers respond to contexts, construct arguments, organize ideas logically, and employ language strategically. They serve as enduring foundations, spiraling across the curriculum to build students' abilities in analyzing and producing texts. The (RHS) big idea centers on the idea that "individuals write within a particular situation and make strategic writing choices based on that situation." It encompasses elements such as the writer's purpose, audience expectations, exigence (the need prompting the text), and broader , guiding students to recognize how these factors shape communication. For instance, writers adapt and structure to address specific audiences, ensuring and . Claims and (CLE) focuses on how "writers make claims about the world, support those claims with evidence, and address counterarguments." This involves identifying credible sources like facts, statistics, or expert testimony to justify assertions, while qualifying claims to acknowledge complexities or opposing views, fostering nuanced argumentation. Reasoning and (REO) explores how "writers guide understanding of a text’s line of reasoning and claims through that text’s and of ." Students learn to trace logical progressions, such as cause-and-effect relationships or comparisons, and use transitions to enhance coherence, ensuring arguments flow persuasively. Finally, Style (STL) addresses how "the informs the strategic stylistic choices that writers make," including , , and rhetorical devices to convey and emphasis. For example, varied sentence structures can build rhythm or urgency, aligning language with the text's purpose. Underpinning these big ideas are eight skill categories, divided into reading and writing components for each, that develop students' rhetorical proficiency. These categories progress from (interpreting texts) to (creating original compositions), enabling students to engage with holistically. The course defines 24 specific skills within these categories, each assessed on the with weights ranging from 11% to 16%, ensuring balanced coverage of foundational abilities. Enduring understandings articulate core principles tied to the big ideas, such as RHS-1: "Individuals write within a particular situation and make strategic writing choices based on that situation," highlighting to and . Similarly, CLE-1 states that "Writers make claims about subjects, rely on that supports the reasoning that justifies the claim, and often acknowledge or respond to other, possibly opposing, arguments," emphasizing evidence's role in engaging ongoing conversations. Essential knowledge statements provide targeted details, like RHS-1.K: "The audience’s beliefs, values, and knowledge affect how comparisons are made," or CLE-1.Y: "Writers use sources to address potential biases and limitations," equipping students with precise tools for rhetorical analysis. The 24 skills are organized by big idea and category, as shown in the following table for clarity:
Big IdeaSkill CategorySpecific SkillsExam Weight
Rhetorical Situation (RHS)Reading (Skill 1)1.A: Identify and describe the components of the rhetorical situation.
1.B: Explain how an author’s rhetorical choices contribute to the rhetorical situation.
1.C: Demonstrate understanding of an audience’s beliefs, values, and needs.
11–14%
Writing (Skill 2)2.A: Write an introduction to a text that addresses the rhetorical situation.
2.B: Write a conclusion to a text that addresses the rhetorical situation.
11–14%
Claims and Evidence (CLE)Reading (Skill 3)3.A: Identify and describe claims and evidence.
3.B: Identify and explain the use of appropriate and relevant evidence to support claims.
3.C: Identify and describe the explanation of how evidence supports a claim.
13–16%
Writing (Skill 4)4.A: Develop a paragraph that includes a claim and evidence.
4.B: Write a thesis statement that requires proof or justification.
4.C: Qualify or limit an argument to address complexity.
11–14%
Reasoning and Organization (REO)Reading (Skill 5)5.A: Describe the line of reasoning and explain how it supports the thesis.
5.B: Describe the organization of a text and explain how it contributes to the development of the argument.
5.C: Identify and describe the use of methods of development to support claims.
13–16%
Writing (Skill 6)6.A: Develop commentary that establishes and explains relationships among textual evidence.
6.B: Use transitional elements to guide the reader through the line of reasoning.
6.C: Use appropriate methods of development to advance an argument.
11–14%
Style (STL)Reading (Skill 7)7.A: Identify and explain the function of word choice, comparisons, and syntax in a text.
7.B: Identify and explain the function of clause relationships in a text.
7.C: Identify and explain the function of grammar and mechanics in a text.
11–14%
Writing (Skill 8)8.A: Use verbs, verb forms, and punctuation to convey specific meanings and tone.
8.B: Write sentences that clearly and concisely communicate meaning.
8.C: Use standard English conventions.
11–14%
This framework ensures skills build progressively, with reading skills fostering analytical depth and writing skills promoting creative application, all aligned to the big ideas for comprehensive rhetorical competence.

Examination

Format

The AP English Language and Composition consists of two main s: a multiple-choice worth 45% of the total score and a free-response worth 55%. The entire lasts 3 hours and 15 minutes, with the multiple-choice portion allotted 1 hour and the free-response portion 2 hours and 15 minutes, including a 15-minute reading . Administered fully digitally through the College Board's Bluebook testing application since the 2025 exam cycle, the test requires students to use compatible devices such as laptops, desktops, or tablets, with responses automatically saved and submitted. Exams are typically held in mid-May, with the 2025 administration on May 14 and the 2026 exam scheduled for May 13 at 8 a.m. local time. The multiple-choice questions are based on and analysis of passages drawn from diverse sources, including essays, speeches, articles, and other rhetorical texts spanning various time periods and cultural contexts. No calculators, reference materials, or external aids are permitted, though the digital platform provides built-in tools for highlighting and annotating passages during the exam. Students with documented disabilities may request accommodations, such as extended time or special formats, through the College Board's Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD) program, with requests submitted by SSD coordinators via an online portal. International testing is available at approved overseas sites, following the same digital format where feasible, to ensure equitable access for global participants.

Multiple-Choice Section

The multiple-choice section of the AP English Language and Composition consists of 45 questions to be completed in , accounting for 45% of the overall score. These questions are organized into five sets, each based on short prose passages drawn from the 18th to the , including genres such as speeches, letters, essays, , and political or autobiographical writing. The passages serve as stimuli for analysis, typically presenting diverse historical and disciplinary contexts to assess students' ability to engage with rhetorical strategies in real-world texts. Of the 45 questions, approximately 23–25 focus on reading skills, requiring students to analyze the provided nonfiction texts closely. These reading questions emphasize rhetorical analysis, such as identifying the author's purpose, audience, exigence, or appeals (e.g., , , ); evaluating claims and supporting evidence; examining reasoning and organization, including the development of a line of reasoning through logical progression; and assessing style, such as the effects of word choice, syntax, tone, or on the overall message. For instance, a question might ask students to determine how an author's rhetorical choices in a 20th-century speech convey a central . The remaining 20–22 questions are writing-oriented, prompting students to "read like a " by revising or stimulus texts for rhetorical effectiveness. These tasks often involve improving organization, strengthening claims with better evidence, refining reasoning for coherence, or enhancing style through precise language adjustments, such as selecting that aligns with the intended . Examples include choosing an effective introductory sentence for an essay or revising a paragraph to better support a thesis with relevant evidence. This section primarily assesses reading-focused skills from the course framework, including Skill Category 1 (: Reading), such as 1.A (identify and describe what specific rhetorical situations are in texts); Skill Category 3 (Claims and Evidence: Reading), such as 3.A (explain claims and reasoning in texts); Skill Category 5 (Reasoning and Organization: Reading), such as 5.A (describe the reasoning in texts); and Skill Category 7 (Style: Reading), such as 7.A (explain the function of specific words and phrases in texts). These skills align with the exam's emphasis on how writers craft arguments to persuade audiences in contexts. Each multiple-choice question is scored with 1 point for a correct answer, with no penalty for incorrect or unanswered questions, encouraging informed guessing when necessary. Effective strategies for this section include practicing to annotate key rhetorical elements in passages, using the process of elimination to narrow down distractors in four-option questions, and managing time to allocate about 1.3 minutes per question while prioritizing comprehension of the stimulus texts. Students can prepare using official resources like Classroom progress checks, which simulate the exam's question formats and provide targeted feedback on skill weaknesses.

Free-Response Section

The free-response section of the AP English Language and Composition exam consists of three essay prompts designed to assess students' abilities in reading, , and writing, lasting a total of 2 hours and 15 minutes, which includes a 15-minute reading period dedicated to reviewing sources for the prompt. This section accounts for 55% of the overall exam score and requires students to produce essays that demonstrate sophisticated rhetorical strategies and evidence-based reasoning. The first prompt, known as the synthesis essay, asks students to develop a position on a contemporary issue by integrating material from 6-8 provided sources, such as articles, graphs, or images, with at least three sources incorporated into their argument to support a defensible . For example, a prompt might require students to argue for or against a specific , drawing on diverse sources to synthesize while addressing counterarguments. This task emphasizes skills such as selecting and integrating relevant (4.A and 4.B) and demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the (2.A). The second prompt is the rhetorical analysis essay, in which students examine the rhetorical choices made by an author in a text, typically an excerpt of 600-800 words, to convey a purpose or achieve an effect on the audience. Students must identify and explain specific techniques, such as , , or appeals to , , and , without incorporating external sources. A representative example involves analyzing an excerpt from a historical speech, like one addressing , to evaluate how the speaker's language choices build credibility and persuasion. Key skills assessed include analyzing rhetorical strategies (4.A and 4.B) and organizing commentary to support claims about the text's effectiveness (2.A and 4.C). The third prompt, the argument essay, requires students to articulate and defend a position on a given topic or quotation using their own reasoning and evidence from personal reading, observation, or experience, without reliance on provided sources. For instance, students might respond to a statement about the value of in society, crafting an that employs logical appeals and specific examples to substantiate their . This prompt focuses on skills like developing claims (2.A), selecting and integrating effectively (4.A and 4.B), and revising for style and organization (4.C). Each of the three essays is scored holistically on a 0-6 scale using an analytic rubric that evaluates three main rows: a defensible (0-1 point), the selection and use of with insightful commentary (0-4 points), and sophistication in the argument, such as demonstrating nuanced understanding or situating the response within a broader context (0-1 point). Overall, the free-response section prioritizes writing skills from 2.A (responding to rhetorical situations through claims) to 4.C (strategic stylistic choices and revisions for clarity and impact), fostering students' ability to compose college-level arguments.

Scoring and Results

Calculation

The AP English Language and Composition exam employs a criterion-referenced scoring , where raw scores from the multiple-choice and free-response sections are combined into a weighted composite score and then scaled to a final score of 1 to 5 based on standards set by faculty, without curving or norm-referencing against other test-takers. This process ensures that scores reflect mastery of course content and skills relative to expectations for introductory college-level work, with no partial or half-point awards on the final scale. The multiple-choice section yields a raw score out of 45, calculated by awarding 1 point for each correct answer among the 45 questions, with no deduction for incorrect or omitted responses. This raw score contributes approximately 45% to the overall composite. The free-response section, consisting of three essays (, , and ), is scored holistically by trained college faculty and experienced AP teachers, with each essay worth up to 6 points for a total raw score out of 18; this section accounts for about 55% of the composite score. To form the composite score, the multiple-choice raw score is scaled to contribute up to 45 points (1:1 weighting), while the free-response raw score is scaled to contribute up to 55 points (each point worth approximately 3.06 in the composite), yielding a total possible composite of around 100 points. This composite is then mapped to the 1-5 AP scale using an exam-specific conversion table developed annually by the , which equates scores to performance benchmarks derived from college-level validation studies. For example, in 2024, a composite score of 75 or higher typically corresponded to a 5, though exact thresholds vary each year to maintain consistent standards. Final scores are released to students online in early to mid-July following the May exam administration and are valid indefinitely for college credit and placement purposes, provided they meet individual institutions' policies.

Grade Distributions

The AP English Language and Composition exam score distributions have shown consistent patterns over the years, with scores ranging from 1 to 5 on a criterion-referenced that does not employ curving. The following table summarizes the annual percentages of students achieving each score, the percentage scoring 3 or higher (considered passing for college credit at many institutions), mean scores, and total exam takers from 2008 to 2025.
Year% Score 5% Score 4% Score 3% Score 2% Score 1% Score 3+Mean ScoreTotal Students
202513.428.032.816.19.774.33.19616,294
20249.821.423.528.816.654.62.79597,097
202310.319.726.129.514.456.12.82562,328
202210.421.124.229.814.555.72.86520,771
20219.122.925.829.312.957.72.86518,548
202012.620.429.126.211.862.12.96535,478
20199.918.226.231.214.554.32.78573,171
201810.617.728.829.313.557.22.83580,043
20179.118.327.730.714.255.02.77579,426
201610.717.627.132.112.655.42.82547,575
20159.918.327.329.714.855.52.79527,274
20149.617.928.430.114.155.82.79505,244
201310.216.228.629.815.255.02.77476,277
201211.020.228.927.911.960.22.90443,835
201111.120.030.127.511.361.22.92412,466
201010.720.829.327.611.660.82.91374,620
200910.519.030.228.411.959.72.88357,441
20088.718.231.430.511.358.22.82306,479
Participation in the exam has grown steadily, increasing from approximately 306,000 students in 2008 to over 616,000 in 2025, reflecting broader access to programs in high schools. Mean scores have hovered around 2.8, with the percentage scoring 3 or higher typically between 55% and 62% from 2008 to 2024. Following the update to the free-response scoring rubrics, which aimed to better align with college-level expectations, there were slight improvements in passing rates in subsequent years, though variability occurred due to external factors like the . In 2025, the distribution shifted notably higher, with 13.4% earning a 5, 28.0% a 4, and 74.3% scoring 3 or above—a 20-point increase in passing rates from 2024—coinciding with the exam's full transition to a format. These distributions are influenced by preparation quality, as AP scores are determined through standard setting to maintain consistency without curving, ensuring comparability across years. Access to official resources, such as AP Classroom's practice materials and progress checks, has been shown to support stronger performance by allowing students to engage with course content and exam formats in advance.

Recent Changes

In 2019, the simplified the free-response scoring rubric for the AP English Language and Composition exam, transitioning from a 9-point holistic scale to a 6-point analytic rubric effective for the Fall 2019 administration. This change aimed to provide clearer criteria for evaluating , rhetorical , and essays by breaking down scores into rows for , and commentary, and , facilitating more consistent grading. The 2024 Course and Exam Description (CED), effective for courses beginning in Fall 2024, introduced a skill-progression model structured around nine units, each designed for approximately 15 class periods to scaffold students' rhetorical analysis and abilities. This update reduced emphasis on rhetorical terminology in favor of practical application of evidence integration, claim qualification, and stylistic choices such as syntax and , while revising the four enduring understandings—, claims and evidence, reasoning and organization, and style—to better align with diverse textual analysis. Units now offer greater teacher flexibility in sequencing and theming, supported by AP Classroom resources including unit-specific progress checks and a question bank for personalized practice. Beginning with the 2025 exam administration, AP English Language and Composition transitioned to a fully format delivered through app, replacing paper testing while maintaining the same structure of 45 multiple-choice questions and three free-response questions. This shift includes adaptive practice tests for preparation and enhanced annotations for free-response sections, improving accessibility and efficiency without altering question counts or core content. Recent updates have also emphasized diverse voices in exam passages and course materials, requiring students to analyze varied perspectives from primary sources to foster inclusive rhetorical understanding. Additionally, deeper integration with AP Classroom provides ongoing progress monitoring and formative assessments tied to the nine units, enabling teachers to address skill gaps in real time.