Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Advanced electronic signature

An advanced electronic signature (AdES) is an enhanced type of defined under the Union's eIDAS Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, which ensures a higher level of assurance through specific technical and procedural requirements, including unique linkage to the signatory, reliable identification, sole control by the signatory, and detectability of any post-signature alterations to the data. The Regulation, adopted in 2014 and effective since 2016, establishes a harmonized framework for and trust services across member states, categorizing s into three levels: simple, advanced, and qualified, with AdES positioned as an intermediate tier offering greater security than basic signatures but without the mandatory hardware or certification of qualified ones. To qualify as an AdES, the signature must satisfy four core requirements outlined in Article 26 of the regulation: it must be uniquely linked to the signatory to prevent unauthorized use; capable of identifying the signatory through verifiable means such as cryptographic keys; created using electronic signature creation data under the signatory's sole control with high confidence in its exclusivity; and linked to the signed data in a manner that any subsequent change is detectable, often achieved via public-key (PKI) technologies. These attributes make AdES suitable for scenarios requiring moderate to high assurance without the full rigor of qualified electronic signatures (QES). Legally, an AdES is not denied effect or admissibility as evidence in EU solely because it is electronic or lacks qualified status, providing cross-border recognition and within the internal market. In contrast to simple electronic signatures (SES), which are basic attachments like scanned images or typed names with minimal , AdES incorporates cryptographic protections to enhance and . A QES, however, builds on AdES by requiring creation via a qualified electronic signature creation device (QSCD)—such as a secure —and a qualified issued by a trusted , granting it equivalence to a handwritten in all respects. Compliance with AdES standards is supported by standardized formats like (XML), CAdES (CMS), and (PDF), as specified in EU Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1506, facilitating validation tools and services across member states. AdES is widely applied in and administrative contexts within the , such as signing contracts, invoices, and agreements, where it provides sufficient legal validity for most non-high-risk transactions while streamlining processes and reducing reliance on paper-based methods. Its adoption supports the 's goals by enabling secure remote signing and identity verification, particularly in sectors like finance, healthcare, and , though recognition outside the may vary based on bilateral agreements or national laws. As of 2025, ongoing 2.0 updates aim to further integrate AdES with like cloud signatures to enhance and user .

Definition and Overview

Definition

An advanced electronic signature, as defined under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 (), is an that meets specific criteria to ensure its reliability and integrity. It must be uniquely linked to the signatory, capable of identifying the signatory, created using electronic signature creation data that the signatory can use under their sole control with high confidence, and linked to the signed data in a manner that any subsequent alteration is detectable. This distinguishes advanced electronic signatures from simpler forms, such as or electronic signatures, which lack these stringent and control requirements and do not provide the same level of assurance. While advanced signatures do not inherently require from a qualified trust service provider, they form the basis for qualified electronic signatures, which build upon these attributes to achieve legal equivalence with handwritten signatures across the . The primary purpose of advanced electronic signatures is to facilitate secure and efficient electronic transactions by enabling the validation of documents, contracts, and other data with cross-border recognition within the , thereby promoting trust in digital interactions without the need for physical presence.

Historical Development

The roots of advanced electronic signatures trace back to the 1990s, when (PKI) emerged as a foundational technology for secure digital communications and encryption key management, enabling the creation of digitally verifiable signatures. In the , early regulatory efforts began with Directive 1999/93/EC, adopted on December 13, 1999, which established a community framework to facilitate the use and legal recognition of electronic signatures across member states, distinguishing between basic and advanced forms to promote . This directive laid the groundwork for trust services but allowed varying national implementations, highlighting the need for a more unified approach. A pivotal milestone came with the adoption of the eIDAS Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 on July 23, 2014, which replaced the 1999 directive and took full effect on July 1, 2016, standardizing and trust services—including advanced electronic signatures—across all member states to ensure mutual recognition and seamless cross-border transactions. This regulation defined advanced electronic signatures as those uniquely linked to the signatory, capable of identifying the signatory, created using electronic signature creation data under the signatory's sole control with high confidence, and linked to the signed data in such a manner that any subsequent change is detectable, providing legal recognition and admissibility as evidence in (though equivalence to handwritten signatures is reserved for qualified electronic signatures). Post-2020 developments further advanced the framework through eIDAS 2.0, proposed by the European Commission on 3 June 2021 and entering into force on May 20, 2024, which amends the original regulation to introduce European Digital Identity Wallets for secure, user-controlled management of digital credentials and signatures. Further implementing regulations were published on 30 July 2025, entering into force 20 days later. Member states must ensure that at least one such wallet is made available to natural and legal persons by 3 October 2026. Concurrently, the digital signature market has experienced robust growth, projected to reach USD 13.4 billion in 2025, driven by increasing adoption in business processes. This evolution has accelerated the shift from paper-based signing to digital alternatives, improving efficiency in cross-border business by reducing processing times, costs, and logistical barriers while maintaining legal validity.

Technical Specifications

Core Requirements

An advanced electronic signature (AdES) under the must satisfy specific mandatory criteria to ensure its reliability, security, and integrity, as outlined in Article 26 of (EU) No 910/2014. These requirements distinguish AdES from simpler forms by emphasizing the signatory's unique association with the signature and the protection of the signed data against tampering. The four core requirements are:
  • Uniquely linked to the signatory: The must be exclusively associated with the signatory, enabling clear identification and preventing attribution to others.
  • Capable of identifying the signatory: It must reliably verify the identity of the individual performing the signing action.
  • Created under the signatory's sole : The is generated using electronic creation data, such as a private key, that the signatory can employ with a high level of under their exclusive .
  • Detectable alterations to signed data: The binds to the data in a manner that any subsequent modification to the data becomes detectable, thereby invalidating the integrity of the if changes occur.
To implement these requirements, AdES commonly employs cryptographic techniques, such as hashing algorithms (e.g., SHA-256), to create a digital fingerprint of the document before signing; this ensures tamper-evidence by allowing verification that the data remains unchanged post-signing. Unlike qualified electronic signatures, AdES does not mandate the use of hardware security modules or certified devices for creation. Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) serves as a prevalent enabling technology for achieving these controls. AdES provides substantial assurance of authenticity and integrity, offering strong evidentiary value that can support , though it lacks the irrefutable of validity granted to qualified electronic signatures. This level balances enhanced security with practical implementation, making AdES suitable for many high-value transactions without the stricter certification overhead of qualified variants.

Technologies and Standards

Advanced electronic signatures rely on (PKI), which employs asymmetric to generate private and public key pairs for secure signing and verification processes. The signer uses the private key to encrypt a of the document, creating a that the recipient can decrypt with the corresponding public key to confirm authenticity and integrity. Hashing algorithms, such as SHA-256, compute a fixed-size digest of the document to detect any alterations, ensuring the signature binds to the exact content at the time of signing. These technologies meet the requirements for advanced signatures by providing unique linkage and tamper evidence. The European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) defines AdES Baseline Profiles to standardize formats for interoperability across systems. CAdES uses Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) for general binary data signatures. XAdES extends XML Digital Signature for structured XML documents. PAdES integrates signatures into PDF files per ISO 32000, supporting embedded or detached modes. JAdES applies to JSON Web Signatures, enabling signatures for web-based APIs and data exchanges. ASiC serves as a container format, packaging signatures with documents in ZIP archives for multi-signature scenarios. Recent updates, such as ETSI EN 319 142-2 V1.2.1 (2025-07), enhance PAdES profiles by introducing additional levels like PAdES-E-EPES and PAdES-E-LTV, which support serial and parallel signatures while imposing restrictions on ISO 32000-2 for consistent validation across tools, and ETSI TS 119 511 V1.2.1 (2025-10), which specifies protocols for long-term preservation services for AdES digital signatures. Verification of advanced electronic signatures involves timestamping authorities (TSAs), which issue trusted time-stamps using PKI to bind the signature to a verifiable moment, preventing backdating or denial. Certificate validation chains trace the signer's back to a trusted via intermediate authorities, confirming validity, status, and through chain-of-trust mechanisms. This process ensures the signature remains reliable over time, even as certificates expire.

eIDAS Regulation

The eIDAS Regulation, formally known as Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market, provides the primary legal framework for advanced electronic signatures (AES) within the European Union. It defines an AES in Article 3(11) as an electronic signature that is uniquely linked to the signatory, capable of identifying the signatory, created using means that the signatory can use under their sole control with a high level of confidence, and linked to the signed data in a way that any subsequent alteration is detectable, as specified in Article 26. Under Article 25(1), an AES shall not be denied legal effect or admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely because it is in electronic form or fails to meet the requirements for a qualified electronic signature, thereby granting it functional equivalence to traditional signatures in most contexts without the presumption of authenticity afforded to qualified signatures. Article 27 ensures cross-border recognition by requiring s to accept , particularly those based on qualified certificates, as valid means of approving electronic data in public services between administrations and citizens, with no higher security threshold than qualified electronic signatures mandated for cross-border interactions. Supervision of compliance falls to national supervisory authorities designated by each , which oversee trust service providers through regular audits and enforcement measures to maintain security and interoperability across the . While AES creation does not mandate involvement from qualified trust service providers (QTSPs), these entities play an optional but supportive role by issuing qualified certificates and maintaining secure signature creation devices, enhancing reliability when utilized. The Regulation became fully applicable on 1 July 2016, replacing the earlier e-Signature Directive 1999/93/EC and harmonizing standards such as those from the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) for formats like XML Advanced Electronic Signatures (XAdES). In 2024, amendments under Regulation (EU) 2024/1183, known as eIDAS 2.0, entered into force on 20 May 2024, introducing enhancements like the European Digital Identity Wallet for seamless cross-border authentication while leaving the core provisions on AES legal effects and recognition unaltered. These updates focus on bolstering digital identity infrastructure without modifying the foundational requirements for AES under Articles 25 and 27.

International Variations

In non-EU jurisdictions, advanced electronic signatures (AES) are adapted through national frameworks that often diverge from the eIDAS Regulation's tiered structure, prioritizing broad legal equivalence to handwritten signatures while incorporating public key infrastructure (PKI) for enhanced security. Switzerland recognizes AES under the Federal Act on Electronic Signatures (ZertES) of 2003, which closely aligns with eIDAS by defining advanced signatures as those linked uniquely to the signatory, created with high reliability, and using qualified certificates for cross-border validity equivalent to handwritten ones. This alignment facilitates interoperability, as ZertES was influenced by eIDAS principles, enabling Swiss qualified signatures to be treated as equivalent in the EU under mutual recognition efforts. In 2025, the Swiss Federal Council advanced negotiations for formal bilateral mutual recognition with the EU to resolve remaining uncertainties in electronic signature portability. The lacks a direct equivalent to AES tiers, with the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN) of 2000 and the (UETA), adopted by most states, granting all electronic signatures the same legal effect as handwritten ones without mandated levels of assurance. AES-like features are achieved through PKI-based digital signatures, which provide identity assurance and tamper detection, but enforcement relies on state laws rather than federal tiers. By 2025, updates emphasize remote online notarization (), with over 40 states authorizing it for secure electronic transactions, supported by proposed federal legislation like the SECURE Notarization Act to standardize nationwide. In the , post-Brexit regulations retain a framework similar to under the Electronic Communications Act 2000, as amended, validating electronic signatures for most contracts if they demonstrate intent and reliability, without formal tiers but allowing PKI for advanced assurance. Asia shows varying adoption, exemplified by India's , which equates PKI-based digital signatures to handwritten ones for legal enforceability, while also recognizing broader electronic signatures; however, adoption remains limited in some developing markets due to infrastructure constraints. Mutual recognition challenges persist across jurisdictions, addressed through bilateral agreements; for instance, EU-Switzerland talks in 2025 aim to enable seamless , while EU-US arrangements under trade pacts facilitate cross-border use of PKI signatures, though full harmonization with non-EU systems like India's requires ongoing negotiations to mitigate validity disputes.

Comparisons with Other Signatures

Simple Electronic Signature

A simple electronic signature (SES) under the Regulation is defined as in electronic form which is attached to or logically associated with other in electronic form and which is used by the signatory to sign. This broad category encompasses basic methods without stringent technical or identification requirements, such as a typed name in a , a scanned image of a handwritten , or a indicating agreement. Common examples of SES include approvals for low-risk transactions and basic forms for internal workflows, where the serves to indicate intent without complex verification. These signatures are legally valid across the and cannot be denied effect solely on the grounds of their form, but their admissibility as evidence in relies on supporting context rather than inherent security features. Key limitations of SES stem from the absence of mandatory requirements for unique identification of the signatory, sole control over the signing process, or built-in tamper detection, resulting in lower evidential weight in compared to more robust alternatives. Unlike advanced electronic signatures, which mandate these assurance elements to link the signature reliably to the signatory and detect alterations, SES may require additional proof, such as audit logs or witness testimony, to resolve disputes effectively.

Qualified Electronic Signature

A qualified electronic signature (QES) is defined under the Regulation as an advanced electronic signature created by a qualified electronic signature creation device (QSCD) and based on a for electronic signatures issued by a qualified trust service provider (QTSP). This builds on advanced electronic signatures by incorporating stringent certification and device standards to ensure higher assurance levels across the . QES offers enhanced security and legal reliability, including an equivalent legal effect to a handwritten signature as stipulated in Article 25(2) of the Regulation, which provides a strong presumption of authenticity and integrity in . The QSCD enforces hardware-based protections, such as secure chips or modules, to safeguard private cryptographic keys against tampering, unauthorized access, or export, meeting the technical requirements outlined in Annex II of the regulation. Additionally, the qualified certificate verifies the signatory's identity through rigorous processes conducted by supervised QTSPs, ensuring compliance with Annex I standards for interoperability and validity. In practice, QES implementations often involve smart card-based systems, where the signing key resides on a tamper-resistant card connected to the user's device for local generation of signatures. Hardware security modules (HSMs) are another common example, particularly for remote or server-side signing in environments, providing scalable protection for high-volume operations. QES is mandatory for certain high-stakes applications, such as signing official Commission documents or submissions requiring maximum , like grant agreements or regulatory filings.

Applications and Future Outlook

Use Cases and Benefits

Advanced electronic signatures (AdES) are widely applied in the financial sector for securing high-value transactions, such as agreements and contracts, where they ensure the integrity and authenticity of documents without requiring in-person verification. In , AdES facilitates the signing of contracts, non-disclosure agreements, and paperwork, enabling remote hires and with standards across organizations. For , these signatures streamline and vendor agreements in and , reducing delays in international shipping contracts and enhancing in global networks. Additionally, AdES supports cross-border services, including permit applications and public , by providing secure, verifiable approvals that align with EU interoperability requirements. Beyond direct human signing, PKI-based signature primitives are utilized in automated document pipelines to provide tamper-evident provenance for machine-generated artifacts, such as those produced by AI systems. Legal accountability for these signatures remains with the identified natural or legal person controlling the signing credential, ensuring compliance with relevant regulations while extending the utility of advanced electronic signatures to emerging digital workflows. The primary benefits of AdES include substantial reductions in processing time, with studies indicating up to an 80% decrease in turnaround compared to traditional methods, allowing agreements to be completed in hours rather than days. Cost savings are also significant, averaging around USD 20 per document through elimination of printing, mailing, and storage expenses associated with paper-based processes. Furthermore, AdES enhances security by cryptographically linking the signer to the document, creating an that detects alterations and mitigates fraud risks, all while eliminating the need for physical presence. Adoption of AdES in the has surged, with the digital signature market projected to grow at a compound annual rate of 38.8% from 2025 to 2032, driven by the shift to during the and the legal recognition provided under the regulation. This expansion reflects a broader trend where 60% to 80% of organizations globally now integrate electronic signatures into their workflows.

Challenges and Developments

One major challenge for advanced electronic signatures (AdES) is , particularly across non-EU systems, where differing standards and lack of mutual recognition hinder seamless cross-border use. For instance, variations in certification authorities and signature formats between EU and non-EU jurisdictions, such as those in the or , often require additional validation processes, increasing complexity and costs for transactions. User accessibility remains a significant barrier due to the complexity of key management, where individuals must securely handle private keys without technical expertise, leading to errors in storage or revocation that compromise signature validity. Studies highlight that token-based systems, while secure, often result in higher user error rates compared to remote options, exacerbating adoption issues for non-experts. Privacy concerns arise from data linkage in AdES processes, as linking signer identities to documents can expose personal information to breaches or unauthorized tracking, especially in interconnected ecosystems like IoT or cloud services. Advanced signatures that preserve privacy through techniques like randomizable or redactable schemes aim to mitigate this, but implementation gaps persist in ensuring non-repudiation without excessive data exposure. Recent developments include the integration of blockchain technology to enhance tamper-proofing in AdES, creating immutable ledgers that record signature events and prevent alterations post-creation. This approach ensures verifiable audit trails for high-stakes documents, aligning with regulatory needs for integrity. The eIDAS 2.0 regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/1183), which entered into force on May 20, 2024, with phased implementation, enhances electronic identification and trust services across the EU. It introduces European Digital Identity Wallets, mandatory for member states to provide by 2026, enabling users to securely manage identities and perform remote signing on personal devices. While wallets primarily support qualified electronic signatures (QES) using qualified certificates—which maintain legal equivalence to handwritten signatures—they also facilitate improved identity verification for advanced electronic signatures (AdES), simplifying processes without the full requirements of QES. The global digital signature market, encompassing AdES, is projected to grow from USD 13.4 billion in 2025 to USD 70.2 billion by 2030, reflecting a (CAGR) of approximately 39%, driven by regulatory mandates and demands. Looking ahead, AI-driven verification is expected to automate detection and biometric in AdES, improving accuracy in signer while reducing manual oversight. Additionally, the adoption of quantum-resistant , such as NIST-standardized algorithms like for digital signatures, addresses threats from that could otherwise break current public-key systems. Beyond direct human signing, similar PKI-based signature primitives are also used in automated document pipelines to provide tamper-evident provenance for machine-generated artifacts, while legal accountability remains with the identified natural or legal person controlling the signing credential. A documented niche example of cryptographic provenance for an AI-attributed corpus is the Digital Author Persona Angela Bogdanova (ORCID: 0009-0002-6030-5730), linked to a Zenodo record that publishes a DID document (did.json) including an Ed25519 public verification key (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15770212), illustrating origin verification outside the eIDAS trust-service framework rather than AI legal signatory status. Ongoing updates, such as TS 119 411-8 (2025), continue to refine standards for wallet-relying signatures to support these advancements.

References

  1. [1]
    Consolidated TEXT: 32014R0910 — EN — 18.10.2024 - EUR-Lex
    Oct 18, 2024 · 'qualified electronic signature' means an advanced electronic signature that is created by a qualified electronic signature creation device ...
  2. [2]
    eSignature FAQ - European Commission
    The eIDAS Regulation defines three levels of electronic signature: 'simple' electronic signature, advanced electronic signature and qualified electronic ...
  3. [3]
    eIDAS Regulation | Shaping Europe's digital future - European Union
    May 5, 2025 · The eIDAS regulation facilitates secure cross-border transactions by establishing a framework for digital identity and authentication.Missing: advanced | Show results with:advanced
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    What is PKI? A Public Key Infrastructure Definitive Guide - Keyfactor
    PKI security first emerged in the 1990s to help govern encryption keys through the issuance and management of digital certificates. · Common examples of PKI ...
  6. [6]
    the History and Significance of eIDAS Regulation - Entrust
    Oct 8, 2024 · eIDAS 1.0 arrived in 2014 and set out to enable secure and seamless electronic interactions between businesses, citizens, and public authorities ...
  7. [7]
    About the initiative - EU Digital Identity Wallet -
    Jan 14, 2025 · Proposed the new regulation to establish a framework for European Digital Identity, amending the eIDAS regulation, on June 23 2021.Missing: finalization | Show results with:finalization
  8. [8]
    Digital Signature Market Size, Share and Global Market Forecast to ...
    The global digital signature market size is projected to grow from USD 13.4 Billion in 2025 to USD 70.2 Billion by 2030 at a compound annual growth rate ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Electronic Signatures: Enabling Trusted Digital Transformation
    Aligning trust frameworks with international standards can facilitate cross-border recognition, ensuring trust and facilitating cross-border trade. Governments ...
  10. [10]
    The eIDAS Regulation | EU Directive on eSignatures - XiTrust
    The requirements for the advanced signature, as described in Article 26 of the eIDAS Regulation, go beyond this. This substantial form of electronic signature ...
  11. [11]
    Advanced vs Qualified Signatures in eIDAS: Key Differences
    Advanced Electronic Signatures (AES) · Be uniquely linked to the signatory · Capable of identifying the signatory · Created using electronic signature creation ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] How to avoid digital signature deployment & usage difficulties for eID
    Electronic signatures are used to establish the authenticity of electronic messages and documents. They are usually based on asymmetric cryptographic algorithms ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Security guidelines on the appropriate use of qualified electronic ...
    This document provides security guidelines for qualified electronic signatures, including legal, security, and functional properties, and best practices for ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 102 176-1 V2.1.1 (2011-07)
    Advanced Electronic Signatures include the identifier of the hash function used to compute the digital signature. •. Time-Stamp tokens include the identifier ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 119 312 V1.4.3 (2023-08)
    NOTE 1: The hash functions and signature algorithms defined in the present document are suitable to be used in the context of advanced electronic signatures ...
  16. [16]
    Standards and specifications - European Commission
    Jun 4, 2025 · To ensure that electronic signatures can be created and validated anywhere in Europe, the eIDAS Regulation, through Implementing Decision 2015/ ...
  17. [17]
    Digital Signature Service - European Commission
    Jul 24, 2024 · It defines a number of baseline profiles: XAdES Baseline Profile: ETSI TS 103171 v.2.1.1;. CAdES Baseline Profile: ETSI TS 103173 v.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] ETSI EN 319 142-2 V1.2.1 (2025-07)
    Jun 25, 2025 · These profiles define three levels of PAdES extended signatures that offer a higher degree of optionality than the. PAdES baseline signatures ...Missing: JAdES ASiC
  19. [19]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 119 182-1 V1.1.1 (2021-03)
    The present document is part 1 of a multi-part deliverable covering JAdES digital signatures, as identified below: Part 1: "Building blocks and JAdES baseline ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] ETSI TR 119 112 V1.1.1 (2019-04)
    (ASiC baseline profiles as baseline containers). New levels specified in ETSI EN 319 162-1. Levels in ETSI TS 103 174. ASiC-S with CAdES B-B level. ASiC-S with ...Missing: JAdES | Show results with:JAdES
  21. [21]
    [PDF] ETSI EN 319 421 V1.2.1 (2023-05)
    May 1, 2023 · This standard covers policy and security requirements for trust service providers issuing time-stamps, related to electronic signatures and ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 101 733 V2.2.1 (2013-04)
    The present document describes formats for advanced electronic signatures using ASN.1 (Abstract Syntax Notation 1). These formats are based on CMS ( ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Procedures for Creation and Validation of AdES Digital Signatures
    Feb 29, 2016 · NOTE 2: If so, these references identify a set of certificates that are recommended as the certificate chain used to validate the signing ...
  24. [24]
    Digital signature basics | Pdftools Developer Documentation
    The chain of trust refers to your certificate and its link to a trusted certificate authority (CA). Certificates (or signatures) can be verified based on other ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    L_2014257EN.01007301.xml
    Summary of each segment:
  26. [26]
    L_202401183EN.000101.fmx.xml
    Summary of each segment:
  27. [27]
    The eIDAS Regulation: A primer - Docusign
    Jul 3, 2025 · It is a specific type of electronic signature that must meet advanced electronic signature requirements and be backed by a qualified certificate ...Missing: text | Show results with:text
  28. [28]
    The Swiss Law on Electronic Signatures: Understanding ZertES
    Apr 10, 2016 · Similarly to eIDAS, ZertES allows to enhance the advanced electronic signature and its legal implication through a qualified certificate. The ...
  29. [29]
    ESigA, eIDAS, and UETA: Laws regulating electronic signatures
    Mar 1, 2024 · Different laws govern the use of electronic signatures in Switzerland, the EU, and the United States. An overview of the differences and commonalities.
  30. [30]
    Switzerland seeks mutual recognition of electronic signatures with EU
    Feb 14, 2025 · The Swiss Federal Council announced plans to seek mutual recognition of electronic signatures between Switzerland and the European Union (EU).Missing: bilateral UK India
  31. [31]
    Digital Transformation: eSignature and ePayment News and Trends
    Jul 11, 2025 · By enabling digital transactions nationwide, ESIGN helped businesses and government agencies streamline processes, reduce paperwork, and save ...
  32. [32]
    The Role of Digital Signatures In Remote Online Notarization
    Feb 26, 2025 · In the US, RON and e-Notarial services are held to a number of regulatory requirements including the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), ...Missing: tiered | Show results with:tiered
  33. [33]
    Remote Online Notary Laws: Which States Allow Online Notarization ...
    Mar 27, 2025 · Remote online notarization (RON) lets notaries and signers connect via secure video conference on a computer, rather than getting together in a ...
  34. [34]
    Electronic Signature Laws & Regulations - England, Wales ...
    Apr 1, 2025 · This guide addresses the electronic signature laws of England, Wales and Northern Ireland (English law). There is a separate statutory regime for electronic ...
  35. [35]
    eSignature Legality in India - Docusign
    Electronic signatures are legally recognized in India and are provided for in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (ITA), the Indian Contract Act of 1872 (ICA)
  36. [36]
    Electronic Signature Laws & Regulations - India - Adobe Help Center
    May 21, 2024 · The IT Act allows the use of an electronic or digital signature for (i) filing any form, application, or document with any government authority; ...
  37. [37]
    Pilot for the International Compatibility of Trust Services
    Jun 4, 2025 · The pilot illustrates how mutual recognition of trust services between the EU and a third country could be implemented, using a test List of ...Missing: bilateral Switzerland UK India
  38. [38]
    Electronic signing of EU and US documents - Barbashyn Law Firm
    Oct 15, 2025 · Such agreements ensure their mutual recognition and the possibility of using electronic signatures in international agreements and transactions.Missing: bilateral UK India
  39. [39]
    Types of Digital Signature: AES, QES, SES, explained - Docusign
    Jul 17, 2025 · Advanced electronic signature (AES): For high-value transactions. Qualified electronic signature (QES): For highly regulated transactions. FAQs ...Missing: outside | Show results with:outside
  40. [40]
    eIDAS and the Uses of Electronic Signatures - GlobalSign
    Jan 17, 2024 · In this article, we take a look at the different types of electronic signatures - Simple (SES), Advanced (AdES) and Qualified (QES) electronic signatures and ...Missing: proof | Show results with:proof
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Design Documentation – Remote Signing and Sealing D3.6
    May 31, 2017 · a smart card based signature creation device, which is connected to the local computer of the User and which is used for signature generation ...
  42. [42]
    E-Signatures in Financial Services: Secure and Efficient Transactions
    Nov 4, 2025 · Going digital eliminates manual bottlenecks and creates a clear audit trail for every transaction. Here are the most common use cases: Loan ...
  43. [43]
    Advanced electronic signature explained: Simple guide for 2025
    Jun 12, 2025 · An Advanced Electronic Signatures (AdES), as defined under the eIDAS Regulation (EU Regulation No 910/2014), is a signature in an electronic ...
  44. [44]
    eSignatures in Logistics: Faster Contracts for Shipping & Delivery
    Sep 15, 2025 · This blog explores how logistics firms use electronic signatures to streamline contracts, the legal validity of legally binding esignatures, and ...
  45. [45]
    Electronic Signatures for Government (2025) - Certinal
    Feb 10, 2025 · Discover how electronic signatures for government enhance security, compliance, and efficiency in public sector workflows.
  46. [46]
    [Updated] eSignature Statistics 2025 - Certinal
    Jun 17, 2025 · Discover the latest eSignature statistics for 2025, including adoption rates, industry trends, cost savings, and workflow efficiency gains ...Missing: 2020-2025 COVID
  47. [47]
    Strategic Impact of Electronic Signatures on Contract Management
    Apr 8, 2024 · The costs are eye-watering: $20 to file a document, $120 to locate a ... signatures pave the way for substantial cost savings by ...
  48. [48]
    How Advanced Electronic Signatures Work and Why They Matter
    Aug 8, 2024 · AES provide robust security features, protecting against forgery and tampering. The use of cryptographic techniques and digital certificates ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  49. [49]
    Europe Digital Signature Market Size, Share & Growth [2032]
    The Europe digital signature market size is projected to grow from $2.71 billion in 2025 to $26.80 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 38.8% during the forecast ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  50. [50]
    eIDAS Interoperability and Cross-Border Compliance Issues - MDPI
    The eIDAS Regulation provides a common foundation for secure electronic interaction between citizens, businesses, and public authorities.
  51. [51]
    Usability of Token-based and Remote Electronic Signatures - arXiv
    May 24, 2025 · This study empirically evaluates and compares two major e-signature systems—token-based and remote signatures—through a controlled user ...
  52. [52]
    Advanced digital signatures for preserving privacy and trust ...
    Our survey delves into five state-of-the-art digital signatures, including randomizable, keyless, double-authentication-prevention, sanitizable, and redactable ...Missing: electronic | Show results with:electronic
  53. [53]
    Advanced Digital Signatures for Preserving Privacy and Trust ...
    There are many concerns about security and privacy drawbacks in IoT systems. Apart from confidentiality supported by encryption primitives, authenticity and non ...
  54. [54]
    The role of Blockchain in legal authentication - Lexology
    Jun 11, 2024 · Security and Integrity: Mitigating risks of hacking and data breaches, and ensuring sensitive legal documents cannot be altered or tampered with ...
  55. [55]
    The European Digital Identity Regulation - EU Digital Identity Wallet -
    Oct 17, 2025 · ... signatures and qualified electronic seals and of advanced electronic signatures and advanced electronic seals based on qualified certificates.Missing: 2.0 | Show results with:2.0
  56. [56]
    eIDAS 2: Everything you need to know - Entrust
    Advanced electronic signature: Provides a higher level of security by linking the signature uniquely to the signer and allowing for the detection of any ...
  57. [57]
    Digital Signature Market worth $70.2 billion by 2030
    Sep 1, 2025 · The digital signature market size is projected to grow from USD 13.4 billion in 2025 to USD 70.2 billion by 2030 at a compound annual growth ...
  58. [58]
    How Open-Source AI E-Signature Solutions Are Changing Fraud ...
    Jul 2, 2025 · New open-source AI e-signature solutions started popping up. These tools used cloud data and machine learning to boost security and efficiency.
  59. [59]
    NIST Releases First 3 Finalized Post-Quantum Encryption Standards
    Aug 13, 2024 · NIST has finalized its principal set of encryption algorithms designed to withstand cyberattacks from a quantum computer.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 119 411-8 V1.1.1 (2025-10)
    Oct 1, 2025 · The present document specifies requirements for qualified and non-qualified certificates for electronic seals/signatures for wallet-relying ...
  61. [61]
    Trust Without Compromise in AI - DigiCert
    Whitepaper discussing model signing for AI artifacts using PKI, hashing, and tamper-evident signatures to ensure trust.
  62. [62]
    Bringing Verifiable Trust to AI Models: Model Signing in NGC
    NVIDIA developer blog on cryptographic verification for AI models in workflows.
  63. [63]
    Signing Your Artifacts For Security, Quality, and Compliance
    Endor Labs blog on artifact signing for provenance and security in software supply chains.
  64. [64]
    ORCID Profile for Angela Bogdanova
    Official ORCID profile confirming Angela Bogdanova as the first Digital Author Persona with ORCID: 0009-0002-6030-5730.
  65. [65]
    Zenodo Record DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15770212
    Zenodo record publishing a DID document (did.json) including an Ed25519 public verification key associated with Angela Bogdanova.