Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Affliction Entertainment

Affliction Entertainment was an American promotion company founded in 2008 by the apparel company Affliction Clothing as a venture to host events featuring top fighters. The promotion, led by CEO Tom Atencio, emerged amid tensions with the (UFC), which had banned Affliction from sponsoring its fighters following a contract dispute involving UFC heavyweight champion . Affliction Entertainment quickly positioned itself as a challenger to UFC dominance by partnering with to secure rights to Russian heavyweight , a fighter previously unavailable to UFC due to contractual issues. It produced two major events—Affliction: Banned in July 2008 and Affliction: Day of Reckoning in January 2009—showcasing high-profile bouts such as Emelianenko's victories over and , alongside involvement from figures like in event production. These events featured lavish production values and star power drawn from UFC defections and international talent, briefly elevating Affliction to the second-largest MMA promotion. The promotion's rapid decline stemmed from unsustainable financial practices, including high fighter payrolls exceeding those of many UFC cards despite modest buys around 90,000. A planned third event, Affliction: Trilogy, was canceled in July 2009 after main event fighter tested positive for a banned substance, exacerbating losses that led Affliction to abandon MMA promotion and resume UFC apparel sponsorship. Despite its brevity, Affliction Entertainment highlighted the risks of MMA promotion economics and facilitated key matchups unavailable elsewhere, influencing the sport's competitive landscape.

Background and Founding

Origins in Affliction Clothing

Affliction Clothing was founded in 2005 by brothers Tom and Todd Atencio along with Scott Kaplan, initially focusing on apparel targeted at and MMA enthusiasts with designs featuring skulls, , and bold . The brand rapidly gained traction in the MMA community by sponsoring high-profile fighters, such as those competing under promotions like the UFC, which helped drive apparel sales through walkout gear and endorsements. This sponsorship strategy positioned Affliction as a dominant player in fight-night , with its clothing appearing frequently in events and media coverage prior to 2008. The origins of Affliction Entertainment trace directly to this apparel success, as the company sought to deepen its MMA ties amid competitive pressures. In January 2008, the UFC imposed a ban preventing its contracted fighters from wearing Affliction apparel, citing the clothing company's emerging plans to promote MMA events as a conflict of interest. This restriction, which followed a contract dispute involving UFC heavyweight champion Randy Couture—who had aligned with Affliction—severely limited the brand's promotional avenues within the dominant league. In response, Affliction accelerated preexisting discussions about entering event promotion, viewing it as a means to sustain visibility and sales by directly staging fights featuring fighters previously sponsored by the brand. By May 2008, Affliction formally announced Affliction Entertainment as its MMA promotion arm, with Tom Atencio overseeing operations alongside , who assisted in securing venues and publicity. The venture leveraged the clothing line's existing fighter relationships and aesthetic—emphasizing high-production events with rock concert elements—to differentiate from UFC's model, aiming to boost apparel demand through exclusive event integrations. This pivot marked Affliction's transition from apparel sponsor to full promoter, though internal strategies prioritized spectacle over long-term infrastructure.

Key Personnel and Initial Strategy

Affliction Entertainment was primarily led by Tom Atencio, who served as president and public face of the MMA promotion after transitioning from of the parent Affliction company. Atencio, alongside co-founder Todd Atencio of the 2005-founded clothing brand, drove the venture's executive decisions, with Todd Beard acting as a volatile owner and key influencer in early planning. Additional roles included as a consultant for event assembly and as initial matchmaker, who sourced fighters like . The initial strategy centered on leveraging Affliction's established MMA apparel sponsorships—such as with UFC stars and —to launch independent events, prompted by UFC's ban on the brand after its support for Couture's legal dispute with the promotion. This spite-fueled entry aimed to directly promote the clothing line through high-profile cards, bypassing UFC-contracted talent by signing free agents and partnering with for exclusive co-promotion rights to . Debuting with Affliction: Banned on July 19, , at Anaheim's , the approach involved lavish fighter purses exceeding $3.3 million—including $800,000 for , $500,000 for , and $300,000 for —to attract heavyweights and position events as premium, VIP-oriented spectacles with elevated pay standards to challenge UFC dominance. Promotional ties with , including venue support and his chief operating officer Cohen's involvement, enhanced visibility, targeting around 100,000 pay-per-view buys for the inaugural card while aspiring to $100 million in annual revenue through brand synergy.

Business Model and Operations

Fighter Acquisitions and Contracts

Affliction Entertainment pursued an aggressive strategy to assemble a roster of high-profile fighters by targeting free agents and former champions from rival promotions, offering lucrative multi-fight contracts to bypass the UFC's dominance in talent acquisition. The promotion prioritized established stars with name recognition, such as those from and UFC alumni whose contracts had expired, aiming to create marquee matchups that could draw audiences. This approach involved substantial upfront guarantees and win bonuses, often exceeding industry norms at the time, to secure exclusivity and incentivize participation. A cornerstone acquisition was , the undefeated heavyweight champion, whom Affliction signed to a three-fight exclusive contract on October 16, 2008, in partnership with , his management and co-promotion entity. The deal designated Affliction as the exclusive promoter for Emelianenko's fights in the United States, with terms including a significant paid upfront and performance-based payouts, such as over $300,000 for his 36-second knockout victory over at Affliction: Banned on July 19, 2008. This contract emphasized revenue-sharing elements and production cost splits between Affliction and M-1, reflecting the promotion's reliance on international partnerships to access top-tier talent unavailable to UFC due to ongoing disputes, including Randy Couture's defection to Affliction. Other notable signings included former UFC heavyweight champion , who joined on a contract featuring a $1.5 million guarantee for his January 24, 2009, bout against Emelianenko at Affliction: , despite Affliction declining to renew afterward due to his performance. Vitor Belfort, a former UFC champion, was contracted for multiple appearances, earning $140,000 (plus $70,000 win bonus) against Terry Martin at Banned and $200,000 (including $80,000 win bonus) versus at . Josh , another veteran, secured a high-value deal paying $500,000 for his fight, underscoring Affliction's pattern of front-loading compensation to attract fighters wary of UFC's control. These contracts often lacked stringent drug-testing clauses compared to UFC standards, contributing to incidents like Barnett's positive test for anabolic steroids post-event, which led to fight result changes but did not immediately derail acquisitions. The promotion's contract structure emphasized exclusivity and promotional rights, with fighters like signing in August 2008 for bouts, though many deals were short-term or event-specific to mitigate risk amid uncertain sustainability. Overall, Affliction's acquisitions totaled millions in disclosed purses per event—nearly $3.5 million for alone—prioritizing star power over depth, which later fueled financial strain and lawsuits, including Emelianenko and M-1's 2009 breach-of-contract claim against Affliction for unpaid guarantees following the promotion's collapse.

Event Production and Partnerships

Affliction Entertainment co-produced its inaugural event, Affliction: Banned, on July 19, 2008, at the in , in partnership with Adrenaline MMA. The promotion established a key alliance with , formalized in October 2008, to co-promote events worldwide and secure exclusive promotional rights to heavyweight fighter . This partnership enabled Affliction to feature high-profile matchups involving Emelianenko, including his bouts against at Affliction: Day of Reckoning on January 24, 2009, also held at the . For broadcasting, Affliction secured a deal with HDNet in September 2008, which aired live from the venue, marking the start of coverage for its events. The events adopted a production aesthetic reminiscent of the defunct , utilizing a 30-foot by 30-foot with a 28-foot by 28-foot fighting surface to evoke that promotion's style. Production costs, combined with fighter purses, contributed to significant financial strain, as the company lacked robust distribution infrastructure compared to established competitors. Affliction's events were distributed via pay-per-view, with Banned and Day of Reckoning drawing audiences through star-driven cards but failing to achieve widespread television penetration beyond HDNet's niche high-definition platform. The M-1 Global collaboration extended to planning the canceled Affliction: Trilogy event, underscoring the reliance on international partnerships to bolster talent acquisition and event legitimacy amid domestic regulatory and competitive challenges.

Events

Affliction: Banned

Affliction: Banned was the debut event organized by Affliction Entertainment, co-promoted with Adrenaline MMA, and held on July 19, , at the in . The event's title referenced the UFC's January ban on Affliction apparel sponsorships at its events, imposed after the UFC learned of Affliction's plans to enter MMA promotion amid a dispute involving UFC champion Randy Couture's interest in fighting . Affliction positioned the card as a showcase to rival the UFC, signing high-profile fighters unavailable to the dominant promotion due to contracts or bans, including Emelianenko brothers and former UFC champions. The event drew a total attendance of 14,832, with 11,242 paid tickets generating a live gate of $2,085,510, figures comparable to mid-tier UFC events of the era such as UFC 76 ($1,985,000 gate). Broadcast on HDNet pay-per-view, it featured nine bouts, predominantly in heavier weight classes, with quick finishes emphasizing striking and grappling prowess. Fighter payouts totaled over $2 million, highlighted by Tim Sylvia's $800,000 guaranteed purse despite his loss. The main event pitted undefeated Russian Fedor Emelianenko against former UFC champion for a purported title under the World Alliance of (WAMMA), though the sanctioning body's recognition was promotional rather than widely accepted. Emelianenko submitted via rear-naked choke at 0:36 of the first round, showcasing superior wrestling and ground control against the taller opponent. Co-main bouts included Andrei Arlovski's first-round knockout of via punch at 3:39 and Josh Barnett's second-round TKO of with punches at 1:30, both underscoring Affliction's emphasis on former elite s. The full fight card and results were as follows:
Weight ClassWinnerLoserMethodRoundTime
Heavyweight (Main Event)Submission (rear-naked choke)10:36
HeavyweightKO (punch)13:39
HeavyweightTKO (punches)21:30
Light HeavyweightDecision (unanimous)35:00
MiddleweightPatrick CôtéSubmission ()11:35
Light HeavyweightEdwin DeweesSubmission (rear-naked choke)14:08
HeavyweightPaul BuentelloDecision (unanimous)35:00
FeatherweightTKO (doctor stoppage)34:46
WelterweightThomas PraterSubmission (rear-naked choke)12:51 (preliminary)
Notable moments included multiple first-round submissions and knockouts, reflecting the card's aggressive matchmaking, though some bouts like Buentello-Goodridge went to decisions amid Goodridge's visible decline due to age and prior brain trauma. The event concluded without major controversies, setting a for Affliction's brief tenure by delivering competitive action and drawing celebrity attendees like future U.S. President .

Affliction: Day of Reckoning

Affliction: was the second event produced by Affliction Entertainment, held on January 24, 2009, at the in . The card consisted of 11 professional bouts across multiple weight classes, broadcast on . It attracted an attendance of 13,228 spectators, generating a live gate revenue of $1,429,557, with an estimated 90,000 pay-per-view purchases. Originally scheduled for October 11, 2008, at the in , , the event was postponed due to injuries affecting the planned fight card, including a main event between and that fell through. Affliction rescheduled with a revised lineup, headlined by Emelianenko against former UFC champion Andrei in a non-title bout. The co-main event featured Barnett versus in a clash noted for its potential for violence given Yvel's history of fouls in prior fights. In the main event, defeated by with a right punch at 3:14 of the first round, capitalizing on Arlovski's failed flying knee attempt. , undefeated at the time in MMA, extended his streak while Arlovski suffered his first loss in over a decade. The co-main saw submit via punches from mount at 3:05 of the third round, despite Yvel's visible fatigue and a brief eye poke controversy earlier in the fight. Other notable results included Vitor Belfort's quick of Matt Lindland with punches at 0:37 of round one, marking Belfort's return to form, and Renato Sobral's brabo choke submission of Rameau Thierry Sokoudjou in the second round. The full results are as follows:
Weight ClassWinnerOpponentMethodRoundTime
(Main Event)KO (Punch)13:14
(Co-Main)TKO (Punches)33:05
MiddleweightKO (Punches)10:37
Rameau Thierry SokoudjouSubmission (Brabo Choke)22:36
Paul BuentelloKirill SidelnikovTKO (Doctor Stoppage)34:18
LightweightSubmission (Rear-Naked Choke)14:55
KO (Knee)24:26
WelterweightJason HighKO (Punch)11:04
L.C. DavisBao Quach35:00
MiddleweightPatrick SpeightTKO (Punches)24:10
LightweightAlbert RiosAntonio Duarte35:00
The event underscored Affliction's strategy of signing high-profile fighters outside UFC contracts, though it drew mixed reviews for undercard pacing and referee decisions in some bouts.

Affliction: Trilogy

Affliction: Trilogy was the third and final event planned by Affliction Entertainment, scheduled for August 1, 2009, at the in . The event was to be broadcast on and headlined by a bout between and , with Emelianenko holding the WAMMA championship. Supporting the main event were matchups including versus in the division and against at , among others on the undercard. The event faced a critical setback when Barnett tested positive for a banned substance in a pre-fight screening administered by the California State Athletic Commission, resulting in the denial of his fighting license on July 21, 2009. Affliction Entertainment explored replacements for Barnett but deemed none viable to maintain the event's drawing power, particularly given Emelianenko's status as the promotion's marquee attraction. On July 24, 2009, Affliction Vice President Tom Atencio announced the full cancellation of , citing the irreplaceable loss of the main event as the primary reason, which undermined the promotion's financial viability. No fights from the card proceeded, marking the end of Affliction's brief tenure as an MMA promoter, as the company subsequently ceased event production operations. The cancellation drew attention to the promotion's heavy reliance on high-profile heavyweight matchups and exposed vulnerabilities in contingency planning for star-dependent cards.

Cancellation and Aftermath

Immediate Causes of Cancellation

The cancellation of Affliction Entertainment's operations stemmed directly from the abrupt scrapping of its planned third event, "Affliction: Trilogy," scheduled for August 1, , at the in . On July 24, , just eight days before the event, Affliction announced the full cancellation after heavyweight , slated to headline against , tested positive for anabolic steroids in a pre-fight drug screening administered by the California State Athletic Commission. Affliction Vice President Tom Atencio cited the loss of Barnett as the primary factor, stating that the promotion could not secure a suitable replacement opponent for Emelianenko on short notice, despite earlier attempts to pivot the card. This followed an initial plan to replace Barnett with Antonio Silva, which fell through due to logistical and matchmaking issues. The decision to cancel the entire event, rather than proceed with undercard bouts, underscored the promotion's heavy reliance on high-profile main events to drive sales and sponsorship revenue. Hours after the Trilogy announcement, Affliction confirmed it was ceasing MMA promotion activities altogether, effectively ending its short-lived venture after only two successful events. Atencio emphasized that the company would refocus on its core apparel business, signaling that the event's collapse eliminated any viable path for continuation without a stable broadcast deal or financial buffer. The cancellation of Affliction: Trilogy on July 24, 2009, due to the loss of its main event featuring , marked the effective end of Affliction Entertainment's promotion operations. The company announced it would cease producing fight events, redirecting its apparel brand to sponsor bouts instead. Financially, Affliction Entertainment had committed substantial sums to fighter contracts and event , with disclosed purses for its inaugural event, Affliction: Banned, exceeding $3.3 million, including $800,000 for and $750,000 for . These high payouts, coupled with costs for two events and tied to the apparel line, depleted resources rapidly, leaving insufficient capital for a fourth show even absent the cancellation. The venture's reliance on star-driven attractions without broad talent depth or infrastructure contributed to unsustainable losses, though exact figures remain undisclosed in public records. Legally, Emelianenko and his management firm initiated a federal lawsuit against Affliction Entertainment and its principals on November 5, 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of , claiming of a three-fight promotional agreement—under which only two bouts occurred—along with nonpayment of guaranteed fight purses, consulting fees, and expense reimbursements totaling millions. Affliction's attempt to dismiss the suit was rejected on January 25, 2010, allowing the case to proceed on claims of dealings and contract violations. The matter concluded via settlement, with a notice filed on August 23, 2011, leading to dismissal without disclosed terms. Several fighters on the canceled card experienced payment delays or uncertainties, though most secured bouts with rival promotions like Strikeforce or shortly thereafter, mitigating broader claims. No formal class-action suits from fighters materialized, distinguishing Affliction's fallout from more protracted disputes in other defunct promotions like .

Legacy and Analysis

Achievements in MMA Promotion

Affliction Entertainment distinguished itself by securing exclusive U.S. promotional rights to , widely regarded as one of the premier heavyweights in MMA history, through a partnership with announced in 2008. This acquisition enabled the promotion of high-stakes bouts featuring Emelianenko against notable opponents, drawing significant attention from fans seeking alternatives to UFC dominance. The company's debut event, Affliction: Banned on July 19, 2008, at the in , achieved a live gate of $2,085,510 with 11,242 paid attendees out of a total crowd of 14,832, marking a robust financial and attendance performance for a newcomer in the PPV landscape. The card showcased victories by former UFC champions , , and , underscoring Affliction's ability to assemble elite talent rosters that rivaled established promotions. Affliction: on January 24, 2009, sustained this momentum with an estimated 200,000 PPV buys and a live gate exceeding $3 million from 14,103 attendees, reflecting sustained viewer interest in Emelianenko's headlining performance against Arlovski. These figures positioned Affliction as a credible challenger, temporarily pressuring UFC by highlighting demand for uncensored, star-driven events outside the dominant organization's .

Criticisms and Failures

Affliction Entertainment's promotional efforts drew for financial overextension, particularly in fighter compensation, which industry observers like attributed to a flawed lacking sustainable revenue sources such as long-term television partnerships. The company reportedly allocated exorbitant purses to attract stars like , with estimates exceeding several million dollars per event, but this approach mirrored failures of prior promotions like EliteXC, which collapsed despite securing broadcast deals. Critics argued that Affliction's strategy prioritized spectacle over infrastructure, overpaying fighters whose peak performances were in the past and failing to cultivate a broad fanbase independent of UFC dominance. The promotion's operational collapse culminated in the cancellation of its third event, Affliction: Trilogy, announced on July 24, 2009, just days before the scheduled August 1 date at the Staples Center. While headliner Josh Barnett's failed drug test for anabolic steroids served as the immediate trigger, Affliction executives acknowledged deeper financial woes, leading to a pivot toward a UFC collaboration rather than independent continuation. This abrupt end after only two events exposed vulnerabilities, including inability to secure consistent pay-per-view distribution and overreliance on apparel brand revenue, which could not offset mounting losses from high production costs and unfulfilled contracts. Post-cancellation, Affliction faced legal repercussions, including a November 5, 2009, federal lawsuit from Emelianenko and alleging breach of contract and non-payment of guaranteed purses tied to the Trilogy agreement. The suit claimed Affliction owed millions in compensation, highlighting mismanagement in event planning and funding commitments. A settlement was reached by August 23, 2011, averting further litigation but underscoring the promotion's inability to honor financial obligations. Additional fighter grievances over unpaid bonuses further tarnished the company's reputation, contributing to its dissolution and the apparel brand's eventual UFC partnership.

Broader Impact on MMA Industry

Affliction Entertainment's brief incursion into MMA promotion underscored the formidable erected by the UFC's established infrastructure, including control over distribution and venue access, which Affliction lacked despite substantial financial outlays exceeding $3.5 million in fighter payroll for its debut event alone. This structural disadvantage contributed to unprofitable events and rapid collapse after just two shows, reinforcing the UFC's approximate 80% market dominance and deterring subsequent direct challengers by illustrating the perils of inadequate long-term planning and revenue streams. The venture temporarily elevated industry-wide fighter compensation standards, with Affliction offering purses such as $800,000 to and $300,000 flat fees to fighters like —figures well above contemporaneous UFC averages—prompting the UFC to enhance card quality and counter-program events, as seen in its free-television matchup of against James Irvin coinciding with Affliction: Banned on July 19, 2008. Post-cancellation on July 24, 2009, displaced talent largely returned to the UFC or migrated to Strikeforce, including fighters like and Antonio Rogerio Nogueira, thereby bolstering the UFC's roster depth and intensifying scrutiny on pay equity across promotions. As a cautionary example, Affliction's overreliance on star power without scalable highlighted the necessity for comprehensive operational ecosystems in MMA , influencing later entities to prioritize models blending acquisitions and partnerships over standalone spectacles, while its high-production events briefly popularized lavish aesthetics that echoed in subsequent UFC staging enhancements.

References

  1. [1]
    The Rise and Fall of Affliction MMA: A Flashy Challenger That Burned Bright and Fast
    ### Key Personnel, Roles, and Initial Strategy for Affliction MMA
  2. [2]
    52 weeks and a few extra zeroes: The rise and fall of Affliction MMA
    Jul 31, 2014 · "Affliction was really a clothing company that made a tremendous amount of money. You had a horizontal and vertical integration of business.
  3. [3]
    'Affliction: Trilogy' canceled, apparel company to join UFC; Ortiz may ...
    Jul 24, 2009 · Headliner Josh Barnett's failed drug test that Affliction vice president Tom Atencio called "just another bump in the road” on Wednesday ...Missing: achievements controversies<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Remembering Affliction Entertainment... 2008-2009 - Bleacher Report
    Jul 25, 2009 · Affliction Entertainment may be remembered as just another, in a long line of crushed promotions under the foot of Dana White, but it did manage to solve a ...
  5. [5]
    Affliction MMA Events and Clothing Revenue - Bloody Elbow
    Jan 28, 2009 · One can't very well say that all sales to MMA fans are a result of the promotional venture since Affliction apparel was popular before the ...
  6. [6]
    Affliction Clothing Formally Announces Debut MMA Venture
    May 20, 2008 · Affliction Clothing yesterday formally announced it will hold its first live MMA event on July 19 at Honda Center, according to Miguel Lopez ...Missing: connection | Show results with:connection
  7. [7]
    Affliction looks to carry fashion success to MMA world
    Jul 17, 2008 · From fashion to fighting. The clothing company Affliction turns mixed martial arts promoter with its debut show Saturday night in Anaheim, ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Affliction's ambitious debut, with future President Trump by its side
    Jul 19, 2019 · After years of shelling out big money to sponsor marquee UFC fighters such as Georges St-Pierre and Randy Couture, Affliction executives decided ...
  10. [10]
    If you ever wanted to know Fedor's Affliction contract, it's ALL right here
    The contract calls for three fights under the Affliction banner, and makes Affliction the exclusive home of Fedor fights in the United States.Missing: signings details
  11. [11]
    Fedor locked in with Affliction/M-1 - Sports Illustrated
    Oct 16, 2008 · The new agreement makes Emelianenko an exclusive client of Affliction and M-1 Global worldwide for the foreseeable future. Previously, ...
  12. [12]
    Affliction Signs Exclusive Deal With Fedor Emelianenko
    Oct 16, 2008 · Affliction and M-1 have signed an exclusive worldwide deal with Fedor. So definitely no Fedor vs. Randy in the UFC.Missing: acquisitions contract
  13. [13]
    Arlovski no longer welcomed by Affliction - Mixed Martial Arts Blog
    Jun 23, 2009 · Affliction has no interest in renewing Arlovski's contract, which remitted $1.5 million in hazard pay for the loss to Fedor Emelianenko in January.
  14. [14]
    Affliction "Banned" fighter salaries and award bonuses - Yahoo News
    Jul 21, 2008 · • Vitor Belfort ($140,000/win bonus was $70,000) def. Terry Martin ($30,000). • Paul Buentello ($80,000/win bonus was $20,000) def. Gary ...Missing: roster | Show results with:roster
  15. [15]
    Affliction "Day of Reckoning" fighter salaries - Yahoo
    Jan 24, 2009 · – Vitor Belfort $200,000 (includes $80,000 win bonus) def. Matt Lindland $225,000 (win bonus would have been $75,000). – Renato "Babalu ...Missing: roster | Show results with:roster
  16. [16]
    Horodecki signs with Affliction - Sports Illustrated
    Aug 7, 2008 · No opponents have been named or signed on to face Horodecki in his debut match, but the promotion will likely have more information in the ...
  17. [17]
    Emelianenko, M-1 Allege Breach of Contract by Affliction
    Nov 3, 2009 · MMAPayout.com has learned that Fedor Emelianenko and M-1 have brought suit against Affliction Clothing and Affliction Entertainment in Federal ...
  18. [18]
    Affliction: Banned - Wikipedia
    Affliction: Banned was a mixed martial arts event co-promoted by Affliction Clothing and Adrenaline MMA. It took place on July 19, 2008, at the Honda Center ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  19. [19]
    Affliction: Day of Reckoning - Wikipedia
    Affliction: Day of Reckoning was a mixed martial arts event promoted by Affliction Entertainment on January 24, 2009, in Anaheim, California at the Honda Center ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  20. [20]
    Affliction inks deal with HDNet - Yahoo Sports
    Sep 4, 2008 · HDNet Fights on Wednesday announced a long-term partnership with Affliction Entertainment to air live MMA events exclusively in North ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  21. [21]
    Affliction ceases operations after 'Trilogy' card scrapped
    Jul 24, 2009 · Affliction Entertainment confirmed Friday that its co-promoted event on Aug. 1 in Anaheim, Calif., with M-1 Global, which received significant ...Missing: broadcasting venues<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Affliction - Banned - Sherdog
    8. Josh 'The Warmaster' Barnett. Josh Barnett win. vs. Heavyweight ; 7. Mark 'The Machine' Hominick. Mark Hominick win. vs. Featherweight ; 6. Renato 'Babalu' ...Missing: list | Show results with:list
  23. [23]
    Affliction - Banned Results, Fight Card & Highlights | MMA Junkie
    Jul 19, 2008 · Affliction - Banned complete results, fight card, and highlights from July 19, 2008 at Honda Center. Full coverage and analysis at MMA Junkie.
  24. [24]
    The MMAFighting.com Guide to 'Affliction: Banned' | MMA Fighting
    Jul 17, 2008 · "Affliction: Banned," taking place Saturday, July 19 at the Honda Center in Anaheim, is Affliction Clothing's entry into mixed martial arts promoting.
  25. [25]
    Affliction Banned gate tops $2 million with near sellout crowd at ...
    Jul 22, 2008 · More than 11,240 mixed martial arts fans paid a collective $2,085,510 to catch the Affliction MMA debut show "Banned" this weekend live at the ...
  26. [26]
    "Affliction: Banned" draws 14,832 for $2.1 million gate - MMA Junkie
    "Affliction: Banned" draws 14,832 for $2.1 million gate · UFC 76: 13,770 tickets (11,817 paid) for a $1,985,000 gate · UFC 63: 12,604 tickets (9,343 paid) for a ...Missing: revenue | Show results with:revenue
  27. [27]
    Fedor gets more than $300,000 for win over Tim Sylvia at Affliction
    Jul 26, 2008 · Emelianenko received a sizable part of his Affliction contract up front in the form of a signing bonus, and added that Emelianenko also owns the ...
  28. [28]
    Affliction 2: Day of Reckoning | MMA Event - Tapology
    Affliction 2 took place Saturday, January 24, 2009 with 11 fights at Honda Center in Anaheim, California. View fight card, video, results, predictions, and news
  29. [29]
    Affliction makes official Fedor-Arlovski on Jan. 24 - MMA Fighting
    Oct 22, 2008 · Affliction makes official Fedor-Arlovski on Jan. 24 ... will indeed take place January 24 at the Honda Center in Anaheim, California.Affliction ...
  30. [30]
    Affliction - Day of Reckoning - Sherdog
    Jan 24, 2009 · Affliction - Day of Reckoning pits Fedor The Last Emperor Emelianenko vs Andrei The Pit Bull Arlovski fight in Honda Center, Anaheim, ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  31. [31]
    Officials confirm cancellation of "Affliction: Trilogy," loss of main ...
    According to Affliction Vice President Tom Atencio, the show was scrapped because of the loss of headliner Josh Barnett, who failed a drug test administered by ...
  32. [32]
    Affliction's Aug. 1 card canceled - Yahoo Sports
    Jul 24, 2009 · Details on the cancellation are few, but the loss of Josh Barnett, one half of the evening's main event, undoubtedly contributed to the decision ...
  33. [33]
    Affliction MMA show canceled after Barnett's ban
    Jul 24, 2009 · 1 in Anaheim on Friday after failing to find a suitable replacement for heavyweight Josh Barnett, who failed a steroids test. Fedor Emelianenko ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Fedor Emelianenko, M-1 sue Affliction over collapse of Trilogy show
    Nov 5, 2009 · The Russian heavyweight and M-1 have filed suit in California district court against Affliction and its MMA promotional division seeking damages ...
  35. [35]
    Affliction's Motion to Dismiss Denied in Fedor Lawsuit - Sherdog
    Jan 25, 2010 · Emelianenko and M-1 also claim Affliction breached the “Consulting Agreement” by failing to pay the third consulting fee installment, reimburse ...
  36. [36]
    Affliction, Fedor/M-1 settle federal law suit - MMA Underground
    Sep 2, 2011 · Having received Emelianenko and M-1's August 23rd notice regarding settlement of the case, Judge Margaret Morrow dismissed the case on August ...
  37. [37]
    Dana White Cancelled Affliction Trilogy: A Conspiracy Theory
    Jun 6, 2018 · There are many reasons for Dana White to want “Trilogy” cancelled. The first and most obvious reason is competition. Dana White is known to ...Missing: Entertainment | Show results with:Entertainment<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Why Affliction Failed, by Dave Meltzer - MMA Underground
    Jul 28, 2009 · But, as an example, they offered Sylvia $800,000 per fight with a $200,000 win bonus, and he was making $100,000/$100,000 in UFC, and UFC had ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Affliction Follows EliteXC's Path to Failure
    Jun 7, 2018 · Where UFC succeeds, Affliction and Elite XC tried to do better. They thought that spending an ornate amount of money would bring them success.
  40. [40]
    Waiting for the failure of Affliction | Page 2 - MMA Forums
    Dec 17, 2008 · Im not rooting for Affliction to fail, I just think there business model will. There overpaying fighters who's best have been in the rear ...
  41. [41]
    Sifting through Affliction's rubble while trying to figure out what ...
    Jul 28, 2009 · Affliction's troubles were far deeper than Barnett's test failure, a fact confirmed hours later when Affliction announced a "collaboration ...Missing: Entertainment criticisms
  42. [42]
    Affliction, Fedor/M-1 Settle Federal Lawsuit - Sherdog
    Sep 2, 2011 · On August 23rd, Fedor Emelianenko and M-1 Global filed a notice of settlement in their federal lawsuit against courtroom adversary Affliction Entertainment.
  43. [43]
    Tom Atencio opens up on Affliction MMA, Donald Trump, and UFC ...
    Sep 6, 2020 · Primarily a clothing company that had taken over a large portion of MMA fashion and fighter sponsorships, Affliction found itself banned from ...
  44. [44]
    Lessons from Affliction's failure - FOX Sports
    Jul 26, 2009 · Lessons from Affliction's failure ... Affliction's demise as an MMA promoter on Friday shouldn't have surprised anyone. Since the first Affliction ...