Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Alexander Grothendieck

Alexander Grothendieck (28 March 1928 – 13 November 2014) was a of exceptional influence, whose work reshaped the foundations of and related fields through abstract categorical frameworks. Developing from self-taught origins amid wartime disruptions, he introduced key innovations including sheaf cohomology, the concept of schemes generalizing varieties to arbitrary commutative rings, for arithmetic applications, and topos theory extending geometry to logic and . His 1957 Tohoku paper revolutionized by emphasizing derived categories and functors, while his seminars at the (IHES) from 1958 produced , a comprehensive reformulation enabling proofs of long-standing conjectures like the for finite fields via the . Awarded the in 1966 for these advances building on predecessors like Weil and Cartan, Grothendieck declined the honor's Moscow ceremony over Soviet policies but accepted the prize itself. In 1970, he resigned from IHES upon discovering its funding ties to French military research, urging colleagues to follow in protest; he then pursued environmental and pacifist activism through groups like Survivre before retreating to seclusion in the French around 1991, producing voluminous unpublished manuscripts on , philosophy, and mysticism until his death.

Early Life and Background

Family Origins and Childhood

Alexander Grothendieck was born on 28 March 1928 in , , to parents engaged in radical political activities. His biological father, Alexander Schapiro (1890–1942), known as Sascha or under the alias Alexander Tanaroff, was a Jew born in who fought in the 1905 against the , endured imprisonment, escaped during the 1917 , and lost his left arm amid the upheavals; he later worked as a street in and . His mother, Johanna "Hanka" Grothendieck (1900–1957), originated from , , belonged to a Protestant family, and participated in left-wing groups as a ; she had previously married Alfred Raddatz, with whom she had a daughter, Frode "Maidi" (born 1924), before divorcing in 1929. Schapiro and Hanka lived together without formal marriage, and Grothendieck was registered at birth as Alexander Raddatz but eventually took his mother's surname. The family lived in from 1928 to 1933, where Schapiro operated a at Brunnenstrasse 165 in the district. With the Nazi ascent to power, Schapiro relocated to in May 1933 to evade persecution, while Hanka and the young Grothendieck initially stayed; by January 1934, the five-year-old was placed in with Wilhelm and Dagmar Heydorn in , attending local schools and until April 1939. Meanwhile, Hanka pursued anarchist involvements, traveling to from 1936 to 1939 before returning to France in April 1939. Grothendieck reunited with his mother in during the summer of 1939, immediately preceding the onset of ; this peripatetic existence, driven by his parents' activism and Europe's political instability, characterized his early childhood.

World War II and Displacement

The rise of the Nazi regime profoundly disrupted Grothendieck's . became Chancellor on January 30, 1933, followed by a boycott of Jewish businesses on April 1 and anti-Jewish laws enacted on April 7, targeting individuals like his father, Alexander "Sascha" Schapiro, a Russian-Jewish anarchist. Schapiro fled to in May 1933, while Grothendieck's , Johanna "Hanka" Grothendieck, remained in with her son until December 1933. In January 1934, Hanka placed the five-year-old Grothendieck with foster parents, Wilhelm and Dagmar Heydorn, in , where he resided until April 1939; meanwhile, she joined Schapiro in Paris and both participated in the from 1936 to 1939 before returning to France. Reunited with his mother in during the summer of 1939, Grothendieck faced further upheaval with the outbreak of in September and France's internment policies for foreigners deemed "enemy aliens." He and his mother were interned at the Rieucros Camp near Mende, established in January 1939 for female refugees and their children, under a November 1938 law targeting stateless persons. Conditions were harsh, marked by displacement, hunger, and poverty; Hanka contracted there, which contributed to her later death. Schapiro, stateless and Jewish, was separately interned at the Camp du Vernet d'Ariège. In 1942, as German forces occupied , the Rieucros Camp closed, transferring inmates including Hanka to the near in the ; Grothendieck, then 13, was permitted to leave for schooling but lived in hiding to evade authorities. That August, the government handed Schapiro over to the Nazis, who deported him from Vernet to Auschwitz, where he perished. Grothendieck found refuge at , a Protestant village known for sheltering Jewish children, attending the Collège Cévenol and earning his in 1945 despite ongoing risks from roundups. Hanka, released earlier, survived the war but in frail health, reuniting with her son postwar in Maisargues near . These years of separation, internment, and loss instilled in Grothendieck a profound sense of and resilience amid the causal chain of Nazi persecution and wartime policies.

Education and Entry into Mathematics

Post-War Studies in France

Following the end of , Grothendieck relocated with his mother to Maisargues near and commenced mathematical studies at the in 1945, supplementing a small scholarship by working in local vineyards to support himself. During this period from 1945 to 1948, he pursued a licence ès mathématiques amid personal challenges, including his stateless status—which he maintained to avoid French military —and initial dissatisfaction with the university's teaching quality, which he found inadequate for rigorous development. Working in relative isolation, Grothendieck independently rediscovered a generalized version of Henri Lebesgue's integral theory while exploring measures, demonstrating early self-directed aptitude despite gaps in formal preparation from wartime disruptions. In 1948, after obtaining his licence, Grothendieck traveled to for a year, auditing courses at the and engaging with advanced seminars, particularly Henri Cartan's on and sheaf theory, which introduced him to contemporary research frontiers. Key interactions there included figures like Cartan and , exposing him to influential ideas in and that later shaped his work, though his focus remained on . This brief Parisian interlude bridged his provincial studies to more sophisticated environments, highlighting his rapid assimilation of cutting-edge concepts despite lacking prior institutional prestige. By 1949, seeking stronger instruction in , Grothendieck moved to the University of Nancy, where he resided with his mother—whose health had been compromised by —and pursued advanced studies leading to his . Under the guidance of locally and as formal supervisor, he delved into topological vector spaces, contributing foundational results on tensor products and nuclear spaces amid Nancy's active mathematical seminars. He completed his thèse de doctorat, titled Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucléaires, in 1953, defending it on 28 February in , which established him as an expert in the field and marked the culmination of his formative post-war training in .

Early Research and Influences

Grothendieck commenced formal mathematical studies at the in 1945, following his return to France after wartime displacement, but encountered limited advanced instruction there, prompting extensive self-study in areas such as and . By 1948, dissatisfied with the local faculty, he relocated to in December of that year and attended the influential seminar led by at the , where exposure to contemporary French mathematics, including discussions on sheaves and , began shaping his perspective. Cartan, recognizing Grothendieck's potential, advised him to pursue doctoral work in with , a leading figure in known for his development of distribution theory. In from 1949 to 1953, Grothendieck worked under the nominal supervision of and , completing his doctoral thesis titled Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucléaires in 1953, which systematically generalized theory to locally convex topological vector spaces. His early research, initiated with papers published from 1950 onward—such as "Une caractérisation vectorielle métrique des espaces L_p" (1950)—focused on metric characterizations of Lebesgue spaces, continuity of linear functionals, and the structure of tensor products, often independently rediscovering or extending results from predecessors like and while posing foundational questions about completeness and duality in infinite-dimensional settings. These contributions established rigorous frameworks for handling pathological behaviors in topological vector spaces, influencing subsequent developments in and partial differential equations. Key influences on Grothendieck's early work stemmed from the axiomatic rigor of the collective, whose emphasis on structural abstraction aligned with his inclination toward unifying disparate concepts, as well as probabilistic and distributional approaches to , which informed his handling of generalized functions. However, Grothendieck's rapid progress frequently outstripped his mentors; for instance, during his tenure, he developed the notion of spaces—spaces where integral representations of operators hold—anticipating applications in , with minimal direct guidance beyond interactions. Cartan's topological s also exposed him to early ideas in , planting seeds for his later pivot toward homological methods, though his initial output remained anchored in until the mid-1950s. This phase underscored Grothendieck's emergent style: deriving broad theorems from minimal axioms, often critiquing ad hoc classical techniques in favor of categorical generality.

Professional Career and Peak Productivity

Appointment at IHÉS

The (IHÉS) was established in 1958 by Léon Motchane, a Russian-born businessman with a passion for , who sought to create a French counterpart to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. Motchane initially recruited as the institute's first permanent professor in . Dieudonné agreed to join on the condition that Alexander Grothendieck be appointed alongside him, recognizing Grothendieck's emerging talent in and related fields. In 1958, Grothendieck was thus appointed as a permanent professor at IHÉS, a position that provided him with stable funding and freedom from teaching obligations, allowing full dedication to . This appointment marked a pivotal shift, relocating him from temporary positions in and to a dedicated research environment in Bures-sur-Yvette. The institute's early years were modest, operating initially without permanent facilities, yet this setup fostered an atmosphere of intense mathematical collaboration. Grothendieck's role at IHÉS quickly centered on leading seminars, such as the , which became instrumental in disseminating his ideas and training a generation of mathematicians. His appointment coincided with IHÉS's foundational phase, where he and Dieudonné formed the core of the mathematics section, emphasizing pure research over applied or institutional pressures. This period laid the groundwork for Grothendieck's transformative contributions, unencumbered by administrative duties.

The "Golden Age" of Contributions (1958–1970)

Upon his appointment as permanent professor at the (IHÉS) in 1958, Grothendieck entered a phase of extraordinary mathematical output that lasted until 1970, fundamentally redefining through abstract, functorial methods. In collaboration with , he produced the (EGA), a foundational series with four volumes published in fascicles between 1960 and 1967, which introduced schemes as a unifying framework for studying algebraic varieties over arbitrary rings, resolving longstanding issues in classical . This work emphasized relative notions and base change, enabling geometric interpretations across diverse base schemes. Grothendieck directed the Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique () at IHÉS, a series of weekly seminars starting in that attracted leading mathematicians and generated multi-volume proceedings documenting cutting-edge developments. Key outcomes included SGA 1 (1960–1961) on étale coverings and fundamental groups, providing an algebraic analogue to topological fundamental groups for varieties, and SGA 4 (1963–1964) on , a cohomology theory suited to proving Weil's conjectures on zeta functions of varieties over finite fields. These seminars fostered a collaborative environment where Grothendieck's visionary ideas, often sketched rapidly and refined by participants, unified with , , and . His innovations extended to , with the development of topoi in the mid-1960s as generalized topological spaces via sites and sheaves, and to , where he defined Grothendieck groups for schemes, leading to the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem (published 1958 but expanded in this period). Working with intense focus—often 12 hours daily—Grothendieck produced thousands of pages of manuscripts, training a generation of geometers and establishing IHÉS as a global hub. In recognition, he received the in 1966 for advances in , , and , though he declined to attend the Moscow ceremony in protest of Soviet policies.

Core Mathematical Innovations

Revolutionizing Algebraic Geometry

Grothendieck's approach to emphasized abstraction and generality, shifting the field from its classical focus on varieties over algebraically closed fields to a framework accommodating arbitrary rings and relative situations. This revolution began in earnest around , following his earlier work on in the 1957 Tohoku paper, as he sought to resolve foundational inconsistencies in handling structures and . By prioritizing functorial viewpoints and representable functors, he replaced geometric intuitions with rigorous categorical methods, enabling precise treatment of moduli problems and deformation theory. Central to this transformation was the introduction of schemes in 1960, defined as locally ringed spaces that are locally affine, with affine schemes constructed as the spectrum Spec(R) of a commutative ring R, incorporating prime ideals as points and structure sheaves encoding ring-theoretic data. Schemes extended classical varieties by admitting nilpotent elements in structure sheaves, thus capturing "infinitesimal thickenings" absent in reduced schemes, and allowed base change over any scheme, facilitating relative geometry over non-fields like the integers. This framework, systematically developed in the multi-volume Éléments de géométrie algébrique (EGA), co-edited with Jean Dieudonné and published starting in 1960, provided a comprehensive foundation integrating commutative algebra, topology, and geometry. The EGA and associated Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique (SGA) seminars, conducted at IHÉS from 1960 to 1969, disseminated these ideas through collaborative exposition, covering topics from Hilbert schemes to precursors. Grothendieck's emphasis on "relative" objects—such as schemes over a base—resolved limitations in absolute varieties, enabling applications to , including the study of arithmetic surfaces and the eventual proof of the via . His methods demanded rethinking proofs in terms of universal properties, yielding tools like the Yoneda embedding for representability, which streamlined and . This paradigm shift elevated algebraic geometry to a cornerstone of modern mathematics, influencing fields from to , as schemes offered a versatile language for gluing local data globally while preserving algebraic invariants. By 1966, Grothendieck received the for these foundational advances, recognizing how his work unified disparate threads into a coherent, general theory. Despite the abstraction's initial steep learning curve, it supplanted classical approaches, with subsequent texts like Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry adapting its core concepts for broader accessibility.

Development of Cohomology Theories

Grothendieck's systematic approach to cohomology emerged from his reformulation of homological algebra, culminating in his 1957 paper "Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique," published in the Tôhoku Mathematical Journal. In this work, he introduced abelian categories and derived functors, establishing that for any abelian category with enough injective objects—such as the category of sheaves of abelian groups on a topological space—cohomology groups could be defined as the right derived functors of the global sections functor. This framework generalized earlier ad hoc computations of sheaf cohomology, providing a universal tool for deriving cohomology in diverse settings beyond classical topology. Building on this foundation, Grothendieck applied derived functors to in his 1958 paper "The theory of abstract algebraic varieties," presented at the . Here, he proposed axioms for a "Weil theory" suitable for varieties over arbitrary fields, including finite fields, emphasizing properties like finite-dimensionality, , and a Lefschetz trace formula to address André Weil's conjectures on zeta functions. Unlike classical de Rham or Betti , which fail over non-algebraically closed fields of positive characteristic, Grothendieck sought theories bridging algebraic and topological invariants, critiquing existing approaches like those of Serre for their limitations in handling non-constant coefficients or arithmetic varieties. To realize such a theory, Grothendieck introduced Grothendieck topologies (or sites) in the early 1960s, generalizing sheaf theory to allow cohomology computations on "non-Hausdorff" sites tailored to algebraic structures. His étale cohomology, developed primarily through the Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique (SGA) volumes starting around 1960–1964, defined the étale site on schemes using étale morphisms—local isomorphisms in the sense of formally unramified and étale extensions—enabling l-adic sheaf cohomology that mimics Betti cohomology's properties for varieties over finite fields. This innovation, inspired partly by Serre's suggestions but formalized via toposes and higher derived functors, proved key to Deligne's 1974 resolution of the Weil conjectures, as the étale cohomology groups satisfy the required additivity and purity axioms. Grothendieck further extended this program with in the mid-1960s, targeting the p-torsion components elusive in étale theory for varieties in characteristic p. Defined using the crystalline site—comprising divided power thickenings of schemes—this theory provides a contravariant to vector spaces over Witt rings, compatible with in mixed characteristic and yielding Hodge decompositions absent in étale settings. These developments, detailed in 4 and 6, unified disparate cohomology theories under machinery, prioritizing causal links between geometric structures and arithmetic invariants over ad hoc fixes, though later critiques noted the abstractness sometimes obscured concrete computations.

Advancements in Category Theory and Toposes

Grothendieck's foundational contributions to category theory emerged prominently in his 1957 paper "Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique," published in the Tôhoku Mathematical Journal, where he introduced the concept of an abelian category possessing enough injective objects. This framework generalized the properties of modules over a ring to arbitrary abelian categories, including sheaves of abelian groups on topological spaces, enabling a unified treatment of homological algebra via derived functors and resolutions without reliance on specific concrete realizations. By axiomatizing exactness and exact sequences in this categorical setting, Grothendieck provided tools for computing cohomology in diverse contexts, such as sheaf cohomology, which paralleled Cartan's earlier work but extended it abstractly to facilitate applications in algebraic geometry. Building on this, Grothendieck integrated category-theoretic language deeply into during the late 1950s and 1960s, particularly through his development of schemes and the (EGA) series, co-authored with starting in 1960. Here, he employed functors, adjointness, and limits/colimits to reformulate classical varieties in terms of relative schemes over base rings, emphasizing universal properties over coordinate-based descriptions and thereby revealing structural analogies across , , and algebra. This categorical perspective not only streamlined proofs of existence via representable functors but also anticipated broader homotopical methods, influencing subsequent developments like derived categories, which Verdier formalized under Grothendieck's guidance around 1963. In the context of étale cohomology, pursued in the Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique (SGA) volumes from 1960 onward, Grothendieck introduced Grothendieck topologies and toposes in the early 1960s to generalize sheaf theory beyond topological spaces. A Grothendieck topology on a category equips it with a notion of "covering families" satisfying axioms akin to open covers, allowing the definition of sheaves as functors satisfying descent conditions with respect to these covers; the resulting category of sheaves forms a topos, which inherits properties like having all finite limits, colimits, and subobject classifiers, generalizing the category of sets or sheaves on a space. This innovation, detailed in SGA 4 (circa 1964), enabled the construction of the étale topos on the étale site of a scheme, providing a cohomology theory analogous to singular cohomology but suited to algebraic varieties, with exactness properties ensuring computability via hypercoverings and Godement resolutions. Toposes thus served as "generalized spaces" for algebraic purposes, bridging point-set topology with abstract algebra and influencing logic through their internal language equivalence to geometric theories.

Ethical and Political Positions

Anti-War Activism and Protests

In 1967, Grothendieck traveled to for several weeks to protest the ' military intervention in the conflict. There, he delivered lectures on advanced topics such as at and in forested areas near the city, often under imminent threat of aerial bombardment by American forces. This direct action symbolized his pacifist stance and commitment to opposing , as he sought to support mathematicians amid the war's disruptions. Grothendieck's anti-war positions extended to criticism of Soviet military actions, reflecting a consistent opposition to expansionist policies on both sides of the divide. In , his aligned with broader protests during the late , including the uprisings, where he engaged with movements decrying militarism and foreign interventions. By the early 1970s, he co-founded the group Survivre with fellow mathematicians and Pierre Samuel, which organized efforts against war, imperialism, and environmental degradation linked to military activities. These initiatives included public campaigns for and against , though they achieved limited institutional impact.

Critiques of Scientific Institutions and Militarization

In 1970, Grothendieck resigned from the (IHÉS) upon discovering that a portion of its budget—never exceeding five percent—derived indirectly from the French Ministry of Defense, which he viewed as enabling militarization of scientific endeavors. He had previously attempted to persuade IHÉS director Léon Motchane and colleagues to reject such funds, arguing that any acceptance implicated the institution in military applications, but faced resistance, prompting his abrupt departure after over a decade of affiliation. This act symbolized his broader rejection of scientific bodies that tolerated ties to defense-related entities, such as the Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique, which supported nuclear programs with dual military and civilian aims. Grothendieck articulated these concerns in speeches, including one on June 26, 1970, at the Faculty of Sciences, and another on July 8, 1970, at the University of Montreal, later compiled as "The of the Scientist Today." Therein, he condemned scientists' widespread acceptance of subventions—such as short-term contracts valued at around $2,000 in the U.S.—as moral abdication and direct complicity in warfare, equating it to bolstering destructive capabilities under the guise of "pure" research. He emphasized that scientists, as creators of enabling technologies like nuclear weapons, held disproportionate for existential threats and urged total non-cooperation, dismissing justifications for fund diversion as hypocritical rationalizations that sustained power. These views extended to institutional critique in his involvement with the Survivre et Vivre group, co-founded on July 27, 1970, in , which advocated , , and opposition to by decoupling science from state aggression. In later reflections, such as Récoltes et Semailles (written 1983–1986), Grothendieck decried the fusion of scientific progress with atomic —evoking —and portrayed Western scientific communities as passively endorsing "barbarian" apparatuses through funding dependencies, prioritizing institutional survival over ethical imperatives. His stance highlighted a causal link between unexamined financial ties and amplified global risks, insisting on personal amid systemic incentives for collaboration.

Declining Engagement and Reclusion

Resignation from IHÉS and Withdrawal

Alexander Grothendieck resigned from his position as permanent at the (IHÉS) via a dated , 1970. The decision stemmed from his discovery that IHÉS received indirect funding from the French Ministry of Defense, a revelation that conflicted with his deepening opposition to and the perceived complicity of scientific institutions in applications. Grothendieck had urged IHÉS director Léon Motchane to reject such funding, but Motchane, who prioritized separating scientific pursuits from political influences, refused, leading to irreconcilable tensions. This principled stand aligned with Grothendieck's broader ethical critiques of science's alignment with state power, though some contemporaries viewed his reaction as overly absolutist given the funding's minor scale. Following the , Grothendieck progressively withdrew from active engagement in the mathematical community, ceasing collaborations and mainstream publications by the early 1970s. While he briefly pursued ecological and anti-militarization activism through groups like Survivre, his involvement diminished, marking a shift toward personal reflection and disengagement from institutional . This retreat was not abrupt but evolved from disillusionment with professional norms and a quest for deeper existential inquiry, as evidenced in his later autobiographical writings critiquing the mathematical establishment's priorities. By refusing awards like the Fields Medal's monetary prize in 1966—donating it to causes—and later shunning recognition, Grothendieck exemplified a deliberate severance from the accolades and networks of elite . His withdrawal preserved his intellectual independence amid growing personal isolation, influencing perceptions of him as both a moral exemplar and an enigmatic figure detached from conventional scholarly life.

1980s Manuscripts and Personal Reflections

In the early 1980s, following his withdrawal from institutional mathematics, Grothendieck composed "La Longue Marche à travers la Théorie de Galois" between January and June 1981, an extensive manuscript of approximately 1600 pages that reinterprets classical Galois theory through modern lenses such as étale cohomology, anabelian geometry, and the role of fundamental groups in reconstructing algebraic varieties. This work, circulated privately among a few colleagues, emphasizes "descent" processes and the interplay between arithmetic and geometry, foreshadowing ideas in his later "Esquisse d'un Programme" of 1984, while critiquing overly rigid foundational approaches in favor of intuitive, structural insights. The manuscript remained unpublished during his lifetime, with drafts preserved in archives, reflecting his solitary pursuit of unifying themes across number theory and topology without reliance on contemporary collaborations. From June 1983 to around 1986, Grothendieck produced "Récoltes et Semailles," a sprawling autobiographical reflection exceeding 900 pages, intended as the first installment in a planned series titled "Réflexions Mathématiques" (Mathematical Reflections). Divided into preludes and thematic sections, it chronicles his career trajectory, mathematical intuitions—described via the metaphor of a "rising sea" submerging obstacles to reveal underlying structures—and profound disillusionment with the profession's interpersonal dynamics, including perceived betrayals by figures like , whom he accused of exploiting his ideas without adequate reciprocity. Grothendieck attributes his 1970 resignation from the (IHÉS) to irreconcilable ethical conflicts, portraying mathematics not as a competitive enterprise but as a demanding purity and communal harmony, which he found absent amid institutional and militarized funding. These manuscripts interweave technical exposition with personal testimony, revealing Grothendieck's evolving , where mathematical discovery parallels spiritual awakening, and critique extends to broader societal ills like and , echoing his earlier . Distributed selectively to acquaintances, they underscore his , as he rejected offers and honors, prioritizing unfiltered expression over dissemination. Partial editions appeared posthumously, with a truncated version released by Gallimard in 2022, though full manuscripts are accessible via digital archives, affirming their status as raw, unpolished testaments to his intellectual odyssey.

Final Years, Seclusion, and Death

In the late 1980s, Grothendieck declined the Crafoord Prize, a prestigious award accompanied by significant monetary recognition, reflecting his growing disengagement from institutional honors. By August 1991, he abruptly left his residence and retreated to an undisclosed location, severing nearly all contact with others and embracing a hermitic existence. He eventually settled in a remote, unpowered house without running water in Lasserre, a village in the Ariège department of the French Pyrenees, where he resided alone until his death. During his two decades in Lasserre, Grothendieck sustained himself through simple means, including and , while producing thousands of pages of writings that delved into physics, philosophical inquiries on and , metaphysics, the nature of , and structural aspects of the . These manuscripts, often accompanied by topological diagrams and numerological elements, were not published during his lifetime and reflected a shift toward esoteric and interdisciplinary themes rather than conventional . He maintained extreme isolation, politely rebuffing most visitors and exhibiting signs of , such as viewing some as adversarial figures or fearing external threats, which limited interactions even with locals and estranged family. In his final months, Grothendieck, afflicted by profound and near-blindness, requested a from a neighbor amid declining health, prompting rare outreach to his children after years of separation. He died on November 13, 2014, at the age of 86, in a hospital in Saint-Girons, Ariège, reportedly from exhaustion without specified underlying causes. His body was buried in the Lasserre churchyard under a simple slab.

Personal Life and Identity

Family Dynamics and Relationships

Alexander Grothendieck's parents, Alexander "Sascha" Schapiro (1890–1942) and Johanna "Hanka" Grothendieck (1900–1957), shared a background steeped in political radicalism. Schapiro, a Jew and anarchist who had participated in revolutionary activities including the uprising and the , met Hanka, a from a Protestant bourgeois family in with socialist leanings, in in the late . Their union produced Grothendieck in 1928, but the couple separated amid the escalating political turmoil of the 1930s, with Schapiro pursuing anarchist causes and Hanka managing practical survival. In 1939, Hanka fled with young Grothendieck to to Nazi , while Schapiro, who had earlier reunited briefly with them, was interned by the regime and deported to Auschwitz, where he was killed in 1942. Grothendieck did not learn of his father's fate until 1946, after the war, and subsequently idealized Schapiro as a moral exemplar despite their limited time together, which profoundly shaped his later ethical and anti-militaristic views. In contrast, Grothendieck endured separations during the war, living in French internment camps with his mother before being placed with relatives; post-liberation in 1945, he reunited with Hanka and maintained a close attachment to her until her death in 1957. This dynamic—distant paternal influence versus maternal proximity—underscored a childhood marked by instability and ideological inheritance rather than conventional family stability. In adulthood, Grothendieck's personal relationships mirrored elements of detachment. He married Mireille Dufour around the late 1950s or early 1960s, and they had three children: Johanna, Mathieu, and Alexandre. The marriage dissolved amid Grothendieck's shifting lifestyle, including the establishment of communes in the following his withdrawal from institutional mathematics. He fathered additional children outside this union, including a son John from an early relationship that ended shortly after the child's birth, resulting in minimal ongoing contact, and another son with Justine Skalba. Grothendieck's interactions with his children evolved unevenly, influenced by his increasing reclusion and pursuits, though specific details remain limited due to his private nature.

Citizenship, Heritage, and Self-Perception

Alexander Grothendieck was born on 28 March 1928 in Berlin, Germany, to parents with revolutionary backgrounds. His father, Alexander "Sascha" Schapiro (1890–1942), was a Russian Jew from Novozybkov who participated in the 1905 Revolution, lost his left arm in the fighting, and later perished in Auschwitz after deportation by the Vichy regime. His mother, Johanna "Hanka" Grothendieck (1900–1957), hailed from Hamburg and engaged in left-wing political groups during the 1920s. The parents, who were not formally married at his birth, shared anarchist convictions and supported pacifist causes, including involvement in the Spanish Civil War; Grothendieck adopted his mother's surname. His paternal heritage was Jewish, though his father rejected religious orthodoxy in favor of atheism, while his mother's German Protestant roots contributed to a secular family ethos devoid of strong ethnic or religious identifications. Fleeing Nazi persecution, Grothendieck arrived in as a in 1939, where wartime of his parents under the 1938 "undesirables" rendered him effectively stateless; German records of his birth nationality were destroyed in 1945. He relied on a , a document for refugees, for international travel and long avoided naturalization due to mandatory requirements, particularly amid opposition to the . Accounts differ on the timing of his eventual , with some indicating in 1971 and others in the late 1980s after prolonged . Grothendieck perceived himself as a "citizen of the world" unbound by national loyalties, reflecting his parents' anarchist heritage and his own ; in 1966, he formally requested citizenship and declined to attend the ceremony in as a protest against militarism. He embraced a universalist identity over ethnic or patriotic ties, viewing not as a burden but as alignment with anti-authoritarian principles, and maintained an atheistic stance uninfluenced by or despite his mixed ancestry. This outlook underpinned his rejection of institutional throughout his career.

Enduring Influence and Reception

Grothendieck's introduction of schemes in the 1960s fundamentally reshaped by generalizing classical varieties to affine schemes associated with commutative , enabling a uniform treatment of geometric objects over arbitrary base rather than restricting to fields. This framework incorporated Spec(R) as the geometric counterpart to the R, allowing to merge seamlessly with classical and resolving longstanding issues in handling singular or non-reduced structures. A pivotal transformation arose from Grothendieck's generalization of the Riemann-Roch theorem, culminating in the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem announced in 1958, which equates the of a class in the of coherent sheaves under a with the Chern character composed with the Todd class of the target. This result, proven using and , provided a universal tool for computing Euler characteristics of vector bundles on schemes, extending beyond smooth projective varieties and influencing subsequent developments in characteristic classes. In parallel, Grothendieck's development of topos theory during the 1960s, motivated by , abstracted sheaf to Grothendieck topoi defined via sites—a category equipped with a Grothendieck for coverings—transforming geometric into categorical terms where topoi behave like generalized spaces supporting internal logic and . This enabled the construction of new theories, such as l-adic , which proved the for varieties over finite fields as part of the resolved by Deligne in 1974, thereby bridging with through functorial transformations. These innovations extended to related fields like , where Grothendieck's emphasis on derived categories and six functor formalisms provided tools for exact computations of sheaf , influencing and the standard conjectures on algebraic cycles. His relative point of view, treating morphisms between schemes as fundamental, shifted geometric reasoning from absolute properties to transformations under base change and fiber products, fostering applications in deformation theory and moduli problems.

Broader Impacts on Mathematics and Beyond

Grothendieck's , developed around 1958 through the introduction of the on schemes, furnished the algebraic analogues of singular cohomology necessary for Pierre Deligne's 1974 proof of the , thereby forging deep connections between and Diophantine problems in . This framework enabled the computation of zeta functions for varieties over finite fields and extended topological methods to arithmetic settings, influencing subsequent advances in the . His vision of motives, proposed in the as universal objects underlying diverse cohomology theories, sought to distill the "heart" of arithmetic geometry by classifying varieties up to numerical equivalence, posing a central challenge that persists in efforts to realize a . This program has spurred research into standard conjectures on algebraic cycles and their role in unifying Hodge, étale, and l-adic , with implications for understanding zeta functions and L-functions beyond classical cases. Grothendieck's axiomatic recasting of in 1957, via derived categories and abstract abelian categories, propelled from a linguistic tool to an autonomous discipline, permeating homological methods across , , and . Similarly, Grothendieck topoi, arising from sheaf theory on sites to resolve issues in like the , generalize spaces in ways that encode local-to-global principles. Beyond core mathematics, topos theory provides a categorical semantics for through internal Heyting algebras and subobject classifiers, offering an alternative to classical for foundational inquiries. In theoretical computer science, it underpins and for programming languages, facilitating proofs of correctness via categorical models. Applications extend tentatively to physics, as in the Bohr topos for contextual , where topoi model non-Boolean event structures without collapsing wave functions.

Recent Reassessments and Publications

In 2022, released the complete edition of Grothendieck's Récoltes et semailles, a multi-volume autobiographical composed between February 1984 and May 1986, comprising over 2,800 pages of reflections on his mathematical career, philosophical insights, and personal motivations. This publication, previously circulated in limited photocopied form among colleagues, details Grothendieck's self-described "great ideas" in , such as schemes, toposes, and , while critiquing institutional dynamics in . Posthumously, initiatives to disseminate Grothendieck's unpublished writings gained momentum. In 2015, the acquired roughly 20,000 pages of his personal notes, including mathematical drafts from 1949 to 1991 and later philosophical texts, with portions digitized and accessible online since May 2017. The Centro Studi Grothendieckiani, established to honor his , coordinates scholarly editions of these materials, encompassing mathematical reflections, ethical essays, and literary pieces from his reclusive period. These efforts have spurred reassessments of Grothendieck's foundational contributions. For instance, analyses of his papers from the 1950s highlight their role in advancing nuclear spaces and tensor products, influencing modern . Edited volumes, such as those examining his theory and philosophical implications, underscore how his abstract frameworks continue to underpin advancements in , , and , with ongoing seminars and journals like the Quaderni del Centro di Studi Grothendieckiani facilitating deeper exploration since 2016. The 2022 release of Récoltes et semailles has particularly prompted reevaluations of his "rising sea" metaphor for conceptual unification, affirming its causal efficacy in resolving longstanding problems in algebraic varieties and motives.

Key Publications and Archives

Grothendieck's foundational contributions to appeared in his 1957 paper "Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique," published in the Tôhoku Mathematical Journal, which introduced derived categories and six functor formalisms for sheaf cohomology. His systematic reconstruction of is detailed in the (EGA), co-authored with : volume I (Le langage des schémas) in 1960, volume II (Étude globale élémentaire de quelques classes de morphismes) in 1961, volume III (Étude cohomologique des faisceaux cohérents) in 1961, and volume IV in four parts from 1964 to 1967, all issued through Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS. The Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique () series, directed by Grothendieck at IHÉS from 1960 to 1969, comprises seven main volumes plus exposés, covering topics from ( 4, 1963–1965) to motives and ( 5 and 6, 1966–1968), with later volumes like 7 on Néron models (1970). These seminar proceedings, edited post-facto, formalized advanced tools in scheme theory and l-adic cohomology. Later published works include Esquisse d'un programme (1984), outlining and the "dessins d'enfants" approach to Galois representations, first circulated privately and reprinted in Geometric Galois Actions (1997). Récoltes et semailles (1985–1986), a reflective on mathematical practice and personal experience, was published in two volumes by Gallimard in 2022. Post-resignation from IHÉS in 1970, Grothendieck generated over 60,000 pages of unpublished manuscripts, known as the Lasserre collection (1992–1999), encompassing revisions of foundations, extensions, and philosophical notes. These were deposited at the around 2010, with approximately 28,000 pages digitized and partially accessible online since 2017, including typed notes and letters. In September 2023, a portion of these unpublished works was transferred to the (BnF) for preservation and scholarly access. Earlier archives, such as seminar drafts, remain at IHÉS.

References

  1. [1]
    As If Summoned from the Void: The Life of Alexandre Grothendieck
    Sep 2, 2004 · Alexandre Grothendieck was born in Berlin on March 28, 1928, into a family consisting of. Hanka, Tanaroff, and Hanka's daughter from her first ...Missing: birth | Show results with:birth
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Fields Medals 1966 - | International Mathematical Union (IMU)
    He introduced the idea of K-theory (the Grothendieck groups and rings). Revolutionized homological algebra in his celebrated "Tohoku paper".Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  4. [4]
    Alexandre Grothendieck, a committed genius | CNRS News
    Nov 29, 2024 · In 1950 he became the first Frenchman to be awarded the Fields Medal, for his work on the theory of distributions. 5. https://webusers.imj ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  5. [5]
    The IHES at Forty - American Mathematical Society
    After twelve years at the institute, in which he ran a celebrated seminar that reshaped the foun- dations of algebraic geometry, Grothendieck suddenly resigned.Missing: Alexander | Show results with:Alexander<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Alexander Grothendieck (1928 - 2014) - Biography - MacTutor
    Nov 13, 2014 · He introduced the idea of K-theory (the Grothendieck groups and rings). He revolutionised homological algebra in his celebrated "Tohoko paper".
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Notes on the life and work of Alexander Grothendieck
    Alexander Grothendieck was born in Berlin in 1928. His father, Alexander ... After Hitler's rise to power, Alexander's parents immigrated to France, leaving their ...
  8. [8]
    The Mysterious Disappearance of a Revolutionary Mathematician
    May 9, 2022 · In 1970, Grothendieck abruptly left. He left the I.H.E.S., he left the twelve to sixteen hours a day of thinking about math, he left his wife ...Missing: resignation | Show results with:resignation
  9. [9]
    Scientific biography - CSG Istituto Grothendieck
    1945-1948: License studies (equivalent to Bachelor Studies) in mathematics at the University of Montpellier. 1948-1949: Having obtained his degree, Grothendieck ...
  10. [10]
    A brief timeline for the life of Alexander Grothendieck (which has the ...
    1945-1948: Grothendieck and his mother move to a small village near Montpellier; he works irregularly on a farm while studying mathematics at the university of ...
  11. [11]
    A Country Known Only by Name | Pierre Cartier - Inference Review
    There is no need to introduce Alexander Grothendieck to mathematicians: he is one of the great scientists of the twentieth century.Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  12. [12]
    [PDF] A. Grothendieck's Early Work (1950-1960)
    The exceptional mathematical talent of Alexander Grothendieck was apparent very soon. He had been a student at the University of Montpellier which, at that.
  13. [13]
    The Life and Work of Alexander Grothendieck - jstor
    Between 1928 and 1933 Alexander lived with his parents in Berlin. When Hitler came to power, Alexander's parents emigrated to France; Alexander stayed in Ham.Missing: childhood | Show results with:childhood
  14. [14]
    History - IHES
    IHES was created in 1958 at a key stage in the history of science and the world. ... 1958Léon Motchane creates IHES. alexander-grothendieck Alexander Grothendieck.
  15. [15]
    Alexander Grothendieck, Permanent Professor from 1958 to 1970
    Permanent Professor at IHES from 1958 to 1970​​ Alexander Grothendieck set the framework for modern algebraic geometry, which is now universally adopted.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  16. [16]
    Grothendieck at 80, IHES at 50 - American Mathematical Society
    IHES professor Laurent Lafforgue was appointed to the institute in 2000, long after Grothendieck's departure. He agrees that what happened to. Grothendieck was ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Elements of Grothendieck's life and work - Columbia Math Department
    Born to a well-off middle-class Jewish family in Ukraine. Gives up his family to join an anarchist revolution against the Tsar at fourteen.Missing: reclusive | Show results with:reclusive
  18. [18]
    [PDF] A biographical reading of the Grothendieck-Serre Correspondence 1
    foundational papers – Grothendieck's “Tohoku” article on homological algebra, Serre's. FAC and GAGA, or the volumes of EGA and SGA. It is well-known that the ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Life and work of Alexander Grothendieck - Penn Math
    From 1958 Grothendieck revolutionized algebraic geometry. He showed us a unified way to describe these concepts. 13. Page 14. In this section we will describe ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Grothendieck and Algebraic Geometry
    Mar 1, 2015 · Grothendieck's thesis and subsequent publica- tions in the early 1950's dealt with functional analysis. This was remarkable work, which is.
  21. [21]
    The most important mathematician you've (probably) never heard of
    Sep 29, 2025 · In 1960, as part of his search for maximum generality, Grothendieck introduced the concept of a “scheme”, which set out to capture this extra ...
  22. [22]
    What is the history behind the concept of "schemes" in algebraic ...
    Aug 15, 2015 · Schemes were invented by Grothendieck. The purpose was unification and simplification of the foundations of algebraic geometry.
  23. [23]
    EGA in nLab
    May 13, 2025 · SGA consists of the writeups of seminars at IHÉS lead by Grothendieck; the work of the members of the seminar under the guidance of Grothendieck ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  24. [24]
    Alexander Grothendieck - in theory - WordPress.com
    Nov 14, 2014 · In his 40s, and the top of his game, Grothendieck left IHES over the issue of military funding, and progressively detached from the mathematical ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] arXiv:2105.08799v1 [math.AG] 18 May 2021
    May 18, 2021 · Grothendieck was positioned as the main expert in algebraic geometry in the world and won the Fields medal in. 1966 for his fundamental work.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Did Earlier Thoughts Inspire Grothendieck? - webspace.science.uu.nl
    It was clear to many of us that the tools which Grothendieck developed in this branch of mathematics revolutionized algebraic geometry and a part of number ...
  27. [27]
    The Maverick's Magnum Opus: Alexander Grothendieck's ... - Medium
    Oct 17, 2023 · Grothendieck's work revolutionized modern mathematics and had a profound impact on various fields, including algebraic topology, category theory ...
  28. [28]
    ag.algebraic geometry - Exposition of Grothendieck's mathematics
    Feb 2, 2022 · In Grothendieck's retrospective Récoltes et Semailles, he identified twelve of his contributions which he believed qualified as "great ideas".
  29. [29]
    Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique, I - Project Euclid
    1957 Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique, I. Alexander Grothendieck · DOWNLOAD PDF + SAVE TO MY LIBRARY. Tohoku Math. J. (2) 9(2): 119-221 (1957).Missing: cohomology | Show results with:cohomology
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Some aspects of homological algebra
    Nov 11, 2011 · This work originates from an attempt to take advantage of the formal analogy between the cohomology theory with of a space with coefficients ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] the cohomology theory of - abstract algebraic varieties
    THE COHOMOLOGY THEORY OF. ABSTRACT ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES. By ALEXANDER GROTHENDIECK. It is less than four years since cohomological methods (i.e. methods of.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Grothendieck topologies and étale cohomology - Pieter Belmans
    At some point it was realized that the existence of a “Weil cohomology theory”, mimicking the properties of algebraic topology, can solve the Weil conjectures.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Notes on the life and work of Alexander Grothendieck
    In 1966 Grothendieck receives the Fields Medal for his contributions to func- tional analysis, the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem, and the work on the.
  34. [34]
    Tōhoku | Rick Jardine - Inference Review
    Sheaf cohomology groups are then defined as derived functors of the global sections functor. The paper's chief result, which I shall call Grothendieck's theorem ...
  35. [35]
    Alexander Grothendieck's biography with his major mathematical ...
    Mar 22, 2013 · Speaker at the International Congress of Mathematicians in 1958; · Alexander Grothendieck received the Fields Medal in 1966, which he accepted;.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    [PDF] An introduction to Grothendieck toposes - Olivia Caramello
    Mar 13, 2020 · Toposes were originally introduced by Alexander Grothendieck in the early 1960s, in order to provide a mathematical underpinning for the ' ...
  37. [37]
    How did Grothendieck come in contact with Category theory?
    Jul 17, 2023 · Category theory was formalized around 1950s, and Grothendieck made his breakthrough papers about 10-20 years from that time.
  38. [38]
    [2508.21609] Sites and Grothendieck toposes: an introduction - arXiv
    Aug 29, 2025 · Topos theory occupies a singular place in contemporary mathematics: born from Grothendieck's algebraic geometry, it has emerged as a unifying ...
  39. [39]
    The Shock Tactics of Alexander Grothendieck - Jewish Currents
    Jun 7, 2015 · In protest against Soviet policies, he boycotted the International Congress of Mathematicians in Moscow, where he was to receive the former ...
  40. [40]
    Alexander Grothendieck - Telegraph obituary - MacTutor
    Nov 14, 2014 · But in 1942, after the Grothendiecks had been moved to a detention camp at Gurs, Alexander was able to attend the Coll&eagravege Cévénol, a ...Missing: childhood | Show results with:childhood<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Celebrating an unusual life - plus.maths.org
    Mar 28, 2008 · A little later, he went to Hanoi to register his protest against the Vietnam war. In an era where direct action was pivotal, mathematics may ...
  42. [42]
    The Anarchist Abstractionist — Who was Alexander Grothendieck?
    Sep 17, 2021 · Mathematician Alexander Grothendieck (1928-2014) was born in 1928 to anarchist parents who left him to spend the majority of his formative years with foster ...
  43. [43]
    Alexander Grothendieck obituary | Mathematics - The Guardian
    Nov 25, 2014 · He resigned from the IHES because of the military funding of a small percentage of the institute budget. Awarded the Fields medal in 1966 ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] The Responsibility of the Scientist Today
    Practically all the scientists of the western world have accepted, or would accept if the opportunity presented itself, military subventions whether for private ...
  45. [45]
    Survivre et vivre - Wikipedia
    Survivre et Vivre (Survive and Live), was a political group founded on 27 July 1970 in Montreal, with the goals of promoting pacificism, ecology, and a new ...Missing: funding | Show results with:funding
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Chapter 23. Récoltes et Semailles
    Oct 20, 2016 · Grothendieck began writing Récoltes et Semailles in June 1983, and ... Grothendieck was enraged at both the politicians and the military.
  47. [47]
    Grothendieck Quest - Roy Lisker's Ferment Magazine
    This letter (A translation is given below) enumerates his reasons for refusing the highly prestigious Crafoord Prize in mathematics.Missing: critiques militarization
  48. [48]
    A Truncated Manuscript | Pierre Schapira - Inference Review
    Editions Gallimard, 29,50 €. Strictly speaking, this essay is not solely a review of Alexander Grothendieck's Récoltes et Semailles (Reaping and Sowing).<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Grothendieck: The Myth of a Break - EMS Press
    In the post-war period and until the 1970s, the French math- ematical world functioned as in the feodal world where legitimacy stems from lineage. Twenty ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Grothendieck's “Long March through Galois theory” Leila Schneps ...
    Alexander Grothendieck wrote the Long March between January and. June 1981. It consists of about 1600 manuscript pages, and nearly as much again in various ...
  51. [51]
    Long March in nLab
    Oct 23, 2022 · The title refers to a document 'La Longue Marche à travers la Théorie de Galois“ by Alexander Grothendieck. He wrote the 'Long March' between January and June ...
  52. [52]
    Archives Grothendieck - Université de Montpellier
    La "Longue Marche" à travers la théorie de Galois. [à partir de 1978-à partir de 1982]. "Longue Marche" [brouillon] : notes manuscrites (s.d.). Cote n° 140 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Récoltes et Semailles - UT Math
    Alexandre Grothendieck. 1986. Page 2. 2. Page 3. Contents. Presentation of the Themes or PRELUDE IN FOUR. PARTS. 9. 1. By way of a foreword. 9. 2. A walk ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Récoltes et Semailles, Part I - Uberty
    The Riemann-Roch-Grothendieck Yoga ( K-Theory and its relationship ... Most of his energy was invested in radical political causes, anti-militarism and organic.
  55. [55]
    Publication of "Récoltes et semailles" by Alexander Grothendieck
    Feb 10, 2022 · Alexander Grothendieck (also known as Alexandre Grothendieck) is considered as one of the most influential mathematicians of the 20th century, ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] A Truncated Manuscript - arXiv
    by Alexander Grothendieck. Editions Gallimard, 29,50 €. Strictly speaking, this essay is not solely a review of Alexander Grothendieck's Récoltes et Semailles.
  57. [57]
    'He was in mystic delirium': was this hermit mathematician a ...
    Aug 31, 2024 · Resigning from France's elite Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques (IHES) – in protest at funding it received from the ministry of defence – ...
  58. [58]
    The Man of the Circular Ruins | PLANET OF STORMS
    Mar 30, 2021 · Grothendieck (pronounced 'Grotendic') was born in Berlin in 1928. His parents were, for lack of a better term, professional revolutionaries. ...Missing: early | Show results with:early
  59. [59]
    Alexander Grothendieck, Brilliant Jewish Mathematician, Dies at 86
    Nov 14, 2014 · His father Alexander “Sascha” Schapiro was a Russian Jewish social progressive who was murdered in Auschwitz in 1942. Grothendieck's work ...
  60. [60]
    [1605.08112] 1 An unusual family - ar5iv
    this was his nickname — lived for the first five years with his parents and a half-sister in Berlin ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Chapter 12. Grothendieck's Family I
    Johanna Grothendieck was born on 16 February 1959 in Boston, but spent only seventeen days of her life in the United States. Her mother returned to. France ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Chapter 21. Grothendieck's Family II
    It seems as though Grothendieck's family never really played a decisive role in his life, particularly after his separation from his wife and children in ...Missing: War displacement
  63. [63]
    Alexander Grothendieck (1928–2014) - Nature
    Jan 14, 2015 · He completed his doctoral thesis on topological vector spaces at the University of Nancy in 1953, and spent a short time teaching in Brazil. His ...
  64. [64]
    March 28: The Stateless Mathematician - Jewish Currents
    Mar 27, 2017 · Alexander Grothendieck, a creator of modern algebraic geometry and one of the most influential mathematicians of the 20th century, was born to anarchist ...Missing: self- perception
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Alexander Grothendieck: 1928-2014 A stateless 20. century ...
    Apr 17, 2015 · But Grothendieck accepted this provisional housing of the IHES, but quit the beautiful place IHES, at. Bures-sur-Yvette, created for Dieudonné ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Alexander Grothendieck: A German Mathematician Who is ...
    Jul 9, 2021 · Alexander was born in Berlin in a Jewish family. His father's name was alexander Sascha Schapiro and his mother's name is Johanna Grothendieck.<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    What did Alexander Grothendieck think of anarchism? - Reddit
    Jan 8, 2016 · He was born to anarchist parents. He lived most of his live without any nationality and he was a radical pacifist.Alexander Grothendieck, considered by many to be the greatest ...Alexander Grothendieck - a hardcore mathematician in every sense ...More results from www.reddit.com
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Grothendieck's theory of schemes and the algebra–geometry duality
    Dec 26, 2022 · We shall address from a conceptual perspective the duality between al- gebra and geometry in the framework of the refoundation of algebraic ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] the grothendieck-riemann-roch theorem - UChicago Math
    The Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem is a deep result in algebraic geometry which relates the Euler characteristic of vector bundles to characteristic classes.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] The Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch Theorem
    Mar 23, 2015 · The classical Riemann-Roch theorem is a fundamental result in complex analysis and algebraic geometry. In its original form, developed by ...
  71. [71]
    Topos Theory (Part 1) | Azimuth - WordPress.com
    Jan 5, 2020 · Topos theory emerged from Grothendieck's work on algebraic geometry; he developed it as part of his plan to prove the Weil Conjectures. It ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Lectures on etale cohomology - James Milne
    About 1958, Grothendieck defined the étale “topology” of a scheme, and the theory of étale cohomology was worked out by him with the assistance of M. Artin ...
  73. [73]
    (PDF) Etale Cohomology: Grothendieck's Contribution - Academia.edu
    Apr 1, 2020 · This contribution was crucial for advancing both algebraic geometry and number theory. What are étale cohomology groups and how are they defined ...
  74. [74]
    Princeton University Press - Facebook
    Apr 12, 2025 · Artin introduced étale cohomology to extend the methods of sheaf-theoretic cohomology from complex varieties to more general schemes. This work ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Motives — Grothendieck's Dream - James Milne
    Feb 3, 2009 · This is a major problem, perhaps the major problem, in arithmetic geometry and in algebraic geometry. In characteristic zero, Conjecture D ...
  76. [76]
    [2304.08737] Motivating Motives - arXiv
    Apr 18, 2023 · Grothendieck and others worked for decades to prove Weil's conjectures, inventing a large chunk of modern algebraic geometry in the process.
  77. [77]
    Introduction
    Grothendieck was aiming for a theory built on numerical equivalence of alge- braic cycles because, as he did foresee and as was later proved by Jannsen, this. – ...
  78. [78]
    Category Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Dec 6, 1996 · Category theory is both an interesting object of philosophical study, and a potentially powerful formal tool for philosophical investigations of concepts.<|control11|><|separator|>
  79. [79]
    Parution de "Récoltes et semailles" d'Alexandre Grothendieck - IHES
    Feb 10, 2022 · Le coffret Récoltes et semailles d'Alexandre Grothendieck sort en librairie le 13 janvier, aux Editions Gallimard.
  80. [80]
    Published works - CSG Istituto Grothendieck
    Title: Récoltes et Semailles I, II; Language: French; Published Date: 2022; Date: February 1984 – May 1986; Published in: Récoltes et Semailles I, II. Éditions ...
  81. [81]
  82. [82]
    Some of Grothendieck's archives published online by the University ...
    May 23, 2017 · Alexandre Grothendieck is considered one of the greatest mathematicians of the 20th century. He revolutionised the foundations and the ...
  83. [83]
    Unpublished works - CSG Istituto Grothendieck
    This self-imposed isolation bequeathed us an extensive collection of intermittent, both lengthy and concise, mathematical reflections and literary meditations.
  84. [84]
    CSG Istituto Grothendieck: Home
    Editorial program. Coordination of editions of unpublished Grothendieck manuscripts, either mathematical, literary, philosophical, ethical or sociological.Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  85. [85]
  86. [86]
    The Mathematical and Philosophical Legacy of Alexander ...
    This edited volume utilizes a multidisciplinary approach to examine Alexander Grothendieck's lasting influence on mathematics, philosophy, and logic.Missing: Istituto | Show results with:Istituto
  87. [87]
    Have Grothendieck's notes in Montpellier already been investigated?
    Feb 11, 2016 · You could keep an eye on the Quaderni del Centro di Studi Grothendieckiani, a biennial refereed journal dedicated to exploring Alexander ...
  88. [88]
    Éléments de géométrie algébrique : II. Étude globale ... - Numdam
    Grothendieck, Alexander. Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS, Tome 8 (1961), pp. 5-222. partie précédente Éléments de géométrie algébrique : I. Le langage ...
  89. [89]
    SGA
    Archive of scans that we created of SGA, etc. Spanish site with huge amount of work by Grothendieck. Click here for a PDF version of the SGA scans.
  90. [90]
    Esquisse d'un Programme - Geometric Galois Actions
    Apr 5, 2013 · Esquisse d'un Programme. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2013. By. Alexandre Grothendieck. Edited by. Leila Schneps and.
  91. [91]
    [LUM#1] In search of Alexandre Grothendieck
    Jan 19, 2016 · Drawn up between 1992 and 1999 in Grothendieck's final residence, the "Lasserre collection" contains his last papers: 60,000 pages, including ...Missing: Alexander | Show results with:Alexander<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    28,000 pages by Alexandre Grothendieck - Université de Montpellier
    May 10, 2017 · The Grothendieck collection includes unpublished manuscripts of major twentieth-century mathematical theories, particularly algebraic geometry.
  93. [93]
    Handover of unpublished manuscripts of A. Grothendieck to the BnF
    Sep 28, 2023 · On 28 September 2023, a ceremony was held in Paris, at the premises of the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF), at which Alexander ...