Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Atesh

Atesh is a pro-Ukrainian movement founded in September 2022 in Russian-occupied , comprising and , with the name deriving from the Crimean Tatar word for "fire." The group operates as a guerrilla network in occupied Ukrainian territories, including , , and other frontline regions, as well as conducting actions inside proper, focusing on gathering, of infrastructure, and disruption of Russian logistics. Atesh's activities include targeted railway sabotages to hinder ammunition and equipment transport, such as disabling relay cabinets near Armyansk in Crimea in October 2025, which halted supply lines during peak logistics periods. The movement claims infiltration of Russian military units for reconnaissance on troop positions and equipment, as well as facilitating evacuations for Russian personnel seeking defection in exchange for intelligence. Operations extend to regions like Russia's Rostov Oblast, Volgograd, and Chuvash Republic, where partisans have severed rail routes supporting frontline logistics. While Atesh publicizes its successes via Telegram channels and reports consistent disruptions to Russian operations, independent verification of specific claims remains limited due to the clandestine nature of guerrilla warfare in contested areas, though patterns of reported railway incidents align with broader Ukrainian resistance efforts. The group's emergence reflects organized local opposition to the Russian occupation following the 2022 full-scale invasion, emphasizing asymmetric tactics to impose costs on occupiers amid conventional frontline stalemates.

Origins and Formation

Founding in 2022

Atesh emerged in September 2022 as a clandestine pro- partisan group operating primarily in Russian-occupied , amid Russia's full-scale of and the Kremlin's announcement of partial mobilization on September 21. The movement was initiated by a network of ethnic , , and disillusioned with the occupation, aiming to conduct sabotage and intelligence operations against Russian forces from within occupied territories. The group's public debut occurred toward the end of the month, with its first operational claims and organizational oath disseminated via Telegram, signaling a structured effort coordinated remotely to evade detection. This formation built on pre-existing informal networks of dissent in , which had persisted since the 2014 annexation, but formalized in 2022 to counter intensified Russian control and mobilization pressures. Early activities focused on low-profile disruptions, reflecting the founders' emphasis on asymmetric tactics over direct confrontation.

Leadership and Crimean Tatar Roots

Atesh maintains an anonymous leadership structure to safeguard its operatives from reprisals, operating through a decentralized network of handlers and curators who coordinate individual agents in occupied territories. Primary initiators and commanders are operating from within , drawing on the ethnic group's historical defiance against domination, which intensified after the 2014 annexation and included mass arrests, forced , and suppression of cultural institutions. This Tatar dominance in leadership reflects the movement's formation amid Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion, when local partisans, including Tatars facing 85% of political detentions on the peninsula, coalesced to conduct and intelligence gathering. The group's nomenclature—"Atesh," translating to "fire" in the Crimean Tatar language—encapsulates its insurgent ethos and indigenous heritage, evoking the unquenchable spirit of resistance akin to historical Tatar uprisings. Established in September 2022 by and in occupied , Atesh embodies the continuity of Tatar partisanship, rooted in the 1944 Soviet deportation of nearly 200,000 and subsequent return struggles post-1989, which fostered a tradition of non-violent and armed opposition to colonial rule. While some Tatar community leaders have distanced themselves from claiming authorship to avoid reprisals, the movement's operations prioritize Tatar-heavy regions, leveraging local knowledge for strikes on Russian infrastructure. Endorsement from , the longstanding head of the Crimean Tatar national movement and a former Soviet-era dissident, has bolstered Atesh's legitimacy within Tatar circles, aligning it with calls for Crimea's de-occupation and restoration of . This support underscores the partisan outfit's role as an extension of Tatar self-defense mechanisms, distinct from state-affiliated units, and focused on to exploit Russian vulnerabilities in ethnically restive areas.

Ideology and Objectives

Core Motivations

The core motivations of Atesh center on resisting Russian and restoring Ukrainian control over annexed territories, especially , where the group formed amid the 2022 full-scale invasion. Drawing heavily from Crimean Tatar heritage—marked by historical deportations and ongoing cultural suppression under Russian rule—members view their actions as essential to countering imperial expansion and preventing demographic erasure of indigenous groups. This drive manifests in a commitment to , such as railways and military sites, to erode Russian logistical superiority and morale. Atesh's stated objectives emphasize direct support for statehood through , including infiltration of units as double agents and sharing with Kyiv's forces. Participants swear oaths of loyalty via public channels, pledging their "blood and soul" to the movement's fidelity in combating invaders. While individual incentives range from personal vendettas against aggression to pragmatic incentives like , the unifying imperative is to inflict on occupiers until withdrawal or defeat. Beyond immediate liberation, Atesh espouses a vision of Russian Federation disintegration, advocating national uprisings among "enslaved nations" to dismantle the "prison of peoples" and preclude recurrent expansionism. This expansive aim aligns with Crimean Tatar advocacy for , positioning the group as a for broader anti-imperial fragmentation rather than mere territorial recovery. Such underscores a causal belief that incomplete Russian collapse perpetuates threats to and neighboring ethnic groups.

Stated Goals and Methods

Atesh declares its central objective as resisting occupation in Ukrainian territories, particularly , by supporting the Ukrainian armed forces through operations aimed at undermining enemy and command structures. The group has publicly stated on its Telegram channel that its aim is "to fight for the " by , emphasizing the expulsion of forces from occupied areas. This motivation stems from a commitment to liberate and restore Ukrainian , with members citing personal drives to counter efforts and protect indigenous populations like . In pursuit of these goals, Atesh employs methods centered on intelligence collection, , and psychological operations. Agents gather detailed data on Russian troop movements, fortifications, and air defense systems in occupied regions, which is relayed to military units for targeted strikes. tactics include attacks on fuel depots and railway , improvised explosive device (IED) placements to disrupt supply lines, and infiltration of Russian military units to sow discord and enable ambushes. The group also conducts by publicizing verified operation footage on , aiming to demoralize Russian personnel and highlight vulnerabilities in occupied zones. Atesh's operational doctrine prioritizes low-profile, high-impact actions to avoid detection while maximizing disruption, often coordinating with other networks for synchronized efforts. These methods are adapted to the asymmetric nature of , focusing on rather than direct confrontations. Claims of success, such as derailing trains carrying munitions or disabling communications, are frequently documented with geolocated evidence to bolster credibility among supporters.

Organizational Structure

Network Composition

Atesh functions as a decentralized network comprising independent operatives and small cells operating across Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories, , and regions within Russia proper, such as and the . The group claims a membership of approximately 1,800 individuals, including informants, agents, and activists who conduct gathering, , and infiltration activities. This structure emphasizes compartmentalization, with agents often working autonomously and reporting to anonymous curators or handlers based in unoccupied to minimize risks from arrests or infiltrations by Russian security services. The network's composition is multi-ethnic, drawing primarily from , , and motivated by opposition to Russian occupation. Members include civilians, volunteers driven by personal losses from the , employees in Russian-controlled law enforcement, and deep-cover infiltrators within the Russian military—often individuals mobilized or drafted into Russian units since late 2022. Atesh has reported identifying and neutralizing internal threats, such as double agents from Russian special services, underscoring the network's vigilance against compromise. Operationally, the network divides into a civilian component focused on non-kinetic tasks like and a more active agent cadre for direct , with cells tailored to regional threats—evident in actions ranging from Crimean disruptions to inland Russian communications . It maintains loose coordination with Ukraine's state-backed National Resistance Centre for sharing but operates independently to preserve deniability and agility. No public details on formal or named exist, as serves as a core safeguard in hostile environments.

Recruitment and Operations

Atesh primarily recruits through grassroots networks in occupied Ukrainian territories and increasingly within Russia, leveraging personal motivations such as opposition to the Russian occupation and familial losses from the war. The group claims to have grown to thousands of members since its founding in September 2022, with recruitment often initiated via Telegram channels where prospective agents swear an oath pledging loyalty to Ukraine's defense. No financial incentives are offered beyond reimbursements for operational expenses like fuel, emphasizing ideological commitment over payment. In Russia, recruitment has expanded through public invitations, including posters in regions like Siberia urging individuals to "become our eyes" and join the movement, targeting civilians, law enforcement personnel, and even military recruits opposed to the war. New recruits begin with low-risk tasks such as intelligence gathering to build trust, progressing to more direct involvement as reliability is established, with the group providing logistical support including weapons and explosives when needed. The movement's structure supports a decentralized of approximately 1,800 informants, agents, and activists divided into civil elements focused on non-violent intelligence collection and specialized agents conducting and infiltration. Agents operate with compartmentalized knowledge, reporting to handlers or curators in unoccupied to minimize risks from Russian security services like the , which has led to detections of double agents within the group. Recruitment has notably included infiltration into and administrative roles since late 2022, enabling internal access for operations. Operations emphasize guerrilla tactics suited to , including solo reconnaissance missions where agents stake out military targets for weeks, capturing photographs and videos of air defenses, bases, and naval assets before relaying data to via secure channels. This intelligence has reportedly facilitated strikes, such as those on the headquarters in and a station in in 2023. Direct actions involve like on railways, checkpoints, and supply trucks, as well as bombings of political targets such as a headquarters, aimed at disrupting logistics and morale without large-scale confrontations. Agents maintain secrecy even from family members, conducting activities covertly to evade detection in high-risk environments like . All gathered intelligence is cross-verified by entities like Ukraine's Centre before use, underscoring a reliance on empirical validation amid the challenges of operations.

Activities in Occupied Territories

Intelligence Operations

Atesh's intelligence operations center on and of Russian military targets, including troop concentrations, equipment deployments, and command infrastructure, primarily in occupied and other territories but extending into regions. The group asserts that its agents, often embedded in local populations, gather geospatial data, photographs, and movement patterns, which are then relayed to Forces for strike planning. This intelligence-sharing has reportedly enabled targeted attacks, though independent confirmation of specific outcomes remains constrained by wartime opacity. A notable example occurred on October 8, 2025, when Atesh provided coordinates of a mobile command post operating from a communications vehicle in occupied , ; Ukrainian forces subsequently struck the target, disrupting coordination among several units in adjacent . In July 2025, Atesh exposed a covert radar installation in , , sharing detailed intelligence with Ukraine's military to inform potential neutralization efforts against air defense systems. Similarly, in September 2025, the group conducted prolonged surveillance of a (GRU) base in , publicly disclosing site layouts and personnel details to aid broader Ukrainian operational awareness. Atesh has expanded recruitment for intelligence contributions, appealing to anti-war Russians to report on military facilities, logistics routes, and ammunition depots via secure channels, with claims of increasing responses from Russian southern regions by October 2025. These efforts complement physical sabotage by prioritizing non-kinetic disruptions through data dissemination, though the group's Telegram announcements serve dual purposes of operational reporting and psychological signaling to Russian forces. Russian authorities dismiss Atesh intelligence as fabricated or exaggerated propaganda, attributing leaks to Ukrainian special services rather than grassroots partisans.

Sabotage in Crimea and Southern Ukraine

Atesh partisans have conducted multiple sabotage operations targeting Russian military logistics in occupied Crimea and southern Ukrainian regions, including Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts, primarily focusing on railway infrastructure to hinder troop and supply movements. These actions, often involving damage to tracks, relay equipment, and signaling systems, aim to sever ammunition and fuel routes supporting frontline operations. On October 26, 2025, Atesh agents railway infrastructure in the Armyansk district of occupied , damaging relay equipment and halting train traffic for several hours, which disrupted to the . Similar operations occurred on March 9, 2025, when partisans targeted a railway line connecting to the Zaporizhzhia front, aiming to isolate supply chains. In , Atesh claimed a successful railway near Verkhnii Tokmak in on October 7, 2025, at coordinates 47°13'22.2"N 36°18'21.9"E, paralyzing military supplies. Earlier incidents include a , 2024, in that damaged key railroad sections, further complicating Russian reinforcements. Atesh has also reported attacks on ammunition depots, such as in , , on July 12, 2024, where weapons storage was allegedly destroyed. These claims, disseminated via Atesh's channels and echoed in outlets, lack independent verification from neutral observers, with Russian authorities typically attributing disruptions to technical failures rather than .

Expansion and Operations in Russia

Initial Cross-Border Actions

The Atesh partisan group expanded its operations from occupied territories into federal subjects starting in mid-2024, marking the onset of cross-border actions aimed at disrupting military logistics near the . These initial efforts primarily targeted railway infrastructure in border regions, leveraging agents embedded within or near supply lines to conduct . authorities have not officially confirmed these incidents, attributing disruptions to technical failures or denying involvement altogether. On July 9, 2024, Atesh claimed responsibility for sabotaging a critical railway segment in Russia's , linking to the occupied Ukrainian city of . The group stated that operatives damaged signaling equipment, halting train movements for several hours and interrupting the transport of Russian troops, ammunition, and fuel to frontline positions in . This action was described by Atesh as a deliberate strike against a logistics artery supporting Russian advances, with the group releasing video footage purportedly showing the site post-sabotage. Independent verification remains elusive, as access to the area is restricted, though the timing coincided with reported delays in Russian military convoys. These early cross-border operations built on Atesh's prior infiltration of Russian military units, with agents reportedly mobilized into the as early as late 2022. By 2024, such networks enabled targeted disruptions without requiring physical border crossings, focusing on vulnerabilities like relay cabinets and communication nodes in regions such as and Rostov oblasts. Atesh emphasized that these actions were low-risk, high-impact tactics to strain resources, though critics, including , dismissed the claims as without evidence of significant damage.

Deep Inland Sabotages (2024-2025)

In 2024 and 2025, the Atesh partisan network claimed responsibility for a series of sabotage operations targeting railway and infrastructure in regions deep inside , including central and eastern areas hundreds to thousands of kilometers from the border. These actions focused on disrupting , such as ammunition transport and equipment movement, through methods like on electrical relay cabinets and track components, which reportedly caused delays lasting hours to days. While Atesh provided video and photographic evidence via its Telegram channel, independent verification was scarce, with Russian authorities typically attributing disruptions to technical failures or denying external involvement. Key claimed incidents included a March 23, 2025, operation in , where agents destroyed a transformer cabinet on a railway line, halting military cargo shipments toward the region near the border. On May 5, 2025, in along the River, Atesh reported disabling a transformer substation, cutting power to facilities supporting Russian operations. Further east, on September 17, 2025, partisans sabotaged a railway junction near in the Urals—over 1,600 kilometers from —disrupting logistics for production and troop movements. In central Russia's Chuvash Republic, Atesh executed multiple railway attacks in October 2025: on , an agent set fire to a box between Altyshevo and Alatyr near , delaying trains and interrupting deliveries of and components for Iranian-made Shahed drones used against targets; a subsequent on October 23 severed a key supply route to frontline units. Atesh also asserted a sabotage mission in Russia's on August 25, 2025, targeting military rail systems to hinder rear-area supplies. These operations, if accurate, indicate of agents or infiltration networks enabling strikes in ethnically diverse, non-border regions, though pro- outlets reporting them lack corroboration from neutral observers.

Impact and Effectiveness

Claimed Disruptions

Atesh has claimed responsibility for multiple sabotage operations targeting Russian , particularly railway infrastructure critical for troop and munitions transport, resulting in temporary halts to train movements and rerouting of supplies. For instance, on , 2025, the group asserted it derailed a military in Russia's Chuvash , severing an ammunition supply route to Ukraine's front lines and paralyzing local logistics for hours, which forced Russian forces to redirect deliveries elsewhere. Similarly, on September 17, 2025, Atesh reported sabotaging a railway junction near —approximately 1,600 kilometers from the Ukrainian border—disrupting rail traffic used for purposes deep in Russian territory. In addition to rail targets, Atesh has claimed disruptions to systems. On October 19, 2025, it stated that partisans struck a Russian command center near the border, causing chaos in operations and temporarily severing oversight of a key frontier sector. Earlier, on May 8, 2025, the group alleged it interfered with communications at military facilities in , impairing coordination among Russian units. These actions, per Atesh's reports, collectively aim to impose delays and increased costs on Russian supply chains, though independent verification remains limited. Other claimed incidents include a September 21, 2025, of a railway line leading to an aerospace plant in , which the group said halted shipments of components for . Atesh has maintained that such operations, ongoing since its formation in September 2022, have systematically degraded rear-area efficiency without specifying aggregate quantitative impacts like total delayed or inflicted. Reports from pro-Ukrainian outlets often relay these claims without corroboration from neutral observers, highlighting challenges in assessing their scale amid the opacity of warfare.

Independent Assessments

Independent assessments of Atesh's operations are constrained by the covert nature of activities, which rely on self-reported evidence such as photographs and videos that are difficult for external analysts to corroborate without on-ground access. Media outlets like the have noted that while Atesh's intelligence contributions are deemed credible by Ukrainian defense and intelligence sources, their specific claims cannot be independently verified due to operational secrecy and lack of open-source confirmation. Similarly, reports from outlets such as and TVP World consistently state an inability to confirm Atesh's assertions, highlighting reliance on the group's Telegram channel for details. Think tanks evaluating the broader Ukrainian resistance, including groups like Atesh, assess their role as contributing to Russian resource diversion rather than decisive military impact. The International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) describes multi-domain resistance efforts, encompassing Atesh's activities, as requiring to allocate substantial security forces to occupied territories, thereby constraining frontline deployments, though quantifying Atesh-specific effects remains elusive amid aggregated actions. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) incorporates Atesh reports into operational analyses, such as claims of targeting personnel in April 2025, treating them as indicative of ongoing low-level threats but without explicit endorsement of efficacy or scale. Overall, experts emphasize psychological and effects over disruptions, with limited of sustained logistical from Atesh's claimed and attacks, as Russian responses often involve rapid repairs and heightened countermeasures. Ukrainian security assessments, while potentially biased toward amplification for , provide the closest proxy for validation, affirming Atesh's utility in gathering and minor amid a ecosystem that imposes asymmetric costs on occupiers. No peer-reviewed studies or comprehensive OSINT breakdowns have emerged to date attributing verifiable, large-scale disruptions solely to Atesh, underscoring the challenges in distinguishing partisan deeds from state-directed or unattributed incidents.

Controversies and Criticisms

Verification Challenges

Verifying claims made by Atesh is inherently difficult owing to the group's covert operations in Russian-controlled territories, where physical access for journalists, analysts, or neutral observers is prohibited or highly dangerous. Atesh disseminates information primarily through its Telegram channel, including videos and photos allegedly depicting outcomes like ignited railway signals or disrupted military convoys, but these lack third-party authentication in real-time. Multiple reputable news organizations, including the and Kyiv Independent, have reported Atesh's announcements while explicitly stating an inability to independently confirm the details, highlighting the evidentiary gap between self-reported successes and verifiable facts. Similarly, outlets such as have noted the same limitations when covering deep inland operations, such as alleged railway in on September 17, 2025. This pattern reflects broader challenges in (OSINT) analysis, where geolocation of footage or correlation with often fails to conclusively link events to Atesh amid information controls and potential . Russian state media and officials consistently refute Atesh attributions, framing incidents as accidents, maintenance issues, or acts by unrelated dissidents, which introduces counter-narratives without resolution. Atesh has itself alleged preparations for false-flag attacks to discredit the group, as claimed in April 2024, but this remains unverified and exemplifies the mutual accusations that obscure ground truth. Absent endorsements from military intelligence or forensic data from international bodies, assessments rely heavily on from cumulative claims, though causal links to strategic impacts—such as delayed —cannot be empirically isolated from other wartime variables like drone strikes or countermeasures.

Russian Government Viewpoint

The Russian government and portray Atesh as a terrorist organization primarily directed by Ukrainian special services, with the aim of conducting and terrorist acts against and civilian infrastructure in annexed territories and mainland . Officials from the Russian Foreign Ministry have explicitly labeled Atesh a "Crimean Tatar terrorist grouping," accusing it of promoting and justifying through its operations, such as and disruptions to . This characterization frames Atesh not as a movement but as a proxy tool of Kyiv's strategy, often amplified by Western intelligence support. The has banned Atesh activities, treating its claimed attacks—ranging from railway sabotage to intelligence gathering—as criminal rather than legitimate . Russian authorities assert that many Atesh operations result in minimal damage or are fabricated , while emphasizing successful efforts, including arrests of purported members in and other regions. For instance, state reports highlight detentions of individuals linked to Atesh for plotting explosions and , portraying the group as a to public safety and . In official narratives, Atesh's recruitment of and other minorities is depicted as manipulative exploitation, with Russian leadership warning that participation equates to and with foreign adversaries. This viewpoint aligns with broader Russian rhetoric on the conflict, where such groups are seen as undermining the integration of occupied areas into the Russian Federation and justifying heightened security measures, such as increased patrols and in sensitive zones.

Ethical and Legal Debates

The actions of Atesh, a pro-Ukrainian group conducting in Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories and deeper into , raise questions under (IHL) regarding the status of irregular fighters and the permissibility of clandestine operations. targeting military infrastructure, such as railways used for troop movements or communication relays, is generally lawful as a form of , provided it adheres to principles of , , and , as outlined in the 1907 Hague Regulations and customary IHL. and intelligence gathering by groups like Atesh, which have supported Ukrainian strikes on Russian assets including the , fall within protected activities under Article 24 of the Hague Regulations, distinguishing them from —a war crime involving feigned protected status to kill or wound—unless combatants misuse appearances in a treacherous manner. No verified incidents attribute to Atesh operations. Partisans such as Atesh members operate without uniforms or fixed distinctive emblems, rendering them unprivileged belligerents rather than lawful combatants under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I, which requires organized forces under responsible command to carry arms openly during attacks. If captured in occupied territories, they may be prosecuted under Russian domestic law for espionage or sabotage, as spies caught out of uniform lack combatant immunity, though execution without trial would violate IHL protections against arbitrary deprivation of life. In non-occupied Russian territory, cross-border sabotage blurs lines between lawful resistance and potential acts of aggression, though the context of Russia's unlawful invasion—deemed a violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter by the International Court of Justice—bolsters arguments for defensive legitimacy under the right to resist occupation per Hague Regulations Article 43. Russian authorities classify Atesh actions as terrorism, subjecting alleged members to anti-terrorist legislation, but this framing overlooks IHL's accommodation of levée en masse in invaded territories. Ethically, Atesh's emphasis on disrupting —such as on relay cabinets or lines supplying —aligns with just war principles of minimizing civilian harm, with no documented cases of intentional civilian targeting in their claimed operations. Critics, including Russian state media, argue such asymmetric tactics erode moral constraints by operating in civilian guise, potentially endangering non-combatants through incidental effects like disrupted civilian access, though assessments favor military utility over collateral risks in an existential defense scenario. From a causal realist perspective, these operations counterbalance Russia's conventional superiority, justified by the aggressor's initiation of hostilities, but raise concerns over if emulated by non-state actors elsewhere; proponents counter that denying effective resistance to occupied populations incentivizes prolonged subjugation. Independent analyses note the absence of systemic ethical lapses, attributing effectiveness to precise targeting rather than indiscriminate violence.

References

  1. [1]
    How Ukraine's shadow army fights back against the Russian ...
    Feb 11, 2025 · One prominent example is “Atesh,” a partisan group that was founded in September 2022 in Russian-occupied Crimea but claims to have carried out ...
  2. [2]
    Crimean resistance movement Atesh — interview
    Jun 19, 2024 · The Atesh movement originated in Crimea in the summer of 2022 among Crimean Tatars and Ukrainians. At that time, it was clear that Russia would likely launch a ...
  3. [3]
    Ukraine war: Atesh, the group spying on Russians in occupied Crimea
    Jan 5, 2024 · Atesh, meaning fire in Crimean Tatar, says it collects data on Russian forces in occupied Ukraine.
  4. [4]
    Atesh: the Ukrainian partisans taking on Russia - The Week
    Sep 3, 2024 · It's a Ukrainian guerrilla group called Atesh which claims to be having great success disrupting Russian military activities.
  5. [5]
    https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/4051709-atesh-agents-carry-out-sabotage-on-railway-in-crimea.html
  6. [6]
    https://en.defence-ua.com/news/atesh_partisans_disrupt_russian_logistics_in_occupied_crimea_ammunition_supply_routes_severed-16271.html
  7. [7]
    Behind the Lines: Inside the Resistance Sabotaging Putin's Plans for ...
    Feb 8, 2024 · The partisan movement Atesh – “fire” in Crimean Tatar – has infiltrated the Russian army as well as destroying targets behind enemy lines.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  8. [8]
    ATESH Partisans Network Reports Russian Soldier Asking ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · The partisan movement ATESH reported that a Russian soldier stationed on the Kherson front has reached out seeking safe evacuation in ...
  9. [9]
    Pro-Ukrainian partisans sabotage railway infrastructure in Russia's ...
    Oct 12, 2025 · The Atesh partisan group sabotaged railway infrastructure in Russia's Rostov Oblast, disrupting Russian logistics, the group claimed in a ...
  10. [10]
    https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/10/23/partisan-operation-in-russias-chuvash-republic-severed-route-feeding-ammo-to-ukraines-front/
  11. [11]
    Pro-Ukraine partisans sabotage railways in Russia's Volgograd ...
    Jul 10, 2025 · The Atesh partisan group sabotaged the railways in the Russian city of Volgograd and in the Russian-occupied settlement of Uvarove in Crimea ...
  12. [12]
    Nothing Is Forever Lost: Ukraine's Multi-Domain Resistance and the ...
    Jun 13, 2025 · Armed resistance groups, such as Atesh, Popular Resistance of Ukraine (NSU), Berdyansk Partisan Army (BPA), and Mariupol Resistance, among ...
  13. [13]
    "I didn't tell anyone about it because this is guerrilla warfare": the ...
    Feb 29, 2024 · One was the Atesh movement, formed in the summer of 2022 in the centre of the Crimean Tatars and the pro-Ukrainian community on the temporarily ...
  14. [14]
    Ukrainian sabotage groups operating behind Russian lines
    in Saky, Dzhankoi, Sevastopol, and other ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    The underground Crimean Tatar group taking up arms against Russia
    Jul 17, 2023 · The Atesh guerrilla group is active behind Russian lines, and leaders of the Indigenous movement say they are ready if they can get the weapons.<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Atesh partisans hit deep in Russia — railway nearly 1,000 km from ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · The “Atesh” partisans operate in the occupied territories of Ukraine and Russia. It was founded in 2022 in response to Russia's all-out war.
  17. [17]
    Crimean Tatars in the Vortex of War: a Decisive Moment for the Nation
    Jun 28, 2023 · According to Mustafa Dzhemiliev, one of the leaders of the Crimean Tatar national movement ... Then, in October, the Atesh movement was formed.
  18. [18]
    The Atesh partisan movement stated that new supporters were ...
    “Overcrowded hospitals, funerals in every district, impoverishment of the population. This forces them to act,” Atesh claims, also publishing photos of posted ...
  19. [19]
    Why Crimean Tatar fighters are playing an increasing role in ...
    Aug 2, 2023 · Partisans including Atesh are using a variety of methods to undermine the Russians in Crimea and beyond. When Atesh claimed responsibility ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  20. [20]
    The Atesh Movement: Ukrainian Partisans Fighting Russia in Crimea
    Apr 16, 2024 · The Atesh Movement is a collection of ethnic Ukrainian, Russian and Crimean Tatar partisans working to assist the Ukrainian state in fighting against Russia.Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
  21. [21]
    Inside Atesh, the Resistance Movement That Stalks Russian Targets
    Mar 19, 2024 · The movement is led by Crimean Tatars who mostly are based on the occupied peninsula, Yuri said. Members include Ukrainians and active duty ...Missing: roots | Show results with:roots
  22. [22]
    ATESH intelligence leads to strike on mobile command post ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · The Ukrainian partisan group Atesh reported conducting a successful sabotage operation in Henichesk, a Russian-occupied town on the Azov Sea ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Russian radar unit in Sevastopol exposed by partisans - RBC-Ukraine
    Jul 31, 2025 · Atesh added that all collected intelligence has already been shared with Ukraine's Defense Forces to support potential operations aimed at ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Russia's Secret Spetsnaz Base in Tambov Leaked by Ukrainian ...
    Sep 9, 2025 · The Ukrainian-linked partisan movement ATESH claimed it has been conducting surveillance on a Russian military intelligence (GRU) special ...
  25. [25]
    Atesh guerrillas report new recruits from Russian south
    Oct 9, 2025 · The number of Russians who oppose the war in Ukraine and want to join the partisans is growing, according to the Atesh movement.Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
  26. [26]
    Ukrainian partisans sabotage railway line in occupied Crimea ...
    Mar 9, 2025 · The Atesh partisan group sabotaged a railway line linking parts of occupied Crimea with the front line in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, ...
  27. [27]
    https://mezha.net/eng/bukvy/ukrainian-partisans-atesh-sabotage-railway-near-armyansk-disrupt-russian-logistics/
  28. [28]
    https://global.espreso.tv/military-news-partisans-disrupt-russian-military-logistics-in-crimea
  29. [29]
    ATESH partisans disrupt Russian military rail supplies in southern ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · “Our agent successfully carried out a sabotage operation on the railway near Verkhnii Tokmak at coordinates 47°13'22.2"N 36°18'21.9"E. As a ...
  30. [30]
    Partisan Sabotage Disrupts Russian Military Supply Lines on Key ...
    Nov 26, 2024 · Ukrainian partisan group Atesh executed a successful sabotage operation disrupting Russian supply lines in southern Ukraine on November 26.Missing: verified | Show results with:verified
  31. [31]
    Ukrainian partisans say they sabotaged railway in Russia's Rostov ...
    Jul 9, 2024 · The Atesh partisan group sabotaged a key railway connection between Russia's Rostov-on-Don and the occupied Ukrainian city of Mariupol used by the Russian ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Atesh partisans sabotage railway line in Russia's Smolensk Oblast ...
    Mar 23, 2025 · The Atesh partisan group sabotaged a railway line in Russia's Smolensk Oblast, disrupting the transport of military cargo toward Bryansk and ...
  33. [33]
    Atesh partisans strike energy facility in Russian Saratov - RBC-Ukraine
    May 5, 2025 · Atesh partisans disabled a transformer substation in Saratov. Important facilities for Russia were left without power, the Atesh Telegram channel reports.
  34. [34]
    Pro-Ukrainian Atesh partisans sabotage railway 1,600km deep in ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · The partisan group Atesh, founded by Ukrainians and ethnic Crimean Tatars in 2022, said on Wednesday that their strike deep into Russian ...
  35. [35]
    Atesh Partisans Sabotage Russian Railway in Cheboksary ...
    Oct 1, 2025 · Atesh Partisans Sabotage Russian Railway in ... Ukraine to Receive 150 Swedish Gripen Fighter Jets, First Deliveries Set for 2026.
  36. [36]
    “We Can Reach You Even in the Far East”: ATESH Partisans Disrupt ...
    Aug 25, 2025 · Atesh partisans executed a sabotage mission in Russia's Far East, targeting military rail systems to disrupt transport and supply lines.<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    https://www.kyivpost.com/post/62788
  38. [38]
    https://www.kyivpost.com/post/62457
  39. [39]
    https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/10/19/with-one-hit-pro-ukrainian-partisans-disrupted-control-over-vital-stretch-of-frontier-with-russia/
  40. [40]
    Partisans disrupt communication at military facilities in Russia's ...
    May 8, 2025 · Partisans from the ATESH resistance movement have claimed that they have disrupted communication at military facilities in Moscow Oblast.
  41. [41]
    Pro-Ukrainian partisans sabotage railway leading to Russian ...
    Sep 21, 2025 · On Sept. 17, Atesh partisans sabotaged railway infrastructure in the Russian city of Yekaterinburg, disrupting Moscow's military logistics "in ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Pro-Ukrainian partisans sabotage railway leading to Russian ...
    Sep 20, 2025 · Pro-Ukrainian partisans sabotaged a railway leading to an aerospace factory in the Russian city of Smolensk, the Atesh group claimed on Sept ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  43. [43]
    Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, April 19, 2025
    Apr 19, 2025 · The “Atesh” Crimea-based Ukrainian partisan group reported on April 19 that almost all families of senior Russian Black Sea Fleet (BSF) ...
  44. [44]
    'This is just the beginning' — Pro-Ukrainian partisans claim ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · The Atesh group regularly conducts sabotage operations on military infrastructure in occupied Ukrainian territory and deep within Russia.
  45. [45]
    ATESH warned of a terrorist attack by Russian security services to ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · УНН War ✎ Russian security services are preparing a false-flag terrorist attack and plan to blame it on the pro-Ukrainian guerrilla movement ...
  46. [46]
    Об оправдании терроризма в «НЦЦ»
    Apr 13, 2023 · Особо примечательно упоминание изначально якобы крымско-татарской террористической группировки «Атеш» (по версии журналиста, «Артеш ...