Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Atypical depression

Atypical depression, formally known as major depressive disorder with atypical features, is a subtype of depression outlined as a specifier in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). It is characterized by mood reactivity, in which an individual's depressed mood temporarily improves in response to actual or potential positive events, accompanied by at least two of the following symptoms: significant weight gain or increased appetite (hyperphagia), hypersomnia (excessive sleep), leaden paralysis (a heavy, leaden feeling in the arms or legs persisting most of the day), or long-standing interpersonal rejection sensitivity that causes significant social or occupational impairment. This specifier applies to major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder, and other specified depressive disorders, but cannot coexist with melancholic or catatonic features. Unlike typical depression, which commonly presents with symptoms such as , due to decreased appetite, and pervasive without mood reactivity, atypical depression features reversed and is often linked to earlier onset (typically in or early adulthood), longer duration, and higher comorbidity with or anxiety disorders. Rejection sensitivity in atypical depression may manifest as intense, long-term patterns of feeling acutely humiliated or rejected, exacerbating interpersonal difficulties and contributing to the disorder's chronicity. Historically identified in the mid-20th century, atypical depression was first distinguished in the 1950s for its distinct response to inhibitors (MAOIs) over antidepressants, highlighting its unique neurobiological profile potentially involving and . Prevalence estimates for atypical features among individuals with vary by setting: approximately 15–29% in epidemiological samples and 18–36% in clinical populations, with lifetime prevalence around 10–15%. Women are disproportionately affected, comprising about 70–80% of cases, and the subtype is associated with greater functional impairment, suicidality, and treatment resistance compared to non- . requires that these features predominate during the most severe depressive episodes and are not better explained by another medical condition or substance use. Treatment approaches for atypical depression emphasize a combination of and , with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like sertraline or often serving as first-line agents due to their efficacy and tolerability. Other options include serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), bupropion, or atypical antipsychotics as adjuncts; MAOIs such as remain effective for non-responders but require dietary restrictions to avoid hypertensive crises. (CBT) and interpersonal therapy are recommended to address rejection sensitivity and behavioral patterns, while (ECT) may be considered for severe, refractory cases. Ongoing research continues to refine criteria and explore biomarkers to improve diagnostic precision and personalized interventions.

Overview and Definition

Core Symptoms and Features

Atypical depression is recognized as a subtype of in the , defined by the presence of the atypical features specifier, which requires mood reactivity along with at least two additional characteristic symptoms that predominate during the majority of days in the most recent or current lasting at least two weeks. These symptoms distinguish atypical depression from other forms by their reverse vegetative patterns and emotional responsiveness, often leading to a more chronic course with significant functional impairment. Mood reactivity, the essential criterion, involves a rapid and noticeable improvement in —potentially reaching normal or near-normal levels—in direct response to positive external events, such as receiving praise, good news from a friend, or a favorable , though the mood elevation is typically temporary and contingent on ongoing positive stimuli. This contrasts with the persistently low, non-reactive seen in . Without such positive triggers, the baseline depressive state resumes, highlighting the situational sensitivity inherent to this feature. Significant or hyperphagia manifests as a marked increase in , often with cravings for carbohydrates or comfort foods, resulting in noticeable that reverses the appetite suppression typical in non-atypical . For example, an individual might consume larger portions at meals or snack excessively between them, leading to a 5% or greater body weight increase over the episode, which can exacerbate feelings of discomfort and . Hypersomnia refers to excessive sleep duration, such as sleeping 10 hours or more per night or at least two hours longer than the person's usual non-depressed , often accompanied by prolonged daytime napping and difficulty initiating morning activities due to lingering . This reversed sleep pattern can disrupt daily routines, contributing to reduced productivity and social withdrawal as the individual struggles to maintain during normal hours. Leaden paralysis describes a profound sensation of heaviness or leaden weight in the arms, legs, or both, persisting for at least one hour per day and frequently much longer, creating a physical of immobility or despite no actual motor impairment. Individuals often report this as feeling "pinned down" or unable to lift their limbs, which intensifies the overall and discourages or engagement in tasks. Long-standing interpersonal rejection sensitivity involves a pervasive, trait-like to perceived criticism, disapproval, or rejection in interpersonal contexts, present for years and intensifying during depressive episodes to cause substantial or occupational dysfunction. For instance, a minor perceived slight, like a delayed response to a , might trigger intense emotional distress, , or , prompting avoidance of relationships or work interactions to preempt further rejection. This fosters behavioral patterns of and relational instability, perpetuating cycles of and impaired functioning across life domains.

Historical Development

The concept of atypical depression originated in the mid-20th century as clinicians identified a depressive subtype characterized by reversed —such as and increased appetite or weight gain—contrasting with the and typical of endogenous depression, alongside mood reactivity to positive events and heightened to rejection. In 1959, E.D. West and P.J. Dally introduced the term, describing it as a non-endogenous form preferentially responsive to inhibitors (MAOIs) rather than antidepressants, based on observations of improved outcomes in patients with anxiety-laden, reactive presentations. Building on this, Donald F. Klein in the delineated "hysteroid dysphoric" states within atypical depression, noting prominent phobic anxiety, interpersonal rejection , and reversed neurovegetative signs like , which responded robustly to MAOIs in contrast to standard treatments. Parallel efforts by Jules Angst in the , through studies on affective disorders, underscored reactive depressions as psychosocially triggered entities lacking endogenous features, laying groundwork for distinguishing atypical variants from autonomous cycles. The 1970s marked a pivotal phase with empirical validation through controlled trials emphasizing MAOI efficacy. In 1984, Liebowitz et al. (including Klein) reported that , an MAOI, yielded significantly higher response rates (67%) in patients with atypical depression—defined by reversed and mood lability—compared to (43%) or (29%), highlighting a treatment-specific profile that differentiated it from typical major depression. This work, extended by Frederick Quitkin and others at , reinforced atypical depression's validity by demonstrating consistent MAOI superiority in outpatient samples with chronic, non-melancholic courses, prompting its consideration as a pharmacologically distinct entity. Formal nosological integration occurred under Robert L. Spitzer's leadership in revising psychiatric classification. In the late , Spitzer's incorporated atypical features into the DSM-III (1980), initially as a residual category encompassing depressions secondary to , intermittent episodes with well-being periods, and brief reactive states, to capture non-standard presentations beyond core . Refinements in DSM-III-R (1987) and DSM-IV (1994) elevated it to a formal specifier for or , requiring mood reactivity plus at least two of increased appetite/weight gain, , leaden , or rejection sensitivity, supported by familial, biological, and course validators distinguishing it from non-atypical forms. The (2013) retained these criteria unchanged while eliminating the multiaxial framework, embedding atypical depression as an enduring subtype specifier within the broader construct. The 1990s saw vigorous debates on atypical depression's boundaries, questioning its status as a standalone unipolar subtype versus a manifestation of the spectrum. Influential figures like Hagop S. Akiskal posited it as a "bridge" to , citing high rates of soft features (e.g., in relatives, cyclothymic ) and temperamental dysregulation in atypical cases, with studies showing up to 50% overlap in outpatient samples. These arguments, drawn from family history and longitudinal data, challenged unipolar purity but did not alter classifications, instead fueling spectrum models that viewed atypicality as a temperamental precursor to bipolarity.

Clinical Aspects

Diagnosis and Assessment

The diagnosis of atypical depression is established as a specifier for (MDD) in the , requiring the presence of a major depressive episode alongside mood reactivity—defined as the capacity for mood to brighten in response to positive events—and at least two additional atypical features: significant weight gain or increased appetite, , leaden (a heavy, leaden feeling in the arms or legs), or a long-standing pattern of interpersonal rejection sensitivity that results in significant social or occupational impairment and typically begins by early adulthood. These criteria emphasize the distinct phenomenological profile of atypical depression compared to melancholic or typical forms, with mood reactivity serving as the defining obligatory feature to differentiate it from non-reactive depressions. The onset of rejection sensitivity is particularly noted to occur before age 25 in many cases, highlighting the need to assess early developmental history during evaluation. Clinicians employ a range of standardized assessment methods to identify atypical depression, including structured diagnostic interviews such as the Structured Clinical Interview for Disorders (SCID-5), which systematically probes for the presence and duration of atypical features within the context of an MDD episode. The SCID-5, a semi-structured tool administered by trained professionals, facilitates reliable ascertainment of mood reactivity through direct questioning about responses to positive stimuli and ensures that atypical symptoms are not better explained by other conditions. Complementing interviews, clinician-rated scales like the Atypical Depression Diagnostic Scale (ADDS) quantify the severity of atypical symptoms such as hyperphagia and rejection sensitivity, with scores aiding in confirming the subtype when threshold criteria are met. Clinical observation remains essential for assessing mood reactivity, often involving real-time evaluation of the patient's emotional response during the interview to potentially uplifting interactions or news. Diagnosing atypical depression presents challenges due to its symptomatic overlap with other mood disorders, particularly , where features like and rejection sensitivity are prevalent, potentially leading to misclassification of unipolar cases as or vice versa without careful exclusion of hypomanic episodes. Additionally, the transient nature of some atypical features necessitates longitudinal assessment over multiple sessions or weeks to verify persistence, as initial presentations may fluctuate and mimic non- depression or adjustment disorders. These diagnostic hurdles underscore the importance of integrating collateral history from family or prior records to establish chronicity and rule out confounds.

Differential Diagnosis and Comorbidities

Differentiating atypical depression from other disorders is essential due to overlapping symptoms such as mood reactivity and interpersonal sensitivity. In contrast to , which is characterized by , significant , early morning awakening, and with worse symptoms in the morning, atypical depression features mood improvement in response to positive events, increased or , , and leaden paralysis. must be excluded, as atypical features are more prevalent in this condition, particularly with early onset before age 20, longer episode duration, and symptoms like and leaden paralysis; approximately two-thirds of atypical depression cases may be linked to spectrum disorders. (SAD), often presenting with winter-pattern and hyperphagia similar to atypical features, requires assessment for a recurrent seasonal pattern to distinguish it. [Borderline personality disorder](/page/Borderline_personality disorder) shares rejection sensitivity and affective instability, necessitating evaluation for pervasive interpersonal patterns beyond episodes. Diagnostic exclusion of medical conditions is critical, as symptoms like and fatigue can mimic atypical depression. Hypothyroidism, for instance, may present with depressive symptoms, weight gain, and lethargy, requiring laboratory tests such as (TSH) levels to rule it out. Other physical examinations should screen for signs of chronic fatigue syndrome, such as absence of tender lymph nodes, to differentiate leaden paralysis. For bipolar screening, tools like the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) are recommended, as it helps identify subtle hypomanic episodes through self-report of 32 items related to elevated mood and energy. Atypical depression frequently co-occurs with other psychiatric conditions, complicating its presentation and management. Anxiety disorders show substantial overlap, with rates of comorbid panic disorder reaching 53.7% and social phobia 20-26% in atypical cases, compared to lower rates in non-atypical depression. Personality disorders, particularly borderline, histrionic, and avoidant types, are more common, driven by shared traits like rejection sensitivity. Substance use disorders exhibit higher prevalence, with drug abuse or dependence at 19% in atypical depression versus 12% in other subtypes. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) rates are elevated due to increased history of childhood trauma and neglect in atypical depression patients. Bidirectional associations with the bipolar spectrum are notable, with genetic vulnerabilities and family history of bipolar disorder increasing risk for atypical features.

Biological Underpinnings

Pathophysiology

Atypical depression is characterized by distinct alterations in the axis compared to typical . While typically involves HPA axis hyperactivity with elevated levels, some studies suggest hypoactivity or a blunted response to in atypical depression, while others indicate normal function relative to controls. This hypoactivity is thought to stem from exposure, which disrupts mechanisms in the HPA axis, leading to immune dysregulation and elevated inflammatory responses. Specifically, reduced signaling in atypical depression permits unchecked immune activation, contributing to the disorder's unique physiological profile. Neurotransmitter imbalances further differentiate atypical depression, with involvement of monoamines such as serotonin and norepinephrine; the subtype shows a preferential response to monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) that increase their availability and counter potential deficits in noradrenergic signaling from the locus coeruleus. Concurrently, atypical depression is associated with elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP), which exceed those observed in melancholic subtypes and healthy controls. These proinflammatory markers, linked to the HPA hypoactivity, promote neuroinflammation that exacerbates mood reactivity and vegetative symptoms like increased appetite. Brain imaging studies reveal structural and functional anomalies in major depressive disorder, including reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex, which impairs emotional regulation and executive function. In major depression, including atypical features, the amygdala shows heightened activation to interpersonal rejection cues, reflecting the interpersonal sensitivity hallmark of the disorder. Additionally, hypothalamic dysregulation contributes to the atypical patterns of hypersomnia and hyperphagia, as this region modulates appetite and sleep-wake cycles. Recent (as of 2025) conceptualizes atypical depression within an immuno-metabolic framework, characterized by clustering of inflammatory, metabolic, and energy-related symptoms, with genetic associations to metabolic-inflammatory traits further validating its distinct neurobiological profile.

and Risk Factors

Atypical depression exhibits a estimate of approximately 40-50%, consistent with broader patterns but with notable subtype-specific genetic influences. Familial clustering is more pronounced in atypical depression compared to melancholic subtypes, with for atypical features reaching 0.46 versus 0.33 for melancholic. Environmental triggers play a significant role, with early life adversity, including and abuse, elevating risk by heightening interpersonal rejection sensitivity—a core atypical trait. Chronic interpersonal stress often acts as a precipitant, exacerbating reactivity and in vulnerable individuals. Developmentally, atypical depression typically emerges earlier, often during , reflecting heightened sensitivity to social and emotional stressors at this stage. Female predominance is evident, potentially linked to hormonal influences such as fluctuations, which modulate serotonin systems and emotional regulation. These genetic and environmental factors may converge on neurobiological pathways underlying atypical presentations.

Management and Treatment

First-line pharmacotherapy for atypical depression typically involves selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as and sertraline, which target pathways to alleviate symptoms and associated vegetative features like increased . Clinical trials have demonstrated response rates of approximately 50-60% with these agents in patients with atypical features, comparable to their efficacy in non-atypical major , though remission may be less consistent due to the subtype's heterogeneity. Similarly, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) like are employed as first-line options, exerting dual inhibition on serotonin and norepinephrine to address both emotional and symptoms; open-label studies report remission rates around 65-70% in atypical depression cohorts. A 2025 systematic review and network meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials confirmed the efficacy of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), including phenelzine and selegiline, for atypical depression, with phenelzine outperforming placebo (standardized mean difference = -1.31) and showing superior response rates compared to tricyclic antidepressants in historical data. These agents irreversibly inhibit enzymes, elevating levels of serotonin, norepinephrine, and —neurotransmitters implicated in the of atypical features such as and leaden — with response rates reaching 70-72% across multiple controlled trials involving over 400 patients, outperforming tricyclic antidepressants (44%) and (26%). However, their use is limited by significant side effects, including and the risk of from tyramine-rich foods, necessitating strict dietary restrictions. For adjunctive therapy, bupropion is particularly beneficial in addressing and in atypical depression, showing greater improvement in these symptoms compared to SSRIs in randomized comparisons, owing to its norepinephrine-dopamine inhibition. Stimulants, such as or , may be added for persistent leaden , providing symptomatic relief through enhanced activity in cases to standard antidepressants. In partial responders, augmentation with enhances antidepressant effects, with meta-analyses confirming its utility in , including atypical subtypes, by modulating intracellular signaling pathways.

Psychotherapy and Other Interventions

Cognitive-behavioral therapy () is a key psychotherapeutic approach for atypical depression, particularly in addressing rejection sensitivity, a core feature characterized by intense emotional responses to perceived criticism or rejection. employs techniques such as to challenge distorted beliefs and to improve interpersonal functioning and reduce mood reactivity. In mild cases, demonstrates efficacy comparable to pharmacological treatments, with a showing a 58% response rate over 10 weeks, equivalent to monoamine oxidase inhibitors and superior to . Interpersonal therapy (IPT) targets the social and relational impairments often prominent in atypical depression, including difficulties stemming from , loss, or early life adversity that contribute to interpersonal deficits and . By focusing on improving communication, resolving role disputes, and processing complicated , IPT enhances social functioning and support networks, which are frequently disrupted in this subtype. Typically delivered in 8-16 sessions, IPT has established efficacy in treating major depression with interpersonal foci, making it suitable for atypical features linked to early . Other non-pharmacological interventions include , which can alleviate —a hallmark symptom of atypical depression—by improving regulation and overall energy levels, with studies showing better treatment outcomes in patients with elevated and disturbances. For cases with seasonal overlaps, (e.g., 10,000 for 30-60 minutes daily in the morning) addresses mood and vegetative symptoms by modulating circadian rhythms, demonstrating modest efficacy beyond . Mindfulness-based approaches, such as (MBCT), reduce emotional reactivity to stressors by fostering non-judgmental awareness of thoughts and feelings, with evidence indicating decreased physiological responses to negative stimuli in depressed individuals.

Epidemiology and Prognosis

Prevalence and Demographics

Atypical depression accounts for 15%–29% of cases among individuals with in epidemiological studies using criteria, with a 1-year of approximately 1%–4% in the general population. In clinical settings, rates range from 18% to 36%, reflecting variations in diagnostic criteria and sample characteristics. In the United States, estimates indicate that 20%–30% of outpatients with depression exhibit atypical features, based on national surveys and treatment trials such as , where the rate was 18.1%. A 2025 scoping review reports varying from 15% to 41% across studies, with predictions of increasing occurrence, particularly among females (70-73% of cases) and young adults. Demographically, atypical depression shows a pronounced predominance, with a 4:1 observed across multiple studies, attributed to higher rates among women seeking outpatient . It is more among adolescents and young adults, with onset typically occurring before age 25, often in the teenage years or early 20s, compared to later onset in non-atypical depression. Rates are elevated in outpatient settings relative to inpatient populations, where atypical features appear less common due to the predominance of severe or melancholic presentations. Cultural variations influence reporting, with higher noted in societies, potentially due to differences in symptom recognition and help-seeking behaviors, though limited data exist from non-Western contexts.

Outcomes and Prognosis

Atypical depression is characterized by a chronic or recurrent course, with studies indicating that it often persists longer than other depressive subtypes and involves fluctuations between atypical and melancholic features in 22% to 29% of cases. Approximately 50% of patients with , including those with atypical features, experience relapse within 2 years after initial remission, highlighting the need for sustained treatment to prevent recurrence. Despite this challenging trajectory, atypical depression shows a better acute response to pharmacotherapies like inhibitors (MAOIs) compared to , with higher remission rates observed in response to MAOIs such as . Several prognostic factors influence the long-term outcomes of atypical depression. Early intervention, particularly with targeted or , can significantly improve recovery rates and reduce chronicity. In contrast, poor predictors include comorbid conditions such as anxiety disorders or bipolar II, which exacerbate symptom severity and hinder remission. Untreated interpersonal rejection sensitivity, a hallmark feature, often leads to and perpetuates the disorder's cycle, worsening functional impairment over time. The societal impact of atypical depression is substantial, contributing to elevated disability days through pronounced interpersonal impairments and reduced social functioning, which surpass those seen in non-atypical depression. risk is also heightened, particularly among those with comorbid features, with attempt rates higher than in typical major (approximately 23% vs. 15%). These elements underscore the importance of addressing both symptomatic and relational aspects to mitigate broader consequences.

Research and Future Directions

Key Findings from Recent Studies

Recent studies from 2017 to 2020 have emphasized the role of inflammatory processes and axis dysregulation in distinguishing from typical forms. In a comprehensive review, Łojko et al. reported that elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), a key pro-inflammatory , were specifically associated with and predicted the presence of atypical features such as mood reactivity and , unlike in typical where such elevations were absent. Complementing this, a 2018 by Juruena et al. analyzed results across multiple studies and found evidence of HPA hypoactivity in , characterized by enhanced suppression compared to the HPA hyperactivity typically observed in . Advancements in and between 2021 and 2024 have further elucidated the neurobiological underpinnings of atypical depression. (fMRI) research has revealed heightened activity in the insula, a region implicated in emotional processing and , particularly in contexts of —a of atypical depression. Additionally, genome-wide studies (GWAS) have between atypical depression and polygenic scores for immunometabolic traits. Clinical trials in recent years have explored targeted interventions for atypical depression, with promising results from rapid-acting agents. These findings underscore the evolving understanding of atypical depression as a biologically distinct entity responsive to inflammation-modulating and therapies.

Emerging Areas and Challenges

Ongoing debates in the field of atypical depression center on its potential role as a precursor to spectrum disorders. Longitudinal studies indicate that individuals with atypical depression exhibit a higher risk of diagnostic conversion to compared to those with non-atypical , with conversion rates estimated between 20% and 50% over follow-up periods of several years, potentially reflecting shared underlying neurobiological pathways such as mood reactivity and interpersonal sensitivity. This overlap has prompted discussions on whether atypical depression represents a bridge between unipolar and conditions rather than a distinct unipolar subtype. Furthermore, post-DSM-5, the nosological validity of atypical depression as a categorical specifier has been questioned, particularly in light of ICD-11's emphasis on dimensional models for depressive disorders that prioritize symptom severity and functional impairment over rigid subtypes to better capture heterogeneity. These debates highlight the need for refined diagnostic frameworks that integrate both categorical and dimensional approaches. Key challenges in studying and treating atypical depression include underdiagnosis stemming from symptom overlap with and other conditions, such as mood reactivity and that may mimic hypomanic features, leading to misclassification as unipolar depression or overlooked bipolar risk. Research on atypical depression remains limited in diverse populations, with studies predominantly featuring Western cohorts and underrepresenting non-Western groups, where cultural factors may influence symptom expression and prevalence, thus hindering generalizability of findings. Additionally, access barriers to monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), which demonstrate superior efficacy for atypical features, persist due to stringent dietary restrictions and potential drug interactions, contributing to their underutilization despite evidence of effectiveness in treatment-resistant cases. Future research directions emphasize precision medicine approaches, including the identification of biomarkers such as inflammatory panels (e.g., elevated levels) to guide treatment selection in atypical depression, enabling tailored based on subtype-specific inflammatory profiles. , particularly those incorporating cognitive-behavioral elements to address rejection sensitivity—a core feature in up to 71% of atypical depression cases—hold promise for accessible, targeted interventions to mitigate interpersonal difficulties. Ongoing and planned trials from 2025 onward are exploring psychedelics like for , with potential extensions to atypical subtypes to evaluate rapid symptom relief and long-term remission in diverse presentations. Recent 2025 research has further highlighted a distinct polygenic profile for atypical depression, associated with metabolic-inflammatory traits, supporting its biological distinctiveness.

References

  1. [1]
    Atypical depression: current perspectives - PMC - NIH
    Sep 20, 2017 · This specifier includes mood reactivity, hyperphagia, hypersomnia, leaden paralysis, and interpersonal rejection sensitivity.
  2. [2]
    Atypical Depression - PMC - NIH
    Columbia criteria require mood reactivity and one of the following symptoms: Increased appetite, hypersomnia, leaden paralysis or rejection sensitivity (unlike ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    The doctrine of the two depressions in historical perspective - PMC
    Spitzer, the architect of DSM-III, reduced the various depressions essentially to one: major depressive disorder. Another category, dysthymic disorder, would ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Relevance of DMS-III Depressive Subtype and Chronicity of ...
    Their courses of illness were also rated for chronicity. Significantly more patients responded to phenelzine (71%) than to imipramine (48%), which benefited ...
  6. [6]
    The high prevalence of “Soft” bipolar (II) features in atypical ...
    These data suggest that the “atypicality” of depression is favored by affective temperamental dysregulation and anxiety comorbidity.
  7. [7]
    Atypical depression: a variant of bipolar II or a bridge ... - PubMed
    From a practical standpoint, AD is best viewed as a variant of BP-II. Clinicians confronted with MDE patients presenting with atypical features should strongly ...
  8. [8]
    Atypical Depression - PsychDB
    Sep 18, 2024 · (1) Significant weight gain or increase in appetite · (2) Hypersomnia · (3) Leaden paralysis (i.e. - heavy, leaden feelings in arms or legs).Primer · History · Specifier Criteria
  9. [9]
    The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 - APA
    The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) is a semistructured interview guide for making the major DSM-5 diagnoses.
  10. [10]
    Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID)
    The SCID is a semi-structured interview guide for making diagnoses according to the diagnostic criteria published in the American Psychiatric Association.
  11. [11]
    Toward validation of atypical depression in the community
    This paper (1) examines the validity of the atypical subtype of depression in a community-based longitudinal cohort study, (2) presents estimates of the ...
  12. [12]
    Is seasonal affective disorder a variant of atypical depression ...
    Differential treatment outcome suggests that SAD and atypical depression are separate disorders.
  13. [13]
    Hypothyroidism and Depression: A Narrative Review - PMC
    Aug 20, 2022 · Atypical depression is associated with high levels of immunoglobulins and microsomal antibodies linked to treatment resistance [20].
  14. [14]
    Is Depression With Atypical Features Associated With Trauma History?
    May 15, 2013 · These results suggest that a relationship exists between atypical depression and lifetime trauma that may be more complex than the etiologic pathways outlined ...
  15. [15]
    Is HPA axis function a biomarker? A systematic review - PubMed
    Our findings indicate that there is a difference in the activity of the HPA-axis between melancholic and atypical depressive subtypes.
  16. [16]
    CRH, neural circuits, and the diathesis for anxiety and depression
    May 23, 2013 · Reduced activity of the HPA axis in atypical depression would help explain increased secretion of immune mediators in this disorder. Decreased ...
  17. [17]
    HPA axis and sleep: Identifying subtypes of major depression
    In contrast, patients with atypical features are characterized by reduced activity of the HPA axis and ascending noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus.
  18. [18]
    Revisiting monoamine oxidase inhibitors for the treatment of ...
    Mar 1, 2021 · Previously MAOIs were shown to be superior to tricyclic antidepressants in patients with features of atypical depression. However, whether MAOIs ...
  19. [19]
    Evidence for a differential role of HPA-axis function ... - PubMed
    Oct 23, 2012 · Persons with atypical depression had significantly higher levels of inflammatory markers, BMI, waist circumference and triglycerides, and lower ...
  20. [20]
    C-reactive protein and clinical subtypes of major depressive ...
    Jul 27, 2020 · The study at hand concluded that patients with atypical MDD had higher level of CRP than other subtypes, and significant relationship was found ...
  21. [21]
    A neuroimaging-based precision medicine framework for depression
    Two neuroimaging subtypes of depression, archetypal and atypical depression, were identified based on distinct frontal-posterior functional imbalance patterns ...A Neuroimaging-Based... · 2. Methods · 3. Results<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Feeling left out: depressed adolescents may atypically recruit ...
    Interestingly, depressed adolescents recruit atypical inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and amygdala activity during negative emotion appraisal, although ...Introduction · Materials And Methods · Discussion
  23. [23]
    Familial Aggregation and Heritability of the Melancholic ... - PubMed
    Nov 1, 2016 · The familial heritability of the atypical subtype was 0.46 (95%CI 0.21-0.71), whereas that of the melancholic subtype was 0.33 (95%CI 0.21-0.45) ...
  24. [24]
    A polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) in the serotonin transporter ... - PubMed
    Melancholic depression was associated with the 5-HTTLPR long (l) allele and atypical depression with the 5-HTTLPR s-allele (two-sided Fisher's exact test ...
  25. [25]
    Genetic Insights into the Molecular Pathophysiology of Depression ...
    ... atypical depression [41], and post-stroke depression [42]. In addition, the ... Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene (BDNF) Polymorphisms. BDNF has ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Atypical Depression: Useful Concept, but it's Time to Revise ... - Nature
    Sep 9, 2009 · The criteria for atypical depression need to be revised in DSM-V, including sharpening the operational definitions for the specific symptoms.
  27. [27]
    Understanding Atypical Depression: Symptoms and Treatment
    Sep 12, 2024 · Environmental Factors: Chronic stress, traumatic events, and significant life changes can trigger atypical depression in susceptible ...Symptoms Of Atypical... · Impact On Daily Life · Research And Future...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Characteristics, comorbidities, and correlates of atypical depression
    May 2, 2019 · For instance, 24% of persons with AD experienced a depression episode lasting over 2 years compared to 13% of persons with nonAD; 39% of persons ...
  29. [29]
    Review Depressive disorders—is it time to endorse different ...
    Interestingly, the female predominance among patients with depression seems to be restricted to the atypical subtype. Besides HPA axis activity, distinct ...
  30. [30]
    Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: Seriously underused in the treatment ...
    Sep 3, 2024 · MAOIs, specifically phenelzine, are also very effective in atypical depression, which may be less of a clinical challenge. Moclobemide, a ...
  31. [31]
    Pharmacological treatments for atypical depression: A systematic ...
    Atypical depression is a highly prevalent subtype that includes mood reactivity, hypersomnia, and leaden paralysis, necessitating different therapeutic ...
  32. [32]
    A systematic review and meta-analysis of lithium augmentation of ...
    Oct 15, 2014 · Randomized controlled trials supported its efficacy but most trials added lithium to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).
  33. [33]
    Atypical Depression in the 21st Century: Diagnostic and Treatment ...
    A unique subtype of nonendogenous depressive episodes characterized by mood reactivity with reversed neurovegetative symptoms (ie, hypersomnia and hyperphagia)Missing: Jules | Show results with:Jules
  34. [34]
    Understanding Rejection Sensitivity: Cognitive Insights
    Apr 30, 2024 · Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) can help individuals reframe their thoughts about rejection from catastrophic to more realistic assessments.
  35. [35]
    Treatment of atypical depression with cognitive therapy or phenelzine
    Cognitive therapy may offer an effective alternative to standard acute-phase treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor for outpatients with major ...
  36. [36]
    EARLY ADVERSITY IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CLINICAL ... - NIH
    Early adversity is associated with dysregulation of neurobiological stress response systems and the development of interpersonal difficulties and depressotypic ...
  37. [37]
    Interpersonal psychotherapy: principles and applications - PMC - NIH
    IPT is a time-limited (acutely, 12-16 weeks) treatment with three phases: a beginning (1-3 sessions), middle, and end (3 sessions). The initial phase requires ...
  38. [38]
    Atypical depressive symptoms as a predictor of treatment response ...
    Previous analyses indicate that hypersomnia and elevations in BMI are associated with better treatment outcomes to exercise (Rethorst et al., 2013; Toups et al ...
  39. [39]
    Bright Light Therapy: Seasonal Affective Disorder and Beyond - PMC
    In this study, the majority of patients with SAD (61% of 33 patients) who received bright light therapy during the 4 week study period reached symptom ...
  40. [40]
    Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Improves Emotional ...
    This study suggests that mindfulness meditation training is associated with decreased emotional reactivity in the face of a negative affect-producing stressor.Missing: atypical | Show results with:atypical
  41. [41]
    Manifestation and Measurement of Atypical Depression: A Scoping ...
    Aug 3, 2025 · hyperphagia (i.e., significant weight gain or increase in appetite);. hypersomnia (i.e., sleeping too much, as opposed to the insomnia present ...
  42. [42]
    Clinical characteristics associated with relapse 2 years after ...
    Results: At 2 years post-ECT, the overall relapse rate was 50%, and the HRs for relapse in patients with psychotic features, a higher severity of depression, ...
  43. [43]
    Treatment of Atypical Depression With Cognitive Therapy or ...
    The results of this placebo-controlled, randomized trial indicate that both cognitive therapy and phenelzine are effective treatments for patients with MDD and ...
  44. [44]
    Reducing Relapse in Depressed Outpatients with Atypical Features
    Aug 17, 2000 · Jarrett RB, Schaffer M, McIntire D, Witt-Browder A, Kraft D, Risser R: Treatment of atypical depression with cognitive therapy or phenelzine: A ...
  45. [45]
    Depression With Atypical Features in the National Comorbidity Survey
    Atypical depression is associated with increased distress, suicidal ideation, and disability compared with nonatypical depression.
  46. [46]
    Atypical depression is associated with suicide attempt in bipolar ...
    Results: Attempters showed significantly higher rates of atypical depression, family history of completed suicide, depression at index episode and cluster B ...
  47. [47]
    Functional Connectivity of the Nucleus Accumbens and Changes in ...
    Aug 24, 2022 · Reduced appetite in patients with depression was associated with reduced functional connectivity between the nucleus accumbens and the ventromedial prefrontal ...
  48. [48]
    Atypical depression: a variant of bipolar II or a bridge between ...
    Although increasing data link atypical depression (AD) to the bipolar spectrum, controversies abound about the extent of the overlap.
  49. [49]
    Atypical depression: A variant of bipolar II or a bridge between ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Other investigators have postulated that atypical depression may be a variant of bipolar II disorder, as it co-occurs more frequently with this ...
  50. [50]
    A Dimensional Diagnostic Strategy for Depressive Disorders - MDPI
    Depressive disorders are diagnosed using categorical definitions provided by DSM-5 and ICD-11. However, categorization for diagnostic purposes fails to account ...Missing: atypical nosological
  51. [51]
    The clinical utility and relevance in clinical practice of DSM-5 ...
    The concept of atypical depression has evolved throughout the years and, starting from the DSM-5, this specifier is now included in both chapters dealing with ...The Clinical Utility And... · 2. Materials And Methods · 4. Discussion<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Misdiagnosis of Bipolar Disorder - PMC - NIH
    Major challenges to accurate diagnosis include difficulties in differentiating bipolar depression from unipolar depression. Significant heterogeneity ...
  53. [53]
    Lack of Sample Diversity in Research on Adolescent Depression ...
    For instance, only 7% of research samples published in psychological science in 2017 examined populations from non-Western countries despite these countries ...Missing: atypical | Show results with:atypical
  54. [54]
    Dietary restrictions and drug interactions with monoamine oxidase ...
    Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are effective treatments for depression that has atypical features or that has failed to respond to other antidepressants.
  55. [55]
    Developing symptom clusters: linking inflammatory biomarkers to ...
    Mar 31, 2022 · Indeed, elevated CRP was previously found among individuals with atypical depression compared to those with melancholic depression [29].Missing: precision medicine
  56. [56]
    Exploration of Novel Biomarkers Through a Precision Medicine ...
    Oct 31, 2025 · This study examines major depressive disorder with atypical features and psychotic symptoms through a multi-omics precision medicine ...Missing: panels | Show results with:panels
  57. [57]
    Prescription Digital Therapeutics for Mental Health - Psychiatry Advisor
    Oct 15, 2024 · The app-based digital therapeutic is a 90-day treatment that provides users with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) via interactive lessons on ...
  58. [58]
    Psychedelics for major depression—From controlled research ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · Psychedelics have shown promising antidepressant effects in recent phase 2 randomized controlled trials, with phase 3 studies underway.Missing: atypical | Show results with:atypical