Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Autism-spectrum quotient

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient () is a 50-item self-report developed to assess the degree to which adults of normal or above-average exhibit autistic traits across five domains: , attention switching, , communication, and . Introduced in 2001 by and colleagues at the Cambridge Autism Research Centre, the serves as a screening tool to quantify subthreshold autistic characteristics in the general population, distinguishing it from diagnostic instruments by focusing on trait dimensionality rather than clinical thresholds. Each of the 50 items presents statements rated on a four-point ("definitely agree," "slightly agree," "slightly disagree," "definitely disagree"), with responses scored to reflect autistic-like tendencies (1 point for endorsements aligning with autism traits, 0 otherwise). Total scores range from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater autistic traits; subscale scores (0–10 per domain) provide additional granularity, though the overall score is most commonly used. Normative data from meta-analyses show mean scores of approximately 16.4 in non-autistic adults (with males averaging higher than females at 17.0 vs. 15.9), while individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) average around 35.8; suggested cutoffs for "consistent with autism" are ≥26 for males and ≥27 for females, though these vary by study and require clinical context for interpretation. The AQ demonstrates solid psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability of r = 0.70 and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) ranging from 0.63 to 0.77 across subscales, supporting its construct validity in differentiating ASD groups from controls (e.g., 80% of high-functioning autism/Asperger syndrome participants scored ≥32 vs. 2% of controls). It has been widely adopted in research and clinical settings for adults aged 16 and older, often as part of multi-method ASD assessments, and translated into 43 languages, though limitations include potential gender biases (lower sensitivity in females) and influences from co-occurring conditions like anxiety. Shorter versions, such as the 28-item AQ-Short or 10-item AQ-10, have been validated for broader screening but retain the original's core focus on trait measurement.

History and Development

Origins and Creators

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) was developed by , Sally Wheelwright, Richard Skinner, Joanne Martin, and Emma Clubley at the Autism Research Centre, , in the . This collaborative effort emerged from the centre's focus on conditions, aiming to create tools for quantifying traits associated with in individuals with normal intelligence. The primary motivation for the stemmed from the need to identify subclinical autistic traits—often referred to as the "broader autism "—in the general and among high-functioning individuals, including those without a formal . Prior to its development, no brief, self-administered instruments existed to measure the degree of autistic traits in adults of average or above-average , limiting into the continuum between clinical and typical development. The tool was designed to facilitate comparisons across groups, such as scientists and mathematicians, and to serve as an initial screening aid for potential diagnostic referrals. Developed during the 1990s at the Autism Research Centre, the AQ underwent piloting over several years, with early versions relying on interview formats before evolving into a self-administered , finalized in February 1998. Its creation was influenced by theories of the as a continuum (Wing, 1988) and evidence for the broader autism (Bailey et al., 1995). The development was supported by funding from the UK Medical Research Council, the McDonnell-Pew Centre for , and the Trust.

Initial Publication and Validation Studies

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) was first published in 2001 by and colleagues in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. The paper introduced the AQ as a 50-item self-report designed to quantify autistic traits in adults with normal intelligence, emphasizing its utility in placing individuals on a continuum from to normality. The initial validation study involved multiple groups to assess the instrument's ability to discriminate between those with autism spectrum conditions and neurotypical individuals. In the primary validation sample, 58 adults diagnosed with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA)—45 males and 13 females—achieved a mean AQ score of 35.8 (SD = 6.5). This was compared to 174 randomly selected controls (76 males, 98 females) with a mean score of 16.4 (SD = 6.3), as well as 840 Cambridge University students (mean 17.6, SD = 6.4) and 16 winners of the UK Mathematics Olympiad (mean 24.5, SD = 5.7). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences, with the AS/HFA group scoring markedly higher than controls (F(1, 228) = 328.9, p < .0001). Additional targeted groups, such as the mathematicians, showed elevated scores relative to general controls but lower than the clinical group, supporting the AQ's sensitivity to subclinical autistic traits. Key discriminatory findings centered on a cutoff score of 32 or higher, where 80% of the AS/HFA group scored above this threshold compared to only 2% of controls. This threshold yielded a sensitivity of 79.3% for identifying AS/HFA and a specificity of 98% for ruling out the condition in controls. The study also noted sex differences, with males in the control groups scoring higher on average than females, though the AS/HFA group exhibited no such disparity. While the paper briefly mentioned potential adaptations for other populations, it focused primarily on establishing the AQ's foundational psychometric properties in this adult sample.

Format and Administration

Questionnaire Items and Domains

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) is a 50-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess the degree to which adults exhibit traits associated with the autism spectrum. Each item presents a statement about everyday behaviors or preferences, and respondents rate their agreement on a 4-point Likert scale: definitely agree, slightly agree, slightly disagree, or definitely disagree. The items are grouped into five conceptual domains, with 10 items per domain, to capture key aspects of autistic traits: social skill, attention switching, attention to detail, communication, and imagination. The social skill domain evaluates difficulties in social interactions, such as preferring solitary activities. The attention switching domain assesses challenges in shifting focus or adapting to changes, often reflected in a preference for routines. Attention to detail items probe a tendency toward noticing small particulars over the big picture. The communication domain examines nuances in verbal and nonverbal exchanges, including literal interpretations or perceived impoliteness. Finally, the imagination domain explores difficulties in engaging with fictional scenarios or empathizing through pretend play. Representative examples include: "I prefer to do things with others rather than on my own" from the social skill domain (reverse-scored, such that disagreement indicates stronger autistic traits); "I prefer to do things the same way over and over again" from attention switching; and "I often notice small sounds when others do not" from attention to detail. These items are crafted to identify subtle autistic characteristics on a continuum, without assuming a clinical diagnosis. The AQ is self-administered, requiring no professional oversight during completion, and typically takes 10-15 minutes. It is intended for adults (aged 16 years and older) without intellectual disability (IQ > 70).

Scoring Procedure

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) consists of 50 self-report items, each scored dichotomously as 0 or 1 point based on the respondent's agreement or disagreement with statements reflecting autistic traits. For positively phrased items that endorse autistic-like behaviors (e.g., those assessing difficulties in or switching), a response of "definitely agree" or "slightly agree" receives 1 point, while "slightly disagree" or "definitely disagree" scores 0. Conversely, for negatively phrased items that describe neurotypical traits (e.g., "I find social situations easy"), a response of "definitely disagree" or "slightly disagree" scores 1 point, indicating an autistic-like response, with agreement scoring 0. As an example, on a item phrased positively for neurotypical ease in interactions, selecting "slightly disagree" would score 1 point. The total AQ score is calculated by summing the points from all 50 items, yielding a possible range of 0 to 50, where higher scores indicate greater endorsement of autistic traits. In standard administration, only the total score is used for interpretation, although the items are grouped into five domains (, attention switching, , communication, and imagination) that can be analyzed separately for research purposes, each with subscores ranging from 0 to 10.

Interpretation of Scores

Score Ranges and Norms

The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) yields total scores ranging from 0 to 50, based on 50 items scored dichotomously (0 or 1) from 4-point Likert responses, where endorsements reflecting autistic traits are scored as 1. In the general population of neurotypical adults, scores are typically normally distributed, with a around 16 to 17 and a standard deviation of approximately 6. A of 69 studies encompassing over 6,900 non-clinical adults confirmed an overall AQ score of 16.94 (95% CI: 16.4–17.4), with a pooled standard deviation of 5.59, indicating that the majority of neurotypical individuals score below 26. Population norms vary by demographic factors. Initial validation in a sample of 174 controls reported a mean of 16.4 ( = 6.3). Larger analyses reveal consistent differences, with males scoring higher than females; for instance, means of 17.89 for males and 14.88 for females (95% : 13.3–16.5) across aggregated studies. Scores are also elevated in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics () professions compared to non-STEM fields, as evidenced by a study of over 450,000 adults where STEM workers averaged 21.92 ( = 8.92) versus 18.92 ( = 8.48) for non-STEM.
GroupMean AQ ScoreStandard DeviationSample SizeSource
Neurotypical Adults (Overall)16.945.596,900+Ruzich et al. (2015)
Males17.89Not specifiedAggregatedRuzich et al. (2015)
Females14.88Not specifiedAggregatedRuzich et al. (2015)
Professions21.928.92450,394Baron-Cohen et al. (2015)
Non-STEM Professions18.928.48450,394Baron-Cohen et al. (2015)
Some large-scale analyses of AQ scores in mixed or samples have identified a bimodal , suggesting potential clusters of low and higher autistic traits within broader populations, though general norms remain approximately .

Clinical Cutoff Thresholds

The clinical cutoff thresholds for the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) serve to identify scores suggestive of clinically significant autistic traits, facilitating referral for further evaluation rather than providing a definitive . The standard threshold is a score of 26 or higher, which indicates the potential presence of autistic traits warranting additional assessment. In contrast, individuals with disorder (ASD) typically score much higher, with means around 35 in validation studies. This cutoff has been associated with a of 95% and specificity of 60% in detecting ASD within screening contexts. A higher cutoff of 32 or above is used to denote a greater likelihood of . In the original validation study, 80% of adults diagnosed with or scored 32 or higher on the AQ, compared to only 2% of controls without . This threshold balances high sensitivity in ASD groups with low false positives in non-clinical populations. To account for observed differences in autistic trait expression, some clinical guidelines recommend adjusted cutoffs, such as for males and 27 for females, to improve detection accuracy across sexes. These are not intended for standalone but to guide referrals when combined with clinical judgment. The utility of these cutoffs in clinical screening was further evidenced in a 2005 study involving adults referred to an autism clinic, where a of achieved a of 95% and specificity of 60%, correctly classifying 83% of cases overall and supporting the AQ's role in initial .

Uses in Practice

Screening for Autism Spectrum Traits

The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) serves as a primary screening instrument in clinical settings, functioning as a quick self-report measure to detect autism spectrum traits in adults and identify those warranting further evaluation for (ASD). Developed for individuals with average or above-average intelligence, it helps clinicians in or services flag potential cases efficiently without requiring extensive training. The AQ is integrated into established protocols like the PhenX Toolkit, which standardizes its use for assessing ASD symptoms in adults aged 16 and older across clinical and research contexts. In practice, the AQ is administered as a 50-item self-report during routine clinic visits or initial consultations, typically completed independently by the patient in 5-10 minutes. A score of 26 or higher—referencing established cutoff thresholds—indicates a positive screen, prompting referral for confirmatory assessments such as the (ADOS) or Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) to establish a formal . This process supports early identification in high-functioning adults, where subtle traits may otherwise go unnoticed. Despite its utility, the AQ is not a standalone diagnostic tool and must be combined with clinical interviews and observations for accuracy. It may miss approximately 12% of ASD cases at the ≥26 cutoff due to false negatives, though it performs well for high-functioning adults without intellectual disabilities. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines (updated 2021) endorse a multi-tool approach incorporating the AQ-10 (a brief version) for initial screening in adults without moderate or severe learning disabilities, stressing inclusivity and the need for informant input to reduce biases.

Applications in Research and Non-Clinical Populations

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) has been extensively utilized in research to quantify subclinical autistic traits in non-clinical populations, facilitating investigations into the dimensional nature of autism across diverse domains such as , , and . In genetic studies, the AQ serves as a phenotypic measure to explore and polygenic influences on autistic traits within large-scale cohorts, helping identify associations between genetic variants and trait variability in the general . In neuroimaging research, the enables the examination of structure and function related to autistic traits in healthy individuals, revealing patterns such as altered connectivity associated with higher scores. A study of 250 psychiatrically healthy adults using demonstrated that elevated AQ scores correspond to reduced integrity in specific neural pathways, underscoring the tool's role in mapping the neural correlates of subclinical traits. Similarly, investigations have linked AQ-measured traits to modulated responses in social processing networks during naturalistic stimuli, highlighting how these traits influence activity in non-clinical samples. Regarding empathy, the AQ has been instrumental in dissecting cognitive and affective components within non-clinical groups, often revealing inverse relationships between trait levels and empathic abilities. For example, a 2023 study of adolescents found that higher AQ scores predicted diminished performance on empathy tasks at behavioral and electrophysiological levels, suggesting that subclinical traits contribute to nuanced variations in social understanding across the general population. In non-clinical populations, the AQ has illuminated elevated autistic traits in certain professions, particularly those emphasizing analytical skills, as evidenced by early findings from 2001 showing mean scores exceeding 21 in mathematicians, , and engineers—substantially higher than the general population average of around 16. These patterns align with the empathizing-systemizing , where higher AQ scores reflect a cognitive preference for systemizing over empathizing, potentially conferring advantages in systematic fields like . Broader applications of the AQ extend to estimating the of autistic traits in the general , supporting epidemiological research that views as a spectrum rather than a condition. By administering the AQ to large, unselected samples, studies have established that traits are continuously distributed, informing public health strategies on . A 2023 study in Japanese adults with normal intelligence validated its utility for identifying subclinical traits in screening for disorder and social .

Psychometric Properties

Reliability and Validity Evidence

The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) exhibits solid internal consistency, with coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.77 across subscales in the original validation study and 0.64 for the total scale in a 2023 Singaporean non-clinical sample. Test-retest reliability is also favorable, with correlation coefficients between 0.70 and 0.88 over intervals of 1 to 6 months, as evidenced in the initial study (r = 0.70 over 2 weeks) and later replications. Construct validity of the AQ is supported by correlations with established autism diagnostic tools, such as the (ADOS); for example, one study reported a moderate (Spearman's rho = 0.44) between AQ scores and ADOS Module 4 in adults. Factor analytic studies reveal a variable structure, often identifying 2 to 5 factors rather than strictly adhering to the original five domains (, , , communication, and ), with common emergent factors emphasizing social-communication and restricted interests/repetitive behaviors. This flexibility underscores the AQ's utility in capturing the multidimensional nature of autistic traits beyond rigid domain boundaries. Criterion validity evidence confirms the AQ's diagnostic accuracy for identifying autism spectrum traits, with area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.96 in a 2023 study distinguishing clinical from non-clinical groups. Systematic reviews have highlighted consistent elevation of AQ scores in autistic individuals compared to controls, supporting its screening role.

Criticisms and Limitations

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) has faced criticism for inconsistencies in its factor structure, which challenges the original five-domain model proposed by its developers. While the AQ was designed to assess , attention switching, , communication, and , empirical studies using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses have identified varying numbers of factors, ranging from two to six, depending on the sample and method. For instance, a 2017 Rasch analysis in a large general population sample revealed that the AQ does not meet criteria for unidimensionality and exhibits item misfit, suggesting it may not reliably capture a single underlying construct of autistic traits. Similarly, alternative models have proposed narrower dimensions such as social anhedonia and detail-oriented interests, indicating that the predefined domains may oversimplify the multifaceted nature of traits. Another limitation stems from the AQ's origins in the cultural , raising concerns about its applicability across diverse populations without . Developed and validated primarily with samples, the AQ has shown reduced validity in non- groups, where factor structures differ significantly; for example, comparisons between and autistic children revealed distinct patterns in trait loadings, highlighting cultural influences on how items are interpreted. in and have reported acceptable reliability but noted discrepancies in mean scores and item endorsements compared to norms, potentially due to varying social norms and linguistic nuances. These findings underscore the risk of , which can lead to under- or over-identification of traits in non- settings. The AQ's design, rooted in the empathizing-systemizing theory, has been critiqued for overemphasizing systemizing tendencies—such as attention to patterns and rules—while underrepresenting core autism features like sensory processing differences and executive function challenges. Although the questionnaire includes items on attention switching, which partially overlaps with executive functions, it lacks direct assessment of sensory sensitivities or hyposensitivities, which are diagnostic criteria in the DSM-5 and prevalent in up to 90% of autistic individuals. This omission can limit its comprehensiveness as a trait measure, as separate tools like the Sensory Perception Quotient are often needed to capture these aspects. Post-2020 research has further highlighted self-report biases, particularly in neurodiverse populations, where high scores may reflect co-occurring anxiety or social concerns rather than autism-specific traits, leading to discrepancies between self- and informant-reports. Additionally, the AQ is not suitable for individuals with low IQ or limited verbal abilities, as it requires and abstract , assumptions that exclude those with intellectual disabilities common in some cases. Studies confirm its development targeted adults of average or above-average , resulting in floor effects and poor performance in lower-IQ groups. For very young adults or those with developmental delays, the tool's adult-oriented language and lack of age-normed adaptations exacerbate these issues. A 2023 study in BMC Psychiatry evaluating the AQ for screening (ASD) versus social found specificity rates of 71% (ASD vs. SCD) to 86% (ASD vs. NT), limiting its utility in broad clinical screening without supplementary assessments.

Variations and Adaptations

Age-Specific Versions

The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) has been adapted into age-specific versions to assess autistic traits in younger populations, differing from the original adult self-report format by relying on parent or caregiver reports and adjusting item wording for developmental stages. The adolescent version, known as the AQ-Adolescent, is a 50-item parent-report designed for individuals aged 12 to 15 years, though it has been applied to ages 9.8 to 16.5 in validation studies. Developed in 2006 by Baron-Cohen and colleagues, it mirrors the structure of the adult , scoring 0 to 50 based on agreement with statements indicative of autistic traits across five domains: social skill, attention switching, , communication, and imagination. In typical populations, mean scores are approximately 17.7, with cutoffs of 30 or higher identifying 88-90% of adolescents with conditions while showing 0% false positives in controls. For 16- to 18-year-olds, the adult is often used with minor shortening, but the AQ-Adolescent serves as the primary tool for this transitional age group, with norms averaging around 15-18 in non-clinical samples. Child versions include the full AQ-Child and its shortened form, the AQ-10 Child, both for parent reports on children aged 4 to 11 years. The AQ-Child, developed by Auyeung, Baron-Cohen, and colleagues in 2008, comprises 50 items on a 4-point , yielding scores from 0 to 150, with higher values indicating greater autistic traits. Validation in general samples (n=1,225) showed scores of 41.7 for controls (boys: 45.7; girls: 37.7), compared to 103-105 in children with conditions. A cutoff of 76 provides 95% for screening. The AQ-10 Child, a 10-item , facilitates quick screening, with scores of 6 or higher signaling the need for further evaluation, demonstrating good balance in for diagnosis in this age group. These versions were created to align with developmental needs, building on the adult AQ's framework but incorporating parent perspectives for younger, less self-aware individuals. Post-2013, following DSM-5's integration of autism spectrum disorder criteria, the tools have been increasingly applied without major structural changes, though cutoff interpretations emphasize broader trait continuity. In pediatric clinics, age-specific AQs support early identification of autism spectrum traits, often as initial screeners before comprehensive diagnostic assessments, with the AQ-10 Child particularly valued for its brevity in primary care settings.

Cross-Cultural and Shortened Forms

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient has several shortened forms for efficient screening. The AQ-10 consists of 10 items selected from the original 50-item version to provide a brief screening tool for autistic traits in adults. Developed by Allison, Auyeung, and Baron-Cohen in 2012, the AQ-10 demonstrates high with the full AQ, typically around r=0.80-0.85 across validation studies, and uses a clinical cutoff score of 6 or higher to indicate potential need for further . Its brevity makes the AQ-10 particularly suitable for use in settings, large-scale population surveys, and applications where time efficiency is essential. Another shortened version is the 28-item AQ-Short (AQ-28), developed in 2011 by Hoekstra et al. as an abridged form retaining the original's factor structure across , , and attention switching domains. It scores 0-28, with a cutoff of 15+ suggesting elevated traits, and shows strong (r ≈ 0.95) with the full AQ, making it useful for and screening where a balance between brevity and comprehensiveness is needed. Cross-cultural adaptations of the AQ have been translated and validated in over 50 languages to enhance its applicability in diverse populations and mitigate cultural biases in item interpretation. For instance, the Japanese version, validated in 2006, showed comparable factor structure and reliability to the original English AQ, with adjustments to ensure linguistic equivalence. Similarly, the Chinese (Mandarin) version, validated in a 2013 study, reported a mean score of approximately 17 in non-clinical adults, lower than the original UK norms of around 16-17 but with established local cutoffs to account for cultural differences in response styles. These adaptations often involve modifications for idioms and social norms, such as rephrasing items related to social conventions to avoid misinterpretation in collectivist cultures. Post-2020 validation studies, including a 2023 analysis comparing (Dutch) and Asian (Malaysian) samples, have confirmed varying for adapted AQs, with ranging from 0.70 to 0.85 depending on the version and population. Such efforts underscore the importance of culturally tailored norms to reduce measurement and improve the AQ's utility in and .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger ...
    In this paper, we report on a new instrument to assess this: the Autism ... the bridge between autism and normality (Baron-Cohen,. 1995; Frith, 1991 ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) NovoPsych Review Paper
    The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) was developed by Baron-Cohen and colleagues. (2001). It is a 50-item self-report measure that assesses autistic traits in ...
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    The Construction and Validation of an Abridged Version of the ... - NIH
    This study reports on the development and validation of an abridged version of the 50-item Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ), a self-report measure of autistic ...
  6. [6]
    The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger ...
    In this paper, we report on a new instrument to assess this: the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Individuals score in the range 0-50. Four groups of subjects ...
  7. [7]
    Is the Autism-Spectrum Quotient a Valid Measure of Traits ... - NIH
    The items, which are given in Table 3, assess five different domains (10 items per domain): social skill, attention switching, attention to detail, ...
  8. [8]
    AQ - Autism Spectrum Quotient Test - NovoPsych
    The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) is a 50 item self-report measure that assesses autistic traits in adults and people as young as 16 years (Baron-Cohen et.Missing: creators Sally
  9. [9]
    Measuring autistic traits in the general population - PubMed Central
    The AQ was first developed as a self-report measure for adults [5] and subsequently as a parent-report measure for adolescents (aged 12 to 15 years) [6] and for ...
  10. [10]
    Sex and STEM Occupation Predict Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ ...
    Oct 21, 2015 · We conclude that autistic traits are consistently higher in males than females, and in those working in STEM than in non-STEM fields. These ...Missing: norms | Show results with:norms
  11. [11]
    The distribution of autistic traits across the autism spectrum - NIH
    May 27, 2019 · We employed a dual Weibull mixture model to examine the distribution of the Autism Spectrum Quotient scores of a mixed sample of autistic and non-autistic ...
  12. [12]
    Screening Adults for Asperger Syndrome Using the AQ
    Screening Adults for Asperger Syndrome Using the AQ: A Preliminary Study of its Diagnostic Validity in Clinical Practice · Abstract · Article PDF · References.
  13. [13]
    Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) - Psychology Tools
    Created by Simon Baron-Cohen and his team at the Cambridge Autism Research Centre, the AQ was introduced to the academic community through a study published in ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  14. [14]
    Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) (Adult)
    Wheelwright, S. Baron-Cohen, N. Goldenfeld, J. Delaney, D. Fine, R. Smith, L. Weil and A. Wakabayashi, (2006) Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from ...Missing: origins creators Sally
  15. [15]
    Protocol - Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorders - Adult
    May 12, 2010 · The Autism Spectrum Quotient for Adults is a 50-question self-report instrument designed to screen ages 16 years and older for symptoms of autism.
  16. [16]
    Autism Spectrum Quotient
    Mar 30, 2020 · The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure the degree to which adults show autistic traits.Missing: original | Show results with:original
  17. [17]
    Predicting the diagnosis of autism in adults using the Autism ...
    Jun 29, 2016 · We tested AQ scores as predictors of ASD diagnosis made by expert clinicians according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 criteria.Screening Measures (aq... · Asd Assessment · The Aq10 As A Predictor Of...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Predicting the diagnosis of autism in adults using the Autism ... - NIH
    Woodbury-Smith MR, Robinson J, Wheelwright S, Baron-Cohen S (2005). Screening adults for Asperger syndrome using the AQ: a preliminary study of its ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Autism spectrum disorder in adults: diagnosis and management
    This guideline covers diagnosing and managing suspected or confirmed autism spectrum disorder (autism, Asperger's syndrome and atypical autism) in people ...
  20. [20]
    Well‐being spectrum traits are associated with polygenic scores for ...
    Aug 21, 2023 · This study aims to investigate if a genetic predisposition for ASD is associated with 5-WBS traits using polygenic risk score (PRS) analysis.
  21. [21]
    Associations of subclinical autistic-like traits with brain structural ...
    In this study, we analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 250 psychiatrically healthy subjects phenotyped for subclinical autistic-like traits.
  22. [22]
    The relationship between autistic traits and empathy in adolescents
    Apr 1, 2023 · Our results show that empathy was negatively associated with autistic traits at the questionnaire, behavioral, and EEG levels.Missing: subclinical | Show results with:subclinical
  23. [23]
    Usefulness of the autism spectrum quotient (AQ) in screening for ...
    Nov 13, 2023 · Baron-Cohen et al. (2001) classified the 50 AQ items into five 10-item subscales: social skills, attention switching, attention to detail, ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  24. [24]
    Measuring autistic traits in the general population - Molecular Autism
    Jan 14, 2015 · The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) is a self-report measure of autistic traits. It is frequently cited in diverse fields and has been administered to adults of ...
  25. [25]
    Validation of the English version of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient in ...
    Sep 28, 2023 · The aim of the current study was to validate the psychometric properties of the original English AQ in a non-clinical Singaporean sample and ...
  26. [26]
    Correlations amongst AQ scores, and total ADOS-G ... - ResearchGate
    These results show that self-reported ASD traits, measured using the AQ, are not correlated with clinician-rated current ASD behaviours (ADOS-G), but are weakly ...
  27. [27]
    Psychometric Properties of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient for ...
    Mar 27, 2017 · The current study systematically investigated the effects of scoring and categorization methods on the psychometric properties of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient.Missing: review | Show results with:review
  28. [28]
    Anxiety and autistic traits in adults: a systematic review and meta ...
    Oct 28, 2025 · Regarding the assessment of autistic traits, 55% of the samples (n = 10) employed the full version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ-50), ...
  29. [29]
    The use of the Autism-spectrum Quotient in differentiating high ...
    The present study aims to examine the usefulness of the AQ in differentiating between high functioning adults with autism, schizophrenia and a neurotypical ...
  30. [30]
    Testing a theory-driven factor structure of the autism-spectrum quotient
    Our study suggests that the Autism-Spectrum Quotient can be used to measure six more narrowly defined dimensions: social anhedonia, interest in details/patterns ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in Japan: A Cross-Cultural ...
    Apr 4, 2006 · The AQ was administered in Japan to test whether the UK results would generalize to a very different culture.
  32. [32]
    A cross-cultural comparison between Malaysia and the Netherlands
    Jan 12, 2023 · The AQ-28 measures autistic traits similarly, and the reliability was acceptable and good in the general population of Malaysia and the Netherlands, ...
  33. [33]
    Revised scored Sensory Perception Quotient reveals sensory ...
    Mar 2, 2020 · The present findings revealed greater sensory hypersensitivity, but not hyposensitivity, in females with ASC compared to BAP and control female groups.
  34. [34]
    Phenotypic divergence between individuals with self-reported ...
    Feb 6, 2025 · In individuals without an ASD diagnosis, a high level of self-reported autistic traits may be more reflective of anxiety surrounding social ...
  35. [35]
    Autism Spectrum Quotient – 10 items (AQ-10) (Child)
    10 items (AQ-10) (Child) Available downloads Copyright © 2024 Autism Research Centre Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge
  36. [36]
    The importance of using an optimal cutoff value for the 10 ... - PubMed
    The ≥ 6 cutoff was also found to provide a better balance between the sensitivity and specificity of the AQ10 with respect to a clinical autism diagnosis. Most ...
  37. [37]
    Autism Spectrum Quotient Children's Version (AQ-Child) - NovoPsych
    The Autism Spectrum Quotient Children's Version (AQ-Child) is a 50 item parent-report measure that assesses autistic traits in children between the ages of 4 ...
  38. [38]
    Autism Spectrum Quotient--10 Item Adult Version - APA PsycNet
    A 50-item self-report that measures the degree to which adults of normal intelligence have traits associated with the autism spectrum.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  39. [39]
    The Autism-Spectrum Quotient–Hebrew version - Sage Journals
    Sep 2, 2022 · A score of 26 and above has been suggested as an appropriate cutoff ... According to the sensitivity and specificity data presented in Table 5 a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Autism Spectrum Quotient – 10 items (AQ-10) (Adult)
    Autism Spectrum Quotient – 10 items (AQ-10) (Adult). References. C. Allison, B. Auyeung, S. Baron-Cohen, (2012) Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism ...
  41. [41]
    The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in Japan: A cross-cultural ...
    The AQ was administered in Japan to test whether the UK results would generalize to a very different culture.Missing: adaptations translations 2008 Arabic 2015 Chinese
  42. [42]
    Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Autism ...
    Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) ... Mean AQ score for the nonclinical population was 16.94 (95% CI 11.6 ...
  43. [43]