Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bahira

Bahira, also known as Baḥīrā or Sargis-Bahira in various traditions, was a Nestorian Christian monk purportedly active in the region of Bosra, Syria, during the early 7th century. In Islamic biographical literature, such as the Sīra of ibn Isḥāq (d. ca. 768 CE), he is depicted as recognizing the future Prophet —then a boy accompanying a Meccan trade caravan—as bearing the signs of prophethood foretold in Christian scriptures, including a distinctive seal between his shoulder blades. Bahira reportedly advised Muḥammad's uncle and guardian, Abū Ṭālib, to safeguard him from potential Jewish adversaries who might seek to harm him based on these prophetic indicators. The narrative's origins trace to early Muslim hagiographic accounts aimed at underscoring divine election, yet parallel Christian polemical legends portray Bahira negatively—as a heretical who either deceived Muḥammad with corrupted teachings or sought to exploit him for sectarian ends, such as promoting Arian or Nestorian doctrines. These Christian variants, circulating in , , and other Eastern traditions from the onward, reflect interfaith under Islamic rule rather than independent historical attestation. Scholarly consensus holds the as ahistorical, classifying it as a legendary construct without corroboration from contemporary non-Islamic sources or archaeological evidence, likely embellished to bridge Abrahamic prophetic lineages or counter accusations of Muḥammad's doctrinal borrowings. Even some traditional Muslim evaluators, including medieval critics, have questioned its chains of transmission (isnād), deeming it deficient for biographical reliability. The motif's persistence across confessional boundaries underscores its role in medieval religious polemics over prophetic legitimacy and scriptural interpretation, rather than verifiable biography.

Name and Etymology

Linguistic Origins

The name Bahira (Arabic: بَحِيرَىٰ; : ܒܚܝܪܐ bḥīrā) originates from Classical , where it serves not as a personal proper name but as a title denoting a who has been "tested and approved" or "proven" through ascetic discipline and divine selection. This term derives from the Syriac root bḥar, meaning "to choose," "to test," or "to elect," implying qualities of virtue, election, or in a monastic context. In Syriac Christian usage, bḥīrā reflects a status of spiritual refinement, akin to "the elect" or "the chosen" among ascetics. In Arabic linguistic adaptation within early Islamic texts, Bahira retained connotations tied to ascetic traditions, sometimes interpreted as "the virtuous" or "the tested," aligning with the Syriac sense of moral or divine approval rather than deriving independently from Arabic roots like bahir ("brilliant" or "dazzling"), which apply more to feminine nomenclature. No attestations of Bahira as a monastic title or name appear in non-Islamic Syriac, Aramaic, or other Near Eastern sources prior to the 7th century CE, with its earliest documented usage confined to Islamic narratives emerging in the following centuries. This absence suggests the name's prominence is contextually linked to post-Islamic literary traditions rather than broader pre-Islamic onomastic records.

Interpretations in Religious Contexts

The name Bahira, rooted in the Syriac bḥīrā signifying "" or "tested and approved by ," symbolizes divine selection and in Syriac Christian nomenclature, reflecting empirical linguistic patterns in early Eastern monastic traditions where such terms denoted figures vetted through ascetic trial or scriptural insight. Within Islamic interpretive frameworks, Bahira embodies a of scriptural prescience, where the name underscores a monk's purported alignment with Abrahamic prophecies—such as those in Deuteronomy 18:18 or —anticipating a prophet like from Ishmaelite lineage, thereby representing an early, non-polemical affirmation of prophetic continuity across faiths without reliance on post-event rationalization. This linkage privileges the monk's etymological "approval" as emblematic of empirical recognition from pre-Islamic texts, though Islamic sources like those in Kamal al-Din attribute such knowledge to preserved oral and written traditions among Syrian ascetics, cautioning against overattribution given the tradition's later compilation. Christian symbolic renderings contrastingly frame Bahira as emblematic of doctrinal deviation, often portraying bearers of the name as Nestorian or Ebionite heterodoxes whose "chosen" status veils erroneous , as seen in medieval polemics like the Apocalypse of Bahira, which casts the figure as a catalyst for aberrant revelations through selective scriptural manipulation. This interpretation, prevalent in and Latin from the onward, leverages the name's connotation of divine testing to critique perceived theological lapses, prioritizing causal chains of over neutral erudition and highlighting institutional biases in patristic that vilify peripheral monastic views.

Accounts in Islamic Sources

The Core Narrative of the Encounter

According to Islamic tradition, Muhammad, at approximately twelve years of age, accompanied his uncle Abu Talib on a trading caravan from Mecca to Syria, reaching as far as Busra. The caravan halted near a monastery where a Christian monk named Bahira resided, who was knowledgeable in scriptural interpretations. Bahira observed a distinctive cloud providing shade exclusively over Muhammad as the group rested, interpreting it as a prophetic sign. Upon closer examination, he identified the seal of prophethood—a physical mark—between Muhammad's shoulders, confirming his recognition of the boy as the awaited prophet described in ancient texts. Bahira then questioned Muhammad privately, adjuring him by local deities to affirm his prophetic status, after which he advised Abu Talib to safeguard the youth from potential harm by Jews aware of the prophecies.

Primary Sources and Chain of Transmission

The account of the encounter with Bahira originates in 's Sirat Rasul Allah, compiled around 767 , marking the earliest extant Islamic textual reference to the narrative. structured his around oral reports with specified chains of transmission (isnad), drawing from informants such as successors to the companions (), though his methodology included traditions without full isnads in some cases. The relevant section traces the story through 's transmission, preserved primarily via his student Abd al-Malik ibn Hisham's , completed around 833 , which omits some of 's extraneous material but retains the core Bahira episode. No mention of Bahira or the associated events appears in the Quran, revealed between approximately 610 and 632 , nor in pre-Ibn Ishaq sources such as early Meccan-Medinan compilations of prophetic traditions or companions' reports documented in the first half of the 8th century. Subsequent hadith collections reference variants of the monk encounter, such as Jami' al-Tirmidhi (compiled c. 884 ), which includes a report without naming Bahira and via an isnad involving multiple transmitters, and al-Hakim al-Nishapuri's Mustadrak ala al-Sahihayn (c. 1014 ), deemed supplementary rather than canonical. These accounts lack inclusion in the Sahih collections of al-Bukhari (d. 870 ) or Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj (d. 875 ), the most rigorously vetted repositories of prophetic traditions. Hadith scholars, including Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 855 ), critiqued Ibn Ishaq's transmissions broadly for incorporating unreliable narrators and unverified reports, contributing to evaluations of weakness in sira-derived narratives like Bahira's.

Variations Across Early Texts

Early Islamic biographical accounts of the Bahira encounter exhibit variations in Muhammad's age at the time of the meeting. Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah, the earliest comprehensive , places the event when Muhammad was twelve years old, during a caravan journey with his uncle Abu Talib. Other traditions, however, report him as nine or ten years old, reflecting differences in transmitted reports from Medinan and Meccan informants. The location of the encounter also differs across sources. Most accounts, including Ibn Ishaq's, situate it in (Busra), a city in southern known for its Christian monastic presence. A variant preserved in later compilations shifts the meeting to , an oasis north of en route to Syria, altering the geographical context without changing the core recognition . Signs of prophethood recognized by Bahira vary in description. In Ibn Ishaq's narrative, Bahira notices a cloud shading and inspects the seal of prophethood—a fleshy protuberance between his shoulders—confirming scriptural prophecies. Some reports add a tree bowing or providing shade to , emphasizing miraculous natural phenomena alongside the physical mark. Others highlight Bahira quoting directly from the or to identify , integrating textual with visual signs. Later historiographical works introduce additional elaborations. Al-Tabari's Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk amplifies Bahira's foretelling, portraying him as declaring the "apostle of the Lord" based on unadulterated texts, and in some chains, Bahira entrusts scrolls or protective advice to safeguard the future . These expansions, drawn from extended isnads, build on earlier sira motifs but incorporate more emphatic doctrinal affirmations.

Historical and Scholarly Analyses

Evidence for Historicity

The encounter between and the monk Bahira is rendered plausible by the established pattern of Meccan caravan trade to during the late 6th century , which facilitated direct contacts between Quraysh merchants and Christian communities along the routes. Archaeological and textual evidence confirms the operation of overland trade networks linking the Hijaz to Syrian markets, with Meccan traders regularly transporting goods such as , spices, and textiles northward via paths like the Darb al-Hijra or routes passing near . These expeditions, often involving young apprentices, align with reports of joining his uncle Abu Talib on a around 594-595 , when he was approximately 12 years old, stopping at monastic sites en route. Syria in this period hosted dense networks of Syriac Christian monasteries, particularly Nestorian and Monophysite establishments near trade hubs like , where interacted with passing Arab caravans for provisions, intelligence, or commerce. Pre-Islamic , including Meccans, maintained familiarity with Syriac-speaking Christians through these exchanges, as evidenced by tribal alliances with Ghassanid clients of and the presence of Christian traders and clerics in Hijazi markets. Such interactions provided a realistic context for a like Bahira, possibly from a Syriac tradition, to observe and engage with a Quraysh youth exhibiting distinctive traits. The 's core elements echo verifiable oral traditions of prophetic foretellings in Near Eastern lore, where ascetic figures discern divine signs in travelers, a motif attested in hagiographies predating and suggesting cultural transmission via rather than later fabrication. Early versions of the Bahira story, preserving linguistic and thematic details absent in later retellings, indicate an origin in authentic encounters rather than purely polemical invention. This circumstantial alignment of logistics, regional demographics, and supports the possibility of a historical kernel to the event, independent of its theological embellishments.

Criticisms of the Legend's Reliability

The primary source for the Bahira encounter is Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah (d. 767 CE), which transmits the narrative through chains of narration (isnad) involving transmitters such as Yunus ibn Ishaq, deemed weak and unreliable by scholars due to inconsistencies and lack of corroboration from more rigorous collectors like al-Bukhari or Muslim. Medieval critics, including (d. 1348 CE), classified related traditions as da'if (weak) or potentially fabricated, citing interrupted links and narrators prone to error or invention, a common issue in early biographical materials predating systematic verification around the . No contemporary non-Muslim records from 6th-century —such as Byzantine chronicles, monastic texts, or Jewish sources—mention an encounter between a Meccan and a named Bahira, despite the region's literate Christian communities and active routes that would likely have documented prophetic omens if they occurred. This evidentiary gap persists even as later Islamic expansions into post-634 produced abundant documentation, suggesting the story lacks independent verification beyond Muslim traditions compiled over a century after the alleged event circa 595 . The legend's structure, featuring a foreign recognizing innate prophethood through signs like a or , parallels apocryphal hagiographies in lore (e.g., infant miracles in the ), indicating possible retroactive embellishment to bolster Muhammad's pre-revelatory exceptionalism amid 8th-century interfaith polemics. Such motifs served theological legitimation rather than historical reporting, as evidenced by variations across texts where details shift to emphasize over chronology.

Potential Cultural and Theological Influences

The presence of Christian monasteries along ancient trade routes from Arabia to and the in the sixth century provided opportunities for caravaneers to engage with Christian scriptural traditions and monotheistic teachings. These monastic sites, often linked to Nestorian or other Eastern Christian communities, acted as hubs for disseminating biblical narratives and theological debates, including perspectives that emphasized God's absolute oneness over Trinitarian formulations. The Bahira legend potentially incorporates elements from such real-world contacts, portraying the monk as an erudite figure versed in prophetic signs, which may composite historical monks encountered by Meccan traders like those accompanying young on journeys to around 594 CE. variants of the story, circulating orally from the eighth century, suggest reciprocal influences between and Christian traditions, adapting motifs of divine foreknowledge to affirm emerging prophetic claims. Theological resonances between the legend and non-orthodox Christian doctrines, particularly 's denial of Christ's co-eternality with , offer another layer of potential inspiration, as Arian critiques of the —viewing the Son as created and subordinate—echo aspects of later Islamic unitarianism without implying direct derivation. Early polemicists such as (c. 675–749 CE) explicitly linked Muhammad's teachings to an Arian monk's influence, citing the Ishmaelite heresy as reviving subordinationist errors suppressed by Nicene orthodoxy. Contemporary analyses, however, emphasize the legend's role in retrojecting cultural familiarity to legitimize the narrative, rather than evidencing causal doctrinal transmission from specific sects like or , which had waned but persisted in peripheral regions.

Christian Perspectives and Polemics

Early Christian Interpretations

One of the earliest documented Christian allusions to a monastic influence on Muhammad dates to the mid-8th century in the writings of John of Damascus (c. 675–749 CE), a prominent theologian in the Umayyad Caliphate. In his treatise On Heresies, John describes Muhammad as having encountered an Arian monk who imparted scriptural knowledge, which Muhammad then adapted into a new doctrine that explicitly rejected the Christian Trinity and the divinity of Christ. This account posits the monk's teachings as the origin of Islam's unitarian theology, diverging sharply from orthodox Christian positions on the nature of God and Jesus. John does not explicitly name the monk as Bahira, but subsequent scholarly interpretations have linked this figure to the Bahira of Islamic tradition, viewing the as a conduit for heretical ideas rather than divine recognition. The emphasis in John's narrative falls on doctrinal incompatibility, with the monk's —denying the full divinity of —mirroring aspects of Islamic , such as portraying as a prophet but not co-eternal with the Father. Contemporary Christian texts from the , reflecting oral traditions in monastic communities under Muslim rule, similarly depict analogous encounters between and figures as cautionary tales against prophetic pretensions. These accounts highlight the ' attempts to instruct in Christian , only to see divergences emerge in monotheistic practices that omit Trinitarian elements, serving as early warnings of theological rather than endorsements of emerging revelations. No sources from this period portray the interaction positively as prophetic affirmation; instead, they underscore irreconcilable differences in core beliefs about Christ's identity and divine unity.

Portrayals as a Heretical Figure

In Christian polemical traditions, Bahira is characterized as a heterodox whose unorthodox doctrines allegedly shaped the theological foundations of , particularly its rejection of core Christian tenets like the . These depictions frame him as a Nestorian or Arian figure evading from authorities, thereby positioning as an extension of ancient Christian heresies rather than a distinct . The Legend of Sergius Bahira, preserved in and manuscripts from the medieval period, exemplifies this portrayal by narrating how the monk Sergius (identified with ) imparts to a corrupted version of Christian scripture emphasizing at the expense of Trinitarian . In these accounts, Sergius/Bahira, driven by resentment toward Byzantine ecclesiastical dominance, instructs the young trader in anti-Trinitarian arguments and selective scriptural interpretations that later underpin Quranic critiques of . Similarly, the Apocalypse of Bahira, a apocalyptic text likely composed between the 7th and 13th centuries, presents the monk as a prophetic heretic who foresees and facilitates the emergence of a deceptive faith among the , blending with eschatological warnings against the "error of the ." This work accuses Bahira of devising teachings that deny the of Christ and promote a theology, influencing to propagate what polemicists deemed scriptural distortions. In the 9th-century Risala attributed to 'Abd al-Masih al-Kindi, Bahira is explicitly labeled a heterodox who abandons monastic discipline to mentor in errant beliefs, including of biblical prophecies to suit Arab audiences and the rejection of incarnational doctrine. These polemics collectively attribute to Bahira the transmission of Arian-like and Nestorian extremes, framing his encounter as the causal origin of Islam's doctrinal divergences from . Early Christian polemics, such as those by in the eighth century, assert that encountered the monk Bahira during his youth and absorbed heretical Christian doctrines that later shaped key ic teachings. These accounts portray Bahira as an Arian or Nestorian figure whose Christological views—emphasizing ' prophetic role over divinity—mirrored the 's depiction of as a human messenger without divine sonship or Trinitarian equality (Quran 4:171, 5:75). Arianism's subordination of the Son to the Father and Nestorianism's separation of Christ's natures provided conceptual parallels to the 's rejection of and as salvific events, framing instead as a miracle-working prophet akin to earlier biblical figures. Critics from this perspective further link Bahira's purported Syrian monastic background to Muhammad's adoption of strict and vehement anti-idolatry, elements resonant with ascetic Christian critiques of prevalent in . Trade caravan routes facilitated exposure to such ideas, where Syrian hermits emphasized tawhid-like unity of God over pagan shrines, influencing Muhammad's Meccan surahs condemning idol worship (Quran 53:19-23). However, no verbatim textual borrowings from Christian liturgies or scriptures appear in the , suggesting indirect cultural rather than deliberate —diffusion through oral interactions and regional debates rather than scripted transmission. These arguments, while highlighting doctrinal affinities, rely on legendary accounts of the Bahira encounter whose historicity remains contested, with limited to later medieval narratives rather than contemporary records. Christian interpreters thus view such parallels as evidence of syncretic formation, where heretical strands filtered through a contributed to Islam's theological framework without originating from independent .

Broader Implications and Debates

Role in Prophetic Legitimation

In the biographical tradition of sira literature, exemplified by ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah (composed circa 767 CE), the Bahira episode illustrates an early external validation of Muhammad's prophetic qualities. During a Meccan trading caravan to around 594 CE, when Muhammad was approximately 12 years old, the monk Bahira purportedly discerns divine signs such as a shading cloud and the physical "seal of prophethood" between his shoulders. Drawing from Christian scriptures in his possession, Bahira identifies these as markers of the anticipated prophet and urges Abu Talib, Muhammad's uncle and caravan guardian, to protect the boy from Jewish adversaries who might seek to eliminate him. This narrative serves a legitimating by Muhammad's destiny within a framework of pre-Islamic divine foreknowledge, accessible even to a secluded Christian ascetic, thus portraying his prophethood as evident through universal signs predating the first Quranic in 610 CE. Within Islamic , the story bolsters arguments for across Abrahamic traditions, positing that discerning interpreters of biblical texts could foresee and affirm Muhammad's role, thereby addressing potential critiques of Islam's abrupt emergence. Critical , however, interprets the account as a hagiographic construct akin to legendary affirmations in Christian vitae, where exhibit prodigious traits recognized by contemporaries to retroactively sanctify their lives amid community-building needs. The tale's reliance on miraculous prescience and lack of independent contemporaneous attestation suggest its development as a to fortify prophetic credentials against , mirroring etiological motifs in other religious foundings rather than historical reportage.

Modern Scholarly Views

Modern scholars predominantly regard the Bahira narrative as a legendary construct rather than a verifiable historical event, citing the absence of any contemporaneous 6th-century documentation and its earliest attestation in the 8th-century Sīra of Ibn Isḥāq. This foundational version, compiled over a century after the purported encounter around 595 CE, relies on oral chains of transmission (isnād) that lack independent corroboration, leading revisionist historians to argue it emerged as a theological motif to legitimize 's prophethood through external validation. Analyses post-2000 emphasize how such stories may reflect later interfaith polemics, with Christian variants portraying Bahira (or Sergius) as a heretical influencer of , potentially inverting Islamic claims for apologetic purposes. While some researchers acknowledge the plausibility of youthful caravan travels along Syrian trade routes—evidenced by archaeological traces of pre-Islamic between and — they stress that no material remains, such as inscriptions or artifacts, link these to a specific monk-disciple interaction. Pro-historicity arguments, often from traditionalist perspectives, invoke ruins near as Bahira's monastery, but these attributions stem from medieval Islamic lore without 6th-century stratigraphic confirmation, highlighting evidential voids amid broader regional Christian-Monophysite networks. Recent studies (e.g., 2021 onward) differentiate oral precursors—possibly circulating prophetic signs in Hijazi —from deliberate 8th-century fabrications, urging caution against conflating socio-economic realities with hagiographic embellishments. This aligns with broader critiques of early sīra reliability, prioritizing empirical gaps over narrative coherence.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Christian Legend of Monk Bakira
    The text of Monk Bahîrâ is an evidence of how historical traditions may have been perverted for polemical purposes. The story of the Christian monk Bahîrâ and ...
  2. [2]
    View of Muḥammad, the Monk, and the Jews - Entangled Religions
    This study analyzes the foundational version of the Baḥīrā legend that appears in the Sīra of Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq (d. ca. 768 CE)
  3. [3]
    Muhammad and the Monk: The Making of the Christian Baḥīrā Legend
    Jun 29, 2021 · This study examines the encounter between Bahira, a Syrian Christian monk, and the young Prophet Muhammad within the socio-religious ...
  4. [4]
    Muhammad and the Monk: The Making of the Christian Bahira Legend
    The popularity of the legend among Christians living under Islamic rule is demonstrated by the relatively large number of known manuscripts, and by its impact ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] The Legend of Sergius Bahira - Eastern Christian Apologetics and ...
    found in both Christian and Muslim sources, of Muhammad, in his early years, meeting a. Christian monk, variously called Sergius or Bahira, who taught him about ...
  6. [6]
    The Story of Bahira the Monk: Fact or Fiction? (2) | Aataai Gazi ...
    The story is suitable as a Hollywood movie or as best-selling fiction. But the story should not be claimed as authenticated history in the life of Muhammad ﷺ.
  7. [7]
    Sargis Bḥira - Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage
    Sargis Bḥira is the name of a Syriac monk who allegedly met the Prophet Muḥammad and inspired him to begin preaching to the Arabs.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Bahira - Al-Islam.org
    His name derives from the Syriac bḥīrā, meaning “tested (by God) and approved”. Read More... 1 Question. How did the monks, such as Bahira, at the time of ...
  10. [10]
    Bahira: The Christian Monk who recognized the prophecy in ...
    Mar 27, 2019 · The monk revealed his visions of Muhammad's future to the boy's uncle (Abu Talib), warning him to preserve the child from the Jews (in Ibn Sa' ...
  11. [11]
    Chapter 14: Report of Bahira the Monk - Al-Islam.org
    Bahira then turned to Muhammad and said: I ask you three things, and adjure you by Laat and Uzza to answer. At the mention of these idols the Prophet was ...
  12. [12]
    Bahira Apocalypse - LinkedIn
    Jan 26, 2020 · His appellation could have been derived from (Syriac: bḥīrā), meaning “tested (by God) and approved” or by the sheer nature of his dwelling next ...Missing: etymology bayra
  13. [13]
    Ibn Kathir: The Story of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) - Islam Awareness
    When Muhammad was twelve years old, he accompanied his uncle Abu Talib on a mercantile journey to Syria, and they proceeded as far as Busra. The journey lasted ...
  14. [14]
    Story of Bahira the Monk - Prophet Muhammad Visit to Syria
    Is the story of Bahira the monk authentic? After the analysis of the sources, we can say that the story of Baḥîra the monk lacks evidence.
  15. [15]
    IBN ISfclAQ'S USE OF THE ISNAD l - Manchester Hive
    1 It is used, for example, about 'Abd al-Muftalib's vow when he dug the well Zamzam,2 about Muhammad's father 'Abdallah being. 'Abd al-Muttalib's favourite son, ...Missing: Bahira | Show results with:Bahira
  16. [16]
    The Reliability of Muslim Chronicler Ibn Ishaq - Answering Islam Blog
    Apr 28, 2020 · As to the tradition from Fatima, al-Khatib gave us an isnad running back through I.I. and Fatima to Asma' d. Abu Bakr: 'I heard a woman ...Missing: Bahira | Show results with:Bahira
  17. [17]
    The Early Youth of the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) - veins of truth
    Jul 8, 2025 · Authenticity Note: While the Bahira story appears in early seerah books, it is not found in Sahih Bukhari or Muslim, and the chain of narration ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    The Tale of Bahira the Monk | EN.tohed.com
    Dec 6, 2024 · The story of Bahira, a monk who allegedly encountered the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) during his childhood, is one of the widely circulated religious ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Sirat Rasoul Allah by Ibn Ishaq - EMAANLIBRARY
    A hundred of his followers emigrated to Abyssinia, and finally Muhammad himself decided to leave Mecca and went to Medina in AD 622. From this year the. Muslim ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Early Life of Muhammad | World Civilization - Lumen Learning
    Islamic tradition states that when Muhammad was either nine or twelve, while accompanying a caravan to Syria he met a Christian monk or hermit named Bahira, who ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Comparative Religion in Versions of the Baḥīrā Legend
    The arrival of the Jewish assassins provides still more support: they too, independent of Baḥīrā, recognize in Muḥammad the scriptural signs of prophethood.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] The Story of Monk Sargis-Baḫīrā - Almuslih
    It contains how Bahira first encountered Muhammand, recognizing him among the rest of the nomads, predicting that “he is the one in whom his prophecy will be ...
  23. [23]
    Trans-arabian routes of the pre-islamic period - Persée
    Shahid has, in part, attributed the rise of Mecca in the 6th century to the successful diversion of caravans to it from Oman and al-Bahrayn, formerly intended ...Texte Intégral · The Neo-Assyrian Period · The Sasanian Period
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    The identity and witness of Arab pre-Islamic Arab Christianity
    This article will explore the identity and witness of the Christian presence in Arabia and claims that the development of an Arabic Bible provides a unique ...
  26. [26]
    Islam, Syriac interactions with
    Interactions between Syriac Christians and Muslims were a regular feature of political, intellectual, and cultural life in the caliphate.
  27. [27]
    We know the monk Sergius/Bahira, who is believed to foretell ...
    May 31, 2016 · We know the monk Sergius/Bahira, who is believed to foretell Muhammad's future as a prophet, is a Christian. But which Christianity? Was he a ...Missing: Symbolic | Show results with:Symbolic<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Monastic Movement as a Driving Force in Syriac Christian Mission ...
    Nov 10, 2022 · ... Syriac monasticism spread from Mesopotamia to China. Most of. the monasteries were built along the trade routes, close to oasis cities or ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  29. [29]
    [PDF] The Historical Evidence for Christians in the Arabian Gulf - Almuslih
    An Anonymous monk translated from Persian into Syriac the legal book of ... Christianity and maritime trade in pre-Islamic Arabia. As mentioned above the ...
  30. [30]
    St. John of Damascus: Critique of Islam
    Mar 26, 2006 · This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, [101] devised his ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] John Damascene in Context: An Examination of "The Heresy of the ...
    May 9, 2009 · John—an earlier source than Ishaq—calls Bahira an Arian. Arian influence on Islam would be more believable than Nestorian influence, and ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Islam, Bahira the Monk, and Arianism - Orthodox - Medium
    Mar 11, 2023 · The saint, St. John of Damascus believed that Islam was a continuation of Arianism in which Muhammad was inspired by an Arian monk.
  34. [34]
    Saint John of Damascus: His Encounter with Islam - Catholic 365
    Jun 20, 2023 · ... influence of an Arian Assyrian Christian Monk, Bahira, who he (Muhammad) was friends with. He sums up Muhammad's teachings as: One God who ...
  35. [35]
    The Monk Encounters the Prophet—The Story of the ... - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · The Monk Encounters the Prophet—The Story of the Encounter between Monk Bahīra and Muhammad as It Is Recorded in the Syriac Manuscript of Mardin ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] The Monk Encounters the Prophet—The Story of the ... - Almuslih
    Muhammad poses leading questions, which Bahīra answers in a way which allows the reader to see both a statement of Christian doctrine and, by implication, the ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    Barbara Roggema, The Legend of Sergius Baḥīrā: Eastern ...
    The story, found in both Christian and Muslim sources, of Muhammad, in his early years, meeting a Christian monk, variously called Sergius or Bahira.Missing: reliability criticism
  39. [39]
    [PDF] A critical analysis of Christian responses to Islamic claims about the ...
    Further,. i t i s John's claim that Muhammad was influenced by the heretical Christian monk Bahira. From the Muslim perspective, however, the possibility of ...
  40. [40]
    Comparative Revelation: The Qu'ran and the Christ (HTML)
    There is much similarity between this view and the Arian view of Jesus. There was also a belief taught that the Qur'an was not pre-existent and was created ...
  41. [41]
    Is Arius the Father of Islam? - Center For Baptist Renewal
    Jan 10, 2022 · Arius was deemed a heretic seventeen hundred years ago, but missionaries continue to have to articulate the nature of Jesus in contrast with conflicting claims ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    [PDF] muhammad learned monotheism from christians - onthewing.org
    The truth is that Muhammad got tired of the Christians constantly preaching monotheism to his fellow Arabs, knowing in his heart, that they were correct in ...Missing: anti- | Show results with:anti-<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    [PDF] The Prophet Muhammad: A Model of Monotheistic Reform for ... - HAL
    Jan 19, 2021 · Nothing is more natural than to suppose that Mahomet, always occupied with his ideas of reform (for he at first thought of destroying idolatry ...
  45. [45]
    What is Islam's Relationship to Christianity? - Lausanne Movement
    I concluded that the sheer volume of biblical reflexes in the Quran is not actually evidence of a deeper 'family-tree' affinity between Islam and Christianity.
  46. [46]
    Falsifying the Prophet: Muhammad at the Hands of His Earliest ...
    ... Bahira recognized the young Muhammad as the one who would fulfil his prophecy. An extended dialogue ensued, during which Sergius Bahira agreed to mentor the ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Islamization and Trade in the Arabian Gulf in the Age of Mohammad ...
    The archaeological evidence also points to the persistence of long-distance trade in the Gulf, although the volume of the goods involved is still a matter of ...Missing: Bahira | Show results with:Bahira
  48. [48]
    Monastery of Bahira the monk - IslamicLandmarks.com
    Bahira advised that Muhammad should be taken back to Makkah at once, if the Jews found out about Muhammad they would try to kill him. Abu Talib took the advice ...
  49. [49]
    <div> Interfaith Dynamics in the 6th Century Arabian Peninsula
    Nov 4, 2024 · This study explores the interfaith dynamics of the encounter between Bahira, a Christian monk, and Muhammad in the socio-religious setting of 6th century ...Missing: trade routes Syria