Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Schism

A schism is the rupture of ecclesiastical union and unity within a religious body, particularly a Christian church, derived from the Greek schisma, meaning "rent" or "division."^[1]^[2] In theological and canon law contexts, it represents a formal breach often stemming from disagreements over doctrine, authority, or disciplinary practices, distinct from heresy which involves erroneous belief, though the two may overlap.^[1]^[3] Schisms have recurrently fractured religious communities across history, fostering the emergence of distinct sects or denominations that maintain parallel structures and claims to legitimacy.^[1] In Christianity, early divisions arose from councils addressing Christological disputes, while later splits like the Nestorian schism in 431 separated groups emphasizing the distinct human and divine natures of Christ.^[4] Similar patterns appear in Eastern traditions: Buddhism experienced an early schism under Devadatta, who advocated stricter monastic rules, leading to temporary fragmentation of the sangha, and Jainism underwent a pivotal division into Digambara and Svetambara sects over monastic nudity and scriptural authority.^[5]^[6] These ruptures, driven by interpretive variances rather than external impositions, underscore schism's role in religious evolution, preserving doctrinal purity at the cost of institutional cohesion.^[1]

Definition and Terminology

Core Definition

A schism constitutes a formal rupture within an organized body, most characteristically a religious institution, whereby irreconcilable disputes over doctrine, authority, or praxis precipitate the emergence of two or more autonomous entities, each possessing independent governance and mutual exclusion from the other.^[1] This division surpasses ephemeral disagreements by manifesting as a structural separation, including the creation of distinct hierarchies, rituals, or membership criteria that preclude reintegration without explicit reconciliation.^[7] Historical precedents reveal that such schisms endure when the resulting factions develop self-sustaining institutions, as opposed to provisional factions that dissolve upon compromise or suppression.^[8] In theological parlance, schism diverges from heresy in its emphasis on communal disunity rather than doctrinal deviance alone; heresy entails the willful rejection of established tenets while potentially preserving formal affiliation, whereas schism demands the active severance of ecclesial bonds, irrespective of orthodoxy in belief.^[9]^[10] This distinction underscores schism's causal mechanism in authority contests, where fidelity to perceived truth prompts organizational fission, yielding verifiable patterns of parallel institutions that persist across generations, as chronicled in denominational records spanning centuries.^[1] Though rooted in religious contexts—where unity derives from shared revelation and sacramental order—the concept extends analogously to non-religious collectives, such as political or ideological movements, provided the split engenders enduring, rival structures; however, secular applications dilute the term's precision absent the metaphysical stakes inherent to faith-based schisms.^[7]

Etymology and Usage

The term schism originates from the Ancient Greek noun schísma (σχίσμα), denoting a cleft, split, or division, derived from the verb skhízō (σχίζω), meaning "to split" or "to tear."^[2]^[11] This root evoked physical acts of rending, such as tearing cloth or nets, imagery resonant in ancient contexts where intact wholeness symbolized integrity.^[12] The word passed into Late Latin as schisma, retaining its sense of rupture, particularly in ecclesiastical divisions, before entering Old French and subsequently Middle English around the late 14th century, where it first appeared in religious writings to describe breaches within the Church.^[2]^[13] In biblical usage, as rendered in translations of 1 Corinthians 12:25, schisma warns against divisions (schismata) in the body, portraying communal discord as antithetical to mutual care and organic unity among members.^[14]^[12] In modern English, schism extends beyond religious contexts to denote ideological, political, or organizational fractures, such as party splits or institutional breaks, yet consistently carries pejorative implications of an undesirable severance from an original, cohesive whole—most pronounced in its primary application to faith communities.^[15]^[16] This evolution underscores a persistent linguistic emphasis on division as a lamentable deviation rather than neutral differentiation.^[2]

Causes and Dynamics

Theological and Doctrinal Factors

Theological and doctrinal factors constitute a primary catalyst for schisms, stemming from irreconcilable interpretations of sacred texts, creeds, or revelatory sources that define a religion's propositional essence. These disputes typically center on fundamentals such as the nature of the divine, soteriological processes, or scriptural authority, where divergent exegeses render communal worship untenable without compromise on core tenets. Empirical analyses of congregational upheavals indicate that doctrinal variances, alongside authority conflicts, frequently precipitate splits, with breakaway adherents viewing departures as defenses against perceived erosions of established orthodoxy.^[17]^[18] In patterns observed across religious traditions, schisms manifest when factions prioritize empirical adherence to originating doctrines—verifiable through historical transmission chains—over interpretive adaptations that introduce novel emphases. Early precedents, such as Christological controversies in Christianity debating the precise union of divine and human natures in Jesus, exemplify how unresolved propositions on divinity's ontology compel formal separations to preserve doctrinal coherence. Such rifts underscore a causal dynamic: innovations risk fracturing the evidentiary lineage from foundational revelations, prompting orthodox guardians to dissociate rather than endorse dilutions.^[19]^[20] Contemporary scholarship critiques narratives portraying these divisions as mere evolutionary progress, noting instead that fidelity enforcement often drives the orthodox side, as deviations challenge the religion's causal realism by prioritizing contextual accommodations over textual invariance. Divisions warrant separation particularly over gospel essentials, like affirmations of deity or resurrection, where concessions equate to abandoning the faith's verifiable anchors, whereas peripheral variances permit coexistence absent mission impairment. This mechanism ensures doctrinal purity but perpetuates fragmentation when interpretive variances prove intractable.^[18]^[20]

Political, Cultural, and Organizational Triggers

Contests over ecclesiastical authority frequently escalate latent tensions into schisms when intertwined with secular political ambitions. In the Byzantine Empire, emperors exercised caesaropapism by appointing and deposing patriarchs, directly challenging the Roman papacy's claims to jurisdictional primacy over Eastern sees, as seen in the Photian Schism of 863–867 where Emperor Michael III installed Photius as patriarch against papal objections. This pattern of state interference subordinated religious hierarchy to imperial policy, amplifying rifts by prioritizing political loyalty over institutional consensus. Similarly, during the Investiture Controversy (1075–1122), Holy Roman Emperors asserted rights to invest bishops with ring and staff, symbolizing both spiritual and temporal power, which provoked papal excommunications and fueled decades of civil strife that weakened centralized church governance. Cultural divergences, particularly linguistic and regional identities, create alienation that rigidifies divisions by hindering communication and fostering mutual suspicions. The East-West Schism was conditioned by growing estrangement between the Latin-speaking West and Greek-speaking East, where translations of key texts like the Filioque clause bred misinterpretations, compounded by distinct liturgical customs and economic orientations—Western feudalism versus Eastern trade hubs—that reinforced separate communal identities.^[21] ^[22] In the case of the Nestorian Schism formalized at the Council of Ephesus in 431, Syriac-speaking communities in Persia perceived the council's decisions as an imposition from Greek-dominated Constantinople, aligning instead with Sassanid state interests to preserve cultural autonomy amid persecution as a "fifth column" for Byzantine rivals. Organizational failures, such as perceived corruption or over-centralization, prompt schisms as factions pursue decentralized alternatives to restore accountability. The Western Schism (1378–1417) originated from French royal influence pressuring the College of Cardinals to elect an Avignon pope after Gregory XI's death, resulting in rival claimants backed by political alliances—Urban VI in Rome versus Clement VII in Avignon—which exposed the electoral system's vulnerability to external manipulation and led to conciliarism's assertion that general councils held superior authority to depose errant popes. ^[23] In response to such rigidity, reformers like those in the 15th-century Hussite movement rejected Prague's subjugation to a distant, scandal-plagued Roman curia, establishing independent governance structures to address local grievances over indulgences and simony without awaiting central redress. These dynamics illustrate schisms as pragmatic reactions to governance breakdowns, where power vacuums invite secession to realign authority with practical needs.

Long-Term Consequences and Patterns

Schisms frequently engender institutional proliferation, creating competitive religious markets that empirical research links to heightened participation and organizational vigor. Sociologists Roger Finke and Rodney Stark's religious economies model posits that doctrinal divisions stimulate innovation by compelling groups to differentiate offerings and appeal to varied constituencies, thereby enhancing overall adherence levels rather than eroding them.^[24] This framework, tested across historical U.S. census data from 1850 to 1980, reveals that areas with greater denominational density exhibit stronger religious mobilization, as competition incentivizes efficiency and responsiveness over monopolistic complacency.^[25] Consequently, schisms can foster renewal, with splinter entities achieving doctrinal purity and adaptive practices that sustain or expand their followings amid evolving societal needs.^[26] Patterns in schism outcomes demonstrate variability in endurance, with some fractures resolving through reconciliation mechanisms like councils or negotiations, restoring unified structures, while others solidify into persistent divergences. Historical analyses indicate that unresolved schisms correlate with expanded denominational counts, which, per cross-national studies, bolster resilience by distributing risks across multiple entities rather than concentrating vulnerabilities in a single body.^[27] This proliferation often yields societal benefits, such as elevated trust within reformed subgroups and ancillary economic gains from cohesive networks, as modeled in economic interpretations of schism dynamics.^[28] However, empirical evidence tempers optimism: idealizations of unity as inherently superior lack substantiation, as competitive pluralism outperforms regulated monopolies in vitality metrics, absent data proving consolidated authority averts decline more effectively.^[29] Countervailing risks include amplified intra-societal tensions and attenuated collective efficacy, where fragmentation dilutes geopolitical leverage and invites doctrinal divergence from foundational tenets. Quantitative studies on religious variance document associations with elevated intra-state conflict frequencies, as identity-based cleavages exacerbate resource competition and erode shared interpretive authority.^[30] Splinter groups may innovate locally but face survival challenges if unable to scale, with patterns showing that unchecked pluralism can precipitate drift, wherein peripheral adaptations supplant core principles over generations.^[31] Thus, while schisms enable purity and competition-driven adaptation, they imperil overarching cohesion, underscoring a causal trade-off between subgroup vitality and aggregate influence, verifiable through adherence trends and conflict indices rather than normative presumptions of unity's primacy.^[32]

Schisms in Abrahamic Religions

In Judaism

Judaism has experienced several schisms primarily driven by disputes over interpretive authority, the role of oral tradition versus written scripture, and responses to external cultural pressures. These divisions often arose from tensions between fidelity to established halakhic (legal) frameworks and adaptations to changing sociopolitical contexts, with the Pharisees' emphasis on oral law prevailing after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, shaping Rabbinic Judaism.^[33]^[34] During the Second Temple period (c. 516 BCE–70 CE), the Pharisees and Sadducees represented a major ideological rift. The Pharisees, drawing support from the scholarly and popular classes, advocated for the authority of both the written Torah and an oral tradition of interpretations, including beliefs in resurrection, angels, and post-mortem reward and punishment.^[33]^[34] In contrast, the Sadducees, an aristocratic priestly elite tied to Temple rituals, rejected oral traditions, limiting authority to the written Pentateuch alone and denying doctrines like immortality of the soul or divine intervention beyond scripture.^[33]^[35] This schism reflected broader causal dynamics of scriptural literalism versus evolving interpretive practices, exacerbated by political alliances—the Sadducees with Roman authorities and Pharisees with the masses—but the Sadducees' influence ended with the Temple's fall, as their ritual-centric authority collapsed without a central cult site.^[33]^[36] In the post-Temple era, the Karaite schism emerged in the 8th–9th centuries CE, challenging Rabbinic Judaism's reliance on the Oral Torah. Originating in Mesopotamia under figures like Anan ben David (c. 715–795 CE), Karaites insisted on scripture alone as binding, rejecting rabbinic interpretations as human inventions lacking Mosaic origin, which led to divergences in practices like calendar determination and ritual observances.^[37]^[38] This split was fueled by dissatisfaction with rabbinic centralization under the Babylonian Geonim and a return to perceived scriptural purity, though Karaites remained a minority, comprising less than 1% of Jews by the medieval period, while Rabbinic Judaism standardized oral law in texts like the Talmud.^[37]^[39] The 19th-century divide between Orthodox and Reform Judaism stemmed from Enlightenment-era emancipation in Europe, which eroded traditional communal structures and prompted Reform leaders to prioritize ethical monotheism over ritual halakha to facilitate assimilation.^[40] Emerging in Germany around 1810 with innovations like the Hamburg Temple's prayer book reforms—discarding Hebrew portions and strict Sabbath observance—Reform viewed Jewish law as evolving rather than eternally binding, driven by causal pressures of secular education and citizenship rights that clashed with isolationist orthodoxy.^[41]^[40] Orthodox Judaism coalesced in response, particularly after the 1876 Frankfurt Rabbinical Conference where rabbis affirmed immutable halakha against Reform dilutions, preserving practices like dietary laws and gender-separated worship amid declining Reform adherence to traditional authority.^[42]^[43] By 1900, these branches formalized distinct institutions, with Orthodoxy emphasizing unchanging Torah observance as causally essential to Jewish continuity, while Reform's adaptations correlated with higher intermarriage rates exceeding 50% in subsequent generations.^[40]^[42]

In Christianity

Schisms in Christianity have primarily arisen from disputes over core doctrines concerning the nature of Christ, the authority of Scripture and tradition, and ecclesiastical governance. The earliest major division occurred at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 AD, where the assembly affirmed the doctrine of dyophysitism—that Jesus Christ possesses two natures, divine and human, united in one person—against the monophysite position advocated by figures like Eutyches and Dioscorus of Alexandria, who emphasized a single incarnate nature.^[44] This led to the separation of the Oriental Orthodox Churches, including the Coptic, Armenian, and Syriac traditions, which adhere to miaphysitism, viewing the schism as a rejection of their Christological formulation despite later clarifications of semantic differences.^[45] The East-West Schism of 1054 formalized the rupture between the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches, precipitated by longstanding tensions over the Filioque clause— the Western addition to the Nicene Creed stating that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son—and the extent of papal primacy. Eastern theologians rejected the Filioque as an unauthorized alteration undermining the monarchy of the Father, while the West defended it as consistent with Latin patristic tradition; simultaneously, Rome asserted universal jurisdiction over the Church, which Constantinople viewed as primacy of honor only among equal patriarchs.^[46] Mutual excommunications by papal legate Humbert and Patriarch Michael Cerularius in 1054 symbolized this doctrinal and jurisdictional divide, though underlying cultural and liturgical differences exacerbated the breach.^[47] The Protestant Reformation, initiated by Martin Luther's 95 Theses in 1517, represented a cascading schism from Roman Catholicism driven by the principle of sola scriptura—Scripture alone as the ultimate authority—challenging perceived corruptions like indulgences, papal infallibility, and the mediation of saints. Reformers argued that doctrines must derive from biblical warrant rather than ecclesiastical tradition, leading to the establishment of Lutheran, Reformed, and Anglican communions; Catholic critiques, however, highlight the resultant proliferation of denominations—over 40,000 by some counts—as evidence of interpretive fragmentation absent a magisterium.^[48] This emphasis on scriptural primacy achieved recoveries of teachings like justification by faith alone but also perpetuated divisions, as seen in Anabaptist radicals rejecting infant baptism on biblical grounds.^[49] In the 21st century, doctrinal tensions over human sexuality have fueled further schisms, notably in mainline Protestant bodies. The United Methodist Church experienced a mass exodus, with approximately one-quarter of U.S. congregations disaffiliating by December 2023, primarily due to refusal to enforce bans on ordaining "self-avowed practicing homosexuals" and performing same-sex marriages, as mandated by the Book of Discipline. Traditionalists formed the Global Methodist Church in 2022 to uphold orthodox anthropology rooted in Genesis 1-2 and Romans 1, while the remaining UMC lifted these prohibitions at its 2024 General Conference, accelerating the split between biblical literalists and those prioritizing cultural accommodation.^[50] Within Catholicism, the December 2023 declaration Fiducia Supplicans by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith permitted non-liturgical blessings for same-sex couples, sparking debates over whether this erodes orthodoxy on marriage as exclusively heterosexual or merely extends pastoral mercy without endorsing unions. Critics, including African bishops and Russian Orthodox and Catholic prelates, argue it risks confusing doctrine with approval of sin, prompting refusals to implement it in regions like Africa and Eastern Europe, where it is seen as a concession to Western secularism rather than fidelity to scriptural prohibitions.^[51] Proponents maintain it aligns with God's boundless mercy, yet the document's ambiguity has heightened perceptions of an orthodoxy-accommodation divide, with ongoing clarifications failing to quell dissent as of 2024.^[52]

In Islam

The primary schism in Islam occurred following the death of Muhammad on June 8, 632 CE, when disagreement arose over his succession as leader of the Muslim community. Adherents who became known as Sunnis supported the election of Abu Bakr, Muhammad's close companion and father-in-law, as the first caliph through consultative consensus among the Medinan elite, emphasizing community agreement over hereditary claims. In contrast, those who formed the Shia faction insisted on the exclusive right of Ali ibn Abi Talib, Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, to leadership, viewing it as divinely ordained through familial bloodline and Muhammad's alleged designation at Ghadir Khumm in 632 CE.^[53]^[54] This dispute escalated into violence, notably the assassination of the third caliph Uthman in 656 CE, which propelled Ali to the caliphate but triggered the First Fitna civil war against Muawiya, governor of Syria. Sunnis ultimately affirmed the legitimacy of the first four caliphs (Rashidun)—Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali—while Shias rejected the first three as usurpers, maintaining that only Ali and his descendants possessed infallible interpretive authority (imamate) over Islamic law and theology. By the late 7th century, Sunnis constituted the majority, developing jurisprudence (fiqh) through consensus (ijma) and analogous reasoning (qiyas), whereas Shias prioritized the imams' guidance, leading to distinct hadith collections and ritual practices.^[53]^[55] A secondary early schism produced the Kharijites, who emerged in 657 CE during the Battle of Siffin between Ali and Muawiya. When arbitration was proposed to resolve the stalemate—Muawiya's forces raising Qur'ans on spears to demand judgment— a faction of Ali's supporters rebelled, rejecting human mediation with the motto "judgment belongs to God alone" (la hukma illa lillah). Labeling both Ali and Muawiya as apostates for compromising, the Kharijites advocated puritanical egalitarianism, declaring any Muslim sinner an unbeliever deserving death, which fueled assassinations including Ali's in 661 CE. Their extremism marginalized them, though descendants persist as Ibadi Muslims in Oman and North Africa, emphasizing strict scripturalism over caliphal authority.^[56]^[57] Within Shiism, further division arose in the 8th century after the death of the sixth imam, Ja'far al-Sadiq, in 765 CE. Twelvers, the largest Shia branch, recognized Musa al-Kazim as the seventh imam, tracing an occulted line of twelve infallible imams ending in the 9th century with Muhammad al-Mahdi's disappearance. Ismailis, however, followed Ja'far's son Ismail ibn Ja'far as the rightful seventh imam, developing esoteric interpretations (batiniyya) of the Qur'an and a cyclical view of seven imams per era, which splintered further into Nizari and Musta'li sub-branches after the Fatimid caliphate's collapse in 1171 CE. These intra-Shia splits reflected disputes over imam succession criteria, compounding doctrinal divergence from Sunnism.^[58]^[59] Empirically, these schisms correlated with political fragmentation rather than a monolithic ummah, as succession crises fragmented authority: the Umayyad caliphate (661–750 CE) alienated Shias and Kharijites, paving the way for the Abbasid revolution in 750 CE, which sidelined Alids and fostered regional dynasties like the Fatimids (909–1171 CE) under Ismaili rule. By the 10th century, parallel caliphates—Abbasid (Sunni), Fatimid (Ismaili Shia), and Umayyad in Iberia—exemplified how doctrinal disputes over legitimacy eroded centralized governance, enabling Byzantine and Crusader incursions amid internal fitnas.^[60]^[61]

Schisms in Indian-Derived Religions

In Hinduism

Hinduism's decentralized and pluralistic structure, lacking a singular founding authority or canonical creed, has historically fostered philosophical and devotional divergences rather than formalized schisms akin to those in religions with centralized institutions. Divergences often manifest as coexisting sects (sampradayas) and interpretive schools (darshanas) rooted in Vedic and Upanishadic texts, where debates over ultimate reality, deity primacy, and ritual practices lead to distinct lineages without excommunication or irreconcilable breaks. This pluralism allows for mutual recognition among traditions, though tensions arise from interpretive differences in scriptures emphasizing ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti ("truth is one, sages call it by many names").^[62] A prominent medieval divide emerged between Vaishnavism and Shaivism, centered on the supremacy of Vishnu (or his avatars) versus Shiva as the ultimate deity. Vaishnavas, drawing from texts like the Bhagavata Purana, prioritize Vishnu's preservative role and bhakti devotion, while Shaivas emphasize Shiva's transformative and ascetic aspects via Shaiva Agamas and Tantras. These traditions solidified between the 7th and 12th centuries CE, with regional patronage—such as Chola support for Shaivism and Vijayanagara for Vaishnavism—leading to separate temple complexes, iconography, and guru lineages, though syncretic overlaps persist in Smartism. Historical conflicts, including temple disputes and textual polemics, reflect ritual and soteriological priorities but rarely escalated to total separation due to Hinduism's accommodative ethos.^[63] Philosophically, the 8th-century Advaita Vedanta of Adi Shankara posits non-dual monism, where Brahman is the sole reality and the empirical world (maya) is illusory, with individual souls (atman) identical to Brahman upon liberation, as interpreted from Upanishads like the Chandogya. In contrast, the 13th-century Dvaita Vedanta of Madhvacharya asserts eternal dualism, distinguishing fivefold differences: between God (Vishnu), souls, matter, time, and modes, rejecting maya as ignorance and emphasizing graded devotion and hierarchy, also Vedic-based but prioritizing texts like the Bhagavad Gita's devotional realism. These opposed ontologies—monistic identity versus dualistic differentiation—spawned rival monasteries (mathas) and commentaries, influencing sect formations without fracturing Hinduism's textual continuum, as both schools claim fidelity to shruti (revealed scriptures).^[62] In the modern era, the Arya Samaj, founded on April 10, 1875, by Dayananda Saraswati in Bombay, represented a reformist divergence from orthodox practices by advocating a Vedic purism that rejects idolatry, polytheism, and birth-based caste, instead promoting monotheistic worship of one formless God (Om) and social equality through education and shuddhi reconversion rituals. This positioned it against Puranic traditions and priestly intermediaries, leading to tensions with established Hinduism, including legal disputes over temple access and conversions, though it integrated into broader Hindu identity without full schism. Internal debates later arose, such as over Vedic interpretation, but its emphasis on scriptural literalism marked a deliberate break from ritual accretions accumulated over millennia.^[64]

In Buddhism

Buddhism's primary schisms trace to the centuries following the Buddha's death in approximately 483 BCE, with the first major division occurring at the Second Buddhist Council around 383 BCE in Vaishali, India, over disputes regarding monastic discipline (Vinaya) and the interpretation of ten points of contention, such as whether monks could accept gold or store salt.^[65] This led to the separation between the Sthavira (elders), who upheld stricter adherence to original rules and evolved into Theravada, and the Mahasanghika (great assembly), which adopted more liberal views and influenced later Mahayana developments.^[66] Empirical records from Pali Canon commentaries and archaeological inscriptions, such as those from Ashoka's era (3rd century BCE), document these early lineage divergences, emphasizing preservation of scriptural authenticity versus interpretive flexibility in meditative practices.^[67] The distinction between Theravada and Mahayana solidified by the 1st century BCE to 1st century CE, driven by doctrinal tensions over the path to enlightenment: Theravada prioritizes the arhat ideal of individual liberation through rigorous scriptural study and insight meditation (vipassana), while Mahayana introduced the bodhisattva vow, advocating delayed nirvana to aid all sentient beings, supported by expanded sutras like the Lotus Sutra.^[66] This was not a violent rupture but a gradual branching, with Mahayana emerging as a reform movement critiquing Theravada's perceived conservatism, evidenced by Mahayana texts' emphasis on universal compassion over personal attainment, though both share core teachings like the Four Noble Truths.^[68] Lineage records, including Chinese pilgrim accounts from Faxian (5th century CE) and Xuanzang (7th century CE), confirm regional variations in practice, with Theravada dominating Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia, and Mahayana spreading to East Asia.^[65] Vajrayana, or Tantric Buddhism, emerged as an esoteric extension of Mahayana in northern India between the 5th and 7th centuries CE, incorporating ritualistic elements like mantras, mandalas, and deity yoga to accelerate enlightenment, distinct from the exoteric scriptural and meditative focus of earlier forms.^[69] Its development responded to socio-political influences, including Hindu tantra integrations, but maintained Mahayana's bodhisattva ethic while emphasizing guru-disciple transmission over public debate, as seen in texts like the Guhyasamaja Tantra (8th century).^[70] This did not constitute a formal schism but a specialized vehicle (yana), flourishing in Tibet from the 8th century under figures like Padmasambhava, with empirical evidence from Dunhuang manuscripts (9th-10th centuries) showing tantric lineages' coexistence with non-tantric ones.^[71] In the 20th century, Western adaptations of Buddhism, influenced by figures like D.T. Suzuki and the Beat Generation, often diluted traditional elements by psychologizing meditation as stress relief and sidelining doctrines like rebirth and karma, creating a "secular Buddhism" that diverges from empirical lineage fidelity.^[72] These shifts, prominent since the 1950s through movements like Vipassana centers in the U.S., represent drifts rather than schisms, as they lack institutional separation or scriptural disputes, prioritizing individual experience over communal vinaya, per critiques from monastics like Bhikkhu Bodhi who argue for retaining causal doctrines of dependent origination.^[72] Traditional lineages, such as Thai Forest Tradition exports, maintain orthodox practices amid these innovations, with data from global surveys indicating hybrid forms but no major fractures equivalent to ancient councils.^[73]

In Jainism

The primary schism in Jainism occurred between the Digambara and Svetambara sects, traditionally traced to a division following a severe famine in the Magadha region around the 3rd century BCE.^[74] According to Digambara tradition, the monk Bhadrabahu led a group southward to maintain strict nudity as essential for monastic perfection, while Sthulabhadra and followers remaining in the north adopted white garments due to hardships, marking the emergence of the Svetambara ("white-clad") sect.^[75] This split arose from differing interpretations of ascetic discipline: Digambaras ("sky-clad") insist that complete nudity symbolizes renunciation of all possessions and is prerequisite for spiritual liberation, rejecting clothed monks as impure, whereas Svetambaras permit white robes for mendicants, viewing nudity as an ideal but not indispensable practice.^[76] A core doctrinal divergence concerns scriptural canonicity. Svetambaras recognize the 12 Angas as authoritative, compiled at councils like Vallabhi in 454 CE, while Digambaras contend that the original teachings were lost after Mahavira's nirvana around 468 BCE and reject the Svetambara canon as apocryphal, relying instead on texts like the Prakrit works attributed to Kundakunda.^[75] These differences reflect tensions between uncompromised monastic rigor—favoring Digambara's nudity and scriptural purism—and Svetambara adaptations that enhanced accessibility for lay practitioners and urban proselytization amid varying regional climates and social norms.^[74] Digambaras also hold that women cannot achieve moksha in their current birth, a view Svetambaras dispute, further entrenching the divide.^[76] Post-schism, Jainism exhibited relative doctrinal stability, with few major fractures owing to its ascetic emphasis on ahimsa (non-violence) and individual karma over communal authority. Sub-sects emerged within each tradition, such as Svetambara's 15th-century Sthanakvasi rejection of idol worship and Digambara's 18th-century Terapanthi reforms, but these pertained to ritual practices rather than foundational tenets.^[77] Historical records indicate no large-scale expulsions or wars, contrasting with schisms in other faiths; the sects coexisted, sharing core soteriology while maintaining parallel monastic lineages into the modern era, where Digambaras comprise about 20-30% of Jains.^[77] This endurance underscores causal realism in Jain schism: strict discipline preserved Digambara orthodoxy but limited expansion, while Svetambara flexibility supported broader adherence without diluting core empirics of soul purification.^[74]

Schisms in Broader Contexts

In Political and Secular Organizations

Schisms in political organizations arise from irreconcilable differences over ideology, strategy, or leadership, often mirroring dynamics of authority and doctrinal purity seen in religious contexts but tempered by pragmatic electoral incentives rather than sacred commitments. These divisions frequently stem from debates on organizational structure, revolutionary tactics, or responses to external pressures like territorial expansion, leading to formal splits that reshape alliances. Unlike religious schisms, political ones tend to be more fluid, with factions recombining or dissolving as power dynamics shift, though they can produce enduring new entities.^[78] A prominent example occurred in the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP) during its Second Congress, held from July 30 to August 23, 1903, in Brussels and London, where delegates debated party statutes on membership criteria. Vladimir Lenin's faction, favoring a tightly disciplined group of professional revolutionaries to maintain ideological purity and operational security against tsarist repression, clashed with Julius Martov's supporters, who advocated broader inclusion of committed workers to build mass support. The vote on the first paragraph of the party rules—Lenin's proposal passing narrowly due to Iskra editorial walkouts—formalized the divide, with Lenin's "majority" (Bolsheviks) emphasizing centralized vanguardism and Martov's "minority" (Mensheviks) prioritizing democratic participation; the schism deepened over subsequent years, contributing to the Bolsheviks' dominance in the 1917 Revolution.^[79]^[80] In the United States, the Whig Party underwent dissolution in the 1850s amid escalating sectional tensions over slavery, exacerbated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of May 30, 1854, which organized territories via popular sovereignty and repealed the Missouri Compromise's ban on slavery north of 36°30'. Northern "Conscience Whigs," opposing slavery's expansion as a moral and economic threat, rejected the party's equivocal stance, while Southern Whigs defended states' rights and agrarian interests; this polarization fragmented the national coalition that had twice elected presidents in 1840 and 1848. By 1856, most Northern Whigs had migrated to the newly formed Republican Party, established March 20, 1854, in Ripon, Wisconsin, explicitly anti-slavery extension, marking the Whigs' effective end as a viable entity.^[81] Another early socialist schism unfolded in the International Workingmen's Association (First International), founded in 1864, splitting at the 1872 Hague Congress over centralization versus federalism. Karl Marx's authoritarian collectivists sought a hierarchical structure to coordinate proletarian revolution, while Mikhail Bakunin's anarchist faction demanded decentralized, anti-state autonomy to prevent bureaucratic tyranny; the expulsion of Bakunin and his allies led to the organization's rapid decline, with Marxists relocating to New York and anarchists forming rival groups, illustrating tactical divergences on authority's role in emancipation.^[82] These cases highlight causal parallels to religious schisms—contentious interpretations of foundational principles and power consolidation—but political variants often prove less doctrinally rigid, enabling adaptation or absorption absent eternal stakes.^[83]

In Modern Religious Movements

In the 20th and 21st centuries, new religious movements and renewal currents within established traditions have frequently fragmented due to tensions over doctrinal purity, leadership legitimacy following charismatic figures' declines, and accommodations to secular social norms. These schisms often represent efforts to realign with foundational teachings amid rapid growth or cultural shifts, rather than mere interpersonal conflicts, as evidenced by patterns of secession by orthodox-leaning groups resisting heterodox innovations. By 2025, such divisions have accelerated in contexts where empirical adherence to scriptural or traditional canons clashes with progressive reinterpretations, leading to institutional separations that preserve core tenets against perceived dilutions.^[84] A significant case arose in Eastern Orthodoxy with the 2018-2019 dispute over Ukrainian autocephaly. On October 9, 2018, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople lifted the anathema on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Kyiv Patriarchate and Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church, revoking the 1686 subordination of Kyiv to Moscow, and proceeded to grant autocephaly to a unified Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) on January 6, 2019.^[85] The Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), viewing this as an encroachment on its canonical territory tied to historical jurisdiction, suspended Eucharistic communion with Constantinople on October 15, 2018, a break that remains in effect as of 2025, with the ROC refusing recognition of the OCU and maintaining parallel structures in Ukraine.^[86] This schism highlights causal links between geopolitical assertions—Russia's influence in post-Soviet spaces—and ecclesiastical authority, where Moscow's resistance stems from defending jurisdictional precedents over ecumenical concessions, rather than purely theological divergence.^[87] Among Protestant evangelicals, rifts over social issues like human sexuality have produced formal schisms, exemplified by the United Methodist Church (UMC). Long-standing prohibitions on ordaining "self-avowed practicing homosexuals" and performing same-sex marriages, reaffirmed in 2019, prompted a disaffiliation window under Paragraph 2553 of the Book of Discipline, allowing exits with assets.^[88] By December 2023, 7,659 U.S. congregations—roughly 25% of the total—had disaffiliated, many affiliating with the Global Methodist Church (GMC), formed in May 2022 to uphold Wesleyan orthodoxy on marriage as between one man and one woman and sexuality as ordered by biblical creation norms.^[89] The 2024 General Conference's removal of these bans on May 1, 2024, further entrenched the divide, with GMC leaders citing it as confirmation of the UMC's departure from scriptural authority, framing the split as a necessary correction to progressive ethical shifts lacking empirical grounding in Methodist doctrine or biblical texts.^[90] This pattern, observed in over 6,000 exits by August 2023, underscores schisms as mechanisms to sustain fidelity to first-order doctrines amid institutional drifts toward cultural accommodation.^[91] In Pentecostal and charismatic movements, which expanded globally from the early 20th century Azusa Street Revival, schisms have emerged less through formal denominational breaks and more via independent offshoots rejecting the prosperity gospel's equation of faith with guaranteed material wealth. Emerging prominently in the 1970s-1980s via figures like Kenneth Copeland, this teaching faced internal pushback by the 1990s, with critics arguing it distorts Pentecostal emphases on spiritual gifts and suffering as per New Testament precedents, leading to departures toward holiness-focused fellowships.^[92] While not yielding a singular schism, such fragmentations—evident in the proliferation of nondenominational megachurches by 2025—reflect causal responses to leadership failures post-charismatic peaks, where unchecked prosperity emphases eroded doctrinal rigor, prompting realignments to empirical Pentecostal origins over wealth-centric heterodoxy.^[93]

References

[1]
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Schism - New Advent
Schism (from the Greek schisma, rent, division) is, in the language of theology and canon law, the rupture of ecclesiastical union and unity.
[2]
Schism - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from late 14th-century Old French and Medieval Latin, "schism" means a division or split, especially within the church, stemming from Greek ...Missing: religious | Show results with:religious
[3]
Topical Bible: Schism
Schism, from Greek 'schisma' meaning division, is a division within a religious community, like a 'rent' or 'fissure' within the church.
[4]
A Summary of the History of MAJOR CHRISTIAN SCHISMS
Christian schisms-a summary of the history of the three major Christian schisms and attempts at reconciliation; the Chalcedonian schism (451 AD), the great ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
[5]
10 Of The Most Important Religious Schisms That Shook The World
Dec 5, 2019 · 8 The Nestorian Schism · 7 The Khawarij Schism · 6 The Gnosticism Schism · 5 Digambara vs. Shvetambara · 2 Sunni-Shia Split · 1 The Great Schism.Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
[6]
The Great Schism of Jainism - Jainworld
The eighth schism was more important as it ultimately split the Jaina religion into two distinct sects of Digambara Jainas and Svetambara Jainas.
[7]
Schism: An Overview - Encyclopedia.com
Schism is the process by which a religious body divides to become two or more distinct, independent bodies. The division takes place because one or each of the ...
[8]
https://escholarship.org/content/qt8v96d189/qt8v96d189_noSplash_6a7c72f5438f7873c1343fa5e2130dd3.pdf
[9]
What is the difference between heresy and schism? - U.S. Catholic
May 15, 2023 · Heresy is a freely chosen denial or stubborn doubt by a Christian of Catholic doctrine. Schism is refusal to remain in communion with the pope ...
[10]
Schism, Heresy, and Apostasy | Catholic Answers Magazine
Jul 11, 2024 · By rejecting part of the Faith, heresy strikes at the former, while by rejecting communion, schism strikes at the latter. As St. Augustine said,.
[11]
It's Greek to Me: SCHISM - Bible & Archaeology
Dec 15, 2023 · The noun schism comes to us almost directly from the Greek noun schísma meaning “a cleft” or “a division,” and the associated Greek verb ...
[12]
Strong's Greek: 4978. σχίσμα (schisma) -- Division, schism, split
σχίσμα evokes the physical act of ripping cloth or net, an image familiar in first-century life where seamless garments were prized and mended items quickly ...
[13]
schism - American Heritage Dictionary Entry
A formal breach of union within a religious body, especially a Christian ... Thousands of entries in the dictionary include etymologies that trace their origins ...
[14]
1 Corinthians 12:25 Commentaries: so that there may be no division ...
(25) That there should be no schism.—The existence of differences of gifts in the Church had been used by the Corinthians to cause schisms, exalting some ...Missing: usage | Show results with:usage
[15]
Schism – Wordpandit
The term “schism” originates from the Greek word “schizein” (σχίζειν), meaning “to split or cleave.” This Greek root transformed into the Late Latin “schisma,” ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
[16]
The Origin of Schism: From Past to Present - Wordpandit
In contemporary contexts, “schism” remains a poignant term to describe divisions that carry significant weight and consequence. From political party splits to ...Missing: non- | Show results with:non-<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Upheavals in Congregations: The Causes and Outcomes of Splits
In sum, the data provide support for proposition 1: Disputes which result in the formation of a breakaway congregation often center on doctrinal and author- ity ...
[18]
Why Does Doctrine Divide? Dr. Rhyne Putman - Phoenix Seminary
Mar 15, 2022 · Reasons why doctrinal disagreements arise; When doctrinal issues should divide Christians; Some of the issues dividing the church right now ...
[19]
The first schisms within Christianity - Musée protestant
The first Christian Churches were founded either by an apostle or by an evangelist: the main Churches of the Roman Empire were those of Alexandria, Antioch and ...
[20]
When Doctrine Divides the People of God | Modern Reformation
Doctrinal disagreements have been with us since the very beginning. The apostles warned first-century churches about doctrines that were denials of the gospel, ...
[21]
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Christianity/Schism-division-over-substantial-matters
[22]
The Origins of the Great Schism - Medievalists.net
Nov 29, 2012 · The Great Schism arose from cultural, theological, and political differences, reinforced by the Crusades, and the different approaches to ...<|separator|>
[23]
Conciliarism | Council of Constance, Papal Supremacy ... - Britannica
Oct 10, 2025 · Conciliarism, in the Roman Catholic church, a theory that a general council of the church has greater authority than the pope and may, if necessary, depose him.
[24]
Religious Choice and Competition - jstor
Finke, Roger and Rodney Stark. 1988. "Religious. Economies and Sacred Canopies: Religious. Mobilization in American Cities, 1906." American Sociological Review ...
[25]
[PDF] Religious Economies and Sacred Canopies
Nov 15, 2013 · The paper argues that religious participation is higher in cities, and competition among religious bodies increases religious mobilization, ...Missing: vitality | Show results with:vitality
[26]
The Churching of America | Acton Institute
Jul 20, 2010 · Finke and Stark write: “The received wisdom is that pluralism weakens faith – that where multiple religious groups compete, each discredits the ...
[27]
RELIGIOUS PLURALISM AND RELIGIOUS PARTICIPATION
Led by Roger Finke and Rodney Stark, the challengers have argued that the traditional view is backwards—that religious pluralism is positively associated with ...
[28]
[PDF] Denominational Schism: An Economic Perspective - EconWPA
Dec 20, 2005 · An increase in the amount of trust within a religious network might be a possible result of schism, leading to better economic outcomes as ...
[29]
Market Share and Religious Competition: Do ... - Wiley Online Library
Dec 3, 2009 · A central claim of the religious economies model is that religious competition affects levels of religious participation and commitment ...
[30]
[PDF] The Inherent Dangers of Religious Variance Within a Single Faith ...
Mar 27, 2017 · This essay explores the relationship between religious variance within a single faith and the frequency of intra- state conflict.
[31]
Religious Fragmentation, Social Identity and Conflict - NIH
Oct 21, 2016 · We examine the impact of religious identity and village-level religious fragmentation on behavior in Tullock contests.Missing: survival innovation
[32]
(PDF) The Dynamics of Religious Economies - ResearchGate
This handbook illustrates the validity of diverse theoretical perspectives and research designs to understanding the multi-layered nature of religion as a ...Missing: vitality | Show results with:vitality
[33]
Ancient Jewish History: Pharisees, Sadducees & Essenes
The most important of the three were the Pharisees because they are the spiritual fathers of modern Judaism. Their main distinguishing characteristic was a ...
[34]
Pharisees and Sadducees | Center for Online Judaic Studies
Apr 8, 2008 · The Pharisees accepted the notions of the immortality of the soul and of reward and punishment after death, both of which the Sadducees denied.
[35]
What are the differences between Scribes, Pharisees, Sadducees?
Aug 19, 2024 · They were primarily a priestly group that was more strict than the Pharisees. · The Sadducees strictly adhered to the written Torah and rejected ...<|separator|>
[36]
What are the differences between the Sadducees and Pharisees?
Jan 4, 2022 · Knowing that some of the court were Sadducees and the others Pharisees, Paul called out, “My brothers, I am a Pharisee, descended from Pharisees ...
[37]
The Karaites: A Medieval Jewish Sect
The Karaites are first mentioned in written sources in the late eighth century. They themselves claim to be descendants of dissident sects of the First Temple ...
[38]
KARAITES AND KARAISM - JewishEncyclopedia.com
The Karaites ( ) = "Followers of the Bible") were a Jewish sect, professing, in its religious observances and opinions, to follow the Bible to the exclusion of ...
[39]
Biblical Exegesis as a Source of Jewish Pluralism - TheTorah.com
Jun 6, 2017 · Historically, the utilization of divergent calendars is a good sign of schism, and this is the case for the Rabbanites and Karaites as well. The ...
[40]
History & Overview of Reform Judaism - Jewish Virtual Library
The increasing political centralization of the late 18th and early 19th centuries undermined the societal structure that perpetuated traditional Jewish life. At ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
How Reform, Conservative, and Orthodox Judaism Began
Feb 3, 2019 · Zechariah Frankel split from the Reformers over using Hebrew in the prayer service and went on to form what ultimately became Conservative ...
[42]
Jewish denominations: Reform, Orthodox, Conservative - Fortune
Jun 19, 2023 · Orthodox Judaism soon organized in reaction to Reform, rallying to defend the strict observance of Jewish customs and law. Orthodox leaders ...
[43]
Hyper-Emancipation - Tablet Magazine
Feb 26, 2023 · Reform, Conservative, and Orthodox Judaism represent the three major 19th-century solutions to making Judaism function on religious terms ...
[44]
[PDF] Ecumenical Councils Fact Sheet - Christendom College
Nov 21, 2019 · Council of Chalcedon – 451. The Christological controversies continued twenty years after the Council of. Ephesus with the arrival of Eutyches ...
[45]
(PDF) Healing the Post-Chalcedonian Schism - Academia.edu
What caused the schism following the Council of Chalcedon in 451 CE?add. The council's ambiguity regarding the nature of Christ and its endorsement of the ...
[46]
The Great Schism: The Estrangement of Eastern and Western ...
The Greeks assigned to the Pope a primacy of honour, but not the universal supremacy which he regarded as his due. The Pope viewed infallibility as his own ...
[47]
The Great Schism That Divided East and West - EWTN
Church relations between Rome and Constantinople were restored, but the root of the problem ¾ papal primacy ¾ was never solved between then and 1054. For ...
[48]
https://www.ligonier.org/posts/two-planks-sola-scriptura
[49]
Remembering the Reformation: Sola Scriptura | For The Church
Oct 20, 2017 · Sola Scriptura, known as the formal principle of the Reformation, is the foundational sola, the authoritative source from which the other four ...
[50]
United Methodists Strike Ban on LGBTQ Clergy - Christianity Today
May 1, 2024 · United Methodists meeting for their top legislative assembly Wednesday overwhelmingly overturned a measure that barred gay clergy from ordination in the ...
[51]
Orthodox and Catholic Prelates in Russia Sharply Criticize 'Fiducia ...
Mar 6, 2024 · Russia's Catholic bishops and members of the Russian Orthodox Church's Biblical-Theological commission have criticized Fiducia Supplicans.
[52]
Debate over Vatican's 'Fiducia Supplicans' continues one year later
Dec 26, 2024 · A year after the Vatican's release of "Fiducia Supplicans," debate still continues over its allowance of blessings for same-sex couples.
[53]
Islam's Sunni-Shia Divide, Explained - History.com
Jul 31, 2019 · The divide originated with a dispute over who should succeed the Prophet Muhammad as leader of the Islamic faith he introduced.Missing: CE | Show results with:CE
[54]
Sunni versus Shia: Origin Story of the Divide - World History Edu
Jan 1, 2025 · The split arose after Muhammad's death in 632 CE, over the question of his rightful successor. Sunnis believed leadership should be chosen by ...
[55]
Sunni-Shia Split
Ali is the central figure at the origin of the Shia / Sunni split which occurred in the decades immediately following the death of the Prophet in 632. ... CE ...
[56]
Kharijites - Islamic Studies - Oxford Bibliographies
In a battle at Siffin (in modern Syria) in 657 CE, ʿAli's troops were poised to defeat Muʿawiyah's forces when the latter sought arbitration. ʿAli agreed ...
[57]
First Fitna - World History Encyclopedia
Jun 26, 2020 · Ali marched towards Syria to confront Muawiya, and the two forces clashed at a site called Siffin (657 CE). The fighting lasted for days and ...Missing: emergence | Show results with:emergence
[58]
The Three Branches of Shia Islam - Chronicle Fanack.com
Feb 17, 2020 · The story of the Ismaili divergence from the Twelver Shiites is again over leadership and succession. The Twelver Shiites believe that after ...
[59]
Shi'a Islam, Sects & Beliefs - Lesson - Study.com
The Ismailis differ from the Zaydis and Twelvers in that they believe the Seventh Imam was Ismail, brother of Musa ibn Ja'far. The Ismaili later separated into ...<|separator|>
[60]
The rise of Islamic empires and states (article) - Khan Academy
Debates raged about the nature of Islamic leadership and religious authority. These conflicts evolved into major schisms between Sunni, Shia, and Ibadi Islam.
[61]
Sectarianism and Fragmentation in the Muslim World: A Qur'anic ...
This study explores the historical and contemporary sectarian divisions within the Muslim world, particularly the Sunni-Shia split, and their political, social, ...
[62]
Madhva | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The Dvaita or “dualist” school of Hindu Vedanta philosophy originated in 13th-century South India with Sri Madhvacarya (Madhva).
[63]
Shaivite landscapes of “India” and South East Asian Countries and ...
Shaivites worship Shiva, emphasizing his role as the Supreme Being, while Vaishnavites prioritize Vishnu as their primary deity. Conflicts between Shaivism and ...
[64]
Arya Samaj - Hinduism - Oxford Bibliographies
Jan 7, 2025 · Founded in 1875 by Dayanand Saraswati (b. 1824–d. 1883), the Arya Samaj (the Society of Nobles), became one of the most influential Hindu socio ...
[65]
Early Development of Buddhism | Survey of World Religions
Among them, Theravada was charged with being too individualistic and insufficiently concerned with the needs of the laity. Such dissatisfaction led a liberal ...<|separator|>
[66]
A Short History of the Buddhist Schools
Sep 29, 2020 · Mahayana Buddhism is said to have split off from Theravada in the belief that it was too self-centered and had lost the true vision; this ...
[67]
The main issues that caused the split of the early Buddhist sects ...
Dec 12, 2022 · There was never a 'split' between Mahayana and mainstream Buddhism. It arose as a grassroots movement inside the mainstream Buddhist schools ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
[68]
When Did Theravada And Mahayana Split? - Ourbuddhismworld.com
Jun 5, 2025 · It was caused by differences in texts, interpretation, and cultural adaptation. Both traditions preserve the Buddha's teachings but focus on ...
[69]
What is Vajrayana Buddhism? - Tricycle: The Buddhist Review
Vajrayana is a form of Mahayana Buddhism that originated in northern India around the 5th century CE, took root in Tibet in the 7th and 8th centuries.
[70]
Vajrayana Buddhism - Patheos
Vajrayana Buddhism, also known as the "Diamond" or "Thunderbolt Vehicle," is a form of Buddhism that developed in India in the 5th century CE.
[71]
Vajrayana - Dharmapedia Wiki
Vajrayana Buddhism was established in Tibet in the 8th century when Śāntarakṣita was brought to Tibet from India at the instigation of the Dharma King Trisong ...<|separator|>
[72]
Bhikkhu Bodhi on traditional versus secular Buddhism
The contrast between Classical Buddhism and Secular Buddhism stems primarily from different ways of understanding the human condition. Classical Buddhism seeks ...Missing: schisms | Show results with:schisms
[73]
[PDF] Change and Evolution - Education and Early Childhood Learning
Contemporary western Buddhism has been significantly influenced by the spread of lay practice centres, where lay persons meet for meditation practice and ...Missing: schisms | Show results with:schisms
[74]
[PDF] A Study Of Digambara - Main Sect Of Jainism - IJCRT.org
Aug 12, 2024 · Hence, arose the two sects of Jains, the Digambaras and the svetambras the. Schism did not become final until the 1st Century. A.D.. Belgaum ...<|separator|>
[75]
(PDF) The Major Schism of Jainism after the death of Mahavira ...
Apr 9, 2020 · This schism within Jainism was called · Schism and divided Jainism between Digambara and ; Svetambara sects that survive today. The word Digambara ...
[76]
(PDF) Digambara and Svetambara traditions within Jainism
The intention of this essay is to explore three contentious issues within the context of the Svetambara and Digambara sects of the Jain tradition.
[77]
(PDF) The Sects and subsects of Jainism and their formation and ...
Apr 15, 2022 · His sect has now lost much of its influence after his death. As you can see many of these sects and sub-sects were personality or teacher-driven ...
[78]
[PDF] DERMAi SOCIAL DEMOCRACY, - The Platypus Affiliated Society
The development of the schism within the body of the old party provides the theme of the work; the history of the late German. Empire, its setting. I have ...
[79]
“The Other Bolsheviks” | Open Indiana
... split between the Menshevik supporters of Martov and the Bolshevik supporters of Lenin. One resolution, drafted by Lenin and Plekhanov and approved by the ...
[80]
[PDF] Bolshevism; an Introduction to Soviet Communism
the role of the party, that the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks split.20. For the ... 10 This description of a basic Marxian-Bolshevik belief is not refuted.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[81]
Whig Party - Papers Of Abraham Lincoln
... slavery split its national membership. Passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 caused most remaining northern Whigs to abandon the party. Many eventually ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[82]
The First Socialist Schism | The Anarchist Library
The First Socialist Schism Bakunin vs. Marx in the International Working Men's Association. CHAPTER 1. Bakunin, Marx, ...
[83]
The great schism: socialism and war in 1914 - International Socialism
Jun 26, 2014 · On 4 August 1914 social democratic deputies in both the German Reichstag and the French Chamber of Deputies voted unanimously for war credits.
[84]
The Orthodox Schism in the Shadow of Empire - CSIS
Oct 19, 2018 · Of course, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has granted autocephaly to numerous other churches in the past, including those in Greece, Bulgaria, and ...
[85]
Announcement of the Ecumenical Patriarchate on the Autocephaly ...
Oct 12, 2018 · 1) To renew the decision already made that the Ecumenical Patriarchate proceed to the granting of Autocephaly to the Church of Ukraine. 2) To ...
[86]
Russian Orthodox Church cuts ties with Constantinople | Religion
Oct 15, 2018 · Last week Bartholomew I of Constantinople, the “first among equals” of eastern Orthodox clerics, granted autocephaly (independence) to the ...
[87]
The Russian-Constantinople schism in the Eastern Orthodox Church ...
Oct 17, 2018 · For Ukrainians, however, the promise of autocephaly represents both spiritual and symbolic freedom from Russian influence. The Ukrainian Church ...
[88]
One fourth of United Methodist churches in the US have left in a ...
Dec 15, 2023 · United Methodist rules forbid same-sex marriage rites and the ordination of “self-avowed practicing homosexuals,” but progressive Methodist ...
[89]
United Methodists Down 7,659 Churches As Exit Window Ends
Dec 18, 2023 · 1 in 4 UMC congregations have now disaffiliated in the largest US denominational schism since the Civil War. Will African Methodists leave next?
[90]
The United Methodist Church Comes Apart - The New York Times
Dec 19, 2023 · A quarter of the denomination's churches have left, as the faith divides over L.G.B.T.Q. policies.
[91]
261 Georgia congregations leave the United Methodist Church over ...
Nov 19, 2023 · As of early August 2023, over 6,000 congregations of just over 30,000 in the United States have been approved for disaffiliation since 2019, ...
[92]
Pentecostal Versus Charismatic Versus Prosperity Gospel - Patheos
Feb 12, 2025 · Pentecostalism may have morphed into ugly things like the prosperity gospel, but I think we are seeing a renewed emphasis in some churches on ...
[93]
Challenges Ahead for Pentecostal-Charismatic Christianity
Jan 4, 2022 · The three challenges are prioritizing prosperity and political reform, privileging private revelation and the prophetic, and promoting other traditions.