Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Biliary microlithiasis

Biliary microlithiasis refers to the presence of tiny, solid calculi measuring ≤5 mm in diameter within the or bile ducts, characterized by echogenic structures with acoustic shadowing on , distinguishing it from the amorphous, viscous precipitate known as . These microliths are typically composed of crystals, calcium bilirubinate, or other crystalline materials that form due to imbalances in composition, and they are often undetectable by conventional . Unlike larger gallstones, microlithiasis represents an early or stage of biliary lithiasis, affecting a subset of patients who may remain or progress to more severe conditions. Clinically, biliary microlithiasis is significant as a potential cause of recurrent biliary colic, acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, and particularly idiopathic acute pancreatitis, where it accounts for up to 30% of cases by obstructing the pancreatic duct or ampulla of Vater. Symptoms, when present, include episodic upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and elevated liver enzymes or amylase levels, mimicking other gastrointestinal disorders but often resolving spontaneously in mild instances. Risk factors include rapid weight loss, total parenteral nutrition, pregnancy, and certain medications that alter bile saturation, with progression to macroscopic gallstones occurring in approximately 20% of untreated cases. Diagnosis relies on high-sensitivity imaging and direct bile examination, as standard transabdominal detects only about 60% of cases due to the microliths' small size. (EUS) is preferred by experts for its superior detection rate (up to 90%), identifying echogenic foci with or without shadowing in the or . microscopy, obtained via duodenal aspiration or (ERCP), serves as the gold standard, revealing birefringent crystals or non-crushable particles under polarized light. Management of asymptomatic biliary microlithiasis involves expectant , as spontaneous occurs in about 40% of cases, though regular follow-up is advised to prevent complications. For symptomatic patients or those with recurrent , laparoscopic is the definitive treatment, recommended by a majority of experts to eliminate the source and reduce recurrence risk. Adjunctive therapies may include to dissolve cholesterol-based microliths or ERCP with sphincterotomy to clear ductal obstructions, particularly in high-risk individuals.

Overview

Definition

Biliary microlithiasis refers to the presence of tiny gallstones or calculi, typically measuring ≤5 mm in diameter, within the gallbladder or biliary tract. These microliths are generally composed of cholesterol crystals, calcium bilirubinate, or other crystalline materials and are characterized by their hardness and opacity, distinguishing them from softer, more amorphous biliary sediments. Unlike biliary sludge, which consists of an amorphous, viscous mixture of cholesterol crystals, calcium salts, and mucin without forming discrete stones, biliary microlithiasis involves solid, crystalline structures that can be visualized as distinct entities on advanced imaging. In contrast to larger cholelithiasis, where stones exceed 5 mm and are more readily detectable, microliths are often subclinical and require specialized detection methods due to their size. The term "biliary microlithiasis" was coined in the to describe these small stones that were frequently missed by standard imaging techniques, such as conventional , leading to underdiagnosis of associated biliary disorders. Consensus definitions from expert panels, including those from societies, describe biliary microliths as particles ≤5 mm in diameter that produce acoustic shadowing on , confirming their solid nature.

Epidemiology

Biliary microlithiasis is implicated in 10%–50% of cases of idiopathic , making it a significant underlying cause in otherwise unexplained episodes. In broader populations at risk for disease, such as those with predisposing factors, the prevalence is estimated at 5%–10%, though exact figures are challenging to determine due to the often nature of the condition. A of supports this range, noting global prevalence of approximately 6%, with microlithiasis representing a subset in high-risk groups. Demographic patterns show a higher incidence among females, with risk factors aligning closely with those for cholelithiasis, including (body mass index >30 kg/m²) and age over 40 years. Obese women face roughly twice the risk compared to non-obese counterparts. The condition is also more prevalent in scenarios involving rapid , such as post-bariatric , where up to 30%–50% of patients develop gallstones, including microliths, within the first year. Geographically, biliary microlithiasis is more common in regions with dietary patterns high in fats and , such as and , where gallstone prevalence reaches 10%–15% in adults. In contrast, populations adhering to plant-based diets, like those in parts of or among vegetarians, exhibit lower rates, with cohort studies showing a 50% reduced risk associated with high fruit and vegetable intake. Incidence rates indicate an approximate 1%–2% annual progression from to microlithiasis in at-risk individuals, such as those with or , based on longitudinal observations of sludge evolution. This progression underscores the dynamic nature of the condition in susceptible groups.

Etiology and Pathophysiology

Causes and Risk Factors

Biliary microlithiasis primarily arises from the rapid precipitation of solid cholesterol crystals in bile that becomes supersaturated with cholesterol or bilirubin due to hepatic hypersecretion of these components. This supersaturation, combined with bile stasis resulting from gallbladder hypomotility, creates an environment conducive to the formation of microscopic calculi ≤5 mm in diameter. Such stasis often occurs when the gallbladder fails to contract effectively, allowing prolonged retention of bile and promoting crystal nucleation. Several non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors contribute to the of biliary microlithiasis. Female sex is a prominent risk due to the influence of , which increases biliary secretion and reduces motility. exacerbates this risk through elevated levels and hormonal changes that further impair emptying, often leading to transient that may progress to microliths. Genetic predispositions, such as mutations in the ABCB4 gene (also known as MDR3), disrupt bile transport, resulting in low-phospholipid that favors crystal formation and recurrent cholelithiasis. Conditions like also heighten susceptibility by altering composition and promoting . Modifiable risk factors include , which correlates with and increased hepatic output, thereby elevating saturation. Rapid weight loss, often from dieting or , induces gallbladder hypomotility and shifts in lipid composition that accelerate microlith formation. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) contributes similarly by causing prolonged and biliary in hospitalized patients. Certain medications, including estrogens (e.g., oral contraceptives) and fibrates, promote supersaturation in . Diabetes mellitus serves as another risk through associated and impaired gallbladder contractility. Environmental factors, such as high-fat, low-fiber diets, exacerbate these risks by disrupting balance and increasing absorption.

Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Biliary microlithiasis arises from the and aggregation of microscopic crystals within , primarily monohydrate or calcium bilirubinate, in a biliary environment. This process begins with an imbalance in bile composition, where hepatic secretion of exceeds the solubilizing capacity of bile salts and phospholipids, leading to in . Relative deficiencies in phospholipids, often linked to mutations in the ABCB4 gene, further promote this supersaturation by impairing solubilization. In pigment microlithiasis, elevated unconjugated levels contribute to calcium bilirubinate , though forms predominate in most cases. Nucleation occurs rapidly when supersaturated favors the precipitation of solid monohydrate crystals, a process accelerated by glycoproteins secreted by the epithelium. These mucins act as pronucleating agents, forming a that traps and stabilizes nascent crystals, preventing their dissolution and facilitating initial aggregation into clusters ≤5 in diameter. Impaired motility, often due to , exacerbates this by prolonging crystal residence time, allowing further into microliths through successive and . The time, a measure of how quickly crystals form in samples, serves as an indicator of lithogenic risk, with shorter times correlating to heightened aggregation propensity. These microliths exert harm through their small size, which permits migration from the via the into the , causing transient mechanical obstruction at the . This obstruction elevates intraductal pressure, distending the biliary tree and activating pathways via stimulation of ductal nociceptors. In cases of ampullary impaction, microliths can also promote reflux of activated pancreatic enzymes into the , initiating inflammatory cascades that contribute to . Chronic irritation from repeated passages may induce low-grade inflammation in the biliary , characterized by release and leukocyte infiltration. Microliths often serve as in the progression to macroscopic gallstones, with approximately 20% evolving into larger calculi under sustained lithogenic conditions. This stepwise development underscores their role in biliary , where persistent formation perpetuates and heightens susceptibility to complications like choledocholithiasis.

Clinical Manifestations

Signs and Symptoms

Biliary microlithiasis is in the vast majority of cases, with many patients remaining unaware of its presence until incidentally discovered during evaluation for unrelated conditions. When symptoms occur, they primarily manifest as , consisting of episodic, intense pain in the right upper quadrant or that typically lasts 30 minutes to several hours. This pain is frequently precipitated by ingestion of fatty meals and is often accompanied by and . The discomfort may radiate to the back or right shoulder, adding to the patient's distress during episodes. Laboratory findings during symptomatic episodes may include elevated liver enzymes such as (ALT), (AST), , or , as well as increased or levels, particularly if is involved. Unlike presentations associated with larger gallstones, biliary microlithiasis does not usually produce chronic dyspepsia or lead to fat malabsorption. Pain attacks generally resolve spontaneously without intervention, though they tend to recur periodically if the underlying microlithiasis persists untreated. In select instances, biliary microlithiasis has been linked to , particularly in cases initially deemed idiopathic.

Associated Conditions

Biliary microlithiasis is frequently associated with , particularly in cases classified as idiopathic, where it serves as an underlying etiology in 10% to 40% of instances. For example, one study identified in 74% of patients with otherwise unexplained episodes. This association underscores the role of undetected small calculi in precipitating pancreatic through involvement. Acute cholecystitis represents another key condition linked to biliary microlithiasis, arising from impaction of microliths in the neck that triggers localized inflammation. Such microliths, often smaller than 3 mm, can mimic or contribute to symptomatic disease despite negative imaging for larger stones. Microlithiasis also correlates with choledocholithiasis, as small calculi may migrate from the into the , leading to obstruction. This migration increases susceptibility to cholangitis, an infectious complication of biliary stasis. Patients who have undergone (ERCP) or sphincterotomy face a heightened risk for these associations, with long-term studies showing elevated rates of recurrent biliopancreatic events due to persistent or reforming microliths. This prevalence highlights its relevance in evaluating persistent upper abdominal complaints where standard diagnostics yield negative results.

Diagnostic Approaches

Imaging Techniques

Transabdominal serves as the first-line imaging modality for evaluating suspected biliary microlithiasis due to its non-invasive nature, widespread availability, and cost-effectiveness. It typically identifies microliths greater than 2 mm as hyperechoic foci within the or bile ducts, often accompanied by posterior acoustic shadowing. However, its sensitivity for detecting microliths, which are generally smaller than 3 mm, ranges from 55% to 65%, limited by factors such as patient body habitus, bowel gas interference, and the subtlety of small calculi. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) offers significantly higher diagnostic accuracy for biliary microlithiasis, particularly in cases where transabdominal ultrasound is inconclusive. Performed via an inserted through the mouth, EUS provides high-resolution images (using 5-12 MHz probes) of the and , detecting hyperechoic signals as small as 0.5 mm with or without shadowing. Studies report EUS of 92.6% to 100% and specificity of 55.6% to 100% for microliths under 3 mm in the or , making it superior for identifying occult stones in patients with biliary pain or idiopathic , including common bile duct microlithiasis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a non-invasive that visualizes the entire biliary tree without or , using T2-weighted sequences to highlight fluid-filled structures and potential filling defects from microliths. It is particularly useful for assessing ductal microlithiasis, with reported sensitivity around 80% to 85% for small stones, though it may miss or very tiny calculi due to lower compared to EUS. MRCP's specificity typically exceeds 90%, providing valuable anatomical context when is limited. Despite these advances, techniques for biliary microlithiasis have inherent limitations, including the absence of acoustic shadowing in microliths smaller than 1 mm, which can mimic or , and operator dependence in -based methods that affects . Overall, while transabdominal remains initial screening, EUS and MRCP enhance detection rates, guiding further management in challenging cases.

Laboratory and Invasive Methods

Laboratory tests for biliary microlithiasis are primarily supportive rather than diagnostic, as there is no specific biomarker for the condition. In cases associated with , patients may exhibit elevated serum and levels, alongside mild increases in liver enzymes such as () and aspartate (), or total if biliary obstruction is present. These findings, however, are nonspecific and reflect secondary complications rather than the microliths themselves. Bile microscopy remains the gold standard for confirming biliary microlithiasis, involving the examination of samples for cholesterol monohydrate crystals or calcium bilirubinate granules, which are characteristic of microliths less than 3 mm in diameter. collection can be obtained via duodenal following cholecystokinin (CCK) to induce contraction, or directly from the during endoscopic procedures. The sensitivity of this method ranges from 65% to 90%, depending on the sampling technique and expertise in crystal identification, though false negatives can occur due to intermittent crystal passage or inadequate sample volume. Polarizing light microscopy enhances the detection of these crystals by revealing their birefringent properties—such as patterns for crystals—distinguishing microliths from amorphous debris under standard light . This technique is particularly useful in suspected cases of idiopathic recurrent , where microlithiasis is a common occult cause. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) serves as an invasive diagnostic tool, allowing direct fluoroscopic visualization of the biliary tree and aspiration of bile for when microliths are not discernible on non-invasive imaging. If confirmed, ERCP facilitates immediate therapeutic intervention, such as sphincterotomy or stone extraction, though it carries risks including post-procedure . While imaging techniques provide an initial non-invasive assessment, these laboratory and procedural methods offer definitive confirmation.

Management

Treatment Options

The primary treatment for symptomatic biliary microlithiasis, particularly when associated with recurrent , is laparoscopic , which serves as the definitive intervention by removing the and eliminating the source of microlith formation. This procedure is recommended for patients with a in and no surgical contraindications, as it prevents relapses of gallstone-associated in the vast majority of cases, with studies showing success in 17 out of 18 patients over a mean follow-up of 36 months. Among experts, 64% endorse as the preferred approach for sludge or microlithiasis detected in idiopathic . For patients at high surgical risk or those with contraindications to , endoscopic sphincterotomy performed via (ERCP) offers an alternative by facilitating the passage of microliths and reducing biliary obstruction, thereby decreasing recurrence rates of . This intervention is particularly suitable for poor operative candidates, with 24% of experts favoring ERCP with sphincterotomy in such scenarios. Pharmacological management with (UDCA) at a dose of 8-10 mg/kg/day, administered orally in divided doses, is indicated for mild or asymptomatic cases with risk factors, as it promotes dissolution of cholesterol-based microliths and prevents recurrence. Clinical evidence demonstrates complete resolution of gallbladder microlithiasis within 3-6 months at 10 mg/kg/day, followed by a maintenance dose that averts attacks over extended follow-up periods of up to 44 months. UDCA is typically reserved for patients ineligible for surgical or endoscopic options, with 64% of experts using it selectively in this context. Treatment selection is guided by symptom severity and patient factors: for recurrent symptomatic episodes to achieve near-complete risk reduction of (approximately 80-90% based on biliary studies), while UDCA suits early or low-risk presentations to avoid invasive procedures.00274-3/abstract)

Preventive Measures

Preventive measures for biliary microlithiasis primarily target modifiable risk factors to inhibit supersaturation and crystal formation, focusing on adjustments and targeted interventions in high-risk scenarios. Maintaining an ideal body weight through gradual changes, rather than rapid , is essential, as abrupt reductions in caloric intake can promote saturation in and increase microlithiasis risk. A emphasizing high-fiber foods such as fruits, , and whole grains, while limiting saturated fats and refined sugars, helps reduce bile lithogenicity by enhancing solubilization and . Regular moderate , such as 30 minutes of brisk walking most days, further supports flow and prevents stasis, contributing to overall risk reduction. In patients exposed to known precipitants, proactive management is key to averting microlithiasis development. For individuals on total (TPN), prompt discontinuation or transition to enteral feeding is recommended when clinically feasible, as prolonged TPN induces gallbladder stasis and formation, a precursor to microliths.90204-4/abstract) During , which elevates levels and bile stasis risk, close monitoring of biliary status is advised, particularly in the third trimester when incidence peaks. Similarly, post-liver transplant patients warrant vigilant oversight due to immunosuppressive therapies and altered composition that heighten microlithiasis susceptibility. Prophylactic pharmacotherapy with (UDCA) is effective in select high-risk groups to inhibit crystal and dissolution of early microliths. In patients undergoing , UDCA (typically 600-1200 mg daily for 6 months postoperatively) significantly lowers the incidence of de novo and microlithiasis formation by altering composition. This approach is also beneficial during rapid phases or in those with established , where UDCA prevents progression to symptomatic microlithiasis. Routine monitoring via abdominal is recommended for at-risk populations, such as those with prior or metabolic risk factors, to detect microlithiasis early and enable timely intervention. Screening intervals of 6-12 months in high-risk cases, like post-bariatric patients, facilitate prevention of complications through lifestyle reinforcement or initiation.

Prognosis and Complications

The for biliary microlithiasis is generally excellent with timely intervention, as or endoscopic sphincterotomy provides lasting symptom relief in the majority of affected patients. In a of individuals with recurrent idiopathic or unexplained biliary due to microlithiasis, all patients who underwent or sphincterotomy remained asymptomatic during a mean follow-up of 23 months. Similarly, reduces the risk of recurrent to less than 10%, compared to 66-75% in untreated cases. therapy also yields high rates of symptom resolution or improvement in patients with persistent biliary-type post- attributable to microlithiasis. Factors influencing include early detection and , which can prevent progression to larger s in approximately 20% of cases where sludge evolves without intervention. , a precursor to microlithiasis, resolves spontaneously in about 40% of patients, often within three years, particularly when precipitating factors such as or total parenteral nutrition are removed; however, microliths tend to persist and may lead to recurrent symptoms if untreated. Association with does not significantly worsen overall outcomes, as sludge- or microlithiasis-induced exhibits lower rates of pancreatobiliary complications (32%) and higher 24-month complication-free survival (59%) compared to (42% complications, 46% survival). A 2023 expert consensus distinguishes (amorphous precipitate) from microlithiasis (crystalline particles ≤5 mm), noting that both carry risks similar to gallstones for but with potentially fewer long-term complications. Recurrence rates are low following surgical intervention, ranging from 5-11% for pancreatitis episodes after cholecystectomy in cases of presumed microlithiasis. In contrast, conservative management alone is associated with higher recurrence, up to 35% in idiopathic acute pancreatitis linked to biliary crystals. These patterns underscore the importance of definitive treatment to achieve long-term resolution and minimize symptom recurrence.

Complications

Untreated or recurrent biliary microlithiasis can lead to acute complications, primarily through obstruction of the biliary or pancreatic ducts. Biliary pancreatitis is a key acute sequela, accounting for 10-40% of idiopathic acute pancreatitis cases, where microliths migrate and cause pancreatic inflammation equivalent in severity to that induced by larger gallstones. Acute cholecystitis arises from cystic duct blockage by microliths or sludge, resulting in gallbladder inflammation. Ascending cholangitis, characterized by bacterial infection secondary to duct obstruction, represents another serious acute risk, often presenting with fever, jaundice, and abdominal pain. Chronic complications may develop over time if microlithiasis persists. Progression to symptomatic cholelithiasis occurs in approximately 20% of cases, as microliths aggregate into larger stones that provoke or further obstruction. Gallbladder perforation, though rare (occurring in less than 1% of biliary stone-related cases), can result from prolonged leading to wall . may also emerge from repeated microlith-induced episodes, contributing to pancreatic and exocrine/endocrine dysfunction. Risks of these complications escalate in certain populations. Patients with face heightened vulnerability due to impaired motility and increased stone formation, amplifying the likelihood of acute events like or . Immunocompromised individuals, such as those with severe illness or post-transplant status, exhibit greater susceptibility to infections like cholangitis following microlith obstruction. Microlith passage itself heightens severity, mirroring outcomes from macroscopic stones due to comparable ductal impact. These complications underscore the need for to mitigate progression.

References

  1. [1]
    Consensus definition of sludge and microlithiasis as a possible ...
    Apr 18, 2023 · We propose a consensus definition for the localisation, ultrasound morphology and diameter of biliary sludge and microlithiasis as distinct entities.
  2. [2]
    Similarities and differences between biliary sludge and microlithiasis
    Biliary sludge and microlithiasis are most often diagnosed ultrasonographically and bile microscopy is considered the gold standard for their diagnosis.
  3. [3]
    Gallstone disease: Microlithiasis and sludge - PubMed
    Microlithiasis and sludge in bile may cause colicky pain, cholecystitis, cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis, and are thus of clinical relevance.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    Obesity and Gallstones - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Obesity has broadly been described as the main risk factor of GD; mainly women with a BMI higher than 30 have twice the risk of developing gallstones.
  5. [5]
    Biliary complications associated with weight loss, cholelithiasis ... - NIH
    Post-bariatric surgery, especially after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), 30% of patients develop biliary disease due to rapid weight loss.
  6. [6]
    Plant-Based Diet, Cholesterol, and Risk of Gallstone Disease - NIH
    Feb 4, 2019 · In Western countries, gallstones are composed mainly of cholesterol in 75%–80% of cases [4]. The associations between GSD and plant-based foods ...
  7. [7]
    Management of Gallstones and Their Complications - AAFP
    Mar 15, 2000 · Cohort studies with follow-up of patients with symptomatic gallstones indicate a 38 to 50 percent incidence rate of recurrent biliary pain per ...
  8. [8]
    Cholesterol cholelithiasis in pregnant women - ScienceDirect.com
    Thus, elevated estrogen levels are a critical risk factor for developing gallbladder disease during pregnancy.
  9. [9]
    association with mutation in the MDR3/ABCB4 gene
    Jun 11, 2007 · Low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis (LPAC) is characterized by the association of ABCB4 mutations and low biliary phospholipid concentration with ...Etiology · Abcb4 Gene Mutations And... · Cholelithiasis And Abcb4...
  10. [10]
    The role of diet and nutrition related indicators in biliary diseases
    Jul 30, 2022 · Recent studies have pointed out that high fructose, low fiber, high fat and low vitamin C will increase the risk of gallstone formation.Missing: microlithiasis | Show results with:microlithiasis
  11. [11]
    Cholelithiasis - Hepatic and Biliary Disorders - Merck Manuals
    In the United States, gallstone prevalence is estimated at 14% of the population ... These symptoms are common, having approximately equal prevalence in ...
  12. [12]
    Similarities and differences between biliary sludge and microlithiasis
    Numerous studies have demonstrated complete resolution of biliary sludge in approximately 40% of patients, a cyclic pattern of disappearing and reappearing in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Biliary Microlithiasis, Sludge, Crystals, Microcrystallization ... - PubMed
    This systematic review aimed to highlight the importance of biliary microlithiasis, sludge, and crystals, and their association with gallstones.
  14. [14]
    Gallstones and gallbladder disease Information - Mount Sinai
    Some patients with biliary colic experience the pain behind the breastbone. Nausea or vomiting may be present. Changing position, taking over-the-counter pain ...Missing: microlithiasis | Show results with:microlithiasis
  15. [15]
    Can the gallbladder cause back pain? - Medical News Today
    Apr 28, 2023 · This can involve sharp, sudden abdominal pain, nausea, and bloating. The pain may also radiate to the right shoulder and back. Gallbladder ...
  16. [16]
    Biliary Colic - Harvard Health
    Aug 16, 2023 · Most episodes of biliary colic pass after 1 to 5 hours. After the most intense pain passes, your abdomen may continue to ache mildly for about ...
  17. [17]
    Biliary microlithiasis in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis and ...
    Biliary microlithiasis in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis and unexplained biliary pain: response to therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Oct;19 ...
  18. [18]
    Biliary Sludge as a Cause of Acute Pancreatitis
    Feb 27, 1992 · The pancreatitis was considered idiopathic in 31 of the 86 patients (36 percent), of whom 23 had microscopical evidence of biliary sludge.
  19. [19]
    Gallstone (Cholelithiasis) Imaging - Medscape Reference
    Oct 10, 2023 · Ultrasonography (US) is preferred as the initial imaging study for right upper quadrant pain, with supplemental cholescintigraphy performed when ...
  20. [20]
    Long-Term Risks of Benign and Malign Complications after ... - NIH
    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy is associated with an increased long-term risk of subsequent benign biliopancreatic disease.
  21. [21]
    Is biliary microlithiasis a significant cause of idiopathic recurrent ...
    The cause of RAP was attributed to biliary microlithiasis in only 10 (13%) of 75 patients. Two additional patients developed gallstones during the follow-up ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
  22. [22]
    Biliary microlithiasis: A neglected cause of recurrent pancreatitis and ...
    Apr 5, 2005 · Biliary microlithiasis in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis and unexplained biliary pain: response to therapy.
  23. [23]
    Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Transabdominal ... - NIH
    Apr 22, 2024 · Cholecystectomy was recommended for patients with gallbladder wall thickness diagnosed by EUS (>3 mm), as well as biliary microlithiasis or ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Role of endoscopic ultrasound in gallbladder and biliary system ...
    Jan 18, 2024 · EUS demonstrates high sensitivity (92.6 to 100%) and specificity (55.6 to 91%) in diagnosing gallbladder microlithiasis. These results underline ...
  25. [25]
    Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance ...
    For MRCP, the sensitivities ranged between 0.77 and 1.00 and the specificities ranged between 0.73 and 0.99. The summary sensitivity and specificity of the ...
  26. [26]
    Acute Pancreatitis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Aug 2, 2025 · Initial laboratory testing should include serum lipase and amylase, which, when elevated, support the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Liver ...
  27. [27]
    Review of idiopathic pancreatitis - PMC - PubMed Central
    Microlithiasis refers to stones of < 3 mm in diameter and is often used interchangeably at times with “microcrystals” and sometimes with biliary sludge[28-30].
  28. [28]
    Polarized light microscopic examination of human bile in ... - PubMed
    This study suggests that polarized microscopy may be a useful method to detect microlithiasis in patients with repeated biliary colics who have normal OCG and ...Missing: sensitivity | Show results with:sensitivity
  29. [29]
    Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and bile duct microlithiasis in acute ...
    Feb 21, 2008 · Endoscopic ultrasound is the most sensitive test to detect bile duct stones and appears more cost effective and sensitive than MRCP[12].
  30. [30]
    Consensus definition of sludge and microlithiasis as a possible ... - Gut
    Regarding concrements' size, 92% of the experts voted in favour of defining biliary microlithiasis as for cases in which examination of the biliary tree or ...Missing: general | Show results with:general
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Microlithiasis: an important cause of 'idiopathic' acute pancreatitis?
    5,6,11-16 In this review we will discuss the role of cholesterol microlithiasis as a potential cause of acute 'idiopathic' pancreatitis. Pathogenesis of ...
  33. [33]
    Ursodeoxycholic Acid - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Feb 12, 2023 · ... biliary sludge showed complete resolution of gallbladder microlithiasis after UDCA treatment, demonstrating its therapeutic effect.[4][1].Continuing Education Activity · Indications · Mechanism of Action · Adverse Effects
  34. [34]
    [PDF] EASL-CPG-Gallstones.pdf
    appropriateness criteria right upper quadrant pain. J Am Coll Radiol · 2014;11 ... Biliary microlithiasis, sludge, · crystals, microcrystallization, and ...
  35. [35]
    A healthy lifestyle pattern and the risk of symptomatic gallstone ...
    Jul 2, 2020 · We aimed to investigate the association between an a priori defined healthy lifestyle score (HLS, including healthy diet, moderate alcohol and regular coffee ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Gallstone disease: primary and secondary prevention - ScienceDirect
    Moderate physical activity and dietary management (high fiber intake and avoidance of saturated fatty acids) can lower the risk of cholelithiasis [17]. Daily ...
  37. [37]
    Ursodeoxycholic acid prophylaxis and the reduction of gallstone ...
    Feb 26, 2025 · This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of UDCA prophylaxis in preventing gallstone formation after bariatric surgery.Missing: microlithiasis | Show results with:microlithiasis
  38. [38]
    Diabetes-Related Gastrointestinal Emergencies: Gallstones and ...
    Dec 17, 2021 · The most common and immediately life-threatening diabetes-related GI complications seen in emergency departments are gallstones and acute pancreatitis.
  39. [39]
    Metabolic dysfunction-associated gallstone disease: expecting more ...
    Jul 16, 2023 · Additional factors are major surgery, multiple trauma, severe burns, acute renal failure, systemic vasculitis, sepsis, immunocompromised illness ...
  40. [40]
    Lower rate of pancreatobiliary complications after sludge and ...
    This multicenter study reveals distinct differences in relapse risk between gallstone- and sludge/microlithiasis-induced AP, with gallstone AP showing a higher ...