Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

CHEK2

CHEK2, or checkpoint kinase 2, is a protein-coding gene located on the long arm of chromosome 22 at position 22q12.1 that encodes the CHK2 protein, a serine/threonine kinase essential for maintaining genomic integrity.^[1] The CHK2 protein functions as a key regulator in the cellular response to DNA damage, particularly double-strand breaks, where it is activated through phosphorylation by the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase.^[2] Upon activation, CHK2 phosphorylates multiple downstream targets, including the tumor suppressor p53 at serine-20 to stabilize it and induce G1/S cell cycle arrest, CDC25 phosphatases to prevent mitotic entry, and BRCA1 to facilitate homologous recombination repair, thereby promoting either DNA repair or programmed cell death (apoptosis) if damage is irreparable.^[2] This multifaceted role positions CHEK2 as a critical tumor suppressor that halts cell proliferation in the presence of genotoxic stress, ensuring fidelity in DNA replication and chromosome segregation.^[1] Expressed ubiquitously across human tissues, with notable levels in bone marrow and lymph nodes, CHEK2 integrates into broader pathways such as the Fanconi anemia-BRCA network, underscoring its involvement in both sporadic and hereditary genomic instability syndromes.^[1] Germline mutations in CHEK2, such as the founder variant 1100delC, are associated with a moderate-penetrance cancer predisposition syndrome with a twofold or greater increase in female breast cancer susceptibility, as well as elevated risks for prostate and colorectal cancers.^[3] These mutations impair the DNA damage checkpoint, leading to unchecked cell division and tumorigenesis.

Gene

Genomic location and organization

The CHEK2 gene is situated on the long arm of chromosome 22 at the cytogenetic band 22q12.1. In the GRCh38/hg38 reference genome assembly, it spans approximately 54 kb, extending from genomic position 28,687,742 to 28,741,834 on the reverse strand.^[1] This location positions CHEK2 within a region associated with various genomic features, though the gene itself is distinct from nearby pseudogenes that share partial sequence homology, particularly in its 3' exons.^[2] The gene is organized into 14 exons, with the first exon being non-coding and containing the 5' untranslated region (UTR). The coding sequence (CDS) initiates in exon 2 and continues through exon 14, encoding a 543-amino-acid protein isoform in the canonical transcript (NM_007194.4). Introns vary in size, contributing to the overall genomic span, and the 3' UTR is located in exon 14, with alternative polyadenylation sites potentially influencing transcript stability.^[4] Notably, exons 10–14 exhibit high sequence homology (>90%) with several pseudogenes dispersed across the human genome on chromosomes 2, 7, 10, 13, 15, 16, X, and Y, which can complicate PCR-based amplification but do not alter the functional gene structure.^[5] Upstream of the transcription start site, the CHEK2 promoter region harbors key regulatory elements that modulate gene expression. These include binding sites for multiple transcription factors, such as AML1a, C/EBPalpha, CUTL1, IRF-7A, p300, Pax-4a, and STAT3, which facilitate basal and inducible transcription. Additionally, an 18-bp recognition sequence in the promoter binds zinc-finger protein transcription factors, enhancing promoter activity. A functional variant at position -48 (c.-48G>A) disrupts a CpG methylation site, relieving transcriptional repression and potentially increasing expression levels.^[6]^[1]^[7] CHEK2 demonstrates robust evolutionary conservation across mammals, with orthologs present in over 200 species ranging from primates to rodents and beyond, reflecting its essential role in cellular homeostasis. Key exons, particularly those encoding the kinase domain (exons 8–14), show high sequence identity (>85%) among mammalian orthologs, underscoring structural preservation. Functional conservation extends to more distant eukaryotes, including yeast (e.g., fission yeast Cds1 homolog), where CHEK2-like mechanisms respond to DNA damage, highlighting the gene's ancient origins in checkpoint pathways.^[8]

Pathogenic variants

Pathogenic variants in the CHEK2 gene primarily consist of loss-of-function mutations that compromise the protein's kinase activity, leading to defective DNA damage response. Common truncating variants include the c.1100delC (p.Thr367Metfs*15) founder mutation, which is prevalent in Northern European populations at frequencies of approximately 1 in 100 to 1 in 200 carriers.^[9] This variant introduces a premature stop codon, triggering nonsense-mediated decay and resulting in absent or truncated protein.^[10] Missense variants such as c.470T>C (p.Ile157Thr, I157T) and c.433C>T (p.Arg145Trp, R145W) are also recurrent; I157T, found in diverse populations, partially impairs protein stability and homodimerization, reducing kinase function to about 20-50% of wild-type levels.^[11]^[12] Similarly, R145W disrupts the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain, leading to protein instability and loss of interaction with partner proteins, thereby abolishing effective phosphorylation of downstream targets.^[13]^[14] Biallelic pathogenic variants in CHEK2, though rare, are associated with severe phenotypes including early-onset multiple primary cancers and constitutional chromosomal instability in humans.^[15]^[16] In animal models, complete biallelic loss-of-function, such as in Chk2 knockout mice, results in viable offspring but with profound defects including T-cell maturation failure, female infertility due to oocyte loss, and accelerated tumorigenesis, highlighting the gene's non-essential role in embryogenesis yet critical function in genomic stability.^[3] These variants often combine truncating mutations on one allele with hypomorphic or missense changes on the other, exacerbating haploinsufficiency effects.^[17] Functional studies demonstrate that most pathogenic CHEK2 variants cause loss-of-function through mechanisms like impaired translation initiation, protein misfolding, or defective autophosphorylation, all converging on reduced kinase activity essential for cell cycle checkpoints.^[18] For instance, truncating variants like 1100delC eliminate the SQ/TQ domain required for activation, while missense variants such as I157T and R145W destabilize the protein, leading to rapid degradation via the proteasome.^[19] As of 2025, the ClinVar database classifies more than 100 CHEK2 variants as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, with updates from large genomic studies like the UK Biobank and gnomAD refining classifications for variants previously deemed variants of uncertain significance (VUS).^[20] For example, comprehensive multiplexed assays have reclassified several missense VUS as likely pathogenic based on their impact on protein stability and checkpoint activation, integrating data from over 3,000 unique variants.^[21] These classifications emphasize the spectrum from high-penetrance truncating mutations to low-penetrance missense changes, guiding clinical interpretation.

Protein

Domain architecture

The CHEK2 protein, encoded by the CHEK2 gene, comprises 543 amino acids and has a calculated molecular weight of approximately 60 kDa.^[6] Its domain architecture is organized into distinct N-terminal regulatory elements, a central catalytic kinase domain, and C-terminal extensions that contribute to localization and regulation. This modular structure enables CHEK2 to integrate DNA damage signals through phosphorylation-dependent interactions while maintaining kinase activity. At the N-terminus, CHEK2 features an SQ/TQ cluster domain (SCD) spanning residues 19–69, which harbors seven SQ or TQ motifs that serve as phosphorylation sites for upstream kinases such as ATM and ATR.^[22] Immediately following the SCD is a flexible linker region (residues 70–91), succeeded by the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain (residues 92–205), a phospho-binding module that facilitates protein-protein interactions essential for CHEK2 dimerization and recruitment to damage sites.^[23] The FHA domain binds phosphorylated motifs on partner proteins or, in an intramolecular fashion, to the phosphorylated SCD of another CHEK2 monomer, promoting trans-autophosphorylation. The core of the protein is the serine/threonine kinase domain (residues 213–501), which adopts the canonical bilobal kinase fold conserved across eukaryotic protein kinases.^[23] This domain is divided into an N-terminal lobe (residues 213–305), rich in β-sheets and involved in ATP binding, and a C-terminal lobe (residues 306–501), predominantly α-helical and containing the substrate-binding site. Key conserved motifs within the kinase domain include the ATP-binding pocket and the activation loop (residues 371–391), which features autophosphorylation sites such as Thr383 that stabilize the active conformation upon dimerization. The dimerization interface primarily involves FHA-FHA contacts and FHA-kinase domain interactions, with critical residues like Ile157 at the FHA-kinase junction. CHEK2 exhibits sequence homology to other checkpoint kinases, sharing approximately 38% identity in the kinase domain with members of the CAMK subfamily, such as phosphorylase kinase, and structural similarities to AGC kinases like protein kinase A, though it is more closely related to yeast Rad53 than to CHEK1.^[23] The C-terminus (residues 502–543) consists of intrinsically disordered regulatory regions, including a predicted nuclear localization signal (residues 515–523) that directs CHEK2 to the nucleus for DNA damage response functions.^[22] This region lacks a defined globular domain but influences protein stability and localization, with truncations beyond residue 500 often retaining core functionality in model systems.

Activation mechanisms

The activation of CHEK2, a serine/threonine kinase, is primarily triggered in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) detected during the DNA damage response. Upon DSB induction, the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, and to a lesser extent the ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase, phosphorylates CHEK2 at threonine 68 (Thr68) within its SQ/TQ-rich domain.^[24] This phosphorylation event initiates a conformational change, promoting the transition from an inactive monomeric state to a transient dimeric form, where the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of one CHEK2 molecule binds to the phospho-Thr68 motif on another, facilitating intermolecular interactions essential for subsequent activation steps.^[23] Within the dimer, CHEK2 undergoes trans-autophosphorylation at multiple sites to achieve full kinase activity, including threonine 383 (Thr383) in the activation loop and serine 516 (Ser516) in the C-terminal regulatory region. Autophosphorylation at Thr383 stabilizes the active kinase conformation by ordering the activation loop, while Ser516 phosphorylation enhances downstream signaling and apoptosis induction, with mutants at this site showing defective function.^[23]^[25] Following these modifications, the dimer dissociates into active monomers, which propagate the checkpoint signal independently of sustained Thr68 phosphorylation, allowing CHEK2 to phosphorylate substrates throughout the nucleus.^[23] CHEK2 activity is further regulated post-activation through ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, mediated in part by the E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2, which promotes CHEK2 turnover to prevent prolonged signaling. Co-expression of MDM2 enhances ubiquitination of both wild-type and certain mutant forms of CHEK2, leading to its degradation and fine-tuning the duration of the DNA damage response.^[26] In unstressed cells, CHEK2 remains inactive through multiple inhibitory mechanisms, including intra-molecular interactions that maintain a monomeric conformation with a disordered activation loop and an open kinase domain structure, suppressing basal activity. Additionally, protein phosphatases such as PP2A, WIP1, and PP1 actively dephosphorylate CHEK2 at key sites like Thr68, ensuring rapid inactivation once the damage signal subsides.^[23]^[27]

Biological functions

DNA damage response

CHEK2, also known as CHK2, is a key effector kinase in the DNA damage response (DDR), particularly in response to double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by ionizing radiation or other genotoxic agents. Upon DNA damage, CHEK2 is activated primarily through phosphorylation by the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, enabling it to orchestrate downstream repair and survival decisions. This activation allows CHEK2 to phosphorylate multiple substrates involved in DSB repair pathways, ensuring genomic integrity by prioritizing accurate repair mechanisms.^[28] In homologous recombination (HR), CHEK2 promotes efficient repair by phosphorylating BRCA1 at serine 988, which facilitates the recruitment of the recombinase RAD51 to DSB sites and enhances strand invasion for homologous template use. Additionally, CHEK2 phosphorylates BRCA2 at threonine 3387, disrupting the inhibitory BRCA2-RAD51 complex and allowing RAD51 loading onto chromatin to initiate HR.^[29] These actions also repress non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) by inhibiting MRE11 nuclease activity via BRCA1, preventing error-prone ligation of DSB ends. Furthermore, CHEK2 interacts with DNA-PKcs, a core component of NHEJ, where DNA-PKcs phosphorylates CHEK2 at threonine 68 to contribute to its activation in response to DNA damage. CHEK2 also contributes to G2/M checkpoint enforcement following ionizing radiation by phosphorylating CDC25C at serine 216, leading to its 14-3-3-mediated cytoplasmic sequestration and inhibition, thereby delaying mitotic entry to permit repair.^[30] CHEK2 further integrates DDR with cell fate decisions by activating apoptosis through phosphorylation of p53 at serine 20, which disrupts its interaction with MDM2, stabilizes p53, and promotes transcriptional activation of pro-apoptotic genes like PUMA and BAX in severely damaged cells. Evidence from CHEK2 knockout mouse models underscores its essential role, revealing increased genomic instability characterized by radioresistance in thymocytes, defective p53-dependent transcription, and elevated susceptibility to carcinogen-induced tumors due to impaired DSB repair and apoptosis. These findings highlight CHEK2's tumor-suppressive function in maintaining genome stability.^[31]^[32]

Cell cycle regulation

CHEK2, encoding the checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2), plays a central role in enforcing cell cycle checkpoints to prevent progression through the cell cycle in the presence of DNA damage, thereby maintaining genomic integrity. Activated primarily by ATM in response to double-strand breaks, Chk2 phosphorylates multiple downstream targets to halt proliferation until damage is resolved. This regulation spans G1/S, intra-S phase, and G2/M transitions, as well as mitotic fidelity, ensuring coordinated arrest and repair. A key mechanism of Chk2-mediated cell cycle arrest involves the phosphorylation and subsequent inhibition of CDC25 family phosphatases, including CDC25A, CDC25B, and CDC25C. By targeting inhibitory sites such as Ser123 on CDC25A, Chk2 promotes its ubiquitin-mediated degradation, preventing dephosphorylation and activation of cyclin-dependent kinases CDK1 and CDK2. Similarly, phosphorylation of CDC25B and CDC25C inhibits their activity, blocking G2/M progression by maintaining CDK1 in an inactive, phosphorylated state. This multi-pronged inhibition ensures robust enforcement of the G2/M checkpoint following DNA damage. At the G1/S checkpoint, Chk2 contributes to arrest through p53-dependent pathways by phosphorylating p53 at residues Thr18 and Ser20, which stabilizes the transcription factor and enhances its transcriptional activity to upregulate genes like p21, inhibiting CDK2 and preventing S-phase entry. In the S-phase checkpoint, Chk2 coordinates with ATR signaling to suppress DNA synthesis in response to damage; while primarily ATM-activated for double-strand breaks, Chk2's activity overlaps with ATR-Chk1 pathways to reduce replication fork progression and radiation-resistant DNA synthesis during intra-S phase arrest. Chk2 also influences the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint indirectly through regulation of E2F1, a transcription factor that controls expression of spindle checkpoint components. Phosphorylation of E2F1 by Chk2 at Ser364 promotes its stability and pro-apoptotic function in cells with spindle defects, linking DNA damage responses to mitotic fidelity and preventing progression with misaligned chromosomes. Experimental evidence from CHEK2-deficient cells underscores these roles, revealing checkpoint failures and increased genomic instability. In Chk2 knockout mouse models and human cell lines, such as HCT116 derivatives, deficiency leads to defective G1/S and intra-S phase arrest, with cells exhibiting radioresistance and failure to suppress origin firing after damage. Moreover, CHEK2-depleted cells display abnormal chromosome alignment, delayed mitosis, and elevated micronuclei formation, indicative of spindle assembly defects and resultant aneuploidy.

Role in meiosis

CHEK2 plays a critical role in the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) that occur during meiotic prophase I in oocytes, where programmed DSBs are induced by SPO11 to facilitate homologous recombination. In mouse models, CHEK2 activation ensures that oocytes with unrepaired DSBs are eliminated through apoptosis, preventing the progression of genetically unstable germ cells. This checkpoint is particularly active in late prophase I, where oocytes exhibiting more than 10 unrepaired DSBs (marked by RAD51 foci) are culled to maintain genomic integrity.^[33] The ATM-CHEK2-p53/p63 signaling axis is essential for oocyte survival following DNA damage in meiosis. In mouse primordial oocytes, ATM phosphorylates and activates CHEK2 in response to DSBs, which in turn phosphorylates p53 and TAp63, leading to transcription of pro-apoptotic genes like Puma and Noxa. This pathway triggers the elimination of damaged oocytes, as demonstrated in studies where CHEK2 deficiency preserves over 90% of the primordial follicle reserve after genotoxic insults, while double knockout of Trp53 and TAp63 similarly protects oocytes. CHEK2 also regulates synaptonemal complex (SC) formation and crossover assurance by enforcing repair pathway choices; for instance, in the absence of HORMAD2, CHEK2 promotes inter-sister recombination, but persistent unsynapsed axes due to SC defects activate CHEK2 to induce oocyte loss.^[34]^[33] Fertility defects are evident in CHEK2 knockout mice, where ablation of Chek2 allows oocytes with unrepaired meiotic DSBs to progress through meiosis, resulting in increased aneuploidy in eggs and offspring with chromosomal aberrations. These mice exhibit restored fertility in backgrounds with meiotic recombination defects, such as Spo11 deficiency, but the ovulated eggs show higher rates of unbalanced chromosomes, leading to embryonic lethality or cancer predisposition in progeny. In humans, germline variants in CHEK2 have been associated with altered ovarian aging; loss-of-function alleles correlate with later age at natural menopause, suggesting a protective effect on ovarian reserve, while implications from mouse models highlight potential risks of infertility or premature ovarian failure in contexts of impaired CHEK2 function during germ cell development.^[35]

Molecular interactions

Key protein partners

CHEK2, a serine/threonine kinase central to DNA damage signaling, engages in direct physical interactions with several key proteins to facilitate its recruitment and activation at sites of genomic stress. One prominent interactor is BRCA1, where the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of CHEK2 binds to ATM-phosphorylated BRCA1, enabling CHEK2's localization to DNA double-strand breaks for coordinated homologous recombination repair.^[36] This interaction is phosphorylation-dependent, with Thr68 phosphorylation on CHEK2 enhancing binding affinity through structural complementarity in the FHA-phosphopeptide interface.^[37] CHEK2 also directly interacts with the tumor suppressor p53 via its N-terminal transactivation domain, where CHEK2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser20. This modification disrupts the p53-MDM2 complex, thereby stabilizing p53 and preventing its ubiquitin-mediated degradation.^[32] The interaction is strengthened following DNA damage, allowing CHEK2 to transduce signals that amplify p53's transcriptional activity without requiring additional adaptors.^[38] At DNA damage foci, CHEK2 associates with MDC1 through a direct binding mechanism involving the FHA domain of MDC1 and phosphorylated Thr68 on CHEK2's N-terminal region. This coupling recruits CHEK2 to chromatin-bound γH2AX-marked sites, amplifying ATM signaling.^[39] Similarly, CHEK2 binds directly to 53BP1 (TP53BP1), which serves as a scaffold to tether CHEK2 to double-strand breaks, promoting its autophosphorylation and downstream effector activation.^[40] These associations occur independently but converge at repair foci to ensure efficient checkpoint enforcement.

Involvement in signaling pathways

CHEK2 plays a central role in the ATM-CHEK2-p53 signaling axis, a key pathway for maintaining genome integrity in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Upon detection of DNA damage, ATM kinase phosphorylates and activates CHEK2, which in turn phosphorylates p53 at serine 20, stabilizing it and promoting its transcriptional activity to induce cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, or apoptosis. This axis ensures coordinated cellular responses to genotoxic stress, preventing propagation of mutations that could lead to genomic instability.^[41] CHEK2 exhibits crosstalk with the PI3K/AKT pathway through regulation of mTOR signaling, primarily mediated by its upstream activation of p53. Activated CHEK2 enhances p53-dependent transcription of genes like PTEN and AMPK, which inhibit mTORC1 activity, thereby suppressing cell growth and proliferation under DNA damage conditions to prioritize repair over anabolic processes.^[42] This interaction balances survival signals from PI3K/AKT with DDR demands, ensuring metabolic reprogramming favors genome maintenance. CHEK2 integrates into the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway, contributing to the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) that stall replication forks. The FA core complex, upon recognizing ICLs, monoubiquitinates FANCD2-FANCI, which facilitates downstream homologous recombination; CHEK2 is activated in parallel by ATM to amplify checkpoint signaling and support FA-mediated repair, preventing chromosomal aberrations.^[43] This coordination enhances the efficiency of ICL resolution during S phase. Recent studies highlight an emerging role for CHEK2 in immune signaling, particularly in activating the STING pathway following DNA damage. CHEK2 depletion or inhibition leads to accumulation of cytosolic DNA fragments from unrepaired breaks, triggering cGAS-STING activation and type I interferon production to mount an antiviral-like immune response against damaged cells.^[44] This mechanism, observed in 2023-2025 investigations, links DDR to innate immunity, potentially enhancing antitumor surveillance. Dysregulation of CHEK2 within these pathways creates opportunities for synthetic lethality in cancer cells, where CHEK2 loss sensitizes tumors to inhibitors of parallel DDR components. For instance, CHEK2-deficient cells exhibit heightened vulnerability to PARP inhibitors or ATM antagonists due to impaired backup repair mechanisms, leading to unrepaired DNA lesions and cell death.^[45] Similarly, CHEK2 mutations combined with alterations in BLM or SOD1 pathways result in lethal genomic instability, underscoring CHEK2's integration into broader networks for therapeutic exploitation.^[46]

Clinical significance

Cancer predisposition

CHEK2 is recognized as a moderate-penetrance gene associated with hereditary cancer predisposition, conferring an elevated lifetime risk of breast cancer estimated at 20-30% for heterozygotes carrying pathogenic variants.^[3] The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends enhanced screening for carriers with lifetime risks exceeding 20%.^[47] This risk is intermediate compared to high-penetrance genes like BRCA1/2, with the magnitude influenced by factors such as variant type and family history; for instance, the founder variant c.1100delC is linked to a twofold to threefold increase in breast cancer risk.^[3] The gene's role in DNA damage response underscores its tumor suppressor function, where germline loss-of-function variants disrupt cell cycle checkpoints and genomic stability.^[48] Pathogenic CHEK2 variants exhibit a prevalence of 0.5-1% in the general population, particularly among individuals of northern European ancestry, where the c.1100delC variant reaches frequencies up to 1% in the Netherlands and approximately 0.5% elsewhere in the region.^[3] In cancer cohorts, this prevalence is notably higher, often 2-3% among women with breast cancer, reflecting enrichment due to ascertainment bias and true association with disease onset.^[49] The haploinsufficiency model explains the loss of tumor suppression, wherein a single functional allele is insufficient to maintain proper CHK2 kinase activity in response to DNA double-strand breaks, leading to accumulated genomic instability and predisposition to malignancy without requiring biallelic inactivation.^[48] Polygenic interactions further modulate CHEK2-associated risks; for example, carriers with high polygenic risk scores for breast cancer experience approximately doubled lifetime risks compared to those with average scores, reaching up to 59% in some models.^[50] Specific epistatic effects with BRCA2 variants have been observed, where co-occurrence amplifies breast cancer susceptibility beyond additive expectations, as evidenced by synergistic impacts on risk alleles.^[51] Recent epidemiological analyses from large cohorts like the UK Biobank (2023-2025 data) confirm these patterns, reporting adjusted odds ratios of 1.84 for breast cancer and 1.77 for prostate cancer among CHEK2 heterozygotes, alongside elevated risks for urinary tract and hematologic malignancies (ORs 1.75-2.11).^[52] These findings from exome-sequenced populations (n>400,000) highlight CHEK2's broad but moderate contribution to cancer heritability across diverse sites.^[53]

Breast cancer associations

Germline pathogenic variants in CHEK2, particularly protein-truncating variants, are associated with a 2.5- to 4.5-fold increased relative risk of breast cancer, with a stronger association observed for estrogen receptor-positive subtypes (odds ratio [OR] 3.42; 95% CI 2.33-5.21).^[54] This elevated risk is supported by meta-analyses of case-control studies, which estimate an overall OR of 3.3 (95% CI 2.4-4.3) for truncating variants compared to non-truncating missense variants like p.I157T.^[55] In contrast to triple-negative or estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers, where associations are weaker or non-significant, CHEK2 variants predominantly confer susceptibility to hormone receptor-positive disease, potentially influencing therapeutic responses such as to tamoxifen.^[56] The CHEK2 c.1100delC truncating variant exemplifies founder effects in specific populations, occurring at higher frequencies in Northern European groups, including Dutch individuals (carrier frequency ~1-2%), and at lower but notable rates in Ashkenazi Jewish populations (~0.3%).^[57]^[58] This variant alone accounts for a 2- to 3-fold breast cancer risk in carriers, contributing significantly to familial clustering in these ancestries without BRCA1/2 mutations.^[59] Similar founder patterns are seen in other truncating variants, amplifying population-specific screening considerations. Carriers of CHEK2 pathogenic variants exhibit clinical features distinct from sporadic breast cancer, including earlier age of onset by approximately 5-10 years (mean diagnosis age ~46-50 years versus 55-60 years in non-carriers) and a higher incidence of bilateral disease.^[60]^[61] The risk of contralateral breast cancer is substantially elevated (OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.34-4.82), often occurring within 10 years of initial diagnosis, underscoring the need for vigilant surveillance in affected individuals.^[61] Recent meta-analyses highlight modifier effects on CHEK2-associated breast cancer risk, with family history conferring up to a 37% cumulative risk by age 70 in carriers versus lower baseline estimates without familial aggregation.^[55] Hormone exposure, particularly in the context of estrogen receptor-positive predisposition, interacts multiplicatively; for instance, exploratory analyses from large cohorts indicate amplified risks in carriers with prolonged endogenous or exogenous estrogen influences, though effect sizes vary by variant type.^[62] These interactions, drawn from 2024-2025 studies integrating genetic and epidemiological data, emphasize personalized risk modeling beyond variant status alone.^[63] CHEK2 pathogenic variants are also associated with an increased risk of male breast cancer, though published studies are limited and suggest a modest elevation above the general population lifetime risk of approximately 0.1%. No specific screening guidelines exist for male carriers.^[3]^[64] Unlike BRCA1/2 variants, which substantially elevate ovarian cancer risk, CHEK2 pathogenic variants show no significant association with ovarian cancer (OR ~1.0), distinguishing their clinical spectrum and guiding targeted screening priorities.^[65] This lack of overlap reinforces CHEK2's role primarily in breast cancer predisposition within moderate-risk gene panels.^[66]

Other cancer risks

Germline pathogenic variants in CHEK2 are associated with an approximately twofold increased risk of prostate cancer, with odds ratios ranging from 1.5 to 2.0 in multiple cohort studies.^[3] This risk appears more pronounced in metastatic cases and is supported by higher variant prevalence in affected individuals compared to population controls.^[3] For colorectal cancer, evidence for elevated germline risk remains conflicting; earlier estimates suggested a 5-10% lifetime risk, but updated 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines indicate no clear increase beyond the general population, based on large-scale analyses showing standardized incidence ratios around 1.4 or lower.^[67]^[3] Somatic CHEK2 alterations occur in approximately 5-10% of colorectal tumors, often involving missense or truncating mutations that disrupt DNA repair pathways, as observed in genomic profiling of early-onset cases.^[68] Emerging data link CHEK2 germline variants to hematopoietic malignancies, including leukemias and lymphomas, with a 2025 study identifying deleterious variants in 1-2% of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome cohorts.^[69] The p.I157T missense variant, in particular, confers an odds ratio of 6.44 for these malignancies, while p.S428F shows an even higher association (OR 17.16), though overall penetrance remains lower than for solid tumors.^[69] For lung cancer, germline CHEK2 variants are rare (0.3-0.4% prevalence) but may contribute to risk in subsets of non-small cell lung cancer patients, with rare deleterious alleles enriching in adenocarcinoma cases per large genomic datasets.^[70] Associations with thyroid and kidney cancers are suggested but require further validation; thyroid risks show odds ratios below 2 in founder variant studies, while kidney excess has been noted in population-based analyses (P=0.0019).^[3]^[71] Additionally, CHEK2 variants have been associated with increased risks of brain tumors and osteosarcoma, though the evidence is preliminary and the magnitude of risk is not well-defined.^[1] Cancer risks modulated by CHEK2 variant type, with truncating variants generally conferring higher odds ratios (e.g., 2.66 for solid tumors) compared to missense variants (OR <1.5), a pattern observed across prostate, colorectal, and hematopoietic sites in meta-analyses of over 6,000 carriers.^[3] This distinction arises from greater functional impairment in truncating mutations, leading to more profound DNA damage response deficits.^[3]

Screening and management

Individuals carrying pathogenic variants in the CHEK2 gene are recommended to undergo enhanced breast cancer screening to facilitate early detection. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines version 2.2025, female carriers should initiate annual breast MRI screening starting at age 30 years, particularly if lifetime breast cancer risk exceeds 20% based on family history or risk models, with annual mammography beginning at age 40 years or 10 years prior to the youngest family member's diagnosis, whichever is earlier.^[47] Clinical breast examinations are advised annually starting at age 25 years, and breast self-examinations from age 18 years.^[3] For colorectal cancer risk management, while recent NCCN updates (version 2.2025) indicate no overall increased risk associated with CHEK2 variants, carriers with a personal or first-degree family history of colorectal cancer or advanced polyps should consider enhanced surveillance, such as colonoscopy every 5 years starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the earliest family diagnosis.^[72] In the absence of such history, standard population-based colorectal screening is sufficient.^[64] Prophylactic interventions, such as risk-reducing mastectomy, are not routinely recommended for CHEK2 carriers due to the moderate penetrance of associated risks but may be considered on a case-by-case basis for those with high familial risk or lifetime breast cancer risk exceeding 30%, potentially reducing incidence by over 90%.^[3] Decisions should involve multidisciplinary discussion, weighing benefits against surgical risks and impacts on quality of life.^[73] Emerging therapeutic strategies target CHEK2-deficient tumors through synthetic lethality with PARP inhibitors, exploiting impaired DNA repair pathways. Phase II clinical trials conducted in 2024-2025, including evaluations of olaparib in treatment-refractory solid tumors harboring CHEK2 mutations, have demonstrated clinical benefit, with objective response rates in subsets of patients with homologous recombination deficiencies.^[74] Ongoing studies continue to assess PARP inhibitors like niraparib and olaparib combinations for broader application in CHEK2-associated cancers.^[75] Genetic counseling is essential for CHEK2 variant carriers to interpret risks, discuss screening options, and facilitate cascade testing for at-risk relatives aged 18 years and older.^[76] NCCN guidelines emphasize pre- and post-test counseling to address psychosocial implications and personalize management.^[77] Variant reinterpretation protocols, guided by American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria, involve periodic re-evaluation of classifications using updated functional assays and population data, as exemplified by reassessments of missense variants like p.Ser428Phe, which may shift from pathogenic to benign based on new evidence.^[76] Laboratories and clinicians are advised to review variant status every 1-2 years or with significant new data.^[78]

References

[1]
11200 - Gene ResultCHEK2 checkpoint kinase 2 [ (human)] - NCBI
Sep 14, 2025 · CHEK2 is involved in the DNA damage repair response Fanconi anemia (FA)-BRCA pathway. An increased risk for breast and other cancers has been ...
[2]
Entry - *604373 - CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; CHEK2 - (OMIM.ORG)
CHEK2, a protein kinase that is activated in response to DNA damage, is involved in cell cycle arrest.<|separator|>
[3]
CHEK2-Related Cancer Predisposition - GeneReviews - NCBI - NIH
May 29, 2025 · Clinical characteristics. CHEK2-related cancer predisposition is predominantly characterized by an increased risk of female breast cancer.Diagnosis · Clinical Characteristics · Management · Genetic Counseling
[4]
What is CHEK2? | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
when the DNA ...
[5]
Homo sapiens checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2), transcript variant 1, mRNA - Nucleotide - NCBI
- **Number of Exons**: 14
[6]
CHEK2 Is a Multiorgan Cancer Susceptibility Gene - PMC - NIH
A single founder allele of the CHEK2 gene has been associated with predisposition to breast and prostate cancer in North America and Europe.
[7]
CHEK2 Gene - CHK2 Protein - GeneCards
CHEK2 (Checkpoint Kinase 2) is a Protein Coding gene. Diseases associated with CHEK2 include Tumor Predisposition Syndrome 4 and Prostate Cancer.
[8]
A variant in the CHEK2 promoter at a methylation site relieves ...
The −48 G→A variant eliminated a methylation site and thereby relieve the transcriptional repression of CHEK2 . Therefore, this polymorphism affected downstream ...
[9]
Functional and genomic approaches reveal an ancient CHEK2 ...
For the moderate-penetrance breast cancer gene CHEK2 , conservation of gene function from yeast through mammals enabled us to develop an assay for naturally ...
[10]
CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation is associated with an increased risk for ...
Sep 5, 2017 · 1100delC has been observed, with highest reported frequencies in the Netherlands (1.3–1.6%) and in Finland (1.1–1.4%) [7]. The rarity of MBC ...
[11]
VCV000128042.156 - ClinVar - NCBI - NIH
1100del, located in exon 11 of the CHEK2 gene, consists in the deletion of one nucleotide, causing a translational frameshift with a predicted alternate stop ...
[12]
VCV000005591.119 - ClinVar - NCBI - NIH
The effect of CHEK2 variant I157T on cancer susceptibility: evidence from a meta-analysis. DNA Cell Biol. 2013 Jun;32(6):329-35. PMID: 23713947. Li J et al ...
[13]
Functional Analysis Identifies Damaging CHEK2 Missense Variants ...
We identified 18 CHEK2 VUS that exhibit major effects on CHK2 protein stability, thereby hampering CHK2 kinase function.
[14]
NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.433C>T (p.Arg145Trp) - NCBI
The CHEK2 c.433C>T (p.R145W) variant has been reported in heterozygosity in at least 6 individuals with various types of cancer, including breast, colon ...
[15]
Genetic and functional analysis of CHEK2 (CHK2) variants in ... - NIH
The CHEK2-1100delC mutation is recurrent in the population and is a moderate risk factor for breast cancer. To identify additional CHEK2 mutations ...
[16]
The heterogeneous cancer phenotype of individuals with biallelic ...
Our study suggests that CHEK2 biallelic gPVs likely increase the susceptibility to develop multiple malignancies in various tissues, both in females and males.Missing: embryonic lethality
[17]
Two unrelated cases with biallelic CHEK2 variants:a novel condition ...
We hypothesize that, at least some biallelic CHEK2 mutations might be associated with a novel disorder, further expanding the group of chromosome instability ...
[18]
Double CHEK2 Pathogenic and Low-Risk Variants and Associated ...
Jan 2, 2025 · In this cohort study, individuals with 2 LR variants in CHEK2 had a cancer phenotype similar to those with a single LR variant and similar to WT controls.
[19]
Comprehensive analysis of the functional impact of single ...
Loss of function mutations in the checkpoint kinase gene CHEK2 are associated with increased risk of breast and other cancers. Most of the 3,188 unique ...
[20]
Functional Analysis Identifies Damaging CHEK2 Missense Variants ...
Our results suggest that the damaging effect of CHEK2 variants is a consequence of protein instability, impaired kinase activation, or perhaps reduced ATP ...
[21]
List of variants in gene CHEK2 reported as pathogenic by OMIM
List of variants in gene CHEK2 reported as pathogenic by OMIM. Minimum ... ClinVar version: 2025-06-30. Total variants: 12. Download table as spreadsheet ...
[22]
Comprehensive analysis of the functional impact of single ... - PubMed
Aug 15, 2024 · Loss of function mutations in the checkpoint kinase gene CHEK2 are associated with increased risk of breast and other cancers.
[23]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.007
[24]
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.190030497
[25]
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M303795200
[26]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19176998/
[27]
Mdm2 and PCAF increase Chk2 ubiquitination and degradation ...
Feb 1, 2009 · Ubiquitination of wild-type Chk2 is increased by co-expression of Mdm2, and increasing amounts of Mdm2 enhance degradation of both wild-type and ...
[28]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4296918/
[29]
CHK2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond - PMC - NIH
Another mechanism involves the phosphorylation of p53 by ATM and CHK2, which stabilizes and activates p53 (Chehab et al., 2000; Hirao et al., 2000).
[30]
Chk2 Phosphorylation of BRCA1 Regulates DNA Double-Strand ...
In response to DNA damage, the BRCA1 protein becomes rapidly hyperphosphorylated at multiple sites by several kinases including ATM (1, 27) and Chk2 (hCds1) (30) ...
[31]
Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G 1 by ...
In response to DNA damage, Chk2/hCds1 stabilizes the p53 tumor suppressor protein leading to cell cycle arrest in G 1.
[32]
The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2 ...
The human homolog of Cds1 (CHK2/hCds1) has been isolated (Matsuoka et al. ... 1998), and this may change Cdc25 activity (Furnari et al. 1999) or cellular ...
[33]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.027
[34]
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg0898
[35]
Dissecting the genetics of ovarian ageing | Nature Reviews Genetics
Aug 26, 2021 · In the human GWAS, loss-of-function alleles of CHEK2 were associated with later ANM. Consistent with this finding, aged Chek2–/– female mice ...Original Article · Author Information · Authors And Affiliations<|separator|>
[36]
Structural and functional versatility of the FHA domain in ... - PubMed
The Chk2 FHA domain is important for checkpoint activation, mediates ATM-dependent phosphorylation, and targets Chk2 to BRCA1 via two mechanisms. Both phospho- ...Missing: architecture | Show results with:architecture
[37]
Structural and Functional Versatility of the FHA Domain in DNA ...
We show that the Chk2 FHA domain mediates ATM-dependent Chk2 phosphorylation and targeting of Chk2 to in vivo binding partners such as BRCA1.
[38]
Chk2‐deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53 ...
These results indicate that Chk2 is not required for phosphorylation of Ser20 of p53 ... Chk2 appears to be essential for IR‐induced apoptosis mediated by p53.<|control11|><|separator|>
[39]
MDC1 is coupled to activated CHK2 in mammalian DNA ... - PubMed
MDC1 localizes to sites of DNA breaks and associates with CHK2 after DNA damage. This association is mediated by the MDC1 FHA domain and the phosphorylated Thr ...
[40]
Distinct versus overlapping functions of MDC1 and 53BP1 in DNA ...
We additionally show that MDC1 regulates 53BP1 foci formation and phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. ... Chk2 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage.
[41]
Prevalence and functional analysis of sequence variants in the ATR ...
... CHEK2, PALB2, and BACH1/BRIP DNA damage response genes are associated with ... interaction with CLSPN namely ATR and ATRIP. We previously reported the ...
[42]
A protein interaction landscape of breast cancer - Science
Oct 1, 2021 · Kim et al. focus on breast cancer and identify two proteins functionally connected to the tumor-suppressor gene BRCA1 and two proteins that regulate PIK3CA.
[43]
Prevalence and Functional Analysis of Sequence Variants in the ...
We previously reported the absence of mutations within CHK1, which encodes a CLSPN-interacting protein, within this same panel of cell lines (6). Here, a single ...
[44]
CHK2 kinase in the DNA damage response and beyond
Nov 17, 2014 · In this review, we discuss the activity of CHK2 in response to DNA damage and in the maintenance of the biological functions in unstressed cells.
[45]
The Cross Talk Between p53 and mTOR Pathways in Response to ...
In response to stress signals, such as DNA damage, certain kinases, such as ATM and CHK2, are activated to phosphorylate p53 and abolish the interaction between ...
[46]
Fanconi Anemia Pathway: Mechanisms of Breast Cancer ...
Apr 2, 2020 · The Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway, involving 22 identified genes, plays a central role in repairing DNA interstrand cross-links.
[47]
Immunomodulatory attributes of CHEK2 in solid tumors - NIH
Jun 10, 2025 · Figure 1 summarizes three known mechanisms by which inhibition of CHEK2 in tumor cells promotes an immune response. Taken together, CHEK2 ...Missing: unstressed intra-
[48]
Checkpoint kinase 1/2 inhibition potentiates anti-tumoral immune ...
Mar 22, 2023 · These results suggested that Chek2 depletion/inhibition in tumor cells activates STING pathway and upregulates PD-L1 expression therefore, we ...Results · Chek2 Depletion Sensitizes... · In Vivo Kinome Ko Crispr...
[49]
Targeting SOD1 induces synthetic lethal killing in BLM- and CHEK2
Sep 29, 2015 · Thus, uncovering synthetic lethal interactors of BLM and CHEK2 will identify novel candidate drug targets and lead chemical compounds.
[50]
Targeting SOD1 induces synthetic lethal killing in BLM- and CHEK2 ...
BLM and CHEK2 are two evolutionarily conserved genes that are somatically altered in a number of tumor types. Both proteins normally function in preserving ...Missing: dysregulation | Show results with:dysregulation
[51]
Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate - Guidelines Detail - NCCN
Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate. Guidelines. NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2026. - Additional Genetic Mutations.
[52]
Rare Germ Line CHEK2 Variants Identified in Breast Cancer ...
Sep 18, 2006 · The low expression of the R145W mutant has been shown to be due to the instability of the encoded protein (16). We therefore investigated if the ...
[53]
Pathogenic Variants in CHEK2 Are Associated With an Adverse ...
May 4, 2020 · This work highlights the adverse prognosis associated with breast cancer in carriers of CHEK2 pathogenic variants.
[54]
The role of polygenic risk and susceptibility genes in breast cancer ...
Dec 14, 2020 · Women with CHEK2 and an average PRS had a lifetime risk of 29.3% (95% CI 26.8–31.8%) which doubled to 59.2% (52.1–66.3%) in women with a high ...
[55]
Synergistic interaction of variants in CHEK2 and BRCA2 on breast ...
These data suggest that the BRCA2 T1915M polymorphism alone might be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, but among CHEK2 mutation carriers, it may ...
[56]
Genomic ascertainment of CHEK2-related cancer predisposition
Aug 8, 2024 · This investigation quantified the prevalence, penetrance, cancer phenotype and survival in CHEK2 heterozygotes.Missing: EP300 | Show results with:EP300
[57]
Protein-truncating and rare missense variants in ATM and CHEK2 ...
Oct 23, 2024 · PTVs in ATM and CHEK2 are associated with a wide range of cancers, with the highest RR for pancreatic cancer in ATM PTV carriers.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
[58]
Rare, protein-truncating variants in ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2, but not ...
Truncating variants in CHEK2 were associated with a higher relative risk for ER-positive (OR=3.42; 95% CI 2.33 to 5.21; table 2), and lower, non-significant ...Missing: estrogen | Show results with:estrogen
[59]
CHEK2 variants, breast cancer, and implications for management
Apr 10, 2025 · The cumulative risk in women with a family history of BC was 37% at 70 years (58). In a later meta-analysis of 25 case-control studies (29,154 ...Missing: exposure | Show results with:exposure
[60]
Rare protein truncating and missense variants in ATM, CHEK2 ...
Jul 15, 2016 · CHEK2 truncating alleles were more strongly associated with risk of estrogen receptor (ER) positive disease than ER negative or triple negative ...
[61]
Genetic modifiers of CHEK2*1100delC-associated breast cancer risk
Oct 6, 2016 · CHEK2*1100delC is a founder variant in European populations that confers a two- to threefold increased risk of breast cancer (BC).
[62]
Germline CHEK2 mutations in Jewish Ashkenazi women at high risk ...
The rate of the CHEK2*1100delC variant in the Ashkenazi Jewish population was reported to be 0.3%. Objectives: To evaluate whether CHEK2 germline mutations ...
[63]
Frequency of the CHEK2 1100delC Mutation among Women with ...
Apr 1, 2008 · In the initial CHEK2 study, the 1100delC variant was found in 5.1% of individuals with familial breast cancer (but with no BRCA1 or BRCA2 ...
[64]
Study: CHEK2 Mutations and Breast Cancer Treatment Resistance
Jul 5, 2023 · The CHEK2 gene helps repair DNA damage in cells by making a protein called CHK2. When it works properly, the CHEK2 gene can help suppress the ...
[65]
Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk Among Carriers of Germline ...
Jan 9, 2023 · Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 are detected in 5%-7% of women with breast cancer in the general ...
[66]
Breast Cancer Risk Modification in Women with Pathogenic Variants ...
May 12, 2025 · We characterized breast cancer risk associated with established risk factors among WHI participants who carry PVs in BRCA1/2, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2.
[67]
Breast Cancer Risk Modification in Women with Pathogenic Variants ...
May 12, 2025 · In exploratory analyses, we grouped genes by established predisposition for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ATM and CHEK2) or ER-negative ( ...
[68]
Common variants at the CHEK2 gene locus and risk of epithelial ...
Functional annotation identified 25 candidate SNPs that alter transcription factor binding sites within regulatory elements active in EOC precursor tissues. In ...
[69]
Rates of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with ...
CHEK2 mutations are associated with increased risk of breast, colon, and prostate cancer but not ovarian cancer. Our study investigated if women with CHEK2 ...
[70]
CHEK2-Associated Cancer Risk and Screening Recommendation ...
Aug 19, 2024 · NCCN recommended that carriers of a CHEK2 pathogenic variant begin colonoscopy screening earlier than typically recommended, at age 40, and ...Missing: predisposition | Show results with:predisposition<|separator|>
[71]
Genomic Landscapes of Early-Onset Versus Average-Onset ... - MDPI
We assessed the somatic and germline mutational profiles of patients with early-onset and average-onset colorectal cancer (aoCRC, diagnosed at age ≥ 50 years).
[72]
Predisposition to hematopoietic malignancies by deleterious ...
May 7, 2025 · Deleterious germline CHEK2 variants are considered moderate penetrance risk alleles for breast [7,8,9,10] and prostate [7, 11] cancers, and ...
[73]
Genomic Profiles of Pathogenic and Moderate-Penetrance Germline ...
Jun 12, 2025 · Rare variants of large effect in BRCA2 and CHEK2 affect risk of lung cancer. Nat Genet. 2014; 46:736-741. Crossref · Scopus (332) · PubMed.
[74]
CHEK2 | Hereditary Cancer Syndromes
Males with a CHEK2 P/LP variant have an increased risk for prostate cancer, but true lifetime risks are unknown. There may also be an increased risk for kidney ...What You Should Know About... · Managing Cancer Risks · Breast CancerMissing: lung hematopoietic 2024
[75]
Colorectal Cancer Screening - Guidelines Detail - NCCN
Colorectal Cancer Screening. Guidelines. NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2025. - Colorectal Cancer Screening ...Missing: CHEK2 | Show results with:CHEK2
[76]
Cancer Risks in People with a CHEK2 Mutation
Jul 11, 2025 · People with an inherited mutation in the CHEK2 gene have an increased risk for certain types of cancer. Read more about these cancer risks.<|control11|><|separator|>
[77]
Cancer Risk Management for People with a CHEK2 Mutation
Experts at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) created guidelines for people with a CHEK2 mutation to manage their cancer risk.Breast cancer · Prostate cancerMissing: germline predisposition
[78]
Efficacy and safety of olaparib in patients with tumors harboring ...
May 29, 2024 · Olaparib has clinical benefit in patients with progressive, treatment-refractory tumors harboring mutations in ATM, CDK12, CHEK2 or RAD51B.
[79]
Phase II Trial of the PARP Inhibitor, Niraparib, in BAP1 and Other ...
Dec 3, 2024 · This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1.
[80]
[PDF] NCCN Guidelines for Patients: Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast ...
RRSO is recommended for those with germline cancer-causing variants ... NCCN Guidelines for Patients®. Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancers, 2025. Words to know.
[81]
Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 ...
Sep 9, 2020 · CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants ...