Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

CURV

The Cable-Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle (CURV) is a family of remotely operated underwater vehicles developed by the in the early 1960s for recovering test ordnance, such as torpedoes, from ocean depths. Initially designed by the Naval Ordnance Test Station in , the CURV series pioneered unmanned submersible technology, featuring a tubular aluminum frame equipped with propulsion motors, television cameras, lights, and hydraulic claws for manipulation. The vehicles are tethered to surface support ships via electro-optical cables, allowing real-time control and video feedback by operators. The CURV lineage began with CURV I in the early 1960s, capable of operating to depths of 2,000 feet (610 meters), followed by CURV II at 2,500 feet (760 meters), and CURV III, completed in , which reached 7,000 feet (2,100 meters) for standard operations and up to 10,000 feet (3,000 meters) for rescue missions. Later variants, including CURV IIIB (lost in 1970), CURV IIIC (introduced 1971), and the modern CURV 21 (capable of 20,000 feet or 6,100 meters), incorporated enhancements like improved systems, integration, and rescue tools. These vehicles weigh approximately one ton and measure about 4 feet (1.2 meters) high, 4 feet wide, and 11 feet (3.4 meters) long, supported by a small on surface vessels. CURV systems gained prominence through high-profile missions, including CURV I's recovery of a lost U.S. hydrogen bomb from 2,850 feet (870 meters) in the in April 1966, marking one of the first uses of remote underwater robotics for sensitive operations. In 1973, CURV IIIC achieved the deepest underwater rescue in history by saving two trapped submariners from the Pisces III submersible at 1,575 feet (480 meters) off Ireland's coast after 76 hours, using a hydraulic claw to attach a recovery line. Additional notable uses include the wreck of the in in 1976. The CURV series laid foundational work for modern remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) in naval, scientific, and commercial applications.

Development

Origins of the CURV program

The origins of the CURV program trace back to the early , when the U.S. Navy sought innovative solutions to recover test , such as torpedoes, lost during weapons trials in the off . These recoveries were essential for analyzing electronic test data and reusing expensive equipment, but traditional diving methods were limited by depth and safety concerns, with losses occurring at depths up to 2,000 feet. To address this need, the Pasadena Annex of the Naval Test Station (NOTS)—a facility focused on underwater —initiated the for a cable-controlled, capable of precise manipulation on the seafloor. The program built upon prior experimental efforts, including the XN-3, a maneuverable camera system developed by VARE Industries of under a contract and delivered to the Pasadena in 1961. This observation vehicle served as a foundational , demonstrating the feasibility of cable-tethered for tasks. By 1963, engineers at the had refined the design into the first operational model, CURV-I (Cable-Controlled Recovery Vehicle), incorporating propulsion thrusters, for navigation, television cameras for real-time viewing, and mechanical arms for grasping objects. The vehicle was tethered to a surface ship via a 2,700-foot electro-optical , allowing operators to direct movements and monitor operations remotely. CURV-I became operational around February 1965, marking the Navy's first successful deployment of a work-class (ROV) for practical missions. Initially rated for depths of 2,000 feet and capable of lifting up to 200 pounds, it quickly proved its value by retrieving multiple items, justifying the program's expansion. The development was overseen by the Naval Test Station, with subsequent iterations like CURV-II emerging to enhance reliability and depth capabilities, laying the groundwork for CURV's role in broader deep-sea operations. This pioneering effort not only solved immediate ordnance challenges but also established remote as a of naval underwater technology.

CURV-I

The Cable-Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle (CURV-I) was the inaugural model in the U.S. Navy's CURV program, developed in the early by engineers at the Naval Test Station (NOTS) Pasadena Annex in to address the challenge of recovering test , such as torpedoes, lost during offshore exercises near . Initial prototyping began around 1961, with the vehicle achieving operational status by 1965 after iterative testing that validated the concept of a tethered, remotely operated underwater system capable of precise manipulation at depth. The design, patented in 1968 by lead engineer Jack L. Sayer Jr. (U.S. Patent 3,367,299), emphasized modularity and air-transportability, allowing rapid deployment from support vessels like the tug YTM-759. By mid-1965, CURV-I had successfully recovered over 50 test items, demonstrating its reliability in real-world conditions and paving the way for program expansion. Structurally, CURV-I featured a robust aluminum frame measuring approximately 11 feet long, 4 feet wide, and 4 feet high, with a total weight of about 2,000 pounds, including four ballast tanks for buoyancy control and stability. was provided by three 10-horsepower electric thrusters, enabling a maximum speed of 4 knots and maneuverability in currents up to 2 knots, while an electro-optical —initially 2,000 feet long, later extendable to 3,100 feet—supplied 50 kW of three-phase AC power and transmitted control signals along with video feedback. Key innovations included a hydraulic manipulator with a rated for 1-ton loads, allowing attachment to irregular objects, and integrated sensors such as a television camera for real-time observation, a still camera for documentation, mercury vapor lights for illumination, a Straza 500 for obstacle avoidance, an , depthometer, and fluxgate for . Rated for operations to 2,000 feet, CURV-I proved capable of exceeding this limit in practice, establishing it as the first viable work-class remotely operated vehicle (ROV) and influencing subsequent underwater technologies. Operated by a five-person via a shipboard console, CURV-I prioritized by enabling human oversight without exposure, a critical advancement for hazardous deep-sea tasks. Its development under NOTS—now part of the —highlighted early integration of commercial components, such as off-the-shelf cameras and hydraulics, to accelerate prototyping within budget constraints of under $500,000. While initial depth capabilities started at 1,000 feet, upgrades by 1965 extended performance to 2,000 feet, with further modifications for specific missions pushing boundaries to 2,800 feet, underscoring the vehicle's adaptability and role in proving the feasibility of untethered manipulator systems in undersea environments.

CURV-II and CURV-III

Following the success and operational wear of CURV-I, the U.S. Navy's Naval Undersea Research and Development Center (NURDC, now part of SSC Pacific) initiated development of CURV-II in the mid-1960s as a direct replacement, retaining core design elements like the cable-controlled tether and manipulator arm while incorporating reliability enhancements for routine torpedo recovery missions. Operational by 1967, CURV-II achieved a maximum depth of 2,500 feet, with a weight of approximately 3,450 pounds for the initial IIA variant, dimensions of 15 feet by 6 feet by 6 feet, and propulsion via three 10-horsepower thrusters powered through a 440 VAC tether. It featured dual television cameras, a still camera, sonar, and a single manipulator for object handling, enabling speeds up to 4 knots in shallow-water recovery tasks off San Clemente Island. Two units were constructed and assigned to naval centers in Panama City and San Diego, with later variants like CURV-IIB (1968, ~7,000 pounds) and CURV-IIC (1980, 6,000-foot depth, added 16 mm movie camera) providing incremental upgrades in weight distribution and instrumentation for broader testing applications. To address limitations in depth and mission versatility exposed by CURV-II's shallower operations, NURDC began CURV-III development in the late 1960s, targeting 7,000 feet for standard use and up to 10,000 feet for emergency rescues, marking a shift toward more robust deep-sea capabilities. Completed in early 1969, the initial CURV-IIIA weighed 4,000 pounds, measured 15 feet by 6.5 feet by 6.5 feet, and utilized a tubular aluminum frame with syntactic foam buoyancy, powered similarly via tether with enhanced thrusters and sensors including television, sonar, and manipulators for precise object recovery. Early testing revealed issues, such as a buoyancy implosion at 6,500 feet, prompting redesigns that resulted in CURV-IIIB (1971) with improved frame, buoyancy modules, and electrical connectors for greater structural integrity. A unit was lost in October 1970 due to cable severance, leading to the CURV-IIIC variant, which integrated specialized rescue tools like cutting devices and lifting capabilities while maintaining the 7,000-foot operational depth. Compared to CURV-II's focus on 2,500-foot torpedo retrieval with heavier builds in later models, CURV-III emphasized lighter construction (4,000 pounds versus up to 7,000 pounds), deeper penetration (7,000+ feet versus 2,500-6,000 feet), and expanded roles in salvage and human rescue, evolving the platform from basic to a versatile work-class remotely operated vehicle. These advancements were driven by naval requirements for reliable deep-water interventions, with CURV-III's allowing post-1980s upgrades to 20,000 feet using remote unmanned work systems (RUWS) and autonomous tow vehicles (ATV) for missions like debris .

Design and capabilities

Physical structure and propulsion

The CURV (Cable-controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle) series featured a robust, open-frame design optimized for underwater maneuverability and payload integration, evolving across versions to support deeper operations. The initial CURV-I, developed in the early , utilized a tubular aluminum frame approximately 4 feet high, 4 feet wide, and 11 feet long, weighing about 1 ton in air, with four ballast tanks mounted symmetrically for . This structure supported essential components such as units, a television camera, lights, and a recovery claw, while maintaining through elements in later iterations. Subsequent models, particularly CURV-III introduced in the late , enlarged the to 6 feet wide, 4 feet high, and 11 feet long (excluding brackets and bumpers), constructed from welded 6061 aluminum structural shapes for corrosion resistance and strength at depth. The overall vehicle dimensions reached 6.5 feet by 6.5 feet by 15 feet, with a total weight of approximately 4,500 pounds, balanced by 50 slabs of 3H Co. providing 4,500 pounds of rated to 4,500 hydrostatic and a crush depth of 11,000 feet. Water absorption in the foam averaged 2.1%, ensuring reliable flotation during extended missions. This modular aluminum chassis allowed attachment of sensors, manipulators, and tools without compromising hydrodynamic efficiency. Propulsion in the CURV series relied on electrohydraulic thrusters powered via a tethered umbilical cable from the surface ship, enabling precise teleoperated control. CURV-I employed three variable-speed, reversible DC motors: two for horizontal propulsion and steering via fixed-pitch propellers, and one vertical thruster for depth adjustment, achieving speeds up to several knots in forward motion. These units drew power through a thick umbilical cord that also transmitted control signals and video feedback, pioneering undersea teleoperation concepts. CURV-III advanced this system with three 3-phase, 440 VAC, 10-horsepower oil-filled, pressure-equalized , each driving fixed-pitch screws to deliver maximum thrusts of 400 pounds forward and 250 pounds reverse. Horizontal propulsion combined the thrusters for speeds estimated at 4 knots, while the vertical handled ascent and descent; thrust output was modulated by varying surface-supplied voltage for fine control. The 10,000-foot umbilical, 1.5 inches in outer diameter and weighing 1.25 pounds per foot in air (0.6 pounds per foot in water), incorporated pressure-balanced, oil-immersed conductors in flexible to withstand deep-sea pressures without signal degradation. This cable-integrated power delivery supported operations to 20,000 feet after upgrades, emphasizing reliability in recovery tasks.

Sensors, tools, and operational limits

The Cable-controlled (CURV) series featured progressively advanced suites to enable precise and in low-visibility underwater environments. CURV-I was equipped with a high-resolution system for locating lost , a transistorized camera for real-time visual feedback, and a deep-sea documentation camera with strobe lighting for photographic records. CURV-II incorporated a Straza 500 active-passive for ranging and imaging, an acoustic and depthometer for height and pressure monitoring, a magnetic for orientation, two Hydroproducts cameras mounted with adjustable lighting, and an 35-mm still camera with electronic strobe for high-resolution documentation. CURV-III advanced these capabilities with a comprehensive array, including a CTFM active operating at 78-82 kHz with selectable ranges up to 800 yards, a 45 kHz passive for , a 100 kHz with ranges to and ±0.5-foot accuracy, a pinger locator at 36.5-37.2 kHz, and a gimballed flux-gate ; it also retained dual Hydro Products solid-state vidicon cameras (54° field of view) and an 35-mm color documentary camera with a 200-watt-second strobe firing every 8 seconds, supported by four 250-watt iodide floodlights and two 100-watt mercury vapor spotlights. Tools and manipulators on the CURV vehicles were designed primarily for recovery tasks, emphasizing grasping and lifting in constrained deep-sea conditions. The original CURV-I included a hydraulically operated , paired with a deployable and line for surfacing payloads. CURV-II focused on similar functions but lacked detailed manipulator specifications beyond its open-frame supporting for torpedo retrieval. CURV-III featured a sophisticated hydraulic five-function manipulator arm with up-down and rotational joints, wrist rotation, and a for precise handling; it supported interchangeable tools such as a 13-inch , , , 54-inch , a marine organism collection basket, and a Pyronol cutting torch for severing cables or debris. Operational limits of the CURV series reflected their evolution from shallow to deeper-water salvage roles, constrained by technology and materials. CURV-I operated to a depth of 1,000 feet initially, upgraded to 2,000 feet, with a submerged speed of approximately 2 knots. CURV-II extended this to 2,500 feet, achieving a maximum submerged speed of 3 knots, with a vehicle weight of 3,000 pounds in air and 25 pounds of positive for ; its was limited only by surface . CURV-III achieved a normal operating depth of 7,000 feet (emergency to 10,000 feet, crush depth 11,000 feet), a maximum speed of 4 knots, direct-lift up to 200 pounds, assisted lift to 2,000 pounds, and over 10,000 pounds with a separate surface line; unlimited submerged was possible due to surface-powered electro-hydraulic systems, though operations were restricted to sea states permitting stable deployment from vessels.

Operational history

1966 hydrogen bomb recovery

On January 17, 1966, a U.S. B-52G Stratofortress collided mid-air with a KC-135 Stratotanker during a refueling operation approximately seven miles off the coast of , in the . The collision resulted in the deaths of all four crew members aboard the tanker and three of the seven on the ; four bombs (B28FI thermonuclear weapons) were released from the B-52. While three bombs were recovered on land near Palomares, the fourth, weighing about 1,800 pounds, parachuted into the sea and sank to a depth of approximately 2,550 to 2,800 feet on a steep underwater slope. The U.S. Navy launched an extensive search operation under Task Force 68 (later redesignated Task Force 65), commanded by William S. Guest, involving over 3,000 personnel, 33 ships, and various submersibles. The search area spanned about 500 square miles, complicated by strong currents, poor visibility, and the bomb's uncertain location due to its parachute deployment. In late February 1966, the research submersible (operated by ) located the bomb at around 2,850 feet but lacked the capability to attach recovery lines or lift it. Statistical methods, including applied by ocean engineer , helped narrow the search grid. An earlier recovery attempt in March using the salvage ship failed when a mooring line broke due to heavy swells, severely injuring Navy diver , who later had his leg amputated. With manned options exhausted, the Navy turned to the experimental Cable-Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle (CURV-I), developed by the Naval Undersea Research and Development Center. CURV-I, capable of operating to 2,900 feet, was rapidly modified with enhanced television cameras, sonar, and manipulator arms before being transported from San Diego to the recovery site aboard the submarine rescue ship USS Petrel (ASR-14). On April 2, 1966, CURV-I relocated the bomb on a ledge at about 2,800 feet. Over the next several days, operators—guided by real-time video feeds—maneuvered the vehicle to attach two grapnel hooks to the bomb's parachute risers. A lift attempt on April 6 partially succeeded but snagged on the underwater terrain. The successful recovery occurred on April 7, 1966, after 80 days of searching. CURV-I's propellers inadvertently entangled in the 's shroud lines during a , securing it firmly; the vehicle then guided the assembly upslope to a plateau at around 400 feet, where divers in diving bells inspected it for damage. The intact —unarmed and with no evidence of radioactive leakage—was hoisted aboard USS Petrel using CURV-I's cable system, later transferred to the salvage ship for display to the press before being shipped to the for disassembly and analysis at . This operation marked the first deep-sea recovery of a and validated CURV's potential for high-stakes underwater missions.

1973 Pisces III rescue

On August 29, 1973, the Canadian-built submersible Pisces III sank to a depth of 1,575 feet (480 meters) off the coast of , , trapping its two crew members, saturation divers and , for over three days. The incident occurred during a routine recovery operation when flooding in the aft sphere caused the vessel to plummet rapidly, striking the at approximately 40 miles per hour just 12 minutes after the emergency. Initial contact with the surface at 09:45 confirmed the crew's survival and estimated 66 hours of oxygen remaining, but the cramped, cold conditions—exacerbated by a failed heater and limited power—posed severe risks as levels rose. Rescue efforts began immediately, mobilizing support vessels and submersibles from , the Pisces III's operator. Attempts on August 31 using sister submersibles and failed due to mechanical issues, including tangled lines and inability to secure a stable connection in the poor visibility and strong currents at depth. With oxygen dwindling, the U.S. Navy was urgently requested for assistance, deploying CURV-III—a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) designed by the Naval Undersea Center in for deep-sea recovery missions—from 6,000 miles away. The CURV-III, capable of operating to 7,000 feet (with emergency extensions to 10,000 feet), arrived on September 1 under the command of principal pilot Larry Brady and his team. At 04:02 on September 1, Pisces II finally attached an initial tow line to III, but the connection proved unstable, necessitating additional support. CURV-III was then deployed and, after overcoming an initial , successfully maneuvered through the challenging underwater environment to secure a second, stabilizing tow cable at 09:40. This dual-line setup enabled the lift to commence at 10:50, with the surfacing by 13:17 after divers assisted in the final stages. The crew had been trapped for 76 hours, with only about 12 minutes of oxygen left, marking the operation as the deepest successful underwater rescue in history at that time. The mission highlighted CURV-III's precision in remote manipulation, using its onboard tools to latch the cable despite visibility limited to mere feet.

1976 Edmund Fitzgerald survey

In May 1976, the U.S. Coast Guard, in coordination with the U.S. Navy, deployed the CURV-III submersible to survey the wreck of the SS Edmund Fitzgerald, which had sunk in Lake Superior on November 10, 1975, during a severe storm, resulting in the loss of all 29 crew members. The survey, operated from the Coast Guard cutter Woodrush, aimed to document the wreck's condition and configuration as part of the ongoing marine casualty investigation. Over the period from May 20 to 28, CURV-III completed 12 dives, accumulating 56 hours and 5 minutes of bottom time at depths around 530 feet. The submersible's operations captured extensive visual data, including 43,000 feet of videotape and approximately 900 still photographs, providing the first detailed images of the site located at coordinates 46°59.91'N, 85°06.6'W, about 17 miles northwest of , , on the Canadian side of the lake. On , CURV-III confirmed the wreck's identity by clearly imaging the name "Edmund Fitzgerald" on the inverted section. The survey revealed the vessel had broken into two primary sections: an upright bow approximately 276 feet long, buried in mud up to its 28-foot draft mark, and an inverted , separated by a missing midships portion of about 200 feet; the site was heavily obscured by sediment, with the wreckage showing extensive topside damage, fractured hatch coamings, and several missing hatch covers (notably Nos. 2, 5, 7, and 8). These findings, which highlighted structural failures likely exacerbated by the storm, were instrumental in the U.S. Coast Guard's 1977 Marine Casualty Report, influencing conclusions about the sinking's probable causes, such as flooding from hatch issues and hull stress. The CURV-III's deployment marked one of its early post-military applications in a civilian maritime investigation, demonstrating the vehicle's utility for deep-water wreckage assessment in freshwater environments.

Post-1976 missions

Following the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster in 1986, CURV-III was transferred from the U.S. Navy's Naval Ocean Systems Center to the Supervisor of Salvage (SUPSALV) to bolster deep-water recovery capabilities for large-scale salvage operations. The vehicle underwent a major redesign by Eastport International, integrating advanced technologies from the Remote Unmanned Work System (RUWS) and Advanced Tethered Vehicle (ATV) programs, which extended its maximum operating depth from 10,000 feet to 20,000 feet and improved its power system to an 80-horsepower electric-hydraulic setup with fiber-optic telemetry supporting 60 Mbps data rates and four video channels. In SUPSALV service, CURV-III became a primary tool for deep-ocean search and , conducting numerous operations focused on retrieving critical from incidents. It played a key role in recovering countless flight data recorders and cockpit recorders (commonly known as black boxes) from sunken , enabling accident investigations across global waters. The vehicle also supported classified missions, including the salvage of sensitive equipment from downed and nuclear ordnance, though specific details remain restricted due to concerns. One landmark post-upgrade operation occurred in 1990 off the coast of , where CURV-III achieved a record dive to 20,106 feet (approximately 6,122 meters), the deepest for any U.S. Navy recovery vehicle at the time and surpassing the 6,000-meter threshold for the first time. This mission validated the upgraded system's performance in high-pressure, deep-sea conditions and involved recovery tasks that highlighted its enhanced manipulation tools for object retrieval. CURV-III remained operational under SUPSALV through the 1990s and into the 2000s, contributing to routine and emergency salvage efforts worldwide, such as rigging large objects for lift and direct recovery of items up to 2,000 pounds with assistance. Its versatility in these roles solidified its status as a foundational work-class ROV until decommissioning, after which it was preserved at the in 2012.

Successors and legacy

CURV-21

The CURV-21, or Cable-Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle 21, is a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) developed by the to succeed the CURV-III and address modern deep ocean salvage needs with enhanced technologies and a reduced footprint. Weighing 6,400 pounds, it is designed for operations down to a maximum depth of 20,000 feet of seawater, enabling precise recovery tasks in extreme environments. Unlike its predecessors, the CURV-21 emphasizes flyaway transportability, allowing rapid deployment from USNS T-ATF-class salvage ships or vessels of opportunity for global missions. The vehicle's physical structure features a compact aluminum measuring 8 feet in , 5 feet in width, and 7 feet in , powered by 45 horsepower thrusters that enable forward speeds of up to 2.5 knots. is managed through , with automated controls for maintaining depth, altitude, and heading to ensure stability during complex maneuvers. Its fiber-optic umbilical, which supports eight channels for video, , and data transmission over a 400 MHz , allows from surface vessels. Key capabilities include a 240-pound capacity and a 4,000-pound lift via its frame and umbilical, supporting customized tool packages for specialized tasks. Sensory systems comprise continuous transmission frequency modulated (CTFM) for obstacle avoidance and , alongside high-resolution digital still cameras, black-and-white, and cameras for detailed imaging. Two seven-function hydraulic manipulators provide dexterity for handling objects, while the system can switch seamlessly between survey modes and full ROV operations.
General CharacteristicsSpecification
Length8 feet
Width5 feet
Height7 feet
Weight6,400 pounds
Maximum Depth20,000 feet
Speed2.5 knots
Power45 Hp
240 pounds
Lift Capacity4,000 pounds
In operational history, the CURV-21 has demonstrated its effectiveness in international and domestic salvage efforts. In December 2017, it was deployed aboard the R/V Atlantis to aid the search for the lost Argentine submarine ARA San Juan near the Argentine coast, where depths exceeded 3,000 meters; the ROV's CTFM and cameras were used to scan the seafloor for wreckage at the continental shelf's edge following an onboard explosion detected in November. This mission highlighted the vehicle's role in multinational humanitarian operations, though the submarine's location was ultimately confirmed in 2018 by other assets. A landmark achievement occurred in March 2021, when the CURV-21, integrated with the Navy's Fly Away Deep Ocean Salvage System, recovered the fuselage of a crashed MH-60S Seahawk helicopter from a record depth of 19,075 feet—approximately 3.6 miles—in the near Okinawa, . Operating from a contracted salvage vessel after mobilization in , the ROV attached lift bags and guided the recovery, surpassing the previous deep-salvage record by 266 feet in collaboration with Phoenix International Holdings and the Navy's Supervisor of Salvage and Diving (SUPSALV). This operation underscored the CURV-21's reliability in recovering high-value assets under extreme pressure and low visibility, advancing the Navy's capabilities in abyssopelagic recovery. In June 2023, the CURV-21 was deployed with the Navy's Flyaway Deep Ocean Salvage System to assist in the international search for the missing Titan submersible near the Titanic wreck site in the North Atlantic Ocean, at depths of about 12,500 feet (3,800 meters). Although the submersible had imploded before full recovery operations, the ROV supported seafloor surveys and highlighted its role in deep-water incident response.

Technological influence

The development of the Cable-Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle (CURV) in the early 1960s marked a pivotal advancement in underwater robotics, establishing it as the first operational remotely operated vehicle (ROV). Created by the U.S. Navy's Naval Ordnance Test Station in , CURV introduced the concept of tethered, unmanned submersibles capable of performing recovery tasks in hazardous deep-sea environments, thereby reducing risks to human divers. This innovation shifted underwater operations from manned submersibles to remote , demonstrating feasibility in real-world scenarios such as ordnance retrieval at depths up to 600 meters. CURV's technological contributions included integrated sensor systems for video feedback via television cameras, allowing operators on support ships to maneuver the vehicle using umbilical cables for power and control. It featured propulsion thrusters for precise positioning, manipulator arms for object handling, and buoyancy modules to achieve at operational depths, innovations that addressed challenges like risks under pressure. These elements set standards for work-class ROVs, influencing designs that incorporated modular accessories such as sampling tools and enhanced lighting for visibility in low-light conditions. The vehicle's success in high-profile missions, including the 1966 recovery of a lost hydrogen bomb at 2,850 feet and the 1973 rescue of the III submersible, validated ROV reliability and spurred broader adoption across , commercial, and scientific sectors. CURV's legacy extended to the evolution of the global ROV industry, enabling beyond 10,000 feet and applications in offshore oil and gas inspections, where tethered systems now dominate for their stability and transmission. Its principles of remote operation and mechanisms directly informed successors like CURV-21, which achieved 20,000-foot depths with integrated , while inspiring (AUV) hybrids that build on for enhanced autonomy.

References

  1. [1]
    1965 - CURV Cable-controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle
    Jul 4, 2015 · CURV is an unmanned vehicle comprised of a tubular aluminum frame 4-ft. high, 4-ft. wide, and 11-ft. long, upon which are mounted four ballast tanks.
  2. [2]
    CURV III - U. S. Naval Undersea Museum
    Apr 21, 2016 · CURV III is the fourth in a family of cable-controlled underwater recovery vehicles (CURV) developed and used by the US Navy.
  3. [3]
    Pioneer Work Class Rovs (CURV-III & 21) – Part 2
    Jul 24, 2014 · In 1973, CURV-III performed the deepest underwater rescue in history when it rescued two men 1,575 feet (480 m) deep, off the southwest coast of ...
  4. [4]
    Professional Notes, Notebook and Progress - June 1966 Vol. 92/6/760
    CURV was developed at the United States Naval Ordnance Test Station in Pasadena, Calif., as a torpedo recovery device. It has been in operation for 14 ...
  5. [5]
    Pioneer Work Class Rovs (CURV-I) – Part 1
    Jul 21, 2014 · The Cable-controlled Undersea Recovery Vehicle (CURV) was the first operational Work Class ROV, developed in the early 1960's by the former ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Naval Ocean Systems Center Underwater Vehicle History - DTIC
    During the early 1960s, NOTS engineers developed the Navy's first ROV, the Cable-. Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle (CURV), which, by 1965, could retrieve ...
  7. [7]
    Cable-controlled Undersea Recovery Vehicle (CURV)
    The Cable-controlled Undersea Recovery Vehicle (CURV) was developed in the early 1960's by the former Pasadena Annex of the Naval Ordnance Test Station, one of ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    [PDF] CURV III (Cable-Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle ... - DTIC
    subsystems including such items as propulsion, search and navigation, optics, ... * Main structure, exclusive of brackets and bumpers, 6-ft wide, 4-ft high ...Missing: physical | Show results with:physical
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Ocean Technology - A Digest - DTIC
    CURV Ii is typical of most unmanned vehicles: it has an open rectangular framework to support the serisois and tools, two horiiontal propulsion motors to ...
  12. [12]
    Lost in the Sky Found in the Sea | Naval History Magazine
    To find and recover a missing hydrogen bomb required Navy underwater experts to think and submersible operators to act like Las Vegas gamblers.
  13. [13]
    H-Bomb Is Recovered Intact After 80 Days; Weapon Will Be Put on ...
    The bomb was hooked to a complex electronic retrieving apparatus known as CURV cable-controlled unmanned recovery vehicle which lifted the heavy bomb from a ...
  14. [14]
    Pisces III submersible: A dramatic underwater rescue - BBC News
    Aug 30, 2013 · Fifty years ago two British sailors plunged almost 1,600ft into an abyss, 150 miles off Ireland, in a deep-sea submersible.
  15. [15]
    The World's Deepest Submarine Rescue | Amusing Planet
    Jun 23, 2023 · The job involved going down on a small submersible called Pisces III to a depth of 1,600 feet, then using water jets to liquefy the mud and lay ...
  16. [16]
    Book recounts San Diego role in 1973 Pisces III rescue
    May 31, 2021 · He was the principal pilot of CURV-III, a remote-controlled submersible designed at the Naval Undersea Center to retrieve practice torpedoes and ...
  17. [17]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  18. [18]
    The Fateful Journey - Great Lakes Shipwreck Historical Society
    The CURV III unit took 43,000 feet of video tape and 900 photographs of the wreck. On May 20, 1976, the words “Edmund Fitzgerald” were clearly seen on the ...Missing: submersible | Show results with:submersible
  19. [19]
    22 Photographs Cataloging the Edmund Fitzgerald Disaster and the ...
    Jul 4, 2017 · From May 20-28, 1976, the U.S. Navy dove the wreck using the unmanned submersible, CURV-III. ... survey the Fitzgerald. The primary ...
  20. [20]
    Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald, photos of the Great Lakes' most ...
    Nov 10, 2020 · When the U.S. Coast Guard surveyed the Edmund Fitzgerald's wreck site in 1976, it used a U.S. Navy submersible to get video of the ship's two ...
  21. [21]
    The Edmund Fitzgerald hasn't been explored in 30 years. Will there ...
    Nov 2, 2025 · The Coast Guard used an unmanned Cable-Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle (CURV) that provided the first rudimentary images of the shipwreck ...
  22. [22]
    The mystery of the Edmund Fitzgerald: Exploring the wreckage
    ### Summary of CURV III and Edmund Fitzgerald Survey 1976
  23. [23]
    CURV III- Cabled Underwater Recovery Vehicle
    The Cable-controlled Undersea Recovery Vehicle (CURV) was developed in the early 1960`s by the former Pasadena Annex of the Naval Ordnance Test Station, ...
  24. [24]
    CURV III Undersea Vehicle Enters The National Navy Museum (USA)
    Jul 6, 2012 · CURV-III participated in the rescue of two crew members trapped in PISCES-III in 1973 off Ireland at a depth of 1,575 feet. In 1990 the ...Missing: II underwater
  25. [25]
    Navy Museum Receives Deep Sea Submersible
    Jul 9, 2012 · In 1990 the submersible dove to 20,106 feet off of Puerto Rico, making it the first Navy recovery vehicle to go deeper than 6,000 meters CURV- ...
  26. [26]
    Naval History News - October 2012 Volume 26, Number 5
    CURV-III participated in the rescue of two crew members trapped in PISCES-III in 1973 off Ireland at a depth of 1,575 feet. In 1990 the submersible dove to ...
  27. [27]
    CURV 21 - Remotely Operated Vehicle - Navy.mil
    Sep 8, 2021 · CURV-21 is a 6,400-pound Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) that is designed to meet the US Navy's deep ocean salvage requirements down to a ...Missing: VARE Industries XN- predecessor
  28. [28]
    U.S. Navy Sends Deep-Dive Unmanned Recovery Vehicle to ...
    Dec 1, 2017 · The CURV is a 6,400-pound Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) equipped with continuous transmission frequency modulation (CTFM) sonar for target ...
  29. [29]
    Phoenix and SUPSALV Perform Record Breaking Deep Ocean ...
    Mar 31, 2021 · Both Trondheim and CURV 21 are rated to operate down to 20,000 feet. Phoenix is an employee-owned, ISO 9001-2015 Management System certified ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    ROVing the Seas, Lands and Space | Proceedings
    This was CURV, "Cable-controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle," developed to help recover experimental underwater ordnance from offshore test ranges. CURV ...