Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Capability management

Capability management is a high-level approach to identifying, assessing, developing, and maintaining an organization's capabilities—the expressed to perform specific types of work or activities—to meet operational requirements, ensure sustainable use of resources, and achieve strategic objectives in dynamic environments. Originating in and contexts, such as the UK's Through-Life Capability Management , it has been adapted to and settings to align with goals, optimize , and sustain . At its core, capability management often distinguishes between operational capabilities, which involve standardized, replicable processes for efficient execution (such as logistics in or logistics support in ), and dynamic capabilities, which encompass the organization's ability to sense opportunities, seize them through reconfiguration, and transform internal and external competences to adapt to changes. This framework, rooted in theory, emphasizes building and to deliver value across sectors. Key processes include mapping capabilities hierarchically (from high-level functions like "" or "force projection" to granular activities), evaluating maturity levels, and integrating with to eliminate redundancies and support transformation initiatives. Benefits include enhanced , informed investment decisions, and better alignment between technology and outcomes, particularly in where capability dependencies inform acquisition strategies, and in business for . Organizations use tools like capability models to visualize elements, enabling and roadmap development for performance.

Core Concepts

Definition of Capability

In organizational contexts, a refers to the collective of an to deploy its resources—both tangible and intangible—to perform tasks or activities that achieve specific operational outcomes or effects. This emerges from the integrated interaction of , processes, , and organizational structures, enabling the realization of strategic goals in a coordinated manner. Unlike static assets, capabilities represent dynamic systems that allow organizations to execute actions under varying conditions and performance levels. Capabilities differ from related concepts such as competencies and resources in scope and nature. Competencies typically denote individual or team-level skills and applied to specific roles or tasks, focusing on proficiency in execution rather than broader systemic potential. In contrast, resources are the underlying assets—such as financial holdings, equipment, or —that organizations possess, but which alone do not guarantee outcomes without deployment mechanisms. Capabilities are enduring and reusable, deriving value from how resources are orchestrated over time to produce repeatable advantages, making them intangible yet strategically vital. Examples of capabilities include an organization's ability to foster through collaborative processes and , or to enable rapid deployment in via optimized technologies and trained personnel. These illustrate how capabilities transcend isolated functions to deliver holistic operational effects. The concept originated in early , particularly through capability-based planning introduced to navigate post-Cold War uncertainties by focusing on mission outcomes rather than fixed threats. It has since evolved into broader organizational applications, influencing frameworks in business.

Overview of Capability Management

Capability management is a strategic dedicated to aligning an organization's capabilities—the abilities to execute specific tasks or achieve desired outcomes—with its overarching goals, thereby ensuring adaptability, sustained performance, and in dynamic environments. This practice spans various sectors, including and , by providing a structured approach to building and maintaining the enterprise's operational effectiveness. At its core, the high-level process of capability management adopts a lifecycle that includes identifying emerging needs based on strategic priorities, developing and integrating those capabilities through targeted investments, assessing their performance against objectives, and retiring obsolete ones to reallocate resources efficiently. This cyclical approach enables organizations to evolve proactively rather than reactively, maintaining alignment between current operations and future aspirations. The primary benefits of capability management lie in its capacity to foster enhanced by anticipating changes, optimize utilization through and , and deliver competitive advantages via superior fulfillment and . Underpinning these outcomes are key principles such as adopting a holistic that considers interdependencies across the , committing to continuous improvement through iterative reviews, and ensuring tight integration with to drive cohesive decision-making.

Applications and Contexts

Business and Organizational Applications

In business contexts, capability management serves as a foundational element of , enabling organizations to identify, develop, and leverage core competencies to achieve competitive advantages and adapt to changes. This approach emphasizes assessing an organization's of capabilities—such as , efficiency, or —to inform decisions on and growth initiatives. For instance, capability-driven strategies help firms prioritize investments that align with long-term objectives, ensuring against disruptions like economic shifts or technological advancements. A prominent application is in (M&A), where capability management guides the evaluation of potential deals by focusing on how acquired assets enhance the acquirer's strategic capabilities rather than just financial metrics. McKinsey notes that capability-driven M&A, aiming to access new tech capabilities, was a prevalent thesis through 2021, 2022, and 2023. This method involves mapping target capabilities against the buyer's gaps, facilitating smoother integrations and sustained post-merger performance. In organizational settings, capability management is integral to (ITSM), where it aligns IT capabilities with broader business needs to optimize service delivery and support operational goals. Frameworks like ITIL (IT Infrastructure Library) provide structured processes for assessing and maturing IT capabilities, such as incident response or , to ensure they directly contribute to business outcomes like cost reduction and agility. For example, organizations use ITSM to evaluate capability maturity in areas like , enabling proactive alignment with strategic priorities and minimizing downtime that impacts revenue. In human resource development, capability management extends to building workforce skills through targeted training programs, fostering organizational learning to bridge competency gaps and drive performance. Case studies illustrate these applications effectively. (GE) has employed capability maturity models to pursue , notably achieving Level 3 appraisal in the (CMMI) framework for its aviation software processes in 2015, which enhanced predictability and quality in complex engineering operations. This maturity level allowed GE to standardize processes across global teams, reducing defects and accelerating product development cycles, contributing to broader efficiency gains in manufacturing and services. In the , capability management supports efficiency programs by enabling agencies to assess and strengthen organizational abilities in areas like digital service delivery and resource optimization. For instance, initiatives drawing on have helped public administrations modernize operations, such as through Roland Berger's analysis of transformations that build adaptive capacities to cut administrative costs and improve citizen services without compromising accountability. Metrics in capability management often revolve around maturity levels, as outlined in the CMMI framework developed by the CMMI Institute. This model defines five progressive levels: Initial ( processes), Managed (basic project controls), Defined (standardized organization-wide practices), Quantitatively Managed (data-driven process control), and Optimizing (continuous improvement focus). Organizations at higher levels, such as Level 3 or above, benefit from improved predictability, , and . These levels provide a quantifiable way to track progress in business and applications, ensuring investments yield measurable strategic impacts.

Military and Defense Applications

In and contexts, capability management emphasizes the development and integration of warfighting capabilities to achieve strategic objectives in dynamic threat environments. defines a capability as "the ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions," realized through combinations of ways, means, and measures that enable military activities. This approach prioritizes among allied forces, ensuring that capabilities align with collective defense needs, such as rapid deployment and joint operations. In the United States, the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) serves as the primary process for identifying, assessing, and validating military capabilities required by the Joint Force. Established to bridge gaps between operational needs and acquisition, JCIDS involves analyzing warfighter requirements, prioritizing solutions, and integrating them across doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership, personnel, facilities, and policy (). For instance, following the , the U.S. Department of Defense adapted JCIDS to address emerging asymmetric threats, including the rapid development of defense capabilities in response to increased digital vulnerabilities exposed during exercises like in 1997. This shift enabled the creation of dedicated units and , enhancing the military's resilience against . Allied nations adapt capability management to their strategic priorities while aligning with NATO standards. In the United Kingdom, the Defence Capability Framework guides investment decisions by integrating military requirements with industrial and technological bases, focusing on through-life capability management to sustain operational effectiveness. Similarly, Australia employs the One Defence Capability System to oversee acquisition and sustainment, emphasizing integrated force design and regional deterrence, as seen in enhancements to maritime and cyber capabilities under the 2024 National Defence Strategy. These variations ensure that national capabilities contribute to coalition interoperability without duplicating core processes.

Key Considerations

Assessment and Planning Processes

Assessment and planning processes in capability management involve systematic of an organization's current abilities against desired future states to inform strategic development. These processes ensure alignment between operational needs and , particularly in dynamic environments like and operations. By identifying deficiencies and opportunities, organizations can prioritize enhancements that build and competitiveness. Key assessment techniques include , maturity modeling, and performance metrics. compares existing capabilities with required ones to pinpoint shortfalls or redundancies, often visualized through phasing models that map capabilities across timelines and scenarios. For instance, in contexts, this identifies unmet functional needs, such as inadequate responses to emerging threats, enabling targeted interventions. Maturity modeling evaluates the developmental stage of capabilities using structured frameworks to benchmark against best practices, revealing areas for improvement in processes like product development or service delivery. This approach helps organizations address issues like inconsistent planning or high defect rates by providing a for optimization. Performance metrics, such as key performance indicators (KPIs), quantify effectiveness, efficiency, and risks, often through scorecards that balance factors like cost and operational readiness in multi-scenario evaluations. These metrics support objective comparisons, for example, assessing how well capabilities perform against variables like target mobility or weapon proliferation. Planning steps typically encompass capability roadmapping, prioritization, and budgeting integration. Capability roadmapping translates strategic ambitions into sequenced initiatives by assessing maturity levels across dimensions like technology, processes, and governance, creating a holistic transformation path. This ensures initiatives align with business or mission goals, prioritizing foundational capabilities before advanced ones. Prioritization occurs based on strategic threats or opportunities, using capabilities-based approaches to allocate resources toward high-impact areas, such as addressing gaps in manpower or equipment amid geopolitical shifts. Integration with budgeting involves aligning capability needs with financial constraints, using diagnostic tools to close gaps and maximize return on investments, such as funding IT architectures that support long-term objectives. Useful tools for these processes include adaptations of SWOT analysis and scenario planning. SWOT analysis, when tailored to capabilities, examines internal strengths (e.g., robust R&D) and weaknesses (e.g., inefficient processes) alongside external opportunities and threats to guide strategic adjustments, often conducted in workshops with data on expertise and market factors. Scenario planning anticipates future needs by developing plausible narratives around uncertainties, such as evolving military conflicts, to test capability robustness and foster collaborative foresight among stakeholders. Best practices emphasize iterative reviews and stakeholder involvement to refine assessments and plans. Iterative reviews break planning into cycles of design, implementation, testing, and refinement, incorporating feedback to adapt to changes and deliver incremental value while reducing risks in complex projects. Stakeholder involvement requires mapping influences, prioritizing engagement through matrices, and developing tailored plans like regular consultations to build commitment and address concerns, ensuring buy-in and project success.

Risks and Implementation Challenges

Capability management, while essential for aligning organizational resources with strategic objectives, is fraught with risks that can undermine its effectiveness. Common risks include capability gaps arising from technological , where rapid advancements outpace planned upgrades, leading to diminished operational readiness. Resistance to change among stakeholders often exacerbates these gaps, as entrenched practices hinder adoption of new capabilities. Misaligned priorities further compound the issue, particularly in resource-scarce environments, where competing demands divert focus from critical capability development. Implementation challenges in capability management frequently stem from resource constraints, limiting the scope and speed of initiatives despite careful assessment. Integration issues across organizational silos pose another hurdle, as disparate units struggle to synchronize processes, technologies, and personnel, resulting in fragmented outcomes. Measuring intangible benefits, such as improved adaptability or cultural shifts, remains particularly difficult, often due to the absence of standardized metrics that capture long-term value beyond immediate financial or performance indicators. To mitigate these risks and challenges, organizations employ techniques that emphasize and communication to address resistance early. Pilot programs allow for testing capabilities on a smaller scale, identifying issues before full rollout and enabling iterative adjustments. Post-implementation audits provide a structured review mechanism, assessing outcomes against objectives and informing refinements to close any emerging gaps. In military contexts, the exemplifies these issues, with persistent delays in software upgrades and production—such as 100% late engine deliveries in 2023 and all engines delivered late in 2024 (averaging 155 days late), alongside aircraft deliveries averaging 238 days late—stemming from disruptions and immature technologies, leading to capability shortfalls and modernization costs exceeding original estimates by more than $6 billion as of September 2025. Similarly, in business settings, many efforts fail to enhance organizational capabilities, with approximately 70% falling short of targets due to inadequate talent deployment and siloed integration, as seen in cases where inflexible platforms prevented scalable benefits.

Frameworks and Methodologies

DOTMLPF and Related Models

The framework serves as a structured approach within the U.S. Department of Defense () for identifying and addressing capability gaps in military operations through a comprehensive, non-materiel-focused . It emphasizes holistic solutions beyond acquiring new equipment, ensuring that changes across multiple domains align to enhance overall effectiveness. The acronym DOTMLPF expands to , , , , and , , and . refers to fundamental principles guiding operations, such as tactical maneuvers or engagement rules. covers the structure of units and commands to execute missions. involves preparing forces through exercises and simulations. encompasses equipment, weapons, and support systems. and focus on developing leaders via formal schooling and . addresses the and of personnel required. include like bases and maintenance depots needed to sustain operations. Originating as a core component of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), was formalized in 2003 to replace earlier service-specific requirements processes and promote joint interoperability. JCIDS uses to validate requirements, prioritizing solutions that integrate across DoD components. In application, enables a systematic evaluation of gaps, recommending balanced changes to achieve success without over-relying on acquisitions. For instance, addressing a defense shortfall might involve updating for , reorganizing units, enhancing training simulations, procuring secure like tools, educating leaders on threats, ensuring skilled personnel availability, and upgrading facility networks—all integrated to close the gap holistically. A common variant is DOTMLPF-P, which appends to account for overarching or interagency regulations influencing the other elements, such as acquisition policies or agreements. This extended model is used in JCIDS like Initial Capability Documents. Additionally, DOTMLPF principles have been adapted within frameworks, such as the DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF), to align IT investments and processes with needs in a federated, data-centric manner.

Defence Lines of Development

The Defence Lines of Development (DLoD) framework provides a structured approach within the (MoD) for integrating multiple elements required to build and sustain effective military capabilities. It identifies eight core lines—Training, , Personnel, , , , Organisation, and —often acronymized as TEPIDOIL, with treated as an overarching consideration. This holistic model ensures that no single aspect, such as acquiring new , overshadows others, promoting cohesive development for operational effectiveness. The framework originated in the early 2000s, emerging from post-operational reviews of programs like the attack helicopter, where equipment arrived without adequate supporting elements, rendering it unusable in combat. Developed to support integrated project teams (IPTs), it shifted practices from siloed toward capability-based planning, emphasizing coordination across lines to avoid such failures. By the mid-2000s, DLoD became a standard tool for capability management initiatives. In practice, DLoD guides the assessment and delivery of operational capabilities by requiring balanced progress across all lines, overseen by a Senior Responsible Owner for non-equipment aspects. For instance, in joint operations like those in NATO-led missions, it ensures that doctrinal updates, personnel training, and logistical sustainment align with equipment deployment to enable rapid force integration. This approach has been applied in major programs, such as the F-35 Lightning II, where Initial Operating Capability was achieved in 2018 after verifying DLoD compliance, with full operational capability for the achieved in November 2025. DLoD aligns closely with standards through its emphasis on , supporting the Alliance's Defence Planning Process by harmonizing developments with multinational requirements for operations. This compatibility enables seamless contribution to capabilities, such as enhanced in coalition environments, while adhering to principles outlined in NATO's capability targets.

Fundamental Inputs to Capability

The Fundamental Inputs to Capability (FIC) model is a structured framework developed by the Department of Defence to identify and manage the essential elements required to generate and sustain defence capabilities within the (ADF). Introduced in the early 2000s following the 2003 Kinnaird Review of Defence , the model was formalized in the 2006 Defence Capability Development Manual to provide a standardized approach for capability acquisition, ensuring all necessary resources are considered holistically rather than in . This originated in response to identified gaps in procurement processes, aiming to support risk-informed decision-making across the capability lifecycle, from needs identification to acceptance into service. The core components of the FIC encompass eight primary inputs: organisation, personnel, collective training, major systems, supplies, facilities, support, and command and management. Organisation refers to functional groupings with command and control structures; personnel addresses recruiting, training, and welfare; collective training involves validated regimes to prepare units for operational readiness; major systems denote platforms and equipment exceeding A$1 million in value or with significant policy implications; supplies cover operational stock holdings and provisioning; facilities include buildings, training areas, and maintenance infrastructure; support encompasses national and international infrastructure and services; and command and management provides guidance, doctrine, and discretionary funding. These elements are interdependent, with their synergy—rather than mere aggregation—determining overall capability effectiveness, as emphasized in the model's foundational documentation. Over time, the list expanded to nine inputs in 2016 with the explicit addition of industry as a distinct category under the Defence Industry Policy Statement, recognizing its role in long-term sustainment and innovation. In application, the FIC supports risk-based by enabling capability managers to assess and potential shortfalls across inputs during acquisition programs, ensuring whole-of-life costs and operational viability are addressed upfront. For instance, in the SSN nuclear-powered program, the framework guides evaluations of , industry capacity for sustainment, and personnel needs to mitigate risks in delivering a sovereign capability, highlighting interdependencies such as for maintenance and platforms for operational integration. This approach facilitates prioritized and , particularly for high-value projects where imbalances in one input, like industry skills, could cascade into broader capability gaps. The FIC model has evolved to align with modern defence imperatives, including operations and networked warfare, through updates emphasizing and network-centric compliance. Post-2006 refinements integrated assessments for (NCW) in acceptance into service processes, ensuring inputs like command and support information-sharing across forces. By the 2020s, further adaptations incorporated , with proposals for whole-of-nation contributions, such as societal inputs for as a potential tenth FIC. Recent proposals, as of , advocate for adding "" to account for broader national contributions like and , while maintaining the model's focus on balanced, risk-managed development.

Integrated Capability Management Approaches

Integrated capability management approaches involve synthesizing multiple frameworks to achieve holistic oversight of organizational capabilities, enabling seamless alignment across strategic, operational, and tactical levels. One prominent integration strategy is the hybrid model exemplified by the Department of Defense Enterprise Service Management Framework (DESMF), which combines the ITIL v3 service lifecycle—encompassing service strategy, design, transition, operations, and continual improvement—with the DOTMLPF-P (Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy) framework to manage IT capabilities in defense contexts. This approach standardizes IT service management processes while ensuring alignment with broader capability requirements, such as annual assessments via the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) to identify gaps and prioritize investments. By integrating ITIL's process-oriented best practices with DOTMLPF-P's holistic capability analysis, DESMF facilitates mission-aligned service delivery, resource optimization, and risk mitigation in complex environments like the Joint Information Environment. In cross-domain applications, enterprise architecture frameworks such as TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework) incorporate capability views to bridge business strategy with IT implementation, allowing organizations to model and manage capabilities as reusable assets across domains. TOGAF's Architecture Development Method (ADM) supports the creation of tailored views, including capability-based architectures, through its Enterprise Continuum, which classifies architectural building blocks from generic to organization-specific solutions. This enables the integration of capability management into broader enterprise planning, such as aligning business functions with technology resources to address gaps in service delivery or operational efficiency. For instance, capability views in TOGAF help stakeholders visualize dependencies and prioritize developments, fostering adaptability in dynamic sectors like defense and commercial IT. Portfolio management of capabilities represents a core in integrated approaches, leveraging tools like capability maps to provide a visual, hierarchical representation of an organization's abilities and their interdependencies. Under Directive 7045.20, capability portfolio management () uses joint capability area (JCA) taxonomies and roadmaps to evaluate investments across near-, mid-, and long-term horizons, balancing , schedule, and performance metrics. Benefits include enhanced strategic alignment, duplication elimination, and gap identification, achieved through data-driven reviews like Capability Portfolio Management Reviews (CPMRs) that synchronize with budgeting and acquisition cycles. Capability maps, in particular, serve as foundational artifacts for portfolio oversight, enabling senior leaders to optimize and ensure mission effectiveness without siloed decision-making. A key example of integrated approaches in practice is 's multinational capability development initiatives post-2010, which emphasize coalition-based projects to enhance and . Following the 2010 Strategic Concept, has pursued High Visibility Projects (HVPs) under the Conference of National Armaments Directors (CNAD), including multinational efforts in air-to-air refuelling, , and cyber defence capabilities. These projects, numbering 29 as of mid-2025, integrate national contributions into collective assets like the Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) fleet and the NATO Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Force (NISRF), supported by the NATO Defence Planning Process (NDPP) to set harmonized targets. This coalition model post-2010 has delivered operational enhancements, such as modernized AWACS operations extending to 2035, while addressing capability shortfalls through shared procurement and development.

Evolution and Future Trends

Historical Development

The concept of capability management in defense originated in the post-Cold War era, as military planners shifted from threat-based, platform-centric strategies to capability-based planning that emphasized integrated systems to address diverse, unpredictable challenges. This transition was driven by the need to adapt to a multipolar security environment following the Soviet Union's dissolution in 1991, prompting reforms to prioritize joint and resource efficiency over individual weapon systems. In the United States, this evolution culminated in the establishment of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) in 2003, which formalized a process for identifying, assessing, and validating joint military requirements to reduce redundancies and enhance overall force effectiveness. Key milestones in allied nations further advanced structured capability management approaches during the early . In the , the Defence Lines of Development (DLoD) framework was endorsed by the management board in 2005, providing a holistic model to coordinate eight interconnected elements—, , personnel, , and concepts, , , and —for delivering operational capabilities. Similarly, formalized its Fundamental Inputs to Capability (FIC) in June 2001, defining eight essential components (personnel, , major systems, supplies, facilities, , collective , and command and ) to generate integrated effects and lifecycle . These models reflected a broader doctrinal shift toward viewing capabilities as emergent properties of synchronized inputs rather than isolated assets. The principles of capability management began expanding beyond defense into the in the 2000s, influenced by consulting firms adapting military-inspired frameworks for corporate and . Boston Consulting Group (BCG) integrated capability building into its offerings, emphasizing resilient organizational structures through digital, operational, and people-focused enhancements to drive . McKinsey & Company similarly promoted capability-building programs during this period, as seen in its support for a major manufacturing spin-off in the 2000s, where targeted interventions in , , and behavioral change yielded significant performance gains, including a sixfold stock price increase over four years. By the 2010s, capability management gained traction in European Union defense policies amid budgetary constraints and calls for greater cooperation. The EU's Headline Goal 2010, approved in 2004 but implemented through subsequent reviews, set benchmarks for military capabilities in crisis management, evolving into the Capability Development Plan (CDP) adopted in 2014 to prioritize 10 key areas across domains like land, air, and cyber. This adoption facilitated pooling and sharing initiatives among member states, marking a structured global dissemination of capability-centric planning.

Emerging Practices and Technologies

In recent advancements, (AI) and (ML) are transforming capability simulation by enabling dynamic, predictive modeling of complex scenarios. These technologies allow for rapid iteration in assessing operational effectiveness, reducing the time required for traditional simulations from months to days. For example, utilizes AI-driven models to enhance capabilities, delivering faster, more accurate results for system design and capability evaluation in and programs. Similarly, the C3 AI platform supports the U.S. by generating large-scale threat data packages and applying ML techniques to simulate scenarios, thereby informing capability prioritization and . CAE and further demonstrate this integration by embedding AI in training simulations to refine warfighter readiness and platform performance, adapting in real-time to emerging threats. Complementing AI/ML, digital twins—virtual replicas of physical systems—facilitate advanced capability assessment by simulating real-world conditions for testing and optimization. In defense applications, digital twins process live data to monitor asset performance, predict failures, and retrain ML algorithms on the fly, enhancing mission readiness without operational risks. A comprehensive review highlights their role in improving and robust mechanisms, particularly for networked systems like command centers and weapon platforms. The U.S. Department of (DoD) reports that 7% of programs are actively building or planning digital twins for agile verification and virtualization, accelerating capability lifecycle management. Emerging practices in capability management emphasize agile development methodologies to enable rapid adaptation to evolving threats, shifting from rigid processes to iterative, user-informed cycles. The DoD's software acquisition reforms incorporate principles to modernize capabilities, allowing for continuous and incremental delivery in areas like cybersecurity and unmanned systems. This approach offers advantages such as improved flexibility and reduced development timelines, though it requires cultural shifts to balance speed with compliance in contexts. Parallel to agility, sustainability-focused capabilities are gaining prominence, integrating eco-friendly technologies into operations to minimize environmental impact while sustaining mission effectiveness. Initiatives like green prioritize energy-efficient systems, waste reduction, and renewable integration, viewing as a strategic enabler for long-term resilience. The UK Ministry of Defence promotes across the capability lifecycle, from to operations, to address risks and enhance competitive advantages. Key trends include data-driven decision-making powered by , which links disparate datasets to uncover dependencies and support evidence-based planning. The Data Strategy mandates making data accessible and interoperable to foster for operational insights, such as and threat forecasting. Platforms like Advana provide unified across systems, enabling commanders to exploit data for decision dominance in contested environments. Additionally, against hybrid threats—blending conventional, , and informational tactics—demands integrated approaches that build societal and infrastructural robustness. advocates a whole-of-society to hybrid , emphasizing cross-domain measures like enhanced attribution and rapid response frameworks. The Hybrid Centre of Excellence outlines comprehensive ecosystems that leverage multi-sector collaboration to mitigate vulnerabilities. By 2030, capability management is projected to center on multi-domain operations (MDO), synchronizing land, air, maritime, space, and cyber elements within adaptive ecosystems for seamless deterrence and response. NATO's identifies MDO as a core priority, requiring integrated capabilities to operate in contested multi-domain environments. This outlook includes seven near- and medium-term initiatives, such as joint all-domain command-and-control systems, to enhance alliance-wide adaptability against peer adversaries. The U.S. Army's Unified Network Plan 2.0 aligns with this vision, targeting full MDO enablement by 2030 through phased network modernization and zero-trust architectures.

References

  1. [1]
    Capability Management - What is it? Definition, Examples and More
    Capability management is the capacity to structure, combine, and leverage internal and external resources for the purpose of creating new value for stakeholders ...
  2. [2]
    Business Capability Management and Business Capability Maps
    Business Capability Management (BCM) is a strategic approach that aligns a company's core competencies with its organizational goals and objectives.
  3. [3]
    What Are Business Capabilities? A Guide to Definition and Guidelines
    Jul 8, 2024 · Business capability is an activity or ability that enables an organization to achieve specific goals or objectives.
  4. [4]
    DODAF Viewpoints CV4: Capabilities Dependencies - DoD CIO
    The intended usage of the CV-4 includes: Identification of capability dependencies. Capability management (impact analysis for options, disposal etc.). Detailed ...
  5. [5]
    Business Capability | www.dau.edu
    A business capability is the core ability the organization needs to deliver requisite products and services and provide value.​ An example of a business ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Organizational Capability Examples
    Apr 12, 2025 · The Organizational Capability forms a system that is realized through the interaction of people, process and technology.
  7. [7]
    Capability | www.dau.edu
    The ability to complete a task or execute a course of action under specified conditions and level of performance.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  8. [8]
    4.3 Resource-Based View – Strategic Management
    While resources refer to what an organization owns, capabilities refer to what the organization can do. More specifically, capabilities refer to the firm's ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage - Jay Barney ...
    This article examines the link betweenfirm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Four empirical indicators of the potential of firm resources
  10. [10]
    Capitalizing on Capabilities
    Such organizational capabilities, as we call them, are key intangible assets. You can't see or touch them, yet they can make all the difference in the world ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Implementing Capability Based Planning within the Public Safety ...
    Introduction: Capability Based Planning (CBP) was introduced in the 1990s to address the inherent ambiguity in the post-Cold War security setting. It offered a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Enterprise Capability Management - SEBoK
    May 23, 2025 · In an operational contextcontext (particularly in defense) the term “capability management” is associated with developing and maintaining all ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
  13. [13]
    [PDF] dod directive 7045.20 capability portfolio management
    Sep 25, 2023 · The objective of CPM is to align the investments, requirements, interoperability, designs, and acquisitions of related capabilities across the ...
  14. [14]
    The Ultimate Guide to Capability-driven Strategic Planning - Capstera
    Jul 7, 2023 · A capability-driven strategic planning process starts by identifying the strategic goals and the capabilities needed to achieve them. Once these ...
  15. [15]
    Time to revisit your M&A strategy - McKinsey
    May 22, 2025 · There is a path to growth through M&A for those companies that maintain an active acquisition strategy, understand their capabilities, and avoid certain assets.The State Of M&a · Going (and Staying) On... · Culture And M&a
  16. [16]
    ITSM: IT Service Management Definition, Benefits & Tools - Atlassian
    ITSM software enables IT teams to align with business needs and take a strategic approach to change, transformation, and growth. A wide variety of ITSM software ...
  17. [17]
    What is ITSM? Managing IT to serve business needs - CIO
    May 27, 2025 · ITSM offers various frameworks for businesses to create management standards around IT services and customer service practices. It encompasses ...
  18. [18]
    GE Aviation Achieves Major Software Appraisal | GE Aerospace News
    Mar 16, 2015 · GE Aviation recently received Level 3 appraisal of the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) and is the first in the world to demonstrate compliance.
  19. [19]
    How dynamic capabilities can support government modernization
    Apr 3, 2025 · Uncertainty and rapid change call for transformation within public administration. Read about how dynamic capabilities can help.
  20. [20]
    What is CMMI?
    The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) is a proven set of best practices that helps organizations understand their current level of capability and ...Knowing Your Organization's... · Using Cmmi · First, Select Your...
  21. [21]
    CMMI Institute - Home
    The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) is a proven set of best practices that helps organizations understand their current level of capability and ...CMMI Levels of Capability and... · Solutions · About ISACA · Sign In
  22. [22]
    [PDF] NATO ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORK
    Capability. A capability is the ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions. A capability is realized through combinations of.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Way Ahead for Cyberspace Operations: A JCIDS Analysis - DTIC
    As a nation, we must develop an overall cyberspace defense capability to include how the military integrates with agencies and departments to protect vital ...
  24. [24]
    Cyber Operations: The New Balance | Article | The United States Army
    A fundamental premise of cyber new normalcy is that a New Balance is required in culture, conduct, and capabilities in order to better operate and defend in and ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] The Defence Capability Framework - GOV.UK
    The Defence. Capability Framework is part of that journey, it provides our approach to and priorities and plans for military capability development, drawing ...
  26. [26]
    One Defence Capability System Manual
    Mar 17, 2025 · The Defence Capability Policy 2025 sets out the key principles defining Defence's approach to capability investment decisions and capability ...
  27. [27]
    Australia's Defense Strategy - Air University
    Sep 10, 2024 · This article examines Australia's 2024 National Defence Strategy (NDS) within the context of evolving regional dynamics and global strategic competition.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Portfolio-Analysis Methods for Assessing Capability Options - RAND
    Capability (1): The ability to achieve a desired effect under speci- fied standards and conditions through combinations of means and ways to perform a set ...
  29. [29]
    Capability Model Descriptions - CV: Capability Phasing - DoD CIO
    Capability gap analysis. Detailed Description: The CV-3 provides a representation of the available capability at different points in time or during specific ...
  30. [30]
    Configuring the transformation roadmap using the capability model
    The capability model can be activated and used as a design and decision management tool to configure the transformation and enable the overall business strategy ...
  31. [31]
    Capabilities Based Planning | RAND
    Capabilities-based planning enables military agencies to identify program needs, allocate resources, and track activities and outcomes.
  32. [32]
    Strategic Planning: What, Why, How, Tools, Templates | Gartner
    Manage budgets to prioritize decisions that will drive impact. Select ... Without identifying early signs of threats and opportunities, strategic plans ...
  33. [33]
    SWOT analysis: An easy tool for strategic planning - BDC
    SWOT analysis is a framework for identifying and analyzing your organization's strengths and weaknesses, as well as the opportunities and threats you are ...
  34. [34]
    Scenario Planning for the Twenty-first-Century Military Strategist
    Apr 27, 2020 · This article outlines a methodology to adapt scenario planning into a streamlined process as a means to foster collaboration and crosstalk among various ...Missing: capability | Show results with:capability
  35. [35]
    Iterative Processes With Change Management: The Best of Both
    Dec 1, 2024 · Iterative processes are ideal for managing complex projects because they enable teams to break large organizational shifts into smaller increments.
  36. [36]
    Engaging Stakeholders for Project Success - PMI
    It is good practice to always treat every stakeholder as a recipient first. Assuming a certain level of commitment from a stakeholder is very risky and often ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] perspectives on the risk in military capabilities management
    Military capabilities management is a process where risk is more present and more powerful than other processes specific to the military organization.
  38. [38]
    Flipping the Odds of Digital Transformation Success | BCG
    Oct 29, 2020 · New BCG research shows that 70% of digital transformations fall short of their objectives, often with profound consequences. Digital ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Navigating Capability-Based Planning: The Benefits, Challenges ...
    Capability-Based Planning (CBP) defines a framework that has an all-encompassing view of existing abilities and future needs for strategically deciding what ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Program Continues to Encounter ...
    The program also faces delays in updating the aircraft's software and has been slow to modernize the engine and other aircraft components. We ...
  41. [41]
    DOTMLPF-P Analysis - AcqNotes
    Jan 18, 2024 · DOTMLPF-P is a tool that allows senior leaders to analyze their organizational capabilities from the perspective of “Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel ...
  42. [42]
    DODAF Glossary - DoD CIO - War.gov
    DoDI. Department of Defense Instruction ; DOTMLPF. Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership and Education, Personnel, and Facilities ; DPG. Defense ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  43. [43]
    Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS)
    Nov 14, 2024 · The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) is the primary U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) process for determining ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Army Cyber/Electromagnetic Contest Capabilities Based ...
    Dec 23, 2010 · DOTMLPF to fully mitigate the gaps as a whole. ... Modernization Strategy and modifies it to address a wide array of C/EM capability gaps.
  45. [45]
    Background - DODAF - DOD Architecture Framework Version 2.02
    DoDAF is a framework for developing architectures to help DoD managers make decisions through information sharing, shifting from product to data-centric focus.Missing: civilian adaptations
  46. [46]
    Britain's National Audit Office Focuses on Ministry of Defence ... - RUSI
    Apr 14, 2020 · Often referred to by its acronym of TEPIDOIL, it asserts that usable capability requires a combination of Training, Equipment, People, ...Missing: Organization | Show results with:Organization
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Defence Lines of Development analysis with MODAF - GOV.UK
    This article will illustrate the use of MODAF with reference to common challenges for capability integration based on analysis of the Defence Lines of ...
  48. [48]
    NATO Defence Planning Process
    Apr 16, 2025 · The aim of the NATO Defence Planning Process (NDPP) is to provide a framework within which national and Alliance defence planning activities can be harmonised.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Defence Capability Development Manual
    Capability is generated by Fundamental Inputs to Capability comprising organisation, personnel, collective training, major systems, supplies, facilities, ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Defence's Implementation of the First Principles Review
    Apr 17, 2018 · It subsequently closed the recommendation that Capability Managers specify Fundamental Inputs to Capability, though later evidence suggests that ...
  51. [51]
    Exploring the untapped element of the Ninth Fundamental Input to ...
    Oct 4, 2019 · This article explores the untapped element of the Ninth Fundamental Input to Capability (FIC), industry as a FIC, detailing innovative ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Australian Government - Parliament of Australia
    The integration of Australian industry as a Fundamental Input to Capability (FIC) will ensure Defence fully considers the industrial capabilities and the ...
  53. [53]
    Implementing Australia's nuclear submarine program - ASPI
    Dec 14, 2021 · On 16 September 2021, the Australian Government announced that it would acquire a nuclear-powered submarine (SSN) capability with support from ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Air Force Capability Guidebook 2020 - Air and Space Power Centre
    Mar 31, 2021 · The Fundamental Inputs to Capability (FIC) is a standardised list of nine inputs, designed to enable the effective generation of Defence.
  55. [55]
    Society as a Fundamental Input to Defence Capability
    May 2, 2024 · This paper argues that the list of Fundamental Inputs to Capability (FIC) of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) is currently incomplete.
  56. [56]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the DESMF integration of ITIL and DOTMLPF for IT Service Management (ITSM) in the Department of Defense (DoD), combining all the information from the provided segments into a concise yet comprehensive response. To maximize detail and clarity, I’ve organized key information into a table in CSV format, followed by a narrative summary that integrates the remaining details and useful URLs.
  57. [57]
    TOGAF as an Enterprise Architecture Framework
    It enables IT users to design, evaluate, and build the right architecture for their organization, and reduces the costs of planning, designing, and implementing ...The Role Of Togaf · Togaf And Architecture... · Using Togaf With Other...
  58. [58]
    NATO's role in capability development
    Jun 26, 2025 · NATO Allies have agreed to develop and maintain the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against potential adversaries ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Whither Capabilities-based Planning? - DTIC
    Nov 27, 2006 · Capabilities-based planning traces its roots to the days immediately following the Cold War, as defense planners began to think about the ...
  60. [60]
    Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) - DAU
    Purpose and Role JCIDS provides the foundation for analyzing warfighter needs and documenting, reviewing, and validating capability requirements across the ...
  61. [61]
    https://www.dau.edu/acquipedia-article/joint-capabilities-integration-and-development-system-jcids-0
  62. [62]
    [PDF] A Review of the Capability Options Development and Analysis ...
    Fundamental Inputs to Capability (FIC) as shown by Figure 1. The set of FICs established in Defence consists of: collective training, command and management,.
  63. [63]
    Business Consulting Services | Building Capabilities | BCG
    BCG utilizes robust business consulting services to help leaders build and fortify their company's capabilities. Discover BCG's consulting capabilities now.
  64. [64]
    How capability building can power transformation - McKinsey
    Mar 30, 2021 · Effective capability-building programs enable organizations to develop the mindsets, behaviors, and skills needed to power a transformation and achieve their ...Approaches To Closing... · Role Modeling · Shaping A New Learning...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Headline Goal 2010 - European Union
    Jun 18, 2004 · It is an instrument to enhance the effective use of military capabilities as a key enabler in achieving EU's ambitions in Crisis Management ...Missing: defense | Show results with:defense
  66. [66]
    [PDF] EU DEFENCE: - IRIS
    The EU defined a complete and coherent defence planning process at the turn of the millennium: The Capability Development Mechanism (CDM), which is expressly ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Lockheed Martin Leverages AI and Machine Learning
    Jul 29, 2024 · Lockheed Martin has offered a solution concentrated on the development of advanced M&S capabilities using AI-driven models to deliver faster and more accurate ...
  68. [68]
    Enterprise AI for Missile Defense Modeling and Simulation - C3 AI
    C3 AI helps MDA by generating large threat data packages and rapidly developing AI techniques for missile defense, using the C3 Agentic AI Platform.
  69. [69]
    AI in the loop: Transforming military training and system design ...
    Oct 20, 2025 · CAE and General Atomics use AI to enhance warfighter readiness, refine aerospace platforms, and learn from simulations.
  70. [70]
    Digital twins in Defense: Enhancing decision-making and mission ...
    Jun 25, 2025 · While processing live battlefield data, digital twins can monitor the performance of ML algorithms and then retrain them on the fly, improving ...
  71. [71]
    On Digital Twins in Defence: Overview and Applications - arXiv
    Aug 7, 2025 · These technologies are central to enhancing operational capabilities, improving situational awareness, and ensuring robust defense mechanisms ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Digital Twin Assessment, Agile Verification Processes, and ...
    This report assesses digital twin practices in the DOD, verification, and plans for using virtualization. 7% of programs are building or planning to build  ...
  73. [73]
    Defense Software Acquisitions: Changes to Requirements ... - GAO
    Jul 20, 2023 · Efforts to modernize DOD's software acquisition include a transition to Agile development principles from a traditional waterfall approach.
  74. [74]
    Agile—the Pros and Cons | www.dau.edu
    The Agile methodology offers numerous advantages over the traditional “waterfall” approach to development.
  75. [75]
    https://www.dau.edu/library/damag/july-august2018/agile-pros-and-cons
  76. [76]
    Defence: sustainability as a competitive advantage - GOV.UK
    Oct 11, 2024 · The defence industry has some unique challenges in considering Climate Change and Sustainability ( CC&S ) products.
  77. [77]
    [PDF] DOD Data Strategy
    Oct 8, 2020 · Goal: Make Data Linked. Data-driven decision-making requires DoD data to be linked such that relationships and dependencies can be uncovered ...
  78. [78]
    Data Solutions for Federal Government Missions - Booz Allen
    Advana is the Department of Defense's (DOD) unified data management and analytics platform, providing actionable insights through data mesh and AI models. It ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] hybrid threats and hybrid warfare | nato
    Jul 10, 2024 · A whole-of-state and whole-of- society approach is necessary to address societal vul- nerabilities and build resilience against hybrid threats/.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] HYBRID THREATS
    Resilience against hybrid threats can take advantage of the resilience measures of different domains. It needs to be thoroughly designed and implemented.
  81. [81]
    Ongoing Military Transformation, Leading to NATO 2030 - NATO's ACT
    Mar 22, 2023 · NATO's Allied Command Transformation has three strategic priorities for 2023 – Multi-Domain Operation enabled Alliance, Adaptation to Deterrence ...Missing: adaptive ecosystems defense
  82. [82]
    NATO multidomain operations: Near- and medium-term priority ...
    Feb 21, 2024 · This issue brief sets forth seven priority initiatives focused on NATO multidomain operations (MDO). Implementing these near- and medium-term initiativesMissing: adaptive ecosystems
  83. [83]
    Army releases Unified Network Plan 2.0, honing in on multi-domain ...
    Mar 11, 2025 · These are designed to be carried out within three phases, the plan explains, with all phases being completed by 2030. “As with command posts, ...Missing: adaptive ecosystems