Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Feedback

Feedback is a process in dynamic systems whereby a portion of the output is returned to the input, influencing future behavior and enabling self-regulation or amplification. This mechanism operates through loops that connect system outputs back to inputs, forming the basis for and across natural and engineered contexts. Feedback manifests primarily in two forms: , which opposes changes to restore , and , which reinforces deviations to accelerate shifts. In , negative feedback underpins systems like amplifiers and regulators, reducing sensitivity to disturbances and enhancing . Biological examples include negative feedback in , such as insulin-mediated glucose , countering fluctuations to sustain viability, while positive feedback drives decisive events like oxytocin-induced labor contractions. These loops reveal causal interdependencies that govern system resilience or escalation, with empirical observations confirming their role in phenomena from to variability.

Fundamentals

Definition and Core Concepts

Feedback is the process by which the output of a is returned to its input to influence future outputs, forming a closed causal loop that enables self-regulation or within the . This mechanism underlies dynamic behavior in diverse domains, including , biological, and systems, where the returned signal modulates the system's response based on prior . At its core, feedback introduces interdependence between inputs and outputs, contrasting with open-loop systems that lack such reciprocity and thus exhibit less adaptability to perturbations. Central to feedback are the concepts of feedback loops, which represent recurrent causal pathways where an action's consequences circle back to affect the initiating conditions. These loops can be reinforcing or balancing: occurs when the output counteracts deviations from a set point, fostering stability and , as seen in biological processes like temperature regulation where rising heat triggers cooling responses to restore . Conversely, amplifies initial changes, driving or rapid shifts away from , such as in blood clotting where initial formation accelerates further . The polarity—positive or negative—arises from the sign of the , determined by whether the feedback adds to or subtracts from the input signal. This distinction is fundamental, as negative loops predominate in stable systems for maintaining steady states, while positive loops often require external bounds to prevent runaway effects. Additional core concepts include delay and within loops, which affect : delays can induce oscillations even in by postponing corrective actions, while magnitude determines the strength of the response. Feedback's causal realism manifests in its ability to enable without external intervention, relying on internal flows rather than predefined instructions, though improper can lead to or inefficiency. In modeling, feedback is quantified through transfer functions or difference equations that capture how outputs recursively influence inputs over time.

Mathematical Representation

Feedback systems are mathematically modeled using algebra, where signals are represented in the to derive relating inputs to outputs. In a standard configuration, the output Y(s) relates to the reference input R(s) through the forward path G(s) and feedback path H(s), yielding the T(s) = \frac{Y(s)}{R(s)} = \frac{G(s)}{1 + G(s)H(s)}. This derivation follows from Y(s) = G(s) [R(s) - H(s) Y(s)], rearranging to isolate Y(s). For , the denominator becomes $1 - G(s)H(s), amplifying deviations from and potentially leading to if the loop exceeds unity. In time domain, continuous-time systems are described by ordinary differential equations; for a plant \dot{y} = -a y + b u with proportional feedback u = r - k y, the closed-loop equation is \dot{y} = -(a + b k) y + b r, with solution decaying exponentially if a + b k > 0. State-space representations generalize to multi-variable systems: \dot{x} = A x + B u, y = C x + D u, where feedback u = r - K y yields closed-loop dynamics \dot{x} = (A - B K C) x + B r. Discrete-time feedback uses difference equations, such as y_{n+1} = a y_n + b u_n with u_n = r_n - k y_n, leading to y_{n+1} = (a - b k) y_n + b r_n; stability requires |a - b k| < 1. These formulations enable analysis of stability via eigenvalues of the closed-loop matrix or roots of the characteristic equation $1 + G(s) H(s) = 0.

Historical Development

Precursors and Early Ideas

The earliest known artificial feedback mechanisms date to ancient civilizations, with the water clock invented by in Alexandria around the third century BCE representing one of the first recorded closed-loop control devices. This system used a float mechanism to regulate water inflow, maintaining consistent timekeeping by adjusting flow based on the water level, thereby embodying a basic negative feedback loop to counteract deviations. In medieval Europe, mechanical clocks incorporating verge and foliot escapements, emerging around the 14th century, incorporated feedback principles to synchronize pendulum swings with escapement actions, stabilizing time measurement against mechanical variations. These devices relied on the interaction between the clock's driving force and regulatory components to achieve approximate constancy, foreshadowing later control engineering. A pivotal advancement occurred in the late 18th century with James Watt's centrifugal flyball governor, patented in 1788 for steam engines, which automatically adjusted steam valve position in response to engine speed variations detected via rotating weighted balls. This mechanism formed a closed-loop system where centrifugal force provided speed feedback to modulate fuel input, enabling stable operation under fluctuating loads and marking a practical engineering application of negative feedback predating formal theory. Mathematical precursors emerged in the mid-19th century, notably with James Clerk Maxwell's 1868 analysis "On Governors," which provided the first rigorous examination of governor stability using differential equations to model feedback dynamics. Maxwell demonstrated that system stability depended on the relative strengths of inertial, damping, and restorative forces, introducing criteria for oscillatory versus divergent behavior in feedback-controlled mechanical systems. This work laid foundational insights into stability without modern linearization techniques, bridging empirical device design to analytical control principles.

20th Century Formalization

The formalization of feedback in control systems began in the early 20th century with efforts to address limitations in amplifier design for telecommunications. In 1927, Harold S. Black, an engineer at , conceived the negative feedback amplifier to minimize distortion and improve linearity in telephone repeaters, which suffered from nonlinearities causing signal degradation over long distances. Black's approach involved feeding a portion of the output signal back to the input in opposition, trading some gain for stability and reduced harmonic distortion; he formalized this in a 1934 Bell System Technical Journal paper after initial patent delays due to skepticism within the company. This invention marked a pivotal shift from open-loop amplification to closed-loop systems, enabling reliable long-haul telephony and laying groundwork for broader feedback applications. Advancements in stability analysis followed amid growing complexity in feedback circuits. In 1932, Harry Nyquist at Bell Labs developed the Nyquist stability criterion, a frequency-domain method to assess closed-loop stability by plotting the open-loop transfer function's response around the complex plane and counting encirclements of the critical point (-1, 0). This graphical technique allowed engineers to predict oscillations or instability without solving time-domain differential equations, proving essential for designing amplifiers and servomechanisms. Complementing this, Hendrik Bode in the 1940s introduced gain and phase margin concepts via logarithmic frequency plots (), providing practical tools for feedback compensation in systems like radar and aircraft controls during World War II. These methods, rooted in empirical testing and linear system approximations, formalized feedback design principles, emphasizing phase shift and gain roll-off to ensure robust performance against parameter variations. World War II accelerated theoretical maturation through servomechanism research for military applications, such as gun directors and autopilots, where feedback loops corrected errors in real-time. Post-war synthesis culminated in Norbert Wiener's 1948 book Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, which unified feedback across engineering, biology, and computation under the term "cybernetics." Wiener defined cybernetics as the study of control and communication in machines and living organisms, highlighting feedback's role in homeostasis and purposeful behavior, with mathematical models drawing on statistical prediction and anti-aircraft fire control experience. This interdisciplinary framework extended feedback beyond electronics to dynamical systems, influencing fields like automation and information theory, though Wiener cautioned against over-reliance on linear approximations in nonlinear regimes. By mid-century, these developments established feedback as a core paradigm in control engineering, supported by rigorous criteria for stability and performance.

Post-2000 Advances

In systems biology, post-2000 research has emphasized the role of feedback loops in gene regulatory networks (GRNs) for achieving robustness, adaptation, and dynamic behaviors such as oscillations and cell fate transitions. Interconnected feedback loops, often involving epigenetic modifications, have been shown to dictate cell fate decisions by integrating signals and stabilizing states, with topological analyses revealing how these structures enable precise control over differentiation processes. Negative feedback motifs, recurrent in bacterial and eukaryotic networks, reduce expression noise and enhance response speed, as demonstrated in models of gene expression where autoregulation halves rise times compared to simple regulation. These insights, enabled by high-throughput sequencing and computational simulations, have advanced predictive modeling of GRN dynamics beyond linear approximations. Synthetic biology has leveraged feedback principles to engineer biomolecular controllers for precise regulation in living cells, addressing challenges like load-induced variability in gene circuits. Designs incorporating integral feedback achieve perfect adaptation—returning outputs to setpoints despite disturbances—as seen in synthetic circuits mimicking bacterial chemotaxis, with experimental validation showing sustained oscillations and robustness to parameter variations. Growth-feedback interactions in these circuits further reveal how dilution effects from cell division influence adaptive responses, informing designs for therapeutic applications like insulin regulation. By 2021, reviews documented over a dozen classes of such controllers, highlighting their scalability from in vitro to mammalian systems. In engineering and physics, extensions of feedback theory have focused on robust and distributed control amid increasing system complexity. Robust feedback incorporating learning compensates for nonlinearities and uncertainties, as in adaptive controllers for mechanical systems that evolve parameters online to maintain stability under damage or faults. Quantum feedback control, formalized in the late 1990s but advanced through experimental implementations post-2000, enables stabilization of quantum states against decoherence, with continuous measurement-based schemes achieving feedback gains up to 10 dB in optical systems. Tutorials for physicists underscore feedback's utility in laser stabilization and atomic cooling, where proportional-integral designs suppress fluctuations by factors of 10^4 or more. These developments parallel networked applications, reducing bandwidth needs via event-triggered updates in cyber-physical systems.

Types of Feedback

Negative Feedback

Negative feedback is a regulatory process in dynamic systems where the output opposes deviations from a setpoint, thereby reducing the magnitude of perturbations and promoting stability. In control theory, it involves subtracting a portion of the output signal from the input, creating an error signal that drives corrective action to minimize discrepancies. This mechanism counters disturbances by generating responses proportional but opposite to changes, as seen in systems modeled by differential equations where feedback terms dampen transients. The stability-enhancing effect arises because negative feedback increases the denominator in the closed-loop transfer function, shifting poles to ensure convergence to equilibrium without unbounded growth. For linear time-invariant systems, criteria like Routh-Hurwitz assess whether roots of the characteristic equation $1 + G(s)H(s) = 0 lie in the left half-plane, confirming asymptotic stability under negative feedback. It also desensitizes the system to parameter variations; for example, a 10% gain change in the forward path affects closed-loop gain by roughly 1/(1+loop gain) times that amount when loop gain exceeds unity. However, excessive feedback or phase lags can induce instability via insufficient margins, leading to sustained oscillations if gain exceeds unity at 180-degree phase shift. In biology, negative feedback underlies homeostasis, such as in mammalian thermoregulation where hypothalamic sensors detect core temperature rises above 37°C, prompting vasodilation and sweat gland activation to dissipate heat via evaporation, restoring balance within minutes. exemplifies this: postprandial hyperglycemia exceeding 5.5 mmol/L triggers pancreatic beta-cell insulin secretion, enhancing uptake by tissues and suppressing hepatic gluconeogenesis, normalizing levels to 4-5.5 mmol/L fasting. In plants, stomatal closure during water stress maintains turgor by reducing transpiration, countering dehydration signals from . Engineering applications leverage negative feedback for precision control; operational amplifiers configured with resistive feedback networks achieve voltage gains stable across decades, with distortion reduced by factors of 40-60 dB. Thermostats in HVAC systems cycle heaters off when ambient temperature surpasses the setpoint by 0.5-1°C, preventing overshoot through hysteresis. Cruise control in vehicles uses speed sensors to throttle engine input inversely to velocity errors, maintaining set speeds within 1-2 km/h on inclines via proportional-integral algorithms. In servomechanisms, position feedback from encoders corrects motor torque, achieving settling times under 100 ms for robotic arms. These implementations demonstrate negative feedback's role in rejecting noise and disturbances, with loop gains often designed above 20-40 dB for robustness.

Positive Feedback

Positive feedback occurs in dynamical systems when the output of a process amplifies the initial input or perturbation, driving the system further from its equilibrium state and often resulting in rapid growth, instability, or irreversible shifts. Unlike negative feedback, which dampens deviations to maintain stability, positive feedback reinforces them through a loop gain greater than unity, where the fed-back signal adds constructively to the input signal. This mechanism is prevalent in both natural and engineered systems, though it typically requires external constraints to prevent unbounded divergence, such as saturation limits or thresholds. Mathematically, positive feedback can be represented in simple linear models as a differential equation of the form \frac{dx}{dt} = kx, where k > 0 is the feedback strength, yielding exponential solutions x(t) = x_0 e^{kt} that grow without bound unless nonlinear terms intervene. In more complex systems, it manifests as a positive eigenvalue in the Jacobian matrix of the system's dynamics, promoting instability and phenomena like bifurcations or hysteresis. Analysis of loop gain A\beta > 1 (where A is forward gain and \beta is feedback fraction) confirms amplification, contrasting with negative feedback's A\beta < 0 for oscillation or damping. In , drives processes like oxytocin release during labor, where stimulate further , escalating contractions until delivery on March 15, 2023, studies confirmed this loop's role in amplifying signals for timely parturition. clotting exemplifies amplification, as initial platelet activation triggers cascades releasing more activators, forming clots rapidly. In climate systems, the ice-albedo feedback accelerates warming: reduced since 1979 has lowered reflectivity, absorbing ~6% more solar radiation annually and melting additional ice, with satellite data from 2007–2012 showing a 10–20% coverage loss per decade. applications include oscillators, where in op-amp circuits sustains sinusoidal outputs at frequencies determined by components, as in Schmitt triggers for square-wave generation since . in sound systems produces high-pitched squeals when microphones capture amplified speaker output, reinforcing the signal until nonlinear distortion caps it. These examples highlight positive feedback's utility in initiating decisive changes but underscore risks of uncontrolled without balancing mechanisms.

Other Types and Variations

Mixed feedback systems incorporate both positive and negative loops within the same structure, enabling complex dynamics such as , oscillations, or robust switching behaviors. In cellular networks, coupled amplifies signals while embedded provides temporal control, forming motifs that underpin processes like regulation or bursts. Delayed feedback introduces time lags between output measurement and input correction, altering system stability and potentially inducing Hopf bifurcations or chaos even in otherwise stable loops. This variation is prevalent in biological oscillators, such as circadian rhythms where transcriptional delays sustain periodicity, and in engineering applications like networked control systems with communication latencies. Nonlinear feedback deviates from linear proportionality, allowing rich behaviors including multiple equilibria or sensitivity to initial conditions; for example, in , density-dependent nonlinear terms can shift negative feedback into positive regimes at low densities. Hysteretic feedback adds memory effects via discontinuous or path-dependent responses, preventing infinite runaway in positive loops and enabling bistable switches in electronic circuits like Schmitt triggers.

Modeling and Stability Analysis

Dynamical Systems and Equations

Feedback mechanisms in dynamical systems are mathematically modeled using ordinary differential equations (ODEs) or difference equations that capture the interdependence between system states and inputs derived from those states. For continuous-time systems, the general form is \dot{\mathbf{x}}(t) = f(\mathbf{x}(t), \mathbf{u}(t), t), where \mathbf{x}(t) \in \mathbb{R}^n represents the state vector, \mathbf{u}(t) is the control input shaped by feedback laws, and f denotes the vector field governing dynamics. Feedback enters through \mathbf{u}(t) = g(\mathbf{x}(t), \mathbf{y}(t), \mathbf{r}(t)), where \mathbf{y}(t) = h(\mathbf{x}(t)) is the output and \mathbf{r}(t) is a reference input, enabling the system to adjust its trajectory based on internal measurements. This formulation allows analysis of how feedback alters qualitative behaviors such as convergence or oscillation. In linear time-invariant systems, prevalent in control applications, the state-space representation simplifies to \dot{\mathbf{x}} = A\mathbf{x} + B\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{y} = C\mathbf{x} + D\mathbf{u}, with matrices A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}, B \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times m}, C \in \mathbb{R}^{p \times n}, and D \in \mathbb{R}^{p \times m}. State feedback, a common strategy, sets \mathbf{u} = -K\mathbf{x} (or includes integral action for tracking), yielding the closed-loop dynamics \dot{\mathbf{x}} = (A - BK)\mathbf{x}. This pole placement via K enables design for desired eigenvalues, as derived from controllability conditions where the controllability matrix [B, AB, \dots, A^{n-1}B] has full rank. Output feedback extends this by estimating states via observers when full measurement is unavailable. Nonlinear dynamical systems with feedback adopt forms like \dot{\mathbf{x}} = f(\mathbf{x}) + g(\mathbf{x})\mathbf{u}, where feedback linearization or Lyapunov-based designs stabilize orbits. For discrete-time systems, analogous representations use \mathbf{x}_{k+1} = A\mathbf{x}_k + B\mathbf{u}_k, with feedback \mathbf{u}_k = -K\mathbf{x}_k closing the loop to \mathbf{x}_{k+1} = (I - BK)\mathbf{x}_k, facilitating digital control implementations. These equations underpin simulations and predictions, as validated in texts on feedback control where empirical tuning matches physical responses in applications like mechanical oscillators.

Stability Criteria and Bifurcations

In linear time-invariant feedback systems, stability requires all closed-loop poles to have negative real parts, which can be verified using the Routh-Hurwitz criterion on the derived from the feedback . This algebraic method constructs a Routh array from coefficients; the system is if all elements in the first column are positive, indicating no right-half-plane roots. For systems with delays or uncertainties, the criterion extends to quasi-polynomials, though computational complexity increases. Frequency-domain approaches complement this for feedback amplifiers and control loops, where the assesses by counting encirclements of the -1 point in the by the open-loop plot; clockwise encirclements equal the number of unstable closed-loop poles for assessment without root solving. In practice, and margins derived from Bode plots provide conservative indicators, with margins exceeding 6 dB and 45 degrees ensuring robustness against parameter variations in feedback designs. For nonlinear feedback systems, local stability around equilibria is analyzed via , applying Routh-Hurwitz to the , while global stability employs Lyapunov functions: a positive definite V(\mathbf{x}) with negative definite \dot{V}(\mathbf{x}) along trajectories \dot{\mathbf{x}} = f(\mathbf{x}) guarantees asymptotic stability without solving the . In feedback contexts like Lur'e systems (linear with nonlinear feedback), circle criterion or sector bounds refine these, ensuring stability if the nonlinearity lies within a sector avoiding encirclement of the Nyquist plot. Bifurcations mark parameter thresholds where feedback-induced qualitative shifts occur, such as Hopf bifurcations in delayed loops, where a pair of eigenvalues crosses the imaginary axis, birthing cycles from equilibria—as seen in Goodwin oscillator models of genetic with Hill-function feedback. often triggers saddle-node bifurcations, yielding with , as in enzymatic or neural circuits where exceeds unity at multiple fixed points. Feedback control can suppress or induce these, using linear state feedback to shift bifurcation curves and stabilize post-bifurcation dynamics in high-dimensional systems. In optoelectronic or mechanical oscillators, such transitions manifest as amplitude death or onset, analyzable via normal forms reducing to supercritical Hopf equations \dot{r} = \mu r - r^3.

Applications in Natural Sciences

Physics

In , negative feedback mechanisms are essential for stability, arising primarily from temperature-dependent changes in interactions. As power increases, temperature rises, causing of absorption resonances in isotopes such as , which enhances parasitic absorption and reduces overall reactivity. Moderator density effects further contribute, as coolant expansion decreases moderation efficiency, yielding a negative coefficient of reactivity typically on the order of -1 to -5 pcm/°C in light-water reactors. These inherent feedbacks render the system self-regulating, damping excursions without external intervention, as demonstrated in transients where reactivity perturbations relax exponentially toward equilibrium. In , feedback control is applied to maintain precision in dynamic systems, such as stabilizing particle beams in accelerators. Sensors detect beam position deviations, and proportional-integral-derivative () controllers adjust electromagnetic fields in to correct trajectories, achieving sub-micrometer stability over operational timescales. Similarly, cryogenic temperature regulation in quantum experiments employs loops via resistive heaters and sensors, counteracting thermal drifts to sustain millikelvin environments essential for studies. Positive feedback in physics drives amplification and instabilities, often culminating in nonlinear phenomena. In laser systems, optical feedback—where emitted light is reinjected into the cavity—can trigger chaotic intensity fluctuations through interference and nonlinear gain saturation, with dynamics governed by delay differential equations showing broadband chaos at feedback strengths exceeding the solitary laser threshold by factors of 10^{-3} to 10^{-2}. In fluid dynamics, self-sustained oscillations arise from feedback loops in impinging jets, where downstream shock cells generate acoustic waves that propagate upstream, periodically modulating the nozzle lip separation and producing discrete tones at Strouhal numbers around 0.3 to 1.0, as observed in under-expanded supersonic flows. In plasma physics, positive feedback underlies certain micro-instabilities, such as beam-plasma interactions where coherent electron beam density waves couple with plasma oscillations, amplifying perturbations if the phase velocity matches, leading to exponential growth rates proportional to the beam density ratio. These mechanisms highlight feedback's role in transitioning systems from equilibrium to bifurcated states, informing models of fusion confinement where active negative feedback counters such positives to avert disruptions.

Biology

Feedback mechanisms in biology primarily function to regulate physiological processes and maintain , the dynamic equilibrium of internal conditions essential for organismal survival. Negative feedback loops, which counteract deviations from a set point, dominate in most systems to stabilize variables such as , , and levels. Positive feedback loops, conversely, amplify deviations to drive rapid changes, though they are less common and typically self-limiting to avoid destabilization. These loops operate across scales, from molecular regulatory networks to whole-organism , often involving sensors, integrators like the or endocrine glands, and effectors such as muscles or hormones. A canonical example of is blood glucose regulation. When glucose levels rise after a , pancreatic cells release insulin, which promotes uptake by cells and storage as , restoring levels to approximately 70-110 mg/dL; conversely, low glucose triggers from alpha cells to mobilize , preventing . This loop exemplifies causal realism in , where deviations directly signal compensatory responses via hormonal cascades. similarly employs : hypothalamic thermoreceptors detect core temperature deviations from 37°C, eliciting effectors like or to restore balance, with failure leading to conditions like . Blood pH maintenance at 7.35-7.45 involves respiratory and renal adjustments, where increased CO2 acidity prompts to expel it, underscoring the loop's role in averting . Positive feedback occurs in scenarios requiring swift amplification, such as parturition. Uterine contractions during labor stretch cervical tissues, stimulating oxytocin release from the ; this hormone intensifies contractions, escalating until delivery expels the and halts the loop, typically completing within 12-18 hours in humans. Blood clotting provides another instance: vascular exposes , activating platelets that aggregate and release , recruiting more platelets and converting fibrinogen to in a cascade amplifying the response until seals the wound, preventing . These mechanisms, while adaptive, can pathologize if dysregulated, as in excessive clotting contributing to . At the molecular level, feedback loops govern gene regulatory networks (GRNs), enabling dynamic behaviors like and oscillations critical for cell fate and development. Negative autoregulation in GRNs accelerates response times and reduces noise, as seen in the where high lactose represses synthesis, fine-tuning E. coli metabolism. motifs, such as mutual activation between transcription factors, create irreversible switches for , exemplified in the toggle switch model where two repressors mutually inhibit, yielding stable "on" or "off" states for prokaryotic or eukaryotic pluripotency. Interplay between positive and negative loops in GRNs modulates oscillations, as in circadian rhythms where PER and CRY proteins negatively feedback on CLOCK-BMAL1 activation, sustaining ~24-hour cycles with periods robust to perturbations. Empirical studies confirm these loops' prevalence, with feedback structures identified in over 70% of analyzed bacterial and eukaryotic GRNs, influencing robustness against mutations. Disruptions, such as in cancer where unchecked drives proliferation, highlight their causal role in .

Climate Science

In climate science, feedback mechanisms amplify or dampen the initial from increases, influencing (ECS), defined as the long-term change per doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration. Without feedbacks, ECS would approximate 1.2°C based on the no-feedback response derived from calculations. Positive feedbacks, such as and surface changes, increase ECS, while negative feedbacks, like the Planck response, counteract warming. Empirical estimates of net feedbacks vary, with energy balance approaches using observed and forcing data yielding ECS medians around 1.6–2.0°C, lower than multimodel means of approximately 3°C. Water vapor feedback is the strongest positive contributor, as warmer air holds more moisture, enhancing the ; combined with feedback (tropospheric warming reducing the temperature gradient), it amplifies forcing by about 50% in models and observations. Surface feedback from melting Arctic and reduces reflectivity, absorbing more solar radiation and contributing positively, estimated at 0.2–0.5 W/m² per degree in polar regions. feedback remains uncertain but recent observations indicate a net positive effect, with low-level cloud reductions allowing more surface warming, supporting ECS above 2°C. Negative feedbacks include the Planck feedback, where increased emission to space from warmer surfaces opposes forcing at roughly -3.2 W/m² per globally, and lapse rate effects in some layers. Biogeochemical feedbacks, such as permafrost thaw releasing or reduced carbon sinks, could add positive amplification, though their magnitudes are debated due to limited paleoclimate analogs and model discrepancies. Critiques of higher sensitivity estimates highlight over-reliance on models with inflated aerosol cooling assumptions, leading to biased forcing adjustments; observationally constrained studies suggest net feedbacks closer to zero, implying less amplification than projected. Uncertainties persist in feedback interactions, such as regional responses and uptake efficacy, complicating transient vs. projections. Satellite-era data show observed warming aligning better with lower-sensitivity estimates, challenging models that overestimate tropospheric warming rates. Overall, while consensus models emphasize positive net feedbacks driving ECS toward 3°C, empirical methods grounded in records indicate a range of 1–3°C, underscoring the need for refined forcing diagnostics and long-term observations to resolve discrepancies.

Applications in Engineering and Technology

Control Theory

Feedback control forms the cornerstone of , enabling the design of systems that maintain desired outputs despite disturbances or uncertainties by comparing measured states to reference values and adjusting inputs accordingly. loops predominate, as they promote stability and reduce sensitivity to plant variations, with early mathematical foundations laid by James Clerk Maxwell in his 1868 analysis of centrifugal governors, which predicted stability limits based on and damping. Subsequent advancements, such as Hendrik Bode's 1945 loop-shaping techniques for feedback amplifiers, extended these principles to frequency-domain design, emphasizing and margins to ensure robust performance. Core components of a feedback include the (process), controller, sensors for output measurement, and actuators for input application, with the controller computing error as the difference between setpoint and sensed value to generate corrective signals. analysis relies on criteria like the Nyquist theorem, which assesses closed-loop by examining the open-loop : for systems with no right-half-plane poles, requires the Nyquist plot to avoid encircling the -1 point in the . This graphical method, rooted in the argument principle, quantifies encirclements to match unstable open-loop poles, ensuring no closed-loop poles enter the right-half-plane under . Robustness to uncertainties, such as multiplicative perturbations, is evaluated via norms like the infinity-norm of weighted complementary sensitivity functions, where ||W₂T||_∞ < 1 guarantees margins. Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers exemplify practical feedback implementation, combining proportional response for immediate error correction, integral action to eliminate steady-state offsets, and derivative terms for anticipating changes, widely applied since the mid-20th century in . In , PID feedback regulates motor speeds in , maintains temperatures in chemical reactors (e.g., continuous stirred-tank reactors adjusting flow rates to stabilize concentrations), and enables in vehicles by modulating based on speed deviations. Positive feedback, conversely, can amplify errors leading to bifurcations or oscillations, as seen in Schmitt triggers or certain adaptive schemes, but is typically avoided in stabilization contexts to prevent instability. Modern extensions incorporate , as in Kalman filtering from 1960, for state estimation in noisy environments, enhancing feedback precision in and . Empirical challenges in feedback design include tuning for non-minimum phase plants or time delays, where or excessive derivative noise can degrade performance, necessitating anti-windup mechanisms or filtered derivatives in implementations. Advances since the have integrated input-output stability frameworks, linking classical methods to multivariable systems and enabling applications in process industries, where feedback rejects disturbances like load changes in distillation columns. These principles underpin servomechanisms from James Watt's 1788 flyball to contemporary adaptive controls, demonstrating feedback's enduring role in achieving causal regulation through measurable error minimization.

Electronic and Mechanical Engineering

In , amplifiers, pioneered by Harold S. Black on August 2, 1927, at Bell Laboratories, reduce distortion and stabilize against variations in component values and temperature. This principle forms the basis of operational amplifiers (op-amps), where feedback loops enable high-precision applications such as integrators, differentiators, and filters in . Stability in these systems is assessed using tools like the , which evaluates encirclements of the -1 point in the , or Bode plots analyzing and margins to prevent oscillations. , conversely, sustains oscillations in circuits like hysteretic oscillators, essential for clock generation in digital systems. In mechanical engineering, feedback mechanisms trace back to James Watt's centrifugal flyball governor, patented in 1788, which automatically adjusted steam valve position to maintain constant engine speed by sensing rotational velocity via weighted balls. This negative feedback loop exemplifies proportional control, where output deviation from setpoint proportionally corrects input, foundational to modern proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers used in servomechanisms for robotics and CNC machines. Feedback also mitigates vibrations in mechanical structures, such as active suspension systems in vehicles, where sensors detect motion and actuators apply counter-forces to dampen resonances, improving stability and performance. Electromechanical integration, like in stepper motors, employs feedback for precise position control, ensuring synchronization between electrical pulses and mechanical output.

Software, Computing, and AI

In computing systems, feedback control principles are applied to maintain stability and performance in hardware-software interfaces, such as clock synchronization, where output discrepancies are fed back to adjust timing mechanisms and prevent drift. This approach treats clocks as unstable dynamical systems, using feedback loops to minimize errors and ensure reliable operation across distributed environments. Similarly, in distributed computing, feedback loops route system outputs—such as load metrics or failure signals—back as inputs to enable self-regulation, adapting resource allocation dynamically to varying workloads and faults. Software engineering leverages feedback loops for iterative refinement, particularly in practices where outputs from , automated testing, and deployment pipelines are recirculated to detect defects early and improve code quality. These loops shorten cycle times between development actions and validation outcomes, with studies showing that tighter feedback—such as real-time test results—correlates with higher delivery success rates by allowing rapid corrections. In for adaptive software, feedback loops model interactions where system decisions alter the environment, which in turn updates the system's state, facilitating evolution in dynamic contexts like cloud-based applications. In , feedback mechanisms underpin learning algorithms that adjust models based on performance signals. (RL) relies on reward feedback, where agents iteratively refine policies by evaluating action outcomes against environmental responses, optimizing long-term objectives through . A prominent extension, (RLHF), trains reward models on human preference data—such as pairwise comparisons of model outputs—to align AI behaviors with subjective human values, as demonstrated in large language models for safer and more helpful responses. This process involves supervised followed by RL optimization using the reward signal, enabling models pretrained on vast corpora to adapt without explicit programming of preferences. Feedback loops in AI also extend to error correction, where model predictions are evaluated and reintroduced as training inputs, iteratively reducing inaccuracies over cycles. However, RLHF's effectiveness depends on the quality and scale of human annotations, with surveys noting challenges in scaling feedback for complex tasks.

Applications in Social and Behavioral Sciences

Economics

In , feedback mechanisms capture the dynamic interactions where outputs from economic agents or markets loop back as inputs, influencing future outcomes and . These s are to models of market adjustment, growth, and cycles, with generally promoting stability by dampening deviations and amplifying changes, potentially leading to instability or multiple equilibria. Economic and approaches incorporate such loops to represent nonlinear interactions beyond static equilibrium analysis. Negative feedback loops underpin the self-correcting nature of competitive markets, where signals restore balance. When supply exceeds , prices fall, signaling producers to reduce output while encouraging higher , converging toward without external intervention. This process exemplifies how decentralized decisions generate stabilizing forces, as seen in Walrasian models adapted to real markets. In , feedback rules like the adjust interest rates based on deviations in and output from targets, providing negative feedback to mitigate inflationary spirals or recessions; empirical estimates show such rules reduced in U.S. from the onward. Positive feedback loops drive amplification and , often explaining booms, busts, and development traps. The Keynesian multiplier effect illustrates this: an initial increase in autonomous spending raises incomes, prompting further consumption based on the (typically 0.6-0.8 in advanced economies), multiplying the impact until leakages stabilize it, but initially reinforcing expansion. In financial markets, and trading create positive loops, where rising asset prices attract more buyers, inflating bubbles; the 2008 featured such dynamics, with home price gains (up 80% from 2000-2006 in the U.S.) fueling lending and until collapse. Models with externalities, such as infrastructure investments generating returns that spur further investment, explain "economic miracles" like East Asia's growth as shifts from low- to high-productivity equilibria via reinforcing loops. These mechanisms highlight ' departure from pure toward dynamical systems, where positive feedbacks introduce bifurcations and tipping points, as in cycles or technological adoption. However, empirical identification remains challenging due to confounding factors, with critiques noting that overlooking positive loops in classical models underestimates risks.

Education and

In , feedback refers to provided to students about their relative to learning goals, enabling adjustments in study strategies and understanding. A of 435 studies involving over 52,000 participants found that feedback interventions yield an average of 0.48 on student achievement, with stronger effects (up to 0.73 in earlier syntheses) when feedback targets task , self-regulation, or effort rather than ego or . This impact is moderated by factors such as feedback timing—immediate feedback enhances cognitive outcomes more than delayed—and content specificity, where verifiable improvements in skills like problem-solving occur when feedback highlights discrepancies between current and desired . For instance, feedback that is clear, actionable, and aligned with revision opportunities directly correlates with higher achievement scores, as evidenced in randomized experiments where students receiving such feedback improved by 10-15% on subsequent assessments compared to controls. Empirical challenges arise when feedback lacks student engagement; studies show that up to 20% of secondary students fail to engage with feedback due to low perceived utility or overload, reducing its causal effect on long-term learning outcomes. Recent surveys indicate 93% of students report heightened from feedback, yet only when it fosters rather than mere praise, underscoring the need for feedback to operate as a negative correcting errors rather than reinforcing unrelated traits. Peer and self-feedback can supplement input, but meta-analyses reveal -provided feedback outperforms peers (effect size 0.61 vs. 0.20) in driving measurable gains in subjects like and writing. In , feedback mechanisms underpin self-regulation theories, where individuals monitor behavior against internal standards via cybernetic processes, adjusting actions to minimize discrepancies in a test-operate-test-exit (TOTE) loop. This model, rooted in , posits that loops—comparing current states to goals and correcting deviations—drive goal-directed behavior, as seen in where reinforcement signals refine responses to achieve . For example, in , feedback from physiological cues (e.g., ) enables downregulation of stress responses, with studies showing activation during discrepancy detection and adjustment. loops, conversely, can amplify behaviors like rumination, leading to maladaptive outcomes unless interrupted by cognitive reappraisal. Behavioral applications include formation, where delayed feedback weakens self-regulatory ; longitudinal studies demonstrate that immediate, discrepancy-focused feedback increases adherence to goals by 25-30% in tasks requiring sustained effort, such as or exercise. Cybernetic frameworks also explain motivational , with feedback influencing perceived —low-trust sources diminish effectiveness, as individuals discount signals and persist in errors. These principles extend to clinical settings, where therapeutic feedback interrupts pathological loops, yielding sizes of 0.50-0.70 in reducing symptoms of anxiety and through structured .

Management and Organizational Behavior

In management, feedback refers to the provision of information about an individual's or team's performance relative to expectations, aimed at guiding behavioral adjustments to enhance organizational outcomes. This process draws from behavioral principles where observable actions receive reinforcement or correction, influencing future performance through mechanisms like operant conditioning. Empirical studies indicate that structured feedback systems correlate with improved task efficiency and goal attainment, though outcomes depend on delivery quality and contextual factors. Types of feedback in organizations include downward feedback from supervisors, upward from subordinates, peer-to-peer, and multi-source (e.g., 360-degree assessments), each serving distinct purposes such as skill development or alignment with strategic goals. Person-mediated feedback, whether qualitative or quantitative, has demonstrated stronger effects on and compared to automated or numeric-only variants, as it allows for personalized interpretation and . Positive feedback reinforces successful behaviors and boosts subsequent productivity, while negative feedback's impact is more variable, often failing to yield improvements without accompanying actionable plans. Meta-analyses of feedback interventions reveal an average positive effect on , with effect sizes moderated by factors like feedback frequency and recipient orientation toward it; for instance, employees with high feedback orientation exhibit better and output. Continuous, frequent feedback—such as weekly check-ins—engages 80% of recipients fully, outperforming annual reviews by enabling corrections and reducing recency biases in evaluations. However, inconsistencies arise: low-quality or infrequent feedback shows negligible or null effects, and low performers may gain more from targeted interventions than high performers, challenging assumptions of uniform benefits. In , effective feedback fosters a of accountability and learning, linking individual actions to collective results via causal pathways like heightened and reduced errors. Studies link it to elevated organizational citizenship behaviors and , particularly when framed around future-oriented actions rather than past failures, which sustains managerial motivation for change. Feedback-seeking behaviors, driven by job resources like , further amplify these dynamics, though systemic barriers such as rater biases or relational tensions can undermine accuracy and acceptance. Overall, while feedback remains a for performance management, its efficacy hinges on empirical calibration to specific organizational contexts rather than rote application.

Limitations and Empirical Challenges

General Limitations

Feedback systems are prone to instability when design parameters, such as margins or margins, are inadequately tuned, potentially resulting in oscillations or rather than to a setpoint. loops, in particular, amplify deviations, leading to or system collapse in contexts where stabilization is intended, as observed in self-reinforcing mechanisms that exceed carrying capacities or thresholds. Time delays inherent in measurement, processing, or actuation introduce phase lags that degrade , often manifesting as underdamped responses or limit cycles, with the highlighting how delays beyond certain frequencies preclude . Feedback exacerbates sensitivity to and disturbances, as corrective actions based on erroneous inputs can propagate errors rather than mitigate them, necessitating additional filtering that further complicates design. Fundamental performance bounds arise from intrinsic system properties, including right-half-plane poles or zeros, which impose unavoidable trade-offs between tracking speed, disturbance rejection, and robustness, as quantified in Bode integral constraints where enhanced low-frequency inevitably amplifies high-frequency . Unmodeled , nonlinearities, or saturation further limit efficacy, as linear feedback approximations fail under large perturbations, leading to bifurcations or behavior not captured by small-signal analyses. Implementation of feedback increases complexity through added sensors, actuators, and controllers, raising costs and points of , while remaining inherently reactive to deviations rather than preempting them via augmentation. In empirical applications, identifying and quantifying all relevant loops proves challenging due to variables and incomplete , often resulting in over- or under-correction that entrenches suboptimal equilibria.

Field-Specific Criticisms and Debates

In , feedback systems face fundamental performance limitations, including trade-offs between stability, robustness, and speed of response, as quantified by metrics like the Bode integral constraints, which impose unavoidable sensitivity to unmodeled dynamics or disturbances. Poorly designed feedback can lead to , particularly in high-gain configurations where amplifies perturbations, potentially causing system oscillations or failure, as seen in mechanical servos or chemical processes with transport delays. Debates persist on the applicability of linear feedback models to nonlinear or systems, with critics arguing that assumptions of small perturbations overlook risks, while proponents of quantitative feedback theory defend robust designs against parametric uncertainty, though empirical validation in real-time applications like remains contested. In software and , feedback loops in pipelines often degenerate into bias amplification, where model predictions recycled as training data exacerbate initial errors, as documented in algorithms that reinforce historical arrest disparities by upweighting flawed outputs. -AI interaction loops further internalize subtle human biases, with studies showing participants adopting AI-amplified stereotypes in perceptual tasks after iterative exposure, raising causal concerns about emergent echo chambers in recommendation systems. A prominent debate centers on "model collapse," where generative models trained on from prior iterations degrade in diversity and accuracy—evidenced by experiments where language models exposed to 90% AI-generated text produced incoherent outputs after three generations—prompting calls for hybrid human-curated datasets to mitigate self-referential decay. Within and , negative feedback frequently fails to yield improvements due to recipient rejection, with meta-analyses indicating that harsh critiques trigger defensiveness, leading to disengagement or poorer peer/course evaluations, particularly when perceived as uncaring. Students often dismiss teacher or peer input amid feelings of powerlessness, as qualitative studies reveal mismatches between feedback intent and actionable , undermining causal pathways to skill acquisition. Debates highlight the risks of over-relying on , which can foster fixed mindsets and reduce to , contrasting with that calibrated boosts and math outcomes in children when timed developmentally, though adult applications suffer from emotional barriers like aversion. Critics argue for interdisciplinary , noting fragmented silos hinder generalizable models of feedback . In , positive feedback mechanisms are critiqued for entrenching , as models of externalities show self-reinforcing cycles—such as capital accumulation favoring high-return assets—trapping economies in low-equilibrium traps, with empirical cases like post-colonial illustrating over equilibrating forces. Rebound effects from efficiency gains, like in energy use, challenge neoclassical assumptions of stabilization, with analyses of 26 mechanisms revealing amplification loops that offset policy interventions by 10-30% in historical data. Debates question the strength of market feedback in developing contexts, where informational asymmetries weaken price signals, fostering volatile loops as observed in Chinese financial markets during 2007-2013 booms. Management and organizational behavior literature underscores receptivity barriers to feedback, with recipients often filtering input through self-serving attributions, resulting in minimal behavioral change despite delivery efforts, as longitudinal studies report uptake rates below 40% for critical comments. Managers hesitate due to overestimated interpersonal costs, with surveys indicating 60% avoidance of negative discussions from fear of backlash, perpetuating unaddressed performance gaps. Toxic or poorly timed feedback demotivates, prompting misallocation of effort toward irrelevant fixes, while computer-mediated variants underperform person-to-person exchanges in driving sustained improvements. Empirical challenges include one-way prescriptive styles that erode buy-in, favoring directive cultures over collaborative loops essential for adaptive organizations.

References

  1. [1]
    Looking for Feedback | POLARIS - CDC
    Sep 16, 2024 · Looking for feedback is an important concept when thinking about systems. Feedback occurs when a condition in a system causes activity that then impacts that ...
  2. [2]
    Feedback Loops Shape Cellular Signals in Space and Time - PMC
    Oct 17, 2008 · Feedback loops are processes that connect output signals back to their inputs. The history of biological feedback goes back at least 130 years ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] CLIMATE CHANGE AND FEEDBACK LOOPS
    A feedback is similar to a cause and effect loop, where information about a system is sent back to the system to improve its performance. An example is your ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers
    This book provides an introduction to the basic principles and tools for design and analysis of feedback systems. It is intended to serve a diverse.
  5. [5]
    Systems explained: What do we mean by feedback? | OpenLearn
    Jul 4, 2010 · Negative feedback happens when an increase in one thing leads to a decrease in another, so bringing the system back into line with its purpose.
  6. [6]
    Climate Feedback Loops and Tipping Points
    The American Meteorological Society defines a feedback as a sequence of interactions determining the response of the system to an initial change.
  7. [7]
    Positive and Negative Feedback in Engineering and Biology
    Positive feedback, from Armstrong's patents, and negative feedback, like the pupil light reflex, are concepts that have deeply impacted engineering and biology.
  8. [8]
    Biological feedback control—Respect the loops - ScienceDirect.com
    Jun 16, 2021 · Similar to negative feedback, positive feedback implemented directly through autogenous regulation (or indirectly through a multi-step ...
  9. [9]
    Biology using engineering tools: The negative feedback amplifier
    First, according to theory, when negative feedback is present, the relationship between system output and input becomes more linear, countering the effects of ...
  10. [10]
    Positive and Negative Feedback Loops in Biology - Albert.io
    May 10, 2023 · Feedback loops are a mechanism to maintain homeostasis, by increasing the response to an event (positive feedback) or (negative feedback).
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Feedback Loops: Mapping Transformative Interactions in ... - ERIC
    Defining Feedback Loops. Feedback loops are structures and approaches to the way that parties engaged in a relationship share information and learn from one ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Some Basic Concepts in System Dynamics
    Jan 29, 2009 · Feedback loops are the structures within which all changes occur. Filling a glass of water is not merely a matter of water flowing into the ...
  13. [13]
    Feedback System - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Feedback describes the functioning principle in self-regulating systems, either mechanical or biologic. Feedback assumes that the output of any self-regulating ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Feedback Loops - Complex Systems Frameworks Collection
    Reinforcing loops, also known as positive feedback ... Balancing loops, or negative feedback loops, counteract changes, promoting stability and equilibrium within ...
  15. [15]
    Systems Thinking: Feedback Loops - The W. Edwards Deming Institute
    Apr 28, 2016 · Feedback loops are a part of systems thinking. Reinforcing Loops A reinforcing loop encourages the system to continue in that direction.
  16. [16]
    Fostering Feedback Loop Thinking - SERC (Carleton)
    Jul 16, 2025 · Feedback loops are systems in which an initial action triggers a chain of influences that either amplifies or counteracts the initial action.
  17. [17]
    10.7: Homeostasis and Feedback - Biology LibreTexts
    Sep 4, 2021 · When body temperature reaches normal range, it acts as negative feedback to stop the process. Feedback may be negative or positive. All the ...What is Homeostasis? · Negative Feedback · Positive Feedback
  18. [18]
    Homeostasis (article) | Feedback - Khan Academy
    In contrast to negative feedback loops, positive feedback loops amplify their initiating stimuli, in other words, they move the system away from its starting ...
  19. [19]
    Positive feedback - Wikipedia
    Positive feedback is a process that occurs in a feedback loop where the outcome of a process reinforces the inciting process to build momentum.Examples and applications · In electronics · In biology · In economics
  20. [20]
    Mental Model: Feedback Loops - Farnam Street
    Positive feedback amplifies system output, resulting in growth or decline. Negative feedback dampers output, stabilizes the system around an equilibrium point.
  21. [21]
    Feedback Loops - Strategy Dynamics - Medium
    This is a positive feedback loop where you get more of the result. · Balancing Loop — This is a negative ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Chapter Eight - Transfer Functions
    The gain of the closed loop system drops off at high frequencies as R2k/(ω(R1 + R2)). The frequency response of the transfer function is shown in Figure 8.3b ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Feedback Control Theory - University of Toronto
    Control systems are designed so that certain designated signals, such as tracking errors and actuator inputs, do not exceed pre-specified levels. Hindering the ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Feedback Systems
    Jul 24, 2020 · In each case, if the real part of the exponent is negative then the signal decays, while if the real part is positive then it grows. Having ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Feedback Control Theory - Duke People
    mathematical approach is most useful for multivariable systems, where graphical techniques usually break down. Nevertheless, we believe the setting of ...
  26. [26]
    History | IEEE Control Systems Society
    The first feedback control device on record is thought to be the ancient water clock of Ktesibios in Alexandria Egypt around the third century B.C. It kept time ...Missing: precursors | Show results with:precursors
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Control Systems as Used by the Ancient World - Scholarly Commons
    Apr 27, 2015 · Ancient control systems also fell into the categories of open loop and closed loop feedback types. Closed loop systems were much more difficult ...
  28. [28]
    Feedback control in ancient water and mechanical clocks
    Attention is focused on Ktesibios' water clock and the outstanding mechanical clocks based on the crown wheel escapement that first appeared in Europe at ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  29. [29]
    Feedback control in ancient water and mechanical clocks
    In this paper, we show that the medieval clocks based on the verge and foliot mechanism can rightfully be regarded as feedback systems. In particular, we derive ...
  30. [30]
    Brief History of Feedback Control - F.L. Lewis
    Namely, control theory began to acquire its written language- the language of mathematics. J.C. Maxwell provided the first rigorous mathematical analysis of a ...
  31. [31]
    The Origins of Feedback Control 026213067X, 9780262630566 ...
    The early history of feedback control must be sought prior to the 19th century. James Watt's centrifugal governor, invented in 1788, was the first 2Missing: precursors | Show results with:precursors
  32. [32]
    I. On governors | Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
    A Governor is a part of a machine by means of which the velocity of the machine is kept nearly uniform, notwithstanding variations in the driving-power or the ...
  33. [33]
    Origin of Stability Analysis: \"On Governors\" by J.C. Maxwell ...
    Sep 15, 2016 · The purpose of this article is to provide historical information on the origin of stability analysis in Maxwell's paper and to rederive his key equations.
  34. [34]
    James Clerk Maxwell, a precursor of system identification and ...
    However, Maxwell was also a precursor of model identification and control ideas. Indeed, with the paper 'On Governors' of 1869, he introduced the concept of ...
  35. [35]
    Harold Black and the negative-feedback amplifier - IEEE Xplore
    Aug 31, 1993 · On August 2, 1927, Harold Black, a young Bell Labs engineer just six years out of college, invented the negative-feedback amplifier.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Inventing the negative feedback amplifier
    Hall of Fame inducted the engineer inventor, Harold S. Black (Fig. 1), in recognition of his invention of negative feedback amplifiers. He spent most of his.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Nyquist Stability Criterion
    The Nyquist method is used for studying the stability of linear systems with pure time delay. For a SISO feedback system the closed-loop transfer function is ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Introduction to Feedback Control Systems
    May 2, 2010 · century. But it was only in the 1930's that a theory of feedback control was first developed by Black and Nyquist at Bell Labs. They were ...
  39. [39]
    Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the ...
    With the influential book Cybernetics, first published in 1948, Norbert Wiener laid the theoretical foundations for the multidisciplinary field of cybernetics ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Feedback, core of cybernetics - Cvut
    systems, the feedback weakens the need for precise models. □ Formalized by Norbert Wiener in 1948. □ The feedback concept is much older, though. Norbert Wiener.
  41. [41]
    Operating principles of interconnected feedback loops driving cell ...
    Jan 2, 2025 · Recent advances have highlighted that the topology (structure) of GRNs can substantially dictate the fate decisions of cells and, have ...
  42. [42]
    A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions ... - Frontiers
    Our aim with this review was to describe the most prominent models and theories, identified using a systematic, three-step approach.
  43. [43]
    Advances in systems biology modeling: 10 years of crowdsourcing ...
    Jun 16, 2021 · ... feedback loops generate a daily oscillation of protein levels underlying the clock's mechanism (Meyer and Young, 2007). In this example, the ...
  44. [44]
    Biomolecular feedback controllers: from theory to applications
    Here, we review various biomolecular feedback controllers, highlight their characteristics, and point out their promising impact.
  45. [45]
    Dynamical mechanisms of growth-feedback effects on adaptive ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · The paper presents valuable computational findings on how growth feedback affects the performance of synthetic gene circuits designed for adaptive responses.
  46. [46]
    Recent advances in robust control, feedback and learning
    Sep 29, 2007 · As robust control theory has matured, a key challenge has been the need for a more flexible theory that provides a unified basis for ...
  47. [47]
    [quant-ph/9912107] Quantum feedback control and classical ... - arXiv
    Dec 24, 1999 · We introduce and discuss the problem of quantum feedback control in the context of established formulations of classical control theory, ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Feedback for physicists: A tutorial essay on control | Rev. Mod. Phys.
    Aug 31, 2005 · This tutorial essay aims to give enough of the formal elements of control theory to satisfy the experimentalist designing or running a typical physics ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  49. [49]
    Recent advances in robust control, feedback and learning
    The theory enables design of nonlinear feedback control systems that learn, discover and evolve in order to robustly compensate for battle damage, equipment ...
  50. [50]
    Control System Basics — FIRST Robotics Competition documentation
    Jun 21, 2025 · The negative feedback controller shown is driving the difference between the reference and output, also known as the error, to zero. What is ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Lecture 13 Dynamic analysis of feedback
    Dynamic analysis of feedback. • Closed-loop, sensitivity, and loop transfer functions. • Stability of feedback systems. 13–1. Page 2. Some assumptions we now ...
  52. [52]
    Negative Feedback, Part 4: Introduction to Stability - Technical Articles
    Nov 19, 2015 · Negative feedback amplifiers are susceptible to oscillation and what condition must be present to ensure stability.Missing: dynamical | Show results with:dynamical
  53. [53]
    Negative feedback loop examples (article) - Khan Academy
    Example #1: Regulation of body temperature · Example #2: Balancing water loss and photosynthesis in plants · Example #3: Regulation of breathing · Example #4: ...
  54. [54]
    Feedback mechanism | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Negative feedback loops are regulatory mechanisms common in engineering and biology. ... Automated thermostats are a common example of a negative feedback loop.
  55. [55]
    Negative Feedback Example: 8 Real-World Insights - Supportman
    Mar 14, 2025 · Negative feedback loops maintain stability by counteracting changes. Examples include thermostats, blood sugar regulation, and cruise control.
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    Difference between Positive Feedback and Negative Feedback
    Jul 23, 2025 · Positive feedback adds to input, is less stable, and has high gain. Negative feedback subtracts, is more stable, and has low gain.What is Feedback? · Positive Feedback · Negative Feedback
  58. [58]
    Feedback Systems - Electronics Tutorials
    A feedback system is one in which the output signal is sampled and then fed back to the input to form an error signal that drives the system.Missing: mathematical | Show results with:mathematical
  59. [59]
    2. The Mathematics of Positive Feedback
    When a model is put into explicit mathematical form, it can be analyzed to predict the effect on all parts of the system of external intervention on any single ...
  60. [60]
    Identification, visualization, statistical analysis and mathematical ...
    Oct 4, 2021 · Feedback loops are well-known gene regulatory network structures responsible for dynamical behaviors important for cell fate decisions. For ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  61. [61]
    15 Climate Feedback Loops and Examples - Earth How
    Climate feedback loops amplify or reduce climate change. Positive feedback loops like permafrost melt amplifies climate change because it releases methane.
  62. [62]
    A feedback control principle common to several biological and ...
    Mar 2, 2022 · The behaviour of discrete-event feedback systems is determined by how a control variable changes upon receipt of positive or negative feedback.
  63. [63]
    Coupled Feedback Loops Form Dynamic Motifs of Cellular Networks
    The main role of positive feedback loops is the amplification of signal. On the other hand, positive feedbacks elongate the time to arrive at a steady state, ...
  64. [64]
    Global stabilization of feedforward nonlinear time-delay systems by ...
    The new special canonical form used in this paper contains not only time delay in the input but also time delays in the state, which leads to natural ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Input Delay Compensation for Forward Complete and Strict ...
    Feb 5, 2010 · Abstract—We present an approach for compensating input delay of arbitrary length in nonlinear control systems. This approach,.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Feedback Systems
    We call the set of all possible states the state space. A common class of mathematical models for dynamical systems is ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  67. [67]
  68. [68]
    [PDF] 16.30 Topic 5: Introduction to state-space models
    State space model: a representation of the dynamics of an Nth order system as a first order differential equation in an N-vector, which is called the state. ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Chapter 5 - State and Output Feedback
    In this chapter we will explore the idea of controlling a system through feedback of the state. We will assume that the system to be controlled is described by ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] ME 433 – STATE SPACE CONTROL State Feedback
    Problem Definition: “A system is said to be controllable if and only if it is possible, by means of the input, to transfer the system from any initial state ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Chapter 5 Dynamic and Closed-Loop Control - Princeton University
    Thus, the transfer function relates the Laplace transform of the input to the Laplace transform of the output. It is often defined as the Laplace transform of ...
  72. [72]
    Routh-Hurwitz Criterion - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The Routh-Hurwitz criterion is defined as a necessary and sufficient condition for the stability of linear systems, determined by the signs and non-zero values ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Lecture 10: Routh-Hurwitz Stability Criterion - Matthew M. Peet
    The Routh-Hurwitz Stability Criterion: • Determine whether a system is stable. • An easy way to make sure feedback isn't destabilizing. • Construct the Routh ...
  74. [74]
    (PDF) Investigating the Stability of Control Systems - ResearchGate
    Jun 22, 2024 · Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet. ... It allows engineers to analyze systems with multiple feedback ...
  75. [75]
    (PDF) Nyquist's Criterion for Stability and Equivalent Feedback ...
    Jan 31, 2025 · Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet. Download file PDF · Read file · Download citation. Copy link Link copied ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] CHEN403 Stability Feedback Control Systems
    A dynamic system is considered stable if for every bounded input it produces a bounded output, regardless of its initial state.Missing: "peer | Show results with:"peer<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    [PDF] 16.30 Topic 22: Analysis of nonlinear systems - MIT OpenCourseWare
    Nov 27, 2010 · Lyapunov's theorem ensures asymptotic stability if we can find a Lya punov function that is strictly decreasing away from the equilibrium. • ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Lecture 15: Nonlinear Systems and Lyapunov Functions
    Nov 27, 2023 · Lyapunov Theorem for Lyapunov Stability. Consider the system: ˙x = f(x), f(0) = 0. Theorem 22. Let V : D → R be a continuously difierentiable ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] An Improved Stability Criterion for a Class of Lur'e Systems
    Peer reviewed version. Link to published version (if available):. 10.1109/CDC ... The stability analysis of systems with nonlinear feedback expressed by a ...
  80. [80]
    Hopf bifurcation analysis for models on genetic negative feedback ...
    Dec 15, 2022 · We perform a thorough Hopf bifurcation analysis on the Goodwin model and two other models on negative feedback loops.
  81. [81]
    Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis in a delayed three-node ...
    In this paper, we systematically consider the effect of time delay on the dynamical behavior of the three-node circuit with three time delays. Based on linear ...
  82. [82]
    Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a ... - PNAS
    We present a simple graphical method for deducing the stability behavior and bifurcation diagrams for such systems and illustrate the method with two examples.
  83. [83]
    Bifurcation Control in Feedback Systems - SpringerLink
    In this chapter the mathematical tools from bifurcation theory are used within the framework of feedback control systems. The first part deals with a simple ...
  84. [84]
    Feedback Control of Bifurcation and Chaos in Dynamical Systems
    Feedback control of bifurcation and chaos in nonlinear dynamical systems is discussed. The article summarizes some of the recent work in this area, ...
  85. [85]
    Hopf-Hopf bifurcation, period n solutions, slow-fast phenomena, and ...
    In this paper, we investigate the co-dimension two bifurcations and complicated dynamics of an optoelectronic reservoir computing (RC) system with single ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Achievement of Negative Reactivity Feedback Effects - DSpace@MIT
    Negative reactivity feedback effects make reactors self-regulating. If the power rises, something heats up and that temperature rise generates negative ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Module 10 - Power Reactor Feedback Effects Rev 01.
    Power reactor: highly damped system with negative feedback that seeks relaxation of ρ back to steady state. • Small increase in reactivity while at Po ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Chapter 11: Feedback and PID Control Theory I. Introduction - Physics
    In particular, physicists use feedback for precise control of temperature, for stabilizing and cooling particle beams in accelerators, for improving the.
  89. [89]
    High-frequency chaotic bursts in laser diode with optical-feedback
    Nov 16, 2022 · Nonlinear optical systems with delayed feedback is a configuration where the light emission from a laser source is reflected back into itself.
  90. [90]
    The feedback loops of discrete tones in under-expanded impinging ...
    Oct 21, 2021 · The upstream-propagating waves of feedback loops in under-expanded impinging jets are investigated through several typical flow conditions.
  91. [91]
    Instability of Interaction of a Coherent Electron Beam and Plasma
    Dec 8, 2015 · It is shown that a positive feedback arises between plasma oscillations and the wave of longitudinal electron density of the beam if the phase ...
  92. [92]
    New feedback system can improve efficiency of fusion reactions
    Jun 9, 2022 · New feedback system can improve efficiency of fusion reactions ... Scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics ...
  93. [93]
    Physiology, Homeostasis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    May 1, 2023 · Negative feedback refers to a response that is opposite to the stress: the compensatory action will increase values if they become too low or ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Positive feedback in cellular control systems - PMC - PubMed Central
    This review focuses on the properties and functions of positive feedback in biological systems, including bistability, hysteresis and activation surges.
  95. [95]
    Homeostasis and Feedback Loops | Anatomy and Physiology I
    positive feedback loops, in which a change in a given direction causes additional change in the same direction. · negative feedback loops, in which a change in a ...
  96. [96]
    Feedback Response Loop - EdTech Books
    Other negative feedback loops that regulate homeostasis include replenishment of oxygen by the lungs, the regulation of the pH of the blood at 7.4, and the ...Missing: biological | Show results with:biological
  97. [97]
    1.3 Homeostasis – Anatomy & Physiology 2e
    Homeostasis is regulated by negative feedback loops and, much less frequently, by positive feedback loops. Both have the same components of a stimulus ...
  98. [98]
    1.7: Homeostasis and Feedback - Biology LibreTexts
    Jul 28, 2023 · The positive feedback accelerates the process of clotting until the clot is large enough to stop the bleeding. Childbirth via Positive Feedback ...What is Homeostasis? · Negative Feedback · Positive Feedback
  99. [99]
    Feedback loops in biological networks - PubMed
    We introduce fundamental concepts for the design of dynamics and feedback in molecular networks modeled with ordinary differential equations.
  100. [100]
    Modulation of dynamic modes by interplay between positive and ...
    Apr 16, 2018 · Positive and negative feedback loops act as key regulatory elements in gene regulatory networks. A negative feedback loop (NFL) alone can ...
  101. [101]
    Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity (Chapter 13)
    Many important feedback processes that occur in the climate system are described. The concepts of climate sensitivity are outlined and related to model ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  102. [102]
    The Impact of Recent Forcing and Ocean Heat Uptake Data on ...
    The Impact of Recent Forcing and Ocean Heat Uptake Data on Estimates of Climate Sensitivity in: Journal of Climate Volume 31 Issue 15 (2018)
  103. [103]
    Chapter 7: The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and ...
    How the climate system responds to a given forcing is determined by climate feedbacks associated with physical, biogeophysical and biogeochemical processes.
  104. [104]
    Water vapor and lapse rate feedbacks in the climate system
    Nov 30, 2021 · This review provides physicists with a deeper understanding of these feedbacks and stimulates engagement with the climate research community.
  105. [105]
    Feedbacks on climate in the Earth system: introduction - PMC
    The papers in this issue review what is known about many of the major feedback processes that have affected past, and will affect future, climate change.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  106. [106]
    Observational evidence that cloud feedback amplifies global warming
    Jul 19, 2021 · This constraint supports that cloud feedback will amplify global warming, making it very unlikely that climate sensitivity is smaller than 2 °C.<|separator|>
  107. [107]
    Energy budget diagnosis of changing climate feedback - Science
    Apr 21, 2023 · The climate feedback determines how Earth's climate responds to anthropogenic forcing. It is thought to have been more negative in recent ...
  108. [108]
    Carbon cycle and climate feedback under CO2 and non-CO2 ...
    Jun 5, 2024 · This study investigates how CO 2 and non-CO 2 gases with nearly equal effective radiative forcing magnitudes impact the climate and carbon cycle.
  109. [109]
    Important new paper challenges IPCC's claims about climate ...
    Sep 20, 2022 · Lewis' analysis reduces the magnitude of climate sensitivity by one third, relative to the range provided by the IPCC AR6. These results suggest ...
  110. [110]
    New Lewis & Curry Study Concludes Climate Sensitivity is Low
    Apr 24, 2018 · Basically, the paper concludes that the amount of surface and deep-ocean warming that has occurred since the mid- to late-1800s is consistent ...
  111. [111]
    Opinion: Can uncertainty in climate sensitivity be narrowed further?
    Feb 29, 2024 · The distributions could nonetheless be narrowed in the future, particularly through better understanding of certain climate processes and paleoclimate proxies.
  112. [112]
    Empirical estimates of global climate sensitivity: An assessment of ...
    May 26, 2008 · This is a test, within a model context, of proposals that have been advanced to use knowledge of the present day climate to make “empirical” ...
  113. [113]
    Changes in Local and Global Climate Feedbacks in the Absence of ...
    Abstract. The global-mean climate feedback quantifies how much the climate system will warm in response to a forcing such as increased CO2 concentration.<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    [PDF] 14 Industrial Applications of PID Control | Emerson Automation Experts
    The positive feedback implementation illustrated in Figure 14-3 enables several important PID options, such as dynamic reset limit, enhancement for wireless, ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Harold Black and the negative-feedback amplifier
    This was the state of Black's work on telephone amplifiers in 1927, the year of the famous flash of insight on the Lack- awanna Ferry. What occurred between the.
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Electronic Feedback Systems: Lectures and solutions
    Feedback control is an important technique that is used in many modern electronic and electromechanical systems. The successful.
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Feedback Systems
    In general, it is best to use the Nyquist plot to check stability since this provides more complete information than the Bode plot. Example 10.7 Stability ...
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Feedback Systems
    An early engineering example of a feedback system is a centrifugal governor, in which the shaft of a steam engine is connected to a flyball mechanism that is ...
  119. [119]
    Feedback Control of Computing Systems - IEEE Xplore
    In terms of control system theory, a clock is an unstable system and synchronizing a clock can be classified as a feedback controller design problem.
  120. [120]
    Feedback Loops in Distributed Systems - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 23, 2025 · Feedback loops are processes where the output of a system is fed back into the system as input. This mechanism allows the system to self-regulate and adapt.
  121. [121]
    What Are Feedback Loops? - Splunk
    Jun 27, 2024 · The primary idea and goal of a feedback cycle is to identify how the output of a system impacts subsequent system behavior.Feedback Loops In Devops... · Feedback Loops: Two Types... · Best Practices For Feedback...
  122. [122]
    The power of feedback loops. Working in software development…
    Jun 14, 2015 · Feedback loops help on a daily basis with project improvement and delivery success; more feedback loops mean greater control of software quality and better ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Requirements Engineering for Feedback Loops in Software ...
    May 9, 2023 · A feedback loop occurs when a system makes decisions that induces certain changes on its environment, which, in turn, influences the system ...
  124. [124]
    What is RLHF? - Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback ...
    RLHF is a machine learning (ML) technique that uses human feedback to optimize ML models to self-learn more efficiently.
  125. [125]
    A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback - arXiv
    Dec 22, 2023 · This article provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of RLHF, exploring the intricate dynamics between RL agents and human input.
  126. [126]
    Illustrating Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
    Dec 9, 2022 · RLHF has enabled language models to begin to align a model trained on a general corpus of text data to that of complex human values.
  127. [127]
    What Is Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback (RLHF)?
    RLHF is a machine learning technique in which a “reward model” is trained with direct human feedback, then used to optimize the performance of an artificial ...Overview · How reinforcement learning...
  128. [128]
    How AI uses feedback loops to learn from its mistakes - Zendesk
    Jan 8, 2025 · A feedback loop is an algorithm that allows an AI model to become more accurate over time. It does this by identifying when an error has been made in the ...
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Introduction To Economic Cybernetics
    Economic cybernetics employs more complex, system-dynamic models that account for feedback loops and nonlinear interactions, providing a more realistic ...
  130. [130]
    Negative Feedback: What it Means, How it Works - Investopedia
    Feedback occurs when outputs of a system are routed back as inputs; negative feedback describes how the system's process produces negative effects.
  131. [131]
    Positive feedback loop - Economics Help
    Dec 1, 2016 · Definition A positive feedback loop is a situation where two events are mutually reinforcing. With this situation, a small change in one input ...
  132. [132]
    [PDF] Feedbacks: Financial Markets and Economic Activity - Sites@Rutgers
    An important such mechanism could be monetary policy itself, which strongly affects and responds to credit conditions. Unraveling this and other feedback in the ...
  133. [133]
    Positive & Negative Feedback Loops in Financial Markets
    Mar 2, 2024 · Positive feedback loops amplify market movements, while negative feedback loops stabilize markets. Both can contribute to systemic risk.
  134. [134]
    (PDF) Introduction to Feedback Economics - ResearchGate
    Aug 22, 2021 · Two types of feedback processes exist in socioeconomic systems: positive (reinforcing) loops and negative (balancing) loops [Radzicki 2021 ].
  135. [135]
    The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational ...
    Jan 21, 2020 · Hattie and Timperley (2007) made basic assumptions with respect to variables that moderate the effectiveness of feedback on student achievement.
  136. [136]
    Hattie effect size list - 256 Influences Related To Achievement
    John Hattie developed a way of synthesizing various influences in different meta-analyses according to their effect size (Cohen's d).
  137. [137]
    Students' perceptions and outcome of teacher feedback - Frontiers
    The study found that teachers' feedback directly influences achievement when it is clear, actionable, and aligned with opportunities for revision.<|control11|><|separator|>
  138. [138]
    Nonengagement and unsuccessful engagement with feedback in ...
    We investigated feedback engagement in a sample of lower-secondary students. Findings show that 20% of students did not engage, 47% unsuccessfully engaged in a ...
  139. [139]
    IMPACT OF TEACHER FEEDBACK ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE
    Jun 23, 2025 · In total, 93 percent of students confirmed that teacher feedback has highly affected their motivation in the specific subject, and 85 percent ...
  140. [140]
    Effects of teacher, peer and self-feedback on student improvement in ...
    Jul 27, 2025 · The results reveal that students evaluated teacher feedback significantly higher than peer feedback, before and after the intervention.
  141. [141]
    Cybernetic Model - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The cybernetic model is defined as a self-control mechanism that operates within a test–operate–test–exit (TOTE) loop, where individuals compare their ...
  142. [142]
    Cybernetic control processes and the self-regulation of behavior.
    This chapter describes a set of ideas bearing on the self-regulation of action and emotion that has been given labels such as cybernetic and feedback control ...
  143. [143]
    Emotion: The Self-regulatory Sense - PMC - PubMed Central
    Feedback, in terms of general function, refers to communication and control mechanisms prevalent in both mechanical and organic systems—those that report upon ( ...
  144. [144]
    [PDF] The Role of Feedback in Enhancing Students' Self-regulation ... - ERIC
    This paper explores the importance of self-regulation and the role of feedback in encouraging such regulation from social.<|separator|>
  145. [145]
    Mechanisms of brain self-regulation: psychological factors ... - Journals
    Oct 21, 2024 · This article reviews the current understanding of the neural mechanisms of brain self-regulation by drawing on findings from human and animal studies.
  146. [146]
    Self-regulation and goal-directed behavior: A systematic literature ...
    This article is one of the first to present a systematic literature review on self-regulation and goal-directed behavior.
  147. [147]
    An Analysis of Feedback from a Behavior Analytic Perspective - PMC
    The present paper presents a systematic analysis from a behavior analytic perspective of procedures termed feedback.
  148. [148]
    Continuous Performance Feedback: Investigating the Effects of ...
    Aug 9, 2023 · The current study assesses how people react to continuous performance feedback in terms of its content and sources concerning their performance, motivation to ...
  149. [149]
    Delivering high-quality feedback is a choice: A self-regulatory ...
    Consistent with this point, empirical evidence shows that increased feedback accuracy is associated with improved performance (Lipschultz et al., 2021; Palmer ...
  150. [150]
    'Good job!' the impact of positive and negative feedback on ...
    Our analysis suggests that receiving positive feedback has a favorable impact on subsequent performance, while negative feedback does not have an effect.2. Theoretical Framework · 3. Setting And Data · 5. Results<|separator|>
  151. [151]
    The effects of feedback interventions on performance - APA PsycNet
    The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
  152. [152]
    Feedback orientation: A meta-analysis - ScienceDirect.com
    Results suggest that feedback orientation is positively related to job satisfaction, work performance, and feedback seeking.
  153. [153]
    How Effective Feedback Fuels Performance - Gallup
    Jan 19, 2024 · Gallup data show that 80% of employees who say they have received meaningful feedback in the past week are fully engaged.
  154. [154]
    Feedback and Managerial Performance: A Longitudinal Multilevel ...
    Apr 16, 2025 · This study challenges the prevailing assumptions by finding empirical evidence that low-performing managers have greater performance improvements than high- ...
  155. [155]
    The effects of performance feedback on organizational citizenship ...
    Performance feedback is a managerial practice whose effects widely impact job satisfaction and commitment. Job satisfaction and commitment represent ...
  156. [156]
    The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement ... - NIH
    Jun 19, 2020 · Managers were motivated to improve to the extent they perceived the feedback conversation to be focused on future actions rather than on past performance.
  157. [157]
    Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis and ...
    Oct 11, 2021 · Based on the Job Demands-Resources theory, this meta‐analysis investigates the role of resources in predicting feedback-seeking behavior ...Antecedents And Outcomes Of... · Antecedents Of... · Results
  158. [158]
  159. [159]
    Fundamental Limitation of Feedback Control - ResearchGate
    Feedback systems are designed to meet many different objectives. Yet, not all design objectives are achievable as desired due to the fact that they are often ...<|separator|>
  160. [160]
    Destructive creation: when feedback loops go wrong
    Sep 18, 2023 · A positive feedback loop is self-reinforcing. It will ultimately destabilize or even destroy a system, moving it toward chaos. Colloquially, you ...
  161. [161]
    [PDF] Chapter 9 Design limitations for feedback control - People
    9.1 Performance restrictions in the time-domain for general systems. The objective when studying feedback control systems is to see how behaviour of certain.
  162. [162]
    Limitations on Control System Performance - ScienceDirect.com
    Factors limiting control system performance include process dynamics, disturbances, process uncertainties, and actuator saturation.
  163. [163]
    Effects of Feedback in Control System - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 23, 2025 · Feedback is an important concept in electronics and electrical engineering. It is used to reduce the error between the reference input and the system output.Feedback in Control System · Types · Effects of Feedback in Control...<|separator|>
  164. [164]
    Fundamental limitations and intrinsic limits of feedback
    This paper presents a review on the fundamental performance limitations and design tradeoffs of feedback control systems.
  165. [165]
    Feedback vs. Feedforward Control: A Detailed Comparison
    Disadvantages of Feedback Control Systems. Reactive, Not Proactive: These systems react after the disturbance has impacted the system's output. Poor Performance ...
  166. [166]
    [PDF] Understanding Systems from a Feedback Perspective
    Sep 4, 2021 · When designing interventions using feedback thinking, we seek to change the structure of the system by adding or removing feedback loops;.
  167. [167]
    What are the main problems of feedback control systems? - Quora
    May 11, 2019 · Feedback systems if not designed carefully can result in the system being unstable and hence can cause damage to the system. Feedback systems ...What are the advantages and disadvantages of feedback control ...Why is positive feedback not used in a control system? - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  168. [168]
    Quantitative feedback theory—reply to criticisms
    In contrast, modern control theory almost completely ignored the uncertainty issue in feedback theory until about five years ago. There has since been much ...
  169. [169]
    Climate, control theory, feedback: does it make sense?
    Oct 10, 2011 · I am somewhat sceptical that a systems approach of using deconvolution to imply feedback would yield an unambiguous answer, although it may be ...<|separator|>
  170. [170]
    The perils of feedback loops in machine learning: predictive policing
    Feb 20, 2023 · The FRA concluded that machine learning can amplify small biases in the test data, creating a 'runaway feedback loop'.
  171. [171]
    Common but overlooked causes of ML system failures Part I - Medium
    Oct 9, 2023 · However, a feedback loop degenerates when system outputs, reused as inputs, damage future performance. This leads to amplified biases, data ...
  172. [172]
    How human–AI feedback loops alter human perceptual, emotional ...
    Glickman and Sharot reveal a human–AI feedback loop, where AI amplifies subtle human biases, which are then further internalized by humans. This cycle, observed ...
  173. [173]
    The AI feedback loop: Researchers warn of 'model collapse' as AI ...
    Jun 12, 2023 · As a generative AI training model is exposed to more AI-generated data, it performs worse, producing more errors, leading to model collapse.<|separator|>
  174. [174]
    A Classification of Feedback Loops and Their Relation to Biases in ...
    To do so, we first clarify the difference between open-loop and closed-loop (or feedback-loop) systems by borrowing the language and the tools from dynamical ...
  175. [175]
    Full article: When negative feedback harms: a systematic review of ...
    Another study reported that negative feedback resulted in poorer evaluations of their peers, teacher, or the course overall. Furthermore, some ...
  176. [176]
    Unheard and unused: why students reject teacher and peer feedback
    Students who feel powerless or unsupported in their learning may reject feedback as they see little connection between their actions and improvement. Social and ...
  177. [177]
    Feedback and the dangers of praise - The Great Teaching Toolkit
    Aug 3, 2022 · In this blog, we explore Feedback about the self - generally both the least effective and most often employed by teachers.
  178. [178]
    How corrective feedback influences children's literacy, mathematics ...
    Research in psychology and education indicates that corrective feedback can be a powerful learning tool. We provide a developmental perspective to focus ...
  179. [179]
    Toward a cohesive psychological science of effective feedback
    Jul 5, 2023 · Empirical research on effective assessment feedback often falls short in demonstrating not just what works, but how and why.
  180. [180]
    [PDF] Positive Feedback Mechanisms in Economic Development
    Models with externalities and positive feedback mechanisms ex- plain economic miracles as instances in which an economy jumps from a bad to a good equilibrium.
  181. [181]
    Capitalism's Positive Feedback Loop is in Need of a Negative One
    Sep 29, 2020 · A positive feedback loop is in full force, resulting in a growing divide between the middle and lower classes and the very rich.Missing: debates mechanisms
  182. [182]
    Modelling the feedback loops of rebound mechanisms - ScienceDirect
    This paper describes the structure of 26 rebound mechanisms based on qualitative system dynamics (SD) modelling using causal loop diagrams (CLD).
  183. [183]
    Feedback Loops | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
    Apr 29, 2013 · These kinds of feedback loops exist in every economy, but for a variety of reasons they seem much stronger in developing countries with weak ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  184. [184]
    Honest feedback: Barriers to receptivity and discerning the truth in ...
    In this article, we identify barriers to receptivity and discerning the truth in feedback and illustrate how these barriers hinder recipients' learning and ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  185. [185]
    Why People Crave Feedback—and Why We're Afraid to Give It
    Aug 5, 2022 · “People overestimate the negative consequences giving feedback for themselves, as well as underestimate the benefits for the other person. This ...
  186. [186]
    Find the Gold in Toxic Feedback - Harvard Business Review
    It can be powerfully demotivating, damaging to managers' confidence, and paralyzing. It can prompt managers to waste time on the wrong issues by, for example, ...
  187. [187]
    Why Managers Are Uncomfortable Giving Performance Feedback
    Managers give directions and directives. Hence, their feedback conversations focus on problems or issues and are one-way, prescriptive, and result in low buy-in ...
  188. [188]
    The Mistakes You're Making with Offering Feedback - eFront LMS
    Fragile egos, miscommunication, and poor timing are just some of the challenges of giving feedback. These challenges can easily stand in the way of giving and ...