Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Characteristic velocity

Characteristic velocity, often denoted as c*, is a key performance parameter in rocket propulsion that measures the effectiveness of the combustion process in converting chemical energy from propellants into directed exhaust flow. It is defined as the ratio of the product of chamber pressure (p_c) and nozzle throat area (A_t) to the propellant mass flow rate (ṁ), given by the equation c* = p_c A_t / ṁ.^[1]^[2]^[3] This metric isolates the influence of propellant properties and combustor design from nozzle geometry, enabling standardized comparisons of engine performance across different rocket systems.^[1]^[2] Theoretically, c* can be derived from equilibrium combustion conditions and is expressed as c* = \frac{1}{\Gamma} \sqrt{\frac{R_o T_c}{M}}, where \Gamma = \sqrt{\gamma} \left( \frac{2}{\gamma + 1} \right)^{\frac{\gamma + 1}{2(\gamma - 1)}}, R_o is the universal gas constant, T_c is the chamber temperature, M is the mean molecular weight of the exhaust gases, and γ is the ratio of specific heats (typically 1.2–1.4 for rocket propellants).^[3]^[2] This formulation highlights its dependence on thermodynamic properties such as chamber temperature and exhaust gas composition, which vary with propellant combinations.^[1] For instance, theoretical values include approximately 2420 m/s for oxygen-hydrogen propellants and 1810 m/s for oxygen-RP-1 (kerosene) mixtures at standard chamber pressures.^[1] Actual measured c* values are often slightly lower due to inefficiencies like incomplete combustion or heat losses.^[4] In rocket engine analysis, c* contributes directly to overall performance metrics, forming part of the specific impulse (I_sp) through the relation I_sp = c* × C_F / g_0, where C_F is the thrust coefficient (dependent on nozzle expansion) and g_0 is standard gravity.^[3]^[2] Higher c* values indicate better propellant utilization, making it essential for optimizing liquid and solid rocket motors in applications from launch vehicles to spacecraft propulsion.^[1] Engineers use c* efficiency (the ratio of actual to theoretical c*) to assess and improve combustion chamber designs.^[4]

Overview

Definition

Characteristic velocity, denoted as c^*, is a parameter in rocket propulsion that quantifies the intrinsic performance of the combustion process in a rocket engine by isolating it from nozzle expansion effects.^[2] This measure focuses solely on the efficiency with which propellants release and convert chemical energy into high-pressure gas within the combustion chamber, independent of downstream flow acceleration.^[5] It represents the theoretical exhaust velocity that would be achieved if the nozzle thrust coefficient were unity, effectively capturing the velocity equivalent of the energy released by the propellants under ideal chamber conditions.^[6] Expressed in units of meters per second (m/s) or feet per second (ft/s), c^* provides a direct indicator of combustion completeness and propellant potential, as it depends primarily on gas properties like temperature and molecular weight.^[2]^[6] In chemical rocket propulsion systems, c^* is employed to assess propellant combinations without considering nozzle geometry, enabling engineers to compare combustion efficiencies across designs.^[5] This distinguishes it from broader metrics like specific impulse, which incorporate overall engine performance including nozzle contributions.^[6]

Historical Development

The concept of characteristic velocity, denoted as c^*, originated in the mid-20th century as part of foundational rocket research, building on early experiments with liquid propellants. Robert H. Goddard, recognized as a pioneer in American rocketry, conducted key tests leading to the first successful liquid-fueled rocket launch in 1926, which established basic principles for evaluating propulsion efficiency, though formal metrics like c^* were not yet defined.^[7] The term and its theoretical framework were formalized during the 1940s and 1950s, coinciding with post-World War II advancements in rocketry.^[6] During the Space Race of the 1950s and 1960s, c^* gained prominence in major rocket programs. By the 1960s, the parameter was routinely incorporated into standard propulsion literature and NASA technical reports, shifting from initial empirical assessments in wartime testing to more rigorous theoretical integrations.^[6]

Mathematical Formulation

Primary Formula

The characteristic velocity, denoted as c^*, is a fundamental parameter in rocket propulsion that quantifies the intrinsic performance of the combustion process, defined by the equation

c^* = \frac{p_c A_t}{\dot{m}}

where p_c is the chamber pressure, A_t is the cross-sectional area of the throat, and \dot{m} is the total propellant mass flow rate.^[8]^[9] In this formula, p_c is the stagnation pressure under choked flow conditions in the combustion chamber for ideal isentropic expansion in liquid rocket engines.^[8] The throat area A_t is the minimum cross-sectional area in the converging-diverging nozzle geometry, where sonic conditions are achieved.^[9] The mass flow rate \dot{m} accounts for the combined flow of fuel and oxidizer entering the combustion chamber.^[10] The units of c^* are consistent with velocity, expressed in meters per second (m/s), as the pressure-area product (in pascals times square meters) divided by mass flow rate (in kilograms per second) yields m/s.^[8] For typical bipropellant liquid rocket engines, such as those using LOX/RP-1, c^* values range from approximately 1500 to 2000 m/s, reflecting efficient combustion of hydrocarbon fuels with oxygen.^[11] This parameter feeds into overall thrust calculations by combining with the nozzle thrust coefficient to determine effective exhaust velocity.^[9]

Relation to Specific Impulse and Thrust Coefficient

The specific impulse I_{sp}, a key measure of rocket engine efficiency, is directly related to the characteristic velocity c^* and the thrust coefficient C_F through the equation

I_{sp} = \frac{c^* \, C_F}{g_0},

where g_0 is the standard gravitational acceleration (approximately 9.80665 m/s²). This formulation decomposes engine performance into components attributable to combustion (c^*) and nozzle effects (C_F), facilitating targeted design improvements.^[1] The thrust coefficient C_F represents the ratio of the actual thrust produced by the engine to the ideal momentum thrust, incorporating factors such as nozzle expansion ratio, pressure distribution, and losses from over- or under-expansion relative to ambient conditions. It is typically expressed as C_F = \frac{F}{p_c A_t}, where F is thrust, p_c is chamber pressure, and A_t is throat area, with values ranging from about 1.5 to 2.0 for optimized nozzles operating in vacuum or low ambient pressure.^[1]^[6] By isolating combustion efficiency in c^*, this relationship enables nozzle geometry and expansion to be optimized separately to enhance C_F, without altering the underlying propellant performance. For example, inefficient combustion yielding a low c^* (e.g., below 1700 m/s for certain mixtures) inherently caps I_{sp}, regardless of nozzle perfection, as seen in fluorine-based propellant tests where injector designs directly influenced combustion isolation.^[12]

Theoretical Calculation

Derivation from Chamber Conditions

The derivation of characteristic velocity, denoted as c^*, begins with the fundamental principles of one-dimensional isentropic flow in the rocket nozzle, assuming the flow reaches sonic conditions (Mach number M = 1) at the throat under choked conditions.^[10] This parameter encapsulates the relationship between chamber stagnation conditions and the mass flow rate through the throat, providing a measure of the intrinsic performance of the combustion process independent of nozzle geometry.^[13] The process starts from the continuity equation for mass conservation at the nozzle throat:

\dot{m} = \rho_t a_t A_t

where \dot{m} is the mass flow rate, \rho_t is the gas density at the throat, a_t is the local speed of sound, and A_t is the throat cross-sectional area.^[10] For an ideal gas under isentropic expansion from stagnation chamber conditions (pressure p_c, temperature T_c), the throat conditions are related to the stagnation values by the isentropic flow relations. Specifically, the temperature at the throat is T_t = T_c \cdot \frac{2}{\gamma + 1}, the pressure is p_t = p_c \left( \frac{2}{\gamma + 1} \right)^{\frac{\gamma}{\gamma - 1}}, and the density is \rho_t = \frac{p_t}{R T_t}, where \gamma is the specific heat ratio and R is the specific gas constant.^[2] The speed of sound at the throat is a_t = \sqrt{\gamma R T_t}. Substituting these into the mass flow equation and simplifying yields the throat mass flux in terms of chamber conditions.^[13] The characteristic velocity is then defined as c^* = \frac{p_c A_t}{\dot{m}}, which rearranges the mass flow expression to isolate c^* from the isentropic relations. This leads to the theoretical formula:

\begin{aligned} c^* &= \sqrt{ \frac{\gamma R T_c }{ \gamma \left( \frac{2}{\gamma + 1} \right)^{\frac{\gamma + 1}{2(\gamma - 1)}} } } \\ &= \frac{ \sqrt{ \gamma R T_c } }{ \gamma } \left( \frac{\gamma + 1}{2} \right)^{\frac{\gamma + 1}{2(\gamma - 1)}} \end{aligned}

This expression highlights c^*'s dependence on the chamber temperature T_c and the thermodynamic properties \gamma and R, emphasizing the throat as the sonic bottleneck where maximum mass flow occurs for given stagnation conditions.^[10]^[2] The derivation relies on several key assumptions to ensure analytical tractability: the gas behaves as an ideal gas throughout the expansion; chemical composition remains frozen after combustion in the chamber (no further reactions in the nozzle); viscous, heat conduction, and other dissipative effects are negligible; and the flow is one-dimensional and adiabatic.^[13] These idealizations allow the isentropic relations to hold from the chamber to the throat, though real engines introduce efficiency factors (typically 0.95–0.99) to account for deviations.^[10] In practice, this theoretical form serves as the basis for empirical formulas used in engine performance predictions.^[2]

Dependence on Propellant Properties

The characteristic velocity c^* is fundamentally influenced by the chemical and physical properties of the propellants used in rocket engines, primarily through their effects on the combustion chamber temperature T_c, the specific gas constant R, and the specific heat ratio \gamma. The chamber temperature T_c arises from the enthalpy of combustion, which depends on the energy released by the propellant mixture during reaction; higher enthalpies yield elevated T_c, directly enhancing c^*. The specific gas constant R is determined by the universal gas constant divided by the molecular weight M of the exhaust gases (R = \mathcal{R}/M), where lower M—often achieved with hydrogen-rich propellants—results in higher R and thus greater c^*. Additionally, \gamma (the ratio of specific heats) is governed by the composition of the exhaust gases, with diatomic gases like H_2 and O_2 typically yielding higher \gamma (around 1.2–1.4) compared to polyatomic species like CO_2 and H_2O (around 1.1–1.25), influencing the efficiency of gas expansion.^[14] The theoretical ideal characteristic velocity can be expressed as

c^*_\text{ideal} = \frac{\sqrt{\gamma R T_c}}{\gamma} \left( \frac{\gamma + 1}{2} \right)^{\frac{\gamma + 1}{2(\gamma - 1)}}

where the parameters reflect propellant-driven conditions at the nozzle throat under isentropic, frozen-equilibrium assumptions. This formula highlights how propellants with high combustion enthalpies and low exhaust molecular weights produce superior c^*; for instance, liquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen (LOX/LH_2) achieves c^* \approx 2428 m/s due to its high T_c \approx 3000 K and low M \approx 9 g/mol, whereas liquid oxygen/RP-1 (LOX/RP-1) yields c^* \approx 1774 m/s with T_c \approx 3600 K but higher M \approx 22 g/mol from carbon-rich exhaust. These differences underscore the selection of propellants for performance optimization in applications like upper-stage engines.^[14]^[2] In practice, actual c^* deviates from the ideal due to propellant-related non-idealities such as molecular dissociation at high temperatures, which absorbs energy and lowers effective T_c; incomplete combustion, which reduces enthalpy release and alters gas composition; and shifts in chemical equilibrium during expansion, which can freeze reactions prematurely. These effects collectively diminish c^* by 5–15% compared to theoretical predictions, with dissociation often accounting for the largest loss in high-temperature systems like LOX/LH_2. Mitigation strategies include optimizing mixture ratios and chamber pressures to minimize such losses.^[14]

Applications and Measurement

Experimental Determination

The experimental determination of characteristic velocity, denoted as c^*, is primarily achieved through hot-fire tests of rocket engines, where key parameters such as chamber pressure (p_c), throat area (A_t), and total propellant mass flow rate (\dot{m}) are directly measured. These tests simulate operational conditions in controlled environments to evaluate combustion performance, with c^* calculated using the formula c^* = \frac{p_c A_t}{\dot{m}}. This approach provides a direct empirical assessment of how effectively the propellants convert chemical energy into directed flow at the nozzle throat, independent of nozzle expansion effects. Thrust measurements may complement the data to derive related parameters like the thrust coefficient, but c^* itself relies on the pressure-flow relationship.^[10] Instrumentation plays a crucial role in ensuring measurement accuracy, typically achieving uncertainties of ±5% under optimal conditions. Chamber pressure is captured using high-precision transducers, such as strain-gauge or capacitance-type sensors rated for ranges up to 1200 psia, positioned near the injector face or throat to minimize dynamic response errors. Propellant flow rates are quantified with turbine-type flowmeters calibrated for liquid or gaseous propellants, capable of handling rates from 0 to 15,000 gallons per minute, while throat area is predetermined from design specifications but verified post-test via high-speed imaging or profilometry to account for potential erosion or ablation. Temperature sensors, like chromel-alumel thermocouples, monitor wall conditions to identify heat transfer losses that could indirectly affect flow uniformity. These instruments are housed in environmentally controlled enclosures during testing to mitigate vibrations and thermal gradients.^[10] Data analysis involves processing steady-state segments from test firings, applying corrections for non-ideal effects such as mixture ratio deviations, frictional losses in the chamber, and non-uniform combustion profiles. For instance, empirical correction factors (typically 0.975 to 1.03) adjust raw c^* values to reflect real-world inefficiencies, yielding combustion efficiencies of 95-98% when compared to theoretical predictions from thermodynamic models. Tests are conducted at facilities like NASA's White Sands Test Facility or the European Space Agency's test stands at Lampoldshausen, where altitude simulation chambers replicate vacuum conditions if needed. Representative results from liquid bipropellant engines, such as those using LOX/RP-1, show measured c^* values around 1650-1700 m/s, validating design assumptions and guiding iterative improvements without requiring exhaustive nozzle redesigns.^[10]

Use in Rocket Engine Design

In the preliminary design phase of rocket engines, characteristic velocity plays a pivotal role in propellant selection by quantifying combustion chamber performance independent of nozzle geometry, allowing engineers to prioritize combinations that maximize energy release per unit mass for improved overall vehicle efficiency. Higher c* values enable reduced propellant mass requirements to achieve mission objectives, directly influencing payload capacity and structural design. For example, storable hypergolic propellants such as N₂O₄/UDMH are favored in upper stages over less efficient storables like IRFNA/UDMH due to their c* exceeding 1600 m/s—typically around 1750 m/s theoretical—balancing performance with operational simplicity in long-duration missions. This approach also applies to solid rocket motors, where c* assesses grain combustion efficiency.^[10]^[1] Characteristic velocity is integrated with mission requirements by combining it with the thrust coefficient (C_F) to forecast specific impulse and delta-v via the relation I_{sp} = \frac{c^* C_F}{g_0}, where g_0 is standard gravity, enabling trajectory simulations that align engine output with orbital insertion or interplanetary transfer needs. This approach ensures propulsion systems meet velocity budgets while accounting for stage masses and gravity losses. In practice, kerosene/liquid oxygen engines like the SpaceX Merlin achieve a c* of approximately 1650 m/s, supporting reusable first-stage operations in the Falcon 9 with thrust levels around 845 kN at sea level. Similarly, cryogenic hydrogen/oxygen engines such as the Ariane 5 Vulcain have a theoretical c* of about 2420 m/s (actual values around 2300 m/s at 95-98% efficiency), facilitating efficient core-stage performance for geostationary satellite launches with vacuum specific impulses exceeding 430 s.^[10]^[1] Optimization of characteristic velocity involves trade-offs with propellant density, thermal stability, toxicity, and production costs, as excessively high c* from advanced mixtures may compromise storability or increase system complexity without proportional mission gains. Engineers balance these factors through performance simulations using tools like NASA's Chemical Equilibrium with Applications (CEA), which computes theoretical c* from chamber temperature, molecular weight, and specific heat ratio to iterate designs for maximum efficiency under constraints like chamber pressure and mixture ratio. For instance, while LH₂/LOX yields superior c* for vacuum-optimized stages, its low density necessitates larger tanks, prompting selections like RP-1/LOX for density-sensitive boosters despite a modestly lower c* around 1810 m/s theoretical.^[10]^[15]^[1]

Comparisons and Limitations

Versus Exhaust Velocity

Characteristic velocity, denoted c^*, functions as a nozzle-independent metric focused on the combustion process within the rocket chamber, encapsulating the efficiency of propellant conversion into directed momentum at the throat.^[2] In contrast, exhaust velocity v_e measures the actual speed of the propellant gases exiting the nozzle, incorporating the effects of expansion and is given by the relation v_e = c^* \cdot C_F, where C_F is the thrust coefficient that reflects nozzle geometry and pressure conditions.^[2] This formulation highlights how c^* isolates intrinsic propellant performance, while v_e provides the complete velocity profile relevant to thrust generation.^[1] A primary distinction lies in their sensitivities: v_e varies with the nozzle's expansion ratio (area ratio A_e / A_t) and ambient back pressure, yielding typical vacuum values of 3000–4500 m/s for chemical rocket engines, as the expansion process amplifies the throat momentum.^[3] Conversely, c^* depends solely on chamber conditions and propellant thermodynamics, maintaining values around 1500–2500 m/s across nozzle designs, such as approximately 2300 m/s for the Space Shuttle Main Engine using hydrogen-oxygen propellants.^[16] These ranges underscore c^*'s role as a standardized benchmark unaffected by downstream flow dynamics.^[17] In practice, c^* is employed for propellant selection and combustion chamber optimization, enabling engineers to evaluate fuel-oxidizer combinations without nozzle variations influencing results.^[2] Exhaust velocity, however, is critical for mission trajectory analysis and overall vehicle dynamics, as it directly determines momentum transfer to the spacecraft.^[18] For electric propulsion systems like ion thrusters, v_e achieves exceptionally high levels of 20–40 km/s through electrostatic acceleration, rendering c^* less pertinent since no thermal combustion throat exists.^[19] Specific impulse serves as a composite metric that bridges these velocities, normalized by standard gravity.^[2]

Efficiency Metrics and Shortcomings

Characteristic velocity serves as a standardized metric for evaluating and comparing the combustion performance of various rocket propellants, enabling direct assessments between solid, liquid, and hybrid systems without the confounding effects of nozzle geometry or engine scaling.^[20] This independence from physical dimensions makes it particularly valuable for hybrid rocket engines, where variable combustion regimes and fuel regression rates can complicate overall efficiency evaluations, allowing engineers to isolate the thermochemical contributions.^[21] Despite these advantages, characteristic velocity calculations depend on simplifying assumptions, including steady-state one-dimensional flow of an ideal gas with constant specific heat ratio, negligible friction, and no heat transfer losses.^[22] These idealizations overlook real-world phenomena such as transient startup and shutdown effects, two-phase flows in solid propellants or incomplete vaporization in bipropellants, and losses from injector mixing inefficiencies or boundary layer interactions, often leading to theoretical values that exceed actual measurements.^[23] To address these shortcomings, characteristic velocity is typically complemented by metrics like vacuum specific impulse, which incorporates nozzle expansion effects, or total impulse, which integrates thrust over burn time for mission-level assessments. Historically, discrepancies between predicted and measured low characteristic velocity values have signaled combustion deficiencies, prompting redesigns in injector patterns and chamber configurations to enhance mixing and heat release uniformity.^[10] For context in broader performance analysis, characteristic velocity provides a chamber-focused counterpart to exhaust velocity, emphasizing intrinsic propellant limitations over nozzle-optimized outputs.

References

[1]
[PDF] Thrust Coefficient, Characteristic Velocity and Ideal Nozzle Expansion
Characteristic Velocity. • Can define similar parameter to characterize combustor. – characteristic velocity. • Can also write ideal characteristic velocity. – ...
[2]
[PDF] 16.50 Introduction to Propulsion Systems, Lecture 7
The "Characteristic Velocity" c* depends mainly on propellant properties. The Thrust. Coefficient cF depends on propellant properties through γ (or ...
[3]
[PDF] 6. Chemical-Nuclear Propulsion MAE 342 2016 - Robert F. Stengel
M = exhaust gas mean molecular weight γ = ratio of specific heats ~1.2-1.4. (. ) 33. Rocket Characteristic Velocity, c* c*=. pcAt qm. = exhaust velocity if CF = ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
[PDF] Comparison of Two Procedures for Predicting Rocket Engine Nozzle ...
Analytically, the characteristic velocity, c*, is a quantity which reflects the effective energy level of the propellants and subsonic expansion. as predicted ...
[5]
None
### Summary of Characteristic Velocity (C*) in Rocket Propulsion
[6]
[PDF] 2. PROPULSION FUNDAMENTALS James F. Connors
Propulsion is key for space travel, with rocket engines as the "muscle". Thrust is the rate of change in momentum. Newton's laws are fundamental.
[7]
95 Years Ago: Goddard's First Liquid-Fueled Rocket - NASA
Mar 17, 2021 · Believing that liquid propellants offered the most promise, he successfully launched the first liquid-fueled rocket on March 16, 1926, on a farm in Auburn, ...
[8]
Foundational Cold War Rocketry Textbook, Rocket Propulsion ...
In stockFirst Edition Sutton, George P. Rocket Propulsion Elements: An Introduction to the Engineering of Rockets. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1949. First edition.
[9]
Brief History of Rockets - NASA Glenn Research Center
Early in the 20th century, an American, Robert H. Goddard (1882-1945), conducted practical experiments in rocketry. He had become interested in a way of ...
[10]
[PDF] A Historical Systems Study of Liquid Rocket Engine Throttling ...
In simple terms, c* efficiency represents the amount of energy that is extracted out the combustion process, and it typically varies from about 96% to 98% at ...
[11]
[PDF] Scaling of Performance in Liquid Propellant Rocket Engine ...
c*. = characteristic exhaust velocity, m/sec. Da,i. = First Damköhler Group. Da,iii. = Third Damköhler Group. D. = diffusion coefficient, m2/sec. Dch. = thrust ...
[12]
[PDF] Converging-Diverging Nozzle Thruster Code for Nuclear or ...
Characteristic Velocity – C*. C* = p0A*/mdot. (3). Thrust Coefficient – Ct. Ct = τ /(p0A*). (4). Note: τ = mdot C* Ct. Critical Pressure and Temperature Ratio.
[13]
[PDF] Rocket Propulsion Elements - aerocastle
This new edition concentrates on the subject of rocket propulsion, its basic technology, performance, and design rationale. The intent is the same as in.
[14]
[PDF] Design of Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines
The book presents sufficient detail to familiarize and educate thoroughly those responsible for various aspects of liquid propellant rocketry, including engine ...
[15]
Lox/Kerosene
Density: 1.02 g/cc. Characteristic velocity c: 1,805 m/s (5,921 ft/sec). Isp Shifting: 301 sec. Isp Frozen: 286 sec.
[16]
[PDF] RESEARCH M EMORAN DUM
Characteristic velocity is related more singularly to propellant combustion efficiency than is specific impulse, which also considers other variables such as.
[17]
None
### Summary of Characteristic Velocity (c*) Derivation from One-Dimensional Isentropic Flow
[18]
[PDF] Rocket Propulsion Elements - NRVR.ORG
Rocket propulsion includes liquid propellant engines and reaction control systems. Key elements are thrust, exhaust velocity, and nozzle theory.
[19]
[PDF] NASA Reference Publication 1311
Velocity of flow is given by equation (6.5). Velocity of sound is given by equation (2.74) (or eq. (3.10)). 6.2.6 Characteristic.
[20]
[PDF] Section 5, Lecture 1: Review of Idealized Nozzle Theory
The characteristic velocity is a figure of thermo-chemical merit for a particular propellant and may be considered to be. Indicative of the combustion.
[21]
[PDF] AA284A Advanced Rocket Propulsion
Jan 9, 2020 · C* is directly proportional to the speed of sound in the rocket chamber and provides a very useful measure of completeness of combustion.
[22]
Rocket Thrust Equations
The amount of thrust produced by the rocket depends on the mass flow rate through the engine, the exit velocity of the exhaust, and the pressure at the nozzle ...
[23]
[PDF] Thruster Principles - DESCANSO
Modern ion and Hall thrusters operating on xenon propellant have exhaust velocities in the range of 20–40 km/s and 10–20 km/s, respectively. The dramatic ...
[24]
Solid Rocket Motor Theory -- Impulse and C-star - Richard Nakka's
Jul 5, 2001 · The characteristic velocity, also called c-star or simply c*, is a figure of thermochemical merit for a particular propellant and may be ...
[25]
[PDF] THEORETICAL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HYBRID ROCKET ...
Characteristic velocity, c*, is basically a function of the propellant pairs ... Hybrid rocket development history. In: 27th Joint Propulsion ...
[26]
Nozzle Flow — proptools 0.0.0 documentation
The assumptions of the ideal model are: The fluid ... This is the characteristic velocity, c∗: c∗≡Atpc˙m. For an ideal rocket, the characteristic velocity is:.
[27]
[PDF] Assessment of performance parameter uncertainty of a solid fuel ...
Characteristic velocity is a fictious velocity in a ramjet or rocket and is independent of the nozzle geometry. This makes it ideal for an even comparison ...
[28]
[PDF] Propulsion System Choices and Their Implications
Jul 28, 2020 · Non-Chemical Propulsion. Focused on choice of propulsion type. C ... These characteristics limit the applications to satellite or small spacecraft ...