Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mach number

The Mach number is a in and that represents the ratio of an object's speed to the in the surrounding medium, denoted as M = v / a, where v is the and a is the local . This parameter is essential for characterizing the behavior of compressible flows, particularly in high-speed applications like and . Named after Austrian physicist and philosopher (1838–1916), the term honors his foundational contributions to the study of supersonic phenomena, including his development of the technique to visualize s and his 1887 publication of the first photograph of a bullet's . The concept was formalized and the term "Mach number" was coined by Swiss aeronautical engineer Jakob Ackeret in a 1929 lecture at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule in , where he proposed it as a standardized measure for airflow speeds relative to the . Ackeret's work built on early 20th-century advancements in high-speed testing and theoretical , addressing the limitations of traditional speed metrics at and supersonic velocities. In , the Mach number delineates critical flight regimes that dictate aerodynamic performance, structural loads, and requirements. flow occurs when M < 1, where compressibility effects are negligible and airflow behaves as mostly incompressible; transonic flow at M ≈ 1 introduces mixed and supersonic regions with shock waves and drag rise; supersonic flow for 1 < M < 5 features attached shock waves and requires specialized airfoils to mitigate wave drag; and hypersonic flow beyond M > 5 involves intense heating, ionization, and non-equilibrium chemistry, as seen in re-entry vehicles. The local a, which varies with and medium properties, is calculated for an as a = √(γ R T), where γ is the adiabatic index (approximately 1.4 for air), R is the specific , and T is the absolute in . The Mach number's utility extends beyond to fields like , gas dynamics, and engineering simulations, where it predicts phenomena such as sonic booms, in nozzles, and the onset of in high-speed pipes. In practice, pilots and engineers use indicated Mach number for high-altitude operations, as it provides a consistent measure unaffected by varying air , unlike . Advances in have further emphasized its role in optimizing designs for efficiency and safety across these regimes.

History and Etymology

Etymology

The Mach number is named after the Austrian physicist and philosopher (1838–1916), who advanced the understanding of shock waves through experimental work in and . In 1887, Mach collaborated with photographer Peter Salcher to produce the first photographs of shock waves using techniques, capturing the and around a traveling faster than the and providing visual evidence of supersonic flow phenomena. The term "Mach number" was coined in 1929 by Swiss engineer Jakob Ackeret (1898–1981) during a on high-speed at the Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) in , as a to Mach's contributions. Unlike other dimensionless quantities such as the , "Mach" is always capitalized because it originates from a proper name.

Historical Development

The concept of the Mach number emerged from pioneering experiments in the late , when Austrian physicist and photographer Peter Salcher captured the first visual evidence of shock waves produced by supersonic projectiles using . In 1887, they fired bullets at speeds exceeding the and photographed the conical shock waves forming ahead of the projectiles, demonstrating how air compresses and forms disturbances at high velocities. These observations, published in the Annals of Physics and Chemistry, laid the groundwork for understanding phenomena, though the dimensionless ratio now known as the Mach number was not yet formalized. In the 1920s, advancements in wind tunnel testing by researchers like Jakob Ackeret and highlighted the effects of in airflow around airfoils at high speeds. Prandtl's theoretical work, including the Prandtl-Glauert correction derived from linearized theory, quantified how air changes influence and as speeds approached the , based on early wind tunnel data showing drag divergence. Ackeret's experiments at the further established these effects through systematic tests on airfoil models, revealing critical Mach numbers where shock waves onset, which became essential for and early high-speed aircraft design. During in the 1940s, the Mach number gained practical urgency in , particularly with the fighter, which encountered severe issues during high-altitude dives. At speeds near Mach 0.7, shock waves formed over the wings, causing abrupt loss of control and structural stress, leading to several aircraft losses. Engineers at innovated by introducing hydraulically actuated dive recovery flaps in later models like the P-38J, which deployed to disrupt airflow and restore aileron effectiveness, allowing pilots to safely exceed previous dive limits and enhancing the aircraft's combat performance. Post-World War II research accelerated supersonic exploration, culminating in the program's breakthrough on October 14, 1947, when U.S. Captain Charles "Chuck" Yeager piloted the rocket-powered aircraft to 1.06 at 43,000 feet, marking the first controlled flight exceeding the in level flight. This achievement, supported by data from onboard instrumentation, confirmed theoretical predictions of transonic drag rise and validated scaling for supersonic designs, paving the way for development. By the 1960s, hypersonic research pushed the Mach number's boundaries with the program, achieving a milestone on October 3, 1967, when U.S. Major William J. "Pete" Knight flew the X-15A-2 to Mach 6.72 (approximately 4,520 mph) at over 100,000 feet. Equipped with an ablative to withstand extreme thermal loads from air friction, this flight provided critical data on hypersonic , including behavior and structural heating, influencing subsequent high-speed vehicle designs.

Definition and Fundamentals

Definition

The Mach number M is defined as the ratio of the local u relative to the medium to the c in that medium, expressed mathematically as M = \frac{u}{c}. This formulation originates from fundamental principles in compressible , where it serves as a key dimensionless parameter. As a , the Mach number facilitates scaling analyses in by normalizing velocities against the local , allowing comparisons across varying conditions such as altitude, temperature, or fluid properties without dependence on absolute units. Velocities u and c are typically measured in meters per second (m/s) or feet per second (ft/s), but their ratio M remains unitless, emphasizing its role in similarity principles for aerodynamic modeling. Physically, a Mach number M < 1 characterizes subsonic flow, where the incompressible flow approximation is generally valid, as disturbances propagate ahead of the object through the medium. In contrast, M > 1 denotes supersonic flow, in which shock waves form due to the inability of disturbances to propagate upstream, leading to abrupt changes in flow properties. The Mach number also quantifies effects, with variations becoming significant above approximately M \approx 0.3, marking the transition from negligible to pronounced thermodynamic influences in the flow.

Speed of Sound in Gases

The speed of sound in a gas represents the propagation velocity of small-amplitude pressure disturbances through the medium, arising from the compressibility of the gas and the resulting wave-like perturbations in pressure, density, and velocity. This speed serves as a fundamental parameter in aerodynamics, particularly in defining the Mach number as the ratio of flow velocity to this characteristic speed. For an , the c is derived from the equations of , , and , assuming the disturbances propagate under isentropic conditions where remains constant and no occurs. The process begins with the differential relation for and changes: dp = \left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial \rho}\right)_s d\rho, where the subscript s denotes the isentropic condition. For an , the isentropic relation follows p \propto \rho^\gamma, leading to \left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial \rho}\right)_s = \gamma \frac{p}{\rho}. Substituting the p = \rho R T yields c^2 = \gamma R T, so the is given by c = \sqrt{\gamma R T}, where \gamma is the adiabatic index (ratio of specific heats at constant pressure and volume), R is the specific gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature in Kelvin. This derivation assumes infinitesimal disturbances, ensuring the process remains reversible and adiabatic. In air, modeled as a diatomic , \gamma = 1.4 and R = 287 J/kg·. At standard sea-level conditions (15°C or 288 ), this yields c \approx 340 m/s. The speed depends solely on for a given gas composition, scaling as \sqrt{T}, with no direct influence from or alone under ideal conditions. In the Earth's troposphere, where temperature decreases with altitude at approximately 6.5 K/km, the speed of sound diminishes accordingly. At the tropopause (around 11 km altitude), the temperature drops to about -56.5°C (216.5 K), resulting in c \approx 295 m/s. This variation arises purely from the temperature lapse rate in the standard atmosphere model. The speed of sound in air is also influenced by humidity and gas composition. Moist air, containing water vapor (molecular weight 18 g/mol compared to 29 g/mol for dry air), has a lower average molecular mass, which increases the effective specific gas constant R and reduces density for a given temperature and pressure; although \gamma decreases slightly (from 1.4 toward 1.33 for water vapor), the net effect is a modest increase in c, about 0.35% higher in fully saturated air relative to dry air at the same temperature. Variations in composition, such as differing ratios of nitrogen, oxygen, or other gases, similarly alter R and \gamma, affecting the speed. For real gases at high temperatures or pressures, deviations from ideal behavior occur due to intermolecular forces, variable specific heats, and dissociation, requiring corrections to the simple formula. At elevated temperatures, vibrational and rotational modes of molecules increase the effective \gamma, while at high pressures, the compressibility factor departs from unity, altering dp/d\rho. A corrected expression for calorically imperfect gases incorporates these effects, such as vibrational contributions via terms like (\theta/T)^2 e^{\theta/T} / (e^{\theta/T} - 1)^2, where \theta \approx 3056 K for air.

Mach Regimes

Classification of Regimes

In , flow regimes are classified according to the Mach number (M), which delineates boundaries where significant physical transitions occur in behavior. These regimes guide design, propulsion systems, and performance predictions by highlighting shifts in , formation, and thermal effects. The standard , widely adopted in aeronautical engineering, divides flows into subsonic, transonic, supersonic, hypersonic, high-hypersonic, and re-entry categories based on empirical and theoretical boundaries derived from testing and flight data. The regime encompasses numbers less than 0.8, where incompressible flow assumptions dominate, and density variations are negligible for most practical calculations. In this range, airflow remains below the local , allowing straightforward application of theory without major corrections for . The regime covers 0.8 < M < 1.2, marked by mixed subsonic and supersonic regions over the body, leading to drag divergence as local sonic conditions emerge. This transitional zone challenges design due to the formation of initial shock waves and boundary layer interactions. For the supersonic regime, 1.2 < M < 5.0, fully supersonic flow prevails with attached shock waves that alter pressure distributions and wave propagation. Oblique and normal shocks become key features, enabling efficient high-speed travel but requiring swept-wing configurations to mitigate wave drag. The hypersonic regime spans 5.0 < M < 10.0, where high thermal loads from viscous dissipation and shock-layer heating dominate, often necessitating advanced materials to prevent structural failure. At these speeds, the ratio of specific heats decreases, and real-gas effects begin to influence aerothermodynamics. In the high-hypersonic regime, 10.0 < M < 25.0, ionization of air molecules leads to plasma formation and electromagnetic interactions, complicating sensor performance and communication. This range involves non-equilibrium chemistry and dissociation, with stagnation temperatures exceeding 5000 K. The re-entry regime applies to M > 25.0, characterized by extreme ablation of materials due to radiative and convective heating peaks during atmospheric interface. Vehicles experience peak heating rates that can ablate tons of protective coating, as seen in orbital returns. The following table summarizes these regimes, their Mach number ranges, key physical transitions, and representative historical aircraft examples that operated within or demonstrated each category:
RegimeMach Number RangeKey Physical TransitionHistorical Aircraft Example
M < 0.8Incompressible flow dominantBoeing 707 (cruise M ≈ 0.8)
Transonic0.8 < M < 1.2Mixed sub/supersonic flow, drag divergenceBell X-1 (approaching M = 1)
Supersonic1.2 < M < 5.0Shock waves presentConcorde (cruise M = 2.0)
Hypersonic5.0 < M < 10.0High thermal loadsNorth American X-15 (peak M = 6.7)
High-hypersonic10.0 < M < 25.0Ionization effectsDARPA HTV-2 (peak M ≈ 20)
Re-entryM > 25.0Extreme (entry M ≈ 25)

Flow Characteristics by Regime

In the subsonic regime, where the freestream Mach number is less than 1, flow characteristics are generally characterized by negligible effects for Mach numbers below approximately 0.3, allowing the application of approximations such as Bernoulli's equation to relate , , and along streamlines. At higher subsonic speeds, such as the cruise Mach number of 0.85 for commercial aircraft like the , mild influences emerge but do not dominate, enabling efficient generation with conventional thick airfoils and minimal wave drag. Engineering challenges in this regime primarily involve managing viscous and separation rather than shock-related phenomena, facilitating stable and predictable aerodynamic performance for subsonic transport vehicles. The regime, spanning freestream numbers from roughly 0.8 to 1.2, features complex mixed- behavior with local regions of supersonic flow over parts of the vehicle, particularly on upper surfaces, leading to the formation of waves and a sharp rise in known as drag divergence. The marks the onset of these supersonic pockets, where the local first reaches Mach 1, triggering thickening and -induced separation that can cause and control issues. To mitigate transonic drag, design strategies like the —pioneered by Richard Whitcomb—distribute the vehicle's cross-sectional area smoothly to minimize , as demonstrated in early applications such as the bomber, which achieved improved transonic performance through fuselage-waist shaping. These characteristics pose significant challenges, requiring swept and supercritical airfoils to delay onset and maintain . In the supersonic regime, for freestream numbers between 1 and approximately 5, the establishes distinct structures, including attached ahead of thin leading edges and detached bow around blunt features, alongside conical disturbance patterns known as cones that propagate at the \sin^{-1}(1/M). Thin airfoil theory, such as Ackeret's linear theory, becomes essential for predicting pressures and forces, emphasizing low-thickness-to-chord ratios to reduce and maintain attached , as thicker profiles lead to detached and higher penalties. like the , capable of sustained flight at 2.25, exemplify the need for slender, highly swept designs to navigate these , where challenges include high skin friction, thermal loads from heating, and the requirement for sharp intakes to capture efficient compression without spillage. The hypersonic regime, typically defined for Mach numbers above 5, introduces pronounced viscous effects and non-ideal gas behavior, with significant heating due to the thin layer where dissipation converts into thermal energy, often exceeding adiabatic wall temperatures by factors of several hundred degrees. effects, including molecular and , alter thermodynamic properties like specific ratios and speeds of sound, necessitating multi-species models for accurate predictions. Blunt shapes are preferred for reentry vehicles, such as the during atmospheric descent from orbital velocities around Mach 25, to detach the and create a thicker that dissipates away from the surface, though this increases drag and requires robust heat shields like reinforced carbon-carbon panels. Key engineering challenges involve balancing aerodynamic stability with thermal protection, as viscous interactions can amplify heating rates by up to 50% near stagnation points. At high-hypersonic and reentry conditions, exceeding –15, extreme aerothermodynamic phenomena dominate, including plasma sheath formation from full air ionization behind strong shocks, which can attenuate electromagnetic signals and complicate communication, alongside widespread molecular dissociation that further modifies gas composition and transport properties. These environments demand ablative thermal protection systems (), where materials like phenolic resins char and erode to carry away heat, as seen in Apollo and reentry capsules, preventing structural failure under peak heat fluxes approaching 10 MW/m². The primary challenges include managing ablation-induced flow contamination, which can alter shock standoff distances and heating distributions, and ensuring TPS integrity against radiative and convective loads in nonequilibrium flows.

Aerodynamic Phenomena

External Flows Around Objects

In external flows around objects such as airfoils or vehicle bodies, where the Mach number M < 1, the streamlines smoothly converge ahead of the body and diverge behind it, with no shock waves forming due to the absence of supersonic regions. This regime allows for irrotational, incompressible-like approximations in many cases, though compressibility effects gradually increase lift and drag as M approaches 1. As the flow transitions to transonic conditions ($0.8 < M < 1.2), mixed subsonic and supersonic regions develop over the body, leading to the formation of shock waves that induce boundary layer separation and generate significant wave drag. These shocks typically appear on the upper surface of airfoils, causing abrupt pressure rises and flow deceleration, which can result in drag divergence and buffet phenomena. To mitigate these effects, supercritical airfoils are employed, featuring a flattened upper surface to delay shock formation and reduce wave drag by maintaining attached flow longer into the transonic regime. In supersonic external flows (M > 1), the flow around objects produces attached oblique shocks at leading edges or compression corners, where the shock angle depends on the deflection and incoming Mach number, while normal shocks may occur in more blunt configurations. Expansion fans arise at convex corners or trailing edges, allowing isentropic turning of the flow with gradual pressure decreases and Mach number increases across the fan. The characteristic Mach angle \mu, which defines the orientation of weak disturbances or the edges of expansion fans, is given by \mu = \arcsin(1/M), originating from the limiting case of infinitesimal oblique shocks. For hypersonic flows (M \gg 5), a strong detached forms ahead of blunt bodies, creating a thin shock layer with high gradients that form an layer engulfing the body and influencing development. This layer arises from non-uniform heating across the , leading to and reduced total pressure along streamlines. For slender bodies, Newtonian impact theory approximates surface pressures as C_p = 2 \sin^2 \theta, where \theta is the local surface inclination, treating the flow as a particle impact neglecting centrifugal effects in the highly directional hypersonic stream. Prandtl-Meyer expansion describes the isentropic turning of supersonic flows around convex corners in external settings, such as at the shoulder of a or trailing edge, where the flow deflects through a centered fan of waves, increasing the Mach number and decreasing without loss. This process is reversible and contrasts with shock-induced compression, enabling efficient flow adjustment in designs like supersonic inlets or vehicle afterbodies.

Internal Flows in Channels

In internal flows through channels such as ducts, nozzles, and diffusers, the Mach number governs the transition from to supersonic regimes under compressible conditions, where area changes and gradients dictate acceleration or deceleration. These one-dimensional flows are critical in systems, as the behavior shifts dramatically at Mach 1, leading to phenomena like and formation that limit mass flow and efficiency. For isentropic flows in nozzles, the relationship between cross-sectional area and velocity is derived from conservation of mass and energy, yielding the differential form: \frac{dA}{A} = (M^2 - 1) \frac{du}{u} where A is the area, M is the Mach number, u is the flow velocity, and dA and du are infinitesimal changes. This equation indicates that for subsonic flow (M < 1), a converging section accelerates the flow, while for supersonic flow (M > 1), a diverging section further increases velocity; the sign reversal at M = 1 highlights the throat's role in regime transitions. Supersonic acceleration is achieved in converging-diverging nozzles, known as de Laval nozzles, where flow in the convergent section reaches sonic conditions (Mach 1) at the , becoming choked and fixing the regardless of downstream pressure reductions. Beyond the , the divergent section expands the flow isentropically to supersonic Mach numbers, converting into directed for efficient thrust generation. occurs precisely at the minimum area () when the local Mach number equals 1, preventing upstream propagation of pressure disturbances and enabling stable supersonic exhaust. In supersonic diffusers, which decelerate high-speed flows to recover for downstream processes like , shock trains form under adverse gradients to compress the flow. A shock train consists of a series of or shocks that progressively slow the supersonic flow, with shocks causing abrupt deceleration, increase, and a significant rise across the wave. These structures maintain the pressure recovery needed in confined channels but can lead to if the backpressure exceeds design limits, displacing the train upstream. The starting problem in supersonic inlets arises when the flow must transition from unstarted (subsonic) to started (supersonic) conditions, limited by the Kantrowitz criterion, which defines the maximum contraction ratio for self-starting based on isentropic flow assumptions. Proposed by Kantrowitz and Donaldson in 1945, this limit ensures that the inlet can swallow the captured mass flow without forming a blocking normal shock, requiring the throat area to be sufficiently large relative to the capture area for a given freestream Mach number. Below this limit, external compression or variable geometry is needed to initiate supersonic internal flow. In and engines, internal channel flows operate at numbers greater than 1 to sustain high-speed , with ramjets decelerating to conditions in the for heat addition and scramjets maintaining supersonic throughout to avoid thermal . These designs leverage nozzle for efficient air and shock trains in isolators to stabilize the against pressure oscillations, enabling operation at flight numbers from 3 to beyond 8.

Calculation Methods

Direct Calculation from Velocity

The Mach number is directly computed as the ratio of the local u to the c in the medium, expressed by the formula M = \frac{u}{c} This method relies on independent measurements of and thermodynamic properties to determine the local regime. u is measured using application-specific instruments that provide direct speed data. In wind tunnels or ground tests, anemometers—such as hot-wire types for low speeds or Doppler velocimeters for higher precision—capture relative airflow. For airborne vehicles, GPS systems deliver by integrating position and time data, while tracking offers non-intrusive determination for projectiles or during test flights. At low speeds, pitot-static systems can yield calibrated readings suitable for initial calculations. The step-by-step process begins with obtaining the u from the chosen instrument. The local c is then calculated from ambient T using c = \sqrt{\gamma R T}, where \gamma = 1.4 is the specific heat ratio for dry air and R = 287 J/kg· is the . The Mach number follows by dividing u by c. Altitude variations necessitate corrections using standardized atmospheric models to estimate and other properties. The (ISA), aligned with the U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976, defines as a function of geopotential altitude h and pressure level, with a of -6.5 /km up to 11 km. At 10 km, for instance, the standard is 223.3 . As an illustrative case, consider a at 10 km altitude with u = 540 m/s, T = 223 K, \gamma = 1.4, and R = 287 J/·K. Here, c \approx 299 m/s, resulting in M \approx 1.8, indicative of supersonic conditions. Key error sources include inaccuracies, which propagate to c via its square-root dependence on T (a 1 K at 223 K yields about 0.2% in c), and non-uniform flows that cause velocity probes to sample atypical regions, potentially biasing u by several percent in sheared fields. calibration and multi-point sampling mitigate these issues.

Pressure-Based Calculation Using Pitot Tubes

Pitot tubes provide a practical means for calculating the Mach number in compressible flows by measuring the stagnation (total) pressure P_t and P_s. The setup involves a Pitot probe aligned with the flow, which captures the impact pressure defined as q = P_t - P_s, assuming isentropic deceleration of the flow to stagnation conditions within the tube. This method is particularly useful in and wind tunnels where direct measurements are challenging. In flows (M < 1), the relationship between pressures and Mach number derives from isentropic flow assumptions, yielding the total pressure ratio: \frac{P_t}{P_s} = \left(1 + \frac{\gamma - 1}{2} M^2 \right)^{\frac{\gamma}{\gamma - 1}} where \gamma is the specific heat ratio. For air at standard conditions, \gamma = 1.4, simplifying to: M = \sqrt{5 \left[ \left( \frac{P_t}{P_s} \right)^{2/7} - 1 \right]} To derive this, start with the isentropic stagnation pressure equation and solve for M^2: M^2 = \frac{2}{\gamma - 1} \left[ \left( \frac{P_t}{P_s} \right)^{\frac{\gamma - 1}{\gamma}} - 1 \right] Substitute \gamma = 1.4, so \frac{\gamma - 1}{\gamma} = \frac{2}{7} and \frac{2}{\gamma - 1} = 5, yielding the explicit form above. This allows direct computation of M from measured pressures without iteration. The formula assumes adiabatic, inviscid flow and is valid for subsonic conditions up to approximately M = 0.8, beyond which probe calibration errors and early shock formation degrade accuracy. For supersonic flows (M > 1), a normal shock forms ahead of the , preventing isentropic stagnation. The Rayleigh-Pitot formula accounts for this, relating the measured total pressure behind the shock P_{t2} to the upstream P_s: \frac{P_{t2}}{P_s} = \left[ \frac{(\gamma + 1) M^2}{2} \right]^{\frac{\gamma}{\gamma - 1}} \left[ \frac{\gamma + 1}{2 \gamma M^2 - (\gamma - 1)} \right]^{\frac{1}{\gamma - 1}} This equation, derived by combining normal shock relations for the pressure jump across the shock with the isentropic stagnation relation post-shock, requires an iterative numerical solution for M given the measured pressure ratio. Begin by assuming an initial M > 1, compute the right-hand side, and refine until it matches \frac{P_{t2}}{P_s}; for \gamma = 1.4, convergence is typically rapid. Standard Pitot tubes underestimate total pressure in supersonic flows due to shock losses, necessitating specialized supersonic Pitot probes designed for accurate measurement above M ≈ 1.5, often with conical tips to minimize shock interference.

Advanced and Modern Applications

Relativistic Mach Number

The relativistic Mach number generalizes the classical Mach number to scenarios involving high speeds comparable to the , where alters the underlying . In relativistic hydrodynamics, this concept is essential for describing flows in which the rest energy is negligible compared to or , such as in ultra-relativistic gases. The formulation ensures Lorentz invariance, preserving the physical meaning across reference frames. For an ultra-relativistic , the equation of state is p = \frac{1}{3} e, where p is the and e is the total . The relativistic speed of sound is derived from perturbations in the relativistic Euler equations as c_s^2 = \left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial e} \right)_s = \frac{1}{3} c^2, yielding c_s = \frac{c}{\sqrt{3}} \approx 0.577c. This value arises because the adiabatic index \Gamma = 4/3 for such gases, and the sound speed reflects the causal structure limited by the . The relativistic Mach number M_\mathrm{rel} is defined as the ratio of the flow speed to this sound speed, but adjusted for relativistic effects using the u^\mu = \gamma (1, \boldsymbol{\beta}), where \gamma = (1 - \beta^2)^{-1/2} and \boldsymbol{\beta} = \mathbf{v}/c. A Lorentz-invariant expression incorporates the h = (e + p)/\rho, where \rho is the , leading to the sound speed c_s = \sqrt{ \frac{\Gamma p}{ \rho h } } in general cases. The Mach number takes the form M_\mathrm{rel} = \frac{\beta}{c_s/c} \sqrt{ \frac{1 - (c_s/c)^2}{1 - \beta^2} }, derived from the of linearized relativistic magnetohydrodynamic equations around a interface. Here, the term accounts for the boost in the lab frame, ensuring invariance. When the v is interpreted via \mathbf{w} = \gamma \mathbf{v}, M_\mathrm{rel} = w / c_s; however, due to the relativistic cap on three-velocity, M_\mathrm{rel} approaches a of \sqrt{3} in the ultra-relativistic regime for the three-velocity ratio, contrasting with the classical case where M \to \infty is possible. This framework applies to astrophysical jets, such as those from active galactic nuclei, where relativistic outflows propagate at speeds exceeding c_s, enabling efficient particle acceleration through internal shocks with M_\mathrm{rel} \gg 1. In particle accelerators, the concept describes beam-plasma interactions, where bunches exceed the sound speed in surrounding relativistic gases, facilitating wakefield acceleration. Unlike classical supersonic flows, strict relativistic treatments preclude infinite Mach numbers and sharp shock discontinuities; instead, transitions across "shocks" are gradual, smoothed by the finite and high Lorentz factors, leading to extended precursor regions.

Hypersonic and Spaceflight Applications

Hypersonic vehicles operate at Mach numbers exceeding 5, where and challenges intensify, often employing designs that leverage shock waves for lift and compression. The X-51A , an unmanned demonstrator, achieved sustained flight at Mach 5.1 during its final test in 2013, marking the longest air-breathing at over 210 seconds powered by fuel. These vehicles rely on advanced thermal protection systems, such as ceramic matrix composites and carbon-carbon composites, to withstand surface temperatures exceeding 1,600°C from frictional heating. Post-2020 developments have advanced both sustained hypersonic and quiet supersonic capabilities. NASA's X-59 QueSST , designed for the , targets Mach 1.4 cruises at 55,000 feet to produce sonic thumps below 75 decibels, enabling overland supersonic flight without disruptive booms; it completed its first flight on October 28, 2025, beginning the initial test campaign. Conceptual efforts like the DARPA-backed envision unmanned hypersonic reconnaissance at 6 using turbine-based combined-cycle engines for from standstill. In spaceflight, re-entry profiles at extreme Mach numbers demand precise trajectory management to mitigate heating. For instance, SpaceX's Starship spacecraft encounters Mach 25+ during orbital re-entry, where peak heating scales approximately as q \propto \rho^{0.5} V^3, with heat flux proportional to the square root of atmospheric density and the cube of velocity, often peaking at altitudes around 60 km. This formula, derived from stagnation-point heating models, underscores the need for robust heat shields to protect against fluxes up to several MW/m². Military applications leverage hypersonic glide vehicles for rapid, maneuverable strikes. Russia's Avangard system, deployed in 2019 atop SS-19 missiles, achieves while gliding at altitudes over 50 km, carrying nuclear warheads up to two megatons and evading defenses through unpredictable trajectories. The U.S. Air Force's AGM-183A ARRW, tested in 2023 from B-52 bombers, reaches speeds with boost-glide capabilities. The program faced challenges like shroud separation, leading to near-cancellation in 2024, but was revived in 2025 with $387.1 million in funding requested for FY2026 procurement. Key challenges in these regimes include material degradation and flight control at , where carbon-carbon composites face oxidation limits above 2,000°C, necessitating for longevity. Control systems must counter extreme aerodynamic sensitivities, with sheaths disrupting communications and requiring advanced guidance for stability during maneuvers.

References

  1. [1]
    Isentropic Flow Equations
    The Mach number M is the ratio of the speed of the flow v to the speed of sound a.
  2. [2]
    Role of the Mach Number | Glenn Research Center - NASA
    Apr 26, 2024 · As the speed increases beyond the speed of sound, the flight Mach number is greater than one, M > 1, and the flow is said to be supersonic or ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  3. [3]
    Ask Us - Ernst Mach and Mach Number - Aerospaceweb.org
    Nov 9, 2003 · The term was first publicized in 1929 when Swiss engineer Jakob Ackeret (1898-1981) named the variable in honor of Mach during a lecture at the ...
  4. [4]
    Mach Number
    As the speed of the object approaches the speed of sound, the flight Mach number is nearly equal to one, M = 1, and the flow is said to be transonic. At some ...
  5. [5]
    Hypersonic Cruise Aircraft
    Typical speeds for hypersonic aircraft are greater than 3000 mph and Mach number M greater than five, M > 5. We are going to define a high hypersonic regime at ...
  6. [6]
    Mass Flow Choking
    We begin with the definition of the Mach number M, and the speed of sound a: Eq #2: V = M * a = M * sqrt (gam * R * T)
  7. [7]
    Mach Number | Encyclopedia.com
    The Mach number is used in fluid mechanics and is especially useful in studies involving supersonic aerodynamics . It is named after Ernst Mach (1838-1916), the ...
  8. [8]
    Mach & Salcher Publish the First Supersonic Image
    The paper reproduced the first photograph of a shock wave in front of an object (in this case a bullet) moving at supersonic speed.
  9. [9]
    Ernst Mach and Peter Salcher's ballistic-photographic experiments
    Photographs of the processes taking place in the air around a flying bullet, which the Austrian physicists Ernst Mach and Peter Salcher published in 1887.
  10. [10]
    MACH NUMBER - Thermopedia
    Feb 2, 2011 · Mach number, Ma, is the ratio of velocity to the local velocity of sound in the medium. Get Adobe Flash player. See also Aerodynamics.
  11. [11]
    Research in Supersonic Flight and the Breaking of the Sound Barrier
    This historic photograph allowed scientists, for the first time in history, to actually see a shock wave. The experimental study of shock waves was off and ...
  12. [12]
    Ernst Mach's Experiments on Shock Waves and The Place of ...
    Dec 23, 2022 · The present paper studies Ernst Mach's experimental work with “spark waves” and other types of shock waves, which brought him to the 1887.
  13. [13]
    Compressibility Effects in Aerodynamics
    Ackeret and Prandtl to the flow of a compressible fluid around airfoils or ... High Speed Wind Tunnel and Tests of. Six Propeller Sections, N.A.C.A. ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The P-38 Lightning Aircraft - DTIC
    The Lockheed solution was to put dive brake flaps under each wing outboard of the engines, which broke up much of the airflow and countered the effects of ...
  15. [15]
    Why Were P-38s Falling From The Sky? - Plane & Pilot Magazine
    Jun 9, 2022 · The Lockheed P-38 Lightning, an advanced fighter ... The issue was ultimately resolved with the addition of fast-acting dive flaps ...
  16. [16]
    Chuck Yeager Broke the Sound Barrier in the Bell X-1
    Oct 13, 2022 · On this, the ninth powered flight of the X-1, the Mach meter jumped from Mach .965 to Mach 1.06—faster than the speed of sound. The ...
  17. [17]
    X-15 Walkaround - Smithsonian Magazine
    ... 1967 Air Force Major William “Pete” Knight flew the rocket-powered aircraft to 4,520 mph, Mach 6.72. It was built to find out how aircraft structures ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Today in Aviation History: X-15 Sets New World Airspeed Record
    Oct 3, 2025 · On October 3, 1967, the North American X-15A-2 set a new world airspeed record of Mach 6.72 (4,520 mph) under the command of USAF Major William ...
  19. [19]
    Role of Mach Number in Compressible Flows
    To determine the role of the Mach number on compressibility effects. we begin with the conservation of momentum equation: rho * V dV = - dp.
  20. [20]
    Similarity Parameters
    The Mach number appears as a scaling parameter in many of the equations for compressible flows, shock waves, and expansions.
  21. [21]
    Schlieren studies of compressibility effects on dynamic stall of ...
    NTRS - NASA Technical Reports Server​​ The delineating Mach number for significant compressibility effects was 0.3 and the dynamic stall process was accelerated ...
  22. [22]
    Speed of Sound Derivation
    On this page we will derive the relationship between the speed of sound and the state of the gas. We begin with the conservation of mass equation.
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Speed of Sound - Equations - The Engineering ToolBox
    For an ideal gas the speed of sound is proportional to the square root of the absolute temperature. Example - Speed of Sound in Air. The speed of sound in air ...
  25. [25]
    Ask Us - Mach vs. Altitude Tables - Aerospaceweb.org
    Feb 23, 2003 · A comprehensive table of values for the speed of sound throughout the atmosphere in common units of both the English and Metric Systems.
  26. [26]
    Speed of Sound
    To a first order approximation, the equation for the speed of sound for a calorically imperfect gas is given by: a^2 = R * T * {1 + (gamma - 1) / ( 1 + (gamma ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Speed of sound in real gases. I. Theory - AIP Publishing
    Oct 1, 1996 · The simple Laplace formula for the speed of sound in gases is corrected to account for three real‐gas effects.
  29. [29]
    Mach Number - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    ### Summary of Flow Regimes Based on Mach Number
  30. [30]
    Mach number regimes - CFD Online
    Sep 13, 2005 · Flow regime, Mach number range ; Incompressible flow, 0.0 - 0.3 ; Subsonic flow, 0.3 - 0.8 ; Transonic flow, 0.8 - 1.2 ; Supersonic flow, 1.2 - 5.0.Missing: aeronautics | Show results with:aeronautics
  31. [31]
    Hypersonic Missions
    Re-entry hypersonic flows are typically at Mach numbers from 25 to 10, with the vehicle constantly decelerating. The surface may be fully insulated, or it may ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] 19930083719.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server
    In fact, the contribution due to compressibility is proportional to the square of Mach number, and, if the average Mach number in the subsonic region is small, ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Bernoulli's Equation
    The equation states that the static pressure in the flow plus one half of the density times the velocity squared is equal to a constant throughout the flow, ...Missing: compressibility | Show results with:compressibility
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Empirically Based - Transonic Aircraft Drag Buildup Technique
    Advances in airfoil section design applicable to aircraft optimized for transonic cruise offer improvements in the range factor VErt increases in wing.
  35. [35]
    The Whitcomb Area Rule: NACA Aerodynamics Research ... - NASA
    The area rule revolutionized how engineers looked at high-speed drag and impacted the design of virtually every transonic and supersonic aircraft ever built.Missing: pockets | Show results with:pockets
  36. [36]
    [PDF] 7. Transonic Aerodynamics of Airfoils and Wings
    Mar 10, 2006 · Transonic flow occurs when there is mixed sub- and supersonic local flow in the same flowfield. (typically with freestream Mach numbers from M = ...Missing: pockets | Show results with:pockets
  37. [37]
    [PDF] NASA Technical Paper 2995 Panel Methods--An Introduction
    A simple example is the supersonic flow over a thin wedge (fig. 3(b)). For small wedge (deflection) angles, the shock is attached at the wedge leading edge,.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] n62-57897 airfoil theory at supersonic speed
    Both wave and. induced. drags are proportional to the square of the lift and depend on the Mach number, that is, the ratio of the flight to sound speed. In ...Missing: attached | Show results with:attached
  39. [39]
    [PDF] CFD Analysis of Hypersonic Flowfields with Surface ...
    This, of course, is the source of the so-called. "real gas" effects an accounting of which is necessary in the Navier-. Stokes, energy and constituent species.<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Experimental Program for Real - Gas Flow Code Validation at
    This method is used for the stagnation region of hypersonic blunt bodies between the bow shock and the body surface. Real gas effects include thermochemical ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Re-Entry Aircraft
    Because of the importance of this speed ratio, aerodynamicists have designated it with a special parameter called the Mach number in honor of Ernst Mach, a late ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] COMM THROUGH PLASMAS AND _ "-'-Kut_KET
    This. NASA conference on communicating through plasmas of atmospheric entry and rocket ez_alast has been sponsored by the Electronics and Control. Division.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Current Technology for Thermal Protection Systems
    Interest in thermal protection systems. (TPS) for high-speed vehicles is increasing because of the stringent requirements of proposed new projects.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] 6. Subsonic Aerodynamics of Airfoils and Wings - Virginia Tech
    Mar 9, 2006 · 6.1 Introduction. In this chapter we discuss the subsonic aerodynamics of airfoils and wings. We look at the basic aerodynamics mainly from ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] NASA SP-367 - Practical Aeronautics
    The flow far ahead of the airfoil section is uniform and of constant velocity. It is irrotational. As the airflow passes about the airfoil section, it remains ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] advanced transonic aerodynamic technology
    NASA supercritical airfoils reduce shock wave strength, delay separation, and use reduced curvature with substantial camber in the rear to regain lift.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] An Experimental Study of Transonic Flow About a Supercritical Airfoil
    A series of experiments was conducted on flow fields about two airfoil models whose sections are slight modifications of the original Whitcomb supercritical.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] NASA Supercritical Airfoils
    The purpose of this report is to summarize the background of the NASA supercritical airfoil devel- opment, to discuss some of the airfoil design guide- lines, ...Missing: history origin<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Oblique Shock Waves
    For the Mach number change across an oblique shock there are two possible solutions; one supersonic and one subsonic. In nature, the supersonic ("weak shock") ...
  50. [50]
    Prandtl-Meyer Angle - NASA Glenn Research Center
    As mentioned above, the Mach number of a supersonic flow increases through an expansion fan. The amount of the increase depends on the incoming Mach number and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Mach Angle
    But the ratio of v to a is the Mach number of the flow. M = v / a. With a little algebra, we can determine that the cone angle mu is equal to the inverse sin ...
  52. [52]
    Effects of entropy layer on the boundary layer over hypersonic blunt ...
    Jul 1, 2021 · A detached bow shock is formed in front of the nose. The inviscid and rotational region behind shock is called entropy layer.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Newtonian aerodynamics for general body shapes with several ...
    Feb 7, 2025 · In the hypersonic regime the Newtonian flow model, especially in its modified form, has been known for some time to produce satisfactory ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
  54. [54]
    [PDF] 19940006457.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server
    In Prandtl-Meyer expansion air behaves as a perfect gas expanding isentropically from an original. Mach number of 1.0 or greater to a region of lower static.
  55. [55]
    Nozzle Design - Glenn Research Center - NASA
    Sep 12, 2024 · This equation tells us how the velocity V changes when area A changes, and the results depend on the Mach number M of the flow. If the flow is ...
  56. [56]
    Converging/Diverging (CD) Nozzle
    A CD nozzle has a convergent section to a throat, then a divergent section. The throat chokes the flow, and the flow expands to supersonic downstream.
  57. [57]
    Supersonic Diffuser - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A supersonic diffuser is defined as a component that reduces the velocity of supersonic airflow and recovers kinetic energy as pressure, often utilizing a ...
  58. [58]
    Analysis of shock train leading shock structure under oscillatory ...
    Jun 23, 2023 · In this study, leading normal and oblique shocks are experimentally observed at the same position and similar velocities in a forced oscillation shock train.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Effect of Back-pressure Forcing on Shock Train Structures in ...
    Feb 16, 2018 · The deceleration of a supersonic flow to the subsonic regime inside a high-speed engine occurs through a series of shock waves, ...
  60. [60]
    Modified Kantrowitz Starting Criteria for Mixed Compression ...
    Jan 29, 2019 · We revisited the problem of predicting intake starting from the physical perspective with Kantrowitz theory as the starting position. As ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Starting phenomena for hypersonic inlets with thick turbulent ...
    Kantrowitz, Arthur; and Donaldson, Coleman duP.: Preliminary Investigation of. Supersonic Diffusers. NACA WR L-713, 1945. (Formerly NACA ACR L5D20.) 8. Mitchell ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Thermodynamic Analysis of Dual-Mode Scramjet Engine Operation ...
    This pressure rise due to heat release is coupled with the decrease of the Mach number in the combustor so that. Mach 1 (thermal choking) can result. Eventually ...
  63. [63]
    Performance comparison of full-scale ramjet and scramjet using ...
    Sep 2, 2025 · ... Mach numbers inside scramjet combustors are significantly higher than in ramjets. Specifically, scramjet combustor flow becomes supersonic ...
  64. [64]
    Speed of Sound, Mach Number & Sound Barrier - Aerospaceweb.org
    Jun 1, 2003 · The Mach number (M) is simply the ratio of the vehicle's velocity (V) divided by the speed of sound at that altitude (a). For example, an ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Airdata Measurement and Calibration
    These airdata encompass indicated and true airspeed, pressure altitude, ambient air temperature, angles of attack and sideslip, Mach number, and rate of climb.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] NASA Reference Publication 1046
    The instruments that are used to measure speed and altitude include the altimeter, the airspeed indicator, the true-airspeed indicator, the Machmeter, and the ...
  67. [67]
    Speed of Sound
    A Mach number less than one indicates subsonic flow, a Mach number near one is transonic, and a Mach number greater than one is supersonic or hypersonic.
  68. [68]
    [PDF] US Standard Atmosphere, 1976
    An exospheric isothermal temperature of 1000 K, now considered representative of the mean for solar activity, is 500 K cooler than the 1500 K in the U.S..
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Wind-Tunnel and Flight-Test Results for the Measurements of Flow ...
    The accurate measurement of Mach number, pressure and angle of attack at transonic and supersonic speeds is important for many reasons in carrying out flight ...
  70. [70]
    Uncertainty in velocity measurement based on diode-laser ...
    This work investigates the error caused by nonuniformities along the line-of-sight in velocity measurement using tunable diode-laser absorption spectroscopy ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Fluids – Lecture 16 Notes - MIT
    measured by the pitot probe, the static p1, and the required flow Mach number M1. After some manipulation, the result is the Rayleigh Pitot tube formula.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Aerodynamics C Summary - Aerostudents
    This equation is called the Rayleigh Pitot tube formula. In its derivation we used the normal shock wave relations for the ratio p2/p1. We used the relation ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] PITOT TUBES acc. to PRANDTL - LAMBRECHT meteo GmbH
    Even compression shocks, which might occur from approx. 0.8 Mach, do not influence the validity of this equation. Pitot tubes have a coefficient of 1 and cause ...
  74. [74]
    Pitot Tubes - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    In general, the Mach number 5 is considered as the limit between supersonic and hypersonic wind tunnels. However, this limit is a matter of controversy.
  75. [75]
    Boeing X-51A WaveRider Sets Record with Successful 4th Flight
    May 3, 2013 · The vehicle reached Mach 5.1 powered by its supersonic combustion scramjet engine, which burned all its JP-7 jet fuel. The X-51A made a ...
  76. [76]
    X-51A Waverider achieves history in final flight
    May 3, 2013 · The final flight of the X-51A Waverider test program has accomplished a breakthrough in the development of flight reaching Mach 5.1 over the ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Ceramic Matrix Composite (CMC) Thermal Protection Systems (TPS ...
    Thermal protection systems (TPS) and hot structures are required for a range of hypersonic vehicles ranging from ballistic reentry to hypersonic cruise ...
  78. [78]
    Materials design for hypersonics | Nature Communications
    Apr 18, 2024 · Carbon-carbon composites (C/C) are historically considered the de facto materials for the fabrication of hypersonic aeroshells and leading ...
  79. [79]
    Quesst: The Vehicle - NASA
    The X-59 is a supersonic, single-pilot experimental aircraft designed to reduce sonic booms to a gentle thump, not for commercial use.
  80. [80]
    Quesst - NASA
    NASA's Quesst mission, which features the one-of-a-kind X-59 aircraft, will demonstrate technology to fly supersonic, or faster than the speed of sound.The Mission · Quesst Mission Image Gallery · NASA F-15s Validate Tools for...
  81. [81]
    SR-72 Hypersonic Vehicle - GlobalSecurity.org
    Envisioned as an unmanned aircraft, the SR-72 would fly at speeds up to Mach 6, or six times the speed of sound. “Hypersonic aircraft, coupled with hypersonic ...
  82. [82]
    SpaceX Starship prototype exploded, but it's still a giant leap ...
    Dec 14, 2020 · The booster only reaches about Mach 6. Starship itself will be returning from orbit, reaching Mach 25. At this speed, the heat of reentry will ...
  83. [83]
    On High Speed Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer
    Jan 2, 2020 · q, W/sq.cm = 1.75 E-08 (rho/rn)^0.5 (1000*V)^3.0, where rho is kg/cu.m, rn is m, and V is km/s. The 1000 factor converts velocity to m/s.Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  84. [84]
    Russia deploys Avangard hypersonic missile system - BBC
    Dec 27, 2019 · Mounted on top of an intercontinental ballistic missile, the Avangard can carry a nuclear weapon of up to two megatons. Russia's defence ...
  85. [85]
    Russia deploys first hypersonic missiles - The Guardian
    Dec 27, 2019 · The president described the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle, which can fly at 27 times the speed of sound, as a technological breakthrough ...
  86. [86]
    AGM-183 ARRW | Air & Space Forces Magazine
    USAF conducted three all-up round tests in 2023 including a test in which the shroud failed to separate from the glide vehicle, invalidating terminal ...
  87. [87]
    Air Force completes another successful hypersonic test - AF.mil
    Jul 13, 2022 · The Air Force conducted another successful hypersonic test off the Southern California coast. The AGM-183A weapons system reached hypersonicMissing: missile Mach 5-12 2023
  88. [88]
    [PDF] On Stability and Control of Hypersonic Vehicles - DTIC
    Hypersonic flight presents major challenges to airframe and control system designers. High velocity can cause a hypersonic vehicle to be highly sensitive to ...
  89. [89]
    Hypersonic Vehicles - Joint Air Power Competence Centre
    Widely unresolved issues relate to structural integrity, propulsion efficiency and endurance, as well as precision of flight control and navigation. The ...