Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Checked baggage

Checked baggage refers to luggage handed over by passengers to an airline during check-in for transportation in the aircraft's cargo hold, where it remains inaccessible throughout the flight. This contrasts with carry-on items retained in the cabin, enabling checked bags to accommodate bulkier or heavier loads subject to airline-imposed limits, commonly 23 kilograms (50 pounds) in weight and 158 linear centimeters (62 inches) in combined dimensions for economy class. Since 2008, when pioneered fees for the first checked bag on domestic U.S. routes at $15, most carriers have adopted paid allowances, generating over $7 billion annually industry-wide by monetizing what was once complimentary service amid rising fuel costs and competitive pressures. Regulations mandate screening by agencies such as the U.S. , which prohibits explosives, flammables, and other hazards in checked holds while permitting items like sporting equipment or tools under restrictions. Defining challenges include mishandling—encompassing delays, losses, and damage—with data tracking enplaned versus affected bags, revealing persistent vulnerabilities during transfers and high-volume periods despite technological aids like RFID tags. Compensation falls under frameworks like the for international flights, capping reimbursements at approximately $1,700 per bag, though carriers must investigate claims promptly. These dynamics underscore checked baggage's role in balancing passenger convenience, operational efficiency, and security imperatives in .

Definition and Historical Development

Definition and Purpose

Checked baggage, also referred to as checked luggage, consists of passenger property tendered to an air carrier at check-in and accepted for transport in the aircraft's cargo hold, where it remains inaccessible to passengers throughout the flight. This definition aligns with international aviation practices, distinguishing it from carry-on items retained in the passenger cabin. Airlines tag and screen such baggage separately to comply with security protocols, ensuring it is loaded into designated compartments below the passenger deck. The core purpose of checked baggage is to accommodate larger volumes or weights of personal items that exceed restrictions, providing passengers with expanded capacity for extended or specialized without compromising onboard or . By segregating these items in the hold, airlines enable thorough for prohibited contents, optimize weight distribution for fuel efficiency and stability, and reduce cabin clutter to enhance passenger mobility during boarding, , or evacuations. This system also streamlines operations at high-volume airports, where checked items undergo automated and loading distinct from hand-carried goods.

Evolution from Early Aviation to Modern Practices

In the early decades of , beginning with services like those of in 1919 and expanding in the U.S. during the , checked baggage was severely limited by aircraft design, with small holds or external racks accommodating minimal loads to preserve range and stability on propeller-driven planes such as the . Passengers often relied on manual handling by porters or couriers who tagged luggage with simple labels and loaded it directly adjacent to the or within passenger compartments, as dedicated screening or sorting infrastructure was absent. By 1938, the U.S. imposed formal restrictions, capping checked baggage at 40 pounds for domestic coach passengers to mitigate weight-related safety risks on underpowered airliners. The post-World War II era marked a transition with larger four-engine propeller aircraft like the in the late 1940s, which featured expanded lower holds and prompted airports to introduce basic baggage carts and short conveyor belts for ground transport, though sorting and reconciliation remained labor-intensive manual processes. The , ushered in by the 707's commercial debut in 1958, dramatically scaled baggage volumes—global air passenger traffic rose from 88 million in 1950 to over 300 million by 1970—necessitating centralized counters and rudimentary tagging systems, yet mishandling rates stayed high due to inconsistent manual verification. The pivotal shift to began in 1971 with BNP Associates' invention of the first mechanized , incorporating powered conveyors and early sorters to process bags at higher speeds in hubs like , where initial implementations handled thousands of items daily. Security-driven reforms accelerated evolution in the late 20th century; the 1988 bombing of over , , which involved a in unaccompanied checked baggage, prompted widespread adoption of passenger-baggage reconciliation protocols by 1989, mandating that bags travel only with confirmed owners aboard via linked manifests and tags. This was reinforced by international standards from bodies like IATA, reducing risks from transferred or interline luggage. Deregulation via the U.S. of 1978 spurred efficiency investments, leading to tagging proliferation in the for optical scanning and initial computer-assisted sorting. Modern practices integrate digital oversight, with RFID tags deployed globally since the early enabling real-time location via sensors along handling paths, alongside AI-optimized in facilities processing up to 20,000 bags per hour. These advancements have halved mishandled rates since the —from over 6 per 1,000 passengers in 1990 to around 6.3 in 2024—through and automated , though challenges like peak-season surges persist in legacy manual elements at smaller airports.

Operational Processes

Check-in and Initial Handling

At counters or dedicated baggage drop points, passengers present travel documents including boarding passes, , and for flights, passports to personnel, who verify eligibility against booking records and policies specific to fare class, route, and carrier. allowances are assessed, with standard limits often capping individual pieces at 23 kg (50 ) and linear dimensions (length + width + height) at 158 (62 in), though variations exist by ; items exceeding 32 kg are typically rejected due to aircraft handling safety risks as per industry guidelines. Prohibited contents, such as batteries over specified watt-hours or , are inspected and may require removal to comply with regulations from bodies like the TSA. Compliant baggage is weighed on calibrated scales and measured, after which staff affix a standardized IATA baggage tag featuring a barcode or RFID for tracking, encoding details like passenger name, flight number, destination, and origin to enable interline compatibility and reconciliation. The tag is generated via airline systems linked to global distribution networks, and a detachable claim stub is issued to the passenger for retrieval. Excess weight or dimensions incur fees calculated per airline tariff, often prepaid online to expedite the process; self-service kiosks or bag drops allow pre-tagged bags to bypass full counters where mobile boarding passes are used. Post-check-in, baggage enters the initial handling phase through conveyor systems feeding into the airport's (BHS), where automated or manual sorting directs items by flight destination, transfer point, or early bag storage to optimize load balancing and reduce peak-hour . Ground staff or load bags onto carts or tubs, ensuring secure stacking to prevent shifting during tow to the aircraft ramp; this stage includes preliminary visual checks for damage or leaks. Security screening follows, with bags routed through systems (EDS) or trace portals mandated by authorities, scanning for threats like concealed explosives— a process handling up to 2,000 bags per hour at major hubs via computed for 3D imaging. Reconciliation protocols, governed by IATA 753, mandate logging key milestones from to loading, cross-referencing bag tags against passenger manifests to offload unboarded items, minimizing risks of orphaned luggage; non-compliance has contributed to incidents like the 2010 Dubai crash partly linked to unreconciled fuel-contaminated bags, underscoring causal links between procedural lapses and safety outcomes. Initial handling efficiency varies by airport infrastructure, with modern BHS reducing mishandling rates to under 1% through real-time sorting, though legacy systems at smaller facilities rely more on manual intervention.

Baggage Transportation and Loading

After security screening and sorting by flight destination, checked is transported from central processing areas to the via a combination of automated conveyor systems and manual handling equipment. Bags are directed to baggage make-up zones near or ramp, where they are aggregated based on load plans to optimize balance and . In these zones, luggage is loaded onto carts, dollies, or unit load devices (ULDs) such as containers or pallets, which are then towed by specialized like baggage tugs to the parking position on the . The loading process varies by aircraft type and airline procedures. Narrow-body aircraft often employ bulk loading, where individual bags are manually or conveyor-assisted placed into contoured shelves within the lower cargo holds to ensure secure fit and prevent shifting during flight. Wide-body aircraft typically use containerized loading, with pre-assembled ULDs—standardized bins or pallets filled with baggage on the ground—hoisted into the hold using winches or loaders and secured to the aircraft structure. Ramp agents coordinate this under strict timelines, often using belt loaders or scissor lifts for access, while adhering to weight and balance calculations provided by the flight operations team to maintain aircraft center of gravity within certified limits. International Air Transport Association (IATA) standards, particularly Resolution 753, mandate tracking and scanning of baggage at key points including prior to loading onto the originating flight to minimize mishandling and ensure traceability. This involves barcode or RFID verification during transfer to transport equipment and final reconciliation at the hold to confirm all tagged items are aboard, reducing lost baggage rates which IATA reports averaged 5.6 per 1,000 passengers globally in 2019 before implementation enhancements. protocols, including proper restraint to withstand and evacuations, are enforced to prevent hazards from shifting .

Unloading and Reclaim Procedures

Upon arrival at the destination , checked baggage is unloaded from the by ground handling crews using equipment such as belt loaders for loose-loaded bags and cargo loaders or tugs for unit load devices (ULDs) containing containerized baggage, reversing the loading sequence to ensure efficient offloading. This manual or semi-automated process prioritizes safety protocols, including positioning equipment to minimize worker twisting and alerting teams to heavy items, as outlined in occupational guidelines to reduce injury risks during transfer to carts or directly into the . Unloaded bags are then inducted into the airport's automated , where scanners or RFID readers capture data to verify flight details and route items via conveyor belts, tilt trays, or destination-coded vehicles (DCVs) to facilities. Switch points and diverters direct bags to the appropriate reclaim carousels in the arrivals , with IATA 753 mandating continuous tracking from offloading through to maintain an accurate baggage inventory and enable reconciliation against passenger manifests. Advanced systems integrate real-time monitoring to minimize errors, though global mishandling rates—defined as bags not reunited with owners within 48 hours—stood at approximately 0.43% of the 4 billion pieces handled annually as of recent industry data. At the baggage reclaim area, passengers proceed to designated carousels announced via flight information displays and public address systems, where bags emerge on rotating conveyor belts typically within 20-45 minutes of docking, depending on size, flight volume, and processing for arrivals. Priority-tagged items, such as those for flights or premium passengers, are offloaded first and routed to early-access belts to expedite retrieval. Passengers identify and remove their bags using visual cues from tags; unclaimed items cycle back for recovery, with procedures under IATA Recommended Practice 1743a guiding tracing of discrepancies through centralized reporting to the operating carrier. For damaged or delayed bags, passengers file claims on-site or via apps, with carriers liable under conventions like the for verified losses during handling.

Tracking and Technology

Traditional Tagging and Reconciliation

In traditional checked baggage handling, tagging begins at the counter where staff or kiosks generate a or synthetic containing a or linear symbology encoding key data such as the unique 10-digit number, passenger name, flight details, and destination per IATA Recommended Practice 740. The , compliant with IATA Resolution 740 for interline compatibility, is printed on durable material and secured to the bag's handle using a strap or adhesive, ensuring visibility and resistance to environmental damage during transit. This process, rooted in practices adapted from 19th-century railway systems and standardized for by , routes bags through airport systems by scanning the at sorting nodes to verify against the flight database and direct to the appropriate belt or chute. Reconciliation integrates with tagging to enforce protocols, particularly ensuring no is loaded onto an without a corresponding boarded , a requirement heightened after security regulations post-2001. At the departure or loading area, baggage handlers scan each tag's using handheld or fixed readers, cross-referencing the bag tag number against the passenger manifest or boarding records in real-time via airport IT systems. Mismatched or unverified bags are quarantined for manual resolution, preventing unaccompanied luggage from reaching the aircraft hold and mitigating risks of unauthorized items. This barcode-dependent method, while effective for basic matching, relies on line-of-sight scanning and human oversight, contributing to occasional errors in high-volume operations where scan rates must exceed 99% for compliance with standards like IATA Resolution 753. Historically, pre-1990s tags were simple paper slips tied with string, lacking barcodes and depending on manual transcription for routing, which increased mishandling rates before the widespread adoption of automated printing and scanning in the late 20th century. Reconciliation in these earlier systems often involved physical checklists or token-based matching, evolving to barcode integration by the 1980s for improved accuracy, though still prone to detachment or illegibility issues compared to later technologies. Overall, traditional tagging and reconciliation prioritize verifiable linkage between passenger and baggage through standardized identifiers, forming the foundational layer of airport operations despite limitations in speed and error resilience.

Advanced Technologies like RFID and Real-Time Systems

(RFID) technology enhances checked baggage tracking by embedding passive tags into baggage labels, which communicate wirelessly with fixed and handheld readers positioned at critical chokepoints such as counters, sorting facilities, loading bays, and reclaim areas, achieving read accuracies up to 99.9% without requiring direct line-of-sight scanning. These tags store unique identifiers linked to and flight , enabling automated capture and transmission to central systems for near-instantaneous updates on bag location and status. The (IATA) has championed RFID adoption through its Bag Tag Initiative, launched to standardize passive UHF RFID tags compliant with ISO 18000-6C, targeting end-to-end visibility and projecting a $3 billion over 10 years via reduced mishandling costs. , an early adopter, invested $50 million starting in 2016 to deploy over 4,600 handheld scanners and hundreds of fixed readers across 344 stations globally, boosting processing rates from 350-400 to 1,500 bags per hour and cutting mishandled rates by 10% while improving accuracy to 99.9%. Industry-wide, RFID implementations have contributed to a 60% decline in global mishandling from 2007 to 2022, with surveys indicating 44% of airlines fully deploying tracking technologies by 2024. Real-time baggage systems integrate RFID data with messaging protocols to provide dynamic oversight, often leveraging platforms like SITA WorldTracer, which processes bag messages for reconciliation, tracing mishandled items across 1,500+ airlines and handling millions of daily transactions via a centralized global database. IATA Resolution 753, mandatory since June 2018, enforces tracking at four waypoints—passenger acquisition, aircraft delivery, interline transfers, and final receipt—with required data exchange via standardized Bag Parts Messages (BPMs) to minimize discrepancies during handoffs. Compliance has driven operational efficiencies, including faster aircraft turnarounds and resource optimization, though full RFID integration remains uneven due to infrastructure costs. Emerging real-time enhancements include GPS-enabled tags for off-airport visibility and AI-driven for predictive routing, as outlined in IATA's May 2025 Global , which envisions passenger-facing apps for live bag monitoring via electronic tags and robotics-assisted handling. These systems promise further mishandling reductions—potentially 25% with widespread RFID—by enabling proactive interventions, though adoption lags in legacy airports reliant on reconciliation. Overall, such technologies shift management from reactive recovery to preventive , supported by empirical gains in accuracy and cost savings exceeding implementation expenses.

Policies and Allowances

Weight, Size, and Quantity Limits

Airlines establish weight, size, and quantity limits for checked baggage primarily to safeguard baggage handlers from musculoskeletal injuries, maintain aircraft center of gravity and structural integrity during loading, and optimize fuel efficiency by controlling total payload mass. These constraints derive from ergonomic standards for manual lifting—typically capping individual piece weights to avoid exceeding safe thresholds of around 23-32 kilograms—and engineering specifications for cargo holds, where excessive volume or mass can compromise balance or exceed certified takeoff weights. The predominant weight allowance per checked bag is 23 kilograms (50 pounds), applied across numerous carriers for standard economy fares, though some permit up to 32 kilograms (70 pounds) as an absolute maximum before requiring subdivision or rejection to prevent handler strain. Linear dimensions are commonly restricted to 158 centimeters (62 inches) total—calculated as length plus width plus height, including handles and wheels—to fit standardized unit load devices (ULDs) and conveyor systems without jamming. Quantity restrictions generally permit one to two pieces per passenger in economy class under piece-concept systems (prevalent in U.S. domestic and some transatlantic routes) or a total weight allowance under weight-concept systems (common internationally), with enforcement tied to ticket class and fare rules to align with revenue management and capacity planning. Exceeding these triggers fees or denial, as verified loads must reconcile with flight manifests for regulatory compliance, including FAA oversight of overall aircraft weight and balance rather than per-bag mandates.

Variations by Airline, Class, and Route

Policies for checked baggage differ markedly across airlines, primarily reflecting their operational models. Low-cost carriers, such as and , generally exclude checked baggage from base fares, imposing fees ranging from €20 to €60 per bag depending on booking timing and route length, to maintain low headline prices through unbundling services. In contrast, full-service carriers like and often include one checked bag of up to 23 kg (50 lbs) in fares on international routes, though basic economy variants on domestic U.S. flights may incur first-bag fees of $30 to $40. Travel class further modulates allowances, with premium cabins providing greater generosity to align with higher fares and service expectations. In on major carriers like or , passengers typically receive one bag up to 23 kg on most routes, whereas entitlements double to two bags, each up to 32 kg, reflecting enhanced revenue and capacity for heavier loads in forward cabins. exemplifies weight-based systems, allocating 40 kg total for versus 30 kg for on long-haul flights. Domestic routes in regions like the U.S. or often mirror these class distinctions but with stricter enforcement of fees for economy add-ons, while international itineraries—particularly transatlantic or transpacific—tend to standardize higher allowances to comply with interline agreements and bilateral regulations. Route-specific variations arise from regulatory, competitive, and geographic factors. For instance, flights within the U.S. under carriers like permit one free checked bag up to 23 kg in main cabin economy but charge $40 for basic economy domestics, whereas transatlantic routes include it standardly. In , short-haul routes with low-cost operators like limit free allowances to zero checked bags, with fees escalating for intra-EU flights versus longer intercontinental ones, where full-service airlines may extend economy inclusions to foster loyalty on high-yield paths. Exceptions occur for routes to destinations with local mandates, such as higher weights for flights to or under certain carriers, but core limits remain 158 cm linear dimensions across most global operators.
Airline TypeEconomy ExampleBusiness ExampleRoute Influence
Low-Cost (e.g., )0 free bags; $25–$60 feesN/A (rarely offered)Higher fees on short-haul; no inclusions
Full-Service (e.g., )1x23 free on intl.; fees domestic basic2x32 freeIntl. more generous than domestic U.S.
Weight-Based (e.g., )30 total40 totalConsistent across long-haul; varies short

Fees and Economics

Origins and Implementation of Baggage Fees

The practice of including checked baggage allowances in base airfares without separate fees predominated among major U.S. carriers until the mid-2000s, when rising costs and competitive pressures from low-cost carriers prompted a reevaluation of models. Airlines historically bundled baggage handling into prices to simplify offerings, but this masked variable costs associated with weight and volume, which directly influenced consumption and operational efficiency. American Airlines pioneered the shift for major legacy carriers by announcing in May 2008 that it would charge $15 for the first checked bag on domestic routes, effective June 15, 2008, marking the first widespread implementation of such fees among U.S. network airlines. This decision was driven by surging prices, which reached over $140 per barrel in mid-2008, and the need to offset multibillion-dollar losses amid economic downturn and capacity cuts. Prior to this, some regional and low-cost operators, such as People Express in 1981, had experimented with per-bag charges, but these did not set a precedent for full-service airlines. Following American's lead, other major U.S. carriers rapidly adopted first-bag fees: implemented a $25 charge for the second bag in February before extending to the first, while , , and followed suit by late , with fees typically starting at $15-$25 per bag. By the end of 2009, all principal U.S. legacy airlines had eliminated complimentary allowances for the first two on most domestic flights, generating $329 million in fees from alone in . Implementation involved updating reservation systems, counters, and baggage tags to enforce fees, often waiving them for frequent flyers or premium classes to segment demand. Internationally, the model spread unevenly, influenced by European low-cost carriers like , which had charged for checked bags since the early 1990s to minimize onboard weight and enable denser seating configurations. U.S. fees initially applied only to domestic itineraries but expanded to and other routes by 2009-2010, with exemptions preserved for codeshare partners and alliances to avoid competitive disadvantages. This unbundling allowed airlines to align revenues more closely with marginal costs, such as fuel burn per kilogram of baggage, though it required regulatory navigation, including U.S. scrutiny for transparency.

Revenue Impact and Economic Rationale

U.S. airlines collected a record $7.27 billion in checked baggage fees in 2024, representing a significant portion of ancillary amid rising operational costs. This figure marked an increase from $6.7 billion in 2022 and contributed approximately 3.2% to total operating in recent years, underscoring baggage fees as a key profit driver in a low-margin . Globally, such fees have similarly boosted carrier earnings, with unbundled services like baggage enabling airlines to capture value from passengers willing to pay for extras without inflating base fares. The economic rationale for implementing checked baggage fees centers on product unbundling, which allows airlines to separate the core from optional services, facilitating based on passenger preferences and characteristics. This approach enables carriers to lower base ticket prices for light travelers while extracting higher payments from those requiring handling, thereby expanding overall market participation and revenue without deterring price-sensitive customers. In a highly competitive with thin margins, unbundling generates substantial ancillary income—exceeding $17 billion from U.S. fees alone between 2010 and 2014—helping offset variable costs like fuel and labor that scale with passenger load. Empirical evidence indicates that baggage fees enhance profitability by aligning pricing with actual service utilization, as unbundling reduces the subsidy light travelers provide to heavy packers under bundled models and incentivizes lighter loads that cut fuel consumption. Studies confirm this strategy increases carrier profits in competitive routes by enabling flexible responses to , though it has drawn for potentially eroding funds like the U.S. Airport and Airway Trust Fund through untaxed ancillary revenues. Airlines justify hikes amid escalating expenses, arguing fees recover costs directly tied to volume rather than subsidizing them via fares.

Restrictions and Security

Prohibited Items and Hazardous Materials

Prohibited items in checked baggage encompass materials that pose risks of fire, explosion, leakage, or toxicity during air transport, primarily regulated by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, which airlines implement through the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR). These standards classify hazardous materials into nine classes, with most entirely forbidden in passenger baggage to mitigate causal risks such as ignition from friction or pressure changes in cargo holds. National authorities, like the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Transportation Security Administration (TSA), enforce aligned rules, prohibiting items that could endanger aircraft integrity or personnel. Class 1 explosives, including , detonators, , and replica or inert explosives, are universally banned in checked baggage due to their potential for detonation under flight conditions. Incendiary devices such as strike-anywhere or self-igniting materials follow suit, as they violate IATA Table 2.3.A restrictions on provisions. Flammable liquids (Class 3), like , paints, thinners, and lighter fluids, are prohibited owing to vapor ignition hazards in unpressurized holds; aerosol cans with flammable propellants (e.g., certain hairsprays or insecticides) exceed safe thresholds unless explicitly excepted in minimal quantities. Compressed gases (Class 2), including canisters, oxygen tanks, and non-flammable gases like cartridges beyond sporting equipment limits, cannot be checked due to rupture risks from altitude-induced pressure drops. Corrosive substances (Class 8), such as acids, alkalis, mercury, and wet cell batteries, are forbidden to prevent structural damage to or components via leakage. Toxic and infectious materials (Class 6), encompassing poisons, radioactive substances (Class 7), and certain medical waste, remain off-limits, with ICAO emphasizing zero tolerance for unapproved biohazards in . Lithium batteries, classified under miscellaneous dangerous goods (Class 9), face stringent curbs: spare batteries exceeding 100 Wh or damaged units are prohibited in checked baggage, as empirical tests show elevated risks from in environments; mandate for compliance. Exceptions exist for limited sporting or declared firearms in locked cases, per IATA provisions requiring approval and separate , but these hinge on national laws like U.S. TSA rules allowing up to 11 pounds of small arms cartridges if declared. Violations trigger fines up to $175,000 per FAA enforcement, underscoring causal enforcement against undeclared hazards. may impose stricter rules, with passengers advised to consult carrier-specific policies for variations.

Screening Processes and Passenger Reconciliation

Checked baggage undergoes mandatory security screening to detect explosives, weapons, and other prohibited items prior to loading onto aircraft. In the United States, the (TSA) requires 100% screening of all passenger checked baggage through its Electronic Baggage Screening Program (EBSP), established under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act following the September 11, 2001 attacks. This process utilizes automated inline systems that integrate explosive detection systems (EDS) directly into airport baggage handling infrastructure, allowing bags to be screened without manual diversion by officers in most cases. Primary screening technologies include scanners and multi-view systems certified by the TSA, which generate three-dimensional images to identify potential threats such as explosives concealed within baggage. These units, like the CTX 9800 series, can process up to 550 bags per hour and automatically flag anomalies for secondary inspection, which may involve explosive trace detection (ETD) swabs, canine units, or manual opening by TSA personnel. Bags triggering alarms are typically held for resolution, with recent advancements in high-speed systems reducing false positives and enhancing throughput at major airports. Internationally, similar requirements apply under standards from bodies like the (ICAO), though implementation varies by country, with some relying on remote review for inbound flights. Passenger reconciliation ensures that checked baggage is matched to boarded passengers, preventing unaccompanied bags from flying and mitigating risks of sabotage. This process, mandated by IATA Resolution 753 and equivalent national regulations, involves scanning baggage tags against passenger manifests at check-in, boarding gates, and aircraft loading. Baggage reconciliation systems (BRS) automate this by cross-referencing unique bag identifiers with real-time boarding data; if a passenger does not board, the system alerts ground crew to offload the corresponding baggage before departure. Non-compliance can result in flight delays or bag removal, with IATA guidelines emphasizing operational checklists from acceptance to offloading to maintain security integrity. Advanced BRS integrations, often using RFID or barcode tracking, provide real-time visibility and compliance verification, reducing human error in high-volume operations.

Mishandling and Risks

Causes of Lost, Delayed, or Damaged Baggage

Baggage mishandling encompasses bags that are lost, , , or pilfered, with accounting for the majority of incidents at 74-80% globally in recent years. and pilferage represent about 20% of cases, while true losses or thefts comprise roughly 5%, equating to around 1.8 million bags annually. International routes exhibit mishandling rates up to five to eight times higher than domestic flights, primarily due to complex transfer processes and longer supply chains. The leading cause of mishandling is transfer errors, where bags fail to connect properly between flights, responsible for 41-46% of delayed bags as of 2023-2024 data. This stems from tight connection times, high passenger volumes at hubs, and discrepancies in or systems during handoffs. Failure to load bags onto aircraft contributes 16-18% of incidents, often resulting from operational pressures like rushed turnarounds or staffing constraints post-2020 recovery. Loading and tagging errors account for smaller but notable shares, at 5-9% combined, arising from human oversight in sorting facilities or at counters where tags are misapplied or damaged. Damage frequently occurs during rough mechanical handling in systems or improper loading, exacerbated by overpacked or fragile items not secured adequately by . Pilferage and , though less common, often happen at high-traffic transfer points or unsecured areas, with airlines not liable for pre-existing bag or packing faults. External factors like disruptions or delays add 8% to mishandling, primarily affecting delays rather than permanent losses.

Statistics, Compensation, and Improvements

In 2024, the global rate of mishandled checked baggage—defined as lost, delayed, damaged, or stolen—stood at 6.3 bags per 1,000 passengers, a decrease from 6.9 the prior year and a 67% improvement compared to 2007 levels, despite an 8.2% rise in worldwide air traffic. This equates to approximately 36.2 million mishandled bags annually, with about 75% involving delays, 20% damage or pilferage, and 5% permanent loss or theft, totaling roughly 1.8 million bags never recovered. In the United States, the Department of Transportation reported a mishandling rate of 0.55% among major carriers for the full year, down from 0.58% in 2023, reflecting stricter domestic reporting and recovery protocols. Regional variations persist, with Asia-Pacific achieving the lowest rates at under 5 per 1,000 due to higher automation adoption, while North America and Europe trail at around 7-8 per 1,000, often linked to hub congestion and legacy systems. Passenger compensation for mishandled baggage is primarily governed by the Montreal Convention of 1999, which applies to international flights among 140+ signatory nations and limits airline liability to 1,519 Special Drawing Rights (approximately $2,175 USD as of 2024) per passenger for destruction, loss, damage, or delay, regardless of fault unless proven otherwise by the carrier. For delayed bags, airlines must cover reasonable essentials like clothing and toiletries until delivery, with bags deemed lost after 21 days of non-delivery, triggering full valuation claims up to the limit; damaged items require claims within 7 days, and delays within 21 days. Domestic U.S. flights fall under Department of Transportation rules with no fixed cap but similar reimbursement expectations, though actual payouts average far below limits—often $100-500 for delays—due to required proof of contents and airline negotiations. Over 61% of mishandled bags are reunited via systems like SITA WorldTracer within 48 hours, minimizing compensation claims, but passengers frequently report under-compensation for high-value items absent declared excess value at check-in. Industry improvements have driven the downward trend in mishandling rates, primarily through adoption of (RFID) tags, which enable real-time tracking and reduce errors by up to 30% in equipped systems, as seen in trials at major hubs like Singapore Changi. for predictive sorting and biometric passenger reconciliation at points further cut delays, while automated handling systems—now in 40% of large airports—minimize in loading and sorting. Initiatives like the International Air Transport Association's improvement programs emphasize end-to-end visibility, with projections for mishandling rates below 5 per 1,000 by 2030 via widespread integration and electronic bag tags, though challenges remain in standardizing across low-cost carriers and smaller airports reliant on manual processes.

Controversies and Debates

Criticisms of Fees and Policies

Criticisms of checked baggage fees often portray them as "junk fees" that airlines use to extract additional revenue from passengers without enhancing service quality, thereby inflating the true cost of beyond advertised base fares. In a December 2024 U.S. Commerce subcommittee hearing, Senator described such fees, including those for checked bags, as exploitative practices warranting federal review and potential fines for lack of transparency. Similarly, Senator criticized low-cost carriers like and for incentivizing employees with $26 million in bonuses in 2023 to enforce strict bag size checks, arguing this amounts to harassment that degrades the passenger experience. A November 2024 report highlighted how unbundled fees for baggage and other services have generated billions for major U.S. airlines over two decades, shifting costs that were previously included in ticket prices. U.S. airlines collected a record $7.27 billion in checked baggage fees in 2024, up from $7 billion in 2023, fueling accusations that these charges serve primarily as a mechanism rather than a response to operational costs. Consumer complaints to the U.S. frequently cite unexpected or escalating fees, with examples including passengers facing $200 surcharges for a single , prompting some to forgo checked bags altogether. In response to such grievances, the issued rules in 2024 mandating upfront disclosure of baggage fees during booking to curb "surprise" charges, and in September 2024 expanded refund requirements for bags delayed over 12 hours on domestic flights. Policies encouraging checked bag fees have also drawn fire for incentivizing passengers to maximize luggage, resulting in overcrowded cabins, prolonged boarding times, and heightened risks. The shift has created a " crisis," with overhead bins routinely insufficient for in personal items, leading to disputes over space and delays as passengers jostle for storage during boarding. Overstuffed s exacerbate hazards, such as bags falling mid-flight or obstructing aisles, which diverts flight attendants from duties and turns cabins into what critics describe as a "full ." While airlines defend fees as optional for cost-conscious travelers opting for lower base fares, detractors contend this unbundling model disproportionately affects budget-conscious passengers who cannot afford premium bundles, effectively penalizing those least able to pay without improving overall efficiency.

Security Efficacy and Mishandling Concerns

The screening of checked baggage for explosives and prohibited items relies primarily on automated explosive detection systems (EDS) and computed tomography (CT) scanners deployed at airports, which analyze bag contents for threats without routine manual inspection. These technologies were mandated for 100% coverage under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act of 2001, following historical vulnerabilities exemplified by the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, where plastic explosives concealed in a radio cassette player within checked luggage destroyed the aircraft over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270 people. Despite upgrades, such as integrating CT for three-dimensional imaging, the systems' efficacy depends on calibration, operator training, and threat evolution, with performance rated as improvable from medium to high through device enhancements and procedural refinements. Audits reveal persistent gaps in detection reliability; a 2022 Department of Office of covert testing operation identified vulnerabilities in TSA's checked baggage screening technologies, procedures, and Transportation Security Officer adherence, allowing simulated threats to pass undetected in multiple instances. Similarly, a 2023 Government Accountability Office assessment found that while TSA certifies screening equipment to meet initial detection standards, insufficient post-deployment testing and hinder assurances of sustained effectiveness against emerging explosives or concealment methods. These findings underscore causal limitations in automated screening—such as resolution constraints for densely packed or novel materials—prompting ongoing maturation roadmaps for next-generation sensors, though no terrorist incident has successfully exploited checked baggage channels, suggesting deterrence value amid layered . Mishandling of checked baggage, encompassing , delay, , or , introduces security risks through extended exposure to ground handling chains involving third-party contractors with varying oversight. Approximately 80% of mishandling incidents stem from delays during transfers, creating windows for unauthorized access post-screening that could enable tampering or extraction of items. A DHS Office of review of prevention procedures noted systemic weaknesses in TSA's checked baggage processes, including inadequate tracking and , which heighten potentials despite tag-matching protocols. Such vulnerabilities are amplified in outsourced baggage handling systems, where unmonitored third-party access to screened luggage raises concerns over deliberate insertion of hazards, as highlighted in cybersecurity analyses of . Empirical mishandling rates, around 0.5-1% globally, correlate with higher-risk indirect flights, indirectly pressuring by complicating passenger-baggage and forensic in threat scenarios.

References

  1. [1]
    Checked luggage (checked baggage) - AltexSoft
    Checked luggage or checked baggage is the luggage handed to the air carrier during check-in to be transported in an area inaccessible to the passenger.
  2. [2]
    What is Checked Baggage? - Going
    Jan 11, 2024 · Checked baggage is luggage that goes in the cargo hold under the plane during flight. You don't have access to it during the flight.
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    History of Airline Fees: Bags, Food & More - FareCompare
    Aug 21, 2017 · It was May 2008 when American Airlines announced it would begin charging a fee for all checked-bags, the first major US carrier to do so.
  6. [6]
    $$7.27 billion and counting: How checked baggage fees became a ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · The fee frenzy began in 2008, when American Airlines became the first U.S. airline to charge $15 for the first checked bag. What began as a ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  7. [7]
    What Can I Bring? | Transportation Security Administration - TSA
    The TSA "What Can I Bring?" page provides a comprehensive list of items that travelers can and cannot bring in carry-on and checked baggage.Complete List (Alphabetical) · Food · Tools · Sharp Objects
  8. [8]
    PackSafe for Passengers - Federal Aviation Administration
    Sep 18, 2025 · Most dangerous goods are forbidden in carry-on and checked baggage. There are a few exceptions for some personal items such as toiletries, medicines, and ...Aerosols · Lithium Batteries · Baggage with lithium batteries · PackSafe Resources
  9. [9]
    Baggage Mishandled by Marketing U.S. Air Carriers
    Starting in 2019, U.S. air carriers no longer submit number of mishandled-baggage reports. Total number of enplaned and mishandled bags are reported instead.<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Lost, Delayed, or Damaged Baggage - Department of Transportation
    If your bag arrives open, unlocked or visibly damaged, immediately check to see if any of the contents are missing or damaged. Report any problems to the ...
  11. [11]
    Lost, damaged or delayed baggage - Air Passenger Protection
    Jan 16, 2023 · If your baggage is lost or damaged while in the airline's care, the airline must compensate you up to approximately $2,780 to replace items that ...Missing: common | Show results with:common<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Carry-On Baggage Tips | Federal Aviation Administration
    Apr 16, 2024 · The maximum size carry-on bag for most airlines is 45 linear inches (the total of the height, width, and depth of the bag). Anything larger ...
  13. [13]
    49 CFR § 1540.5 - Terms used in this subchapter. - Law.Cornell.Edu
    Checked baggage means property tendered by or on behalf of a passenger and accepted by an aircraft operator for transport, which is inaccessible to passengers ...
  14. [14]
    Checked Bag vs. Carry-On: What You Need to Know - NerdWallet
    Oct 14, 2025 · A checked bag is a piece of luggage you hand over to an airline check-in agent at the airport. It'll be placed in the airplane's cargo hold.
  15. [15]
    What is Checked Baggage? - Navan
    Checked baggage is luggage that passengers check in at an airline's counter, which the airline then handles and transports in the cargo hold of the plane.
  16. [16]
    What Are Checked Bags:Airline Rules, Fees & Packing Tips - Szoneier
    Jul 21, 2025 · A checked bag is any luggage you hand over to the airline at ticketing or curbside drop‑off, which travels in the aircraft's cargo hold. Carry‑ ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    History of Airline Baggage - Yahoo
    Apr 28, 2017 · 1938: The first baggage rules are put in place: with limited space on planes, the Civil Aeronautics Board restricts coach passengers to 40 pounds for domestic ...
  18. [18]
    How does a baggage handling system work? - BEUMER Group
    Despite its humble beginnings, the baggage handling system has evolved over time to be very sophisticated, fully-automated systems. They can now involve ...
  19. [19]
    The History of the ICS Baggage Handling System and Its Potential
    On 14 March 1972, an ICS was introduced to the Middle terminal (what is now T1 and T2) at Frankfurt International Airport and is still operating today.
  20. [20]
    2024 SITA Baggage IT Insights
    The global mishandled bag rate (MBR) has dropped by 63% since 2007 – down from around nineteen mishandled bags per thousand to less than seven. In the past year ...
  21. [21]
    Mishandled bag rate drops, thanks to technology - Stuck at the Airport
    Jun 12, 2025 · SITA reports that the mishandled bag rate dropped to 6.3 bags per 1,000 passengers in 2024, down from 6.9 in 2023. Of the 33.4 million ...
  22. [22]
    Thirty Years of Passenger-Baggage Reconciliation: Is it still relevant?
    Aug 20, 2018 · Passenger-baggage reconciliation was introduced 30 years ago, but its relevance is questioned due to new security measures and the separation ...
  23. [23]
    What Is Check-in Baggage? What Are The Rules for ... - Pegasus
    Check-in baggage refers to items handed over during the check-in process to be placed in the aircraft's cargo hold, within the specified guidelines.
  24. [24]
    Checked Bag Policy | Southwest Airlines
    We have baggage embargoes in place for some countries—restrictions on oversized, overweight, and extra checked bags. See if your destination is impacted by an ...Baggage Embargo for... · Self-Tagging Baggage · Changes
  25. [25]
    Security Screening | Transportation Security Administration - TSA
    Checked Baggage Screening · Inspection Notices: TSA may inspect your checked baggage during the screening process. · Claims: If your property is lost or damaged ...
  26. [26]
    Baggage Standards - IATA
    Passenger and baggage standards are developed and adopted under the IATA Traffic Conferences, where all IATA's members can participate and vote. Baggage ...
  27. [27]
    Checked bags | United Airlines
    We can't accept bags weighing more than 100 pounds (45 kilograms). Musical instruments and assistive devices are exceptions. We'll accept musical instruments up ...
  28. [28]
    A Guide to Baggage Handling Process (BHS) - AiQ Consulting
    Jul 7, 2017 · From having an easy baggage drop off point at CheckIn, to having an innovative Early Bag Store to sort luggage that may arrive early or late, ...
  29. [29]
    Understanding Airport Baggage Handling Systems
    Apr 23, 2024 · Baggage handlers play a role in the initial sorting process, directing bags based on their destination (departure gate, transfer area, or ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Baggage Tracking IATA Resolution 753
    Nov 30, 2023 · ... standard baggage handling process from check-in, then this event should be specifically recorded to comply with Resolution 753 (acceptance ...
  31. [31]
    Demystifying Checked Baggage Handling at Airports
    Mar 15, 2024 · Ground handlers meticulously organize luggage according to weight distribution and flight manifests, ensuring optimal balance and stability ...
  32. [32]
    A Guide to the Baggage Handling Process - Transvirtual
    Feb 22, 2024 · Explore our guide to baggage handling in airports, covering everything from check-in procedures to luggage retrieval.
  33. [33]
    Loading the Plane - How Baggage Handling Works | HowStuffWorks
    Some planes are bulk loaded, meaning the bags are brought up one-by-one on a conveyor and placed into shelves in the cargo hold. Other planes are container ...
  34. [34]
    How Cargo & Baggage is Loaded & Unloaded from an Aircraft
    May 31, 2020 · For unloading of Cargo and Baggage, the whole procedure is reversed. Cargo loaders unload cargo; belt loaders unload baggage; staff loads up ...Baggage Journey from Airport... · Belt Loaders · Unit Load Device (ULD...
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    Baggage Operations - IATA
    Baggage Tracking: Based on the requirements of IATA Resolution 753, explore the different options to track baggage, and how tracking data could be exchanged ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    IATA Type B Bag Messages and Baggage Messaging Refresher
    May 20, 2017 · A unique 10 digit number as reference for each piece of baggage, defined in IATA RP 740. The bag tag number is part of the baggage messages.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Interline Considerations on Baggage Standards - IATA
    There are two standard checked-in free baggage allowance concepts: • Weight Concept: measured by the total weight of checked-in baggage, which is shown as a.
  39. [39]
    The History of Bag Tags - Security Label
    It was in the 1930s that airlines began to use the baggage label patented in 1882, adapting it in their own way.
  40. [40]
    Tech Talk: Baggage Reconciliation Systems – (BRS)
    May 23, 2022 · Baggage reconciliation is a system to guarantee that all passenger bags are authorised to be loaded onto an aircraft, and no baggage travels unless the baggage ...
  41. [41]
    IATA Resolution 753 - Beumer Group
    IATA members shall maintain an accurate inventory of baggage by monitoring the acquisition and delivery of baggage.
  42. [42]
    Baggage Handling: A more efficient process
    Jun 17, 2014 · Tag your bag at home, using a home-printed baggage tag or electronic baggage tag, and then use a fast bag drop facility. Use self-service at ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Baggage Reference Manual - IATA
    Jun 1, 2019 · The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] RFID for Baggage Handling and Tracking
    RFID has proven read rates of 99.9% in baggage handling and is the most reliable and cost-effective technology to increase capacity and improve the baggage ...
  45. [45]
    How Airlines Track Bags and Avoid Losing Baggage with RAIN RFID
    Oct 26, 2021 · Airlines use RAIN RFID tags embedded in baggage labels, scanned by readers at key points, sending data to the airline's system in real-time.<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    RFID Baggage Tracking Solutions - Jadak
    RFID baggage tracking uses tags with chips to track luggage in real-time from check-in to arrival, enhancing security and reducing lost luggage.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] RFID Bag Tag Initiative Fact Sheet - IATA
    The IATA RFID initiative uses RFID for baggage tracking, aiming for 100% tracking, cost efficiency, and a high read rate, with a $3B estimated return on ...
  48. [48]
    Delta improves baggage performance and experience with RFID
    Jan 18, 2017 · By implementing RFID, we can scan more bags at a faster rate. Delta teams have deployed 4,600 cellular handheld scanners across the system. ...
  49. [49]
    The Role of RFID in Airlines and Modern Baggage Tracking
    RFID is used for baggage tracking, cargo handling, and real-time oversight of ground equipment, enabling efficient operations and reducing loss.
  50. [50]
    Nearly half of airlines fully track bags, RFID adoption on rise: IATA
    May 12, 2024 · “Between 2007 and 2022 baggage mishandling reduced by nearly 60%. That is good news,” said Monika Mejstrikova, IATA Director of Ground ...
  51. [51]
    Using RFID, Airline Industry Making Progress to Reduce Baggage ...
    Jun 6, 2024 · The survey of 155 airlines and 94 airports revealed 44 percent of airlines have fully implemented baggage tracking with 41 percent more in progress.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  52. [52]
    WorldTracer - SITA
    SITA Bag Manager. Real-time baggage management and reconciliation system to help airlines, airports and ground handlers reconcile, track, and manage baggage.
  53. [53]
    Baggage Tracking - IATA
    Automated baggage tracking also supports efficient use of ground handling resources, supports aircraft turnaround time improvement, and operational efficiency.
  54. [54]
    IATA Launches Global Baggage Roadmap
    May 14, 2025 · This includes the use of electronic baggage tags, GPS tracking, and robotics that will enable passengers to track their bags in real time and ...
  55. [55]
    Airports & Airlines Solutions - Lyngsoe Systems
    Experience a seamless digital journey with real-time baggage tracking data. Stay ahead of the competition and comply with IATA resolution 753.
  56. [56]
    Weights for Passengers, Carry-on & Checked Baggage Complete ...
    This document is a complete file of weights for passengers, carry-on, and checked baggage, created by the Weight and Balance Working Group. It is a PDF file.
  57. [57]
    Checked Luggage Sizes, Weight Limits and Airline Fees
    May 29, 2025 · The most common weight limit for checked luggage is 50 pounds per bag. Checked baggage fees can vary by airline, destination and length of ...
  58. [58]
    Checked Luggage Size and Allowance Chart for 62 Airlines
    Oct 16, 2025 · Airline policies for checked luggage sizes and weights vary, with most allowing bags up to 62 linear inches and 50 pounds, though these ...
  59. [59]
    Checked Luggage Sizes, Weight Limits & Airline Fees | Travelpro
    For most airlines, the largest luggage size for check-in is 62 linear inches. This means the total length + width + depth must equal 62 inches or less.
  60. [60]
    How much checked baggage may I take on board an airliner?
    Depending on the airline, type of travel, and origin or destination, airlines may limit either the number of pieces or the weight of your baggage. Please check ...
  61. [61]
    Hold luggage allowances: size, weight and fees by airline
    Jul 30, 2025 · Here we'll look at a few airlines in detail and investigate their checked baggage allowances, including British Airways, Ryanair and easyJet.
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    Checked Baggage - Air Canada
    Use our checked baggage calculator to determine your free checked baggage allowance, and any additional fees should you exceed it.
  64. [64]
    Checked Baggage | Singapore Airlines
    Weight concept ; Suites and First Class. 50 kg. Additional 50 kg. Total: 100 kg ; Business Class. 40 kg. Additional 40 kg. Total: 80 kg ; Premium Economy Class. 35 ...
  65. [65]
    Checked bag policy − Travel information - American Airlines
    For First / Business, weight is 70 lbs / 32 kgs for free bags and 50 lbs / 23 kgs for excess charged bags. For all confirmed customers on flights to / from ...Bag limitations · Oversize and overweight bags · British AirwaysMissing: early | Show results with:early
  66. [66]
    The History of Airline Baggage Fees - Danny the Deal Guru
    Mar 5, 2024 · The genesis of baggage fees can be traced back to the early 2000s when airlines faced financial ...Missing: origins timeline
  67. [67]
    The impact of baggage fees on passenger demand on US air routes
    In the United States, major “legacy” carriers first introduced fees for passengers' first and second checked bags in 2008, and subsequently raised their fees ...
  68. [68]
    How airline fees have turned baggage into billions - BBC
    Jun 4, 2025 · In 2008 American Airlines became the first US airline to charge a fee, $15, for the first checked bag on its domestic routes. Mr Sorenson says ...
  69. [69]
    Air travelers hit with new baggage fees - Los Angeles Times
    May 22, 2008 · Starting June 15 most American passengers must pay $15 for checking a single bag. That comes on top of the airline's decision two weeks ago to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Baggage fees a goldmine for US carriers - CAPA - Centre for Aviation
    Oct 6, 2009 · Commencing in early 2008, most of the US carriers commenced charging for the first and second bags checked by passengers. Previously, additional ...
  71. [71]
    When did airlines begin charging for carry-on bags? How long has ...
    Jan 4, 2024 · People Express airline was the first carrier to begin charging luggage fees in 1981. ... Extras such as luggage, food and drink, seat location, ...
  72. [72]
    Baggage Fees by Airline 2008 | Bureau of Transportation Statistics
    Baggage Fees by Airline 2008 ; 1, American Airlines, 32,959 ; 2, US Airways, 7,478 ; 3, Delta Air Lines, 26,571 ; 4, United Airlines, 12,219 ...Missing: implementation major
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Billions of Dollars in Baggage Fees Travel the Globe
    Aug 15, 2011 · By the end of 2009, the time-honored domestic travel benefit of two free checked bags was eliminated by every major US carrier with the ...
  74. [74]
    The economics and evolution of airline baggage policies - myflyright
    Historical evolution of baggage policies​​ By charging for checked luggage, airlines found a new avenue to boost their income without raising base fares, a ...
  75. [75]
    Why do airlines charge so much for checked bags? This ... - CNN
    Mar 28, 2024 · In the two decades since 2002, flyers paid a total of about $70 billion in bag fees. This means separately charging for bags saved airlines ...
  76. [76]
    Do bags fly free? An empirical analysis of the operational ...
    In 2008, the majority of U.S. airlines began charging for the second checked bag, and then for the first checked bag. One of the often cited reasons for this ...
  77. [77]
    Airlines raked in over $7B in revenue thanks to check-in bag fees
    May 28, 2025 · US airlines collected a staggering $7.27 billion in checked baggage fees last year, marking a new industry record, according to recent federal data.
  78. [78]
    Airlines Are Making Big Money on Checked Bags. Here's How It ...
    Jun 2, 2025 · According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, airlines raked in a record-breaking $7.27 billion from checked bag fees in 2024, which is ...
  79. [79]
    As their policies shift, see how much U.S. airlines are ... - CBS News
    May 27, 2025 · In 2022, U.S. airlines made over $6.7 billion in bag fees, another major jump from the $5.3 billion made in 2021.
  80. [80]
    US Airlines net profit was $6.7 billion in 2024, a decrease over 2023
    May 13, 2025 · Baggage fees: $5.8 billion, 3.2%, compared to 3.2% in 2023; Reservation change fees: $850 million, 0.5%, compared to 0.5% in 2023. Fees are ...
  81. [81]
    Who Benefits from Airline Baggage Fees? - Kellogg Insight
    Aug 3, 2015 · One rationale for baggage fees is that they allow airlines to charge different customers different prices according to customer characteristics.
  82. [82]
    There's No Such Thing as Free Checked Bags
    Mar 17, 2025 · When a company changes how it charges customers, it's usually for one of two reasons: to make more money or to spend less of it. Southwest ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  83. [83]
    The competitive effects of product unbundling: Evidence from U.S. ...
    ... fees. Baggage fees have a large impact on airlines' profits, accounting for over $17 billion in revenue from 2010–2014.1 The introduction of bag fees also ...
  84. [84]
    Why airlines are raising baggage fees and charging more at the airport
    Feb 24, 2024 · Airlines have argued that higher costs such as labor and fuel, their biggest expenses, mean they had to raise bag fees. "While we don't like ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Product Unbundling in the Travel Industry: The Economics of Airline ...
    This paper provides theory and evidence on airline bag fees, offering insights into a real-world case of product unbundling. The theory predicts that an ...
  86. [86]
    Highly debated but still unbundled: The evolution of U.S. airline ...
    May 18, 2022 · We estimate that the product unbundling trend has decreased revenues to the U.S. Airport and Airway Trust Fund by 4.0%–4.6% due to untaxed ...
  87. [87]
    Current Airline Baggage Fees (2024) & Why They Are Increasing
    Mar 18, 2024 · In the early 2000s, major carriers began introducing fees for checked bags, moving away from an all-inclusive pricing model.
  88. [88]
    Dangerous Goods - ICAO
    The Technical Instructions require that all dangerous goods be packaged and, in general, restrict the quantity per package according to the degree of hazard and ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Dangerous Goods Regulations - IATA
    ... dangerous goods such as explosives, compressed gases, lithium batteries, etc. are forbidden in carry-on baggage or checked baggage or on the person. Fuel ...
  90. [90]
    Dangerous Goods Guidance for Passengers - IATA
    Most usual toiletry items in reasonable quantities are acceptable and therefore allowed in carry-on and checked baggage. See the link to Table 2.3.A at the ...
  91. [91]
    Pack your bags – Prohibited Dangerous Goods | Help Center | ICC
    Oct 31, 2023 · Flammable substances like gasoline, lighter fluid, and aerosol cans containing flammable materials are also prohibited. These items pose a ...
  92. [92]
    Restricted and prohibited items | Information - British Airways
    Bows, cross bows and arrows; Harpoon guns and spear guns; Slingshots and catapults. You can travel with the following types of firearms as checked baggage under ...
  93. [93]
    Dangerous Goods Regulations for Air Transportation
    Jan 10, 2023 · The Hazardous Materials Regulations ( HMR ) are the minimum requirements for the safe transportation of dangerous goods in commerce. They ...Missing: checked baggage
  94. [94]
    Electronic Baggage Screening Program - TSA
    Planning Guidelines and Design Standards. TSA assists planners and designers in developing cost-effective solutions for checked baggage inspection systems.
  95. [95]
    49 U.S. Code § 44901 - Screening passengers and property
    “The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) shall utilize existing checked baggage explosive detection equipment and screeners to screen cargo carried ...
  96. [96]
    Inside Look: Inline Baggage Screening Systems - TSA
    May 10, 2016 · Learn about TSA's inline baggage screening systems, which are automated screening equipment that remotely screen and clear a bag without the use of a physical ...
  97. [97]
    TSA debuts state-of-the-art Checked Baggage Inspection System ...
    Jun 1, 2022 · Each EDS unit is capable of screening up to 550 bags per hour. The EDS is programmed to analyze the contents of a checked bag to determine if it ...
  98. [98]
    Reveal Baggage Inspection Systems - Leidos
    Our Reveal explosives detection systems (EDS) use computed tomography (CT) X-ray technology to automatically detect a variety of explosives in checked baggage.
  99. [99]
    CTX 9800 DSi - Smiths Detection
    3 approved and TSA certified explosives detection system (EDS) suitable for identifying threats in checked baggage and cargo packages.
  100. [100]
    TSA introduces new checked baggage screening equipment at ...
    Aug 7, 2024 · The new CT system will screen baggage automatically and will alert TSA officials if something inside needs a closer inspection by a TSA officer.
  101. [101]
    S&T Checked Baggage Program Fact Sheet - Homeland Security
    May 8, 2025 · The S&T program aims to develop automated, high-speed, high-performance checked baggage explosives detection systems for the TSA.
  102. [102]
    CBP launches innovative International Remote Baggage Screening ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · CBP personnel can now view the same checked baggage x-ray images captured at the foreign international airport and review them remotely before ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Hold Baggage Reconciliation (2025) - IATA
    In June 2025, ICAO released updated guidance on Hold Baggage Screening, Handling, and Processing, specifically clarifying procedures for accompanied versus ...
  104. [104]
    Baggage Reconciliation System (BRS) - TAV Technologies
    Ensuring that checked baggage is reconciled with its passenger before it is loaded onto a flight is one of the key security requirements in the airport industry ...
  105. [105]
    Baggage Reconciliation - Aptaero
    Process Overview. The Aptaero BRS enables you to track, trace and maintain visibility into the baggage journey from check-in to arrival. Key System Benefits.
  106. [106]
    Baggage Reconciliation System - abomis brs
    ABOMIS BRS is a state-of-the-art baggage reconciliation system that provides airlines, and ground handlers with accurate, relevant and timely information.
  107. [107]
    [PDF] 2023 Baggage IT Insights | © SITA
    May 15, 2023 · Recent data reveals that delayed bags accounted for 80% of all mishandled bags in 2022, a 9% increase compared to the previous year. The ...
  108. [108]
    Aviation mishandled baggage rates improve in 2024
    Jun 13, 2025 · Global figures show a mishandling rate of 6.3 per 1,000 passengers in 2024, down from 6.9 the previous year, and a 67% improvement since 2007.
  109. [109]
    Baggage mishandling rates continue to fall – new report
    Jun 12, 2025 · Delayed bags remain the most common issue, accounting for 74% of mishandled baggage, down from 80% in the previous year. Lost or stolen bags ...
  110. [110]
    Air Travel Consumer Report: December 2024, Full Year 2024 ...
    Mar 14, 2025 · In 2024, the reporting marketing carriers reported a mishandled baggage rate of 0.55%, down from 0.58% in 2023. Mishandled Wheelchairs and ...
  111. [111]
    Asia-Pacific leads in baggage handling as global systems improve
    Jun 13, 2025 · Transfer-related issues were the leading cause, responsible for 41% of mishandling, although this marks an improvement from 46% in the previous ...
  112. [112]
    The Montreal Convention 1999 (MC99) - IATA
    The Montreal Convention 1999 (MC99) establishes a modern framework for airline liability in cases of passenger injury or death, baggage loss or damage, ...
  113. [113]
    The Montreal Convention protects your luggage when traveling ...
    May 23, 2025 · If the bag is not found after 21 days, it is deemed lost. The airline must compensate you for the lost value, up to approximately $1,738. So if ...
  114. [114]
    How new technology is improving baggage handling performance
    Oct 7, 2024 · Airlines and airports investing in digital and automation solutions are seeing significant improvements in their mishandled baggage rates, and ...
  115. [115]
    IDEMIA and SITA set to transform Baggage Handling with Computer ...
    Dec 5, 2024 · The baggage mishandling rate decreased from 7.6 to 6.9 per 1,000 passengers in 2023, showing a 9.2% year-on-year improvement, thanks to ...
  116. [116]
    Top baggage trends to watch in 2025: robotics, automation & more
    “Travellers will benefit from real-time tracking of their baggage using electronic tags and Internet of Things (IoT) technology, reducing lost bags and stress.<|control11|><|separator|>
  117. [117]
    WATCH: Airline executives face Senate hearing over seat choice ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · A U.S. Senate subcommittee is taking aim at airlines and their growing use of fees for things like early boarding and better seats.
  118. [118]
    [PDF] The Sky's the Limit, the Rise of Junk Fees in American Travel
    Nov 26, 2024 · Over the past two decades, U.S. airlines have increasingly charged separately for goods and services that were once included in the price of ...
  119. [119]
    File a Consumer Complaint | US Department of Transportation
    Aug 1, 2025 · DOT requires airlines to acknowledge consumer complaints within 30 days of receiving them and to send consumers written responses addressing these complaints ...
  120. [120]
    Biden-Harris Administration Announces Final Rule to Protect ...
    Apr 24, 2024 · The rule requires airlines and ticket agents to tell consumers upfront what fees they charge for a first or second checked bag, a carry-on bag, ...
  121. [121]
    New rules surrounding refunds, baggage fees coming soon for air ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · When it comes to baggage fees, if a checked bag arrives 12 hours or more late for a domestic flight, consumers are due a refund. For ...
  122. [122]
    The Carry-On-Baggage Bubble Is About to Pop - The Atlantic
    Feb 14, 2024 · Travelers are rightly infuriated by the situation: a crisis of carry-ons that someone must be responsible for, and for which someone must pay. I ...
  123. [123]
    Overfilled Carry-Ons: A Growing Passenger Safety Risk - LugLess
    Overstuffed carry-ons cause flying to be a "full contact sport" with bags falling on passengers, and flight attendants are less focused on safety.
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Checked Baggage Capability Maturation Roadmap - TSA
    Sep 4, 2023 · The primary objective for Checked Baggage stakeholders is to develop, acquire, and implement dynamic material and non-material based, modular ...
  125. [125]
    20 Years After Lockerbie, Aviation Security Gaps Remain - ProPublica
    Dec 22, 2008 · Twenty years ago this Sunday, plastic explosives hidden in a radio cassette player in a Samsonite suitcase ripped a hole in Pan Am Flight 103 ...
  126. [126]
    Evaluation of the effectiveness of an airport passenger and baggage ...
    The results show that the screening system performance can be improved from medium to high by upgrading screening devices at hold baggage checkpoints and by ...
  127. [127]
    [PDF] OIG-22-61 - Vulnerabilities Continue to Exist in TSA's Checked ...
    We conducted covert tests to determine the effectiveness of TSA's checked baggage screening technologies, related procedures, and whether Transportation ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  128. [128]
    Aviation Security: TSA Could Better Ensure Detection and Assess ...
    Oct 19, 2023 · This statement discusses TSA's efforts to (1) ensure passenger and baggage screening technologies continue to meet detection requirements after deployment.
  129. [129]
    GAO-10-763, Aviation Security: Efforts to Validate TSA's Passenger ...
    According to TSA, each one of these layers alone is capable of stopping a terrorist attack. In combination, TSA states that their security value is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  130. [130]
    This NYC Area Airport Is Among The Worst For Mishandled Baggage
    Apr 4, 2025 · Mishandled baggage encompasses various issues, including delayed, lost, damaged, or stolen luggage. 80% of mishandled baggage is due to delayed ...
  131. [131]
    [PDF] A Review of Procedures to Prevent Passenger Baggage Thefts
    This report addresses the strengths and weaknesses of the checked baggage screening process employed by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to ...
  132. [132]
    The Hidden Third Party Risk in Airport Baggage Handling Systems
    Jul 24, 2025 · Airports must treat third-party access as a critical issue. Trust in complex environments like BHS must be continuously earned and verified.
  133. [133]
    To Check Or Not To Check A Bag For A Flight? Here's How ... - Forbes
    Jun 12, 2023 · The risk of mishandled luggage drops dramatically when you book a direct flight. That's because about a third of mishandling happens when ...