Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chirp mass

The chirp mass is a fundamental parameter in physics, defined as \mathcal{M} = \frac{(m_1 m_2)^{3/5}}{(m_1 + m_2)^{1/5}}, where m_1 and m_2 are the individual of the two compact objects (such as black holes or neutron stars) in a . This quantity, often expressed in solar (M_\odot), combines the total M = m_1 + m_2 and \mu = m_1 m_2 / M into a single effective that governs the leading-order of the system's during inspiral. In binary inspirals, the two objects each other in gradually shrinking due to energy loss through , causing the orbital frequency to increase over time in a process known as "chirping." The chirp mass specifically determines the rate of this frequency sweep, as the gravitational wave frequency f evolves according to \dot{f} \propto \mathcal{M}^{5/3} f^{11/3}, making it the dominant observable in the early detection phases of events captured by interferometers like and . For instance, the first detected merger, GW150914, had a chirp mass of approximately 28 M_\odot, which helped parameterize the signal's amplitude and duration. The concept originates from post-Newtonian approximations of , where the chirp mass emerges naturally in the quadrupole formula for emission, simplifying the analysis of non-spinning binaries. Beyond detection, it enables inferences about properties, such as distinguishing astrophysical populations (e.g., stellar-mass binaries) from instrumental noise, and has been used to catalog over 200 confirmed events in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observations as of 2025. In the redshifted frame, accounting for cosmological expansion, the observed chirp mass \mathcal{M}_z = \mathcal{M} (1 + z) further links signals to luminosity distance, aiding multimessenger astronomy.

Definition and Properties

Mathematical Definition

The chirp mass \mathcal{M} of a consisting of two compact objects with masses m_1 and m_2 is defined as \mathcal{M} = \frac{(m_1 m_2)^{3/5}}{(m_1 + m_2)^{1/5}}. This expression combines the individual masses into a single parameter that governs the leading-order dynamics of the system's inspiral under . Equivalently, the chirp mass can be expressed in terms of the \mu = m_1 m_2 / (m_1 + m_2) and the total mass M = m_1 + m_2 as \mathcal{M} = \mu^{3/5} M^{2/5}. This form highlights its role as an effective mass scale in the post-Newtonian expansion for binary systems emitting gravitational waves. The chirp mass emerges from the derivation of the orbital frequency evolution during the inspiral phase, driven by energy loss through gravitational radiation as described by the quadrupole formula. For a circular binary orbit, the time-averaged power radiated is \langle P \rangle = \frac{32}{5} \frac{G^4 \mu^2 M^3}{c^5 a^5}, where G is the gravitational constant, c is the speed of light, and a is the orbital separation. The orbital energy is E = -G M \mu / (2a), so the rate of energy loss yields dE/dt = - \langle P \rangle, which relates to the evolution of the orbital angular frequency \omega = \sqrt{G M / a^3} via \frac{d\omega}{dt} = \frac{96}{5} \frac{G^3 \mu M^2}{c^5 a^4} = \frac{96}{5} \pi^{8/3} \left( \frac{G \mathcal{M}}{c^3} \right)^{5/3} f^{11/3}, where f = \omega / \pi is the gravitational-wave frequency. This demonstrates how \mathcal{M} parameterizes the "chirp"—the monotonic increase in frequency and amplitude—as the binary inspirals. The chirp mass is typically expressed in solar masses (M_\odot), with values for astrophysical binaries ranging from around 1 M_\odot for pairs to tens of M_\odot for mergers; for instance, the system in had \mathcal{M} \approx 1.19 \, M_\odot.

Physical Significance

The chirp mass represents an effective for compact binary systems, encapsulating the combined of the component masses on the emission of during the . It governs the characteristic "chirping" of the waveform, where the orbital and wave increase over time due to the dissipation of orbital and through quadrupole . This emerges naturally in the leading-order post-Newtonian , determining the dominant contribution to the signal's as the tightens its . In the early inspiral regime, accessible to ground-based detectors like , the chirp mass is more readily measurable than the individual component because it primarily controls the observable rate of frequency sweep in the , with uncertainties typically below 1% for detected events, while separate suffer from strong degeneracies with other parameters such as inclination and . The formulation of the chirp mass weights the component asymmetrically, reaching its maximum value for nearly equal-mass configurations at fixed total , which correspondingly maximizes the amplitude and inspiral timescale, thereby enhancing detectability for symmetric binaries. The chirp mass connects directly to Keplerian descriptions of binary motion by dictating the rate of orbital decay via the Peters-Mathews quadrupole radiation formula, which approximates energy loss using Newtonian orbits augmented by the leading radiation-reaction term, without invoking the full machinery of . This relation allows the parameter to quantify how the semi-major shrinks over time, scaling the inspiral duration and drift proportionally to the chirp mass raised to the 5/3 power. Historically, the parameter now known as the was first derived by Peters and Mathews in through their calculation of gravitational radiation losses from Keplerian binaries. This framework was later applied to model the long-term evolution of systems, such as the Hulse-Taylor binary PSR B1913+16 discovered in 1974. The term "chirp mass" was introduced later in the context of detection to emphasize its role in the chirp of inspiral signals. This framework proved essential decades later for , serving as the primary coordinate in LIGO's template banks for matched filtering, where searches are parameterized efficiently in chirp mass and evolution to detect inspiral signals.

Role in Gravitational Wave Astronomy

Inspiral Signal Characteristics

The gravitational wave frequency f_{\rm GW} during the inspiral phase of a compact binary system evolves as f_{\rm GW} \propto \mathcal{M}_{\rm chirp}^{5/8} (t_c - t)^{-3/8}, where \mathcal{M}_{\rm chirp} denotes the chirp mass, t_c is the coalescence time, and t is the time prior to coalescence. This relation stems from the quadrupolar radiation reaction, which causes the orbital separation to decrease, thereby accelerating the orbital frequency and producing the increasing pitch known as the "chirp" signature. Higher chirp masses lead to faster frequency sweeps, shortening the observable inspiral duration for a given detector sensitivity band. The characteristic strain amplitude h of the emitted scales with the according to h \propto \mathcal{M}_{\rm chirp}^{5/3} f_{\rm GW}^{2/3} / D, where D is the to the source. This dependence arises from the leading-order quadrupolar , linking the wave amplitude to the orbital and second time of the . Consequently, binaries with larger generate stronger signals at fixed and , improving detectability in interferometric observatories. In the frequency domain, the under the stationary phase approximation takes the form \phi(f) \propto f^{-5/3} / \mathcal{M}_{\rm chirp}^{5/3}. This expression, derived by integrating the frequency to obtain the accumulated , dominates the signal and facilitates via template-based matched filtering. The mass primarily imprints on this term, making it the most precisely measurable quantity during the early inspiral. These Newtonian-order descriptions hold in the early inspiral regime, where the frequency satisfies f \ll f_{\rm ISCO} and f_{\rm ISCO} is the orbital frequency at the , scaling as f_{\rm ISCO} \propto 1 / M with total binary mass M. Beyond this limit, post-Newtonian corrections and non-perturbative effects become essential, marking the onset of the merger .

Parameter Estimation from Observations

Parameter estimation of the chirp mass from observations primarily relies on matched filtering techniques applied to data from detectors such as , , and . These methods involve convolving the observed data with a bank of template waveforms that model the expected inspiral, merger, and ringdown phases of compact binary coalescences, identifying the best-matching template based on the (SNR). The chirp mass emerges as one of the most precisely measured parameters because it dominantly influences the inspiral waveform's evolution, allowing for robust inference even in the presence of . Bayesian inference frameworks, such as the LALInference pipeline, are employed to derive distributions for the chirp mass by combining the likelihood—computed from the matched filter SNR and the and of the detected signal—with astrophysical priors on the component masses. For high-SNR events (typically SNR > 20), the resulting uncertainties on the chirp mass are generally 1-5%, reflecting the strong constraint from the inspiral where the signal is most sensitive to this parameter. These analyses account for detector noise characteristics and calibration uncertainties to ensure reliable posteriors. In multi-messenger events like , electromagnetic counterparts such as the associated AT2017gfo provide independent constraints that refine chirp mass estimates by linking the -inferred masses to light curve models dependent on ejected material and . The measurement yielded a chirp mass of approximately 1.188 M_\sun with ~0.1% , while modeling corroborated the total mass and tightened bounds on individual component masses, reducing systematic uncertainties from waveform modeling alone. Measurement techniques have evolved significantly since the initial detection of GW150914 in 2015, where the chirp mass was estimated at ~28 M_\sun with uncertainties of about 5%, limited by single-detector baselines and early waveform models. Events since the start of the fourth observing run (O4) in 2023, benefiting from multi-detector networks and improved templates, have achieved sub-percent precision for similar systems, as seen in O4 observations as of November 2025, which have more than doubled the total number of confident detections to over 180. Recent advancements incorporate methods, such as normalizing flows and variational autoencoders, to accelerate inference by emulating Bayesian likelihoods, enabling real-time parameter estimation within seconds for multimessenger follow-up.

Applications and Implications

Binary System Analysis

In binary systems, the chirp mass provides a key for inferring the individual component es when combined with the total , which can be estimated from the post-merger ringdown phase of the signal. For binaries, the ringdown frequency is inversely proportional to the final , which approximates the pre-merger total M = m_1 + m_2 after accounting for energy loss to (typically \sim 5\% for non-spinning systems). The individual masses m_1 and m_2 (with m_1 \geq m_2) are then solved from the : \mathcal{M}_\text{chirp} = \frac{(m_1 m_2)^{3/5}}{(m_1 + m_2)^{1/5}}, \quad M = m_1 + m_2. This yields the quadratic solution: m_{1,2} = \frac{M}{2} \left( 1 \pm \sqrt{1 - 4 \left( \frac{\mathcal{M}_\text{chirp}}{M} \right)^{5/3}} \right). The expression under the square root requires \mathcal{M}_\text{chirp} \leq M/2^{6/5} for real solutions, ensuring physical mass ratios q = m_2/m_1 \leq 1. This method has been applied to events like GW150914, where the inspiral chirp mass and ringdown total mass constrain the progenitor masses to m_1 \approx 36 M_\odot and m_2 \approx 29 M_\odot. The mass ratio q derived from the chirp mass and total mass reveals selection effects in detections, as systems with q \approx 1 (near-equal masses) produce higher signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for a given chirp mass due to maximized \mu = m_1 m_2 / M. The inspiral amplitude scales as \propto \mu M^{2/3} f^{2/3}, but since \mathcal{M}_\text{chirp} fixes the phase evolution, equal-mass binaries yield stronger signals and are preferentially detected, biasing observed populations toward q > 0.5. This is evident in LIGO-Virgo , where most have q \gtrsim 0.6, underrepresenting highly asymmetric mergers (q \ll 1) that contribute less to the detectable SNR. In binaries, the chirp mass informs the equation of state () through tidal deformability effects, which modify the phase. For , the measured source-frame chirp mass \mathcal{M}_\text{chirp} = 1.188^{+0.004}_{-0.002} M_\odot (90% ) implies component masses m_1 = 1.36--$1.60 M_\odot and m_2 = 1.17--$1.36 M_\odot, assuming low spins. Combined with the dimensionless tidal deformability \tilde{\Lambda} = 300^{+420}_{-230}, this excludes stiff EOS models (e.g., those predicting radii R > 13 km) at >90% confidence, favoring softer EOS with radii R \approx 11--$13 km and maximum masses \lesssim 2.3 M_\odot. For populations, chirp mass distributions from LIGO's O3 run reveal structure with peaks at \sim 8 M_\odot, $14 M_\odot, and $28 M_\odot, reflecting astrophysical formation channels like isolated field binaries or dynamics. These peaks, analyzed from 69 confident events, indicate a primary spectrum clustered around $10 M_\odot, $20 M_\odot, and $35 M_\odot, with the chirp mass enhancing sensitivity to lower-mass components. Preliminary O4 data (through mid-2025) reinforce this, with over 100 events showing similar clustering but extending to higher masses (\mathcal{M}_\text{chirp} \gtrsim 40 M_\odot) from hierarchical mergers. Current datasets highlight gaps in the chirp mass , notably a suppression between $10--$12 M_\odot (95%--99.5% ), potentially to pair-instability mass gaps in stellar progenitors. This underrepresents asymmetric mergers, as mass correlations (e.g., m_2 \approx 0.7 m_1) cluster events around peaks, masking broader ; simulations suggest thousands more detections are needed to resolve chirp histograms and quantify asymmetric fractions accurately.

Cosmological Measurements

In gravitational wave observations, the measured chirp mass is affected by a mass-redshift degeneracy, where the observed chirp mass M_{\rm chirp, obs} relates to the intrinsic chirp mass M_{\rm chirp} by M_{\rm chirp, obs} = M_{\rm chirp} (1 + z), with z denoting the . This scaling arises because the gravitational waveform frequencies and their evolution are redshifted due to cosmic , complicating the inference of source-frame masses without independent or information. The degeneracy broadens parameter uncertainties, particularly for distant events, and requires additional data, such as electromagnetic counterparts or modeling, to resolve intrinsic properties. The standard siren method leverages chirp mass-dominated inspiral signals from compact binary coalescences to directly measure luminosity distance D_L, enabling cosmological inferences when combined with redshift measurements from electromagnetic host galaxy identification. For the binary neutron star merger GW170817, the inspiral phase provided a precise chirp mass estimate of approximately 1.188 M_\odot, yielding a luminosity distance of $43.8^{+2.9}_{-6.9} Mpc, which, paired with the host galaxy NGC 4993's redshift (z \approx 0.0099), constrained the Hubble constant to H_0 = 70.0^{+12.0}_{-8.0} km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}. This multimessenger approach breaks the mass-redshift degeneracy for individual events, offering an independent probe of cosmic expansion free from systematic uncertainties in traditional distance ladders. Future detectors promise enhanced cosmological measurements using chirp mass from binaries. The (LISA) will observe inspirals of binaries with total masses $10^4--$10^7 M_\odot, measuring chirp masses with uncertainties below 1% in the final hours before merger and constraining redshifts to ~10% at z \approx 1, allowing tests of the distance-redshift relation and parameters. Similarly, the Einstein Telescope will detect massive and binaries, resolving chirp masses to distinguish populations and mitigate low-redshift incompleteness through higher sensitivity and volume coverage. These capabilities will address the mass-redshift degeneracy via multimessenger follow-ups and statistical methods, enabling precise mapping of cosmic . Post-2023 developments integrate gravitational wave data with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) galaxy surveys for robust multimessenger cosmology, providing spectroscopic redshifts to calibrate intrinsic chirp masses independently of distance assumptions. For instance, DESI spectroscopy yielded a precise redshift z = 0.084840 \pm 0.000006 for a candidate host galaxy of the sub-solar-mass gravitational wave event S250818k, enabling evaluation of its chirp mass (< 0.87 \, M_\odot) against the event's luminosity distance and refining population-level inferences. Joint analyses with DESI constrain modified gravity parameters, such as the running of the Planck mass (\alpha_{M_0} = 0.98 \pm 0.89), and forecast H_0 measurements from dozens of events with sub-5% precision, enhancing chirp mass-based calibration across cosmic volumes.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Chirp mass–distance distributions of the sources of gravitational ...
    May 21, 2021 · chirp mass is defined as. M = (m1m2)3/5. (m1 + m2)1/5 ... Ossowski: Chirp mass–distance distributions of the sources of gravitational waves.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Sources of Gravitational Radiation - UMD Astronomy
    where Mch is the “chirp mass”, defined by M. 5/3 ch. = µM2/3. The chirp mass is named that because it is this combination of µ and M that determines how fast ...
  3. [3]
    Sources and Types of Gravitational Waves | LIGO Lab | Caltech
    LIGO can convert its space-time distortion signals into an audible sound called a chirp so we can all “hear” the final moments of the lives of two black holes ...
  4. [4]
    Gravitational Radiation from Point Masses in a Keplerian Orbit
    The gravitational radiation from two point masses going around each other under their mutual gravitational influence is calculated.
  5. [5]
    Constraining the Maximum Mass of Neutron Stars from Multi ...
    Nov 21, 2017 · We combine electromagnetic (EM) and gravitational-wave (GW) information on the binary neutron star (NS) merger GW170817 in order to constrain ...
  6. [6]
    Real-time inference for binary neutron star mergers using ... - Nature
    Mar 5, 2025 · where f is the frequency, c is the speed of light in vacuum and = (m1m2)3/5/(m1 + m2)1/5 is the chirp mass of the system, with m1 and m2 being ...
  7. [7]
    On the importance of source population models for gravitational ...
    Knowledge of the shape of the mass spectrum of compact objects can be used to help break the degeneracy between the mass and redshift of the gravitational wave
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Measuring cosmic distances with standard sirens
    Dec 3, 2018 · parameter: the chirp mass. Once you know M, you know how quickly the frequency is changing at any point in the evolution of the binary system.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] A GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE STANDARD SIREN MEASUREMENT OF ...
    Oct 14, 2017 · The Hubble constant, the universe's expansion rate, was measured using GW170817 as a standard siren, resulting in 70.0+12.0-8.0 km s-1 Mpc-1.
  10. [10]
    Premerger observation and characterization of massive black hole ...
    Nov 11, 2024 · We demonstrate an end-to-end technique for observing and characterizing massive black hole binary signals before they merge with the LISA space- ...
  11. [11]
    Exploring compact binary populations with the Einstein Telescope
    We conclude that the ET as a single instrument is capable of detecting and distinguishing different compact binary populations separated in chirp mass – ...
  12. [12]
    Observing the inspiral of coalescing massive black hole binaries ...
    Jun 22, 2020 · In this work, we study the evolution of the sky position, luminosity distance, chirp mass and mass ratio uncertainties as function of time left before merger.
  13. [13]