Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chlorothalonil

Chlorothalonil (2,4,5,6-tetrachloroisophthalonitrile) is a synthetic organochlorine compound utilized principally as a broad-spectrum, non-systemic contact fungicide to combat fungal diseases affecting vegetables, fruits, turf, ornamentals, and other crops, with additional applications as a wood preservative and in paints. Introduced commercially in the mid-1960s following its development as an effective biocide, it operates by multi-site inhibition of fungal enzymes, rendering it valuable against resistant pathogens but also contributing to its persistence in soil and water via degradation products like R471811. Its widespread adoption stemmed from proven efficacy in protecting yields from diseases such as early blight and downy mildew, positioning it as a high-volume pesticide with global usage in the millions of kilograms annually prior to recent restrictions. However, empirical evidence of acute toxicity to aquatic species—at concentrations as low as parts per billion causing gill damage in fish and lethality in amphibians—along with chronic risks including genotoxicity and groundwater contamination, prompted the European Union to deny approval renewal in 2019, classifying environmental hazards as unacceptable despite low mammalian acute toxicity. In contrast, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has maintained its registration subject to mitigation measures, such as buffer zones near water bodies, based on risk assessments balancing agricultural benefits against ecological impacts, though ongoing reviews address emerging data on degradation metabolites' persistence and potential carcinogenicity. These divergent regulatory outcomes highlight tensions between precautionary approaches emphasizing worst-case ecological modeling and data-driven evaluations prioritizing empirical exposure thresholds.

Discovery and Development

Historical Background

Chlorothalonil was developed during the early by researchers at the Corporation in response to the pressing need for effective broad-spectrum fungicides amid widespread fungal epidemics affecting high-value crops such as potatoes and vegetables. In the and , untreated fungal infections, including early and late blights caused by and species, resulted in crop losses estimated at 20-50% in susceptible varieties, driving innovation in protective agrochemicals to support expanding . This era saw a shift from inorganic protectants like copper-based compounds, which offered limited efficacy and risks, toward synthetic organics screened for multisite activity against fungal pathogens. The compound, chemically 2,4,5,6-tetrachloroisophthalonitrile, emerged serendipitously from systematic screening of halogenated aromatic nitriles for properties, revealing potent fungitoxic effects against a range of foliar pathogens without systemic uptake. Initial laboratory evaluations demonstrated its contact-mode inhibition of germination and mycelial growth in species like Botrytis and Sclerotinia, positioning it as a non-systemic protectant superior to earlier dithiocarbamates in spectrum and persistence. Fungicidal properties were first publicly detailed in 1964 by N.J. Turner and colleagues, who reported greenhouse and field trial validations confirming efficacy on crops including turf, ornamentals, and , with minimal injury at application rates of 1-2 kg/ha. Concurrently, U.S. 3,290,353 was granted in 1966 to for halogenated benzonitriles, including chlorothalonil, covering its synthesis via chlorination of isophthalonitrile and applications as a foliage protectant. These pre-commercial milestones established its foundational role in multi-site chemistry, preceding regulatory approval.

Initial Registration and Commercialization

Chlorothalonil was first registered by the (EPA) in 1966 for use as a on turfgrass, following submission of data demonstrating low to mammals and effective control of fungal pathogens such as dollar spot and brown patch. The registration was supported by acute toxicity studies indicating an LD50 greater than 5,000 mg/kg in rats for oral exposure, classifying it as practically non-toxic to mammals, while field efficacy trials showed significant reductions in disease incidence on turf surfaces. Registration expanded to food crops in , enabling applications on such as potatoes and tomatoes for control of early and late blight, based on additional residue and data confirming protective performance without unacceptable residues under good agricultural practices. By the , chlorothalonil achieved rapid commercial adoption globally, becoming a leading protectant in turf and markets due to its broad-spectrum activity and reliability in preventing foliar diseases, with production scaling to meet demand as one of the most heavily used non-systemic fungicides. Commercial products like Daconil and facilitated this uptake, marketed by manufacturers including (later SDS Biotech) for agricultural and non-crop uses. Further label expansions in the included ornamental and fruit crops such as strawberries and peaches, justified by field trial results documenting up to 70-90% reductions in incidence for pathogens like Botrytis and anthracnose in controlled studies. These approvals reflected ongoing evidence of efficacy in diverse settings, with minimal reported under recommended rates, solidifying chlorothalonil's role in integrated management for high-value crops.

Chemical Properties and Production

Physical and Chemical Characteristics


Chlorothalonil is a white to tan crystalline solid with a of 250–251 °C and a of approximately 350 °C at 760 mmHg. Its vapor pressure is low, measuring 7.62 × 10⁻⁵ Pa at 25 °C, which contributes to minimal volatilization under typical environmental conditions. The compound exhibits moderate lipophilicity, with an octanol-water partition coefficient (log Kow) of 2.94, facilitating its persistence on surfaces while allowing limited mobility in .
Chlorothalonil demonstrates chemical stability resistant to across values of 5 to 9, supporting its efficacy in diverse agricultural spray solutions. However, it undergoes upon exposure to strong (UV) radiation, with pathways involving dechlorination and formation of metabolites such as 4-hydroxy-chlorothalonil. Under highly alkaline conditions, hydrolytic breakdown accelerates, though it remains robust in neutral to mildly acidic media. For residue analysis and quality control, chlorothalonil is commonly detected using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with UV detection, achieving limits of quantification suitable for environmental and food monitoring. This method enables precise measurement in matrices such as air, soil, and plant tissues, with validation confirming accuracy across exposure scenarios.

Synthesis and Manufacturing

Chlorothalonil is produced industrially primarily via the high-temperature gas-phase chlorination of isophthalonitrile (1,3-benzenedicarbonitrile) with gas, substituting the four ring hydrogens to form 2,4,5,6-tetrachloroisophthalonitrile in yields exceeding 90% under optimized conditions. This occurs at temperatures around 200–300°C, often in fluidized-bed reactors for efficient heat management and scalability, enabling annual production capacities in the tens of thousands of metric tons to support global fungicide demand. An alternative route involves dehydration of tetrachloroisophthalamide with , though the chlorination method predominates due to its directness and economic viability for large-scale operations. Major producers include , SE, and AG, with maintaining significant facilities following its original development of the compound. Production has expanded notably in the region, where the market holds over 45% global share as of 2023, driven by rising agricultural needs; for instance, Chinese firms like Suli reported a 5% capacity increase in 2023 to address demand surges. These expansions leverage cost-effective feedstocks and infrastructure, optimizing for high-throughput synthesis that aligns with by reducing per-unit costs to below $5/kg in efficient plants. Contemporary manufacturing emphasizes process intensification, such as integration and byproduct , to minimize ; empirical data from reports indicate reduced chlorinated discharges by up to 50% in upgraded facilities through closed-loop chlorine recovery and purification steps. This scalability supports consistent supply for broad-spectrum formulations while addressing economic pressures from volatile raw material prices, like sourced from electrolytic processes.

Uses and Applications

Agricultural Applications

Chlorothalonil serves as a broad-spectrum fungicide in agricultural settings, primarily applied as a protectant to prevent the establishment of fungal and pathogens on foliage before occurs. It is integrated into pest management programs for row crops, , and fruits, where it targets diseases such as blights, spots, and mildews through surface deposition and multi-site inhibition of enzymes. In (IPM) strategies, chlorothalonil is valued for its low risk of resistance development due to its non-specific , allowing with single-site fungicides and use alongside disease-resistant varieties to sustain long-term . On potatoes, chlorothalonil is extensively used to control early (Alternaria solani) and late (Phytophthora infestans), with applications starting shortly after crop emergence and repeated at 7- to 14-day intervals under high disease pressure. For tomatoes, it effectively manages early and (Septoria lycopersici), often applied preventively in fresh market production systems to protect foliage and reduce defoliation. In turfgrass production, such as on farms, it suppresses spot (Clarireedia spp.) and other foliar diseases, supporting uniform stand quality for agricultural harvest. Regional application patterns reflect crop dominance, with heavy use in the U.S. Midwest and northern states for production, where it addresses recurrent outbreaks in states like and . In the Southeast and Plains regions, it sees substantial deployment on and vegetable crops to combat leaf spots and , contributing to its role across over 65 agricultural commodities.

Non-Agricultural Uses

Chlorothalonil is utilized in turfgrass management on , lawns, and farms to control foliar diseases including dollar spot (Clarireedia spp.), brown patch (), and rusts ( spp.). Applications typically involve 30 to 100 gallons of water per acre on fairways, tees, greens, and ornamental turf, with formulations like Chlorothalonil DF providing broad-spectrum contact fungicidal activity against these pathogens. In settings, usage accounts for over 80% of chlorothalonil applied to turf, representing more than 47 million dollars in annual value based on 2010-2015 data analyzed by the EPA. Beyond turf, chlorothalonil treats ornamental plants, shrubs, and trees to suppress fungal blights, spots, and molds, often in and settings outside production. It is incorporated into non-agricultural antimicrobials for mold inhibition in paints, caulks, sealants, and grouts. In , chlorothalonil serves as an agent for surface treatments, pressure impregnation, and anti-sapstain applications on to prevent fungal decay and discoloration, though these uses are subject to specific labeling restrictions. Limited non-agricultural treatments occur for ornamental or turf to damping-off fungi during . Overall, non-agricultural applications have faced increasing local restrictions in urban areas during the due to environmental and risk assessments, contributing to a reduced market share relative to agricultural uses.

Mechanism of Action

Biochemical Interactions

Chlorothalonil exerts its fungicidal effects through multi-site interactions, primarily by acting as an electrophile that covalently binds to sulfhydryl (-SH) groups on enzymes and proteins within fungal cells. In vitro kinetic studies reveal that this binding inhibits thiol-dependent enzymes, with the extent of inhibition directly proportional to the amount of chlorothalonil conjugated to protein -SH residues, and no reversal observed upon addition of low-molecular-weight thiols like glutathione. This non-specific reactivity disrupts multiple metabolic pathways, including those reliant on cysteine-containing enzymes essential for fungal viability. The compound's broad reactivity with and other cellular thiols leads to depletion of these protective molecules, exacerbating dysfunction across diverse biochemical targets rather than a singular site. Unlike targeted inhibitors such as blockers (e.g., carboxamides), chlorothalonil's mode avoids high-selectivity vulnerabilities, as evidenced by low emergence in long-term field monitoring despite widespread use since the . Empirical data from resistance surveys confirm that its multi-site action imposes a high fitness cost on mutants, limiting selection pressure compared to single-site fungicides. In vitro assays further indicate that chlorothalonil interferes with fungal membrane integrity by binding to groups in membrane-associated proteins, potentially altering permeability and functions, though direct synthesis inhibition appears secondary to enzymatic disruption. These interactions underscore its classification as a non-systemic, protectant, with biochemical potency maintained across ranges typical of fungal microenvironments.

Spectrum of Activity

Chlorothalonil demonstrates broad-spectrum fungicidal activity against a wide array of true fungal pathogens, primarily through its multi-site inhibition of enzymatic processes in foliar and surface infections, as validated in laboratory and field trials. It effectively controls over 40 major diseases caused by Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes, including leaf spots and blights from Alternaria spp., Septoria spp., and Colletotrichum graminicola (anthracnose); gray leaf spot from Pyricularia spp.; dollar spot from Clarireedia spp.; and brown patch from Rhizoctonia spp. Additional targeted pathogens encompass Botrytis spp. (blights), rusts from Puccinia spp., and needlecasts from Rhizosphaera spp., with efficacy ratings consistently high in turf, ornamental, and conifer applications under protective use. Its contact-only mode limits penetration into plant tissues or soil, rendering it ineffective or minimally efficacious against oomycete pathogens such as spp. (e.g., damping-off) and spp. (e.g., root rots), where systemic alternatives are required for curative control. While some foliar phases of * (late blight) may show partial suppression in field settings, overall activity against oomycetes remains constrained by the compound's nonsystemic properties and lack of targeted disruption in their zoospores or mycelia. Chlorothalonil is frequently combined with systemic fungicides (e.g., , ) in tank mixes or co-formulations, yielding synergistic enhancements in spectrum coverage and durability; these mixtures broaden control to include pathogens partially resistant to single agents while preserving chlorothalonil's protective barrier. Such pairings have demonstrated improved inhibition and reduced disease incidence in field validations against mixed infections.

Efficacy and Benefits

Disease Control Effectiveness

Chlorothalonil, a multi-site contact , has demonstrated consistent in reducing severity across replicated field trials for foliar pathogens such as early () in potatoes. A network of 12 randomized complete block trials conducted from 2003 to 2014 reported that chlorothalonil applications reduced early severity by 49% at the early bulking stage and over 50% at late bulking or tuber maturation compared to nontreated controls. improved under high pressure, with severity reductions increasing by 3 to 9% at later growth stages when inoculum levels were elevated. In anthracnose management on cucurbits, chlorothalonil achieved a 96% reduction in severity in replicated trials, outperforming some single-site alternatives when applied preventively. For early , foliar applications at 2.0 g/L resulted in a incidence of 2.47% (measured as percent index), ranking as the second most effective treatment among tested fungicides in field evaluations. Its multi-site , targeting multiple metabolic processes in fungi, contributes to low resistance development risk, with no documented instances of resistance reported over more than 60 years of widespread agricultural use. This profile supports its role in resistance management strategies, where it is alternated or tank-mixed with single-site fungicides to maintain long-term control efficacy. Recent (IPM) programs, including those for potatoes, incorporate chlorothalonil as a foundational protectant, enabling reduced application frequencies—such as 40 to 70% fewer sprays via forecasting models like TOMCAST—while sustaining disease suppression in variable pressure environments.

Economic and Productivity Impacts

Chlorothalonil plays a critical role in safeguarding economically vital crops, particularly in the U.S. sector, where farm production was valued at approximately $5.65 billion in 2023. The National Potato Council has underscored its foundational status in foliar disease management, noting that it serves as the baseline protectant against pathogens like early blight (), with any significant reduction in allowable use projected to severely disrupt production volumes and economic viability. Its economic appeal stems from superior cost-efficiency relative to substitutes, enabling growers to maintain broad-spectrum control without escalating input expenses. Industry analyses indicate that alternatives demand higher application frequencies or rates, often rendering them less efficacious and more costly; for example, the NPC reports that replacement strategies would compel reliance on pricier options with inferior performance profiles. This positions chlorothalonil as a low-cost bulwark against yield losses, directly supporting farm profitability in fungicide-dependent systems. On a global scale, the compound's market valuation—$270.4 million in 2024, forecasted to expand to $421.3 million by 2033 at a 5.05% CAGR—signals persistent amid partial restrictions, driven by its contributions to yield stability and in diverse agricultural contexts. This trajectory highlights chlorothalonil's macro-level productivity multiplier, where its deployment correlates with minimized harvest shortfalls and sustained output in billion-dollar crop portfolios.

Safety and Toxicity

Human Health Effects

Chlorothalonil exhibits low acute in mammals via oral and dermal routes, classified as Toxicity Category IV by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the least toxic category, with median lethal doses (LD50) exceeding 5,000 mg/kg in rats for both routes. toxicity is higher, with an LC50 of approximately 0.06 mg/L in rats over 4 hours, but exposure at typical agricultural field application rates does not pose significant acute risks due to rapid degradation and low volatility. Dermal sensitization occurs rarely, primarily manifesting as in occupationally exposed workers, such as handlers, with incidence linked to prolonged skin contact rather than incidental exposure. Chronic oral exposure in induces kidney toxicity and tumors, including renal tubular adenomas and carcinomas in male rats at doses above 3,000 ppm (approximately 150 mg/kg/day), and forestomach papillomas in mice and rats at similar levels, attributed to and regenerative rather than . The EPA classifies chlorothalonil as having "suggestive of carcinogenicity" based on these findings but determines it is "not likely to be carcinogenic to s" at low doses, citing the absence of a linear dose-response (low Q1* potency) and non-relevance of -specific mechanisms like forestomach , which humans lack. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) categorizes it as Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans), relying on data without adequate . Epidemiological studies among applicators show no significant association between chlorothalonil exposure and overall cancer incidence, including colon, , or cancers, with standardized incidence ratios near unity even after adjusting for cumulative exposure. Developmental and reproductive toxicity studies in rats and rabbits reveal no teratogenic effects or fetal malformations at doses below 100 mg/kg/day, with maternal toxicity (e.g., reduced weight gain) observed only at higher levels exceeding 500 mg/kg/day; the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for offspring is consistently 30-100 mg/kg/day across multiple two-generation reproduction and developmental designs. Human epidemiology provides limited data, but no clear links to reproductive outcomes have been established from occupational cohorts.

Environmental Fate and Effects

Chlorothalonil exhibits moderate persistence in aerobic soils, with degradation half-lives typically ranging from 30 to 60 days under field conditions, though laboratory studies report shorter periods of 4 to 40 days depending on soil type, moisture, and organic matter content. Its low solubility and strong adsorption to soil particles limit leaching to groundwater, but runoff potential is elevated in poorly draining soils or during rainfall events shortly after application, with concentrations in surface runoff reaching up to 500 μg/L when associated with sediment. Bioaccumulation of chlorothalonil in aquatic organisms is generally low, with factors (BCFs) reported as low as 9.4 in tissues of , though higher values up to 2,700 for whole-body accumulation indicate moderate potential in non- portions under certain exposure scenarios. However, its primary metabolites, such as R471811 (1,3-dicarboxylic acid derivative), demonstrate greater environmental persistence, particularly in systems, where they resist degradation and have been detected in at concentrations exceeding 0.1 μg/L in over 60% of monitoring sites in affected regions. This metabolite's high solubility and slow breakdown contribute to prolonged aquatic exposure risks. Chlorothalonil is highly toxic to non-target aquatic organisms, particularly , with acute LC50 values for species like Daphnia magna ranging from 12 to 195 μg/L, classifying it as very highly toxic in standard ecotoxicity assessments. Laboratory studies and field monitoring confirm adverse effects on benthic and through disruption of gill function and , though sediment binding may reduce bioavailability in some habitats. Metabolites like R471811 show lower direct but amplify risks due to their and accumulation in sediments and columns. Product labels recommend vegetative buffers to mitigate runoff into bodies, reducing observed non-target impacts in managed applications.

Regulatory History and Status

Approvals and Restrictions in Key Regions

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for chlorothalonil in April 1999, deeming it eligible for reregistration provided that certain high-risk uses, such as on turfgrass replacement sites and home gardens, were prohibited or restricted to mitigate ecological risks. In July 2007, the EPA established tolerances for combined residues of chlorothalonil and its metabolite 4-hydroxy-2,5,6-trichloroisophthalonitrile in or on various commodities, reflecting ongoing reassessment under the Food Quality Protection Act. The registration review process advanced with a Proposed Interim Decision (PID) in September 2023, which proposed application rate reductions, buffer zones near water bodies, and rainfall restrictions to address potential dietary and aquatic exposure risks, while affirming that the benefits of chlorothalonil for controlling foliar diseases in agriculture—such as on potatoes, peanuts, and vegetables—outweigh identified risks when mitigations are applied. In the , chlorothalonil held approval as a broad-spectrum until the adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 in April 2019, mandating that member states withdraw all authorizations for plant protection products containing it by November 20, 2019. The ban stemmed primarily from (EFSA) assessments highlighting the persistence and mobility of metabolites like R471811 (chlorothalonil sulfonic acid) and R417888, which leach into and raised uncertainties regarding , carcinogenicity, and reproductive effects, even though direct risks from the parent compound were deemed low based on non-genotoxic mechanisms observed in mammalian studies. In , the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) under concluded a re-evaluation in December 2022 (Re-evaluation Decision RVD2022-17), permitting continued registration of chlorothalonil for select uses, including greenhouse ornamentals and certain field crops, subject to label amendments for reduced application rates, buffer zones, and restrictions on tank-mixing with other pesticides to minimize environmental exposure. A prior proposed special review in February 2022 had flagged risks from metabolites but ultimately prioritized risk mitigation over outright cancellation for viable uses. Regulatory status varies globally, with approvals persisting in regions like and parts of for agricultural applications under national guidelines emphasizing , though many jurisdictions impose groundwater protection setbacks or seasonal limits akin to North American approaches.

Scientific Assessments and Decisions

The (EPA) issued an interim registration review decision for chlorothalonil on December 26, 2024, determining that aggregate risks to human health, including from exposures, are mitigated by existing use restrictions and mitigation measures such as buffer zones and application limits. Ecological risk assessments identified potential adverse effects on aquatic organisms and terrestrial species, prompting requirements for updated product labels with clarified statements, pollinator protections, and enhanced spray drift management practices to reduce off-target deposition. The (EFSA) conducted a of chlorothalonil in 2018, concluding that several metabolites, including R471811, exhibit high persistence in soil (DT50 > 1 year) and potential contamination exceeding the 0.1 μg/L parametric value, which factored into the European Commission's non-renewal of approval in 2020. EFSA's toxicological assessments found no indications of acute human health emergencies, with chronic dietary risks assessed as low when residues remain below the ADI of 0.015 mg/kg body weight per day, derived from a (NOAEL) of 1.5 mg/kg bw/day for in rats. Aligning with these evaluations, the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) established an (ADI) of 0.01 mg/kg body weight for chlorothalonil, based on long-term studies demonstrating renal effects as the critical , with application of an uncertainty factor to protect against chronic exposure in humans. This value informs maximum residue limits (MRLs) and supports probabilistic risk modeling for dietary intake across populations.

Controversies and Scientific Debates

Risk-Benefit Evaluations

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has evaluated chlorothalonil's benefits as substantial for production, particularly in controlling foliar diseases like early blight and late blight in crops such as and peppers, where it serves as a foundational protectant . Modeling and grower data indicate that loss of chlorothalonil could reduce U.S. yields by up to 20-30% in high-disease-pressure scenarios without adequate alternatives, contributing to broader output declines estimated at 10-20% based on dependency studies. The EPA's interim registration review balances these against dietary and ecological risks, concluding that mitigations like application limits (e.g., 6.2 / on vulnerable soils) and (IPM) practices render risks acceptable while preserving economic productivity. In contrast, the (EFSA) assessments have prioritized potential long-term uncertainties, such as chronic exposure pathways, over demonstrated yield protections, leading to determinations that risks exceed benefits for key uses like potatoes and tomatoes despite acknowledged against fungal . This precautionary weighting, as critiqued by agricultural stakeholders, may undervalue empirical field trial data showing chlorothalonil's role in stabilizing outputs amid variable weather and pressures, favoring hypothetical low-probability harms over quantifiable production gains. Agricultural industry groups, including the National Potato Council, argue for data-driven thresholds, citing season-long trial evidence that chlorothalonil enables resistance management and cost-effective disease suppression unavailable in single-mode alternatives, with IPM integration further minimizing exposures. Environmental organizations counter that even mitigated risks impose undue ecological burdens, though EPA analyses find such concerns overstated relative to the fungicide's irreplaceability in high-value systems, where yield protections translate to billions in annual economic value. Overall, U.S. evaluations emphasize verifiable productivity thresholds, while European approaches highlight unresolved data gaps, underscoring tensions between empirical utility and conservative risk aversion.

Persistence of Metabolites and Monitoring

Chlorothalonil undergoes to several s, including SDS-3701 (2,4,5-trichloro-6-hydroxyisophthalonitrile), which demonstrates high in environmental matrices. In , SDS-3701 exhibits a DT90 value of up to 1132 days under aerobic conditions, far exceeding that of the parent compound. This forms rapidly from chlorothalonil and accumulates in sediments, where DT50 values often surpass one year, contributing to long-term residue carryover. Other s, such as R471811 and R417888, show similar , with revealing their prevalence due to slow rates. These metabolites raise toxicity concerns, with SDS-3701 displaying up to 20 times higher than chlorothalonil in certain assays, prompting EU evaluations of their environmental impact. The has highlighted unacceptable groundwater risks from such transformation products, classifying them under regulatory scrutiny for potential and ecotoxic effects akin to or exceeding the parent's 1B status. Despite this, peer-reviewed assessments note that metabolite-specific NOECs for aquatic organisms often remain above detected environmental concentrations, tempering acute risk claims. Recent monitoring efforts underscore detection challenges and variable exposure levels. In , a 2025 analysis of resources identified chlorothalonil metabolites like R471811 in 57% of samples, with concentrations averaging below 0.5 µg/L but occasionally surpassing the 0.1 µg/L parametric value; however, French agency concluded no immediate risks, as levels fell short of thresholds. Similar surveys in , per 2025 regional reports, report trace detections aligned with national guidelines, typically under acute NOEC limits for , though comprehensive metabolite-specific data remain limited. Debates persist on analytical methodologies, where laboratory-derived quotients may overestimate field impacts by neglecting dilution, , and reductions in natural waters. Advanced LC-MS/MS techniques improve quantification but highlight the need for context-specific modeling to avoid inflated hazard perceptions.

References

  1. [1]
    Chlorothalonil | C8Cl4N2 | CID 15910 - PubChem - NIH
    Chlorothalonil is primarily used as a fungicide to control fungal foliar diseases of vegetable, field, and ornamental crops(1). It is also used as a wood ...
  2. [2]
    Chlorothalonil - NCBI - NIH
    Chlorothalonil is used as an agricultural and horticultural fungicide, bactericide and nematocide (Budavari, 1996). It is also used as a preservative in paints ...
  3. [3]
    Chlorothalonil induces oxidative stress and reduces enzymatic ... - NIH
    Apr 9, 2019 · Introduction. Chlorothalonil (2,4,5,6-tetrachloro-isophthalonitrile) was discovered in 1964 as an effective alternative biocide in marine paint ...
  4. [4]
    Environmental Fate and Toxicology of Chlorothalonil - ResearchGate
    1) was introduced in 1965 by Diamond Shamrock Corp. and was first registered in 1966 for use on turfgrass within the United States. An additional registration ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  5. [5]
    Chlorothalonil - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Chlorothalonil is defined as an organic biocide known for its low toxicity to mammals and broad efficacy against decay fungi and insects, characterized by ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Chlorothalonil (PC Code 081901) Usage, Pest Management ...
    Sep 14, 2023 · SUMMARY. Chlorothalonil is a broad-spectrum, non-systemic, contact pesticide with fungicidal and antimicrobial properties.
  7. [7]
    CHLOROTHALONIL - EXTOXNET PIP
    Chlorothalonil is a broad-spectrum organochlorine fungicide used to control fungi that threaten vegetables, trees, small fruits, turf, ornamentals, and other ...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Implementing regulation - 2019/677 - EN - EUR-Lex - European Union
    Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 of 29 April 2019 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance chlorothalonil.
  9. [9]
    EU bans popular fungicide chlorothalonil, citing 'high risk' to ...
    Apr 1, 2019 · EU bans popular fungicide chlorothalonil, citing 'high risk' to amphibians, fish and bumblebees. One of the world's most common pesticides will ...
  10. [10]
    EPA Announces Interim Decisions on Chlorothalonil, Thiophanate ...
    Jan 8, 2025 · To mitigate risks from dietary exposure to TM and MBC in water, EPA is restricting soil applications and reducing application rates of TM.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Chlorothalonil Interim Registration Review Decision Case Number ...
    Dec 26, 2024 · other terrestrial invertebrates are sensitive to chlorothalonil toxicity, but effects were observed at concentrations higher than the EECs ...
  12. [12]
    Proposed Special Review Decision PSRD2022-01 ... - Canada.ca
    Feb 10, 2022 · New toxicity data indicate that chlorothalonil is more toxic to fish than reported in PRVD2011-14. Thus, lower levels of residues reaching water ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Value of Fungicides In U.S. Crop Production
    chlorothalonil to control purple spot on the ferns since 1990. Growers ... South Florida until the development of the EBDC fungicides in the 1950s.[570].
  14. [14]
    Fifty Years of Fungicide Development, Deployment, and Future Use
    May 3, 2023 · Growth in population, crop production, crop areas, and yields from 1960 to. 2016 (reproduced, by permission of the publisher, from Phillips ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Mechanism of action and fate of the fungicide chlorothalonil (2,4,5,6 ...
    2. N.J. Turner, R.D. Battershell. The relative influence of chemical and physical properties of the fungitoxicity of tetrachlorisophthalonitrile and some of its ...
  16. [16]
    287. Chlorothalonil (WHO Pesticide Residues Series 4) - INCHEM
    Turner, N.J., Limpel, L.E., Battershell, R.D., Bluestone, H., Lamont, D. (1964). A new foliage protectant fungicide, tetrachloroisophthalonitrile. Contr ...
  17. [17]
    Chlorothalonil
    Title: Chlorothalonil. CAS Registry Number: 1897-45-6. CAS ... Literature References: Fungicidal properties first described by N. J. Turner et al., Contrib.
  18. [18]
    US3290353A - Halogenated aromatic nitriles - Google Patents
    The term halogenated aromatic nitriles as employed in the specification and claims refers to monoand dicyano substituted benzenes having at least one ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] US EPA-Pesticides; Chlorothalonil | US EPA ARCHIVE DOCUMENT
    Date: Subject: From: June 16, 1982. EPA ... Chlorothalonil (tetrachloroisophthalonitrile). Inert Ingredients. ... *Coveted under US Patent No. 3.290.353 and No ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Chlorothalonil Summary Document Registration Review
    Mar 22, 2012 · Chlorothalonil is a pesticide active ingredient that was first registered in the United States in. 1966 for use as a fungicide on turfgrass. The ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Occurrence of Chlorothalonil, Its Transformation Products, and ...
    Chlorothalonil has a wide variety of beneficial uses, including agricultural, home and garden, industrial, and vector control of fungi, and it is used ...
  22. [22]
    A Short History of Fungicides - American Phytopathological Society
    Mar 1, 2008 · Another important discovery was made in France in 1882 by Millardet, who noticed that grape vines that had been sprayed with a bluish-white ...
  23. [23]
    Guidance for the Reregistration of Pesticide Products Containing ...
    USE PROFILE Chlorothalonil is registered as a broad spectrum non-systemic protectant fung- icide for use on apricots, beans (dried and snap), broccoli, brussel ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Chlorothalonil (Ref: DS 2787) - AERU
    A fungicide used to control a wide range of diseases on a broad range of crops. Also used as a wood preservative. · Rust; purple spot; Leaf blight; Anthracnose; ...
  26. [26]
    UV characterization and photodegradation mechanism of the ...
    UV characterization and photodegradation mechanism of the fungicide chlorothalonil in the presence and absence of oxygen. Author links open overlay panelMissing: hydrolysis | Show results with:hydrolysis
  27. [27]
    [PDF] chlorothalonil (081)
    Chlorothalonil is a non-systemic fungicide first evaluated by JMPR in 1974 and a number of times subsequently. It was recently reviewed for toxicology by the ...
  28. [28]
    Determination of the pesticide chlorothalonil by HPLC and UV ...
    An HPLC method with UV detection was developed to measure chlorothalonil exposure. Sampling methods were validated for air, hand, and leaf residues. Cellulose ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Environmental Chemistry Method for Chlorothalonil in Air - EPA
    All solvents and other reagents must be of high purity, e.g. glass distilled/HPLC grade solvents and analytical grade reagents. Particular care must be taken to ...
  30. [30]
    Chlorothalonil (EHC 183, 1996) - INCHEM
    Most of the residue is removed when cucumbers, melons, peanuts and potatoes are peeled (Diamond Shamrock, 1974). As much as 85-98% of chlorothalonil added to ...
  31. [31]
    CN116199601B - Refining and purifying process of high-content ...
    At present, the industrial production of chlorothalonil generally adopts a high-temperature gas phase method, isophthalonitrile and chlorine are used as raw ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Chlorothalonil Market Size, Share | CAGR of 3.6%
    BASF SE, Bayer AG, and Syngenta are among the key global players with a strong foothold in the agrochemical industry.<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Exploring Opportunities in Broad-Spectrum Chlorothalonil Sector
    Rating 4.8 (1,980) 5 days ago · June 2023: Jiangsu Suli reports a 5% increase in its chlorothalonil production capacity to meet rising demand from Asian markets.
  34. [34]
    Exploring Chlorothalonil Production Facilities and Their ...
    Oct 8, 2024 · Many of the factories producing chlorothalonil are under pressure to reduce their carbon footprint and minimize waste generation. As global ...
  35. [35]
    Chlorothalonil Production Overview and Key Manufacturing ...
    Dec 15, 2024 · The production of chlorothalonil involves several chemical reactions and processes, primarily initiated through the chlorination of 2,4,5- ...
  36. [36]
    Chlorothalonil Fungicide | Minnesota Department of Agriculture
    Sep 22, 2025 · It is widely used on potato and numerous other crops in Minnesota to protect against fungal and oomycete diseases such as late blight and downy ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Active Ingredient CHLOROTHALONIL - UC IPM
    Chlorothalonil is a fungicide that can be used on turf, ornamentals, vegetables, trees, small fruits, and other agricultural crops.
  38. [38]
    Fungicide Resistance Management | Oklahoma State University
    Such diseases include damping off and root and lower stem rots caused Pythium and Phytophthora, and foliar diseases such as late blight, downy mildew, and white ...
  39. [39]
    Late Blight / Potato / Agriculture: Pest Management ... - UC IPM
    COMMENTS: Use only in combination with a protectant fungicide (e.g., mancozeb, chlorothalonil). For tank mixes, observe all directions for use on all labels, ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] NATIONAL POTATO COUNCIL
    Jan 17, 2024 · Chlorothalonil is used in potato production to control Brown Spot (Alternaria alternata), Early Blight. (Alternaria solani), Tan Rot (Botrytis ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] BEAD Response to Public Comments on the Chlorothalonil ...
    Sep 19, 2024 · Commenters discuss a broad range of potato diseases for which growers use chlorothalonil, including late blight (Phytophthora infestans), early ...
  42. [42]
    Early Blight Management in Fresh Market Tomatoes
    Also, this system assumes the use of a fungicide containing chlorothalonil. Because mancozeb residue tends to be less persistent on the foliage than ...
  43. [43]
    Proposed Interim Decision for Chlorothalonil and Implications in ...
    Dec 20, 2023 · The Chlorothalonil PID comment period closes on January 17, 2024. References: EPA Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Chlorothalonil.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] CHLOROTHALONIL DF | Turf Trade
    Apply Quali-Pro Chlorothalonil DF in 30 to 100 gallons of water per acre on fairways, lawns, ornamental turfgrass, and other turfgrass including sod farms.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] CHLOROTHALONIL DF - PICOL
    Quali-Pro Chlorothalonil DF is an excellent disease control agent when used according to label directions for control of a broad spectrum of plant diseases.
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    CHLOROTHALONIL EXPOSURE AND CANCER INCIDENCE ... - NIH
    It has been widely used to control diseases affecting more than 50 fruit, vegetable and agricultural crops and on turf, lawn and ornamental plants for over 30 ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Chlorothalonil Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision Case ...
    Date: 09/29/2023. Approved by: Mary Elissa Reaves, Ph.D. Director. Pesticide Re-evaluation Division ... Chlorothalonil Registration Review Docket EPA-HQ- ...
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
    EPA completes interim registration review on chlorothalonil - TurfNet
    Jan 10, 2025 · The EPA issued this Interim Decision for chlorothalonil on Dec. 26, 2024 to identify risk mitigations that would address risks of concern for chlorothalonil.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  51. [51]
    Mechanism of action and fate of the fungicide chlorothalonil (2,4,5,6 ...
    Chlorothalonil forms GSH derivatives, reacts with proteins, and inhibits thiol-dependent enzymes, leading to toxicity. The mechanism resembles other fungicides.
  52. [52]
    Mechanism of action and fate of the fungicide chlorothalonil (2,4,5,6 ...
    Enzyme inhibition was related to the amount of [14C]chlorothalonil ... Reversal of enzyme inhibition could not be demonstrated with the low molecular thiol ...Missing: succinate | Show results with:succinate
  53. [53]
    Modeling of the mechanism of nucleophilic aromatic substitution of ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · In the case of chlorothalonil, its exact mode of action is unknown; however, it can be described as inactivation of glutathione-related enzymes ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Control of <em>Alternaria solani</em> Resistance to Boscalid ...
    Dec 1, 2015 · Chlorothalonil (Bravo, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC) is a multi-site inhibitor that reacts with glutathione and other thiols, ...
  55. [55]
    Increasing virulence and decreasing fungicide sensitivity in ...
    Aug 16, 2024 · Because of the multi-site effect of chlorothalonil, the risk of resistance development is lower than that observed for site-specific fungicides ...Missing: kinetic | Show results with:kinetic
  56. [56]
    The rising threat of fungicide resistance in plant pathogenic fungi
    A new generation of fungicides was developed in the 1960s, starting with the benzimidazoles. They have a specific mode of action towards a target protein in the ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Fungi Resistance to Multissite Fungicides
    Oct 15, 2021 · Most of them were multisite inhibitors, i.e., captan, chlorothalonil, folpet, mancozeb whose fungicidal action is attributed to their reaction ...
  58. [58]
    The influence of chlorothalonil on the activity of soil microorganisms ...
    As one of the most widely used pesticides in agriculture, chlorothalonil can pose threat to soil ecosystems. Therefore, the impact of this substance on the ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Efficacy of Systemic and Contact Fungicide Mixtures - in Controlling ...
    acetate, folpet, chlorothalonil, captafol, or one of a mixture of them was ... mixtures of contact fungicides were used mainly to achieve synergy and to ...
  60. [60]
    Quantifying Control Efficacy of Fungicides Commonly Applied for ...
    Sep 10, 2019 · Network metaanalysis results demonstrated that all fungicide treatments significantly reduced early blight disease severity compared with the ...
  61. [61]
    Reducing Chlorothalonil Use in Fungicide Spray Programs for ...
    Oct 20, 2020 · We designed alternative fungicide programs to examine the impact of reducing chlorothalonil use (Bravo Weather Stik) on watermelon, cantaloupe, and honeydew ...
  62. [62]
    (PDF) Evaluation of new molecules of fungicides against early blight ...
    Sep 30, 2019 · The data also indicated that foliar spray of Chlorothalonil 75 WP @2.0 g/l resulted in 5.23 and 2.47 PDI which proved to be the second effective ...
  63. [63]
    EPA Chlorothalonil Review - Vegetable Crops Hotline
    Jan 4, 2024 · In over 60 years of use, there has never been any recorded instance of fungicide resistance because it has multi-sites of action. For this ...Missing: incidence | Show results with:incidence<|control11|><|separator|>
  64. [64]
    Reducing copper and chlorothalonil in staked tomato production on ...
    Tomcast can reduce the number of applications by 40-70 % per year and provide adequate control of early blight. Azoxystrobin provides better control of early ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    Chlorothalonil Market Size, Growth and Forecast to 2033
    The chlorothalonil market size reached USD 270.4 Million in 2024 to reach USD 421.3 Million by 2033 at a CAGR of 5.05% during 2025-2033.Missing: capacity | Show results with:capacity
  67. [67]
    Fact Sheet: Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Chlorothalonil
    Chlorothalonil is not a restricted use pesticide. Human Health Assessment Toxicity Chlorothalonil is in acute Toxicity Category IV (the least toxic of four ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] US EPA-Pesticides; Chlorothalonil | US EPA ARCHIVE DOCUMENT
    The results of the 96-hour acute toxicity studies indicate that chlorothalonil is "very highly toxic" to fish. The guideline requirements are fulfilled ...
  69. [69]
    A mechanistic interpretation of the oncogenicity of chlorothalonil in ...
    Chronic dietary treatment of rodents with the fungicide chlorothalonil causes an increased incidence of papillomas and carcinomas of the forestomach squamous ...
  70. [70]
    Chlorothalonil; Pesticide Tolerances - Federal Register
    Dec 3, 2008 · There was no indication of a carcinogenic response in the rat chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study from the newer data set; however, an ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Chlorothalonil (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Volume 73, 1999)
    Sep 30, 1999 · CHLOROTHALONIL (Group 2B) ... For definition of Groups, see Preamble Evaluation. VOL.: 73 (1999) (p. 183). CAS No.: 1897-45-6
  72. [72]
    Mammalian Toxicokinetics and Toxicity of Chlorothalonil
    The potential for chlorothalonil to induce developmental toxicity has also been investigated in the rat and rabbit. It is concluded that chlorothalonil is not a ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Chlorothalonil Toxicological Summary August 2025
    Guidance for chlorothalonil was first developed by MDH in 1993/1994 with a ... Sponsored by. Diamond Shamrock Corporation, T.R. Evans Research Center ...
  74. [74]
    Chlorothalonil transformation products in drinking water resources
    Sep 15, 2020 · To remove all chlorothalonil TPs, activated carbon needs to be exchanged or regenerated very frequently, approximately as often as for the ...Missing: manufacturing | Show results with:manufacturing
  75. [75]
    Analysis of the pesticide Chlorothalonil and its metabolites
    Feb 5, 2024 · Furthermore, chlorothalonil is not very soluble in water, unlike its metabolite chlorothalonil R471811, which is very persistent in water.
  76. [76]
    The toxicity of chlorothalonil to aquatic fauna and the impact of its ...
    Chlorothalonil is a fungicide whose heavy use in eastern Canada gives it the potential for significant aquatic contamination. Laboratory bioassays and field ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Federal Register/Vol. 72, No. 137/Wednesday, July 18, 2007/Rules ...
    Jul 18, 2007 · In. April 1999, EPA released a RED for chlorothalonil finding it eligible for reregistration so long as various uses were prohibited and ...
  78. [78]
    Chlorthalonil; Pesticide Tolerance - Federal Register
    Jul 27, 2007 · SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for the combined residues of chlorothalonil and its metabolite, 4-hydroxy-2,5 ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/ 677
    Apr 30, 2019 · Member States shall withdraw authorisations for plant protection products containing chlorothalonil as active substance by 20 November 2019 at ...
  80. [80]
    France's Drinking Water Contaminated with Toxic Fungicide ...
    Apr 18, 2023 · The EU banned uses of chlorothalonil in 2019, due to concerns over water contamination, the effects of such contamination on fish and amphibians ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  81. [81]
    Re-evaluation Decision RVD2022-17, Chlorothalonil and Its ...
    Dec 8, 2022 · Health Canada has determined that continued registration of products containing chlorothalonil is acceptable with mitigation measures.
  82. [82]
    Pesticides that have Completed Product Reregistration | US EPA
    Chlorothalonil. 3/11/2009. 2100. Chlorophacinone. 7/8/2011. 0271. Chlorpropham. 11/29/2006. 0100. Chlorpyrifos. 1/10/2008. 0631. Chlorsulfuron. 8/2/2011. 0132.
  83. [83]
    Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ...
    Jan 30, 2018 · Chlorothalonil presents a low acute toxicity profile when administered via oral or dermal route; however, it was shown to be very toxic if ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] EN E-000263/2024 Answer given by Ms Kyriakides on behalf of the ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · of chlorothalonil for the renewal of approval2 showed that it is not persistent. However, its metabolite R4718113 is considered persistent ...
  85. [85]
    chlorothalonil
    This inventory summarizes evaluations of pesticides that have been performed by the Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR).
  86. [86]
    Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ...
    Jan 30, 2018 · The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of chlorothalonil as a fungicide on wheat, barley, tomato and potato.Missing: persistent metabolites
  87. [87]
    [PDF] The Benefits of Chlorine Chemistry in Crop Protection in the United ...
    Jul 6, 2022 · Without effective and safe crop protection products, farmers would incur significant costs to maintain the current high level of agricultural.
  88. [88]
    Modification of the existing MRLs for chlorothalonil in barley ... - EFSA
    Jan 15, 2010 · In soil chlorothalonil yields two metabolites which are more persistent than parent: SDS-3701 with a maximum DT90 value of 1132 days (derived as.
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Proposed Re-evaluation Decision PRVD2011-14
    Nov 1, 2011 · SDS-3701 produced from parent chlorothalonil biotransforms slowly in aerobic soil. SDS-3701 is expected to persist and carryover in soils.
  90. [90]
    Pesticide transformation products: a potential new source of interest ...
    Jan 30, 2025 · Among TPs, chlorothalonil R471811 and metolachlor ESA were the most frequently quantified compounds, with quantification in more than 50% of raw ...
  91. [91]
    Deposition, dissipation, metabolism, and dietary risk assessment of ...
    The half-lives of chlorothalonil in pakchoi in May, October, and December were 2.86–5.79, 3.08–5.87, and 6.41–11.32 days, respectively.
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Chlorothalonil Human Health and Ecological Draft Risk Assessment
    Apr 9, 2021 · This risk assessment focuses on the antimicrobial uses, which include wood preservation, mold control and material preservation. The ...
  93. [93]
    Pesticides in French tap water 'not a health risk' - The Connexion
    May 6, 2023 · Metabolites of the fungicide chlorothalonil, which has been banned in France since 2019, were found in half of the drinking water sampled in ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Chlorothalonil - Australian Drinking Water Guidelines
    Chlorothalonil can be measured in surface waters by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (UV) detection, with a practical limit of quantitation of 25 ng/L ( ...
  95. [95]
    Determination of chlorothalonil metabolites in soil and water samples
    Oct 11, 2021 · We developed and validated a method for the determination of 5 chlorothalonil metabolites in soil (R471811, R417888, SYN507900, SYN548580 and R611968),