Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chrysoperla

Chrysoperla is a of insects in the family and order , commonly known as green lacewings, comprising about 50 species worldwide. They are characterized by their pale green bodies, golden eyes, and delicate, transparent wings held rooflike at rest. Adults typically measure 12–20 mm in body length and are active fliers, particularly at or night, with a fluttering flight pattern. The larvae, often called "aphislions," are elongate, flattened, and alligator-like predators with prominent tubelike mouthparts used to suck fluids from prey. Notable species include C. carnea and C. rufilabris, which are widespread in and valued for . Members of Chrysoperla undergo complete , with eggs laid singly on long silken stalks to prevent ; these eggs are , pale green, and about 0.8–1.5 mm long. The larval stage consists of three instars lasting 2–3 weeks, during which individuals grow from less than 1 mm to about 7–13 mm and voraciously consume soft-bodied pests like , thrips, mealybugs, and small caterpillars—each larva can devour up to 600 . Pupation occurs in a roundish, whitish silken , taking 10–14 days, after which adults emerge; the typically completes in 3–6 weeks depending on temperature, allowing multiple generations per year in warm conditions. Overwintering occurs as adults in sheltered sites like leaf litter or, in some species and colder regions, as diapausing prepupae or pupae. Ecologically, Chrysoperla species inhabit diverse environments globally, including agricultural fields, gardens, and wildlands in temperate and arid regions; adults feed primarily on honeydew, nectar, pollen, or plant fluids rather than prey. Unlike some related genera like Chrysopa, where adults are often predaceous, Chrysoperla adults are generally non-predatory; they are distinguished morphologically, for example, by a trumpetlike empodium on larval tarsi. Their predatory larvae make them key natural enemies in integrated pest management (IPM), with species commercially reared and released to suppress pests in crops.

Taxonomy and Systematics

Classification

Chrysoperla belongs to the order , which encompasses net-winged insects including lacewings, antlions, and mantidflies; within this order, it is placed in the family , known as green lacewings, the subfamily Chrysopinae, and the tribe Chrysopini. The genus Chrysoperla was originally classified as a subgenus within but was elevated to full generic status during taxonomic revisions in the , primarily through the work of Brooks and Barnard, who distinguished it based on morphological and song characteristics. The type species is (Stephens, 1836), originally described as Chrysopa carnea from specimens collected in . Approximately 70 species, including 67 described and several provisional taxa, are currently recognized in the genus worldwide as of recent compilations, though this number reflects ongoing taxonomic revisions; for instance, Brooks (1994) validated 36 in a comprehensive review, and regional updates such as the 2022 faunal analysis of Pakistan's identified three within the genus. Key diagnostic traits at the genus level include a prominent pale longitudinal stripe extending along the and abdomen, as well as distinctive wing venation patterns, such as the configuration of the costal area and pseudotracheae on the forewings. These features help differentiate from closely related genera like , which lack the full-length stripe.

Phylogenetic Relationships

Chrysoperla is placed within the tribe Chrysopini of the subfamily Chrysopinae in the family , where it forms a monophyletic group closely related to other genera in the tribe, such as Nineta and Hypochrysa. Phylogenetic analyses using combined molecular and morphological data reveal basal divergences of Chrysoperla from genera like , which belong to a clade within Chrysopinae, supporting an early split in the subfamily's radiation during the . These relationships highlight Chrysoperla's position as a derived lineage adapted to diverse temperate and subtropical environments. The is notable for its cryptic species complexes, where morphologically similar taxa are differentiated by behavioral, ecological, and genetic traits. The 'carnea group' exemplifies this, encompassing sensu stricto and closely related sibling such as C. agilis and C. lucasina, which were identified through variations in courtship song patterns, minor morphological differences in genitalia, and molecular markers. These cryptic often occur sympatrically but maintain via species-specific acoustic signals, underscoring the role of in their diversification. Molecular studies have been pivotal in resolving these relationships, employing mitochondrial DNA regions like the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I () gene and (AFLP) markers to construct phylogenies. Henry et al. (2002) analyzed multiple mitochondrial loci to delineate the carnea group, revealing a complex of at least 15-20 sibling across the Holarctic region. Similarly, a study on the C. nipponensis complex in and used , COII sequences, and AFLP data to identify distinct lineages, demonstrating geographic structuring and cryptic divergence within East Asian populations. Phylogenetic trees derived from these datasets depict the carnea-group as a well-supported monophyletic with a radiation centered in Holarctic regions, featuring multiple independent colonizations of temperate habitats. Recent investigations, including a taxonomic review of Asian faunas, have contributed to refining the genus's evolutionary history in the Oriental and Palearctic realms, such as a faunal review of the in that identified three species of Chrysoperla.

Morphology and Identification

Adult Features

Adult Chrysoperla individuals are soft-bodied insects characterized by a slender, pale green body typically measuring 12–20 mm in length, with prominent golden eyes and a yellow-white dorsal stripe extending along the thorax and abdomen. The body is delicate and elongated, adapted for flight and minimal predation, with long filiform antennae that aid in sensory perception. The wings are large, transparent, and held roof-like over the body at rest, featuring intricate green and a of approximately 20–30 mm. A key identifying trait in the forewing is the closed subcosta, where the subcosta fuses with the for most of its length, distinguishing Chrysoperla from other neuropteran genera. The mouthparts are haustellate, consisting of elongate maxillary and labial palps modified for sucking liquids such as , , and . Sexual dimorphism is subtle and primarily evident in the genitalia: males possess specialized claspers on the apex of sternites 8+9, shaped as a or chin for species-specific , while females have a prominent adapted for laying stalked eggs. Color variation occurs within the , particularly in response to environmental cues; non-diapausing adults maintain a vibrant green hue for , but diapause-induced forms in species like C. carnea s.l. shift to brownish or reddish tones during winter for overwintering adaptation.

Larval Characteristics

The larvae of Chrysoperla undergo three distinct , progressing from approximately 1 mm in length at to 6–12 mm in the final instar, with the entire larval period typically lasting 2–3 weeks under optimal conditions. These instars are characterized by an elongate, flattened, alligator-like body form, featuring well-developed legs for and prominent sickle-shaped mandibles that function as piercing-sucking stylets for injecting venom and extracting prey fluids. A distinguishing feature is the trumpet-shaped empodium on the pretarsi between the tarsal claws. The body surface bears tubercles and setae, which serve defensive roles and facilitate debris-carrying behavior in later instars; specialized hooked or filiform setae on dorsal tubercles allow larvae to construct tubular "trash-packets" from plant fragments, , and prey remains for against predators. Coloration is typically mottled brown or gray, contrasting with the green hues of adults, and often includes species-specific patterns of setal arrangements, such as those in the carnea group, aiding in taxonomic . Sensory structures include short antennae for general chemosensation and six stemmata (three on each side of the head) that provide basic visual detection of prey movement, with black pigmentation and brown surrounding them for contrast enhancement. Upon reaching maturity in the third , non-feeding pupae form within round, parchment-like silken cocoons, typically 3–6 mm in diameter, spun in concealed locations; the pupal stage lasts 10–14 days before .

Biology and Behavior

Life Cycle

The life cycle of Chrysoperla species encompasses four distinct stages: , , , and , with the entire generation typically completing in 3-6 weeks under optimal conditions of 25-30°C. Development is highly temperature-dependent, with shorter durations at higher temperatures within the viable range of 18-33°C and no development above 37°C. Larvae engage in voracious predatory feeding during this phase, which supports rapid growth. Eggs are laid singly on plants, each approximately 1 mm long and attached to a slender silken stalk about 0.5-1 cm high, an that elevates them above the substrate to reduce cannibalism by hatching larvae. occurs after 3-6 days, depending on , with pale green eggs darkening to gray as they mature. A single female can produce 100-600 eggs over her lifetime, typically near potential prey sites in spring and summer. The larval stage consists of three instars, lasting a total of 2-3 weeks under optimal conditions, during which the grows from less than 1 mm to 6-8 mm in length. First-instar duration is about 3-4 days, second-instar 2-5 days, and third-instar 3-12 days, with overall time decreasing as temperature rises from 21°C to 30°C. This stage is critical for nutrient accumulation through predation, influencing subsequent survival and reproduction. Pupation follows, with the mature third-instar spinning a silken in a sheltered location, where it undergoes over 7-14 days before emerging as an adult. Pupal development shortens with increasing , averaging 5-9 days at 25-30°C. Adults live 4-6 weeks in non-diapausing conditions, feeding on , , or to support , though temperate species enter facultative reproductive under short photoperiods, extending longevity to 3-4 months or more for overwintering. involves species-specific through substrate-borne vibratory songs produced by abdominal tremulation, which facilitate mate recognition and duetting in a precise, often multi-volley format lasting 2-6 seconds. Parthenogenesis is rare in Chrysoperla, with predominant. Oviposition begins 1-2 weeks after , yielding high egg output that enables multiple generations per season in warmer climates.

Predatory Habits

The larvae of Chrysoperla species, such as C. carnea and C. rufilabris, are voracious generalist predators that primarily consume soft-bodied arthropods, including (Aphis gossypii), mealybugs (Phenacoccus solenopsis), (Tetranychus urticae), (Frankliniella occidentalis), and small eggs or larvae from species like the bollworm () and Angoumois grain moth (Sitotroga cerealella). Adults, in contrast, exhibit reduced predatory activity and supplement their diet with non-animal sources like , , and , which support longevity but do not contribute to direct predation. Hunting in Chrysoperla larvae involves an active strategy where they use their pincer-like mandibles to grasp and pierce prey, injecting that liquefy internal tissues for subsequent suction feeding. Larvae display polyphagous tendencies with a preference for such as , consuming up to 645 first- mealybug nymphs in the third instar under no-choice conditions, though no strong preferences emerge among , mealybugs, and mites in multi-choice assays. Foraging efficiency varies by habitat, with larvae spending up to 70% of their time searching on host plants like crested and moving at speeds of 0.73 cm/second, while adults show nocturnal activity patterns focused on collection rather than prey pursuit. Intraguild predation is notable among Chrysoperla larvae, including cannibalism of eggs or younger conspecifics when prey is scarce, as observed in laboratory hunger trials where larvae abandoned alternative prey to consume siblings. However, field studies indicate low rates of conspecific cannibalism, with no attacks recorded among over 100 encounters, though larvae face higher mortality from heterospecific predators like hemipterans (Orius tristicolor, Geocoris spp.), which kill up to 0.02 neonate larvae per hour through ambush tactics. Environmental factors significantly influence predation efficacy in Chrysoperla, with optimal rates occurring at temperatures of 20–28°C and relative of 65–75%, where third-instar larvae exhibit (e.g., 400–600 prey items) and faster compared to extremes like 15°C or 35°C, which reduce and activity by up to 50%. below 50% further impairs predation by limiting adult reproduction and larval vigor, though larvae maintain functionality across a broader range when prey is abundant.

Distribution and Habitat

Global Distribution

The genus Chrysoperla exhibits a , with approximately 50 to 67 recognized worldwide. The genus demonstrates particular dominance in the , where the C. carnea is widespread across , , and , ranging from southward through the to northern and eastward to . In other biogeographic regions, Chrysoperla species occur in the Neotropics, exemplified by C. externa, which spans all of and extends northward into and in the United States. The Afrotropical region hosts species such as C. zastrowi, distributed from northward to the . Presence in the is largely attributable to human-mediated introductions, including C. carnea and C. externa in areas like and . Several Chrysoperla species, notably C. carnea, have been widely introduced and established in greenhouses and agricultural settings globally for biological applications. Biogeographically, the encompasses over 50 species, with the highest concentrated in temperate zones, and recent expansions documented, such as the phylogenetic confirmation of C. zastrowi in and tentatively in . Endemism is low, with most species displaying broad ranges rather than strict regional confinement.

Habitat Preferences

Species of the genus Chrysoperla predominantly inhabit temperate and agricultural landscapes, including forests, shrublands, grasslands, vineyards, groves, and field crops, where they remain in close proximity to harboring prey populations such as . These environments provide the structural complexity and resource availability essential for their predatory , with higher abundances observed in diverse habitats that support both and sources. Abiotic conditions play a critical role in their distribution, with Chrysoperla species favoring moderate temperatures between 20°C and 30°C and relative of 50% to 80%, conditions that optimize development and survival. They exhibit tolerance to arid and cold climates but avoid extreme aridity without access to moisture sources and enter reproductive during prolonged cold periods or short photoperiods to endure winter, resuming activity when conditions improve. High enhances larval performance, while excessive dryness or can reduce and . These lacewings associate closely with both arboreal and herbaceous , frequently occurring on crops such as and fruit orchards, where they exploit extrafloral and from flowering species to supplement their diet. Chrysoperla demonstrates adaptability to disturbed and urban settings, including greenhouses, parks, and woody urban areas, where they overwinter and utilize hedgerows for refuge. Seasonally, many Chrysoperla species exhibit nomadic behavior, migrating from overwintering sites in woody or urban habitats to agricultural fields in spring to track fluctuating prey availability, with adults dispersing widely post-emergence. This mobility allows them to colonize temporary habitats like annual crops, enhancing their role in pest suppression across varied landscapes.

Species Diversity

Recognized Species

The genus Chrysoperla currently includes approximately 70 valid , based on taxonomic updates through 2023 that account for new descriptions and revisions of cryptic taxa since earlier works. A seminal taxonomic review by Brooks in recognized 36 as valid, proposing 40 new synonymies to resolve prior nomenclatural issues, such as the absorption of several former synonyms into C. carnea. Subsequent discoveries, often driven by molecular and acoustic analyses, have added to this tally without major overhauls to the core framework established by Brooks. Among the key recognized species, (Stephens, 1836) serves as the and is a cosmopolitan predator, widely distributed across the Holarctic region and valued for its role in biological control against and other soft-bodied pests. Chrysoperla plorabunda (Fitch, 1852) is prominent in , where it inhabits agricultural and forested areas, preying on a variety of pests. Chrysoperla rufilabris (Burmeister, ) is native to , particularly the and , distinguished by its red-tinged mouthparts and noted for its predatory efficiency on . Regional diversity highlights include Asian species such as Chrysoperla sinica (Tjeder, 1962), a common predator in agricultural systems targeting and other pests, and Chrysoperla nipponensis (Okamoto, 1910), widespread in and adapted to temperate habitats. In , Chrysoperla zastrowi (Esben-Petersen, 1922) is a notable representative, occurring in arid and semi-arid regions and contributing to in crops like . Many Chrysoperla species exhibit subtle diagnostic traits that challenge , including differences in songs (vibrational signals used in ), male genitalia morphology, and sequences. These cryptic features often require specialized acoustic or genetic analysis for accurate separation, particularly within species groups like the C. carnea complex.

Cryptic and Provisional Taxa

The Chrysoperla carnea group comprises over 20 cryptic sibling species that are morphologically indistinguishable but reproductively isolated through species-specific substrate-borne vibrational mating songs, exchanged in duetting behaviors prior to copulation. Examples include C. agilis and C. lucasina, which were identified and formally described based on these acoustic signals rather than physical traits. These songs exhibit in some cases, where similar signal patterns have arisen independently in distantly related lineages, complicating identification without behavioral analysis. Provisional taxa within the C. carnea complex include poorly understood forms in , such as those referred to as "C. carnea group B," alongside enigmatic entities like C. ankylopteryformis and C. renoni, which have been debated as distinct or synonyms based on limited morphological and song data. In , the C. nipponensis (s.l.) encompasses multiple provisional lineages, with molecular analyses revealing at least three to four genetically distinct clades that await formal elevation pending courtship song confirmation. Recent genetic splits in this complex, supported by mitochondrial phylogenies, highlight ongoing taxonomic revisions, including the 2015 description of C. nigrocapitata from the former "nipponensis-B" form. Taxonomic challenges in Chrysoperla arise from morphological , where sibling show minimal external differences, leading to historical misidentifications in field collections and biocontrol programs. Integrative , combining acoustic analysis with , is essential to resolve these ambiguities, as s provide premating isolation while genetic markers confirm phylogenetic relationships. Between 2002 and 2022, key studies advanced resolution of these taxa through methods like (AFLP) fingerprinting and sequencing, proposing elevations for several provisional forms. For instance, AFLP and COI/COII analyses delineated clades in the C. nipponensis complex, while 2022 genomic mapping identified loci underlying variation in the C. carnea group, linking traits to specific chromosomal regions. These efforts have clarified historical type specimens via , confirming identities like the true C. carnea. Unresolved cryptic and provisional taxa in Chrysoperla have significant implications for biological control, as misidentified strains may exhibit varying predation efficacy, host compatibility, or establishment success in augmentation programs. Accurate delineation ensures targeted release of effective predators, preventing inefficacy from releasing non-local or hybrid forms.

Ecological and Economic Role

Biological Control Applications

Chrysoperla species, particularly C. carnea, are extensively mass-reared for inundative releases in (IPM) programs targeting and on crops such as , tomatoes, sweet peppers, and . Larvae exhibit high predatory efficiency against soft-bodied pests, consuming multiple individuals per day during development. Commercial production focuses on strains like C. carnea and C. rufilabris, with eggs or larvae distributed via cards or bottles for field or application. Typical release rates include 2–20 individuals per square meter weekly in infested areas, or up to 40 cards per acre starting from early crop stages, achieving pest reductions of over 90% in controlled systems. In greenhouses, success rates often reach 70–90% for control when combined with . Key advantages of Chrysoperla in biological include their high reproductive potential, with females producing 500–1,000 eggs over 30 days under optimal rearing conditions, and a broad range encompassing various soft-bodied , making them versatile for IPM integration. These traits support cost-effective mass rearing on artificial diets, enabling large-scale augmentative releases without disrupting other beneficial organisms. However, challenges arise from the cryptic within Chrysoperla, where morphological similarities mask genetic and behavioral differences, leading to variable efficacy if mismatched strains are released in specific regions. Additionally, managing in rearing is essential, as low-temperature storage (8–13°C) of eggs or adults maintains viability but requires precise to prevent developmental delays in non-diapausing strains. Global adoption of Chrysoperla for biological control began in the with advancements in mass-rearing techniques, expanding widely in , , and for conventional and organic agriculture. In and , commercial suppliers like Koppert and Biobest provide strains for IPM, while in , applications in and vegetable fields in and have reduced use. Recent expansions in leverage their compatibility with conservation tactics, enhancing natural enemy populations in diverse cropping systems.

Conservation and Threats

Wild populations of Chrysoperla species face significant threats from anthropogenic activities, particularly the widespread use of broad-spectrum insecticides in , which cause high mortality rates in larvae and adults, drastically reducing local populations through direct and disruption of prey availability. For instance, systemic insecticides like can lead to near-total mortality (up to 96% in related lacewing species) via secondary poisoning when predators consume contaminated prey. loss due to agricultural intensification and further exacerbates these declines by fragmenting diverse landscapes essential for and , resulting in lower abundance in monoculture-dominated areas. Climate change poses additional challenges by altering diapause induction and life-history traits in Chrysoperla, with rising temperatures shortening developmental times (approximately 8% per 1°C increase) and potentially desynchronizing reproductive cycles with seasonal prey availability. In the C. carnea species group, warming has been linked to shifts in photoperiodic responses that induce , which may drive range expansions or contractions as populations adapt to changing thermal regimes, though remains limited. These impacts could compound effects, as Chrysoperla prefer diverse, vegetated environments with stable microclimates. Conservation efforts emphasize enhancement to bolster natural Chrysoperla populations, such as increasing in agricultural settings, which can more than double abundance in groves compared to uniform habitats. Selective use and reduced application timing further support predator persistence by minimizing non-target exposure, while monitoring programs using semiochemical attractants help track without disrupting ecosystems. Most Chrysoperla species have not been individually assessed by the , with many classified broadly as , reflecting a general lack of data on their global . However, regional declines have been documented in , where populations, including lacewings, have decreased by 25-75% in some areas due to combined and chemical pressures. Key research gaps include the need for comprehensive surveys in understudied tropical regions, where Chrysoperla is high but and land-use impacts on cryptic remain poorly understood, hindering targeted strategies.

References

  1. [1]
    Common Green Lacewing Biocontrol Agent Factsheet - Cornell CALS
    The common green lacewing, C. carnea, and the red-lipped green lacewing, C. rufilabris, are species of lacewings in the genus Chrysoperla and family ...
  2. [2]
    Green lacewings - UC IPM
    Adults are soft-bodied insects with golden eyes and 4 membranous wings held rooflike over the body at rest. The wings and body are commonly green. Adults (head ...Missing: genus | Show results with:genus
  3. [3]
    Phylogenetic relationships among tribes of the green lacewing ...
    Aug 3, 2017 · Chrysopinae is by far the largest subfamily in species number, including 97% of all chrysopid species, and is subdivided into four tribes, ...
  4. [4]
    Chrysopinae Esben-Petersen, 1918 - GBIF
    Chrysopinae is the nominate subfamily of green lacewings in the insect family Chrysopidae in the order Neuroptera. This subfamily is also the largest within ...
  5. [5]
    Chrysoperla - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The genus Chrysoperla contains about 50 species worldwide (Brooks & Barnard, 1990). This genus was once considered a subgenus of Chrysopa, but distinctly ...
  6. [6]
    Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens, 1836) - GBIF
    Classification ; kingdom; Animalia ; phylum; Arthropoda ; class; Insecta ; order; Neuroptera ; family; Chrysopidae ...
  7. [7]
    (PDF) The green lacewings of Pakistan (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)
    Sep 1, 2022 · Chrysopinae comprises six extant genera and 24 species in Pakistan: Apertochrysa (8 spp.), Chrysopa (6 spp.),. Chrysoperla (3 spp.), Italochrysa ...
  8. [8]
    Genus Chrysoperla - Common Green Lacewings - BugGuide.Net
    Chrysoperla is the most widespread genus with a pale stripe along its body length. There are a small number of restricted genera that share this trait.
  9. [9]
    Phylogeny of Chrysopidae (Neuroptera), with emphasis on ...
    Oct 13, 2021 · Traditionally, Chrysopidae have been divided into three subfamilies (Brooks & Barnard, 1990): Apochrysinae with c. 25 species in five genera, ...
  10. [10]
    The green lacewings of Pakistan (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) - Biotaxa
    Sep 1, 2022 · 19 green lacewing species are known in Pakistan, including 3 new records, 5 undetermined species, and 16 species described/re-described. The ...
  11. [11]
    Chrysoperla (=Chrysopa) carnea, C. rufilabris - Biological Control
    Adult green lacewings are pale green, about 12-20 mm long, with long antennae and bright, golden eyes. They have large, transparent, pale green wings and a ...
  12. [12]
    Chrysoperla carnea - Green lacewing for pest control - Koppert
    Chrysoperla ... Adult stage: Adult green lacewings are 23-30 mm long, slender, yellow-green in colour, with a yellow-white dorsal stripe, and golden eyes.
  13. [13]
    Families of Neuroptera of British Columbia
    Recently, in may parts of the world, green lacewings, particularly members of the Chrysoperla ... The forewing characteristically has the subcosta (Sc) fused to ...
  14. [14]
    (PDF) Discovering the True Chrysoperla carnea (Insecta: Neuroptera
    Aug 5, 2025 · In particular, adult morphology displays several subtle but useful differences between the species, including the shape of the basal ...
  15. [15]
    A New Look at Adaptive Body Coloration and Color Change in ...
    Mar 1, 2014 · Green lacewings in the genus Chrysoperla are not always green. They can be yellow (autosomal recessive mutant); change from whitish-yellow to ...Missing: elevation subgenus
  16. [16]
    Debris-Carrying in Larval Chrysopidae: Unraveling Its Evolutionary ...
    Mar 1, 2014 · These larvae share a suite of anatomical features related to debris-carrying: their bodies are moderately humped; they have long, cylindrical ...
  17. [17]
    Larvae of five horticulturally important species of Chrysopodes ...
    (1) *stemmata black, with integument between all stemmata brown to black. (2) *exterior margin of stemmata with thin, brown border. Appendages. (3) antenna ...
  18. [18]
    Biology and thermal requirements of Chrysoperla genanigra ...
    It is concluded that the best temperature for rearing C. genanigra is 25 °C, with the lowest preimaginal mortality and the highest egg production (992.7 eggs/ ...
  19. [19]
    Lifecycle Completion and Reproductive Improvement of Chrysoperla ...
    The present study aimed to assess the lifecycle completion and reproductive improvement of green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens), larval instars in a
  20. [20]
    Chrysopidae) Under Long and Short Photoperiods - Oxford Academic
    Mar 1, 2017 · This extended adult longevity that occurred under the short photoperiod, however, was still nearly two months shorter than the 6-7 month-long ...
  21. [21]
    Courtship Songs of Chrysoperla nipponensis (Neuroptera ...
    Sep 1, 2009 · In this study, we present detailed descriptions of the vibrational songs of the two cryptic species of C. nipponensis, A and B, sampled across ...
  22. [22]
    Behavioural responses of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae
    The courtship song of the P1 morph of the Chrysoperla plorabunda complex consists of a volley of tremulation about 600 ms long and modulated in frequency ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Prey Preference of Chrysoperla Rufilabris (Burmeister) (Neuroptera
    It is important to continue to research and clarify the preferences and prey selection behavior of C. rufilabris to optimize management strategies for growers.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Feeding behaviour and life durations of Chrysoperla carnea ...
    Dec 4, 2017 · The present study was done to observe predatory behaviour of chrysoperla carnea and how it can successfully be implied in initializing an ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] IMPACT OF GENERALIST PREDATORS ON A BIOLOGICAL ...
    Impact of generalist predators on the survivorship of larvae of the predatory lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea. Shown is the expected survival (solid line) and ...
  26. [26]
    Predatory Potential of Chrysoperla carnea and Cryptolaemus ...
    The most probable reason for preference of first instar larvae could be due to small size. A steady increase in predation was recorded with the progression of ...
  27. [27]
    Modeling of the effect of temperature on developmental rate of ...
    Dec 10, 2020 · Increasing temperature showed an inverse effect on developmental time of C. carnea, and increasing temperature led to decreasing its ...
  28. [28]
    Effect of relative humidity on development, survival and reproduction ...
    Temperature and relative humidity (RH) are the most important abiotic factors that may affect seasonal development, geographical distribution and abundance ( ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  29. [29]
    Seasonal variation in the migration strategies of the green lacewing ...
    Jul 18, 2006 · What was, until recently, considered a single Holarctic species, C. carnea, distributed across North America, Europe, northern Africa, and Asia, ...
  30. [30]
    Chrysoperla carnea group - NatureSpot
    It often has a pale strip along its dorsal surface and also has hairy veins on its wings, can just be seen with a hand lens. NBN carries a note on the page for ...Missing: diagnostic genus stripe
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Confirming World-wide Distribution of an Agriculturally Important ...
    Aug 31, 2018 · Members of the family Chrysopidae are commonly known as green lacewings. This family includes the genus Chrysoperla, which houses a cryptic ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Chrysoperla carnea (Green Lacewing) (Predator)
    Chrysoperla carnea are used worldwide as highly effective biocontrol agent. She lays green eggs in the hundreds, each atop a vertical, hairlike stalk; and ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] A new East-Asian species in the Chrysoperla carnea-group of ...
    Feb 11, 2015 · Larval morphology and substrate-borne vibrational courtship songs have been hypothesized to distinguish and isolate. Chrysoperla 'nipponensis ...
  34. [34]
    Discovering the True Chrysoperla carnea (Insecta: Neuroptera
    Chrysoperla carnea was first described in England (as Chrysopa carnea) by J. F. Stephens (1835). The species was based on a short type series collected in ...Missing: subgenus | Show results with:subgenus
  35. [35]
    Abundance and Seasonal Migration Patterns of Green Lacewings ...
    May 1, 2024 · There are 1415 lacewing species worldwide [12]. Among these species, 251 species are found in China, including 213 endemic species [13].
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Insect Diapause: A Review - David Publishing
    temperature, humidity, food, natural enemies and ... Common green lacewing. (Chrysoperla carnea) enters diapause, only if day length decreases abruptly.<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    [PDF] biology and ecology of important predators and parasites attacking ...
    Because cotton is grown as an annual crop, it is available as a habitat for predators and parasites only during the growing season. In a single crop ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Rearing of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) against two laboratory ...
    Dec 25, 2017 · carnea as a biological control agent has been demonstrated in field crops, orchards and green houses [2]. ... different insect pests of cotton.
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    Monitoring aerial insect biodiversity: a radar perspective - PMC - NIH
    May 6, 2024 · Seasonal variation in the migration strategies of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea species complex. Ecol. Entomol. 31, 378-388 ...Missing: urban | Show results with:urban
  41. [41]
    A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing genus ...
    The genus Chrysoperla is revised, with 36 species being recognized as valid. Five new species are described, the status of 4 species is revised and 40 new ...
  42. [42]
    Details - A taxonomic review ot the common green lacewing genus ...
    A taxonomic review ot the common green lacewing genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) by Brooks, Stephen J. (Stephen John), 1955-Missing: species 1990
  43. [43]
    Lacewings | WSU Tree Fruit | Washington State University
    Brown lacewing and Chrysopa adults are also carnivorous, but adults of Chrysoperla species feed on aphid honeydew and plant fluids.
  44. [44]
    The Developmental Stage Symbionts of the Pea Aphid-Feeding ...
    Previous observations suggest that prey could alter pre-imaginal development, survival, adult longevity, and fecundity of C. sinica (Khuhro et al., 2012).<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    The green lacewing, Chrysoperla nipponensis in nature and in an ...
    However, Brooks (1994) suggested that C. nipponensis should be considered a distinct species, because it shows consistent morphological differences when ...
  46. [46]
    High-quality genome assembly of a cosmopolitan insect predator ...
    Feb 16, 2025 · Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Petersen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), commonly known as the green lacewing or aphid lion is a potential ...
  47. [47]
    DNA from a 180 Year Old Type Specimen Confirms the Identity of ...
    One such example is Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens), which belongs to a complex of about 20 cryptic species, most of which can only be reliably distinguished by ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    A lacewing with the wanderlust: the European song species 'Maltese ...
    Apr 7, 2003 · Discussion Chrysoperla agilis is most similar to C. carnea (sensuHenry et al., 2002) and C. pallida among the European members of the carnea ...
  49. [49]
    CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF COURTSHIP SONGS AMONG ...
    Here we present the first well‐documented case of such convergence, in a group of sibling, cryptic species characterized by substrate‐borne vibrational mating ...
  50. [50]
    The puzzling, rarely encountered European lacewings Chrysoperla ...
    Chrysoperla Steinmann is an important green lacewing genus, delineated by its male genitalic morphology and its non-predatory, overwintering adults ...
  51. [51]
    Phylogeny of the green lacewing Chrysoperla nipponensis species ...
    Jun 5, 2012 · Abstract Several studies have indicated that the green lacewing, Chrysoperla nipponensis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) may include more than one ...
  52. [52]
    group of cryptic lacewing species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) based ...
    Brooks, S.J. (1994) A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural ...Missing: elevation subgenus
  53. [53]
    Speciation Genomics of the Chrysoperla carnea Complex
    May 8, 2020 · In this dissertation, I examine speciation in the Chrysoperla carnea-group by reconstructing the evolutionary history of the clade and identifying the genomic ...Missing: nipponensis 2022<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Genomic regions underlying the species‐specific mating songs of ...
    Oct 25, 2022 · The majority of genes associated with Drosophila vibrational courtship signals are found within the song-associated regions for Chrysoperla, ...
  55. [55]
    (PDF) Can What We Don't Know About Lacewing Systematics Hurt ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The Chrysoperla carnea group of green lacewings has species-specific substrate-borne duetting songs that maintain reproductive isolation among ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Testing of Chrysoperla carnea (S) against Bimisia tabaci in Bt. cotton ...
    Jan 2, 2021 · Chrysoperla carnea, one of the most important natural enemies has a great role in reducing the use of pesticides and environmental pollution in ...
  57. [57]
    (PDF) Field evaluation of indigenous predacious insect, Chrysoperla ...
    carnea effectively controlled cotton aphids and whiteflies in Saudi Arabia, achieving over 90% pest reduction in sweet pepper and squash [8]; In Portugal, ...
  58. [58]
    The Green Lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea: Preference between ...
    The 3rd instar larval stage was ascertained on the basis of morphology and developmental time (Scopes 1969; Butler and Ritchie 1970; Tauber 1974; Gepp 1984).
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Biological Control of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera ... - USDA ARS
    Chrysoperla rufilabris; Hibiscus rosa-sinensis; preda- tion ecology ... ently undetermined number of species described as. "spiders" (Araneae). The B ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Field Release Performance of Chrysoperla Carnea for Population ...
    Jun 28, 2022 · C. carnea caused over 40-75% pest population reduction. In the first year, it reduced aphid, jassid, thrip, and whitefly by 76%, 86%, 39%, and ...Missing: phylogeny | Show results with:phylogeny
  61. [61]
    Commercialization of Predators: - Recent Lessons from Green ...
    Chrysoperla spp. and biotypes exhibit consid- erable variation in their responses to physical and biotic factors inthe habitat, habitat preference, adult.<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Chrysopid Predators and their Role in Biological Control
    The genus Chrysoperla includes approximately 36 species that can be found worldwidely (Brooks and Barnard, 1990). Their biology and ecology have been ...
  63. [63]
    An example using a pilot mass rearing system for green lacewing
    Abstract. Augmentative and inundative biological control releases of arthropod natural enemies require the production of high-quality product at low prices.Missing: strains | Show results with:strains
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Chrysopid Predators and their Role in Biological Control
    Difficulties in the systematics of chrysopids have made the release of. Chrysoperla sp. more problematic. The evaluation of the efficacy of chrysopid species ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  65. [65]
    [PDF] The uptake of biological control in Latin America and the Caribbean.
    Until 1970, mainly classical biocontrol was used, though in some countries augmenta- tive biocontrol was employed as well; later, con- servation biocontrol was ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Enhancing Natural Pest Control as an Ecosystem Service
    replicated, controlled tests) from Europe, North America Asia and Australasia found more natural enemies under organic farming, although seven2,5,6,7,14,15 ...
  67. [67]
    Indirect Effect of Pesticides on Insects and Other Arthropods - PMC
    Pesticides released to the environment can indirectly affect target and non-target species in ways that are often contrary to their intended use.
  68. [68]
    Habitat Diversity Increases Chrysoperla carnea s.l. (Stephens, 1836 ...
    Feb 12, 2024 · Chrysoperla carnea sl, a vital predator in olive groves, plays a key role in reducing the reliance on pesticides.
  69. [69]
    Comparative life‐history responses of lacewings to changes in ...
    We found that developmental times consistently decreased with temperature for all species. Survival and reproduction however showed a weaker response to ...
  70. [70]
    Do Changes in Photoperiodic Induction of Diapause in a Green ...
    Oct 22, 2025 · Do Changes in Photoperiodic Induction of Diapause in a Green Lacewing (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) Coincide with Changing Regional Temperatures?
  71. [71]
    Semiochemicals and habitat manipulation to support green ...
    Conservation biological control (CBC) is a promising tool for ecological intensification that aims to establish resilient natural enemy populations that ...
  72. [72]
    Green lacewings, Family Chrysopidae in Namibia
    Green lacewings, common names in other Namibian language groups, number of Namibian species: 28, endemism: Endemic, 5. IUCN Conservation status: Not Evaluated, ...
  73. [73]
    Declines in insect abundance and diversity: We know enough to act ...
    Jun 22, 2019 · Insects are experiencing a multicontinental crisis with declines in abundance, diversity, and biomass, driven by habitat loss, pesticides, and ...
  74. [74]
    Elevational Diversity Patterns of Green Lacewings (Neuroptera
    Nov 14, 2021 · Accordingly, for the common and species-rich genera Chrysoperla, Apertochrysa, and Mallada, GMYC and bPTP are recommended for molecular species ...<|control11|><|separator|>