Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Colmar Pocket

The Colmar Pocket, also known as the , was a German-held bulge in Allied lines during , protruding westward from the River into the region of northeastern between the cities of and Mulhouse. Formed in late 1944 following German counteroffensives that recaptured territory after initial Allied advances, it represented the last major German foothold west of the and posed a threat to Allied supply lines and the city of Strasbourg. The pocket was ultimately eliminated through a coordinated Allied offensive from 20 January to 9 February 1945, securing the western bank of the for the Allies and facilitating their push into Germany as part of the broader Rhineland Campaign. Under the command of U.S. Sixth Army Group led by General , the operation involved close collaboration between American and forces, highlighting the complexities of warfare. The primary Allied units included the U.S. Seventh Army's XXI —comprising the 3rd, 28th, and 75th Infantry Divisions—and the First Army under General , with its I and II , including the French 2nd Armored Division. Opposing them was the German Nineteenth Army, entrenched in heavily fortified positions amid harsh winter conditions, urban terrain around , and the surrounding Mountains and plains. The offensive began on 20 with forces attacking from the south toward the , supported by U.S. advances from the north to envelop the pocket. engagements included the U.S. 3rd Infantry Division's push into itself, culminating in the city's liberation on 2 after intense house-to-house fighting. By 9 , the pocket was fully reduced, with 16,438 German prisoners taken, though Allied casualties totaled approximately 24,000 killed, wounded, or missing (8,000 U.S. and 16,000 ). Strategically, the battle's success not only neutralized a persistent threat but also underscored the importance of U.S.- cooperation, despite tensions over national priorities such as retaining , which leaders insisted on holding for reasons. Conducted in freezing weather and flooded terrain, the operation demonstrated effective tactics, including assaults, armored support, and , paving the way for Allied crossings of the in March 1945. The Pocket's elimination marked a critical step in the final and the collapse of defenses in .

Background

Formation of the Pocket

In mid-November 1944, as part of the broader Allied advance into following the campaign, the French First under General launched a rapid offensive from the south, capturing on 21 November and reaching the River by 19 November. Concurrently, the U.S. Seventh advanced from the north toward the Ill River line, creating a that threatened to envelop positions in central . However, on 24 November, Supreme Allied Commander ordered a halt to further crossings, redirecting the Seventh northward to support operations in , which allowed the Nineteenth under General Friedrich Wiese to regroup and consolidate its defenses west of the . The German response involved a series of counteroffensives to exploit the pause in Allied momentum. On 24 November, the Nineteenth Army was ordered to withdraw to a defensive line along the Ill River, but overruled recommendations for a full retreat across the , insisting on holding a in to retain control of the region and threaten Allied flanks. By 27 November, this directive had formalized the Colmar Pocket as a salient protruding westward from the , centered on the city of , which the Germans had secured along with surrounding villages like and Riedisheim during their consolidation. The pocket initially measured about 45 miles along the and 25 miles deep, encompassing roughly 850 square miles of territory bounded by the Ill River to the north, the to the east, and the French advances to the south. The First Army's subsequent attempts to reduce the were hampered by the retreat from advanced positions along the Ill River line, as ordered on 24 to align with the group boundary near Erstein, leaving the Nineteenth in firm control of the . The German Nineteenth played a pivotal role in maintaining this position, deploying its depleted but determined divisions to fortify the and repel probes, thereby isolating the and preventing its immediate collapse despite the overall Allied superiority in the region. These maneuvers effectively created a persistent German stronghold that tied down significant Allied resources for the ensuing months.

Strategic Context

In late 1944, the Allied advance into eastern left the Germans holding a precarious salient in central , known as the Colmar Pocket, where remnants of the German Nineteenth Army clung to a bridgehead west of the River. The First Army, under General , launched offensives in November to exploit breakthroughs in the and Mountains, liberating on 21 November and reaching the south of , while the U.S. Seventh Army, supported by the 2nd Armored , captured on 23 November; these efforts halted short of fully eliminating the salient due to stiff German resistance and logistical strains. These initial efforts failed to eliminate the salient, as the faced redeployments ordered by General , including the withdrawal of two divisions in late September for operations against Atlantic ports like , which weakened their assault capability and allowed the pocket to consolidate by early December. The German high command, directed by , viewed retention of as essential for maintaining a defensive bulwark against Allied crossings into the , using the area as a potential staging ground for counteroffensives aimed at the gateways and disrupting the southern Allied flank. This strategy was reinforced by the dispatch of fresh divisions to the Nineteenth Army in , despite broader resource shortages, to harass and delay the U.S. Sixth Army Group's advance toward the . was personally tasked with bolstering the pocket's defenses, underscoring its role in tying down Allied forces and buying time for German preparations elsewhere. Allied priorities shifted dramatically with the German Ardennes offensive, launched on 16 December 1944, which diverted critical resources from the sector to the northern front, including elements of the U.S. Third Army and reinforcements originally earmarked for the south. Under General ’s broad-front strategy, emphasis was placed on containing the Bulge and securing the , sidelining the Colmar Pocket as a secondary theater despite its threat to supply lines. Commanding the U.S. Sixth Army Group, General oversaw operations in southern , with the U.S. Seventh Army under General positioned to the north, having captured and advanced through the to support the French in pinching off the salient. Devers criticized the French First Army’s December attempts to reduce the pocket, exacerbated by redeployments, and requested additional U.S. divisions like the 36th to bolster efforts, though Eisenhower’s focus on the north limited immediate reinforcements until January 1945. This command structure highlighted tensions between national French objectives and the integrated Allied effort to clear the west bank of the .

Environmental Factors

The Colmar Pocket encompassed a diverse terrain in central , characterized by the flat Alsatian plain that extended eastward from the Mountains, providing open fields but limited natural cover for advancing forces. The Ill River, approximately 90 feet wide, served as a significant bisecting the pocket, while the Colmar Canal, with its steep banks and partially frozen s, further obstructed movements across the region. To the west, the forested slopes of the Mountains formed a rugged , complicating access and enabling defensive positions amid dense woodlands. These features collectively created a of water obstacles and open expanses that channeled operations into predictable corridors. Winter conditions from November 1944 to February 1945 severely hampered activities within the pocket, with heavy snowfalls accumulating up to three feet in places, overcast skies producing persistent , and seasonal flooding exacerbating the challenges. Temperatures often dropped below freezing, reaching as low as 20 degrees below zero, while melting led to muddy quagmires that bogged down vehicles. The weather grounded air support for extended periods, as and low clouds restricted , and flooding from swollen waterways like the Ill and Fecht rivers turned low-lying areas into impassable swamps. These meteorological factors persisted through the campaign, transforming the flat plain into a treacherous environment of deep snowdrifts and icy surfaces. Logistically, the frozen ground offered some advantages by firming up surfaces for defensive emplacements but severely complicated Allied positioning and maneuvers, as the hard soil resisted digging and caused equipment to skid on . Supply lines suffered from snow-blocked and scarce bridging materials needed to span the numerous water barriers, delaying reinforcements and ammunition delivery. In the floodplains to the east, recurrent inundations from the river limited mechanized advances to narrow dikes, while urban Colmar's surrounding canals and snow-laden streets amplified these issues, turning the city into a fortified where flooding isolated key sectors. Overall, these environmental elements prolonged the pocket's resistance by favoring static defenses over .

Opposing Forces

Allied Forces

The primary Allied force committed to eliminating the Colmar Pocket was the French First Army, commanded by General , which bore the main responsibility for the operation under the broader oversight of the U.S. Sixth Army Group led by Lieutenant General . De Lattre's army was organized into two corps: I Corps under General Émile Bethouart, comprising the 1st Armored Division, 2nd Moroccan Infantry Division, 4th Moroccan Mountain Division, 9th Colonial Infantry Division, and 10th Infantry Division; and II Corps under General Joseph de Goislard de Monsabert, including the 1st Infantry Division, 2nd Armored Division, and 3rd Algerian Infantry Division. These units, drawn from French metropolitan, colonial, and Free French formations, were tasked with a to envelop and destroy the German salient, leveraging their experience from earlier campaigns in . To bolster the French effort amid resource strains from the concurrent , the U.S. Sixth Army Group attached several American divisions, including the 3rd Infantry Division, 28th Infantry Division, 75th Infantry Division, 10th Armored Division, and 12th Armored Division. The 28th and 75th Infantry Divisions provided infantry support in the northern sector, while the 10th and 12th Armored Divisions served as mobile reserves, equipped with tanks for breakthroughs against German defenses. units from both nations, including 155mm howitzers, offered critical to counter the pocket's fortified positions and River crossings. Reinforcements arrived progressively to build up Allied strength: the U.S. , under Frank W. Milburn, entered the theater on , 1945, assuming control of the American divisions and integrating them with French II Corps elements, such as the 5th Armored Division temporarily attached for the offensive. This coordination allowed for a unified command structure, with de Lattre directing the overall envelopment while Milburn handled U.S. tactical operations. By late January 1945, the combined Allied forces totaled an estimated 120,000 to 150,000 troops, providing the numerical superiority needed to overcome the terrain challenges of the plain and the Ill River floodwaters. This buildup emphasized armored mobility and preparation, with and units sharing to sustain the multi-week .

German Forces

The German Nineteenth Army, commanded by General Siegfried Rasp, bore the primary responsibility for defending the Colmar Pocket during its formation in late November 1944. The army's structure within the pocket included the LXIV Corps under General Helmut Thumm in the northern sector and the LXIII Corps under Erich Abraham in the southern sector, with additional oversight from higher commands like Oberrhein. Key divisions assigned to these corps encompassed the 708th Division, 16th Division, 198th Division, 189th Division, 338th Division, 159th Division, 716th Division, 269th Division, 2nd Mountain Division, and ad-hoc units formed from remnants and replacements to bolster depleted formations. German high command viewed the Colmar Pocket as a strategic "fortress" designed to pin down Allied forces and safeguard the against further incursions, with explicitly refusing withdrawal orders to maintain this defensive bulwark. This posture emphasized fortified strongpoints in towns and villages, leveraging the flat, flooded terrain and harsh winter conditions to maximize defensive depth despite the army's overall exhaustion from prior retreats. Internal assessments by highlighted the pocket's role in tying down significant enemy resources, though frontline commanders reported severe issues and equipment shortages that undermined long-term sustainability. By January 1945, the Nineteenth Army's total strength in the pocket had stabilized at approximately 40,000 to 50,000 personnel, including combat effectives, support troops, and rear-area units, though many divisions operated at 30-50% of authorized levels due to attrition. Reinforcements remained limited amid the broader offensive priorities; notable arrivals included the 106th Panzer Brigade, which provided modest armored support but could not offset ongoing losses estimated at over 22,000 permanent casualties by early February. Logistical sustainment posed acute challenges, as the army relied on precarious supply lines crossing the via ferries at sites like and bridges under constant threat from interdiction, which disrupted , , and reinforcement flows. These crossings, often conducted at night to evade detection, supported only about 65 tanks and limited antitank assets across the pocket, exacerbating vulnerabilities in a defensive setup already strained by incomplete fortifications and winter flooding.

The Battle

Initial Southern Attack

The initial southern attack on the Colmar Pocket was launched by the French First Army's I Corps between 15 and 20 January 1945, with the main effort commencing on 20 January amid a driving snowstorm. The operation involved the 9th Colonial Infantry Division as the pivot, supported by the 5th Armored Division providing limited armor elements, alongside the 4th Moroccan Mountain Division and 2nd Moroccan Infantry Division for the primary assaults. Advancing from positions near , the French forces aimed to drive northeast toward Ensisheim, , and ultimately the River to pinch off the German salient from the south. Tactically, the assault relied heavily on advances through deep snow and flooded terrain, which restricted deployment and forced reliance on support from the 1st and 5th Armored Divisions, as well as a U.S. . Initial progress yielded gains of 5 to 10 kilometers, including the capture of key positions such as bridges over the Thur River near Ensisheim, though dense forests and water barriers like the Thur River complicated maneuvers. These early successes cleared territory between Cernay, Ensisheim, and , but momentum slowed as German defenses, characterized by elastic positions and prepared counterattacks, inflicted mounting attrition. German resistance, bolstered by elements of the Nineteenth Army including the 159th and 716th Infantry Divisions and the 106th Panzer Brigade, featured aggressive panzer-led counterthrusts that exploited the harsh weather and terrain to target exposed . On 21 January, small armor-supported attacks by the 654th Tank Destroyer Battalion (German schwere Panzerjäger-Abteilung 654) and XXXIX elements halted further advances, resulting in high casualties—estimated in the thousands for the First Army's overall pocket operations, with significant losses in this phase alone from exhausted troops and depleted artillery ammunition. By month's end, the had advanced 5-6 miles but remained short of fully linking with northern forces, underscoring the pocket's resilient defenses.

Northern Offensive

The Northern Offensive began on January 22, 1945, as part of the broader effort to eliminate the Colmar Pocket, with W. Milburn's U.S. XXI launching attacks from the Mountains eastward toward the River. The included the U.S. 3rd, 28th, and 75th Infantry Divisions, supported by the French 2nd Armored Division under General Philippe Leclerc, which played a key role in exploiting breakthroughs and pursuing retreating Germans. This northern envelopment aimed to cut off German escape routes by advancing along the Ill River valley, coordinating with French forces to the south. A pivotal engagement was the Battle for Jebsheim from January 23 to 28, where the U.S. 254th of the 63rd , operating under the 3rd , assaulted the heavily fortified town—a critical defended by elements of the German 136th . Intense house-to-house fighting ensued amid minefields, bunkers, and counterattacks, with American infantry employing support and artillery barrages to clear positions, resulting in approximately 870 U.S. casualties and over 1,100 prisoners captured. The battle exemplified the grueling characteristic of the offensive, as troops navigated frozen terrain and urban rubble to secure the objective by January 28. Following Jebsheim, the U.S. 3rd Infantry Division crossed the Colmar Canal on January 29 using rubber boats and improvised bridges, facing sporadic resistance but establishing bridgeheads that enabled a rapid southeastward push. Leclerc's French 2nd Armored Division supported the advance, mopping up bypassed pockets and advancing toward , a Rhine fortress town, which fell by early February. When weather cleared briefly, from P-47 Thunderbolts targeted German positions, supplementing artillery that fired over 16,000 rounds in key sectors. These operations yielded gains of 15 to 20 kilometers, isolating the northern sector of the pocket and severing German supply lines to the .

Central Reinforcements and Advances

As Allied forces pressed their offensives from the north and south, reinforcements bolstered the central sector of the Colmar Pocket around February 1, 1945, enabling a decisive push toward the River. The U.S. 12th Armored Division, committed by General of the French First Army, passed through positions held by the U.S. 28th Infantry Division to launch a southward drive, while the 28th Infantry continued clearing operations around Colmar's northern suburbs. These joint Franco-American efforts under de Lattre's overall command coordinated the U.S. XXI Corps with French I and II Corps, achieving advances of 10-15 kilometers in the central zone despite harsh winter conditions. By February 2, French Combat Command 4 (CC4) from the 5th Armored Division, supported by elements of the U.S. and the French 1st Parachute , entered in a night assault led by General Schlesser, initiating intense that lasted until February 9. German defenders, entrenched in positions, mounted fierce resistance, but Allied forces methodically cleared key buildings and streets, liberating the city and splitting the pocket into smaller enclaves isolated from resupply. This combat, marked by house-to-house engagements, effectively severed lines of communication in the area. Simultaneously, central advances targeted the corridor between and the river, with the U.S. 3rd Infantry Division pushing eastward to secure by , capturing its vital bridge intact to prevent reinforcements from crossing. On February 5, task forces from the U.S. 12th Armored Division linked up with French I Corps at Rouffach, further fragmenting the pocket and trapping units in isolated pockets south and east of . French forces then cleared the remaining territory to the at Chalampe by February 9, destroying a key bridge there as Germans attempted retreat. These operations, building on earlier northern gains, progressively dismantled the central defenses and facilitated the pocket's overall reduction.

Pocket Collapse

As Allied forces intensified their assaults in early February 1945, the German 19th Army, under General , faced mounting pressure that forced a hasty withdrawal across the River. On February 8, following Adolf Hitler's belated authorization to abandon the , initiated the evacuation, prioritizing the ferrying of remaining equipment and personnel using makeshift sites capable of handling 10-ton, 16-ton, and 70-ton loads. Rearguard units suffered severe during this retreat, with only about 400–500 combat-effective soldiers per managing to cross, as pursuing Allied troops destroyed isolated pockets near the riverbanks. Key events unfolded rapidly between February 9 and 19, marking the pocket's complete collapse. German forces made desperate last stands in villages such as Wintzenheim, where fierce delayed French advances but ultimately crumbled under coordinated assaults. By , only four villages remained under control on the west bank, with the bridge at Chalampe detonated to hinder pursuit as troops closed in. Allied mopping-up operations, led by the I and II Corps alongside U.S. XXI Corps elements, systematically eliminated these holdouts, destroying the final Rhine-adjacent pockets and preventing any organized rearguard consolidation. The evacuation concluded with the full link-up of French and U.S. forces, securing the entire west bank of the in by 9 February. Approximately 10,000 German troops escaped via ferries to the eastern bank, but the 19th Army's was irrevocably eliminated, ending its threat to Allied lines in the region. This closure followed the prior liberation of , fragmenting the pocket beyond repair. The operation resulted in over 8,000 Allied casualties (killed, wounded, or missing) and approximately 18,000 German prisoners, with around 10,000 Germans escaping across the .

Aftermath and Legacy

Immediate Consequences

The elimination of the Colmar Pocket resulted in heavy casualties on both sides. The Allied forces, comprising primarily the U.S. Seventh Army and French First Army under the 6th Army Group, suffered approximately 24,000 casualties in total, including over 8,000 for American units and more than 16,000 for French forces. German losses were even more severe, with the Nineteenth Army recording over 22,000 permanent casualties (killed or missing), thousands more wounded, and 16,438 prisoners captured during the operation. The battle's conclusion on 9 February 1945 marked the complete elimination of the last significant German foothold west of the River in , securing full Allied control over Alsace-Lorraine from the Mountains to the . This territorial gain allowed the 6th Army Group to consolidate its positions and advance toward the and the defenses in . Logistically, the victory freed up substantial Allied resources previously tied down in containing the pocket, enabling the redeployment of divisions to support broader offensives on other fronts, including preparations for crossing the . However, the intense fighting led to high equipment losses, particularly for the , who faced shortages in , , and spare parts, while both sides struggled with the destruction of bridges and vehicles during the harsh winter conditions. The local population in and surrounding villages endured significant destruction from artillery barrages, tank engagements, and house-to-house combat, with key areas like Riedwihr, Jebsheim, and suffering extensive damage to buildings and . Civilians faced displacement amid the freezing winter fighting, fleeing combat zones and enduring hardship, though exact numbers of those affected remain unquantified in records.

Historical Significance

The Battle of the Colmar Pocket held significant strategic importance in the final stages of in , as its elimination removed the last major German foothold west of the River, thereby securing the Allied southern flank in and enabling smoother preparations for the critical crossings in March 1945. The operation occurred concurrently with the , which had diverted substantial Allied resources northward and delayed the full-scale assault on the pocket until , contributing to its relative obscurity in historical narratives. By collapsing the pocket through a coordinated double envelopment, Allied forces, including substantial units, liberated the region from German occupation, marking a key step in France's territorial reclamation. Often referred to as the "Forgotten Campaign," the Colmar Pocket battle has been overshadowed by the more prominent Ardennes Offensive, despite its essential role in preventing German counterattacks that could have disrupted Allied advances into . This relative obscurity stems from the intense media and historical focus on the Bulge, yet the engagement underscored the vital contributions of French forces under General , whose First Army played a central role in the victory and symbolized national resurgence. Recent scholarly analyses, such as Clinton W. Thompson's 2014 thesis "Hell in the Snow: The U.S. Army in the Pocket," have reevaluated American involvement, emphasizing the battle's diplomatic and strategic undercurrents while drawing on oral histories and after-action reports to highlight its overlooked human and tactical dimensions. In 2025, the 80th anniversary commemorations in and , organized with participation from the U.S. Army's 3rd Infantry Division, French reenactors, and French President , honored the Franco-American partnership through parades, wreath-laying ceremonies, and community events that celebrated the shared sacrifices in liberating . The legacy of the Colmar Pocket endures in French national memory through monuments like the Colmar Pocket Memorial Fountain, which lists units from American, French, and North African forces involved in the liberation, and the Musée Mémorial des Combats de la Poche de Colmar in , dedicated to preserving artifacts and veteran stories as symbols of restored freedom. These sites also convey lessons on winter warfare in , illustrating the challenges of combat in frozen, flooded terrain that tested Allied resilience and logistics during the harsh 1944-1945 season.

References

  1. [1]
    None
    ### Summary of the Colmar Pocket within the Rhineland Campaign (WWII)
  2. [2]
    [PDF] United States-French Coalition Operations in the European Theater ...
    Nov 23, 2024 · This monograph examines the relationship between the U.S. Sixth Army Group and its subordinate French First Army during World War II to draw out ...
  3. [3]
    80th Anniversary of the Liberation of Colmar | Article - Army.mil
    Feb 12, 2025 · The battle was a decisive engagement that saw the 3rd Infantry Division play a critical role in their victory against German forces in the ...
  4. [4]
    Chapter XXIV Lost Opportunities - HyperWar: Riviera to the Rhine
    ... Nineteenth Army in the Colmar Pocket. At the time neither he nor his staff ... Army would have created. Finally, it allowed the Nineteenth Army to ...Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
  5. [5]
    Chapter XXIX The Colmar Pocket - HyperWar: Riviera to the Rhine
    Operation SONNENWENDE had left the 198th in the Erstein salient and the 708th Volksgrenadiers holding a north-south line along the Ill River from Selestat south ...
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    [PDF] THE U.S. ARMY IN THE COLMAR POCKET, JANUARY 22
    As long as the German bridgehead across the Rhine River in the Colmar area ... official history of the 30th Infantry Regiment: Colonel McGarr was ...
  8. [8]
    Destruction Of The Colmar Pocket - Warfare History Network
    The pocket, which consisted of 850 square miles on the west side of the Rhine River, was the last piece of German-held territory on French soil.Missing: formation November 1944 Unternehmen
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Air Power - Air Force Historical Research Agency
    Feb 8, 2025 · Air Power And the reduction of the colmAr Pocket. U.S. European Command, Battle Studies, World War II, 519.042. U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey.
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    History of Colmar pocket battle
    At the end of 1944 the liberation of France progressed quickly. German troops are still resisting especially in central Alsace.Missing: Unternehmen Sonnewende
  12. [12]
    The Colmar Pocket – “The Forgotten Campaign”
    The Battle of the Colmar Pocket began December 15, 1944, and by February 19, 1945, all German units have been pushed to the west of the Rhine in the southern ...Missing: Unternehmen Sonnewende
  13. [13]
    colmar pocket museum: A Deep Dive into Alsace's Unsung WWII ...
    Oct 8, 2025 · Why did the German forces hold out for so long in the Colmar Pocket? ... This created a large, isolated bulge or “pocket” of enemy ...
  14. [14]
    hell in the snow: the u.s. army in the colmar pocket, january 22
    This thesis is about the overlooked story in the Allied struggle against Germany which provides an important window into wartime strategy and diplomacy.
  15. [15]
    Colmar Pocket Memorial Fountain - Monument Details
    The plaque features the names and insignia of 17 American, French, and North African military units. All text is in French. Monument Text: 1° DFL, 2° DIM, 3° ...
  16. [16]
    Musée Mémorial des Combats de la Poche de Colmar
    The Musée-Mémorial bring together an exceptionnal collection of artifacts. Those objects tell us with an outstanding precision the story of the Colmar pocket ...