Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Common Interface

The Common Interface (CI), formally known as DVB-CI, is a standardized hardware slot and protocol specification for receivers that enables the insertion of removable modules (CAMs) to decrypt pay-TV channels and support additional functions in (DVB) systems. Developed by the Project, a of broadcasters, manufacturers, and regulators, the core specification EN 50221 was first published in February 1997 to promote between host devices—such as televisions and set-top boxes—and external modules. This interface uses a PC Card-based , allowing modules to be hot-swapped without powering down the device, and it supports a minimum of 15 simultaneous modules per host for flexibility in multi-service environments. At its foundation, DVB-CI comprises two primary logical interfaces: the MPEG-2 Transport Stream Interface, which handles encrypted video and audio data flow between the host and module, and the Command Interface, which manages control signals, , and application-layer communications using a layered (physical, , , session, and application). Key resources include support for descrambling via the DVB Common Scrambling Algorithm, man-machine interfaces (MMI) for user interactions like menus and text displays, date-time synchronization, EBU handling, and low-speed communication ports. The design employs extensible Tag-Length-Value (TLV) coding to accommodate future enhancements and proprietary broadcaster applications while ensuring backward compatibility. Over time, the specification has evolved to address security vulnerabilities and new delivery methods; extensions defined in TS 101 699 (1999) added command protocols for advanced features. In 2008, CI Plus (CI+), an enhanced version developed by the CI Plus LLP, introduced content protection mechanisms like operator profiling and PVR restrictions to combat signal piracy, building directly on EN 50221 and TS 101 699. Subsequent iterations, such as CI+ 1.4 (2014) and CI+ 2.0 (2015), incorporated USB-based interfaces for higher bandwidth and support for hybrid broadcast-broadband services, while maintaining the original PCMCIA slot compatibility. By 2025, it remains a cornerstone of digital TV infrastructure, with ongoing updates including CI+ v1.4.4 and v2.0.2 (as of 2024) enhancing features like Operator Profile V3 and overt watermarking, alongside certification of over one billion devices. Widely adopted across Europe and beyond for DVB-C (cable), DVB-S (satellite), and DVB-T (terrestrial) standards, the Common Interface has enabled modular pay-TV ecosystems, reducing the need for proprietary hardware and fostering competition among conditional access providers.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

The Common Interface (CI), also known as DVB-CI, is a standardized hardware and software specification that defines an interface for integrating conditional access modules (CAMs) into Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB)-compliant devices, such as televisions and set-top boxes, to enable decryption of pay-TV signals. This interface allows the host device to communicate with a removable CAM, which processes encrypted MPEG transport streams to descramble content using embedded smart card protocols for key management and authorization. The primary purpose of the Common Interface is to separate the decryption hardware from the core receiver device, permitting consumers to support services from multiple pay-TV providers by simply swapping CAMs without replacing the entire unit. It ensures compliance with European standards for terrestrial, , and broadcasting by providing a unified mechanism for secure content delivery and measures, thereby promoting among broadcasters, module manufacturers, and device makers. At its core, the system comprises a PCMCIA Type II slot on the host device for inserting the , where the host manages the incoming and routes filtered packets to the module for processing. The , in turn, performs descrambling operations, executes applications, and interfaces with a via ISO 7816-compliant protocols to verify subscriptions and retrieve decryption keys. This specification was initially defined in the European Norm EN 50221 by CENELEC Technical Committee 206 in February 1997, establishing the foundational protocol for DVB conditional access systems. Subsequent enhancements, such as CI+, have built upon this to address evolving security needs in content protection.

Benefits and Limitations

The Common Interface (CI) offers users considerable flexibility in managing pay-TV subscriptions, as it allows the simple swapping of conditional access modules (CAMs) to access services from different providers without needing to replace the entire television or set-top box. This modular approach is particularly beneficial in regions with diverse broadcasting ecosystems, enabling seamless transitions between operators. For manufacturers, CI standardizes the interface slots across devices, leading to cost savings through reduced development and production expenses for provider-specific hardware. Furthermore, the use of removable modules enhances security by permitting quick replacement of compromised units, thereby isolating vulnerabilities to the module rather than the host device. In Europe, CI supports multi-system operators by accommodating a variety of CAMs tailored to regional services, promoting broader compatibility within the DVB framework. Despite these advantages, the CI's physical slot design introduces vulnerabilities to tampering, as the exposed interface can be exploited for unauthorized module insertion or signal interception if physical safeguards are inadequate. The technology is inherently limited to DVB standards, restricting its applicability to non-DVB systems such as ATSC in North America or ISDB in parts of Asia and Latin America, which necessitates alternative solutions in those markets. Decryption processes via CI also incur higher latency compared to fully integrated solutions, owing to the data transfer overhead across the command and transport stream interfaces, potentially affecting real-time viewing in high-bandwidth scenarios. Additionally, compatibility challenges emerge with non-standard CAMs, where deviations from the EN 50221 specification can result in interoperability failures, such as incomplete signal processing or recognition errors. For consumers, CI facilitates access to encrypted channels from major European providers like Canal+ by inserting the appropriate CAM, avoiding the expense and inconvenience of a full set-top box replacement. However, this benefit comes with the drawback of requiring manual user intervention for module changes, which may disrupt viewing sessions and demand technical familiarity to ensure proper installation and activation.

History

Origins of DVB-CI

The Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) Project, established in 1993 as a consortium of European broadcasters, manufacturers, and regulators, initiated development of the Common Interface (DVB-CI) in the mid-1990s to mitigate fragmentation in conditional access systems for emerging digital satellite, cable, and terrestrial television services across Europe. This effort addressed the proliferation of proprietary conditional access technologies, such as VideoGuard used by Canal+, which risked locking consumers into incompatible receivers and hindering widespread adoption of digital broadcasting. By promoting an open, standardized interface, DVB-CI enabled interoperability between diverse pay-TV decryption modules and host decoders, fostering a unified market without mandating a single conditional access protocol. Key milestones included the initial specification outlined within DVB's conditional access framework in 1996, which emphasized non-proprietary mechanisms for integrating multiple systems into receivers. This was formalized as the European standard CENELEC EN 50221 in February 1997, defining the interface for removable modules compliant with PCMCIA Type II standards to ensure portability and ease of integration. The development was driven by the need for open standards amid competing proprietary solutions, with DVB adopting a common scrambling algorithm (DVB-CSA) as a complementary element to support seamless decryption. Early adoption saw DVB-CI integrated into the first generation of DVB-S receivers by late 1998, coinciding with the rollout of services in , such as those by Canal+ in starting in 1995. The interface's design drew from PCMCIA standards to facilitate plug-and-play functionality, allowing consumers to upgrade without replacing entire set-top boxes. Initial challenges centered on ensuring among manufacturers, including early participants like and , whose diverse implementations risked compatibility issues in multi-vendor environments. These hurdles were addressed through DVB's consensus-driven testing and the optional nature of the interface, which balanced flexibility with the goal of reducing market fragmentation.

Development of CI+

The development of CI+ was motivated by the need to address security vulnerabilities in the original DVB-CI standard, which provided only one-sided encryption and lacked robust protection for emerging technologies like high-definition (HD) programming, digital video recorders (DVRs), and internet-connected set-top boxes. In 2007, a consortium of manufacturers including Neotion, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, SmarDTV, and Sony formed the CI Plus forum to create an enhanced standard that maintained backward compatibility with DVB-CI while introducing end-to-end content protection. This effort evolved into the CI Plus LLP in 2008, which formalized the specification and managed its initial releases, involving over 110 manufacturers and more than 100 pay-TV operators such as Canal+ and Sky in collaborative development to ensure widespread adoption and operator-specific customizations. The 1.0 specification, released in January 2008, introduced encrypted output controls and content security extensions to protect HD broadcasts, marking a significant advancement over by enabling secure decryption without compromising . Version 1.1, published in 2009, built on this foundation by enhancing support for personal video recording (PVR) functionalities, allowing operators to implement secure recording and playback features. 1.2 followed in 2009, extending protections for HD content to meet growing demands in pay-TV services. 1.3, initially released in 2011 (with updates like v1.3.2 in 2015), incorporated a secure return channel for bidirectional communication, facilitating advanced services like video-on-demand and operator authentication. Subsequent major updates included CI+ 1.4 ( TS 103 205, published in 2014), which improved multi-stream handling and hybrid broadcast-broadband support, and CI+ 2.0 ( A173-2, 2015), introducing USB-based interfaces for higher bandwidth while maintaining PCMCIA compatibility. Protections for ultra-high-definition (/UHD) content, requiring HDCP 2.2, were extended in CI+ 1.4 and further enhanced in CI+ 2.0. As of November 2025, CI+ continues to evolve, with Enhanced Content Protection (ECP) introduced in 2018 for improved HD and UHD security, and USB CI+ 2.0 modules entering commercial use in the early 2020s to support interactive services across and beyond. These advancements enabled pay-TV operators to implement branded user interfaces and robust anti-piracy measures, such as forensic watermarking integrated with CI+ modules to trace unauthorized content distribution. By standardizing secure host-CAM interactions, CI+ reduced risks associated with legacy vulnerabilities while supporting the transition to interactive, high-quality broadcast services across and beyond.

Technical Standards

DVB-CI Specification

The DVB Common Interface (DVB-CI) specification, formally known as CENELEC EN 50221, was published in February 1997 and approved on February 15, 1997, with subsequent revisions to address implementation details while maintaining the core framework. This standard defines the for communication between a host , such as a digital video () decoder, and a removable (CAM), enabling secure handling of and other applications. At its core, the specification outlines key functional elements to facilitate module-host interaction. The Resource Manager handles the detection, enumeration, and management of inserted modules, supporting up to 16 modules per host and establishing sessions for , such as user interfaces or communication channels. The Transport Stream Interface (TSI) manages the input and output of transport streams between the host and , allowing selective descrambling of services while filtering irrelevant data to optimize bandwidth. Complementing this, the Command Interface provides an application programming interface () for control operations, including requests for descrambling keys via commands like the Conditional Access Programme Map Table (CA ) exchange. The is fundamentally based on the ISO/IEC 7816 series for communications, incorporating transport protocol data units (TPDUs) for fragmentation, multiplexing, and reliable data exchange over an compliant with the standard. This setup supports data rates of at least 58 Mb/s (7.25 MB/s) averaged over sync bytes through an 8-bit parallel interface for the TSI (with a minimum byte transfer clock period of 111 ns), with the Command Interface requiring a minimum of 3.5 Mb/s to ensure efficient operation. Compliance with EN 50221 is mandatory for DVB-compliant hosts, mandating support for mechanisms, such as cyclic redundancy checks (), along with robust session management to handle connection establishment, maintenance, and teardown. Hosts must also implement a minimum 256-byte for command processing and ensure interoperability through standardized slot configurations.

CI+ Specification

The CI+ specification is managed by CI+ LLP and extends the original DVB Common Interface (DVB-CI) defined in EN 50221 by incorporating content security enhancements in versions from 1.0 to 2.0.2 (as of 2025), including foundational additions from TS 103 197 for head-end SimulCrypt implementations in versions 1.0 through 1.3, with later iterations like CI+ 1.4 (2012) for multi-stream handling, CI+ 2.0 (2015) for USB-based interfaces and hybrid broadcast-broadband support, and CI+ v2.0.2 mandating Operator Profile V3 with optional overt watermarking. The CI+ Enhanced Content Protection (ECP) v1.2, based on CI+ 1.4, further enhances and UHD security. These extensions focus on securing high-value content delivery while maintaining with legacy systems. Key enhancements include the Operator Profile Server (), which delivers operator-specific profiles via the CICAM to restrict access to authorized channels using a private Network Information Table (). The Content Authority () system provides robust protection for HD and content through post-decryption encryption using AES-128 or DES-56, along with integration of smart card-based descrambling and support for HDCP revocation lists. Secure messaging protocols prevent unauthorized copying by establishing an authenticated channel with Diffie-Hellman and content control rules. New protocols introduced in CI+ encompass a return channel supporting or connectivity for bidirectional communication, enabling features like URI acknowledgments and operator status updates. PVR restrictions limit recording of premium content through content licensing exchanges, with configurable retention periods (e.g., default 90 minutes) and enforced via PIN management. CI+ ensures , as CI+ Modules (CAMs) can operate in standard -CI slots, though with reduced functionality such as limited security features. Full CI+ support requires host certification, including PKI-based authentication with a single Root of Trust and verification of device certificates to enable advanced protections.

Operation

Mode of Operation

The Common Interface (CI) facilitates the processing of encrypted MPEG transport streams in host devices like set-top boxes or integrated digital TVs by integrating a removable (). When an encrypted transport stream is received, the host detects the insertion of a compatible and initiates a session via the Resource Manager, which allocates communication resources between the host and . The host subsequently forwards the transport stream, including embedded Entitlement Control Messages (ECMs) and Entitlement Management Messages (EMMs), to the for descrambling, enabling authorized access to the protected audiovisual content. The operational workflow unfolds in three primary phases: initialization, data transfer, and termination. Initialization begins with the exchange of module identification data between the host and using the Transport Stream Interface (TSI) for stream-related setup and the Command Interface for control signaling, ensuring proper resource binding through the Resource Manager. During data transfer, the TSI conveys the transport stream packets to the for real-time processing, while the Command Interface handles ongoing control commands, responses, and status updates to maintain the session. Termination is triggered by explicit close requests, detection of removal, or error conditions, prompting the Resource Manager to release resources and the interface. Security in the CI workflow relies on the 's internal of an inserted , which validates subscriber entitlements against the EMMs. Upon successful , the extracts ECMs from the transport stream to derive short-term control words (CWs), applying these via XOR operations to decrypt the scrambled packets before returning the clear stream to for decoding and presentation. This process ensures while preserving the integrity of the broadcast signal. Error handling provisions allow the system to maintain usability in adverse conditions. If the fails to or process the stream—due to invalid credentials, faults, or communication errors—the host can bypass the , reverting to unencrypted playback if available in the stream. To mitigate processing delays from descrambling, the host employs input buffering that enforces a constant , with a maximum variation of 1 µs to avoid audio-video desynchronization. The CI+ specification builds on this core mode with enhanced and protection mechanisms, but retains the fundamental .

Key Interfaces

The Common Interface (CI) in DVB systems relies on several key interfaces to facilitate communication between the host device (such as a television or set-top box) and the Conditional Access Module (CAM). These interfaces ensure efficient data transfer, command execution, and resource management for descrambling protected content. The Transport Stream Interface (TSI) serves as the primary pathway for delivering filtered MPEG-2 transport stream packets from the host to the CAM and returning descrambled packets. It operates bidirectionally over an 8-bit parallel bus, handling consecutive transport packets with control signals for strobe and valid data indicators, while maintaining a constant delay variation of no more than 1 µs per byte to support data rates of at least 58 Mb/s. To enhance efficiency, the TSI incorporates PID (Packet Identifier) filtering, allowing the host to select specific packets relevant to the service, such as those containing encrypted video or entitlement data, thereby reducing unnecessary bandwidth usage. Buffer management is negotiated during initialization, with minimum sizes of 256 bytes on the host side and 16 bytes on the module side, using single or dual buffers to prevent overflow and ensure smooth packet flow without gaps in the stream. The Command Interface provides an asynchronous for exchanging control commands between the host and , enabling operations like initiating descrambling. It uses an 8-bit bidirectional data bus to transmit Application Protocol Data Units (APDUs) structured with Tag-Length-Value (TLV) encoding based on rules, supporting chaining for larger data payloads exceeding buffer limits. For instance, the CA_enable command, sent via the CA Program Map Table (CA_PMT) object, instructs the to start processing and descrambling a specific by providing details on program elements and criteria. This interface aligns with ISO 7816 standards for APDU formatting and command-response sequences, particularly in interactions within the CAM, ensuring reliable temporal control and error handling through transport data units (TPDUs) fragmented into link data units (LPDUs). The Resource Manager oversees the discovery and allocation of resources, such as systems or tuner access, to optimize host-CAM interactions. It enumerates available resources through Profile Enquiry and Reply objects, assigning unique identifiers (e.g., 0x00010041 for the Resource Manager itself or 0x00600xx1 for low-speed communication instances), and supports multiple sessions per resource for concurrent operations. Bandwidth allocation is negotiated implicitly during initialization and session setup, where buffer sizes and data rates are agreed upon to match the transport stream requirements, preventing bottlenecks in resource-intensive tasks like multi-service descrambling. This manager, implemented solely on the host side, ensures that only compatible resources are activated, with changes propagated via Profile Changed notifications. In the CI+ extension, these interfaces are enhanced for advanced security and higher-resolution content. CI+ introduces a Secure Authenticated Channel (SAC) using Diffie-Hellman and AES-128-CBC to protect Operator Profile Server () communications, enabling secure exchange of operator-specific data like entitlements and network information tables (NITs) via dedicated APDUs such as operator_status and operator_nit. The TSI is upgraded to support higher bitrates, mandating 72 Mb/s and optionally up to 96 Mb/s on the PCMCIA bus—compared to 58 Mb/s in legacy —to accommodate and streams, with data_rate_info APDUs for dynamic bitrate management and synchronized key refreshes to maintain integrity during high-throughput descrambling. These improvements ensure CI+ compatibility with modern pay-TV services requiring robust protection and elevated data demands.

Implementations

Embedded Common Interface

The Embedded Common Interface (ECI), also known as eCI, represents a software-based of the Common Interface technology, integrating (CA) and (DRM) functionality directly into the system-on-chip () or chipset of consumer devices such as televisions (TVs) and set-top boxes (STBs). This approach eliminates the need for a physical PCMCIA slot and removable modules while preserving compatibility with the core protocols defined in the EN 50221 standard, allowing software emulation of CI operations through virtual machines and secure containers. Development of ECI began under the ETSI Industry Specification Group (ISG) on Embedded Common Interface, established to address the limitations of hardware-based CI in modern compact devices. The initial specifications were published in September 2014 (version 1.1.1), with updates in March 2018 (version 1.2.1) extending support for advanced and multi-client environments; these build on DVB-CI principles but shift to software architectures for greater flexibility and cost efficiency in manufacturing. Key advantages of ECI include accelerated device integration by avoiding physical dependencies, reduced power consumption due to optimized software execution, and simplified firmware updates that enable remote enhancements without module swaps. It also fully supports CI+ features, such as content and operator-specific , within an , thereby minimizing production costs and device footprint while maintaining for multiple CA/ providers. In practice, ECI is widely deployed in smart TVs to deliver native pay-TV access, enabling seamless decryption of broadcast signals without external hardware. It facilitates virtual conditional access modules (CAMs) that support over-the-top (OTT) streaming services, allowing users to switch between providers in multi-screen ecosystems like integrated digital TVs (iDTVs), personal video recorders (PVRs), and portable devices.

Compatible Devices and Operators

The Common Interface (CI) and its enhanced version, CI+, are supported in a wide array of televisions (TVs) and set-top boxes (STBs) produced by major manufacturers. Prominent brands such as , , Humax, and incorporate DVB-CI slots in their devices, enabling compatibility with modules (CAMs) for pay-TV decryption. For instance, 's UE series models introduced after 2015 feature CI+ 1.3 certification, allowing seamless integration with European broadcast standards for and services. Similarly, and TVs in their mid-to-high-end ranges, including and LED models, routinely include CI+ slots to meet regulatory requirements in DVB-compliant markets. Humax specializes in STBs that support CI+ for broadcast-broadband TV reception. These devices collectively represent over 110 manufacturers worldwide, with more than one billion CI+ certified units deployed as of 2024, a figure that continues to grow into 2025. Major European pay-TV operators extensively utilize CI and CI+ for secure content delivery via satellite and cable networks. Canal+ in relies on CI+ CAMs to protect its premium channels, enabling subscribers to access encrypted broadcasts on compatible TVs without proprietary STBs. Sky employs CI+ for its satellite services, supporting high-definition content decryption across Italy's infrastructure. In , NTV Plus integrates CI+ for nationwide satellite pay-TV distribution, serving millions of households with localized programming. Other notable providers include UPC in the , which uses CI+ for cable TV packages, and Digi TV in , facilitating affordable access to bundled channels. These operators are part of a broader of over 100 pay-TV services across 40 countries that leverage CI+ for content protection and . Adoption of CI and CI+ remains widespread in the , driven by regulatory mandates that require -compliant receivers to include the for open standards-based access to services. Most sold in support CI+, ensuring broad compatibility and contributing to its status as a for legacy systems. However, physical slot-based implementations are declining amid the rise of embedded CI solutions and IP-based platforms, which prioritize streaming over traditional broadcast hardware. Despite this shift, CI+ persists as essential for setups combining terrestrial/ reception with , maintaining relevance for rural and non-IP households. Regionally, and CI+ are predominantly concentrated in , where they underpin the majority of pay-TV and free-to-air deployments across countries like , , , and the . Adoption in is limited, overshadowed by competing standards such as ISDB-T in and DTMB in , though expansion is occurring in select markets like and through partnerships with local operators. This European dominance reflects the technology's origins in specifications tailored to the continent's broadcasting landscape, with global extensions remaining niche outside pay-TV contexts.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] En50221.V1.pdf - DVB
    The scope of this document is to describe this common interface. The decoder, referred to in this specification as the host, includes those functions that are ...
  2. [2]
    Common Interface Specification for Conditional Access and ... - DVB
    Common Interface Specification for Conditional Access and other Digital Video Broadcasting Decoder Applications. Published Standard EN 50221 V1 01.02.1997.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 101 699 V1.1.1 (1999-11)
    The present document presents a set of extensions to the command interface protocols of the common interface standardized in EN 50221 [5]. ... DVB CI is DVB SI.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] CI Plus™ specification (V1.3.2) (2015-03)
    The DVB Common Interface specifications EN 50221 [7] and TS 101 699 [8] ... The Common Interface connector is an industry standard PCMCIA slot. This ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Part 2: Extensions to the CI Plus Specification - DVB
    Jun 2, 2015 · The consortium came together in 1993 to provide global standardization, interoperability and future proof specifications. The present document ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 103 605 V1.1.1 (2018-10)
    Oct 1, 2018 · The DVB Common Interface (DVB-CI) specifications CENELEC EN 50221 [1] and ETSI TS 101 699 [2] describe a system whereby a removable Conditional ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Guidelines for Implementation and Use of the Common Interface for ...
    This means that DVB-compliant hosts can accept any other PCMCIA module without damage and determine that it is not a Common Interface module. Similarly a Common.
  8. [8]
    Second generation DVB-CI standard published
    Nov 2, 2018 · ETSI has published TS 103 605 V1.1.1, the second generation DVB Common Interface specification. DVB-CI enables a removable Conditional Access module (CAM).Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Introduction Issues of Interoperability of Set Top Boxes and proposal ...
    Nov 4, 2015 · However the disadvantage is that there is no USB-based CI+2.0 solutions and CAMs today. DVB CI implementation experience. From market data of ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] IDEAS REGARDING VULNERABILITIES IN ST DVB CHIPSETS
    The final idea is about a possible detection of rogue cards abusing vulnerabilities in ST chipsets for plaintext CW extraction and arbitrary content ...
  11. [11]
    https://dvb.org/news/second-generation-dvb-ci-standard-published/
  12. [12]
    Conditional Access Module: How It Unlocks Satellite TV Channels?
    Jul 22, 2025 · Using a conditional access module gives you flexibility. You don't need a bulky set-top box, just plug it into your TV's common interface slot.Missing: Canal+ | Show results with:Canal+
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Satellites, science and success The DVB story - EBU tech
    The DVB Project is probably the major success story in European broadcast technology of the last twenty years. It will provide our television future.Missing: origins CI history
  14. [14]
    A common conditional access interface for digital video ...
    It has been decided not to standardize the conditional access (CA) system, but only the mechanisms for interoperation of different CA systems on DVB decoders.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Conditional access and digital television - UK Parliament
    Apr 12, 1996 · In addition, DVB has defined a non-proprietary common interface specification to allow the use of other conditional access systems in receivers ...
  16. [16]
    DVB conditional access - IET Digital Library
    2 CENELEC EN 50221:1997: 'Common interface for conditional access and other DVB decoder applications'. 3 DAVIC: The Digital Audio Visual Council. For further.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] History of the DVB Project
    During 1991, broadcasters and consumer equipment manufacturers discussed how to form a concerted pan-European platform to develop digital terrestrial TV.
  18. [18]
    The history of the DVB Common Interface - StreamGuru
    EN 50221 is the core specification. It defines a PC-card based on PCMCIA version 5 including electrical details (like higher address pins being re-defined as ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] DVB-SCENE Issue 21 lo res.indd
    DVB-H mass market adoption and the emergence of multiple commercial profiles ... The very first booth, in. 1996, featured a DVB-S interoperability demonstration.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] CI Plus Case Study - DigiCert
    In 2007, Neotion, Panasonic, Phillips, Samsung, SmarDTV and Sony created the CI Plus forum to address the issue. The new standard they developed, Common ...
  21. [21]
    CM-CI-Plus (Common Interface) - DVB
    DVB's original Common Interface standard was published in 1997, and extensions to it were published in 1999. The CI Plus LLP consortium developed the CI+ ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 102 796 V1.1.1 (2010-06)
    Jul 13, 2010 · In terminals where CI or CI+ [13] is supported, the CICAM may also enforce parental access control for the broadcast channel. 10.2.6.2.
  23. [23]
    Smart STB Solutions | Direct To TV | NAGRAVISION
    They are fully integrated with both our content protection and NAGRA NexGuard Forensic Watermarking solutions and utilize the DVB CI and CI Plus standards.<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    https://www.iso.org/standard/39626.html
  25. [25]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 103 197 V1.5.1 (2008-10)
    The Common Information Model specification maps directly into an SNMPv2 SMI MIB and therefore also includes the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) ...Missing: CI+ | Show results with:CI+
  26. [26]
    [PDF] GS ECI 001-1 - V1.2.1 - ETSI
    Mar 1, 2018 · The present document has been produced and approved by the Embedded Common Interface (ECI) for exchangeable CA/DRM solutions ETSI Industry ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] ETSI GS ECI 001-2 V1.1.1 (2014-09)
    Sep 19, 2014 · Embedded Common Interface (ECI): architecture and system to be specified in the ETSI ISG "Embedded CI", which allows the development and ...
  28. [28]
    Deployments - CI Plus
    CI Plus technology is in use in devices of 110+ CE Manufacturers, protection content for 100 Pay-TV operators in 40+ countries. CI Plus LLP is referenced as ...Missing: Common Interface
  29. [29]
    CI Plus certification given to one billion devices - Broadband TV News
    Jan 25, 2024 · DigiCert and CI Plus LLP have announced that DigiCert CI Plus certificates have been issued to more than one billion devices.
  30. [30]
    DigiCert and CI Plus Eclipse One Billion Devices with Trusted ...
    Jan 24, 2024 · It gives pay-TV broadcasters in Europe a method to deliver protected services directly to TV sets without the need for an additional set top box ...
  31. [31]
    Digital Set Top Box Market 2025 - Semiconductor Insight
    The European Union's push for Common Interface Plus (CI+) standards ensures compatibility across borders, benefiting manufacturers like Sagemcom and Humax.