Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS), widely referred to as the scheme, was a temporary government intervention launched on 20 March 2020 by Chancellor to avert widespread layoffs amid the pandemic's disruptions to business operations. Under the scheme, eligible employers could claim grants covering up to 80% of furloughed employees' regular wages, capped at £2,500 per month initially, with employers required to pay any shortfall and maintain employee contracts without dismissing them. The program operated from April 2020 until its phased wind-down concluded in September 2021, during which it supported 11.7 million jobs across 1.3 million employers at a total cost exceeding £70 billion to the public purse. The CJRS evolved through several phases, starting with full funding for 80% of wages and tapering to require contributions of up to 20% by summer 2021, alongside caps on pension and contributions, to encourage a gradual return to normal operations. Flexible options introduced in July 2020 allowed partial working with proportional grants, broadening applicability to sectors like and hardest hit by lockdowns. Official evaluations credit the scheme with stabilizing the labor market by preventing an estimated 1.5 million additional redundancies in its early months, thereby averting a sharper spike comparable to those in prior recessions, though its design prioritized short-term job preservation over long-term economic restructuring. While praised for its rapid rollout and scale in shielding workers from immediate income loss—furloughed employees reported sustained mental wellbeing relative to the newly unemployed—the scheme faced scrutiny over its fiscal burden, estimated error and rates approaching 5-10% of outlays, and potential for subsidizing unviable "" firms, which may have delayed necessary adjustments and contributed to persistent post-pandemic labor inactivity. assessments affirmed positive value for money in job retention terms but highlighted risks of and uneven sectoral , with over 1 million jobs still supported in the scheme's final month. Critics, including analyses from think tanks, argued that extending such interventions risked and inefficient , though empirical data showed no disproportionate long-term scarring for participants compared to alternatives like .

Origins and Implementation

Announcement and Launch

On 20 March 2020, announced the launch of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) during a statement to , as an emergency response to the economic disruptions from the . The scheme enabled employers to place workers on temporary leave, or , when unable to operate due to government-mandated shutdowns or sharp declines in demand, with grants covering 80% of furloughed employees' regular wages up to a cap of £2,500 per month. Payments were backdated to 1 March 2020 and initially available for a minimum of three months, with the option for extension based on evolving circumstances. This rapid policy introduction preceded the United Kingdom's first national lockdown, declared by on 23 March 2020, which enforced widespread business closures, school shutdowns, and to curb virus transmission. Sunak framed the CJRS as essential for safeguarding livelihoods and preventing widespread redundancies, arguing that direct wage support for retained employees would better preserve labor market attachments and firm viability than relying solely on or business proceedings. The measure formed part of a broader package of fiscal interventions, including loans and tax relief, under the led by Johnson, aimed at stabilizing the economy amid enforced inactivity. The scheme's design prioritized simplicity and universality, applying to employers of any size across the , to facilitate quick uptake and minimize administrative barriers during . Official guidance followed shortly after, with further details on operations released on 27 March 2020, and the claims portal opening to employers on 20 April 2020, allowing reimbursements for eligible periods. By maintaining contracts intact, the CJRS sought to mitigate the risk of mass spikes and corporate failures that could prolong economic , drawing on the principle that subsidizing idle labor temporarily was preferable to permanent job destruction in a demand-shock scenario induced by restrictions.

Eligibility and Application Process

Employers eligible for the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) included any entity with a UK, Isle of Man, or Channel Island bank account and a UK PAYE scheme registered with HMRC, regardless of size, sector, or prior grant claims. To participate, employers were required to designate specific employees as furloughed, obtain their agreement (or that of their representatives for collective agreements), and confirm in writing that the employees would perform no work for the employer during the furlough period. The scheme applied broadly across employment contracts, encompassing full-time, part-time, agency, flexible, and zero-hour arrangements, though it was intended for businesses facing operational disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, excluding those in essential services where work continuity was mandated. Employee eligibility centered on payroll status at key cutoff dates, initially requiring individuals to have been on an employer's on or before 19 March 2020, as notified to HMRC via Information (RTI) submissions. This date was extended from an earlier proposed 28 February 2020 to accommodate hiring surges in early response, enabling claims for employees paid through PAYE even if they had not yet received salary. For scheme extensions, eligibility criteria were relaxed; for instance, from November 2020, employees needed only to be on payroll by 30 2020, broadening access without altering core requirements like the no-work rule. Directors and variable-hour workers qualified if meeting these thresholds, provided employers retained records to verify genuine furlough designation tied to impacts. The application process emphasized administrative simplicity to facilitate rapid deployment, with claims submitted online via HMRC's dedicated portal using Government Gateway credentials. Employers provided details including PAYE reference numbers, employee counts and wages, bank account information, and confirmation of furlough agreements, with HMRC cross-verifying against RTI data for eligibility. Initial claims opened on 20 April 2020 for periods retroactive to 1 March 2020, with grants typically processed and paid within six working days, prioritizing speed over exhaustive pre-checks. As the scheme extended, HMRC introduced enhanced compliance reviews and post-payment audits to curb misuse, though the core portal-based submission remained streamlined, requiring claims at least 14 days after the end of the claim period but no later than deadlines like four years from the accounting period end.

Scheme Operations

Furlough Mechanics

Under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS), furloughed employees retained their employment status and associated statutory rights, including eligibility for statutory sick pay (SSP) if they fell ill during the furlough period, provided the absence was not short-term or related to routine sickness. Employers were required to designate employees for furlough in writing, confirming the arrangement and maintaining records of this agreement for at least five years to demonstrate compliance. This structure preserved the employment relationship without requiring termination, distinguishing furlough from redundancy or unpaid leave, while prohibiting any productive work for the employer or associated entities during designated furlough periods. Furloughed workers were explicitly barred from undertaking any duties, tasks, or services for their , ensuring the supported job preservation amid enforced idleness rather than subsidized productivity. Limited exceptions permitted activities to maintain skills, , or employment with unrelated third parties if not contractually restricted, but these did not extend to benefiting the furloughing . The had to stem directly from COVID-19-related disruptions to the 's operations, such as lockdowns or reduced demand, rather than voluntary staffing decisions, employee holidays, or pre-existing non-coronavirus absences. From 1 July 2020, the scheme introduced "flexible ," allowing employers to bring staff back on a part-time basis while claiming support only for non-working hours, with no minimum furlough duration beyond the initial three-week blocks for early entrants. This required precise tracking of usual versus actual hours, enabling variable patterns tailored to business recovery while upholding the no-work rule for claimed periods. Employers faced administrative obligations including detailed record-keeping of furlough designations, hours (especially under flexible arrangements), and supporting calculations, retained for six years to facilitate HMRC audits. Initially, the government reimbursed employer contributions and minimum pension contributions on furlough pay, alleviating some compliance costs, though employers remained responsible for deducting and remitting employee-side taxes and contributions. These requirements ensured accountability, with non-compliance risking claim denials or penalties.

Payment Structure and Extensions

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme initially provided employers with grants covering 80% of an employee's reference wages for furloughed hours, capped at £2,500 per month, plus associated employer contributions (NICs) and minimum automatic enrolment pension contributions on the furloughed amount, for the period from 20 March to 30 June 2020. This structure ensured employees received at least 80% of their pre-furlough pay (up to the cap), with no grant payable for any hours worked, tying reimbursements strictly to non-productive time. Grants were calculated pro-rata for partial months or flexibly furloughed workers once flexibility was introduced, and lower earners benefited from the percentage-based formula without a minimum payment threshold beyond statutory entitlements. In late May 2020, the scheme was extended beyond June, with tapering adjustments to shift costs toward employers starting 1 July 2020. For July 2020, the government grant reduced to 70% of reference wages (capped at £2,000 per month), requiring employers to contribute the remaining 10% of wages plus NICs and pension contributions to maintain employee pay at 80%. This tapered further in August and September 2020 to a government grant of 60% (capped at £1,875 per month), with employers covering 20% of wages plus NICs and pensions. October 2020 reverted to full government coverage of 80% (up to £2,500), though employers remained responsible for NICs and pensions. Flexible furlough options, allowing partial work with grants only for unworked hours, were also implemented from July 2020. A further extension was announced on 10 November 2020, maintaining 80% government grants (capped at £2,500) through to 31 March 2021, with employers continuing to pay NICs and pensions from November onward. This was prolonged in March 2021 to 30 September 2021, introducing additional tapering from May: government grants at 70% (capped at £2,187.50) for May and June 2021, requiring employer top-ups of 10% of wages plus NICs and pensions; then 60% (capped at £1,875) for July to September 2021, with employer contributions of 20% of wages plus NICs and pensions. These adjustments aimed to balance ongoing support against fiscal sustainability as economic recovery progressed, with all grants remaining exclusive to furloughed (non-worked) hours. The following table summarizes the key payment phases:
PeriodGovernment Grant (% of wages / cap)Employer Contribution (beyond top-up to 80%)Notes
Mar–Jun 202080% / £2,500NoneIncludes gov coverage of NICs and pensions
Jul 202070% / £2,00010% wages + NICs + pensionsFlexible furlough introduced
Aug–Sep 202060% / £1,87520% wages + NICs + pensions-
Oct 202080% / £2,500NICs + pensions-
Nov 2020–Apr 202180% / £2,500NICs + pensionsExtension announced Nov 2020
May–Jun 202170% / £2,187.5010% wages + NICs + pensions-
Jul–Sep 202160% / £1,87520% wages + NICs + pensionsScheme closure 30 Sep 2021

Financial Framework

Government Funding and Total Costs

The government expended approximately £70 billion on the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS), covering grants for 11.7 million furloughed employee jobs from March 2020 to September 2021. This figure represents the total value of payments disbursed through (HMRC) to 1.3 million employers, with the scheme's scale reflecting the breadth of economic disruption from . Participation peaked at 8.9 million furloughed jobs on 8 May 2020, equivalent to about 30% of the eligible at the time. Funding for the CJRS derived from , as government revenues plummeted while expenditures surged amid the response. The scheme's costs contributed to a net borrowing that reached £174 billion in the 2020-21 —over three times the pre-COVID level—and propelled national debt to £2 trillion by August 2020, surpassing annual GDP. This borrowing financed wage subsidies up to 80% of employees' pre-crisis earnings (capped at £2,500 monthly initially), without immediate hikes or spending cuts elsewhere, thereby deferring fiscal adjustment. The £70 billion outlay dwarfed many routine public budgets; for context, it exceeded the UK's annual international development aid allocation pre-COVID (around £15 billion) and approached half the yearly National Health Service operational budget (approximately £140 billion in 2019-20). Aggregate CJRS payments equated to roughly £6,000 per furloughed job on average, though this varied by duration and wage levels, with longer-term support in lockdown-affected sectors amplifying per-job costs. The necessity for such intervention stemmed directly from statutory restrictions on business activity, which halted revenue generation and necessitated state substitution for private payroll to avert widespread insolvency and unemployment. Later estimates indicated £3.5 billion (about 5%) of expenditure may have involved fraud or error, underscoring administrative challenges in rapid disbursement.

Employer and Employee Obligations

Employers participating in the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) were required to designate employees as furloughed, ensuring they did not perform any work for the employer during the period, with the exception of minimal training activities up to one day per month initially. Employers had to agree the furlough arrangement in writing with affected employees and maintain accurate records of furlough periods for at least five years to facilitate HMRC audits. While the government covered 80% of furloughed employees' wages up to £2,500 per month from March 2020, employers could optionally top up the remaining 20% but were not obligated to do so; they were responsible for paying employer National Insurance contributions and pension contributions on the full wage initially, though these were later subsidized by the government from August 2020. To claim grants, employers certified that they had a genuine need due to COVID-19-related financial difficulties and committed to avoiding redundancies for furloughed staff where feasible, though no strict legal enforcement mechanism existed beyond repayment risks for false claims. Employees on retained their , including the right to statutory redundancy pay based on pre- , and employers could not make employees redundant solely for refusing to consent to , as acceptance was voluntary. payments were treated as regular wages, subject to , deductions, and pension contributions at the usual rates, with employers required to operate PAYE on the full amount received from HMRC . Employees had no entitlement to if they could work from home or perform duties, and the scheme design incentivized employers to prioritize over redundancies to access , potentially creating moral hazards such as retaining unproductive staff longer than economically rational. As the scheme tapered from July 2021, employers progressively assumed greater costs to align incentives with economic : they covered employer and contributions from July, 10% of wages from August, and 20% from September 2021, while the government funded the remaining 70% up to the £2,500 cap until the scheme's end on 30 September 2021. This structure aimed to wean employers off subsidies and encourage workforce reactivation, though it imposed cash flow burdens on businesses still facing effects, with flexibility allowing partial for reduced hours from July 2020 to mitigate abrupt transitions. Failure to meet these obligations, such as reclaiming grants for ineligible periods, could result in HMRC actions, underscoring the scheme's reliance on employer compliance for fiscal .

Closure and Recovery

Phase-Out Timeline

In the March 2021 Budget, Chancellor announced the extension of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme until 30 September 2021, with a gradual tapering of government support to encourage a transition to normal employment conditions amid easing restrictions across , , , and . From 1 July 2021, the government covered 70% of furloughed employees' wages up to a cap of £2,187.50, requiring employers to contribute 10% plus contributions and pension contributions, marking the initial step-down from full government funding. This tapering intensified in and 2021, when support reduced further to 60% of wages (up to £1,950 cap), with employers covering 20% alongside their ongoing and pension obligations, aligning the scheme's wind-down with the lifting of most legal restrictions on 19 July 2021 and subsequent regional reopenings. The policy aimed to balance ongoing economic recovery needs with fiscal sustainability, as vaccination rates exceeded 70% of the adult population by mid-2021, reducing the perceived necessity for blanket wage subsidies. To incentivize job retention post-scheme, the initially proposed a one-off Job Retention Bonus of £1,000 per eligible employee who remained on until 31 2022, but this was canceled in November 2020 following further CJRS extensions, with funds redirected to sustain the scheme amid renewed . The scheme closed fully on 30 September 2021, with approximately 1.16 million jobs still furloughed, representing a sharp decline from peak usage but underscoring persistent challenges in sectors like and . Regional differences were limited, as the national framework applied uniformly, though uptake varied with local lockdown easings, such as Scotland's full reopening by .

Repayments and Clawback Mechanisms

(HMRC) employed data matching techniques, integrating real-time information from Pay As You Earn (PAYE) submissions and other internal datasets, to conduct post-claim compliance reviews of Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) payments. These reviews targeted discrepancies such as claims for ineligible employees or periods where conditions were not met, with employers selected either through risk-based or random audits to assess the prevalence of errors. HMRC issued letters to numerous employers prompting self-review and correction of potentially inaccurate claims, emphasizing proactive identification of overpayments to facilitate voluntary repayment. Upon identification of overpayments, employers were required to notify HMRC within 90 days of discovering the error to mitigate penalties, with voluntary repayment encouraged via direct bank transfer or adjustment against future liabilities. If unreported or unpaid, HMRC could impose a charge equivalent to the overclaimed amount under 16 of the Finance Act 2020, treating it as an or corporation tax liability due immediately, inclusive of interest from the payment date. Direct repayment demands were issued where data evidenced ineligibility, such as employees continuing substantive work during , enforcing full without offset against underclaims unless part of a balanced compliance adjustment. Penalties for non-notification or inaccurate claims ranged from 0% for reasonable care to 100% of the overpayment for careless behavior, escalating to 70-105% for deliberate actions, with a deterrence-focused prioritizing over leniency. Employers could HMRC determinations through statutory review or processes, though success required substantiating eligibility with records and furlough agreements. By March 2023, these mechanisms supported HMRC's data-driven efforts, targeting billions in erroneous payments while treating underclaims equivalently to overclaims to promote overall compliance accuracy.

Fraud and Misconduct

Extent and Patterns of Fraud

HMRC's final evaluation of the (CJRS) estimated error and at £3.5 billion, representing 5.1% of total payments, with a range of £2.0 billion to £5.4 billion (3.0% to 7.8%). This figure aligned with initial projections of 5-10% irregularity, which equated to up to £3.5 billion when approximately £35 billion had been disbursed by September 2020. Pre-payment controls blocked over 22,000 suspicious claims worth more than £114.7 million, demonstrating partial mitigation, though the scheme's scale—£68.9 billion paid to 1.3 million employers—amplified vulnerabilities. Fraud patterns centered on opportunistic exploitation of lax initial , including claims for employees who continued working ( for two-thirds of estimated losses, or £2.3 billion), inflated payrolls with bogus or ineligible employees added post-eligibility cutoffs, and reactivation of dormant companies to submit fraudulent grants. groups targeted the scheme through digital attacks and shell entities, with early National Audit Office assessments suggesting £1-2 billion siphoned, though revised to £100 million amid improved controls. Such methods proliferated in the scheme's early months (March-June 2020), when strict rules and high application volumes—coupled with a rushed rollout prioritizing speed over robust upfront checks—facilitated irregularities estimated at up to 8.7% initially, declining as flexibilities and audits were introduced. While comprehensive sector breakdowns remain limited in official data, elevated claims in labor-intensive industries like and correlated with heightened risks, as evidenced by HMRC's focus on high-volume payers and reports of phoenixing tactics—dissolving and reforming entities to recycle grants. The scheme's design simplicity, enabling rapid payouts without real-time cross-verification, causally linked to these patterns, as the urgency of the March 2020 launch deferred safeguards until later phases. By 2021, HMRC had initiated reviews of thousands of high-risk cases based on over 8,000 whistleblower reports, underscoring systemic exposure rather than isolated incidents.

Detection, Investigations, and Consequences

HMRC established the Taxpayer Protection Taskforce in April 2021, allocating £100 million and 1,200 staff to investigate across support schemes, including the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS). The taskforce prioritizes recovery of misclaimed funds through analytics to flag high-risk claims, such as inconsistencies in or employee eligibility, and maintains dedicated channels for whistleblowers and public tips. These efforts identified thousands of potential irregularities, enabling targeted compliance checks on employers. Investigations involve cross-agency collaboration, particularly with forces, for cases warranting criminal probes; by October 2022, HMRC had 29 active criminal investigations related to suspected CJRS , building on earlier arrests such as the July 2020 detention of a businessman over a £495,000 fraudulent claim. Where evidence supports public interest, HMRC refers matters to the Crown Prosecution Service, focusing on deliberate misconduct like falsifying employee statuses or claiming for non-existent workers. Consequences for violations include civil penalties equivalent to 100% of overclaimed amounts, recoverable via tax charges, alongside criminal sanctions such as for convictions carrying up to 10 years. HMRC pursues disqualifications through the Service for misuse of scheme funds and seeks asset confiscation under proceeds-of-crime legislation to deter and recoup losses. Recovery efforts yielded partial success, with HMRC projecting £1.1 billion reclaimed from CJRS-related and error by 2023-24, though investigations extended into 2023 amid ongoing data reviews. These actions informed subsequent safeguards, such as pre-claim verification pilots using advanced analytics for future emergency schemes.

Impacts and Evaluations

Job Protection and Economic Outcomes

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) directly protected approximately 4 million at its peak usage, particularly during the most severe phases of the in 2020 and early 2021, by allowing employers to workers while receiving government wage subsidies covering up to 80% of salaries. This intervention mitigated the immediate fallout from enforced closures, with peak participation reaching 8.7 million in April 2020, equivalent to about 27% of the eligible workforce. Empirical analysis from the government's 2023 CJRS evaluation indicates that the scheme prevented widespread redundancies that would have otherwise occurred due to lockdown-induced demand collapse, thereby stabilizing workforce attachments and averting a sharper rise in . Unemployment in the UK peaked at 5.2% in late 2020, a moderate increase from pre-pandemic levels of around 3.8%, in contrast to deeper troughs observed in prior recessions like the 8.5% peak during the 2008-2009 financial crisis. Counterfactual modeling in official evaluations attributes this containment to the CJRS, which substituted for outright job losses by maintaining employer-employee links amid zero-activity mandates from lockdowns; without it, unemployment could have exceeded 10% based on cross-country comparisons of less-supported economies. The scheme's design—subsidizing furlough over severance—fostered quicker reabsorption into payrolls post-restrictions, with Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) analysis of government data confirming a substantial net boost to overall employment levels during the crisis period. In terms of economic outcomes, the CJRS contributed to a shallower GDP contraction, with the UK's 2020 depth of 9.8% moderated relative to projections absent job supports, as retained labor preserved productive capacity and via sustained incomes. By scheme closure in 2021, over 88% of recently furloughed workers had returned to or secured new roles within months, per surveys tracking transitions. Long-term data from the Office for National Statistics and IFS show minimal scarring effects, with furloughed cohorts exhibiting rates comparable to non-furloughed peers by 2022 and labor force participation recovering to pre-pandemic trends, underscoring the scheme's role in bridging temporary shocks without entrenching detachment. This contrasts with unemployment insurance alternatives, where evidence links furlough's firm-level retention to higher post-crisis re-employment probabilities over severance-based systems.

Criticisms and Unintended Consequences

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) has been criticized for distorting labor and capital markets by artificially sustaining unviable businesses, often termed " firms," which delayed necessary economic . Analysis indicated that government support, including payments, propped up firms in significant financial distress—estimated at 557,000 by late 2020—preventing the that would reallocating resources to more productive sectors. Economists argue this intervention hindered post-pandemic recovery by freezing labor mobility and preserving inefficient entities that might have failed absent the crisis, with employees in such firms facing prolonged uncertainty as operations could not fully resume. Fiscal critiques highlight the scheme's contribution to elevated public debt, with gross costs reaching nearly £70 billion by September 2021, exacerbating long-term pressures including higher taxes or risks from monetized deficits. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) emphasized that while net costs were mitigated somewhat by clawbacks and taxation—estimated lower than gross outlays—the overall burden strained public finances without fully offsetting deadweight losses from subsidized . Right-leaning analyses, such as those from market-oriented think tanks, contend that such expansive subsidies undermined incentives for , prioritizing short-term over fiscal realism and fostering a culture of state dependency that left-leaning narratives often overlook in favor of equity-focused praise. Unintended behavioral shifts included potential , where prolonged periods—averaging months for many workers—may have eroded or skills, contributing to a post-scheme rise in economic inactivity. inactivity rates increased by 1.7 percentage points from pre-pandemic levels, with the nation uniquely experiencing growth in inactivity from 2019 to 2024 amid analyses linking to "frozen" labor reallocation and reduced participation incentives. Critics, including economists wary of interventionist overreach, warn that lax eligibility and payment structures inadvertently enabled misuse, amplifying opportunities through minimal upfront verification, though this reflected broader design flaws prioritizing speed over safeguards.

Official Reviews and Legacy Analysis

The UK government's final evaluation of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS), published by and in July 2023, affirmed its value for money based on comparing outcomes to counterfactual scenarios without the scheme, estimating it averted substantial rises in and preserved approximately 1.4 million jobs that might otherwise have been lost by 2021. This assessment calculated a net social benefit of £50 billion and a benefit-to-cost of around 4:1, factoring in reduced fiscal outlays for and associated economic multipliers from sustained employment, though it incorporated adjustments for deadweight effects where up to 40% of furloughed workers might have retained jobs absent the scheme. The evaluation also recognized the scheme's of £70 billion, including fraud-related losses estimated at £3-8 billion from overclaimed grants, but maintained that these were outweighed by broader societal gains in labor market stability during enforced lockdowns. Independent analyses, such as those from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, corroborated the employment-preserving effects but highlighted limitations in the government's modeling, noting potential overestimation of causal impacts due to unobservable firm-specific factors and the scheme's role in delaying necessary restructurings in unviable sectors. Critics, including economists at the Office for Budget Responsibility, argued that while the CJRS mitigated short-term spikes—keeping rates below 5% through mid-2021 versus projected 10-12%—it contributed to inflated public debt exceeding 100% of GDP without rigorous ex-ante scrutiny of stringency as the primary driver of demand collapse, raising questions about whether targeted sectoral aid or looser restrictions could have achieved similar outcomes at lower cost. In legacy terms, the CJRS influenced the design of job retention programs globally, accelerating adoption in over 20 countries by mid-2020 and supporting up to 50 million positions through short-time work and wage subsidies—a tenfold increase from pre- levels—as governments emulated its wage-replacement model to buffer shocks. Debates on emphasize its utility in acute, exogenous crises but caution against normalization, with proponents crediting it for averting a 1980s-style recessionary labor contraction, while detractors warn of entrenched , including reduced firm adaptability and worker re-entry barriers evidenced by elevated long-term inactivity post-scheme. Empirical reviews underscore that future iterations would require stricter eligibility tied to verifiable demand destruction, rather than blanket subsidies, to align incentives with causal economic realities over reactive fiscal expansion.

References

  1. [1]
    The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme final evaluation - GOV.UK
    Jul 17, 2023 · The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme ( CJRS ) was a central part of the government's response to this historic shock to the UK economy, centred ...
  2. [2]
    Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme - GOV.UK
    Oct 13, 2022 · The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme ( CJRS ) was a temporary scheme designed to protect the UK economy by helping employers whose operations were affected by ...
  3. [3]
    Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: statistics
    Dec 23, 2021 · 11.7 million employee jobs were furloughed through the scheme, at a cost of £70 billion. At the end of the scheme, at 30 September 2021, 1.16 million jobs were ...
  4. [4]
    Changes to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme from July 2021
    Oct 29, 2021 · To be eligible for the grant you must continue to pay your furloughed employees 80% of their wages, up to a cap of £2,500 per month for the time ...
  5. [5]
    The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme interim evaluation - GOV.UK
    Oct 13, 2022 · The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme interim evaluation covers topics including scheme implementation, error and fraud, protecting jobs, preventing permanent ...
  6. [6]
    Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention ...
    In March 2020, the UK implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – known as furlough – to minimize the impact of job losses. We investigate ...
  7. [7]
    What happened to furloughed employees after the CJRS closed?
    In the final month of the coronavirus job retention scheme (September 2021), over 1 million people were still receiving payments from the scheme.<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme | Institute for Government
    Sep 9, 2021 · The furlough scheme risks providing poor value for money and should end as planned at the end of September – even if it is still supporting many jobs.Missing: controversies criticisms
  9. [9]
    Has job furlough reduced UK labour force participation after Covid-19?
    Jan 10, 2024 · Labour force participation in the UK has not recovered since the pandemic. Some blame the generosity of the job furlough scheme, but many countries with ...
  10. [10]
    The Chancellor Rishi Sunak provides an updated statement on ...
    Mar 20, 2020 · The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme will cover the cost of wages backdated to March 1st and will be open initially for at least three months - ...
  11. [11]
    2 Years of COVID-19 on GOV.UK – Government Digital Service
    Jul 25, 2022 · The first lockdown​​ On 23 March 2020, the Prime Minister announced the first national lockdown during an address to the nation. Behind the ...
  12. [12]
    Further details of Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme announced
    Mar 27, 2020 · In a move that could save businesses an extra £300 a month for each employee under the scheme,the government will now cover the employer ...
  13. [13]
    Check if your employer can use the Coronavirus Job Retention ...
    For claims relating to August and September 2021, the government will pay 60% of wages up to a maximum cap of £1,875 for the hours the employee is on furlough. ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (HR Guide) - DavidsonMorris
    To be eligible for the grant, employers will have to agree with their employees any new flexible furloughing arrangement and confirm that agreement in writing.
  15. [15]
    Check which employees you can put on furlough to use ... - GOV.UK
    You can claim for employees who were employed on 2 March 2021, as long as you have made a PAYE Real Time Information (RTI) submission to HMRC between 20 March ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme ('CJRS'): A Brief Guide
    An employer can claim for employees on any type of employment contract, including full-time, part- time, agency, flexible or zero-hour contracts. Foreign ...
  17. [17]
    Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme - details for employees
    The purpose of the scheme is to protect jobs for workers who cannot continue to work for their employer because of the COVID-19 situation. In order to ...
  18. [18]
    A Guide to the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) [Updated]
    The furlough claims portal opened on Monday 20 April and can be accessed by employers or outsourced payroll agents but not “file only” agents or payroll bureaus ...
  19. [19]
    LGA workforce: coronavirus job retention scheme
    Throughout the period from 1 November 2020, to be eligible for the scheme the employee must have been on the employer's payroll by 23.59 on 30 October 2020 or ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Claim for wages through the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
    Claim for some of your employee's wages if you have put them on furlough or flexible furlough because of coronavirus (COVID-19).
  21. [21]
    UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
    The government plan to introduce a new Job Retention Bonus to reward and incentivise employers who retain their furloughed employees.
  22. [22]
    Coronavirus job retention scheme: step by step guide for claiming
    Apr 20, 2025 · The scheme will be open to make claims on April 20th. Once an application is made you will receive payments within six working days.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Understanding Customer ...
    The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) was launched in April 2020 to support businesses affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. The scheme initially offered ...
  24. [24]
    FAQs: Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme - Commons Library
    Oct 1, 2021 · The CJRS initially applied from 1 March to 30 May 2020. It was then extended to 30 June. The CJRS was extended again from 1 July to 31 October ...
  25. [25]
    Calculate how much you can claim using the Coronavirus Job ...
    From 1 August 2021, the government will pay 60% of wages up to a maximum cap of £1,875 for the hours the employee is on furlough. Employers will top up ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] HM Revenue and Customs & HM Treasury - COVID employment ...
    In total the schemes cost £96.9 billion. The Departments distributed £68.9 billion of furlough payments through CJRS to 1.3 million employers covering 11.7 ...
  27. [27]
    Examining the end of the furlough scheme
    Nov 15, 2021 · 11.7 million jobs were furloughed, costing the Government £70 billion. The number of people on furlough peaked at 8.9 million on 8 May 2020.
  28. [28]
    How did COVID affect government revenues, spending, borrowing ...
    The COVID-19 crisis entailed a record-breaking fall in output and increase in government spending. The economy will bounce back but debt remain high.
  29. [29]
    New furlough scheme: how does it work and who will benefit?
    Oct 9, 2020 · The difference between public spending and income from taxes has soared to almost £174bn, more than three times the £55.8bn budget deficit last ...
  30. [30]
    UK government spending on virus measures pushes debt to £2 trillion
    Aug 21, 2020 · Spending on measures such as the furlough scheme means the debt figure now equals the value of everything the UK produces in a year. Total debt ...
  31. [31]
    Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: qualitative research ... - GOV.UK
    Jul 17, 2023 · The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme ( CJRS ) operated between April 2020 and September 2021. It offered financial support to employers who placed employees on ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme - Institute for Government
    Sep 30, 2021 · The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (the CJRS, the furlough scheme) has cost the Treasury £69 billion and counting. 1 At one time or another ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) final evaluation ...
    Apr 24, 2024 · The CJRS was a central part of the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It focused on helping stabilise the labour market by ...
  34. [34]
    Check if you can claim for your employees' wages through ... - GOV.UK
    Find out if you're eligible and how much you can claim to cover wages for employees on temporary leave ('furlough') due to coronavirus (COVID-19).
  35. [35]
    Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme statistics: 16 December 2021
    Dec 16, 2021 · Final figures show there were 971,900 employments on furlough when the scheme closed on 30 September 2021, 4% of the total eligible; London, the ...
  36. [36]
    The coronavirus job retention scheme – mistakes and corrections
    Susan Ball and Carolyn Brown discuss the coronavirus job retention scheme (CJRS) and some of the key issues associated with reviewing employer claims and ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  37. [37]
    receiving grants you were not entitled to (CC-FS48) - GOV.UK
    May 31, 2022 · Penalties for not telling HMRC about Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme grant overpayments - CC/FS48 ... CJRS grants you've claimed that you were ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Corporation Tax/Income Tax – Taxation of Coronavirus Support ...
    Apr 30, 2020 · • Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS). • the Small ... Income Tax charge raised in relation to any CJRS payment to which the company.
  39. [39]
    Covid-19 Business Support Meta-Evaluation: Final Report ... - GOV.UK
    Jun 26, 2025 · The Finance Act granted HMRC the authority to begin compliance activities for the CJRS and recover overpaid funds using a data-driven approach.
  40. [40]
    Coronavirus job retention scheme reviews | Tax Guidance | Tolley
    Aug 22, 2025 · HMRC has adopted a rigorous approach to compliance reviews of claims made under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS), reflecting the ...Missing: matching | Show results with:matching
  41. [41]
    Up to £3.5bn furlough claims fraudulent or paid in error - HMRC - BBC
    Sep 8, 2020 · Up to £3.5bn in Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme payments may have been claimed fraudulently or paid out in error, the government has said. HM ...Missing: matching | Show results with:matching
  42. [42]
    Delivery of employment support schemes in response to the COVID ...
    Oct 13, 2022 · Audits of accounts and reviews of how well government is delivering value for money ... (CJRS) and the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme ...
  43. [43]
    Government Action on Fraud in Covid Support Schemes - GOV.UK
    May 29, 2024 · The government understands that people are frustrated with reports that fraudsters took advantage of Covid support schemes during the pandemic.Missing: sectors | Show results with:sectors
  44. [44]
    The work of the Taxpayer Protection Taskforce | CIPP
    How HMRC has tackled, and is tackling, fraud across Covid-19 schemes ... We identify potentially fraudulent or mistaken claims primarily through data analysis.
  45. [45]
    Man arrested over alleged £495000 fraud of furlough scheme
    Jul 9, 2020 · HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said the 57-year-old from Solihull was detained on Wednesday in connection with allegations of a £495,000 fraud of ...
  46. [46]
    Coronavirus: Fraud - Written questions, answers and statements
    Jan 22, 2025 · Where appropriate, HMRC will conduct criminal investigations and seek criminal prosecutions if it is in the public interest, particularly where ...Missing: convictions | Show results with:convictions
  47. [47]
    Furlough Fraud Investigations | Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
    Dec 8, 2023 · Fraud is a serious criminal offence and a business which has defrauded the CJRS could face charges of: fraud by false representation,; fraud ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Can I be Investigated for Furlough Fraud? - Old Bailey Solicitors
    In these circumstances, a conviction for fraud carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. Whilst sentences of that length are unlikely, the stress of a ...
  49. [49]
    Directors disqualification - post Covid-19
    Oct 19, 2022 · Directors can be disqualified for misusing Covid-19 support funds, drawing excessive salaries, continuing to trade when insolvent, or failing ...Missing: seizures | Show results with:seizures
  50. [50]
    Delivery of employment support schemes in response to the COVID ...
    Oct 13, 2022 · HMRC's latest estimate for the total of fraud and error in the schemes is £4.5 billion (4.6% of the total cost). HMRC's estimate of CJRS fraud ...
  51. [51]
    The CJRS and unemployment - Office for Budget Responsibility
    While the numbers furloughed are down by 5.1 million from the peak of 8.7 million at the height of the first lockdown in April 2020, it is still a very large ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Employment and the end of the furlough scheme - IFS
    For example, the unemployment rate rose from 3.8% in 2019Q4 to a peak (so far) of 5.2% in 2020Q4: significantly less than the peak of 8.5% during the GFC.
  53. [53]
    Government publishes new evidence on impacts of income and job ...
    Jul 17, 2023 · Robert Joyce discusses some of the main takeaways from the government's evaluations of the income and job protection schemes during the pandemic.
  54. [54]
    Post-furlough blues - Resolution Foundation
    Nov 14, 2021 · Our survey suggests that 88 per cent of respondents who were furloughed in September were in work in October, with 8.5 per cent being inactive and just 3.4 per ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    'Zombie company' warning as 557000 firms endure significant distress
    Oct 29, 2020 · As Halloween approaches, a report suggests we should take fright from the number of firms in significant financial difficulty.
  56. [56]
    Coronavirus: Business rescue package has 'delayed the inevitable'
    Jul 28, 2020 · A wave of "zombie companies" kept afloat during lockdown are on a cliff-edge going into the autumn, experts say. Analysis by the BBC shows a ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  57. [57]
    [PDF] The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme - Institute for Government
    Oct 22, 2020 · The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) was a highly unusual policy response from the UK government to a unique economic crisis.
  58. [58]
    Employment and the end of the furlough scheme - IFS
    Sep 30, 2021 · The government's furlough scheme ended on 30 September. In many ways it has been very successful, albeit at a cost of almost £70 billion so far.
  59. [59]
    Fiscal risks and sustainability – July 2023 - OBR
    Jul 13, 2023 · The UK government's net interest cost rose by 2.6 per cent of GDP ... furlough scheme, and now the energy price guarantee. Risks from ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Employment, economic inactivity and incapacity: past lessons and ...
    Since the 3 months to. February 2020, the proportion of the workforce who are economically inactive has risen by 1.7 percentage points. Around half of this rise ...
  61. [61]
    Keep Britain Working Review: Discovery - GOV.UK
    Mar 20, 2025 · The UK is the only country to have seen an increase in the economic inactivity rate between 2019 and 2024. 103. Each country has a distinct ...
  62. [62]
    Furloughing and COVID-19: assessing regulatory reform of the state
    Indeed, as the pandemic evolved, a criticism of the CJRS was that it was arguably propping up non-viable jobs in 'zombie' firms (Cominetti et al., 2021). As ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Job Retention Schemes during COVID-19
    The aim of this policy brief is to analyze job retention schemes, in particular short-time work or furlough polices and equivalent wage subsidy programs ...