Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

HM Treasury

HM Treasury, formally His Majesty's Treasury, is the government's economic and finance ministry, responsible for maintaining control over public spending, setting the direction of the UK's , and working to achieve strong and sustainable growth across the economy. Headed by the —a senior minister who holds ultimate responsibility for the department's operations—the Treasury formulates and implements , including the preparation and presentation of the annual to , which outlines government revenues, expenditures, and borrowing plans. The department's core functions encompass raising revenue through taxation, managing national debt via its executive agency the Debt Management Office, and overseeing public sector pay and pensions, all while promoting and long-term economic prosperity. With origins tracing back to the medieval responsible for royal revenues, HM Treasury has evolved into a central institution for macroeconomic management, exerting influence over in coordination with the and addressing fiscal challenges such as deficits and debt sustainability. Notable for its role in steering the through economic crises—including post-war reconstructions and recent fiscal consolidations—the Treasury's decisions have historically shaped public service funding levels and growth trajectories, though its centralized control over expenditures has drawn scrutiny for potentially constraining departmental autonomy and innovation in spending allocation.

Historical Development

Medieval and Early Modern Origins

The Exchequer, the medieval precursor to HM Treasury, was established during the reign of Henry I (r. 1100–1135) as the central financial institution of the English Crown, initially functioning as an ad hoc system for managing royal revenues. The first recorded appointment of a Treasurer of the Exchequer occurred in 1126, with Nigel, Bishop of Ely, serving in this role to oversee the custody and accounting of funds. Its core operations involved biannual sessions at Easter and Michaelmas to receive payments from sheriffs, audit local accounts, and issue royal expenditures, thereby centralizing fiscal oversight amid feudal fragmentation. The Exchequer's name originated from the chequered woolen cloth draped over its counting table, which facilitated calculations using counters in a manner resembling a or , enabling precise tallies of taxes and debts. From the , wooden tally sticks—typically made of or —were introduced as a secure recording method, with notches carved to represent monetary values and the stick split lengthwise into a "stock" (retained by the Exchequer) and a "" (given to the payer) to prevent fraud through perfect matching upon redemption. Under (r. 1154–1189), the system advanced with the regular use of —annual leather-bound records of audits shaped like a pipe when rolled—establishing the first systematic charge-and-discharge in medieval . In the , the persisted as the operational hub for revenue collection, but the administrative oversight shifted toward the emerging , rooted in the office of the , which gained prominence from the and formalized under as the chief steward of finances. Initially a physical repository for cash, jewels, and documents at sites like , the evolved into a departmental entity by the . A pivotal came in 1667 under , when the singular was replaced by a board of , introducing collegiate decision-making that prefigured the modern ministerial structure while the handled day-to-day receipts until later consolidation. This transition reflected growing demands for coordinated amid expanding state expenditures on warfare and administration.

19th-Century Institutionalization

In the early , following the , HM 's functions expanded significantly to manage a ballooning national debt, which had risen from approximately £250 million in 1793 to over £800 million by 1815, necessitating sophisticated debt servicing and funding mechanisms through consols and annuities. This period marked a shift from wartime financing to institutionalized oversight of public borrowing, with the Treasury assuming greater authority over the sinking fund and debt redemption policies established under earlier acts like the Act 1787. Mid-century reforms under Chancellors such as further institutionalized Treasury dominance over public expenditure, responding to fiscal pressures from the (1853–1856), which drove spending surges and prompted Gladstone's 1853 budget to enforce retrenchment and parliamentary scrutiny via detailed departmental estimates submitted for Treasury approval. Gladstone's approach entrenched the "power of the purse," requiring spending departments to justify outlays annually, thereby centralizing budgetary control and curbing profligacy, as evidenced by his reduction of and estimates by over £3 million between 1857 and 1860. The Northcote-Trevelyan Report of catalyzed administrative professionalization, advocating merit-based recruitment via competitive examinations, which the adopted early to enhance efficiency in financial oversight, replacing with a cadre of specialized clerks handling complex fiscal analysis. This reform elevated the 's internal capacity, aligning it with growing demands for precise accounting amid expanding government roles in infrastructure and . The and Audit Departments Act 1866 represented a pinnacle of institutional formalization, merging Exchequer functions into the while establishing the and to independently verify accounts, thereby separating executive spending from auditing and mandating consolidated funds for all public moneys to prevent misuse. By the late , these developments had transformed the into a centralized guardian of fiscal discipline, with annual budgets becoming key parliamentary events and expenditure capped relative to revenue growth, reflecting Gladstone's enduring legacy of balanced budgets averaging surpluses in peacetime.

20th-Century Expansion and Reforms

During the First World War, HM Treasury significantly expanded its role in managing national finances amid unprecedented expenditure demands, issuing £300 million in paper banknotes under the Currency and Bank Notes Act and stabilizing the by closing the and pausing certain payments. The national debt surged from £650 million in to £7,500 million by 1919, necessitating enhanced debt management and post-war fiscal controls that accelerated the department's evolution into a central economic authority. The saw Treasury influence fluctuate with economic challenges, including the , but prompted another major surge in responsibilities, including wartime budgeting and resource allocation, despite temporary losses of authority to ad hoc bodies. damage to its original premises in 1940 led to relocation to 1 Horse Guards Road, where it remains. Post-1945, the Treasury adopted Keynesian principles, embracing active fiscal and monetary policies to support and expansion, with public spending rising to reflect the state's growing economic footprint. ![Troops from the Grenadier Guards constructing sandbag defences around government buildings on the corner of Horse Guards Road, Great George Street and Birdcage Walk, London, May 1940.][float-right] In the 1960s, the creation of the Department of Economic Affairs briefly challenged Treasury dominance over economic planning, but its abolition in 1969 restored Treasury monopoly on macroeconomic policy. The 1970s inflation crisis, culminating in the 1976 IMF bailout, prompted spending rule overhauls and a pivot to monetarism under the 1979 Conservative government, introducing the Medium-Term Financial Strategy in 1980 to target money supply growth and curb inflation through higher interest rates, despite inducing recession. The 1980s saw further reforms, including privatization of state industries and civil service efficiency drives led by Treasury oversight, enhancing market-oriented fiscal discipline. By century's end, these changes solidified Treasury control over public expenditure, with the state capturing over 40% of GDP in revenues.

Post-1997 Modernization

Following the government's election victory on 6 May 1997, Chancellor announced the granting of operational independence to the for decisions, effective immediately through the establishment of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) tasked with targeting 2.5% . This reform, outlined in a letter from Brown to Bank Governor , separated interest rate setting from direct Treasury control, aiming to insulate it from short-term political pressures based on international evidence linking central bank independence to lower and more stable rates. The change refocused HM Treasury on , supply-side reforms, and long-term economic stability, marking a pivotal shift in its operational scope. In parallel, the Treasury introduced a new fiscal framework in 1997–1998, including the Code for Fiscal Stability and two rules: the "" requiring current spending to be funded by current revenues over the economic cycle, and the "sustainable investment rule" capping net public debt at 40% of GDP. These measures sought to bind future governments to prudent borrowing, enhancing market credibility after the high-debt . Complementing this, the inaugural Comprehensive (CSR) in July 1998 established multi-year departmental budgets (typically three years) alongside Public Service Agreements to link funding to measurable outcomes, replacing annual bidding with strategic planning. On 1 April 1998, the UK Debt Management Office was created as a Treasury , assuming responsibility for gilt issuance and cash management from the to separate debt operations from policy formulation. Subsequent structural reforms included the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, which created the and formalized a tripartite system for financial stability involving the Treasury, , and FSA, with the Treasury retaining ultimate responsibility for and resolution. In April 2005, the merger of and HM Customs & Excise formed HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) as a non-ministerial department under Treasury oversight, consolidating tax collection, benefits administration, and customs enforcement to boost efficiency and compliance amid rising complexity in revenue streams. The exposed limitations in the tripartite model, leading to its replacement post-2010 with a single Financial Policy Committee at the . Under the 2010 , Chancellor established the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) in May 2010—statutorily enshrined in 2011—to deliver independent economic and fiscal forecasts, addressing prior criticisms of Treasury-optimistic projections that undermined credibility. These evolutions emphasized evidence-based accountability, though fiscal rules have been iteratively revised across governments to adapt to shocks like the 2008 recession and COVID-19.

Governance and Leadership

Chancellor of the Exchequer

The Chancellor of the Exchequer is the chief financial minister of the UK government and head of HM Treasury, responsible for formulating and implementing economic policy, managing public finances, and overseeing the raising of government revenue through taxation and borrowing. The role entails presenting the annual Budget to Parliament, which outlines fiscal plans, tax changes, and spending priorities, thereby setting levels of taxation and public expenditure across the UK. As a senior member and one of the , the Chancellor is invariably a sitting from the , appointed by the and sworn in by the . The position also carries the nominal title of Second Lord of the Treasury, reflecting its historical ties to the medieval system for royal revenue management. Key powers include control over the , from which public expenditures are drawn, and influence over measures, often in coordination with the . The office's modern authority expanded significantly in the 18th and 19th centuries, coinciding with the consolidation of national finances and the institutionalization of annual budgeting practices. By the , the Chancellor's remit had broadened to encompass macroeconomic policy, including post-war funding and responses to economic crises, such as debt management during . Rachel Reeves has held the position since 5 July 2024, following the government's formation after the general election. In this capacity, she has overseen initiatives like regulatory reforms to reduce business bureaucracy, projected to save firms nearly £6 billion annually, and preparations for the Autumn Budget on 26 November 2025.

Permanent Secretaries and Senior Civil Servants

The Permanent Secretary to HM Treasury is the department's highest-ranking civil servant, serving as the accounting officer accountable to Parliament for the effective, efficient, and proper use of public funds, while advising the Chancellor on economic policy formulation and implementation. This role encompasses oversight of departmental operations, risk management, and coordination with other government bodies to ensure fiscal discipline and alignment with government priorities. Second Permanent Secretaries support these functions, often specializing in areas like infrastructure investment or financial markets, and may include external appointees to inject specialized expertise into civil service decision-making. James Bowler has been since October 2022, having previously served as for Economic and Fiscal Analysis within the department. Under his leadership, the has emphasized data-driven fiscal forecasting amid post-pandemic recovery and geopolitical economic pressures. Beth Russell acts as a Second Permanent Secretary, focusing on regional from the Darlington Economic Campus, with prior roles in and . In May 2025, O'Neil was appointed as an additional Second Permanent Secretary, bringing experience from and to enhance the department's capacity in capital markets and growth-oriented strategies. Senior civil servants below this level include Director Generals (SCS3 grade) who head major directorates, such as public spending, taxation policy, and . As of March 2025, examples include Conrad Smewing as for Public Spending and Net Zero, responsible for departmental budgeting and carbon reduction initiatives, and others managing and . These roles ensure continuity in expertise across political administrations, with appointments selected through merit-based processes overseen by the to maintain impartiality. The Treasury's senior structure comprises approximately 50-60 pay band members, enabling specialized handling of complex fiscal challenges like debt sustainability and tax compliance.
Key Senior Positions (as of mid-2025)IncumbentPrimary Responsibilities
James BowlerOverall departmental leadership and accounting officer duties
Second Permanent SecretaryBeth RussellEconomic campus operations and infrastructure policy
Second Permanent SecretaryJim O'NeilFinancial markets and investment strategy
Director General, Public SpendingConrad SmewingBudget allocation and expenditure control

Organizational Structure

The organizational structure of HM Treasury is headed by the , James Bowler, who acts as the department's most senior civil servant, principal policy adviser to ministers, and accounting officer accountable to for the propriety and regularity of public finances. This role encompasses oversight of departmental operations, , and implementation of economic and fiscal policies. Supporting the Permanent Secretary are two Second Permanent Secretaries: , who also serves as Chief Economic Adviser and Head of the Government Economic Service (GES), focusing on macroeconomic analysis and ; and Beth Russell, responsible for spending, taxation, and growth-related functions. These positions reflect a division of labor that integrates economic expertise with operational delivery, with the GES comprising over 1,500 economists across to ensure rigorous forecasting and evaluation. The department operates through a network of directorates led by Director Generals, each specializing in core policy areas. Key examples include the directorate under Lindsey Whyte, which handles multilateral institutions and ; the directorate led by Dan York-Smith, overseeing banking regulation and market stability; the Tax and directorate directed by Conrad Smewing, managing revenue policy and benefit design; and international affairs under Gwyneth Nurse. These directorates coordinate cross-government teams, with staff numbers totaling approximately 1,100 full-time equivalents as of mid-2025, emphasizing a lean structure suited to high-level policy rather than frontline delivery. Governance is augmented by the HM Treasury Board, comprising executive members and non-executive directors such as Sir Charlie Mayfield (Lead Non-Executive), who advise ministers on strategy, performance monitoring, and risk assurance. Subordinate bodies include the Executive Management Board's Operating Committee for operational risks and financial controls, and the People Committee for human resources and inclusion strategies, ensuring alignment between execution and ministerial priorities. Organograms detailing this hierarchy, including senior salaries and reporting lines, are published quarterly to promote transparency.

Core Functions and Responsibilities

Fiscal Policy and Public Finances

HM Treasury formulates the UK's , which encompasses government decisions on taxation, public spending, and borrowing to support , , and sustainable public finances. The department's objectives, as defined in the Charter for Budget Responsibility, prioritize sustainable public finances, value for money for taxpayers, and alignment with broader economic goals, while considering metrics like debt-to-GDP ratios for long-term assessments. Fiscal policy is operationalized through the annual , where the compiles projections, expenditure plans, and tax measures for presentation by the to , typically in the . This process integrates departmental spending bids, forecasts, and adherence to fiscal rules, with the enforcing consolidated budgeting standards that distinguish between resource budgets (for day-to-day operations) and capital budgets (for investments). For the 2025-26 financial year, these standards mandate bodies to align budgets with -approved frameworks, ensuring predictability in and financial transactions. To maintain public finance sustainability, HM Treasury enforces fiscal rules updated in the Autumn 2024 Charter, including the stability rule—requiring day-to-day spending to be fully funded by revenues, targeting a current budget balance within five years—and a rule ensuring net falls as a share of GDP within five years. These rules replaced prior targets in October 2024, aiming to reduce vulnerabilities amid post-pandemic deficits, where net borrowing reached 7.5% of GDP in 2020-21 before declining to around 4.4% by 2023-24. The Treasury monitors compliance via multi-year spending reviews, such as the 2021 review setting departmental budgets through 2024-25, and adjusts policy to counter cyclical pressures without compromising long-term fiscal health. Public finances management involves Treasury oversight of aggregate revenues (primarily from taxes collected by ), expenditures across departments, and net borrowing, guided by the "Managing Public Money" framework that emphasizes accountability, , and innovation in resource use. This includes controlling the net financial liability, which incorporates assets and liabilities beyond traditional measures, to provide a fuller picture; for instance, as of March 2025 updates, the framework requires annual reporting on financial investments to enhance transparency and mitigate risks from volatile assets like indemnities. Breaches of fiscal targets, such as the temporary suspension during the response when exceeded 100% of GDP in 2020, underscore the rules' role in constraining , though critics note their procyclical effects during downturns.

Economic Policy and Forecasting

HM Treasury sets the strategic direction for the United Kingdom's economic policy, emphasizing sustainable long-term growth, macroeconomic stability, and enhancements to productivity, employment, and regional competitiveness through structural reforms. This involves formulating policies that integrate fiscal measures with broader objectives, such as deficit reduction and efficient resource allocation, as outlined in the Charter for Budget Responsibility, which mandates the department to pursue sustainable public finances alongside economic growth and stability. The Treasury's economists, part of the Government Economic Service, provide analytical support via internal modeling and scenario assessments to evaluate policy options, including interactions between fiscal policy, monetary policy, and supply-side interventions. While the independent has produced official economic and fiscal forecasts since 2010 to accompany major fiscal events like the , HM Treasury retains responsibilities for ongoing economic monitoring and auxiliary analysis. Under a , the Treasury collaborates with the OBR by providing access to macroeconomic models and recent data for forecast preparation, though final judgements remain with the OBR. Internally, the department's Chief Economic Adviser oversees advice, drawing on these tools to inform real-time decisions, such as responses to global shocks or domestic productivity challenges. To track broader economic expectations, HM Treasury compiles and publishes monthly summaries of independent forecasts from organizations like the IMF and analysts, covering indicators such as GDP growth (projected at 1.1% for 2025 in the September 2025 edition), , and . These consensus aggregates, last updated on 15 October 2025, assist in calibrating policy without relying solely on the biannual OBR outlooks. Policy appraisal follows the methodology, requiring quantitative assessments of costs, benefits, and risks to ensure evidence-based decisions on initiatives like infrastructure or tax reforms.

Taxation and Revenue Management

HM Treasury formulates the UK's , determining the structure, rates, and allowances for major taxes to raise revenue necessary for public services and servicing while aligning with broader economic goals such as promoting and productivity. It leads on policy design across direct taxes like and corporation tax, and indirect taxes including (VAT) and excise duties, working in partnership with (HMRC), which handles implementation, collection, and enforcement. Tax policy changes are primarily announced in the of the Exchequer's statement and associated fiscal events, with HM Treasury conducting consultations and impact assessments to evaluate effects on revenue, behavior, and the economy. In June 2025, HM Treasury published the Making Principles, establishing guidelines for policy development that prioritize predictability, stability, and a consolidated cycle of major fiscal announcements to reduce uncertainty for taxpayers and businesses. For revenue management, HM Treasury integrates tax projections into overall public finance planning, relying on forecasts from the independent (OBR) to assess sustainability. In the 2024-25, HMRC-collected tax and contributions totaled £489.0 billion, forming a significant portion of the government's £1,136 billion in total receipts, equivalent to about 39% of GDP. Key revenue sources include , projected at £330.7 billion for 2025-26 (26.9% of receipts), underscoring the Treasury's role in balancing revenue mobilization with incentives for economic activity.

Financial Stability and International Affairs

HM Treasury oversees the formulation of policy and legislation for the UK's sector, with a core objective of maintaining while supporting economic growth and competitiveness. This includes setting the framework for to mitigate systemic risks in the banking and s. The department collaborates closely with the , particularly through the Financial Policy Committee (FPC), which operates under the Bank's auspices but receives an annual remit from HM Treasury outlining the government's objectives, including . The FPC's primary statutory objective, established under the Financial Services Act 2012, is to protect and enhance the resilience of the , with HM Treasury empowered to recommend adjustments to its operational boundaries and tools, such as countercyclical capital buffers applied to banks as of December 2012. In practice, HM Treasury's efforts emphasize creating "stronger and safer banks" and improving regulatory oversight to safeguard consumers and the broader economy from vulnerabilities like those exposed in the 2008 global financial crisis. The directorate, led by a , coordinates these policies, ensuring alignment with fiscal objectives and responding to emerging risks such as non-bank financial intermediation, which the FPC has monitored since its inception in 2013. For instance, in response to post-crisis reforms, HM Treasury has supported the FPC's directives on leverage ratios and liquidity requirements, which by 2024 had contributed to banks maintaining capital ratios above 14% on average, exceeding minimum regulatory thresholds. On international affairs, HM Treasury leads the UK's engagement in global financial institutions and forums, including representation at the (IMF), , , and , where it advances positions on sustainable debt restructuring and economic surveillance. The directorate manages these responsibilities, focusing on bilateral and multilateral relations to promote UK interests in areas like financial regulatory equivalence and cross-border stability. Notable examples include co-chairing the U.S.-UK Financial Regulatory Working Group, which in September 2024 issued statements on enhancing market certainty amid global uncertainties, and advocating for increased voice for low-income countries in IMF/ governance during the 2025 Annual Meetings. These efforts underpin HM Treasury's strategy to position the UK as a leading international financial center post-Brexit, with policies emphasizing regulatory independence and global competitiveness over harmonization with EU standards.

Associated Institutions

Relationship with the Bank of England

The , established by an in 1694 to act as the government's banker and manage public debt, has maintained a close operational and ownership relationship with HM Treasury since its inception, with the Treasury serving as its sole shareholder following under the Bank of England Act 1946. This ownership structure positions the Treasury as the ultimate authority over the Bank's strategic framework, while the Bank operates as a public corporation responsible for , , and certain fiscal agency functions on behalf of the government. A pivotal shift occurred on May 6, 1997, when granted the operational independence for setting interest rates to meet the government's target, formalized in the Bank of England Act 1998, which established the (MPC) with exclusive authority over short-term interest rates. The Treasury retains influence by annually issuing a remit letter to the MPC outlining the target—currently 2% measured by the Consumer Prices Index—and objectives for growth and employment, though the MPC's decisions remain free from direct government intervention to insulate from short-term political pressures. The approves appointments to the MPC, including the , typically for eight-year terms, ensuring alignment with government economic priorities while preserving the Bank's autonomy. Coordination between the two institutions is governed by several Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs), including the 1997 MoU on macro-economic policy objectives, which delineates responsibilities— for and the for —and promotes regular dialogue to avoid conflicts. Updated in February , the MoU on financial relationship clarifies the 's capital framework, , and indemnity arrangements, such as guarantees for the Asset Purchase Facility during , with the paying profits to the and receiving reimbursement for losses. In financial crisis management, a separate MoU, revised in September , outlines joint roles under the Banking Act 2009, where the holds statutory powers for resolution funding and taxpayer protection, while the , through its Prudential , executes stabilization measures. The Bank performs key agency services for the , including managing the Exchange Equalisation Account for interventions and maintaining the , the government's primary bank account, ensuring seamless handling of public revenues and expenditures. This interdependence underscores a division of labor where fiscal decisions by the , such as borrowing and spending, interact with the Bank's monetary tools, with empirical evidence from post-1997 periods showing reduced volatility due to the independence framework, though debates persist on the adequacy of coordination during events like the and 2022 gilt market turmoil.

Office for Budget Responsibility

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is an independent fiscal watchdog established in May 2010 by the coalition government to provide authoritative, unbiased assessments of the sustainability of public finances, replacing the Treasury's previous in-house forecasting role which had been criticized for lacking credibility due to potential political influence. Its creation was motivated by the need to restore market confidence in fiscal projections following the , with statutory independence formalized under the Budget Responsibility and National Audit Act 2011, which mandates the OBR to operate without ministerial direction in its judgments. The OBR's core functions include producing biannual Economic and Fiscal Outlooks (EFOs), which forecast key economic variables such as GDP growth, , , and borrowing over a five-year horizon, alongside detailed projections of receipts, spending, and . These reports, published alongside the Autumn Budget (e.g., the next scheduled for 26 November 2025) and Spring Statement (e.g., March 2025 edition), scrutinize the government's against its self-imposed rules, such as the target for underlying net to fall as a share of GDP within five years. Additionally, the OBR issues a Fiscal Risks and Sustainability Report every five years—most recently due in July 2025—to evaluate long-term pressures like ageing populations, , and pension liabilities on public finances. It also publishes specialized analyses, such as welfare trends reports, drawing on teams specializing in economic, fiscal, and forecasting. Operatively independent despite being housed within HM premises, the OBR is led by a chair (currently Richard Hughes, appointed in 2024) and two non-executive members, appointed by the for fixed eight-year terms to minimize political capture, with staff largely seconded from the but insulated from day-to-day interference. The framework agreement with emphasizes transparency, requiring the OBR to base judgments on and economic rather than government targets, though it must incorporate policy measures announced by ministers. External reviews, including the third in 2025, have affirmed its resilience amid shocks like and energy crises, crediting its role in enhancing fiscal discipline without undue bias. Critics, including some economists, have questioned the OBR's forecasting accuracy, noting instances where projections diverged from outcomes—for example, underestimating post-2010 recovery strength relative to austerity assumptions or over-optimism in revenue forecasts tied to specific policies. The 2022 mini-budget under Liz Truss highlighted tensions, as the government's initial refusal to submit plans for OBR scrutiny contributed to bond market instability, underscoring the body's de facto market influence despite no legal enforcement power. Others argue its rigid five-year horizon and assumptions constrain dynamic policy responses, potentially fostering a technocratic bias toward deficit reduction over growth-oriented measures, though empirical evidence shows improved credibility in bond yields and deficit paths post-establishment compared to pre-OBR eras. The OBR counters such critiques by publishing historical forecast errors and adhering to transparent methodologies grounded in data from sources like the Office for National Statistics.

Debt Management Office and Other Agencies

The United Kingdom Debt Management Office (DMO) is an executive agency of HM Treasury, established on 1 April 1998 to handle the government's debt and cash management operations. Prior to its creation, these functions were primarily managed by the , but operational independence in prompted the transfer of wholesale sterling debt issuance responsibilities to the DMO under Treasury oversight. The agency's statutory remit, as defined by HM Treasury, focuses on executing the government's debt management policy to minimize long-term borrowing costs while accounting for risk, without engaging in monetary policy activities. Key responsibilities include issuing government securities such as gilts (fixed-interest bonds) and treasury bills to finance public sector deficits, managing daily cash flows through the and National Loans Funds, and providing loans to local authorities via the Public Works Loan Board. The DMO also administers certain legacy public sector pension schemes, including those for civil servants, armed forces personnel, teachers, and staff, handling investments and payments to meet long-term liabilities. In fiscal year 2023-24, for instance, the DMO raised approximately £237 billion through gilt auctions and syndicated offerings to fund government borrowing needs. Beyond core debt operations, the DMO incorporates the functions of the Commissioners for the Reduction of the National Debt (CRND), a established under the National Debt Act 1958, which oversees the application of debt redemption proceeds and certain annuities. HM Treasury does not oversee additional executive agencies comparable to the DMO; other associated entities, such as , operate as semi-independent departments rather than direct agencies, focusing on tax collection and compliance rather than debt management. The DMO's operations emphasize market-based financing, with quarterly funding plans published in advance to promote transparency and investor confidence in sovereign debt, which totals over £2.7 trillion as of March 2024.

Controversies and Criticisms

Excessive Influence and Centralization

The HM Treasury's extensive oversight of departmental budgets and economic policymaking has drawn persistent criticism for fostering excessive centralization, whereby officials exert disproportionate control over policy implementation across government. This dominance stems from the Treasury's authority to approve spending allocations, enforce fiscal rules, and appraise projects via mechanisms like the , which critics argue enables that undermines departmental flexibility and . For instance, former heads Lord Kerslake and Lord Butler have urged the Treasury to refrain from micromanaging departments, advocating instead for focus on macroeconomic policy to allow spending ministries greater autonomy in resource deployment. Parliamentary scrutiny has highlighted this issue, with a 2001 House of Commons Treasury Committee expressing concern that the department had begun exerting undue influence over domains traditionally reserved for other ministries, potentially distorting priorities beyond fiscal prudence. More recent analyses, such as the Institute for Government's 2024 examination of "Treasury orthodoxy," contend that the department's rigid control over tax, spending, and economic strategy dominates thinking, sidelining broader strategic considerations and contributing to policy silos. Critics, including former ministers like , have argued that this centralization hampers and initiatives; Heseltine's 2012 proposed devolving powers to local partnerships to counter Treasury-led blockages on and industrial strategy. Empirical examples of this centralizing tendency include the Treasury's role in appraising and ring-fencing funds for specific programs, which a 2023 Economist assessment linked to a culture of granular oversight that cascades micromanagement down to sub-departmental levels, as seen in research funding allocations where short-term fiscal targets override long-term efficacy. In sectors like prisons, centralized Treasury-driven budgeting has been blamed for inefficiencies, prioritizing annual fiscal compliance over sustained operational improvements, per a 2024 Policy & Politics study. While proponents of Treasury dominance cite it as essential for aggregate fiscal discipline—evidenced by its coordination during crises like the 2008 financial downturn—detractors maintain that such power concentration, unchecked by robust inter-departmental challenge mechanisms, fosters short-termism and erodes evidence-based policymaking in devolved areas.

Ideological Rigidity and Policy Orthodoxy

The "," a term originating in the , encapsulated HM 's longstanding skepticism toward fiscal stimulus, positing that public spending initiatives, such as projects to alleviate , would simply crowd out equivalent private without generating net economic gains. This perspective influenced policy during the , notably in 1931 when advocated measures including tax hikes and cuts to amid rising joblessness, exacerbating the downturn and contributing to the collapse of the government. Critics, including , contended that such rigidity ignored demand deficiencies in recessions, where government expenditure could multiply economic activity rather than displace it. In the post-2008 era, echoes of this orthodoxy manifested in the Treasury's endorsement of fiscal consolidation under the 2010 coalition government, prioritizing deficit reduction through spending restraint over aggressive stimulus, despite debates on whether this prolonged sluggish recovery. Accusations of ideological entrenchment intensified during Liz Truss's 2022 premiership, when her administration's push for unfunded tax cuts to spur growth clashed with Treasury resistance, framed by proponents as a challenge to an anti-growth dogma overly wedded to static fiscal rules and short-term budgeting horizons. The Institute for Government has highlighted how Treasury processes, including simplistic appraisal of spending bids and a culture of micro-management, foster a "deadening scepticism" toward transformative policies like industrial strategies or long-term investments, though it attributes these issues more to institutional power imbalances than immutable beliefs. Further critiques point to the Treasury's historical underemphasis on supply-side reforms and drivers, with evaluations often prioritizing immediate fiscal costs over dynamic effects, as evidenced by persistent economic underperformance relative to peers since the . While defenders argue that fiscal prudence averts crises like the 1976 IMF bailout—necessitated by unchecked borrowing and sterling pressures—this orthodoxy has been faulted for constraining adaptive responses to structural challenges, such as post-Brexit reconfiguration or energy transitions, by subordinating policy innovation to orthodoxy-derived rules on debt and deficits. Empirical analyses, including those questioning austerity's multipliers, underscore tensions between cautionary discipline and opportunity costs in foregone investment.

Fiscal Decisions and Economic Outcomes

HM Treasury's fiscal policies under the Labour governments of 1997–2010 shifted towards rules-based frameworks, including the "golden rule" allowing borrowing for investment but not current spending, yet these were criticized for enabling off-balance-sheet initiatives and public-private partnerships that masked rising liabilities. By 2007–08, the budget was in surplus, but the exposed vulnerabilities, with the deficit quadrupling to £157 billion (11% of GDP) by 2009–10 due to automatic stabilizers and discretionary stimulus, including bank bailouts and coordination. This led to a deep , with GDP contracting 4.3% in 2009, public debt rising from 40% of GDP in 2007 to over 80% by 2014, and long-term scarring effects on productivity growth, averaging just 0.5% annually from 2008–2019 compared to 2.3% pre-crisis. Critics attribute part of the severity to pre-crisis fiscal loosening, which amplified the downturn through higher baseline debt servicing costs amid elevated gilt yields. The post-2010 Conservative-led measures, formalized in the 2010 , aimed to eliminate the structural deficit within five years through spending cuts totaling £81 billion annually by 2016–17 and restrained tax rises, reducing the deficit from 10% of GDP in 2009–10 to 1.1% by 2018–19. Economic outcomes included stabilized public finances, avoiding sovereign debt crises seen elsewhere in , but at the cost of subdued growth—UK GDP expanded at an average 1.8% annually from 2010–2019, below the average and pre-crisis trends—alongside strained public services and regional inequalities. Empirical analyses indicate fiscal multipliers were lower than anticipated (around 0.5–1.0), suggesting cuts had limited contractionary impact, yet stagnation persisted, with output per hour 20% below pre-2008 trends by 2019, partly due to underinvestment in and skills. 's legacy included heightened vulnerability to the 2020 COVID shock, as depleted fiscal buffers necessitated even larger interventions. The response under HM Treasury involved unprecedented fiscal expansion, with public spending surging from 39.1% to 51.9% of GDP in 2020–21, funded by borrowing that pushed the to 14.7% of GDP and above 100% of GDP. Measures like the £410 billion furlough scheme and business support prevented a steeper GDP drop (9.8% in 2020) and supported a V-shaped rebound to 7.5% growth in 2021, averting mass . However, outcomes included persistent pressures, peaking at 11.1% in October 2022, exacerbated by supply-constrained stimulus amid global energy shocks, and a legacy burden with interest payments reaching 9% of revenues by 2025—double the 2010–2020 average—crowding out future spending. Real GDP growth stalled at 0% in Q3 2024, reflecting structural weaknesses amplified by high servicing, which limited fiscal space for growth-enhancing investments. The mini-budget under Chancellor proposed £45 billion in unfunded tax cuts, including scrapping the 45% top rate and reversing hikes, intended to stimulate supply-side growth amid 40% marginal debt dynamics. Markets reacted sharply, with gilt yields spiking 100 basis points, the pound falling to a 37-year low against the dollar, and a near-liquidity crisis in funds requiring intervention, ultimately forcing policy U-turns and contributing to Truss's after . Economic fallout included elevated borrowing costs (10-year gilt yields rising to 4.5%), subdued investment, and no discernible growth boost, with GDP contracting 0.3% in Q4 ; the episode underscored HM Treasury's challenges in signaling fiscal credibility amid high debt, leading to revised fiscal rules emphasizing debt stabilization over current balance targets. evaluations highlight recurring forecast errors, such as overoptimistic productivity assumptions (actual growth 0.4% annually vs. 1.5–2% projected post-2010), which have enabled procyclical loosening but masked underlying fiscal risks.

Economic Impact and Evaluation

Key Achievements in Fiscal Discipline

Under the from 2010, HM Treasury, led by , implemented a programme of fiscal consolidation that reduced the from 10.1% of GDP in 2009–10 to 1.1% in 2018–19, marking one of the largest peacetime reductions in modern history. This was achieved through a combination of spending restraint and tax increases, with total managed expenditure falling from 47.6% of GDP in 2009–10 to 38.6% by 2018–19, primarily via cuts to unprotected departmental budgets averaging 1% real-terms annual reductions outside health, schools, and pensions. The 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review established multi-year departmental expenditure limits (DELs), capping unprotected spending growth at an average of -0.6% annually in real terms from 2011–12 to 2014–15, which enforced discipline across government departments and contributed to stabilizing net at around 80% of GDP by preventing further escalation. Complementing this, the creation of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) in 2010 introduced independent verification of fiscal forecasts, enhancing credibility and constraining political manipulation of projections, as evidenced by the OBR's consistent identification of risks to sustainability that informed subsequent policy adjustments. In the under , HM Treasury achieved a shift to budget surpluses, with the public sector borrowing requirement (PSBR) turning positive in 1980–81 at -1.7% of GDP and averaging surpluses thereafter until 1988–89, driven by revenues and restrained spending growth limited to 1.5% annually in real terms, which reduced debt from 50% of GDP in 1979 to 25% by 1990. These measures demonstrated Treasury's capacity for first-order fiscal control, prioritizing current to fund without borrowing, though later revisions attributed part of the surplus to cyclical factors rather than permanent structural changes. More recently, adherence to fiscal rules post-2021, including the requirement for falling as a share of GDP within five years, has supported confidence, with gilt yields remaining below 4% through despite elevated levels, reflecting investor perceptions of Treasury's commitment to eventual . Empirical assessments by for Fiscal Studies note that while growth was subdued, the framework prevented deficits from exceeding 3% of GDP in non-crisis years from 2015–19, underscoring effective short-term discipline amid external shocks like .

Criticisms of Growth Constraints and Overspending

Critics have argued that HM Treasury's adherence to stringent fiscal rules and orthodox spending controls has imposed undue constraints on public investment, thereby hindering long-term . For instance, the Institute for Government highlighted in 2024 that Treasury dominance fosters an ideological rigidity, with inexperienced spending staff relying on inadequate expertise, resulting in policies that prioritize short-term fiscal targets over growth-oriented initiatives like and spending. Similarly, analyses from 2025 suggest that the UK's fiscal framework, emphasizing debt sustainability, limits borrowing for productive investments, potentially exacerbating sluggish productivity growth, which has averaged below 1% annually since the according to assessments. This approach has drawn fire from economists advocating for looser to stimulate demand and supply-side reforms. , in an August 2025 commentary, contended that Treasury's fixation on rules akin to EU-style constraints perpetuates weak growth amid persistent inflationary pressures, ignoring evidence that targeted deficits could fund capacity-building without inflationary spirals. The Grantham Research Institute echoed this in March 2025, proposing that abandoning dogma for sustainable investment—potentially via rule reforms—could unlock higher GDP trajectories, citing empirical models showing fiscal multipliers above unity for outlays. Such critiques underscore causal links between underinvestment and Britain's relative decline, with data indicating the lagged peers by £40 billion in potential revenues if growth had matched averages over the prior decade. Conversely, HM has been accused of enabling or concealing overspending, undermining fiscal discipline and ballooning deficits. In November 2024, the for Budget rebuked the Treasury for failing to disclose a £9.5 billion departmental overspend ahead of the Spring , potentially breaching statutory obligations under the Charter for Budget and eroding transparency. A subsequent Treasury in August 2024 projected a £21.9 billion excess on resource departmental expenditure limits for 2024-25, attributed to uncontrolled pressures in areas like asylum processing and border operations, where the alone exceeded budgets by multiples in recent years. The Institute for Fiscal Studies characterized the £22 billion "" unveiled in July 2024 as foreseeable from prior forecasts, criticizing oversight for allowing cumulative unplanned spending to accrue without preemptive adjustments, which fueled higher borrowing costs and strained rule compliance. Under Chancellor Rachel Reeves, June 2025 allocations drew scrutiny for opaque efficiencies and reliance on optimistic growth assumptions to mask gaps, with unprotected services like prisons facing real-terms cuts despite overall day-to-day spending rises of 2.3% annually to 2028-29. These lapses highlight tensions in 's dual role as guardian of prudence and enabler of ministerial demands, where weak departmental controls have repeatedly led to ex-post bailouts, as evidenced by multi-year cost overruns exceeding £8 billion since 2022. Empirical reviews, such as the National Audit Office's October 2024 report, attribute such patterns to flawed planning frameworks that fail to enforce multi-year discipline, perpetuating boom-bust cycles in public finances.

Empirical Assessments of Policy Effectiveness

Empirical analyses of HM Treasury's fiscal policies, particularly the 2010-2019 framework, demonstrate success in reduction, with net borrowing falling from 9.7% of GDP in /10 to 1.1% in 2018/19, stabilizing debt-to-GDP at around 80-85%. This consolidation, emphasizing spending cuts over increases, incurred lower short-run output costs than tax-based alternatives, with estimated multipliers for spending reductions below 1.0 versus higher for revenue hikes. However, growth impacts were muted, as UK productivity rose only 0.5% annually from 2011-2019, lagging peers like the (0.8%) and (0.8%). Fiscal multipliers provide a causal on : estimates place government spending multipliers at 0.5-1.0 on impact, tapering over time, with larger effects (up to 1.5+) in recessions due to slack utilization and monetary accommodation. Time-varying models confirm multipliers near zero in expansions but approaching 1.0 in downturns, supporting countercyclical easing but highlighting risks of procyclical tightening, as seen in early phases when exceeded 8%. Public investment multipliers exceed 1.0 long-term, boosting potential output by 0.5% after five years per 1% spending increase, though HM Treasury's rules have constrained such outlays to meet debt targets. COVID-19 era policies, including £400 billion in and support (peaking borrowing at 17% of GDP in 2020/21), amplified with GDP rebounding 7.5% in 2021, but contributed to spikes above 10% in via demand pressures and supply constraints. Evaluations of fiscal rules, binding since , show mixed sustainability: they curbed debt accumulation pre-crisis but are deemed counterproductive by 63% of economists for limiting countercyclical flexibility, potentially exacerbating low growth (1.8% average 2010-2019). Recent reforms under 2024 rules, allowing higher headroom, aim to address this, though empirical precedents suggest persistent trade-offs between fiscal discipline and output without structural reforms. Sources like OBR and NBER prioritize data-driven models over narrative critiques, revealing policies' effectiveness in fiscal repair but limitations in fostering sustained gains amid external shocks.

References

  1. [1]
    About us - HM Treasury - GOV.UK
    HM Treasury is the government's economic and finance ministry, maintaining control over public spending, setting the direction of the UK's economic policy.Working for HMT · Our governance · Complaints procedure · Equality and diversity
  2. [2]
    His Majesty's Government: HM Treasury - MPs and Lords
    By Government department. You can select a department to view Members for His ... Financial Secretary (HM Treasury). Lord Livermore. Labour. Life peer.
  3. [3]
    HM Treasury - Debt Management Office
    The office of the Treasury was within the Exchequer (responsible for managing the royal revenue in addition to collecting and issuing money).
  4. [4]
    [PDF] An Overview HM Treasury for the new Parliament 2023-24
    Oct 24, 2024 · As the government department with overall responsibility for public spending, one of. HM Treasury's strategic objectives is to place public ...
  5. [5]
    The history of HM Treasury | Institute for Government
    Jan 29, 2024 · The Treasury has continued to hold the primary responsibility for managing the government's finances and supporting the stability and health of ...
  6. [6]
    Political history in the medieval era - an overview
    The Exchequer was the main financial department of royal government. It had two primary functions – to receive and issue money on the king's behalf and to audit ...
  7. [7]
    The Exchequer: a chequered history?
    Aug 14, 2013 · The Exchequer started as an ad hoc financial management system, named for its chequered cloth, and was later eclipsed by the Treasury, with its ...
  8. [8]
    Medieval Exchequer Tally Sticks - Science Museum Group Collection
    From the 12th to the 19th centuries, the Exchequer of England used tally sticks made of wood to account for taxes owned and collected.
  9. [9]
    Treasurer | Encyclopedia.com
    The title lord treasurer, or lord high treasurer, came into use in the Tudor period. Thereafter the post was held by prominent figures such as Protector ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    'Follow the money': The Treasury - History of government
    Jul 17, 2013 · The Treasury started out as a physical repository for the Crown's valuable possessions such as important documents and jewels, as well as its cash reserves.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Sir Nicholas Macpherson 'The Origins of Treasury Control'
    Jan 16, 2013 · The most potent symbol of this was the emergence of the First Lord of the Treasury as Prime Minister in the early 18th century.
  12. [12]
    Open, Meritocratic and Transparent - Policy Exchange
    The Treasury was quicker to understand the benefits of open competition: it ... That principle, embedded in the Northcote-Trevelyan reforms, is inviolable.
  13. [13]
    Exchequer and Audit Departments Act 1866 - Legislation.gov.uk
    An Act to consolidate the Duties of the Exchequer and Audit Departments, to regulate the Receipt, Custody, and Issue of Public Moneys, and to provide for ...
  14. [14]
    The First World War paid off? | The Western Front Association
    Under this Act the Treasury issued £300 million (equivalent to more than £30 billion today) of paper banknotes (in denominations of £1 and 10 shillings), ...
  15. [15]
    The use and application of history in HM Treasury
    Jan 5, 2023 · This case study on the use and application of history by civil servants in the Treasury aims to help academic historians and political scientists gain a ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The Civil Service Reforms of the 1980s - King's College London
    It is also about the role of the. Treasury in the management of the Civil Service. ... of State, HM Treasury, 1981–5. Arthur Cockfield, (Lord Cockfield), civil ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Letter from the Chancellor to the Governor, 6 May 1997
    May 6, 1997 · The changes I propose will enhance accountability by ensuring that the decision-making process is fully transparent, by the arrangements for.<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    British Central Bank Independence and Inflation Expectations
    Nov 28, 1997 · On May 6, 1997, the new Chancellor of the Exchequer of Great Britain, Gordon Brown, announced a policy change that he described as “… the most ...
  19. [19]
    Fiscal rules in the UK since 1997 | Institute for Government
    Nov 26, 2024 · The first fiscal rules in the UK were adopted by the New Labour government in 1997. Those rules applied for over a decade, but since then the ...Missing: modernization reforms
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Modern Public Services for Britain: Investing in Reform - GOV.UK
    Our aim is to reallocate money to key priorities; to change policies so that money is well spent; to ensure that departments work better together to improve ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Tailored Review: UK Debt Management Office - GOV.UK
    1.3 The UK Debt Management Office (DMO) is an Executive Agency of HM Treasury ... 1.4 The DMO was established on 1 April 1998, when responsibility for government ...
  22. [22]
    House of Commons - Treasury - Fifth Report - Parliament UK
    Jan 26, 2008 · The roles of the Tripartite authorities are set out in the Memorandum of Understanding, signed initially in 1997 by the Bank of England, the ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] The Merger of Customs & Excise and the Inland Revenue
    Nov 11, 2004 · The merger aimed to improve customer service, effectiveness, and efficiency, and to bring together the functions of the revenue departments.
  24. [24]
    The Office for Budget Responsibility - House of Commons Library
    Feb 28, 2025 · The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was established within days of the Coalition Government coming to power in May 2010 with the aim of improving the ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Charter for Budget Responsibility - GOV.UK
    2.2. The creation of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) in 2010 was a major reform to the fiscal framework. The OBR is designed to address past ...
  26. [26]
    Chancellor of the Exchequer - GOV.UK
    The Chancellor of the Exchequer is the government's chief financial minister and as such is responsible for growing the UK economy.
  27. [27]
    Chancellor of the Exchequer - UK Parliament
    They are responsible for setting levels of taxation and public spending across the UK and announce changes to these each year in the annual Budget statement.
  28. [28]
    The Chancellor and The Budget: Power and Responsibility?
    Oct 29, 2024 · The role and powers of HM Treasury and of the Chancellor expanded hugely in the eighteenth and ninteenth centuries. The concept of a speech to ...
  29. [29]
    Rachel Reeves appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer
    Jul 5, 2024 · Rachel Reeves has been sworn in as Chancellor of the Exchequer, following Labour's sweeping victory in the general election.
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    Permanent secretaries | Institute for Government
    May 30, 2025 · The government does not publish a single list of permanent secretaries ... hm-treasury ), there are around 40 permanent secretaries. These ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  32. [32]
    Roles of permanent secretaries and other senior civil servants
    Below, we briefly outline the role of a permanent secretary and other relevant positions. Permanent secretaries. 19.A permanent secretary is the most senior ...
  33. [33]
    Organogram of Staff Roles & Salaries - Data.gov.uk
    Aug 1, 2025 · Organogram (organisation chart) showing all staff roles. Names and salaries are also listed for the Senior Civil Servants.
  34. [34]
    New Second Permanent Secretary To The UK Treasury - Jim O'Neil
    May 14, 2025 · Jim O'Neil has been appointed as a new Second Permanent Secretary to the Treasury. Jim brings a wealth of experience from investment banking and corporate ...
  35. [35]
    Speaker - Beth Russell - CSW Collaboration Conference
    Beth Russell has been appointed as the Second Permanent Secretary to the Treasury and is based in the Darlington Economic Campus.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] HM Treasury Organisation Chart January 2025 - GOV.UK
    Sam Beckett. Second Permanent Secretary and Chief Economic Advisor. Beth Russell. Second Permanent Secretary. (Spending, tax, growth). Lindsey Whyte.
  37. [37]
    Our governance - HM Treasury - GOV.UK
    The purpose of the HM Treasury board is to advise and support the department's ministers, and operationally turn policy into reality.
  38. [38]
    HM Treasury - GOV.UK
    HM Treasury is the government's economic and finance ministry, maintaining control over public spending, setting the direction of the UK's economic policyAbout us · Working for HMT · Our governance · Complaints procedure
  39. [39]
    HM Treasury organisational charts - GOV.UK
    Jan 31, 2025 · Organisational chart (organogram) data is released by all central government departments and their agencies since 2010.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Charter for Budget Responsibility: Autumn 2021 update - GOV.UK
    3.1. The Treasury's objectives for fiscal policy are to ensure sustainable public finances, economic growth and stability, value for money for the taxpayer, a.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Charter for Budget Responsibility Autumn 2024 - GOV.UK
    In setting fiscal policy, the. Treasury will consider a wide range of metrics to inform a full assessment of the sustainability of the public finances, and will ...
  42. [42]
    Consolidated budgeting guidance: 2025-26 - GOV.UK
    Feb 27, 2025 · The Treasury is responsible for the design of the budgeting system and can offer advice and explanations in applying this system. It is only the ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Charter for Budget Responsibility approved by Parliament - GOV.UK
    Jan 29, 2025 · There are two new non-negotiable fiscal rules. The first is the stability rule which ensures that day to day spending is matched by tax revenues ...
  44. [44]
    A strong fiscal framework - GOV.UK
    Oct 30, 2024 · This policy document outlines the government's strengthened fiscal framework, including the new fiscal rules which put the public finances on a sustainable ...
  45. [45]
    A brief guide to the public finances - Office for Budget Responsibility
    The independent Office for Budget Responsibility was established in 2010 to monitor the public sector's finances. Twice a year – usually alongside each Budget ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Managing Public Money - GOV.UK
    Public sector organisations can and should innovate in carrying out their responsibilities, using new technology and adopting good business practice. Throughout ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Financial Transaction Control Framework - GOV.UK
    Mar 2, 2025 · 3 Measures to help manage risk and return, including an annual report on government's financial investment portfolio to provide transparency; ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Interview with Dave Ramsden, Chief Economic Adviser to HM ...
    Jul 12, 2013 · The Treasury's plans are built on what the IMF has termed a multi-pronged approach to managing the economy – fiscal policy, monetary policy and ...
  49. [49]
    Economic and fiscal outlook – March 2025 - OBR
    We consider the uncertainty around our economic and fiscal forecasts and the risks to the Government meeting its targets. We also test the sensitivity of our ...
  50. [50]
    Memorandum of Understanding (accessible) - GOV.UK
    Apr 10, 2025 · In producing the economic forecast and other analysis, the OBR also uses a variety of auxiliary analytical tools, examines recent data and ...
  51. [51]
    Forecasts for the UK economy - GOV.UK
    Forecasts for the UK economy is a monthly comparison of independent forecasts. From: HM Treasury; Published: 16 October 2013; Last updated: 15 October 2025 ...
  52. [52]
    Forecasts for the UK economy: September 2025 - GOV.UK
    Sep 17, 2025 · A comparison of independent forecasts for the UK economy in September 2025. From: HM Treasury; Published: 17 September 2025.
  53. [53]
    The Green Book (2022) - GOV.UK
    The Green Book is guidance issued by HM Treasury on how to appraise policies, programmes and projects. It also provides guidance on the design and use of ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Treasury Minutes - Government Response to the Committee of ...
    Jul 7, 2025 · HMRC takes the lead role in government on the implementation of tax policy. HM Treasury leads on the design of tax policy. Administering taxes ...
  55. [55]
    Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury - GOV.UK
    The Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury (XST) is responsible for: The UK tax system including: Direct, indirect, business, property, and personal taxation ...
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    Tax Policy Making Principles - GOV.UK
    Jun 12, 2025 · This document sets out the principles that will guide how the government will design and deliver tax policy changes.
  58. [58]
    Tax Policy Making Principles - GOV.UK
    Predictability and stability: The single major fiscal event cycle will provide a predictable and stable framework for the delivery of tax changes.Missing: formulation | Show results with:formulation
  59. [59]
    Income tax - Office for Budget Responsibility
    In 2025-26 we estimate that income tax will raise £330.7 billion. This represents 26.9 per cent of all receipts and is equivalent to around £11,500 per ...
  60. [60]
    HMRC tax receipts and National Insurance contributions for the UK ...
    receipts in 2024 to 2025 are £489.0 billion (17.0% as a proportion of GDP ), a year-on-year increase, despite a reduced rate for employee NICs , reflecting pay ...Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax... · Business taxes · Stamp Taxes including Annual...
  61. [61]
    Tax statistics: an overview - The House of Commons Library
    Aug 19, 2025 · In 2024/25, UK government raised around £1,136 billion (£1.1 trillion) in receipts – income from taxes and other sources. This is equivalent to ...
  62. [62]
    The contribution of the Financial Policy Committee to UK financial ...
    Sep 25, 2024 · HM Treasury is required to give the FPC written notice each year of the Government's economic policy and must make recommendations about the ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Remit and recommendations for the Financial Policy Committee
    Nov 15, 2024 · It is tasked with ensuring that emerging risks and vulnerabilities across the financial system are identified, monitored and effectively ...Missing: involvement | Show results with:involvement
  64. [64]
    Financial Policy Committee | Bank of England
    The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee (FPC) identifies, monitors and takes action to remove or reduce systemic risks.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Response by HM Treasury to the Committee's 2nd Report of ...
    Sep 2, 2025 · The government agrees it is vital to get the balance right on capital requirements and deliver financial stability whilst ensuring UK banks can ...
  66. [66]
  67. [67]
    Joint Statement on the U.S.-UK Financial Regulatory Working Group
    Sep 10, 2024 · UK Treasury outlined the UK government's core mission to deliver sustainable economic growth and the work to provide stability and certainty to ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ - GOV.UK
    Jul 1, 2025 · A thriving, international financial services sector, regulated by independent expert regulators with a global reputation for promoting stability ...Missing: affairs responsibilities
  69. [69]
    Governance and funding | Bank of England
    Jul 24, 2025 · Although we are a public body, we do not get a budget from the UK Treasury. Instead, we generate the funds we need for our work by: The Bank of ...
  70. [70]
    Independence - 20 years on | Bank of England
    Since we were granted operational independence over monetary policy on 6 May 1997, our responsibilities have grown to include financial stability and regulating ...Missing: Treasury | Show results with:Treasury
  71. [71]
    Review of the monetary policy framework - GOV.UK
    Mar 20, 2013 · Since the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England was given operational independence in 1997, the remit for the MPC has included an ...
  72. [72]
    House of Lords - Making an independent Bank of England work better
    The Bank of England Act 1998 formalised these arrangements, granting operational independence over monetary policy to the Bank, and establishing the Monetary ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Memorandum of Understanding Between HM Treasury and the ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · HM Treasury and the Bank of England have updated the 2018 Memorandum of Understanding on their financial relationship and published a Joint Statement.
  74. [74]
    Financial relationship between HM Treasury and the Bank of England
    Feb 13, 2025 · Documents on the financial relationship between the Bank of England and HM Treasury. From: HM Treasury; Published: 13 February 2025.
  75. [75]
    Memorandum of Understanding on financial crisis management
    Sep 1, 2025 · The Memorandum of Understanding on crisis management provides detail of the arrangements the Treasury, Bank of England and PRA will put in place ...
  76. [76]
    Joint statement on the Bank of England and HM Treasury financial ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · The Bank of England and HM Treasury have concluded a 5-yearly review of the parameters of the Bank's capital framework as set out in Section 2B ...
  77. [77]
    What we do - Office for Budget Responsibility
    The Office for Budget Responsibility was created in 2010 to provide independent and authoritative analysis of the UK's public finances.Missing: 2010 | Show results with:2010
  78. [78]
    Who we are - Office for Budget Responsibility
    The staff work in teams covering: economic forecasting and analysis; fiscal forecasting and analysis; welfare forecasting and analysis; sustainability analysis; ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Office for Budget Responsibility and HM Treasury Framework ...
    The OBR's main duty is to examine and report on the sustainability of public finances, providing analysis for the government's fiscal policy.
  80. [80]
    Publications - Office for Budget Responsibility
    Report into the main fiscal risks facing the UK and sustainability of the public finances. Fiscal risks and sustainability – July 2025.
  81. [81]
  82. [82]
    Office for Budget Responsibility - GOV.UK
    The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) gives independent and authoritative analysis of the UK's public finances.
  83. [83]
    Third external review of the OBR published - Office for Budget ...
    Feb 10, 2025 · The review concludes that “Over the last five years, the OBR has successfully navigated a series of unprecedented economic and fiscal challenges”
  84. [84]
    Has the OBR experiment been worthwhile? - Heywood Quarterly
    Some critics argue that the OBR underestimated the impact of 'austerity' on economic growth after 2010, although current data show a stronger recovery than ...
  85. [85]
    The Office for Budget Responsibility is a really terrible economic ...
    Oct 28, 2021 · Much of my criticism of the Budget has focused on the reliance it places on wildly optimistic economic forecasts. In that case it is worth ...<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    Blocking OBR forecasts undermines the credibility of Liz Truss's ...
    Sep 22, 2022 · As we have argued before, this is irresponsible and undermines the credibility of the government's fiscal and economic policy. The government ...
  87. [87]
    We should be wary of a fiscal technocracy - IFS
    May 27, 2024 · The Office for Budget Responsibility has brought discipline to fiscal policymaking, but it is possible to have too much of a good thing.
  88. [88]
    How the UK's Fiscal Watchdog Holds Sway Over a £1.5 Trillion Budget
    Mar 31, 2025 · The OBR is an arms-length government body whose remit is set by politicians but carries out its duties independently. It “must be independent ...
  89. [89]
    Who we are - Debt Management Office
    The DMO's remit is to carry out the Government's debt management policy of minimising financing costs over the long term, taking account of risk.
  90. [90]
    UK Debt Management Office - GOV.UK
    The DMO carries out the government's debt management policy of minimising financing costs over the long term, taking account of risk.
  91. [91]
    UK DMO
    The DMO is an Executive Agency of HM Treasury. We are responsible for debt and cash management for the UK Government, lending to local authorities and managing ...Gilt Market · Who we are · Treasury Bills · Careers
  92. [92]
    Treasury 'orthodoxy' | Institute for Government
    Jan 19, 2024 · The Treasury wields too much influence across government and dominates strategic thinking at the centre.Missing: centralization | Show results with:centralization
  93. [93]
    Why Britain's Treasury must change its ways - The Economist
    Nov 16, 2023 · As well as these events, triennial spending reviews are used to set departmental budgets. Since 1997 chancellors have embraced fiscal rules to ...
  94. [94]
    Treasury must not "micromanage" departments, say former civil ...
    The Treasury should stick to wider macro-economic policy and avoid "micro-managing" government departments, two former heads of the civil service have said.
  95. [95]
    House of Commons - Treasury - Third Report - Parliament UK
    [54] We are concerned that the Treasury as an institution has recently begun to exert too much influence over policy areas which are properly the business of ...
  96. [96]
    Why Hasn't UK Regional Policy Worked? The ... - DASH (Harvard)
    by Michael Heseltine in his 2012 report for the ... The lack of Treasury control changed following ... Our own analysis of HM Treasury archives makes clear that – ...
  97. [97]
    Heseltine's No 10 report blasts coalition over growth strategy
    Oct 30, 2012 · Lord Heseltine publishes no-holds-barred report challenging government policy on range of issues including immigration.Missing: HM control
  98. [98]
    The inefficiency of centralised control and political short-termism
    Jun 12, 2025 · We examine how centralised financial control and short-term political pressures have undermined the performance of the Prison Service in England and Wales.
  99. [99]
    Britain's mighty Treasury needs to change - Financial Times
    May 14, 2024 · It needs to impose discipline on government spending to counter politicians' predilection to overspend. Co-ordination is also needed as ...<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    The Treasury View - Economics Help
    Jan 26, 2013 · The Treasury view could be summarised as the belief that: The Keynesian view criticises this Treasury orthodoxy because they argue in a recession, government ...
  101. [101]
    How is Liz Truss's government challenging 'Treasury orthodoxy'?
    Sep 14, 2022 · In the classic Treasury view of the world, expansionary fiscal policy (tax cuts or spending increases) has no impact on growth or employment.
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Crisis and consolidation in the public finances - OBR
    1.6. And, when the crisis did hit, the fiscal consequences were dramatic. The budget deficit quadrupled between 2007-08 and 2009-10, reaching £157 billion or 11 ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] The UK's fiscal targets - UK Parliament
    May 2, 2025 · The fiscal targets are designed to achieve the Treasury's objective for fiscal policy, which is explained in section 2.3. In the first instance, ...
  104. [104]
    How austerity made the UK more vulnerable to COVID
    Jul 27, 2023 · One recent analysis estimated that austerity policies pursued between 2010 and 2019 were associated with £540 billion less public spending.
  105. [105]
    United Kingdom government austerity programme - Wikipedia
    Government spending jumped from 39.1% of GDP to 51.9%, widening the deficit to a level not seen even during the 2008 financial crisis, and reversing austerity ...Missing: eg | Show results with:eg
  106. [106]
    How did COVID affect government revenues, spending, borrowing ...
    The COVID-19 crisis entailed a record-breaking fall in output and increase in government spending. The economy will bounce back but debt remain high.
  107. [107]
    Risks and challenges for the public finances | Institute for Fiscal ... - IFS
    Oct 16, 2025 · Debt interest spending this year was equivalent to 9% of overall government revenues, compared with an average 6% over the two decades to 2020.<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    Monetary Policy Report - February 2025 | Bank of England
    Feb 6, 2025 · UK GDP growth is estimated to have been zero in 2024 Q3, 0.2 percentage points below the projection in the November Report (Section 2.3). GDP is ...
  109. [109]
    The inside story of the mini-budget disaster - BBC
    Sep 24, 2023 · The term "mini budget" will be forever toxic in British politics. So disastrous was then-Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng's September 2022 ...
  110. [110]
    The mini-budget that broke Britain – and Liz Truss - The Guardian
    Oct 20, 2022 · From soaring mortgage costs to a sterling slump, the fiscal event set off a chain of chaos that led to PM's downfall.
  111. [111]
    What are fiscal rules and how have they worked in the UK?
    Apr 16, 2024 · A fiscal rule is a limit or restriction adopted by governments to constrain their decisions around taxes and public spending.
  112. [112]
    Forecast evaluation report – July 2025 - OBR
    Our annual Forecast evaluation report (FER) examines how our forecasts compare to subsequent outturn data and identifies lessons for future forecasts.
  113. [113]
    The Conservatives and the Economy, 2010–24 - IFS
    Jun 3, 2024 · The Great Recession resulted in very big increases in borrowing across Europe, and the UK's total deficit amounted to 10 per cent of GDP, or £ ...
  114. [114]
    UK government debt and deficit: March 2019
    Jul 17, 2019 · In the financial year ending March 2019, the UK general government deficit was £25.5 billion, equivalent to 1.2% of gross domestic product (GDP) ...
  115. [115]
    The budget deficit: a short guide - House of Commons Library
    Jan 17, 2025 · The IMF report UK government borrowing of 6.0% of GDP in 2023. Amongst the G7 countries, Italy and the US borrowed more than the UK, relative to ...
  116. [116]
    Total UK public spending | Institute for Fiscal Studies - IFS
    Between 1999–2000 and 2007–08, Labour increased public spending by an average annual rate of 4.3%, targeting areas such as reducing child and pensioner poverty.
  117. [117]
    Government spending as share of GDP - Our World in Data
    The Public Finances in Modern History Database documents two-hundred years of the history of budget deficits and government debts.
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Economic and fiscal outlook - OBR
    It rises modestly in 2019-20, then falls slowly in the four years to 2023-24. Our central forecast is for a structural deficit of 0.8 per cent of GDP in 2020-21 ...
  119. [119]
    A dominant Treasury is causing problems for government
    The Treasury wields too much influence across government and dominates strategic thinking at the centre.Missing: excessive | Show results with:excessive
  120. [120]
    Fiscal risks and sustainability – July 2025 - OBR
    Jul 8, 2025 · The latest update of our assessment of the current pressures on the public finances was published in our Fiscal risks and sustainability report.<|separator|>
  121. [121]
    Are fiscal rules holding the UK back? - KPMG Responsible Tax
    May 15, 2025 · KPMG International and Jericho hosted a roundtable discussion in March 2025 to explore how to rethink the UK's fiscal rules to breathe life into the economy.Missing: HM successes
  122. [122]
    The British government's obsession with the fiscal rules is driving the ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The UK economy enters the second half of 2025 still confronting weak growth and stubborn inflationary pressures … domestic challenges dominate ...
  123. [123]
    Unleashing growth in the UK: time to break the fiscal chains - LSE
    Mar 6, 2025 · A smarter fiscal strategy for Britain would look like – one that eschews austerity and champions investment in intelligent, sustainable and resilient growth.Missing: stifling | Show results with:stifling
  124. [124]
    Government Performance against Fiscal Rules - Hansard
    Jul 7, 2025 · The fiscal rules are important because when we control the nation's finances, we bring stability to family finances. We have all experienced the ...Missing: HM successes
  125. [125]
    Treasury should have declared overspend by law - OBR - BBC
    Nov 6, 2024 · The Treasury should have disclosed a £9.5bn overspend in the public finances in the run-up to the previous government's Spring Budget "under ...
  126. [126]
    Treasury may have broken law by failing to reveal £9.5bn spend in ...
    Nov 5, 2024 · Treasury officials may have broken the law when they failed to alert the Office for Budget Responsibility about £9.5bn of spending that should ...
  127. [127]
    Fixing the foundations: public spending audit 2024-25 (HTML)
    Aug 2, 2024 · The audit carried out by the Treasury shows that the forecast overspend on departmental spending is expected to be £21.9 billion above the resource ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  128. [128]
    Home Office budgeting and asylum overspends - IFS
    Aug 29, 2024 · The Home Office has repeatedly spent far more than budgeted for asylum, border, visa and passport operations in recent years.
  129. [129]
    The £22bn 'black hole' was obvious to anyone who dared to look - IFS
    Aug 5, 2024 · A week on from Rachel Reeves's big reveal that there is a £22 billion “black hole” in the nation's finances, what are we to make of the claims and ...<|separator|>
  130. [130]
    Spending review 2025: Six key things we learned from Rachel ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · Going into the spending review, the outlook was grim for unprotected services such as local government, police, prisons and criminal courts.
  131. [131]
    [PDF] Lessons learned: a planning and spending framework that enables ...
    Oct 27, 2024 · Source: National Audit Office analysis of HM Treasury spending review documents. Length of spending review period. Multi-year spending review.
  132. [132]
    [PDF] What do we know about the effects of Austerity?
    The key results are that deficit reduction policies based upon spending cuts are much less costly in terms of short run output losses than tax based ...
  133. [133]
  134. [134]
    Some recent analysis of fiscal multipliers a - OBR
    This box outlines some recent research on the size of multipliers, how the multiplier varies during the economic cycle and how multipliers 'taper' over time.
  135. [135]
    [PDF] Fiscal multipliers: How does the OBR estimate the demand impact of ...
    The OBR uses fiscal multipliers, calculated as change in national income divided by change in government spending, to estimate the impact of tax and spending ...
  136. [136]
    No. 991: New evidence on state-dependent fiscal multipliers
    The results indicate that the government spending multiplier varies significantly, ranging from near zero during expansions to slightly below one in downturns.
  137. [137]
    [PDF] Discussion paper No.5: Public investment and potential output - OBR
    A 1% increase in public investment could increase potential output by just under ½% after five years and around 2½% in the long run.
  138. [138]
    [PDF] Public investment fiscal multipliers: - University College London
    Fiscal multipliers tend to be larger than one, with public investment having a permanent effect on output. They are lower excluding post-crisis and larger in ...
  139. [139]
    Evaluating the Spring Budget and the UK's fiscal rules - CEPR
    Jul 2, 2024 · The majority of the panel (63%) thinks that the UK's fiscal rules are either ineffective or counterproductive in limiting the accumulation of ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  140. [140]
    [PDF] An Assessment of Fiscal Rules in the United Kingdom - WP/01/91
    One ex ante empirical approach which would be more appropriate for the U.K. situation is to simulate the effects of fiscal rules on key variables using a ...
  141. [141]
    [PDF] Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad
    This paper finds no evidence that government spending multipliers differ by the amount of slack in the economy. Most estimates are between 0.6 and 1.