Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cryptanalysis

Cryptanalysis is the study of mathematical techniques for defeating cryptographic systems and information security measures, including the identification of errors, vulnerabilities, or weaknesses that allow recovery of plaintext from ciphertext without knowledge of the encryption key. Historically, the discipline advanced from rudimentary manual methods to systematic approaches, with the earliest known description of frequency analysis—a technique exploiting letter occurrence probabilities in languages—attributed to the 9th-century Arab polymath Al-Kindi, who outlined procedures for breaking monoalphabetic substitution ciphers. A defining achievement came during World War II, when British cryptanalysts, including Alan Turing, exploited structural flaws in the German Enigma rotor machine to decrypt military communications, employing innovations like the electromechanical Bombe device to test key settings efficiently and contributing to Allied intelligence successes that shortened the conflict. In contemporary applications, cryptanalysis rigorously tests modern ciphers through methods such as differential and linear analysis, as demonstrated in attacks on the Data Encryption Standard (DES), thereby driving improvements in cryptographic standards to withstand computational and mathematical assaults.

Fundamentals of Cryptanalysis

Definition and Objectives

Cryptanalysis is the study of mathematical techniques aimed at defeating cryptographic systems or information security measures, typically by recovering plaintext from ciphertext or deriving encryption keys without authorized access. This discipline focuses on exploiting structural weaknesses, implementation flaws, or probabilistic patterns in ciphers, distinguishing it from brute-force exhaustive search by emphasizing analytical methods that reduce computational complexity. Key objectives encompass both offensive and defensive applications: adversaries seek to breach confidentiality by decrypting protected data, while cryptographers use cryptanalytic results to evaluate and fortify algorithm designs against foreseeable attacks. The primary goal in adversarial cryptanalysis is to undermine encryption integrity, enabling unauthorized access to in-transit or stored data through methods such as frequency analysis for classical substitution ciphers or differential analysis for modern block ciphers. Defensively, objectives include quantifying security margins—such as resistance to specific attack complexities measured in operations or time—and informing standards like those from NIST, where cryptanalysis validates primitives before deployment. For instance, successful cryptanalysis has historically exposed vulnerabilities in systems like DES, prompting transitions to stronger alternatives like AES after evaluating key recovery feasibility under realistic resource constraints. Beyond mere breaking, cryptanalysis objectives extend to broader system resilience, incorporating side-channel evaluations (e.g., timing or power analysis) and protocol-level scrutiny to prevent cascading failures in real-world deployments. This dual-edged nature underscores its role in advancing cryptographic science, where empirical testing against known attacks ensures that security claims withstand rigorous, evidence-based challenges rather than unverified assumptions.

Adversarial Models

In cryptanalysis, adversarial models formalize the capabilities, knowledge, and resources attributed to an attacker attempting to compromise a cryptographic system, enabling systematic security assessments. These models assume, per Kerckhoffs' principle—enunciated by Auguste Kerckhoffs in his 1883 pamphlet La Cryptographie Militaire—that the adversary knows the full details of the algorithm, protocol, and implementation, with security hinging exclusively on key secrecy. This principle underpins modern evaluations by isolating key-dependent strength from design obscurity, countering earlier security-by-obscurity approaches that failed against informed adversaries. Adversarial models are stratified by access levels to plaintexts, ciphertexts, and oracles, progressing from passive eavesdropping to active manipulation. Passive models limit the attacker to observation, while active models permit interaction, reflecting escalating threats in real-world deployments such as intercepted communications versus compromised endpoints. Computational assumptions typically bound the adversary to feasible resources, often polynomial-time algorithms relative to a security parameter n (e.g., key length in bits), as exhaustive search becomes impractical beyond certain thresholds; for instance, brute-forcing a 128-bit key requires approximately 2^128 operations, exceeding global computing capacity as of 2023 estimates. Key classifications include:
  • Ciphertext-only attack (COA): The attacker possesses solely ciphertext samples, relying on inherent statistical biases or patterns in the output for key recovery or plaintext inference; historical examples include frequency analysis on monoalphabetic ciphers, effective due to non-uniform letter distributions in natural languages.
  • Known-plaintext attack (KPA): Access to specific plaintext-ciphertext pairs allows exploitation of linear or differential correlations; for example, Enigma cryptanalysis during World War II leveraged known message headers ("Wetterbericht") to map rotor settings.
  • Chosen-plaintext attack (CPA): The adversary queries an encryption oracle with selected plaintexts to generate ciphertexts, probing structural weaknesses like adaptive inputs revealing key bits; this models scenarios such as malware encrypting chosen data on a target device.
  • Chosen-ciphertext attack (CCA): Extending CPA, the attacker accesses a decryption oracle for chosen ciphertexts (excluding the target in CCA2 variants), simulating tampering or malleability exploits; Padding Oracle attacks on CBC-mode implementations, disclosed in 2002 by Serge Vaudenay, demonstrated practical CCA vulnerabilities yielding full plaintext recovery.
These models inform provable security reductions, where resistance to stronger attacks (e.g., CCA) implies resilience to weaker ones, though empirical cryptanalysis often tests boundaries via side-channel extensions like timing or power analysis, assuming bounded but resourceful adversaries.

Evaluation Criteria

The effectiveness of a cryptanalytic attack is evaluated based on its computational feasibility, typically quantified through time complexity, which measures the number of basic operations (such as encryptions or table lookups) required to execute the attack. Space or memory complexity assesses the amount of storage needed, often expressed as the number of bits or blocks, as high memory demands can render an attack impractical even if time-efficient. Data complexity evaluates the volume of known plaintext-ciphertext pairs or other oracle queries necessary, with lower requirements indicating a more efficient attack under resource-constrained scenarios. Success probability quantifies the likelihood of recovering the key or distinguishing the cipher from random, particularly for probabilistic methods like differential or linear cryptanalysis, where analytical formulas derive expected success rates from statistical biases. Attacks are further contextualized by the adversarial model, such as ciphertext-only (least advantageous) versus chosen-plaintext access, with evaluations requiring the attack to outperform exhaustive search (e.g., exceeding 2^{128} operations for 128-bit security). Comprehensive assessment often compares these metrics against benchmarks like NIST security levels, where breaking a scheme must demand resources equivalent to or exceeding targeted computational bounds, such as 2^{112} operations for moderate security. Key recovery remains the gold standard for success, as partial breaks (e.g., message recovery without the full key) may not compromise long-term secrecy, though distinguishing attacks serve as precursors indicating underlying weaknesses. Trade-offs between time, space, and data are inherent; for instance, time-memory trade-off attacks reduce runtime at the cost of preprocessing storage, evaluated via equations balancing these factors against brute-force baselines. Rigorous evaluation demands empirical validation through simulations or hardware implementations to confirm theoretical complexities under real-world constraints.

Historical Evolution

Ancient and Classical Periods

In ancient civilizations, rudimentary cryptography appeared as early as 1900 BC in Egypt, where non-standard hieroglyphs were used on tomb inscriptions to obscure text from the uninitiated, potentially requiring interpretive analysis by scribes to decipher deviations from standard forms. Similar protocryptographic practices existed in Mesopotamian cuneiform tablets around 1500 BC, hiding recipes or messages beneath altered scripts, which could be resolved through contextual linguistic knowledge or trial comparison with known writings rather than formal methods. These early systems lacked complexity, making "cryptanalysis" effectively a matter of scholarly familiarity or physical access to references, with no surviving records of systematic breaking techniques. By the classical Greek period, military cryptography advanced with the Spartan scytale around 400 BC, a transposition device wrapping a message strip around a baton of specific diameter to scramble text, which could only be reordered correctly using a matching baton—thus, interception without the physical tool rendered it challenging, though brute-force unwrapping trials or measurement estimation might succeed against short messages. Aeneas Tacticus, circa 350 BC, authored the earliest known treatise on securing communications in On the Defense of Fortifications, detailing encoding methods like hidden inks and signal variations to evade interception, reflecting awareness of adversarial eavesdropping but emphasizing prevention over analytical decryption. Polybius (c. 150 BC) described a grid-based substitution system pairing letters into numeric coordinates, vulnerable to pattern recognition in sufficient volume, yet no contemporary accounts document its cryptanalytic exploitation. Roman adoption included the Caesar cipher around 50 BC, a monoalphabetic shift of three letters (e.g., A to D), employed for military orders, which remained susceptible to exhaustive trial of the 25 possible shifts or rudimentary frequency matching against Latin letter distributions—methods feasible even without formal tools, though historical evidence points to reliance on captured couriers or betrayed keys rather than mathematical deduction. Emperor Augustus modified it to a one-letter shift, offering marginal improvement but identical weaknesses. Overall, classical cryptanalysis remained ad hoc, constrained by cipher simplicity and absence of voluminous ciphertext, prioritizing human intelligence over algorithmic approaches until later eras.

World Wars and Early 20th Century

British naval intelligence established Room 40 in August 1914 to analyze intercepted German wireless messages, achieving early successes in decrypting naval codes using recovered codebooks from sunken ships and mathematical reconstruction. By January 1917, Room 40 cryptanalysts decrypted the Zimmermann Telegram, a message sent on January 16 from German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmermann to the Mexican government via the German ambassador in Washington, proposing a military alliance against the United States in exchange for territory lost in the Mexican-American War. The decryption relied on prior breaks into German diplomatic codes, and its public release on March 1, 1917, through American channels to conceal British interception methods, contributed to the U.S. declaration of war on Germany on April 6, 1917. In the interwar period, Polish cryptanalysts at the Cipher Bureau targeted the German Enigma machine, adopted by the military in 1928. Mathematician Marian Rejewski, recruited in 1932, exploited known-plaintext attacks and permutation group theory to recover the internal wiring of Enigma rotors by December 1932, enabling periodic recovery of daily keys despite the machine's estimated 10^16 possibilities. Rejewski, with Jerzy Różycki and Henryk Zygalski, developed electromechanical aids like the Bomba (1938) for key search and perforated sheets for crib-based attacks, though Enigma modifications in 1937 and 1938 increased difficulty. On July 25, 1939, the Poles shared their methods, replica Enigma, and Bombe design with British and French intelligence at a meeting in Warsaw's Pyry forest, providing crucial foundational knowledge as war approached. During World War II, the Government Code and Cypher School (GC&CS) relocated to Bletchley Park in 1939, where Hut 8 under Alan Turing adapted Polish techniques to break naval Enigma variants, incorporating a plugboard that multiplied settings to about 10^23. Turing designed the British Bombe, an electromechanical device simulating multiple Enigmas to test rotor orders and plugboard settings via "cribs" (guessed plaintext), with the first unit operational in March 1940 and breaking keys for April 22–27 traffic. By late 1941, American-built Bombes supplemented British production, reaching 211 machines by war's end, enabling daily decryption of Enigma traffic that yielded Ultra intelligence, estimated to have shortened the European war by two to four years. Parallel efforts targeted the Lorenz SZ40/42 cipher used for high-level German army commands; cryptanalyst William Tutte deduced its 12-wheel structure from a 1942 depth error in August 1942, leading engineer Tommy Flowers to build Colossus, the first programmable electronic computer, operational on December 5, 1943 (Mark I by January 1944), which processed 5,000 characters per second to set wheel starts and predict chi wheels. American cryptanalysts in the Signal Intelligence Service independently broke Japan's Type B Cipher Machine (U.S. codenamed Purple), a stepping-switch system introduced in 1939 for diplomatic traffic, achieving initial recovery of settings by August 1940 through Leo Marks and others' analysis of non-rotor correlations, producing Magic decrypts that informed U.S. policy but failed to predict Pearl Harbor due to incomplete naval code breaks. These wartime cryptanalytic advances demonstrated the shift toward machine-assisted methods, leveraging mathematics, captured materials, and intercepted traffic to exploit systematic weaknesses in rotor and additive ciphers, fundamentally altering intelligence dynamics.

Post-WWII to Digital Transition

The establishment of the (NSA) in 1952 by consolidated U.S. cryptologic efforts, merging and units to address threats from Soviet systems. This reorganization emphasized , as post-war cryptanalysts adapted vacuum-tube computers for tasks previously reliant on manual or electromechanical methods, enabling faster of high-volume intercepted . Claude Shannon's 1949 paper, "Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems," applied information theory to cryptography, defining perfect secrecy as achievable only when ciphertext provides no more information than plaintext under known-plaintext assumptions, and introducing unicity distance as the minimum redundant text needed to uniquely determine a key. These metrics shifted cryptanalysis from ad-hoc frequency analysis to probabilistic evaluations of redundancy and entropy, influencing designs resistant to statistical attacks. By the mid-1950s, NSA cryptanalysts deployed custom electronic computers, such as those derived from wartime Colossus derivatives, for algebraic and statistical attacks on teletype ciphers, marking the transition from punched-card sorters to programmable . The saw further with transistor-based systems, allowing exhaustive searches on short keys and in polyalphabetic substitutions, though classified until declassifications decades later. The 1970s brought cryptography into commercial domains with the National Bureau of Standards' (NBS) selection of the Data Encryption Standard (DES) in 1977, an IBM-modified block cipher using a 56-bit effective key for 64-bit blocks. Early cryptanalytic concerns centered on brute-force feasibility; Diffie and Hellman in 1977 argued that dedicated hardware could exhaust the 2^56 keyspace within 1.5 years at $10 million cost, highlighting how Moore's Law amplified digital threats to fixed-key systems. This era's techniques, including meet-in-the-middle attacks reducing DES exhaustive search to 2^57 operations by 1981, underscored the digital transition's core challenge: computational scalability over manual ingenuity.

Techniques for Symmetric-Key Systems

Block Cipher Cryptanalysis

Block cipher cryptanalysis focuses on identifying weaknesses in symmetric-key algorithms that process fixed-size data blocks, such as the Data Encryption Standard (DES) or Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), typically structured as iterated rounds of substitution-permutation networks or Feistel constructions. These attacks aim to recover the secret key, forge ciphertexts, or distinguish the cipher's output from a random permutation using resources fewer than exhaustive search, often exploiting statistical biases in the round functions or key schedule. Success depends on the cipher's diffusion and confusion properties, with modern designs like AES resisting full-round breaks but vulnerable in reduced-round variants. Differential cryptanalysis, introduced by Eli Biham and Adi Shamir in 1990, analyzes pairs of plaintexts differing in specific bits to propagate predictable differences through rounds, estimating the probability of output differences to deduce key bits. Applied to DES, it breaks up to 15 of 16 rounds with 2^47 chosen plaintexts, though full DES requires more due to meet-in-the-middle optimizations; it also compromised early ciphers like FEAL and IDEA variants. Truncated variants extend this by ignoring some difference bits, improving applicability to SPN structures. Linear cryptanalysis, developed by Mitsuru Matsui in 1993, approximates nonlinear operations with linear equations over GF(2), seeking high-bias relations where plaintext bits XORed with ciphertext bits approximate key bits XORed with intermediate values. For DES, Matsui's attack on the full 16 rounds uses 2^43 known plaintexts and 2^43 time, leveraging the best approximation with bias 2^{-15}; it was experimentally verified in 1994. Extensions include partitioning linear approximations for better coverage in multi-round ciphers. Integral cryptanalysis, proposed by Lars Knudsen and David Wagner in 1999, propagates integral properties over sets of plaintexts where subsets sum to zero modulo 2 (or other values), exploiting byte-wise bijectivity in ciphers like Square. It distinguishes 3 rounds of Square with 2^18 chosen plaintexts and extends to key recovery on 6 rounds; applied to AES precursors, it reveals weaknesses in incomplete diffusion rounds. Bit-based division properties refine integral distinguishers for lightweight ciphers. Impossible differential cryptanalysis, an extension of differential methods from 1998 onward, identifies differentials with provable probability zero across rounds, using them to filter incorrect key candidates via contradiction in partial decryption. It breaks 5 rounds of Skipjack with 2^21 chosen plaintexts and 2^30 time, and reduced-round AES (e.g., 7 rounds) with complexities around 2^100; generalized variants incorporate multiple impossible paths for tighter bounds. Other techniques include attacks, combining two short differentials for amplified probability without full , effective on AES-like ciphers up to 7 rounds with 2^39 ; and algebraic attacks modeling rounds as systems solvable via Gröbner bases, though computationally intensive for full keys. Key-schedule weaknesses enable related-key attacks, as in reduced-round AES-192/256 with 2^99.1 time. These methods underscore the need for wide-trail designs and provable security margins in ciphers.

Stream Cipher Cryptanalysis

Stream ciphers generate a pseudorandom keystream that is combined with plaintext via bitwise XOR to produce ciphertext, making cryptanalysis primarily target weaknesses in the keystream generator for key recovery, distinguishing the output from true randomness, or predicting future bits. Common generators include linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs) combined nonlinearly, permutation-based designs like RC4, or word-oriented feedback shift registers in modern proposals. Attacks exploit statistical biases, linear approximations, or algebraic structures, with success depending on the generator's nonlinearity, feedback polynomial degree, and internal state size. Correlation attacks, introduced by Siegenthaler in 1985, target LFSR-based stream ciphers by identifying linear approximations between the keystream and individual LFSR outputs with correlation probability greater than 0.5, allowing recovery of LFSR initial states via maximum likelihood decoding. Fast variants, such as those using fast Walsh-Hadamard transforms, reduce complexity from exponential in the number of approximations to quadratic, enabling attacks on ciphers with multiple short LFSRs combined by a nonlinear filter. Higher-order correlations extend this to multivariate approximations, improving efficiency against ciphers like nonlinear filter generators. Algebraic attacks model the stream cipher as a system of multivariate quadratic equations over GF(2), derived from keystream bits and the generator's update function, solvable via Gröbner bases or linearization for low-degree nonlinearities. These are particularly effective against filter-based LFSRs with algebraic degree less than the linear span, as demonstrated in attacks recovering keys from observed keystream segments. Cube attacks, a variant targeting black-box access, enumerate low-degree cubes of input variables to compute approximations, breaking reduced-round versions of Grain and Trivium with complexities around 2^40 operations in some cases. Distinguishing and key-recovery attacks often leverage initial keystream biases or resynchronization weaknesses. For RC4, Fluhrer, Mantin, and Shamir identified in 2001 that certain key bytes produce non-uniform initial outputs, enabling related-key attacks recovering WEP keys with 2^15 computations from 802.11 packets. A5/1, used in GSM since 1991, succumbed to correlation attacks by Biryukov et al. in 2000 (2^40 time precomputation) and time-memory-data tradeoff attacks by Maximov et al. in 2005 (2^48.6 operations real-time), allowing practical decryption with rainbow tables. eSTREAM finalists like Trivium and Grain resist full-round practical attacks but face distinguishing attacks on reduced rounds, with Trivium vulnerable to SAT-solver-based key recovery in 2007 for 767 rounds (out of 1152) at 2^84 complexity. Time-memory-data tradeoff (TMDTO) attacks, applicable to memory-bound ciphers, store precomputed state transitions to accelerate online key searches, limiting security to roughly half the internal state bits for designs like A5/1 or early Grain versions. Side-channel aware cryptanalysis, though distinct, complements these by exploiting implementation leaks, but pure mathematical breaks emphasize generator design flaws like insufficient nonlinearity or predictable IV handling. Modern stream ciphers, such as ChaCha20 adopted in TLS 1.3 since 2018, incorporate larger states and ARX operations to mitigate known techniques, though ongoing research targets potential higher-order biases.

Public-Key Cryptanalysis

Attacks on RSA and Factoring

The RSA cryptosystem's security fundamentally depends on the computational difficulty of factoring the public modulus n = p \times q, where p and q are large, distinct primes of comparable size. Factoring n allows recovery of the private exponent d, enabling decryption of all ciphertexts encrypted with the corresponding public exponent e. While no polynomial-time classical algorithm exists for general integer factorization, subexponential-time methods have progressively threatened smaller RSA keys, with the general number field sieve (GNFS) representing the state-of-the-art for large semiprimes. GNFS exploits algebraic number theory to find relations among smooth numbers in sieved factor bases, achieving complexity roughly L_n[1.923, c] where L_n[a, c] = e^{c (\ln n)^a (\ln \ln n)^{1-a}} and c \approx 1.9 for optimal parameters. Historical factoring milestones GNFS's : RSA-129 (426 bits) was factored in 1994 using a coordinated via the , while RSA-768 (768 bits, 232 digits) fell to GNFS in December 2009 after approximately 2,000 CPU-years of across distributed systems. More recently, RSA-240 (795 bits) was factored in November 2019 using optimized GNFS implementations, highlighting ongoing refinements in polynomial selection and sieving despite no asymptotic breakthroughs. Earlier algorithms like Pollard's rho (expected O(\sqrt{p}) time for smallest prime p) and the (suited for moduli up to about 100 digits) remain practical for smaller or specially structured n, but GNFS dominates for RSA-relevant sizes exceeding 512 bits. Beyond direct factoring, RSA implementations vulnerable to poor parameter choices admit efficient attacks without full factorization. Wiener's 1990 continued-fraction attack recovers d in polynomial time if d < n^{1/4} (about 256 bits for 1024-bit n), by approximating e/n \approx k/d via convergents of the continued-fraction expansion of e/n and checking for valid roots of the resulting quadratic. Boneh and Durfee extended this in 1999 using lattice reduction on Coppersmith's method for small roots of univariate modular equations, attacking up to d < n^{0.292} by solving perturbed instances of (x + f(x))^e \equiv c \pmod{n} where f is low-degree. Coppersmith's framework more broadly enables attacks on low-exponent RSA with partial key exposure or faulty padding, such as finding small plaintext roots modulo n when high-order bits are known, though these require d or message fractions below specific thresholds (e.g., n^{0.5} for half the bits). Multi-prime RSA (with more than two factors) amplifies risks from these, as unbalanced primes weaken continued-fraction bounds. These attacks emphasize causal vulnerabilities: RSA's equivalence to factoring holds only under random oracles or specific padding like OAEP, but raw textbook RSA permits message malleability and chosen-ciphertext exploits if not hybridized with symmetric primitives. Empirical evidence from factoring challenges confirms 2048-bit moduli remain secure against classical resources as of 2025, but projected GNFS scaling suggests 1024-bit keys approach feasibility with massive parallelism. Defenses include ensuring |p - q| \approx \sqrt{n}, d > n^{0.3}, and balanced primes, alongside hybrid encryption to limit exposure.

Discrete Logarithm Problem Attacks

The problem (DLP) consists of finding an x such that g^x \equiv h \pmod{p} for a prime p, g, and h in the \mathbb{F}_p^*, or more generally in other groups like elliptic curve groups. Attacks on the DLP exploit group , with methods applicable to arbitrary groups achieving O(\sqrt{n}) time where n is the group , while non-generic attacks algebraic for faster solutions in specific settings like finite fields. Pohlig-Hellman algorithm, published in 1978, reduces the DLP to computations in subgroups corresponding to the prime factors of n, with complexity O(\sum \sqrt{p_i^{e_i}}) where n = \prod p_i^{e_i}, making it effective against groups with smooth orders but ineffective for prime-order groups used in modern cryptography. The baby-step giant-step (BSGS) algorithm, introduced by Daniel Shanks in 1971, performs a meet-in-the-middle search by precomputing "baby steps" g^{i} for i = 0 to \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil and checking "giant steps" h \cdot g^{-j \cdot m} where m = \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil, yielding O(\sqrt{n}) time and space complexity. Pollard's rho algorithm, proposed by John Pollard in 1978, uses a pseudorandom walk in the group to detect collisions via Floyd's cycle-finding method, achieving the same O(\sqrt{n}) expected time but constant space, and parallelizable variants like van Oorschot-Wiener further optimize it for distributed computation. In finite fields \mathbb{F}_p^*, index calculus attacks provide subexponential . The selects a of small primes, computes discrete logs for elements by solving relations from sieving smooth values of g^r \cdot h^{-s}, and extends to arbitrary logs via linear over the logs of the ; its heuristic is L_p[1/2, c] for some c > 0, where L_p[\alpha, c] = e^{c (\log p)^\alpha (\log \log p)^{1-\alpha}}. The number field sieve for discrete logarithms (NFS-DL), an extension of the factoring NFS introduced in the early 1990s and refined for DLP by 1993, uses two rings (rational and algebraic) to collect smooth relations via sieving, followed by a large sparse linear system solution over \mathbb{F}_2 for log ratios, achieving L_p[1/3, (64/9)^{1/3}] complexity; practical records include solving a 530-bit DLP in 2005 and larger instances up to around 800 bits by 2019 using distributed efforts. For elliptic curve groups E(\mathbb{F}_q), generic attacks like Pollard's rho dominate due to the absence of general index calculus methods, maintaining O(\sqrt{n}) hardness, though optimizations such as distinguished points reduce memory needs. Special vulnerabilities include the MOV attack (1990), which reduces the elliptic curve DLP to a finite field DLP via Weil pairing when the embedding degree is small, enabling index calculus if the extension field is amenable; anomalous curve attacks (Smart, 1999; Satoh-Araki, 1998) lift points to characteristic zero for traceable computation when the trace of Frobenius is $1 \pmod{q}; and Pohlig-Hellman applies if the order is smooth. Recent advances, such as quasi-index calculus for certain curves with complex multiplication (2010), target specific families but do not threaten standardized NIST or SEC curves with large prime orders.

Lattice and Code-Based System Vulnerabilities

Lattice-based cryptographic systems, which derive security from problems such as Learning With Errors (LWE) and Short Integer Solution (SIS), are vulnerable to lattice reduction attacks that approximate the shortest vector problem (SVP) or closest vector problem (CVP). The Lenstra–Lenstra–Lovász (LLL) algorithm, introduced in 1982, provides a polynomial-time method for basis reduction, enabling subsequent Block Korkine–Zolotarev (BKZ) variants to solve LWE instances by finding short vectors in associated lattices; for example, the primal attack constructs a q-ary lattice from LWE samples and applies BKZ to recover the secret vector, with complexity scaling as approximately 2^{0.292d} for dimension d under optimized block sizes. Dual attacks, leveraging the Kannan embedding, similarly exploit CVP approximations to distinguish LWE from uniform noise, achieving success rates exceeding 90% for underparametrized schemes like certain ring-LWE variants with modulus q around 2^{32}. These methods have no asymptotic breaks but render insecure schemes with small dimensions or noise parameters below recommended thresholds, as demonstrated by breaks in early NTRU implementations using dimensions as low as 400. Recent cryptanalytic advances incorporate machine learning, with Transformer-based models like VERDE outperforming classical BKZ on LWE instances by exploiting distributional patterns in error terms, achieving key recovery in under 2^{100} operations for NIST security level 1 parameters in targeted experiments conducted in 2025. Quantum-enhanced variants, such as those improving lattice sieving via quantum walks, further erode margins for high-dimensional lattices, though classical ISD hybrids remain dominant for practical breaks. Parameter selection critically mitigates these; NIST post-quantum finalists like Kyber withstand attacks up to level 5 security (2^{128} operations) with dimensions around 768 and noise σ ≈ 2/√(2π), but surveys of lattice attacks underscore that over-reliance on heuristic BKZ simulations risks underestimating real-world performance, as core hardness reduces to worst-case lattice problems without known polynomial solutions. Code-based systems, exemplified by the McEliece cryptosystem proposed in 1978, base security on the intractability of syndrome decoding for general linear codes, but face iterative improvements in information set decoding (ISD) algorithms that probabilistically recover error vectors. Prange's 1962 ISD framework, which selects error-free information sets to solve for secrets, has evolved through Stern's 1989 birthday-paradox optimization and May-Ozerov-Meurer's 2015 variant, reducing complexity from exponential O(2^{n/ log n}) to near-quadratic in code length n for binary codes with error weight t ≈ 0.05n, enabling attacks on undersecured parameters like n=1024, t=50 in under 2^{60} operations using modern implementations. Quantum ISD accelerations, via Grover's algorithm on subset-sum subproblems, halve the exponent for exhaustive search but remain impractical for full breaks due to high qubit requirements exceeding 10^6 for McEliece-sized instances. Structural vulnerabilities plague variants exploiting code substructures; for instance, quasi-cyclic constructions in BIKE or HQC suffer distinguisher attacks recovering parity-check matrices via linear algebra on cyclic shifts, as shown in 2019 analyses breaking 80-bit security claims with 2^{40} time. Alternant and Goppa code-based schemes like Classic McEliece resist ISD up to t=128 errors in n=6960 dimensions at 2^{128} cost, but "escher-like" wild Goppa proposals from 2015 were invalidated by low-weight codeword attacks costing 2^{50} operations due to hidden algebraic dependencies. Recent ISD enhancements, including nearest-neighbor pruning and belief propagation hybrids, target moderate-density parity-check codes, eroding key-size advantages and prompting larger parameters (e.g., n>10^4) for quantum-resistant security, though no generic polynomial-time break exists for random codes.

Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions

Collision and Preimage Resistance Breaks

In cryptographic hash functions, collision resistance requires that finding two distinct inputs producing the same output hash value is computationally infeasible, ideally requiring effort on the order of $2^{n/2} operations for an n-bit hash. A break occurs when this property is violated through practical or near-practical attacks. The first major collision break targeted MD5, a 128-bit hash designed by Ronald Rivest in 1991. In August 2004, researchers Xiaoyun Wang, Dengguo Feng, Xuejia Lai, and Hongjun Wu announced a collision attack on full MD5 at the Crypto 2004 rump session, constructing two messages differing in about 6 bytes that hash to the same value using a differential cryptanalysis approach exploiting weaknesses in MD5's compression function. This attack's complexity was approximately $2^{39} MD5 evaluations, far below the birthday bound of $2^{64}, rendering MD5 unsuitable for collision-dependent applications like digital signatures. Subsequent improvements, such as Marc Stevens' 2006 fast collision attack, reduced the complexity to $2^{33} time and $2^{24} space for two-block collisions. SHA-1, a 160-bit hash standardized by NIST in 1995, faced similar vulnerabilities. Theoretical collisions were known since 2005, but practical construction eluded researchers until February 23, 2017, when Marc Stevens, Elie Bursztein, and colleagues from Google and CWI Amsterdam demonstrated the first real-world SHA-1 collision via the SHAttered attack. They generated two distinct PDF files with identical SHA-1 hashes, requiring about $2^{63} SHA-1 computations using Google Cloud infrastructure over 6,500 CPU-years and 2.7 million core-hours. The attack exploited SHA-1's modular addition differences and near-collision blocks, confirming long-held suspicions of its weakness and prompting deprecation in protocols like TLS by 2017. No collisions have been publicly demonstrated for SHA-2 family hashes like SHA-256, which remain collision-resistant against known attacks, though reduced-round collisions exist for variants. Preimage resistance, demanding that inverting a hash to find any input yielding a given output requires roughly $2^n effort, has proven more robust. No practical full preimage attacks exist for MD5 or SHA-1; the best known for MD5 target reduced-round versions, such as a 2008 attack on 44 of 64 steps with $2^{96} complexity using meet-in-the-middle techniques. For full MD5, preimage resistance holds near the $2^{128} brute-force bound, as collision vulnerabilities do not directly translate to preimage breaks without additional structure exploitation. Similarly, SHA-1 lacks full preimage attacks beyond theoretical $2^{160} efforts, with only second-preimage weaknesses noted in expandable message constructions for MD5-like functions. These distinctions underscore that while collisions undermine integrity checks, preimage breaks would more severely compromise one-way properties, but none have materialized practically for deployed full hashes, preserving limited utility in non-collision contexts.

Merkle-Damgård and Sponge Construction Weaknesses

The Merkle-Damgård (MD) construction, which iteratively applies a compression function to fixed-size blocks of input data with appended padding including message length, exhibits structural vulnerabilities that enable specific generic attacks. A prominent weakness is the length-extension attack, wherein an adversary possessing the hash value of a message M, denoted H(M), can efficiently compute H(M \Vert \text{pad} \Vert X) for arbitrary chosen X without access to M itself. This exploits the chaining of the internal state across blocks and the deterministic padding scheme, allowing the attacker to simulate continued iteration from the known final state of M. Such attacks compromise the use of raw MD-based hashes in message authentication contexts, as demonstrated in practical exploits against early implementations like Flickr's web authentication scheme prior to its 2012 mitigation. MD constructions also facilitate multi-collision attacks more efficiently than expected for a random oracle model. In 2004, Joux demonstrated that finding $2^k messages sharing the same hash requires only approximately k \cdot 2^{n/2} evaluations of the compression function for an n-bit hash output, rather than the naive $2^{n k / 2} effort, by constructing collisions block-by-block across a tree of differing suffixes. This generic attack, extended in subsequent work to enable herding attacks for second preimages on long messages, undermines confidence in MD's resistance to collisions when message lengths vary significantly. For instance, Kelsey et al. in 2005 detailed long-message second preimage attacks leveraging multi-collisions, achievable with effort comparable to finding a single collision. These flaws persist in MD-based functions like SHA-2, prompting recommendations to pair them with prefixes or use alternatives for MACs. In contrast, the sponge construction, employed in SHA-3 (Keccak), mitigates MD's length-extension vulnerability through its absorb-squeeze paradigm: input is XORed into a fixed-width state (capacity c plus rate r) before permutation, and output is squeezed from the rate bits without exposing the full state for direct extension. Appending data requires full re-absorption and permutation, preventing efficient extension from a known output alone. However, sponges are not impervious to generic cryptanalysis; time-space tradeoff attacks can target collision-finding in the squeezing phase, as explored in 2022 work showing that single-block collisions in sponge hashing reduce to function inversion problems, potentially amplifying effort to O(2^{r/2}) with optimized storage. Specific to Keccak, reduced-round distinguishers and algebraic attacks exist—such as rebound attacks on up to 7 rounds out of 24 in 2011—but these do not breach the claimed security margins of $2^{n/2} for n-bit outputs against practical adversaries as of 2025. Weaknesses may emerge if the permutation's differential uniformity is insufficient, though Keccak's design provides a buffer exceeding 50% rounds unbroken.

Implementation Attacks

Side-Channel Exploitation

Side-channel exploitation refers to cryptanalytic techniques that infer secret keys or other sensitive data from unintended physical leakages during cryptographic computations, rather than from algorithmic weaknesses. These leakages arise from implementation details, such as variations in execution time, power consumption, electromagnetic emissions, or acoustic noise, which correlate with internal states involving secrets. Unlike black-box analysis, side-channel attacks require access to the device's operational environment, often necessitating proximity or instrumentation, but they can recover full keys from relatively few traces when correlations are strong. Timing attacks, introduced by Paul Kocher in 1996, target implementations where computation duration depends on secret values. For instance, in RSA decryption using the square-and-multiply algorithm for modular exponentiation, multiplication steps occur only for bits set to 1 in the private exponent, leading to measurable time differences across operations; attackers statistically correlate these variances across multiple encryptions to reconstruct the exponent. Kocher demonstrated recovery of 768-bit RSA keys from remote network timings and full breaks on smart-card implementations with local measurements, assuming uniform input distributions and negligible noise. Such vulnerabilities persist in non-constant-time software like early OpenSSL versions for Diffie-Hellman. Power analysis attacks extend this by measuring voltage fluctuations or current draw during key-dependent operations. Simple power analysis (SPA) visually inspects traces for patterns, such as distinguishing squaring from multiplication in RSA exponentiation via distinct power profiles. Differential power analysis (DPA), formalized by Kocher, Jaffe, and Jun in 1999, employs statistical hypothesis testing: attackers hypothesize intermediate values (e.g., Hamming weights of S-box outputs in DES), predict power models, partition traces, and compute differentials to amplify key-correlated signals while averaging out noise; experiments broke 56-bit DES keys on smart cards using 1-10 traces per subkey bit with oscilloscope measurements. DPA's efficacy scales with trace count via the signal-to-noise ratio, often succeeding against AES implementations by targeting byte-wise substitutions where power leaks subkey bits. Electromagnetic (EM) analysis, a variant of power attacks, captures radiated fields with near-field probes, offering non-invasive advantages over direct power lines; it has recovered AES keys from processors at distances up to centimeters, exploiting similar Hamming-weight models but with potentially higher spatial resolution for multi-core leaks. Acoustic side-channels, though rarer, exploit sound from capacitors or vibrations, as shown in 2004 attacks on RSA via exponentiation-induced CPU fan noise patterns. These methods underscore causal links between physical observables and secret-dependent computations, with exploitation feasibility hinging on leakage models validated empirically against hardware traces.

Fault and Timing Attacks

Timing attacks exploit variations in the execution time of cryptographic operations that depend on secret data, such as private keys, to infer those secrets through statistical analysis of timing measurements. Paul C. Kocher first formalized this vulnerability in his 1996 paper, demonstrating that non-constant-time implementations of modular exponentiation in Diffie-Hellman key exchange, RSA decryption or signing, and Digital Signature Standard (DSS) could leak fixed exponents or private keys when attackers measure operation times with sufficient precision, often requiring thousands of samples to distinguish bit-dependent branches or table lookups. For RSA, exponentiation via methods like square-and-multiply reveals key bits if multiplication times vary with operand sizes or modular reductions, enabling recovery of the full private exponent after iterative refinement across multiple ciphertexts. These attacks succeed against software or hardware lacking time normalization, such as early SSL/TLS implementations where remote timing over networks was feasible if jitter is minimized, and have been extended to symmetric ciphers like AES when key-dependent operations like S-box lookups exhibit measurable delays on specific processors. Kocher's analysis showed that even microsecond differences suffice, with practical breaks on 512-bit RSA keys achievable using standard workstations of the era. Fault attacks, conversely, induce transient hardware malfunctions during cryptographic computations to generate erroneous outputs from which secrets can be derived, often requiring physical access or proximity to the target device. Dan Boneh, Richard A. DeMillo, and Richard J. Lipton pioneered this in 1997, proving that a single random fault in the RSA Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) implementation during signature generation—such as corrupting one modular exponentiation—yields a faulty signature allowing computation of the greatest common divisor with the public modulus to factor it and recover the private primes, typically succeeding with one fault in implementations lacking error detection. Faults are injected via techniques like voltage glitching (altering supply to skip instructions), clock skewing, laser pulses, or electromagnetic pulses, each capable of flipping bits or halting operations mid-execution. In symmetric settings, differential fault analysis on AES applies similar principles: inducing faults in intermediate states during encryption rounds enables attackers to solve for the key using differences between correct and faulty ciphertexts, with as few as 2-250 faults sufficient for 128-bit key recovery depending on fault model precision, as demonstrated in hardware implementations vulnerable to low-voltage perturbations. These attacks highlight implementation fragility, where algorithmic soundness assumes fault-free execution, and have prompted countermeasures like redundancy checks, but persistent vulnerabilities appear in resource-constrained devices like smart cards or IoT hardware.

Quantum Cryptanalysis

Shor's and Grover's Algorithms

Shor's algorithm, introduced by Peter Shor in 1994, provides a polynomial-time quantum method for integer factorization and the discrete logarithm problem, achieving exponential speedup over the best known classical algorithms. The algorithm relies on identifying the period of a modular exponential function via the quantum Fourier transform, followed by classical post-processing to extract factors from the period. This directly undermines cryptographic systems like RSA, where security depends on the computational difficulty of factoring the product of two large primes; a sufficiently large-scale quantum computer running Shor's algorithm could derive the private key from the public modulus in feasible time. Similarly, it solves the discrete logarithm problem efficiently, threatening protocols such as Diffie-Hellman key exchange and elliptic curve variants used in DSA and ECDSA. Despite demonstrations of on small integers using early quantum , such as factoring or 21, scaling to cryptographically relevant sizes (e.g., 2048-bit RSA moduli) requires thousands of logical qubits with low error rates, a not yet achieved as of 2025 due to challenges in and coherence times. The algorithm's has driven the of post-quantum cryptography standards, with organizations like NIST prioritizing lattice-based and hash-based alternatives resistant to Shor-style attacks. Grover's algorithm, developed by Lov Grover in 1996, offers a quadratic speedup for unstructured search problems, reducing the query complexity from O(N) to O(\sqrt{N}) on a quantum computer, where N is the search space size. In cryptanalysis, this applies to brute-force key searches in symmetric ciphers, effectively halving the security level of key lengths; for instance, AES-128 provides only about 64 bits of quantum security against Grover, while AES-256 retains approximately 128 bits. Unlike Shor's existential threat to asymmetric systems, Grover's impact on symmetric cryptography is mitigated by doubling key sizes, as the speedup does not render current standards obsolete but necessitates adjustments for long-term security. Practical implementation of for key recovery demands significant resources, including billions of quantum gates for AES-256 and fault-tolerant qubits, rendering it infeasible with near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. Both algorithms highlight quantum computing's potential to disrupt through superior computational power rather than exploiting protocol flaws, underscoring the need for hybrid classical-quantum models in assessments.

Implications for Current Standards

Shor's algorithm poses an existential threat to widely deployed public-key cryptographic systems, including RSA, elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), and Diffie-Hellman key exchange, by enabling efficient factorization of large integers and solution of discrete logarithm problems on sufficiently large quantum computers. These primitives underpin core internet security protocols such as TLS, where breaking them would compromise certificate authorities, secure communications, and digital signatures. Although no quantum computer has yet achieved the scale required—estimated at millions of logical qubits with low error rates—the algorithm's polynomial-time complexity renders classical hardness assumptions obsolete in a quantum era, necessitating a full replacement of affected standards. Grover's algorithm provides a quadratic speedup for unstructured search problems, effectively halving the security level of symmetric ciphers and hash functions against brute-force attacks. For instance, AES-128's 128-bit security degrades to approximately 64 bits quantum-equivalent, making it vulnerable to exhaustive key search feasible with advanced quantum resources, while AES-256 retains 128-bit security and is considered adequate with mitigations. Similarly, hash-based signatures and preimage resistance in functions like SHA-256 face reduced margins, prompting recommendations for doubled output sizes or quantum-resistant alternatives in standards like FIPS 140. In response, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has accelerated post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standardization, finalizing three core algorithms—ML-KEM for key encapsulation, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA for digital signatures—in August 2024, with HQC selected for additional code-based encryption in March 2025. These lattice- and hash-based schemes resist known quantum attacks, but their integration into existing standards like TLS 1.3 requires hybrid modes to maintain backward compatibility during migration. The transition timeline, projected over 5–10 years, underscores risks from "harvest now, decrypt later" strategies, where encrypted data collected today could be retroactively broken, urging immediate inventorying and upgrades in critical infrastructure.

Recent Advances and Future Challenges

Machine Learning in Cryptanalysis

Machine learning techniques have been applied to cryptanalysis since the late 2010s, primarily to enhance statistical attacks such as differential and linear cryptanalysis by identifying subtle biases in cipher outputs that traditional methods might overlook. A pivotal advancement occurred in 2019 when Alex Gohr introduced a framework at CRYPTO using deep neural networks to distinguish ciphertexts from random data, achieving a key-recovery attack on 11-round SPECK32/64, surpassing prior differential cryptanalysis results. This approach leverages supervised learning on plaintext-ciphertext pairs to train models that approximate the cipher's behavior, enabling the construction of high-probability distinguishers. Subsequent work extended this to other primitives, including reduced-round SIMON variants, where mixture differential cryptanalysis combined with ML improved attack complexities. Further developments include machine learning-aided , which automates the search for linear approximations with high biases. In , researchers proposed frameworks applying this to one-bit and multi-bit , demonstrating attacks on ciphers like PRESENT with fewer known plaintexts than classical methods required. Neural networks have also facilitated differential- attacks, as detailed in a targeting ciphers by on concatenated differential and linear trails to overall distinguisher strength. These techniques often outperform exhaustive search in low-data regimes, with models like convolutional neural networks or transformers processing representations of cipher states. A 2024 survey of neural differential cryptanalysis over six years highlighted consistent improvements in distinguisher advantages for lightweight ciphers, though gains diminish for full-round versions of AES-like designs. Despite these successes, machine learning has not yielded practical breaks of full-strength modern ciphers such as AES-128 or SHA-256, as these primitives exhibit negligible statistical biases resistant to empirical pattern detection. Limitations stem from the data-intensive nature of training: effective distinguishers require vast labeled datasets, often infeasible for high-security parameters, and models struggle to generalize beyond reduced rounds without overfitting to noise. Moreover, translating distinguishers into full key recoveries demands additional algebraic or search steps, where ML provides marginal efficiency gains but no exponential shortcuts akin to quantum algorithms. Experts note that cryptosystems designed under provable security paradigms, like those relying on pseudorandomness, inherently thwart ML by mimicking true randomness, rendering compression or pattern extraction futile without side-channel leaks. Ongoing research explores information-theoretic ML approaches for empirical security bounds, but as of 2025, no peer-reviewed work demonstrates ML compromising standardized primitives at their security levels.

Post-Quantum Transition Realities

The transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) addresses the vulnerability of current public-key systems, such as RSA and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), to quantum algorithms like Shor's, which could factor large integers and compute discrete logarithms efficiently on sufficiently powerful quantum hardware. NIST has outlined a phased migration, recommending deprecation of algorithms providing 112-bit security by 2030 and full disallowance of vulnerable standards like RSA-2048 and ECC-256 by 2035, driven by risks including "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks where encrypted data is stored for future quantum decryption. This timeline assumes cryptographic systems must achieve quantum resistance without disrupting existing infrastructure, though estimates for cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs) capable of breaking RSA-2048 vary, with some projections placing the threat in the early 2030s. NIST's standardization process, initiated in 2016, culminated in selections like CRYSTALS-Kyber for key encapsulation and CRYSTALS-Dilithium for digital signatures in 2022, with additional algorithms such as HQC approved for on March 11, 2025, following the fourth round's conclusion. Federal agencies, per NIST IR 8547, must inventory quantum-vulnerable and implement hybrid schemes—combining classical and PQC primitives—for interim , emphasizing crypto-agility to enable algorithm swaps without system overhauls. Industry efforts include integration into protocols like TLS 1.3, but adoption remains uneven, with government mandates accelerating while private sectors lag due to resource constraints. Technical challenges dominate the transition, including PQC algorithms' larger key sizes—Kyber public keys exceed 1 KB compared to RSA-2048's 256 bytes—and higher computational overhead, which can increase latency by factors of 2-10 in constrained environments like IoT devices. Side-channel vulnerabilities persist in lattice-based schemes, necessitating robust implementations, while interoperability issues arise from mismatched algorithm support across legacy systems. Organizational hurdles involve comprehensive crypto asset discovery, often revealing undocumented usages, and the need for retraining, with surveys indicating many enterprises underestimate migration costs estimated at billions globally. As of 2025, PQC deployment is nascent: Forescout research found support in only a minority of industrial IoT SSH servers, and web adoption via browsers remains experimental despite NIST's finalized standards. CISA's 2025 guidance mandates PQC planning in federal systems, signaling policy-driven momentum, yet full-scale transitions face delays from hardware limitations and standardization of additional primitives like hash-based signatures. Empirical progress, such as Akamai's planned PQC rollout for mid-tier networks by Q1 2026, underscores hybrid approaches as pragmatic bridges, though causal risks from incomplete migrations could expose long-lived data.

Impact on Cryptography

Driving Secure Design Principles

Cryptanalysis fundamentally shapes cryptographic design by exposing vulnerabilities that necessitate robust, attack-resistant algorithms, emphasizing principles where security derives from key secrecy rather than algorithmic obscurity. Auguste Kerckhoffs articulated this in 1883, positing that a cryptosystem should remain secure even if all details except the key are public knowledge, as adversaries can reverse-engineer secret designs through analysis. This principle counters "security by obscurity," which cryptanalytic successes have repeatedly undermined, promoting open scrutiny to identify flaws pre-deployment. Modern block ciphers like AES exemplify how cryptanalysis drives iterative improvements, with designers incorporating resistance to techniques such as differential and linear cryptanalysis during development. The AES selection process in 2001 by NIST evaluated candidates for their ability to withstand these attacks, requiring low probabilities of exploitable differentials across multiple rounds to ensure a wide security margin against foreseeable advances. Differential cryptanalysis, introduced by Biham and Shamir in 1990, demonstrated practical weaknesses in predecessors like DES, prompting S-box designs and round structures in AES that bound differential probabilities to approximately 2^{-63} for full rounds, far exceeding brute-force feasibility. Linear cryptanalysis, developed by Matsui in 1993, similarly influenced AES by favoring non-linear components like the ShiftRows and MixColumns operations to minimize linear approximations. The interplay between empirical cryptanalysis and provable security further refines design, where reductions offer lower bounds on resistance but cryptanalytic breakthroughs provide upper bounds, revealing gaps in assumptions. For instance, while provable security models against linear attacks exist, real-world cryptanalysis has shown that standard design heuristics often fail to achieve tight bounds, necessitating hybrid approaches that validate proofs empirically. This dynamic has led to principles like over-designing rounds (e.g., AES-128's 10 rounds exceeding minimal requirements) to accommodate computational advances or novel attacks, as seen in the transition from DES to AES amid growing key-space threats. Ultimately, cryptanalysis enforces causal realism in design, prioritizing verifiable resilience over theoretical ideals, with standards bodies like NIST mandating ongoing reevaluation based on attack evolutions.

Notable Historical Breaks

In the 9th century, Abu Yusuf Yaqub ibn Ishaq al-Kindi developed the first known systematic method of cryptanalysis through frequency analysis, which exploited the statistical regularity of letter frequencies in languages to break monoalphabetic substitution ciphers. By calculating the occurrences of symbols in ciphertext and mapping them to the most common letters in plaintext, such as the high frequency of 'alif' in Arabic, al-Kindi enabled the decryption of encrypted messages without keys, marking a foundational advance in the field. During World War I, British cryptanalysts in Room 40 intercepted and deciphered the Zimmermann Telegram on January 17, 1917, a message from German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmermann proposing a military alliance with Mexico against the United States. Using recovered codebooks from earlier German diplomatic ciphers and manual reconstruction of numerical codes 0075 and 13040, the team, led by William Montgomery and Nigel de Grey, translated the document by January 19, revealing Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare plans and territorial incentives to Mexico, which, upon public disclosure on March 1, 1917, propelled U.S. entry into the war. The cryptanalysis of the German Enigma machine during World War II began with Polish mathematicians Marian Rejewski, Jerzy Różycki, and Henryk Zygalski, who in December 1932 reconstructed the machine's internal wiring using mathematical permutation theory and intercepted messages with known plaintext from German radio traffic. Employing the bomba kryptologiczna device and later the cyklometr for daily key settings, the Poles broke early military Enigma variants by late 1932, producing readable intelligence until 1938 when German changes increased complexity. In 1939, they shared their methods and replica machines with British and French allies at Bletchley Park, where Alan Turing refined electromechanical bombes to automate rotor searches, enabling routine decryption of Luftwaffe and later naval Enigma traffic by 1940–1941, contributing to Allied victories including the Battle of the Atlantic.

References

  1. [1]
    cryptanalysis - Glossary - NIST Computer Security Resource Center
    Cryptanalysis is the study of mathematical techniques to defeat cryptographic techniques and/or information systems security, including looking for errors or ...
  2. [2]
    2.1 Arabic Analysis of the Alphabet - WCSU Sites
    What al-Kindi is describing above is what we now call frequency analysis which is the first step in cryptanalysis.. Definition 2.1.2. Frequency Analysis.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Lecture 11: Cryptography - Harvard Mathematics Department
    It consist of cryptography, the creation of codes and cryptanalysis, the theory of cracking codes. ... First known attacks using frequency analysis Al Kindi in 9' ...
  4. [4]
    Alan Turing's Everlasting Contributions to Computing, AI and ...
    Jun 23, 2022 · Turing went on to make fundamental contributions to AI, theoretical biology and cryptography. His involvement with this last subject brought him ...
  5. [5]
    Cracking stuff: how Turing beat the Enigma - Science and Engineering
    Nov 28, 2018 · While there, Turing built a device known as the Bombe. This machine was able to use logic to decipher the encrypted messages produced by the ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Cryptanalysis of DES - Introduction to Cryptography CS 355
    DES cryptanalysis includes weak keys, brute force, 2DES/3DES, differential, and linear cryptanalysis. Exhaustive search remains the most effective attack.
  7. [7]
    What is Cryptanalysis? Definition from SearchSecurity - TechTarget
    Apr 10, 2024 · Cryptanalysis is the study of ciphertext, ciphers and cryptosystems to understand how they work and to find and improve techniques for defeating or weakening ...
  8. [8]
    What Is Cryptanalysis? (Definition, Types, Goals) | Built In
    Cryptanalysis is the study and discovery of vulnerabilities within cryptographic algorithms that can be used to decrypt ciphertext without the secret key.
  9. [9]
    Cryptanalysis - OWASP Foundation
    Cryptanalysis is a process of finding weaknesses in cryptographic algorithms and using these weaknesses to decipher the ciphertext without knowing the secret ...
  10. [10]
    Handbook of Applied Cryptography
    This site provides order information, updates, errata, supplementary information, chapter bibliographies, and other information for the Handbook of Applied ...
  11. [11]
    What's the idea behind Kerckhoffs's principle?
    Apr 19, 2025 · Kerckhoffs's principle in cryptography says that one should design a cryptosystem under the assumption that everything about it, except the key, is public ...Kerckhoffs' principles – Why should I make my cipher public?What are the exceptions to Kerckhoffs's principle?More results from crypto.stackexchange.com
  12. [12]
    What does the Kerckhoffs's principle state? - EITCA Academy
    Sep 11, 2023 · It states that a cryptosystem should remain secure even if an adversary knows all the details of the system, except for the secret decryption key.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] The Role of the Adversary Model in Applied Security Research1
    Dec 7, 2018 · In this study, we conduct a survey of prominent adversary models used in the seminal field of cryptography, and more recent mobile and Internet ...Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis
  14. [14]
    Attacks and cryptanalysis | Cossack Labs
    Ciphertext-only attack (COA) – the adversary only has access to a limited number of ciphertexts. The adversary doesn't have access to the encryption key.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Methods of cryptanalysis
    The known-plaintext attack (KPA) or crib is an attack model for cryptanalysis where the attacker has samples of both the plaintext and its encrypted version ( ...
  16. [16]
    Cryptanalysis and Types of Attacks - GeeksforGeeks
    Dec 28, 2024 · Cryptology has two parts namely, Cryptography which focuses on creating secret codes and Cryptanalysis which is the study of the cryptographic ...
  17. [17]
    Pitfalls in Machine Learning-based Adversary Modeling for ...
    When designing a cryptographic scheme or protocol, the adversary model plays a crucial role in the formalization of the capabilities and limitations of ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] SOGIS-Agreed-Cryptographic-Mechanisms-1.3.pdf
    Feb 3, 2023 · We can distinguish several complexity metrics, that evaluate the cost of running an attack: • Time complexity. This corresponds to the amount of ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] The Side-Channel Metrics Cheat Sheet - Cryptology ePrint Archive
    The common metrics that reflect the security of a cipher are the time, memory and data complexity required for an attack [37], i.e., the number of encryptions, ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    On Probability of Success in Linear and Differential Cryptanalysis
    Sep 14, 2007 · In this paper, we present an analytical calculation of the success probability of linear and differential cryptanalytic attacks.
  21. [21]
    Security (Evaluation Criteria) - Post-Quantum Cryptography
    Jan 3, 2017 · Any attack that breaks the relevant security definition must require computational resources comparable to or greater than those required for ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Submission Requirements and Evaluation Criteria for the ...
    Cryptanalytic attacks on the hash function shall require at least 2112 computations on a classical computer. The hash function shall not specify output sizes ...
  23. [23]
    Cryptanalysis Mindmap: CISSP Domain 3 Encryption and Attacks
    The primary goal of Cryptanalytic attacks is to deduce the key. Find the crypto variable, the key, that can be used to decrypt the ciphertext. Remember that – ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] A Cryptanalytic Time - Memory Trade-Off
    To obtain the N213 complexity claimed earlier, set m = t. = N '/3 so that P(S) is approximately N -'/3 for a single table. Generate Nli3 ( or several times that ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Neural Cryptanalysis: Metrics, Methodology, and Applications in ...
    We define neural cryptanalysis as a cryptanalysis approach that leverages the learning ability of neural networks to measure the strengths of ciphers. We train ...
  26. [26]
    The History of Cryptography | IBM
    1977: Ron Rivest, Adi Shamir and Leonard Adleman introduce the RSA public key cryptosystem, one of the oldest encryption techniques for secure data transmission ...
  27. [27]
    The History of Cryptography: Timeline & Overview - Entrust
    Explore key moments in the history of cryptography, from ancient ciphers to modern encryption.Key Takeaways · Pre-20th Century... · Quantum Cryptography And The...Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis
  28. [28]
    A History of Cryptography From the Spartans to the FBI
    Feb 20, 2025 · Computer scientist Panos Louridas traces the evolution of secret communication, from ancient Greece to the quantum era.
  29. [29]
    Aeneas Tacticus Describes Methods of Encoding Messages
    The messages in some place known by the recipient, to whom arrival of the man in the city to buy or sell something should be a signal that a letter has come ...Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis
  30. [30]
    A Brief History of Cryptography - Red Hat
    The first known evidence of the use of cryptography (in some form) was found in an inscription carved around 1900 BC, in the main chamber of the tomb of the ...
  31. [31]
    The Zimmermann telegram and Room 40 - History of government
    Jan 16, 2017 · Signals intelligence in the First World War. German naval and diplomatic communications were decoded by the Admiralty in Room 40, the centre of ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Zimmermann Telegram - National Security Agency
    Room 40's role would therefore be concealed. Because Germany had just declared unre- stricted submarine warfare and the United States had broken off diplomatic ...Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis
  33. [33]
    The Zimmermann Telegram - National Archives
    His Room 40 cryptographers had intercepted Zimmermann's telegram to Bernstorff, but knowing they would have to admit to having spied on American diplomatic ...Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis
  34. [34]
    Marian Rejewski and the First Break into Enigma
    One of the very first steps, and one of the most intriguing, was made by Marian Rejewski, who applied the theory of permutations in an interesting way to figure ...
  35. [35]
    Marian Rejewski - National Security Agency
    Marian Rejewski was responsible for the initial analysis that enabled exploitation of the German ENIGMA cryptographic machine.<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    How Alan Turing Cracked The Enigma Code | Imperial War Museums
    The main focus of Turing's work at Bletchley was in cracking the 'Enigma' code. The Enigma was a type of enciphering machine used by the German armed forces to ...
  37. [37]
    6 facts about the Bombe | Bletchley Park
    Alan Turing originally developed the Bombe to help work out the settings of Naval Enigma, which was not breakable by the current by-hand methods. A mechanical ...
  38. [38]
    Colossus - Engineering and Technology History Wiki
    Nov 23, 2017 · It began successful operations in January 1944, built for its specific task: military cryptanalysis. Colossus had an electronic memory, was ...
  39. [39]
    The Magic of Purple - National Security Agency
    Aug 4, 2021 · The stunning success of Purple distracted the U.S. cryptologic community from the true indicator of Japanese intentions, the naval code.Missing: WWII | Show results with:WWII
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Early History of NSA - National Security Agency
    The NSA's roots trace back to a 1917 Army Cipher Bureau, with the NSA officially named in 1952. The Navy's early unit, OP-20-G, worked by 1924.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] (U)Before Super-Computers: NSA And Computer Development
    (U) With the knowledge of what machines could make possible in cryptanalysis, Army and Navy personnel adapted and adopted devices of increasing power and ...Missing: formation | Show results with:formation
  42. [42]
    Claude E. Shannon | IEEE Information Theory Society
    When his results were finally de-classified and published in 1949, they revolutionized the field of cryptography. ... For more information about Shannon and his ...Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis
  43. [43]
    [PDF] The Early Struggle to Automate Cryptanalysis - Government Attic
    May 29, 2013 · ... history entitled: It Wasn't All Magic: The Early Struggle to Automate Cryptanalysis,. 1930s-1960s. The report has been reviewed under the ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] A SELF-STUDY COURSE IN BLOCK-CIPHER CRYPTANALYSIS
    This paper attempts to organize the existing literature of block-cipher cryptanal- ysis in a way that students can use to learn cryptanalytic techniques and ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Cryptanalysis of Block Ciphers: A Survey - of Luca Giuzzi
    We presented some cryptanalytic techniques developed against block ciphers in the 1990s. Historically, these techniques are closely related to the cryptanalysis.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] A Tutorial on Linear and Differential Cryptanalysis - IOActive
    In this paper, we present a tutorial on two powerful cryptanalysis techniques applied to symmetric-key block ciphers: linear cryptanalysis [1] and differential ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Linear Cryptanalysis of DES Cipher
    The first aim of this paper is to give an explicit description of the best linear approximate expression and its approximate probability for DES. We then carry ...
  48. [48]
    Integral Cryptanalysis | SpringerLink
    The method is particularly applicable to block ciphers which use bijective components only.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Cryptanalysis of Block Ciphers: Lecture 1 | TCG Crest
    Differential Cryptanalysis. Construct a differential characteristic with a high probability. Detect the right key from the obtained key suggestions. Impossible ...
  50. [50]
    Generalized Impossible Differential Attacks on Block Ciphers
    Nov 25, 2024 · Impossible differential cryptanalysis is a crucial cryptanalytical method for symmetric ciphers. Given an impossible differential, the key ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Attacks in Stream Ciphers: A Survey - Cryptology ePrint Archive
    Aug 26, 2014 · The method of this attack is to search through all possible states, checking for a match between the resulting and the observed keystream.
  52. [52]
    New correlation attacks on stream ciphers - IEEE Xplore
    Abstract: We introduce two new correlation attacks on stream ciphers that make use of non-linearly combined linear feedback shift-registers (LFSRs).
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Fast correlation attacks against stream ciphers and related open ...
    (Fast) correlation attacks have been originally described against LFSR-based generators, which is still a major family of synchronous stream ciphers. In this ...
  54. [54]
    Multivariate Correlation Attacks and the Cryptanalysis of LFSR ...
    Mar 23, 2023 · The new approach is a multivariate generalisation of the correlation attack by Siegenthaler. A fast version of the attack is provided too.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Stream cipher designs: a review
    Feb 10, 2020 · Its main attacks are cube attack against reduced-round Trivium ... Resynchronization attack targets the key/IV setup of stream ciphers.<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    RC4 Encryption-A Literature Survey - ScienceDirect.com
    A chronological survey demonstrating the cryptanalysis of RC4 stream cipher is presented in this paper. We have summarized the various weaknesses of RC4 ...Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Stream ciphers in the IoT: Grain and Trivium
    Different attacks showed the weaknesses of the algorithm and therefore it can be seen as broken[1] and should not be used anymore. The A5/1 stream cipher was ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Two Trivial Attacks on Trivium - Cryptology ePrint Archive
    Feb 24, 2006 · The core of any stream cipher is its pseudo-random keystream generator (PRKG). It is initial- ized with a secret key K, and an initial value (IV) ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] A Note on Stream Ciphers that Continuously Use the IV
    Time-memory-data tradeoff (TMD-TO) attacks limit the security level of many classical stream ciphers (like E0, A5/1, Trivium, Grain) to n/2, where n denotes ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Twenty Years of Attacks on the RSA Cryptosystem 1 Introduction
    We refer to factoring the modulus as a brute-force attack on. RSA. Although factoring algorithms have been steadily improving, the current state of the art is.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Factorization of a 768-bit RSA modulus - Cryptology ePrint Archive
    Dec 12, 2009 · On December 12, 2009, we factored the 768-bit, 232-digit number RSA-768 by the number field sieve (NFS, [20]). The number RSA-768 was taken ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  62. [62]
    RSA-240 Factored - Schneier on Security -
    Dec 3, 2019 · RSA-240 Factored ... The previous records were RSA-768 (768 bits) in December 2009 [2], and a 768-bit prime discrete logarithm in June 2016 [3].<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Attacks on RSA - Introduction to Cryptography CS 355
    • Three most effective algorithms are. – quadratic sieve. – elliptic curve factoring algorithm. – number field sieve. • One idea many factoring algorithms use:.
  64. [64]
    [PDF] On the Security of Multi-prime RSA
    Jun 13, 2006 · We consider three attacks in this section: Wiener's continued fraction attack, Boneh and Durfee's lattice-based attack and Blömer and May's ...
  65. [65]
    Computing Discrete Logarithms - Cryptology ePrint Archive - IACR
    Sep 10, 2021 · We describe some cryptographically relevant discrete logarithm problems (DLPs) and present some of the key ideas and constructions behind the most efficient ...
  66. [66]
    Discrete Logarithms in $GF ( P )$ Using the Number Field Sieve
    This paper presents an algorithm to solve the discrete logarithm problem for 𝐺 ⁢ 𝐹 ⁡ ( 𝑝 ) with heuristic expected running time 𝐿 𝑝 ⁡ [ 1 / 3 ; 3 2 / 3 ] . For ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Computing individual discrete logarithms faster with NFS-DL - arXiv
    May 27, 2016 · The Number Field Sieve (NFS) algorithm is the best known method to compute discrete logarithms (DL) in finite fields Fpn , with p medium to ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Recent progress on the elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem
    Oct 22, 2015 · Abstract We survey recent work on the elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem. In particular we review index calculus algorithms using ...
  69. [69]
    A Discrete Logarithm Attack on Elliptic Curves
    Nov 11, 2010 · We give an improved index calculus attack for a large class of elliptic curves. Our algorithm works by efficiently transferring the group structure of an ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Lecture 9: Lattice Cryptography and the SIS Problem 1 Introduction
    Apr 30, 2018 · The existence of an adversary that can break SIS or LWE can be directly translated to breaking the GapSVP problem. Due to time constraints ...
  71. [71]
    Red Team Cryptanalysis of Lattice-Based Post-Quantum ... - TechRxiv
    Jun 5, 2025 · This paper evaluates Transformer models (SALSA and VERDE) for attacking LWE-based post-quantum cryptography, finding VERDE outperforms SALSA.
  72. [72]
    A survey on the security of the lattice-based NIST finalists
    Feb 20, 2025 · This survey, mostly written in the years 2022-2023, is meant as an as short as possible description of the current state-of-the-art lattice attacks.<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    [PDF] The Learning with Errors Problem
    The LWE problem involves recovering a secret s from approximate linear equations with errors, and is as hard as worst-case lattice problems.
  74. [74]
    Revisiting Nearest-Neighbor-Based Information Set Decoding
    The syndrome decoding problem lies at the heart of code-based cryptographic constructions. Information Set Decoding (ISD) algorithms are commonly used to ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Code-based cryptography V - Information-set decoding
    Code-based cryptography V. 10. Page 14. Improvements. • Increase n: The most obvious way to defend McEliece's cryptosystem is to increase the code length n.
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Classic McEliece - Code based Cryptography - arXiv
    The attack exploits the QC structure to find some version of the secrret key, then uses Stern's algorithm to reconstruct the entire secret key. Faigre et al.
  77. [77]
    [PDF] conservative code-based cryptography: guide for security reviewers
    Oct 23, 2022 · This document is aimed at security reviewers who are checking, qualitatively and quantita- tively, the security provided by Classic McEliece ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Fast Collision Attack on MD5 - Marc Stevens
    In this paper, we present an improved attack algorithm to find two-block colli- sions of the hash function MD5. The attack uses the same differential path of ...
  79. [79]
    Announcing the first SHA1 collision - Google Online Security Blog
    Feb 23, 2017 · ... attacks against SHA-1 practical using Google infrastructure. Ange Albertini developed the PDF attack, Pierre Karpman worked on the ...
  80. [80]
    Research Results on SHA-1 Collisions | CSRC
    A team of researchers from the CWI Institute in Amsterdam and Google have successfully demonstrated an attack on the SHA-1 hash algorithm.
  81. [81]
    Preimage Attacks on Step-Reduced MD5 - SpringerLink
    In this paper, we propose preimage attacks on step-reduced MD5. We show that a preimage of a 44-step MD5 can be computed to a complexity of 296.<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Second Preimages on n-bit Hash Functions for Much Less than 2n ...
    We then demonstrate how these expandable messages can be used to violate the second preimage resistance of nearly all currently specified cryptographic hash.<|control11|><|separator|>
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Some Attacks on Merkle-Damgård Hashes
    May 8, 2018 · so we can carry out long-message second preimage attacks! Long-Message Second Preimage Attack. 43 / 63. Page 44 ...
  84. [84]
    A modified secure hash design to circumvent collision and length ...
    However, the length extension attack threatens all Merkle-Damgård structure hash standards, including SHA-2. Therefore, a strong replacement that preserves the ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Time-Space Tradeoffs for Finding Multi-Collisions in Merkle ...
    This multi-collision finding attack is based on the attack of Joux in [25] and the pre-computing attacks given in. [23, 12, 1]. We assume M>N and thus 2-way ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Time-Space Tradeoffs for Sponge Hashing: Attacks and Limitations ...
    Our attack relies on a novel connection between single-block collision finding in sponge hashing and the well-studied function inversion problem. We also give ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Sponge Functions - Keccak Team
    Abstract. A good cryptographic hash function should behave like a random oracle: it should not have weaknesses that a random oracle does not have.Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Timing Attacks on Implementations of Diffie-Hellman, RSA, DSS ...
    Abstract. By carefully measuring the amount of time required to per- form private key operations, attackers may be able to find fixed Diffie-.
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Differential Power Analysis - Paul Kocher
    This paper examines specific methods for analyz- ing power consumption measurements to find secret keys from tamper resistant devices. We also discuss ...
  90. [90]
    Side-channel attacks on RSA - People | MIT CSAIL
    E.g., Apache web server running on some Internet-connected machine. Often some other vulnerability exists and is easier to exploit. Slowly becoming a bigger ...
  91. [91]
    Side-channel attacks explained: All you need to know - Rambus
    Oct 14, 2021 · In the paper titled “Introduction to Differential Power Analysis,” Paul Kocher describes how information inadvertently leaked through power ...How does a side channel... · What attacks use side channel... · DPA & Paul Kocher
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Introduction to Side-Channel Attacks
    The side-channel attacks we consider in this paper are a class of physical attacks in which an adversary tries to exploit physical information leakages such as.
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Side-Channel Attacks: Ten Years After Its Publication and the ...
    Power analysis attack is actually the current research focus of side-channel attacks. ... timing analysis and power analysis was used for theoretical attacks.
  94. [94]
    Timing Attacks on Implementations of Diffie-Hellman, RSA, DSS ...
    Techniques for preventing the attack for RSA and Diffie-Hellman are presented. Some cryptosystems will need to be revised to protect against the attack.
  95. [95]
    Timing Attacks on Implementations of Diffie-Hellman, RSA, DSS ...
    By carefully measuring the amount of time required tm perform private key operalions, attackers may be able to find fixed Diffie-Hellman exponents, ...Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis
  96. [96]
    Timing attacks against RSA, DH and AES
    Mar 11, 2014 · The seminal paper on timing attacks is Paul C. Kocher, 'Timing Attacks on Implementations of Diffie–Hellman, RSA, DSS, and Other Systems', ...
  97. [97]
    Kocher's Timing Attack: A Journey from Theory to Practice - ZKSecurity
    Sep 19, 2025 · Paul Kocher's 1996 timing attack showed how microsecond differences in execution time could leak private keys from RSA implementations.
  98. [98]
    On the Importance of Eliminating Errors in Cryptographic ...
    Nov 27, 2000 · We present a model for attacking various cryptographic schemes by taking advantage of random hardware faults. The model consists of a ...
  99. [99]
    Fault Injection Attacks | DEKRA
    Aug 5, 2024 · Some of these are: Information redundancy: Typical examples are signatures generated from the data, parity bits, etc.
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Low Voltage Fault Attacks to AES and RSA on General Purpose ...
    Abstract—Fault injection attacks have proven in recent times a powerful tool to exploit implementative weaknesses of robust cryptographic algorithms.<|control11|><|separator|>
  101. [101]
    Cryptanalysis of a Type of CRT-Based RSA Algorithms - JCST
    ... RSA iscareless, an attacker can reveal some secret information by exploitinghardware fault cryptanalysis. ... Boneh D, DeMillo R A, Lipton R J. On the importance ...
  102. [102]
    SoK: A Beginner-Friendly Introduction to Fault Injection Attacks - arXiv
    Sep 22, 2025 · A more serious example is an incident in 2004 when a cosmic ray caused an election voting system to count 4096 extra votes [2] . Needless to say ...
  103. [103]
    [quant-ph/9508027] Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime ... - arXiv
    Aug 30, 1995 · Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. Authors:Peter W. Shor (AT&T Research).
  104. [104]
    [quant-ph/0411184] Shor's Factoring Algorithm and Modern ... - arXiv
    Nov 25, 2004 · A quantum computer employing Shor's algorithm can be said to accomplish the factoring of very large numbers with less computational effort than a classical ...
  105. [105]
    Toward a code-breaking quantum computer | MIT News
    Aug 23, 2024 · This promise is based on a quantum factoring algorithm proposed in 1994 by Peter Shor, who is now a professor at MIT. But while researchers have ...Missing: cryptanalysis | Show results with:cryptanalysis<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    Post-Quantum Cryptography | CSRC
    HQC was selected for standardization on March 11, 2025. NIST IR 8545, Status Report on the Fourth Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization ...Workshops and Timeline · Selected Algorithms · Presentations · Post-Quantum
  107. [107]
    A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search - arXiv
    Nov 19, 1996 · Authors:Lov K. Grover (Bell Labs, Murray Hill NJ). View a PDF of the paper titled A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, by ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] On the practical cost of Grover for AES key recovery
    Mar 22, 2024 · Grover's quantum search algorithm gives an asymptotic square-root speed-up over classical algorithms for generic unstructured search problems ...
  109. [109]
    Grover's Algorithm and Its Impact on Cybersecurity - PostQuantum.com
    In summary, the impact on symmetric encryption is serious but manageable: Grover's algorithm means that 128-bit keys will no longer be sufficient in the long ...Cybersecurity Implications of... · Mitigation Strategies Against...
  110. [110]
    [PDF] The Quantum Computer and its Implications for Public-Key Crypto ...
    Asymmetric cryptography is vulnerable to Shor's Algorithm and all the asymmetric crypto we use today will need to be completely replaced with new “quantum- ...
  111. [111]
    How Quantum Computing Threats Impact Cryptography and ...
    Shor's algorithm allows quantum computers to factor large numbers exponentially faster than classical computers, breaking RSA and ECC encryption and making ...<|separator|>
  112. [112]
    Understanding Shor's and Grover's Algorithms | Fortinet
    Shor's and Grover's algorithms pose significant risks to public-key and symmetric encryption, making the transition to quantum-resistant cryptographic methods ...
  113. [113]
    When a Quantum Computer Is Able to Break Our Encryption, It Won't ...
    Sep 13, 2023 · One of the most important quantum computing algorithms, known as Shor's algorithm, would allow a large-scale quantum computer to quickly break ...
  114. [114]
    How Post-Quantum Cryptography Affects Security and Encryption ...
    Jul 11, 2025 · Quantum computers can use Grover's algorithm to speed up brute-force attacks against symmetric encryption. Grover's algorithm provides a ...<|separator|>
  115. [115]
    NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization
    Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization ... HQC was selected for standardization on March 11, 2025. NIST IR 8545, Status Report on the Fourth Round of the NIST ...Round 3 Submissions · Call for Proposals · Round 1 Submissions
  116. [116]
    NIST Releases First 3 Finalized Post-Quantum Encryption Standards
    Aug 13, 2024 · NIST has finalized its principal set of encryption algorithms designed to withstand cyberattacks from a quantum computer.
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Status Report on the Fourth Round of the NIST Post-Quantum ...
    Mar 5, 2025 · Based on this feedback and internal reviews of the fourth-round candidates,. NIST announced the selection of HQC in March 2025 for ...
  118. [118]
    NIST advances post-quantum cryptography standardization, selects ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · NIST advances post-quantum cryptography standardization, selects HQC algorithm to counter quantum threats. March 12, 2025. NIST advances post- ...
  119. [119]
    Mixture Differential Cryptanalysis on Round-Reduced SIMON32/64 ...
    Regarding cryptography, machine learning has been used for side-channel attacks [5,6] and cryptanalysis [7], demonstrating its superiority over traditional ...
  120. [120]
    Improved machine learning-aided linear cryptanalysis - Cybersecurity
    Apr 1, 2025 · In CRYPTO 2019, there is a significant breakthrough in using machine learning to assist classical cryptanalysis due to Gohr's work (Gohr 2019).
  121. [121]
    Machine learning-aided differential-linear attacks with applications ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · In CRYPTO 2019, Gohr (2019) proposes a new framework utilizing machine learning to attack block ciphers. Gohr designs a training data format ...
  122. [122]
    Why Can't We Break Cryptography? - Computational Complexity
    Apr 9, 2025 · Cryptography is designed to look completely random. No compression. If you remove the randomness you have nothing left. And thus modern algorithms have no hook ...
  123. [123]
    Why AI cannot break modern encryption - ISC2 Community
    Aug 25, 2025 · Notably, there is no equivalent global effort for “post-AI cryptography.” Experts understand that AI does not change the game the way quantum ...
  124. [124]
    NIST Drops New Deadline for PQC Transition - Keyfactor
    Nov 15, 2024 · NIST set a deadline: by 2030, RSA, ECDSA, EdDSA, DH, and ECDH will be deprecated, and by 2035, they will be disallowed.
  125. [125]
    [PDF] NIST IR 8547 initial public draft, Transition to Post-Quantum ...
    Nov 12, 2024 · This report describes NIST's approach to transitioning from quantum-vulnerable to post-quantum cryptography, identifying standards for IT ...
  126. [126]
    SANS Emerging Threats Summit 2025 Recap
    Jun 2, 2025 · Quantum computing is on track to fundamentally disrupt cryptographic security. Experts estimate that by the early 2030s, quantum systems will ...
  127. [127]
    Current Landscape of Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration
    Sep 10, 2025 · The March 2025 heatmap provides a snapshot of when major cryptographic standards began to take shape as the migration to PQC started to emerge.
  128. [128]
    The Weaknesses of Post-quantum Cryptography - Quantropi
    3 Weaknesses of Post-quantum Cryptography The World Can't Afford to Ignore · Large Key Sizes & Performance Costs · Non-Ideal Scalability · Vulnerability to ...
  129. [129]
    Challenges with Adopting Post-Quantum Cryptographic Algorithms
    Apr 28, 2021 · This paper introduces challenges associated with adopting and using post-quantum cryptography once new algorithms and new standards using them are ready.
  130. [130]
    Untold Challenge of Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration - Fortanix
    May 6, 2025 · Post-Quantum Cryptography is an inevitable migration, but rushed migration without undisclosed dependencies being revealed is a major risk.
  131. [131]
    Forescout research finds post-quantum cryptography adoption still ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · New research from Forescout Research's Vedere Labs shows that support for post-quantum cryptography (PQC) in SSH servers is gradually expanding.
  132. [132]
    https://www.washingtontechnology.com/opinion/2025/10/cisa-moves-forward-post-quantum-musts-cyber/409059/
  133. [133]
    A Guide to International Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards
    Oct 8, 2025 · We're on track to complete the PQC update for mid-tier connections across all of Akamai's networks in Q1 2026 (March). With this change, all ...
  134. [134]
    Kerckhoffs's Principle | Cryptography | Crypto-IT
    The Kerckhoffs's principle is one of the most basic and most important principles of modern cryptography. It was first published in 1883 in France.
  135. [135]
    Kerckhoff principle - Kerckhoff & Cryptography - Rock the Prototype
    Nov 10, 2024 · The system should be able to withstand even attacks by an adversary with unlimited computing power. SWOT analysis on the Kerckhoff principle.
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Differential and Linear Cryptanalysis in Evaluating AES Candidate
    Cryptanalysis attempts to find the plaintext without the key, or the key without prior knowledge. Differential and linear cryptanalysis are important attacks.
  137. [137]
    The Story and Math of Differential Cryptanalysis — Blog - Evervault
    Sep 27, 2023 · NIST chose IBM's algorithm, and named it the Data Encryption Standard (DES). A key aspect of DES was the use of Substitution Boxes (S-Boxes) ...
  138. [138]
    [PDF] An Overview of Cryptanalysis Research for the Advanced Encryption ...
    AES was designed to be secure against differential and linear cryptanalysis and their variants. Therefore, any threat from these attacks is minimal.
  139. [139]
    Provable security of block ciphers against linear cryptanalysis
    Aug 30, 2008 · Our experiments illustrate both that provable security against linear cryptanalysis is not achieved by present design strategies and the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  140. [140]
    Cryptanalysis vs. Provable Security - SpringerLink
    We argue that security is complex, and that there is much to gain from better interaction between cryptanalysis and provable security.
  141. [141]
    Al-Kindi, Cryptography, Code Breaking and Ciphers - Muslim Heritage
    Jun 9, 2003 · Al-Kindi's technique came to be known as frequency analysis, which simply involves calculating the percentages of letters of a particular ...
  142. [142]
    Al-Kindi Writes the First Treatise on Cryptanalysis
    The first recorded exposition of any kind of cryptanalysis was the discussion of frequency analysis Offsite Link by the Muslim Arab philosopher.
  143. [143]
    The Zimmermann Telegram | National Archives
    In January 1917, British cryptographers deciphered a telegram from German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmermann to the German Minister to Mexico, Heinrich von ...