Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Death Master File

The Death Master File (DMF) is a database maintained by the comprising death records for individuals issued Social Security numbers, compiled from reports submitted since 1936 by family members, funeral homes, federal and state agencies, and other sources. It includes key identifiers such as full names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and reported dates of death, serving primarily to enable to terminate benefit payments upon notification of decease and to support program administration. A limited-access public version, distributed weekly and monthly by the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), contains over 83 million records and is available to certified users for purposes including detection, identity verification, and improper payment prevention in financial and governmental contexts. Public dissemination of the DMF originated from a 1980 settlement mandating SSA data sharing, transforming internal death reports into a broadly accessible resource for businesses and researchers, though its accuracy relies on unverified external submissions without routine proof requirements from SSA. Notable issues include erroneous inclusions of living persons—potentially affecting thousands annually—resulting in disrupted banking, credit access, and benefits, as well as policy shifts like early restrictions on recent deaths that expunged millions of records from public files to address concerns, later partially reversed by the 2013 Bipartisan Budget Act. Recent analyses highlight declining comprehensiveness, with the file capturing only a fraction of actual U.S. deaths due to underreporting, underscoring limitations in its role for mortality and enforcement applications such as status checks.

Origins and Development

Creation and Initial Purpose

The (SSA) maintains the Numident as its master database of Social Security numbers (SSNs) issued since 1936, which includes death information to track beneficiary status. Systematic electronic recording of deaths within the Numident began in 1962, drawing from reports submitted by funeral directors, relatives of the deceased, state vital statistics offices, and other entities. These inputs were initially manual but transitioned to automated processes, with death coverage in the system rising from approximately 50% of reported cases in the 1962–1971 period to over 85% thereafter, reflecting improved reporting mechanisms during the 1960s and 1970s. The primary internal purpose of compiling this death data was to enable to efficiently update individual records and the termination of benefit payments upon notification of death, thereby minimizing improper disbursements to deceased beneficiaries. Prior to widespread , delays in death reporting contributed to overpayments, as relied on fragmented notifications without a centralized, tool; the Numident's death component addressed this by facilitating prompt eligibility checks and benefit suspensions. This internal efficiency tool supported 's core mission of administering Old-Age, Survivors, and (OASDI) programs while curbing fiscal waste from unrecovered payments issued posthumously. The Death Master File (DMF) emerged as a formalized extract from the Numident's death records, with its first public release occurring in 1980 pursuant to a court-mandated settlement from a 1978 Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which required SSA to disclose certain death data including SSNs, surnames, and dates of death. This initial public version encompassed historical records dating back to SSA's establishment in 1936, though comprehensive electronic integration was limited to post-1962 reports at the time of release. The public DMF extended the internal system's utility beyond SSA, allowing external entities like financial institutions to verify deaths and prevent fraud, while the core purpose remained tied to SSA's benefit administration safeguards.

Expansion and Technical Evolution

The Death Master File (DMF) underwent substantial expansion in scale during the late 20th and early 21st centuries, evolving from periodic extracts of death reports into a centralized repository drawn from the Numident database of Social Security number holders. By 2018, the file contained approximately 121 million death records, reflecting cumulative reports from SSA program interactions, family notifications, and state vital records. This growth accelerated with broader reporting mandates, reaching over 142 million records by 2025, encompassing deaths reported since 1899. A pivotal technical advancement occurred in the early 2000s with the implementation of Electronic Death Registration (EDR) systems, enabling state vital statistics bureaus to submit death notices electronically while verifying Social Security numbers against records at the registration stage. This reduced processing delays from weeks or months—previously reliant on manual or tape-based transmissions—to near-real-time validation, enhancing accuracy and timeliness by cross-checking against SSA's holdings before finalizing entries in the Numident and subsequent DMF extracts. By the mid-2000s, contracts with states emphasized EDR adoption, covering a growing proportion of the roughly 2.8 million annual U.S. deaths reported to SSA. Post-2011 legislative reforms, prompted by concerns over recent deaths in public releases, refined the DMF's structure and distribution: the full internal version remained available to agencies for comprehensive use, while a limited access variant—excluding records under three years old unless verified—was provided to certified private entities via the National Technical Information Service (NTIS). This era marked a shift to automated, frequent , with NTIS offering weekly updates every and monthly files on the second U.S. government , supplemented by corrections to support ongoing without compromising the core file's exclusivity. Deeper integration with SSA's operational systems, including the Numident and beneficiary payment files, automated death-to-payment linkages, allowing for systematic suspension of benefits upon matched notifications from EDR or other sources. These enhancements streamlined internal detection and payment cessation, contributing to SSA's broader efforts in managing improper disbursements through proactive record matching rather than retrospective audits.

Data Composition and Sources

Key Data Fields and Record Structure

The Death Master File (DMF) records are structured to include only essential identifiers for deceased Social Security number (SSN) holders, comprising the SSN, full name (first name, , last name, and suffix), date of birth, and date of death, as reported to the (SSA). These fields enable precise matching against SSNs for mortality verification, with dates formatted as MMDDCCYY. A single-character verification code (V for verified or P for proof) accompanies the date of death to denote the evidentiary basis of the report. The record format employs a fixed-width in flat-file extracts, with fields positioned as follows: record type indicator (position 1), SSN (positions 2-10), last name (11-30), (31-34), first name (35-49), middle name (50-64), verification code (65), date of death (66-73), and date of birth (74-81), followed by reserved blank space. This design prioritizes compatibility with database systems for automated screening, excluding extraneous details such as , next-of-kin information, or geographic data like state of residence to maintain focus on core empirical identifiers. Entries are confined to SSN-holding decedents with reported and processed deaths, omitting non-SSN individuals, living persons, or unverified claims to reduce erroneous inclusions based solely on assumptions rather than documented reports from primary sources. Record types denote additions, changes, or deletions to reflect updates from verified inputs.
FieldDescriptionPositionLength
Record TypeIndicator: blank (standard), A (add), C (change), D (delete)11
SSNSocial Security number2-109
Last NameDeceased's surname11-3020
SuffixName suffix (e.g., Jr., Sr.)31-344
First NameDeceased's given name35-4915
Middle NameDeceased's middle name or initial50-6415
Verification CodeV (verified death) or P (death by proof)651
Date of DeathMMDDCCYY format66-738
Date of BirthMMDDCCYY format74-818
ReservedBlank space (formerly other fields)82-10019

Reporting Mechanisms and Input Sources

The () aggregates death data for the Death Master File (DMF) from diverse primary reporters, including state vital statistics offices—predominantly via Electronic Death Registration (EDR) systems—funeral directors, surviving relatives, financial institutions, postal authorities, and federal entities such as the ' Identification Records Locator Subsystem (BIRLS). These inputs follow a structured , with states transmitting official vital records electronically where EDR is implemented, while non-state reporters submit via forms or direct notifications to SSA field offices or beneficiary services. EDR submissions, representing about 70 percent of total records, originate from certified death certificates processed by state registrars, ensuring a direct link from medical certifiers and funeral homes to SSA integration. The SSA processes over three million such death notifications annually, prioritizing those with Social Security numbers for rapid handling. Verification occurs through automated and manual cross-checks against the Numident—the master database of all issued Social Security numbers—and active beneficiary files, applying multiple screening criteria to validate identities, dates, and consistency before posting to the Numident. Unverified or mismatched reports enter a , delaying inclusion in the DMF until confirmatory evidence, such as matching payment terminations or secondary sources, resolves discrepancies; this safeguards against premature entries while the full file draws exclusively from validated Numident updates. Death reporting evolved from manual, paper-driven processes dominant from the SSA's inception in the 1930s through the 1980s, which frequently incurred multi-month delays in and dissemination, contributing to extended improper payments after . The shift to mechanisms, including state-federal EDR collaborations formalized around , digitized submissions and enabled real-time validations, markedly shortening processing times from weeks or months to days for compliant reports and minimizing historical lags in benefit adjustments.

Access Protocols and Distribution

Internal Government Access

The (SSA) maintains unrestricted internal access to the full Death Master File (DMF) to verify deaths reported from its Numident records and external sources, enabling prompt termination of benefits such as Old-Age, Survivors, and (OASDI) payments upon confirmation of a beneficiary's death. This process supports on-demand queries during benefit eligibility determinations and ongoing payments, directly halting disbursements to deceased individuals and reducing overpayments that could otherwise accrue daily. SSA's internal systems integrate DMF data to automate cessation, with death notifications triggering reviews that prevent continuation of monthly benefits averaging over $1,500 per recipient. Federal agencies receive the full DMF through data exchange agreements without the certification mandates imposed on non-federal entities, allowing seamless integration for program administration. The Department of the Treasury accesses it via the Do Not Pay (DNP) portal for pre-payment validations across federal disbursements, while the and utilize it for tax refund verifications and veterans' benefit terminations, respectively. This unrestricted sharing supports causal mechanisms for improper payment prevention, as agencies cross-reference applicant or beneficiary data against the complete death records—including unverified entries from states—to flag and deny ineligible claims in . Empirical outcomes demonstrate the DMF's role in fiscal accountability; for example, incorporation of full death data into the DNP system contributed to preventing over $650 million in potential improper payments in 2023, with death matching enabling agencies to recover or avoid funds otherwise directed to deceased parties. A pilot leveraging expanded DMF access further recovered $31 million in five months by identifying post-death disbursements, underscoring how internal access bypasses delays inherent in limited-file distributions and prioritizes verifiable reductions in over privacy barriers for external users.

Certification and Limited Access Procedures

Non-federal entities seeking access to the Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF) must participate in a certification program administered by the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) under 15 CFR Part 1110, enacted pursuant to Section 203 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. This program mandates that applicants certify their intended use aligns with permissible purposes, such as preventing fraud in financial services or administering benefits, while prohibiting access for genealogical, marketing, or other non-verification activities. Certification further requires attestation to robust data security measures, including encryption of data at rest and in transit, role-based access controls, regular employee training, and third-party audits to ensure compliance with information safeguarding standards. Upon approval, certified users—typically financial institutions, insurers, and creditors—receive LADMF data through NTIS in weekly or monthly electronic files, subject to non-disclosure agreements that bar redistribution or transfer without explicit NTIS authorization. Access incurs fees structured to recover program costs, including an initial certification processing fee of $247 and annual subscription charges varying by usage level, often exceeding $1,000 for ongoing updates. NTIS conducts periodic audits of certified entities' systems and procedures to verify adherence, with potential revocation of access for non-compliance. Violations, such as unauthorized disclosure or misuse of LADMF , trigger civil penalties of up to $1,000 per under 15 CFR § 1110.200, capped at $250,000 annually per entity unless the is deemed intentional or grossly negligent. This framework emerged in response to pre-2013 public availability of the full Death Master File, which facilitated affecting an estimated 2.5 million deceased individuals annually by enabling fraudsters to exploit outdated records for fraudulent accounts and claims. The restricted LADMF model thus prioritizes controlled dissemination to legitimate verifiers while mitigating risks of widespread misuse observed in the unrestricted era.

Commercial and Public Availability

The Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF) is commercially distributed by the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), a component of the U.S. Department of Commerce, to certified subscribers under a subscription-based model that includes weekly and monthly updates. Subscribers, encompassing such as banks and credit unions, as well as genealogy firms, obtain the data for applications including identity verification and mortality screening. This controlled distribution supports private sector uses while excluding death records for individuals deceased within the prior three calendar years, as mandated by federal regulation. Publicly available derivatives, such as the (SSDI), are accessible via genealogy platforms including , which compile historical extracts from the Death Master File but systematically redact Social Security numbers (SSNs), particularly for deaths occurring after implementation of restrictions under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. These versions prioritize genealogical research and omit sensitive identifiers to comply with post-2013 access limitations, which curtailed broad public dissemination of full SSN-inclusive records to address documented instances of misuse, such as facilitation. 203 of the Act established a certification framework and barred disclosure of recent decedent data, effectively ending unrestricted public sales of the complete file previously offered by NTIS. No mechanism exists for full public download of the unredacted LADMF, preserving safeguards against unauthorized proliferation despite the Social Security Administration's position that deceased persons hold no privacy interests in their records under the Freedom of Information Act. Commercial access, by contrast, enables industries to integrate the data into automated systems for real-time screening, yielding measurable reductions in synthetic and improper payouts through proactive mortality cross-checks. This utility underpins economic efficiencies in sectors like and , where timely death verification mitigates risks otherwise leading to overpayments or fraudulent claims.

Primary Uses and Impacts

Benefits Administration and Fraud Prevention

The (SSA) relies on death information from sources contributing to the Death Master File (DMF) to query and terminate Old-Age, Survivors, and (OASDI) benefits for deceased beneficiaries, directly preventing monthly overpayments that would otherwise continue until manual detection. This process ensures prompt cessation of payments upon verified death reports, safeguarding the fiscal integrity of SSA's annual OASDI outlays exceeding $1.3 trillion. Accurate death data thus serves as a causal mechanism for cost control, with SSA updating its Numident database— the foundational source for the DMF—to halt eligibility automatically. By integrating DMF-derived death records into verification protocols, minimizes improper payments to the deceased, a subset of overall overpayments estimated at 0.5% of OASDI benefits in 2022 ($6.5 billion total). Such integration counters potential systemic waste through empirical matching, where unreported or delayed deaths could lead to unchecked ; however, 's low improper rate reflects effective deterrence, with residual errors confined to discrepancies like rejected state reports totaling $327 million in one audited period. Federal-wide adoption of SSA death data, including via the Do Not Pay portal and Treasury pilots, has yielded measurable reductions in improper payments; a five-month Treasury initiative in 2024-2025 prevented and recovered $31 million using such records. GAO data confirm a $74 billion drop in government improper payments for 2024, attributable in part to enhanced death data matching across agencies, while Treasury projections estimate $12 billion in prevented outlays by 2029 from ongoing DMF access expansions. These metrics underscore data-driven savings over narratives of inefficiency, with 's post-2010 death processing enhancements—such as improved state data acceptance—sustaining minimal error prevalence relative to program scale.

Identity Verification and Commercial Applications

Financial institutions, including banks and insurers, leverage the certified Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF) for in identity verification, screening applicant and customer records against its database to detect attempts to use identities of deceased individuals for loans, accounts, or claims. This process flags potential by matching names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and death dates from over 142 million records spanning back to 1899, enabling proactive closure of inactive accounts or denial of services to prevent losses from or erroneous payouts. Insurers particularly rely on the DMF to verify annuitant , cross-referencing policyholder quarterly or upon claims to confirm deaths and halt payments, a practice that has historically curbed overpayments in the life sector by identifying unreported deaths through systematic record matching. Commercial vendors provide integrated screening services that achieve death match success rates ranging from 25% to 95%, influenced by data quality and matching algorithms, allowing firms to reduce exposure to financial crimes like deceased-person account takeovers or estate-related disputes. In genealogy and historical research, redacted public versions of the DMF, such as the , support private-sector applications by furnishing non-sensitive death records for construction and demographic studies without exposing full Social Security numbers. Commercial genealogy tools and platforms incorporate DMF-derived datasets to enhance search accuracy for 20th-century U.S. deaths, facilitating compliance with know-your-customer (KYC) requirements in verification services while maintaining user privacy through anonymized aggregates. Access to the full LADMF requires certification through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), ensuring users attest to fraud-prevention purposes and implement safeguards against misuse, which balances the tool's cost-effectiveness in against potential data exposure risks. Empirical use demonstrates its utility in private-sector fraud mitigation, with certified matching reducing undetected deceased-identity transactions, though effectiveness depends on timely SSA updates and supplementary commercial death indexes to address DMF omissions.

Law Enforcement and Immigration Enforcement

The Death Master File (DMF) supports law enforcement efforts by enabling federal agencies, including the (IRS), to verify the death status of individuals in investigations involving beneficiary , estate audits, and improper payments. The IRS receives weekly updates from the (SSA) containing death data extracted from the DMF, which it matches against taxpayer records to halt erroneous refunds or benefits to deceased persons and flag potential or schemes. Similarly, the Department integrates DMF data into its Do Not Pay system, which screens payments for eligibility and has prevented or recovered over $31 million in and improper disbursements during targeted pilots by cross-referencing recipient status against deceased records. In immigration enforcement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) leverages DMF access through interagency data-sharing to cross-check the vital status of non-citizens, facilitating the revocation of benefits and work authorizations for those deemed ineligible, such as parolees or holders whose conditions have lapsed. This process verifies whether individuals reported as deceased or ineligible continue receiving federal aid, thereby enforcing eligibility rules under immigration statutes that bar non-qualified aliens from certain entitlements. Empirical analyses indicate that such verifications contribute to reducing improper payments to non-citizens, with federal estimates documenting billions in overpayments across programs like —$8 billion attributed to ineligible migrants in 2022 alone—highlighting systemic gaps in prior enforcement that DMF integration addresses. A notable 2025 development involved the adding approximately 6,300 living migrants—flagged by DHS as ineligible—to the DMF (or a repurposed ineligible variant), assigning false dates to terminate their Social Security numbers, employment authorizations, and access to like banking and , with the defended by administration officials as a targeted prevention measure to compel and self-deportation among those lacking . Critics, including Democratic lawmakers and advocacy groups, condemned the tactic as an evasion of , akin to "digital murder" that disrupts lives without formal hearings, though proponents countered that it enforces existing eligibility barriers empirically linked to over $10 billion in annual federal costs from unverified non-citizen claims, countering institutional hesitancy to apply statutes strictly. This approach underscores DMF's utility in causal chains, where accurate status checks directly curb unauthorized resource allocation, despite debates over procedural norms.

Accuracy, Errors, and Quality Control

Prevalence and Causes of Errors

The receives approximately 3 million death reports each year for the Death Master File, of which less than one-third of 1 percent—fewer than 10,000 cases—are erroneously reported as deaths requiring correction. These inaccuracies predominantly manifest as wrongful inclusions of living persons, often stemming from unverified or mismatched inputs rather than widespread systemic failures, with SSA data countering claims of rampant errors amplified in public discourse. Prior to expanded verification protocols in the , annual wrongful death entries reached around 14,000, but subsequent processes have reduced this volume significantly while maintaining overall low prevalence. Primary causes of these errors include human inaccuracies in initial reporting, such as confusions over similar names or dates of birth among family members or directors submitting . Additional factors encompass processing lags in state vital records verification, where manual entries from diverse sources like hospitals or informants introduce inconsistencies, and rare instances of deliberate via fabricated reports. Office of the Inspector General reviews attribute such issues to decentralized input mechanisms—drawing from over 50 state registries and non-state reporters—rather than any inherent or biased flaws in SSA's compilation, emphasizing procedural vulnerabilities over institutional prejudice. Implementation of Electronic Death Registration systems has addressed many root causes by standardizing and accelerating state-submitted data, yielding more reliable electronic records that outperform paper-based reports in precision. This shift has correlated with a greater than 45 percent drop in erroneous death removals from the since the mid-2010s, demonstrating that targeted enhancements to input validation mitigate errors arising from fragmented without overhauling the underlying .

Consequences of Erroneous Entries

Erroneous entries in the Death Master File (DMF) primarily manifest as false positives, where living individuals are incorrectly listed as deceased, leading to immediate practical harms such as frozen credit reports and restricted access to . Credit reporting agencies, relying on the DMF for verification under the (FCRA), often flag affected persons as deceased, resulting in account freezes, denied loan applications, and inability to open new banking or credit lines. This can extend to disruptions in retirement accounts and insurance payouts, as institutions halt transactions to mitigate risks. In verifiable cases, such as a 2023 investigation highlighting a Virginia resident's multi-year struggle with inaccessible funds after an SSA error, these issues compound into prolonged financial distress until corrections are processed. The scale of impact affects thousands annually, with the SSA's Office of the Inspector General estimating around 6,000 living persons wrongly listed each year as of 2017, though earlier 2011 analyses from advocacy groups reported up to 14,000 cases stemming from clerical input errors. These false positives trigger FCRA violations when credit bureaus fail to promptly reinvestigate disputes, prompting lawsuits; for instance, affected individuals have successfully sued agencies like for damages due to uncorrected "deceased" notations sourced from DMF inaccuracies. Government benefits, including Social Security payments, may also face temporary suspensions, exacerbating hardships for vulnerable populations reliant on timely disbursements. While harms are isolated relative to the DMF's volume of over 3 million annual death reports—with an overall error rate below 0.3%—delays in correction processes can prolong disruptions, sometimes lasting months as individuals navigate requiring such as medical records or affidavits. The provides an appeal mechanism for erroneous listings, allowing living numberholders to request removal upon , but critics note that bureaucratic timelines and lack of proactive notifications amplify secondary effects like denied services. Despite these issues, empirical indicate most corrections occur without , as the low error prevalence limits widespread impact.

SSA Mitigation and Verification Processes

The (SSA) maintains the Death Master File (DMF) through structured protocols that prioritize data integrity from the Numident database, the primary repository of Social Security number holder information including records. reports from family members—deemed first-party notifications—are treated as upon receipt and immediately incorporated into the DMF, streamlining accurate updates while relying on direct evidence of mortality. Third-party reports, such as those from homes or institutions, trigger mandatory steps, including cross-checks against SSA internal systems like the Numident, Master File Queries, and the Evidence Portal to confirm and details before processing. Cross-matching with external sources enhances reliability, particularly via the Electronic Death Registration (EDR) process, where collaborates with state vital records offices to validate SSNs and names at the outset of death , reducing downstream errors from mismatched reports. The Death Information Processing System (DIPS) further bolsters controls by automatically scrutinizing incoming state death reports for discrepancies, rejecting invalid submissions—such as those with unverified SSNs—that fail predefined checks, with rejections comprising about 11% of processed volumes in recent fiscal years to preempt inaccurate entries. These automated and manual safeguards ensure that only corroborated data populates the Numident, from which the full DMF is derived and periodically refreshed. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) audits reinforce these processes by evaluating Numident-to-DMF , identifying gaps in death data inclusion and recommending targeted enhancements to upstream reporting and validation logic, such as improved handling of delayed or incomplete state submissions. This causal focus on systemic refinements, rather than isolated corrections, has yielded measurable accuracy gains; processes roughly 3 million death reports annually, with fewer than 0.33% requiring subsequent reversal due to errors. In a March 2025 public update, highlighted this low erroneous rate to affirm the DMF's overall precision, noting proactive reviews that facilitate timely deletions of validated inaccuracies, including adjustments to thousands of records in mid-2025 to align with verified living statuses. These outcomes demonstrate effective quality controls that minimize propagation of flaws into downstream uses.

Controversies and Debates

Privacy and Ethical Concerns

The legal framework governing the Death Master File (DMF) recognizes that deceased individuals hold no enforceable under U.S. , a position upheld by administrative policy and judicial precedent, thereby permitting the (SSA) to compile and disseminate death records for purposes of without infringing on protected interests. This stance prioritizes causal mechanisms of fraud prevention—such as cross-referencing SSNs against payment systems—over posthumous data seclusion, as demonstrates the file's role in averting improper disbursements estimated in the hundreds of millions annually across federal programs. Ethical debates center on the potential for deceased data to facilitate if compromised, with critics arguing that broad availability could normalize commodification of personal histories and expose families to indirect harms like fraudulent claims in the decedent's name. However, the addressed such risks by establishing the Limited Access DMF, which redacts SSNs for deaths occurring within three years prior to release and mandates user certifications attesting to secure handling and lawful application, thereby curtailing unauthorized exploitation while preserving access for verified entities. These measures responded to pre-2013 misuse patterns where public DMF queries enabled criminals to harvest unredacted SSNs for synthetic identities, but post-implementation safeguards have empirically reduced breach incidents, with no large-scale leaks tied to systemic DMF vulnerabilities. Proponents contend that the file's net societal value—evidenced by pilots recovering over $31 million in fraudulent payments within months through —substantially outweighs residual ethical apprehensions, as the causal chain from exposure to harm is attenuated by legal non- for the deceased and rigorous controls. advocates, including those aligned with progressive protection frameworks, voice concerns over entrenching infrastructures that could extend to living populations, yet quantitative analyses reveal misuse rates below detectable thresholds in certified environments, underscoring the primacy of deterrence in policy calculus. Conservative viewpoints reinforce this by highlighting enforcement efficiencies, such as streamlined terminations, without documented trade-offs in privacy integrity.

Political and Policy Disputes

In early 2025, assertions by President and officials associated with the Department of Government Efficiency (), including , highlighted potential in Social Security payments to individuals listed in outdated records within the Death Master File (DMF), such as centenarians or even those appearing over 150 years old. These claims suggested millions of deceased persons were receiving benefits, prompting calls for aggressive DMF updates to curb waste. However, the () refuted widespread payouts, clarifying that active payments to such aged records were minimal and often ceased automatically upon death reports, with no evidence of "millions" in ongoing ; actual improper payments to deceased beneficiaries totaled around $31 million recovered in 2025 through cross-agency efforts. SSA's acting emphasized that unupdated death records in the DMF do not equate to active benefit receipt, attributing discrepancies to reporting lags rather than systemic abuse. A related policy flashpoint emerged in April 2025 when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), under administration directives and DOGE influence, requested to add over 6,000 living —primarily those with temporary —to the DMF, effectively classifying them as deceased to revoke Social Security numbers (SSNs), halt benefits, and facilitate deportations. This approach aimed to enforce rules by leveraging the DMF's role in benefits eligibility, but it ignited objections from critics, who argued it bypassed hearings and risked erroneous deactivations for eligible individuals, potentially disrupting access to wages, credit, and services tied to SSNs. partially reversed the additions by June 2025 amid legal and operational pushback, underscoring tensions between rapid enforcement and administrative safeguards. Conservative advocates, including DOGE proponents, championed these DMF applications as essential for fiscal discipline, citing SSA Office of Inspector General (OIG) data showing nearly $72 billion in improper payments from fiscal years 2015 to 2022—predominantly overpayments preventable through better death verification—and arguing that unaddressed laxity enables billions in annual leakage to non-qualifiers, including ineligible immigrants. Government Accountability Office (GAO) analyses similarly highlight persistent gaps in fraud detection, supporting stricter DMF integration with enforcement agencies to yield net savings exceeding $4.9 billion recovered in overpayments alone in fiscal year 2023. Progressive viewpoints, often amplified by outlets like the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, decry such measures as overreach that politicizes neutral data tools, risking errors and operational disruptions at SSA without proportional fraud gains, given that death-related improper payments represent a fraction of total outlays. Empirical evidence, however, indicates that targeted DMF enhancements have historically reduced improper disbursements without widespread harm, as automated cross-checks with state vital records and funeral home reports minimize false positives when implemented with verification protocols, delivering causal fiscal benefits through prevented payouts to non-entitled parties.

Recent Developments and Reforms

Updates from 2023 to 2025

In 2023 and 2024, the (SSA) maintained routine weekly updates to the Death Master File (DMF), typically incorporating 8,000 to 13,000 new verified death records per week from sources including family reports, , and state vital records. These updates supported ongoing efforts to curb improper payments, with the SSA emphasizing verified first-party death notifications as immediately actionable for inclusion. Early 2025 saw significant fluctuations in the Limited Access DMF (LADMF), a certified subset available to qualified users. Between March 14 and April 19, 2025, the added nearly 11 million records of individuals born in 1905 or earlier, presumed deceased due to exceeding age 120, as part of a cleaning initiative to incorporate historical mortality and reduce outdated records in beneficiary systems. On March 17, 2025, the issued a blog post affirming the file's accuracy, stating that it processes approximately 3 million verified deaths annually through rigorous cross-verification with multiple sources to minimize errors. In April 2025, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) collaborated with the to add roughly 6,000 living noncitizens whose immigration status had been revoked to the DMF, a measure intended to terminate their eligibility for federal benefits including Social Security, , and credit access, thereby facilitating enforcement actions such as deportations. This policy, enacted under executive authority, drew criticism from advocacy groups for potentially misclassifying living individuals but was defended by administration officials as a targeted tool against and ineligible claims. By June 2025, the reversed portions of these and related additions, deleting nearly 6,000 entries from the LADMF—far exceeding the typical weekly average of 200—to correct for over-inclusions amid ongoing data reconciliation. These updates enhanced fraud prevention capabilities, enabling quarterly audits for programs like and contributing to legislative efforts such as the September 2025 Senate-passed bill mandating full DMF integration with Treasury's Do Not Pay system to eliminate payments to deceased individuals. However, the abrupt additions and deletions caused short-term disruptions for subscribers using the LADMF for and , as mismatched records temporarily flagged living users as deceased. A May 15, 2025, SSA-DHS agreement further streamlined data sharing for , aiming to stabilize future updates while prioritizing eligibility enforcement.

Ongoing Challenges and Future Directions

Persistent data lags persist in states without Electronic Death Registration (EDR) systems, where manual reporting processes delay the incorporation of death records into the Death Master File (DMF), contributing to discrepancies that result in improper payments estimated at $327 million from mismatched state reports alone. These lags exacerbate challenges in maintaining real-time accuracy, as non-EDR jurisdictions rely on slower paper-based or batch submissions, hindering timely updates and increasing the risk of overpayments to deceased beneficiaries. Balancing broad access for prevention with heightened security measures remains critical amid rising synthetic , where criminals exploit deceased identities; however, post-2011 restrictions on the Limited Access DMF have reduced its coverage to approximately 16% of U.S. deaths, complicating verification efforts by financial institutions. Recent 2025 deletions, including nearly 6,000 erroneous entries of living individuals removed in June, underscore the ongoing need for systematic cleanup to address historical inaccuracies, such as unmarked living immigrants or clerical errors that inflate the file's 94 million records. These actions highlight vulnerabilities in control, prompting calls for empirical metrics like reduced improper payment rates to guide reforms rather than unverified ideological interventions. Future directions include mandating EDR adoption across all states to minimize reporting delays and enhance cybersecurity in data transfers, potentially integrating AI-driven to accelerate detection and cross-checks against synthetic identities. Enforcement expansions, such as quarterly DMF checks for eligibility, could further rigorize processes, aiming to curb overpayments through verifiable confirmations over self-reported . Emerging audit technologies, akin to distributed ledgers, offer prospects for tamper-proof in record maintenance, ensuring immutable trails for SSA and user while prioritizing causal reductions in error propagation.

References

  1. [1]
    Requesting SSA's Death Information | Data Exchange - Social Security
    NTIS sells the public file of death information, also known as the public Death Master File (DMF) or Limited Access DMF, to other agencies and private ...Security Information · State Agreements · Data Exchange
  2. [2]
    NTIS: Limited Access Death Master File Download
    The Death Master File (DMF) from the Social Security Administration (SSA) contains over 83 million records of deaths that have been reported to SSA.
  3. [3]
    Social Security and the Death Master File | SSAB
    Jun 17, 2019 · The Death Master File (DMF), a file extracted from the Social Security Administration's (SSA) database of Social Security number holders, contains the death ...
  4. [4]
    Social Security Death Record Limits Hamper Researchers
    Oct 8, 2012 · As a result, four million deaths were expunged from the publicly available master file last November. Social Security officials expect the ...
  5. [5]
    What You Need to Know About Changes to the SSA's Death Master ...
    May 8, 2025 · These files include, if available, the deceased individual's SSN, first name, middle name, surname, date of birth, and date of death. The full ...
  6. [6]
    Immigrants and the Social Security death master file | Brookings
    Apr 15, 2025 · Adding immigrants to the Social Security death master file undermines both the integrity and the solvency of the Social Security system.
  7. [7]
    The Story of the Social Security Number
    This article explores the history and meaning of the SSN and the Social Security card, along with SSA 's SSN master data file, generally known as the Numident.<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Measuring All-Cause Mortality With the Census Numident File - PMC
    Before 1980, the Census Numident death counts drop steadily until 1967, when they are 75% of the CDC counts. The coverage then drops precipitously, reaching ...Missing: 1970s | Show results with:1970s
  9. [9]
    United States Social Security Administration Records - FamilySearch
    Jul 18, 2025 · The index includes a few deaths from 1937 to 1961, about 50 percent of deceased persons from 1962 to 1971, and about 85 percent of deceased ...Missing: system 1960s 1970s
  10. [10]
    Examining Federal Improper Payments and Errors in the Death ...
    Mar 16, 2015 · To identify and prevent its own and other agencies' improper payments, SSA must collect and maintain accurate death records. Death Master File.
  11. [11]
    The Social Security Administration's Death Data: In Brief
    Jan 11, 2021 · SSA also provides a limited extract of its death data, referred to as the Death Master File (DMF), to the Department of Commerce's National ...
  12. [12]
    Social Security's Death Records | Office of the Inspector General
    Feb 2, 2012 · SSA uses death information from the Numident to create the DMF. If a person knew an individual was deceased and that the death record was not on ...Missing: history initial
  13. [13]
    Chairman Johnson Announces a Hearing on Social Security's Death ...
    Feb 2, 2012 · A 1980 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) court-mandated settlement required the SSA to make publicly available the surname, Social Security ...
  14. [14]
    Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee, Committee on ...
    Nov 8, 2001 · The Death Master File (DMF) was created because of a 1980 consent ... SSA now maintains a national file of death information, the DMF.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Social Security and the Death Master File - Amazon S3
    1 SSA uses the death data it receives to determine eligibility for and termination of benefit payments . However, errors in the death-reporting process cause ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Treasury Data Pilot Prevents and Recovers $31 Million in Payments ...
    Jan 15, 2025 · The Full Death Master File contains more than 142 million records, with records going back to 1899.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Effectiveness of the Social Security Administration's Death ...
    Sep 17, 2002 · Under EDR, SSA verifies the Social Security number (SSN) with the State bureaus of vital statistics at the beginning of the death registration ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  18. [18]
    Internet Electronic Death Registration (I-EDR) - Social Security
    Internet Electronic Death Registration is a process that allows state vital statistic agencies to verify Social Security numbers and process death notices ...Missing: Master File 2000s
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Change in Public Death Master File Records - ladmf
    Effective November 1, 2011, the DMF no longer contains protected state death records, removing about 4.2 million records and adding 1 million fewer annually.Missing: expansion growth
  20. [20]
    Limited Access Death Master File Weekly Updates - NTIS
    Death Master File Weekly Updates should be available on each Saturday of the month but can be delayed until the following US Government business day.Missing: post- 2010s
  21. [21]
    Limited Access Death Master File Monthly Updates - NTIS
    Death Master File Monthly Updates should be available on the second US Government business day of the month but can be delayed until the following US ...Missing: post- 2010s
  22. [22]
    Record Layout (LADMF) - NTIS
    THIS ENTIRE “C” RECORD FOR THAT SSN SHOULD REPLACE ANY CURRENT RECORD YOU HAVE ON YOUR MASTER DMF, OR BE ADDED IF NO ENTRY FOUND ON YOUR MASTER DMF, (AGAIN FOR ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Rejection of State Death Reports - SSA OIG
    Mar 17, 2025 · If the death report passes the DIPS verification, DIPS posts the information to the Numident, a database that stores information for all Social.
  24. [24]
    Stopping Payments to Dead People - Ways and Means
    Dec 21, 2020 · Currently, 70 percent of the death records the SSA receives are from States through EDR. The SSA compares death record information with ...
  25. [25]
    Social Security Provides Update about its Death Record | SSA
    Mar 17, 2025 · If a person suspects that they have been incorrectly listed as deceased on their Social Security record, they should contact their local Social ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Follow-up Review of Numident Death Information Not Included on ...
    Jul 31, 2024 · The DMF includes each deceased numberholder's SSN, name, date of birth, and date of death. As of December 2023, the full. DMF contained ...Missing: format DOD
  27. [27]
    [PDF] A Report to Congress on Sources of and Access to State Death Data
    Jul 6, 2022 · death registration. Moving from paper-based to electronic death records is expensive but more efficient and reduces data entry errors that ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Social Security Administration's Rejection of State Electronic ...
    Sep 21, 2020 · 5 SSA and the States developed the EDR program in 20026 to improve the accuracy and timeliness of death information, reduce costs associated ...
  29. [29]
    Outcomes Following Termination of Social Security Disability ...
    Using Social Security Administration data, we found that approximately 16 percent of former DI-only beneficiaries whose benefits were terminated because of ...
  30. [30]
    Do Not Pay - What Can I Search? - Fiscal.Treasury.gov
    What Can I Search? ; Death Master File Full (DMF-Full). SSA. Contains records of deaths reported to the Social Security Administration (SSA).
  31. [31]
    [PDF] IMPROPER PAYMENTS Strategy and Additional Actions ... - GAO
    Oct 14, 2016 · Sharing the full death file through the DNP working system would enhance efforts to identify and prevent improper payments. The 10 agencies GAO ...
  32. [32]
    Fiscal Service using death data to reduce improper payments
    Oct 4, 2024 · As close as you can get to that date of death, the chances that you're not going to make an improper payment is reduced.” The bureau didn't have ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    part 1110—certification program for access to the death master file
    A fee-based certification program for persons who seek access to the Death Master File (DMF), and prohibits disclosure of DMF information for an individual.
  34. [34]
    15 CFR § 1110.1 - Description of rule; applicability.
    113-67), Section 203, provides for the establishment of a fee-based certification program for persons who seek access to the Death Master File (DMF), and ...
  35. [35]
    15 CFR § 1110.102 - Certification. - Law.Cornell.Edu
    In order to be certified to be eligible to access the Limited Access DMF under the certification program established under this part, a Person shall certify.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Limited Access Death Master File Certification Program (Publication ...
    This publication, “Limited Access Death Master File Certification Program (Publication 100):. Information Security Guidelines for Use and Protection of ...
  37. [37]
    Certification Program for Access to the Death Master File
    Dec 30, 2014 · This rule sets forth requirements to become a certified person, establishes a process for third party attestation and auditing of the information safeguarding ...
  38. [38]
    Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF) - NTIS
    The National Technical Information Service (NTIS) established a certification program for those seeking access to the Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF).
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Limited Access Death Master File Non-federal Licensee Agreement ...
    Mar 25, 2014 · Certification Form may subject the Subscriber to penalties under 15 CFR 1110.200 of $1,000 for each disclosure ... found at 15 CFR part 1110. This ...
  40. [40]
    Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF), Subscriber Certification ...
    Price. Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF), Subscriber Certification Attestation Form Processing Fee, $247.00. PLEASE NOTE: Due to end-of-month reporting, ...Missing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Limited Access Death Master File Non-federal Licensee Agreement ...
    Mar 21, 2014 · CFR Part 1110. Licensee agrees that NTIS may conduct periodic and unscheduled audits of the systems, facilities, and procedures of Licensee ...
  42. [42]
    15 CFR Part 1110 Subpart C -- Penalties and Audits - eCFR
    The total amount of the penalty imposed under this part on any Person for any calendar year shall not exceed $250,000, unless such Person's disclosure or use is ...Missing: breach | Show results with:breach
  43. [43]
    Study: ID thieves robbing the grave; 2.5 million dead hit annually
    Apr 22, 2012 · Nearly 2.5 million dead people are victims of identity theft every year, according to a data analysis by fraud prevention firm ID Analytics being made public ...
  44. [44]
    Death Master File - All You Need To Know - Streamline Verify
    Jun 14, 2021 · DMF stands for “Death Master File”. It's an index of those who are deceased. This list includes names, SSNs, DOBs, and Dates of Deaths.
  45. [45]
    Social Security Death Index Redactions - The Ancestry Insider
    Apr 11, 2012 · Ancestry.com removed the SSDI from RootsWeb.com and redacted (removed) social security numbers (SSNs) for individuals who have died in the last ten years.
  46. [46]
    Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 Restricts Access to Death Master File
    Jan 3, 2014 · 59, will restrict access to a decedent's DMF records for a three-year period following the date of death. Only those persons certified by the ...
  47. [47]
    Certification Program for Access to the Death Master File
    Mar 3, 2014 · Section 203, “Restriction on Access to the Death Master File,” requires a fee-based certification program for allowable uses of DMF data for any ...
  48. [48]
    The hidden costs of outdated mortality data - Guidehouse
    May 8, 2025 · Recent analyses of the Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF) reveal data ... savings by stopping improper payments and mitigating fraud.
  49. [49]
    Social Security Administration Death Master File - Verisys
    Jul 10, 2019 · The Death Master File (DMF) is an important primary source to achieve full transparency in the prevention of identity fraud.Missing: creation | Show results with:creation
  50. [50]
    Overpayments in the Social Security Administration's Programs
    Oct 31, 2024 · The overpayment will remain on the benefit record for collection when a future recovery method is available.Missing: Master | Show results with:Master
  51. [51]
    State Death Report Discrepancies Led to $327M in Improper ...
    Mar 19, 2025 · SSA's Death Information Processing System (DIPS) accepted about 12.2 million and rejected nearly 1.5 million (11 percent) state death reports.
  52. [52]
    Social Security sets the record straight on its Death Master File
    Mar 17, 2025 · After repeated false claims by the White House and DOGE that SSA is paying tens of thousands of people who are more than 100 years old, the ...Missing: history controversies
  53. [53]
    What is the Death Master File? TINcheck.com
    Mar 26, 2025 · The Death Master File (DMF) is a database maintained by the Social Security Administration (SSA) containing records of over 142 million reported deaths dating ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Data Double-Takes: Why the Social Security Death Master File Gets ...
    Its purpose is to let government agencies, lenders, insurers, and credit bureaus quickly verify deaths and prevent identity theft using deceased individuals' ...Missing: creation history initial
  55. [55]
    Death Master File Under Scrutiny at House Hearing - ThinkAdvisor
    Feb 2, 2012 · The Death Master File is a primary tool by which the life insurance industry determines when annuitants have died, thereby notifying them when ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] White Paper: Searching Plan Records for Deceased Participants
    Jun 12, 2023 · The commercial vendors report death match success rates ranging between 25 percent and 95 percent, depending upon several factors.Missing: hit studies
  57. [57]
    Death Master File (DMF) Compliance and Audits for Businesses
    Nov 13, 2024 · The DMF is an invaluable tool for preventing identity theft. By cross-referencing individuals in their database with the information from the ...
  58. [58]
    United States, Social Security Death Index - FamilySearch
    Name index to deaths recorded by the Social Security Administration beginning in 1962. Current as of February 28, 2014.<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Social Security - SSDI & Other Databases Online - Cyndi's List
    This is a privately owned genealogy website using a purchased copy of the Social Security Death Master File. This site uses the Death Master File edition of 30 ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  60. [60]
    How Health Care Organizations Use the Death Master File - Verisys
    Feb 26, 2020 · The DMF contains over 83 million records of deaths that have been reported to the SSA of individuals who had Social Security numbers.
  61. [61]
    Why Should We Screen Against the Social Security Administration ...
    Oct 1, 2023 · Maintaining accurate and complete records in the Death Master File requires stringent data quality checks and verification processes. Errors in ...
  62. [62]
    What Happens When the IRS Erroneously Thinks You're Dead?
    Sep 15, 2023 · Social Security is an important player because it maintains the death master file. Each week it sends to the IRS a list of deceased taxpayers.
  63. [63]
    Fixed-Fee Death Master File (DMF) Social Security Administration ...
    The IRS Death Master File provides important information to prevent identity theft and fraud by matching deceased individuals against their tax records. This ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    Do Not Pay - FAQs - Fiscal.Treasury.gov
    Jul 29, 2025 · This will help prevent, reduce, and stop improper payments, as well as prevent fraud, waste, and abuse. Using Do Not Pay. How does an agency ...
  65. [65]
    New IRS and SSA Data-Sharing Efforts Raise Immigration Stakes for ...
    Apr 17, 2025 · ... enforcement. The next day, the Social Security Administration announced it was repurposing its “death master file” – which is typically used ...
  66. [66]
    Homeland Majority's Fourth Interim Report on the Financial Cost of ...
    Nov 16, 2023 · ... billion in fiscal 2022, with migrants receiving at least $8 billion in improper Medicaid payouts (10% of the nation's total of $80 billion).
  67. [67]
    Social Security Lists Thousands of Migrants as Dead to Prompt ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · Social Security Lists Thousands of Migrants as Dead to Prompt Them to 'Self-Deport'. By placing migrants in Social Security's “death master file ...Trump Shuts Down CBP One... · Tara Siegel Bernard · Vance and Trump Call for...
  68. [68]
    Social Security Administration Reverses Course on Death Master ...
    which it says “far exceeds the ...Missing: termination statistics
  69. [69]
    SSA listed thousands of living immigrants as dead. What we know
    Apr 11, 2025 · The Trump administration's move to classify thousands of living immigrants as dead and cancel their Social Security numbers is an escalation.Missing: defense | Show results with:defense
  70. [70]
    Loss of Social Security numbers called 'digital murder' for immigrants
    In its latest move, the White House has taken to referring to it as the “Ineligible Master File.” Effective April 8, Customs and Border Patrol ...Missing: defense | Show results with:defense
  71. [71]
    The Fiscal Cost of Unlawful Immigrants and Amnesty to the U.S. ...
    The tax loss and added welfare costs from this could reach $10 billion per year. ... immigrants tend to pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits. The ...Missing: improper | Show results with:improper
  72. [72]
    Federal Government Made $236 billion “Improper Payments” Last ...
    Mar 26, 2024 · The federal government reported an estimated $236 billion in “improper payments” during the most recently completed fiscal year (FY 2023).
  73. [73]
    SSA Pushes Back on Claims of Widespread Death Record Fraud
    Mar 17, 2025 · “Social Security announced today that more than three million deaths are reported to the Social Security Administration each year and explains ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Follow-up on Personally Identifiable Information Made Available to ...
    Jun 11, 2021 · In both reports, we recommended SSA implement a risk-based approach for distributing public DMF information by delaying the release of file ...Missing: Index redaction
  75. [75]
    Social Security falsely lists 6,000 people a year as dead - CNBC
    Jan 12, 2017 · That fatal mistake affects about 6,000 people a year, according to the Social Security Administration's Office of the Inspector General. And ...
  76. [76]
    The Fraud Risks of Misusing the Death Master File
    May 17, 2025 · The misuse of the Death Master File serves as a cautionary tale about the unintended consequences of aggressive fraud prevention measures.Missing: savings | Show results with:savings
  77. [77]
    Mistakenly declared dead: How one error can lead to years of ...
    Sep 6, 2023 · “I just thought it was an error, human error that could be fixed quickly,” Allen said. “But I was wrong.” The I-Team found others have sadly ...
  78. [78]
    Grave Mistakes in SSA Bring Problems - Consumer Watchdog
    Jun 26, 2011 · The Death Master File was created in 1980 at the request of U.S. business interests to prevent consumer fraud. The massive database of nearly 90 ...
  79. [79]
    Falsely Reported as Deceased on Your Credit Report?
    Falsely reported as deceased on your credit report? FCRA Attorneys help correct this serious error and hold credit bureaus accountable under the Fair Credit ...
  80. [80]
    Mistakenly Reported as Deceased on Your Credit Report?
    Answer: The Death Master File (DMF) is the source of the problem in many cases, but it's fixable—and you still have legal rights regardless of who caused it. We ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Sources of Erroneous Death Entries Input into the Death Master File ...
    Feb 4, 2009 · For example, the digits of an SSN could be inadvertently transposed during death entry input, erroneously terminating the wrong numberholder's ...Missing: consequences | Show results with:consequences
  82. [82]
    Social Security Clarifies Death Master File Accuracy - MSN
    The agency says that less than one-third of one percent of all reported deaths need to be corrected. “The Death Master File is highly accurate,” said SSA ...
  83. [83]
    Trump and DOGE Claim Power to Falsely List Living Persons as ...
    Apr 15, 2025 · The Trump Administration has made a shocking claim: that it can declare living people dead to cut off their access to government benefits ...Missing: real- cessation
  84. [84]
    POMS: GN 02602.065 - Types of Death Alerts - Social Security
    Jan 15, 2016 · Third-party verification alerts are death reports for beneficiaries from third parties that we must verify by following the steps in GN ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Numberholders Age 100 or Older Who Did Not Have Death ...
    Jul 31, 2023 · SSA uses Numident information to create its full file of death information we refer to as the full Death Master File (DMF). SSA shares the full ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Office of the Inspector General Audit Recommendations that Had ...
    Mar 3, 2025 · We have compiled Office of Audit (OA) recommendations the Social Security Administration. (SSA) had not implemented as of January 29, 2025.
  87. [87]
    Does the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) enable identity theft?
    Aug 15, 2025 · This information—known as the SSA Death Master File or U.S. Social Security Death Index (“SSA Death Index”)—is a public record and is not ...
  88. [88]
    What's Going on with SSA's "Death Master File"? | SentiLink
    Apr 14, 2025 · The DMF is an important source of data for verifying whether the identity on a checking account application (for example) is alive or deceased.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies<|control11|><|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Trump, Musk Exaggerate Scale of Improper Social Security ...
    Feb 21, 2025 · President Donald Trump incorrectly interpreted data shared by Elon Musk when he misleadingly claimed on Feb. 18 that “millions and millions of ...
  90. [90]
    Musk misreads Social Security data, millions of dead people not ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · President Donald Trump and Elon Musk are falsely implying that millions of dead Americans are receiving Social Security benefits, ...Missing: centenarians | Show results with:centenarians
  91. [91]
    New Social Security Chief Contradicts Claims That Millions of Dead ...
    The new head of the Social Security Administration said Wednesday that deceased centenarians are “not necessarily ...
  92. [92]
    US recovers $31 million in federal payments to dead people
    Jan 15, 2025 · Ever since the U.S. Social Security Administration opened its books to the Department of the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service, ...
  93. [93]
    Social Security head clarifies claims about people over 100 ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · The Social Security Administration's acting commissioner clarified claims promoted by Elon Musk and President Trump about centenarians receiving monthly ...
  94. [94]
    Trump administration lists thousands of immigrants as dead in new ...
    Apr 11, 2025 · The Department of Homeland Security requested the Social Security Administration to enter more than 6000 names of immigrants into its ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  95. [95]
    Trump aides, DOGE, pushed for 6,000 living immigrants to be listed ...
    Apr 12, 2025 · The Social Security Administration listed more than 6000 living immigrants as dead in a move directed by the Trump White House and DOGE.
  96. [96]
    IG Reports: Nearly $72 Billion Improperly Paid - SSA OIG
    Aug 19, 2024 · From FYs 2015 through 2022, SSA estimates it made nearly $72 billion in improper payments, most of which were overpayments.Missing: GAO | Show results with:GAO
  97. [97]
    Improper Payments: Ongoing Challenges and Recent Legislative ...
    Dec 10, 2024 · Since FY2004, agencies have reported $2.7 trillion in improper payments, including $236 billion in FY2023. Fraud in pandemic relief spending, ...
  98. [98]
    Fraud & Improper Payments | U.S. GAO
    For instance, 16 agencies reported a total of about $162 billion in improper payments across 68 programs in FY 2024. Most (75%) of these improper payments were ...
  99. [99]
    Trump Administration, DOGE Activities Risk SSA Operations and ...
    including Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency — has taken actions that risk creating ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  100. [100]
    Social Security Addressing Aged Records | SSA
    Mar 5, 2025 · The data reported in the media represent people who do not have a date of death associated with their record. While these people may not be ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Preventing, Detecting, and Recovering Improper Payments - SSA OIG
    Jul 25, 2024 · SSA also must identify and prevent improper payments through automation and data analytics, expand efforts to collect data from reliable ...<|separator|>
  102. [102]
    More Changes to Social Security Death Master File – NCTR
    Sep 10, 2025 · Over a million records appeared in the Limited Access Death Master File (LADMF) maintained by the Social Security Administration (SSA) over ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  103. [103]
    What You Need to Know About Changes to the DMF - Berwyn Group
    Apr 22, 2025 · The Social Security Administration's (SSA) Limited Access Death Master File (DMF) has undergone significant changes over the past month.<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    SSA Reverses Course on April DMF Additions - Berwyn Group
    Jun 11, 2025 · The Social Security Administration (SSA) appears to have reversed a substantial and unprecedented addition of records to the Death Master File (DMF).
  105. [105]
    Changes Coming to Medicaid: Death Checks and the Reform Bill
    Jul 17, 2025 · One of the least talked about tools maintained by the Social Security Administration (SSA), the Death Master File (DMF), will play a large role.
  106. [106]
    U.S. Senate passes Kennedy, Peters, Wyden bill to end government ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · This bill mandated the sharing of the Social Security Administration's Death Master File with the Department of the Treasury's Do Not Pay ...
  107. [107]
    Another Wave of Changes Hits the SSA Death Master File
    Sep 5, 2025 · The LADMF had millions of records added in April, mostly removed in June, and 1.074 million more added over Labor Day, mostly pre-2010, raising ...Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
  108. [108]
    New SSN Death Master File Will Complicate Fraud Checks
    Apr 13, 2025 · The file which contains 94 million records of deceased people has been a core database to detect and prevent synthetic identity fraud at banks and finance ...Missing: leaks | Show results with:leaks
  109. [109]
    The Role of Death Master Files and OIG Exclusion Lists in Identity ...
    Rating 100% (20) Sep 21, 2024 · The Death Master File helps organizations prevent fraudulent use of deceased individuals' identities, while the OIG Exclusion List ensures ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  110. [110]
    An Overview of the Death Master File (DMF) Certification
    Accessing DMF data requires certification for data security and privacy. DMF certification unlocks the data's full potential facilitating business growth.<|separator|>