Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Defense Language Aptitude Battery

The Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) is a standardized aptitude test administered by the to measure a native English speaker's potential for learning foreign languages, using an artificial to evaluate innate abilities rather than existing knowledge. Developed in the mid-1970s by researchers at the , the DLAB was created to predict performance in intensive military language training programs and to select personnel for linguist roles without bias from prior education or exposure to specific languages. The test comprises 126 multiple-choice questions divided into audio and visual sections, lasting approximately two hours, and assesses key such as auditory discrimination, in sounds and grammar, and the ability to infer rules from unfamiliar linguistic structures. Scores range from a low of about 7 to a maximum of 164, with qualifying thresholds determined by language difficulty categories: typically a minimum of 95 for Category I languages (e.g., , ), 100 for Category II (e.g., ), 105 for Category III (e.g., , Hebrew), and 110 for Category IV (e.g., , ); branches like the and Corps often require at least 100 overall, though waivers may apply. Administered at military testing centers, the DLAB is essential for eligibility in language-intensive positions across all branches, including cryptologic technicians , psychological operations specialists in the , and roles in the and , thereby supporting the of Defense's global operational needs.

Overview

Purpose and Administration

The Defense Language Battery (DLAB) is a standardized test developed by the U.S. Department of Defense to assess an individual's potential for success in training among . It evaluates innate learning abilities through artificial linguistic constructs, ensuring the assessment measures independent of any prior exposure to . The primary purpose of the DLAB is to determine eligibility for enrollment in intensive language programs at the (DLI), helping the military identify candidates likely to achieve proficiency in demanding language roles. By focusing on like and auditory processing, the test predicts performance in training for languages across various difficulty categories, without relying on existing knowledge. This qualification process supports the assignment of personnel to specialized positions requiring linguistic expertise. The DLAB is administered as a timed, 2-hour test comprising 126 multiple-choice questions, divided into audio and visual components. It is proctored at authorized military testing centers or Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS) by trained personnel, using headphones and audio recordings for listening sections alongside paper booklets or computer-based interfaces for visual tasks. The test is managed by the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (DLIFLC) under Department of Defense oversight, ensuring standardized delivery across services. As of 2025, the DLAB continues to be a mandatory requirement for U.S. enlistees and officers seeking language-intensive career fields, including cryptologic linguists and specialists, to verify their aptitude before committing to DLI training.

Eligibility and Requirements

The Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) is primarily administered to U.S. personnel, including active duty, reserve, and members across all branches—, , , Marine Corps, and —to assess their potential for foreign language training in roles such as linguists or specialists. Civilians are eligible only at the discretion of the Secretaries of the Departments or directors of Defense Agencies, typically for specific Department of (DoD) positions requiring language aptitude evaluation. Eligibility requires U.S. , as language-related military occupational specialties () or ratings demand eligibility for security clearances, such as with (SCI) access, which precludes individuals with significant criminal history or other disqualifying factors. Applicants must be high school graduates or equivalent and typically complete the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) prior to DLAB testing as part of enlistment or assignment processes; no prior proficiency is required or considered, as the DLAB measures innate rather than existing skills. Minimum age is generally 17 with or 18 without, varying slightly by branch enlistment standards. Branch-specific rules tie DLAB eligibility to targeted career fields: in the , it is required for such as 35P (Cryptologic Linguist) or 35W (Foreign Language Specialist); the mandates it for ratings like CTI (Cryptologic Technician Interpretive); the uses it for Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSCs) in cryptologic or linguist roles; the Marine Corps requires it for occupational fields like 02XX () or 26XX (); and the applies it similarly for relevant ratings in intelligence or operations. Retakes are permitted after a six-month waiting period from the previous attempt, with most branches allowing up to two retests without special approval; subsequent attempts require documentation of a valid need by a unit commander. Accommodations for disabilities are available under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and , including options like extended time or modified audio delivery, coordinated through base education offices or testing centers to ensure equal access for qualified individuals.

History

Development

The origins of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) trace back to the 1960s, evolving from earlier language aptitude assessments like the (MLAT), which was developed post-World War II to predict success in foreign language learning. However, the DLAB was specifically customized to meet the escalating military demands for linguists during the , when the need for personnel proficient in languages such as surged, with over 20,000 service members receiving training through (DLI) programs between 1965 and 1973. This period highlighted the limitations of existing civilian-oriented tests for selecting and assigning military personnel to intensive, operationally critical language courses. The DLAB was developed in the early 1970s, initiated by Colonel Kibbey M. Horne and further advanced by James R. Child in 1973 using an artificial language called VORD, as part of a targeted effort to standardize across the armed forces. The development involved empirical studies on more than 1,000 service members undergoing training in various foreign languages, employing to identify key predictors of learning success, such as phonetic coding, grammatical sensitivity, and inductive language learning ability. Drawing on linguistic theories of aptitude pioneered by researchers like John B. Carroll, who emphasized components like in and , the test was field-tested in late 1973 and early 1974. The DLAB became operational across all branches of the Department of Defense () by 1976-1977, replacing disparate branch-specific tests and providing a unified tool for assigning personnel to language training programs. Early validation studies in the , conducted at the DLI, demonstrated strong predictive power, with correlations ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 between DLAB scores and success rates in DLI courses, outperforming predecessors like the MLAT in military contexts. This empirical foundation ensured the test's reliability for high-stakes applications, establishing it as a for language .

Revisions

Validity studies in the reinforced the DLAB's utility; a 2010 analysis affirmed its ongoing relevance for predicting training success and recommended pre-screening models to improve efficiency, including for Category IV languages. Policy developments in 2015 integrated DLAB results with the Defense Language Proficiency Test (DLPT) for hybrid evaluations in select branches, allowing demonstrated proficiency to offset lower scores in decisions. This evolution, including the 2015 launch of DLAB2—a new battery adding measures of , , and non-cognitive factors like —aims to more holistically predict success and reduce in training.

Test Format

The Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) begins with a brief personal survey section consisting of 10 questions, which must be completed in 90 seconds. The main test comprises 126 multiple-choice questions divided into audio and visual sections, lasting approximately two hours in total.

Audio Sections

The audio sections of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) evaluate a test-taker's for processing phonetic elements, auditory patterns, and basic linguistic associations in an unfamiliar language, using an artificial to avoid reliance on prior knowledge of English or any . This portion is delivered entirely through audio playback via , ensuring isolated listening conditions, and comprises five distinct sections that emphasize skills like syllable recognition, differentiation, and rule-based comprehension without visual or written linguistic cues beyond answer selection. The entire audio component lasts approximately 80 minutes, with audio clips playing only once and no option to pause or replay, simulating real-time language processing under controlled conditions. Part 1 focuses on patterns, requiring identification of the stressed in nonsense words presented via audio cues, where test-takers select the option matching the emphasized pattern heard in spoken sequences of invented . This assesses the ability to discern prosodic features, such as primary placement, which are crucial for languages with tonal or -based morphologies. Part 2 involves nouns and adjectives, testing noun-adjective order and sounds by distinguishing between similar phonemes, including and , by comparing paired audio clips of pseudo-words and choosing the one that differs in . Examples might include differentiating subtle variations like /ɪ/ versus /iː/ or /p/ versus /b/, highlighting auditory acuity for recognition essential in phonetically complex languages. Part 3 covers possessives, assessing possessive structures through audio examples of rules for in the artificial language, requiring selection of the correct audio response that adheres to the demonstrated patterns. It evaluates the capacity to infer and apply simple syntactic rules from auditory demonstrations alone. Part 4 addresses verbs and objects, presenting audio examples of rules for verb-object or subject-verb relationships in the artificial language, requiring identification of correct structures. Part 5 is a compilation section that integrates skills from previous parts, using short audio narratives or sequences in the constructed language to identify patterns, sequences, or outcomes based solely on the heard content. This measures the integration of phonetic and structural skills into higher-level understanding.

Visual Section

The visual section of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) is a single component delivered either in paper-based format or digitally on-screen. This section simulates language learning by presenting an artificial language constructed from abstract symbols, pictures, and visual patterns with associated gibberish words, designed to evaluate innate aptitude without relying on prior knowledge of any real-world language. The section introduces grammatical rules—such as noun-article agreement, verb tense formations, and —through a series of pictorial examples paired with symbolic representations or words. These examples avoid any English translations or familiar linguistic cues, requiring test-takers to infer rules solely from contextual patterns and relationships depicted visually, such as selecting the correct word for a given picture. Subsequent questions require applying the deduced rules to analyze novel sentences or phrases composed of the artificial symbols or words, selecting the correct grammatical form, identifying errors, or completing structures from provided options. This format emphasizes the ability to extend learned patterns to unseen contexts, mirroring the challenges of acquiring an unfamiliar . Core skills assessed include in symbolic sequences, formation of analogies between examples and new scenarios, and applied to and , all without auditory input. The section allocates about 25 minutes for completion, prioritizing rapid inference and precise application under timed conditions to reflect real pressures. A distinctive feature is the use of an entirely invented , symbology, and pictures, which emulates the orthographic complexity of foreign languages while eliminating cultural or alphabetic biases inherent in using actual scripts.

Scoring and Categories

Score Calculation

The raw score on the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) is calculated by awarding one point for each correct answer across its 126 multiple-choice questions, with no deduction for incorrect answers or guessing, yielding a possible raw score range of 0 to 126. The test comprises five audio sections totaling approximately 95 questions, which contribute about 75% to the raw score, and one visual section with approximately 31 questions, contributing the remaining 25%; however, no separate subscores for these sections are computed or reported. This raw score is then transformed into a standard score using norm-referenced conversion tables that adjust for variations in test form difficulty to ensure comparability across administrations. The resulting ranges from 7 to 164, with higher values reflecting stronger predicted aptitude for acquisition (the maximum was previously 176 but revised to 164 in ). These norms are derived from extensive validation data on military populations spanning the 1970s to the 2020s, providing a basis for rankings within that group. The conversion is based on norms from samples, with a typical mean around 95, though precise parameters and tables are detailed in restricted technical manuals and not publicly disclosed. Standard scores are reported officially immediately after completion for computer-delivered tests or within 24 hours for manual scoring of paper versions, and they remain valid indefinitely for language program eligibility without an expiration period.

Language Difficulty Categories

The Department of Defense () classifies into four difficulty categories (I through IV) for native or near-native English speakers, primarily based on the estimated time required to achieve at least ILR Level 2 proficiency in , reading, and speaking, as well as linguistic complexity including phonetic differences from English and grammatical structures. These categories guide minimum DLAB score requirements for entry into language training at the Foreign Language Center (DLIFLC) and reflect factors such as orthographic systems and overall structural divergence from English. As of 2025, training lengths are: Categories I and II: 36 weeks; Category III: 48 weeks; Category IV: 64 weeks. Category I languages represent the easiest for English speakers due to close linguistic ties; examples include , , , and , with a minimum DLAB score of 95. Category II languages are moderately difficult, often involving slightly greater grammatical and phonetic variances; representative examples are , , and , requiring a minimum DLAB score of 100. Category III languages pose harder challenges with more complex grammar, unfamiliar phonetics, and non-Latin scripts in some cases; examples include , , Turkish, Hebrew, and , with a minimum DLAB score of 105. Category IV languages are the most difficult, characterized by significant phonetic distance, intricate grammar, and unique writing systems; key examples are (all dialects), (), , and , demanding a minimum DLAB score of 110. Higher DLAB scores provide flexibility in selecting harder languages, while some military branches, such as the , may grant 5-10 point waivers below the minimum for critical operational needs or strategic languages.

Preparation and Implications

Study Strategies

Preparing for the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) centers on honing skills rather than rote memorization, as the test evaluates innate language learning potential through an artificial devoid of real-world vocabulary. Test-takers are advised to dedicate 4-6 weeks to , committing 1-2 hours daily to gradually build analytical abilities in auditory and visual pattern detection without attempting to learn actual foreign languages, which would not align with the exam's focus on . To enhance phonetics training, individuals should practice discriminating between non-English syllables and sounds, utilizing audio features from apps like for exposure to diverse phonetic elements and Forvo for precise examples across languages, thereby sharpening the ear for patterns and vowel variations central to the test's audio components. For grammar exercises, focus on deducing structural rules from invented systems by engaging with artificial languages in dedicated preparation materials, such as DLAB-specific guides that present sample rule sets for sentence construction and modification, fostering the ability to infer patterns like noun-adjective ordering or tense applications without prior linguistic knowledge. Books like "The Official DLAB Training Manual: Study Guide and Practice Test" by Robert J. Cunnings provide structured exercises in this area. Timed practice is essential to simulate the DLAB's approximately two-hour duration, including around 80 minutes for audio sections and 25 minutes for visual ones; official pamphlets from military installations offer descriptive samples to replicate the environment, helping build endurance and pacing while avoiding fixation on individual items. Valuable resources include official Department of Defense study guides available through military education offices, as well as online platforms like iPREP and Union Test Prep, which offer legitimate practice questions and explanations; however, test-takers must steer clear of unauthorized full-length tests or leaked materials, as these can lead to exam invalidation due to protocols. Common pitfalls involve mistakenly studying real-world languages, which diverts effort from the core aptitude assessment, or succumbing to that impairs focus; to mitigate the latter, incorporate simple breathing techniques, such as deep inhalations for four counts followed by exhalations for four, practiced regularly to maintain composure during the high-stakes audio and visual challenges.

Results and Military Applications

DLAB scores play a pivotal role in determining eligibility for training within the U.S. , directly influencing to the Foreign Language Center (DLIFLC). Scores below 95 generally render individuals ineligible for language school admission across all branches, while scores of 95 or higher qualify candidates for Category I languages such as , , , and . Higher thresholds apply to more challenging languages: 100 for Category II (e.g., , ), 105 for Category III (e.g., , ), and 110 for Category IV (e.g., , ). The requires a minimum of 95 for Categories I-III and 100 for Category IV; the Marine Corps requires a minimum of 100 for all languages, with waivers available down to 90 for Categories I and II. Scores exceeding 130 are particularly valued for elite Category IV roles, indicating strong potential for mastering exceptionally difficult languages. High DLAB scores, particularly 110 or above, grant priority for slots at DLIFLC, the primary venue for initial language training. These elevated scores facilitate assignment to demanding programs, such as those for dialects, where candidates scoring 115 or higher may receive expedited placement to meet operational needs. In contrast, lower qualifying scores may limit options to less complex languages or result in deferral if training capacity is constrained. The Department of Defense allocates thousands of annual language training slots through DLIFLC, supporting over 3,500 students across more than 65 languages each year, with high DLAB performers often prioritized to fill critical gaps in strategic languages. DLAB results significantly shape military career trajectories, serving as a gateway to linguist-specific roles. For instance, a qualifying score is essential for 1N3 (Cryptologic Language Analyst), which includes linguists, and Marine Corps 267X ( Cryptologic Linguist), both requiring demonstrated aptitude for . Personnel with sub-qualifying scores are typically redirected to non-language military occupational specialties (), such as general or support roles. High scores not only secure these positions but also enhance opportunities for bonuses; as of April 2025, proficient linguists in critical languages may receive up to $1,000 monthly through the Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus program, capped at $12,000 annually. Reclassification opportunities further underscore DLAB's impact on long-term roles, allowing mid-career service members to switch to linguist positions via retesting. Individuals who initially fail to qualify (scoring below 95) may retest after a six-month waiting period, with no expiration on valid scores, enabling transitions to language-dependent for promotions or specialized assignments. This flexibility supports the DoD's need for adaptable linguists in evolving geopolitical contexts. Despite its predictive value, the DLAB has limitations in assessing ultimate performance. It measures innate aptitude for language learning rather than achieved fluency, which is evaluated separately through the Defense Language Proficiency Test (DLPT) for and eligibility. Thus, while high DLAB scores facilitate entry into , sustained proficiency requires ongoing DLPT validation to maintain linguist qualifications and career progression.

References

  1. [1]
    CIWT: Language, Regional Expertise, and Culture FAQs - NETC
    DEFENSE LANGUAGE APTITUDE BATTERY (DLAB): The DLAB measures a typical native English speaker's aptitude to learn a foreign language. The DLAB is comprised ...
  2. [2]
    The Development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (Dlab
    The purpose of this research was to develop and to validate a language aptitude battery for use by the Defense Language Institute (DLI)
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB): Perspectives - DTIC
    Sep 2, 2010 · o Definition: Respondent says that DLAB is an accurate measure of language learning aptitude without referencing personal or general ...
  4. [4]
    None
    ### DLAB Summary
  5. [5]
    [PDF] dod instruction 5160.71 dod language testing program
    Jun 30, 2022 · The DLAB is the preferred test battery authorized for assessing DoD personnel's aptitude for learning a foreign language. c. Except as ...
  6. [6]
    None
    ### DLAB Administration Summary
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Accession Screening for Language Skills and Abilities
    The DLAB is used to identify language aptitude for both enlisted and officer personnel. It is typically administered to new and prospective recruits at the MEPS ...
  8. [8]
    Security Clearance Process - U.S. Intelligence Community careers
    You must be a U.S. citizen (Dual citizens may be eligible for TS/SCI clearance). When does the security clearance process start? The security clearance ...Missing: DLAB | Show results with:DLAB
  9. [9]
    CTI - MyNavy HR
    Must be world-wide assignable · Candidates must be a high school graduate or equivalent (GED, CPT, home study or other equivalency) · All applicants for CTI are ...
  10. [10]
    Requirements to join the U.S. military - USAGov
    Aug 27, 2025 · Each branch of the military has age limits to enlist in active duty: Air Force: 17 - 42; Army: 17 - 35; Coast Guard: 17 - 41; Marine Corps: 17 - ...Missing: DLAB | Show results with:DLAB
  11. [11]
    Foreign Language Specialist | U.S. Army
    10weeks of Basic Training · 85or above on the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) (active duty only) · 101ASVAB Score: Skilled Technical (ST) *can bypass ...
  12. [12]
    defense language aptitude battery test requirement for ... - Marines.mil
    Aug 28, 2009 · All unrestricted officers and enlisted marines in occupational fields 02XX and 26XX are to have a DLAB test score on file in Marine Corps Total Force System.Missing: eligibility | Show results with:eligibility
  13. [13]
    APT_Retesting_Policy | Army University
    Soldiers may retake any Army personnel test that resulted in an unsatisfactory score. The retest may not be taken sooner than six months after the previous ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] DLAB FT STEWART EMAIL FORM TO
    The Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) evaluates the aptitude of a Soldier to learn a Foreign Language. The test is used to determine eligibility ...
  15. [15]
    ADA Requirements: Testing Accommodations
    Sep 8, 2015 · This document provides technical assistance on testing accommodations for individuals with disabilities who take standardized exams and ...Missing: military | Show results with:military
  16. [16]
    [PDF] (9 September 2013) - DoD
    The purpose of this guide is to provide information on reasonable accommodation to qualified individuals with disabilities. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Testing Aptitude for Second Language Learning - ResearchGate
    Feb 13, 2019 · Applied Linguistics. Peterson, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. R. (1976). The development of the Defense Language Aptitude. Battery. Educational and ...Missing: Petersen | Show results with:Petersen
  18. [18]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  19. [19]
    The Development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (Dlab
    The purpose of this research was to develop and to validate a language aptitude battery for use by the Defense Language Institute (DLI) ...
  20. [20]
    Testing Language Aptitude (Chapter 9)
    The Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) (Petersen & Al-Haik, Reference Petersen and Al-Haik1976) was produced against such a background, as were the CANAL- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] ED321573.pdf - ERIC - U.S. Department of Education
    Language Association Bulletin, 7-. 8. Petersen, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. it (1976). The development of the. Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Management of the Defense Foreign Language Program - DTIC
    Mar 15, 1987 · The Defense. Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) is designed to predict an individual's ability to learn foreign languages. The DLAB replaced ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness)
    Mar 29, 2019 · • DLAB. The objective of this project is to transition to all computer-based testing and improve the predictive validity of the DLAB. • Web ...
  24. [24]
    New battery launched for foreign language aptitude
    “The new battery is called the Defense Language Aptitude Battery 2, or DLAB2, and will be administered at the recruiting stations in conjunction with the ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] A Talent for Language - GovInfo
    CASL is currently examining these issues for the Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center (DLIFLC) as part of the DLAB 2 project.
  26. [26]
    Free DLAB Practice Test & Video Explanations - iPREP
    The DLAB test is scored on a scale of 0-164, with 164 being the highest possible score. There is no specific score that is considered a “good” score on the DLAB ...
  27. [27]
    How is the DLAB Test Organized - DLAD Study
    Sep 23, 2017 · The DLAB test, basically put, consists of 124 multiple choice questions broken into two parts: Audio and Visual.
  28. [28]
    Mastering the DLAB Exam: Your Complete Guide
    Discover everything you 2025 need to know about the DLAB (Defense Language Aptitude Battery), including its format, preparation tips, and scoring.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] DLAB Study Guide
    The DLAB test is divided into two primary sections: the audio portion and the visual portion. Each section evaluates different cognitive skills related to ...
  30. [30]
    DLAB Practice Test 2025
    How many questions are on the DLAB? The DLAB contains 126 multiple-choice questions divided into audio and visual sections. How long is the DLAB test? The ...
  31. [31]
    How to study for the dlab test - DLAB Practice Test -
    Feb 7, 2024 · Your performance across these sections translates into a raw score ranging from 0 to 164. This score then gets converted into a scaled score, ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Evaluating DLAB as a Predictor of Foreign Language Learning - DTIC
    Trainees with higher DLAB scores were more likely to attain higher speaking proficiency than lower DLAB trainees.Missing: deviation | Show results with:deviation
  33. [33]
    [PDF] usarmy.riley.imcom.mbx.education-service-testing@mail.mil 1 0 X
    The Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) evaluates the aptitude of a Soldier to learn a Foreign Language. The test is used to determine eligibility for ...
  34. [34]
    What Is the Defense Language Aptitude Battery Test? (Plus Study ...
    Jul 24, 2025 · A passing score for the DLAB is 95. The most points an individual can score on the Defense Language Aptitude Battery test is 164. An individual ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  35. [35]
    Languages Offered
    Languages Offered: Category I&II languages – 36 week-long courses, Category III languages – 48 week-long courses, Category IV languages – 64 week-long courses.
  36. [36]
    DLI's language guidelines - AUSA
    Aug 1, 2010 · The Defense Language Institute categorizes languages into four levels of difficulty. Category I languages are easier to pick up, while moving on up through ...Missing: DLAB | Show results with:DLAB
  37. [37]
    Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) Testing - LiveAbout
    Nov 6, 2024 · DLAB testing helps the military find out how easily someone can learn languages and covers grammar, sound patterns, and how words are put ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  38. [38]
    FULL DLAB study guide Sep by step - DLAB Practice Test
    Feb 6, 2024 · – Two main parts: audio and visual. ... – 5 subsections testing ability to process sounds, identify patterns, and grasp grammatical structures in ...
  39. [39]
    The Official DLAB Training Manual: Study Guide and Practice Test ...
    This Study Guide gives you a comprehensive understanding of the DLAB test and breaks down each section of the Exam.Missing: DoD | Show results with:DoD
  40. [40]
    Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) Testing - Veteran.com
    Nov 4, 2022 · The Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB) evaluates the aptitude of a soldier to learn a foreign language.
  41. [41]
    DLI-Washington
    DLI-Washington, which is a under DLIFLC Command, trains over 900 students annually in approximately 60 languages under the Contract Foreign Language Program ( ...
  42. [42]
    Cryptologic Language Analyst - U.S. Air Force
    Minimum Education. A High School Senior (age 17 or older)*, High school diploma, a GED, or 15 college semester hours · ASVAB REQUIREMENTS. 62 General (G) ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] dod instruction 1340.27 military foreign language skill proficiency ...
    Aug 17, 2022 · Annual DLP Test (DLPT) Recertification of ILR Skill Level 3–Proficient Personnel in All Required Modalities Exception. This ILR skill level 3 ( ...Missing: slots 5000