Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Diamondback moth

The diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella), a small lepidopteran insect in the family Plutellidae, is a cosmopolitan species recognized for its slender, grayish-brown adult form measuring about 6 mm in length, featuring cream-colored bands that form diamond-shaped patterns on the folded wings, which tip upward at rest.^[1] Its larvae, pale green and up to 11 mm long, possess a distinctive "V"-shaped pair of prolegs and feed voraciously on foliage, while adults are weak fliers often dispersed by wind.^[1] Believed to have originated in the Mediterranean region of Europe but with genomic evidence suggesting South America as the origin, it is now distributed globally wherever cruciferous crops are grown, including the Americas, Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand; this moth completes its life cycle in 17 to 51 days, producing 4 to 12 generations per year depending on climate, with overwintering typically as adults in temperate zones.^[1]^[2]^[3] As one of the most destructive pests of brassica vegetables and oilseed crops such as broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, kale, canola, and mustard, the diamondback moth causes extensive economic damage through larval defoliation of leaves, buds, flowers, and pods, potentially leading to total crop loss in severe infestations.^[2]^[1] Its pest status has intensified with agricultural expansion of crucifers over recent decades, resulting in annual global control costs exceeding US$4 billion, particularly in regions like Southeast Asia and North America.^[4]^[5] The species' remarkable adaptability, including widespread resistance to nearly all major classes of insecticides and over 100 different active ingredients since the 1950s—such as pyrethroids, organophosphates, and newer modes like diamides—has made it notoriously difficult to manage, prompting integrated pest management strategies worldwide, with genomic studies revising its evolutionary history and recent trials of genetic control methods.^[1]^[2]^[6]^[3]^[7] Biologically, P. xylostella eggs are tiny (0.4 mm), cream-colored, and laid in clusters of 2 to 8 on host plant undersides, hatching in 2 to 3 days; larvae undergo four instars, exhibiting a characteristic violent wriggling or dropping on silk threads when disturbed, before pupating in a loose cocoon for 5 to 15 days.^[2] Adults emerge with a lifespan of 12 to 16 days, during which females produce 150 to 300 eggs, favoring warm temperatures (optimal at 25–30°C) that accelerate development and allow rapid population buildup.^[2]^[1] Restricted primarily to plants in the Brassicaceae family, including weeds like wild mustard, the moth's host specificity and high reproductive rate underscore its role as a model organism for studying insecticide resistance and biological control.^[4]^[1]

Taxonomy and Morphology

Taxonomy

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758), is a species in the family Plutellidae, order Lepidoptera, and superfamily Yponomeutoidea.^[8] Originally described by Carl Linnaeus in his Systema Naturae as Phalaena xylostella, the species has undergone several nomenclatural revisions.^[8] Historical synonyms include Cerostoma maculipennis Curtis, 1832, Cerostoma xylostella (Linnaeus), and Harpipteryx thoracella Fabricius, 1793, reflecting early classifications that placed it within broader moth groupings.^[9] The family Plutellidae was previously subsumed under Yponomeutidae but is now recognized as distinct based on morphological and molecular evidence, comprising small moths often associated with herbivory on Brassicaceae plants.^[10] Phylogenetic studies position P. xylostella within the genus Plutella, closely related to other brassica-feeding moths in the Yponomeutoidea superfamily, such as species in Yponomeutidae that specialize on crucifers.^[11] This relationship highlights shared evolutionary adaptations for exploiting Brassicaceae hosts, including tolerance to glucosinolates, though P. xylostella stands out for its global pest status and high mobility. The first-instar larvae exhibit leaf-mining behavior, a trait potentially ancestral to the family, where early stages feed within leaf tissues before transitioning to external feeding—a pattern seen in some related yponomeutoid lineages.^[1] Genomic analyses of 532 individuals from 114 populations across six continents reveal that P. xylostella originated in South America, challenging earlier hypotheses of Mediterranean or South African origins.^[11] Phylogenetic reconstructions, using mitochondrial and nuclear markers, indicate three major global expansions approximately 500 and 200 years ago, driven by European colonization and trade in cruciferous crops, leading to divergent clades in North America, Afro-Eurasia, Southeast Asia, and Oceania.^[11] These expansions underscore the species' rapid adaptation and lack of strong genetic structure, facilitating its cosmopolitan distribution.^[11] In 2024, a chromosome-level genome assembly was published, providing a high-quality reference for further studies on its genetics and evolution.^[12]

Physical Characteristics

The diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) belongs to the family Plutellidae, characterized by small-sized moths with distinctive wing patterns. Adults are slender, measuring 5–7 mm in body length, with a wingspan of 15–20 mm.^[1]^[13]^[14] The forewings are grayish-brown, featuring cream-colored markings that form diamond-shaped patterns when folded at rest, while the hindwings are narrower, lighter in color, and fringed.^[13]^[14] Sexual dimorphism is evident in males, which possess brush-like structures on the abdomen.^[15] Eggs are oval and ribbed, with dimensions of 0.44 mm long by 0.26 mm wide, and appear pale yellow.^[1]^[16] Larvae are caterpillar-like, attaining a maximum length of 1.3 cm, and are pale green with black spots and scattered black hairs.^[13]^[17] They feature prolegs on the thorax and abdomen, with five pairs total, the posterior pair forming a distinctive V-shape.^[1]^[16] Pupae measure 8–9 mm in length and are enclosed in an open-network, loosely spun silk cocoon that varies from green to brown in color.^[1]^[14]^[18]

Distribution and Habitat

Global Distribution

The diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) exhibits a cosmopolitan distribution, having established populations on every continent except Antarctica. Its native origin remains uncertain, with traditional accounts pointing to the Mediterranean region, Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, or East Asia as possible ancestral areas, while a comprehensive genomic analysis of 532 strains suggests South America as the most likely point of origin, where related Plutella species are endemic.^[3]^[1]^[9] The insect's worldwide dispersal has been largely human-mediated, occurring through the international trade and transport of brassica crops, its preferred hosts. This pathway enabled its rapid invasion of new regions following European colonization and agricultural expansion. For example, P. xylostella was first documented in North America in 1854 near Urbana, Illinois, marking its introduction from Europe via infested cabbage shipments, after which it quickly spread to Florida and the Rocky Mountains by 1883.^[3]^[6]^[1] Currently, the diamondback moth thrives in temperate and subtropical climates across the globe, with particularly high densities in brassica-growing hotspots of Asia (e.g., China and India), the Americas (from Canada to Argentina), and Australia. Its close association with cultivated brassica plants, such as cabbage and broccoli, underpins this prevalence in agricultural zones.^[9]^[1]^[6] Population dynamics of P. xylostella are characterized by exceptional migration capabilities, allowing adults to undertake long-distance flights aided by prevailing winds. Notable records include transatlantic movements, such as during the 1958 outbreak when thousands of moths infested a weather ship approximately 800 km off the Scottish coast, evidencing crossings from continental Europe over the North Atlantic.^[19]^[20]^[9]

Habitat Preferences and Migration

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, primarily inhabits temperate agricultural fields dominated by Brassicaceae crops such as cabbage (Brassica oleracea) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica), where these plants serve as essential hosts for larval development.^[9] These environments provide the necessary foliage for feeding and shelter, with the moth showing a strong association with cultivated crucifers in regions supporting year-round or seasonal cropping. The species tolerates a temperature range of 10–30°C for optimal development and survival, enabling multiple generations in mild temperate zones without extreme heat or cold stress.^[21] Migration plays a key role in the moth's dispersal and population dynamics, facilitated by wind-assisted long-distance flights that can cover 400–500 km in a single night at altitudes of 150–500 m.^[22] These movements are often oriented seasonally, with northward migrations in spring from southern overwintering or breeding areas to exploit emerging crops in temperate latitudes, and southward returns in fall to milder regions.^[23] Such wind-borne transport contributes to the moth's cosmopolitan distribution by rapidly recolonizing agricultural landscapes after local extinctions due to weather or management.^[24] In mild climates, the diamondback moth overwinters primarily as pupae or late-instar larvae in a state of quiescence rather than diapause, allowing survival in crop residues or sheltered microhabitats without entering true hibernation.^[25] Larvae and pupae exhibit chill tolerance, enduring near-freezing temperatures (around 0°C) for up to 80 days in protected sites, though populations in colder areas rely more on spring immigration than local persistence.^[26] The moth prefers lowland agricultural settings for its crop hosts, typically below 1,500 m elevation, where warmer microclimates support continuous breeding. Pupation occurs in loose cocoons attached to foliage or within moist soil litter and crop debris, with higher humidity in these substrates enhancing pupal survival rates by preventing desiccation.^[27]

Life Cycle

Egg Stage

The eggs of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) are typically deposited singly or in small clusters of up to several eggs on the undersides of host plant leaves, often in natural depressions or crevices to provide protection. Females commence oviposition shortly after mating and continue over several days, with each female capable of laying 150 to 300 eggs during her adult lifespan, with averages around 150 eggs depending on strain and conditions. ^[28]^[29] These eggs are small, oval, and flattened, measuring approximately 0.44 mm in length and 0.26 mm in width, with a pale yellow to greenish hue when freshly laid. The chorion, or eggshell, features a finely reticulated or ribbed surface that aids in camouflage by mimicking the texture of leaf veins, enhancing survival against visual predators. Viability remains high under suitable conditions, with hatching success often exceeding 90% if eggs avoid parasitism by egg parasitoids such as Trichogramma species, though predation and abiotic stresses can reduce it significantly. ^[1]^[30]^[28] Egg development duration varies from 2 to 7 days until hatching, strongly influenced by temperature; at optimal temperatures around 25–30°C, incubation typically lasts 2–3 days, while cooler conditions (e.g., 15–20°C) extend it to 4–8 days. Humidity plays a key role in maintaining egg integrity, with relative humidity levels above 70% supporting higher survival rates by minimizing desiccation, as low humidity can impair chorion function and embryonic development. Additionally, the placement on leaf undersides helps shield eggs from ultraviolet radiation and direct sunlight, which can degrade viability post-oviposition. ^[30]^[9]^[31]

Larval Stage

The larval stage of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) consists of four instars, during which the caterpillars grow from approximately 1.7 mm to 11.2 mm in length.^[1] The first instar is typically colorless to pale green with a dark head capsule and measures up to 1.7 mm, while subsequent instars become more robust and greenish, reaching up to 3.5 mm, 7.0 mm, and 11.2 mm, respectively.^[1] The total duration of the larval period varies from 10 to 21 days, influenced by temperature and food availability, with each instar lasting about 3 to 5 days under optimal conditions (e.g., 20–25°C).^[24]^[1] Larvae are primarily folivores, targeting cruciferous plants such as cabbage, broccoli, and canola, with a preference for tender young foliage.^[24] In the first instar, neonates mine the leaf mesophyll, creating narrow, serpentine galleries that are often inconspicuous.^[1] Later instars shift to external feeding, rasping the lower leaf surface and skeletonizing tissue while leaving the upper epidermis intact, resulting in characteristic "windowpaning" damage—translucent patches riddled with small shot holes.^[24]^[1] This feeding can extend to buds, flowers, and pods in severe infestations, though larvae avoid thick veins.^[24] When disturbed, larvae exhibit a defensive behavior of violent thrashing and backward wriggling, often dropping from the plant suspended by a silk thread, which facilitates short-distance dispersal or escape.^[1] Early instars can also employ ballooning dispersal, using silk threads to be carried by wind to nearby plants or fields.^[32] Additionally, larvae respond to chemical cues from conspecific females; they are attracted to the sex pheromone (particularly its major component, (Z)-11-hexadecenal) deposited on leaves during oviposition, which guides them to suitable host plants and promotes aggregation on high-quality foliage. This attraction is mediated by general odorant-binding proteins and the sex pheromone receptor PxylOR47.

Pupal Stage

The pupal stage of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, represents a non-feeding metamorphic phase where the insect undergoes significant internal reorganization. Following the larval stage, mature larvae spin a loose, gauzy silk cocoon typically on the lower surface of host plant leaves or among plant debris, providing minimal protection compared to more enclosed pupal cases in other lepidopterans.^[33] This cocoon formation process, known as prepupation, involves the larva attaching itself with silk and shedding its final larval exoskeleton, marking the transition to the pupa.^[34] The pupal stage lasts 5 to 15 days under typical temperate conditions, with an average duration of about 8.5 days, though this varies with temperature—shorter at warmer temperatures (e.g., around 25°C) and longer in cooler environments.^[9] Morphologically, the pupa is angular and ridged, measuring approximately 6-8 mm in length, with a distinct ridged structure along the thorax and abdomen that outlines the developing wings and appendages. Initially, the pupa appears pinkish-white to pinkish-yellow, featuring subdorsal and subspiracular lines, before darkening to green, tan, or brown as development progresses toward adult eclosion.^[9]^[1] This color change reflects histolysis and histogenesis within the pupa, but the insect remains immobile and non-feeding, relying on stored larval nutrients for the transformation.^[34] In certain populations exposed to short-day photoperiods, pupal diapause may occur as a facultative response, allowing overwintering in a dormant state to survive unfavorable conditions, though this is not universal and depends on environmental cues like day length and temperature.^[35] The loose nature of the cocoon exposes pupae to high predation risk from generalist predators such as spiders, ants, and birds, as well as parasitoids targeting this stage, contributing to significant natural mortality.^[36] Emergence from the pupa is triggered primarily by temperature accumulation and completion of development, often synchronizing with the availability of suitable host plants in spring, ensuring newly emerged adults can access cruciferous foliage for reproduction.^[25]

Adult Stage

Adult diamondback moths (Plutella xylostella) are small, grayish-brown insects with a wingspan of approximately 8–13 mm, characterized by their slender bodies and fringed wings. When at rest, the moths fold their wings roof-like over the body, revealing three diamond-shaped yellow or white spots along the posterior edge of the forewings, which gives the species its common name.^[24] These adults emerge primarily in the afternoon, between 1:00 and 4:00 PM, and exhibit crepuscular and nocturnal activity patterns, remaining inactive during daylight hours unless disturbed, at which point they take flight erratically.^[9] Flight activity typically begins at dusk, peaks 2–4 hours after sunset for males and 4 hours after for females, and continues through the night, with strong dispersive capabilities enabling long-distance migration.^[37] The lifespan of adult P. xylostella varies with temperature and sex, ranging from 9 to 40 days under laboratory conditions, though field averages are shorter at 12 days for males and 16 days for females.^[38]^[9] Adults do not feed on plant tissues but sustain themselves by sipping nectar from flowers or dew and water droplets, which supports their energy needs for flight and reproduction without causing crop damage.^[24] Females generally outlive males and remain active for oviposition over 7–10 days, after which their longevity declines rapidly as resources are depleted. Sensory adaptations include plumose antennae in males specialized for detecting female sex pheromones over distances, while both sexes rely on a combination of olfaction for plant volatiles and vision for locating host plants during foraging.^[9]^[39] In warm climates, P. xylostella completes 4–12 generations annually, facilitated by its rapid life cycle of 14–28 days at 25°C, allowing continuous development without diapause in tropical and subtropical regions.^[36] This short generation time, with egg development in 2–3 days, larval stage in 7–14 days, and pupation in 4–6 days at optimal temperatures, underpins the moth's pest potential through overlapping populations and migratory spread to new habitats.^[40]

Reproduction and Behavior

Mating and Pheromones

The sex pheromones of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) are produced by virgin females from glands in the pheromone gland located on the eighth abdominal segment. The pheromone blend typically includes (Z)-11-hexadecenal (Z11-16:Ald) as the major component (about 60%), with (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11-16:Ac) (about 25%) and (Z)-11-hexadecen-1-ol (Z11-16:OH) (about 15%), though ratios can vary by population.^[41] Minor components like (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14:OAc) at 5-10% enhance male antennal responses and attraction when combined with the major components.^[41]^[42] Mating in P. xylostella is crepuscular to nocturnal, typically occurring from dusk onward under natural light-dark cycles, with peak activity between 21:00 and 02:00. Virgin females initiate calling behavior—extruding their pheromone glands to release sex pheromones—primarily at night, synchronized with male responsiveness influenced by circadian rhythms.^[43]^[37] During courtship, males approach calling females and perform displays involving the hair-pencil organs on the abdominal tip, releasing volatile chemicals that act as close-range signals to stimulate female acceptance and reduce rejection. These displays increase in vigor with male-male competition, enhancing mating success through sexual selection.^[44]^[15] Females are capable of polyandry, mating up to three or four times, though most mate only once with no significant fitness benefits from multiple matings in terms of fecundity or longevity; males can mate multiple times as well. A single female produces 100-300 eggs over her lifetime, primarily after the first mating.^[45]^[46]

Oviposition and Host Selection

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, exhibits a narrow host range primarily restricted to plants in the Brassicaceae family, including numerous species such as cabbage (Brassica oleracea) and canola (Brassica napus).^[9]^[47] This specialization is driven by the moth's dependence on glucosinolate-containing plants, which serve as key attractants for oviposition.^[48] Female moths rely on multiple sensory cues for host selection and oviposition. Olfactory cues, particularly volatile isothiocyanates derived from glucosinolates, strongly attract gravid females to suitable Brassicaceae hosts, with specialized olfactory receptors enabling detection at low concentrations.^[48] Gustatory cues allow females to assess leaf surface chemicals post-landing, where deterrents like certain alkaloids can reduce egg-laying on suboptimal plants.^[49] Tactile cues, including leaf texture and hairiness, further influence acceptance, as smoother surfaces on preferred hosts facilitate prolonged contact and oviposition.^[50] Host preference in P. xylostella is also shaped by experience-based learning, where prior exposure modifies oviposition behavior. Naive females, lacking prior contact, show strong attraction to host plant odors like those from cabbage and aversion to non-host volatiles, such as those from pea.^[51] However, females with larval or adult experience on specific hosts develop habituation, increasing acceptance of those plants while avoiding poor-quality ones that previously led to low larval survival.^[52] Once a host is selected, females deposit eggs primarily on the underside of lower leaves, either singly or in small clusters of up to eight, to shield them from environmental stressors and predators.^[28] This microsite preference is modulated by plant volatiles, with herbivore-induced emissions from infested leaves enhancing attraction and clustering in responsive females.^[53]

Ecology

Natural Enemies

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, faces regulation from a diverse array of natural enemies in its habitats, including predators, parasitoids, and pathogens that primarily target immature stages such as eggs, larvae, and pupae. These biotic factors play a crucial role in suppressing population outbreaks, particularly in cruciferous crop fields where the moth is a pest. Predators, often generalists, contribute to mortality across life stages, while specialist parasitoids and microbial pathogens exert targeted pressure, with their efficacy varying by region and environmental conditions.^[54]^[6] Predators of P. xylostella include birds, such as sparrows and other insectivorous species that forage on larvae in foliage; spiders, particularly lycosid, linyphiid, and salticid species that ambush or web-trap larvae and pupae; and ground-dwelling beetles like carabids that consume pupae and fallen larvae. These predators can account for significant mortality, with studies showing spiders and beetles reducing larval densities by up to 20-30% in organic fields under natural conditions. Syrphid fly larvae and lacewings also prey on eggs and young larvae, enhancing overall trophic control.^[55]^[14]^[54] Parasitoids are among the most effective natural enemies, with hymenopteran wasps targeting specific stages. Larval parasitoids include Diadegma spp. (e.g., D. insulare and D. semiclausum), which oviposit in early to mid-instar larvae and can achieve parasitism rates of 30-50% in unsprayed fields; Cotesia plutellae, effective against young larvae with rates up to 40%; and Microplitis plutellae, which attacks later instars. Pupal parasitoids like Diadromus subtilicornis and Oomyzus sokolowskii contribute additional mortality, often reaching 10-20% in peak seasons. Egg parasitoids, such as Trichogramma spp. (e.g., T. pretiosum and T. chilonis), parasitize up to 20-30% of eggs in natural settings, though rates are generally lower than for larval stages.^[2]^[56]^[57] Pathogenic microorganisms further limit P. xylostella populations through natural epizootics. Viruses, notably Plutella xylostella granulovirus (PluGV), infect larvae and can cause 50-90% mortality in dense outbreaks, spreading via host cadavers. Fungi such as Beauveria bassiana and Zoophthora radicans infect larvae under humid conditions, with epizootics reducing populations by 40-70% in favorable weather. Bacteria, including natural strains of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), occur sporadically and target gut tissues in larvae, leading to 20-50% mortality in untreated fields; 2025 research highlights non-Bt bacterial strains isolated from environmental sources (e.g., wastewater and sediment) with insecticidal potential comparable to Bt in laboratory assays against larvae.^[1]^[9]^[36]^[58] Trophic interactions among these enemies influence their overall impact, with hyperparasitism—where parasitoids of parasitoids attack primary ones like Diadegma spp.—reducing primary parasitism efficacy by 10-30% in intensified agricultural landscapes. Despite this, natural enemies collectively impose high generational mortality (>90% in some Canadian studies), preventing outbreaks by maintaining low densities; for instance, combined predation and parasitism suppressed P. xylostella populations below economic thresholds in organic systems.^[59]^[60]^[54]

Environmental and Climate Influences

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, exhibits development and survival patterns strongly influenced by temperature, with an optimal range of 25–30°C for most life stages, allowing for efficient progression from egg to adult.^[9] Below 8°C or above 32°C, development slows significantly, and extreme temperatures lead to high mortality; for instance, exposure above 35°C can kill eggs and early larvae within hours due to thermal stress disrupting cellular processes.^[40] These thresholds vary slightly by population and host plant but underscore the moth's sensitivity to thermal extremes, which can limit local outbreaks in cooler or hotter regions.^[61] Climate change has profoundly altered the moth's population dynamics and distribution, primarily through warming winters that expand overwintering ranges northward by approximately 2.4 million km² over the past 50 years, enabling year-round persistence in previously transient habitats.^[62] This expansion, projected to increase by 2.2 million km² per 1°C of additional warming, facilitates more generations per year—up to 20 in tropical regions—by shortening developmental times and reducing migration dependency.^[62]^[63] Elevated temperatures associated with climate change are expected to intensify pest pressure on cruciferous crops through expanded ranges and increased generations.^[62] Precipitation and humidity also play critical roles, as the moth favors moderate moisture levels that support host plant vitality without excessive wetness; droughts reduce larval survival by desiccating foliage and limiting food quality, while heavy rainfall can dislodge up to 50% of eggs from leaves, directly lowering population densities.^[64]^[65] High humidity, often above 80%, promotes fungal pathogens that further suppress populations, though optimal relative humidity around 60-70% sustains development without these risks.^[24] Additional abiotic factors include sensitivity to ozone and ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which can impair early life stages. Elevated ozone levels indirectly affect moths by altering host plant volatiles, reducing oviposition attractiveness and foraging efficiency, while UV exposure can damage larval cuticles and increase mortality.^[66] These stressors, exacerbated by climate-driven atmospheric changes, compound temperature and precipitation effects, potentially disrupting migration patterns in vulnerable regions.^[62]

Pest Status

Crop Damage and Economic Impact

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, primarily targets cruciferous vegetables such as cabbage, kale, and broccoli, with secondary hosts including canola and mustard crops.^[24]^[67] Larvae cause damage through defoliation by feeding on leaf tissues, often skeletonizing foliage and mining into heads or buds, which can reduce yields by 50-100% in severe infestations.^[68]^[69] Globally, the economic impact of the diamondback moth exceeds $4-5 billion annually, encompassing crop losses and management costs, with estimates holding steady from 2022 assessments into recent years.^[70]^[71] This burden is particularly acute in Asia, where China alone incurs about $0.77 billion yearly, and India faces substantial losses in Brassica production due to widespread outbreaks.^[72]^[73] In untreated fields, outbreaks typically result in 20-30% crop losses, exacerbated by the moth's migratory behavior and potential for rapid population buildups.^[74] Quarantine restrictions on infested produce further amplify economic consequences through trade barriers.^[75] In North America, 2025 monitoring reports showed increased diamondback moth captures in canola fields in the northern United States, such as North Dakota and Minnesota, while across western Canada, infestation levels remained low to moderate with no reports of spraying or significant yield reductions.^[76]^[77]^[78]

Pesticide Resistance

The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, was the first crop pest to evolve resistance to DDT, with the initial case documented in 1953 in Java, Indonesia.^[79] Since then, it has developed resistance to virtually all major classes of insecticides, including organophosphates, pyrethroids, carbamates, neonicotinoids, and diamides, driven by intensive agricultural use.^[3] As of 2025, the Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database records 1,099 documented cases of resistance in P. xylostella populations worldwide to 104 unique active ingredients.^[80] Resistance mechanisms in P. xylostella primarily involve metabolic detoxification and target-site insensitivity. Metabolic resistance is mediated by elevated activity of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, such as CYP321E1, which metabolize insecticides like chlorantraniliprole and indoxacarb, often through gene overexpression or amplification.^[81] Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and esterases also contribute by conjugating or sequestering toxins.^[82] Target-site mutations alter insecticide binding; for example, mutations in the ace-1 gene encoding acetylcholinesterase, such as G324A and A298S, confer high-level resistance to organophosphates by reducing enzyme inhibition.^[83] Similarly, L1014F in the voltage-gated sodium channel imparts pyrethroid resistance, while G4946E in the ryanodine receptor enables diamide resistance.^[3] Field-evolved resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins, particularly Cry1Ac, first emerged in Hawaiian populations during the late 1980s and 1990s following repeated foliar applications of Bt subsp. kurstaki.^[84] In strains like NOQA from Hawaii, resistance exceeded 400-fold and was controlled by a single autosomal recessive gene, though multiple loci, including reduced expression of ABC transporters (e.g., ABCC2), contribute in other populations by limiting toxin binding in the midgut.^[84]^[82] Genomic studies have revealed adaptive variants underlying resistance, including non-synonymous SNPs in P450 genes like Px002515 and detoxification clusters under positive selection across global populations.^[3] These insights highlight polygenic contributions, with 93 candidate genes identified for insecticide detoxification.^[3] Management of resistance requires rotating insecticides from different IRAC mode-of-action groups per generation to prevent selection pressure buildup, as over-reliance on single classes accelerates evolution.^[85] Recent studies (2023–2025) indicate cross-resistance between neonicotinoids and other classes like pyrethroids in field populations, complicating control and underscoring the need for monitoring via bioassays and molecular diagnostics.^[86] This resistance contributes to ongoing economic losses in crucifer crops by reducing insecticide efficacy.^[3]

Management Strategies

Integrated Pest Management Approaches

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) for the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) emphasizes a multifaceted strategy that integrates monitoring, prevention, and targeted interventions to suppress populations sustainably while reducing reliance on chemical controls and mitigating resistance. Core principles include regular field scouting to assess pest density and damage, establishment of action thresholds tied to economic injury levels (EIL), and informed decision-making to deploy appropriate tactics only when necessary. This approach prioritizes preserving natural enemies and minimizing non-target effects, drawing from foundational IPM frameworks adapted to the moth's biology.^[87]^[88] Key components involve deploying pheromone traps for adult monitoring and visual scouting for larvae, typically conducted twice weekly during vulnerable crop stages like seedling and pre-heading. Pheromone-baited traps help detect early influxes, while larval thresholds—such as 20% of plants infested before heading or 100–150 larvae per square meter in immature canola—guide interventions to avoid exceeding EIL, where control costs equal or exceed yield benefits. In 2025, precision agriculture tools like remote sensing via UAVs and GIS-based spatial analysis have gained emphasis, enabling hotspot identification and site-specific monitoring to optimize resource use in brassica crops.^[89]^[24]^[90] Success stories highlight IPM's efficacy; for instance, in Australian canola systems, combining sweep-net monitoring, economic thresholds (e.g., 30–50 larvae per 10 sweeps pre-flowering), and selective insecticides has underpinned substantial reductions in broad-spectrum pesticide applications, supporting resistance management. Similarly, recent mating disruption trials in Virginia using aerosol formulations like CheckMate® DBM-F have shown significant reductions in male moth captures in treated fields, potentially cutting insecticide sprays by integrating pheromones into broader IPM programs.^[91]^[92] Challenges persist due to the moth's long-distance migration, which introduces populations from distant sources and undermines localized efforts, often requiring regional coordination among growers for synchronized monitoring and control. Overreliance on chemicals in fragmented systems further complicates adoption, underscoring the need for extension support to enhance farmer implementation of thresholds and integrated tactics.^[88]^[87]

Biological and Cultural Controls

Biological controls for the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) primarily involve augmenting natural enemies such as parasitoids, predators, and entomopathogens to suppress larval populations. The parasitoid Diadegma insulare, an ichneumonid wasp, targets diamondback moth larvae and pupae, often achieving parasitism rates of 70-90% under favorable conditions, which significantly reduces host feeding and survival.^[93]^[36] Predators like ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae), ground beetles (Carabidae), and spiders contribute to control by consuming eggs and small larvae, with studies showing their abundance correlates with lower pest densities in diverse agroecosystems.^[94]^[95] Entomopathogens, including Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) formulations and viruses such as Plutella xylostella granulovirus (PxGV), provide effective larval mortality; for instance, PxGV-based products like Plutex applied at 100 ml/ha weekly can reduce leaf damage by targeting neonate larvae specifically.^[36]^[96] Recent advancements include non-Bt bacterial strains, such as Serratia sp., which exhibit insecticidal activity against diamondback moth larvae, offering alternatives to Bt in resistance management programs.^[58]^[97] Cultural practices focus on agronomic strategies to disrupt diamondback moth life cycles and reduce infestation risks without relying on synthetic inputs. Crop rotation with non-host plants like cereals, maize, tomatoes, or onions breaks the pest's continuity, particularly in semi-arid regions where wild hosts are limited, preventing population buildup across seasons.^[98]^[99] Trap cropping using mustard varieties, such as Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) or white mustard (Sinapis alba), attracts ovipositing females away from main crops like cabbage, with field trials demonstrating up to 50% reduction in larval numbers on protected plants when mustard is planted as a border.^[100]^[101] Intercropping brassica crops with onions repels diamondback moths through volatile compounds, equaling the efficacy of some insecticides in reducing larval infestation on cabbage.^[102]^[103] Adjusting planting dates to avoid peak moth flights—such as synchronizing all cole crops in a field or planting early in the season—minimizes overlap with generations, thereby preventing outbreaks.^[87]^[9] Conservation tactics enhance biological control by fostering habitats that support natural enemies while inducing plant resistance. Establishing hedgerows and semi-natural habitats around fields increases predator and parasitoid diversity, with landscape studies showing improved suppression of diamondback moth when non-crop areas comprise over 20% of the surrounding matrix.^[104]^[105] Recent research highlights the use of vermiwash and salicylic acid applications to bolster host plant resistance; foliar sprays of vermiwash combined with salicylic acid on canola cultivars reduced diamondback moth larval survival by activating defense pathways, achieving up to 60% lower infestation compared to untreated plants.^[106] Overall, integrating these biological and cultural methods within IPM frameworks can reduce larval populations by approximately 70% and avert economic losses from outbreaks.^[36]

Chemical and Physical Controls

Chemical controls for the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) primarily involve targeted insecticides, with application timed to small larvae for optimal efficacy, as larger larvae are more mobile and less susceptible.^[87] Insect growth regulators such as novaluron and methoxyfenozide disrupt larval development by inhibiting chitin synthesis or molting, providing selective control with reduced impact on beneficial insects.^[107] Spinosad, derived from soil bacteria, acts on the nervous system of larvae and is approved for organic use in formulations like Entrust SC, showing high mortality rates against early instars when applied at rates of 1-2 oz/acre.^[87] Neonicotinoids, including acetamiprid, target nicotinic acetylcholine receptors but require rotation due to widespread resistance development in P. xylostella populations.^[108] Ongoing resistance monitoring through bioassays is essential to detect shifts in susceptibility and guide insecticide selection.^[109] Physical controls emphasize barriers and traps to prevent oviposition and capture adults without relying on chemical residues. Floating row covers, made of lightweight fabric, physically exclude adult moths from crops like cabbage and broccoli, reducing larval infestation by up to 90% when installed before moth flight peaks.^[28] Sticky traps baited with pheromones monitor and capture male moths, deployed at 1-2 per acre to assess population levels and disrupt minor infestations.^[110] Light traps enhanced with sex pheromones attract and kill adults at night, improving capture rates in vegetable fields.^[111] Recent advancements include attract-and-kill formulations like ISR: PLT-008A1, a 2025 semiochemical blend incorporating D-limonene that lures moths to insecticide-treated surfaces, achieving significant population suppression in field tests.^[112] Mating disruption uses pheromone dispensers, such as sprayable CheckMate DBM-F or Meso hand-applied units, to flood fields with synthetic sex pheromones (Z-11-hexadecenal and Z-11-hexadecenyl acetate), confusing males and reducing oviposition by over 70% in treated areas.^[113] Trials in Virginia on commercial brassica farms have demonstrated effective adult suppression using these dispensers.^[92] These methods prioritize IPM-compatible options with low environmental residues, favoring narrow-spectrum agents over broad-spectrum pyrethroids to preserve natural enemies and mitigate resistance buildup, as detailed in pesticide resistance guidelines.^[85]

References

[1]
EENY-119/IN276: Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus ...
Relaxation of insecticide use, and particularly elimination of pyrethroid use, can return diamondback moth to minor pest status by favoring survival of ...
[2]
Diamondback Moth | VCE Publications | Virginia Tech
Feb 23, 2024 · Diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), is the most important pest of brassica crops worldwide.
[3]
Biology, Ecology and Management of Diamondback Moth
This worldwide pest of crucifers was mentioned briefly above, but deserves special recognition because of its impact on a global scale.
[4]
Species Plutella xylostella - Diamondback Moth - Hodges#2366
May 30, 2025 · Classification. Kingdom Animalia (Animals) · Hodges Number. 2366 · Range. Probably of European or Eurasian origin but is now found throughout the ...
[5]
Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) | CABI Compendium
Jul 28, 2022 · Order: Lepidoptera. Family: Plutellidae. Subfamily: Plutellinae. Genus: Plutella. Species: Plutella xylostella ... scientific name (Moriuti, 1986) ...
[6]
Diamondback moth | Pest Control, Crops & Agriculture - Britannica
Oct 20, 2025 · Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella), species of moth in the family Yponomeutidae (order Lepidoptera) that is sometimes placed in its own family, ...Missing: synonyms changes
[7]
Variation among 532 genomes unveils the origin and evolutionary ...
May 8, 2020 · Our analysis indicates that Plutella xylostella has experienced three major expansions across the world, mainly facilitated by European ...
[8]
Diamondback Moth | NC State Extension Publications
The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, has narrow forewings, conspicuously fringed hind wings, and an ¾ inch wingspan. When at rest, the wings of the ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[9]
[PDF] Diamondback Moth - Agriculture Research
Physical Description: Adult diamondback moths are small, 12 mm long, with an 18-20 mm wingspan. They are grey or brownish with white marks on the margin of ...
[10]
hair-pencil displays in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella
Aug 8, 2025 · Males of some moths possess specific scale brushes located on the eighth abdominal sternite that are associated with the production of volatile ...
[11]
Pests of Crucifers | NC State Extension Publications
Jun 6, 2024 · Diamondback moth larva—A pale-green caterpillar up to 3/8 inch long with a black head and scattered black hairs, it has five pairs of prolegs ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
Diamondback Moth | Oklahoma State University
They have black heads and scattered black hairs on the body. At the rear end of the larva, the prolegs on the last segment are spread apart, forming a ...Diamondback Moth · Symptoms · Life Cycle
[13]
Diamondback moth | Priority pest insects and mites | Biosecurity
May 6, 2025 · Mature larvae spin fragile looking open mesh cocoons in which the pupa is clearly visible (Figure 4). Young pupa start off green and turn brown ...
[14]
Variation among 532 genomes unveils the origin and evolutionary ...
May 8, 2020 · xylostella originated in South America, where other endemic Plutella species are known. Our study convincingly repolarizes the evolutionary ...
[15]
Natural History, Ecology, and Management of Diamondback Moth ...
Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), has become the most destructive insect pest of cruciferous vegetables (Brassica oleracea ...Missing: synonyms nomenclature
[16]
The Diamond-Back Moth outbreak of 1958 - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · The invasion of a weather ship in the Atlantic, some 800 km from the coast of Scotland, by thousands of moths in 1958 could only be explained by ...
[17]
Diamondback moths: an epic journey | Natural History Museum
Jun 9, 2016 · Scientists think that the moths arrive in cooler countries - including the UK - by riding on strong wind currents. A gardener's enemy.Missing: transatlantic | Show results with:transatlantic
[18]
Diamondback Moth: Temp Affects Dev, Survival & Generations
Nov 7, 2011 · xylostella is tolerant to a wide range of temperatures (6.1-32.5°C). Therefore, temperature cannot be considered a limiting factor for the ...Missing: Brassicaceae | Show results with:Brassicaceae
[19]
High‐altitude migration of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella ...
5. Radar data and back-tracking indicated that a major wind-borne migration of P. xylostella from The Netherlands to southern England took place in early May, ...Missing: assisted | Show results with:assisted
[20]
Genetic Structure and Demographic History Reveal Migration ... - NIH
Apr 2, 2013 · The diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) is one of the most destructive insect pests of cruciferous plants ...Missing: synonyms nomenclature
[21]
Diamondback moth | Canola Council of Canada
A common pest insect in canola, the diamondback moth adults blow in from the southern United States each spring with their larval offspring.Missing: global | Show results with:global
[22]
Elusively overwintering: a review of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera ...
Feb 21, 2018 · Eggs of diamondback moth survive for about 55 days at temperatures at or slightly above 0 °C but only for 23 days at temperatures just below 0 ° ...
[23]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[24]
Spatial distribution of Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L ...
Sep 17, 2025 · In highland areas, daily maximum temperatures positively influenced the aggregation index, whereas in the lowland areas, rainfall had a negative ...
[25]
Diamondback Moth / Floriculture and Ornamental Nurseries ...
The life stages of diamondback moth (family Plutellidae) are egg, larva, pupa, and adult. First instars are colorless or pale, tiny larvae (caterpillars) ...Missing: classification history
[26]
Plutella xylostella - CTAHR
The number of eggs laid per female may range from 18 to 356, the mean being 159. Oviposition normally begins on the day of emergence lasting about 10 days ...Missing: morphology | Show results with:morphology
[27]
Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) - Knowledge Master
Plutella xylostella, or diamondback moth, is a cosmopolitan pest of crucifers, including broccoli and cabbage, with larvae feeding on leaves.Missing: ancestry | Show results with:ancestry
[28]
Effects of Temperature and Humidity on Emergence Dynamics of ...
Aug 8, 2025 · The effects of temperature and humidity on the emergence patterns of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), ...Missing: morphology | Show results with:morphology
[29]
[PDF] Bertha Armyworm in Canola - North Dakota State University
The wind can disperse larvae by ballooning them on threads of silk to other plants. Larvae of the diamondback moth also exhibit a similar ballooning ... behavior ...
[30]
Plutella - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Plutella xylostella feeds on various cruciferous plants, especially Brassica species. Classification and description. The Plutellidae are a family of moths ...
[31]
Characterization of Molting Process during the Different ...
Mar 15, 2022 · In this study, we observed the morphological changes and behavioral sequences of the molting process of P. xylostella during different stages, ...Missing: camouflage | Show results with:camouflage
[32]
Biology of Diamondback Moth, Plutellae xylostella (Lepidoptera
Aug 6, 2025 · The pupae were carefully gathered and put in a cage for adult emergence. The second instar larvae was employed to carry out the bioassay tests ( ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[33]
Biological control of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella
High altitude migration of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella to the U.K.: A study using radar, aerial netting, and ground trapping . Ecological ...
[34]
Diel and Circadian Patterns of Locomotor Activity in the Adults of ...
Aug 14, 2021 · Consistent with previous reports that the P. xylostella adults are usually active at twilight and throughout the night [23], we found a ...
[35]
(PDF) Life Table of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (L ...
Aug 9, 2025 · No food was provided to feeding adult moths during experiments. The survival rate on Savalan and Burren potatoes was higher than on other ...
[36]
The roles of olfaction and vision in host-plant finding by the ...
This strong plant position effect indicates that, when host plants are present in a mixture, foraging P. xylostella are more likely to alight on the first row ...
[37]
Development and Survival of the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera
The insect developed successfully from egg to adult emergence under alternating regimes including temperatures as low as 4°C or as high as 38°C. The degree-day ...Missing: preferred | Show results with:preferred
[38]
Sex Pheromone Composition of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella ...
The minor components, 0.5% of Z11-16.-OH or 5 to 10% of (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9-14: Ac) also elicited the EAG response when mixed with major components ...
[39]
Sex Pheromone Composition of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Z11-16:OH, Z9-14:OH, and Z9-14:Ac are also considered to be pheromone components as they can enhance attraction and antennal response, when ...
[40]
Analysis of the Mating and Reproductive Traits of Plutella xylostella ...
Simple statistical analysis showed relatively higher mating rates maintained from 21:00 to 2:00, thereafter dropping to a minimum at about 18:00.Missing: polyandrous | Show results with:polyandrous
[41]
hair-pencil displays in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella
We investigated the use of chemical signals during courtship in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Males of P. xylostella have a hair-pencil gland on ...Missing: anti- | Show results with:anti-
[42]
Effect of male and female multiple mating on the fecundity, fertility ...
Jan 13, 2005 · Effect of male and female multiple mating on the fecundity, fertility, and longevity of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) X.-P ...
[43]
Diamondback moth - Cesar Australia
Larvae go through four instar stages before they pupate. The rate of development from eggs to moths depends on temperature; faster in warm weather and slower in ...Missing: moisture | Show results with:moisture<|separator|>
[44]
Diamondback moth–host plant interactions: Implications for pest ...
In this review, we synthesize information on certain plant biochemical and morphological characteristics that have been investigated to promote DBM resistance ...
[45]
Oviposition site selection by the diamondback moth,Plutella ...
Mar 25, 1996 · Moths given gustatory but not olfactory stimuli deposited similar numbers of eggs but spent significantly more time performing olfactory-related ...
[46]
Diamondback moth oviposition: Effects of host plant and herbivory
Aug 6, 2025 · The preferred site for Diamondback moth oviposition on Brassica napus seems to be the lower first, second and third true leaves [15]. ...Missing: underside | Show results with:underside
[47]
The influence of early adult experience and larval food restriction on ...
Naïve ovipositing females showed aversion to the odor of pea, a nonhost plant of P. xylostella, and seldom accepted pea plants for oviposition. However, females ...
[48]
Experience-induced habituation and preference towards non-host ...
Naive females showed aversion to the odors of the non-host plant, the pure chemicals, and the pure chemical-treated host plants. In contrast, experienced ...Missing: learning | Show results with:learning
[49]
Diamondback Moth Larvae Trigger Host Plant Volatiles that Lure Its ...
The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella L., is a serious pest of crucifer crops with a cosmopolitan distribution [10]. The DBM has developed resistance ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[50]
Biocontrol of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) in organic crops
Jun 15, 2025 · This study provides rare direct quantification of the contribution of arthropod natural enemies to pest population suppression on farms.
[51]
[PDF] The Role of Natural Enemies to Control Diamondback Moth, Plutella ...
Various predators and parasitoids were recorded feeding upon immature stages of P. xylostella. Predators included various species of ants and spiders, ...
[52]
Validation of a molecular tool for detecting Diadegma spp ...
Oct 31, 2025 · War of the wasps: is Diadegma insulare or Microplitis plutellae a more effective parasitoid of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella?
[53]
The parasitoid complex of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella ...
Jan 25, 2022 · Three species – the widespread Diadegma insulare, Microplitis plutellae, and Diadromus subtilicornis – are the main parasitoids impacting ...
[54]
Insecticidal efficacy of non-Bt bacterial strains against ... - Frontiers
Jun 24, 2025 · The diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.), a major global pest of cruciferous vegetables, has resisted conventional insecticides, ...
[55]
Agricultural intensification drives landscape‐context effects on host ...
Apr 20, 2012 · 3. Rates of primary- and hyperparasitism of aphids and primary parasitism of P. xylostella decreased with increasing annual crop cover, whereas ...
[56]
The parasitoid complex of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella ...
Overall, diamondback moth populations showed high generational mortality (> 90%) in all provinces, although parasitism levels were generally low. The net ...
[57]
Development and survival of Plutella Xylostella in central Argentina
Apr 2, 2025 · We found that temperatures outside the optimal range (15–23°C) significantly reduced survival, with no individuals surviving at 5 or 30°C.
[58]
Climate warming promotes pesticide resistance through expanding ...
Sep 9, 2021 · We show that climate change over the past 50 years increased the overwintering range of a global agricultural insect pest, the diamondback moth (Plutella ...
[59]
Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758) - Diamondback Moth
Species Status: The Diamondback Moth is an introduced species in North America that specializes on members of the mustard family (Brassicaceae).Missing: classification | Show results with:classification
[60]
Highly Improved Captures of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella ...
Aug 24, 2025 · The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (DBM), is highly widespread and the most destructive pest of plants belonging to the Brassicaceae ...
[61]
Potential changes to diamondback moth thresholds
May 31, 2022 · Diamondback moth populations The extreme weather conditions, including severe drought in 2018 and heavy rainfall in 2019 and 2020, may have ...
[62]
Effect of rainfall on a population of the diamondback moth, Plutella ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Rainfall can cause significant removal of eggs of diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), from host plants ( ...
[63]
Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on volatile terpenoid ...
Dec 3, 2008 · CO2 and O3 effects were studied in separate experiments. The herbivores used were Bt Cry1Ac-susceptible diamondback moth (DBM; Plutella ...
[64]
Physiological and Molecular Response Modifications by Ultraviolet ...
Aug 29, 2022 · This study was designed to investigate the effect of UV-C radiation on the physiology and gene expression level of Plutella xylostella, a destructive vegetable ...
[65]
Diamondback Moth Project at Cornell University FAQ
Jan 29, 2020 · The diamondback moth is the world's worst insect pest of brassica vegetable crops including cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, kale, radish and many other crops.
[66]
The hymenopterous parasitoids of the diamondback moth, Plutella ...
Sep 16, 2023 · Syed et al. (2018) recorded six parasitoid species, acting as primary parasitoids of P. xylostella at different life stages. These included the ...
[67]
Comparison of yield loss on cabbage from Diamondback moth ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Diamondback moth can caused 100 percent yield loss of cauliflower crop (lingappa et al., 2006) [10] and according to Krishnamurthy 2004 ...
[68]
Estimating the economic cost of one of the world's major insect pests ...
A conservative estimate of total costs associated with diamondback moth management is thus US$4 billion-US$5 billion. The lower bound represents rational ...
[69]
(PDF) Diamond Back Moth: Biology, Damage and Integrated Pest ...
Sep 29, 2025 · The diamondback moth is a damaging pest of Brassica crops that results in an estimated $4-5 billion in economic losses every year.
[70]
Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Diamondback Moth in ...
The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.), costs the Chinese economy US$0.77 billion annually, and considerable research has focused on its biology, ...Missing: Asia India
[71]
[PDF] Biological Control of Diamondback Moth in A Climate of Change
IPM programs have been developed but the pest is still estimated to cost the world economy US$ 4-. 5 billion per annum. In parts of Southeast Asia, India, China ...
[72]
[PDF] assessment of yield losses due to diamond-back moth (dbm ...
The DBM attack the crop from the nursery stage onwards caused 52% loss in marketable yield of cabbage (KRISHNA KUMAR et al., 1983;. TALEKAR and SHELTON, 1993).
[73]
Diamondback moth | Alberta.ca
Larval feeding damage to canola leaves is usually considered to have a minor effect on yield. But larval feeding on buds and flowers can be more damaging, ...
[74]
2025 - Week 10 - Prairie Pest Monitoring Network
Diamondback moths were captured on pheromone traps across western Canada from mid- to late-May in 2025. Once adults arrive, there can be several in-season, non- ...
[75]
Canola Insect Trapping 2025
Sep 30, 2025 · The cumulative number of diamondback moths captured increased 6-fold to 19,190 moths (average of 1,066 adults per trap) in 2025, compared to 1, ...Missing: damage America
[76]
Diamondback Moth - Insects - Government of Saskatchewan
Hoverfly larvae, wasps, lacewings, plant bugs, pirate bugs, beetles, spiders and birds also prey on the diamondback moth larvae. Chemical Control. Although many ...
[77]
[PDF] The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera - CORE
plutellae and environmental factors including humidity, temperature, rainfall and wind speed. Table 7.4 b. Pearson partial correlation coefficients between ...
[78]
Symbiotic bacteria mediate chemical-insecticide resistance but ...
Using the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) as the target pest, we demonstrated that long-term exposure to chlorpyrifos (an organophosphate insecticide) ...
[79]
Identification of a novel cytochrome P450 gene, CYP321E1 from the ...
Identification of a novel cytochrome P450 gene, CYP321E1 from the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) and RNA interference to evaluate its role in ...
[80]
(PDF) Recent insights into pesticide resistance mechanisms in ...
Aug 25, 2023 · We present an overview of insecticide resistance in insects, focusing on P. xylostella, to provide insights into the current resistance status of this pest.
[81]
Mutation in ace1 associated with an insecticide resistant population ...
The ER strain exhibited very high AChE insensitivity, high resistance ratio, and two point mutations (G324A, A298S) in ace1-type AChE gene (Pxace1). The CS ...
[82]
(PDF) Diamondback Moth Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Hawaii
### Summary of Bt Resistance in Diamondback Moth in Hawaii (1990s)
[83]
Insecticide Resistance Management for Diamondback Moth in Cole ...
This insect has a long history of becoming resistant to insecticides beginning with DDT in 1953. Since then, DBM has become resistant to each new class of ...
[84]
Cross-Resistance Variation among Different Populations of ...
May 23, 2023 · Cross-Resistance Variation among Different Populations of Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (Linn.) to New Insecticides. Authors. V ...
[85]
Diamondback Moth / Cole Crops / Agriculture - UC IPM
Diamondback moth larvae (caterpillars) grow to be up to 0.3 inch long. They are wider in the middle and taper at both ends. The two prolegs on the last ...
[86]
Integrated Pest Management of Diamondback Moth: Practical Realities
The latter mainly includes harnessing key natural enemy species, using microbials, and applying relatively safer insecticides when these are necessary as guided ...
[87]
ENY2119/IN1443: Diamondback Moth Management in Cole Crops
Mar 27, 2025 · The purpose of this publication is to provide current management practices for diamondback moth in both conventional and organic cabbage.Missing: altitudinal preferences lowland moist soils
[88]
(PDF) Precision Agriculture and Smart Technologies for Insect Pest ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Precision Agriculture and Smart Technologies for Insect Pest Management. April 2025 ... IPM helped control. the diamondback moth, a major pest of.
[89]
[PDF] RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR DIAMONDBACK ...
Jun 1, 2017 · The use of integrated pest management. (IPM) tactics for DBM management in canola is integral to underpinning a reduction in DBM insecticide use ...
[90]
Mating Disruption of Diamondback moth – An effective strategy that could reduce insecticide applications on cabbage and broccoli | Virginia Ag Pest and Crop Advisory
### Summary of 2025 Mating Disruption Trials for DBM, Effectiveness in IPM, and Reduction in Pesticide Use
[91]
Diadegma insulare - Biological Control
Diadegma insulare is a small (6 mm long) ichneumonid wasp with reddish-brown legs and abdomen. It pupates inside the cocoon made by the mature diamondback moth ...
[92]
Biological control of diamondback moth - Top Crop Manager
Aug 4, 2020 · Natural predators and parasitoids are known to have a role in biological control, however their contributions are not fully understood. More ...
[93]
Diamondback Moth - K-State's entomology
May 1, 2024 · Larvae are typically slender and yellowish green, with a forked tail. Pupae are often visible within loosely woven silken cocoons that adher ...
[94]
Plutex – a new active ingredient for diamondback moth control
Jun 12, 2023 · Plutex is a new solution for diamondback moth control using Plutella xylostella granulovirus, aiding resistance prevention and reducing larvae ...
[95]
(PDF) Evaluation of Insecticidal Activity of a Bacterial Strain, Serratia ...
Aug 6, 2025 · the diamondback moth. Continued long-term use of insecticides. to control the diamondback moth has resulted in the. development of insecticide ...
[96]
Diamondback moth (DBM) | Infonet Biovision Home.
Jul 10, 2019 · Crop rotation can be effective in controlling the diamondback moth in semi-arid environments as there are only very few wild host plants. A ...
[97]
Diamondback moth (DBM) on cabbage. - | Plantwise Knowledge Bank
Apr 1, 2017 · Rotate cabbage, rape, broccoli or cauliflower with any of the following crops: tomato, onion, maize, or sweet potato. Plant early in the season to avoid the ...
[98]
Testing and improving the effectiveness of trap crops for ... - PubMed
Background: The aim of this study was to assess white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) as a trap crop for diamondback moth [Plutella xylostella (L.)] on ...
[99]
The possibility of using Indian mustard, Brassica juncea, as a trap ...
Results indicated that Indian mustard has potential as a trap crop for P. xylostella in South Africa. Introduction. The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L ...
[100]
Control of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) on cabbage ...
Intercropping cabbage with onion, tomato or pepper was found to be as effective as spraying the cabbage with chlorpyrifos. Cabbage intercropped with onion ...
[101]
(PDF) Potentiality of intercropping in managing Diamondback moth ...
Jun 19, 2025 · Additionally, the intercrops treatments, viz. cabbage + marigold, cabbage + onion and cabbage + garlic also significantly reduced the number of ...
[102]
Landscape composition mediates suppression of major pests by ...
Aug 15, 2021 · Conservation biological control provides an environment-friendly approach to improve the efficacy of natural enemies. Although numerous studies ...
[103]
Structure, function and management of semi‐natural habitats for ...
May 14, 2016 · Conservation biological control (CBC) aims to enhance pest control by (i) improving resources for natural enemies through habitat enhancement5 ...
[104]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167880921001596
[105]
Cole crop insect management - MSU Extension
Jul 7, 2011 · Novaluron and methoxyfenozide are both insect growth regulators, which means that they stop insects from developing through their normal life ...
[106]
Acetamiprid resistance and cross‐resistance in the diamondback ...
Aug 5, 2004 · Acetamiprid is a neonicotinoid insecticide,1, 2 widely used in Japan for managing the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L) (Lepidoptera: ...2.1 Insects · 2.2 Insecticides · 2.3 Bioassay For...
[107]
Monitoring of insecticide resistance of Plutella xylostella ... - Weslaco
Sep 15, 2023 · By regularly assessing insecticide resistance levels in diamondback moth populations, we can detect emerging resistance mechanisms, track the ...
[108]
Monitoring for Diamondback Moth in Cole Crops - Suterra
Jun 15, 2021 · Wing Traps are ideal for use with Diamondback Moth because of the abundant airflow and large surface area of the trap. Assembling a wingtrap ...
[109]
[PDF] Protocol for Monitoring Diamondback Moth with Pheromone-Baited ...
Apr 1, 2024 · 4. Remove the covering from the sticky insert, and place it on the bottom of the trap so the sticky surface faces up (Figure 4).
[110]
Electrophysiological Responses and Field Attractants of Plutella ...
Apr 7, 2025 · The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella L., is an economically important pest that damages Brassicaceae crops such as ...
[111]
Mating Disruption for Diamondback Moth - Suterra
CheckMate® DBM-F is a sprayable pheromone for diamondback moth mating disruption, using a species-specific pheromone, and is easy to deploy.