Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Emperor Ping of Han

Emperor Ping of Han (9 BC – AD 6), personal name Liu Kan (劉衎), was the eleventh emperor of the Western , reigning from 1 BC to AD 6. A grandson of and son of the Prince of , he ascended the throne at the age of nine sui following the death of his childless cousin, . His minority saw the appointment of as regent by Grand Empress Dowager , under whose influence Wang consolidated power, including through the marriage of his daughter to Ping in 3 CE. The emperor's reign was marked by Wang Mang's elimination of rivals, such as the execution of Ping's maternal uncles, fostering resentment that reportedly led Wang to poison the young ruler in 5 or 6 CE to avert potential vengeance. This act facilitated Wang Mang's usurpation, establishing the short-lived and ending direct Western rule. Buried in the Kangling tomb, Ping's death at age 17 symbolized the dynasty's terminal decline amid regency intrigue and factional strife.

Early Life

Family Background and Ancestry

Emperor Ping of Han, born in 9 BC with the personal name Liu Jizi (劉箕子)—later changed to Liu Kan (劉衎) in 2 CE to avoid naming taboos—was the son of Liu Xing (劉興), Prince of Zhongshan (中山王), and a consort surnamed Wei (衛姬). Liu Xing, the youngest son of Emperor Yuan of Han (劉奭, r. 48–33 BC), had been enfeoffed with the Zhongshan fief in 8 BC following the demise of the prior princely line, establishing a collateral branch of the imperial Liu clan. This positioned Ping as a direct grandson of Emperor Yuan, whose restrained rule and favoritism toward eunuchs contrasted with the expansive policies of his father, Emperor Wu, yet sowed seeds of dynastic instability through weak succession planning. The imperial family's reliance on princely sidelines for heirs underscored broader genealogical challenges, as Emperor Yuan's primary successor, Emperor Cheng (劉驁, r. 33–7 BC), produced no surviving sons amid scandals involving imperial consorts and external influences. Similarly, the brief reign of Emperor Ai (劉欣, r. 7–1 BC) ended without male issue, amplifying the role of peripheral kin like those from in preserving legitimacy. Ping's infancy in this fief—located in modern province—involved standard aristocratic rearing under local administrators, with limited documented agency owing to his youth (father Liu Xing died in 7 BC, when Ping was two) and the court's deference to imperial precedent over individual princely autonomy.

Selection and Life as Imperial Prince

Liu Kan, born in 9 BC with the personal name Liu Jizi, was the posthumous son of Liu Xing, Prince Jing of (d. 13 BC), and his consort Lady Wei; Liu Xing himself was a grandson of (r. 48–33 BC). Upon his father's death, the infant Liu Jizi succeeded to the principality, a semi-autonomous in the northern commandery of modern , distant from the imperial capital at . Historical records offer few details of his early years, reflecting both his extreme youth—under five (Chinese virtual age) at succession—and the peripheral status of princes, who held nominal honors like ritual sacrifices and tabooed characters in naming but exercised no significant political role. In 1 BC, following Emperor Ai's death (r. 7–1 BC) without a direct heir, , widow of Emperor Yuan and aunt to the rising , orchestrated the selection of a successor from collateral branches. She bypassed adult princes from closer lines, such as those descended from Emperor Cheng's brothers, in favor of the malleable nine-sui , whose youth ensured dependency on regency oversight amid norms where empress dowagers wielded decisive influence over non-primogeniture successions. This choice prioritized control over strict agnatic proximity, enabling family consolidation; upon designation, 's name was altered to to conform to imperial avoidance taboos, granting him the title of before immediate enthronement. His pre-ascension life remained secluded in , with no recorded interventions in court affairs, underscoring the causal weight of the dowager's preferences in perpetuating dynastic continuity through pliable heirs.

Ascension to the Throne

Death of Emperor Ai and Succession Crisis

Emperor Ai died on 15 August 1 BC at the age of 26, succumbing to chronic illnesses that had plagued him throughout his reign, leaving the throne vacant without a designated heir or surviving sons. His rule had been marked by favoritism toward male companions, particularly , a low-ranking promoted to high command despite limited qualifications, which fueled and resentment among traditional elites. This , involving lavish grants of titles and estates to Dong's family, contributed to administrative instability and eroded imperial authority, as recorded in contemporary annals critiquing Ai's deviations from Confucian governance norms. The sudden death created an acute , as Ai's lack of progeny necessitated selecting a candidate from collateral branches of the imperial Liu clan to preserve dynastic continuity amid factional rivalries. , Ai's great-aunt and the dominant surviving matriarch with ties to the preceding emperors, swiftly asserted control by convening senior officials and excluding the Fu clan—Ai's maternal relatives who had wielded influence during his reign—from decision-making. She prioritized a young successor to minimize threats from ambitious adults, rejecting mature princes who might challenge regency arrangements, thereby prioritizing short-term stability over immediate merit-based selection. Factional tensions escalated as Wang Zhengjun's faction moved to neutralize rivals: Dong Xian, upon learning of Ai's death, committed suicide, while members of the Fu and Ding clans—previously empowered under Ai—faced execution or forced suicide for alleged disloyalty, effectively dismantling their networks and clearing obstacles to a Wang-dominated regency. This , justified in as restoring order but reflecting raw power consolidation, underscored the causal role of maternal clan influence in successions, where unchecked outer relatives often precipitated instability. The attributes these maneuvers to Wang's strategic acumen, though later historians note the selective elimination preserved elite consensus only temporarily.

Enthronement and Establishment of Regency

Following the death of Emperor Ai on August 15, 1 BC, Liu Kan (personal name of Emperor Ping), born in 9 BC and thus aged 9 sui, was selected as successor and enthroned in the ninth lunar month of that year (corresponding to September or October in the proleptic Gregorian calendar). The formal ascension adhered to Han protocols for imperial succession during crises, involving announcement by court officials under the direction of Grand Empress Dowager Wang Zhengjun, without elaborate public ceremonies typical of mature emperors. Grand Empress Dowager , as , issued an edict reappointing her nephew to the position of da sima (Minister Over the Masses or ), granting him oversight of the imperial secretariat (shangshu) and broad supervisory powers over administrative functions. This mirrored precedents for child rulers in the dynasty, such as Emperor Zhao's regency under Huo Guang from 87 BC, where a powerful consort relative or official managed state affairs to maintain stability amid the emperor's minority. The regency structure entrenched Wang Mang's authority by leveraging bureaucratic inertia and loyalty networks cultivated during his earlier tenure under Emperors Cheng and Ai; officials, facing fragmented imperial clans and influences, deferred to Wang's directives as the practical locus of decision-making, thereby transitioning control into institutionalized dominance without immediate overt usurpation. In 1 CE, further consolidation occurred when Wang was elevated to taifu (Grand Tutor) and enfeoffed as Duke of Anhan, symbolizing imperial endorsement of his stabilizing role.

Reign under Wang Mang's Influence

Initial Regency and Administrative Control

Upon ascending the throne in 1 BCE at the age of eight, Emperor Ping's rule immediately fell under the regency of , who had been appointed General of the Guards and acting father-regent (jiafu) by . swiftly initiated purges targeting officials elevated during Emperor Ai's tenure, eliminating potential rivals through demotions, exiles, or executions to secure unchallenged authority at court. He simultaneously installed loyal adherents, including family members and Confucian scholars, in critical administrative roles such as the imperial secretariat, thereby consolidating control over policy formulation and execution. To legitimize his regency, emphasized the restoration of ancient Confucian rituals and institutions previously neglected or abolished under Emperor Wu and subsequent rulers, invoking precedents like those of to frame his actions as a return to moral and ceremonial order. These efforts included reviving rites documented in classical texts, which served to align the regime with scholarly ideals and undermine the influence of Ai-era factions associated with extravagance and favoritism. In 2 CE, received the title Duke who Stabilizes the (An Han gong), further entrenching his administrative dominance while nominally deferring to imperial authority. Emperor Ping's involvement remained ceremonial, with edicts issued in his name but drafted and directed by , reflecting the child's limited capacity amid the regent's orchestration of court affairs. This puppet status was evident in the period's records, where the young sovereign's nominal endorsement masked 's de facto governance, including early fiscal adjustments inherited from Emperor Ai's profligate policies that had strained state resources through generous grants to favorites like . Such strains provided causal impetus for 's initial stabilizing measures, though their implementation focused on administrative reconfiguration rather than immediate overhauls.

Marriage Alliance and Power Aggrandizement

In AD 4, Wang Mang orchestrated the marriage of his daughter, then aged 13, to the 13-year-old as a strategic means to bind the imperial line to his own family, with the emperor promptly designating her empress upon her entry into the palace. This union, achieved through orchestrated petitions to the despite initial hesitations, effectively positioned Wang Mang's kin at the dynasty's core, enhancing his regental leverage beyond mere administrative oversight. Immediately following the empress's , Wang received escalated honors, including the title Duke of Anhan (Anhan Gong), connoting "Duke who Pacifies the ," along with 28,000 taxable households and the supreme role of Steward-Regulator of the State (Zaiheng), which superseded traditional or princely ranks in authority. These elevations, formalized in early but intensified post-marriage, reflected Wang Mang's consolidation of de facto sovereignty, as the titles evoked precedents like the while granting him ritual and decisional primacy over court affairs. By AD 5, further augmented his prestige through the revival of archaic rituals, compelling the emperor to confer the Nine Bestowments (Jiujian)—a suite of emoluments historically awarded for monumental state service, symbolically paralleling the emperor's own fengshan sacrifices at without Wang Mang performing them personally. This maneuver, justified by fabricated omens and scholarly endorsements, not only burnished Wang Mang's image as a restorer of antiquity but also eroded institutional checks, as courtiers' protests were quelled through or , prioritizing familial over meritocratic norms rooted in exams and bureaucratic . Such nepotistic entrenchment, while stabilizing Wang Mang's regency short-term, sowed discord by sidelining clans and officials, foreshadowing broader governance fractures.

The Lü Kuan Incident and Seizure of Absolute Power

In AD 3, Wang Mang's son Wang Yu, alarmed by his father's consolidation of dictatorial authority during the regency for the infant Emperor Ping, conspired with his tutor Wu Zhang, brother-in-law Lü Kuan, and members of the clan to challenge that dominance. The plot aimed to exploit Wang Mang's belief in portents by having Lü Kuan sprinkle blood on the doors of his mansion as an omen of divine disfavor, avoiding direct remonstrance that might provoke backlash. Guards detected Lü Kuan during the attempt, prompting to arrest the participants and frame them as traitors plotting and disorder. , , and Lü Kuan were compelled to commit , while 's wife Lü Yan—Lü Kuan's sister—was executed; the clan faced mass extermination, sparing only due to her minor role. As detailed in the , this purge neutralized internal opposition from 's own kin and former allies like the Wei, who had ties to imperial networks, eliminating procedural checks such as collective deliberations among officials. By portraying the incident as a threat to stability, Wang Mang justified unilateral control, shifting the regency from shared governance to personal motivated by safeguarding his position rather than broader ideological pursuits.

Death and Succession

Circumstances of Death and Suspected Poisoning

Emperor Ping succumbed on February 3, 6 CE, at the age of 14 sui, during his confinement in the in amid ongoing illness. Court records in the attributed his demise to a protracted ailment that began in late 5 CE, characterized by weakness and recurrent fevers, which had previously prompted imperial physicians to administer treatments including herbal decoctions and elixirs. Suspicions of foul play arose immediately, with the official of the Masters of Writing, Zhai Yi, submitting memorials explicitly accusing of orchestrating the emperor's poisoning through tainted medications or food. These charges, preserved in the , portrayed Wang as administering slow-acting toxins—common in court intrigues, such as aconite derivatives or mercury-laced elixirs—to simulate natural decline while eliminating threats. Zhai Yi's accusations fueled a brief in 7 CE, where he rallied imperial kin and officials, decrying Wang's regency as tyrannical and the death as , though the uprising was swiftly crushed. The poisoning hypothesis gains credence from Wang Mang's established pattern of neutralizing rivals via lethal means, including the forced suicides or executions of Emperor Ai's consort clans and kin, such as the Fu and Ding families, to preempt challenges to his authority. By 5 , following the Lü Kuan incident, Ping's emerging awareness of his puppet status and a temporary from illness heightened Wang's peril, as a maturing could mobilize loyalists against the regent's monopolization of edicts and appointments. Primary , drawing from contemporary memorials rather than Wang's self-aggrandizing edicts, prioritize these causal motives over benign illness narratives, underscoring Wang's strategic eliminations as instrumental to his eventual usurpation.

Immediate Aftermath and Wang Mang's Maneuvers

Following the death of Emperor Ping in early 6 CE, Wang Mang, who had dominated the regency since 1 CE, selected the infant Liu Ying—a great-grandson of Emperor Xuan of Han (r. 74–49 BCE)—as successor and enthroned him as emperor, later known as Ruzi Ying. Born in 5 CE, Ruzi was approximately one year old at enthronement, ensuring prolonged regency under Wang's control. Wang Mang positioned himself as acting emperor (she huangdi or temporary emperor), drawing on classical precedents like the Duke of Zhou's regency to legitimize his authority while publicly pledging to relinquish power upon Ruzi's maturity and restore full Han governance. To secure this interim dominance, swiftly suppressed dissent, including rebellions in 6 CE led by imperial clansman Liu Chong in Kuaiji Commandery and others such as Zhai Yixian, Zhao Ming, and Huo Hong, which challenged the succession and regency. These uprisings reflected early fractures in legitimacy amid Wang's overreach, as the child emperor's installation prioritized control over stable transition. Wang also invoked fabricated omens—such as divine signs reported from 1 CE onward, including a white pheasant symbolizing auspicious regency—to manufacture heavenly endorsement for continuity and his protective role over the throne. By 7–8 CE, escalated titles like "Regent Emperor" and altered the era name to Jushe ("Occupying the Regency"), embedding his rule in ritual and classical texts while eroding sovereignty through incremental aggrandizement. This pattern of regent manipulation—exploiting succession vacuums, neutralizing rivals, and engineering symbolic justifications—culminated in 9 CE when dethroned , abolished institutions, and proclaimed the , marking the causal collapse of Western legitimacy via unchecked interim power.

Tomb and Archaeological Context

The Kangling Mausoleum, Emperor Ping's burial site, lies in Xianyang, Shaanxi Province, within the Western Han imperial tomb cluster near ancient Chang'an. This necropolis features mound tombs typical of the dynasty, with Ping's forming an earthen pyramid structure aligned with predecessors' designs for symbolic elevation and defense. Archaeological efforts have yielded scant data from the site, as the primary chamber remains unexcavated in line with preservation protocols for intact imperial burials. Peripheral explorations reveal no substantial artifacts, suggesting restrained funerary provisions befitting a juvenile ruler's brief tenure, though this inference rests on comparative analysis rather than direct recovery. Such evidentiary gaps illustrate archaeology's limitations in substantiating textual burial descriptions, with risks of ancient robbery further complicating preservation.

Administrative and Personal Aspects

Era Names and Calendar Reforms

The primary era name of Emperor Ping's reign was Yuanshi (元始, "Primordial Beginning"), instituted upon his ascension and extending from 1 BCE to 5 . This designation evoked classical ideals of cosmic origins, aligning with administrative conventions for marking imperial epochs. In 6 , the era name shifted to Jianping (建平, "Establishing Peace"), a brief period that concluded with the emperor's death on of that year. As regent, directed administrative standardizations, including weights and measures (度量衡, duliangheng), drawing on textual descriptions of prototypes to symbolize Confucian restoration. These efforts lacked explicit endorsement in primary annals like the Hanshu for substantive implementation during the regency, yielding mixed empirical outcomes; archaeological recoveries reveal ongoing local variations in unit sizes, such as catties (jin) fluctuating around 240–250 grams, indicative of incomplete uniformity. Calendar adjustments were similarly symbolic, emphasizing alignment with ancient seasonal observations via halls, but no verifiable overhaul supplanted the prevailing Taichu established in 104 BCE. Such initiatives stemmed from 's ideological framework, independent of Emperor Ping's documented involvement, and prioritized precedent over causal efficacy in governance.

Consorts and Family Relations

Emperor Ping's sole recorded empress was , the daughter of , to whom he was married in AD 4 during the first year of the Jianping era; she received the title of empress upon the union. This marriage adhered to norms of selecting imperial consorts from prominent aristocratic lineages to foster political stability and dynastic continuity, though Ping's selection was notably influenced by Wang Mang's regency. No children issued from the empress or any other consorts, a circumstance attributable to Ping's youth—he ascended the throne at age nine sui (approximately seven Western years) in 1 BC and died at age 14 sui in AD 6—limiting opportunities for progeny. Historical annals, including the Book of Han, document no heirs, aligning with patterns among late Western Han emperors where childless reigns exacerbated succession vulnerabilities due to reliance on distant kin. Beyond the empress, records indicate minimal additional consorts, with traditional accounts noting perhaps nominal appointments of concubines but no substantive development owing to Ping's age and Wang Mang's oversight of inner palace affairs. Ping's included his father, Liu Jizi (posthumously Emperor Kuang of Han), and his mother, Consort Wei of the Prince of Zhongshan's household; he had no recorded siblings, leaving the imperial lineage without direct descendants upon his death.

Historiography and Legacy

Traditional Historical Accounts

The Book of Han (Hanshu), the official dynastic history compiled by Ban Gu (32–92 CE), depicts Emperor Ping (r. 1 BCE–6 CE) as a juvenile sovereign who inherited the throne at age nine following Emperor Ai's death without issue, but wielded no substantive authority amid the dominance of regent (45 BCE–23 CE). Wang is characterized as a shrewd operator who, appointed Duke of Anhan and acting as Grand Regent from 1 CE, systematically neutralized threats from imperial consort clans, including the execution of Lü Kuan and associates in 3 CE on charges of disloyalty and sorcery, an event framed as a to secure unchallenged control. Classical narratives, including the Hanshu, attribute Ping's sudden death at age 14 to suspected poisoning orchestrated by Wang to avert retaliation from the emperor's maternal kin and enable the enthronement of the infant Ruzi Ying as a more pliable figurehead; however, these accounts lack contemporaneous corroboration beyond court rumor, highlighting potential inconsistencies such as the absence of verified symptoms or motives beyond retrospective vilification. The Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government (Zizhi Tongjian), Sima Guang's (1019–1086 CE) chronological synthesis drawing from earlier records, reinforces this portrayal of Ping as a ceremonial puppet, with Wang cast as a duplicitous regent whose reforms and manipulations masked ambitions for dynastic overthrow, culminating in his self-proclamation as emperor in 9 CE. Post-Han historiography, oriented toward legitimizing Liu family restoration under the Eastern Han, exhibits a systemic bias against Wang-era figures, amplifying accusations of infanticide and treachery—such as Wang's alleged elimination of rival heirs—to underscore moral decay and justify the Xin interregnum's brevity, though primary records reveal no empirical adjudication of these claims beyond factional imputations. Verifiable excerpts from the Hanshu annals note Wang's orchestration of imperial rituals and edicts in Ping's name, underscoring the emperor's marginal role: "The Emperor was young and did not participate in government; all affairs were decided by the Regent." Such depictions prioritize narrative coherence over causal verification, reflecting the epistemic priorities of dynastic loyalism rather than detached chronicle.

Modern Scholarly Interpretations

In twentieth-century historiography, Michael Loewe characterized Wang Mang's regency during 's reign (1 BCE–6 ) as emblematic of escalating tensions between progressive, realist governance and Wang's advocacy for a restorative rooted in apocryphal texts and archaic rituals, which prioritized symbolic legitimacy over administrative efficacy. This framework posits Wang not merely as an opportunistic usurper but as a ideologue whose early policies, including the 2 imposing land limits of 1,000 mu per household and temporarily restricting sales, aimed to emulate egalitarianism yet triggered elite backlash and bureaucratic strain without addressing core issues like by magnates. Empirical records of failures, such as uneven leading to and short-term agricultural disruptions, support critiques that these measures masked power consolidation rather than fostering sustainable reform. Causal analyses emphasize how Wang's overreliance on ritual projects—such as erecting altars modeled on classical precedents and bestowing Zhou-style titles amid 3–6 CE droughts and floods—diverted labor and funds from practical relief, intensifying famines that displaced peasants and sparked localized unrest by 5 CE, thereby hastening Western Han disintegration. Loewe's examination links these outcomes to a doctrinal shift away from Han empiricism toward textual literalism, where policies like experimental coinage variants disrupted commerce without stabilizing revenues, evidencing that regency innovations amplified existing vulnerabilities rather than resolving them through evidence-based adaptation. Such interpretations reject idealized portrayals of Wang as a benevolent innovator, grounding the era's instability in verifiable policy-induced disequilibria over abstract intentions. Since 2000, interdisciplinary studies merging with have corroborated accounts of Wang's manipulative regency dynamics under Ping, including court exclusions of rival kin, via evidence from settlement sites showing interrupted agrarian cycles and frontier logistics during the period, absent any Ping-attributable finds that challenge traditional power narratives. These works, prioritizing material data over speculative benevolence, affirm that Wang's ritual-centric —evident in resource reallocations confirmed by site —exacerbated economic fractures, debunking progressive reform myths by highlighting causal chains from ideological rigidity to systemic breakdown.

Controversies and Causal Analysis of the Era

The sudden death of Emperor Ping on 6 February 6 AD, at the age of 14, following a brief illness after inspecting palace construction sites, has fueled longstanding debate over potential poisoning orchestrated by regent . The Book of Han (Hanshu), the primary dynastic chronicle compiled under the subsequent Eastern Han, records the illness as abrupt but offers no explicit evidence of murder, attributing it to natural causes amid the emperor's youth and prior health issues. However, later accusations by rebels like Zhai Yi in 23 AD explicitly charged with poisoning Pingdi to preempt vengeance for the 3 AD executions of Ping's uncles, Princes Liu Xin of Donghai and Liu Yu of , whom had eliminated on fabricated charges. Scholarly analyses of patterns note 's consistent elimination of threats, including family rivals, rendering poisoning probable despite the absence of forensic verification or unbiased contemporary testimony—the Hanshu itself reflects post-usurpation bias from pro-Liu historians like Ban Gu, yet the timing aligns with Ping's impending majority, when 's grip risked challenge. Wang Mang's regency from , initially stabilizing a vacuum after Emperor Aidi's , masked deeper systemic failures by eroding imperial through unchecked centralization. While providing nominal continuity—evidenced by Wang's administrative edicts maintaining tax collection and frontier garrisons amid ongoing factional plots—it systematically dismantled checks on regental , as seen in Wang's self-aggrandizing titles like "Duke Who Assists the Han" by 7 BC and confinement of . This fostered resentment among the nobility and outer kin clans, culminating in suppressed rebellions like Wang Yu's 3 AD suicide plot against Mang's dominance; causal analysis reveals how such maneuvers prioritized personal consolidation over dynastic legitimacy, weakening the emperor's perception and priming elite disillusionment. Proponents of Wang's benevolence overlook this erosion, but first-principles scrutiny of dynamics shows regency as a direct precursor to peasant unrest, as alienated elites withheld loyalty and administrative inefficiencies compounded under rule. Ping's brief reign encapsulates late Western Han decadence, where regency dependence exposed flaws in succession amid entrenched factionalism and eunuch meddling, prioritizing verifiable institutional decay over revisionist downplaying of usurpatory chaos. Child emperors like Ping, selected from collateral Liu lines due to prior rulers' infertility or excesses, invited regent overreach, as Wang exploited this to purge rivals—executing over 300 in the 3 AD incident alone—while eunuchs like Shi Xian gained undue court influence, per Hanshu annals. Economic strains, including land concentration via sales to magnates and flood-induced famines in 2-5 AD affecting millions, strained peasantry without effective relief, as regency edicts favored Confucian ritual over pragmatic governance. This microcosm of decline—factional Wang clan dominance versus imperial house irrelevance—causally accelerated collapse, as suppressed dissent and perceived illegitimacy eroded central cohesion, evidenced by rising provincial defections post-6 AD; normalized historiography minimizing these as mere "transitional" ignores how regency failures normalized extralegal power grabs, seeding the revolts that toppled Wang's facade.

References

  1. [1]
    Emperor Ping of Han Biography - Pantheon World
    Emperor Ping of Han (9 BC – 3 February 6 AD), personal names Liu Jizi and later Liu Kan, was the eleventh emperor of the Chinese Han dynasty.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  2. [2]
    Emperor Han Pingdi 漢平帝Liu Kan 劉衎(www.chinaknowledge.de)
    He was a grandson of Emperor Yuan 漢元帝(r. 49-33 BCE) and a son of the Prince of Zhongshan 中山王and Lady Wei 衛姬. When he succeeded Emperor Ai 漢哀帝(r. 7-1 ...
  3. [3]
    Empress Yuan 元后Wang Zhengjun 王政君(www.chinaknowledge.de)
    The family Wang became more and more powerful during the reigns of the emperors Cheng, Ai 漢哀帝(r. 7-1 BCE) and Ping 漢平帝(r. 1 BCE-5 CE), with the help of ...Missing: selection BC
  4. [4]
    漢哀帝 - Chinese Text Project
    Emperor Ai of Han, personal name Liu Xin (劉欣; 25 BC – 15 August 1 BC), was an emperor of China's Han dynasty. He ascended the throne when he was 20, ...
  5. [5]
    漢孝哀皇帝(Emperor Xiao Ai of Han) - Chinese Text Project Dictionary
    ... Ai died in 1 BC. Emperor Ai was also famous for being the most effusive homosexual emperor of the Han Dynasty. Traditional historians characterized the ...Missing: cause | Show results with:cause<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    PAN KU'S BOOK OF THE FORMER HAN
    More than a year after [Wang] Mang returned to the imperial capital, Emperor Ai died. He had no children and both the [August Grand] Empress Dowager [nee Fu] ...
  7. [7]
    Wang Zhengjun | empress dowager of Han dynasty - Britannica
    Wang Zhengjun, who had been the empress of Yuandi and mother of Chengdi, exercised considerable powers not only in her own capacity but also through several of ...
  8. [8]
    https://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=2003_Q4/uvaGenText/tei/z000000039.xml;query=;brand=default
  9. [9]
    Wang Mang 王莽 and the Xin Dynasty 新 (8-23 CE) - Chinaknowledge
    On Emperor Ai's death the minor-aged Emperor Ping 漢平帝 (r. 1 BCE-5 AD) came to the throne. The Grand Empress Dowager acted as regent for the young emperor ...Missing: date BC
  10. [10]
    WANG MANG 王莽 (c. 45 b.c.e.–23 c.e.) AND CLASSICAL ...
    Oct 17, 2022 · This article inquires into the ideological circumstances behind Wang Mang's 王莽 seizure of power, to examine how he built legitimacy at every stage of his ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Law and Ritual in Early Imperial China - UC Berkeley
    Aug 1, 2025 · After Emperor Ping's death in 6 CE, Wang. Mang, serving as the regent to the infant heir-apparent Liu Ying 劉嬰, invoked the precedent of the ...
  12. [12]
    Empress Wang - The usurper's daughter - History of Royal Women
    May 4, 2022 · The Grand Empress Dowager appointed Wang Mang as Commander-in-Chief to help Emperor Ping with his duties to the throne. Wang Mang was the ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] WANG MANG 王莽 (c. 45 b.c.e .–23 c.e .) AND CLASSICAL ... - HAL
    Jan 29, 2023 · ... reign of the young Emperor Ping under Wang Mang's regency, which many took to be the first “sign” of Heaven's favor for Wang Mang's.
  14. [14]
    Medical events in the time of Wang Mang ca. 26 BC -AD 23
    ... Mang. Zhai Yi set up a member of the. imperial house as emperor and established an administration. He accused Wang Mang of having. poisoned Ping Di and this ...
  15. [15]
    Ruzi Ying 孺子嬰(www.chinaknowledge.de)
    Two years later Wang Mang dethroned Ruzi Ying and proclaimed himself emperor of the Xin dynasty 新(8-23 CE). Ruzi Ying was given the title of Duke of Ding'an ...
  16. [16]
    Emperor Wang Mang: China's First Socialist? - Smithsonian Magazine
    Dec 9, 2011 · Wang Mang may be the most controversial of China's hundred or more emperors. Born into one of his country's oldest noble families in about 45 ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Rise and Fall of the Western Han Dynasty Imperial Power from ...
    Mausoleum of Emperor Yuan and Kangling Mausoleum of Emperor Ping, Maoling Mausoleum,. Pingling Mausoleum, Weiling Mausoleum and Kangling Mausoleum also ...
  18. [18]
    Han Kangling 汉康陵 - Emperor Ping Pyramid Tomb - YouTube
    Apr 20, 2018 · #pyramid #ancientchina #chinahistory Another Western Han Dynasty tomb from the Xianyang area. In fact, this was the last of the Western Han ...Missing: Mausoleum | Show results with:Mausoleum
  19. [19]
    The Pyramid of China—the Imperial Mausoleum of the Western Han ...
    Apr 27, 2017 · Excavations of the eastern section of Maoling Mausoleum in 1981 revealed 200 plus cultural relics including the precious gilded bronze horse and ...Missing: artifacts | Show results with:artifacts
  20. [20]
    (PDF) The Western Han Dynasty Pyramids and their Orientation in ...
    Mar 23, 2024 · According to Wikipedia, the tomb for the emperor is in the west and empress tomb is to the east. Satellite tombs are located east of the Chang ...
  21. [21]
    Han Dynasty Emperors (www.chinaknowledge.de)
    Emperor Ping 漢平帝, Xiaoping Huangdi 孝平皇帝{Yuanzong 元宗} (r. 1 BCE-5 CE), Liu Kan 劉衎(Liu Jizi 劉箕子), Yuanshi 元始(1 BCE-5 CE). Jianping 建平(6). Taichu ...Missing: era | Show results with:era
  22. [22]
    https://brill.com/display/book/9789004314900/B9789004314900_013.pdf
  23. [23]
    Problems of Chronology (Chapter 1) - Han Material Culture
    In contrast, coins introduced by Wang Mang from his regency through his reign are readily identified and, with the exception of the buquan (布泉), clearly ...
  24. [24]
    Empress Wang (Xiaoping) of Han - Xiang Li Art
    Jun 29, 2023 · Empress Wang (died 21 CE) was the wife of Emperor Ping of the Western Han Dynasty. Chosen for her noble lineage as the daughter of Wang Mang.
  25. [25]
    Wang Mang | Chinese Emperor & Reformer - Britannica
    Wang Mang solved the succession problem to his own advantage by selecting the youngest among more than 50 eligible heirs, a boy born in ad 5. The child was not ...Missing: precedents | Show results with:precedents
  26. [26]
    Hanshu 漢書(www.chinaknowledge.de)
    The Hanshu 漢書is the official dynastic history of the Former Han dynasty compiled by the historian Ban Biao 班彪(3–54 CE), his son Ban Gu 班固(32–92 CE) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Crisis and conflict in Han China 104 BC to AD 9 - ResearchGate
    This volume illustrates the growth of two attitudes towards government in China during the first century B.C., the one progressive, realist and forward ...Missing: review | Show results with:review
  28. [28]
    3 - Wang Mang, the restoration of the Han dynasty, and Later Han
    Crisis and conflict in Han China. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1974. [abbreviation Crisis and conflict]. Loewe, Michael. Records of Han administration. 2 ...
  29. [29]
    Wang Mang | Research Starters - EBSCO
    Wang Mang, who rose to power through his aunt, the dowager empress Wang, declared himself emperor of the Xin Dynasty, dividing the Han dynasty in two. Key ...Missing: precedents regency
  30. [30]
    Review: [Untitled] on JSTOR
    New York Times', dated 1971. MICHAEL LOEWE: Crisis and conflict in. Han China, 104 B.C. to A.D. 9. 340 pp., front., plate. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd ...
  31. [31]
    Han Frontiers: Toward an Integrated View - jstor
    On Wang Mang policies toward the Xiongnu, see Ma Yong 3fJ§, "Lun Dong Han ... The need to integrate archaeological and textual sources has often limited the ...
  32. [32]
    Resettlement strategies and Han imperial expansion into southwest ...
    Oct 13, 2019 · In the upheaval following the rise of Wang Mang, even more migrants came to the southwest, although mostly as refugees and thus probably in less ...
  33. [33]
    A Quantitative History of Regicide in China - SpringerLink
    Sep 26, 2025 · As Emperor Ping grew older, he became increasingly dissatisfied with Wang Mang. So, feeling insecure, Wang Mang murdered Emperor Ping and later ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] WANG MANG, THE RESTORATION OF THE HAN DYNASTY, AND ...
    Wang Mang's power grew during the brief nominal ... intended to do: Wang Mang was the Yellow Emperor and next in line to ... migration in motion during the time ...