Epulis is a non-specific clinical term encompassing a group of benign, reactive hyperplastic lesions that manifest as localized, tumor-like enlargements on the gingiva or alveolar mucosa. The term derives from the Greek ἐπουλίς (epoulís), meaning "(growth) on the gingiva."[1] These growths are typically firm, pedunculated or sessile, and arise in response to chronic local irritants such as plaque, calculus, or trauma, rather than representing true neoplasms. Unlike generalized gingival hypertrophy, epulis involves focal tissue proliferation, often presenting as painless, reddish masses that may bleed upon provocation.[2][3]The main types of epulis include fibrous epulis (also known as peripheral ossifying fibroma), vascular epulis (pyogenic granuloma), giant cell epulis (peripheral giant cell granuloma), and pregnancy-associated epulis.[2] Fibrous epulis is characterized by fibrous connective tissue with possible ossification, commonly affecting younger adults.[3] Pyogenic granuloma appears as a rapidly growing, vascular lesion, frequently linked to hormonal influences during pregnancy.[1] Giant cell epulis features multinucleated giant cells and typically occurs in middle-aged individuals, while pregnancy epulis arises due to elevated hormone levels and often regresses postpartum.[2]Epidemiologically, epulis affects individuals across a wide age range (1–98 years), with peak incidence between 30 and 60 years and a higher prevalence in females (up to 2:1 ratio).[2] Overall prevalence in dental populations ranges from 5.6% to 20.6%, influenced by factors like poor oral hygiene and denture wear.[2] Etiologically, chronic irritation plays a central role, with molecular pathways such as aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling and RAS-PI3K-AKT-NF-κB activation implicated in lesion development.[2] Hormonal changes, particularly during pregnancy, and mechanical trauma from ill-fitting prostheses are notable contributors.[1]Diagnosis relies on clinical examination combined with histopathological analysis to confirm the reactive nature and exclude malignancies like squamous cell carcinoma or metastatic tumors.[3] Management primarily involves surgical excision of the lesion, often with removal of underlying irritants to prevent recurrence, which occurs in up to 15–20% of cases.[2] Adjunctive therapies include laser ablation or sclerotherapy for vascular variants, emphasizing the importance of oral hygiene and addressing predisposing factors for long-term resolution.[1]
Introduction
Definition and Etymology
Epulis is a clinical descriptor used in dentistry and oral pathology to refer to any tumor-like enlargement or mass arising on the gingiva or alveolar mucosa. It serves as a broad term encompassing various reactive hyperplastic lesions induced by chronic irritation, but it does not indicate a specific histopathological diagnosis; instead, biopsy is required to determine the precise nature of the lesion.[4][5][6]The etymology of "epulis" (plural: epulides) traces back to Ancient Greek, derived from "epi" (ἐπί), meaning "upon" or "on," and "oulis" (οὐλις), referring to "gum" or "gingiva," thus literally signifying "upon the gum." This nomenclature highlights the topographic location of the lesion rather than its pathological characteristics. The term was initially employed by the ancient physician Galen to denote abnormal growths on the gums, applying it generally to a range of gingival tumors without regard to etiology.[7][8]In the 19th century, Rudolf Virchow, a foundational figure in cellular pathology, reintroduced and popularized the term in modern medical literature around 1864, using it to describe any mass involving the gingiva or alveolar mucosa irrespective of its origin—whether inflammatory, fibrous, or neoplastic. Over time, as diagnostic precision advanced, the broad application of "epulis" evolved in contemporary dentistry toward subtype-specific usage, such as fibrous epulis or giant cell epulis, to better reflect histopathological findings while retaining its role as a clinical descriptor.[9][10] These lesions are most commonly encountered on the gingiva in adults.[4]
Epidemiology
Epulis is a relatively uncommon condition in the general population, with hospital-based studies reporting prevalences as low as 0.88% among oral pathologies in certain settings. However, it constitutes a notable proportion of gingival and oral soft tissue lesions, representing 5.6% to 20.6% of reactive hyperplastic lesions in biopsy series from dental clinics.[11][4][2]The condition predominantly affects adults, with cases reported across a wide age range from 1 to 98 years and a peak incidence between 30 and 60 years; the mean age in large cohorts is approximately 45.5 years. There is a slight female predominance, observed in up to 63% of cases, yielding a female-to-male ratio of about 1.7:1, potentially influenced by hormonal factors.[2][4]Geographic variations exist, with higher frequencies reported in regions characterized by poorer oral hygiene or widespread denture usage, though no strong ethnic predispositions have been identified. Large biopsy series, such as one involving 2,971 cases from China spanning 2010–2022, highlight epulis as 1–2% of broader oral soft tissue lesions in clinical practice, underscoring its relevance among gingival overgrowths. Brief associations with local irritants like plaque have been noted in epidemiological data.[2][4]
Pathophysiology
Causes and Risk Factors
The development of epulis is primarily attributed to chronic local irritation in the gingival tissues, including dental trauma, accumulation of plaque and calculus, and mechanical stress from ill-fitting dentures or restorations. These irritants provoke a reactive inflammatory response, leading to localized overgrowth. For instance, persistent friction from poorly adapted prosthetic appliances is a well-documented trigger, particularly in cases associated with long-term denture wear.[4][2][12]Hormonal influences play a significant role, especially elevated levels of estrogen and progesterone, which can exacerbate gingival reactivity during pregnancy or with oral contraceptive use. Local factors such as poor oral hygiene and smoking further compound the risk by promoting plaque retention and chronic inflammation. Orthodontic appliances may also contribute through ongoing mechanical irritation, though this is less common. Certain medications, such as phenytoin and cyclosporine, can induce gingival hyperplasia that may present as or contribute to epulis-like lesions through enhanced fibroblastic proliferation.[2][13][4]While epulis is predominantly a local reactive process, rare systemic associations include vitamin C deficiency, which can manifest as gingival hypertrophy mimicking epulis in scurvy cases, and certain autoimmune conditions like IgG4-related disease. Risk is stratified by patient factors, with edentulous individuals facing higher incidence of denture-related epulis due to prolonged irritation from prosthetics; although primarily a reactive process driven by local irritants, genetic and molecular mechanisms, such as signaling pathways, also play a role in lesion development. Overall, these triggers induce reactive hyperplasia without neoplastic intent.[14][15][16]
Mechanisms of Formation
Epulis formation primarily involves reactive hyperplasia of epithelial and connective tissues in the gingival region, triggered by chronic local stimuli such as irritation or trauma, resulting in localized, non-neoplastic proliferation without malignant transformation.[2] This process distinguishes epulis from true neoplasms, as it represents an exuberant tissue response aimed at repair rather than uncontrolled growth.[2] Unlike generalized gingival hypertrophy, epulis lesions are focal and directly linked to persistent mechanical or inflammatory insults.[2]At the cellular level, fibroblasts play a central role by proliferating and synthesizing extracellular matrix components, leading to fibrous tissue accumulation in types like peripheral ossifying fibroma.[2]Angiogenesis is prominent, particularly in vascular variants such as pyogenic granuloma, where endothelial cells form new capillaries amid proliferating fibroblasts.[2] Inflammatory cells, including lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages, infiltrate the lesion, sustaining the hyperplastic response through cytokine release and further recruitment of reparative elements.[2] In peripheral giant cell granuloma, multinucleated giant cells derived from fused macrophages contribute to the reactive milieu without neoplastic intent.[2]The development progresses through distinct stages: an initial inflammatory phase characterized by edema and immune cell influx in response to the stimulus; followed by granulation tissue formation, where vascular proliferation and fibroblast activity dominate; and culminating in maturation, where the lesion stabilizes as a fibrous, vascular, or ossified mass depending on the subtype and duration of irritation.[2] This maturation often involves collagen deposition and, in ossifying forms, calcification within the fibrous stroma.[17]Key molecular drivers include growth factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which promote angiogenesis and endothelial proliferation in vascular epulis types.[18] Cytokine-mediated pathways, such as RAS-PI3K-AKT-NF-κB signaling, enhance fibroblast survival and anti-apoptotic effects, while aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) upregulation sustains inflammation and hyperplasia.[2] These factors collectively orchestrate the localized tissue response without systemic involvement.[2]
Clinical Features
Signs and Symptoms
Epulis typically presents as a solitary, pedunculated or sessile nodule arising from the gingiva, often measuring 0.5 to 2 cm in diameter, with a firm or soft consistency depending on the degree of vascularity or fibrosis.[19] The surface may appear smooth, irregular, or ulcerated, and the color ranges from pink to red, reflecting underlying inflammation or vascular components.[14] These lesions are generally well-circumscribed and can vary in appearance based on subtype, such as more vascular features in certain forms.[20]Patients with epulis are usually asymptomatic, though the lesion may bleed easily upon probing or trauma, particularly if the surface is ulcerated.[19]Pain can occur in cases of ulceration or secondary infection, and larger growths may interfere with mastication, speech, or denture retention.[20]Epulis lesions predominantly occur on the interdental or marginal gingiva, with a preference for the anterior maxilla, though they rarely extend to the palate or tongue.[19] They exhibit slow progression over weeks to months, remaining benign in nature without rapid expansion in most instances.[14]
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of epulis encompasses various oral lesions that present as localized gingival swellings, necessitating careful clinical evaluation to distinguish benign reactive growths from malignant or infectious processes.[14] Key differentials include drug-induced gingival hyperplasia, which often manifests as diffuse, painless enlargement associated with medications like phenytoin or cyclosporine, contrasting with the more focal, pedunculated nature of epulis.[14]Squamous cell carcinoma may mimic epulis through ulceration and exophytic growth but typically exhibits induration, rapid progression, and irregular borders, unlike the softer, reactive texture of epulis.[2] Peripheral odontogenic fibroma presents as a firm, sessile mass with potential calcification, differing from epulis by its slower growth and radiographic evidence of bone involvement.[14] Abscesses, such as periodontal or gingival types, are characterized by acute pain, fluctuance, and pus discharge, setting them apart from the non-inflammatory, chronic presentation of epulis.[14]Lymphoma, particularly non-Hodgkin's, can appear as a rapidly enlarging, firm gingival mass with systemic symptoms like weight loss, unlike the localized, asymptomatic epulis.[2]Epulis is generally benign and reactive, often linked to chronic irritation from dental appliances or plaque, whereas carcinomas show indurated bases and potential lymphadenopathy, and infections like abscesses involve purulent drainage and tenderness.[2] A clinical approach begins with a thorough history to identify irritants favoring epulis or systemic factors suggesting malignancy, followed by examination of lesion characteristics such as color, consistency, and growth rate.[14] Rare mimics include parulis (gumboil), a focal swelling from periapical infection tied to non-vital teeth and accompanied by radiographic periapical radiolucency, and hemangioma, which displays a compressible, bluish vascular appearance that blanches under pressure, potentially mimicking vascular variants of epulis.[14]Biopsy remains essential for definitive confirmation in ambiguous cases.[2]
Types
Epulis Fissuratum
Epulis fissuratum, also known as denture-induced fibrous hyperplasia or inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia, is a benign reactive lesion characterized by pseudotumoral overgrowth of fibrous connective tissue in the oral mucosa, primarily resulting from chronic mechanical irritation caused by ill-fitting or overextended dentures.[12] This hyperplasia typically manifests as linear or nodular folds of tissue along the vestibular sulcus adjacent to the denture flanges, forming redundant, pseudopod-like projections that adapt to persistent pressure.[21] Unlike neoplastic growths, it represents a non-malignant response to low-grade trauma, with no involvement of bone or odontogenic structures.[22]Clinically, epulis fissuratum most commonly affects edentulous patients in the mandibular vestibule, where it presents as firm, fibrous folds that are soft and smooth to the touch, often with erythematous or ulcerated surfaces due to ongoing friction from the prosthesis.[23] These lesions are typically sessile and raised, occurring as single or multiple parallel bands alongside the alveolar ridge, and they may cause discomfort, interfere with denture retention, or lead to secondary infections if traumatized.[24] The condition is prevalent among older adults with long-term denture use, reflecting cumulative irritation over time.[25]Histologically, epulis fissuratum exhibits fibro-epithelial proliferation overlying dense, collagen-rich connective tissue with a chronic inflammatory infiltrate, including lymphocytes and plasma cells, but without osseous metaplasia or neoplastic features.[26] The epithelium may show hyperkeratosis or pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia in areas of irritation, while the underlying stroma demonstrates reparative fibrosis without vascular proliferation.[22]This lesion is particularly common in older adults with dentures, and it frequently resolves spontaneously or with conservative denture relining and adjustment to alleviate the source of irritation.[27][28]
Pyogenic granuloma, also known as granuloma pyogenicum, is a benign, reactive vascular lesion that commonly presents as a type of epulis in the oral cavity, particularly on the gingiva. It is characterized by a lobulated, friable mass with rapid growth, typically measuring 5-10 mm in diameter, exhibiting a bright red to purple coloration due to its vascular nature, and often exuding blood or serum upon minor trauma. The lesion's pedunculated or sessile base and tendency to ulcerate contribute to its friable appearance, making it prone to easy bleeding and frequent misdiagnosis as an infectious process despite the absence of true pyogenic bacteria.[29][30]The etiology of pyogenic granuloma involves local trauma or chronic bacterial irritation, such as from dental calculus or periodontal disease, which triggers an exaggerated angiogenic response in the granulation tissue. In pregnant individuals, a hormonal subtype known as pregnancy epulis or granuloma gravidarum arises, influenced by elevated estrogen and progesterone levels that promote vascular proliferation, often regressing spontaneously postpartum. This subtype frequently occurs on the anterior gingiva during the second or third trimester.[29][30][18]Histologically, pyogenic granuloma features endothelial cell proliferation forming lobular capillary hemangioma-like structures within a stroma of granulation tissue, accompanied by mixed inflammatory infiltrates including lymphocytes, plasma cells, and neutrophils, but lacking evidence of suppurative infection. The lesion is often surfaced by stratified squamous epithelium, which may be hyperkeratotic or ulcerated, with vascular channels lined by plump endothelial cells positive for markers such as CD31 and CD34.[29][30]As the most prevalent form of epulis, pyogenic granuloma accounts for approximately 30-40% of cases in various studies of gingival reactive lesions, with a notable recurrence rate of 15-17% if the underlying irritant persists or excision is incomplete. Its high frequency underscores the importance of addressing predisposing factors like poor oral hygiene to prevent regrowth.[31][4][30]
Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma
Peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF), formerly known as ossifying fibroid epulis, is a non-neoplastic reactive lesion arising from the gingival connective tissue, characterized by the presence of mineralized elements within a fibrous stroma. It typically presents as a firm, pedunculated or sessile nodule with a mineralized core, measuring 0.3 to 5 cm in diameter (mean approximately 1.3 cm), and exhibits a pink to red coloration depending on vascularity and surface ulceration. These lesions preferentially occur in interdental areas, particularly in the incisor-cuspid region of the gingiva, more common in the maxilla (about 60%) than the mandible. POF accounts for approximately 3-10% of gingival growths and can lead to tooth displacement due to its slow but progressive growth.[32][17][33]The pathogenesis of POF is considered reactive, often triggered by chronic irritation or trauma to the periodontal ligament or periosteum, such as from plaque accumulation, calculus, or ill-fitting dental appliances. It is hypothesized to originate from the periodontal ligament, leading to a hyperplastic response that matures over time to incorporate calcified tissues resembling bone or cementum-like material. Unlike the purely fibrous composition of fibromatous epulis, POF develops ossification, distinguishing it through this mineralization process.[32][17]Histologically, POF features a fibrous stroma composed of fibroblastic connective tissue with varying degrees of collagen fibers and chronic inflammatory infiltrates, such as lymphocytes and plasma cells, covered by stratified squamous epithelium. The hallmark is the presence of calcified structures in 23-75% of cases, including trabecular woven or lamellar bone, cementum-like formations, and dystrophic calcifications, which may appear as psammoma-like bodies in some variants. These mineralized elements are randomly distributed and increase with lesion maturity.[32][17]POF predominantly affects young adults, with a peak incidence in the second and third decades of life (mean age around 20-40 years), though cases have been reported across a wide age range from childhood to elderly. There is a notable female predominance, potentially influenced by hormonal factors, and it represents about 1-3% of all oral biopsies submitted for pathologic examination.[32][17][33]
Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma
Peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG), also known as giant cell epulis, is a reactive, non-neoplastic lesion characterized by the proliferation of multinucleated giant cells within the gingival or alveolar mucosa.[34] Clinically, it presents as a firm, sessile or pedunculated mass, often exhibiting a purplish-blue or reddish-purple coloration due to its vascularity and hemorrhage.[34] The lesion typically measures 0.5 to 2 cm in diameter, though larger sizes exceeding 5 cm have been reported in cases associated with poor oral hygiene or xerostomia.[34] It predominantly arises on the anterior gingiva, particularly in the mandibular incisor-canine region, and may cause superficial bone erosion, appearing as a cup-shaped radiolucency on radiographs without deep invasion.[34]The etiology of PGCG is linked to local chronicirritation, trauma, or hemorrhage, often triggered by factors such as dental plaque, calculus accumulation, or ill-fitting prostheses, leading to a hyperplastic response rather than a true neoplastic process.[34] It accounts for approximately 10% of all epulides and shows a female predominance with a 2:1 ratio compared to males, typically affecting individuals in the third to fourth decades of life, though cases occur across a wide age range from childhood to elderly.[35][36]Histologically, PGCG consists of a non-encapsulated mass of fibroangiomatous stroma containing numerous osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells scattered among ovoid or fusiform mesenchymal cells, with prominent vascular channels, areas of hemorrhage, and hemosiderin deposits contributing to its pigmented appearance.[37] Fibrous elements may vary from loose to dense, and inflammatory infiltrates are common, distinguishing it from central giant cell granuloma by its exclusive peripheral location and lack of deeper bony involvement.[37] Unlike peripheral ossifying fibroma, PGCG emphasizes hemorrhagic and giant cell features without significant calcified or osseous components.[34]Recurrence rates for PGCG range from 10% to 15%, primarily attributed to incomplete surgical excision that fails to address the base or underlying irritants, necessitating thorough removal of the lesion and periosteum for prevention.[38][39]
Fibromatous Epulis
Fibromatous epulis, also synonymous with gingival fibroma, represents a benign reactive overgrowth of fibrous connective tissue in the gingiva, characterized as a firm, non-ulcerated, rubbery nodule that develops slowly over time.[2] These lesions typically measure 0.5-1.5 cm in diameter and are often asymptomatic, presenting as smooth, sessile or pedunculated masses matching the surrounding gingival color, commonly located in interdental areas of the maxilla.[2][40]The pathogenesis involves chronic irritation from local factors such as dental plaque, calculus, or trauma, which stimulates fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis without significant vascular proliferation or osseous components.[2][40] This reactive process leads to hyperplastic fibrous tissue formation, occasionally influenced by hormonal factors that enhance fibroblast activity in susceptible individuals.[2]Histologically, fibromatous epulis features dense bundles of collagen fibers arranged in a haphazard or radiating pattern, with minimal inflammatory cell infiltration and an overlying layer of stratified squamous epithelium that is typically keratinized.[2][40] The connective tissue stroma shows variable cellularity but lacks prominent vascularity, giant cells, or calcifications, distinguishing it from ossifying variants.[2]These lesions frequently arise in regions prone to mechanical trauma, such as areas of poor oral hygiene or prosthetic irritation, and exhibit a low recurrence rate of approximately 9.55% following complete surgical excision, provided underlying irritants are addressed.[2][40] Fibromatous epulis is sometimes classified under the broader category of inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia due to its reactive nature.[2]
Congenital Epulis
Congenital epulis, also known as congenital granular cell epulis (CGCE), is a rare benign tumor that presents at birth as a firm, pedunculated or sessile mass arising from the alveolar ridge, most commonly in the maxilla.[41] It typically measures 1-2 cm in diameter, though sizes up to 9 cm have been reported, and features a smooth, pink surface without ulceration in most cases.[42] The lesion is evident immediately after birth, having developed prenatally, often during the third trimester, and does not cause discomfort to the newborn unless it interferes with feeding or respiration.[42] Unlike reactive epulides in adults, it exhibits no surface erosion or inflammation at presentation.[41]The etiology of congenital epulis remains uncertain, with proposed origins including a hamartomatous or neoplastic proliferation of granular cells derived from mesenchymal or possibly Schwann cell precursors.[43] It shows a marked female predominance, with ratios ranging from 8:1 to 10:1, potentially influenced by maternal hormones during gestation.[42] The tumor is exclusively neonatal, with no known association to syndromes or genetic defects, and arises almost three times more frequently in the maxilla than the mandible.[42] Approximately 10% of cases present as multiple lesions involving both jaws, though solitary occurrence is far more common.[41]Histologically, congenital epulis consists of sheets or nests of large polygonal cells with abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm and small, eccentric, bland nuclei, lacking significant mitotic activity or atypia.[41] The granular cytoplasm results from lysosomal accumulation, and the lesion is supported by a vascular fibrous stroma without odontogenic elements in most instances.[42] Immunohistochemically, the cells are positive for vimentin and variably for neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in about 40% of cases, but typically negative for S-100, cytokeratins, and CD68, distinguishing it from adult granular cell tumors.[42]Proliferation indices, such as Ki-67 (11-17%) and PCNA (15-33%), indicate low cellular turnover consistent with its benign nature.[41]Management focuses on conservative observation for small, asymptomatic lesions, as spontaneous regression occurs in some cases postnatally, particularly if the mass is under 1 cm.[43] Surgical excision is indicated for larger tumors that impair nursing or cause airway obstruction, performed via simple en bloc removal with minimal margins to preserve developing dentition.[41] No adjunctive therapies are required, and the procedure carries low risk in neonates. The prognosis is excellent, with no reported recurrences or malignant transformations following treatment or observation.[42]
Diagnosis
Clinical Examination
The clinical examination of suspected epulis begins with a detailed history taking to identify key risk factors and contextualize the lesion's presentation. Patients are queried regarding the duration of the lesion, which often spans months to years with slow progression, though rapid onset within weeks may occur in response to acute irritation. Growth rate is assessed, as gradual enlargement is typical, but accelerated growth raises concern for underlying pathology. Symptoms such as pain, which is uncommon unless secondary to trauma or ulceration, and bleeding, particularly upon manipulation or during oral hygiene, are elicited; functional issues like interference with mastication, speech, or aesthetics may also be reported. Dental history includes evaluation for local irritants such as plaque accumulation, calculus, faulty restorations, orthodontic appliances, or trauma from brushing, as well as the presence of ill-fitting dentures, which can induce chronic mechanical stress. Hormonal status is explored, noting associations with pregnancy or puberty due to elevated estrogen and progesterone levels exacerbating gingival reactivity to irritants.[2][14][44]Physical examination proceeds with thorough intraoral inspection under adequate lighting to characterize the lesion's morphology. The size is noted, ranging from a few millimeters to several centimeters, rarely exceeding 3 cm, with pedunculated or sessile attachment to the gingiva. Color varies from pink matching the surrounding mucosa to red or erythematous, potentially with surface ulceration in irritated cases. The lesion's location is documented, most commonly on the maxillary anterior gingiva or interdental papillae, with assessment of gingival involvement, often graded by extent (localized versus diffuse) and proximity to teeth or restorations. Oral hygiene is evaluated concurrently, identifying plaque or calculus deposits that may contribute to lesion persistence, alongside denture fit in edentulous patients to detect pressure areas or flanges causing hyperplasia.[2][14][44]Palpation follows inspection, using gloved fingers to assess texture and behavior without causing undue discomfort. Consistency is probed, typically firm and fibrous but potentially soft and vascular in reactive forms, with resilience noted upon compression. Mobility is evaluated; lesions are generally fixed to the underlying tissue, though subtle mobility may indicate deeper involvement. Tenderness is gauged during manipulation, usually absent but present if inflamed or secondarily infected. Extraoral examination includes palpation of submandibular and cervical lymph nodes for enlargement, which is atypical but warrants further investigation if detected. Site-specific considerations include bimanual palpation for mandibular lesions to assess lingual extension and bone involvement.[2][14][44]Red flags during examination prompt urgent referral, including rapid growth over weeks, induration or hardening on palpation suggesting infiltrative processes, persistent ulceration unresponsive to hygiene measures, spontaneous bleeding, paresthesia, or associated tooth mobility indicating possible malignancy or aggressive neoplasm. These findings necessitate exclusion of metastatic disease or primary oral carcinoma, particularly in patients with a history of systemic illness or prior malignancy. Comprehensive documentation of these elements guides the provisional diagnosis and informs subsequent diagnostic steps.[2][44][14]
Imaging and Biopsy
Imaging plays a supportive role in the diagnosis of epulis, primarily to assess for bone involvement or extension, though most lesions lack distinctive radiographic features. Periapical radiographs are commonly used to evaluate superficial bone changes, such as erosion or cup-shaped resorption observed in peripheral giant cell granuloma variants.[2] Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is recommended when deep tissue invasion is suspected, providing detailed three-dimensional views of bone defects, as seen in cases of aggressive bone loss associated with pregnancy epulis or peripheral ossifying fibroma.[45]Ultrasound, particularly with Doppler, aids in assessing vascularity, revealing feeding vessels in highly vascular lesions like congenital epulis, which helps differentiate from less vascular overgrowths.[46]Biopsy is essential for confirmatory diagnosis of epulis, typically performed as an excisional or incisional procedure under local anesthesia to obtain tissue for histopathological analysis. Excisional biopsy is preferred for smaller, accessible lesions, allowing complete removal while minimizing recurrence risk, whereas incisional biopsy is reserved for larger or suspicious masses to avoid excessive trauma.[47] Care must be taken during the procedure to minimize manipulation of vascular components, as lesions like pyogenic granuloma can exhibit significant bleeding upon disruption.[48]Histopathological examination provides definitive confirmation, distinguishing reactive hyperplastic epulis from neoplastic processes through characteristic microscopic features without cellular atypia. Benign epulis subtypes show organized granulation tissue, fibrous stroma, or multinucleated giant cells in a vascular background, with no mitotic activity or pleomorphism to differentiate from sarcomas.[2] For congenital epulis, histopathology reveals sheets of large polygonal granular cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, confirmed by immunohistochemical stains such as vimentin (positive) and CD68 (weakly positive), aiding in ruling out malignant granular cell tumors.[49] Overall, these findings underscore the reactive nature of epulis, with pathology serving as the gold standard for subtype classification and exclusion of malignancy.[50]
Management and Treatment
Conservative Approaches
Conservative approaches to managing epulis are primarily indicated for small, asymptomatic lesions where reversible irritants, such as ill-fitting dentures or plaque accumulation, can be addressed without surgery. These methods aim to eliminate the underlying cause, promoting lesion regression while minimizing patient discomfort and risk. For epulis fissuratum, which often arises from chronic denture trauma, initial treatment focuses on prosthetic adjustments like relining or tissue conditioning to redistribute pressure and allow tissuerecovery.[16][51]Improved oral hygiene forms a cornerstone of conservative management, particularly for irritant-related epulis such as pyogenic granuloma. This includes professional scaling, root planing, and plaque control to reduce gingival inflammation and local trauma, which can lead to lesion stabilization or resolution. For vascular subtypes like pyogenic granuloma, laser therapy—using modalities such as pulsed dye or diode lasers—provides a targeted, non-excisional option to coagulate abnormal vessels and shrink the lesion with minimal bleeding. In pregnancy-associated epulis, hormonal management involves observation, as elevated estrogen and progesterone levels contribute to development, and lesions frequently regress postpartum without intervention.[52][29][53]Topical agents, including corticosteroids, are rarely used due to inconsistent efficacy and potential for systemic absorption in oral sites. Success rates for irritant-related cases vary with prompt irritant removal and hygiene optimization, though persistent lesions may require escalation. Patients undergoing conservative management should receive follow-up evaluations every 3-6 months to monitor progress and ensure no malignant transformation. Spontaneous resolution can occur in pyogenic granuloma cases, especially those tied to pregnancy or transient irritants.[29][54][53]
Surgical Interventions
Surgical interventions represent the definitive treatment for epulis lesions that persist despite conservative measures or cause significant symptoms such as bleeding, pain, or functional impairment. The standard procedure involves complete excision of the lesion using a scalpel or laser under local anesthesia, typically performed on an outpatient basis. Excision is carried out with 2-3 mm margins beyond the visible lesion edges to ensure removal of the base, including the underlying periosteum or periodontal ligament, followed by curettage of the adjacent bone or soft tissue to eliminate any residual irritants or proliferative cells.[2] This approach minimizes recurrence by addressing the reactive etiology, with healing generally occurring within 2-4 weeks and primary closure achieved through suturing or natural approximation.[2]For ossifying variants, such as peripheral ossifying fibroma, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap is often raised to access and excise the lesion down to bone, incorporating peripheral ostectomy or bone smoothing if calcified material extends into the alveolar cortex.[55] In vascular types like pyogenic granuloma, electrocautery or laser coagulation (e.g., CO2 or diodelaser) is employed during excision to control intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, given the lesion's rich vascularity.[29]Laser-assisted excision offers advantages including reduced hemorrhage, precise margins, and accelerated wound healing compared to traditional scalpel methods.[2]Adjunctive measures are tailored to the lesion's impact on surrounding structures. Postoperatively, denture modification or relining is essential to eliminate chronic irritation, alongside thorough scaling and root planing to remove plaque and calculus, thereby reducing recurrence rates to as low as 2-10% with proper follow-up.[2]
Prognosis
Outcomes and Recurrence
The prognosis for epulis is generally excellent, as these lesions are benign and respond well to treatment.[4] This high success rate applies particularly to common subtypes such as fibromatous epulis and peripheral giant cellgranuloma, where thorough removal of the lesion and underlying irritants minimizes residual tissue that could lead to regrowth.[4]Recurrence rates for epulis range from 5% to 15% overall, though they can reach up to 20% in cases of peripheral giant cell granuloma or pyogenic granuloma if local irritants like plaque or dental trauma persist post-treatment.[3] Factors influencing recurrence include incomplete excision and ongoing irritation, with studies showing higher rates in lesions associated with hormonal changes, such as those during pregnancy.[56] In contrast, congenital epulis demonstrates near-100% success with surgical intervention, exhibiting no recurrence even after incomplete removal due to its unique biological behavior.[57]Post-treatment follow-up typically involves clinical examinations at 1, 3, and 6 months to monitor for recurrence, with long-term periodic checks recommended given the low but persistent risk.[3]Malignant transformation is extremely rare across all epulis subtypes. Early intervention significantly enhances outcomes by preventing lesion progression and reducing recurrence potential through prompt excision before extensive tissue involvement.[4]
Complications
Epulis lesions can lead to several local complications due to their growth and location on the gingival mucosa. In fibromatous and other reactive types, progressive enlargement may cause tooth mobility by exerting pressure on adjacent periodontal structures, particularly when associated with underlying periodontitis.[4]Malocclusion can occur if the lesion interferes with normal occlusion, leading to functional disorders such as difficulty in chewing and speech.[4] Secondary infections are possible, especially if the lesion ulcerates or traps food debris, exacerbating gingival inflammation and bleeding.[4] In cases of large congenital epulis, prenatal complications may include polyhydramnios from impaired amniotic fluidswallowing due to oral obstruction, potentially triggering preterm labor; postnatally, these lesions can cause feeding difficulties, respiratory distress, and nutritional deficits by hindering mouth closure and breastfeeding.[58]Treatment of epulis, primarily through surgical excision, introduces additional risks. Vascular variants, such as pyogenic granuloma, are prone to postoperative bleeding due to their highly vascular nature, often requiring electrocautery or hemostatic measures during removal.[29] Scarring may develop at the excision site, potentially affecting gingival aesthetics or contour, though oral mucosa typically heals with minimal fibrosis.[51] Nerve injury is rare but can occur in excisions near sensory branches like the mental nerve, leading to temporary numbness or paresthesia.[59] For patients with epulis fissuratum related to ill-fitting dentures, postoperative changes such as vestibular shortening or alveolar bone atrophy may impair denture stability and tolerance.[51]Rare complications include incomplete excision resulting in lesion regrowth, with recurrence rates varying by subtype (e.g., up to 17% for pyogenic granuloma).[29] Misdiagnosis of epulis as a malignancy, such as squamous cell carcinoma or sarcoma, can delay appropriate intervention and heighten patient anxiety, underscoring the need for biopsy confirmation.[60]Most complications can be minimized through thorough removal of irritants like plaque or calculus prior to treatment and regular follow-up care.[4]