Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Extreme Associates


Extreme Associates, Inc. is a California-based adult film production company owned by Robert Zicari (professionally known as Rob Black) and Janet Romano (professionally known as Lizzy Borden), specializing in the creation and distribution of featuring depictions of extreme , degradation, and simulated non-consensual acts. The company marketed its content through a website offering video sales via mail and downloadable clips to paid members, emphasizing gonzo-style production with minimal narrative and high intensity.
Extreme Associates achieved notoriety primarily through its confrontation with federal obscenity laws, culminating in the 2003 indictment United States v. Extreme Associates, where it was charged with conspiracy and distributing obscene materials interstate via mail and the internet under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1461 and 1465. The defendants mounted a challenge, arguing that prohibitions infringe on private rights akin to those in , but the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected this extension to commercial distribution in 2005, reinstating the charges. Following further proceedings, Zicari and Romano entered conditional guilty pleas in 2009, receiving one-year prison sentences, which affirmed the constitutionality of targeted enforcement against commercial purveyors while highlighting tensions between First Amendment protections and community standards. The case underscored the company's defining characteristic: producing boundary-pushing content that tested legal limits on explicit material, influencing debates on regulation without overturning established precedents like .

Founding and Operations

Establishment and Early Development

Extreme Associates, Inc., a corporation, was established and operated by Robert Zicari, professionally known as Rob Black, and Janet Romano, professionally known as , from its North Hollywood offices. The company focused on producing and distributing films, emphasizing gonzo-style content that featured intense and boundary-pushing sexual acts. Early operations involved low-budget , with facilitated through a publicly accessible website and direct mail orders across state lines. In its formative period, Extreme Associates differentiated itself within the adult industry by prioritizing material that incorporated elements of , , and simulated non-consensual scenarios, content that elicited strong reactions even from peers in pornography production. This approach stemmed from the founders' intent to challenge conventional limits in adult , building on Zicari's prior experience in video . The company's output quickly garnered a niche following while drawing scrutiny for its explicit depictions, setting the stage for later legal confrontations.

Business Model and Distribution

Extreme Associates functioned as an independent producer of low-budget, high-volume gonzo-style , targeting a with extreme themes that mainstream competitors avoided. The company aimed to release two films per week, emphasizing cost efficiency in production to maximize output without reliance on high-end sets or extensive marketing budgets. Distribution occurred primarily through wholesale channels, supplying videotapes and DVDs to bookstores and distributors across the , which served as the main retail outlets for their content. Less controversial titles reached these seedy, age-restricted stores, aligning with the company's exclusion from mainstream retailers due to content intensity and industry affiliations like VCA. For particularly graphic material, such as the film Forced Entry, sales were restricted to direct-to-consumer methods via the company's or orders, deliberately avoiding broader video availability to control access and underscore the content's provocative nature. This dual approach catered to a dedicated unwilling to compromise on elements, generating revenue streams insulated from conventional porn distribution networks. By March 2006, Extreme Associates expanded into third-party distribution, securing exclusive U.S. rights for Shots Video Netherlands' catalog, including series like Men's Lounge and Bi Sex, amid a broader industry shift toward diversified wholesale partnerships. The model sustained financial viability into the mid-2000s, funding ancillary ventures like Rob Black's wrestling promotion XPW, though it faced challenges from declining DVD sales post-2005.

Content Characteristics

Core Themes and Production Style

Extreme Associates' films centered on themes of , simulated non-consensual acts, and degradation, often portraying female performers in scenarios involving fantasies, , and elements where characters are depicted as murdered during or after sexual encounters. Specific titles like Forced Entry (2002) featured simulated home invasions with and stabbing sequences inspired by real serial killers, while series such as Cocktail and Ass Clowns incorporated drug-fueled degradation and multiple-partner abuse, emphasizing male dominance and without narrative redemption. These themes were defended by founders Rob Black and as fictional fantasies catering to niche audiences seeking boundary-pushing intensity, distinct from mainstream pornography's softer dynamics. The production style adhered to gonzo pornography conventions, employing handheld cameras for immersive, documentary-like footage that minimized scripting and editing to heighten raw authenticity and viewer proximity to the action. Low-budget shoots blended hardcore sex with slasher-horror tropes, such as improvised violence and performer-driven improvisation, often resulting in unpolished visuals that prioritized shock value over polished aesthetics. Directors Black and Borden oversaw this approach, staging scenes to evoke real-time chaos—e.g., apparent performer resistance or walkouts—while ensuring all acts were pre-negotiated and consensual among adult participants, though the final product blurred lines between performance and peril to amplify extremity. This method distinguished Extreme Associates from plot-heavy studio productions, aligning with gonzo's emphasis on immediacy but escalating it through taboo integrations like mock executions.

Notable Films and Series

Extreme Associates is recognized for producing gonzo-style adult films emphasizing , often violent, and themes, with several long-running series forming the core of its catalog. Key series include Whack Attack, featuring intense anal and group scenes; Extreme Teen, focusing on younger performers in explicit encounters; Cock Smokers, centered on acts; Lord of Asses, highlighting anal penetration; and Ass Clowns, incorporating thematic elements of degradation and rough play. These series spanned multiple volumes, with Extreme Teen alone extending to at least 38 installments by 2005. Among individual films, Forced Entry (2002), directed by Lizzie Borden and produced by Rob Zicari, stands out for its narrative simulating serial killings, rapes, and murders in a horror-themed format, starring performers such as Jewel De'Nyle and Taylor St. Clair. The film's director's cut was cited in federal obscenity investigations for depicting fictional violence including strangulation, beatings, and urination alongside sexual acts. Other notable titles include Extreme Teen #24, part of the teen-oriented series, and Tiffany Mynx: Rest in Peace (1999), a compilation emphasizing humiliation and extreme acts with the titular performer. Additional productions like Black Cocksmokers 2 (2000) and Extreme Brazil 4 (2000) gained attention for interracial and international themes, respectively, within the company's boundary-pushing style. These works contributed to Extreme Associates' reputation for unfiltered content, often distributed via DVD and later digital formats.

Key Personnel

Founders and Primary Directors

Extreme Associates was founded by Robert Zicari, professionally known as Rob Black, who launched the company after working as a for . His wife, Janet Romano, known professionally as Lizzy Borden, served as co-owner and contributed significantly to its operations. The company emerged in amid a split from prior industry affiliations, focusing on independent production of content. Zicari, born August 5, 1974, acted as the primary and , overseeing the of characterized by gonzo-style explicitness and simulated . Romano, born December 20, 1976, also directed multiple titles, including those emphasizing extreme themes, while performing in various productions. Together, they managed the North Hollywood-based entity, which distributed videos through and platforms until legal challenges curtailed operations. No other individuals are prominently documented as primary directors during the company's active period.

Performers and Contributors

Extreme Associates' productions prominently featured its founders, Rob Black (Robert Zicari) and Lizzy Borden (Janet Romano-Zicari), who doubled as performers in addition to their directing and producing roles. Rob Black appeared as an actor in films like Forced Entry (2002), portraying a role in the narrative alongside cast members including as Victim #1, Taylor St. Clair as Victim #2, and as the killer. Lizzy Borden, active as a performer from the late , contributed to the company's output through on-screen roles in extreme-themed content, often aligning with her directorial style emphasizing hardcore scenarios. Veteran adult film actor served as an early performer and co-founder affiliate, participating in the company's initial breakout from in 1998 alongside Rob Black, , and Van Damage. Byron's involvement helped establish Extreme Associates' and intense production ethos. Heather Gables emerged as a notable recurring performer, starring in multiple titles such as Extreme Teen 37 (circa 2005), which included scenes with co-stars like Bianca Pureheart and Chanel Chavez, highlighting the company's focus on youthful, high-intensity vignettes. Other frequent contributors included actresses like and Taylor St. Clair, who appeared in key releases amid the company's catalog of over 100 titles emphasizing anal, gangbang, and violent-themed content. Performers often navigated the risks of extreme acts, with some crew and cast walking off sets during production of controversial films due to content intensity.

Federal Indictment (2003)

On August 6, 2003, a in the Western District of returned a ten-count against Extreme Associates, Inc., its Robert W. Zicari (known professionally as Rob Black), and vice president Janet Romano (known as ), charging them with and substantive offenses related to the of obscene materials. The first count alleged under 18 U.S.C. § 371 to commit offenses against the by distributing obscene matter. Counts two through ten charged interstate transportation of obscene matter for sale and , in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462, and aiding and abetting under 18 U.S.C. § 2. The charges focused on the company's sale and distribution of hardcore adult videos via its website and U.S. mail, which depicted graphic simulated violence including , , mutilation, and murder during sexual acts. Prosecutors contended these materials lacked serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value and appealed to prurient interest under the test, appealing primarily to an average person's contemporary community standards for patently offensive depictions of sexual conduct. The indictment emphasized that such content was mailed and shipped across state lines from the company's Northridge, California, location, targeting a national audience despite local variations in community standards. This action followed a executed by federal agents at Extreme Associates' Los Angeles-area premises in April 2003, which uncovered of widespread interstate . The case marked the first significant federal prosecution of an adult video distributor in over a decade, reflecting the U.S. Department of Justice's revived enforcement priorities under Attorney General amid concerns over the proliferation of extreme pornography enabled by lax 1990s prosecutions. Zicari and Romano faced potential penalties including fines and up to five years' imprisonment per count if convicted. The venue in was justified by the effects of the within that district, overriding the defendants' arguments for .

Court Rulings and Appeals (2004–2005)

In January 2005, the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted Extreme Associates' motion to dismiss the indictment, ruling that the federal obscenity statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 1461–1465) were unconstitutional as applied to the defendants' distribution of materials to consenting adults for private consumption in the home. The court, presided over by Judge Gary L. Lancaster, extended the Supreme Court's privacy protections from Stanley v. Georgia (1969)—which shielded private possession of obscene materials—to commercial interstate distribution, arguing that prohibiting such sales burdened the recipient's fundamental right to receive information without sufficient justification under substantive due process. This decision dismissed all ten counts, including nine for mailing and interstate transport of obscene matter and one for conspiracy, without reaching the question of whether the specific films met the Miller v. California (1973) obscenity test. The Department of Justice announced its intent to appeal the dismissal on February 16, 2005, contending that the ruling improperly equated distribution with private possession and undermined longstanding precedents affirming Congress's authority to regulate obscene materials beyond the home. On December 8, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the district court in a unanimous opinion (United States v. Extreme Associates, Inc., 431 F.3d 150), holding that federal obscenity laws do not infringe on any recognized privacy right in receiving such materials, as obscenity lacks First Amendment protection and the statutes target harmful commercial conduct rather than mere possession. The appellate panel, comprising Judges Franklin S. Van Antwerpen, D. Brooks Smith, and , emphasized that Stanley protects only against state intrusion into the home, not against federal prohibitions on interstate distribution, and remanded the case for trial on the obscenity elements under Miller. This reversal reaffirmed the constitutionality of the challenged statutes, rejecting the district court's novel extension of privacy doctrine as unsupported by precedent.

Guilty Plea and Sentencing (2009)

In March 2009, Robert Zicari (known professionally as Rob Black) and Janet Romano (known as Lizzie Borden), owners of Extreme Associates, pleaded guilty in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to a single count of conspiracy to distribute obscene materials in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The plea resolved a federal obscenity case initiated in 2003, following the company's distribution of videos via mail and its website that depicted simulated acts of extreme violence, rape, torture, and murder during sexual encounters. Under the agreement, the couple admitted to mailing obscene videotapes to an undercover postal inspector in Pittsburgh and operating a website that facilitated interstate distribution of such content, though they maintained that the materials were protected speech for consenting adults. On July 1, 2009, U.S. District Judge Gary L. Lancaster Jr. sentenced Zicari and Romano each to one year and one day in , below the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines' recommendation of up to 27 months. The sentences included two years of supervised release to follow incarceration, during which the defendants were barred from producing or distributing any materials deemed obscene under , as well as a requirement to register as sex offenders in upon release. Zicari's argued at sentencing that his client had reformed, citing a shift away from extreme content production, though prosecutors emphasized the materials' potential to harm community standards of decency. The couple, then aged 35 and 32 respectively, began serving their terms shortly thereafter, marking the first for internet-distributed video in over a .

Industry Impact and Recognition

Awards and Industry Standing

Extreme Associates received limited formal recognition from major adult industry award bodies, primarily in and anal-themed categories during its early years. The studio won the Award for Best Scene—Video in 2000 for the scene featuring Anastasia Blue and in Whack Attack 6. It secured the same category in 2001 for a scene from In the Days of Whore. Performers affiliated with the studio also garnered , including Best Group Sex Scene in 2001 for In the Days of Whore.
YearAwardCategoryFilm/SceneSource
2000Best Scene—VideoWhack Attack 6 (Anastasia Blue & )
2001Best Scene—VideoIn the Days of Whore
2001XRCOBest SceneIn the Days of Whore
Despite these niche wins, Extreme Associates maintained a marginal standing within the broader adult entertainment industry, often viewed as an outlier due to its emphasis on violent, degradation-focused content that alienated mainstream producers and distributors. Founders Rob Black (Robert Zicari) and Janet Romano positioned the company as a provocateur against industry norms, prioritizing unfiltered styles over polished aesthetics, which earned followings but few additional accolades post-2001. Legal entanglements, including a 2003 federal , further isolated the studio from industry events and partnerships, diminishing its influence amid shifting preferences toward more sanitized productions. By the late 2000s, following guilty pleas in , Extreme's output and visibility waned, with recognition confined to retrospective discussions of its role in boundary-pushing subgenres rather than ongoing prestige.

Influence on Adult Entertainment

Extreme Associates contributed to the evolution of by producing content that emphasized unscripted, performer-led scenes incorporating simulated violence, degradation, and elements, such as mock and simulations, which intensified the raw, documentary-style format pioneered in the 1980s by directors like . Founded in 1998 by Rob Zicari (stage name ) and Janet Romano (), the company released over 200 titles by the mid-2000s, targeting a niche seeking material beyond , thereby helping define "extreme " as a subgenre distinguished by its provocation and boundary-pushing aesthetics. However, this stylistic approach garnered limited emulation due to its association with legal peril rather than innovation, as evidenced by the reluctance of larger studios to adopt similar intensities amid rising . The company's most significant industry impact stemmed from its 2003 federal —the first major such case in over a —which scrutinized 10 specific videos for lacking serious artistic, literary, political, or scientific value under the test. The 2005 appeals court ruling upholding the prosecution's validity, followed by Zicari and Romano's 2009 guilty pleas and one-year prison sentences, effectively shuttered operations and deterred producers of comparable content. This precedent spurred subsequent federal actions against figures like Paul Little () and influenced , with many studios toning down depictions of violence or humiliation to evade community standards challenges. Industry-wide, Extreme Associates operated as a marginal entity, achieving financial viability through sales and website distribution but facing ; peers withheld legal defense funding, viewing the content as aberrantly risky rather than paradigmatic. While it heightened awareness of First Amendment limits in adult production, the fallout reinforced a on extreme content creation, prioritizing compliance over escalation and contributing to a fragmented market where such material persists underground or abroad rather than shaping mainstream trends.

Controversies and Broader Debates

Obscenity Law and First Amendment Challenges

In 2003, Extreme Associates, Inc., along with proprietors Robert Zicari (known as Rob Black) and Janet Romano (known as ), was indicted in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of on multiple counts of mailing and transporting materials in interstate commerce, violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1461, 1462, 1465, and 1466. The charges stemmed from the distribution of videos such as Cocktails, Hand Grenades and Other Party Essentials, Forced Entry, and Extreme Teen #13, which prosecutors alleged depicted extreme violence, rape, and murder fantasies lacking redeeming value. Defendants mounted a and as-applied challenge to the statutes' constitutionality, contending they infringed First Amendment protections for speech and an implied in private sexual expression among consenting adults. On November 18, 2004, District Judge Gary L. Lancaster Jr. dismissed the indictment, ruling the obscenity statutes unconstitutional as applied. Invoking the right to privacy from Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972), Stanley v. Georgia (1969)—which protects private possession of obscene materials—and especially Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which invalidated sodomy laws as invading personal liberty in intimate conduct, the court held that no compelling government interest justified regulating obscene materials distributed to and consumed by willing adults in private. Lancaster reasoned that distribution to subscribers constituted an extension of private viewing, absent harm to minors or unwilling viewers, and that the statutes failed strict scrutiny by overbroadly criminalizing protected expressive conduct without narrow tailoring. This marked the first federal district court invalidation of obscenity laws on privacy grounds post-Lawrence. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed on December 8, 2005, in United States v. Extreme Associates, Inc., 431 F.3d 150, reaffirming obscenity's categorical exclusion from First Amendment protection under (1957) and (1973). The panel, per Judge , distinguished as addressing consensual sexual conduct, not commercial distribution of materials promoting antisocial violence or lacking serious value, and noted the Supreme Court's repeated refusal to extend privacy rights to obscenity dissemination. It upheld the test—requiring material to appeal to prurient interest, depict sexual conduct patently offensively, and lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, judged by contemporary community standards—as constitutional, rejecting defendants' calls to supplant it with a national standard or heightened scrutiny. The ruling clarified that while private possession remains shielded (Stanley), pandering and interstate transport for profit fall outside protections, preserving states' and Congress's authority to proscribe to safeguard public morals without First Amendment violation. Subsequent proceedings underscored ongoing First Amendment tensions in obscenity enforcement, as defendants continued arguing the Miller framework's vagueness and subjectivity chilled protected speech depicting extreme fantasies as artistic provocation. In 2007, the district court denied motions to dismiss based on these claims, mandating jury determination of obscenity under Miller prongs applied to specific works, while rejecting broader invalidation. The case's trajectory—culminating in guilty pleas on August 7, 2009, without full trial—reinforced judicial deference to legislative obscenity bans but fueled critiques that such laws enable viewpoint discrimination against non-mainstream erotica, potentially undermining expressive liberty for content producers targeting niche adult audiences. Critics, including defense counsel, contended the rulings perpetuated a post-hoc moralistic carve-out from free speech doctrines, though appellate affirmation aligned with precedents prioritizing societal standards over individual privacy in commercial contexts.

Criticisms from Moral and Feminist Perspectives

Critics from moral and conservative perspectives have characterized Extreme Associates' output as emblematic of profound societal decay, featuring simulated acts of rape, torture, and murder that exceed mere titillation to embody "the depths of human depravity." In a 2006 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on prosecutions, Senator highlighted the company's films as "the most vile sort of ," arguing they foster addiction, family dissolution, and elevated criminal tendencies by eroding communal ethical standards and individual restraint. Such views align with the 1986 Attorney General's Commission on , which prioritized prosecuting materials endorsing violence or degradation, positing that widespread exposure normalizes antisocial behaviors without redeeming social value. From feminist standpoints, particularly those of radical anti- advocates, Extreme Associates' productions exemplify how perpetuates women's subordination by equating sex with dominance and harm, serving as both a reflection and driver of misogynistic structures. Catharine MacKinnon has contended that such content institutionalizes by merging with , while described depictions of heterosexual intercourse in porn as inherently reinforcing male entitlement to brutalize women. Applied to Extreme's gonzo-style films, which include graphic simulations of non-consensual acts and degradation, critics assert these materials cultivate viewer attitudes conducive to real-world and , with one analysis framing them as promoting " and in viewers" through unflinching portrayals of female humiliation. These arguments, often rooted in qualitative assessments of cultural impact rather than uniform empirical causation—given mixed evidence on pornography's direct link to aggression—emphasize the genre's role in degrading female participants and audiences alike.

Defenses and Free Speech Arguments

The primary legal defense mounted by Extreme Associates, Inc., proprietors Robert Zicari (known as Rob Black) and Janet Romano (known as Lizzie Borden), challenged the constitutionality of federal obscenity statutes under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1461 and 1465, asserting they violated substantive due process rights to privacy derived from the Fifth Amendment. Drawing on Stanley v. Georgia (394 U.S. 557, 1969), which affirmed a private right to possess obscene materials in one's home, the defense contended that distribution via mail and Internet—intended solely for private, consensual adult consumption—impinged on this fundamental liberty interest, akin to protections in Griswold v. Connecticut (381 U.S. 479, 1965) and Lawrence v. Texas (539 U.S. 558, 2003). They argued that Lawrence undermined the moral underpinnings of obscenity laws by rejecting state intrusion into private sexual conduct between consenting adults, rendering the statutes overbroad when applied to non-public transactions. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania initially dismissed the indictment on these grounds on January 27, 2005, but the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed on December 8, 2005, holding that Supreme Court precedents like United States v. Reidel (402 U.S. 351, 1971) and United States v. Orito (413 U.S. 139, 1973) explicitly permitted regulation of obscene material distribution, distinguishing it from mere private possession. Free speech arguments supplemented the privacy claim, positing that the statutes burdened a corollary First Amendment right to disseminate obscene content for private viewing, particularly in an era of individualized where no unwilling audience is exposed. Zicari publicly emphasized voluntary participation, stating that consumers must actively seek the materials via website or phone order, with no forced exposure in public venues like video stores. He critiqued the (413 U.S. 15, 1973) obscenity test's reliance on contemporary community standards as anachronistic for home-based digital consumption, questioning why "the community" should dictate private adult choices. Zicari further defined obscenity narrowly as limited to child exploitation or bestiality, excluding simulated or consensual extreme acts in his productions, and drew parallels to mainstream violence, arguing inconsistent application of standards fostered government overreach rather than genuine harm prevention. Supporters framed the case as a bulwark against expanding federal censorship, with defense counsel warning that unchecked obscenity prosecutions could erode broader expressive freedoms. Zicari positioned himself as resolute against plea deals, viewing capitulation as enabling prosecutorial success in testing post-Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (535 U.S. 234, 2002) boundaries on virtual or simulated content. However, attorney Paul Cambria, who represented Zicari and Romano, later expressed reservations about using Extreme Associates as a flagship for First Amendment battles in adult entertainment, suggesting more mainstream producers might better advance the cause. Despite these arguments, the defense did not prevail at trial, leading to guilty pleas on one count each of interstate transportation of obscene material on March 11, 2009, with sentences of one year and one day imprisonment imposed on July 1, 2009.

References

  1. [1]
    United States of America, Appellant v. Extreme Associates, Inc.
    On August 6, 2003, a federal grand jury returned a ten-count indictment against Extreme Associates. The first count was a conspiracy charge under 18 U.S.C. § ...
  2. [2]
    02-16-05 JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO APPEAL DISTRICT COURT ...
    Feb 16, 2005 · As alleged in the indictment, Extreme Associates, based in Los Angeles, California, offered obscene materials for sale through its website.
  3. [3]
    03-203 - USA v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES,, et al - Content Details
    Document Citations · Chicago · APA · MLA · Bluebook. Copy. USA v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES,, et al, (W.D. Pa. 2009) (JUDGMENT as to EXTREME ASSOCIATES, ...
  4. [4]
    "Extreme" Porn Couple Gets Prison Time for Violent Videos
    Jul 1, 2009 · A real life husband and wife team from California who now will each spend a year and a day in prison for distributing violent sex videos depicting simulated ...
  5. [5]
    Interviews | American Porn | FRONTLINE - PBS
    "Rob Black" is the name that Robert Zicari uses in the porn business. Together with his wife, Janet Romano (who is known as "Lizzy Borden" in the industry), ...
  6. [6]
    Justice Department Targets Porn Industry - ABC News
    Aug 27, 2003 · On April 8, law enforcement seized five movies produced by Zicari's California-based company, Extreme Associates, which bills itself as "The ...Missing: history early development
  7. [7]
    Xtreme Measures - Reason Magazine
    May 1, 2004 · A bustling trade show for sexual entrepreneurs sponsored by the adult video trade magazine AVN in January at the Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas.<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    U.S. Indicts Porn Sellers, Vowing Extensive Attack
    Aug 8, 2003 · The Justice Department on Thursday charged a North Hollywood wholesaler of adult films with violating federal obscenity laws, launching the ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Interviews - Rob Black | American Porn | FRONTLINE - PBS
    This is FRONTLINE's old website. The content here may be outdated or no longer functioning. Browse over 300 documentaries on our current website.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] CEO Press Release - August 07, 2004 - Department of Justice
    Aug 7, 2003 · The ten-count indictment named Extreme Associates, Inc., of 11133 Vanowen, Suite D, North Hollywood, California, Robert. Zicari, a/k/a Rob Black ...
  11. [11]
    Extreme Associates - Wikipedia
    Extreme Associates, formerly known as Extreme and Extreme 2.0, is an independent pornographic film production company, featuring a catalog of DVD titles and ...
  12. [12]
    Extreme Porn, Xtreme Wrestling and Solitary Confinement - VICE
    Nov 28, 2014 · Black – real name Rob Zicari – is a cocky young director leaning back in an office chair, cackling a menacing laugh and boasting that he makes the most extreme ...
  13. [13]
    Too 'Extreme': gonzo, snuff, and governmentality: Porn Studies
    In the early 2000s, Extreme Associates was one of the most controversial gonzo porn production companies, famous for its outrageous videos which often ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] EXTREME CINEMA - Edinburgh University Press
    Oct 12, 2011 · In contempo- rary American horror, dubbed torture porn—Saw and Hostel being the most representative films of this type—bodies are torn asunder, ...
  15. [15]
    Adult Video and Movie Studio Extreme Associates
    Longest Running Series. Cock Smokers · Extreme Teen · Whack Attack · Lord of Asses · Ass Clowns. Most Popular Videos From Extreme Associates.
  16. [16]
    dick nasty - iafd.com
    Extreme Teen 29, 2002, Extreme Associates · 1 · D · Extreme Teen 37, 2004, Extreme Associates · 2 · D · Extreme Teen 38, 2005, Extreme Associates · 1 · Extreme ...
  17. [17]
    Forced Entry (Video 2002) - IMDb
    Forced Entry: Directed by Lizzy Borden. With Jewel De'Nyle, Taylor St. Clair, Barrett Moore, Alexandria Quinn. The city of Los Angeles is being terrorized ...
  18. [18]
    Tiffany Mynx: Rest in Peace (Video 1999) - IMDb
    Tiffany Mynx: Rest in Peace: With Lizzy Borden, Tom Byron, Cassy Carson, Van Damage. This sexually charged adult film is a compilation of Tiffany Mynx's ...
  19. [19]
    Best movie search: Extreme Associates - Kinorium
    1. Movie «Black Cocksmokers 2» (2000) · Black Cocksmokers 2 ; 2. Movie «Extreme Brazil 4» (2000) · Extreme Brazil 4 ; 3. Movie «What Lurks in the Shadows» (2000).Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  20. [20]
    Extreme Associates - XBIZ.com
    Rob Black Productions and Extreme Nation Live will be broadcasting live at 4 p.m. PST today with the second episode of Nikki Charm's new weekly show “Throwback ...Missing: gonzo style
  21. [21]
    AVN Hall of Fame Director Patrick Collins Passes Away
    Aug 11, 2024 · Collins also signed notable directors Rob Black—who went on to launch Extreme Associates—and Nicky Starks, and offered future Hall of Fame shot- ...
  22. [22]
    Extreme Associates - Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
    It is owned by Rob Zicari ("Rob Black") and his wife Janet Romano ("Lizzy Borden"). It is also closely associated with another adult film company, Evolution ...
  23. [23]
    Positive Segment on Adult Industry by 60 Minutes | AVN
    Feb 20, 2010 · And Black, president of Extreme Associates – the company that is the subject of the first major obscenity case brought by the federal ...
  24. [24]
    Lizzy Borden - Pro Wrestling Wiki - Fandom
    Janet Romano-Zicari, better known as Lizzy Borden, (born December 20, 1977) is an American former pornographic actress and professional wrestling valet.
  25. [25]
    Forced Entry (Video 2002) - Full cast & crew - IMDb
    Cast ; Jewel De'Nyle · Victim #1 ; Taylor St. Clair · Victim #2 ; Barrett Moore · Victim #3. (as Veronica Caine) ; Alexandria Quinn · The Copycat Killer's Victim.Missing: Extreme Associates
  26. [26]
    Lizzy Borden - IMDb
    Lizzy Borden. Actress: Fossil Fuckers 2. Lizzy Borden was born on 20 December 1976 in Huntington Beach, California, USA. She is an actress and director.Missing: Associates | Show results with:Associates
  27. [27]
    Extreme Teen 37 - DVD - Extreme Associates - Adult DVD Marketplace
    Adult DVD Marketplace offers Extreme Teen 37 DVD Movie by Extreme Associates Starring: Bianca Pureheart, Chanel Chavez, Christie Lee, Heather Gables.Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  28. [28]
    UNITED STATES v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES INC (2005) | FindLaw
    Extreme Associates was indicted for engaging in commercial transactions that its own brief on appeal describes as “Internet commerce.” This case cannot be ...
  29. [29]
    Court Deals Blow to U.S. Anti-Porn Campaign - ABC News
    Jan 22, 2005 · 24, 2005 &#151; -- On the same day that President Bush was inaugurated for his second term, a federal court in Pittsburgh was handing him a ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  30. [30]
    Extreme Associates Obscenity Case Ends in Guilty Pleas
    Mar 18, 2009 · Extreme Associates Obscenity Case Ends in Guilty Pleas. Jacob Sullum | 3.18.2009 5:11 PM ... Greg Beato chronicled the Extreme Associates case ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Couple gets prison time for Internet obscenity - Network World
    Jul 2, 2009 · Extreme Associates and owners Robert Zicari, also known as Rob Black, 35, and his wife, Janet Romano, aka Lizzie Borden, 32, pleaded guilty ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Porn producer, wife get 1-year jail terms | Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    Jul 1, 2009 · Porn producer Rob Zicari's attorney called his client a changed man at his sentencing yesterday for distributing obscenity.
  33. [33]
    West Valley Pair Punished for Perverted Porn in Pittsburgh
    Jul 1, 2009 · Robert Zicari, 35, and Janet Romano, 32, also received two years of probation to follow. The Northridge, Calif., couple pleaded guilty in March ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Best Anal Sex Scene - Video at 2000 AVN Awards - AIWARDS
    Winners include Anastasia Blue, Lexington Steele and "Whack Attack 6". Honored as 2000 Best Anal Sex Scene - Video at AVN Awards ... Extreme Associates. Social ...
  35. [35]
    Zupko in Black - ADULTFYI.COM
    Chatsworth, Ca – Extreme Associates is proud to announce that ... Best Anal Sex Scene, In The Days of Whore. 2001 XRCO Best Anal Sex Scene, In ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Brian Surewood - Adult Industry Awards
    Nov 18, 2021 · Extreme Associates; 2001 XRCO Best Group Sex Scene In The Days Of Whore Extreme Associates. See Also: AVN Awards, XRCO Awards. The first ever ...
  37. [37]
    January 10, 2000 - LUKE IS BACK
    Best Anal Sex Scene, Video Whack Attack 6, Anastasia Blue & Lexington Steele, Extreme Associates. Best Anal Sex Scene, Film Breaking Up, Chloe & Chris Cannon ...
  38. [38]
    in the days of whore - iafd.com - internet adult film database
    In the Days of Whore (2000). Minutes. 138. Director. Thomas Zupko. Distributor. Extreme Associates ... Winner: Best Anal Sex Scene: Video, Anthony Crane, Arnold ...
  39. [39]
    Extreme Porn Crackdown - SUSANNAH BRESLIN
    Jul 17, 2024 · Porn producer Rob Black, head of Extreme Associates, has since searched his own online buying records looking for the same pseudonymous ...Missing: recognition | Show results with:recognition<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    (PDF) "Too 'Extreme': gonzo, snuff, and governmentality"
    Dec 14, 2016 · Zicari and Romano received prison sentences of one year and a day under federal obscenity laws, impacting the gonzo porn industry significantly.<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Too 'Extreme': gonzo, snuff, and governmentality - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · Download Citation | Too 'Extreme': gonzo, snuff, and governmentality | In the early 2000s, Extreme Associates was one of the most ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] A War Over Words - BrooklynWorks
    Jan 30, 2008 · profile federal obscenity prosecution in years” and adding that the case against. Extreme Associates is “the centerpiece of Attorney General ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] The 2008 Federal Obscenity Conviction of Paul Little and What It ...
    In October 2008 a federal judge in Pittsburgh set the trial date for adult movie company Extreme Associates and its principals Rob Black115 and Janet Romano116 ...
  44. [44]
    Extreme Pornography and The Wider Politics of Snuff - ResearchGate
    The financial burden of the defence led Extreme Associates to seek funding from the pornography industry. However, the industry turned its back on them. In ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    In Defense of Extreme Pornography - Reason Magazine
    Oct 27, 2009 · Zicari and Romano, known in the porn industry as Rob Black and Lizzy Borden, were the primary figures behind Extreme Associates, a production ...
  46. [46]
    3rd Circuit ruling in Extreme obscenity case praised by director of ...
    Dec 8, 2005 · The appeals court reversed a district court decision that had concluded federal obscenity laws violate the privacy rights of pornographers.Missing: 2009 | Show results with:2009
  47. [47]
    Extreme Associates Challenges Obscenity Standard - AVN
    With the Extreme Associates obscenity trial still months away, the company's defense team has filed another motion to dismiss the indictments against ...
  48. [48]
    A Prosecution Tests the Definition of Obscenity - The New York Times
    Sep 28, 2007 · The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that trial judges are still obligated to follow long-established obscenity ...
  49. [49]
    S.Hrg. 109-1023 — OBSCENITY PROSECUTION AND THE ...
    ... Extreme Associates, purveyors of the most vile sort of pornography. The ... distributor of obscene material. I mentioned it in my testimony. That ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Porn Wars: Serious Value, Social Harm, and the Burdens of Modern ...
    both a symptom and a cause of systemic violence against women. For these ... The district court's opinion in. Extreme Associates echoed the anti-censorship ...
  51. [51]
    In an article drawn from an interview with “extreme” porn filmmaker
    News columns listing top-selling videos and using the Internet Adult Film Database [IAFD]). ... portunities to direct or distribute their own porn if they have ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Obscenity Prosecutions and the Bush Administration
    May 23,. 2006), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/press-room/pressreleases/. 2006 4616_2_06-01-06obscenityfivestarindict.pdf (charging JM Productions ...<|separator|>