Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Falcon Heavy test flight

The Falcon Heavy test flight, designated as the Falcon Heavy demonstration mission, was the inaugural launch of SpaceX's heavy-lift rocket on February 6, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. EST from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Composed of three strapped-together Falcon 9 cores powered by 27 Merlin engines generating more than 5 million pounds of thrust, the vehicle successfully reached orbit and deployed its sole payload—a midnight-cherry Tesla Roadster owned by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, affixed to the second stage with a spacesuit-clad mannequin dubbed Starman—into a heliocentric orbit intersecting Mars' trajectory. The payload served primarily as a mass simulator to test the rocket's performance rather than a functional satellite, enabling data collection on structural loads and propulsion under maximum conditions. The mission achieved several milestones, including clean separation of all stages, precise orbital insertion by the second stage, and synchronized vertical landings of the two side boosters at Cape Canaveral's , marking the first such recovery for a heavy-lift vehicle and validating 's reusability paradigm. However, the center core's landing attempt on the droneship Of Course I Still Love You failed; it relit only one engine instead of three, resulting in an impact with Ocean at approximately 300 miles per hour about 300 feet short of the target, though telemetry indicated the rocket's overall flight was nominal. At launch, became the most powerful operational rocket in the world, with a payload capacity of 63,800 kg—roughly double that of its nearest competitors—paving the way for future and deep-space missions while underscoring empirical progress in cost-effective heavy launch capabilities.

Background and Development

Design Principles and Rationale

Falcon Heavy's core design principle involves assembling three first-stage cores in a parallel configuration: two side boosters flanking a central core, powered by 27 engines that generate over 5 million pounds of thrust at liftoff. This architecture connects the cores via a nosecone, interstage, and octaweb structure to minimize stage separation events and enhance reliability during ascent. The central core incorporates structural reinforcements to endure the additional aerodynamic and vibrational loads from the attached boosters, distinguishing it from standard hardware used as side boosters. The rationale for this approach stemmed from leveraging the proven reliability of , which had achieved multiple successful launches by 2017, to rapidly develop a heavy-lift capability without engineering a novel rocket system. By scaling existing cores, targeted payload capacities up to 63,800 kg to , enabling missions infeasible for alone, such as large geostationary satellites or deep-space probes, while substantially lowering per-launch costs through hardware reuse. Reusability formed a foundational tenet, with all three cores designed for post-flight recovery—the side boosters via propulsive landing on concrete pads and the central core on an autonomous droneship—prioritizing savings over full vehicle expendability to drive down operational expenses. This multi-engine setup also provided redundancy, including engine-out tolerance, drawing from Falcon 9's nine-engine cluster to mitigate single-point failures in high-thrust scenarios. For the maiden test flight on February 6, 2018, the design validated synchronized ignition and separation of the boosters, demonstrating the architecture's potential as a cost-effective bridge to future systems amid the technical challenges of core synchronization and structural integrity.

Pre-Launch Preparations and Challenges

The assembly of the for its demonstration flight utilized three first-stage cores: two flight-proven side boosters transported from prior landing sites and refurbished, and a new central core, stacked vertically at Launch Complex 39A following infrastructure upgrades including a reinforced launch mount and transporter-erector-launcher modifications completed in late 2017. The upper stage, equipped with a single vacuum-optimized Merlin engine, and the were integrated after core stacking, with the dummy payload—a —installed in early February 2018. A critical preparation step was the static-fire test on , 2018, during which all 27 1D engines ignited simultaneously for a few seconds while the fully stacked rocket remained secured to the pad, validating thrust synchronization and structural integrity after individual core hot-fires at SpaceX's McGregor facility in . This test followed a planned wet that was skipped to accelerate progress, amid preparations that included aerodynamic modeling and to accommodate the rocket's unprecedented scale. The preparations faced substantial challenges, including delays pushing the launch from an initial November-December 2017 target to February 6, 2018, due to the inherent complexities of combining three cores, which required redesigns to the central core's to withstand tripled vibrations, acoustics, and structural loads from the 27 engines. CEO stated that the integration proved "way harder than we thought," with naive initial assumptions about and Max-Q stresses necessitating extensive revisions, and the project nearly canceled multiple times owing to these difficulties. Further hurdles involved risks of engine ignition failure or thrust torque from simultaneous firing, mitigated by a staggered startup sequence, alongside potential for rapid unscheduled disassembly that Musk estimated carried a "real good chance" of preventing orbital insertion. Launch attempts were additionally postponed by adverse weather, upper-level wind constraints, and a brief U.S. in January 2018 that halted certain regulatory approvals and testing.

Mission Configuration and Objectives

Rocket Assembly and Configuration

The Falcon Heavy for its demonstration mission on February 6, 2018, consisted of a first stage formed by three cores: two side boosters strapped to a central core, all powered by 1D engines arranged in an octagonal pattern on each core, for a total of 27 engines producing approximately 22.8 meganewtons of thrust at . The side boosters were flight-proven units recovered from prior launches, marking their second flights, while the central core was a newly manufactured unit reinforced with structural enhancements, including a beefed-up interstage and additional pneumatic systems in the propellant tanks to manage the stresses from the attached boosters and ensure stable . The second stage was a standard Block 3 upper stage with a single 1D Vacuum engine, topped by a enclosing the test payload of a automobile and an inert mass simulator. Assembly occurred primarily at SpaceX's Horizontal Integration Facility (HIF) adjacent to Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The process began with stacking the central core atop the launch mount adapter, followed by mating the second stage and fairing assembly. The side boosters were then attached to the central core via structural linkages at the nosecones for load sharing, the octawebs for thrust vector alignment, and the interstage for separation mechanics, enabling the configuration's parallel operation during ascent. The fully assembled vehicle, standing 70 meters tall with a liftoff mass exceeding 1,420 metric tons fueled, was transported horizontally on a specialized transporter-erector to the pad in late December 2017 before being raised vertically for static fire testing and final integration with ground support equipment. This horizontal assembly approach facilitated efficient handling of the vehicle's width and reusability features, contrasting with vertical stacking methods used for single-core Falcon 9 rockets.

Payload and Secondary Goals

The payload for the Falcon Heavy demonstration mission, launched on February 6, 2018, was a midnight cherry red Tesla Roadster personally owned by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. The vehicle served as a dummy payload to simulate the mass and deployment of future satellites or interplanetary probes, weighing approximately 1,000 kilograms including its mounting hardware. A mannequin named Starman, clad in a SpaceX-designed spacesuit, was placed in the driver's seat with its right hand on the steering wheel and left arm resting on the door. Onboard cameras transmitted live video feeds from deep space, and the car's audio system looped David Bowie's "Space Oddity" during the broadcast. Secondary goals for the payload focused on demonstrating the Falcon Heavy's capacity for insertion, targeting a with a high aphelion exceeding Mars' to showcase potential for deep space missions. The mission verified upper stage engine performance and separation, with the remaining attached to the second stage rather than being deployed as a free-flying object. This unconventional choice, announced by via , aimed to generate public interest and highlight the rocket's payload versatility beyond traditional scientific instruments. No additional secondary payloads were included, emphasizing the test flight's emphasis on vehicle validation over revenue-generating cargo.

Launch Execution

Liftoff and Initial Ascent

The Falcon Heavy Demo Mission lifted off from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's on February 6, 2018, at 3:45 p.m. EST (20:45 UTC). The rocket's first stage, comprising three cores with a total of 27 Merlin 1D engines, ignited sequentially to produce more than 5 million pounds-force (22 MN) of thrust at sea level, equivalent to approximately eighteen aircraft at takeoff. All engines performed nominally during ignition and hold-down, with the vehicle rising steadily off the pad under full thrust. Shortly after liftoff, the center core's engines throttled down to manage aerodynamic loads, while the side boosters maintained higher thrust to ensure stable ascent. Telemetry confirmed the rocket cleared the launch tower within seconds and followed the planned trajectory through the dense lower atmosphere, passing maximum dynamic pressure (Max-Q) without anomalies around T+1:10. Initial ascent data indicated structural integrity and propulsion efficiency consistent with pre-flight simulations, validating the parallel staging configuration's performance under real flight conditions. No engine-out events or deviations were reported in this phase, marking a successful of the vehicle's raw power and control systems.

Stage Separations and Boostback Burns

The side boosters reached booster engine cutoff (BECO) at T+2:29, after which their engines shut down while the central core's nine Merlin 1D engines continued firing. Four seconds later, at T+2:33, the side boosters separated from the central core via pneumatic push-off mechanisms, marking the first such multi-booster detachment in the rocket's configuration. Each booster then performed a 180-degree flip maneuver using cold gas thrusters and ignited three sea-level 1D engines at T+2:50 for the boostback burn, a approximately 20-second firing that reversed their downrange and targeted return trajectories to on Air Force Station. These burns demonstrated the precision of SpaceX's reusable booster architecture, expending propellant to counteract the high-energy ascent while preserving enough for subsequent entry and landing phases. Following side booster separation, the central core throttled its engines back to full thrust briefly before achieving main engine cutoff () at T+3:04. Stage separation from the upper stage occurred at T+3:07 using the standard Falcon 9 pneumatic separation system, releasing the second stage to continue toward . The central core then initiated its own boostback burn at T+3:24, relighting three engines to arc back toward the Atlantic Ocean drone ship Of Course I Still Love You, approximately 620 km downrange. Although the burn commenced nominally, post-flight indicated a leak depleted reserves, impairing actuation and preventing engine relights for the entry and landing burns, resulting in the core's structural failure during atmospheric reentry at around T+6:20. This outcome highlighted challenges in scaling reusability to the higher-mass central core, which flew a more demanding than typical Falcon 9 first stages.

Flight Outcomes and Analysis

Booster Recoveries

The two side boosters separated from the central core at approximately T+2 minutes 36 seconds after liftoff on February 6, 2018, and performed boostback burns to reverse course toward the launch site. Following atmospheric reentry, each booster ignited three Merlin 1D engines for the landing burn, resulting in successful, near-simultaneous touchdowns at Landing Zone 1 (LZ-1) and Landing Zone 2 (LZ-2) on Cape Canaveral Air Force Station roughly eight minutes post-launch. These boosters, previously flown on separate Falcon 9 missions, demonstrated the feasibility of recovering components from a triple-core configuration, with post-flight inspections confirming minimal damage and enabling potential refurbishment for future use. The precision landings, achieved via autonomous guidance using onboard sensors and grid fins for steering, highlighted advancements in reusable rocket technology, as the boosters settled with reported velocities under 1 m/s and minor tilt. This marked SpaceX's first synchronized recovery of side boosters in a heavy-lift vehicle, contributing empirical data to validate the reusability model's scalability.

Central Core and Upper Stage Performance

The central core, a modified first stage, operated nominally during ascent, contributing to the overall of over 5 million pounds-force (22 MN) from its nine 1D engines alongside the side boosters. Main engine cutoff for the central core occurred at T+3 minutes and 20 seconds, enabling successful separation from the upper stage and side boosters at an altitude of approximately 70 km. Following separation, the core executed a boostback burn to target the drone ship Of Course I Still Love You (OCISLY) positioned in Ocean about 1,000 km downrange from the launch site. During reentry, the central core endured the most severe and structural loads of any Falcon booster flight to date, owing to its extended trajectory compared to standard Falcon 9 recoveries. The entry burn proceeded as planned to reduce velocity, but the subsequent landing burn initiated at around T+8 minutes and 30 seconds failed when two of the three center engines could not relight, attributed to depletion of triethylaluminum-triethylborane (TEA-TEB) igniter fluid after prior relights during the mission. This resulted in insufficient deceleration, causing the core to tip over and strike the ocean surface at roughly 300 mph (480 km/h) adjacent to OCISLY, where it disintegrated upon impact. SpaceX CEO stated post-flight that the core "almost made it," coming within a few hundred meters of the deck, but the anomaly highlighted limitations in igniter reserves for cores undergoing multiple burns in heavy-lift configurations. The upper stage, powered by a single 1D engine, separated cleanly from the central core and executed its first burn to insert the into a low at about 200 km altitude, demonstrating reliable performance consistent with prior second stages. After a coast phase lasting approximately 30 minutes, the second burn commenced at T+40 minutes to perform the trans-Mars injection , targeting a with a period of 557 days. During this burn, the stage experienced an anomaly: a small leak led to elevated chamber , inducing uncontrolled spin that oriented the stage randomly relative to and . Despite the rotation, which complicated thermal management and , the engine sustained operation long enough to deliver the required delta-v of over 3.5 km/s, achieving and precisely placing the on its planned solar orbit with perihelion at 0.99 and aphelion at 1.66 . described the upper stage as exceeding performance expectations overall, with the spin not compromising the mission's primary orbital objective, though it prevented further burns or precise control.

Payload Trajectory and Status

The payload, affixed to the Falcon Heavy's upper stage, was inserted into a following separation from the first stage on February 6, 2018. The upper stage executed an initial burn to reach a low Earth , followed by a trans-solar injection burn that achieved from 's gravitational influence. Due to thermal overload during the second burn, which caused the engine to operate 50% longer than planned, the payload attained a higher-than-intended energy trajectory. This resulted in an eccentric solar orbit with a perihelion of approximately 0.99 (near Earth's orbit) and an aphelion of 1.66 (beyond Mars' orbit), crossing the Martian orbital path but not intersecting it. The is about 557 days, with a low inclination of roughly 1 degree relative to the plane. The trajectory demonstrated the upper stage's capability to deliver payloads to interplanetary , though it deviated from the original Mars orbit objective due to the unplanned burn extension. As of October 2025, the and upper stage remain in stable , with no immediate risk of reentry; the probability of collision with over the next million years is estimated at 6%. Orbital position is continuously tracked using ephemeris data from observatories and efforts, placing it approximately 286 million kilometers from in the constellation . In February 2025, the object was briefly misclassified as a new by astronomers before identification as the known . Degradation from solar radiation and micrometeoroids is expected to eventually render the payload non-functional, but it continues as an artificial of .

Technical Achievements

Thrust and Reusability Demonstration

The Falcon Heavy test flight on February 6, 2018, validated the rocket's thrust capability via the coordinated ignition of 27 Merlin 1D engines—nine on each of the three first-stage cores—producing 5.13 million pounds-force (22.8 MN) at liftoff. This output, exceeding that of 18 Boeing 747s at maximum thrust, propelled the 63-metric-ton vehicle skyward from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center without anomalies in engine performance or structural loads during initial ascent. Reusability was demonstrated primarily through the side boosters, which separated from the central core 2 minutes and 29 seconds post-liftoff and executed boostback burns using three engines each to reverse trajectory toward the launch site. Both boosters then performed reentry under hypersonic control, followed by landing burns with a single engine, achieving synchronized touchdowns on approximately 8 minutes after launch—the first such recoveries for a heavy-lift booster pair. Post-flight inspections confirmed minimal wear, enabling their refurbishment and on the subsequent STP-2 in 2019. The central core separated from the upper stage 8 minutes and 45 seconds into flight but, due to reserves optimized for deployment rather than , failed to reach the ship Of Course I Still Love You, resulting in an unrecovered ocean impact. This partial success underscored reusability challenges in tri-core configurations, where the central booster's extended burn duration limits return fuel margins compared to side units.

Data on Cost Reduction Potential

The successful recovery of the two side boosters during the Falcon Heavy test flight on February 6, 2018, validated the reusability of components comprising two-thirds of the 's first-stage hardware, enabling potential savings on manufacturing s estimated at $20–30 million per booster by avoiding the need to produce new units for subsequent missions. Each first-stage booster, used in the Heavy configuration, represents a significant portion of the overall , with production expenses around $30 million before refurbishment, which adds approximately $5–10 million per cycle based on operational data from recoveries. This demonstration shifted the economic model from expendable launches, where hardware is discarded, to one amortizing fixed costs over multiple flights, theoretically reducing the per launch by 30–50% once full reusability of all three cores is routine. Falcon Heavy's listed launch price of $90 million for a reusable supports a per to of approximately $1,410 per kg, based on its 63,800 kg capacity, marking a substantial reduction compared to prior heavy-lift vehicles that often exceeded $10,000 per kg without reusability. In expendable mode, the vehicle achieves up to 64,000 kg to LEO at a higher price point of around $150 million, yet still undercuts competitors like the , which requires $350–400 million for roughly half the . The test flight's achievements underscored the causal link between propulsive precision and efficiency, as each successful booster eliminates the bulk of recurring expenses, with substantial savings from analogous operations that informed Heavy's .
MetricExpendable ModeReusable Mode (Potential Post-Test)
Launch Price~$150 million~$90 million
LEO Payload64,000 kg63,800 kg (with recovery)
Cost per kg to LEO~$2,344/kg~$1,410/kg
These figures highlight the test flight's role in proving scalability of and in-house manufacturing, which further compresses costs by minimizing reliance on external suppliers, though actual savings depend on flight rates and refurbishment yields exceeding 10 reuses per booster for optimal economics.

Criticisms and Limitations

Recovery Anomalies and Reliability Questions

During the Falcon Heavy demonstration mission on February 6, 2018, the two side boosters successfully executed boostback burns and landed vertically on at Air Force Station, marking the first dual-booster recovery for the vehicle configuration. However, the central core booster, after separation from the upper stage, failed to achieve a precise on the Of Course I Still Love You positioned in Ocean approximately 620 kilometers downrange. Telemetry indicated that the core's three central Merlin 1D engines were commanded to relight for the burn, but only the center engine ignited successfully, with the two outer engines failing to start due to depleted triethylaluminum-triethylborane (TEA-TEB) ignition fluid reserves. This fluid depletion resulted from the core's multiple prior relight attempts during ascent, including burns for deployment assistance, which exceeded the side boosters' ignition demands. The single-engine burn proved insufficient to arrest the core's descent velocity, causing it to approach the target zone at excessive speed—estimated at around 100 meters short of the ship—before splashing down and disintegrating upon impact. CEO [Elon Musk](/page/Elon Musk) attributed the mishap to the cumulative effects of high entry heating, aerodynamic loads, and the core's extended flight profile, which imposed greater thermal and structural stresses compared to single-core recoveries. Post-flight analysis revealed no major structural failures prior to reentry but confirmed the ignition fluid limitation as the causal factor, with the core's hydraulic systems also experiencing pressure issues that impaired gimbaling for attitude control during the abbreviated burn. This recovery anomaly prompted scrutiny over the Falcon Heavy's reusability reliability, particularly for the central core, which bears a disproportionate mission burden: longer burn durations, higher delta-v requirements, and more frequent engine relights to optimize payload performance. While the side boosters demonstrated proven landing precision akin to Falcon 9 Block 5 precursors, the central core's 0% recovery success in the demo flight highlighted scalability challenges for full-stack reuse, as expending it negates a significant portion of projected cost savings—estimated at 30-50% per launch through booster refurbishment. Industry analysts noted that such failures, though not catastrophic to the mission's primary objectives, underscore the empirical risks of scaling reusable architectures, with early operational Falcon Heavy flights (e.g., STP-2 in 2019) initially expending the core to prioritize payload reliability over recovery attempts. Over subsequent missions, SpaceX iterated on TEA-TEB capacity and reentry profiles, achieving central core recoveries by 2020, but the demo underscored that Heavy's end-to-end reusability demands refined fluid management and thermal protection beyond single-core precedents to attain Falcon 9-level dispatch reliability above 95%.

Payload Selection Debates

SpaceX selected Elon Musk's personal , a 2008 electric weighing approximately 1,270 kg, as the dummy for the 's demonstration flight on February 6, 2018, after failing to secure a customer-sponsored mission for the high-risk maiden voyage. The decision avoided exposing valuable operational hardware to potential failure, as Musk noted the rocket's debut carried significant uncertainty, rendering a non-critical item preferable to a billion-dollar . Musk publicly stated that conventional mass simulators—such as concrete blocks or metal plates—were "dull and uninteresting," opting instead for the Roadster to inject excitement and demonstrate the vehicle's capacity for deep-space trajectories simulating Mars missions. This choice included equipping the car with a spacesuit-clad mannequin dubbed "Starman," positioned at the wheel with David Bowie's "Space Oddity" looping on the dashboard stereo, further emphasizing the payload's performative element. Critics, including voices from traditional aerospace circles, contended that the slot represented a squandered chance to advance or , proposing alternatives like small satellites, CubeSats, or even a redundant GPS that could have provided practical utility. Such objections highlighted the payload's lack of intrinsic scientific merit, labeling it a mere that prioritized appeal over substantive contribution, with one analysis asserting it collected no data nor served calibration purposes. Defenders emphasized the mission's core engineering goals—verifying stage separations, booster recoveries, and upper-stage performance for insertion—which the successfully facilitated without compromising test objectives. The ensuing global media frenzy, amassing billions of views, empirically boosted public engagement with , arguably accelerating interest in commercial rocketry more than a prosaic could have, while incurring negligible additional cost since the car was slated for disposal. Embedded within the was a minor secondary , the "Arch"—a disc etched with inspirational messages and Isaac Asimov's Foundation trilogy—adding a subtle nod to cultural preservation amid the spectacle.

Impact and Legacy

Advancements in Commercial Launch Market

The successful of on February 6, 2018, validated a reusable capable of delivering 63.8 metric tons to (LEO), surpassing competitors like the Delta IV Heavy's 28.8 metric tons while targeting a launch price of approximately $90 million—less than one-quarter the cost of the Delta IV Heavy's $350–400 million per flight. This demonstration shifted the commercial launch paradigm toward reusability at scale, as the and landing of both side boosters highlighted the potential for rapid turnaround and reduced per-launch expenses through refurbished hardware, contrasting with expendable rockets that required full manufacturing for each mission. By proving operational feasibility, the test flight intensified competition in the geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) market, where heavy-lift capacity is critical for telecommunications satellites; SpaceX's pricing pressured incumbents like United Launch Alliance and Arianespace to reconsider strategies, contributing to broader industry price erosion from over $200 million to under $100 million for comparable missions in subsequent years. The event underscored private-sector innovation's role in democratizing access to space, enabling smaller commercial operators to afford high-mass payloads without relying on government-subsidized vehicles, and foreshadowed Falcon Heavy's later commercial successes, such as the Arabsat-6A satellite deployment in April 2019. Long-term, the flight catalyzed investments in reusable architectures across the sector, with the achieved thrust of over 5 million pounds from 27 engines establishing a for ; this reusability focus has driven down marginal costs, potentially by up to 65% compared to expendable alternatives, fostering a where launch cadence increased from dozens to hundreds annually by the mid-2020s, primarily via reusable systems.

Influence on Space Policy and Competition

The successful Falcon Heavy demonstration flight on February 6, 2018, intensified competition in the heavy-lift launch market by showcasing a vehicle capable of delivering approximately 64,000 kg to at a projected cost of around $150 million in fully expendable mode—roughly one-third to one-half the price of competitors like Launch Alliance's , which carried about 29,000 kg to for $350–400 million per launch. This pricing disparity, rooted in SpaceX's reusability innovations demonstrated during the test (with two boosters recovered), compelled rivals such as ULA to accelerate development of lower-cost alternatives like the rocket to retain in and payloads. The flight validated private-sector for heavy payloads, contributing to a broader decline in launch prices and spurring entrants like and , though SpaceX's early dominance stemmed from empirical reliability rather than subsidies alone. In U.S. space policy, the test flight amplified arguments for prioritizing commercial providers over bespoke government systems, particularly for national security missions, leading the U.S. to procure Falcon Heavy launches and pursue under the Evolved Strategic Capabilities program by 2020. It fueled debates on , with critics like former Deputy Administrator highlighting 's potential to supplant SLS for certain missions, given SLS's higher costs (over $2 billion per launch) and delays despite $20+ billion invested since 2011; however, entrenched political commitments and a "10 consecutive successful flights" reliability threshold limited its substitution for crewed deep-space roles. Policymakers' reluctance persisted due to SLS's integration with and lunar architecture, but the demonstration empirically pressured toward hybrid approaches, such as evaluating for secondary payloads like the , underscoring causal tensions between cost-driven commercial viability and risk-averse .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Falcon Heavy Demonstration Mission - NBBD
    SpaceX is targeting launch of the Falcon Heavy demonstration mission on Tuesday, February 6 from. Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at NASA's Kennedy Space.
  2. [2]
    5 Years Ago: First Flight of the Falcon Heavy Rocket - NASA
    Feb 6, 2023 · The first demonstration flight of SpaceX's Falcon Heavy rocket took place on Feb. 6, 2018, from Launch Pad 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
  3. [3]
    Falcon Heavy - SpaceX
    Falcon Heavy is composed of three reusable Falcon 9 nine-engine cores whose 27 Merlin engines together generate more than 5 million pounds of thrust at ...
  4. [4]
    B1091 "A Heavy Core in Falcon 9 Clothing" - NASASpaceFlight.com
    Aug 12, 2025 · Falcon Heavy center cores differ significantly from standard Falcon 9 boosters. Designed to withstand the intense stresses of being flanked by ...
  5. [5]
    Elon Musk explains why SpaceX's Falcon Heavy is risky - GeekWire
    Feb 5, 2018 · Because of the timeline and the advantages of the BFR architecture, Musk is no longer expecting to send passengers on a trip around the moon ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  6. [6]
    Falcon Heavy Compendium - ElonX.net
    Falcon Heavy is powered by Merlin 1D engines and was the most powerful rocket in operation at that time (having the highest thrust and LEO payload capability).
  7. [7]
    Falcon Heavy prepares for debut flight as Musk urges caution on ...
    Jul 19, 2017 · Challenges to Falcon Heavy's debut – Musk asks for realistic expectations: The long wait is nearly over as SpaceX readies for the final series ...
  8. [8]
    Falcon Heavy completes dramatic pre-launch engine test
    Jan 9, 2018 · Live coverage of SpaceX's preparations for the first Falcon Heavy launch from pad 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  9. [9]
    Falcon Heavy comes to life as SpaceX conduct Static Fire test
    Jan 24, 2018 · SpaceX achieved a major milestone on Wednesday, firing up the 27 engines at the base of Falcon Heavy in an event that will help solidify the target launch date.Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  10. [10]
    Falcon Heavy preparing for Static Fire test - NASASpaceFlight.com
    Dec 30, 2017 · It was originally understood SpaceX would first conduct a Wet Dress Rehearsal (WDR) on the rocket to test prop loading and the characteristics ...
  11. [11]
    Government shutdown further delays SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket test
    Jan 22, 2018 · As long as the government shutdown continues, SpaceX won't be able to test fire the company's new Falcon Heavy rocket.
  12. [12]
    Success! SpaceX Launches Falcon Heavy Rocket on Historic ...
    a historic test flight that also sent a car toward Mars and included two confirmed booster landings. Billed as the world's most ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  13. [13]
    First Falcon Heavy launch blends SpaceX style, raw power and the ...
    Feb 5, 2018 · Musk said the upper stage carries additional battery power and pressurant gas for the extra operating time in space. Musk unveiled the Falcon ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  14. [14]
    SpaceX to launch Falcon Heavy with two “flight-proven” boosters ...
    Mar 31, 2017 · SpaceX plans to conduct the debut launch of the Falcon Heavy rocket this summer using two boosters that have already flown on other missions.
  15. [15]
    Falcon Heavy raised on pad 39A for first time - Spaceflight Now
    Dec 28, 2017 · SpaceX's first Falcon Heavy rocket, made up of two previously-flown Falcon 9 boosters and a beefed up central core stage, made the trip to launch pad 39A.
  16. [16]
    Elon Musk says SpaceX will try to launch his Tesla Roadster on new ...
    Dec 2, 2017 · “Just to reiterate, the payload for the first Falcon Heavy rocket will be a Tesla electric car, playing Space Oditty, heading for Mars,” wrote @ ...
  17. [17]
    Updated | SpaceX successfully launches Falcon Heavy - SpaceNews
    Feb 6, 2018 · A SpaceX Falcon Heavy successfully launched on its inaugural flight here Feb. 6, placing a demonstration payload into orbit.
  18. [18]
    Hold-down firing nudges Falcon Heavy rocket closer to first liftoff
    Jan 24, 2018 · Ramping up to approximately 5 million pounds of ground-shaking thrust, the Falcon Heavy's 27 Merlin 1D main engines ignited at 12:30 p.m. EST ( ...
  19. [19]
    Launch timeline for Falcon Heavy's maiden flight - Spaceflight Now
    Feb 6, 2018 · T+0:02:50: Side Cores Begin Boostback Burn. After flipping around to fly tail-first, the Falcon Heavy's two side boosters each reignite three ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  20. [20]
    SpaceX successfully debuts Falcon Heavy in demonstration launch ...
    Feb 5, 2018 · Overall, the maiden flight of Falcon Heavy is designed to validate the rocket's overall performance while also providing flight data to support ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  21. [21]
    Long-Awaited Maiden Voyage of Falcon Heavy Brings Deep-Space ...
    Feb 6, 2018 · Eight minutes after launch, the Heavy's two side-mounted boosters smoothly alighted on separate pads at Landing Zones (LZ) 1 and 2 at nearby ...
  22. [22]
    SpaceX landed two of its three Falcon Heavy first-stage boosters
    Feb 6, 2018 · The side boosters landed, touching down at LZ-1 and LZ-2 at Kennedy Air Force Station, the designated landing pads SpaceX uses to recover its ...
  23. [23]
    Elon Musk Explains Why SpaceX's Falcon Heavy Core Booster ...
    Feb 14, 2018 · SpaceX CEO Elon Musk says he knows exactly why the Falcon Heavy core booster crashed. Also, SpaceX is building a third droneships for rocket ...
  24. [24]
    SpaceX CEO Elon Musk explains why Falcon Heavy's center core ...
    Center core B1057 missed drone ship OCISLY after SpaceX's hardest reentry yet, causing an explosion/fire that was visible on the webcast.
  25. [25]
    Is the Tesla Roadster Flying on the Falcon Heavy's Maiden ... - Space
    Feb 5, 2018 · A cherry red Tesla Roadster will serve as the payload on the maiden flight of SpaceX's Falcon Heavy rocket.
  26. [26]
    SpaceX Successfully Launches the Falcon Heavy—And Elon Musk's ...
    Feb 6, 2018 · SpaceX decided to coast the Falcon Heavy's single-engine second stage in orbit for six hours to demonstrate missions typically flown by the US ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Tesla Roadster "Starman" Space Orbit - The Planets Today
    One of the objectives of the Falcon Heavy test flight was to demonstrate that the new rocket could carry a payload as far as the orbit of Mars. NASA deputy ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  28. [28]
    Live Orbital Position - Where in Space is Tesla Roadster
    The Tesla Roadster's current location is shown in a real-time simulation, with orbital elements updated daily. Its orbital period is 557.165 days.Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025
  29. [29]
    Don't panic: The chance of this space-traveling sports car ... - Science
    Don't panic: The chance of this space-traveling sports car hitting Earth is just 6% in the next million years · Elon Musk's returning Tesla Roadster would burn ...
  30. [30]
    SpaceX Roadster: Complete Information & Live Data - TheSkyLive
    Star map showing the position of SpaceX Roadster in the constellation of Virgo on October 26, 2025. Field of view: 15x9 degrees. View in interactive star map.
  31. [31]
    Elon Musk's Tesla Is Still Floating in Space After 7 Years - CNET
    Feb 15, 2025 · Tesla Roadster as near-Earth object​​ Musk's car was accidentally and briefly classified as an asteroid in 2025. The International Astronomical ...
  32. [32]
    Elon Musk's Telsa Roadster was mistaken for an asteroid. Here's why
    Feb 7, 2025 · The car has an extremely small chance of ever impacting Earth. So as far as astronomers are concerned, it's just a hefty piece of space junk.<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Falcon Payload User's Guide - SpaceX
    Falcon Heavy (Figure 2-2) is a two-stage, heavy-lift launch vehicle powered by LOX and RP-1. Falcon Heavy builds on the proven, highly reliable design of Falcon ...
  34. [34]
    What is the cost of manufacturing and operating a Falcon 9 rocket for ...
    Jun 21, 2024 · The SpaceX Falcon 9 has a build cost of about $30 million but SpaceX sells rides for about $62–67 million.
  35. [35]
    How much money has SpaceX been saving? From the reuse of the ...
    Feb 24, 2018 · A core costs somewhere around $15-20 million. Each time they reused a booster, that's $15-20 million saved (minus any refurbishment cost). I ...Do SpaceX quote custom launch prices or average across all rockets?What's the cost savings of reusing Falcon 9 boosters? - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.com
  36. [36]
    Reducing the Cost of Space Travel with Reusable Launch Vehicles
    Feb 12, 2024 · Reusable rockets can be up to 65% cheaper by spreading costs across multiple missions, unlike single-use rockets.Missing: data | Show results with:data<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Falcon Heavy, in a Roar of Thunder, Carries SpaceX's Ambition Into ...
    Feb 6, 2018 · SpaceX lists a price of $90 million for a Falcon Heavy flight, compared with $62 million for one by Falcon 9, a bargain in the context of ...
  38. [38]
    Falcon Heavy Launch an Apollo Moment for SpaceX, Former DoD ...
    Feb 14, 2018 · Either way, SpaceX's $90 million-$150 million price per Falcon Heavy flight is significantly less expensive, even if tens of millions of dollars ...
  39. [39]
    SpaceX gaining substantial cost savings from reused Falcon 9
    Apr 5, 2017 · SpaceX saw significant cost savings by reusing a Falcon 9 first stage in a launch last week, a key factor for the economic viability of reusable launch ...Missing: Heavy | Show results with:Heavy
  40. [40]
    SpaceX and the categorical imperative to achieve low launch cost
    Jun 7, 2024 · Today it is generally recognized by all observers that SpaceX, with its partially reusable Falcon launch system, has achieved major cost ...
  41. [41]
    SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : Feb. 6, 2018 : Updates
    Feb 12, 2018 · The centre core landing failure was caused by the fact that the need for ignition fluids (TEA/TEB) increases after several engine relights.
  42. [42]
    Why did the SpaceX Falcon Heavy's center booster fail to land?
    May 24, 2023 · The core booster went out of fuel, not having enough for the landing burn. It crashed in the ocean at 300 mph. The mission has priority. If you ...Why exactly did the center core of the SpaceX Falcon Heavy fail?Will/how will the loss of the Falcon Heavy Center Core affect SpaceX ...More results from www.quora.com
  43. [43]
    Doubts About SpaceX Reliability Persist As Astronaut Missions ...
    Jan 15, 2018 · With regard to reliability though, the jury is still out, and the evidence is ambiguous. Although SpaceX was quick to assert last week that its ...
  44. [44]
    SpaceX customers' views on reuse - NASA Spaceflight Forum
    Jul 7, 2018 · The concern isn't for the performance of the rocket core. But, you cannot re-fly a full falcon heavy first stage without first landing all 3 of ...
  45. [45]
    SpaceX Falcon Heavy Carrying Tesla Roadster is Go for Launch
    Feb 5, 2018 · Musk chose his personal Tesla Roadster as a test payload because he feels traditional mass simulators are "extremely boring." If the test is ...
  46. [46]
    SpaceX will use the first Falcon Heavy to send a Tesla Roadster to ...
    Dec 2, 2017 · The idea is that the rocket will have a high chance of failing so they send a "worthless" object as a test payload instead of a billion dollar ...Missing: chose | Show results with:chose<|control11|><|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Why is the first launch of Falcon Heavy sending a car instead of ...
    Feb 4, 2018 · The first launch of the new Falcon Heavy will be sending up a Tesla Roadster owned by Elon Musk as its payload instead of something more useful.Has any payload been as silly, as the Falcon Heavy's Tesla Roadster?Starman/Roadster in a=1.795 AU orbit, now what's the method to ...More results from space.stackexchange.comMissing: demo | Show results with:demo
  48. [48]
    Elon Musk's 'Starman': Is it Really Legal for Billionaires to Launch ...
    Apr 11, 2018 · The Tesla roadster launch had no scientific value. It didn't collect measurements; it is not being used to calibrate instruments; in fact, the ...
  49. [49]
    Let's talk about Elon Musk launching his Tesla into space
    Feb 5, 2018 · I opened my phone to pictures of the car in the Falcon Heavy's cavernous payload fairing, and tried to answer his questions: Yes, it's real.Missing: selection | Show results with:selection
  50. [50]
    What is the greatest danger to the Tesla Roadster model floating in ...
    Feb 11, 2019 · The Tesla Roadster was NOT the only Payload on onboard the Falcon Heavy! Buried inside the Tesla was something called an 'Arch'. A storage ...
  51. [51]
    Falcon Heavy will change spaceflight less than you think
    Feb 19, 2018 · The rocket offers a much greater performance than United Launch Alliance's Delta IV Heavy at a lower price. Yet, the Pentagon doesn't buy many ...
  52. [52]
    Falcon Heavy success paves the way for open access to space ...
    Feb 9, 2018 · Musk stated that the overall price for a Falcon Heavy could reduce significantly once Falcon Heavy flies in its fully reusable configuration – ...
  53. [53]
    The Fate of Falcon Heavy - Supercluster
    May 24, 2022 · This particular change turned out to be quite a challenge and caused major delays, which were exacerbated by two major Falcon 9 anomalies, which ...
  54. [54]
    What Is the Point of Elon Musk's Big Rocket? - Live Science
    Feb 6, 2018 · The story of the SpaceX Falcon Heavy's test flight is two things at once: a step toward a mechanism for cheaper commercial space hauling, and — ...
  55. [55]
    Falcon Heavy's launch ushers in an era of cheaper, bolder space flight
    Feb 7, 2018 · SpaceX's ability to reuse rockets massively cuts down on the cost of launches and recycling them into Falcon Heavy launch systems only brings ...
  56. [56]
    SpaceX Falcon Heavy: That's No Moon … It's A Tesla! - RUSI
    Feb 12, 2018 · Perhaps the greatest benefit to customers of the Falcon Heavy is its estimated cost per launch of only $90 million.
  57. [57]
    How SpaceX Falcon Heavy undercuts its competition three-fold
    Feb 13, 2018 · In its fully expendable configuration (call it the Delta IV Heavy config), Falcon Heavy is a beast of a rocket, quoted at ~64,000 kg to LEO and ...
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    Why SpaceX is running away with the commercial space race
    Aug 4, 2024 · SpaceX has achieved an unprecedented degree of reliability and low cost with its Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles. Company engineers ...
  60. [60]
    Update: Why has the Falcon Heavy had so little impact on NASA?
    The first reason the Falcon Heavy has not had more impact is that it only flew once in 2018. The planned flights for later in the year were delayed while the F9 ...
  61. [61]
    Falcon Heavy's first commercial launch to pave the way for reusable ...
    Mar 25, 2019 · Falcon Heavy's first commercial launch to pave the way for reusable rockets in national security missions.
  62. [62]
    Former NASA official on trying to stop SLS: “There was just such ...
    Aug 25, 2022 · I really hoped they could get Falcon Heavy before SLS, because that had been announced, and they were starting to work on it. And it was all ...Missing: cancellation | Show results with:cancellation