Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fat face

Fat face is a bold style of in the Didone family, distinguished by its extreme contrast between massively thickened vertical strokes and slender horizontal elements, designed primarily for eye-catching display and use in the early . Originating in , the fat face style emerged as an innovative response to the growing demand for attention-grabbing amid the expansion of commercial printing and poster during the . The is widely credited to typefounder Robert Thorne, who introduced the first examples in 1803, building on the high-contrast "modern" designs of pioneers like Giambattista and Firmin Didot from the late . Thorne's bold, swollen variants quickly gained popularity, with other English foundries such as & Catherwood, Fry & Steele, and Figgins contributing to its development through specimen books and new cuttings by the 1810s. Key characteristics of fat face typefaces include narrow, unbracketed serifs, vertical weight stress, and a graceful yet bulky appearance that amplifies the Didone structure for maximum visual impact, often in all-caps forms suitable for large-scale titling. Early variants expanded to include italics (introduced around 1808), shaded effects (1810), and modifications like compressed, elongated, or expanded widths to fit diverse printing needs. These features made fat faces ideal for posters, broadsides, and , where their "outrageous coolness" helped them stand out in an increasingly cluttered visual landscape. The style's influence persisted through the 19th century, with continued production by foundries like Fann Street through the early 19th century and revivals by into the early 20th century, and it continues in modern digital fonts such as Abril Fatface (inspired by 19th-century and poster types) and Ohno Fatface, which adapt its dramatic flair for contemporary . Notable historical examples include Thorne's original 1803 cutting, the renamed Thorowgood family (revived in the 1950s), and the 1928 Ultra by American Type Founders, which echoed the fat face aesthetic in a more condensed form. As the first major innovation of the 19th century, fat face exemplifies the era's shift toward bold, functional that prioritized and in public spaces.

Definition and characteristics

Visual features

Fat face typefaces are defined by their extreme stroke , featuring boldly thickened vertical stems contrasted sharply against hairline-thin horizontals and serifs, which produces a dramatic vertical emphasis ideal for capturing attention in settings. This magnification of contrast, while rooted in Didone proportions, amplifies the thin elements to remain slender while expanding the verticals to create a sense of weight and dynamism. Unlike types, which employ thicker, more even strokes without such deep contrast, fat faces prioritize this stark differentiation to enhance readability and impact at distance. The serifs in fat faces are typically unbracketed and hairline-thin, meeting the stems at sharp angles to heighten contrast, with some designs featuring ball terminals on thin strokes for added dynamism, particularly on curved letters like the lowercase 'o' and 'e'. These unbracketed forms contribute to the typeface's robust yet elegant , with the serifs maintaining a crisp, hairline thinness that heightens the overall contrast. Proportions in fat faces emphasize condensed widths to maximize visual punch in limited spaces, with uppercase letters dominating through their bold, upright forms and lowercase exhibiting playful swelling in bowls and counters for added liveliness. This structure ensures capitals convey authority while lowercase elements introduce subtle rhythm, all tailored for high-impact applications. Designed specifically for metal type and later adapted to wood-type printing, fat faces were created in the early 1800s to stand out amid cluttered posters and advertisements, where their bold presence helped promote goods in an era of burgeoning commercial printing. Exemplary letterforms include the 'B', with its massively thickened vertical stems and delicate horizontal crossbars connected by flaring serifs; the 'O', featuring a rounded accented by prominent ball terminals at the joints; and the 'S', showcasing undulating curves with swollen thicks and hairline thins for a serpentine, eye-catching flow. Fat face typefaces are distinguished from boldface Romans by their hyper-exaggerated stroke modulation, featuring dramatically thickened vertical stems paired with hairline-thin horizontals and serifs, in to the more uniform boldness of transitional bold types that maintain balanced proportions without such extreme variations. This results in a "Didone on steroids" effect, where the emphasis on verticality and amplifies at large display sizes, unlike the even weighting in bold Romans intended for emphasis within text blocks. In comparison to or slab-serif types, fat faces prioritize dramatic thin-thick ratios and delicate, triangulated serifs over the blocky, monolinear construction and heavy, unbracketed slab serifs characteristic of , which exhibit minimal contrast for a more uniform, mechanical appearance. While both emerged in the early 19th century for , fat faces retain the neoclassical elegance of their Didone , focusing on optical dynamism rather than the solid, authoritative presence of slab serifs. Fat faces also separate from later display types like Tuscan through their maintenance of serif elegance and vertical stress, avoiding the whimsical, outlined forms and elaborate, curved or angled serifs of Tuscans that introduce decorative flair and low contrast for ornamental effect. This distinction underscores fat faces' role as proto-display fonts, bridging the restrained neoclassicism of Didone types—such as Bodoni—with the Victorian era's penchant for excess, rather than serving as everyday text faces or purely fanciful decorations. As a bolder evolution of Didone types, fat faces represent a key step in typography's developmental tree, with early examples showcasing profound stroke modulation depths that heighten their impact in commercial printing hierarchies.

Historical development

Origins in early

The emergence of fat face typefaces in early was closely tied to the socio-economic transformations of the , which spurred a boom in commercial printing and . As accelerated and consumer markets expanded, printers required bold, attention-grabbing letters for broadsides, shop signs, auction posters, and newspaper headlines to compete in an increasingly crowded visual landscape. This demand for high-visibility display types marked a departure from the more restrained styles of the previous century, favoring designs that could stand out at a distance in public spaces. The first innovator in this development was the London typefounder Robert Thorne (1753–1820), who introduced bold letters around 1803 as an extreme expansion of the contemporary (Didone) style. Thorne created these designs by swelling the thick strokes while retaining hairline thins and flat serifs, producing unprecedented contrast for display purposes. He sold the punches for these letters to Vincent Figgins's foundry, where they appeared in Figgins's 1815 specimen book, signifying the transition from subtle antique forms to the more dramatic fat faces. This innovation was enabled by advancements in punch-cutting techniques, pioneered by founders like Figgins, which allowed for thicker stems and larger sizes without compromising the metal type's structural integrity during casting. These early fat faces also reflected evolving aesthetic motivations, drawing from neoclassical interests in ancient inscriptions—whose monumental letterforms emphasized clarity and weight—but amplified for the practical needs of visibility in Britain's growing commercial sphere. The high-contrast visual features, with their bold vertical stress and minimal serifs, echoed the elegance of classical capitals while adapting them to the era's bold imperatives. However, initial production faced significant limitations: the custom punch-cutting process was labor-intensive and expensive, resulting in rarity and sporadic availability, confined mostly to large capitals for titles and headings until broader adoption in the 1820s.

Expansion and peak popularity

Following its initial development by Robert Thorne in the early , the style experienced rapid expansion across and during the and , driven by growing demand for bold display types in an era of increasing printed . In , leading quickly adopted and diversified the style; Vincent Figgins included fat face designs in his 1815 specimen book, while William Thorowgood acquired Thorne's Fann Street Foundry in 1820 and issued his own versions shortly thereafter. , established in , began producing fat faces in the mid-1820s, contributing to the style's proliferation through their extensive catalogs. This British dominance facilitated export and imitation abroad, with the style reaching American foundries by the , where Wells & Webb in produced fat face-inspired wood types for large-scale posters, and the Cincinnati Type Foundry offered metal versions in the 1840s. The geographical spread was accelerated by technological advancements, particularly the widespread adoption of steam-powered presses after the 1814 invention by Friedrich Koenig, which enabled higher-volume printing and heightened the need for attention-grabbing types like fat faces. By the 1840s, fat face types achieved peak popularity, dominating applications in Victorian-era posters, book titles, and ephemeral printing such as handbills and advertisements, as sales surged in 's bustling type warehouses. Job printing shops, which specialized in short-run commercial work, increasingly relied on these bold, high-contrast faces to create visually striking materials that could compete in the crowded urban advertising landscape. For instance, fat faces were prominently featured in street posters of the , where their exaggerated stroke widths ensured readability from a distance amid the era's proliferating . Economically, the post-1830s era saw cheaper production of fat face types due to improved techniques and mechanized casting processes, which lowered costs and spurred innovation, resulting in dozens of variants by mid-century, including condensed and expanded forms tailored for diverse display needs. A pivotal event in this growth was the 1838 expansion of the Thorowgood Foundry, when Robert Besley joined as a partner, enabling the introduction of novel designs like the six-line reversed italic and bolstering output for jobbing printers. Culturally, fat faces epitomized the opulent excess of the Regency period's lingering influence into the Victorian age, symbolizing boldness and spectacle in media like fashion plates and theater bills, with their peak production and usage spanning approximately 1840 to 1860 as became integral to public entertainment and .

Variations and decline by late 19th century

As the progressed, fat face typefaces evolved into more elaborate forms to meet the growing demands of decorative and . Ornamented variants emerged, featuring inline, shadowed, and outlined designs that amplified their visual impact for posters and broadsides. For instance, in the late , American foundries introduced outlined fat faces, such as George Bruce's Extended Rimmed Ornamented (patented November 19, 1867), which added rimmed edges for a three-dimensional effect, and Farmer, Little & Co.'s Rimmed (patented June 16, 1868), enhancing the bold contrast with bordering lines. These modifications built on the core fat face structure, exaggerating its thick-thin stroke ratio for greater decorative excess. Similarly, shadowed versions, evolving from early 19th-century precedents, incorporated drop shadows to create depth, as seen in mid-century specimens. In , particularly , expanded fat faces gained traction during the 1860s, widening letterforms to fill larger spaces in theatrical and commercial posters while retaining the extreme vertical stress and hairline serifs characteristic of the style. Inline ornamentation, where thin lines or patterns were etched within letters, further diversified these types, allowing for intricate, space-efficient designs in job printing. By the 1870s, Wm. H. Page & Co. in produced examples like Aetna Ornamented Nos. 1, 2, and 3, showcased in their 1874 specimen book, which integrated floral and geometric motifs into the bold skeleton for heightened ornamental appeal. These variants reflected a broader trend toward excess in display , prioritizing eye-catching elaboration over restraint. Regional adaptations highlighted the style's flexibility amid expanding print markets. In America, bolder, more robust fat faces proliferated for frontier-era applications, including Wild West posters and wanted notices, where their squat, high-contrast forms conveyed urgency and prominence on rough woodblock or metal prints. European designers, by contrast, shifted toward condensed variants in the 1870s to accommodate denser layouts in newspapers and trade cards; Page's Aetna Condensed series (patented December 23, 1873), for example, compressed widths while preserving the inflated stroke weights, making it suitable for compact yet impactful headings. Chromatic iterations, like Page's and designs from 1874, added multicolored layering for poster work, further tailoring the style to industrial-era visual needs. The decline of fat faces accelerated in the late as competing styles eroded their dominance in display printing. The rise of typefaces, beginning with early grotesques in the 1830s but surging in popularity by the 1880s, offered simpler, more versatile alternatives for modern advertising, gradually displacing the ornate contrast of fat faces. Art Nouveau's organic, flowing motifs, emerging around the same decade, further rendered the rigid, exaggerated geometry of fat faces outdated, favoring custom lettering with asymmetrical curves and integrated illustrations over standardized bold serifs. Imports of and types into also flooded markets, reducing demand for traditional fat faces in foundry catalogs by the 1890s. The advent of in the late 1890s exacerbated this shift, enabling easier manipulation of images and text without reliance on sorts, which diminished the need for specialized display faces like fat faces. Late examples persisted sporadically into the early 1900s as precursors to , where bold, condensed serifs echoed fat face boldness in geometric posters, though primarily in archival or conservative contexts by then. Foundry specimens illustrate this waning: fat faces, once a staple comprising a significant portion of mid-century offerings, appeared infrequently by 1900, signaling their transition to historical novelty.

Notable examples and designers

Key typefaces and foundries

One of the earliest and most influential fat face typefaces was Figgins' Fat Face, introduced in 1815 by the London-based Vincent Figgins , featuring exaggerated stroke contrast suitable for display purposes. This was followed by Thorowgood's Two-Line Pica in the 1820s, a bold roman design produced by William Thorowgood, noted for its robust vertical stress and availability in larger formats for posters and advertisements. In the United States, adaptations emerged in the 1840s, such as condensed fat face variants from the Type and Stereotype , including styles akin to French Condensed, which compressed the letterforms for tighter spacing while retaining . Major foundries played a pivotal role in developing and disseminating fat face types. The Vincent Figgins foundry in pioneered bold cuts, producing innovative punchcuttings that allowed for the extreme weight variations defining the style. The Fann Street Foundry, operated by Robert Thorne and later Thorowgood, advanced matrix production techniques, enabling precise casting of heavy display letters with consistent hairline details. Other notable English foundries, such as Caslon & Catherwood and Fry & Steele, also contributed through new cuttings in the 1810s. Across the Atlantic, the Boston Type Foundry contributed U.S. adaptations, modifying British designs for local printing needs and expanding the range of condensed and shaded variants. Specimens of fat face typefaces typically ranged in size from pica (approximately 12 points) to canon (up to 48 points or larger), with larger cuts like two-line pica (24 points) favored for billboards and broadsides due to their visual impact. These were showcased in 19th-century foundry catalogs, such as Figgins' 1815 specimen and Caslon's 1841 book, highlighting the types' casting quality—smooth faces with minimal flash from high-precision molding. Availability varied by foundry, with London producers offering broader assortments in the 1820s, while American catalogs in the 1840s emphasized practical adaptations for job printing. Many original fat face matrices and fonts were lost during foundry consolidations and industrial shifts in the late , rendering complete sets rare today. Surviving specimens, including printed sheets from the to , are preserved in collections such as the St. Bride Foundation Library in , which holds examples from Figgins, Thorne, and Thorowgood eras. These artifacts provide insight into the style's evolution, with intact samples demonstrating the durability of the designs despite wear from repeated use. Fat face types were cast using , an primarily composed of lead (approximately 82%), with (12%) for hardness and tin (6%) for fluidity, allowing for the deep needed in large display sizes like 72-point cuts. This composition ensured sharp impressions on coarse paper, a key factor in their era-specific point sizes, which followed non-standardized bodies such as double pica (about 28 points) before the of the 0.918-inch in the mid-19th century.

Influential designers

Robert Thorne (d. 1820), a merchant who transitioned into typefounding, played a foundational role in the development of fat face typefaces by commissioning the creation of bold letterforms in 1803, marking the style's emergence as a distinct for purposes. His short career, centered at the Fann Street Foundry he established, emphasized extreme contrast with thickened vertical strokes to enhance legibility at a distance, particularly for and posters, which became a hallmark of the style's vertical stress. Thorne's designs drew from the modern Didone tradition but pushed boundaries toward bolder expressions, influencing the type scene amid rivalries with established foundries like , from whose punchcutter IV he initially sourced tools. Vincent Figgins (1766–1844), a punchcutter with roots in the Caslon apprenticeship tradition, refined Thorne's concepts and produced the first commercial fat face typefaces in his 1815 specimen book, including variations like backslanted italics and inline forms that broadened the style's applications. Operating from his foundry established in 1798, Figgins introduced innovations that tied into the competitive dynamics of the type community. His contributions solidified fat face as a viable commercial style, building on Thorne's foundation while expanding its technical and aesthetic possibilities. William Thorowgood (d. 1877), who acquired Thorne's Fann Street Foundry in 1820 shortly after its founder's death, expanded the fat face style through the 1820s by producing additional sizes and variations, including shaded and condensed forms that adapted the for evolving needs. As a successor in type , Thorowgood's work maintained the emphasis on bold verticals for visual impact while integrating with the Caslon-influenced of punchcutters and founders, ensuring the style's proliferation in British printing. In the United States, James Ronaldson (1769–1851), co-founder of the Philadelphia-based Binny & Ronaldson foundry (established 1796), adapted fat face designs for American markets during the 1830s, producing bold display types that catered to the growing demand for impactful posters and broadsides in the expanding print industry. Taking over after partner Archibald Binny's retirement in 1813, Ronaldson focused on robust, locally cast variations of European styles like fat face, bridging British innovations with U.S. practicalities amid the era's typefounding rivalries.

Modern revivals and influence

20th century reinterpretations

In the and , designers and foundries revisited Victorian-era amid a broader interest in historical styles, leading to targeted revivals of fat face designs for display purposes. American Type Founders (ATF) issued Ultra in 1928, a condensed, high-contrast face drawing directly from 19th-century fat faces to provide bold impact in advertising and editorial layouts, as seen in Herbert Bayer's 1939 cover for *. Monotype followed with Falstaff in 1931, an expansive English fat face intended for headlines and decorative applications, gaining popularity for its robust yet elegant form in book jackets and international printing. By mid-century, fat face revivals adapted to postwar , particularly in and public campaigns where their dramatic weight conveyed energy and prominence. In , Stephenson Blake's 1950 catalog highlighted revivals like Thorowgood Italic and Thorne Shaded, while designer Barbara Jones employed Thorne Shaded for posters at the 1951 , blending historical boldness with modern whimsy to evoke national heritage. ATF contributed post-World War II efforts with faces like those designed by Gerry Powell around 1937, explicitly based on fat face models, which supported packaging and promotional materials emphasizing visual punch over subtlety. The shift to in the mid-20th century posed challenges for traditional bold metal types like fat faces, as it favored lighter, more reproducible designs and diminished the need for heavy casting to achieve opacity on press. This led to hybrid interpretations that toned down extreme contrasts for versatility in photomechanical processes. A cultural resurgence emerged in the , with fat face drama influencing psychedelic posters and rock album art to amplify countercultural vibrancy. Designers favored dense, fat display faces for their ability to warp and layer under optical effects, as in Wes Wilson's swirling concert bills or the bold titling on Nancy Sinatra's 1966 album Boots, where a revived chubby fat face from asserted playful authority. Similarly, Bruno Munari incorporated the Nebiolo foundry's Normandia—a fat face—in his 1960 ABC book, using its weight for experimental layouts that echoed the era's bold, theatrical ethos.

Digital era adaptations and legacy

In the digital era, fat face typefaces have seen renewed interest through high-quality revivals that adapt their extreme contrast for screen-based design. Adobe's , designed by in the early 1990s, exemplifies this by drawing on 19th-century fat face proportions for bold display use in digital publishing, emphasizing thick vertical strokes against hairline horizontals. Open-source platforms have further democratized access, with offering fonts like Abril Fatface (released around 2011) and Gravitas One, both inspired by Victorian-era fat faces for modern web headings and posters. Software advancements have enhanced fat face usability in , particularly through CSS integration for responsive headings where high-contrast serifs create visual impact without overwhelming text. Variable font technology, introduced around 2016, allows designers to adjust stroke contrast dynamically—thinning or bolding elements —making fat face variants more versatile for mobile and scalable interfaces; examples include contemporary fat face-inspired variable fonts that support weight and width axes. In editorial design, these adaptations appear in layouts and covers, evoking historical grandeur while fitting digital workflows. Contemporary applications extend fat face's bold aesthetic to , especially in and sectors of the , where fonts like Abril Fatface convey confidence and uniqueness through their dramatic proportions in logos and packaging. This influence echoes in forms, such as editorial illustrations that mimic Victorian excess for thematic depth. As a foundational high-contrast style within the Didone family, fat face has shaped modern revivals of and similar serifs, informing sleek displays that prioritize vertical emphasis in minimalist . Its legacy persists in the hipster typography movement, where fat face revivals fueled retro-inspired trends in craft branding and poster art, blending nostalgic excess with ironic detachment. Archival efforts by institutions like Monotype continue to digitize historical specimens, ensuring fat face designs remain accessible for contemporary experimentation and preservation.

References

  1. [1]
    The Story of Our Friend, the Fat Face - Fonts In Use
    Feb 6, 2014 · The first truly fat roman typeface is believed to have been introduced by prominent London type founder Robert Thorne, in 1803.
  2. [2]
    Fat Faces - Luc Devroye
    Oct 28, 2025 · Fat faces describe fat didones, which showed magnified contrast, keeping the thin parts of the letter slender while magnifying the vertical ...
  3. [3]
    Robert Thorne and the origin of the ‘modern’ fat face
    ### Summary of Robert Thorne and Fat Face Typefaces
  4. [4]
    Abril Fatface - Google Fonts
    Abril Fatface in particular is inspired by the heavy titling fonts used in advertising posters in 19th century Britain and France. The thin serifs and clean ...
  5. [5]
    Here's How to Classify Modern Font Types - ThoughtCo
    Dec 13, 2019 · One style of slab serif, the Fat Faces, may be described as Didone (or Modern) on steroids with fattened strokes that make the flat, hairline ...
  6. [6]
    Sybarite - Adobe Fonts
    Striking contrast and exquisite curves make Sybarite a powerful tool for attracting attention. The key to a fat face is dramatic contrast between thick and ...
  7. [7]
    Wood Type Posters: 19th century and Today
    Mar 1, 2009 · A fifth type style on this poster is a fat face type style, as is evidenced by the thick-thin contrast with the strong, triangular serifs. This ...
  8. [8]
    Roman - Rob Roy Kelly American Wood Type Collection
    The extra bold display types known as Fat Faces were developed from this style, and distinguished by an even more exaggerated stroke contrast. The thick ...
  9. [9]
    A Brief History of Type—Part 5 - I Love Typography
    Jun 20, 2008 · ... Fat Face display types, making them fit for use as text faces. Contrast was reduced, the serifs thinned somewhat and up with the x-height ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Type Tuesday - Fat Faces - California Historical Society
    Jun 2, 2015 · Johnson's Fat Faces: Their History, Forms and Use. All of the following images come from Johnson's article on the Fat Face font.Missing: PDF | Show results with:PDF
  11. [11]
    The first sanserif type - ABYME
    ... contrast with the hugely differentiated thick and thin strokes of the contemporary 'fat face' roman type. It is true that the unprecedented size and weight ...
  12. [12]
    Robert Thorne and the origin of the 'modern' fat face, Poem ...
    May 28, 2020 · It is usually believed that the typefounder Robert Thorne (1753–1820) was the first to have introduced in the early 19th century the 'fat face'.Missing: one | Show results with:one
  13. [13]
    [PDF] early advertising types
    The earliest of these were the fat faces and Egyptians, both probably due to Robert Thorne, the man who led the way in introducing the modern face into this ...Missing: 19th Britain
  14. [14]
    Trilogy Fatface - Jeremy Tankard StudioType
    This idea was developed more fully in the Trilogy Fatface [fig 33] . D4 Tri F 02. 28. Notes for a script inspired fat face, alternate letter shapes and widths.Missing: features | Show results with:features
  15. [15]
    Fat Faces: origins - Luc Devroye
    Feb 22, 2021 · Paul Barnes, upon publishing Isambard in 2019: The fat face is the joyful expression of an idea---to make something as bold as can be---executed ...Missing: s | Show results with:s
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    Etna – A History of 'Aetna' Typefaces - Mark Simonson Studio
    In American Wood Type 1828–1900 Rob Roy Kelly described Aetna as an innovative reaction against the perceived fragility of the long popular fat face roman, and ...
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Calligraphic tendencies in the development of sanserif types in the ...
    This type of sanserifs dominated the market for the rest of the century. They fulfilled their function perfectly and eventually drove out the fat faces and the ...
  20. [20]
    By the Numbers no. 2—Fat Faces in New England Cemeteries
    Aug 31, 2018 · This second installment of By the Numbers is devoted to examples of Fat Faces found on gravestones in cemeteries in Massachusetts and Maine.
  21. [21]
    Robert Thorne: The Trailblazer Who Made Typography Bolder
    A page from an 1825 specimen book showcasing 'Fat Face' type from the Fann Street Foundry in London. This bold, high-contrast typeface ...Missing: s | Show results with:s
  22. [22]
    About » Isambard - Commercial Type
    Shapes become simplified: the E, F, L, T, and Z all lose the curvature in ... The fat face was created for display typography in sizes from 14 point to ...
  23. [23]
    File:Caslon 1841 specimen Sixteen-line Pica fat face typeface.jpg
    DescriptionCaslon 1841 specimen Sixteen-line Pica fat face typeface.jpg. English: Specimen of the Caslon type foundry's Sixteen-line Pica fat face typeface.Missing: 19th canon<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Blue Pencil no. 64—Type Specimens from 1800 to 1836
    Oct 11, 2022 · 1803. [Robert Thorne specimen book] London: 1803. Internet Archive / St. Bride Library [no cover or title page] [the only fat faces are italics]Missing: preservation | Show results with:preservation
  25. [25]
    The materials of typefounding - Typefoundry
    Jan 6, 2006 · The older matrices of the Fonderie Caslon, including all sizes of Caslon Old Face ... Elizabeth Harris, The fat and the lean: American wood type ...
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Thorowgood in use - Fonts In Use
    The original fat face was designed by Robert Thorne in 1806 [ DWB ]. This cut is credited to William Thorowgood, ca. 1820 [Neil Macmillan]. Thorowgood's Fat ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    The 20th Century "Antique" Type Revival - Circuitous Root®
    The Fat and the Lean: American Wood Type in the 19th Century . Washington ... [ Lyons] Typograph: A Compilation of Nineteenth Century Type Faces, Borders and ...
  34. [34]
    Nancy Sinatra – Boots album art - Fonts In Use
    Mar 26, 2023 · First released in 1922, the chubby face was far from a mid-life crisis at 44. In fact, it had quite a moment in 1966: in addition to this album ...
  35. [35]
    Matthew Carter Fonts · Type Network
    Aug 6, 2023 · Vincent Figgins developed his “fat face” in the early 1800s in response to the demand for advertising. It features extremely high contrast ...
  36. [36]
    Gravitas One - Google Fonts
    Gravitas One is modeled on the "UK fat face" which is a kind of very heavy advertising type created during the industrial revolution in England.Missing: inspired 2010s
  37. [37]
    Variable Fonts on the Web - WebKit
    Nov 2, 2016 · Therefore, a web site declaring font-weight: bold may cause a variable font to be selected, and then bold applied to that variable font.Missing: fat | Show results with:fat
  38. [38]
    fat-face - Variable Fonts
    A listing of fat-face variable fonts with design info, interactive samples and download links ... ​A contemporary interpretation of extra-bold blackletter type ...Missing: CSS | Show results with:CSS
  39. [39]
    50 Modern Fonts to Jumpstart Your Contemporary Look - Adobe
    Clean Modern Fonts that are versatile. Sometimes you just need an all-round multi-purpose versatile font that can be used easily and doesn't detract from ...Missing: fat 2020s
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Monotype Plantin - Brigitte Schuster
    Jan 19, 2010 · The project was based on the typeface Monotype Plantin from a book (figures 1, 36) entitled Fables Choisies II by. La Fontaine, dated 1934, and ...