Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

First Moroccan Crisis


The First Moroccan Crisis (1905–1906), also known as the Tangier Crisis, was a diplomatic confrontation between the and , centered on competing claims to influence over , which escalated into a broader European power struggle involving and other nations. The crisis originated from 's expanding control in , formalized in the 1904 with , which recognized French predominance there in exchange for British interests in , prompting —pursuing its agenda—to challenge this arrangement to test and potentially fracture the emerging Anglo-French alignment. On 31 March 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm II arrived unannounced in , publicly affirming 's support for Moroccan independence under Sultan Abdelaziz and advocating an "open door" policy for , directly undermining French ambitions and risking through implied threats of enforcement. responded with troop mobilizations and demands for German concessions, while , fearing German naval expansion, backed diplomatically, leading to heightened tensions and partial preparations across . The standoff was resolved at the (January–April 1906), where thirteen powers convened; , supported by , the , and most attendees, secured rights to organize police forces in key Moroccan ports alongside , while upholding general economic openness but failing to grant equivalent political leverage, resulting in diplomatic isolation for Berlin with only Austria-Hungary's alignment. Though averting immediate conflict, the crisis backfired on German strategy by solidifying the framework, exacerbating Anglo-German antagonism, and contributing causally to the and alliance rigidities that presaged the First World War, as 's miscalculation of allied resolve demonstrated the limits of coercive diplomacy without credible backing.

Historical Background

European Colonial Ambitions in North Africa

France's colonial ambitions in intensified after its Algerian conquest, with military advances from Algerian territory into border regions. In June 1903, French troops occupied Zanagra and collaborated with Moroccan forces to suppress near , an oasis contested due to raids originating from Moroccan soil since 1900. These actions extended French administrative and security influence, paving the way for broader control. By 1904, the formalized British acquiescence to French predominance in , exchanging recognition for French non-interference in . France further pressed for internal reforms, including reorganization in major ports, with demands conveyed to Abdelaziz in early February 1905 to justify enhanced European oversight. Germany countered French expansion by championing an "open door" policy, insisting on equal commercial opportunities to avert monopolistic control. German economic stakes centered on mining and infrastructure, with firms like pursuing concessions for and extraction in southern , where untapped deposits promised significant yields. These interests reflected Germany's broader strategy to secure raw materials and markets amid limited territorial holdings in . Spain asserted longstanding claims to northern Morocco, rooted in its 19th-century presidios such as , and bolstered by a 1902 Franco-Spanish accord delineating spheres—France dominant in the south and interior, in the north including . retained trade privileges, particularly via , while ceded Moroccan ambitions for French backing in through a 1900 secret pact; the emphasized open access for commerce without territorial designs. These rivalries underscored Morocco's status as a arena for economic penetration and strategic positioning among European powers.

Morocco's Internal Weakness and International Status

retained formal sovereignty and independence under , as recognized through treaties such as the Anglo-Moroccan of 1856, which established commercial relations and tariff structures while affirming the sultan's , and the of 1880, where European powers agreed to regulate their consular protections and economic interests without imposing formal protectorates or partitioning the territory. These agreements incorporated capitulatory rights, granting European nationals extraterritorial jurisdiction and most-favored-nation status, but preserved 's status as an independent Islamic state capable of conducting foreign relations. Under , who ascended the throne in 1894 at age ten, internal governance deteriorated due to the ruler's ineffective administration, marked by favoritism toward influences and detachment from tribal constituencies. Tribal unrest intensified in the early 1900s, with regional leaders and pretenders challenging central authority, exemplified by growing opposition in the south and regions that foreshadowed broader revolts by 1907. Failed attempts at centralization, including reliance on foreign advisors for and reforms, eroded legitimacy and fueled perceptions of the sultan as a of outsiders. Fiscal insolvency compounded these weaknesses, as Morocco's treasury faced chronic deficits from extravagant court spending, military setbacks like the 1859-60 Hispano-Moroccan War, and inadequate tax collection amid decentralized power structures. By 1904, desperation led to a 62.5 million loan arranged mainly by French banks, of which the received only a fraction after creditor repayments, while the deal established foreign oversight of customs revenues through the Office d'Administration de la Dette Publique Marocaine, accelerating financial dependency. Internal security further declined with rampant in rural areas, disrupting trade routes and exposing the state's inability to enforce order, though maritime had subsided following 19th-century suppressions by European navies.

The Entente Cordiale and German Strategic Anxieties

The , formalized on April 8, 1904, between the and , delineated colonial spheres of influence to resolve longstanding rivalries. Under its terms, Britain recognized French predominance in , including France's right to maintain order and undertake military measures there if necessary, while France acknowledged British control over and agreed not to interfere in its administration. This mutual acquiescence extended commercial equality in both territories, effectively granting France a free hand in without formal annexation, in exchange for British consolidation in . From Berlin's perspective, the agreement exacerbated anxieties over strategic isolation, amplifying fears of encirclement by the of 1894 now augmented by Anglo-French coordination. 's post-Boer War position—following Britain's exhausting conflict from 1899 to 1902—appeared vulnerable to a dual containment strategy, prompting adherence to as a means to secure global naval parity and colonial footholds against perceived Anglo-French dominance. Rather than passive resignation, this reflected balance-of-power calculations: sought to uphold the status of as an open economic sphere under the 1880 Madrid Convention, challenging French preeminence to prevent unilateral control and assert equal great-power rights. Within German policymaking, Foreign Minister approached Morocco as a calculated "adventure" driven by prestige and the need to demonstrate resolve, favoring diplomatic leverage over outright confrontation to probe cohesion without risking broader war. This caution contrasted with pressures from Pan-German nationalists and the German Colonial Society, who advocated aggressive testing of the Anglo-French pact to expose its limits and rally domestic support for expansionist aims. Such debates underscored 's dual imperatives—projecting strength amid alliance shifts while navigating internal divisions between restraint and confrontation.

Triggering the Crisis

Kaiser Wilhelm II's Visit to Tangier

On 31 March 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm II landed in the port of Tangier, Morocco, after navigating challenging seas, and was greeted on the dock by officials of the Moroccan Makhzen and the local German colony. The Kaiser then rode through streets festooned with decorations amid enthusiastic crowds of natives and Europeans, creating a spectacle of oriental pomp under clear weather. At the German Embassy, Wilhelm II received members of the diplomatic corps and conferred with an envoy of Sultan Abdelaziz, who presented a formal reception on behalf of the Sultan's great uncle; the Kaiser delivered a personal address and an autograph letter affirming direct negotiation as equals with the Moroccan sovereign. Symbolic gestures included the loading of German ships with local produce as tribute, alongside a confidential message from the Sultan pledging no reforms without German consultation. In a public speech delivered from horseback, the proclaimed his view of Abdelaziz as the ruler of a free and independent empire free from foreign dominance, vowing German support for the rights and insisting on principle for equal commercial opportunities among all nations. This declaration to the representative emphasized Germany's demand for and parity with other powers. The timing of the visit aligned with Foreign Théophile Delcassé's drive for bilateral exclusivity in , intended to provoke multilateral scrutiny of such arrangements.

German Declarations and Initial Objectives

On March 31, 1905, Wilhelm II landed at and publicly declared Germany's unwavering support for the of Morocco's independence and territorial integrity, emphasizing that he regarded as the sovereign of a free empire free from foreign domination. In his address to Moroccan representatives, the pledged to protect policy, ensuring equal commercial access for all nations, and expressed confidence in the 's ability to enact internal reforms without external interference. This pronouncement, delivered amid French efforts to consolidate influence via the 1904 agreements, marked Germany's initial diplomatic challenge to perceived violations of Morocco's sovereignty. Chancellor Bernhard von Bülow's government followed with formal demands for the restoration of Morocco's full sovereignty, rejection of police and economic exclusivity arrangements, and convocation of an international conference to regulate principle and affirm equal trading . These objectives were documented in Germany's July 1905 white book, which compiled to justify as a defense of and German commercial interests, including protections for concessions held by firms like Tubes, which had secured mining in southern around 1904 threatened by dominance. The demands prioritized economic causality, safeguarding German enterprises from discriminatory practices while nominally upholding multilateral access over bilateral control. Underlying these declarations was a strategy to test resolve through diplomatic pressure rather than overt , aiming to expose fissures in the Anglo- entente by forcing to justify its North African ambitions internationally. German policymakers, aware of limited tangible stakes beyond prestige and trade, employed the crisis as a calculated bluff to reassert Berlin's voice in colonial affairs and potentially extract concessions, without committing to . This approach reflected Bülow's balancing act between aggressive posturing and avoidance of broader conflict, focusing on procedural gains like the to legitimize Germany's position.

Diplomatic Escalation

French Posture and Domestic Politics

Théophile Delcassé, serving as French Minister of Foreign Affairs, pursued a policy of resolute opposition to German pretensions in Morocco, interpreting Kaiser Wilhelm II's Tangier speech of March 31, 1905, as a bluff and insisting on French preeminence derived from geographic proximity and the Entente Cordiale with Britain. This stance reflected France's strategic overreach, treating Morocco as an inevitable adjunct to its Algerian holdings, with Delcassé directing military reinforcements to the Algerian-Moroccan frontier and preparatory measures to curtail Moroccan autonomy, including enhanced border controls akin to a de facto blockade on unregulated trade. Such actions underscored a defensive-aggressive posture, prioritizing imperial consolidation over diplomatic accommodation. France's initiatives in , however, antedated the German challenge; as early as January 1905, Delcassé's government issued unilateral demands to Abdelaziz for internal reforms, particularly in policing and suppression of arms smuggling, contravening the 1901 international agreement affirming Morocco's and open-door economic policy. These demands aimed to legitimize French administrative penetration, aligning with economic imperatives like modernizing Casablanca's harbor to facilitate French commerce and investment, which French colonial advocates promoted as vital for regional stability and prosperity. Domestically, Delcassé enjoyed broad parliamentary and public backing for his Moroccan ambitions, fueled by nationalist sentiments viewing the territory as a logical extension of Algerian and economic sphere, with press and colonial lobbies emphasizing opportunities in and . Yet this fractured within the Rouvier , where moderates, wary of Germany's military superiority and France's post-Russo-Japanese War vulnerabilities, prioritized averting conflict over confrontation. The ensuing cabinet crisis culminated in Delcassé's resignation on June 6, 1905, as Maurice Rouvier assumed foreign affairs to pursue conciliation, a move that ignited public indignation and anti-German rallies perceiving it as capitulation despite widespread endorsement of assertive colonial policy. This internal schism highlighted tensions between expansionist imperatives and realist caution in French politics, exposing Delcassé's isolation amid fears of broader European entanglement.

Reactions from Britain, Russia, and Other Powers

's reaction was shaped by the recent of April 8, 1904, which delineated spheres of influence in , assigning to while addressing British concerns in . Lord Lansdowne conveyed a stern warning to the ambassador in London, Paul Wolff Metternich, shortly after Kaiser Wilhelm II's speech on March 31, 1905, stating that could not assure neutrality in the event of war over , reflecting fears of naval expansion threatening British maritime dominance. This stance persisted under Lansdowne's successor, Edward Grey, who assumed office on December 11, 1905, and reaffirmed support for , prioritizing of power over specific Moroccan stakes. Russia, bound by the of 1894, offered diplomatic backing to France despite severe constraints from its defeat in the , concluded by the on September 5, 1905, and the ensuing 1905 Revolution, which precipitated the on October 30, 1905. Foreign Minister Vladimir Lamsdorff assured French Premier Maurice Rouvier in June 1905 of Russia's support in the crisis, though military aid was infeasible amid internal instability and resource depletion, limiting involvement to alliance obligations rather than active intervention. The under President adopted a policy of neutrality, viewing as peripheral to American interests and favoring an "" for trade without endorsing exclusive control by any power. Roosevelt's response to German inquiries was deliberately ambiguous, interpretable as neutral, while privately inclining toward French predominance to avert broader European conflict that could disrupt global stability; he later facilitated the but avoided partisan commitments during the initial escalation. Italy, a member of the Triple Alliance with Germany and Austria-Hungary since 1882, displayed ambivalence due to a secret 1900 agreement with France conceding Moroccan influence in exchange for French neutrality on Italian ambitions in Libya. This led Rome to hedge publicly while leaning toward France, contributing to Germany's diplomatic isolation by not invoking alliance solidarity against French actions in Morocco. Spain, harboring territorial claims in northern Morocco including around Melilla and Ceuta, reacted cautiously, initially objecting to unilateral French advances but seeking accommodations to secure its positions amid the crisis. Madrid's hedging reflected pragmatic pursuit of enclaves rather than alignment with Germany, further underscoring the latter's lack of robust support from potential allies. These responses collectively isolated Germany, as pragmatic national interests—British naval security, Russian alliance fidelity despite weakness, American commercial impartiality, Italian colonial trade-offs, and Spanish regional claims—aligned against Berlin's challenge, reinforcing the emerging framework without direct Moroccan-centric motivations.

Negotiation and Resolution

Breakdown of Direct Talks

Following the Kaiser's visit to Tangier on March 31, 1905, German Chancellor initiated diplomatic exchanges with Foreign Minister , demanding recognition of Morocco's independence and proposing an international to address encroachments. Delcassé, favoring a bilateral to preserve dominance without broader involvement, countered with proposals for direct Franco-German talks limited to Morocco's , but Bülow this, insisting on a multilateral venue and open agenda to internationalize the dispute and expose ambitions. These exchanges stalled by May 1905 amid mutual distrust, with viewing the demand as a ploy to undermine the , while perceived intransigence as evidence of aggressive intent. Miscalculations compounded the deadlock: Bülow underestimated British resolve to back , signaling partial war readiness through troop movements near the French border in early June, while Delcassé's hardline stance provoked domestic cabinet opposition, fearing escalation into general war. On , 1905, Delcassé resigned after his government refused to endorse confrontation without Anglo-Russian assurances, paving the way for Rouvier's more conciliatory approach. German threats peaked with a June 22 note hinting at a defensive with , prompting to cancel all military leaves on and quietly mobilize reserves, heightening the risk of inadvertent conflict as both sides misread the other's bluffing thresholds. Moroccan Sultan Abdul Aziz nominally appealed to for aid against pressure, welcoming the Kaiser's support and relying on to enforce his sovereignty through the proposed , but these entreaties proved ineffective amid Morocco's internal fragility. Tribal revolts and fiscal collapse eroded Aziz's authority, foreshadowing coups that would depose him in 1908, rendering his regime unable to leverage German backing into tangible resistance and exposing the limits of external appeals in a weakening state.

Proceedings of the Algeciras Conference

The Algeciras Conference opened on January 16, 1906, in , , with delegates from 13 powers: , , , , the , , , the , , , , , and the . The proceedings unfolded over nearly three months until April 7, marked by intense diplomatic maneuvering between the German-Austrian bloc, which advocated for complete economic openness and rejection of French predominance in , and a coalition including , Britain, , and others favoring regulated French and Spanish influence to maintain order. Germany anticipated broader support for its "open door" policy but found itself largely isolated, with only consistently aligning on key issues, while even Morocco's delegation occasionally voted with the during procedural tallies. Central debates centered on the organization of Moroccan police forces and the creation of a state bank to handle finances and reforms. On the police question, which dominated sessions, proposals evolved from French advocacy for supervisory control in southern ports like Casablanca to a compromise granting France primary responsibility there and Spain oversight in northern zones including Tangier, with the forces to consist of Moroccan Muslims under international regulations for recruitment, discipline, and administration. Voting on these protocols revealed stark divisions, with a reported tally favoring the Franco-Spanish arrangement by a margin that underscored Germany's diplomatic setback, as the majority rejected Berlin's push for purely Moroccan or multilateral control without French involvement. Economic equality provisions, including the establishment of the State Bank of Morocco with multinational oversight to issue currency and manage loans while preserving the Sultan's nominal authority, faced less contention but still required concessions to ensure German access alongside French interests. United States mediation, facilitated by President Theodore Roosevelt's prior assurances to Germany of an impartial forum, played a pivotal role in averting deadlock through discreet proposals emphasizing open economic liberty and police neutrality. The U.S. delegation, headed by Henry White, initially positioned itself as neutral but ultimately aligned with the majority on votes concerning police supervision and banking equality, reflecting Roosevelt's strategy to balance great-power stability without endorsing exclusive spheres. This intervention, rooted in Roosevelt's correspondence encouraging participation, helped frame protocols that integrated German demands for non-discrimination into the final agreements while advancing the majority's framework.

Key Agreements and Compromises

The General Act of , signed on , , by representatives of 13 nations, reaffirmed the and of the Moroccan , while establishing reforms to maintain nominal amid European influence. Key provisions addressed policing, granting primary responsibility for organizing, training, and equipping the Moroccan police force in the Chaouia, , and other southern districts, with assigned similar duties in the northern regions around and ; these forces were to operate under the supervision of a to ensure impartiality. This arrangement provided with substantial administrative leverage in core Moroccan territories without conferring formal status, limiting its influence to specified zones and functions rather than comprehensive political control. Economically, the enshrined the principle of for all signatory powers in Morocco's commerce, loans, and , rejecting any preferential treatment and mandating competitive bidding for contracts to preserve an "open door" policy. No territorial concessions or annexations were authorized, preserving Morocco's borders and prohibiting exclusive economic spheres that might undermine parity. , having prioritized economic access over political dominance in its negotiations, secured this non-discriminatory framework, which neutralized efforts to monopolize trade but fell short of blocking administrative encroachments. The policing compromise notably elevated Spain's role alongside France, apportioning zones to balance Franco-German rivalry without alienating , which had historical claims in the and north; this division—France handling about 55% of the territory by area, the rest—averted unilateral French control while diluting Germany's veto power. Diplomatically, the Act marked a setback for , as only voted consistently in its favor during conference divisions, with the remaining powers (including , , , and the ) aligning behind French preeminence, thereby exposing the fragility of Berlin's alliances and its inability to rally broader support against the Anglo-French .

Outcomes and Assessments

Immediate Results and Power Shifts

The Act of , signed on April 7, 1906, granted and joint authority over Morocco's police forces in major ports and interior regions, with receiving the dominant role, while affirming economic equality for all powers and Morocco's nominal . This outcome effectively legitimized French predominance in Moroccan affairs, enabling under Maurice Rouvier—who had steered negotiations—to pursue consolidation through administrative reforms, including the establishment of a under French direction and troop deployments to suppress unrest, such as the occupation of on March 29, 1907, following clashes with Moroccan forces. In , Chancellor framed the conference results as a moral and diplomatic triumph, highlighting the rejection of a full protectorate and the upholding of Morocco's alongside the open-door economic principle, which bolstered his domestic position and averted immediate political fallout despite the isolation of —allied only with among major powers. The crisis, however, exposed strategic miscalculations in German foreign policy, as the bluff of military confrontation failed to dislodge gains. The events accelerated Anglo-French military coordination, with Britain, perceiving the German challenge as revanchist posturing tied to naval expansionism, initiating confidential naval staff conversations in 1906 to redistribute fleets—freeing French Mediterranean assets for army focus while concentrating strength in home waters against potential German threats—thus intensifying the pre-existing . Internally in , the crisis undermined Sultan Abdul Aziz's authority amid accusations of capitulation to European powers, sparking tribal revolts that enabled his half-brother, Abd al-Hafid, to proclaim himself in July 1907; French recognition of Hafid soon followed, positioning him as a more amenable figure for advancing Parisian interests amid ongoing instability.

Long-Term Impacts on European Balance of Power

The First Moroccan Crisis exacerbated alliance rigidities in Europe by accelerating the completion of the . The diplomatic isolation of during the crisis prompted and to formalize their on August 31, 1907, resolving disputes over Persia, Afghanistan, and Tibet, thereby countering perceived German expansionism and solidifying the informal alignment of , , and against the Triple Alliance. This evolution transformed flexible diplomatic understandings into more committed bloc structures, as evidenced by the subsequent naval arms race between and , with British production rising from 1 in 1906 to 29 by 1914. Germany's failure to garner support beyond at the of 1906 deepened mistrust and prompted a strategic pivot toward exclusive reliance on its Dual Alliance partner, formalized in renewals of the Triple Alliance treaty in 1909 and 1912. This shift reinforced bilateral dependencies, with Germany providing unconditional support in Balkan contingencies, as pledged in December 1912 correspondence between German and Austro-Hungarian leaders, entrenching the ' isolation from other European actors. The crisis signaled deterrence failures, contributing directly to the (Second Moroccan) Crisis of July 1, 1911, when dispatched the gunboat to challenge French incursions, only to yield territorial compensations in the via the November 4, 1911, Franco- accord. This recurrence underscored alliance brittleness, spurring : strength increased from 545,000 in 1906 to 872,000 by 1914, while expanded its forces to 714,000, reflecting heightened deterrence needs amid eroded diplomatic flexibility. Economically, the Act of Algeciras on April 7, 1906, maintained an " guaranteeing trade access in equivalent to privileges, with exports to rising from 12 million marks in 1905 to 18 million by 1910. However, the crisis's diplomatic fallout hastened France's consolidation of influence, culminating in the Treaty of Fez on March 30, 1912, establishing a over and marginalizing economic leverage despite preserved nominal rights.

Historiographical Debates and Alternative Perspectives

Historians aligned with Fritz Fischer's interpretation of German foreign policy have framed the First Moroccan Crisis as an instance of Wilhelm II's aggressive , interpreting the Kaiser's 1905 Tangier speech as a calculated provocation designed to fracture the Anglo-French entente and expand German influence, thereby foreshadowing the bid for continental dominance that precipitated the Great War. This view posits Germany's actions as rooted in a premeditated strategy of power maximization, dismissing defensive rationales as pretexts for . Revisionist analyses counter that French maneuvers, including the 1904 entente cordiale and prior military occupations in dating to 1903, established de facto faits accomplis that violated the international open-door principle and upset the , necessitating Germany's intervention to preserve equitable access rather than initiate bullying. These perspectives emphasize causal in great-power competition, where Germany's response aligned with classical balance-of-power logic against encroachments by a Franco-British bloc, rather than unprovoked ; academic consensus favoring German culpability often reflects post-1945 interpretive biases prioritizing Allied narratives over primary diplomatic records. Game-theoretic models, such as the Tripartite Crisis game, interpret the escalation through incomplete-information bargaining, where actors' signaling of resolve—via Germany's naval demonstration and France's mobilization—stemmed from mutual uncertainty about red lines and alliance commitments, yielding inefficient outcomes like without inherent belligerence on either side. This highlights miscalculation in assessments over deliberate warmongering, supported by archival evidence of contingent under informational asymmetries. Revisionist emphases further underscore underappreciated Moroccan , with Sultan Abdul Aziz's overtures to multiple powers for economic and reform aid reflecting internal fiscal collapse and tribal revolts by 1904–1905, which great-power posturing exploited rather than originated. Economic drivers, including Morocco's strategic trade position—French-Algerian comprising over 40% of imports by 1903—and potential like phosphates, motivated interventions as rational pursuit of commercial spheres amid , not mere games. Germany's perceived by the , while amplifying risk aversion, arose from verifiable diplomatic shifts like the 1904 Anglo-French agreement, rendering it a self-reinforcing misperception driven by alliance dynamics rather than fabricated .

References

  1. [1]
    The First Moroccan Crisis | March 31, 1905 - History.com
    What began as mere friendship turned, after the First Moroccan Crisis, into a type of informal military alliance, including conversations between the British ...
  2. [2]
    A diplomatic report on the first Moroccan Crisis (1905) - Alpha History
    Feb 3, 2013 · In 1905 a German official submitted the following report on Kaiser Wilhelm's state visit to Morocco, an event that precipitated the First Moroccan Crisis.Missing: Britain analysis
  3. [3]
    (PDF) The Moroccan Crisis of 1905–1906: An Analytic Narrative
    This paper interprets the Moroccan crisis of 1905–1906 in the context of an incomplete information game model, the Tripartite Crisis game.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  4. [4]
    (PDF) The Algeciras Conference (Abstract) - Academia.edu
    The First Moroccan Crisis (the so-called Tangier Crisis) originated from this system of alliances and from the German intentions of not leaving the Sultanate ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Historians, Political Scientists, and the Causes of the First World War.
    France and Russia between 1886 and 1888; the First Moroccan Crisis in 1905-1906; and Chief of the Austrian General Staff Conrad's pressure for a preventive ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] EUROPEAN INTERVENTION IN MOROCCO
    In June, 1903, the French occupied Zanagra and aided the Moroccan forces in suppressing brigandage in the region of Figuig. In August the French and Sheriffian ...
  7. [7]
    1903 Battle of El Moungar | French Foreign Legion Information
    Sep 23, 2023 · Figuig was believed to have been the main base for bandits raiding the Zousfana Valley since 1900. Again, many French newspapers called for ...
  8. [8]
    Morocco - Decline, Traditional Gov, 1830-1912 | Britannica
    European powers seized the occasion to extend their own influence. In 1904 Britain gave France a free hand in Morocco in exchange for French noninterference ...Missing: 1900-1905 | Show results with:1900-1905
  9. [9]
    The Rhetoric of the Moroccan Crises, 1905 and 1911
    A crisis broke out over Morocco, which was resolved after Britain and other powers backed France against Germany.
  10. [10]
    Mannesmanns and Morocco; Rhodes and the Jameson Raid.
    (8) This would seem to accord with the general line of German policy from the Kaiser's landing at Tangier (1905) until 1908, in certain respects, at least.
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Chapter XXII. The French Conquest of Morocco
    Jul 30, 2020 · France acquired the right to the “military occupation of Moroccan territory” and to undertake “any kind of police measures” in Morocco. The ...
  13. [13]
    No. 579. Mr. Fairchild to Mr. Evarts. - Office of the Historian
    A general report of the proceedings of each session, of the position taken by each government, and of the final result of the conference.
  14. [14]
    Judgment of 27 August 1952 | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
    by the treaties. This contention is based on certain bilateraltreaties with Morocco as well as on the Madrid Convention of 1880and the. Act of Algeciras of ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Public debt and European expansionism in Morocco From 1860 to ...
    The Moroccan Sultan Abdelaziz was impeached in 1907 since he was accused of selling the country to Europeans. Its brother and successor - Moulay Hafid - could ...Missing: revolts | Show results with:revolts
  16. [16]
    When France Used the Public Debt to Colonise Morocco - CADTM
    Feb 17, 2017 · The debt contract of 1904 also provided for the creation of a State Bank of Morocco (BEM), which would not take place until 1907, after the ...
  17. [17]
    The Entente Cordiale Between England and France - April 8, 1904
    The Entente Cordiale included agreements that neither would alter the status of Egypt or Morocco, France would preserve order in Morocco, and commercial ...
  18. [18]
    Britain and France sign Entente Cordiale | April 8, 1904 - History.com
    Formally entitled a Declaration between the United Kingdom and France Respecting Egypt and Morocco, the Entente Cordiale of April 1904 amounted more than ...
  19. [19]
    Entente Cordiale | Franco-British Alliance, 1904 Treaty | Britannica
    Sep 12, 2025 · The most important feature of the agreement was that it granted freedom of action to Great Britain in Egypt and to France in Morocco (with the ...
  20. [20]
    Uncle and nephew: Edward VII and the 'encirclement' of Germany
    With the conclusion of the Anglo-French Entente Cordiale on 8 April 1904 the coalition of west European Powers which Wilhelm II had been predicting for a year ...
  21. [21]
    Entente Cordiale - Oxford Public International Law
    The Entente Cordiale was a friendly understanding between Great Britain and France, a flexible, cordial relationship, not a formal alliance.A. Notion And History · 1. Contents · 2. Evaluation
  22. [22]
    Bülow and the War | Foreign Affairs
    That was why he wrote, in 1905, that Germany had embarked on the Morocco venture out of considerations of prestige, pure and simple; and that confession ...
  23. [23]
    VEXED AT ANGLO-FRENCH PACT.; German Colonial Society ...
    Count von Pfeil and others presented resolutions addressed to Chancellor von Bülow asking the German Government to take steps to provide for the ...
  24. [24]
    4 Weltpolitik: The German Aspiration for World Power Status
    Apr 17, 2019 · The precariousness of its social status was revealed during the First Moroccan Crisis, when in response to acts of misrecognition Germany ...
  25. [25]
    31 March, 1905 The First Moroccan Crisis
    Feb 5, 1996 · His Majesty remarked that he looked upon the Sultan as the ruler of a free and independent empire subject to no foreign control; that he ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  26. [26]
    31st March 1905: Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany lands in Morocco ...
    Mar 31, 2022 · The Kaiser's speech in Tangier was a direct challenge to the French Foreign Minister, Théophile Delcassé, who had previously secured wide European support for ...
  27. [27]
    GERMANY Will BEJM Announces Her Position Toward Morocco to ...
    The Kaiser demands the open door in Morocco in the same sense that this government has sought to maintain in China and the preservation of the statue qup there.
  28. [28]
    Mannesmann Mining Interests and the Franco-German Conflict over ...
    Eugene Staley, Mannesmann Mining Interests and the Franco-German Conflict over Morocco, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Feb., 1932), pp. 52-72.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] The First Moroccan Crisis(1904-1906)
    ... France, the development of Anglo-German rivalry, the failure of Germany's policy of playing between Great Britain and the Dual Alliance, Germany's riposte ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  30. [30]
    The Port of Casablanca in the First Stage of the Protectorate
    The Moroccan administration considered it necessary to have a safer, more practical port. In 1905, on the initiative of Sultan Mulay Abd el Aziz, a contract was ...
  31. [31]
    (PDF) The Moroccan Crisis of 1905–6 - ResearchGate
    ... cabinet unanimously supported the Prime Minister. Rouvier took over the foreign. ministry when Delcassé left office on June 5. Delcassé's resignation was ...Missing: dismissal | Show results with:dismissal
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The First Moroccan Crisis - MacGregor Is History
    The Algeciras Conference was held as a result of the First Moroccan Crisis that started in. 1905. The conference at Algeciras started on January 16 th. 1906 ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] FIRST MOROCCAN CRISIS 1905 ALGECIRAS CONFERENCE 1906
    Their only support at the conference, Austria-Hungary, suggested in late March that France and Spain would be allowed to send police forces to the Moroccan port ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] the foreign policy of sir edward grey - bac-lac.gc.ca
    This unbroken continuity of British foreign policy from the signing of the Moroccan agreement of April 1904, during Lansdowne's tenure of office, and throughout ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Russia and the Franco-Russian Alliance, I 905-14: Dependence or
    In June 1905 Lamsdorf had already assured Rouvier of Russia's support in the Morocco crisis. But the question was what kind of support? Not, it seems, such ...
  36. [36]
    First Moroccan Crisis | Research Starters - EBSCO
    In 1880, the European powers and Morocco met in Madrid, Spain, to resolve issues related to Morocco's governance. The meeting resulted in the Madrid Treaties, ...
  37. [37]
    Moroccan Crises 1905-1911 - 1914-1918 Online
    Oct 8, 2014 · The two Moroccan crises of 1905 and 1911 reveal the extent to which “predatory shared imperialism” degenerated into rivalries dangerous for global stability.Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Transcript. - The History of the Twentieth Century
    On March 31, 1905, the German Kaiser, Wilhelm II, surprised the world with an unscheduled appearance at the ancient Moroccan port city of Tangier. The French ...
  39. [39]
    Moroccan Crisis, First - Oxford Reference
    In the international crisis that ensued, the French foreign minister, Delcassé, had to resign. However, the French agreement to an international conference ...
  40. [40]
    Tangier Crisis | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The Tangier Crisis, which unfolded in 1905, marked a significant diplomatic conflict primarily between Germany and France over the status of Morocco.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  41. [41]
    Theophile Delcasse - History Learning Site
    Mar 31, 2015 · Delcassé was manoeuvred into resigning in June 1905. Once out of office, his political enemies continued their attack on his diplomatic skills, ...
  42. [42]
    The First Moroccan Crisis - History Learning Site
    Mar 31, 2015 · In February 1905, Aziz gathered around him those Moroccan notables who still supported him. Aziz told them that he put his faith in Allah and ...
  43. [43]
    Algeciras Conference | Moroccan-European Relations, Imperialism ...
    France's attempt to implement the agreement by presenting the Moroccan sultan with a program of economic and police “reforms” brought the indignant German ...
  44. [44]
    Text of the General Act of the International Conference of Algeciras.
    Tangier, June 22, 1906. (Mr. Gummeré states that the Italian minister announces the ratification by the Sultan of the general act without reserve on the 18th ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  45. [45]
    THE VOTE AT ALGECIRAS. - The New York Times
    ... police question in the Algeciras conference. That, with the vote of Morocco in the same sense, is extremely significant. Austria is not only weak because of ...
  46. [46]
    Humiliation in Algeciras (Chapter sixteen) - Wilhelm II
    On 16 January 1906 the international conference to settle the Moroccan question was convened in Algeciras, not far from Gibraltar.Missing: tallies | Show results with:tallies
  47. [47]
    [PDF] INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AT ALGECIRAS AFFAIRS OF ...
    Regulations for the proper working of the recruiting, disci- pline, instruction, and administration of the police force shall be- drawn up by common agreement ...Missing: details debates tallies
  48. [48]
    From Berlin to Moscow - Columbia | Journal of International Affairs
    Nov 13, 2018 · The conference of Algeciras in 1906 found Germany, to her surprise and dismay, essentially isolated.[3]. After looking at the sequence of ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Spain's Part in the 1906 Algeciras Conference
    The 1906 Algeciras Conference falls within a period embracing the last third of the 19th century and the first third of the 20th, marked by the Berlin ...Missing: proceedings key tallies
  50. [50]
    Moroccan crises | History & Facts - Britannica
    First Moroccan Crisis, was resolved in January–April 1906 at the Algeciras Conference, where German and other national economic rights were upheld and where ...
  51. [51]
    Moroccan Crises: German v. French Imperialism
    Sep 30, 2025 · The Moroccan Crises were two international incidents, the first in 1905-6 and the second in 1911, when Imperial Germany, eager to expand its ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Circumstances Leading to Formation of Triple Alliance and Triple ...
    Apr 19, 2021 · France developed a strong bond with Russia by ratifying into Franco-Russian Alliance, the alliance was simply and purely formed to counterattack ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Moroccan Crisis 1905-1908: European Alliances and Tensions
    Sep 17, 2025 · The crisis led to closer ties between Russia and Britain, solidifying their alliance against perceived German aggression. · The Entente Cordiale ...
  54. [54]
    Moroccan Crisis - (AP European History) - Fiveable
    The first Moroccan Crisis occurred in 1905 when Kaiser Wilhelm II made a provocative visit to Tangier, asserting Germany's support for Moroccan independence.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] The Algeciras Conference was held from the 15
    The direct consequence was a more strict tie between the two Central Empires, and an often complete support of Germany to Austria, especially in the Balkan ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    The Algeciras Conference of 1906 - History Learning Site
    Mar 31, 2015 · It is probable that the failure of the German politicians at Algeciras led to an increase in the influence the military had over the Kaiser at ...
  57. [57]
    Agadir Crisis | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The Agadir Crisis, also known as the Second Moroccan Crisis, occurred in 1911 and was a significant diplomatic conflict involving Germany, France, and Britain.
  58. [58]
    The First and Second Moroccan Crises: Paving the Way to World War I
    Jan 1, 2025 · In March 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm visited the Moroccan city of Tangier, where he delivered a provocative speech supporting Moroccan independence and ...
  59. [59]
    Moroccan Crisis - Definition, History, Facts, FAQ's - Vedantu
    Rating 4.2 (373,000) The subsequent worldwide panic, known as the First Moroccan Crisis, was resolved in January–April 1906 at the Algeciras Conference, which protected German and ...First Moroccan Crisis... · Causes Of First Moroccan... · Outcomes Of Moroccan Crisis...
  60. [60]
    To what extent should Germany be held responsible for causing ...
    The German historian Fritz Fischer was the first to blame solely Germany for causing the Great War. His thesis was that Germany was aching for a war since 1912 ...
  61. [61]
    The Fischer Controversy, the War Origins Debate and France - jstor
    for Fritz Fischer in 2000, by the historian of the 1911 Agadir crisis and former. Renouvin doctoral student, Jean-Claude Allain. The first reason he gave was ...
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    Game Theory, Diplomatic History and Security Studies. By Frank C ...
    Jun 1, 2023 · The fact that Zagare's game-theoretic models present reasonable explanations of important aspects of the Moroccan Crisis, the Cuban Missile ...
  64. [64]
    An International Historical Sociology of the First Moroccan Crisis ...
    Jan 2, 2023 · This article argues that Morocco was not just a footnote in the 1904-6 crisis, but had agency, and explores the materialist roots of Muslim ...