Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Forage War


The Forage War was a campaign of numerous small skirmishes and ambushes waged by detachments and militia against and foraging parties in from to May 1777, during the . Following the American victories at Trenton and Princeton, forces under General William Howe occupied and required extensive —such as hay and oats—to sustain their thousands of amid winter shortages, prompting expeditions into the countryside that exposed them to attack. American commander directed a of preemptive forage removal and guerrilla to starve the enemy of resources, with Philemon Dickinson leading key militia operations that inflicted disproportionate casualties relative to the scale of engagements. Notable actions included the January 20 Battle of Millstone, where Dickinson's forces routed a column, capturing wagons and while pursuing a policy of denying supplies that compelled the to rely on river transport and ultimately abandon control of rural . Jaeger captain Johann von Ewald, involved in many foraging efforts, recorded the persistent ambushes and supply vulnerabilities in his contemporaneous diary, highlighting the campaign's effectiveness in disrupting logistics without large-scale battles.

Historical Context

Prelude and Strategic Necessity

The British capture of in September 1776 enabled General William Howe's army to push into , securing positions along the and establishing outposts in , Perth Amboy, and other towns by November. This advance, part of a broader strategy to consolidate control over the , exposed the expeditionary force to acute logistical strains, as maintaining thousands of horses for wagons, artillery caissons, and mounted units demanded immediate access to local hay, oats, and . Winter conditions exacerbated supply vulnerabilities, with transatlantic shipping hampered by storms and ice, rendering reliance on imported impractical and forcing commanders to dispatch protected parties to strip farms and meadows of provender essential for animal survival. Forage needs were immense, as each horse required roughly 12-15 pounds of hay daily alongside grain, with forces in the region encompassing up to 20,000 troops supported by extensive draught animals whose depletion threatened operational paralysis. Hessian auxiliaries, integral to these efforts, similarly depended on such expeditions, as their contingents from German states arrived without sufficient remounts or feed reserves suited to American winters. The imperative stemmed from causal : without local , immobilized transport would halt and provision flows, undermining Howe's ability to hold territory and prepare for spring campaigns toward . American responses crystallized from the occupation's direct impacts on civilian agriculture, as and parties seized crops and , devastating harvests needed for local sustenance and militia horse maintenance. This plunder, often indiscriminate amid perceptions of Loyalist support in eastern , eroded passive neutrality and galvanized irregular enlistments, with farmers and militiamen motivated by property defense and the opportunity to economically bleed occupiers through supply . By December 1776, following initial advances, heightened patrols and requisitions bred organized harassment, transforming logistical necessity into a theater of where resource control became a for broader strategic .

British Occupation of New Jersey

Following the American victories at Trenton on December 26, 1776, and Princeton on January 3, 1777, British forces under General William Howe withdrew from forward positions and consolidated control by establishing primary outposts in and Perth Amboy (modern-day Perth Amboy). These garrisons anchored British territorial hold in central , facilitating communication and supply routes between and anticipated operations toward , while projecting power into the Raritan Valley and surrounding countryside. The occupation, however, exposed extended lines across dispersed settlements, with distances between outposts—often 10 to 20 miles apart—creating logistical strains amid rugged terrain and limited roads, which British officers noted as sources of unease for defensive cohesion. British control relied on collaboration from local Loyalists, who comprised an estimated one-third of New Jersey's population and actively opposed through sharing, provisioning, and into provincial units. Thousands of Loyalists sought refuge within lines, offering services that included movements and safeguarding collections, thereby challenging postwar accounts of near-universal colonial resistance. This support was unevenly distributed, stronger in urban outposts and eastern counties, but provided critical offsets to the predominantly hostile rural populace, enabling administrators to extract resources from occupied farms without total reliance on coerced neutrality. The strategic imperatives of amplified vulnerabilities tied to supply self-sufficiency, as the army's 10,000-plus troops and thousands of demanded vast local —typically 12 to 15 pounds of hay per horse daily—to avoid dependence on protracted maritime shipments from , which were hampered by weather and interdiction. from New Jersey's fertile lowlands yielded essential hay, grain, and to sustain garrisons and draft animals for and , yet this necessity bound commanders to static territorial defense while compelling repeated excursions into contested areas, where control of agricultural output directly determined operational endurance. Failure to secure these yields risked equine and immobilized campaigns, illustrating the inherent tension between maintaining footholds for political leverage and the exposure inherent in resource extraction amid a divided populace.

Forces Involved

American Commanders and Militia Organization

![Brig. Gen. Philemon Dickinson](.assets/Brig.-Gen.Philemon_Dickinson%252C_member_of_the_Continental_CongressNYPL_b12349181-420040 The effort in the Forage War relied on a decentralized command structure, with providing overarching coordination from his headquarters via couriers and directives to subordinate officers. Local brigadiers and colonels assembled ad-hoc units from state s, emphasizing rapid over rigid to counter foraging expeditions. This approach leveraged the militia's familiarity with terrain but exposed limitations in discipline and sustained operations. Brigadier General Philemon Dickinson, appointed major general of the in June 1777, played a central role in organizing defenses against British incursions. Dickinson commanded combined forces of militiamen and riflemen, such as the 450 militiamen and 50 riflemen he led on January 20, 1777, at Van Nest's Mills, where they destroyed 20-30 British wagons loaded with forage. His leadership focused on intercepting supply parties near key rivers and roads, coordinating with Continental detachments when available. Colonel Oliver Spencer similarly directed militia actions, leading 300 militiamen on January 15, 1777, at Connecticut Farms, where they ambushed and captured 70 foragers with minimal losses. Other officers, including Brigadier General William Maxwell, organized militia in northern earlier in the campaign, transitioning from independent commands to integrated harassment tactics. New Jersey militia formed the core, drawn from county regiments totaling around 10,000-15,000 eligible men statewide, though active participants in the Forage War peaked at 1,000-2,000 across simultaneous operations, augmented by Pennsylvania and Connecticut volunteers. Motivation stemmed primarily from protecting personal farms and livestock from British confiscation, fostering quick turnouts but leading to rapid demobilization once immediate threats subsided. This structure proved effective for ambushes and supply denial, inflicting disproportionate casualties relative to numbers—British losses exceeded those from major battles—yet militias struggled with unreliability in prolonged engagements due to short enlistments and lack of training, often breaking under disciplined fire. Empirical outcomes demonstrated causal efficacy in guerrilla denial tactics, compelling British forces to limit foraging radius and rely more on sea supply lines.

British Commanders and Expeditionary Forces

The British foraging operations during the Forage War were directed from by General Sir William Howe, overall commander of British forces in , with significant involvement from Lieutenant General , who oversaw Hessian contingents integrated into the expeditions. Major General Leslie commanded British brigades in during the early 1777 phase, coordinating with local garrison commanders in outposts such as and Amboy. Tactical leadership of individual expeditions fell to field-grade officers, including Robert Abercromby, who led a party from on January 20, 1777, and Charles Mawhood, who directed operations culminating in the Spanktown action on February 23, 1777. Expeditionary forces typically comprised 500 to 1,000 men, blending professional regulars with auxiliaries and Loyalist provincials to balance labor with security. Core units included from the 16th and 17th Regiments for scouting and flank protection, elite and for rapid response, and jägers for skirmishing in wooded terrain. Loyalist formations such as the provided versatile support, emphasizing mobility and local knowledge despite their nascent organization under initial command of Robert Rogers. This hierarchical structure leveraged the discipline of veteran troops—accustomed to European linear tactics—to escort extended lines, though the necessity of dispersing into vulnerable columns across New Jersey's countryside exposed them to militia ambushes. Despite logistical strains from winter conditions and persistent , these forces demonstrated operational resilience, securing essential supplies that sustained and draft through 1777. Expeditions yielded hay, , and in quantities sufficient to offset some shortages, countering assessments of outright failure by enabling the army's repositioning toward later that year; for instance, Abercromby's party returned with partial loads despite American of 49 wagons. The of the troops, marked by coordinated escorts and disciplined retreats, minimized total losses relative to the forage gathered, underscoring the effectiveness of formal elements in asymmetric amid supply imperatives.

Operational Tactics

American Harassment and Ambushes

forces in the Forage War utilized irregular tactics to disrupt supply efforts, emphasizing asymmetry through small-unit actions that exploited local terrain and knowledge. units, often numbering between 100 and 300 men, relied on scouts and informants for early detection of foraging parties, enabling rapid assembly from dispersed farms and villages. These forces would strike vulnerable elements such as herds and loaded wagons before dispersing quickly to evade organized pursuit by superior numbers. Targeting extended beyond immediate captures to long-term denial, with Americans systematically burning haystacks and grain stores to render the countryside unusable for British sustenance. For instance, operations under Philemon Dickinson focused on intercepting expeditions, as seen in the January 20, 1777, action near where 450 militiamen and riflemen seized 49 wagons and 107 horses laden with , destroying what could not be carried off. This approach inflicted cumulative attrition, compelling British commanders to augment detachments with heavy escorts—often 500 or more troops—thereby immobilizing regular forces needed for broader campaigns. The tactics' effectiveness is evidenced by British losses exceeding 950 killed, wounded, captured, or missing between January and March 1777, surpassing casualties from the preceding campaign despite smaller-scale engagements. By prioritizing hit-and-run ambushes over sustained battles, American militia not only preserved their limited resources but also eroded British logistical capacity, demonstrating the viability of petite guerre in denying an invader's material sustainment.

British Foraging Expeditions and Escorts

British foraging expeditions during the Forage War were methodically planned operations launched from outposts such as to procure hay, grain, and livestock essential for sustaining horses and troops through the winter of 1776-1777. These sweeps followed principal roads into the countryside, with forces typically numbering 1,500 to 2,000 men, including foragers accompanied by protective elements to counter anticipated harassment. The expeditions emphasized logistical efficiency, prioritizing areas with known stockpiles while minimizing exposure through coordinated movements. Tactical formations featured cavalry dragoons and as advanced screens to detect threats, backed by infantry reserves such as and for rapid response. For instance, on 8 1777, a column of approximately 1,750 and troops advanced from toward Quibbletown, employing 100 dragoons and 400 in the , supported by units including 400 Scots, 400 English , and grenadier battalions. Such arrangements allowed foraging parties to load wagons under cover, though the extended lines inherent to gathering operations occasionally exposed flanks to opportunistic attacks. Despite these vulnerabilities, the expeditions yielded sufficient to prevent of draft animals and cavalry mounts, supplementing maritime imports and enabling the British to maintain their positions until spring campaigns. Procurement efforts, often involving purchases with promissory notes alongside seizures, secured critical resources like and oats from local farms, underscoring the pragmatic necessity of overland amid strained supply lines. While critics noted the risks of dispersing forces for subsistence, the approach demonstrated a realistic adaptation to the theater's constraints, sustaining mobility without full reliance on distant provisioning.

Key Skirmishes

Elizabethtown Raid

On January 5, 1777, a small patrol from Elizabethtown, —stationed to support foraging operations across the state—was ambushed by American militia under Brigadier General William Maxwell near the town. The patrol, consisting of vulnerable during reconnaissance or supply escort duties, suffered at least one trooper killed and additional wounded, with the Americans seizing stores and disrupting access to local resources. This engagement marked an early tactical success for Maxwell's light troops, who exploited the winter terrain and element of surprise to target isolated enemy elements without committing to open battle. The prompted British commanders to issue evacuation orders for Elizabethtown on , as the outpost proved untenable amid persistent harassment. During the withdrawal toward Amboy (modern Perth Amboy), forces pursued and struck the rear guard, capturing around 100 prisoners—including elements from two regiments—and further supplies, though specific killed or wounded tallies beyond the initial patrol losses remain unquantified in period accounts. casualties were minimal, reflecting the hit-and-run nature of the operation. Rather than immediate reinforcements, the British response emphasized consolidation, retreating to fortified positions like to mitigate further ambushes, an adaptation that underscored the growing costs of dispersed foraging in contested territory. This raid exemplified the Forage War's guerrilla dynamics, where small-scale actions by 200–300 Continentals and inflicted disproportionate logistical strain on British forces reliant on New Jersey's farms for winter provisions.

Drake's Farm Engagement

On February 1, 1777, forces under Colonel Charles Scott ambushed a party at Drake's Farm near , during the ongoing Forage War. Local intelligence had alerted Scott to the movement, enabling a rapid response that positioned troops to exploit the farm's buildings and fences for cover in against the exposed foragers. The initial assault targeted Hessian grenadiers and elements of the 42nd Regiment (), disrupting the collection of hay and provisions essential for winter supplies. British William Erskine, anticipating such interference, had deployed the foraging detachment as bait to draw out American attackers, supported by concealed reserves including additional grenadiers and Highlanders. As the skirmish intensified amid the farm's terrain, British forces launched a coordinated counterattack, leveraging superior numbers and discipline to push back the Americans from their defensive positions. The fighting featured intense musketry and clashes in confined spaces, with Americans inflicting losses while destroying portions of the gathered forage before being compelled to withdraw. Casualties reflected the ferocity of the engagement: suffered one and seven enlisted men killed, alongside 22 wounded, while British losses included one and six men killed, with 23 wounded. Though the British trap partially succeeded in repelling the , the American action achieved partial denial, highlighting the militia's tactical adaptation to farm-based defenses in denying British logistical gains without open-field confrontation. This clash underscored the escalating reliance on terrain-specific ambushes, setting a pattern for subsequent mobile harassment in the campaign.

Quibbletown Clash

The Quibbletown Clash occurred on March 8, 1777, near Quibbletown (present-day New Market section of Piscataway Township, New Jersey), as part of the Forage War's escalating partisan actions during the winter of 1776–1777. American forces under Brigadier General William Maxwell, operating as light infantry detachments directed by General George Washington to harass British supply efforts, engaged a British foraging expedition seeking livestock and provisions in the countryside east of the Raritan River. This encounter exemplified the intensifying scale of ambushes, involving coordinated American skirmishers targeting vulnerable British parties amid thawing conditions that briefly extended operations before spring growth curtailed large-scale foraging needs. Maxwell's troops, comprising elements of the light corps and militia totaling several hundred, positioned themselves to the column as it advanced through open fields and wooded edges near Quibbletown. The expedition, estimated at a reinforced company or small with wagon trains for collection, faced sudden volleys from concealed American positions, leading to heavy initial fighting characterized by musket fire and bayonet charges. Despite the , the maintained cohesion, securing an unspecified number of and other supplies before pressing forward, though they incurred considerable as reported in contemporary accounts. Washington's strategic oversight emphasized mobile harassment over pitched battles, instructing Maxwell to exploit intelligence on British movements while avoiding decisive engagements that could expose his outnumbered forces. The Americans inflicted losses through but ultimately fell back to prevent by potential British reinforcements from or Amboy, preserving their operational capability for further interdictions. British reports highlighted significant dead and wounded carried off the field, underscoring the tactical cost of despite material gains, while American casualties remained light, with no precise figures documented for this specific action. This clash demonstrated the Forage War's peak disruptive potential, where American initiative forced British commanders to allocate escorts that strained their logistics without fully neutralizing the threat.

Spanktown Action

On February 23, 1777, Lieutenant Colonel Charles Mawhood led a British reinforced brigade from Elizabethtown toward Spanktown (modern Rahway), New Jersey, with orders to forage for supplies and destroy any encountered American forces holding livestock or provisions. The expedition included light infantry, grenadiers, and elements of the 10th, 37th, 38th, and 52nd Foot regiments, totaling several hundred men tasked with disrupting American supply efforts in the contested region. Mawhood's column encountered an American militia detachment herding sheep and cattle, screened by Continental troops under General William Maxwell, comprising the 1st through 4th Regiments, 1st and 8th Regiments, and the German Battalion positioned on adjacent hills. The British advanced to seize the livestock and burn nearby American-held forage stores, prompting Maxwell's forces to descend and engage; a flanking party was ambushed by concealed Pennsylvanians, escalating into a prolonged firefight lasting into the evening. Although the British initially repelled militia probes and inflicted losses while securing some animals, American envelopment maneuvers forced Mawhood to withdraw to Perth Amboy, denying full success amid mutual efforts to deny resources to the enemy. Late-winter conditions, including thawing ground from recent mild weather, likely impeded maneuverability for both sides' and wagons, compounding the from in wooded terrain. casualties totaled 5 killed and 9 wounded, while losses reached 69 killed or wounded and 6 missing, underscoring the escalating human costs of persistent raids despite tactical resistance to initial .

Other Notable Encounters

![Brig. Gen. Philemon Dickinson][float-right] On January 10, 1777, near Chatham, Colonel Charles Scott led forces in capturing approximately 70 British Highlanders from the 42nd Regiment along with their wagons during a , inflicting losses and seizing supplies without significant casualties. This exemplified the militia's tactic of targeting isolated parties on rural roads east of Morristown. The Battle of Millstone occurred on January 20, 1777, when General Philemon Dickinson commanded about 400 militia and 50 riflemen to flank a foraging detachment of roughly 500 men under Robert Abercromby near Van Nest's Mill in . The Americans destroyed a bridge to block retreat, captured 47 loaded wagons of flour and , and compelled the to abandon equipment; losses included 6-12 killed and several wounded, while Dickinson reported only 2-6 American casualties. Additional skirmishes, such as General William Maxwell's engagement on January 5, 1777, near where 400 men killed several foragers and seized 20 wagons, highlighted recurring ambushes along supply routes like the River valley. These encounters, often involving local without support, forced commanders to augment foraging escorts with jägers and Loyalist units for protection, though such measures reduced expedition efficiency and yields. Persistent harassment in areas like Somerset County contributed to cumulative material losses, underscoring the Forage War's guerrilla nature beyond major clashes.

Outcomes and Assessments

Casualty Figures and Material Losses

and forces sustained approximately 950 casualties—killed, wounded, captured, or missing—during the Forage War from January 4 to March 21, , though this total excludes some undocumented skirmishes. American militia casualties were markedly lower and less systematically recorded, reflecting the employed; for example, at the Battle of on , , losses totaled 4-5 killed or wounded. In specific engagements, British casualties included 25 killed or wounded and 12 captured at , while other actions such as Quibbletown resulted in several killed and captured without precise enumeration. Material losses for the British were substantial, with parties abandoning loaded wagons under ; at , Americans captured 49 wagons, 107 horses, 115 cattle, 70 sheep, 40 barrels of flour, and 106 bags of supplies, though some accounts cite 43 wagons. British expeditions inflicted retaliatory damage on farms through plundering, including and , leaving trails of devastation as noted in contemporary reports. Uncertainties persist in militia-derived figures, which often exaggerated enemy losses relative to admissions, compounded by the irregular nature of the and incomplete records.

Tactical Effectiveness and Strategic Impact

The militia's guerrilla tactics during the Forage War proved tactically effective in inflicting attrition on foraging parties, with approximately 950 and soldiers killed, wounded, captured, or missing between January 4 and March 21, 1777. These hit-and-run ambushes, often involving small units of 400-500 militiamen supplemented by riflemen, forced commanders to deploy large escorts—such as 1,350 troops for a single expedition to Quibbletown—thereby tying down substantial forces that might otherwise have supported offensive operations or reinforced outposts at and Amboy. This commitment of manpower amplified the logistical costs of sustaining an occupying army reliant on local forage for horses and draft animals, as preemptive seizures of supplies in the countryside compelled the to import provisions from at greater expense. However, American efforts achieved only partial denial of resources, as British parties still secured some cattle, hay, and despite losses, preserving the army's basic operational viability through the winter. Militia limitations in sustained engagements prevented wholesale disruption of British supply lines, with remaining an inevitable necessity for a large in occupied territory lacking reliable overland resupply. captain Johann Ewald noted the militia's improved maneuverability, stating, "Never have I seen these maneuvers carried out better than by the American militia," yet the irregular nature of the yielded no decisive territorial gains or annihilation of British detachments. From the perspective, the war eroded amid constant threats, exposure, and , with officers reporting grim conditions that undermined discipline and . Nonetheless, the maintained army cohesion by prioritizing defended quarters and escorted parties, avoiding the starvation that plagued Continental forces elsewhere. The cumulative toll—exceeding casualties from the prior New York campaign—strained personnel, prompting William Howe to request 20,000 reinforcements mid-winter, though only 7,800 arrived, highlighting how militia actions delayed broader strategic initiatives without collapsing . Overall, the Forage War demonstrated that partisan resistance could impose asymmetric costs on a superior conventional force, forcing resource diversion and import dependency while exposing the vulnerabilities of occupation-dependent supply in contested regions.

Aftermath

Transition to Spring Campaigns

As the Forage War drew to a close around , 1777, British commanders curtailed extensive foraging operations from their primary outposts at and Perth Amboy, owing to cumulative losses exceeding 950 killed, wounded, captured, or missing among British and troops, alongside the onset of milder weather facilitating alternative logistics. British units withdrew from scattered, vulnerable positions across central , concentrating forces to minimize exposure to American ambushes that had previously disrupted hay and grain collection essential for their 18,000-man army's horses and draft animals. In response, American militia formations, which had numbered in the thousands under leaders like William Winds and Charles Scott, dispersed progressively from late March onward; many militiamen returned to farms to plant spring crops or reinforced regiments at Morristown, as the diminished British foraging threat allowed General to redirect emphasis toward training and intelligence for impending field armies. This dispersal reflected a tactical pivot, with Washington's scouts reporting British consolidation by early April, enabling patriot forces to husband their own depleted regional supplies, which had been preemptively gathered under orders issued as early as to avert enemy seizures. British supply stabilization materialized through intensified naval resupply, including shipments of foodstuffs from to offset forage shortfalls estimated at thousands of tons of hay; this overseas reliance, while costly, permitted General William Howe to stockpile provisions at secure coastal bases, sustaining his command without further risking detachments in contested countryside. Skirmishes persisted into , such as the British assault on an American outpost at Bound Brook on April 13, where 4,000 troops under Lord Charles Cornwallis overran General Benjamin Lincoln's 1,000-man detachment, capturing supplies but suffering 60 casualties to American 40, underscoring the transition from guerrilla harassment to probing conventional advances. This operational wind-down aligned with broader maneuvers, exemplified by the British raid on , from to 28, involving 2,000 troops from under Governor , who torched an American depot holding 4,000–5,000 barrels of pork and beef alongside clothing and tents, thereby preemptively weakening logistics ahead of Howe's offensive. Such actions marked the Forage War's logistical imperatives yielding to strategic campaigning, with forces evacuating interior posts by May to stage on for embarkation.

Long-Term Implications for Supply Logistics

The Forage War underscored the vulnerabilities inherent in reliance on local for fodder and provisions, compelling adaptations such as the deployment of larger, escorted parties that increased operational costs and risks. These measures, necessitated by persistent American militia harassment, contributed to a broader strain on , as evidenced by extended lead times for transatlantic resupplies and unreliable inland distribution networks. By early , such disruptions had already inflicted irreparable attrition on units, with losses in personnel and draft animals diminishing their capacity for sustained maneuvers. This campaign established a precedent for American irregular forces employing denial tactics to target enemy supply lines, a strategy later replicated in the southern theater, particularly South Carolina, where partisan raids similarly interdicted British forage and wagon trains, exacerbating vulnerabilities in extended operations. British responses evolved toward fortified depots and coastal basing to mitigate these threats, yet this shift amplified dependence on vulnerable sea lanes and limited inland penetration, factors that critically undermined Cornwallis's position at Yorktown in 1781, where severed supply routes and forage shortages hastened surrender. While the Forage War's successes in forcing decentralization highlighted the efficacy of militia-led attrition against conventional armies, it also exposed frailties, as overreliance on diverted resources from sustainment and revealed gaps in coordinated supply denial. Nonetheless, these engagements compelled the to disperse efforts, diluting their logistical efficiency and setting a pattern of caution that persisted through the war, ultimately contributing to strategic overextension.

References

  1. [1]
    Forage Wars - Crossroads of the American Revolution
    The British needed to scour the local countryside to find forage – food like hay and oats – to keep their horses alive during the cold winter months.Missing: historical facts
  2. [2]
    Forage Wars - Ten Crucial Days
    The Forage War was a partisan campaign consisting of numerous small skirmishes that took place in New Jersey during the Revolutionary War between January and ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  3. [3]
    The Battle of Millstone - Journal of the American Revolution
    Oct 22, 2014 · The Battle of Millstone in central New Jersey on 20 January 1777,[1] is a “local interest” battle, the kind that is often known only to locals and specialists.<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Diary of the American War : a Hessian journal : Ewald, Johann von ...
    Sep 1, 2021 · Diary of the American War : a Hessian journal ; Publication date: 1979 ; Topics: Ewald, Johann von, 1744-1813 -- Diaries, United States -- History ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] The New Jersey Campaign, 1776-1777
    Jun 5, 2025 · The 1776–1777 campaign unfolded in Page 21 21 central and northern New Jersey (Map 1), with peripheral operations also taking place in the ...
  6. [6]
    Forage War | American Revolutionary War
    On January 16, 350 Americans set upon a large body of British foragers at Bonhamtown, New Jersey, killing 21 enemy soldiers and wounding 30 or 40 more. American ...Missing: primary sources
  7. [7]
    Fighting for Forage - HistoryNet
    Apr 6, 2017 · In New Jersey, ominous lessons for the British emerge from a little-known campaign in the bitter winter of 1777.Missing: prelude necessity
  8. [8]
    Episode 127 The Forage War - American Revolution Podcast
    Dec 15, 2019 · Patriot militia in New Jersey came out from hiding and began attacking British soldiers. What became known as the “forage war” began. Now that ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] New Jersey Military History
    Just as all appeared lost, the New Jersey militia, responding to indiscriminate British pillaging, began to revive and harass the enemy in small actions ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    The Battle of Princeton
    Dec 1, 2016 · As the British army of occupation settled into quarters, some officers felt a little uneasy about the distances separating the New Jersey ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The Loyalist Opposition - NJ State Library
    The Loyalist opposition in NJ included over a third of the population, who opposed independence, and were a threat due to their numbers and proximity to  ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    A History of the 4th Battalion, New Jersey Volunteers - Part 1 of 2
    Hundreds and later thousands of loyalist Americans flocked into the British lines to seek protection and offer their services to the Royal army. One of these ...
  14. [14]
    The Provisioning & Supply Lines of the British Army
    Learn about the supply lines and provisioning strategies used by the British Army to supply their regiments during the Revolutionary War.
  15. [15]
    Philemon Dickinson Full Biography
    During the Forage War of 1777, my militiamen guarded the area near New Brunswick to prevent the British from sending out foraging parties to obtain food for the ...
  16. [16]
    Philemon Dickinson, American Revolution, New Jersey, APUSH
    Jan 29, 2024 · Dickinson served as a Brigadier General in the New Jersey Militia. In 1777, he was promoted to Major General and became the Commander-in-Chief ...Philemon Dickinson Quick... · Philemon Dickinson Overview... · The Forage War
  17. [17]
    The Militia General: Philemon Dickinson - Yankee Doodle Spies
    Jan 27, 2019 · Kicking Off the Forage War​​ On January 20, 1777, Dickinson led a combined force of 350 Jersey militiamen and 50 Pennsylvania riflemen in a ...A Call To Arms · Militia General · Crushing The Cabal
  18. [18]
    Battle of Millstone / Van Nest's Mills - American Revolutionary War
    Armies - American Forces was commanded by Gen. Philemon Dickinson and consisted of about 450 Soldiers. British Forces was commanded by Lt. Col. Robert ...
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Revolutionary War | National Guard Militia Museum of New Jersey
    In 1776, the New Jersey militia helped defend New York under General George Washington. When the Americans were defeated and retreated across the state, the ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    The Forage War and the Battle for New Jersey
    Feb 28, 2014 · The “Forage War,” an insurgency campaign largely conducted by local New Jersey militia companies, harassed the British whenever they ventured out into the ...Missing: Revolution prelude necessity<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    The Forage War: Spanktown - Robert Krenzel
    Feb 23, 2017 · Increasingly frustrated by American attacks on their foraging parties, the British command unleashed Lieutenant Colonel Charles Mahwood, the ...
  24. [24]
    List of Revolutionary War Battles, Raids & Skirmishes for 1777
    Philemon Dickinson, commanding 400 militia and riflemen, drives off a British foraging party of comparable size at Somerset Courthouse. They captured prisoners, ...
  25. [25]
    Battles and Skirmishes - Crosswicks to Hackensack
    NJA 2, 1, 177. ELIZABETHTOWN January 5, 1777. Gen. William Maxwell (Am.) conducts foraging raid and captures stores. NJA 2, 1, 253. Vermeule, Plainfield, 12 ...
  26. [26]
    Forage War Facts for Kids
    Jun 9, 2025 · The Forage War was a series of small battles and attacks in New Jersey during the American Revolutionary War. It happened between January and ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  27. [27]
    William Maxwell, New Jersey's Hard Fighting General
    Aug 15, 2016 · Maxwell's mobilization of New Jersey militia and work in Morristown preceded the Continental Army's encampment in Morristown in January 1777 and ...
  28. [28]
    Forage War - History Maps
    On January 10, Colonel Charles Scott's Virginia Continentals captured 70 Highlanders at Chatham, and on January 15, Colonel Oliver Spencer's militia captured 70 ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Battles and Skirmishes of the American Revolution in New Jersey
    The lack of primary source materials makes local actions, both British and American, extremely difficult to discover and document. The problem is most ...
  30. [30]
    02/01/1777 – Battles – Skirmish at Drake's Farm Near Metuchen ...
    Feb 7, 2014 · 02/01/1777 – Battles – Skirmish at Drake's Farm Near Metuchen, New Jersey (New Jersey Campaign) (Forage War) ; Date(s):, 02/01/1777, Killed: 27 ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The War in the North, 1778-1781 - U.S. Army Center of Military History
    Aug 19, 2025 · Opening Shots in the Colonies, 1775–1776. The Canadian Campaign, 1775–1776. The New York Campaign, 1776. The New Jersey Campaign, 1776–1777.
  32. [32]
    The American Revolutionary War in the Millstone Valley
    A well-armed British foraging party, sent out from New Brunswick on January 30, 1777, were raiding Van Neste's mill at Weston when four hundred militia under ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  33. [33]
    New York and New Jersey Campaign 1776-77 - Revolutionary War
    The New York and New Jersey campaign was a series of battles for control of New York City and the state of New Jersey in the American Revolutionary War
  34. [34]
    Battle of Bound Brook - Abraham Staats House
    Apr 19, 2025 · On Sunday, April 13, 1777, a four-column force of 4,000 British Crown troops led by Lord Charles Cornwallis attacked a small American garrison ...
  35. [35]
    British rampage Danbury, Connecticut | April 26, 1777 - History.com
    On April 26, 1777, British troops attacked Danbury, destroying homes and tents. American troops attacked during the British retreat, but were unable to stop it.<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    DANBURY RAID | Connecticut Sons of the American Revolution
    The Danbury Raid was a British punitive raid to destroy American supplies, destroying 4,000-5,000 barrels of food, 5,000 pairs of shoes, and 1,600 tents.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The Impact of Logistics on the British Defeat in the Revolutionary War
    Out of 856 horses shipped, only 532 survived the voyage. This convoy marked the last time that Britain attempted to ship fresh food and livestock to its army.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] British Logistics Challenges in the American Revolution - DTIC
    May 1, 2012 · The significant length of time and unreliability of supplying the British military during the revolution drained valuable resources, which led ...
  39. [39]
    The British Supply Chain in the South | American Battlefield Trust
    Nov 7, 2023 · The British over-relied on resources from their homeland, which strained their supply lines and hampered troops in the field. Successfully ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Logistical Operations during the Yorktown Campaign, 1781
    Yorktown Campaign provides an excellent Revolutionary War example of this since it has all the phases of modern logistical operations. The actual siege ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] redcoat resupply! strategic logistics and operational indecision in the ...
    May 27, 1999 · This monograph is an examination of the logistical system established and employed by the British in the American Revolution, and it extracts ...