Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

GRACE and GRACE-FO

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) was a collaborative satellite mission between the United States' National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Germany's Center of Earth Observation (CEO) of the German Aerospace Center (DLR), launched on March 17, 2002, featuring twin satellites in low-Earth orbit that employed microwave ranging to measure minute variations in Earth's gravity field, thereby detecting redistributions of mass such as those from ice sheet melting, groundwater extraction, and ocean circulation.^[1]^[2] These measurements, achieved by precisely tracking the inter-satellite distance affected by gravitational pulls, enabled monthly gravity maps with resolutions revealing changes on scales of hundreds of kilometers, providing empirical data on global water cycle dynamics and solid Earth processes over its 15-year operational lifespan from 2002 to 2017.^[3]^[4] Key achievements include quantifying accelerating mass loss from Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, identifying depletion in major aquifers like California's Central Valley and India's groundwater reserves, and monitoring post-glacial rebound, which have informed causal models of climate impacts and resource management without reliance on surface observations alone.^[4]^[5] The GRACE Follow-On (GRACE-FO) mission, launched on May 22, 2018, as a partnership between NASA and the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), replicates this tandem-satellite architecture with upgraded instrumentation, including a laser ranging interferometer for sub-micron precision complementary to the K-band microwave system, sustaining continuous gravity observations to track ongoing mass flux in Earth's hydrosphere and cryosphere.^[6]^[7]

History and Development

Conception and Launch of Original GRACE Mission

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission originated from a proposal developed in 1996 by the Center for Space Research at the University of Texas at Austin, the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) in Potsdam, and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).^[8] This concept aimed to measure temporal variations in Earth's gravity field using a novel inter-satellite ranging technique between two co-orbiting spacecraft.^[2] In May 1997, GRACE was selected as the second mission under NASA's Earth System Science Pathfinder (ESSP) program, marking it as a cost-effective initiative for advancing understanding of Earth's mass transport processes.^[2]^[5] The mission represented a partnership between the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the German Aerospace Center (DLR), with NASA providing project management, one spacecraft, the launch vehicle, and ground operations, while DLR contributed the second spacecraft and scientific instruments.^[5] Development proceeded with a formal agreement signed between NASA and DLR in 1998, enabling collaborative engineering and testing phases focused on the precision microwave ranging system and electrostatic accelerometers essential for gravity mapping.^[9] The satellites were constructed to operate in a low Earth orbit, initially planned for a five-year primary mission lifetime to capture monthly gravity field models.^[5] GRACE satellites, designated GRACE-A (leading) and GRACE-B (trailing), were launched together on March 17, 2002, at 09:21 UTC aboard a Rockot launch vehicle from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia.^[1]^[10] The launch successfully placed the twin satellites into a 489 km circular polar orbit with a 220 km along-track separation, initiating the commissioning phase that verified instrument functionality and formation-flying capabilities within weeks.^[11] This deployment enabled the mission's core objective of tracking mass redistributions, such as those from ice melt and groundwater changes, through high-precision ranging measurements.^[2]

Transition Period and Development of GRACE-FO

The original GRACE mission concluded its science operations on October 27, 2017, after 15 years, primarily due to a battery failure on GRACE-2 that rendered it inoperable, followed by the decommissioning of GRACE-1.^[12] This termination created an approximately 11-month data gap until GRACE-FO began producing science data in mid-2018, prompting researchers to employ interpolation techniques, hydrological models, and statistical methods such as principal component analysis or multichannel singular spectrum analysis to bridge the discontinuity in gravity field observations.^[13] ^[14] The urgency for continuity arose from GRACE's unprecedented insights into Earth's mass redistribution, necessitating a successor to sustain monitoring of ice sheets, groundwater, and sea-level contributions amid ongoing climate variability.^[6] Development of GRACE-FO, formally approved as a partnership between NASA and German institutions, accelerated in the mid-2010s to minimize the inter-mission hiatus, with satellite construction commencing around 2014-2015 under Airbus Defence and Space.^[15] The first satellite completed assembly and testing by November 13, 2016, followed by environmental qualifications in Germany, and both spacecraft arrived at Vandenberg Air Force Base in December 2017 for final preparations.^[16] Launched on May 22, 2018, aboard a Falcon 9 rocket from California, GRACE-FO entered its science phase after initial checkout, extending the gravity measurement legacy with monthly gravity field solutions starting from June 2018.^[17] This timeline reflected concerted efforts to replicate GRACE's twin-satellite architecture while incorporating refinements for enhanced data quality. Key advancements in GRACE-FO included the integration of a Laser Ranging Interferometer (LRI), developed by German partners, which supplements the microwave ranging system with sub-micron precision over 220 km baselines, potentially improving measurement accuracy by a factor of 10 compared to GRACE's K-band system.^[18] Funding was shared, with NASA covering U.S. contributions including project management at JPL and the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and GFZ providing the LRI, optical components, five years of operations funding, and the launch vehicle elements.^[15] ^[19] These developments ensured GRACE-FO's nominal five-year lifespan, now extended, maintains empirical continuity in tracking causal mass fluxes without reliance on unverified modeling assumptions during the transition.^[20]

Scientific Objectives and Measurement Principles

Core Objectives for Earth System Monitoring

The core objectives of the GRACE and GRACE-FO missions center on producing high-resolution, monthly global maps of Earth's time-variable gravity field to quantify large-scale mass redistributions within the Earth system, including the hydrosphere, cryosphere, oceans, atmosphere, and solid Earth.^[21]^[22] These measurements, achieved through precise inter-satellite ranging, reveal variations in surface mass density at scales of hundreds of kilometers, enabling the isolation of signals from phenomena such as seasonal water storage fluctuations and long-term climate-driven changes.^[23] By tracking these mass shifts, the missions provide empirical data on the redistribution of water and ice masses, which traditional in-situ observations cannot capture at a global scale.^[8] A primary focus is monitoring terrestrial water storage variations, which encompass changes in groundwater, soil moisture, lakes, and rivers, thereby illuminating the global water cycle and human-induced depletions.^[22] For instance, GRACE data have documented significant groundwater losses in regions like northern India and California's Central Valley, with annual declines exceeding 20 gigatons in some aquifers during the 2002–2017 period.^[24] GRACE-FO extends this record post-2018, maintaining continuity for detecting trends in continental hydrology amid droughts and irrigation demands.^[21] Such observations support assessments of sustainable water resource management, independent of surface-only gauges that may overlook subsurface dynamics.^[25] In the cryosphere, the missions track mass balance in ice sheets and glaciers, distinguishing land ice contributions to sea level rise from thermal expansion. GRACE revealed accelerating mass loss from Greenland (averaging about 280 gigatons per year by mission end) and Antarctica (about 150 gigatons per year), driven by iceberg calving and surface melt, with GRACE-FO confirming ongoing trends through 2025.^[22]^[21] Ocean monitoring objectives include mapping bottom pressure variations and total ocean mass, which help partition sea level rise into mass addition (barystatic) versus density changes (steric), revealing, for example, that ocean mass gain accounted for roughly two-thirds of global mean sea level rise from 2002–2017.^[25] Additionally, atmospheric and solid Earth mass signals are resolved, aiding studies of post-glacial rebound and short-term weather patterns, though these are secondary to the dominant hydrological and cryospheric targets.^[8] Overall, these objectives prioritize causal inference from gravity-derived mass anomalies, privileging direct geophysical measurements over model-dependent proxies.^[24]

Gravity Recovery Technique and Underlying Physics

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its follow-on mission (GRACE-FO) utilize the satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) technique in the low-low mode to detect variations in Earth's gravity field. This method involves two co-orbiting satellites flying in tandem, separated by approximately 220 kilometers along the flight path in a near-polar low Earth orbit at an altitude of roughly 500 kilometers.^[26]^[27] The core measurement relies on the differential gravitational accelerations experienced by the lead and trailing satellites as they traverse regions of uneven mass distribution, which perturb their relative positions.^[11]^[8] The primary instrument for SST is the K-band microwave ranging (KBR) system, which continuously measures the line-of-sight distance between the satellites with a precision of about 1-10 micrometers after processing.^[27]^[8] When the satellites pass over a mass anomaly, such as an ice sheet or groundwater reservoir, the gravitational pull accelerates the leading satellite more strongly than the trailing one, causing a measurable increase in separation.^[26] Conversely, a mass deficit results in deceleration of the lead satellite relative to the trail, decreasing the distance. Onboard electrostatic accelerometers compensate for non-gravitational forces like atmospheric drag and solar radiation pressure, isolating the gravitational signal.^[27]^[11] Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers provide precise absolute positioning, enabling the integration of range-rate data into gravity field models.^[8] Underlying the technique is the physics of Earth's heterogeneous mass distribution, which generates a non-spherical gravitational potential deviating from a point-mass approximation. Newton's law of universal gravitation dictates that local mass concentrations produce stronger accelerations, manifesting as gravity anomalies on the order of tens of milligals.^[26] These anomalies arise from surface and subsurface mass redistributions, such as hydrological cycles or glacial melt, and are quantified through the second derivatives of the gravitational potential. The SST observable—the range-rate change—is particularly sensitive to along-track gravity gradients, allowing resolution of features larger than about 300-400 kilometers due to the satellite baseline and orbital geometry.^[8]^[27] The resulting data are inverted using least-squares adjustment to spherical harmonic coefficients up to degree and order 60 or higher, capturing both static and time-variable components of the gravity field with monthly temporal resolution.^[28] In GRACE-FO, an experimental laser ranging interferometer supplements the KBR for potential enhanced precision, though the fundamental microwave-based SST remains the primary gravity recovery mechanism.^[15]

Spacecraft Design and Instruments

Twin-Satellite Formation and Orbit Configuration

The GRACE mission employed two identical satellites, designated GRACE-1 (lead) and GRACE-2 (trailing), operating in a formation-flying configuration to enable precise measurement of inter-satellite distance variations caused by Earth's uneven gravity field.^[27] The satellites maintained an along-track separation of approximately 220 kilometers, with the lead satellite experiencing gravitational perturbations before the trailing one, allowing the mission to detect relative accelerations on the order of 10^{-7} m/s².^[29] This setup was implemented in a near-circular, polar orbit with an initial altitude of 500 kilometers, which naturally decayed to about 300 kilometers over the mission's lifespan due to atmospheric drag.^[27] The orbital inclination was approximately 89 degrees, ensuring near-polar coverage that allowed the satellites to pass over nearly all of Earth's surface every 15 days, completing about 15 orbits per day.^[30] Formation maintenance involved periodic thruster maneuvers to control the separation distance within ±50 kilometers and to mitigate drift, including a notable position swap on December 10, 2005, where the satellites exchanged lead and trail roles to balance wear and extend mission life.^[31] GRACE-FO replicated this twin-satellite architecture with minor refinements for enhanced precision, launching into an initial orbit at 490 kilometers altitude and the same 220-kilometer nominal separation.^[32] The inclination remained near-polar at 89 degrees, with the orbit decaying similarly to lower altitudes over time, supporting continued gravity field mapping.^[15] Station-keeping maneuvers using cold-gas thrusters ensured the along-track distance stability required for the microwave and laser interferometry ranging systems, with the configuration optimized to minimize non-gravitational perturbations like atmospheric drag and solar radiation pressure.^[33]

Primary Instruments and Their Functions

The Microwave Instrument (MWI), consisting of a K/Ka-band ranging assembly, functions as the primary science payload on both GRACE and GRACE-FO satellites. It enables dual one-way ranging measurements between the twin satellites, achieving distance precision on the order of 10 micrometers while tracking relative velocity changes at the nanometer-per-second level. These measurements detect perturbations in the inter-satellite separation caused by spatial variations in Earth's gravity field, forming the basis for gravity recovery.^[34] Three-axis electrostatic accelerometers measure non-gravitational accelerations, including atmospheric drag, solar radiation pressure, and thermal effects, with sensitivities down to 10^{-10} m/s². Positioned to sense forces at the satellites' centers of mass, they provide data for modeling and subtracting these disturbing accelerations from the ranging observables, thereby isolating pure gravitational signals.^[35] Geodetic-quality GPS receivers track signals from the Global Navigation Satellite System to determine each satellite's absolute position with centimeter accuracy and provide precise timing for synchronization. This supports high-fidelity orbit determination and kinematic positioning, essential for mapping the measured range-rate variations onto Earth's surface gravity field.^[2]

Enhancements in GRACE-FO Instrumentation

The primary enhancement in GRACE-FO instrumentation is the addition of the Laser Ranging Interferometer (LRI), a technology demonstrator that supplements the heritage microwave ranging system used in the original GRACE mission.^[36] The LRI employs laser interferometry to measure inter-satellite distance variations with greater precision than the K-band ranging (KBR) system of GRACE, achieving noise levels below 1 nm/√Hz and enabling detection of gravitational signals as small as 0.1 nm/s² at 490 km altitude.^[37] This represents an improvement in ranging precision by more than a factor of 20 compared to GRACE's microwave measurements.^[38] The LRI operates autonomously, providing continuous range telemetry at approximately 10 samples per second, and includes capabilities for measuring yaw and pitch angles relative to the line of sight with low noise.^[39] The microwave instrument (MWI) in GRACE-FO maintains continuity with GRACE's KBR assembly, delivering comparable precision in inter-satellite ranging while serving as a backup to the LRI and allowing direct comparison of laser and microwave data products.^[40] Accelerometers on GRACE-FO, similar to those on GRACE, measure non-gravitational forces such as atmospheric drag and solar radiation pressure to isolate gravitational signals, with ongoing refinements in data processing to enhance accuracy despite occasional instrument challenges.^[41] The Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers remain dual-frequency units, tracking satellite positions with high fidelity, though improved kinematic orbit determination techniques, including handling of GPS flex power effects, have been developed for GRACE-FO data analysis.^[42] Further improvements include enhancements to the star camera assembly (SCA), which provides attitude determination; GRACE-FO features designs that increase data availability during periods of Sun or Moon blinding and yield higher accuracy compared to GRACE's two star tracker heads.^[43] These instrumentation upgrades collectively enable GRACE-FO to produce gravity field models with reduced error contributions from ranging noise, supporting finer resolution in time-variable gravity observations.^[15]

Mission Operations and Timeline

Operational Phases of GRACE (2002–2017)

The GRACE mission commenced with the launch of its twin satellites on March 17, 2002, from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in Russia aboard a Rockot launch vehicle.^[11]^[5] Following separation, the Launch and Early Operations Phase (LEOP) spanned approximately two and a half weeks, during which ground controllers established basic telecommunications, attitude control, and propulsion systems for both spacecraft.^[44] The satellites achieved their initial 500-kilometer circular low-Earth orbit configuration, with GRACE-A (later renamed GRACE-1) leading GRACE-B (GRACE-2) by about 220 kilometers along the same orbital plane. A subsequent three-week commissioning phase verified the functionality of the primary instruments, including the microwave ranging system and accelerometers, enabling the transition to full science operations by late April 2002.^[45] The nominal science phase, designed for five years, involved continuous gravity field measurements via inter-satellite ranging, with data collected in monthly solutions reflecting Earth's mass redistributions.^[46] Orbit maintenance maneuvers, using onboard thrusters, preserved the formation-flying geometry despite atmospheric drag, which gradually lowered the altitude from 500 kilometers to around 300 kilometers by the mission's later years.^[27] In 2007, the mission entered an extended operations phase after successful completion of the baseline objectives, continuing data acquisition with refined processing to mitigate accumulating errors from instrument noise and orbital decay.^[2] Over the subsequent decade, periodic reboosts extended the operational lifetime beyond the planned duration, yielding over 15 years of observations despite challenges such as K-band ranging signal dropouts and electrostatic accelerometer degradation.^[10] Fuel reserves dwindled, limiting maneuvers, while battery performance remained adequate until 2016. The mission terminated in October 2017 following the failure of multiple battery cells on GRACE-2, culminating in an eighth cell loss on September 3, 2017, which rendered safe operations untenable due to insufficient power during orbital night passes.^[47]^[10] Mission managers prioritized final science data collection in early October before decommissioning GRACE-2 on October 27, 2017; GRACE-1 continued limited solo operations until fuel exhaustion later that year, but paired measurements essential for gravity recovery ceased.^[48]^[49] This conclusion marked the end of GRACE's primary data stream, bridging to the GRACE-FO successor.^[8]

GRACE-FO Operations and Status as of 2025

The GRACE-FO mission, launched on May 22, 2018, from Vandenberg Air Force Base aboard a Falcon 9 rocket, consists of two satellites, GRACE-FO 1 (leading) and GRACE-FO 2 (trailing), flying in a low Earth orbit formation approximately 220 km apart.^[6] After an initial commissioning phase involving instrument calibration and orbit adjustments, the satellites achieved their nominal science orbit at an altitude of about 490 km by late 2018.^[18] The mission entered its primary science phase on January 28, 2019, following successful validation of the microwave ranging system and initial laser ranging interferometer tests.^[50] Operations involve continuous inter-satellite ranging measurements using both microwave instruments (primary) and the laser ranging interferometer (LRI) as a technology demonstrator, supplemented by onboard accelerometers, GPS receivers, and star trackers to account for non-gravitational forces.^[6] Since July 2023, the satellites have operated in a wide deadband attitude control mode to conserve fuel, enabling extended mission life beyond the nominal five years.^[51] Monthly gravity field solutions are derived from these measurements, with data processed through Level-1 (raw telemetry) to Level-3 (geophysical products) by centers including NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), and the University of Texas Center for Space Research.^[52] As of February 2025, both satellites remain operational with stable system performance and data quality.^[51] Orbital parameters include a mean altitude of 462.8 km, an along-track separation of 197.5 km, and a decay rate of approximately 45 m/day, reflecting gradual orbital lowering due to atmospheric drag.^[51] Accelerometers function in normal range mode, and the microwave instrument tracks nominally, while the LRI operates in diagnostic mode without collecting science ranging data.^[51] Level-1 data are available through February 2025, and Release 06.3 gravity solutions extend to December 2024, with ongoing monthly updates despite a temporary pause in some website maintenance due to U.S. federal funding issues.^[51] A transient increase in gravity field errors occurred in October 2024 at 469 km altitude but has been resolved.^[51] The 2025 GRACE-FO Science Team Meeting, held remotely on October 7-9, reviewed mission status and near-term plans, including data system enhancements and continuity with future missions like GRACE-C slated for 2028.^[54] No major satellite health anomalies are reported, supporting continued monitoring of Earth's mass redistribution until fuel depletion or instrument failure limits operations, potentially extending several years beyond 2025.^[18]

Data Products, Processing, and Analysis

Gravity Field Models and Derived Products

The primary gravity field models from GRACE and GRACE-FO are monthly estimates of Earth's time-variable geopotential, derived from inter-satellite ranging measurements using the Microwave Instrument (MWI) and, for GRACE-FO, the additional Laser Ranging Interferometer (LRI).^[55] These Level-2 products consist of fully normalized Stokes coefficients (spherical harmonic coefficients) up to degree and order 60, enabling resolution of mass variations at spatial scales of approximately 300–400 km.^[56] Three independent processing centers—the Center for Space Research (CSR) at the University of Texas at Austin, the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) in Potsdam, and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)—generate these solutions, each incorporating distinct background models for non-tidal atmospheric and oceanic de-aliasing, accelerometer calibration, and attitude data handling.^[57] The Release 06 (RL06) series, finalized around 2018, represents the standard for both missions, with GRACE-FO data integrated seamlessly despite the mission gap from 2017 to 2018; RL06.1 variants for GRACE-FO further incorporate LRI observations for improved precision in post-2018 solutions.^[58] ^[56] Derived products transform these harmonic models into more interpretable formats for Earth science applications. Mascon (mass concentration) solutions, such as JPL's RL06 series, parameterize surface mass changes directly over equal-area 3° spherical cap blocks (approximately 4,500 mascons globally), augmented by coastal resolution enhancement filters to reduce land-ocean leakage; these yield monthly equivalent water height (EWH) anomalies in centimeters, representing integrated mass variations assuming uniform water density.^[59] Similarly, CSR's RL06 mascon grids apply Tikhonov regularization and empirical orthogonal function constraints to stabilize estimates, while GFZ provides constrained spherical harmonic fields alongside mascon-like gridded outputs.^[60] Level-3 gridded products, often at 0.5° × 0.5° or 1° resolution, include filtered EWH maps for land hydrology, ocean bottom pressure, and ice mass balance, with ancillary data like uncertainty estimates and glacial isostatic adjustment corrections.^[61] Ongoing advancements include the RL07 reprocessing, initiated around 2024, which refines Level-1 data handling, accelerometer recovery, and total variation regularization in mascons to enhance signal fidelity and reduce correlated errors; preliminary RL07 mascon solutions from CSR demonstrate improved leakage suppression in regional trends.^[62] ^[63] These models and products are distributed via NASA's Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center (PO.DAAC) and the International Gravity Field Service, supporting quantitative assessments of terrestrial water storage, ice sheet dynamics, and post-glacial rebound with uncertainties typically below 10–20 Gt/year for global basins after appropriate averaging.^[64] Despite inter-center discrepancies at high degrees (due to aliasing from short-term signals), ensemble means from multiple solutions provide robust, low-bias estimates validated against independent GPS and tide gauge observations.^[57]

Error Characterization and Data Validation Methods

Errors in GRACE and GRACE-FO gravity field solutions stem from multiple sources, including instrumental noise in inter-satellite ranging (microwave for GRACE, laser interferometry for GRACE-FO), accelerometer inaccuracies in measuring non-gravitational accelerations, and attitude determination errors from onboard star cameras.^[65] Additional contributions arise from orbital modeling deficiencies, such as relativistic effects and empirical accelerations, and background model shortcomings in static gravity fields or time-variable components.^[66] These errors are quantified during Level-2 processing via least-squares adjustment, yielding a variance-covariance matrix for spherical harmonic coefficients, though full matrices are often approximated as diagonal or block-diagonal due to computational constraints.^[67] Temporal aliasing from inadequately modeled short-term mass redistributions, particularly ocean tides and atmospheric loading, introduces correlated errors manifesting as longitudinal striping in monthly solutions, with ocean tide discrepancies identified as the dominant contributor.^[68] ^[69] Characterization involves post-fit residual analysis and empirical power spectral density estimation to assess noise levels, while regularization methods like Tikhonov or empirical orthogonal functions suppress striping and leakage in higher-degree harmonics.^[70] ^[71] For GRACE-FO accelerometer data, error mitigation incorporates refined non-gravitational force models and bias corrections, reducing scale factor and misalignment uncertainties compared to GRACE.^[72] Data validation employs cross-comparisons with independent datasets, including in-situ hydrological observations (e.g., groundwater wells), GPS-derived surface loading deformations, and forward-modeled signals from atmospheric or ocean models.^[73] ^[74] Consistency checks across processing centers (CSR, GFZ, JPL) reveal solution differences on the order of 10-20% of signal variance in Release-6 (RL06) products, informing empirical error budgets.^[65] Advanced techniques, such as Monte Carlo propagation of full variance-covariance matrices, enable rigorous uncertainty quantification for derived mass change estimates, particularly in mascon solutions where leakage is corrected via forward modeling and regularization.^[75] ^[76] For GRACE-FO, validations confirm reduced ranging noise (from ~1 μm to ~10 nm precision) enhances signal recovery, though aliasing persists similarly to GRACE without updated dealiasing products.^[65]

Applications and Key Discoveries

Hydrological Mass Changes and Groundwater Depletion

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions detect hydrological mass changes by measuring variations in Earth's gravity field caused by redistributions in terrestrial water storage (TWS), which encompasses groundwater, soil moisture, surface water, snow, and canopy storage.^[77] These monthly TWS anomaly maps, derived from inter-satellite ranging data processed into spherical harmonic coefficients or mascon solutions, reveal seasonal fluctuations and long-term trends at basin scales larger than approximately 200,000 km², enabling global monitoring of water cycle dynamics without reliance on ground networks.^[78] To isolate groundwater storage (GWS) changes, researchers subtract modeled or observed contributions from other TWS components, such as those from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), though uncertainties arise from model biases and signal leakage across basin boundaries.^[79] GRACE data from 2002 to 2017 documented widespread GWS depletion in over half of the world's 37 largest aquifer systems, with total losses exceeding 1,000 km³ in some cases when combined with GRACE-FO observations through 2021.^[80] Of these, 21 aquifers exhibited unsustainable depletion rates surpassing natural recharge, with 13 classified as significantly distressed due to human extraction outpacing replenishment, primarily for irrigation in arid regions.^[80] GRACE-FO, operational since 2018, has extended these trends, confirming accelerated declines in key basins amid prolonged droughts and intensified agriculture; for instance, global analyses indicate that TWS deficits in non-glaciated land areas have contributed to a net hydrological mass loss of about 2,150 Gt from 2002 to 2020, equivalent to roughly 7 mm of sea-level rise if redistributed.^[22] Prominent examples include northwest India's Indo-Gangetic Plain, where GRACE detected GWS depletion at 17.7 ± 4.5 km³/yr from 2002 to 2008, driven by monsoon-dependent irrigation unsupported by equivalent recharge, totaling over 100 km³ lost by 2010.^[81] In California's Central Valley, GRACE and GRACE-FO recorded an average loss of 15.7 ± 1.4 mm/yr (2.41 ± 0.22 km³/yr) from 2003 to 2021, accelerating 28% relative to pre-2003 rates due to drought and pumping, with cumulative deficits reaching 36 million acre-feet by 2021 despite occasional wet-year recoveries.^[82] Similar patterns appear in the North China Plain (depletion ~7 km³/yr) and U.S. High Plains (~30 km³ total loss 2003–2013), where GRACE signals correlate with well-level declines but require validation against in-situ data to mitigate mascon smoothing effects.^[83] These findings underscore anthropogenic dominance over climatic drivers in many depletions, though debates persist on GRACE's overestimation in leaky aquifers due to unmodeled vertical land motion.^[84] GRACE-FO enhancements, including laser ranging interferometry since 2018, have improved TWS resolution by up to 40% over microwave-only GRACE data, aiding finer detection of hydrological extremes like the 2011–2017 California drought's 28 km³ GWS drawdown. Regionally, positive TWS trends occur in high-precipitation zones like the Amazon Basin, where seasonal storage varies by 1,000 km³ annually, but global net losses highlight vulnerability; peer-reviewed ensembles estimate uncertainty in GWS trends at ±0.5 cm/yr equivalent water height, emphasizing the need for integrated models to disentangle human versus natural variability.^[85] As of 2025, ongoing GRACE-FO data continue to inform policy, such as California's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, by quantifying extraction impacts beyond local wells.^[86]

Ice Sheet and Glacier Dynamics

GRACE and GRACE-FO missions have provided direct measurements of mass changes in the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, revealing net ice loss that contributes substantially to global sea level rise. Between April 2002 and June 2017, the Greenland Ice Sheet experienced an average annual mass loss of approximately 286 gigatons, accelerating from about 34 gigatons per year in the early 2000s to over 400 gigatons per year by the mission's end, driven by increased surface melting and enhanced ice discharge from outlet glaciers. In Antarctica, GRACE data indicated an average loss of 127 gigatons per year over the same period, with mass gain in the East Antarctic Ice Sheet offset by accelerated losses in West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula, particularly from dynamic thinning of Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers. GRACE-FO has extended these observations, confirming continued mass loss, including an exceptional 600-gigaton summer loss in Greenland in 2019 following prior cold summers.^[87] Regional analyses from GRACE/GRACE-FO highlight spatial variability in ice dynamics. In Greenland, mass loss is concentrated in the southeast and northwest, linked to atmospheric warming and marine-terminating glacier retreat, while central regions show relative stability.^[88] Antarctic losses are dominated by West Antarctica, where ocean-driven basal melting accelerates ice shelf collapse and grounding line retreat, whereas East Antarctica exhibits localized gains insufficient to counterbalance western deficits.^[89] These gravity-derived mass trends align with independent altimetry and input-output assessments, validating the signals amid glacial isostatic adjustment corrections.^[90] Beyond polar ice sheets, GRACE/GRACE-FO data have enabled estimates of mountain glacier mass balance globally, excluding ice sheet contributions through regional mascon solutions. From 2002 to 2019, glaciers in High Mountain Asia lost mass at a rate of -28 ± 6 gigatons per year, equivalent to -0.34 ± 0.07 meters of water equivalent annually, with anomalies in the Karakoram region showing slight gains amid broader retreat.^[91] Other glacierized areas, such as Alaska, Patagonia, and the peripheral Arctic, exhibit consistent losses, contributing about one-third of observed sea level rise alongside ice sheets.^[92] These measurements reveal accelerating glacier wastage post-2010, attributed to rising temperatures, though data resolution limits detection of individual small glaciers, necessitating integration with altimetry for finer-scale dynamics.^[93]

Geophysical Signals and Solid Earth Processes

GRACE and GRACE-FO satellites detect geophysical signals from solid Earth processes through time-variable gravity field measurements, which reveal mass redistributions associated with tectonic deformations, isostatic adjustments, and seismic events. These signals manifest as low-degree spherical harmonic coefficients in monthly gravity solutions, with spatial resolutions of approximately 300–500 km, enabling the isolation of continental-scale changes after accounting for hydrological, cryospheric, and atmospheric influences.^[94] Such observations provide empirical constraints on mantle viscosity and lithospheric responses, surpassing traditional geodetic methods in global coverage.^[95] A primary application involves glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), the ongoing viscoelastic rebound of Earth's mantle following Pleistocene ice sheet melting. GRACE data have quantified uplift rates in regions like Hudson Bay and Fennoscandia, with observed gravity decreases of up to -1.5 μGal/year attributable to mass loss from crustal uplift outpacing mantle inflow.^[95] These measurements refine GIA models, such as ICE-5G, by revealing discrepancies in ice load history and mantle viscosity profiles, where GRACE gravity trends combined with GPS vertical rates indicate higher effective viscosities in the lower mantle (around 10^21 Pa·s) than previously modeled.^[96] GRACE-FO extends these observations post-2017, confirming secular trends despite data gaps, though signal separation requires forward modeling of non-GIA effects.^[97] Seismic events produce detectable co-seismic and post-seismic gravity perturbations from crustal dislocations and viscoelastic relaxation. For instance, the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Mw 9.0 earthquake induced a gravity change of approximately -4 μGal in monthly GRACE solutions, consistent with poroelastic rebound and fault slip models exceeding 50 m.^[98] Similarly, GRACE captured signals from the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Mw 9.1 event, with mass equivalents of 5–10 Gt redistributed over oceanic trenches, validated against tsunami and GPS data.^[99] GRACE-FO has detected intermediate-depth events, such as the 2016–2017 Papua New Guinea Mw 8.0 earthquakes, highlighting contrasts in slab dehydration versus hydration effects on gravity.^[100] Detection thresholds limit sensitivity to Mw > 8.5 for continental quakes, with mascon solutions outperforming spherical harmonics for localized signals.^[101] Other processes, including volcanic intrusions and subduction zone dynamics, yield subtler signals often below GRACE's noise floor after de-striping and leakage corrections. Independent component analysis has separated earthquake from hydrological noise in non-Gaussian data, enhancing attribution to solid Earth sources.^[102] Overall, these observations underscore causal links between surface deformations and deep mantle flows, though interpretations remain model-dependent due to trade-offs in viscosity and load assumptions.^[103]

Ocean Circulation and Sea Level Contributions

The GRACE and GRACE-FO missions measure variations in ocean bottom pressure (OBP) through gravity field anomalies, providing direct observations of mass changes in the ocean interior that are indicative of deep circulation processes. OBP data from GRACE, spanning 2002 to 2017, revealed monthly fluctuations in ocean mass distribution, as visualized for the period November 2002 to January 2012, which correlate with large-scale current systems including suppressed eddy activity near continental slopes.^[104]^[105] GRACE-FO, operational since 2018, extends these measurements, enabling validation against in situ bottom pressure recorders and demonstrating consistency in capturing basin-scale OBP signals driven by currents and eddies.^[73]^[106] These OBP observations have refined models of ocean circulation, such as tracing deep current speeds in the Atlantic Ocean and identifying patterns in the Arctic, where GRACE data complemented by steric height estimates highlighted barotropic variability in the Beaufort Gyre and transpolar drift.^[107]^[108] By integrating GRACE-derived OBP with ocean reanalyses like ECCO, researchers have improved quantification of transports in meridional overturning circulations and heat flux estimates, addressing limitations in traditional hydrographic methods that alias surface signals.^[109]^[110] In sea level studies, GRACE and GRACE-FO isolate the mass-driven (barystatic) component of global mean sea level rise by subtracting steric effects inferred from Argo float temperature and salinity profiles from total altimetric observations. From 2002 onward, these missions have quantified ocean mass accumulation at rates contributing approximately 1.5–2.0 mm/year to sea level rise during overlapping periods with altimetry, primarily from terrestrial water storage depletion and ice sheet melt, with GRACE-FO data confirming continuity post-2017.^[22]^[111]^[112] This separation reveals that mass changes dominate over steric expansion in certain basins, such as the South China Sea, and informs closure of the sea level budget by reconciling discrepancies in global estimates.^[113]^[25] Processing choices in GRACE data, including leakage corrections and glacial isostatic adjustment modeling, influence ocean mass trend estimates, with variations up to 1 mm/year across global and basin scales, underscoring the need for standardized approaches in long-term assessments.^[114] Overall, these contributions enhance causal understanding of sea level dynamics by linking observable mass fluxes to geophysical drivers, independent of volume-based proxies.^[115]

Broader Geodetic and Environmental Insights

The GRACE and GRACE-FO missions have advanced geodetic science by providing high-resolution time-variable gravity data that refines models of the Earth's geoid and static gravity field, essential for accurate height reference systems and global positioning frameworks.^[5] These observations, spanning from 2002 to the present, enable the separation of contemporary mass redistributions from long-term geophysical signals, such as glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), thereby improving the realization of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF).^[116] In solid Earth geophysics, GRACE/GRACE-FO data constrain mantle viscosity profiles and convective dynamics when integrated with geoid anomalies and post-glacial uplift measurements from GPS. Studies utilizing these datasets estimate upper mantle viscosities on the order of 10^{21} Pa·s, revealing lateral heterogeneities that influence plate tectonics and dynamic topography.^[117] Such insights challenge uniform viscosity models and highlight the role of subducting slabs in driving global mantle circulation.^[118] Environmentally, the missions offer a holistic view of Earth system mass fluxes, linking cryospheric, hydrological, and oceanic compartments to quantify the global water cycle's imbalances under climate forcing. For instance, GRACE-derived terrestrial water storage trends indicate a net continental mass loss of approximately 215 Gt per year from 2002–2016, contributing to steric sea level rise adjustments.^[22] This integrated perspective underscores causal connections between anthropogenic climate change and geodynamic responses, including potential feedbacks on Earth's rotation and excitation of Chandler wobble variations.^[119] Beyond sectoral applications, GRACE/GRACE-FO data facilitate validation of coupled Earth system models, revealing discrepancies in simulated versus observed mass transport that inform refinements in general circulation models for atmosphere-ocean-ice interactions.^[11] As of 2025, ongoing GRACE-FO observations continue to support these broader insights, with extended data records enhancing signal detection amid noise from interannual variability.^[120]

Challenges, Limitations, and Scientific Debates

Technical Limitations and Error Sources

The spatial resolution of GRACE and GRACE-FO gravity measurements is inherently limited to approximately 300–500 km due to the fixed inter-satellite distance of about 200 km and the low Earth orbit configuration, preventing the detection of finer-scale mass variations such as those from individual river basins or small glaciers.^[121] Temporal sampling is constrained by the 30-day repeat cycle, which undersamples high-frequency geophysical signals like atmospheric pressure fluctuations and ocean tides, leading to aliasing errors that manifest as spurious longitudinal stripes in monthly gravity field solutions.^[122]^[123] Instrumental errors primarily arise from accelerometer measurements of non-gravitational accelerations, where thermal drifts and scale factor instabilities contribute noise levels on the order of 10^{-9} to 10^{-10} m/s²/√Hz, potentially mismodeling satellite orbits and introducing systematic biases in range-rate observations.^[124] In GRACE, microwave ranging (K-band) errors, including carrier phase noise, add to the range-rate uncertainty of about 1–2 μm/s, while GRACE-FO's Laser Ranging Interferometer reduces this to below 1 μm/s but does not eliminate residual pointing and thermal effects.^[65] GPS receiver errors and attitude determination inaccuracies further propagate into the gravity field recovery, with overall Level-1B data noise budgets dominated by these components during post-processing.^[125] Processing-induced errors include correlated north-south striping in spherical harmonic coefficients, stemming from resonant orbital sampling and incomplete removal of short-wavelength errors, which can be mitigated but not fully eliminated by empirical filters or regularization techniques, resulting in residual artifacts equivalent to 10–20% of signal variance in mid-latitudes.^[123]^[126] Mascon-based solutions address some striping but introduce leakage errors from signal smoothing across basin boundaries, particularly over heterogeneous terrains, with formal uncertainties often underestimated by factors of 2–3 compared to validation against in-situ data.^[127] Background model deficiencies represent a major error source, as imperfect de-aliasing products for atmosphere, ocean, and tides leave residuals up to 20% of the gravity signal, while Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) model uncertainties—arising from poorly constrained mantle viscosity and ice history—can bias continental-scale mass trends by 10–30 Gt/yr, especially in polar regions.^[121] GRACE-FO inherits these issues with comparable magnitudes, though enhanced calibration reduces some accelerometer-related contributions; overall error budgets for monthly mass change grids remain at 5–15 mm equivalent water height over land, validated against independent geodetic datasets.^[65]^[73]

Debates on Data Interpretation and Model Discrepancies

Different processing centers for GRACE and GRACE-FO data, including the Center for Space Research (CSR), German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), generate monthly gravity field solutions that exhibit discrepancies in derived products such as terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWSA). These differences, often on the order of several gigatons in regional mass estimates, stem from variations in satellite orbit determination, background force models, regularization parameters, and post-processing steps like destriping or mascon parameterization.^[128] ^[65] For example, standard spherical harmonic solutions from these centers show greater inter-center variability compared to non-parametric mascon approaches, affecting trend estimates for hydrological and cryospheric signals by up to 20-30% in some basins.^[128] ^[121] A prominent debate centers on the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) correction, which subtracts modeled viscoelastic rebound from past ice loading to isolate present-day mass changes but introduces substantial uncertainty due to incomplete ice history reconstructions and mantle viscosity profiles. GIA errors can bias GRACE-derived ice sheet mass loss rates by 0.25-0.45 mm/yr equivalent sea level rise in Antarctica, with ensemble analyses revealing that alternative GIA models alter continental water storage trends by factors of 2 or more in glaciated regions.^[129] ^[130] Ongoing contention, as noted in exchanges from 2010-2012, questions the adequacy of forward-modeled GIA against empirical constraints from GPS and paleodata, potentially over- or under-correcting signals in high-latitude basins.^[131] ^[132] Interpretation challenges in Antarctic ice mass balance highlight model discrepancies, where GRACE signals conflate surface accumulation, dynamic discharge, and GIA, leading to historical disputes over net gain versus loss. Early analyses (2002-2009) reported accelerated mass loss of approximately 150 Gt/yr continent-wide, but alternative processing and GIA choices yielded contradictory regional gains in East Antarctica offsetting West Antarctic losses, complicating attribution to climate drivers.^[133] ^[134] Signal leakage from adjacent oceans and insufficient resolution further exacerbate debates, with forward modeling tests indicating biases up to 50 Gt/yr in basin-scale estimates without tailored corrections.^[135] Broader discrepancies appear in sea level budgets, such as a 5.72 ± 0.98 mm/yr mismatch in the North Atlantic between GRACE-inferred ocean mass and altimetry-sterically corrected totals, attributed to unresolved hydrological model errors or incomplete barystatic components.^[136] Global hydrological models also systematically underestimate decadal groundwater declines observed by GRACE, with discrepancies exceeding 100 Gt in arid regions, underscoring limitations in parameterizing human-induced extractions.^[137] These issues prompt recommendations for ensemble averaging across centers and independent validation with in-situ data to mitigate interpretation biases.^[65]

Legacy and Future Prospects

Scientific and Policy Impacts

The GRACE and GRACE-FO missions have provided unprecedented monthly gravity field data, enabling scientists to quantify mass redistributions that underpin key Earth system processes. In hydrology, GRACE revealed global groundwater depletion rates exceeding 200 km³ annually in major aquifers such as those in India, the Middle East, and California's Central Valley between 2002 and 2016, highlighting unsustainable extraction amid climate variability.^[138] In glaciology, the missions measured ice sheet mass losses totaling over 4,000 gigatons from Greenland and Antarctica from 2002 to 2017, attributing much of this to increased surface melting and ice discharge driven by warming temperatures.^[22] Oceanographic applications distinguished mass-driven sea level rise from thermal expansion, showing that land ice melt and terrestrial water storage changes accounted for approximately 44% of global sea level rise from 2005 to 2013.^[139] These measurements have advanced causal understanding of climate feedbacks, such as how hydrological droughts amplify aquifer depletion and how post-glacial rebound influences solid Earth dynamics, with GRACE data closing water balance equations at continental scales for the first time.^[22] GRACE-FO's laser ranging interferometer has enhanced precision by over 20 times compared to GRACE's microwave system, refining estimates of subtle mass signals like ocean bottom pressure variations linked to circulation changes.^[140] On the policy front, GRACE data have directly informed water management strategies, including California's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014, where observations of Central Valley depletion during the 2012–2016 drought quantified storage losses exceeding 20 km³, prompting regulatory reforms for sustainable extraction.^[141] California's Department of Water Resources now incorporates semi-annual GRACE and GRACE-FO assessments for regional groundwater insights, aiding basin prioritization under the act.^[142] Globally, the missions' tracking of terrestrial water storage anomalies has supported drought early warning systems and informed international assessments of climate-induced water scarcity, emphasizing human-driven depletions over natural variability in policy dialogues.^[77]

Planned Successor Missions and Ongoing Data Utilization

The GRACE-Continuity (GRACE-C) mission, developed in partnership between NASA and the German Aerospace Center (DLR), represents the primary planned successor to GRACE-FO, with a targeted launch in 2028 to extend high-precision gravity measurements for tracking Earth's mass redistribution.^[143]^[144] GRACE-C aims to maintain continuity in monthly gravity field observations, enhancing resolution of time-variable signals related to the water cycle, ice mass balance, and solid Earth processes, while incorporating technological improvements such as advanced laser interferometry from GRACE-FO's experience.^[145] Development efforts, including mission extension approvals in 2024, underscore commitments to bridging potential data gaps post-GRACE-FO's operational lifespan.^[120] Ongoing utilization of GRACE and GRACE-FO datasets involves continuous reprocessing and integration into geophysical models, with recent releases like the CSR Release 06.3 Mascon solutions incorporating refined accelerometer data to reduce errors in gravity field estimates, particularly during periods of variable satellite attitude control.^[146] These datasets provide monthly surface mass anomaly updates, supporting assessments of terrestrial water storage changes and their assimilation into numerical models for water cycle reanalysis, as demonstrated in studies evaluating GRACE-FO's role in global hydrology from 2002 onward.^[147]^[148] Advanced processing techniques, such as stepwise destriping and decomposition-based reconstruction, address correlated errors and gaps, enabling precise quantification of interannual mass trends in regions like aquifers and ice sheets.^[149]^[150] Scientific teams continue to leverage the data for high-resolution applications, including de-aliasing high-frequency signals from atmospheric and oceanic sources to isolate hydrological signals, with ongoing refinements informed by 2025 science meetings focused on data system enhancements and future mission synergies.^[18]^[151] This sustained analysis ensures the missions' gravity observations remain integral to climate monitoring, despite challenges like signal leakage, by cross-validating with independent datasets such as altimetry and GPS.^[15]

References

[1]
GRACE | Mission
The GRACE twin satellites, launched 17 March 2002, are making detailed measurements of Earth's gravity field changes and revolutionizing investigations.Grace-fo · Grace-c · Gravity 101
[2]
Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) - Earth - NASA
GRACE maps Earth's gravity field with accurate measurements of the distance between the two satellites, made possible with the K-band microwave ranging system.
[3]
Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)
The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) twin satellites, which orbited Earth from 2002 to 2017, made detailed measurements of Earth's gravity field.
[4]
15 Years of GRACE Earth Observations
For 15 years, the GRACE mission has unlocked mysteries of how water moves around our planet. It gave us the first view of underground aquifers from space, ...
[5]
Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) - Center for ...
Over the 15 years GRACE provided scientists with unprecedented information about the Earth system. Scientists use measurements of very small changes in the ...
[6]
Overview | Mission - GRACE-FO
The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On (GRACE-FO) mission is a partnership between NASA and the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ).
[7]
GRACE-FO - NASA Science
May 22, 2018 · GRACE-FO is a successor to the original GRACE mission, which orbited Earth from 2002-2017. GRACE-FO tracks Earth's water movement.
[8]
GRACE | Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Mission: GFZ
The increase in accuracy has been achieved by utilizing two satellites following each other on the same orbital track. To consider precise attitude and non- ...
[9]
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-and-dlr-sign-agreement-to-continue-grace-mission-through-2015
[10]
GRACE mission comes to an end
Oct 27, 2017 · Since their launch on 17 March 2002 on board a Rockot rocket from the Russian Cosmodrome in Plesetsk, the two twin satellites GRACE-1 and GRACE- ...Missing: conception development
[11]
Grace - Earth Missions - NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, or GRACE, mission flew twin spacecraft in tandem around Earth to study key changes in the planet's waters, ice ...<|separator|>
[12]
Prolific Earth Gravity Satellites End Science Mission - GRACE-FO
Oct 30, 2017 · Atmospheric reentry of GRACE-2 is expected sometime in December or January. Decommissioning and atmospheric reentry of GRACE-1 are expected in ...<|separator|>
[13]
Bridging the data gap between GRACE and GRACE-FO using ...
Three methods are used to fill the data gap between GRACE and GRACE-FO in Greenland. · The RMS of gap filling is 1.5 cm for pan Greenland and 1.5–3.6 cm for the ...
[14]
Bridging the gap between GRACE and GRACE Follow-On by ...
Sep 13, 2024 · We present a complete series covering the period from 2003 to 2022 filling the gaps of GRACE and between the missions. The achieved spatial ...
[15]
GRACE-FO (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment - Follow-On)
May 13, 2025 · Germany will provide five years of funding as well as the launcher and optical elements of the LRI (Laser Ranging Interferometer) assembly, ...
[16]
First GRACE Follow-On Satellite Completes Construction - NASA
Nov 13, 2016 · Over the course of the five-year GRACE-FO mission, the satellites will provide an updated measurement of Earth's gravitational field every 30 ...
[17]
Timeline | Interactives – GRACE-FO
Consequently, the decision was made to decommission the GRACE-2 satellite and end GRACE's science mission. December 12, 2017. GRACE-FO Satellites Arrive at ...Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
[18]
GRACE-FO | Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
Launch May 2018 with a nominal mission lifetime of 5 years. Currently the mission is in its extension phase which should have an overlap of one year (till end ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
[PDF] GRACE-FO LAUNCH PRESS KIT
May 19, 2018 · NASA has been funding a competitively selected science team for the. GRACE mission, and since 2016, for both the GRACE and GRACE-FO missions.
[20]
Summary of the 2023 GRACE Follow-On Science Team Meeting
May 30, 2024 · The NASA project team submitted its response in spring of 2023 to extend mission operations through 2026. The proposal received overall ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[21]
GRACE-FO Launch Press Kit | Mission Overview
GRACE-FO mission continues the GRACE mission's critical task of measuring and monitoring the movements of mass within and between Earth's atmosphere, oceans, ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
[22]
Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change - PMC
The primary objective of GRACE was to apply monthly-aggregated measurements of the Earth's gravity field to track mass changes in the hydrosphere, cryosphere ...Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
[23]
GRACE Fact Sheet - NASA Earth Observatory
Mar 30, 2004 · The GRACE mission detects changes in Earth's gravity field by monitoring the changes in distance between the two satellites as they orbit Earth.Missing: core | Show results with:core
[24]
Extending the Global Mass Change Data Record: GRACE Follow ...
May 24, 2020 · GRACE-FO is extending the 15-year GRACE record of global monthly mass change at an equivalent precision and spatiotemporal sampling Since ...Missing: redistribution | Show results with:redistribution
[25]
GRACE mission: 15 years of watching water on Earth
Mar 14, 2017 · With GRACE, scientists are able to distinguish between changes in water mass and changes in ocean temperatures. An example of the value of this ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
[26]
Gravity 101 | Mission - GRACE Tellus - NASA
GRACE detects that change when the pull on the leading satellite is slightly stronger than normal, changing the distance between the two satellites. GRACE ...Missing: physics principle
[27]
GRACE (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment) - eoPortal
May 13, 2019: The U.S.-German Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission, active from 2002 to 2017, continues to play a crucial role in advancing ...
[28]
GRACE Tellus
GRACE measures Earth's surface mass and water changes, including land water storage, and is used for applications like hydrology and land ice.Data Portal · GRACE & GRACE-FO - Data... · Grace-fo · MissionMissing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
[29]
Gravity Gradiometry With GRACE Space Missions: New ...
Jul 19, 2019 · GRACE mission comprised two identical spacecraft separated by about 220 km and placed in a near polar orbit at an altitude of 500 km.
[30]
GRACE Beauty Pass Animations - NASA SVS
The primary goal of the GRACE mission is to accurately map variations in the Earth's gravity field over its 5-year lifetime.<|separator|>
[31]
GRACE Orbital Configuration (plots updated daily)
On December 10 2005, the satellites swapped positions, after which GRACE-2 is flying backwards while leading. GRACE satellites were launched on March 17, 2002, ...Missing: formation | Show results with:formation
[32]
Quick Facts - GRACE-FO - NASA
Orbit: Near polar inclination of 89 degrees. Altitude: 305 miles (490 km). Distance between spacecraft: 137 miles (220 km) on average. Velocity. Per second: 4.7 ...
[33]
GRACE-FO | Mission
The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-on (GRACE-FO) mission is a partnership between NASA and the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ).
[34]
Microwave Instrument - GRACE-FO - NASA
The key science instrument for GRACE-FO is the microwave tracking system, known on GRACE-FO as the Microwave Instrument (MWI).
[35]
Accelerometer - GRACE-FO - NASA
These instruments allow scientists to distinguish between gravity influences and those caused by air drag in the atmosphere.
[36]
Laser Ranging Interferometer - GRACE-FO - NASA
GRACE Follow-On will test a Laser Ranging Interferometer to measure intersatellite distance changes with unprecedented precision.Missing: LRI | Show results with:LRI
[37]
GRACE Follow‐On Laser Ranging Interferometer Measurements ...
Aug 4, 2020 · We found that LRI captures gravitational signals as small as 0.1 nm/s 2 at 490 km altitude, improved by 1 order of magnitude from KBR.Abstract · Introduction · Data and Methods · Results
[38]
GRACE-FO: The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow ...
This improved our understanding of the mean Earth gravity field (Fig. 1), resulting in improvements in the determination of permanent ocean currents [1] and in ...
[39]
In-Orbit Performance of the GRACE Follow-on Laser Ranging ...
Jul 19, 2019 · The LRI instrument operates autonomously and produces continuous range telemetry at a ≈ 10 samples per second update rate to be used for gravity ...Article Text · Introduction. · LRI components and design. · On-orbit performance.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[40]
Spacecraft Overview - GRACE-FO
The two GRACE-FO satellites will use the same kind of microwave ranging system as GRACE, and so can expect to achieve a similar level of precision. They will ...Missing: enhancements | Show results with:enhancements
[41]
GRACE Follow‐On Accelerometer Data Recovery - AGU Journals
Apr 15, 2021 · The GRACE-FO accelerometer is a three-axis electrostatic accelerometer manufactured by the Office National d'Études et de Recherches ...1 Introduction · 4 Grace-D Acc Recovery · 5 Results
[42]
Improved GRACE-FO kinematic orbit determination with epoch ...
Sep 1, 2024 · This study investigates the influence of GPS flex power on Hatch-Melbourne-Wübbena (HMW) linear combinations and GRACE-FO kinematic orbits from January 1 to ...
[43]
GRACE-FO Launch Press Kit | Spacecraft and Instruments
The system consists of a GPS receiver, Star Tracker Assembly, coarse Earth and sun sensor, fluxgate magnetometer, inertial measurement unit, magnetic torquers ...
[44]
GRACE Launch, Deployment
Over the next two and a half weeks, basic satellite operations were established. During a subsequent three-week commissioning phase, GRACE's science instruments ...<|separator|>
[45]
GRACE Launch and Deployment
During the next two and a half weeks, basic satellite operations will be established. During a subsequent three-week commissioning phase, GRACE's science ...
[46]
Mission Detail - GRACE - Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
The mission lifetime is divided into five phases. These are the Pre-Launch Phase, Launch and Early Operations Phase (LEOP), the Commissioning Phase, the ...
[47]
GRACE Making Plans for Final Science Data Collection
Sep 14, 2017 · On Sept. 3, one of 20 battery cells aboard the GRACE-2 satellite stopped operating due to an age-related issue. It was the eighth battery cell ...Missing: end failure
[48]
GRACE satellites end 15-year science mission
Oct 30, 2017 · Atmospheric reentry of GRACE-2 is expected sometime in December or January. Decommissioning and atmospheric reentry of GRACE-1 are expected in ...Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
[49]
GRACE - Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
Following an age-related battery issue on GRACE-2 in September, it became apparent by mid-October that GRACE-2's remaining battery capacity would not be ...Missing: failure | Show results with:failure
[50]
https://eoportal.org/satellite-missions/grace-fo
[51]
[PDF] GRACE Follow-On
GRACE Follow-On: Mission Status. GRACE Follow-On: Orbit. The GRACE Follow-On orbital parameters on 2025-02-28 were as follows: Mean Altitude. (>6378.1 km).
[52]
Data Updates & Announcements - GRACE Tellus - NASA
Recent updates include 2025 GFO-STM shifting to remote, new GRACE-FO data release RL06.3, and a new Level-1B ACX2 data product.
[53]
GRACE-FO - NASA
GRACE-FO is continuing GRACE's legacy of tracking Earth's water movement across the planet. Monitoring changes in ice sheets and glaciers, underground water ...Mission · GRACE Tellus · NASA Satellites Reveal Major... · GRACE-FO 3D Model
[54]
2025 GRACE-FO Science Team Meeting UPDATED
Oct 7, 2025 · [Sep-30, 2025]. Important UPDATE: we have pivoted to a remote-only meeting. Abstract submission is now closed.
[55]
GRACE-FO Mission Documentation | PO.DAAC / JPL / NASA
This Handbook is designed to guide both experienced and beginner users in understanding and using Level-3 GRACE and GRACE-FO data products.The three main ...Missing: primary functions<|separator|>
[56]
GRACE-FO - Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On
1 Release Notes for more details. A GRACE-FO Level-2 gravity field product is a set of spherical harmonic coefficients of the exterior geopotential. A product ...
[57]
Which GRACE(-FO) data set should I choose?
The official GRACE & GRACE-FO Science Data System continuously releases monthly gravity solutions from three different processing centers.
[58]
RL06 Products - GRACE - Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment
Apr 26, 2018 · The RL06 data products for month with single accelerometer data will be produced and released over the next month. The RL06 data products ...Missing: RL07 | Show results with:RL07
[59]
JPL GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Ocean, Ice, and Hydrology ...
The water storage/height anomalies are given in equivalent water thickness units (cm). The solution provided here is derived from solving for monthly gravity ...
[60]
The JPL Release-06/07 Data Products - NASA ADS
Here, we present a detailed description and assessment of the RL06 time series, with an emphasis on characterization of errors throughout the flight system's ...
[61]
JPL GRACE and GRACE-FO Mascon Ocean, Ice, and Hydrology ...
Comparison of decadal water storage trends from common GRACE releases (RL05, RL06) ... The solution provided here is derived from solving for monthly gravity field ...Missing: RL07 | Show results with:RL07
[62]
GRACE/GRACE-FO RL07 Mascon solutions from CSR - ADS
The RL07 mascon approach builds on the success of the CSR RL06 solutions and incorporating total variation (TV) regularization to reduce signal leakage between ...
[63]
GRACE and GRACE-FO Level 2 RL07 data processing at JPL
Sep 16, 2024 · The RL07 series of GRACE gravity field products generated at JPL is a reprocessing of updated Level 1 data for the entire mission duration.
[64]
GRACE-FO First Gravity Field Data Now Available
Jun 24, 2019 · The GRACE-FO project released their first Level-2 data products, which are now available at NASA's Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center.Missing: derived | Show results with:derived
[65]
Error Assessment of GRACE and GRACE Follow‐On Mass Change
Aug 19, 2021 · We carry out a comprehensive error assessment of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE Follow-On (GFO) Release-6 (RL06) solutions.
[66]
Revisiting Force Model Error Modeling in GRACE Gravity Field ...
Apr 19, 2022 · GRACE gravity field recovery is affected by observation noise and dynamic force errors, especially temporal aliasing. Four approaches are used ...
[67]
The impact of error covariance matrix structure of GRACE's gravity ...
Jan 1, 2021 · We consider four different structures to the error variance-covariance matrix, (i) full matrix, (ii) block diagonal matrix, (iii) diagonal matrix, and (iv) ...
[68]
Corrections and Auxiliary Products - GravIS - GFZ
GRACE/GRACE-FO Level-3 products represent mass anomalies, i.e., positive or negative variations about a long-term mean gravity field of the Earth. Essentially, ...Missing: characterization | Show results with:characterization<|separator|>
[69]
Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) alias error from ...
Mar 28, 2008 · [3] Inaccuracy in ocean tide models used to remove ocean mass redistribution in GRACE processing is an error source that can contaminate GRACE ...
[70]
A least-squares method for estimating the correlated error of GRACE ...
A new least-squares method is developed for estimating and removing the correlated errors (stripes) from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)
[71]
Error Characterization and Regularization for GRACE gravity solutions
The design of the regularization matrix makes use of the characterization of the errors in GRACE gravity solution. It discusses the use of post-fit residuals to ...
[72]
Modeling GRACE-FO accelerometer data for the version 04 release
Feb 1, 2022 · This paper describes our current characterization of error sources in the GRACE-FO accelerometers and the error mitigation strategies used in the generation of ...
[73]
Validation and Evaluation of GRACE-FO Estimates with In Situ ...
May 28, 2023 · The validation and evaluation of the accuracy of the GRACE-FO estimates in the SCS are expected to provide a reliable foundation for the ...
[74]
[PDF] Optimizing GRACE/GRACE-FO data and a priori hydrological ...
2.3 Validation data. 167. In situ groundwater data are obtained from groundwater networks in five different regions (Table. 168. 1). The in situ data are ...
[75]
A Monte Carlo Propagation of the Full Variance‐Covariance of ...
Sep 16, 2024 · A Monte Carlo Full Variance-Covariance method is proposed to propagate errors of GRACE(-FO) level-2 data, where the covariance is hardly ...
[76]
[PDF] Regularization and error characterization of GRACE mascons
A simple procedure for end users to construct the total uncertainties of the GSFC mascon product for both individual mascons and regional anal- yses is provided ...
[77]
Water Storage | Science - GRACE-FO - NASA
GRACE-FO will provide global measurements on seasonal and inter-annual river basin water storage changes, human influences on regional water storage changes.Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
[78]
Water Cycle Science Enabled By the GRACE and GRACE-FO ...
Jan 19, 2023 · We review key milestones in satellite gravimetry's progression from the fringes of hydrology to being a staple of large-scale water cycle and water resources ...
[79]
Groundwater | Applications - GRACE Tellus - NASA
A study by Rodell et al. [2009] in northwest India used terrestrial water storage-change observations from GRACE and simulated soil-water variations from a data ...
[80]
Map of Groundwater Storage Trends for Earth's 37 Largest Aquifers
A map of groundwater storage trends for Earth's 37 largest aquifers using GRACE data, showing depletion and replenishment in millimeters of water per year.
[81]
Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India - PubMed
Aug 20, 2009 · Groundwater is being depleted at a mean rate of 4.0 +/- 1.0 cm yr(-1) equivalent height of water (17.7 +/- 4.5 km(3) yr(-1)) over the Indian states.
[82]
Groundwater depletion in California's Central Valley accelerates ...
Dec 19, 2022 · Groundwater loss rates observed from GRACE/FO (15.7 ± 1.4 mm/yr; 2.41 ± 0.22 km3/yr) between 2003 and 2021 are 28% faster than the longer-term ( ...
[83]
Comparison of Groundwater Storage Changes From GRACE ...
Nov 5, 2020 · GHMs overestimate depletion in major aquifers, such as the Central Valley (GHM = −30 to −72 km3/12 yr; GRACE = −15 km3/12 yr), NHP (GHM ...
[84]
Have GRACE satellites overestimated groundwater depletion in the ...
Apr 14, 2016 · The NWIA has been shown to experience among the highest GWD rates globally over the past decade based on GHM simulations or GRACE observations.
[85]
Measuring Water Storage in the Amazon - GRACE Tellus
The amount of water stored in the Amazon basin varies from month to month, and can be monitored from space by looking at how it alters Earth's gravity field.
[86]
Data in Action: GRACE and GRACE-FO are used by California's ...
Aug 13, 2024 · Groundwater replenishment in 2005, 2010/11, 2017, and 2019 are observed, followed by critical and longer groundwater depletion periods. GRACE ...
[87]
Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Balance from GRACE ...
In Greenland, the GRACE-FO data revealed an exceptional summer loss of 600 Gt in 2019 following two cold summers.Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[88]
GRACE and GRACE-FO polar ice mass loss - NASA SVS
Mar 8, 2024 · These images, created from GRACE and GRACE-FO data, show changes in polar land ice mass since 2002. Orange and red shades indicate areas that lost ice mass.Missing: peer- reviewed
[89]
Regional acceleration in ice mass loss from Greenland and ...
Sep 17, 2014 · We use Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) monthly gravity fields to determine the regional acceleration in ice mass loss in Greenland and ...Missing: FO | Show results with:FO
[90]
Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 ...
Apr 20, 2023 · In Greenland, the rate of mass loss is 169±9 Gt yr−1 between 1992 and 2020, but there are large inter-annual variations in mass balance, with ...
[91]
Continuous Estimates of Glacier Mass Balance in High Mountain ...
Dec 17, 2020 · We estimate a total mass change of HMA glaciers is −28 ± 6 Gt yr −1 (Gt = 109 t water) or −0.34 ± 0.07 m yr −1 from 2003 to 2019.
[92]
Global mass balance from GRACE - NASA Sea Level Change Portal
Using satellite measurements from the NASA/German Aerospace Center Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), the researchers measured ice loss in all of ...
[93]
Global Glacier Mass Loss During the GRACE Satellite Mission ...
May 20, 2019 · We present annual mass balances for 17 glacier regions, that show a qualitatively good agreement with published estimates from in situ ...Introduction · Data and Methods · Results and Discussion · Conclusions
[94]
Data‐Driven Gap Filling and Spatio‐Temporal Filtering of the ...
Apr 27, 2023 · Moreover, GRACE revealed valuable information on processes occurring within the solid Earth ... geophysical signals in the GRACE and GRACE-FO ...
[95]
Postglacial rebound and Earth's viscosity structure from GRACE
Dec 28, 2002 · One potential application of GRACE measurements of time-variable gravity will be to isolate the postglacial rebound signal, which can then be ...
[96]
Constraining models of postglacial rebound using space geodesy
The vertical observations and GRACE gravity data together suggest that the western Laurentide ice sheet was nearly as massive as that in ICE-5G but distributed ...
[97]
GIA & Trends | Data Portal – GRACE Tellus - NASA
The GRACE(-FO) measurements record a geopotential change at the satellite altitude, which can be inverted to yield Earth's geopotential and geoid change map. To ...
[98]
Monthly GRACE detection of coseismic gravity change associated ...
Feb 24, 2015 · We demonstrate that the coseismic gravitational changes due to the 2011 M w = 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake are detectable by GRACE with only ...<|separator|>
[99]
Performance of GRACE Mascon Solutions in Studying Seismic ...
Oct 7, 2020 · In this study, we examine the performance of the mascon solutions for seismic gravity signals induced by three M9 class (2011 Tohoku-Oki, 2004 Sumatra, and ...
[100]
GRACE and GRACE Follow‐On Gravity Observations of ...
Feb 19, 2024 · We report contrasting observations of gravity change from two intermediate-depth (100–150 km) earthquakes of 2016 & 2017 Mw 8.0 (two combined) Papua New Guinea ...
[101]
Gravity Changes Due to Large Earthquakes Detected in GRACE ...
Feb 4, 2019 · We report on the seven largest earthquakes for which we can detect unequivocal coseismic signals in the time-variable gravity (TVG) data of ...
[102]
Separation of earthquake and hydrology signals from GRACE ...
In this study we apply a model-free technique of independent component analysis (ICA), to separate earthquake and non-earthquake signals from non-Gaussian ...Missing: FO | Show results with:FO
[103]
Frontiers Time-variable gravity from space and present-day mass ...
Solid Earth applications. Besides the refinement of Earth's static gravity field (Fig. 1), GRACE has contributed to understanding solid Earth processes.Frontiers · Satellite Gravity... · Acknowledgments
[104]
Ocean Bottom Pressure 2002-2012 - GRACE-FO
This visualization shows monthly changes in ocean bottom pressure data obtained by the GRACE satellites from November 2002 to January 2012.
[105]
A window on the deep ocean: The special value of ocean bottom ...
Measuring ocean bottom pressure offers an efficient means to monitor ocean climate. Ocean eddies are strongly suppressed by the continental slope.<|separator|>
[106]
A comparison of in situ bottom pressure array measurements with ...
Sep 10, 2008 · Ocean bottom pressure estimates from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) have been validated by comparisons with an array of in ...
[107]
Ocean Bottom Pressure - GRACE-FO
GRACE-FO will measure Atlantic Ocean bottom pressure as an indicator of deep ocean current speed, as GRACE did.
[108]
Arctic Ocean Circulation Patterns Revealed by GRACE in
Measurements of ocean bottom pressure (OBP) anomalies from the satellite mission Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), complemented by information ...
[109]
ECCO Ocean Bottom Pressure (monthly) | Data Portal - GRACE Tellus
To aid in the interpretation of gravity change data over the oceans, we also provide ocean bottom pressure (OBP), as estimated by the ECCO Project ...
[110]
Contributions of GRACE to Climate Monitoring - NASA Technical ...
Jan 1, 2011 · GRACE also measures ocean bottom pressures (OBP), which help to refine understanding and modeling of ocean circulation and the ocean's fresh ...
[111]
Global Ocean Mass Change From GRACE and GRACE Follow‐On ...
Nov 3, 2020 · GRACE has greatly improved our understanding of large-scale water mass variations in the climate system (e.g., Cazenave & Chen, 2010; Tapley et ...
[112]
Revisiting the global mean ocean mass budget over 2005–2020 - OS
Mar 23, 2023 · We compare the global mean ocean mass estimates from GRACE and GRACE Follow-On to the sum of its contributions from Greenland, Antarctica, land glaciers, ...<|separator|>
[113]
Trends and interannual variability of mass and steric sea level in the ...
Jul 13, 2017 · So far only in the South China Sea have mass and steric components have been separated using GRACE and ocean reanalyses or in situ measurements ...
[114]
Processing Choices Affect Ocean Mass Estimates From GRACE
Feb 4, 2019 · However, developing and testing predictions for future sea levels requires a partitioning of the observed change into steric and mass components ...
[115]
Global sea level change signatures observed by GRACE satellite ...
Sep 10, 2018 · Variations of sea level reflect both ocean mass and steric changes. The former is associated with terrestrial ice and water mass exchange ...
[116]
Separating GIA signal from surface mass change using GPS and ...
Aug 23, 2022 · GRACE data are known for highlighting the contemporary surface mass redistribution, which can only be estimated after correcting for GIA ( ...Missing: FO broader
[117]
Mantle Viscosity Derived From Geoid and Different Land Uplift Data ...
Aug 6, 2022 · ... gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) data, and also combined them using the Kalman ...
[118]
Inferring radial models of mantle viscosity from gravity (GRACE) data ...
... (gravity recovery and climate experiment) is then ... rebound studies, dynamic topography, geoid and plate velocities for mantle convection analysis. ... post- ...
[119]
GRACE Mission Data Contributes to Our Understanding of Climate ...
Apr 29, 2019 · GRACE operated for more than 15 years and has provided unprecedented insight into our global water resources, from more accurate measurements of polar ice loss.
[120]
GRACE-C – German-US-American environmental mission has been ...
Mar 19, 2024 · The idea behind the GRACE principle is quite simple: GRACE is used to 'weigh' ice sheets and continents to see how their mass decrease or ...<|separator|>
[121]
Applications and Challenges of GRACE and GRACE Follow-On ...
GRACE is a twin satellites mission utilizing a state-of-the-art technique to map variations of the global gravity field by accurately tracking variations of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[122]
Weighing Earth's Water from Space - NASA Earth Observatory
Dec 23, 2003 · This means that GRACE cannot view the Earth quickly enough to measure the fastest changes in the gravity field from space. Therefore, in order ...Missing: FO | Show results with:FO
[123]
Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data
Apr 25, 2006 · The presence of stripes implies correlations in the gravity field coefficients. Here we examine the spectral signature of these correlated ...
[124]
Mitigation of thermal noise in GRACE accelerometer observations
Jan 1, 2022 · Temperature-induced drift in the accelerometer measurements causes mismodelling of the satellite orbits, creating error in the mass change ...
[125]
[PDF] The Impact of New Accelerometer Transplant Data (ACH) on
In general, we conclude that the change in mascon solutions by ACH is within the error budget of GRACE-FO mascon solutions from JPL and GSFC. Finally ...
[126]
Reducing errors in the GRACE gravity solutions using regularization
Mar 10, 2012 · Due to the use of imperfect background models and data noise, these errors are manifested as north-south striping in the monthly global maps of ...
[127]
Regularization and error characterization of GRACE mascons - NIH
We present a new global time-variable gravity mascon solution derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Level 1B data.<|separator|>
[128]
A comparison of different GRACE solutions in terrestrial water ...
Feb 11, 2019 · Results show that great discrepancies exist in TWSA between GRACE solutions derived from the standard spherical harmonic approach (SSH) and the ...
[129]
Role of Antarctic ice mass balance in present-day sea-level change
Jun 25, 2008 · We show that GIA significantly affects GRACE-estimated Antarctic mass loss: it adds 0.25–0.45 mm/yr to the estimate of sea-level rise, depending ...
[130]
Influence of GIA Uncertainty on Climate Model Evaluation With ...
Apr 30, 2024 · A glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) model ensemble characterizes the uncertainty of GIA corrections on GRACE-derived water storage trends ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
[131]
[PDF] The Role of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) Process On the ...
In addition, about the GIA correction for GRACE, considerable debate is still ongoing [Chambers et al., 2010; Peltier et al., 2012; Tamisiea, 2011]. In order to ...
[132]
Comment on “Ocean mass from GRACE and glacial isostatic ...
Nov 3, 2012 · The modern global theory of the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) process is a theory that directly addresses the extent to which the geoid of classical ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
[133]
[PDF] Accelerated Antarctic ice loss from satellite gravity measurements
Nov 22, 2009 · Antarctic ice mass balance has long been a controversial topic, because of difficulties in estimating it, and because of its importance in ...
[134]
NASA Study: Excess of Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet over ...
Apr 15, 2021 · “We now have an accurate record of how the mass balance of the Antarctic ice sheet has changed over 24 years and the causes of those changes.
[135]
Antarctic Ice Mass Change Products from GRACE/GRACE-FO Using ...
Signals of Antarctic surface mass balance and the mean annual mass balance cause the largest signal leakage for basins comparable to Basin 21 (Figures S12–S16).Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
[136]
Contrasting Discrepancy in the Sea Level Budget Between the North ...
Aug 8, 2024 · We find substantial discrepancy of 5.72 ± 0.98 mm/yr over the North Atlantic Ocean, and the basin scale discrepancies are smaller elsewhere.
[137]
Global models underestimate large decadal declining and rising ...
Jan 22, 2018 · The poor agreement between models and GRACE underscores the challenges remaining for global models to capture human or climate impacts on global ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
[138]
GRACE Sees Groundwater Losses Around the World
NASA's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) has measured significant groundwater depletion around the world in recent years.Missing: impacts | Show results with:impacts
[139]
Sea Level | Science - GRACE-FO - NASA
GRACE data provide important information about the amount of sea level rise caused by melting ice and changes in rainfall that add water to the oceans.
[140]
GRACE & GRACE-FO - JPL Earth Science - NASA
Aug 6, 2020 · This animation of a PowerPoint presentation describes how the GRACE and GRACE-FO satellites have provided fifteen years of mass change measurements.
[141]
GRACE Satellites Advance Understanding of Global Hydrology
Apr 18, 2024 · GRACE satellites monitor changes in Terrestrial Water Storage (TWS) by measuring changes in Earth's gravity, estimating changes in TWS, not ...
[142]
Data in Action: GRACE and GRACE-FO are used by California's ...
Aug 13, 2024 · As of May 2024, the CA's DWR includes GRACE and GRACE-FO data on a semi-annual basis for 'insight for the regional changes in groundwater'.
[143]
GRACE-C - NASA Science
GRACE-C is a successor to the original GRACE and GRACE-FO missions, which orbited Earth from 2002 to the present day. GRACE-C will provide month-to-month ...
[144]
Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment – Continuity (GRACE-C)
GRACE-C is a successor mission to measure Earth's gravity, aiming to improve understanding of climate and the water cycle, scheduled for launch in 2028.
[145]
Short‐Period Mass Variations and the Next Generation Gravity Mission
Jan 21, 2025 · This has led to the subsequent rapid development of a successor mission in partnership between NASA and DLR, GRACE-Continuity (GRACE-C), ...
[146]
CSR GRACE/GRACE-FO RL06.3 Mascon Solutions (RL0603) Note
Improved GRACE-FO acceleromter data was used to processes the gravity fields (ACH vs ACX2 bundle) for the days that use loser deadbands for attitude control to ...<|separator|>
[147]
GRACE-FO Data
GRACE-FO provides regular (at least monthly) updates of surface mass anomalies. For more information and data access, please visit http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov.
[148]
Assessment of the Effectiveness of GRACE Observations in ...
Aug 9, 2025 · The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE/GRACE-FO) mission have been providing global data on terrestrial water storage (TWS) for ...Missing: utilization reprocessing
[149]
Stepwise iterative enhanced destriping of GRACE/GRACE-FO data ...
This study presents a processing strategy based on GBVMD and evaluates its effectiveness in estimating global water mass changes using GRACE SH data. Our ...Missing: utilization reprocessing
[150]
Decomposition-based reconstruction scheme for GRACE data with ...
This study introduces a decomposition-based reconstruction scheme specifically developed to preserve and leverage the ITI features of GRACE data for improved ...Missing: ongoing utilization reprocessing
[151]
(PDF) GRACE‐FO and Future Satellite Gravity Missions Will Need to ...
Oct 11, 2025 · The current state‐of‐the‐art of satellite gravity data processing makes use of de‐aliasing products to reduce high‐frequency mass anomalies.