Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gideon Force


Gideon Force was a British-led formation established in 1941 during the East African Campaign of the Second World War to assist Ethiopian patriot fighters in liberating the province from occupation. Commanded by Major , the force consisted of approximately 40 British officers and non-commissioned officers who directed several thousand Ethiopian and Sudanese drawn from local tribes and patriot bands. Employing guerrilla tactics emphasizing mobility, surprise, and long-range penetration behind enemy lines, Gideon Force conducted raids that severed Italian communications, captured key garrisons, and demoralized colonial forces. In a six-week campaign, it seized 1,100 Italian troops, 14,500 Ethiopian askaris, 12 artillery pieces, numerous machine guns, and substantial ammunition supplies, significantly weakening Italian defenses and facilitating the advance on . Named after the biblical figure for its reliance on a small core directing larger native contingents to achieve outsized results, the unit exemplified innovative that prefigured later Allied doctrines.

The force's operations highlighted Wingate's unorthodox leadership, which prioritized psychological impact and local alliances over conventional firepower, though it strained relations with regular British commanders due to its decentralized structure and high operational tempo. By May 1941, Gideon Force's disruptions had isolated Italian garrisons, enabling patriot forces to overrun them and hastening 's restoration to Emperor , marking a pivotal Allied success in early in the war.

Historical Context

Italian Conquest and Occupation of Ethiopia

Italian forces invaded Ethiopia on October 3, 1935, advancing from bases in Eritrea and Italian Somaliland under Benito Mussolini's directive to establish a new Roman Empire in Africa. The Ethiopian army, commanded by Emperor Haile Selassie I, numbered approximately 500,000 troops but was equipped primarily with rifles and spears, lacking mechanized units or air support. Italian expeditionary forces totaled over 500,000 men, supported by 400 aircraft, 825 guns, and 150 tanks, enabling rapid territorial gains despite challenging terrain and supply lines. Throughout the campaign, employed chemical weapons, including and , in aerial bombings and shells, with documented use beginning in December 1935 and intensifying during the Battle of Shire from February 29 to March 2, 1936. These agents caused thousands of Ethiopian casualties, violating the 1925 , though justified them as retaliatory against Ethiopian guerrilla tactics. A decisive victory at the on March 31, 1936, shattered remaining organized Ethiopian resistance on the northern front. Italian troops captured on May 5, 1936, prompting to flee into exile; Mussolini proclaimed victory on May 9, annexing and merging it with and to form on June 1, 1936, with King titled . During the occupation from 1936 to , Italian authorities divided the territory into six governorates, implementing infrastructure projects like 25,000 kilometers of roads and encouraging civilian settlement, though only about 10,000 Italian colonists arrived by due to logistical constraints. Administrative policies emphasized , culminating in the 1937 application of fascist racial laws prohibiting interracial marriages and imposing curfews on in areas. Suppression of dissent involved mass executions and collective punishments following assassination attempts on in February 1937, which triggered reprisals killing up to 30,000 in . Persistent guerrilla warfare by Arbegnoch ("Patriots") fighters, operating in highland regions, controlled nearly a quarter of Ethiopia's territory through late 1939, ambushing convoys and disrupting supply lines with an estimated 50,000-100,000 irregular combatants. Italian garrisons, initially bolstered to over 250,000 troops in , faced attrition from ongoing pacification campaigns and redeployments to following Italy's entry into on June 10, 1940, leaving defenses vulnerable to external threats. Chemical agents continued in anti-guerrilla operations until at least 1939, contributing to the regime's brutal consolidation but failing to eradicate resistance entirely.

British Imperial Interests and East African Campaign


Italy's declaration of war on and on 10 June 1940 immediately endangered British imperial interests in , as —comprising , , and —bordered to the west and to the south. These territories threatened vital shipping lanes, which were essential for securing the , maintaining supply routes to , and accessing Middle Eastern oil fields. Italian naval bases at and further risked disrupting British maritime dominance in the region, while over 415,000 Italian and colonial troops outnumbered the limited British garrisons of approximately 9,000 in and 8,500 in .
The British response initiated the East African Campaign, with early Allied offensives launched from Sudanese and Kenyan bases to counter Italian advances and reclaim border areas. Following Italian seizure of in on 4 July 1940, the Sudanese Defence Force, augmented by local and imperial units, swiftly recaptured the strategic railhead on 21 July, marking one of the first Allied successes. Operations from involved probing attacks against Italian positions in Somaliland, aimed at relieving pressure on defended frontiers and disrupting enemy supply lines. These actions sought to dislodge Italian forces from , , and , preventing further incursions into British-held territories. Coordination fell under , headed by General Archibald Wavell, which grappled with severe resource shortages amid broader commitments in and the Mediterranean. With conventional forces stretched thin, the command prioritized economical strategies, including and the integration of auxiliary forces, to maximize limited manpower and achieve strategic objectives with minimal reinforcement from . This approach underscored the necessity for innovative tactics to neutralize the Italian threat without diverting substantial assets from primary theaters.

Formation and Leadership

Orde Wingate's Role and Selection

Major , a with a reputation for unorthodox methods, drew on his experience in during the in from 1936 to 1939. There, he organized and commanded the , auxiliary units comprising British troops and Jewish volunteers from the , conducting aggressive night patrols and raids against Arab irregulars to disrupt ambushes and secure supply routes. These operations emphasized rapid movement, surprise assaults, and offensive patrolling, yielding tactical successes such as the defense of Jewish settlements and the infliction of disproportionate casualties on insurgents despite limited manpower. In late 1940, General Archibald Wavell, Commander-in-Chief of , selected Wingate for Mission 101, an operation aimed at supporting Ethiopian resistance against Italian occupation, due to his proven expertise in guerrilla tactics and persistent advocacy for "deep penetration" strategies. Wingate's proposal, presented at a in December 1940, outlined using mobile columns to infiltrate enemy territory, sever logistics, and erode Italian morale through sustained harassment behind the lines, contrasting with conventional frontal assaults. Wavell, impressed by Wingate's Palestine record and doctrinal arguments for exploiting enemy vulnerabilities via surprise and dispersion, authorized him to lead a specialized detachment under the broader mission framework. Wingate's reflected his eccentric traits, including a fervent religious zeal that inspired naming his operational wing Gideon Force after the biblical judge who routed superior Midianite forces with a small band through and . He prioritized mobility via pack animals over heavy mechanization, relentless surprise to avoid decisive engagements, and psychological operations to amplify fear among isolated garrisons, principles rooted in his earlier experiments and tailored to Ethiopia's rugged terrain and sparse infrastructure. This approach, while controversial for its risks and disregard for standard doctrine, aligned with Wingate's first-hand validations of irregular warfare's efficacy against stretched occupiers.

Organizational Structure and Manpower

Gideon Force consisted of a core strength of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 personnel, functioning as a d'élite within broader Allied operations in . This included elements from the (SDF), such as the Frontier Battalion, alongside Ethiopian regular forces composed of exiles and a small number of and officers and NCOs. The composition emphasized lightly equipped mobile units suited to the rugged terrain of Gojjam Province, eschewing heavy armor or artillery in favor of infantry portability. Under Orde Wingate's command, the force was organized into independent mobile columns designed for deep penetration raids, each typically comprising several hundred troops supported by pack including mules for . Armament focused on light weapons such as Bren light machine guns, , and 3-inch s, with dedicated mortar platoons providing support. Coordination among columns relied on signals units from the , enabling real-time communication via radio for synchronized movements against dispersed Italian garrisons. The force integrated local Ethiopian irregulars known as (Patriots), who augmented manpower through recruitment for scouting, intelligence gathering, and auxiliary combat roles. These patriots, often operating in bands numbering in the hundreds per engagement, served as force multipliers by harassing supply lines and providing local knowledge, though they remained distinct from the formal SDF and exile contingents. This hybrid structure allowed Gideon Force to punch above its weight against numerically superior forces, leveraging elite training and irregular support for guerrilla-style operations.

Planning and Preparation

Strategic Objectives under Mission 101

Mission 101 directed to infiltrate Province from in early 1941, building on prior covert efforts to arm and fund resistance fighters against occupiers. The core objective was to ignite a province-wide uprising by linking with local patriot bands already active under preliminary Mission 101 operations led by Colonel , thereby isolating garrisons and disrupting their control over key terrain. A secondary but symbolically potent goal involved escorting Emperor into to legitimize the and mobilize broader Ethiopian loyalty, as his presence would signal the restoration of imperial authority and undermine propaganda portraying the occupation as permanent. This approach leveraged minimal British-led manpower—approximately 1,500-2,000 troops including Sudanese battalions and Ethiopian exiles—against an estimated 15,000-20,000 and colonial forces, emphasizing guerrilla disruption over direct conventional engagement to maximize strategic leverage. These aims aligned with the wider East African Campaign by severing Italian supply routes through , which connected to northern strongholds like , thus preventing reinforcements to beleaguered fronts in and where Allied forces under Generals Wavell and Platt were advancing. By pinning down disproportionate enemy divisions in rugged interior terrain, Gideon Force aimed to dilute Italian defensive concentrations elsewhere, facilitating conventional Allied breakthroughs without requiring large-scale commitments in the region.

Logistics and Initial Mobilization

Gideon Force assembled in during December 1940, primarily from elements of the , Ethiopian regular troops in exile, and irregular fighters loyal to Emperor , under Orde Wingate's command as part of Mission 101. Logistics preparations emphasized mobility over heavy supply lines, procuring hundreds of pack mules and local scouts to navigate the impending , as mechanical transport proved impractical for the rugged terrain ahead. Limited air support constrained resupply options, forcing reliance on ground porters and foraging, while seasonal concerns included avoiding the onset of monsoons that could flood rivers and mire movements later in the campaign. Training in the Sudan camps focused on guerrilla techniques suited to deep penetration, including rigorous night marches to minimize detection by Italian patrols and reconnaissance flights, sabotage of bridges and telegraph lines to disrupt enemy communications, and the use of portable loudspeakers for psychological operations broadcasting surrender appeals in Amharic and Italian to erode garrison morale. These methods drew from Wingate's prior experience in Palestine, adapting special night squads' tactics to East African conditions, with emphasis on small-unit autonomy and rapid assembly under cover of darkness. Initial mobilization culminated in the force's departure from the vicinity in mid-January 1941, crossing the near Roseires into Province amid challenges from swollen tributaries, dense scrub, and sparse water sources that tested animal endurance and human acclimatization. Coordination with Ethiopian liaison officers, such as those attached from exile contingents, enabled early contacts with () networks across the border, securing provisional basing points and intelligence on Italian dispositions without compromising operational secrecy. These preparations ensured the force, numbering around 1,700 men plus auxiliaries, could sustain initial thrusts despite stretched supply chains vulnerable to interdiction.

Military Operations

Penetration into Gojjam Province

Gideon Force initiated its penetration into Gojjam Province by crossing from and descending the eastern on 18 1941, evading Italian detection through long-range infiltration tactics that prioritized off-road routes across difficult terrain. The force, numbering approximately 1,700 men including British regulars, Sudanese troops, and Ethiopian patriots, aimed primarily at the Italian stronghold at Debra Marcos and outlying garrisons such as those at Bure and Finote Selam, seeking to sever reinforcements from the main Italian concentrations in . This deep penetration enabled the establishment of concealed forward bases deep within the province, facilitated by alliances with local (Ethiopian patriot fighters) who supplied guides, intelligence on Italian dispositions, and auxiliary manpower for securing supply lines via pack animals. Wingate's emphasis on mobility and surprise minimized encounters with major Italian roadblocks, allowing Gideon Force to position itself for interior disruptions while Italian commanders, under General Giuseppe Nasi, initially dismissed reports of the incursion as exaggerated patriot activity. Initial operations focused on targeted ambushes against isolated convoys and of telegraph lines linking Debra Marcos to northern posts, which compelled Italian units to divert resources inward and abandon peripheral patrols by late . These actions, conducted with minimal casualties—Gideon Force suffering fewer than a dozen losses in the entry phase—eroded Italian morale and logistics without committing to prolonged engagements, setting conditions for broader unrest among Gojjam's population.

Guerrilla Tactics and Key Battles

Gideon Force utilized guerrilla tactics centered on surprise night attacks, feints, and encirclements to isolate and overwhelm garrisons in Province, minimizing direct confrontations with larger enemy concentrations. Troops advanced via rapid nocturnal marches, often covering 15-20 miles per night, supported by mule trains for , grenades, and light mortars while forgoing heavy or extensive resupply to preserve mobility across rugged terrain. These operations exploited the Italians' dispersed fortifications and supply vulnerabilities, with small columns feigning larger forces through coordinated diversions and amplified noise to induce panic and overestimation of Gideon Force's strength. Psychological elements amplified these physical maneuvers; units deployed loudspeakers, megaphones, and hand-distributed leaflets proclaiming Emperor Haile Selassie's return, which accelerated morale deterioration amid news of broader Allied advances. This combination pressured isolated posts into surrender or flight without prolonged sieges, as seen in the early routs that severed key roads linking to northern strongholds. A pivotal early engagement occurred at Burye in late February 1941, where Gideon Force encircled the fort after a grueling march, launching and assaults that repelled counterattacks and secured the position as a forward base for deeper incursions toward Debra Marcos. Subsequent operations featured repeated night raids on peripheral outposts, culminating in the unopposed entry into Debra Marcos on April 3, 1941, following the garrison's desertion under sustained pressure from feints and interdictions. These actions demonstrated the efficacy of Wingate's emphasis on speed and deception, yielding territorial control with minimal casualties while disrupting reinforcements.

Collaboration with Ethiopian Patriots

Gideon Force's operations in Province from January to May 1941 depended heavily on alliances with local fighters, who numbered in the thousands and provided essential manpower augmentation to the force's core of approximately 1,700 British-led troops. These Ethiopian irregulars contributed intimate knowledge of terrain and supply routes, enabling effective guerrilla maneuvers that harassed Italian rear areas and supply lines. Orde Wingate emphasized training select Ethiopian elements in guerrilla tactics, building on earlier efforts by Mission 101, while distributing rifles and ammunition to compliant bands to enhance their combat utility and secure loyalty to Emperor . This arming was conditional on demonstrated effectiveness against , fostering mutual benefits through shared intelligence on enemy positions and diversions that isolated garrisons. British officers coordinated with major leaders, leveraging Selassie's symbolic authority to unify fragmented groups for joint operations. The proved effective in disrupting Italian reinforcements and containing forces through ambushes and sieges, amplifying Gideon Force's limited size and contributing to the rapid ejection of Italian troops from key areas like Debra Markos in April 1941. However, challenges persisted, including inconsistent discipline among , who sometimes misused supplied arms for personal gain or tribal rivalries, and reliability issues stemming from feudal structures and logistical shortages. These factors necessitated ongoing oversight to maintain operational coherence.

Results and Immediate Aftermath

Captures, Casualties, and Territorial Gains

Gideon Force captured 1,100 troops and 14,500 colonial Ethiopian troops (Askaris), along with 12 pieces, numerous machine guns, rifles, substantial ammunition stocks, and over 200 pack animals. On 23 May 1941, an additional 12,000 soldiers under Severio Maraventano surrendered to the force at Debra Markos. The force's own casualties remained minimal throughout the campaign, with approximately 100 losses recorded for the 2nd Ethiopian Battalion amid engagements such as the Battle of Dembacha, where Italian forces suffered around 400 casualties. By early May 1941, Gideon Force had established control over Gojjam Province, capturing key towns including Bure on 14 March and Debre Marqos on 6 April, which isolated remaining Italian garrisons. This territorial control spanned from the River's curve to positions south of near Bahrdar Giorgis, securing critical road networks, bridges, and supply routes that prompted en masse Italian surrenders and enabled subsequent link-ups with broader Allied advances.

Advance to Addis Ababa and Selassie's Restoration

Following successes in Gojjam Province, elements of Gideon Force, including parts of the Frontier Battalion, escorted Emperor eastward toward , linking up with advancing Allied columns from the south comprising South African and East African (primarily Kenyan) brigades that had captured the capital unopposed on April 6, 1941, after Italian forces under General Pietro Frangipane evacuated to avoid encirclement. This coordination ensured a unified front, with Gideon Force's providing vanguard and harassment against retreating rearguards, facilitating Selassie's symbolic procession into the city on May 5, 1941—exactly five years after his flight during the . Upon arrival, Selassie broadcast a via radio equipment supplied by Gideon Force, urging Italian forces to lay down arms and affirming the restoration of Ethiopian sovereignty, which accelerated surrenders among demoralized garrisons across . The emperor's return, accompanied by Ethiopian patriot fighters integrated into Gideon operations, marked the political culmination of the campaign, dispelling Italian claims of continued control and bolstering Allied legitimacy in the region. In the ensuing weeks, Gideon Force units assisted in suppressing isolated Italian pockets in central , such as those near Amba Alagi where Amedeo d'Aosta surrendered on May 18, 1941, before the force's formal disbandment on June 1. Authority was progressively handed over to a joint Ethiopian government under Selassie and , establishing provisional stability amid disarmament of Italian and colonial troops, with Gideon personnel withdrawing to or reallocating to other theaters.

Analysis and Legacy

Factors Contributing to Success

The success of Gideon Force in liberating Gojjam Province stemmed primarily from the forces' strategic overextension across vast East African territories, where approximately 300,000 troops at the campaign's outset in were thinly dispersed over rugged terrain, leaving isolated garrisons vulnerable to disruption. In Gojjam specifically, Italian holdings relied on fixed posts that proved ineffective against mobile threats, exacerbated by chronic supply shortages and declining morale following earlier defeats in and . This contrasted sharply with Gideon Force's compact structure—comprising around 1,000-2,000 personnel including Sudanese regulars and Ethiopian auxiliaries—which enabled high mobility via pack animals and local paths, allowing surprise penetrations that bypassed main roads and Italian defenses. Orde Wingate's emphasis on aggressive and offensive initiative further amplified these asymmetries, as his forces executed rapid, deep strikes against command nodes and supply lines, disrupting Italian cohesion without engaging in prolonged battles. This approach, rooted in exploiting enemy paralysis through speed and initiative, culminated in the province's clearance within six weeks from initial crossings in late January 1941, capturing over 1,100 and 14,500 while sustaining minimal losses. air superiority, while present, was neutralized by Gideon's terrain-focused in escarpments and highlands, where proved logistically challenging for the occupiers. Psychological operations, including radio broadcasts and leaflets proclaiming Allied advances, compounded Italian demoralization by fostering surrenders and defections, as isolated units perceived inevitable defeat amid eroding command structures. These elements—overextension versus mobility, doctrinal aggression validated by swift results, and targeted erosion of enemy will—formed the causal core of 's efficacy, independent of broader theater dynamics.

Challenges, Criticisms, and Tactical Innovations

Gideon Force faced significant logistical challenges in the rugged terrain of Gojjam Province, where long and tenuous supply lines relied heavily on pack animals, resulting in shortages of food, , and for both British-led troops and Ethiopian irregulars. Operations from to May 1941 were hampered by the need to traverse impassable landscapes, exacerbating vulnerabilities to disease such as , which weakened personnel despite overall low combat casualties relative to achievements. These strains underscored the risks of deep penetration tactics against numerically superior Italian forces, estimated at 12,000 in key engagements compared to Gideon Force's 2,000 men. Wingate's unorthodox methods elicited skepticism from British high command, who questioned the viability of amid conventional priorities, viewing it as a diversionary gamble despite successes like forcing Italian surrenders through bluff and mobility. Personal criticisms targeted Wingate's zealous personality and disregard for military conventions, including inflammatory reports decrying subordinates and superiors, which fueled perceptions of arrogance and —prompting considerations of his by General Wavell and the eventual disbandment of Gideon Force in June 1941. British military figures like William Slim later echoed detractors' concerns over Wingate's approaches as wasteful, though proponents praised their decisiveness in outnumbered scenarios. Tactical innovations included "" emphasizing hit-and-run night raids, ambushes, and high mobility via camels, enabling Gideon Force to defeat forces ten times larger, as in instances where 1,000 Ethiopian and Sudanese troops routed 7,000 . Integrated psychological operations, employing loudspeakers, handbills, and biblical motifs like the narrative, demoralized enemies and rallied unvetted local patriots, foreshadowing modern doctrines but introducing risks of over-reliance on irregulars whose effectiveness varied, with some accounts debating their utility amid potential disloyalty or poor discipline. While these methods yielded no major strategic failures, bold risks contributed to tactical casualties and post-operation tensions, including Ethiopian concerns over sustained influence despite the campaign's role in restoring .

Long-Term Influence on Irregular Warfare

The tactics employed by Gideon Force, emphasizing deep penetration by small, mobile columns supported by local irregulars to disrupt enemy logistics and morale, directly informed the doctrinal foundations of British operations during . Brigadier Orde Wingate's success in with a force of approximately 1,700 British and Sudanese troops augmented by Ethiopian patriots demonstrated how limited regular units could amplify their impact through alliances with indigenous fighters, a model Wingate replicated in forming the ' 77th Indian Infantry for operations in starting in 1943. This approach prioritized offensive surprise and psychological disruption over conventional firepower, yielding lessons in where numerically inferior forces achieved strategic paralysis of superior opponents by targeting supply lines and command cohesion. Post-war, Gideon Force's integration of regular penetration groups with native auxiliaries influenced the evolution of elite units like the (), which adopted similar principles of operational flexibility, local collaboration, and behind-the-lines raiding for conflicts in and beyond. Wingate's emphasis on devolved to column leaders, allowing initiative in fluid environments, became a hallmark of training, countering rigid hierarchies in traditional armies and enabling adaptation to irregular threats. However, the campaign's reliance on terrain familiarity and motivated local support highlighted limitations in scalability; while effective against isolated Italian garrisons in 1941, analogous Chindit operations on a brigade scale in Burma suffered from overextension and logistical strain, underscoring that such methods excel in niche, supportive roles rather than as primary warfighting doctrines. Recent analyses, including Andrew Stewart's 2016 examination of the , affirm the empirical efficiency of Force's model in leveraging Allied-Ethiopian synergies to expel forces with minimal resources, challenging historiographical tendencies to understate colonial contributions in favor of narratives centered on native agency alone. Scholarship in the , such as assessments of Wingate's irregular tactics, reinforces their enduring relevance for countering peer adversaries through morale-focused disruption but cautions against uncritical emulation without robust air and intelligence enablers, as scalability falters in high-intensity theaters without these multipliers. These insights counterbalance views minimizing external intervention by evidencing causal Allied roles in restoring Ethiopian , where Force's strikes complemented uprisings to fracture control decisively.

References

  1. [1]
    East African Campaign - BBC - WW2 People's War - Timeline
    The other was Gideon Force, an irregular group organised by Major General Orde Wingate. Gideon Force was intended to aid Ethiopian rebels and hold down Italian ...
  2. [2]
    Gideon (i) | Operations & Codenames of WWII
    The campaign lasted six weeks and captured 1,100 Italian and 14,500 Ethiopian troops, 12 pieces of artillery, many machine guns and small arms together with ...
  3. [3]
    The Eccentric General Whose Guerrilla Tactics Drove Italy Out of ...
    Nov 28, 2017 · As soon as Wingate and the Gideon Force delivered their Italian POWs to Addis Ababa, he was summoned to headquarters in Harar, where he was ...
  4. [4]
    Orde Wingate And His Chindits Pioneered Guerrilla Warfare
    With audacity and determination, Wingate's Ethiopian and Sudanese tribesmen—named Gideon Force—disrupted the enemy garrisons and blocked the road to the capital ...
  5. [5]
    The Abyssinia Crisis – a Lesson for today
    Mar 7, 2025 · ... Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie. On 3 October 1935, Italian armies invaded Ethiopia sparking the Second Italo-Ethiopian War. The invasion ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Invasion of Ethiopia | World War II Database
    On 31 Mar 1936, the Italians defeated the Ethiopians at the Battle of Maychew, the last major battle of the war. On 2 May, Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie I ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The use of chemical weapons in the 1935–36 Italo-Ethiopian War
    first invaded Ethiopia.1 The second war was expected and tensions had ... Italy also used chemical weapons in the Battle of Shire (29 February–2. March ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Military Operations in the Italian East Africa, 1935-1941 - DTIC
    Thesis: Mussolini sacrificed the Italian East Africa Empire and its armed forces with the expectation of regaining it through the peace negotiations; he ...
  9. [9]
    Making Italy Great Again
    Jan 27, 2017 · In Mussolini's conquest of Ethiopia, Italians saw a chance to strengthen their national character and improve their international standing.Missing: annexation administrative
  10. [10]
    [PDF] A Patriotic Resistance to Italian Occupation of Ethiopia (1936-1941)
    Feb 27, 2015 · For the second time in forty years, a European power, Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1935. Until this time, Ethiopia was a traditional polity ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    How Italy Was Defeated In East Africa In 1941 - Imperial War Museums
    In 1940, Italy's fascist dictator Benito Mussolini wanted to expand his African Empire. His forces in Ethiopia attacked neighbouring British possessions, but in ...Missing: administrative | Show results with:administrative
  13. [13]
    HyperWar: East African Campaign, 1940-41 (Introduction)
    ... Sudan was threatened on its east by the Italian empire. With this new ... threaten British ships passing through the Red Sea. Similarly Kisamayu and ...Missing: WWII | Show results with:WWII
  14. [14]
    East Africa and Middle East in World War 2 - Naval-History.Net
    The Italian army was also powerful enough to conquer British and French Somaliland and posed a threat to the Sudan and Kenya. The Italians' one major problem ...Missing: interests declaration
  15. [15]
    HyperWar: East African Campaign, 1940-41 (Chapter 3) - Ibiblio
    The line of British defence extended from Port Sudan in the north to Roseires in the south. Kassala, an important communication centre, occupied the middle of ...Missing: onset | Show results with:onset
  16. [16]
    Docs – E W S Africa 1930-1947–East Africa 1940 - 1947
    The declaration of war by Italy on the United Kingdom and France on 10 June 1940 created additional problems for the Middle East Command.
  17. [17]
    A decisive but forgotten campaign: East Africa 1940–41 - Osprey
    Jan 19, 2025 · The first step was to defend the British positions in Egypt, Sudan and Kenya ... Italian threat once and for all. Already in early November 1940, ...Missing: Red Sea
  18. [18]
    Terror in Galilee: British-Jewish Collaboration and the Special Night ...
    Sep 4, 2015 · British army officer Orde Wingate organised and led a joint British-Jewish military unit, the Special Night Squads (SNSs), to defeat Palestinian rebels.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Orde Wingate And the British Internal Security Strategy During the ...
    Despite tactical successes in his validation of proofs of concept through the Special Night Squads, his determined efforts failed to achieve his stated goals at ...
  20. [20]
    MILITARY MISFIT?
    Feb 17, 2024 · It was named after Gideon, the Old Testament military leader and judge. It is noteworthy that Wingate believed guerrilla warfare was a matter ...
  21. [21]
    When You’re Outnumbered: Lessons from Two British Masters of Irregular Warfare
    ### Summary of Gideon Force: Challenges, Criticisms, Tactical Innovations, Integration with Locals, Risks, Examples, Outcomes
  22. [22]
    Great Contemporaries: Orde Wingate - "A Man of the Highest Quality"
    Oct 8, 2020 · He was dejected, depressed, overusing an anti-malarial drug, and physically and mentally exhausted after fighting in the East African Campaign.
  23. [23]
    (PDF) ALLIED GROUND FORCES IN EAST AFRICA 1940-41
    ... Gideon Force (Lieutenant-Colonel Wingate)1 : Frontier Battalion, SDF (minus ... Sudan Defence Force Signals 10 From Bisheshwar Prasad, East African ...
  24. [24]
    Orde Wingate and Combat Leadership - The Strategy Bridge
    Feb 13, 2015 · Wingate succeeded far beyond MI(R)'s ambitions, raising and commanding 'Gideon Force', a purpose organised regular formation for operations ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] British Military Administration of Occupied Territories in Africa During ...
    ... Gideon force, with its 450 fighting men, a mortar platoon, a propaganda unit ... Sudan Defence Force troops were made available to take over police ...
  26. [26]
    SOE in Abyssinia - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · Wingate did not need to know. He, aware that he was wielding the sword of the Lord and of Gideon, called his wing of the mission Gideon Force.
  27. [27]
    A Third Front: The Patriots | The First Victory - Yale Scholarship Online
    Major Orde Wingate quickly forged a key role for himself and eventually acted as an adviser to Haile Selassie while also leading insurgent forces into battle ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Deep Penetration Operations Past and Future - DTIC
    Nov 4, 2017 · Three and Five Columns' attacks accomplished the initial goals of the operation, and Orde. Wingate saw he had achieved nearly total surprise and ...
  29. [29]
    Orde Wingate And Paramilitary Support Operations: Messages For ...
    He advocated what current soldiers call 'manoeuvre warfare' carried out by specially-trained regular troops alongside local irregulars and supported by air, as ...Missing: strength mules mortars
  30. [30]
    The Chindits: Unique Burma Jungle Force - Historic UK
    Apr 14, 2025 · Later, In Ethiopia, Wingate and his Gideon Force (named after the ... sabotage, and continual psychological disruption of the enemy.<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    [PDF] ORDE WINGATE AND THE BRITISH ARMY, 1922-1944
    2. Abstract: Major General Orde Charles Wingate (1903-1944) is one of the most controversial British military commanders of the last hundred years.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Local history of Ethiopia : Debre Tabor - Delo wereda
    "While Wingate and Gideon Force were operating /March-April 1941/ before Debre ... Ethiopian liaison officer on board. "At that point the Ethiopian Air Force ...
  33. [33]
    Gideon Force | Military Wiki - Fandom
    ... Gideon Force was a small British-led African special force ... East African Campaign of World War II. The leader and creator of the force was Major Orde Wingate.
  34. [34]
    Orde Wingate | World War II Database
    May 1, 2009 · The Gideon Force began operating in Feb 1941 at the strength of 1,700 men, disrupting supply and communications lines of the much larger ...
  35. [35]
    Orde Wingate, 'Guerrilla' Warfare and Long-range Penetration, 1940 ...
    Major General Orde Wingate was a highly controversial figure in his time and remains so among historians. However, his eccentric and colourful personality ...
  36. [36]
    World War II Chronology for March 1941 - OnWar.com
    The Italian forces and their new local allies begin an attack on Wingate's Gideon force around Burye (continuing to April 4th). They are beaten off despite ...
  37. [37]
    Taking back the Homeland - Ethiopian Guerrillas in World War II
    ### Summary of Ethiopian Guerrillas (Arbegnoch) in WWII with Gideon Force
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Open PDF - DTIC
    In Ethiopia, the British Empire cooperated with forces known as the Patriots, or arbegnoch. Formed from many different groups, including the Ethiopian army,.
  39. [39]
    HyperWar: The Mediterranean & Middle East, Vol.I (Chapter XXI)
    The three following chapters describe the ensuing campaign against Italian East Africa until the surrender at Amba Alagi in May 1941.
  40. [40]
    Emperor Haile Selassie I Returns Triumphant to Ethiopia | Origins
    May 30, 2016 · On May 5, 1941, Haile Selassie I returned triumphantly to his beloved capital city, Addis Ababa ... British Colonel Orde Wingate led Gideon Force ...
  41. [41]
    Today in World War II History—May 5, 1941 - Sarah Sundin
    May 5, 2021 · May 5, 1941: Emperor Haile Selassie returns to Ethiopian capital of Addis Ababa, 5 years to the day from fleeing during the Second Italo-Abyssinian War.
  42. [42]
    No Deserts for Il Duce: The Italian Rout in East Africa
    To show his certainty about the outcome, he renamed his operation from Mission 101 to Gideon Force, after a Biblical commander who defeated 15,000 with only 300 ...Missing: Defence equipment
  43. [43]
    The Italian Colonial Empire: A Note on Its Rise and Fall—II - jstor
    Italian forces, still outnumbering the British and still as well-equipped except for 'planes and morale, had now to be mopped up. The surrender of the Duke ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Origins of the Special Forces | National Army Museum
    The Chindits were founded and led by Brigadier Orde Wingate. He had earlier successfully commanded Gideon Force - an irregular army inspired by the Special ...
  45. [45]
    Lessons from Two British Masters of Irregular Warfare
    Aug 21, 2020 · At one point, 1,000 Ethiopian and Sudanese troops in the Gideon Force with 500 in reserve drove 7,000 Italians into a rout. One final battle ...Missing: Defence numbers
  46. [46]
    The First Victory: An Introduction by Andrew Stewart - Yale Books Blog
    Nov 8, 2016 · Andrew Stewart introduces his new book The First Victory: The Second World War and the East Africa Campaign, a riveting account of the long- ...
  47. [47]
    The First Victory: The Second World War and the East ... - Amazon.com
    The First Victory: The Second World War and the East Africa Campaign ... Ethiopia, and, last, the Commonwealth-Ethiopian campaign to liberate Ethiopia. ... book ...