Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gideon


Gideon, also known as Jerubbaal, was a and military commander of ancient who, according to the in the , led the to victory over the Midianites after seven years of their raids and oppression.
Called by of while secretly to evade Midianite plunderers, Gideon initially demonstrated reluctance and sought divine confirmation through two miraculous involving a wool fleece—one where wet only the fleece amid dry ground, and another reversing the conditions—described in Judges 6:36–40. He destroyed his father's altar to , sparking local conflict, then amassed an army that Yahweh reduced from 32,000 to 300 men via selection tests to emphasize reliance on divine power rather than human strength. Employing trumpets, empty jars, and torches at night, Gideon's force caused panic and rout among the Midianite host, pursuing and slaying their kings Zebah and Zalmunna, thus securing 40 years of peace for . Though he declined offers of kingship, affirming Yahweh as ruler, Gideon later crafted a gold from spoils that became an object of , foreshadowing internal divisions exploited by his son Abimelech's violent bid for power. The narrative portrays Gideon as a figure of flawed and , embodying the cyclical pattern of , oppression, and deliverance in pre-monarchic , with archaeological correlations to Midianite activity in the supporting the of regional conflicts during the late Bronze to early transition.

Etymology and Designations

Hebrew Origins and Meanings

The Hebrew name for Gideon is גִּדְעוֹן (transliterated as Gidʿōn), derived from the verbal root גָּדַע (gāḏaʿ), signifying "to hew down," "to fell," or "to cut off." This root appears in to denote the act of chopping or lopping off, as in felling trees or severing limbs, carrying implications of forceful reduction or destruction. The noun form gōdēaʿ from the same root explicitly means "feller" or "hewer," aligning the name with descriptors of one who wields an axe or performs destructive labor. In ancient linguistic patterns, names formed from such action verbs often connoted prowess or capability, potentially evoking a "" or "destroyer" archetype suited to the martial demands of tribal societies in the . This etymology avoids theophoric elements common in contemporaneous names (e.g., those incorporating or ), instead emphasizing functional or occupational traits that could signify readiness for conflict or in agrarian contexts. Scholarly analyses of Hebrew confirm that Gidʿōn fits within a class of hypocoristic or descriptive names prevalent among early , where roots denoting cutting or breaking underscore themes of agency and impact.

Nicknames and Titles in Scripture

In the Hebrew Bible, Gideon bears the secondary name Jerubbaal, a compound term from yārîb ("to contend" or "strive") and baʿal ("Baal" or "lord/master"), literally signifying "may Baal contend" or "contender with Baal." This designation functions narratively as an alternative identifier in the , appearing in contexts that reference Gideon's and actions without primary reliance on his . Its linguistic structure underscores a polemical edge, invoking the Baal in a phrase that implies contention or judgment. A textual variant, Jerubbesheth, occurs in 2 Samuel 11:21, substituting bōšet ("shame" or "disgrace") for baʿal in a scribal tradition aimed at purifying Hebrew names from associations with foreign gods. This alteration reflects post-exilic editorial practices to eliminate pagan theophoric elements, preserving the original phonetic form while altering its theological implications. The shift highlights scriptural mechanisms for maintaining monotheistic integrity in nomenclature. Scripture further titles Gideon as a (šōpēṭ), denoting a temporary, divinely appointed leader who exercised authority through and prowess rather than dynastic succession. This role, emblematic of the era's decentralized , positions him among figures who functioned as deliverers (môšîaʿ) from external threats, emphasizing arbitration and over institutionalized rule. Such appellations underscore the non-monarchical framework of pre-kingship , where leadership arose episodically in response to crises.

Historical and Cultural Context

The Period of the Judges in Israelite History

The Period of the Judges encompassed roughly the 12th and 11th centuries BCE, bridging the Israelite conquest of under and the rise of monarchy under around 1020 BCE, during a time of transition from nomadic and semi-nomadic tribal structures to more settled agrarian societies amid the . This era featured a decentralized tribal , where authority rested in localized elders and amphictyonic assemblies rather than a unified kingship, resulting in "every man doing what was right in his own eyes" and vulnerability to external pressures due to fragmented coordination. The outlines a repetitive cycle as the dominant socio-religious dynamic: Israelite apostasy through adoption of and worship, interpreted biblically as infidelity; subsequent by foreign dominators for periods ranging from 8 to 18 years; communal and pleas for relief; and via charismatic judges who effected temporary through military prowess. This pattern, reiterated across accounts of figures like , , and , reflects causal realism in that likely fostered internal divisions and eroded martial readiness, exacerbating exposure to raids by nomadic and settled foes exploiting Israel's agricultural cycles. Regional dynamics amplified these vulnerabilities, with persistent threats from Canaanite enclaves in the hill country and emerging Philistine pressures along the , where superior iron technology and organized city-states enabled economic predation on Israelite harvests and livestock. The absence of fortified central institutions meant responses relied on ad hoc mobilizations, perpetuating instability until accumulated failures prompted demands for kingship as chronicled in 1 Samuel. Archaeological correlates, such as sparse highland settlements and evidence of conflict in I sites, align with this depiction of opportunistic incursions amid weak cohesion, though specific judge attributions remain unattested outside biblical texts.

Midianite Oppression and Regional Dynamics

The Midianites, a semi-nomadic tribal originating from regions east of the , initiated a period of severe oppression against the lasting seven years, as detailed in the biblical narrative. This dominance stemmed from repeated incursions where Midianite forces, leveraging their mobility, overwhelmed Israelite settlements and agricultural activities. The raids targeted the Valley of Jezreel and extended southward toward , systematically destroying crops and livestock essential for sustenance. Allied with the Amalekites and other eastern peoples, the Midianites conducted opportunistic plunder expeditions synchronized with the Israelite planting and seasons, camping temporarily on the land to maximize disruption before withdrawing with spoils. Their forces, described as innumerable like locusts and supported by vast herds enabling rapid strikes, rendered conventional defense infeasible for the agrarian . This alliance amplified the threat, combining Midianite pastoralist raiding expertise with Amalekite nomadic aggression from the southern deserts. In response to the unrelenting predation, the adopted survival strategies suited to , constructing hides in clefts, caves, and fortified strongholds to evade direct with superior raiders. The economic toll was profound, impoverishing communities to the point of destitution and compelling a reliance on concealment rather than open . These reflect the vulnerabilities of settled farming societies to transjordanian semi-nomadic groups, whose actions prioritized short-term gain over territorial or permanent , absent any indications of sustained . Such patterns align with ancient Near Eastern tribal conflicts, where defensive imperatives arose from existential threats to and population viability, countering interpretations that downplay the coercive nature of the .

Primary Biblical Account

Divine Calling and Confirmation Signs

In the biblical narrative, the came and sat under the terebinth tree at , which belonged to Joash the Abiezrite, while Gideon his son was beating out in the to hide it from the ites. The addressed Gideon directly: "The is with you, O mighty man of valor," despite Gideon's clandestine activity indicating fear of oppression. Gideon replied with doubt, asking if the was truly with given the Midianite devastations and protesting his own insignificance as the least from the weakest clan of Manasseh. The countered by commissioning him: "Go in this might of yours and save from the hand of Midian; do not I send you?" and affirmed, "But I will be with you, and you shall strike the Midianites as one man," rejecting Gideon's self-assessment of weakness. To verify the angel's identity, Gideon requested a sign and prepared an offering of a young goat, unleavened cakes in a , and in a pot, placing them on a rock. The touched the and unleavened cakes with the tip of his , causing fire to rise from the rock and consume the offering entirely, after which the vanished from sight. Recognizing the encounter as face-to-face with the , Gideon expressed fear of death, but received reassurance: " be to you. Do not fear; you shall not die," prompting him to build an there and name it Yahweh , meaning "The is ." That same night, the directed Gideon to demolish his father's to and the adjacent to it, commanding the construction of an to the on the stronghold site using the Asherah wood, and the sacrifice of the 's second bull as a burnt offering. Gathering ten men from his father's household, Gideon carried out the destruction covertly at night due to fear of his and townspeople. Upon discovery, the Abiezrites demanded his execution, but Joash intervened, challenging, "Will you contend for ? ... If he is a god, let him contend for himself," since the had been broken; thus, Gideon was thereafter called Jerubbaal, interpreted as "Let contend against him," because of this act. Seeking additional assurance before proceeding, Gideon laid out a of wool on the and petitioned: "If you will save by my hand, as you have said, behold, I am laying a of wool on the , and if there is on the alone, and it is dry on all the ground, then I shall know that you will save by my hand, as you have said." The next morning, the held water enough to wring out a bowlful, while the ground remained dry, fulfilling the request. Undeterred in hesitation, Gideon then asked for the inverse: "Please let not your anger burn against me; let me speak just once more. Please let me test just once more with the . Please dry on the only, and on all the ground let there be ," which also granted precisely. These sequential tests provided , replicable tailored to Gideon's circumstances, highlighting a pattern of doubt yielding to empirical validation within the divine interaction.

Assembly, Reduction, and Victory over Midian

Empowered by the of the , Gideon blew a in and sent messengers throughout Manasseh, Asher, , and , assembling an army of 32,000 who encamped by the spring of Harod opposite the ite host in the Valley of Jezreel. The declared the force too numerous, warning that success would lead to boast of rather than divine , and commanded Gideon to announce that whoever trembled with could return home, resulting in 22,000 departures and 10,000 remaining. The further instructed a test at the : those who lapped using their tongues were separated from those who knelt to by bringing to their mouths with hands; the lappers were retained, while the other 9,700 were sent away, leaving Gideon with provisions and trumpets from the dismissed men. That night, after divine encouragement via an overheard Midianite dream of a loaf tumbling into a —interpreted as Gideon's victory—Gideon divided the into three companies, equipping each with a trumpet, an empty jar concealing a torch. At the beginning of the middle watch, when guards were changed, Gideon's men surrounded the camp, simultaneously shattering jars, exposing torches, blowing trumpets, and shouting, "A for the and for Gideon!" The Midianites panicked in confusion, crying out and fleeing as the Lord set against each other within the camp, enabling the small force to rout the vast without direct combat. Pursuing forces from , Asher, and Manasseh captured and killed Midianite princes Oreb at the rock of Oreb and Zeeb at the winepress of Zeeb, delivering their heads to Gideon beyond the . This decisive engagement shattered Midianite dominance, attributing triumph to over numerical superiority.

Post-Victory Events and Domestic Conflicts

Following the defeat of the Midianites, Gideon pursued punitive actions against Israelite towns that had withheld support during his campaign. Upon reaching Succoth, he captured its elders and chastised them with desert thorns and briers as retribution for their refusal to provide bread to his weary troops (Judges 8:5–7, 14–16). He then proceeded to , where he similarly destroyed the town's tower and executed its male inhabitants for denying aid (Judges 8:8–9, 17). In response to the victory, the urged Gideon to establish a , proposing rule by him, his son, and his grandson, but he rejected kingship, declaring that "the will rule over you" (Judges 8:22–23). The people nonetheless offered spoils including 1,700 shekels of gold from earrings captured from , which Gideon accepted and used to create an displayed in ; this object, though initially commemorative, ensnared Gideon and in (Judges 8:24–27). Gideon amassed significant wealth and influence, maintaining seventy sons through multiple wives and an additional son, , by a concubine from , thereby forming a dynastic structure despite forgoing formal kingship (Judges 8:30–31). Gideon's expansive family precipitated subsequent internal divisions. After his death at age 110 and burial in , sought kingship in , securing funds from his mother's kin to hire assassins who slaughtered his seventy brothers on a single stone, sparing only the youngest, , who fled (Judges 8:32; 9:1–6). This , framed as a bid for sole rule to consolidate power amid rival claims from Gideon's progeny, ignited civil unrest between and Abimelech's forces (Judges 9:23–57).

Theological Analysis

Themes of Faith, Obedience, and Divine Sovereignty

Gideon's narrative in Judges 6–8 illustrates a progression from doubt and fear to obedient action, underscoring faith as a response to divine initiative amid human inadequacy. Initially depicted as threshing grain in a winepress to hide from Midianite raiders, Gideon questions God's presence and his own suitability for leadership, prompting the angel's reassurance that "the Lord is with you" (Judges 6:12–13). This exchange highlights faith not as innate confidence but as reliance on God's promises, reinforced through confirmatory signs that demonstrate divine control over natural processes. Central to the theme of is Gideon's tests, where he requests on the alone, then dryness while the ground is wet, events defying typical atmospheric conditions and affirming God's ability to orchestrate improbable outcomes independently of effort. These serve as empirical validations within the framework, linking queries to responses and emphasizing that victory stems from God's power rather than numerical superiority or tactical prowess. Scholarly analysis notes this as a structural pivot, where Gideon's faith struggles yield to trust in Yahweh's assurances, portraying as the causal force enabling agency. Obedience manifests in Gideon's adherence to divine directives for asymmetric confrontation, reducing his 32,000-man force to 300 selected by drinking habits, ensuring "Israel cannot boast against me, 'My own hand has saved me'" (Judges 7:2). The subsequent rout via trumpets, torches, and jars exploits Midianite disarray without direct combat, empirically demonstrating the efficacy of faith-aligned strategies against overwhelming odds, as the enemy's self-inflicted confusion (Judges 7:22) underscores orchestrated over material advantages. This obedience-faith dynamic reveals causal : human compliance activates transcendent mechanisms, yielding disproportionate to resources. Yet the story contrasts this episodic faith with Israel's recurrent apostasy, as Gideon's triumph provides only a 40-year reprieve before relapse into idolatry and oppression (Judges 8:28, 33). Theological exegesis frames this as evidence of divine sovereignty's limits in transforming systemic unfaithfulness, where individual obedience yields tactical relief but not enduring reform absent collective covenant fidelity. Thus, the motifs interweave to affirm God's primacy in causation, privileging obedience as the conduit for sovereign action while exposing faith's fragility against entrenched disobedience.

Leadership Qualities and Strategic Innovations

Gideon's demonstrated pragmatic effectiveness through his implementation of a selective reduction, prioritizing alertness and discipline over numerical superiority. Initially mustering 32,000 men from tribes including Manasseh, Asher, , and , Gideon followed divine instructions to dismiss 22,000 who were fearful, leaving 10,000; a further test at the separated 300 who lapped water like dogs—indicative of vigilance—while the majority knelt to drink, resulting in their dismissal. This counterintuitive strategy, yielding a minimal against an estimated Midianite host of 135,000, underscored a first-principles approach to warfare: emphasizing quality, surprise, and psychological impact rather than mass confrontation, which proved decisive in averting overreliance on human strength. In executing the assault, Gideon employed guerrilla tactics optimized for , dividing the into three companies armed with rams' horns, empty jars concealing torches, and no beyond shouted war cries. Approaching the Midianite camp at from the north, south, and west, they simultaneously shattered the jars to reveal sudden blazes, sounded the horns, and proclaimed "The sword of the Lord and of Gideon," inducing panic that led the enemy to turn on itself in the darkness, with many fleeing toward Beth-shittah and Zererah. This innovation exploited sensory overload and the Midianites' overconfidence, turning a vast encampment into self-inflicted chaos without direct melee, as subsequent captures of leaders Oreb and Zeeb by allied Ephraimites extended the rout. Gideon's inter-tribal and enforcement of further sustained his amid decentralized tribal structures. When Ephraimites complained of delayed , he defused by crediting their in beheading Oreb and Zeeb, likening their deeds to dew on Manasseh and averting broader conflict. Yet, pursuing exhausted Midianite remnants, he compelled aid from Succoth and despite refusals, later punishing their elders with thorns and towers to deter future disloyalty, thereby reinforcing coalition cohesion without establishing permanent command. Declining the ' post-victory offer of hereditary kingship in Judges 8:22-23—"The Lord shall rule over you"—Gideon preserved the judgeship's theocratic framework, avoiding premature centralization that might consolidate power in one lineage and invite the administrative burdens or tyrannies observed in later monarchies like Saul's. This restraint aligned with the era's covenantal ideal of over human rulers, maintaining tribal autonomy while demonstrating leadership through merit rather than title.

Moral Ambiguities: Violence, Vengeance, and Idolatry

Gideon's post-victory reprisals against the cities of Succoth and exemplify intra-tribal violence amid existential threats from Midianite incursions. When Gideon's forces, pursuing retreating Midianites, requested provisions from Succoth's elders, they were denied due to fear of reprisal if the enemy prevailed; Gideon vowed to return and "thresh your bodies with the thorns of the and with briers," which he fulfilled by capturing a Midianite and using his to punish the elders upon victory. Similarly, Penuel's inhabitants refused support and mocked Gideon's weakened army; after the battle, he demolished their tower and killed the men of the city. These acts, while severe, functioned as deterrence against disloyalty in a decentralized tribal lacking centralized enforcement, where withholding could undermine collective survival against nomadic raiders who had oppressed for seven years, destroying agriculture and livestock. The fabrication of an from Midianite spoils introduced idolatrous elements into Gideon's legacy, highlighting the perils of material trophies in a covenantal framework prohibiting graven images. Using earrings collected from his —estimated at 1,700 shekels, roughly 42 pounds—Gideon crafted the , initially perhaps as a priestly garment or victory monument, but it became a site of for , ensnaring Gideon and his household. This dual role underscores a causal progression from legitimate spoils of defensive warfare to spiritual snare, reflecting human tendencies toward relic absent textual safeguards against with practices. Gideon's extensive polygamy precipitated familial strife, culminating in the violent prelude to Abimelech's tyranny and illustrating power vacuums in pre-monarchic anarchy. Fathering seventy sons by multiple wives in , plus an additional son by a Shechemite concubine, Gideon established a dynastic core vulnerable to succession conflicts upon his death. 's subsequent murder of sixty-nine half-brothers with a millstone—sparing only who escaped—exploited this fractured household, funded by Shechem's elite, amid the judges-era cycle of tribal fragmentation without enduring institutions. Such outcomes trace causally to unrestrained marital practices amplifying rivalries, contextualizing rather than mitigating the brutality in a reliant on charismatic leaders rather than codified laws.

Interpretive Traditions

Jewish Rabbinic and Medieval Commentary

In rabbinic , Gideon's encounter with the angel is interpreted as highlighting his profound , with midrashim expanding on his secretive of in a as a reflection of self-effacing caution amid oppression, underscoring divine choice of the lowly for elevation. The fleece episodes in Judges 6:36–40 are viewed not as skeptical testing but as deferential requests for confirmatory , enabling Gideon to align his actions precisely with divine intent and demonstrating reverent obedience rather than disbelief. Rashi, in his commentary on Judges 6:25–32, frames Gideon's nocturnal demolition of his father's Baal altar and as an act of faithful zeal against idolatrous , performed discreetly to evade immediate backlash while prioritizing monotheistic exclusivity and purity. This interpretation reinforces the polemic against blending practices with Israelite worship, deriving halakhic imperatives for eradicating foreign altars to safeguard covenantal fidelity. Regarding the fashioned from Midianite spoils in Judges 8:27, rabbinic sources regard it as initially a commemorative artifact symbolizing the vastness of the defeated foe through its gold-derived scale, yet it devolved into a snare of for after Gideon's death, exemplifying how material trophies can precipitate spiritual lapse and familial downfall. notes this posthumous whoring after the ephod as a cautionary deviation, unintended by Gideon but illustrative of vulnerability to object veneration over exclusive devotion to . Medieval commentators, including those drawing on Aggadat Bereshit, further allegorize Gideon's narrative to extol as the antidote to post-victory arrogance, portraying his refusal of kingship as a model of deferring ultimate authority to divine rule, though tensions arise in reconciling literal conquests with homiletic derivations that prioritize ethical over historical verbatim. Such exegesis often employs aggadic elaboration to extract moral and legal insights, occasionally subordinating surface-level to timeless halakhic applications, as in deriving protocols for prophetic validation from the fleece inquiries.

Christian Patristic and Reformation Views

In early Christian , Gideon's narrative in Judges 6–8 was frequently interpreted typologically as foreshadowing divine empowerment of human weakness and the extension of beyond . of (c. 339–397), in his treatise On the (c. 381), allegorized the fleece episodes to illustrate the Holy Spirit's role in salvation history: the initially dew-soaked fleece amid dry ground symbolized the initial outpouring of upon the Jews, while the subsequent dry fleece and wet ground signified 's rejection of the and the subsequent calling of the Gentiles. This reading emphasized God's initiative in choosing the improbable Gideon—a man in hiding—to prefigure Christ's selection of the humble and marginalized for work, underscoring that victory arises not from human strength but from divine enablement. Other patristic interpreters, such as those compiled in catenae, viewed Gideon's reduction of his army to 300 men as typifying the small, Spirit-empowered remnant that liberates the world from spiritual oppression, mirroring the Church's mission against demonic incursions. Reformation theologians built on these typological foundations while stressing and divine sovereignty amid human frailty. (1483–1546) portrayed Gideon as an exemplar of exercised in doubt, where God's address to the fearful thresher as a "mighty warrior" (Judges 6:12) demonstrated how divine declaration precedes and imparts strength, akin to justification by faith alone transforming the unworthy. (1509–1564) similarly analyzed the fleece requests not as presumptuous testing of God but as humble petitions for assurance in a context of evident divine calling, cautioning that such signs serve to confirm obedience rather than originate it, thereby modeling pious discernment without undermining trust in Scripture's clarity. Both reformers highlighted Gideon's initial destruction of the altar (Judges 6:25–28) as a for iconoclastic , prioritizing fidelity over . Gideon's post-victory fabrication of the from Midianite spoils (Judges 8:27), which ensnared in , drew sharp critique from writers as a against sacralizing human artifacts or traditions. and Calvin, in their broader polemics against perceived Roman Catholic "abuses," analogized the ephod to practices devolving into , insisting that no intermediary object or supplants direct reliance on God's word and , lest it foster spiritual prostitution akin to 's relapse into worship. This interpretation reinforced the reformers' emphasis on privileging divine action over heroic agency, with Gideon's flaws—, against Succoth and (Judges 8:5–17), and dynastic ambition—serving to exalt God's faithfulness despite human inconsistency.

Parallels in Other Abrahamic Texts

In the Quran, Surah Al-Baqarah 2:249–251 recounts Talut—traditionally equated with the biblical Saul—testing Israelite soldiers' obedience at a river, where only those showing restraint by lapping water minimally advance, reducing the force to a faithful few who then defeat Jalut (Goliath). This episode parallels the selection process in Judges 7:4–7, where Gideon identifies 300 warriors by their manner of drinking from a spring—lapping directly versus using hands—prior to victory over the Midianites, yet the Quranic version attributes the test to Saul's campaign against the Philistines roughly 300 years later, without referencing Gideon or Midian. The omits Gideon's name entirely and integrates the army reduction into a broader context of kingship validation via the (2:248), diverging from the biblical emphasis on personal divine signs like the and altar miracles. Islamic , such as those by (d. 923 CE), interpret as without linking to Gideon, viewing the river test as a demonstration of (God-consciousness) rather than a direct transposition. Scholarly analysis attributes the similarity to potential borrowing from Hebrew Bible traditions via Jewish or Christian communities in 7th-century Arabia, evidenced by the chronological conflation and shared motifs absent in pre-Quranic Arabian lore; alternative views posit independent revelation, though the narrative variances—such as combining elements from Judges and 1 Samuel—suggest adaptation rather than pristine transmission. Parallels are scarce elsewhere in Abrahamic corpora, with no equivalents in Samaritan Book of Joshua or Druze Epistles of Wisdom, positioning Judges 6–8 as the originating textual authority.

Textual and Literary Examination

Composition and Redaction of Judges 6-8

The account in Judges 6-8 constitutes a unified cycle within the Deuteronomistic History's portrayal of Israel's recurrent unfaithfulness, manifesting as leading to foreign , divine through a deliverer, and temporary respite followed by relapse. This Gideon episode exemplifies the pattern, detailing Midianite incursions (6:1-6), prophetic rebuke (6:7-10), Gideon's commissioning (6:11-32), military reduction and victory (7:1-8:21), and post-victory (8:22-35), with the Deuteronomistic editor framing it to illustrate theocratic ideals over human , as in Gideon's rejection of kingship in 8:22-23. The cycle's integration into the book's symmetrical structure—mirroring themes of incomplete and motifs of —supports editorial intent for a cohesive theological rather than isolated inventions. Literary analysis reveals internal coherence through symmetrical patterning, dividing the text into five sections (6:1-10 introduction; 6:11-32 commissioning; 6:33-7:18 preparation; 7:19-8:21 ; 8:22-32 conclusion) with chiastic reversals (e.g., initial oppression paralleling final ) and concentric focus on Gideon's tests in the preparation phase, indicating a deliberate rhetorical design that prioritizes narrative flow over fragmentation. Potential doublets, such as dual altar destructions (6:25-28 vs. implied prior Ba'al ) or naming variants (Gideon/Jerubbaal in 6:32; 7:1), have prompted source-critical attributions to Yahwist-Elohist traditions, where divine messengers alternate between anthropomorphic appearances and mediated "angel of " forms to resolve tensions. However, the absence of contradictory timelines or ideologies, coupled with consistent thematic progression from doubt to triumph to moral lapse, weighs against late conflation, favoring a pre-exilic core tradition adapted minimally by editors. Redaction likely involved insertions reinforcing covenant fidelity, such as the anonymous prophet's indictment (6:7-10) echoing Deuteronomic warnings against , and the ephod's ensnaring role (8:27) as a cautionary pivot to Abimelech's tyranny in chapter 9. These elements, while aligning with exilic Deuteronomistic emphases on theocratic loyalty, preserve an older heroic , evidenced by linguistic features (e.g., tribal alliances in 6:34-35) and oral-tradition markers like repetitive divine assurances (6:12,16; 7:14-15), suggesting from northern Israelite prior to the monarchy's consolidation around 1000 BCE. Source-critical fragmentation, often rooted in hypothetical documentary separations lacking manuscript support, underestimates this unity, as synchronic evidence prioritizes the text's causal logic: infidelity provokes , selective obedience yields , but incomplete submission invites .

Linguistic and Narrative Analysis

The of Judges 6–8 utilizes repetitive motifs to build narrative tension, with Gideon's articulated through lexical recurrences such as yare (to ) in contexts of hiding (6:11), nocturnal altar destruction (6:27), and sign-seeking (6:17, 36–40, 7:10–15). These instances function as a causal , where escalating prompts divine accommodations—like the and tests—that resolve hesitation and advance the plot toward confrontation, creating a patterned of human frailty yielding to validation. Linguistically, the bestowal of "Jerubbaal" (6:32), etymologically derived from rib (to strive/contend) and ba'al (lord/master), meaning "let Baal contend [against him]," juxtaposes Gideon's iconoclastic act against 's altar with the deity's narrative inaction, underscoring a deliberate between Yahweh's operational —in military routs and cultic reforms—and Baal's implied inefficacy. This onomastic irony, rooted in the term's polemical , empirically delineates syncretistic vulnerabilities through observable narrative outcomes, where Baal's persists only until supplanted without . Foreshadowing emerges in the domestic expanse of Gideon's —seventy sons from multiple wives (8:30)—which narratively prefigures monarchical dysfunction, as Abimelech's parricidal bid for kingship (9:1–6) exploits this polygynous structure for strife, embedding structural hints of power centralization's perils amid Gideon's prior kingship disclaimer (8:22–23). This motif integration critiques emergent via consequential lineage fragmentation, distinct from overt thematic declarations.

Evidence for Historicity

Archaeological Corroboration and Artifacts

In 2019, excavations at Khirbet al-Ra'i, located approximately 4 km west of in the Judean , uncovered a fragment bearing a Proto-Canaanite inscription in ink that includes the "Jerubbaal." Dated to around 1100 BCE through stratigraphic context and ceramic typology consistent with I, this artifact represents the earliest extrabiblical attestation of the name Jerubbaal, an explicitly applied to Gideon in Judges 6:32 and 7:1 as a result of his destruction of a . The rarity of the name in ancient Near Eastern —appearing only here and in the biblical text—suggests a possible historical association with the figure depicted as leading resistance against Midianite incursions during the same period. Material traces of Midianite presence, characterized by distinctive painted with geometric and zoomorphic motifs, have been identified at sites in the and Transjordan, including Qurayyah and , dating to the late 13th through 11th centuries BCE. These ceramics, often linked to nomadic groups utilizing caravans for raiding and , appear in Edomite and Moabite territories east of the , indicating seasonal encampments and economic interactions that align with the biblical portrayal of Midianite depredations on Israelite settlements. Such finds, including sherds at Khirbat en-Nahas in Faynan (modern ), reflect heightened mobility and disruption in the region during I, supporting the contextual plausibility of organized nomadic threats without direct ties to named individuals. No excavated sites conclusively match the specific battle locations described in Judges 7–8, such as the spring of Harod or the hill of Moreh, nor have artifacts like mass graves or weapon caches been linked to Gideon's campaigns. However, widespread evidence of fortified villages, destroyed settlements, and pastoral encampments across the central highlands and Transjordan during this era—evidenced by burn layers and abrupt abandonments at sites like Izbet Sartah—demonstrates chronic instability from incursions, consistent with the episodic raids attributed to camel-riding groups like the Midianites. This paucity of direct corroboration underscores the challenges of attributing transient conflicts to specific personalities amid limited epigraphic and monumental records from pre-monarchic Israel.

Scholarly Debates on Core Events and Figure

Scholars remain divided on the of , also known as Jerubbaal, with maximalist positions affirming a historical core anchored by archaeological finds, while view the narrative as largely etiological shaped by later Deuteronomistic . A key piece of evidence is the 2019 discovery at Khirbet al-Ra'i, near Lachish, of a Proto- inscription on a 12th-century BCE fragment reading "yrbʿl" (Jerubbaal), the earliest extrabiblical attestation of the name from the I judges period. This find, dated to circa 1200 BCE via stratigraphic context and pottery typology, suggests a real individual or clan name in southern , countering claims that Jerubbaal was a purely fictional construct to explain cultic transitions. , however, note the inscription's southern contrasts with Gideon's northern Manassite setting in Judges, proposing it reflects broader onomastic patterns rather than the biblical judge, though without direct disproof of linkage. Recent redactional analyses (post-2020) scrutinize potential substrates in the name's element but concede the inscription's antiquity undermines theories of ex nihilo invention during the monarchy, favoring an preserving authentic tribal memory over ideological . Debates on core events like the fleece episodes (Judges 6:36-40) pivot between interpretations as standard ancient Near Eastern oracular versus a piety test reflecting adaptive amid . Comparative evidence from Mesopotamian and Hittite texts documents -based divination for discerning divine favor through absorption, aligning with Gideon's method as a culturally query rather than . Yet, emphasizes its strategic utility: in a pre-monarchic tribal context of Midianite raids depleting resources, such a low-risk sign-seeking enabled consolidation without presuming prophetic certainty, prioritizing empirical confirmation over unverified zeal. Skeptics dismiss it as narrative embellishment to humanize a heroic , but parallels in omen texts indicate , resisting reduction to ahistorical moral fable. The post-victory violence, including Gideon's execution of Succoth elders and Midianite kings (Judges 8:4-17), draws minimalist critiques as exaggerated brutality anachronistically projected from II ethics, yet maximalists contextualize it within ancient Near Eastern norms of retaliatory justice to deter reprisals in nomadic-pastoral conflicts. Tribal warfare records from and archives routinely depict victors liquidating non-combatants or hostages to secure fragile peaces, where leniency invited cycles of amid absent centralized . Empirical patterns in Judges' judge cycles—oppression yielding deliverance via force—mirror instability circa 1200-1100 BCE, evidenced by settlement shifts and camel incursions, rendering the acts plausibly historical deterrence rather than gratuitous excess. Academic here often reflects humanitarian lenses overdetermining ancient survival imperatives, sidelining how such measures empirically stabilized clans in decentralized polities.

Enduring Legacy

Symbolic and Idiomatic Influences

The idiom "putting out a fleece" originates from the account in Judges 6:36–40, where Gideon twice tested divine intent by laying a wool fleece on the threshing floor, first requesting dew only on the fleece amid dry ground and then the reverse. This practice entered English usage via biblical exegesis and sermons, denoting a request for a specific miraculous sign to confirm God's will in decision-making. Commonly employed in Protestant contexts since at least the Reformation era, the phrase persists in modern evangelical literature and speech, though critics argue it reflects doubt rather than faith. Gideon's in Judges 7:16–22, involving 300 men armed with rams' horns (trumpets), torches concealed in jars, and coordinated shouts, symbolizes the efficacy of psychological over . The sudden blast of trumpets, shattering jars revealing lights, and cries of "A for the and for Gideon" induced among the Midianites, leading to their self-destruction. This imagery has influenced conceptions of , exemplifying asymmetric strategies where minimal resources amplify perceived threats to demoralize numerically superior foes.

Representations in Art, Literature, and Warfare

Depictions of Gideon in visual art span medieval illuminations to Renaissance paintings, often emphasizing the miracle of the fleece and the nocturnal battle against the Midianites. For instance, a 16th-century painting by Maerten van Heemskerck illustrates Gideon testing the fleece with dew, symbolizing divine confirmation amid doubt. Similarly, stained glass windows from around 1500 in St. Mary's Church, Fairford, Gloucestershire, portray Gideon seeking guidance, influencing later Protestant visual traditions through Bible illustrations rather than elaborate iconography due to Reformation iconoclasm. These works highlight Gideon's reliance on empirical signs from God, portraying his leadership as grounded in verifiable divine intervention over mere faith assertions. In literature, Gideon's narrative serves as an exemplar of faith tested by adversity, with allusions appearing in allegorical texts. John Bunyan's The Pilgrim's Progress (1678) references Gideon's pitchers, trumpets, and lamps as relics displayed in the Palace Beautiful, symbolizing unconventional tools for spiritual victory against overwhelming odds. Such representations underscore Gideon's strategic ingenuity—reducing his army to 300 men and employing psychological warfare—without glossing over his initial fleece tests as signs of human frailty. Bunyan's inclusion draws from Judges 7, framing Gideon as a model for pilgrims navigating trials through obedience, influencing Puritan and evangelical writings on resilience. Gideon's tactics have informed discussions of , where a smaller force leverages and disruption against a superior enemy. In Judges 7, Gideon's division of men into three companies, armed with trumpets and torches hidden in jars, caused Midianite and self-inflicted , demonstrating empirical through feigned numbers and night attack. Modern analyses in contexts cite this as a in unconventional strategy, such as reducing forces to ensure reliance on non-human factors—here, divine aid manifested as enemy confusion—while acknowledging Gideon's flaws like post-victory . These applications appear in training materials emphasizing verifiable outcomes over heroic idealization, paralleling historical guerrilla precedents without attributing causality to unproven spiritual elements alone.

References

  1. [1]
    Judges 6:1-8:35 – Gideon - Enter the Bible
    Gideon, from the tribe of Manasseh, is raised up to deliver Israel from the Midianites, but becomes a harbinger of the decline to come.
  2. [2]
    Book of Judges | Key Information and Resources - The Bible Project
    Mar 30, 2023 · Judges 3-16: Israel's Six Judges, Including Gideon and Samson. The stories of the first three judges, Othniel, Ehud, and Deborah, are epic ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  3. [3]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%206:36-40&version=NKJV
  4. [4]
    The Bible Story of Gideon - Verses and Meaning | Bible Study Tools
    In this Bible story, from chapter 6 of the book of Judges, Gideon is called upon to save the people of Israel by leading them against the Midianites.
  5. [5]
    Gideon v. Midian: Evidence for the Biblical Account
    Oct 26, 2021 · It's one of the most famous accounts of the biblical Judges period: Gideon and his 300 versus the Midianites. It's certainly a dramatic ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] The Evolution of the Gideon Narrative Chapter Author(s)
    The Midianites joined forces with others to destroy Israel's grain harvest and livestock. They would swarm in droves thick as locusts and lay waste to the ...
  7. [7]
    The amazing name Gideon: meaning and etymology
    Dec 26, 2010 · From the verb גדע (gada'), to hew down or cut off. Related names: • Via גדע (gada'): Gideoni, Gidom. The name Gideon in the Bible.
  8. [8]
    Gideon - Etymology, Origin & Meaning of the Name
    Gideon, from Hebrew Gidh'on meaning "feller," originates as the name of an Israelite judge and warrior; also linked to the Bible society and hotel Gideon ...Missing: gada fell
  9. [9]
    https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780198610601.001.0001/acref-9780198610601-e-1293
  10. [10]
    Jerubbaal Meaning - Bible Definition and References
    Jerubbaal [N] [H]. contender with Baal; or, let Baal plead, a surname of Gideon; a name given to him because he destroyed the altar of Baal (Judg.
  11. [11]
    Why is Gideon referred to as Jerubbaal? | GotQuestions.org
    Jul 8, 2025 · Gideon was called Jerubbaal, or “Let Baal contend with him” because Gideon had broken down the altar of Baal.
  12. [12]
    The amazing name Jerubbesheth: meaning and etymology
    Sep 10, 2014 · Meaning: Let Shame Contend, He Will Contend With Shame; Etymology: From (1) the verb ריב (rib), to contend, and (2) the noun בשת (boshet), ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Topical Bible: Jerubbesheth
    The name "Jerubbesheth" is a variant of "Jerubbaal," which means "Let Baal contend against him." This name was given to Gideon after he destroyed the altar of ...
  14. [14]
    Who was Gideon in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
    Aug 29, 2022 · Gideon was the fifth judge and renowned as the greatest of Israel. The account of his life is recorded in Judges 6:11—8:32.
  15. [15]
    Extraordinary Judges: Names of Gideon - Topical Bible
    4. Deliverer of Israel: Although not a formal title, Gideon's role as a deliverer is central to his account. Under God's command, Gideon led a small army ...
  16. [16]
    Period of Judges - Search results provided by BiblicalTraining
    The period of the Judges, therefore, was c. 1200 b.c.—1020 b.c., i.e. approximately 180 years. Internal chronology. The conclusion reached in the ...
  17. [17]
    The Date of the Exodus: The Historical Study of Scripture
    If we follow the generally accepted chronology of John Bright, the period of the Judges was between 1200 and 1020 BC. If we allow for the activity of the other ...
  18. [18]
    Period of the Judges - Enter the Bible
    Israel, in this period, was a loose confederation of independent tribes with no central government. At times of Philistine attack, charismatic military leaders ...Missing: confederacy | Show results with:confederacy
  19. [19]
    The Book of Judges: The Israelite Tribal Federation and Its Discontents
    While the tribes were still linked by covenant, the Israelites shifted to less institutionalized national government, rooted more in tribal and local custom, ...
  20. [20]
    Outline of Judges - Enter the Bible
    This second introduction seeks to explain the defeats in Judges 1:22-36 as the result of a cyclical pattern: Israel's apostasy (2:11-12), followed by oppression ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  21. [21]
    Understanding the Recurring Cycle in the Book of Judges - CliffsNotes
    The recurring cycle we see for the nation of Israel is apostasy, oppression, repentance, and deliverance. After the death of Joshua, the people are left without ...
  22. [22]
    Judges | Commentary | John Currid | TGCBC - The Gospel Coalition
    The Book of Judges covers the time between the conquest of Canaan under Joshua until the rise of the monarchy under Israel's first king, Saul.
  23. [23]
    Topical Bible: Cycles of Oppression and Deliverance
    The cycles of oppression and deliverance are most prominently featured in the Book of Judges ... This apostasy leads to a breach in their covenant ...
  24. [24]
    Introduction to Joshua and Judges - BibleTalk.tv
    The events of Judges are dated to the late 12th and early 11th centuries BC, spanning the period of Israel's tribal confederacy and the emergence of the ...
  25. [25]
    https://biblearchaeology.org/research/conquest-of-canaan/2403-from-ramesses-to-shiloh-archaeological-discoveries-bearing-on-the-exodusjudges-period?highlight=WyJ0aGUiLCIndGhlIiwidGhlJ2tpbmciLCJ0aGUnMCciLCJ0aGUneWFod2VoIiwidGhlJ3dhdGVycyIsInRoZSdzY2hvbGFycyciLCJ0aGUnZmllcnkiLCJyYW1lc3NlcyIsInJhbWVzc2VzJyIsInRvIiwiJ3RvIiwidG8nIiwic2hpbG9oIiwic2hpbG9oJyIsInc2hpbG9oJyIsInc2aWxvaG0iLCJyYW1lc3NlcyB0byI7InJhbWVzc2VzIHRvIHNoaWxvaCIsInRvIHNoaWxvaCJd
  26. [26]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6%3A1-2&version=NIV
  27. [27]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6%3A3-5&version=NIV
  28. [28]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6%3A3&version=NIV
  29. [29]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6%3A6&version=NIV
  30. [30]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6%3A1-6&version=NIV
  31. [31]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:11&version=ESV
  32. [32]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:12&version=ESV
  33. [33]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:13&version=ESV
  34. [34]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:14-16&version=ESV
  35. [35]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:17-19&version=ESV
  36. [36]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:20-21&version=ESV
  37. [37]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:22-24&version=ESV
  38. [38]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:25-26&version=ESV
  39. [39]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:27&version=ESV
  40. [40]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:28-32&version=ESV
  41. [41]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:36-37&version=ESV
  42. [42]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:38&version=ESV
  43. [43]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6:39-40&version=ESV
  44. [44]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%207%3A1&version=NIV
  45. [45]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%207%3A2-3&version=NIV
  46. [46]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%207%3A4-8&version=NIV
  47. [47]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%207%3A9-15&version=NIV
  48. [48]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%207%3A16-22&version=NIV
  49. [49]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%207%3A23-25&version=NIV
  50. [50]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%207%3A2&version=NIV
  51. [51]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A5-7%2C14-16&version=ESV
  52. [52]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A8-9%2C17&version=ESV
  53. [53]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A22-23&version=ESV
  54. [54]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A24-27&version=ESV
  55. [55]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A30-31&version=ESV
  56. [56]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A32%3B+9%3A1-6&version=ESV
  57. [57]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+9%3A23-57&version=ESV
  58. [58]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6%3A11-13&version=ESV
  59. [59]
    https://www.crossway.org/articles/did-a-faithless-gideon-use-a-fleece-to-test-gods-will-judges-6/
  60. [60]
    Judges 6:37 Commentaries: behold, I will put a fleece of wool on the ...
    The sign which Gideon asked for, therefore, was that God would cause the dew to fall only upon a shorn fleece, which he would spread the previous night upon ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Gideon Narrative as the Focal Point of Judges
    God's promise and Gideon's problem of faith are crucial matters in tension within 6:33-7:18, an observation confirmed even by the structural components. For ...
  62. [62]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+7%3A2-7&version=ESV
  63. [63]
    Gideon and His Victory | BibleTalk.tv
    This highlights the theme of faith and trust in God's timing and plans. 3. God's Commission to Gideon (Judges 6:14-16). Event: The Lord turns to Gideon and ...Missing: scholarly analysis
  64. [64]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A28%2C33&version=ESV
  65. [65]
    How God Makes Us Mighty - Desiring God
    Aug 21, 2017 · The story of Gideon, in the book of Judges, is about God, and how he operates in the lives of his children. God's interactions with Gideon are ...Missing: themes scholarly
  66. [66]
    Enduring Word Bible Commentary Judges Chapter 7
    David Guzik commentary on Judges 7, where Gideon wins the battle against the Midianites with only 300 men, because God had him sent the scared ones home.Missing: text | Show results with:text
  67. [67]
    https://www.armstronginstitute.org/382-gideon-v-midian-evidence-for-the-biblical-account
  68. [68]
    Gideon's victory: In the strength of the Lord | Salvationist
    Jul 18, 2022 · Gideon then adopted a brilliant tactic. With a vastly smaller army and an enemy that potentially felt the Israelites were receiving divine help, ...
  69. [69]
    Enduring Word Bible Commentary Judges Chapter 8
    David Guzik commentary on Judges 8, where Gideon refuses to be made king over Israel, but then leads Israel into idolatry by wrongfully making an ephod.
  70. [70]
    Judges 8 - A Tragic Ending to the Story of Gideon | Christian Library
    Even though he refused the kingship, he most certainly hankered after it (as is evidenced in the naming of his son) and acted as de facto king of Israel. Dr ...
  71. [71]
    4. Gideon's Tragic Mistake (Judges 8:22-35) - Bible Study
    Gideon Refuses the Kingship (8:22-23) ... The Israelites' second error was to seek to make Gideon the first in a hereditary dynasty of kings. What an honor, to ...
  72. [72]
    Topical Bible: Gideon Refuses Kingship - Bible Hub
    Gideon's refusal to accept kingship is a pivotal moment that underscores the theocratic ideal in Israel during the period of the Judges.
  73. [73]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A4-7%2C+15-16&version=ESV
  74. [74]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+8%3A8-9%2C+17&version=ESV
  75. [75]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+6%3A1-6&version=ESV
  76. [76]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+20%3A4-5%3B+Deuteronomy+7%3A25-26&version=ESV
  77. [77]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+9%3A1-6&version=ESV
  78. [78]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges+2%3A11-19&version=ESV
  79. [79]
    Gideon | Texts & Source Sheets from Torah, Talmud and ... - Sefaria
    Gideon's creation of an ephod led to idolatrous practices and a moral decline among the Israelites after his death. Louis Ginzberg's early 20th-century work, ...Missing: exegesis | Show results with:exegesis
  80. [80]
    https://www.sefaria.org/Judges.6.36?with=Rashi&lang=bi
  81. [81]
    https://www.sefaria.org/Judges.6.25?with=Rashi&lang=bi
  82. [82]
    Shoftim - Judges - Chapter 6 - Tanakh Online - Torah - Chabad.org
    24And Gideon built an altar to the Lord there, and he ... Features an English translation of the entire Tanakh (Jewish Bible) with Rashi's commentary.
  83. [83]
    Shoftim - Judges - Chapter 8
    ### Rashi's Commentary on the Ephod in Judges 8:27
  84. [84]
    https://www.sefaria.org/Judges.6?with=Rashi&lang=bi
  85. [85]
    CHURCH FATHERS: On the Holy Spirit, Book I (Ambrose)
    Ambrose commences by allegorizing the history of Gideon and the fleece, seeing in the drying of the fleece and the moistening of the threshing-floor a type ...
  86. [86]
    The Choice of Gideon was a Figure of Our Lord's Incarnation, The
    The seeking of various signs by Gideon was also a mystery, for by the dryness and moistening of the fleece was signified the falling away of the Jews and the ...Missing: interpretation | Show results with:interpretation
  87. [87]
    Judges 6:40 - Catena Bible & Commentaries
    ... Gideon the judge has its end in Christ. He asked the Lord for a sign, that a fleece laid on the floor should alone be rained upon and the floor should be ...
  88. [88]
    Martin Luther and the Rule of Faith | Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary
    For instance, in discussing Isaiah 9, Luther speaks of Gideon as an allegory of Christ in his lectures, while Hains calls Gideon a type of Christ. The bottom ...Missing: Judges | Show results with:Judges
  89. [89]
    Judges 8:27: Gideon's Idolatrous Ephod
    Jun 15, 2018 · In that, understanding, the Ephod, that is, it was a cause of idolatry (Vatablus). This was able to be done while Gideon was yet alive, and ...
  90. [90]
    Gideon's Short-Lived Revival - Ligonier Ministries
    After the defeat of Midian, the Israelites came asking that Gideon be king over them. However, Gideon refused the kingship in an apparent show of humility, ...
  91. [91]
    Saul and Gideon: revelation or error? - Answering Islam
    The Quran seems to confuse an episode in Saul's life with one in Gideon's life, who lived about three hundred before Saul.
  92. [92]
    Section 33, Saul's Victory over Goliath - Al-Islam.org
    In this verse, the Qur'an announces the failure of a large group of Israelites in their test when they drank water from the prohibited stream.
  93. [93]
    [PDF] The Qur'anic Talut (Saul) and the Rise of the Ancient Israelite ...
    Judges, and I Samuel, feature such characters as Joshua, Gideon,. Samuel, and Saul. The Qur'an is thereby reading the books of. Joshua, Judges 6-8, I Samuel 1 ...
  94. [94]
    Sources of the Qur'an: Saul, Gideon, David and Goliath
    "The Quran does not name Saul. It refers to Talut who many believe must have been Saul. Personally, I believe Talut corresponds to Gideon." (Source; and arguing ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Compositional Strategy of the Book of Judges - ERA
    Under historical critical scholarship, the book of Judges is generally considered a composite work comprising three distinct and essentially unrelated.
  96. [96]
    The Sources of the Gideon Stories - jstor
    The malak calls 'out of heaven' thus avoiding the anthropomorphism of. J where he appears directly to men. In Judges vi 14, for example, the malak is Yahweh ...Missing: doublets | Show results with:doublets
  97. [97]
    The Characterisation of Gideon and Doublets in Judges 6
    This study examines the significance of doublets (repeated or paralleled narratives, events, themes within a text) specifically the two altars and the two ...
  98. [98]
    Geographical and Historical Observations on the old North Israelite ...
    Gideon's pursuit after the Midianite kings east of the Jordan River is in direct continuation of the area referred to in v. 7:22b: Zebah and Zalmunna were in ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] The Call Narratives of Gideon and Moses: Literary Conventions or ...
    6 All of these elements appear in the Gideon and Moses narratives. Other biblical call narratives, such as those of Joshua,. Samuel, and Elisha, and of Isaiah, ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] WILL THE REAL GIDEON PLEASE STAND UP? NARRATIVE ...
    This idealized interpretation of the book of Judges as a whole and the story of Gideon in particular has deep and ancient roots. The OT itself contains no hints ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  101. [101]
    The amazing name Jerubbaal: meaning and etymology
    May 5, 2014 · Meaning: The Lord Contends, Baal Contends; Etymology: From (1) the verb ריב (rib), to contend, and (2) the verb בעל (ba'al), to be lord.
  102. [102]
    [PDF] GIDEON OR JERUBAAL - Jewish Bible Quarterly
    May 31, 2010 · ' And he was called on that day Jerubaal meaning let Baal quarrel with him (6:27-32). This is an extreme instance of a midrash-on-name; one ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] "Reign Over Us!": The Theme of Kingship in Judges 8-9 - MacSphere
    The negative attention given to human kingship in the Gideon-Abimelech narrative draws attention to Israel's inability to remain faithful to. Yahweh, their king ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] The Jerubba'al Inscription from Khirbet al-Ra'i: A Proto-Canaanite ...
    This article presents a Proto-Canaanite inscription written in ink on a jug. It was unearthed in 2019 at Khirbet al-Ra'i, located 4 km west of Tel. Lachish, in ...Missing: potsherd | Show results with:potsherd
  105. [105]
    3000-Year-Old Inscription Found in Israel - Archaeology Magazine
    Jul 12, 2021 · The alphabetic script inscription, written in ink on a fragment of a pottery jug, includes the name “Jerubbaal” and dates to about 1100 BC.Missing: potsherd | Show results with:potsherd
  106. [106]
    Israeli Archaeologists Find Biblical Name 'Jerubbaal' Inked on Pot ...
    Jul 12, 2021 · Archaeologists digging in southern Israel may have found the name of Jerubbaal, scourge of the Midianites, on a broken fragment of a Judges-era clay pot.Missing: potsherd | Show results with:potsherd
  107. [107]
    Midianite Pottery: The designer import of the ancient world. - Bible.ca
    The identical Midianite pottery has been found at Timna, Jezirat Faraun, Al-Bad (near the Straits of Tiran) and Qurayyah north east of Mt. Al-Lawz.Missing: archaeology | Show results with:archaeology<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Piotr Bienkowski - The Iron Age and Persian Periods in Jordan
    the 'Midianite' pottery found there, as has been proposed. (Bawden and Edens ... The Kingdoms of. Ammon, Moab and Edom: The Archaeology of Society in. Late Bronze ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] The Iron Age Pottery from Khirbat en-Nahas, Jordan
    the Iron Age archaeology of Edom is of great interest to biblical scholars ... Rothenberg, B., and Glass, J. 1983. The Midianite Pottery. Pp. 65–124 in ...
  110. [110]
    Archaeological Evidence of Gideon the Judge?
    Jul 15, 2021 · A 3100-year-old inscription was found with the earliest archaeological occurrence of the name Jerubbaal, a nickname of Gideon the Judge.
  111. [111]
    The Jerubbaal Pottery Fragment Found Near Lachish
    Aug 16, 2021 · A pottery fragment possibly inscribed with the name Jerubbaal may be connected to Gideon, making it the first piece evidence to document a ...
  112. [112]
    Gideon the Judge—Found in Southern Israel? | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    Oct 17, 2021 · Critically, the inscribed vessel was found in an archaeological context from the time period of the judges—the late 12th century b.c.e. “The ...
  113. [113]
    https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781575065908-016/html
  114. [114]
    Magic and Divination in Ancient Israel - Jeffers - 2007 - Compass Hub
    Nov 15, 2007 · Divination by fleece. In the episode related in Judges 6:36–40, Gideon's fleece is used as a means to give a sign in order to make a political ...<|separator|>
  115. [115]
    https://brill.com/view/journals/vt/68/3/article-p349_1.xml
  116. [116]
    Authority and Violence in the Gideon and Abimelech Narratives
    £55.00Authority and violence exhibit a close and complex relationship in the social worlds depicted in biblical narratives as well as in ancient and modern societies.Missing: eastern norms<|separator|>
  117. [117]
    Is it acceptable to “lay out a fleece” before God in prayer?
    Jan 4, 2022 · After the first fleece sign, he said, “Do not be angry with me. Let me make one more request” (Judges 6:39). But our God is a merciful, loving ...
  118. [118]
    Study Guide for Judges 6 by David Guzik
    (Judges 6:11-13) The Angel of the LORD appears to Gideon. Now the Angel of the LORD came and sat under the terebinth tree which was in Ophrah, which ...Missing: scholarship | Show results with:scholarship
  119. [119]
    Gideon in the Bible Overcame Doubt to Answer God's Call
    Apr 8, 2020 · "Putting out a fleece," or testing God, is a sign of weak faith. Sin always has bad consequences. Key Bible Verses. Judges 6:14-16 "Pardon me ...
  120. [120]
    Judges 7:16 Bible Verse Study | TrulyRandomVerse
    The "trumpets" symbolize divine proclamation, authority, and the unmistakable sound of God's intervention in human affairs.
  121. [121]
    Judges 7:19 Study Bible: So Gideon and the hundred men who ...
    The breaking of jars and the blowing of trumpets symbolize God's unconventional methods of warfare. God often uses the weak and the few to accomplish His ...
  122. [122]
    Gideon and the Miraculous Dryness of the Fleece - Getty Museum
    The images, their inscriptions, - and, in some cases, their titles - are products of their time. They are presented here as documentation, not as a reflection ...
  123. [123]
    Paintings and Artwork of Gideon - Bible Study
    A study of the life of Gideon from the standpoint of lessons of faith for disciples. Examines the story's context in the period of the Judges, the conquest ...
  124. [124]
    John Bunyan: Pilgrim's Progress - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
    They showed him Moses' rod; the hammer and nail with which Jael slew Sisera; the pitchers, trumpets, and lamps too, with which Gideon put to flight the armies ...
  125. [125]
    Gideon. 3. The Sword of the Lord (Judges 7:15-8:21) - Bible Study
    Gideon's strategy involves several elements: Surround the Midianite camp with a line of men a few hundred feet apart. This way the enemy will feel like they ...Missing: military | Show results with:military
  126. [126]
    5 Leadership Lessons From Gideon - Lifeway Voices
    Mar 24, 2021 · This study will encourage you to recognize your weakness as the key that the Lord gives you to unlock the full experience of His strength in your life.Missing: 6-8 scholarly analysis