Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gold fixing

Gold fixing, formally the LBMA Gold Price, is a twice-daily electronic auction process administered by Benchmark Administration that establishes the global price for in dollars per , serving as the primary reference for wholesale transactions in mining, refining, fabrication, and investment. Originating as the London Gold Fix in 1919, it initially involved a among five major banks to balance buy and sell orders at a single agreed price, a method that endured for nearly a century due to its efficiency in coordinating the opaque over-the-counter . The modern auction, implemented in 2015, features up to 15 direct participants submitting anonymous net buy or sell quantities in discrete rounds, with the chair adjusting the opening price iteratively until residual imbalances approach zero, ensuring the fix reflects the volume-weighted equilibrium without disclosing individual positions. This shift from manual to auditable electronic execution addressed longstanding criticisms of the telephone system's lack of transparency, which regulators viewed as susceptible to informal coordination among fix members. The LBMA Gold Price's dominance stems from London's historical role as the world's bullion trading hub, handling over 70% of global physical gold turnover, though its influence has faced challenges from rising Asian markets and digital alternatives. Notable controversies arose in the 2010s when investigations revealed attempts by banks to manipulate fix outcomes through or spoofing, prompting fines including $44 million against by regulators in 2014 and multimillion-dollar settlements by in U.S. litigation for conspiring to rig gold prices. These incidents, echoing broader benchmark scandals like , underscored causal risks in concentrated, non-transparent pricing mechanisms but also catalyzed reforms, including independent oversight and IOSCO-compliant protocols, reinforcing the fix's credibility as a causal anchor for gold's $10 trillion-plus annual market despite persistent skepticism from independent analysts questioning short-term price deviations.

Historical Development

Origins and Establishment (1919)

The London gold market had been suspended during due to wartime restrictions on gold exports and the collapse of the international , leading to fragmented and unreliable over-the-counter pricing upon partial resumption in the post-war era. To address this instability and establish a standardized for settling transactions globally, five leading trading firms formalized the gold fixing process on September 12, 1919. This inaugural fixing set the price at £4 18s 9d per fine ounce, marking the first market-determined price in since the war. The founding members of the London Gold Fixing consortium were N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Mocatta & Goldsmid, Pixley & Abell, Samuel Montagu & Co., and Sharps Wilkins, drawn from the pre-war informal brokers who had previously gathered to approximate prices. N.M. Rothschild & Sons assumed the chairmanship, hosting the proceedings at its offices and leveraging its role as broker to the to ensure procedural authority. This structure aimed to centralize pricing authority among trusted market participants, minimizing discrepancies that had plagued trading and providing a reliable reference for miners, refiners, jewelers, and central banks worldwide. From inception, the fixing operated twice daily—at 10:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. time—through a confidential auction designed to equilibrate aggregate buy and sell orders from clients, thereby deriving a single consensus price without public disclosure of individual positions. This frequency accommodated intraday market fluctuations while preserving the opacity essential to preventing speculative distortions, establishing the fix as a of 's enduring dominance in trading.

Key Participants and Changes in Membership

The London Gold Market Fixing Ltd. was initially formed in 1919 by five members: N.M. Rothschild & Sons, & Goldsmid, Pixley & Abell, Samuel Montagu & Co., and Sharps Wilkins, with Rothschilds acting as chair and representing interests aligned with the . Over the subsequent decades, mergers and consolidations transformed these original bullion brokers into operations under larger international banks, resulting in an evolved roster dominated by institutions such as AG, Bank plc, Scotia (a division of the Bank of , successor to Mocatta & Goldsmid), and Corporate & Investment Banking. N.M. Rothschild & Sons retained the chairmanship, which entailed proposing an initial price near the prevailing level, soliciting confidential buy and sell orders from other members, and iteratively adjusting the price until balanced, thereby moderating the twice-daily auctions. In 2004, N.M. Rothschild & Sons withdrew from the fixing after 85 years, citing a strategic retreat from trading; Barclays Capital acquired the seat, assuming initial chairmanship duties while the role began rotating annually among the remaining members to distribute influence. This shift reflected broader market dynamics, including banks reevaluating precious metals desks amid fluctuating demand and operational costs, though the core five-member structure persisted with participants holding substantial shares of volume. ScotiaMocatta maintained long-standing involvement as one of the most enduring participants, leveraging its heritage in physical dealings. Further changes occurred in January 2014 when resigned its membership amid heightened regulatory scrutiny of pricing practices in precious metals markets, leaving no immediate successor and reducing active fixers to four: , , , and ScotiaMocatta. These transitions underscored the influence of external pressures, including post-financial oversight and banks' strategic exits from commodities trading, on the fixing's , while the chair's facilitative ensured in balancing members' aggregated orders—often representing major institutional flows—to establish the . The member banks' collective market dominance, derived from their roles as primary dealers and custodians, positioned the fixing as a concentrated reflection of wholesale , though rotations aimed to mitigate perceptions of entrenched power.

Shift from Physical to Digital Era (Pre-2015)

The gold fixing, initiated in , continued to employ a manual conference process among a limited of five member banks—conducted twice daily at 10:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. time—throughout the pre-2015 period, eschewing electronic mechanisms despite broader . This persistence stemmed from entrenched tradition, whereby the opaque, verbal negotiations among participants were deemed sufficient for establishing a reflective of aggregated buy and sell orders. Critics, including academic analyses, highlighted the system's lack of transparency and absence of automated , which hindered contemporaneous market oversight and exposed it to inherent procedural limitations in an increasingly interconnected trading environment. The fixed schedule and confidential conference format, while efficient for its originating era, failed to provide instantaneous price signals essential for high-frequency participants, fostering reliance on post-fix adjustments rather than live equilibrium discovery. By the early , escalating global over-the-counter gold trading volumes—averaging 55.1 million ounces (approximately 1,714 tonnes) daily in 2010—intensified these inefficiencies, as the analog process struggled to accommodate the scale and velocity of transactions without risking disconnects from realities. The telephone-based structure's potential for unlogged verbal coordination among fix members underscored early systemic fragilities, prompting calls for modernization to align with demands for auditable, technology-driven benchmarks amid surging liquidity.

Operational Mechanisms

Traditional Telephone Conference Process

The traditional London Gold Fixing process, employed until March 19, 2015, consisted of closed telephone conference calls held twice daily at 10:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. time, involving representatives from five member banks responsible for aggregating and balancing client buy and sell orders for physical gold. The chairman, whose role rotated annually among the banks, opened each call by stating an initial price proposal calibrated closely to prevailing quotations, prompting members to report their net positions without revealing individual client details or quantities to non-participants. Members sequentially indicated whether they held excess buy or sell orders at the proposed price, quantified in multiples of bars (approximately 400 ounces each), derived from pre-call aggregation of client instructions for , forward, and settlements. If buy orders exceeded sells (or vice versa), the chairman iteratively adjusted the price—upward for net selling pressure or downward for net buying—repeating member declarations until was reached, defined as balanced aggregate quantities or an imbalance of no more than 50 bars. This iterative balancing mechanism ensured the fixed price reflected a point of approximate supply-demand parity across participants' order books, without real-time trading or external inputs during the call. Throughout the process, no details were disclosed publicly or to non-members to maintain and avoid influencing external markets, with the final fixed price announced only upon , typically within minutes of the call's start. This benchmark served as the settlement reference for a substantial volume of global forwards, options, and over-the-counter , channeling aggregated liquidity into a single equilibrium point that empirically anchored prices and mitigated short-term by standardizing valuation across interconnected markets.

Modern Electronic Auction System (Post-2015)

The LBMA Gold Price was launched on March 20, 2015, replacing the previous Gold Fix with an electronic auction administered by Benchmark Administration (IBA). This platform conducts auctions twice daily at 10:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. time for , unallocated loco , operating as a physically settled, tradeable process in U.S. dollars with aggregated and anonymous bids and offers. The proceeds through a series of rounds on the Trading Platform, which automates order matching without human intervention or moderation, continuing until achieve balance at a single clearing price. Direct participants—currently numbering around 15 to 16 institutions, including major banks such as Bank, N.A. London Branch and —submit bids and offers directly into the system, while indirect participants access the auction via provided by direct members, enabling broader involvement. The process emphasizes real-time order management, separation of house and client orders, and live credit limit monitoring to ensure orderly execution. Key enhancements include improved auditability through timestamped electronic logs of all submissions and trades, compliant with IOSCO Principles for Financial Benchmarks, which minimizes discretionary elements present in prior manual systems. Independent oversight by IBA, supported by LBMA governance and external committees, verifies the integrity of each auction, with full for regulatory review. This technological framework allows auctions to settle efficiently, often within minutes, enhancing speed and compared to telephone-based methods.

Economic Role and Significance

Function as Global Benchmark

The LBMA Gold Price, established through a twice-daily electronic , functions as a market-clearing that aggregates net orders from major bullion banks, thereby facilitating efficient by converging on an equilibrium where unexecuted volume approaches zero. This process, administered by ICE Benchmark Administration, balances participant submissions to determine a single price reflective of prevailing market conditions at fixed times (10:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. time), providing a standardized superior to fragmented over-the-counter trading, where is dispersed across continuous but thinner bilateral deals. By concentrating orders from institutions handling substantial global volumes, the fixing captures causal signals of underlying physical and financial demand more reliably than decentralized quotes, which often exhibit wider bid-ask spreads and less depth during off-peak hours. This benchmark underpins pricing for diverse gold market segments, including mining output contracts, jewelry fabrication agreements, and central bank reserve valuations, where participants rely on its transparency and representativeness for settlement and hedging. For instance, miners and fabricators index production and procurement deals to the fixing to mitigate intraday volatility, while central banks reference it for official reserve accounting due to its alignment with London Good Delivery standards governing physical bars. Empirical data show strong correlation between the LBMA Gold Price and COMEX gold futures, with daily price movements typically aligning within 0.5% due to across venues, yet the London benchmark holds precedence in physical delivery contexts, as COMEX contracts often settle against London-standard bars sourced from the LBMA vaulting system. This precedence stems from London's dominance in global gold clearing, where over 70% of internationally traded passes through its market infrastructure, ensuring the fixing's price anchors real-world physical flows rather than purely paper positions.

Influence on Markets and Participants

The LBMA Gold Price serves as a standardized global benchmark for gold transactions, allowing miners to hedge production risks through forward contracts linked to the twice-daily reference, which locks in revenues against spot market fluctuations and supports operational planning amid volatile commodity cycles. Investors gain efficient access via exchange-traded funds that directly track the LBMA price, enabling diversified portfolio exposure to gold's safe-haven properties without the logistics of physical storage; prominent examples include funds holding hundreds of tonnes of bullion valued against this benchmark. This uniformity reduces basis risk in international trade, where disparate regional pricing could otherwise inflate transaction costs or spark disputes in contracts for jewelry fabrication, industrial applications, and central bank reserves. Price fix announcements exert immediate downstream effects on and participant behavior, often precipitating intraday that influences positioning in and trades, with the underpinning over $5 trillion in annual over-the-counter volume across outputs, , and fabrication deals. Such dependency amplifies efficiency by synchronizing global flows but introduces concentration risks tied to the limited direct participants, potentially amplifying disruptions if strains occur during high-demand periods like 2025's surge driven by accumulation. Gold market advocates have criticized the dominance of large banks among fix members as fostering potential price suppression to benefit short positions, yet demonstrates the LBMA price's alignment with core fundamentals, including supply constraints, surging , and dynamics—gold advanced approximately 1.5% for each 1% rise in inflation metrics in recent analyses, while 2025's over 30% yearly gain mirrored record purchases exceeding 1,000 tonnes. This tracking underscores causal ties to real economic pressures over structural biases, validating the benchmark's role in reflective despite participant critiques.

Controversies and Allegations of Manipulation

Barclays Manipulation Incident (2012)

On June 28, 2012, during the 3:00 p.m. London Gold Fixing, Barclays trader Daniel James Plunkett, a director on the bank's Precious Metals Desk, manipulated the benchmark price by placing large sell orders totaling 40,000 to 60,000 ounces in the underlying spot market. These orders were strategically timed during the fixing conference to influence indicative prices downward, with the intent to push the final fix below a USD 1,558.96 per ounce barrier level tied to a digital options contract held by a client (referred to as Customer A). Plunkett's actions deviated from the equilibrium driven by genuine supply and demand signals in the fixing process, as evidenced by trading records and an email he sent the prior day expressing hope for a "mini puke" in gold prices to trigger the barrier breach. The succeeded when the fixed at USD 1,558.50 per , just below the barrier, thereby avoiding a USD 3.9 million payout to Customer A under the while booking a USD 1.75 million profit for Plunkett's trading book at . Plunkett subsequently withdrew or unwound portions of the positions at a net loss of USD 114,000, indicating the orders were not placed for genuine execution but to spoof market signals during the brief fixing window. ' internal controls failed to detect or prevent this , as the bank lacked adequate systems to monitor desk-level trading for potential of the fixing process, despite Plunkett's dual role in options trading and gold fixing participation. Following an internal prompted by A's complaints on June 28 and 29, 2012—which Plunkett misleadingly downplayed— repaid the full USD 3.9 million to the client and terminated Plunkett without his bonus. The UK's (FCA) imposed a £26 million fine on on May 23, 2014, for these systemic control shortcomings that enabled the abuse. Separately, Plunkett was personally fined £95,600 (after a discount for cooperation) and received a lifetime ban from performing any regulated activities, citing his deliberate exploitation of fixing vulnerabilities for personal and desk gain over client interests.

Broader Bank Fines and Spoofing Schemes (2014–2020)

In 2014–2020, U.S. regulators including the (CFTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) expanded investigations into spoofing schemes by major banks in precious metals futures markets, revealing patterns of traders placing large, non-bona fide orders to distort prices, including during periods influencing price fixes. These schemes involved fictitious orders to mislead the market, often executed around fixing times, which contributed to artificial price movements in and silver futures on exchanges like , thereby impacting the and its successors. The probes uncovered thousands of manipulative trades across multiple institutions, leading to and penalties totaling hundreds of millions of dollars, with findings emphasizing supervisory failures that enabled persistent spoofing from as early as 2008. JPMorgan Chase & Co. faced the largest penalty in September 2020, agreeing to pay $920.2 million to the CFTC—the record amount for spoofing at the time—for schemes on its precious metals desk involving over 15 traders who executed more than 19,000 spoofing episodes in and silver futures between 2008 and 2016. These actions included placing and quickly canceling large orders to create false impressions of supply or demand, distorting benchmark prices and generating illicit profits or losses avoided estimated at $300 million in . The DOJ's agreement highlighted how such manipulations influenced futures settlements tied to physical pricing mechanisms. The Bank of () settled related charges in August 2020, paying $77.4 million to the CFTC for spoofing and false statements in precious metals trading from 2011 to 2015, plus $60.4 million in criminal penalties and forfeiture to the DOJ, totaling over $127 million. This followed an earlier $800,000 CFTC sanction in 2018 for similar and silver spoofing by its New York desk, where traders used algorithms and manual orders to manipulate prices, exacerbating distortions during high-volume periods like fixes. Deutsche Bank AG settled in January 2018 for $30 million with the CFTC over , attempted manipulation, and spoofing in precious metals futures, admitting to traders executing deceptive orders that triggered customer stop-losses and influenced benchmarks. AG paid $15 million in the same multi-bank CFTC resolution for analogous spoofing conduct, while HSBC Holdings Plc contributed $1.6 million, underscoring a coordinated enforcement action against European banks' U.S. trading desks. These settlements revealed systemic use of spoofing to exploit around pricing windows, with regulators noting inadequate internal controls despite prior warnings. also faced separate probes into precious metals collusion potentially affecting fixes, though U.S. fines focused on spoofing mechanics.

Criticisms of Opacity and Systemic Vulnerabilities

The traditional London Gold Fix prior to 2015, involving closed telephone auctions among five major banks, drew criticism for its profound opacity, as the process lacked public visibility into participant bids and deliberations, thereby heightening risks of undetected in a handling trillions in annual turnover. Empirical examinations, including the 2013 analysis by economists Rosa Abrantes-Metz and Albert Metz, highlighted statistical deviations in afternoon fix prices—such as clustering around round numbers and atypical return patterns—suggesting potential manipulative intent, though these anomalies were limited in scope and duration. Counteranalyses, such as Fertig's for the LBMA, rebutted claims of decade-spanning by attributing observed irregularities to legitimate auction dynamics like bid shading and information asymmetries, rather than coordinated suppression, aligning with broader evidence that prices exhibited long-term upward trends inconsistent with sustained artificial depression. Detractors emphasized the five-bank —typically comprising institutions like , , and —as embodying an oligopolistic structure akin to a , where concentrated control over could incentivize tacit coordination to the detriment of broader market participants, including miners and investors. Proponents of the arrangement, however, contended that such consolidation naturally arose from the need for high-volume providers in an over-the-counter market, enabling efficient price convergence without the fragmentation that might erode reliability; verified short-term infractions existed, but lacked substantiation for enduring systemic distortion. The 2015 shift to the LBMA Gold Price's electronic auction format introduced verifiable logs and broader accessibility, curtailing certain opacity-driven risks, yet inherent vulnerabilities endure due to the persistent reliance on a narrow cadre of dominant direct participants—predominantly global megabanks—whose outsized submission volumes could still skew equilibrium prices amid imbalances in . Advocates for argue that expanding contributor pools beyond institutional incumbents would better insulate the benchmark against single-entity dominance, fostering a more resilient, competitively derived reference akin to decentralized spot trading venues.

Regulatory Responses and Reforms

Investigations by FCA and CFTC

The (FCA) launched preliminary reviews of the London gold fixing in late 2013 as part of a broader examination of benchmark-setting practices, prompted by concerns over potential in the twice-daily calls among fixing banks. These probes entailed of audio recordings and communications from the fix calls to identify irregularities, such as unauthorized influences on submissions during the auction-like . By 2014, the FCA's efforts had escalated to formal actions, revealing deficiencies in oversight mechanisms that allowed traders to exploit procedural gaps. Concurrently, the US (CFTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) conducted parallel investigations into spoofing and related manipulative trading in precious metals markets, including activities timed around the London gold fix, employing advanced trade data analytics to detect anomalous order placements and cancellations. These methodologies involved algorithmic surveillance of futures and data to uncover patterns of deceptive practices, such as layering non-bona fide orders to influence prices without intent to execute. The probes highlighted systemic control lapses at involved institutions, including inadequate monitoring of trader conduct and failure to prevent cross-desk . Coordination among the FCA, CFTC, DOJ, and international counterparts exposed interconnected schemes spanning jurisdictions, contributing to findings of widespread vulnerabilities in the fixing ecosystem. These investigations precipitated private class-action litigation, notably in the Southern District of , where investors—including hedge funds alleging artificial suppression of prices—sued fixing members for damages stemming from manipulated benchmarks between 2004 and 2013. Resulting fines across cases incorporated components for disgorged ill-gotten gains, underscoring the empirical detection of profit-driven abuses through reviewed data and communications.

Transition to LBMA Gold Price and Transparency Measures

In response to regulatory pressures following investigations into benchmark manipulation, the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) transitioned the gold price setting mechanism from the opaque, telephone-based London Gold Fix to the LBMA Gold Price on March 20, 2015. This shift, administered independently by ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA), introduced a physically settled electronic auction conducted twice daily via a secure platform, enabling real-time bidding and requiring participants to declare net positions upfront to balance supply and demand algorithmically. Key enhancements included comprehensive audit trails for all bids and trades, direct client access to the auction process without intermediary discretion, and expanded participation beyond the former five fixing banks, thereby eliminating the chairman-led negotiation that had allowed subjective influence in the prior system. The LBMA Gold Price was designed to comply with International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) principles for financial , emphasizing governance, quality controls, and transparency to mitigate risks. As a regulated under the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), it incorporates verifiable input data, conflict-of-interest safeguards, and post-trade reporting, fostering causal improvements in integrity by replacing bilateral opacity with observable, rule-based . Empirical analyses of and silver price data pre- and post-2015 reveal shifts in patterns and , with reduced unexplained deviations during auction windows attributable to the electronic format's , which discourages spoofing or by enabling regulatory audits. Notwithstanding these reforms, critiques persist regarding the LBMA's structure as a membership-based lacking by end-users, which concentrates authority in a self-regulating body dominated by bullion banks. The model remains bank-centric, with direct participants primarily comprising large that aggregate client orders, potentially sustaining dependencies on these entities for and . However, post-2015 data indicates enhanced systemic resilience, evidenced by the absence of FCA- or CFTC-documented in the LBMA Price auctions themselves, contrasting with pre-reform incidents tied to the old fixing process. This suggests the and auditable has verifiably curtailed the causal pathways to coordinated distortions observed earlier, though broader OTC opacity beyond the persists as a separate .

References

  1. [1]
    LBMA Gold Price
    The LBMA Gold Price is administered independently by ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA). IBA independently administers the price and provides the auction ...LBMA Gold Price FAQs · LBMA Gold Price Disclaimer · Market Standards
  2. [2]
    https://www.theice.com/iba/lbma-gold-silver-price
  3. [3]
    History of Global Trade in Bullion - LBMA
    First London gold fix. 1919. On the 12th September the Bank of England makes arrangements with N M Rothschild & Sons for the formation of a free gold market in ...
  4. [4]
    What is the London Gold Fix? | Gold Fixing | APMEX
    Mar 19, 2024 · Established in 1919, the fix served as a mechanism for setting the benchmark price of gold and facilitating transactions among market ...
  5. [5]
    LBMA Gold Price FAQs
    How does the auction process work? The chairperson sets the starting price and the price for each round in line with current market conditions and the activity ...
  6. [6]
    What is the Gold Fix? | The Royal Mint
    The London Bullion Market Association launched its LBMA Gold Price auction in March 2015, as a more technologically-savvy update on the historic model. It ...
  7. [7]
    LBMA: The Independent Precious Metals Authority
    Latest pricing ; Gold Price · $4125.7 · PM $4143.75 23/10 ; Silver Price · $49.105 ; Platinum Price · $1655 · PM $1649 23/10 ; Palladium Price · $1477 · PM $1463 23/10.About LBMA Daily Auction Prices · LBMA Gold Price · London Vault Data · Portal
  8. [8]
    Barclays slapped with $44 million fine over gold price fix | Reuters
    May 23, 2014 · The Libor rigging scandal has put scrutiny on how all benchmark prices are set, including London's gold "fix", which dates back to 1919. Banks ...
  9. [9]
    Deutsche Bank settles U.S. gold, silver price-fixing litigation | Reuters
    Apr 14, 2016 · (Reuters) - Deutsche Bank AG agreed to settle U.S. lawsuits accusing it of conspiring with other banks to manipulate gold and silver prices ...
  10. [10]
    Deutsche Bank to Resolve U.S. Gold Price-Fixing Case
    Dec 5, 2016 · In Oct 2016, Deutsche Bank also agreed to the settlement of a lawsuit related to silver price manipulation, by paying $38 million. Deutsche bank ...
  11. [11]
    Has There Been a Decade of London PM Gold Fixing Manipulation?
    We have come to the conclusion that their findings could be explained and are not a valid proof of manipulation of the pm London gold fixing.
  12. [12]
    The Early Development of the London Gold Fixing | Alchemist - LBMA
    The First World War halted the informal fixing, but after the cessation of hostilities, a more formal process was established on 12 September, 1919. At 11:00 ...
  13. [13]
    The Gold Standard Between the Wars (Part I)
    Jun 5, 2023 · During the First World War, this system was suspended virtually everywhere and currencies were allowed to float freely for the first time.
  14. [14]
    The First Gold Fixing - LBMA
    This page from the Bank of England's daily prices book records the first London gold price fixing on Friday, 12th September 1919.
  15. [15]
    Flag from the Gold Fixing Room, New Court, 2004
    The first Gold Fixing took place on 12 September 1919 and achieved a price of £4.18s.9d. per ounce. Bids were made by telephone during those first few days, but ...
  16. [16]
    Gold Fix: What it Means, How it Works, Bullion Trading - Investopedia
    They were known as the London Gold Market Fixing Ltd., and consisted of N.M. Rothschild, Mocatta & Goldsmid, Pixley & Abell, Samuel Montagu & Co. and Sharps ...
  17. [17]
    Rothschild vacates golden chair | Business - The Guardian
    Apr 14, 2004 · The venerable bullion trader has chaired the gold fix, where five banking participants set the price of gold, in its London offices since 1919.
  18. [18]
    The London Gold Fix | Alchemist - LBMA
    Today the gold fixings take place at 10: 30 am and 3:00 pm at the premises of N M Rothschild & Sons Limited, the Chairman. In keeping with the principle of ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] London Gold Market: 1660-2014 - BullionStar
    Thus, on 12. September 1919, the first gold fixing took place; the price was ... The fixing members now are: N.M. Rothschild, Midland Montagu, Kleinwort.<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    The London Gold Fix Guide and Information | BullionVault
    History of the London Gold Fix. The London Gold Fix was first held on 12th Sept. 1919 to kick-start London's gold market after the end of the First World War.
  21. [21]
    Deutsche quits gold price-setting as regulators investigate fix - Reuters
    Jan 17, 2014 · Chairmanship of the gold fixing rotates annually among the member banks. The last time a fixing seat changed hands was in 2004, when N.M. ...
  22. [22]
    Twelve Firms Expressed Interest in Running Gold Fix Replacement
    Oct 10, 2014 · Deutsche Bank's exit from the gold process this year left Societe Generale SA, Bank of Nova Scotia, HSBC Holdings Plc and Barclays Plc to ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Fixing the fix for silver and gold - BearWorks - Missouri State University
    Nov 6, 2020 · The change in the gold fix occurred on March 20, 2015, when the new auction platform replaced the twice-daily telephone conference fixing ...Missing: persistence | Show results with:persistence
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Liquidity in the global gold market
    Table 1: Average daily trading volume 2010. Millions of oz/day. Billions of US$/day. Gold OTC. 55.1. 67.4. COMEX (USA). 16.9. 20.8. TOCOM (Japan). 1.5. 1.8. MCX ...
  25. [25]
    How the London Fix Works - Manhattan Gold & Silver
    Feb 18, 2015 · This process continues until supply and demand meet (or the imbalance is 50 good-delivery bars of gold or less), then the price is fixed.
  26. [26]
    Fixing a Leaky Fixing: Short‐Term Market Reactions to the London ...
    Sep 2, 2013 · This article investigates the impact of the London PM gold price fixing on two exchange-traded gold instruments: the GC gold futures contract and the GLD ...3 Sample Data And... · 3.2 The Spot Gold And The... · 4 Empirical Results And...
  27. [27]
    ICE Benchmark Administration Launches LBMA Gold Price
    Mar 23, 2015 · IBA has transitioned the gold price to a new, independently administered, transparent and electronic auction process. IBA operates twice daily, ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  28. [28]
    LBMA Gold and Silver Price | ICE Benchmark Administration
    The LBMA Gold Price and LBMA Silver Price are the global benchmark prices for unallocated gold and silver delivered in London.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LBMA GOLD PRICE
    IBA's methodology underpinning the LBMA Gold Price is an electronic auction run twice daily at. 10:30am and 3:00pm London time. The auction process provides ...
  30. [30]
    About LBMA Daily Auction Prices
    These auction prices are independently operated by experienced benchmark administrators. They're assisted by established external oversight committees, ensuring ...
  31. [31]
    Global information distribution in the gold OTC markets - ScienceDirect
    A key focus of the literature is the price discovery process that incorporates new information into the asset prices. Several methods have been proposed to ...
  32. [32]
    The Gold Fixing - Quantum Mutual Fund
    The purpose of the fix is to set a benchmark price for gold, which is subsequently used by dealers, central banks and mining firms to buy and sell the precious ...
  33. [33]
    London Fix Price: A Century-Old Benchmark in Precious Metals
    The primary purpose of the Gold Fixing is to establish a price for settling contracts within the London bullion market. However, its influence extends far ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    https://www.gainesvillecoins.com/blog/who-sets-gold-price-market-forces-key-players
  35. [35]
    Trading COMEX Gold and Silver - CME Group
    Jun 8, 2018 · Correlation is an important tool for traders engaged in cross-market trading. Gold prices are closely correlated across regional exchanges, and ...
  36. [36]
    Understanding Gold Prices: Spot vs Futures vs LBMA vs COMEX
    Aug 7, 2024 · You've got spot prices, futures prices, COMEX prices, and LMBA prices. Each system has a distinct purpose and influence within the gold market.
  37. [37]
    Who Sets the Price of Gold? London or New York - Hauptfleisch - 2016
    Feb 22, 2016 · This figure plots the 180-day moving average bid-ask spread of the London OTC gold spot quotes and the New York COMEX gold futures quotes.Missing: precedence | Show results with:precedence
  38. [38]
    The Hedging Advantage | Alchemist - LBMA
    Through hedging, we increase the price we receive for our gold. At the same time, Barrick is focusing on cost containment and increasing production from low- ...
  39. [39]
    Gold ETFs and Gold Mining ETFs: What They Are and How They Work
    Many gold ETFs track the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) gold price, which replaced the London Gold Fix in 2015. The LBMA is the global benchmark based ...
  40. [40]
    LBMA Precious Metals Market Report: Q3 2025
    Oct 8, 2025 · Price Drivers. For example, while as stated the gold price gained over 44% in dollar terms to the end of Q3, its gain in sterling was 34.3%, and ...Missing: turnover | Show results with:turnover
  41. [41]
    What Impacts Gold Prices Most in Today's Market - VRAY Instrument
    Jun 16, 2025 · Recent research finds that gold tends to rise by about 1.5% for every 1% increase in inflation. Changes in global economic factors, such as ...
  42. [42]
    Gold's Historic 2025 Surge | WisdomTree
    Sep 17, 2025 · Gold has surged over 30% year-to-date in 2025, driven largely by unprecedented central bank demand and geopolitical tensions, ...
  43. [43]
    Gold Market Commentary: Riding a wave of uncertainty
    Mar 6, 2025 · Rising inflation expectations, lower rates, and continued geoeconomic uncertainty are playing in gold's favour. Dollar weakness and ETF flows ...
  44. [44]
    None
    ### Summary of Gold Fixing Manipulation Incident (28 June 2012)
  45. [45]
    How a Barclays' options trader manipulated the gold price fix | Reuters
    May 23, 2014 · The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) fined Barclays 26 million pounds ($43.8 million) for failures in internal controls that allowed the ...
  46. [46]
    Barclays fined £26m for gold fix failings - The Guardian
    May 23, 2014 · The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said it had fined Daniel James Plunkett £95,600 and banned him from working in key roles in the City ...
  47. [47]
    Barclays Fined $44 Million for London Gold Fix Failings - Bloomberg
    May 23, 2014 · The FCA also fined the former trader, Daniel Plunkett, 95,600 pounds and banned him from the industry. Plunkett “exploited the weaknesses in ...
  48. [48]
    CFTC Orders JPMorgan to Pay Record $920 Million for Spoofing ...
    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission ...Missing: fixing sources
  49. [49]
    JPMorgan Chase & Co Deferred Prosecution Agreement
    Aug 27, 2024 · Under the terms of the DPA, the JPMorgan has agreed to pay a combined $920,203,609 in a criminal monetary penalty ($436,431,811), criminal ...
  50. [50]
    CFTC Orders The Bank of Nova Scotia to Pay Record $77.4 Million ...
    Aug 19, 2020 · Release Number 8221-20. CFTC Orders The Bank of Nova Scotia to Pay Record $77.4 Million for Spoofing and Making False Statements.
  51. [51]
    The Bank of Nova Scotia Agrees To Pay $60.4 Million in Connection ...
    Aug 19, 2020 · “For over eight years, Scotiabank traders placed thousands of orders for precious metals futures contracts in an attempt to manipulate prices ...Missing: fixing regulators
  52. [52]
    CFTC Orders Deutsche Bank to Pay $30 Million Penalty for ...
    Jan 29, 2018 · CFTC Orders Deutsche Bank to Pay $30 Million Penalty for Manipulation, Attempted Manipulation, and Spoofing In the Precious Metals Futures ...
  53. [53]
    UBS, Deutsche Bank and HSBC to pay millions in spoofing ... - CNBC
    Jan 31, 2018 · Deutsche Bank will pay $30 million and UBS $15 million of that total in a wide-reaching investigation by the Commodity Futures Trading ...
  54. [54]
    Farewell to the shady business of the London gold price fix
    Apr 16, 2015 · In 2004, when the five fixing banks agreed to confer in a private teleconference rather than in person, the tradition of raising a small Union ...
  55. [55]
    The Historical London Gold Fix Is Replaced by the LBMA Gold Price
    Yes, the price will continue to be set twice daily at 10:30 am and 3:00 pm each business day. Who will participate? Initially six banks will take part in ...
  56. [56]
    London gold fix may have been manipulated for a decade: Study
    Mar 1, 2014 · According to the study, Authorities around the world are examining the $20-trillion gold market for signs of wrongdoing.
  57. [57]
    Why a handful of banks may have unfair advantage in the US$20 ...
    Nov 26, 2013 · There's no evidence that gold dealers sought to manipulate the London fix or worked together to rig prices, as traders did with Libor. Even so, ...
  58. [58]
    Gold fix under scrutiny as regulators probe archaic system
    Jun 8, 2014 · Five banks that set the standard – Barclays, Bank of Nova Scotia, Societe Generale, Deutsche Bank and HSBC – have been hit by lawsuits.
  59. [59]
    Don't waste time fixing gold fix, it's obsolete - Research - Goldmoney
    Does the system of fixing the daily price of gold in London really need fixing, or should it be allowed to fade into the annals of history?
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Standard for the Conduct of Participants in LBMA Precious Metal ...
    This Standard is designed to provide some clarity as to the way in which those risks can be managed, so as to increase the volume of bids and offers submitted ...
  61. [61]
    Gold Benchmarks Said to Be Reviewed in U.K. Rates Probe
    Nov 20, 2013 · The FCA review is preliminary and hasn't risen to the level of a formal investigation, said the person, who asked not to be identified ...
  62. [62]
    London Gold Fix Calls Draw Scrutiny Amid Heavy Trading
    Nov 26, 2013 · The UK Financial Conduct Authority is scrutinizing how prices are set in the $20 trillion gold market, according to a person with knowledge of the review.
  63. [63]
    Barclays fined £26m for failings surrounding the London Gold Fixing ...
    May 23, 2014 · When Barclays relayed the customer's concerns to Plunkett on 28 and 29 June 2012, he failed to disclose that he had placed orders and traded ...Missing: spoofing | Show results with:spoofing
  64. [64]
    Spoofing Enforcement in an Increasingly Complex World
    May 14, 2021 · The DOJ, the CFTC and other regulators have increased their efforts to prosecute spoofing and market manipulation, resulting in an increasing ...Missing: fixing analytics
  65. [65]
    Eight Individuals Charged With Deceptive Trading Practices ...
    Jan 29, 2018 · Seven of the eight individuals were charged with the crime of spoofing, an illegal trading practice that can be used to manipulate the ...
  66. [66]
    The DOJ and CFTC dig deeper in precious metals market investigation
    Mar 6, 2015 · 10 Banks are under investigation by the US Justice Department (DOJ) and CTFC for irregularities and potential price fixing in the precious metals market.Missing: coordination systemic lapses
  67. [67]
    Commodity Exchange – Gold Futures and Options Trading Litigation
    ... Gold Fix to facilitate Defendants' agreement to manipulate and fix gold prices and the prices of Gold Investments during the Settlement Class Period.
  68. [68]
    In re Commodity Exchange, Inc. Gold Futures and Options Trading ...
    Berger Montague served as co-lead counsel and obtained $152 million in this lawsuit alleging five banks participated in price-fixing gold.
  69. [69]
    The New LBMA Gold Price successfully launched on 20th March 2015
    On 20 March, the morning and afternoon gold price auctions settled at $1,171.75 and $1,183.10 respectively, with the aggregate interest in the rounds across ...
  70. [70]
    ICE Benchmark Administration to Administer the LBMA Gold Price ...
    The new LBMA Gold Price, which replaces the long established London Gold Fix, is expected to be launched in March 2015.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] LBMA GOLD PRICE – CONSULTATION Introduction ICE ...
    - Introducing a new electronic auction process for the LBMA Gold Price with increased participation. Using ICE's trading technology – WebICE – all ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] ice benchmark administration lbma gold price – iosco assessment ...
    The LBMA Gold Price is one of the eight Specified Benchmarks regulated by the. Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and therefore IBA is required to comply with ...
  73. [73]
    ICE Benchmark Administration to ... - Intercontinental Exchange
    Jul 14, 2017 · “The decision by the LBMA membership reflects our commitment and investment in making the LBMA Gold Price IOSCO compliant over the last two ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Evaluation Paper 18/2: the impact of bringing additional benchmarks ...
    LBMA Gold and Silver Price to hedge exposures to gold and silver price fluctuations, and provide a reference price in trading activities and financial products,.
  75. [75]
    (PDF) Fixing the Fix for Silver and Gold - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · This change in the price fixing process raises questions about whether manipulation was occurring prior to the fix change and whether any ...Missing: persistence | Show results with:persistence
  76. [76]
    11. Precious Metal Benchmarks - LBMA
    The LBMA Gold Price is set twice daily (at 10.30am and 3pm London time) in US dollars per fine troy ounce of 995 gold. The price formation for the gold auction ...
  77. [77]
    LBMA to start reporting OTC gold trade soon; exchange model seen ...
    Jun 24, 2015 · Currently no data is available for the bilateral OTC trades, leading to complaints of lack of transparency in the market. Crowell said while the ...