Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hadiya case

The Hadiya case, legally titled Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M., centered on the 2016 religious conversion and of Hadiya (born Akhila Asokan), a 24-year-old woman from , , who left her Hindu family to embrace and wed Muslim Shafin Jahan, prompting her parents to file a petition claiming brainwashing and abduction. The annulled the marriage in May 2017, deeming Hadiya susceptible to influence despite her adulthood, and remanded her to parental custody amid suspicions of organized . In a landmark 2018 ruling, the overturned the after Hadiya testified to her voluntary decisions, affirming that competent adults hold an inviolable right to select their faith and partner, provided no coercion or incapacity is proven, and dismissing broader conspiracy allegations following a probe that uncovered no evidence of or terror links. The proceedings highlighted tensions between individual autonomy and familial or societal oversight in inter-religious unions, with the Court prioritizing empirical assessment of consent over unsubstantiated fears of demographic shifts or indoctrination.

Background

Family and early life

Akhila Ashokan, who later adopted the name Hadiya following her , was born around 1992 or 1993 as the only child of Hindu parents in , , . Her father, K. M. Ashokan, was a retired armyman who had served as a driver in the , while her mother, Ponnamma, was a devout Hindu who maintained traditional religious practices in the household. The family resided in a middle-class setting in TV Puram near , where Akhila was raised in a conservative Hindu environment emphasizing adherence to cultural and religious norms, with no reported prior signs of dissatisfaction with her upbringing or faith. Early occurred locally in before she pursued higher studies outside the state at age 18, reflecting a typical trajectory for youth from similar families focused on professional qualifications within established societal frameworks.

Education and path to conversion

Akhila Asokan enrolled in August 2010 at Sivaraj Homoeopathic Medical College in , to pursue a five-year Bachelor of Homoeopathic Medicine and Surgery (BHMS) course. She initially resided in the college hostel before moving to a rented house shared with peers, including Jaseena and Faseena, daughters of a local resident named Aboobacker. During holidays, Asokan visited their family home, fostering interactions that exposed her to Islamic teachings and practices. These associations marked the beginning of Asokan's interest in , as she later described in affidavits being drawn to its principles through discussions with Muslim classmates. By late 2015, signs of shifting inclinations emerged; on December 6, 2015, following a member's death, she displayed reluctance to participate in Hindu rituals. This period coincided with a gradual withdrawal from ties, including reduced communication after January 5, 2016, and failure to return home amid reported health issues. On , 2016, Asokan appeared at wearing a pardah, signaling deeper engagement with Islamic customs, as reported by peers. Later that month, on January 20, 2016, she traveled from to in to reside at a facility associated with , further distancing herself from familial oversight while continuing her academic pursuits remotely.

Religious Conversion

Influences and process

Akhila Asokan initiated the formal process of converting to shortly after leaving her parental home on January 1, 2016, traveling to the residence of a friend in , . She then proceeded to the Therbiathul Islam Sabha, an Islamic study center in , to enroll in a course on , where she completed her conversion and adopted the name Hadiya. This step involved reciting the , the Islamic declaration of faith, marking her official entry into the religion. Post-conversion, Hadiya adopted visible markers of Islamic observance, including the , and ceased contact with her family, aligning herself with a new social and religious network. In a 26-page to the in February 2018, she detailed that her choice resulted from independent study of the and Islamic teachings, influenced by observations of Muslim peers' disciplined prayer routines and ethical conduct during her college years, without external pressure. She reiterated this voluntariness during in-camera interactions with the in January 2016 and justices in 2017, emphasizing personal conviction over familial or societal ties. Contrasting her account, her father alleged orchestration by the (PFI), an Islamist group later banned for terror links, asserting that PFI affiliates at centers like Therbiathul Sabha indoctrinated her through structured persuasion or coercion tactics, including extended isolation and ideological immersion. The NIA investigation, initiated by the in 2018, identified PFI members as facilitators in her relocation and conversion, citing patterns of organized recruitment akin to those in other cases, though it found no direct evidence of force and incorporated Hadiya's affirmation of . These claims highlight tensions between individual agency and institutional influence, with the ultimately prioritizing Hadiya's repeated court testimonies over investigative suspicions of .

Family opposition and initial legal actions

In December 2015, Hadiya's parents observed changes in her behavior during her grandfather's funeral rites, where she displayed reluctance to engage in Hindu rituals, raising initial concerns about her religious inclinations. On January 6, 2016, her father, K.M. Asokan, an ex-serviceman, discovered that Hadiya had adopted Islamic attire, including a pardah, and had expressed a desire to convert to ; she subsequently left home and did not return, prompting Asokan to file a complaint with the Malappuram district police superintendent. Asokan filed a petition (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 25 of 2016) in the on January 14, 2016, alleging that his 24-year-old daughter Akhila Asokan (later Hadiya) was being illegally confined and potentially brainwashed by radical influences. The family contended that her actions were not voluntary but resulted from or , reflecting broader parental fears of systematic religious indoctrination targeting young women. On January 19, 2016, Hadiya appeared before the , where she affirmed her voluntary in November 2015—undertaken after self-study and interactions that convinced her of its tenets—and expressed her intent to reside independently at Satyasarani, a women-only hostel in . Despite her testimony, her parents questioned the authenticity of her statements, suspecting external manipulation and ; they alleged risks of her being transported abroad, potentially to join groups like , as part of a larger pattern of forced conversions. The , after verifying her presence and volition, disposed of the petition on January 25, 2016, ruling she was not under illegal detention, though family opposition persisted through subsequent filings.

Marriage

Circumstances of the marriage

Hadiya, formerly known as Akhila Asokan, solemnized her marriage to Shafin Jahan, a Muslim man from , on December 19, 2016, through a nikah ceremony conducted according to . The union took place in amid ongoing proceedings related to her custody and conversion, with Hadiya appearing before the court two days later on December 21 to affirm the marriage. Shafin Jahan, who had no prior personal acquaintance with Hadiya beyond a brief meeting on November 30, 2016, was selected as a match based on criteria she specified through intermediaries, characterizing the marriage as arranged rather than stemming from a relationship. The marriage proceeded without the knowledge or consent of Hadiya's family, who learned of it shortly after and immediately raised suspicions of orchestration by Islamist organizations involved in her conversion. Hadiya's father, K.M. Asokan, filed a petition in the on December 22, 2016, alleging that the union was deceptive and part of a broader scheme to radicalize her. Investigations later highlighted the absence of family involvement and the rapid progression from Hadiya's brief interaction with Jahan to the nikah, fueling claims that external influences facilitated the event without independent verification of voluntariness at the time.

Immediate aftermath and annulment attempts

Following Hadiya's marriage to Shafin Jahan on December 22, 2016, her parents escalated their concerns by filing a in the on December 23, alleging that their daughter had been manipulated by Islamist organizations into the union and was not acting of her own . The petition specifically referenced connections to the (PFI), claiming the marriage formed part of a broader network aimed at converting Hindu women through deception and coercion. National media outlets rapidly amplified the case, often portraying it through the lens of ""—a advanced by Hindu nationalist groups asserting organized efforts by Muslim men to lure and convert non-Muslim women via romantic relationships. Coverage highlighted Hadiya's prior disappearance and conversion, with some reports questioning her autonomy and suggesting external radical influences despite her affirmations of . Hadiya appeared before the on December 21, 2016—prior to the formal marriage registration—and later on January 2, 2017, where she testified that her and decision to marry Jahan were voluntary, prompting an initial court dismissal of the petition on January 25, 2017, on grounds of voluntary action. However, the court voiced skepticism regarding potential indoctrination, noting the involvement of individuals linked to other alleged incidents, which fueled ongoing efforts by the family. In the ensuing months leading to formal proceedings, Hadiya remained with Jahan, but familial pressure and court scrutiny effectively isolated the couple from unrestricted , as the monitored the situation amid claims of psychological vulnerability and external pressures. The parents' persistent arguments centered on Hadiya's alleged inability to resist organized tactics, setting the stage for intensified legal challenges without immediate separation orders.

Legal Proceedings

Kerala High Court involvement

In January 2017, Hadiya's father, K.M. Asokan, filed a habeas corpus petition in the Kerala High Court, alleging that his 24-year-old daughter was missing, coerced into conversion and marriage, and possibly subjected to radical influences. The court issued notices to Hadiya and her husband, Shafin Jahan; when Hadiya appeared before the single judge bench of Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque, she affirmed her voluntary conversion to Islam and marriage, stating she was not under duress. However, the court expressed skepticism regarding her agency, questioning the authenticity of her statements amid reports of external influences and directing further inquiry. The adopted an investigative stance, appointing a team including the Kattakada police to probe the circumstances of Hadiya's and , examining potential from organizations like the . Hearings continued over several months, with the court reviewing Hadiya's interactions, family testimonies, and preliminary findings that suggested grooming or rather than independent choice. On May 24, 2017, the court annulled the under Section 25 of the Special Marriage Act, deeming it a "" and nullity due to Hadiya's perceived vulnerability to manipulation. In its judgment, the court characterized Hadiya as a "swooning ," arguing that at age 24, she remained susceptible to exaggerated notions of devotion and external , rendering her invalid despite her adulthood. Custody was granted to her parents, with directions for her and continued monitoring to prevent further influence, prioritizing familial protection over individual in light of suspected psychological control. This approach reflected the court's emphasis on evidentiary scrutiny of interfaith unions amid allegations of proselytization, though it drew criticism for paternalistic overreach in assessing adult competence.

Supreme Court hearings and observations

Shafin Jahan filed a special leave petition in the in July 2017 challenging the High Court's May 8, 2017, order that annulled his marriage to Hadiya and declared her a victim of manipulation. The case was assigned to a Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice , with Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud. On November 27, 2017, Hadiya was produced before the as directed in an earlier order, where she testified in open court that her and marriage to Jahan were acts of her own volition, without . She expressed a desire for personal freedom, stating she had been in unlawful custody for 11 months and wished to reunite with her husband. Following her testimony, the bench ordered her release from her parents' custody and permitted her to reside with Jahan pending further hearings. Chief Justice Misra remarked during the proceedings that the case presented unprecedented complexity, describing it as "the most complex case I have seen in my life" and a unique challenge unlike typical matters. The bench framed core issues around the of competent adults in matters of faith and marriage against potential state intervention to safeguard against radicalization or . Hearings extended over multiple sessions, incorporating arguments on , the limits of judicial in interfaith unions, and the of investigative agencies in probing external influences.

Supreme Court verdict

On March 8, 2018, a three-judge bench of the , comprising Chief Justice and Justices A. M. Khanwilkar and D. Y. Chandrachud, issued an interim order setting aside the Kerala High Court's annulment of Hadiya's to Shafin Jahan, restoring the union pending final adjudication. The full , delivered on April 9, 2018, upheld Hadiya's autonomy as a 24-year-old adult to convert to and marry, emphasizing that her decisions were voluntary based on her repeated affirmations in court. The majority opinion ruled that the right to choose one's spouse and religion constitutes an integral facet of Article 21's guarantee of life and personal liberty, rejecting the High Court's exercise of jurisdiction over a competent as an impermissible paternalistic intrusion. The Court found no substantive evidence of coercion, fraud, or undue influence compelling Hadiya's actions, deeming the High Court's speculative concerns about her vulnerability insufficient to override her expressed will. While permitting the continuation of the National Investigation Agency's probe into potential influences, the bench clarified that such inquiries could not retroactively invalidate a consensual absent proof of criminality. In a , Chandrachud reinforced individual autonomy as foundational to constitutional freedoms, critiquing the High Court's overreach in assessing the suitability of Hadiya's husband and treating her as requiring perpetual guardianship, akin to . He acknowledged societal risks of and in conversions but stressed that without of vitiating factors like duress, courts must defer to the adult's to shape her life trajectory. The verdict thus prioritized empirical assessment of consent over presumptive familial or judicial skepticism.

Investigations and Allegations

NIA probe into radicalization

The , on August 16, 2017, ordered the (NIA) to probe the Hadiya case for potential involvement in a broader conspiracy of and orchestrated conversions, directing the inquiry to be supervised initially by a retired apex court judge. The NIA's mandate extended to examining patterns of interfaith marriages in , including possible links to extremist networks, amid allegations of systematic inducement beyond individual choice. The investigation uncovered communications indicating Shafin Jahan's prior contacts with two individuals chargesheeted in ISIS-related cases, Manseed and P. Safvan, who were accused in the 2016 Omar Mahroof disappearance plot involving radical recruitment. NIA sleuths also scrutinized affiliations with the (PFI), an Islamist organization later banned in 2022 for terror financing and jihadist activities, noting Shafin Jahan's and his mother Zainaba's membership in PFI fronts. The probe included forensic analysis of digital trails, such as exchanges, to assess exposure to radical ideologies, though Hadiya's recorded statement to NIA affirmed her voluntary conversion and marriage without coercion. While no terror charges were directly leveled against Hadiya or Shafin Jahan, the NIA's findings highlighted organized networks facilitating conversions, including training sessions at Islamic centers in Kerala that promoted Wahhabi-influenced doctrines potentially conducive to radicalization. The agency documented over 100 similar interfaith unions under review, suggesting coordinated efforts by PFI-linked groups to target vulnerable individuals, though it stopped short of confirming ISIS operational involvement in Hadiya's specific case. The Supreme Court permitted the probe to continue independently post its 2018 marriage validation verdict, emphasizing the need to dismantle any underlying radicalization infrastructure.

Evidence of external influences

The (NIA) investigation into Hadiya's conversion revealed links to the (PFI), an organization suspected of orchestrating conversions through structured . Specifically, four individuals associated with PFI were identified as having influenced Hadiya's decision to convert, including her stay at a PFI-affiliated center in where recruitment activities were alleged to occur. The NIA reported evidence of a PFI-run facility employing and prolonged counseling sessions to condition converts, drawing parallels to tactics used in Hadiya's case. Witness accounts from associates highlighted coordinated efforts beyond individual choice. Hadiya's during her period, Zainaba—a PFI member—was interrogated by the NIA for over two hours regarding the process, with investigators probing potential grooming through religious classes and isolation from . Communications , including exchanges, were examined by the NIA to trace influences, particularly involving figures linked to overseas radical networks, though specific content details remained under review. The agency described a "well-oiled machinery" in facilitating such , supported by preliminary evidence of Hadiya's exposure to propaganda materials and group sessions prior to her and marriage. Patterns emerged when comparing Hadiya's circumstances to at least 89 other reported interfaith conversions in forwarded to the NIA, many involving PFI or its affiliate SDPI in recruitment and relocation to training centers. These cases shared common elements, such as young Hindu women attending PFI-linked seminars or staying at affiliated hostels, followed by abrupt conversions without parental notification, indicating organized external facilitation rather than isolated personal decisions. Despite these findings, the NIA's probe into aspects concluded without substantiating forced elements in Hadiya's specifically.

Controversies

Love Jihad and forced conversion claims

In the Hadiya case, Akhila Asokan's parents alleged that her conversion to Islam and marriage to Shafin Jahan in December 2016 were outcomes of a deliberate indoctrination process orchestrated by Islamist networks, fitting the pattern of "love jihad"—a term describing purported organized efforts by Muslim men to lure and convert Hindu women through romantic relationships for demographic and ideological gains. They cited her sudden adoption of strict Islamic practices, severance of family ties, and isolation as evidence of coercion rather than voluntary choice, noting that prior to 2016, she showed no signs of religious radicalization. Hindu organizations, including the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), echoed these claims, arguing that Hadiya's behavioral shifts—such as abandoning Hindu rituals and embracing purdah—indicated grooming by radical elements linked to groups like the Popular Front of India (PFI). Investigations into Kerala interfaith marriages, including Hadiya's, uncovered indicators of structured operations. The (NIA), tasked by the in August 2017 to probe 90 such cases reported by , identified a common female mentor associated with PFI who persuaded Hindu women to convert, suggesting coordinated recruitment rather than isolated romances. Further, NIA findings revealed PFI-operated centers employing and techniques on converts, including women targeted in alleged scenarios, to enforce ideological post-conversion. These modules reportedly involved intermediaries facilitating meetings and marriages, as in Hadiya's case where the originated through a known contact in August 2016, aligning with patterns in other instances. Proponents of the narrative, drawing from these probes, frame such activities as part of a broader strategy for demographic engineering in , where interfaith unions purportedly accelerate through higher fertility incentives tied to conversions. In , with its history of communal tensions, families and right-leaning analysts pointed to rising conversion-marriage cases—numbering in dozens annually—as eroding Hindu majorities in border districts, supported by police data on elopements involving external handlers. Hadiya's family specifically highlighted her pre-conversion exposure to Islamist literature and peers at , correlating with her rapid , as corroborative of systemic targeting rather than personal agency.

Autonomy and adult rights arguments

Hadiya, appearing before the multiple times during hearings from November 2017 to March 2018, consistently affirmed that her in May 2016 and subsequent marriage to Shafin Jahan on December 20, 2016, were acts of her own , without or external pressure. She expressed a desire for independence from her parents' custody, stating she had been unlawfully detained for over 11 months following the Kerala High Court's annulment of her marriage on May 8, 2017. In its March 8, 2018, verdict in Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M., the Supreme Court emphasized that Hadiya, as a 24-year-old adult, possessed absolute autonomy over her personal decisions, including choice of religion and spouse, which are protected under Articles 21 and 25 of the Indian Constitution. The Court ruled that neither parents, society, nor the state could override an adult's fundamental right to privacy and self-determination in matters of marriage and faith, rejecting arguments portraying her as vulnerable despite her explicit affirmations of consent. This stance aligned with liberal interpretations prioritizing individual liberty over familial or communal objections, with the bench noting that consent remains paramount in marital validity. Advocates for critiqued interventions in the Hadiya case as undue interference, arguing that parental claims of guardianship undermine women's post-majority. Activists and commentators from progressive circles hailed the Supreme Court's decision as a safeguard against patriarchal overreach, asserting that adult women should not require judicial validation for personal choices absent proven incapacity. Regarding "love jihad" allegations central to the case, proponents of Hadiya's autonomy dismissed them as a driven by majoritarian anxieties rather than empirical substantiation, pointing to the absence of large-scale data confirming organized coercive conversions through in or nationwide. Such views, often articulated in left-leaning outlets skeptical of Hindu nationalist claims, contended that the lacks verifiable patterns of systemic targeting, framing it instead as a tool to stigmatize interfaith unions and erode under the guise of protection. The Court's dismissal of evidence in Hadiya's instance reinforced this perspective by upholding her without endorsing broader conspiracy claims.

Judicial overreach debates

The Kerala High Court's of Hadiya's on May 24, 2017, drew sharp criticism for exemplifying judicial overreach through patriarchal assumptions that undermined an adult woman's capacity for . The court characterized Hadiya, aged 24, as "weak and vulnerable," invoking jurisdiction to prioritize parental custody despite her expressed volition, a move later deemed by the as an erroneous expansion of powers into personal autonomy. This intervention was faulted for treating the woman as a "" under familial control, contravening constitutional guarantees of under Article 21, which encompasses choices in religion and partnership without state or judicial . Opposing critiques targeted the Supreme Court's April 9, 2018, restoration of the marriage, arguing it constituted overreach by sidelining (NIA) evidence of potential radicalization and organized inducement in the process. The NIA's probe, initiated on August 10, 2017, uncovered patterns suggestive of "psychological " across nearly 90 similar cases involving vulnerable individuals drawn into interfaith unions potentially linked to Islamist networks, yet the Court upheld the marriage while permitting only tangential criminal scrutiny, prioritizing over contextual risks. Procedural elements, such as the bench's in-camera interaction with Hadiya on November 27, 2017, were seen by some as prejudging outcomes and eroding the impartiality of the supervised NIA inquiry, fostering perceptions of selective evidence weighting. These contentions underscore broader judicial tensions in interfaith marriages, where assertions of adult clash with imperatives to probe external manipulations amid rising concerns over anti-conversion statutes and . While the Court's emphasis on individual agency reinforced barriers against familial vetoes, detractors contended it diluted scrutiny of systemic influences, potentially normalizing conversions tied to ideological agendas without robust evidentiary safeguards. Such debates illustrate the judiciary's challenge in calibrating intervention to avert both undue erosion and overlooked harms from , influencing precedents on personal laws versus public order.

Aftermath

Post-verdict marital status

On March 8, 2018, the restored Hadiya's marriage to Shafin Jahan, declaring it valid and setting aside the High Court's annulment, thereby allowing her to live independently with her . Hadiya subsequently moved to Jahan's residence in , , marking the immediate restoration of their cohabitation following over a year of separation enforced by prior court orders. Hadiya expressed relief post-verdict, stating in interviews that the ruling granted her freedom and that the legal battles stemmed from her , while affirming her choice to remain married to Jahan. The couple's public appearances together were minimal, with Hadiya focusing on resuming normal life, including professional pursuits in . Later, Hadiya initiated proceedings against Jahan, citing personal reasons, though specific details were not publicly elaborated. The dissolution occurred without extensive commentary from either , reflecting their preference for privacy in subsequent personal matters.

Recent developments and family concerns

In December 2023, Hadiya's father, K. M. Asokan, filed a petition in the , alleging that his daughter had been untraceable for about one and a half months and was potentially held in illegal custody by members of a banned , raising fears of continued external influence. The petition echoed long-standing family apprehensions about , including past claims of through methods like sessions at religious centers, though no new (NIA) findings were cited in the filing. On December 15, 2023, the closed the petition after Hadiya appeared in person, confirming she was safe, voluntarily living with her second husband—having divorced Shafin Jahan—and not under duress or illegal confinement. She denied her father's claims, asserting her autonomy and accusing him of being influenced by external political actors. Asokan maintained his concerns, describing the situation as a persistent loss of contact and potential risks from radical elements, including historical fears of trafficking networks linked to conflict zones like , though these remained unsubstantiated in recent proceedings. Hadiya has since adopted a low-profile existence, working as a homeopathic doctor in while estranged from her family, with no public reconciliation reported as of 2024. The estrangement underscores ongoing parental worries about her vulnerability to coercive influences, despite court affirmations of her agency, amid a backdrop of closed NIA probes finding no evidence of organized in the original case.

References

  1. [1]
    Judgment in Plain English - Supreme Court Observer
    On May 24th 2017, Justices Surendra Mohan Kuriakose and Abraham Mathew of the Kerala High Court annulled Hadiya's marriage to Mr. Shafin Jahan. The Kerala High ...
  2. [2]
    Hadiya Marriage Case - Supreme Court Observer
    Oct 25, 2021 · Shafin Jahan v Ashokan K.M. The Court assessed the allegation that Hadiya was deceived into marrying her husband Mr. Shafin Jahan and forcibly ...
  3. [3]
    From Akhila to Hadiya: What exactly is the controversial marriage ...
    Aug 19, 2017 · The case history​​ Born to Hindu parents in Vaikkom in Kottayam district, Akhila joined a college in Salem to pursue Bachelor of Homeopathic ...Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing
  4. [4]
    Hadiya case: A timeline | India News - The Indian Express
    Mar 8, 2018 · August 2010: Akhila, the only daughter of K M Ashokan, applied for admission to a private institute, Sivaraj Homeopathy Medical College & ...Missing: early life details<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    The Year of Love Jihad in India | The New Yorker
    Dec 31, 2017 · Her father, K. M. Ashokan, was an ex-military man; her mother, Ponnamma, a practicing Hindu. In Salem, Akhila studied homeopathy, boarding with ...Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing
  6. [6]
    Ground report: How Akhila became Hadiya – and why her case has ...
    Aug 30, 2017 · Her father, Ashokan Mani, worked as a driver in the Central Reserve Police Force until he retired. Akhila's mother, Ponnamma, is a devout Hindu ...Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing
  7. [7]
    Is it love, jihad or something else in Kerala? Here is the story of ...
    Oct 9, 2017 · She was born to KM Ashokan, a retired Armyman and Ponnamma of TV Puram in Kerala's Kottayam district. According to reports, Akhila's mother ...Missing: family upbringing<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Who is Hadiya? - The Hindu
    Oct 14, 2017 · Hadiya is with her parents at TV Puram, near Vaikom, in Kerala. It is not clear why she converted to Islam or got married to Mr. Jehan, but ...Missing: Ashokan background upbringing
  9. [9]
    Hadiya in Salem college to resume her internship | Coimbatore News
    Nov 29, 2017 · ... Hadiya submitted a letter written in English and signed it as Akhila Ashokan. ... Hadiya enrolled in the college in 2010 for the five-year course.Missing: Asokan | Show results with:Asokan
  10. [10]
    [PDF] reportable - Supreme Court Observer
    Mar 8, 2018 · The judgment and order passed by the. High Court is set aside. Respondent No.9, Hadiya alias Akhila Asokan is at liberty to pursue her future ...
  11. [11]
    'I embraced Islam and married Shafin Jahan of my own will,' Hadiya ...
    Feb 20, 2018 · In her 26-page affidavit in the apex court, Hadiya gave details on how she got influenced by teaching of Islam and got converted. 1x1 polls. She ...
  12. [12]
    How Akhila became Hadiya - The Hindu
    Oct 30, 2017 · On January 1, 2016, she left for the residence of one of her friends at Perinthalmanna in Malappuram district. A few days later she appeared ...
  13. [13]
    I converted to Islam of my own will, want to live with husband Shafin
    Feb 21, 2018 · In an affidavit filed on Tuesday in the Supreme Court, Kerala Muslim convert Hadiya said that she embraced Islam of her own free will and wants to continue to ...
  14. [14]
    NIA report includes Hadiya statement that she wed of her own will
    Nov 25, 2017 · “She has said that she married Jahan of her own free will and decided to convert voluntarily,” a top government source told The Indian Express.
  15. [15]
    How Courts Have Treated the Hadiya Case | CJP
    The father of the detenue alleged that Hadiya's conversion was not only overtly propagated and conducted by radical Muslim organisations such as the Popular ...
  16. [16]
    PFI-run centre used hypnosis on converts in 'love-jihad' cases: NIA
    Mar 11, 2018 · Persons converted or attempted to be converted allegedly by PFI activists were sent to the Sathyasarini Islamic learning centre for a two-month ...
  17. [17]
    Kerala love jihad: NIA finds four PFI links between Athira & Hadiya ...
    Oct 6, 2017 · Four men, suspected to be associated with the People's Front of India, forced Kerala resident Akhila Asokan to convert and take the name Hadiya.
  18. [18]
    Kerala 'Love Jihad': It is the most complex case I have seen in my life ...
    Nov 28, 2017 · Ashokan KM, Hadiya's father, had alleged that there was a “well-oiled systematic mechanism” for conversion and Islamic radicalisation.Missing: family radicalization
  19. [19]
    The Truth about Love Jihad - Open The Magazine
    Nov 15, 2017 · In the Akhila Asokan case, the father of the converted girl has said that he suspects love jihad may be the latest method of recruitment by ISIS ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Hadiya, Shafin Jahan after being reunited: 'We want to show society ...
    Mar 13, 2018 · While the case was being heard, Hadiya married Shafin Jahan on December 19, 2016. Two days later, the High Court sent her to a hostel. Six ...
  21. [21]
    Hadiya : A Scapegoat of Islamophobia And Patriarchy
    Dec 7, 2017 · The case of Hadiya , a 25-year-old adult woman (who of her own free will converted to Islam in 2013 and married Shafin Jahan in Dec'2016) ...Missing: path interactions classmates
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Shafin Jahan vs. Asokan K.M. and Ors. (09.04.2018 - SC) - CLPR
    Dec 6, 2024 · Facts: The Respondent had a habeas corpus petition before the High Court with the apprehension that his daughter was likely to be transported ...
  23. [23]
    Hadiya Case - Key highlights - iPleaders
    Dec 4, 2017 · Her conversion was greatly influenced by an unauthorised Islamic Conversion Centre, which also happens to be a banned radical organisation. In ...
  24. [24]
    The Akhila/Hadiya arranged marriage jihad: A judicial satire
    Aug 30, 2017 · Akhila Asokan alias Hadiya: A 24-year-old woman and a graduate in Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery (also referred to as 'child', 'ordinary girl ...Missing: upbringing | Show results with:upbringing
  25. [25]
    SC directive to NIA brings Kerala 'love jihad' case… - inkl
    2016; Dec 19: Akhila Ashokan alias Hadiya and Sefin Jehan get married. Dec 22: Haduya's father moves Kerala high court. ... Aug 16 ... Shafin Jahan, a Muslim man ...
  26. [26]
    #8 Hadiya Marriage Case - Supreme Court Observer
    KM Ashokan, Hadiya's father alleged before the Court (Kerala High Court & Supreme Court) that Hadiya was indoctrinated to convert to Islam and her marriage to ...
  27. [27]
    Hadiya case: Supreme Court says consent is prime in marriage
    Oct 30, 2017 · Hadiya case: Supreme Court says consent is prime in marriage. Hindu groups accuse Hadiya, who converted and married to a Muslim man, a victim of ...
  28. [28]
    Viewpoint: India court disregards woman's right to choose husband
    Dec 11, 2017 · This is the background in which the controversy over the marriage of Hadiya and Shafin Jahan is set. Ms Jahan, 24, was born a Hindu and ...
  29. [29]
    Hadiya's Marriage Restored By Supreme Court, High Court Decision ...
    Mar 8, 2018 · His fresh appeal was in response to Hadiya telling the court last month that she converted to Islam of her own accord and wants to live her life ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Recalling the case of Kerala's Hadiya, whose religious conversion ...
    Dec 9, 2023 · Hadiya attempted to persuade her parents to convert but after their refusal, she left home in 2016 and began living with a friend.
  31. [31]
    Kerala 'love jihad' case: All you need to know - Times of India
    Nov 27, 2017 · *The Kerala high court gave Hadiya's father KM Asokan her legal custody after the annulment of the marriage. *The husband, Jahan, then ...
  32. [32]
    Supreme Court sets aside Kerala HC order annulling Hadiya's ...
    Mar 8, 2018 · The Supreme Court on Thursday set aside a Kerala High Court order annulling the marriage of Hadiya to Shafin Jahan, whom she had married after converting to ...Missing: judgment | Show results with:judgment<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)
    25 of 2016 wherein he alleged that the. Detenue has been converted to Islam against her free will by her two friends and their father and leveled baseless ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    I Want to See My Husband, I Want To Be Free, Hadiya Told ... - NDTV
    Nov 27, 2017 · Kerala woman Hadiya, 25, was released from her parents' custody today after she told the Supreme Court that she had converted to Islam and married a Muslim man ...
  35. [35]
    CJI On Hadiya Case: Very Complex; Coming Across Such A Case ...
    Nov 27, 2017 · “How did the gender issue come in here”, asked the CJI, Dipak Misra, expressing his surprise. Many counsel then cautioned the bench that Hadiya ...Missing: comments | Show results with:comments
  36. [36]
    Day 8 Arguments - Supreme Court Observer
    Feb 22, 2018 · Today, the hearings began with CJI Dipak Misra making it clear that Hadiya had made her wishes known and expressed her views in open court. The ...Missing: complexity | Show results with:complexity
  37. [37]
    'Right To Change Of Faith Is Part Of Fundamental Right Of Choice ...
    Apr 9, 2018 · Justice Chandrachud rightly asserted that "how Hadiya chooses to lead her life is entirely a matter of her choice" and opined that the High ...
  38. [38]
    Right to marry person of one's choice is integral to right to life & liberty
    Apr 10, 2018 · “The right to marry a person of one's choice is integral to Article 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Constitution”, the Supreme Court said ...
  39. [39]
    SC orders NIA probe into Hadiya case - Onmanorama
    Aug 16, 2017 · New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday directed an National Investigation Agency (NIA) probe under the supervision of a retired apex court ...
  40. [40]
    Hadiya Case: Supreme Court orders NIA probe to see if it is a case ...
    Aug 16, 2017 · The Court directed NIA to look into the matter in order to facilitate the Court in determining the extent of the ramifications of the issue and ...
  41. [41]
    3 months after Kerala HC annulled marriage, SC orders NIA probe
    Aug 16, 2017 · The Supreme Court has asked the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to investigate the case of Hadiya (born Akhila), a woman from Kerala, ...Missing: radicalization | Show results with:radicalization
  42. [42]
    Hadiya's 'husband' was in touch with IS men before their marriage: NIA
    Dec 4, 2017 · Shafin Jahan, husband of Hadiya, was allegedly in touch with two key chargesheeted accused in the terror group Islamic State Omar al-Hindi case.Missing: family | Show results with:family
  43. [43]
    PFI ban: What is Popular Front of India and why has India outlawed it?
    Sep 27, 2022 · Indian authorities have accused PFI members of having links with terror groups - a charge they deny ... (ISIS). "The PFI and its associates or ...
  44. [44]
    Hadiya case: NIA breaks new ground by questioning couple over ...
    Feb 3, 2019 · In 2016, Ms. Hadiya's father had moved the Kerala High Court alleging that she was radicalised and forcibly married to a Muslim man. The ...
  45. [45]
    Hadiya Husband had Connections with ISIS People Before Marriage
    Dec 5, 2017 · As per the findings of the NIA Hadiya Husband Shafin Jahan was in ... NIA: Hadiya Husband had Connections with ISIS People Before Marriage.
  46. [46]
    NIA ends Kerala probe, says there's love but no jihad
    Oct 17, 2018 · The National Investigation Agency's (NIA) “examination” of interfaith marriages in Kerala has not unearthed any evidence of coercion that can result in ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  47. [47]
    NIA Grills Kerala's 'Conversion Queen' Zainaba On Hadiya Case For ...
    Jan 9, 2018 · Hadiya's guardian, Zainaba, of the Popular Front of India (PFI) spoke to the National Investigating Agency (NIA) for two hours about the ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  48. [48]
    Hadiya case: NIA files status report of probe in SC - Onmanorama
    Nov 23, 2017 · The NIA had earlier alleged in the court that there was a 'well-oiled machinery working in Kerala' indulging in indoctrination and ...
  49. [49]
    NIA: Have proof of Hadiya brainwash - Times of India
    Mar 9, 2018 · India News: The National Investigation Agency (NIA) informed the Supreme Court on Thursday that it has gathered evidence indicating that ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  50. [50]
    Love Jihad: Kerala sent list of 90 cases of `forced' conversions to NIA
    Oct 16, 2017 · Significantly, `radical' Muslim outfit Popular Front of India and its political arm Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) have emerged as a ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  51. [51]
    Mohabbat Zindabad! It was love, no Jihad, says NIA in Hadiya Case
    Oct 18, 2018 · The National Investigation Agency (NIA) probe into interfaith marriages in Kerala came to an end, and no evidence of coercion was found in ...
  52. [52]
    The Hadiya case and the myth of 'Love Jihad' in India - Al Jazeera
    Aug 24, 2017 · Shafin Jahan approached India's Supreme Court after his marriage to ... In December last year, she chose to marry Jahan, a Muslim man.
  53. [53]
    NIA finds a common mentor in Kerala 'love jihad' cases - Times of India
    Aug 28, 2017 · The “mentor” who persuaded Hindu girls to embrace Islam is a woman associated with the radical group Popular Front of India (PFI).Missing: organized | Show results with:organized
  54. [54]
    Kerala reported 90 'love jihad' cases for NIA probe - Times of India
    Oct 11, 2017 · It furnished a list of around 90 cases of “forced” conversions and alleged luring of women into inter-faith relationships including marriage to the central ...Missing: organized modules
  55. [55]
    https://ndtv.com/india-news/in-keralas-love-jihad-case-nia-widens-net-to-probe-90-inter-faith-marriages-1761334
  56. [56]
    Love Jihad and Demographic Fears - Mohan Rao, 2011
    Sep 30, 2011 · He argued that only those whose reli-gion emanated in India could be Indian citizens, thus marking Christians, Muslims, Parsees and Jews as 'outsiders'.
  57. [57]
    NIA seeks details on 'forced conversions' - The Hindu
    Sep 11, 2017 · It was at this Islamic centre that Akhila Asokan alias Hadiya, a 25-year-old Hindu girl, converted to Islam and later married a Muslim man. Her ...Missing: Therbiathul | Show results with:Therbiathul
  58. [58]
    https://www.thecompanion.in/hadiya-scapegoat-islamophobia-patriarchy
  59. [59]
    No role of state, society in individual's choice: SC order on Hadiya ...
    Apr 9, 2018 · The SC also said that Hadiya was neither a child nor a vulnerable adult, as argued by her father. “She has absolute autonomy over her person.
  60. [60]
    INDIA: Supreme Court agrees Hadiya has the right to choice, not her ...
    Nov 28, 2017 · INDIA: Supreme Court agrees Hadiya has the right to choice, not her parents - Asian Human Rights Commission.Missing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
  61. [61]
    Hadiya case: It took Supreme Court to rule that adult Indians can ...
    Mar 8, 2018 · The Supreme Court judgment that Hadiya, the 24-year-old Kerala resident at the centre of an alleged “love jihad” row, was free to live with her husband Shafin ...
  62. [62]
    'Yes, an adult has the right to choose': Activists thank SC on Hadiya ...
    Jan 23, 2018 · A number of activists and writers welcomed the Supreme Court's observations, which allowed Hadiya to decide on her marriage.
  63. [63]
    Hadiya's Choices | The Indian Express
    Nov 30, 2017 · Question to SC: Does an adult woman not have a right to privacy and autonomy? Hadiya: SC adjourns hearing till March 8, questions Kerala HC's ...
  64. [64]
    The Hindu Nationalist Myth of Love Jihad | Foreign Affairs
    Dec 23, 2020 · Right-wing Hindu groups in India have conjured the specter of a “love jihad” among Muslim men: a campaign to court Hindu women with the intention of converting ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  65. [65]
    “New” Muslim Women and the Myth of “Love Jihad”: From Victims to ...
    This paper seeks to untangle the intertwined nature of securitization and gendered Islamophobia through the prism of the newly enacted anti-conversion law in ...
  66. [66]
    Hadiya's marriage restored, Supreme Court says no love jihad
    Mar 8, 2018 · The Supreme Court ordered an NIA probe into the matter to ascertain if there was any terror angle in the conversion of Hadiya and her marriage ...Missing: statements | Show results with:statements
  67. [67]
    Supreme Court explains how annulling Hadiya's marriage ... - Scroll.in
    Apr 10, 2018 · Supreme Court explains how annulling Hadiya's marriage was illegal and 'patriarchal autocracy'. In its full judgment in the matter, the apex ...
  68. [68]
    Hadiya Case : Beyond the Verdict - Organiser
    Mar 19, 2018 · Supreme Court of India, by its order dated March 8, 2018, allowed an appeal filed by Shafin Jahan against the Kerala High Court?s Division ...
  69. [69]
    SC's Unusual Direction In Hadiya Case Triggers Concerns Of ...
    Aug 16, 2017 · If the bench is not likely to believe Hadiya, then there is no point in meeting her at the last stage; if she prevails on the bench, then it ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  70. [70]
    "We Feel We Have Got Freedom": Hadiya After Court Upholds Her ...
    Mar 10, 2018 · The top court on March 8, set aside an order of the Kerala High Court that annulled their marriage. Hadiya, 24, earlier Akhila Ashokan, embraced ...
  71. [71]
    Hadiya case: Supreme Court restores her marriage, sets aside ...
    Mar 8, 2018 · The Supreme Court on Thursday restored the marriage of Hadiya to Shafin Jahan and set aside a May 2017 order of the Kerala High Court that had annulled the ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  72. [72]
    Really happy, says Hadiya after SC restores her marriage with ...
    Mar 9, 2018 · The Supreme Court had on Thursday restored the marriage of Hadiya, who had converted to Islam and entered wedlock with a Muslim man, after ...
  73. [73]
    The Kerala Story: Why the southern state is debating the divorce and ...
    Dec 10, 2023 · Hindutva groups raised the love jihad bogey when homoeopathy doctor Akhila Ashokan converted to Islam and rechristened herself Hadiya to marry a Muslim man in ...Missing: Asokan influences
  74. [74]
    The Kerala Story: Hadiya remarries, alleges her father has made her ...
    Dec 11, 2023 · This time after she took divorce from Shafin Jahan and remarried. The exact reasons for the divorce are not known immediately though she ...
  75. [75]
    Hadiya Case: K M Ashokan: 'They snatched her away from us' - Rediff
    Dec 15, 2023 · Ashokan filed a habeas corpus petition in the Kerala high court in the first week of December, saying his daughter has been missing for one-and-a-half months.
  76. [76]
    New twist to Hadiya case: Father moves Kerala HC alleging her ...
    Dec 8, 2023 · The petitioner K M Asokan apprehends that his daughter was in the illegal custody of the respondents, who were members of a banned organization ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Hadiya divorces and marries again, father approaches court saying ...
    Dec 9, 2023 · Dr Hadiya – whose conversion to Islam and marriage to a Muslim in 2016 triggered a heated debate on love jihad in Kerala – has divorced him and married another ...
  78. [78]
    Hadiya father's petition closed - The Hindu
    Dec 15, 2023 · The Kerala High Court on Friday closed a habeas corpus petition filed by the father of Akhila alias Hadiya, who had converted to Islam and married a Muslim man.Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
  79. [79]
    Kerala High Court closes father's plea seeking whereabouts of ...
    Dec 15, 2023 · The Kerala High Court on Friday closed the habeas corpus petition filed by the father of Hadiya, whose conversion to Islam and marriage to a Muslim in 2016 had ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
  80. [80]
    Father manipulated by Sangh Parivar, says Hadiya, whose ...
    Dec 10, 2023 · Hadiya alleged that her father was a tool in the hands of the Sangh Parivar, which forced him to take this step.
  81. [81]
    Hadiya's father moves court again, this time alleging 'illegal detention'
    Dec 8, 2023 · Hadiya, 31, told a local TV channel in Thiruvananthapuram that she was 'safe and secure' and that her father's allegations were 'untrue.
  82. [82]
    Five years after apex court ruling, Hadiya lives in oblivion
    May 5, 2023 · Five years after a Supreme Court ruling restored Hadiya's right to embrace Islam and marry Shafin Jahan, she now lives as a homeopathic doctor ...