Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hexaxial reference system

The hexaxial reference system is a diagrammatic tool in (ECG) that represents the heart's electrical activity in the frontal plane through the six standard limb leads—I, II, III, aVR, aVL, and aVF—arranged radially at 30-degree intervals around a circle from -180° to +180°. It integrates leads (I, II, III) with augmented unipolar leads (aVR, aVL, aVF) to model the net direction and magnitude of ventricular vectors originating from cardiac myocytes. This system builds on , extending it into a hexagonal framework where each lead's positive points outward at specific angles—lead I at 0°, lead II at +60°, lead III at +120°, aVF at +90°, aVL at -30°, and aVR at -150°—allowing for precise angular plotting of electrical forces. Vectors aligned toward a lead's positive produce upright deflections on the ECG tracing, while those directed away yield inverted ones, facilitating estimation via methods like analysis (using leads I and aVF) or isoelectric lead identification. Clinically, the hexaxial reference system is essential for calculating the mean QRS axis, with normal values typically ranging from -30° to +90° (or up to +105° in some references), enabling detection of deviations such as left axis deviation (<-30°), right axis deviation (>+90°), or extreme axis deviation (-90° to -180°). These abnormalities can signal conditions like ventricular hypertrophy, conduction blocks, or pulmonary embolism, thus supporting differential diagnosis in cardiology.

Introduction

Definition and Overview

The hexaxial reference system is a diagrammatic tool in that represents the six limb leads—I, II, III, aVR, aVL, and aVF—in a 360-degree hexagonal format to visualize the heart's electrical activity in the frontal plane. This representation allows for a clear depiction of how these leads capture the directional components of cardiac and as projected onto the body's . At the core of the system is a central point symbolizing the origin of the heart's electrical activity, from which six primary axes radiate outward at 30-degree increments, corresponding to the positive poles of each limb lead (e.g., lead I at 0°, lead II at 60°). These axes form a circular framework that encompasses the full 360 degrees, providing a standardized geometric layout for reference. The hexaxial reference system functions as a static overlay for plotting mean electrical s in ECG , simplifying the alignment of cardiac signals with lead orientations to assess overall direction. By doing so, it streamlines the projection of complex cardiac vectors onto individual lead axes, which is essential for determining the heart's mean electrical axis in the frontal plane.

Role in Electrocardiography

The integrates seamlessly into the standard 12-lead (ECG) by providing a structured framework for interpreting the six limb leads (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, and aVF), which collectively assess the heart's electrical activity in the . This integration allows clinicians to isolate the vector of ventricular from the overall 12-lead recording, where the limb leads complement the precordial leads (V1-V6) that focus on the . By analyzing deflections—positive, negative, or equiphasic—in these limb leads, the system enables a targeted evaluation of the mean electrical without requiring additional equipment beyond the routine ECG setup. In clinical practice, the hexaxial reference system facilitates rapid visual correlation between the polarity of deflections in the limb leads and the orientation of the heart's electrical , streamlining the process during routine ECG readings. For instance, a predominantly positive deflection in lead I paired with positivity in lead aVF suggests a normal alignment, allowing interpreters to quickly map the cardiac vector's direction relative to the leads. This visual approach, often represented by a hexagonal , enhances efficiency in busy settings like emergency departments or outpatient clinics, where timely assessment informs diagnoses such as left or . As a foundational tool, the hexaxial reference system standardizes axis evaluation across interpreters, minimizing subjectivity in ECG reports by offering a consistent diagrammatic for lead relationships and vector projections. It supports both novice learners, who benefit from its intuitive layout for building foundational skills, and experienced cardiologists, who use it to confirm subtle deviations in complex cases, thereby promoting reliable clinical decision-making. This standardization has been integral to ECG and practice since the early , derived from foundational work on limb lead configurations.

Theoretical Foundations

Heart's Electrical Axis

The heart's mean electrical axis represents the average direction of ventricular in the frontal plane, conceptualized as a single resultant that summarizes the overall electrical activity during the . This arises from the sequential activation of myocardial cells, beginning at the and propagating through the ventricular walls from to epicardium. Physiological factors such as the orientation of and the heart's conduction pathways significantly influence the direction. The left ventricle's greater mass and the subendocardial Purkinje network direct predominantly inferiorly and to the left, resulting in a typical normal range of -30° to +90°. The reflects the net sum of all action potentials generated during the , providing a key indicator of underlying cardiac and function. Limb leads serve as the primary tools for measuring this in clinical .

Limb Leads Configuration

The limb leads in electrocardiography (ECG) are derived from four electrodes placed on the patient's limbs: the right arm (RA, white electrode), left arm (LA, black), left leg (LL, red), and right leg (RL, green, serving as a ground to reduce noise). These placements are standardized to ensure reproducibility, with electrodes positioned distal to the shoulders and hips, often at the wrists and ankles for practicality. The bipolar limb leads, designated I, II, and III, measure potential differences between pairs of these limb electrodes and form the basis of Einthoven's , a geometric model representing the heart's electrical activity in the frontal plane. Lead I records the voltage between the (positive) and (negative); lead II between the (positive) and (negative); and lead III between the (positive) and (negative). This configuration assumes the heart is centrally located within the triangle formed by the , , and electrodes, providing two independent vectors due to the mathematical relationship where lead II equals the sum of leads I and III (Einthoven's law). To enhance the sensitivity of unipolar recordings, the augmented limb leads—aVR, aVL, and aVF—are derived by measuring the voltage from one limb relative to Wilson's central terminal (WCT), an average reference point calculated as the potential of the RA, LA, and LL electrodes (WCT = (RA + LA + LL)/3). Specifically, aVR uses the RA as positive with the averaged LA and LL as negative; aVL uses the LA positive with averaged RA and LL negative; and aVF uses the LL positive with averaged RA and LA negative, resulting in a 50% augmentation compared to non-augmented unipolar leads. Together, these six limb leads (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF) comprehensively capture the heart's electrical activity in the frontal plane, forming the foundation for axis determination in the hexaxial reference system. Their configurations have been standardized since the early through guidelines from organizations such as the and the to promote consistent clinical interpretation.

Construction and Components

Derivation from Einthoven's Triangle

The hexaxial reference system traces its origins to Einthoven's seminal 1913 publication, in which he formalized the three bipolar limb leads—I from right arm to left arm (oriented at 0°), II from right arm to left leg (at 60°), and III from left arm to left leg (at 120°)—as forming an that approximates the heart's position in the frontal plane. This represented the initial triaxial framework for electrocardiographic analysis, enabling the projection of the heart's electrical vector onto these axes to assess directional activity. The system's evolution into a hexaxial occurred in 1942 through Emanuel Goldberger's introduction of augmented unipolar limb leads, derived by modifying Wilson's central terminal to enhance signal amplitude by 50% while using single-limb explorations. These leads—aVR (right arm, at -150°), aVL (left arm, at -30°), and aVF (left leg, at 90°)—interpolate the 30° gaps between Einthoven's leads, thereby expanding the reference to six equidistant axes. Fundamentally, the hexaxial system derives from the mathematical principles of vector projections in electrocardiography, where the augmented unipolar leads supplement Einthoven's triangular base to provide comprehensive 30°-spaced references encircling the 360° frontal plane, facilitating precise determination of the mean electrical axis.

Angular Positions and Lead Arrangement

The hexaxial reference system visualizes the frontal plane of the heart's electrical activity through a circular diagram, where the six standard limb leads (I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF) are positioned at precise angular intervals radiating from a central point representing the heart. This geometric layout allows for the projection and summation of electrical vectors to determine the mean electrical axis. The positive pole of each lead points outward at its designated angle, while the negative pole is oriented 180° opposite, ensuring that deflections reflect the direction of depolarization relative to the lead's axis. The angular positions of the positive poles are standardized as follows: lead I at 0° (horizontal, from right to left arm), lead II at +60° (diagonal, from right arm to left leg), lead III at +120° (diagonal, from left arm to left leg), aVF at +90° (vertical, from the center to left leg), aVL at -30° (superior left, from the center to left arm), and aVR at -150° (superior right, from the center to right arm). These positions create a hexagonal arrangement with 60° intervals between leads (I, II, III) and 30° intervals incorporating the augmented unipolar leads (aVR, aVL, aVF), enabling uniform angular resolution for analysis. A positive deflection in any lead indicates alignment of the cardiac with that lead's positive , while a negative deflection signifies opposition; isoelectric (flat) tracings occur when the is perpendicular to the lead. Lead arrangements in ECG displays vary between traditional and Cabrera formats to optimize clinical . In the traditional format, leads are grouped as (I, , III) followed by augmented (aVR, aVL, aVF), without regard to angular sequence. The Cabrera format, however, reorders them to follow a anatomical progression around the hexaxial : aVL (-30°), I (0°), -aVR (+30°, the inverted aVR for continuity), (+60°), aVF (+90°), III (+120°), filling gaps and providing a seamless 30° progression from superior-left to inferior-right perspectives. This format enhances recognition of transitional changes in the electrical by presenting leads in spatial order. Building upon Einthoven's foundational for the leads, the hexaxial incorporates the augmented leads to complete the 360° .
LeadPositive Pole AngleNegative Pole AngleType
I180°
II+60°+240°
III+120°+300°
aVF+90°+270°Augmented unipolar
aVL-30°+150°Augmented unipolar
aVR-150°+30°Augmented unipolar
The table above summarizes the polarities, with angles measured clockwise from the positive x-axis (lead I) in the frontal plane.

Axis Determination Methods

Amplitude-Based Estimation

The amplitude-based of the QRS axis utilizes the relative heights of the and waves in the limb leads to approximate the mean electrical vector's direction on the hexaxial reference system. This approach relies on the principle that the lead recording the tallest positive wave aligns most closely with the axis, while the lead with the deepest negative wave indicates the opposite direction. The process begins with a quadrant determination using the polarity of the in leads I (at 0°) and aVF (at +90°), which divides the frontal plane into four 90° sectors. If both leads show a predominantly positive (net wave exceeding depth), the axis falls in the normal range between 0° and +90°; a positive lead I with negative aVF indicates (0° to -90°); negative lead I with positive aVF suggests (+90° to +180°); and negative deflections in both point to extreme axis deviation (-90° to -180°). Within the identified quadrant, refinement occurs by locating the lead with the tallest R wave or deepest S wave among the relevant limb leads. For instance, the tallest R wave in lead II (positioned at +60°) approximates an near +60°, while a deepest S wave in lead II would suggest an approximately 180° opposite, near -120°. provides further precision: equal R wave amplitudes in leads I and aVF indicate an around +45°, midway between their positions. This method offers a rapid visual assessment, typically accurate to within 15°-30° of calculated values.

Isoelectric Lead Technique

The isoelectric lead technique provides a precise method for estimating the mean QRS axis in the frontal plane by focusing on the limb lead exhibiting the smallest net QRS deflection, where the positive and negative components of the QRS complex are approximately equal, resulting in a net amplitude close to zero. This approach is particularly valuable in electrocardiography for its reliance on the geometric properties of the hexaxial reference system, where the electrical axis aligns perpendicular to the positive pole of the isoelectric lead. To apply the technique, first examine the six standard limb leads (I, , III, aVR, aVL, aVF) to identify the most isoelectric one; for instance, if lead aVL shows minimal net deflection, the axis must be perpendicular to its orientation at -30°, placing it at either +60° or -120°. Next, confirm the direction by evaluating the polarity of the in the lead perpendicular to the isoelectric one—typically, a positive deflection in lead (at +60°) indicates the axis at +60°, while a negative deflection points to -120°. This step leverages the 90° perpendicular relationships inherent in the hexaxial system, such as lead being orthogonal to aVL. In cases where no lead is perfectly isoelectric, approximate the axis by interpolating between the two closest leads with near-zero deflections, again using their perpendicular counterparts to refine the quadrant and degree. For example, if leads I and aVL both show small but balanced QRS complexes, the axis lies between 0° and -30°, with the exact position determined by the relative amplitudes in perpendicular leads like aVF. This refinement maintains the method's accuracy by adhering to hexaxial perpendicularity principles. Overall, the isoelectric lead technique offers higher precision compared to amplitude-based methods, especially in borderline or subtle axis shifts, as it directly exploits the vector perpendicularity rule to achieve estimates within approximately ° of the true when an equiphasic lead is present. It is widely regarded as the most accurate manual approach for determination in clinical settings.

Clinical Applications

Normal Axis Ranges

In the hexaxial reference system, the normal QRS axis in adults is defined as ranging from -30° to +90°, reflecting the dominant electrical activity originating from the left ventricle, which directs the mean toward the left arm in the frontal . This range accounts for the leftward orientation due to greater left ventricular mass compared to the right. The normal P-wave axis, representing atrial depolarization, typically falls between 0° and +75° in the frontal plane. For the T-wave axis, which indicates ventricular , the standard range is 15° to 75°, and it generally aligns closely with the QRS axis to reflect normal repolarization sequences. These axis ranges vary with age; in neonates, the QRS axis is more rightward, averaging around +120° with a broad range up to +180°, due to relatively greater right ventricular dominance at birth. Over time, it shifts leftward, stabilizing in adulthood between -30° and +90°, with further gradual leftward progression in older adults. Positional changes also influence axis measurements; recordings in the upright position may show slight deviations compared to the standard , with potential rightward shifts due to gravitational effects on cardiac orientation, emphasizing the need for consistent supine acquisition for accurate benchmarking. Axes falling outside these normal ranges may indicate underlying anatomical or conduction abnormalities, though they require confirmation through comprehensive ECG evaluation and clinical correlation.

Abnormal Deviations and Associated Conditions

In the hexaxial reference system, deviations from the normal QRS axis range of -30° to +90° often signal underlying pathologies that alter ventricular vectors. (LAD), defined as a QRS axis less than -30°, is frequently associated with (LVH), (LBBB), and inferior (MI). LVH typically develops due to chronic pressure overload, such as from , resulting in thickened left ventricular walls that shift the electrical axis leftward. LBBB disrupts conduction in the left bundle, delaying left ventricular activation and contributing to the deviation, while inferior MI may damage the inferior wall, altering the overall vector. Right axis deviation (RAD), characterized by a QRS axis greater than +90°, commonly links to (RVH), (PE), and chronic lung diseases like (COPD). RVH arises from right ventricular pressure overload, often secondary to in lung conditions, redirecting the depolarization vector rightward. Acute PE can cause sudden right ventricular strain, producing RAD, whereas chronic lung disease leads to progressive cor pulmonale with similar effects. Extreme axis deviation, between -90° and -180° (northwest ), manifests in severe conditions including (VT) and . This pattern, also termed indeterminate , reflects disorganized or profoundly altered ventricular activation; the northwest subtype is particularly indicative of VT in wide-complex tachycardias due to its atypical directionality. exacerbates conduction abnormalities, potentially yielding a northwest in tachycardia settings with peaked T waves and widened QRS complexes. Although axis deviations provide valuable clues, they are not diagnostic in isolation and should prompt targeted investigations, such as for in hypertensive patients to assess for LVH.

Limitations and Alternatives

Sources of Variability

The hexaxial reference system, which relies on the precise alignment of limb leads to determine the heart's electrical , is susceptible to technical artifacts that can introduce significant variability in readings. misplacement is a of error; for instance, of the right arm and left arm electrodes inverts the in lead I, resulting in a rightward shift of the QRS that mimics . Similarly, swapping the left arm and left leg electrodes can produce a negative QRS complex in lead I and an upright complex in aVR, falsely indicating . Poor electrode-skin contact, often due to inadequate preparation or movement, attenuates signal amplitude and distorts lead vectors, leading to unreliable hexaxial projections. Lead wire reversals or incorrect cable connections further exacerbate these issues by altering the Einthoven triangle configuration, potentially shifting the apparent by up to 90° or more in severe cases. Physiological factors unrelated to cardiac also contribute to axis variability within the hexaxial framework. Changes in body position, such as transitioning from to erect, typically cause a rightward shift in the QRS by approximately 10-20°, attributable to gravitational effects on heart orientation and diaphragmatic descent. induces cyclic variations; deep inspiration can shift the rightward by 10° to 40°, as the heart's position relative to the electrodes changes with expansion. influences lead vectors through increased thoracic impedance and altered cardiac geometry, often resulting in a leftward deviation of 15° or greater, independent of age or . These non-pathologic influences can compound, amplifying discrepancies in serial measurements. Normal physiological variability in the hexaxial axis can reach 15-30° between repeated electrocardiograms, even under standardized conditions, due to subtle fluctuations in , , and electrode positioning. To mitigate inconsistencies, guidelines recommend repeating ECGs when axis readings appear anomalous, as the hexaxial system's visualization of lead polarities facilitates detection of technical errors through illogical patterns. While these variabilities must be differentiated from deviations, such as those in , the hexaxial approach aids in identifying non-clinical artifacts to ensure accurate interpretation.

Comparison to Other Reference Systems

The hexaxial reference system provides a two-dimensional representation of the heart's electrical in the , derived from the limb leads of the scalar electrocardiogram (ECG). In contrast, (VCG) extends this analysis to a three-dimensional spatial framework by constructing vector loops that capture the magnitude, direction, and temporal evolution of cardiac electrical activity across frontal, horizontal, and sagittal . This 3D approach allows for a more comprehensive assessment of ventricular and patterns, which can reveal subtle abnormalities not apparent in the planar hexaxial view, such as posterior or right ventricular involvement. However, VCG requires specialized lead placements, such as the orthogonal system, and is more complex to interpret, limiting its routine clinical adoption compared to the simpler hexaxial method. Modern digital ECG software automates axis determination through algorithmic computation, often integrating lead voltage amplitudes or integrals from the 12-lead ECG to estimate the mean QRS with high and reduced interobserver variability. As of 2025, AI-enhanced algorithms have further improved accuracy in processing, minimizing associated with hexaxial plotting, and are particularly useful in high-volume settings like screening programs. Nonetheless, software algorithms may occasionally overlook morphological nuances, such as subtle isoelectric leads or noise artifacts, that a might detect visually using the hexaxial system, potentially leading to discrepancies in borderline cases. Studies have shown that visual via the hexaxial reference correlates strongly with computational results, suggesting that methods remain reliable when performed expertly. Despite these alternatives, the hexaxial reference system endures as the standard for teaching and bedside ECG interpretation owing to its intuitive simplicity and alignment with conventional 12-lead recordings, enabling rapid axis assessment without additional equipment. In research contexts, however, three-dimensional systems like the lead configuration offer superior precision by providing orthogonal leads that better approximate true cardiac vectors, facilitating advanced analyses of spatial QRS-T angles and localization. The hexaxial system's limitations, including sensitivity to electrode placement variability, underscore the value of these more robust alternatives in specialized applications.

References

  1. [1]
    ECG Axis Interpretation - LITFL
    For a deeper understanding of axis determination, including a detailed explanation of the hexaxial reference system, check out this excellent series of articles ...
  2. [2]
    None
    ### Hexaxial Reference System in ECG
  3. [3]
    Electrocardiography | Thoracic Key
    Apr 15, 2019 · The hexaxial reference system is made up by the six limb leads (leads I, II, III, aVR, aVL, and aVF) and provides information about the ...
  4. [4]
    Introduction. I—Leads, rate, rhythm, and cardiac axis - PMC - NIH
    The hexaxial diagram shows each lead's view of the heart in the vertical plane. The direction of current flow is towards leads with a positive deflection, away ...
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    Ventricular Depolarization and the Mean Electrical Axis
    The mean electrical axis is the average of all the instantaneous mean electrical vectors occurring sequentially during depolarization of the ventricles.
  7. [7]
    Electrical Right and Left Axis Deviation - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    The mean QRS vector, representing the average direction of all cardiac vectors, typically positions at 59° in a normally situated heart. This vector points ...
  8. [8]
    Electrocardiogram - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    The cardiac axis is related to the area of significant muscle bulk within the healthy conducting system. A typical cardiac axis is between -30 to +90 degrees.Missing: orientation | Show results with:orientation
  9. [9]
    Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the ...
    Feb 23, 2007 · The 4 limb electrodes define the standard frontal plane limb leads that were originally defined by Einthoven. With the right leg electrode ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Willem Einthoven and the Birth of Clinical Electrocardiography a ...
    Einthoven developed a system of electrocardiographic standardization that continues to be used all over the world and introduced the triaxial bipolar system ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  11. [11]
    Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1924
    ### Summary of Einthoven's Description of the Three Leads and Their Configuration
  12. [12]
    A simple, indifferent, electrocardiographic electrode of zero potential ...
    American Heart Journal · Volume 23, Issue 4, April 1942, Pages 483-492 ... A technique for obtaining augmented unipolar extremity leads is described.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Einthoven's triangle and law: standard limb leads
    triaxial system of the bipolar limb leads, we can derive a hexaxial reference system with each axis being separated from the next by 30°. Page 3. ▫ Note ...
  14. [14]
    A new method to determine the QRS axis—QRS axis determination
    Oct 6, 2020 · The six limb leads that fall in the range of −30° to 120° are as follows (referred to as the Cabrera sequence 4 ): aVL (−30°), I (0°), −aVR (30 ...Missing: arrangement | Show results with:arrangement
  15. [15]
    Determining the Electrical Axis of the Heart - ECG book
    They divide the heart into 4 quadrants in the hexaxial system. Leads I and aVF divide the thorax into 4 electrical quadrants. Main Cardiac Vector and the 4 ...
  16. [16]
    Estimating Cardiac Axis | ECG Basics - MedSchool
    Normal Axis. -30° to +90°. Einthoven's Triangle. Quadrant Method. An ECG lead will be positive if the direction of depolarisation is in the same direction as ...
  17. [17]
    Essential Electrocardiography
    The normal mean QRS axis is from right to left and from the right shoulders or Superior towards the left hip or inferior.
  18. [18]
    Determine the QRS axis for this ECG - ECG Learning Center - Test
    Question 3: What is the normal range of the QRS axis? Select an answer: A. 0 degrees to 180 degrees. B. 0 degrees to +90 degrees. C. -30 degrees to +90 ...Missing: reference system
  19. [19]
    AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and ...
    Feb 19, 2009 · It shifts to the left with increasing age. In adults, the normal QRS axis is considered to be within −30° and 90°. Left-axis deviation is −30° ...Normal Qrs Duration · Review Of Prior... · Mean Frontal Plane Axis<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Skills Laboratory: How to determine and interpret the mean electrical ...
    The hexaxial lead system is arranged around the heart in essentially a short-axis plane, which is referred to as the frontal plane. In this plane, the left ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    The predictive value of abnormal P-wave axis for the detection of ...
    Dec 1, 2022 · The normal P-wave axis is defined by angles between 0° and 75°. An abnormal P-wave axis may either be right-wardly displaced, which is typically ...
  22. [22]
    Refining Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation–Related Stroke Using the P 2
    Oct 2, 2018 · B, The grey area on the hexaxial reference system (lead I 0°, lead II 60°, aVF 90°, aVR −150°, aVL −30°) represents normal P-wave axis (0–75°). ...Missing: range | Show results with:range
  23. [23]
    Abnormal T-wave axis is associated with coronary artery ... - NIH
    This value was chosen to facilitate comparisons with prior studies in which a frontal T-axis between 15° and 75° was defined as normal (1). QT interval was ...
  24. [24]
    Wide QRS-T angle on the 12-lead ECG as a Predictor of Sudden ...
    Aro et al defined the normal T-wave axis as 0° to 90° and, since the T-wave axis was determined manually at 10° intervals, an abnormal T-axis was regarded as <− ...
  25. [25]
    The normal ECG in childhood and adolescence - PMC - NIH
    The mean frontal plane QRS axis of the neonate is around 75° with a range from 60–160°. There is a relatively rapid change in axis over the first year of life ...
  26. [26]
    Electrocardiogram Standards for Children and Young Adults Using Z ...
    Jul 7, 2020 · The average R wave axis decreased during the first 6 months of life from 120° to 130° at birth to 70° to 80°, then remained unchanged until ...
  27. [27]
    Paediatric electrocardiography - PMC - NIH
    By age 1 year, the axis changes gradually to lie between +10° and +100°. The resting heart rate decreases from about 140 beats/min at birth to 120 beats/min at ...
  28. [28]
    Correction of ECG variations caused by body position changes and ...
    Each patient underwent a body position test (supine, left-lateral, and upright position). Scalar and spatial approaches were investigated for reconstruction of ...
  29. [29]
    Left ventricular hypertrophy - Symptoms and causes - Mayo Clinic
    Aug 6, 2024 · The most common cause is high blood pressure. Left ventricular hypertrophy is thickening of the walls of the lower left heart chamber. The lower ...
  30. [30]
    Electrocardiographic “Northwest QRS Axis” in the Brugada Syndrome
    Oct 14, 2020 · Extreme QRS right-axis deviation is a rare ECG finding that occurs when the QRS axis is between –90° and ±180º. The normal QRS axis is ...
  31. [31]
    Hyperkalemia: Is it always about slow rhytm? - PMC - NIH
    ... ECG (Fig. 1A) showed wide QRS tachycardia (110 bpm) with right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology, a “northwest” axis, absent P-waves, peaked T-waves, ST ...
  32. [32]
    Determining the QRS axis: visual estimation is equal to calculation
    Jan 27, 2025 · The authors confirm a strong correlation between calculated QRS axes and QRS axes estimated visually with the help of the hexaxial reference ...Missing: automated | Show results with:automated
  33. [33]
    Performance of manual vs automated electrocardiogram analysis for ...
    We aimed to assess the performance of manual expert versus automated 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis in the prediction of VA origin.Missing: axis calculation hexaxial
  34. [34]
    Comparison of scalar with vectorial electrocardiogram in axis ...
    Although no one doubts the superiority of vector cardiography (VCG) as the most accurate in axis determination, most clinicians adopt the Hexaxial Reference ...
  35. [35]
    Review of Processing Pathological Vectorcardiographic Records for ...
    The first corrected lead system was derived by Frank based on a mathematical model Frank (1956). This system, which uses seven measuring electrodes, is today ...
  36. [36]
    Comparison of Different Electrocardiography with ... - MDPI
    This paper deals with transformations from electrocardiographic (ECG) to vectorcardiographic (VCG) leads. VCG provides better sensitivity.Missing: hexaxial | Show results with:hexaxial<|separator|>